ML18041A103

From kanterella
Jump to navigation Jump to search
Suppl 2 to Environ Rept - OL Stage
ML18041A103
Person / Time
Site: Nine Mile Point Constellation icon.png
Issue date: 06/30/1983
From:
NIAGARA MOHAWK POWER CORP.
To:
Shared Package
ML17053D849 List:
References
ENVR-830630, NUDOCS 8306220107
Download: ML18041A103 (262)


Text

a REGNLATOIINFORNATION DISTRISUTION OSTEN (RIDS)

AOCESSION NBR;8306220107 DOC ~ DATE: 83/06/30 NOTARIZED! NO DOCKET FACIL:50 010 Nine Mile Point Nuclear Stationi Uni;t 2i Niagara Hoha 05000010 AUTH,NAME AUTHOR AFFILIATION Niagara Hohawk Power Corp, RECIP ~ NAHE RECIPIENT AFFILIATION

SUBJECT:

Suppl 2 t environ r ept - Og stage, DISTRIBUTION CODE: C001S COPIES RECEIVED:LTR Licensing Submittali Environmental Rept

~Amdt ENCL I 8

SIZE Related Correspondence

~,'ITLE:

NOTES;PNL 1cy FSAR'S 8 AHDTS ONLY. 05000410 REC IP lENT COPIES RECIP IENT iCOPIES ID CODE/NAME LTTR ENCL- ID CODE/NAME LTTR ENCL NRR LB2 BC 18 1 NRR LB? LA 19 1 1 HAUGHEYgH 00 1 INTERNAL>> ELD/HDS3 1 0 NRR/DE/AEAB 08 NRR/DE/EEB 06 1 1 NRR/DE/FHEB 1 NRR/DE/SAB 07 1 1 NRR/DSI/METB 1 NRR/DSI/RAB 09 1 1 REG FILE -1 RGN1 1 1 EXTERNAI >> ACRS 20 6 6 LPDR 03 NRC PDR 0? 1 1 NSIC 05 NTIS 1 1 NOTES; 1 1 TOTAL NUMBER OF COP lES REQUIRED: L~TTR 23 ENCL '2

L

( ~

'I 0

ft

a. mesa w y ~

I I F

W

'1 y

tl l ff

Also Available On Aperture Card LEGEND:

A K E 0 N 7 A /i' 0

3 RESIDENTIAL AGRICULTURAL IO KM COMMERCIAL/INDUSTRIAL TE RECREATIONAL PUBLIC FACILITIES y FOREST ~~ OVER 30 FEET I

WETLAND 4 NINE MILE POINT SITE BOUNDARY (cs 0

oQ PRC APERTURE CARD 0

SCALE- MILES 0

SCALE-KIL0METERS 2.2-2 FIGURE IAGARA MOHAWK POWER CORPORATION glNE MlLE POINT-UNIT 2 g VIRONMENTAL REPORT -OLS JUNE 1983'

'6 se z.~d.:/j7,-o/-

h

~2 f

Nine Mile Point'-Uni't "2 ER-OLS 1,840 vehicles on Route 1A, 4 km (2.5 mi) southwest of the site. Within 10 km (6.2 mi) of the site -are and 2 state highways.

ll county roads The two state highways are Routes 104 and '104B, 6.2 km (3.9 mi) and 8 km (5 mi) southeast of the site, respectively. County Route 29 -connects with'Route:104 at approximately 6 km (3.7 mi)'outh-southeast of the site.

Daily traffic volume 'or Route 10$ was 5,841 vehicles in 1979 and 7,000 vehicles in 1976'~'. Table 2.2-5 provides daily traffic volumes of county roads within the vicinity of the site.'igure 2.2-4 identifies major transportation cor-ridors within,the*10-km (6.2-mi) radius of Unit 2,.

The nearest air field to the site is Lakeside Airstrip, a private facility which operates primarily as a maintenance s airstrip and is located east of Route 176, approximately 10 km (6.2 mi) south of Unit 2.

Approximately 72 km (45 mi) of the New York State Barge Canal system are located within Oswego County. The Oswego Canal, which's composed of the Oswego River and the Oneida" River, flows north 38 km (24 mi) to Lake Ontario. The con-fluence of the Oswego River and Lake Ontario lies in the vicinity of the Nine Mile Point site.

The canal drops over 0.036 km (120 ft) from Oneida Lake to Lake Ontario through the use of seven locks, located at Brewer'ton, Phoenix, Fulton, Minetto, and Oswego. Lock 7 is located in the'city of Oswego and within the site vicinity.

The lock dimensions are 14 by 90 m (45 by 300 ft).

Commercial boats have priority'ver Oswego' pleasure boats .for pas-sage through the canal. No other restrictions, however, are imposed on pleasure boat travel on the- canal'. 'The average operating season begins in mid-April and extends to the first week in December:

l'ocated in the city of Terminals for freight handling are the 10-km (6.2-mi) radius of'nit 2 are four trans-

'ithin mission corridors. Three of the corridors lead from Unit 1 and the JAF plant. Running south from'nit 1 are two 115-kV and'wo 345-kV lines. From the JAF plant is one 115-kV -

line running in a southerly direction and one 345-kV line running in a sou'theasterly direction.

2.2.1.3 Local and Regional Land Use Plans for Site and Vicinity The site and its immediate area have been designated for continued expansion of the electric power generating indus-try by the Oswego County Planning Board and zoning regulations. Other industrial growth is anticipated by the Oswego County Planning Board for the Oswego River Corridor Supplement 5 2.2-3 December 1983

Nine Mile Point Unit 2 ER-OLS and in the .vicinity,of the cities of Oswego and Fulton. Ac-cording to the 1985,,and 2000 Land Use Plans for Oswego County, the area in the site vicinity has been designated primarily for rural/agricultural land uses. Future residen-tial development in Oswego County has been designated along River Corridor the county's southern the Oswego and border.

According to the New York Statewide Comprehensive Recreation Plan, no state facilities are proposed, within 10 km (6.2 mi) of the power station. The only future recreational ac-tivities proposed for Oswego County Salmon are park expansions Reservoir at in Selkirk Shores State Park and at River the town of Orwell'he 10-km (6.2-mi) radius from -Unit 2 encompasses portions of the towns of Scriba and New Haven, and a small portion of the city of Oswego. The towns of Scriba and New Haven presently have no zoning restrictions. The only existing land use controls for the two towns are building .codes and floodplain regulations. The city of Oswego has zoning as well as building codes that apply to the use of city water and floodplain regulations.

As discussed in Section, 2.2.1.2, the towns of Scriba and New Haven are part of agricultural districts in which designated agricultural lands are eligible for tax incentives -if the land is kept in agricultural production.

2.2.2 Land Use: Transmission Corridors and Offsite Areas 2.2.2.1 Transmission Corridors The new transmission ,line will extend from Unit 2 to the existing 345-kV Volney Station, 15 km (9.4 mi) south-southeast of the power plant. The new transmission line will parallel four existing lines: two 115-kV and two 345-kV lines. Two other 115-kV lines run perpendicular to the new line 1 km (0.62 mi) south of State Hignway 104. The two transmission lines of the JAF plant are 'ew located ap-proximately 1 km (0. 62 mi.) east of the line.

Figure 2.2-7 identifies the location of the existing and proposed transmission lines.

The existing transmission corridor has a width of 152.4 m (500 ft). This right-of-way (ROW) is owned by NMPC. The centerline of the new transmission line is located 30.5 m Supplement 2 2. 2-4 June 1983

L AK E 0 /V 7 A /I' 0 NINE MILE POINT I OK M NUCLEAR STATION Nine Mile Point

~

Shore Oaks IA Lake View Pleasant HKkopf Point Grove Demster Binet CIUI IO 29 II f(A MINeIL QD I

<<<<' MI!0<<

oo<<IIIII!4 Oo.

63 W<stker 4<< emster l'iwrr oa 5 4 OOA 29 I lul New MAIM 1$

5 ao Haven I04

, Mwca QoulllR<

    >r >>o Butte 0 w ~ 05 S B' I '\ Oro>> 29 Pd >>o>> Austir /l+ XCAROIIWO ,Il((u umings Come Cp 'ioo. I lIIr>>l Bridg 64 Corners Sate ~ M~ I <<alai Oa 53 OOIA SD 53 4 I MORLA MAROR 04 ao. ( 57 Ile i Clliu 'I 2O 25 <<I,e ca~ DICC nc 01 ~ Iu ~ SSCC ~ I!id(ru l II(l l<<>>al ,I <<<<>>oI I 6 lcorth Vctney/ /- 4 42 i t oaf Oa / A Q Rl UYICII HIII  !&45 ao ARAKII 45 3 ~Oooo((( 4-~ / ts .MinBUO >>o UACIO Vl 4 Sayle's Come OOCOCR RIL 3I CRA 04 I Mki II Si AV 45 4 / Milal > 0 ndyville MIACR Cai ount ~ / ao fro>>o 56 I 10 I!o <<,Pleasant 4// >>0 c R LEGEND: U.S. HIGHWAYS 0 STATE ARD COUNTY ROADS TOWN ROADS FIGURE 2.2-4 RAILROADS SITE LOCATION TRANSPORTATION ROUTES WITHIN A 10-KM RADIUS OF UNIT 2 0 I 2 S 4 SCALE- MILES 0 2 6 NIAGARA MOHAWK POWER CORPORATION SCALE" KILOMETERS NINE MILE POINT-UNIT 2 FINAL SAFETY ANALYSIS REPORT SUPPLEMENT 6 MARCH 1984 FIGURE 2.2-5 HAS BEEN DELETED Supplement 2 June 1983 FIGURE 2.2-6 HAS BEEN DEIETED Supplement 2 June 1983 'l0 0 N T A R I 0 NINE MILE POINT NUCLEAR STATION -UNIT 2 ~ AE X I CO ~ A 5 ORES SSASASST SRCNOST SSAASSSS SSACN <<55"'i ~l I e 5 0 0 EWHAVEN JOSOS ~ wNMGLT COSSQSS SOWN COEOMS Cl I 0 r n~ ~ SAGA A AOO MWSSSIOO Akl&r 0v SATu5 CORNERS V OLNEY Y VOLNEY IIALERMO SUBSTATION LEGEND
    TOWN BOUNDARIES EXISTING ELECTRIC TRANSMISSION LINES 0 I NINE MILE 2 TO VOLNEY PLANNED SCALE-MILES 0 1 2 3 4 FIGURE 2.2-7 SCALE IN KILOMETERS LOCATION OF TRANSMISSION LINES NIAGARA MOHAWK POWER CORPORATION NINE MILE POINT-UNIT 2 ENVIRONMENTAL REPORT-OLS

    LEGEND:

    ~ Avgybe P~

    Aperture G R ES I DE NTI A L AGRICULTURAL COMMERCIAL/INDUSTRIAL RECREATIONAL PUBLIC FACILITIES FOREST ~x OVER 30 FEET WETLAND / ~C

    ~~pc.'OLNEY SUBSTATION SITE C7 0 TRANSMISSION LINE STUDY AREA

    /

    /

    'p' Q

    G PRC

    'Q APERTURE CARD SCALE- MILES 0

    ,0 SCALE - KILOMETERS q~g c l+Ckpn -<>

    /leg< '),

    F.IGURE 2.2-8

    ~AND USES WITHIN THE RANSMISSION LINE STUDY AREA NIAGARA MOHAWK POWER CORPORATION N,INE MILE POINT-UNIT 2 ENVIRONMENTAL REPORT-OLS j~og w ~i~ 7-cD SUPPLEMENT 2 JUNE 1983.

    t i T g1

    00 O 0 O 0 0 O 0 0 O 0

    O 0

    0 JJJ JJJ JJJ JJJ N I284000 z<<

    LA/C~ gN7-A P IO DIKE NORMAL SHORE LINE

    ~ZS0 NI283000 LEGEND ORIGINAL GROUND CONTOUR ONE PERCENT CHANCE FLOG LIMIT (249.4 FT. NGVD )

    PRC APERTURE NI282000 CARD 0 200 400 600 SCALE - FEET 2S0 z70 z70 Aho XvaBab1e On Aperture Card--

    NI28IOOO FIGURE 2.3-11 270 IOO YEAR FLOODPLAIN PRIOR TO S I T E TOP OG RA P H I C ALTERATIONS RAILROAD NIAGARA MOHAWK POWER CORPORATiON NINE MlLE POINT- UNIT 2 ENVIRONMENTAL REPORT - OLS 9'ccrc>~>i /0 7- 0p SUPPLEMENT 2 JUNE 1983

    '4.

    n 0ta Aql 0

    O O

    0 O

    0 O

    O O

    O O Also Available 6a O O O O O CO Aperture Card ct "I ILI UJ N 128 4000 ON TA BIO LAKE DIKE Z58 7 260 260~ I

    ~J RAII ROAD NORMAL SHORE LINE 260 I i' NI283000 LEGEND 260 >> ORIGINAL GROUND CONTOUR ONE PERCENT CHANCE FLOG

    \

    -260 J (6 LIMIT (249.4 FT. NGVD )

    r 262 264 I NEW GROUND CONTOUR L

    I I I

    Z60 Il I II COOLING IL PRC TOWER I I IAPERTURE g II l NI282000 CARD Ill 0 200 400 600 gO KK ~ 268 lI SCAL= - FEET 260 Ill i i 272~i 11'

    \

    ~i))I i L T6 z70 270 NI28IOOO P'IGURE 2.3-12 270 IOO YEAR FLOODPLAIN o AFT E R S I T E TOPOGRA P HI C j'AILROAD ALTERATIONS N I AG A RA MOH AWK POWER CO RPOR ATION NINE MILE POINT-UNIT 2 ENVIRONMENTAL REPORT - OLS SljPPLEMENT 2 JUNE 1983 9 hd(u2>d/07

    0

    \ lg o,

    lA y'1 ~

    lA l"

    >~

    I" 0 ~

    A

    .0 0 e~

    I

    1a JULY

    ~ ~

    o ~ ~ ~ ~ ~

    ~

    1yyrtll

    ~ +

    pl I

    ~

    ~

    ~ ~~aaar

    ~ ~ ~

    10 cm s-i 1b DECEMBER

    /

    C'~N~4 4A~hiihi A44~h ii i4 i ig gi iiiiiai1 I

    ~QN>h~Xi1%%'I i<4hii I i i i 1111) '1 111)411 i%~4

    ~i 1 i 'I I I I I I I 1

    'L 111'111 I I I I I L I i///8/ j lg iI///r 'I I I I 1 i 4 I I i '11.'xiii

    'I 'L I I I I

    1 I IiI I / /yW I <

    )Jl I

    hi) aii a a 10 cm s-'OURCE:

    9 FIGURE 2.3-1 MONTHLY MEAN CURRENTS AT THE SURFACE LAYER OF THE SIMULATION HOURLY'IME-DEPENDENT NIAGARA MOHAWK POWER CORPORATION NINE MILE POINT-UNIT 2 ENVIRONMENTALREPORT-OLS SUPPLEMENT 2 JUNE 1983

    240 1969 FIELD SURVEY 200 160 0.05 KNOTS OR MORE M

    K D

    0 120 K

    M Q 0.15 80 L, NOTE:

    M CURRENT MEASURED Q AT 5.8 m (19 ft) DEPTH LU 40 0.30 O 0.45 Cl z 0.60 0 1970 FIELD SURVEY 120 0

    I-0.05 KNOTS OR MORE 80 O NOTE:

    CURRENT MEASURED AT 9.5 m (31 ft) DEPTH 0.15 40 0.30 0.45 0.60 0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 110 PERCENT OF TOTAL TIME OF RECORD FIGURE 2.3-2 DURATION OF LAKE ONTARIO CURRENT NIAGARA MOHAWK POWER CORPORATION NINE MILE POINT-UNIT 2 ENVIRONMENTALREPORT-OLS SUPPLEMENT 2 JUNE 1983

    CURRENT DIRECTION (DEGREES MAGNETIC) 0 22.5 45.0 67.5 90.0 112.5 135.0 157.5 180.0 202.5 225.0 247.5 270.0 292.5 315.0 337.5 360.0 0.15.020 0.05-0.15 0.15.0.30 J 1969 0.05-0.15 10 FIELD SURVEY ALL 0

    O Lll K NOTE:

    L)- 20 5.8 m (19 tl) OEPTH 0 200 m,(650 It) ill OFFSHORE gI-0.05.0.15 0

    I- KNOTS 0 10 0.05-0.15 KNOTS 0.15-0.30 KNOTS 0.1 5.0.30 KNOTS 0

    I-z LLI 1970 20 ALL FIELD SURVEY K

    Ill NOTE:

    Q.

    9.5 m(31 tt) DEPTH 485 m (1590 tt) 30 OFFSHORE FROM NORTH FROM EAST FROM SOUTH FROM WEST FROM NORTH FIGURE 2.3-3 LAKE ONTARIO CURRENT DIRECTIONS NIAGARA MOHAWK POWER CORPORATION NINE MILE POINT-UNIT 2 ENVIRONMENTALREPORT-OLS SUPPLEMENT 2 JUNE 1983

    MAY -OCTOBER o j~~

    .05

    /+

    .006 009 o/

    .02 g/~

    07 I 642 PLATFORM

    .08 P II 2 NEW HAVEN SITE

    ~06 .I NINE MILE POINT NUCLEAR STAT(ON

    17. UNIT 2 OSWEGO STERLING SITE

    .03 NOVEMBER -MARCH 02 .o4 0

    o>

    '. 04

    .04-.IO

    . I0-.16 Vl

    .16-.2 m

    .07 .23-.2 CO . 29-. FIGURE 2.3-4

    <. 32 NiAII SPiiO CURRENT ROSES AT NEW HAVEN SITE PLATFORM 2 NIAGARA MOHAWK POWER CORPORATION

    .I2 NINE MILE POINT-UNIT 2 ENVIRONMENTALREPORT-OLS SUPPLEMENT 2 JUNE 1983

    l5 IO X 5 0

    0 U .4

    .3 CO 0 .2 o .I 0

    E

    ~ .I

    .2 8/23 8/24 8/25 8/26 8/27 8/28 8/29 8/30 FIGURE 2.3-5 LONGSHORE COMPONENT OF THE OBSERVED WIND (UPPER) AND CURRENT (LOWER) VS. TIME FOR THE PERIOD 8/23/73 8/29/73 AT THE STERLING SITE NIAGARA MOHAWK POWER CORPORATION NINE MILE POINT-UNIT 2 ENVIRONMENTALREPORT-OLS SUPPLEMENT 2 JUNE 1983

    LA i'NTARIO O.I I.p DYE DISCHARGE FAIR H VEN DYE CONCENTRATION (ppb ) AT I METER DEPTH 8-I3- 73 IS I055 I 5 I 5 IT IB IB 20 2I 22 23 24 OI CO 04 05 05 07 8 09 Qlo /II QIR QI5 QI4 QI5 QI6 024 NUMBER INDICATES HOUR-E.DT.; NUMBER ON ARROW INDICATES SPEED IN MPH.

    ARROW DIRECTION REFERENCED TO MAGNETIC NORTH AS SHOWN ON MAP.

    FIGURE 2.3-6 RESPONSE OF DYE PLUME TO OFFSHORE WINDS AT STERLING SITE NIAGARA MOHAWK POWER CORPORATION NINE MILE POINT-UNIT 2 ENVIRONMENTALREPORT-OLS SUPPLEMENT 2 JUNE 1983

    s 30.0

    -- SURFACE VERTICAL TEMPERATURE DIFFERENCE 20.0 O

    LLJ K

    D 10.0 K

    LU Q.

    ILJ I-y r<

    (,I I I) l I a

    ~

    II(P 1, (I

    II liS I I(+ I QP 0.0 r ~ +is~

    -10.0 JAN FEB MAR APR MAY JUN JUL AUG SEP OCT NOV DEC MONTH SURFACE TEMPERATURE = MEAN OF ALL SURFACE TEMPERATURES RECORDED WITH THE BIOLOGICALSAMPLING PROGRAMS PER DATE FIGURE 2.3-7 VERTICAL TEMPERATURE DIFFERENCE =

    TEMP ERATU RE AT NMP E 1 2-M DIFFERENCE BETWEEN THE MEAN SURFACE (40+1) STATION, NINE MILE POINT AND BOTTOM TEMPERATURES VICINITY-1976 NIAGARA MOHAWK POWER CORPORATION NINE MILE POINT-UNIT 2 ENVIRONMENTAL REPORT-OLS SUPPLEMENT 2 JUNE 1983

    I I

    k

    100 80 o

    o 0

    Pu 60 Q

    UJ K

    UJ I-

    ~ 40 D

    O BOUNDARY OF DISCHARGEZONE 20 400 300 200 100 2'C PLUME SURFACE VOLUME (ACRES)

    FIGURE 2.3-8 CUMULATIVEFREQUENCY OF PLUME SURFACE AREAS WITHIN THE 20C ISOTHERM NIAGARA MOHAWK POWER CORPORATION NINE MILE POINT-UNIT 2 ENVIRONMENTAL REPORT-OLS SUPPLEMENT 2 JUNE 1983

    0 0

    100 80

    -K O

    X 60

    )

    ill I

    X 40 O

    BOUNDARY OF 20 DISCHARGEZONE 1500 1000 500 24C PLUME SURFACE VOLUME (ACRE-FT)

    FIGURE 2.3-9 CUMULATIVEFREQUENCY OF PLUME VOLUMES WITHIN THE 20C ISOTHERM NIAGARA MOHAWK POWER CORPORATION NINE MILE POINT-UNIT 2 ENVIRONMENTAL REPORT-OLS SUPPLEMENT 2 JUNE 1983

    e NMPP/FITZ NMPE

    /do FITZ voao~vo LAKE ONTARIO i

    ( oswfoo NMPW NMPP DISCHARGE ZONE LOCATION MAP 9% (30 FT)

    O JAMES A. FITZPATRICK NINE POWER PLANT MILE +c 4% (13 FT)

    POINT NINE MILE UNIT 1 POINT UNIT 2 Oi P O LEGEND:

    0

    ~ INTAKE C) DISCHARGE 0.8 1.6 (1 mi)

    ALCAN ALUMINUMCORP. 7 DIFFUSER KILOMETERS NMPW: NINE MILE POINT WEST 4m NMPP: NINE MILE POINT PLANT NMPP/FITZ: NINE MILE POINT PLANT/J.A. FITZPATRICK FITZ: J.A. FITZPATRICK NMPE: NINE MILE POINT EAST FIGURE 2 3-10 DISCHARGE ZONE AT NINE MILE POINT UNIT 1 NIAGARA MOHAWK POWER CORPORATION NINE MILE POINT-UNIT 2 ENVIRONMENTAL REPORT-OLS SUPPLEMENT 2 JUNE 1983

    0

    'tlat HASTINGS LENNOX AND ADDINGTO 22 FEONTENAC 'p 4 A<f4444<4 4I/ft

    '<<IO 23 I

    24 NTTIVILLI 19 B ~

    ~)"

    4 I 4 26 20 i ]/g 15

    ~ RINCE EDWARD i /16 ~S I 1 WATTXTOWN 4 it rg+

    i/s I

    /Pi I

    / L 80 KM I ~ fttfft<<~ I

    //g

    ~ <tlat <t IA

    'A<II 0 MTXICO WT

    )I) 7 ll SITE I 10

    /-J y]

    I" l

    2 l

    Ltf ftt <own

    <lfWl <tel ~

    I

    ~ ll 0 II<4< XOMI I

    jl~

    jlc ht I

    ~I <*It< <mf O<4<OA

    )

    ~ f~<tf fr OIWAII

    ~ fm <~f ~

    II Il

    )It

    .L CA<<A<<At<4<f4 II<nCA

    <I I<It<I 1 I ~ I~

    ftItlt ~It<<tttf

    <~f

    ~f

    <~

    ~ I<hi

    ~ <~ff ~<<It<It I I

    L NOTE NUMBERS REFER TO TABLES 2.3-3 FIGURE 2.3-13 AND 2.3-4.

    + SITE WATER SUPPLIES AND INDUSTRIALUSERS 0 10 20 SCALE-MILES ON LAKE ONTARIO WITHIN 80-KM REGION 0 20 40 SCALE-IIlILOMETERS NIAGARA MOHAWK POWER CORPORATION NINE MILE POINT-UNIT 2 ENVIRONMENTAL REPORT-OLS SUPPLEMENT 2 JUNE 1983

    20 0

    O I

    IJj l2 I-cf.

    lL lJj s

    Z IJj I-0 APR MAY JUN JUL AUG SEP OCT NOV DEC I 978 DATA (II)

    LEGEND SU R FACE BOTTOM

    ~MEAN VALUE NOTE: MONTHLY MEANS AND RANGE OF WEEKLY VALUES FOR THE NMPW, NMFP AND NMPE TRANSECTS. SURFACE (09m[5 FOOT])

    AND BOTTOM (50m [lOO FOOT]) STRATA ALONG THE 30m ()OO FOOT)

    DEPTH CONTOUR.

    FIGUR E 2.3-14 SEASONAL VARIATION IN WATER TEMPERATURES NIAGARA MOHAWK POWER CORPORATION NINE MILE POINT-UNIT 2 ENVIRONMENTAL REPORT-OLS SUPPLEMENT 2 JUNE 1983

    <io LAKE ST. FA'AIVCIS CORNWALL r

    +i+

    "ohio ply~

    its KINGSTON LEGEND o

    4 5f - - S. /CA U N A DIAN BOUNDAR ci~ ~ CHAUMONT CANADIAN STATISTICAL Qe io DISTRICT BOUNDARY PO RT HOPE cP PRINCE g Qe STATISTICAL DISTRICT EDWARD 4'd OF L'AKE ONTARIO 6 f'OINTI THE SAINT LAWRENCE TORONTO RIVER (CANADA )

    ~La A'E~ OIVTA R/0 - -

    q,'P

    , ~p0 50 Mi (c,> <~,s.

    SITE ROC HESTE NEW YORK 25 50 FIGURE 2.3-15 SCALE- MILES COMMERCIAL FISHING AREAS 50 100 LAKE ONTARIO UNITED STATES G CANADA SCALE-KILOMETERS NIAGARA MOHAWK POWER CORPORATION SOURCE: Reference 46 NINE MlLE POINT-UN IT 2 ENVIRONMENTAL REPORT-OLS SUPPLEMENT 4 OCTOBER 1983

    I 4

    Nine Mile Point Unit 2 ER-OLS 2.4 ECOLOGY 2.4 ' Terrestrial Ecology 2.4.1.1 Site and Vicinity The following description of the existing terrestrial eco-systems in the vicinity of Unit 2 is derived primarily from

    1) 1979 aerial photographs, 2) a 1979 terrestrial field sur-vey (see Section 6 5.1 for methodology), and 3) review of

    ~

    pertinent literature as referenced.

    Stereoscopic false color infrared and true color aerial photographs of the Unit 2 site were taken in August 1979 to delineate areas of existing environmental stress and to facilitate vegetative mapping (Figures 2.4-1 and 2.4-2). In addition, a terrestrial field survey was conducted in Sep-tember 1979 to provide quantitative and qualitative descrip-tions of the floral and faunal communities within 1.6 km (1.0 mi) of the geographic center of the Unit 2 site (Figure 2.4-2). To provide information in the general vicinity of the site, up to 80 km (50 mi), data were obtained from the habitat and wildlife inventory of the Oswego County Coastal Zone, conducted in 1976, the Port Ontario Harbor terrestrial vertebrate study, conducted in 1977, the Napanee District Land Use Strategy Plan, and from communication with state and local wildlife personnel'.4.1.1.1 General Site Characteristics Unit 2 is located within the Oneida Plain physiographic region of Oswego County, NY'~'. The site also lies within the 93.8-sq km (36.2-sq mi) area defined by the St. Lawrence Eastern Ontario Commission as the Oswego County Coastal Zone'. The topography of the Oneida Plain, which extends south of Lake Ontario, is most appropriately described as a series of undulating hills. The lake plain rises from a minimum of 76.2 m (250 ft) above sea level in the numerous wetlands along the Lake Ontario shoreline to a maximum of 93 ' m (308 ft) above sea level at Derby Hill in the town of Mexico. The south shore of Lake Ontario is basically un-derlain by Oswego sandstone.

    The closest state or federal wildlife management area is the Deer Creek Marsh Wildlife Management Area, operated by the New York State Department of Environmental Conservation (NYSDEC), located about 31 km (19 mi) east-southeast of the site. The closest area to the north is the Point Petre Provincial Wildlife Area in Prince Edward County (Athol, Ontario) about, 69 km (43 mi) from the site'. The only

    2. 4-1

    Nine Mile Point Unit 2 ER-OLS other wildlife management area in the vicinity of the site is an Audubon bird sanctuary located 3 km (1.9 mi) from the site on the Lake Ontario shore, east of Nine Mile Point Road (Figure 2.4-3). This is the closest protected wildlife area to the site, and management consists primarily of the erection of nest boxes and the maintenance of visitor trails.

    2.4.1.1.2 Terrestrial Communities and Their Interactions With Their Environment The coastal zone of Oswego County lies in a transitional area between boreal forest and northeastern hardwood forest'~'. The proximity of Lake Ontario appreciably modifies the climate, and thus has a significant effect on the floral and faunal associations of the region'. The climax community is a deciduous forest with an extensive herbaceous ground cover. The biota of the area are characteristic of a transitional zone with high species diversi ty' '

    Two basic ecosystems are present in the coastal zone:

    wetlands and upland areas. The wetlands generally result from disruption of drainage caused by the drumlin topography of the region'. They are generally transitional and include shallow ponds, shrub swamps, wood swamps, and intermittently wet bottomland-like forests.

    Much of the original mature forest land of the Oneida Plain was cleared in the past for farming, but a great deal has since been abandoned'. As such, the uplands are mostly second-growth communities in a variety of successional stages. For this region, the mature climax hardwood community is composed of the beech-maple-hemlock association. Ironwood (~Car inus caroliniana), witch hazel the understory. Ground cover, although generally sparse due to the closed canopy, consists of false Solomon's seal 2

    The vegetation in the vicinity of the site may be divided into a number of distinct community types (Figure F 4-2).

    The forested cover types described in the following paragraphs were sampled quantitatively along three transects using a point-quarter sampling technique (Section 6.5.1) during the 1979 field survey. The remaining cover types are described qualitatively, based on observations made during Supplement 1 2.4-2 May 1983

    Nine Mile Point Unit 2 ER-OIS the 1979 survey. A phylogenetic species list of the flora recorded during the field investigation is provided in Table 2.4-1. A brief description of the major communities within a 1.6-km (1-mi) radius of Unit 2 is given in the fol-lowing paragraphs.

    Earl Second-Growth Forest Cover T e Transect 1 White ash (Fraxinus americana) is the dominant overstory species along Transect 1 (Figure 6.5-1), with an Importance Value (IV = Relative Dominance + Relative Density + Relative Frequency) of 171.2 (Table 2.4-2). Dominance is reflected by the high density (224 stems/ha), high frequency of occur-rence (91), and basal area (5.49 sq m/ha) . Diameter at breast height (dbh) measurements range from 10.2 to 48.2 cm (4 to 19 in), with a mean of 17.7 cm (7 in).

    Other components of the canopy include apple (Malus sp.),

    sp.), with IVs of 62.8, 45.5, and 19.9, respectively. Crown cover along Transect 1 is estimated to be 50 to 75 percent.

    The shrub stratum along Transect 1 is dominated by silky dogwood (Comus amomum), arrowwood (Viburnum dentatum),

    hawthorn, juneberry (Amelanchier sp.), and grape (Vitis sp.). Generally, arrowwood dominates those areas where the canopy is mostly complete, while dogwcod and grape are abun-dant in open areas. Both dogwood and grape are charac-teristic of advanced old field communities. Additional un-derstory components include alder (Ainus sp.) in wetter areas and occasional saplings of quaking aspen and white

    .ash.

    West of the road leading to the meteorological tower, there is a distinct transition from forest to a shrub community.

    This area . is characterized by a very dense, 1.8- to 2.4-m (6- to 8-ft) shrub layer, consisting of dogwood, alder, staghorn sumac (Rhus ~t hing), and apple.

    Wild grape is also present, often replacing the sumac. The presence of large apple trees and also a scattering of maple and oak ((Luercus sp.) suggests that this community was for merly cropland or orchard and is again advancing toward a mature climax community.

    Ground cover along Transect 1 consists primarily of poison ivy (Rhus radicans) and grasses (Graminea). In the wooded areas, poison ivy dominates, while grasses are more abundant in open areas.

    2. 4-3

    Nine Mile Point Unit 2 ER-OLS Mixed Forest and Shrublands Cover T e Transect 2 White ash and black cherry (Prunus serotina) are codominant overstory species along Transect 2 with IVs of 76.2 and 66.0, respectively. White ash exhibits the highest density (155 stems/ha), while black cherry occurs with greater frequency (Table 2.4-3). Mean dbh of white ash and black cherry is 13.6 and 15.6 cm (5.4 and 6.1 in), respectively.

    Sugar maple (Acer saccharum) is also an important component of the overstory by virtue of its large basal area (3.57 sq m/ha). Associates of the canopy also include apple, quaking aspen, hemlock (~sucSa canadensis), black oak RSL Mean dbh of sugar maple and eastern hemlock is 32.0 and 27.7 cm (12.6 and 10.9 in), respectively.

    The shrub stratum consists primarily of species occurring in the overstory. Components include arrowwood, black cherry, quaking aspen, apple, maple, and in more open areas, cover is generally less abundant than that found along Transect 1, due to a fairly dense canopy. Poison ivy is abundant. Seedlings of the overstory species are also common.

    As in the case of the vegetative communities along Transect 1, the presence of apple suggests that this com-munity was formerly cleared for orchard or pastureland and is presently advancing toward a northern hardwood climax forest. Fingers of northern hardwood forest extend into the shrublands from adjacent areas (Figure 2.4-2). Also, the dominance of overstory species in the understory suggests that the community is maturing and reproducing itself. Com-pared to the forested habitat along Transect 1, this appears to be a more successionally advanced community.

    Mixed Hardwood Forest, Cover T e Transect 3 Sugar maple is the dominant overstory species in this com-munity (Transect 3), with an IV of 106.7 (Table 2.4-4).

    Density for the species averages 373 stems/ha. It is also the most frequently occurring tree species, with a mean dbh of 37. 1 cm (14.6 in). Quaking aspen is an important com-ponent of the canopy with an IV of 66.4, primarily the result of its large basal area (8.2 sq m/ha). Other com-birch.

    The IV of beech (25.8) was t "e'""

    ponents of the overstory include white ,ash, yellow birch

    ' "i essentially the result of the large mean dbh (35.9 cm [ 14. 1 in]) which contributes to a moderately large basal area (25.8 sq m/ha).

    2.4-4

    Nine Mile Point Unit, 2 ER-OLS Mature black cherry and hemlock trees are also present along Transect 3. Portions of the transect are intermittently wet, and the hydric nature of these areas is reflected by the presence of black willow (Salix nicira) and red maple (Acer rubrum).

    The understory is dominated by saplings of the overstory species. In addition, striped maple, hackberry, hophornbeam, ironwood, black cherry, and arrowwood are present.

    Ground cover consists of partridgeberry (Mitchella ~re ens),

    The mixed hardwood forest is the most advanced successional stage onsite. Nithin this community, subclimax areas are maintained by differences in edaphic conditions (e.g.,

    low-lying wet areas support red maple and willow stands).

    Dominance of the understory by saplings of overstory species suggests that this community is reproducing and continuing to mature.

    Old Field Communit In terms of secondary ecological succession, the old field community typically is the first sere, or successional stage, to develop after abandonment of farmland or cleared land. One to three years after a field is abandoned, annual weeds such as ragweed (Ambrosia sp.) and crabgrass the annuals are replaced by more vigorous perennials such as aster (Aster spp.) and goldenrod (Solidacao spp.). The perennial weed stage, persisting from 3 to 7 yr after abandonment, eventually yields to a more advanced succes-sional stage, characterized by aggressive, adaptable peren-stages depend on edaphic conditions, such as moisture, fire, light availability, and soil characteristics as well as overall climate and regional physiognomy.

    At the Unit 2 site, two distinct open field communities are present. The first consists of areas that are maintained by Unit 2 personnel. One such area is used annually for snow dumping from the plant area. This field is seeded each spring with a mixture of grasses. Another, a spoil area, is generally in grasses when not in use.

    2. 4-5

    Nine Mile Point Unit 2 ER-OLS The second type of. open field community consists of areas that are proceeding through natural succession after abandonment. Several open field communities are found near Unit 2. Grasses and forbs such as ragweed, wood-sorrel (Oxalis sp.), goldenrod, and asters dominate these communities, depending on their successional stage (i. e.,

    sere).

    Transmission Corridor Maintenance of the transmission corridor in accordance with right-of-way (ROW) specifications has resulted in a diver-sity of vegetation. As a consequence of cutting the cor-ridor (near Unit 2) through a mature forest community, species occurring in the bordering stands are expected to be found in addition to the early successional species normally associated with disturbed areas. The undulating topography along the ROW creates a variety of moisture levels, and thereby contributes to the diversity of plant species found along the ROW.

    Among those species commonly occurring along the ROW within the site area are numerous grasses (Gramineae), sedgms (Cares spp.), and forbs such as mullein (Verbascum ~tha sus),

    wild strawberry (Fracraria sp.), dwarf cinquefoil (Potentilla (Linaria vulcuaris), blackberry (Rubus sp.), smartweed sensibilis), black cherry, and quaking aspen. Transmission corridor vegetation is discussed further in Section 2.4 '.2.

    Management of the ROW (Section 5.6.1) will restrict its development to its present level of succession.

    Im ortant S ecies No plant species listed by the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Ser-vice as endangered or threatened have been .found at the site' '. Several plants classified by NYSDEC as protected have been identified at the site (Table 2.4-1). These plants are listed because they are attractive and are not considered rare or endangered in New York State'~'.

    2.4.1.1.3 Fauna The fauna of the Oswego County Coastal Zone is typical of

    =

    that found throughout the northeastern United States.

    2.4-6

    Nine Mile Point Unit, 2 ER-OLS The proximity of Lake Ontario modifies the climate and tends to extend northward ranges of a number of species with southern affinities.

    2. 4. 1. 1. 3. 1 Mammals Most of the mammalian species that occur in this coastal zone are wide-ranging species with no regional affinity

    The remainder are primarily northern or northeastern species approaching the southern and western limits of their ranges in the area'. A few mammals are southern species ap-proaching the northernmost extension of their range in Oswego County.

    Past clearing of land for agriculture and urban/industrial development has appreciably affected the species composition and abundance of mammals. Clearing of land has favored species such as opossum, eastern cottontail, and prairie deer mouse. However, reduction of forested habitat and in-creased hunting and trapping pressure have significantly reduced or eliminated populations of larger mammals such as black bear, bobcat, mountain lion, fisher, marten, wolf, coyote, and river otter.

    Small Mammals The small-mammal trapping program conducted in September 1979,(Section 6.5.1) yielded five species of mammals col-lected from four locations on the Unit 2 site (Table 2.4-5).

    The two most commonly collected species were the (P. maniculatus), accounting for 40 and 30 percent, respectively, of all small mammals captured. Other species captured included the meadow jumping mouse (~Za us hudsonius), meadow vole (Microtus enns lvanicus), and red squirrel (Tamiasciurus hudsonicus).

    Habitat Utilization Habitat utilization for a given area is defined as the proportion of animals captured within each habitat type. To equalize trapping effort among communities, the number of mammals captured per 100 trap-nights was used to calculate habitat utilization rather than the actual number of organisms captured.

    Data for the trapping period indicate that the mixed hard-wood forest (the most mature successional community onsite is Transect 3) receives the greatest habitat utilization:

    50.0 percent. The early second-growth hardwood forest (along Transect 1) is also an important habitat, with 24.9 percent of the utilization. Habitat utilization is lowest 2.4-7

    Nine Mile Point Unit 2 ER-OLS in the transmission corridor (15.0 percent) and open field (9.9 percent) habitats (Table 2.4-5).

    As previously stated, the white-footed mouse and deer mouse constitute the greatest percentage of small mammals captured. The white-footed mouse is found in a variety of habitats. It is a nocturnal mouse which nests in cavities such as stone walls and hollow trees'. Its breeding season extends from April to October. All captures of this species occurred in areas of preferred habitat (i.e.,

    forested areas).

    The deer mouse was captured most frequently from the mixed hardwood forest, indicative of its preference for coniferous and deciduous habitats.

    . It nestsand inbuildings.

    burrows in the ground, Its usual as well as in trees, stumps, breeding time is from February to November. Its home range is 0.2 to 1.2 ha (0.5 to 3.0 acres) or more'he meadow vole prefers low, moist areas of grasslands with rank growths of herbaceous vegetation' '. All specimens were taken in the old field community, where herbaceous vegetation is dominant.

    The meadow jumping mouse prefers areas closely associated with moi:st shrub-herbaceous communities; however, Burt and Grossenheider indicate that, the meadow jumping mouse is un-restricted in various land habitats'. This species was collected from the transmission corridor. It is primarily nocturnal with a home range of 0 ' to 0.8 ha (0.5 to 2.0 acres)'~'. It hibernates in October or November, emerging in April or May.

    One red squirrel (Tamiasciurus hudsonicus) was trapped in the early second-growth hardwood forest. Red squirrels in Oswego County are not as common as gray squirrels (Sciurus carolinensis), because the red squirrel is a northern species approaching the southern limit of its range in this area. Within the coastal zone, they are most closely as-sociated with the beech-maple-hemlock forests.

    In addition to those small mammals trapped at the Unit 2 site, a variety of other species are likely to occur.

    Table 2.4-6 lists those small mammals that are most likely to occur in this area, based on the wildlife inventory of the coastal zone conducted in 1976'~'.

    2. 4-8

    Nine Mile Point Unit 2 ER-OLS Medium- and Lar e-Sized Mammals Observations of medium- and large-sized mammals (carnivores, large rodents, lagomorphs, and even-toed ungulates) and/or their signs were made during the field investigations of the Unit 2 site in 1979, but few sightings were recorded.

    However, two woodchucks (Marmota monax) were observed along the roadside. Tracks of the white-tailed deer (Odocoileus one bedding area was noted along Transect 1 in the early second-growth hardwood forest.

    Based on data collected during the wildlife inventory of the coastal zone in 1976, 14 species of medium to large mammals are expected to occur within the region (Table 2.4-6): red fox (V~ul es fulva), gray fox (proc on cinereoar enteus),

    bobcat (~L nx rufus), coyote (Canis latrans), river otter floridanus), varying hare (~Le us americanus), striped skunk

    (~Me hitis ~me hitis), porcupine (Erethizon dorsatum), muskrat (Castor canadensis), white-tailed deer (Odocoileus lists those species of mammals that are most likely to occur near the Unit 2 site, based on the availability of suitable habitat, data on habitat preference, geographic range, and historical records (huntinc;, trapping, scientific studies, etc).

    Im ortant Mammalian S ecies Several mammalian species are considered important because:

    1) they are endangered or threatened species protected by state and/or federal legislation, 2) they are valuable com-mercially or recreationally, 3) they exert a significant in-fluence on ecosystem dynamics, or 4) they are biological in-dicators of radionuclides' ~ Biological indicators of radionuclides are discussed in Section 5.4.

    Endan ered or Threatened S ecies New York State lists the Indiana hat (~M otis sodalis) as endangered. This species is also protected under the Federal Endangered Species Act of 1973, amended in 1978'he Indiana bat is a medium-sized bat closely resembling the little brown bat. It is associated with the major cavernous limestone areas of the midwest and eastern United States, where it roosts).

    overwinters in hibernaculum (caves used as winter Little is known about the behavior of this bat in summer except that it disperses and has been found up to 2.4-9

    Nine Mile Point Unit 2 ER-OIS 644 km (400 mi) away from its winter roosts' ' .

    Populations are thought to be declining due to bio-accumulation of insecticides and to disruption of their hibernacula'~,~. There are two winter roosts within 80 km (50 mi) of the Unit 2 site: the Jefferson County hiber-naculum located approximately 69 km (43 mi) north of Unit 2 and the Syracuse hibernaculum located approximately 72 km (45 mi) south'. Although Indiana bat could occur at the site during the summer it is possible that the months, it was not recorded from the coastal zone during the habitat and wildlife inventory in 1976 or other recent studies,'. In addition, there are no known caves that would serve as winter roosting sites in the Unit 2 site area, and because of the Indiana bat's dispersed summer ranges, it is not particularly susceptible to the clearing of small land parcels.

    Commerciall and Recreationall Im ortant S ecies Commer-cially and/or recreationally important. game species in floridanus), gray squirrel, varying hare (~Le us americana),

    and white-tailed deer (Table 2.4-7)'~'. Furbearing species of importance include mink (Mustela vison), muskrat (Ondatra zibethica), beaver (Castor canadensis), raccoon (~Proc on lotor), skunk (M~ehitis ~me hitis), red fox (~vul es fulva),

    and gray fox (Duroc on cinereoar enteus)'a'.

    2 4 1.1.3.2

    ~ ~ Avifauna The coastal zone of Oswego County supports a large number of avian species. Numerous bird species breed in the area. In addition, there is a large influx of spring and fall mi-grants traveling through the region, since the area is part of the Atlantic Flyway'uring the winter, large numbers of waterfowl and waterbirds congregate along the coastal areas of Lake Ontario (Figure 2.4-3). The overwintering population from the Salmon River west of the city of Oswego consists primarily of diving ducks. Dominant birds include greater scaup (~A th a valisineria) and oldsquaw (Clanclula ~h emalis) are also found in this area' '. During years of heavy ice these water-fowl generally move out into deeper, ice-free of avian species were made primarily along water'bservations transect routes during vegetation sampling and small-mammal trapping. In addition, records were kept of incidental 2.4-10

    Nine Mile Point Unit 2 ER-OLS sightings made in the vicinity of Unit 2 (in disturbed areas, along roadsides, ecotones, or the transmission ROW).

    Ten species of birds were recorded at the Unit 2 site during the 1979 field investigations. These included black-capped (Sitta carolinensis), mourning dove (Zenaidura macroura),

    tristis), and killdeer (Charadrius vociferus). In addition, transmission corridor.

    In addition to those species observed during the field reconnaissance, numerous other species are likely to occur in the area. Table 2.4-8 provides 'a list of species recorded from the Oswego County Coastal Zone.

    Tables 2.4-9 and 2.4-10 provide generalized habitat as-sociations for major breeding and nonbreeding species.

    Table 2.4-11 lists the results of a roadside count and breeding bird strip census for areas adjacent to the Unit 2 site, conducted in 1976.

    Im ortant Avian S ecies A number of avian species are considered "important" in ac-cordance with Regulatory Guides 4.2 and 4.11 because they:

    1) are endangered or threatened species, 2) are valued com-mercially or recreationally as game species, or 3) exert a significant influence on ecosystem dynamics'ndan ered or Threatened S ecies The osprey (Pandion haliaetus), bald eagle (Haliacetus leucoce halus), and pere-New York State'. Both the bald eagle and peregrine falcon are also listed on the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service's list of endangered species'he osprey is a fairly common spring and fall migrant along the shoreline of Lake Ontario. The breeding territory nearest to Unit 2 is the area along the St. Lawrence River (the Indian River Lakes region, encompassing portions of northeastern Jefferson and southwestern St. Lawrence Counties) about 100 km (62 mi) northeast of the site. The 1976 nesting season showed the largest increase in success-ful nesting for the osprey within the past 20 bald eagle was formerly a fairly common spring and fall yr'he migrant along the shores of Lake Ontario, nesting locally at 2.4-11

    Nine Mile Point Unit 2 ER-OLS Selkirk Shores in the past'~'. Presently, observations of this raptor are rare, and nesting at Selkirk Shores has not occurred since 1955. The nearest active nest is located at the south end of Hemlock Lake in Livingston County about 135 km (85 mi) southwest of the site'.

    and Cornell University are participating in a cooperative At present, NYSDEC program to reestablish the bald eagle as a breeding raptor in New York. Forty-four bald eagles were hatched and released in western New York State between 1976 and 1981.

    Release points included the Montezuma National Wildlife Refuge, 32 km (20 mi) southwest of the site, and the Oak Or-chard State Wildlife Refuge, 160 km (100 mi) west-southwest, of the site. Many of these birds have moved north to the Lake Ontario shore, and some have been sighted east and north of Oswego"

    The peregrine falcon's a rare inland migrant, occasionally observed along the shores of Lake Ontario. Formerly a com-mon breeding species in New York State, the peregrine falcon has not nested in New York since 1961'. Its decline has been attributed to "pesticide toxicity. As in the case of the bald eagle, NYSDEC is cooperating with Cornell Univer-sity to reestablish the peregrine falcon as a breeding rap-tor in New Yoxk Recreationall Im ortant S ecies A large State'ommerciall and number of hawks, eagles, falcons, and ospreys migrate each spring along the shore of Lake Ontario and swing north along the eastern end of the lake. As many as 55,000 of these birds have been observed per season from Derby Hill, an ob-servation area north of Mexico, NY

    Table 2.4-12 lists the bird of prey nesting locations for the Oswego County Coastal Zone.

    Other commercially or recreationally important avian species in Oswego County include ruffed grouse (Bonasa umbellus),

    woodcock (~Socio ax minor), ring-necked pheasant (Phasianus (Rallus addition to

    ~ ~).

    limicola),

    28 Sora rail (Porzana species of waterfowl (Table 2.4-7).

    carolina), gallinule

    2. 4. 1. 1. 3. 3 Herpetof auna The reptilian and amphibian faunas of the coastal zone are sparse, with the majority of the species widely distributed throughout the area'~'. About, 40 species of reptiles and amphibians are believed to inhabit portions of Oswego
    2. 4-12

    Nine Mile Point Unit 2 ER-OLS County, but only 21 have been observed from the coastal zone(1)

    During the 1979 ~

    field investigation, two species of was recorded from the mixed hardwood forest community (Transect 3). This amphibian prefers moist, deciduous or coniferous woods; however, considerable distances from water' it may frequently be found Breeding occurs near the end of March, usually in small, shallow ponds. The tadpole stage lasts 2 to 3 months. In the fall, the wood frog begins hibernation under leaves, stones, stumps, or in swamps'umerous leopard frogs (Rana ~i iens) were observed in disturbed areas of the Unit 2 site. The frog is most commonly found in meadows and fields ' ' Eggs are laid in shallow water in the spring and hatch in 4 to 6 days. The northern leopard frog is less common than the green frog (R. clamitans) or bullfrog (R. catesbeiana) in Oswego wetlands; however, large numbers of juveniles have been found in the area in August.

    One unidentified snake was observed at the Unit 2 site during the 1979 field reconnaissance.

    Table 2.4-13 lists those species of herpetofauna which are most likely to occur onsite or in adjacent, areas'his list was compiled from available literature and takes into consideration factors such as availability of suitable habitat, geographic range, and historical records.

    Im ortant Re tiles 'and Am hibians A number of herpetofauna are considered important vertebrate species based on their status as endangered or threatened species. With respect to amphibians, none are presently listed as endangered or threatened.

    Of- the reptiles, the hog turtle (~Clemm s muhlenher ii) is listed as endangered by the state of New York . Its present status along Lake Ontario is unknown'. Records indicate that the bog turtle prefers sphagnaceous bogs, swamps, and wet meadows traversed by clear, slow-moving streams. Although the bog turtle has not been recorded from the Oswego County Coastal Zone, there is,a possibility that this species may occur in Deer Creek Marsh, a wetland associated with the Salmon River about 32 km (20 mi) southeast of the site'upplement 2 2.4-13 June 1983

    Nine Mile Point Unit 2 ER-OLS 2.4. 1 ..1. 4'ignificant Habitats Two areas within the Oswego County Coastal Zone near the Unit 2 site have been identified by NYSDEC as significant habitats (Figure 2.4-3) '. One area is the nearshore area of Lake Ontario between the Salmon River and the city of Oswego, including the area immediately offshore from the plant. This stretch of coastline is an important non-breeding waterfowl winter concentration area, as discussed in Section 2.4.1.1 3.2. The second significant habitat is deer yard (concentration area) northwest of Seneca Hill

    ~

    a about 11 km (7 mi) southwest of the site (Figure 2.4-3). It has been estimated that approximately 50 deer use this area between December and March'.4.1.1.5 Environmental Stresses There are two major types'f vegetation stresses, natural and man-induced, which can affect species composition of a community. Natural environmental stresses to vegetation can result from diseases of numerous origins, insects, wind, fire, drought, ice, and snow. Man-induced stresses, such as farming, logging, quarrying, application of pesticides, and recreational'ctivities, generally alter habitat and thus may significantly affect floral and faunal communities.

    No naturally occurring environmental stresses were noted during the 1979 site survey, nor did 'stereoscopic infrared aerial photographs taken in August 1979 reveal any major natural environmental stresses within the 1.6-km (1-mi) radius of Unit 2.

    Discussion with the NYSDEC staff (Cortland Regional Office) revealed that there is no indication of stress to forest, vegetation or wildlife in the area of Unit 2 that could be attributed to pest or disease vectors (personal com-mun'ication with NYSDEC) .

    With respect to man-induced environmental stresses, the clearing of land in the past, for agricultural uses has ap-preciably altered the structure of the vegetational com-munities within the region. Presently, much of the area is in varying stages of secondary succession following land use as cropland, pastureland, or orchards. Pioneer stages of succession (old field communities) are present, along with intermediate stages (early second-growth hardwood forests) and those seres approaching mature climax communities (beech-maple forests).

    2.4-14

    Nine Mile Point Unit 2 ER-OIS Management of the transmission line ROWs and grassed areas adjacent to the power plant complex will maintain them in early, suppressed stages of secondary succession. These managed areas are useful habitats for several wildlife species including deer, raptors and field-dwelling birds, small mammals, and herpetofauna.

    2.4.1.1.6 Summary Several distinct biotic communities are present within the 1.6-km (1-mi) radius of Unit 2. These communities vary in successional stage, diversity, and role in the ecological relationships of the site.

    In general, the forest communities in the area are productive, stable ecosystems characterized by complex food webs. The stability of forest ecosystems is attributed to the diversity of organisms, the relatively long life cycles of the dominant organisms, and tight nutrient the vicinity of Unit 2, several forest communities are cycles'n present, each representing different stages in secondary succession (early second-growth forest, intermediate second-growth forest, and mixed hardwood forest, each ap-proaching the mature climax community of the region).

    The open field communities are typical examples of the an-nual weed stage in old field succession. Food chains in the open field community are generally simple, with most energy flow occurring through the herbivores'. Most of the dominant plants have short life cycles and produce abundant seed crops in the fall, making these communities valuable to wi ldlife.

    Open field/shrub communities are more stratified than open fields and contain more plant forms (perennial herbs, vines, shrubs, and young trees). More specialized ecological niches are therefore available for wildlife. The open field/shrub communities, because of their more complex food webs, less pronounced seasonal fluctuations in community function, and the longer life cycles of the dominant organisms, are considered to be more ecologically stable'~.

    There are numerous ecotones because of the patchy distribution in the vicinity of Unit 2 of vegetation. Often, the diversity of species is greater in ecotones than in sur-rounding communities'~ '. Thus, ecotones such as those found in this area are valuable to wildlife as habitat and food sources.

    2.4-15

    Nine Mile Point Unit 2 ER-OLS 2.4.1.2 Transmission Corridors and Offsite Areas Descriptions of the terrestrial ecosystem within the Unit 2-to-Volney transmission corridor are based on the Ar-ticle VII application, a literature review, aerial photographs, consultation with local specialists, a field survey in September 1979, and a site visit in October 1981'~~,~~'. A description of the methodologies used during the September 1979 site visit is included in Section 6.5 '.

    2 '.1.2.1 General Corridor Characteristics The new 345-kV transmission line will extend from Unit 2:to the existing Volney substation, 15 km (9.4 mi) south-southeast of Unit 2 (Figures 3.7-1 and 3.7-4)'. The new transmission line will parallel the existing Nine Mile 1-Volney 345-kV transmission line, passing through the towns of Scriba and Volney, NY. The existing transmission ROW, south of Lake Road, is 152 m (500 ft) wide. The centerline of the new transmission line will be located 30 m (100 ft) east of the easternmost 345-kV line and will require clearing of an additional 23 m (75 ft) within the existing ROW.

    2.4.1 2.2

    ~ Terrestrial Communities and Species Interactions Hardwood cover types dominate the areas to be cleared for the new line, interrupted with small areas of hardwood-conifer and conifer trees. The age class of these forested areas is principally sapling and pole timber, with isolated areas of mature merchantable timber. Other forested uplands include small portions of conifer plan-tations and abandoned apple and pear orchards. Scattered wooded and shrub wetlands and actively farmed bottomlands also occur along the proposed route.

    Table 2.2-6 and Figure 2.4-4 present the results of the ROW vegetation analysis survey conducted prior to the proposed clearing. Tables 2.4-14 and 2.4-15 present the vegetative species traversed by the existing ROW.

    The existing transmission corridor is in a successional process which is similar to that in the adjacent forest brushland, except that it has been maintained at an earlier stage. Immediately following clearing of the ROW, the vegetation present within the corridor would have been dependent on the original ecosystem. Forested stretches would have resembled areas clear-cut during a logging operation, whereas agricultural areas would be essentially unchanged. Since that time, maintenance procedures have 2.4-16

    Nine Mile Point Unit 2 ER-OLS tended to create and hold all areas, except those actively farmed, at an advanced old field stage of succession.

    The history of the transmission corridor is, in many respects, similar to that of the large stretches of surrounding vegetation presently in forest brushland that also have been previously cleared. Species composition is similar in many cases, with the greatest differences being the greater dominance of grasses and forbs in the transmission corridor versus tall-growing woody species (shrubs and trees) in the forest brushland.

    Forested Communities The forest communities in the region crossed by the new 345-kV line include four major vegetation types (Table 2.2-6). The predominant vegetation is forest brushland, which is defined as areas with brush cover up to fully stocked poles less than 9.1 m (30 ft) high. This vegetation type includes approximately 3,939 ha (9,733 acres) in the vicinity (Table 2.2-7) of the ROW and covers approximately 19.3 ha (47.0 acres), or 59.0 percent of the new corridor. This vegetation type results from a variety of natural and manmade perturbations of what was originally a typical northeastern climax deciduous forest.

    The greatest source of disturbance has been clearing for agricultural purposes, including orchards, pasture, and cropland. Other disturbances typical of this area include logging, clearing for residential use, fire, blowdown, and natural disease. All of these areas have succeeded, following their disturbance, to ecosystems partway between forest and old field and would be expected to continue until they reach a climax forest.

    A second type of forested land, mature forest, is defined as containing natural stands where at least 50 percent of the trees are over 50 yr old and over 9. 1 m (30 ft) high. The largest area of mature forest along the corridor is located north of Miner Road and is known as Scriba Woods. The area east of the corridor has been described by Bieber, et al, and is representative of a typical climax community for this area'~'. Canopy cover is 80 to 90 percent and the trees reach 23 m (75 ft) in height. Dominant canopy species include American beech and sugar maple. Codominant species include hemlock, red maple, white ash, and yellow birch.

    Approximately 9 percent of the ROW crosses mature forest.

    The third vegetation type is forest wetland. Wetlands (forested and otherwise) in Oswego County have been surveyed by NYSDEC in accordance with the New York State Wetlands Supplement 2 2. 4-17 June 1983

    Nine Mile Point Unit 2 ER-OLS Act' "'. An update of this survey with particular atten-tion paid to the transmission corridor has been, performed by the Oswego County Environmental Management Council. In the vicinity of the corridor, 1.6 km (1 mi) on each side, are 26 wetlands, each having a size of 5 ha (12.4 acres),

    the minimum size recorded. A total of 1.0 ha (2.4 acres),

    or 3 percent of the area to be cleared along the ROW, will cross this vegetation type.

    The largest area of unmanaged (not farmed) wetlands that will be crossed by the new transmission line designated as Wetland WT-7 on the Oswego County Wetland maps is located between Lake Road and Miner Road south of Unit 2. This naturally developed area has apparently experienced a recent increase in water levels due to beaver activity, causing considerable mortality in trees and other vegetative cover over several acres'. As a result, the next successional stage for many parts of this area will probably be a shallow pond or a shrub swamp. Of this wetland, about 0.2 ha (0.4 acres) will be crossed by the new transmission line.

    The fourth forest category is plantation, a forest area that is artificially stocked. Only 1.6 percent of the corridor crosses forest plantations.

    Nonforested Communities The new 345-kV line will also cross two small sectors of cultivated land. The first area, which lies south of County Route 4, is an ll-ha (26-acre) field generally used for growing lettuce or onions. The remaining area, immediately north of State Highway 104, is a 4-ha (11-acre) hayfield.

    The portions of these fields crossed by the new line total 2.0 ha (4.8 acres) and represent about 6 percent of the area to be cleared.

    Endan ered or Threatened S ecies No federally listed endangered or threatened floral species are known to exist in Oswego County. Information concerning species listed as protected by NYSDEC is discussed in Section 2.4.1.1.

    2.4.1.2.3 Fauna Vertebrate fauna that may be found in and along the trans-mission corridor are similar to those found onsite (Section 2.4.1.1.3). Natural history information on verte-brate fauna has been presented previously (Section 2.4 '.1 and Tables 2.4-6 through 2.4-13) . Approximately 26 mammals,

    ~ 3 including 1 marsupial, 6 insectivores (shrews and moles), 1 Supplement 6 2 '-18 March 1984

    Nine Mile Point Unit 2 ER-OLS V

    1agomorph, 8 rodents ( including 6 small mammals), 9 carnivores, and 1 even-toed ungulate, have ranges and habitat requirements .that are met by new and shrubby fields and thus may be found in the vegetative habitats provided by the ROW (Table 2.4-6). Many of these animals may also be found in the forest and forest shrub communities along the ROW. In addition, there are about 18 more mammals that are primarily woods dwellers. Similarly, there are many birds (Tables 2.4-9 and 2.4-10) and reptiles (Table 2.4-13) found near the site that may also occur in or along the transmis-sion corridor.

    The recent history of the ROW and the nearby environs (Section 2.4.1 1.2), and the many ecotonal areas along the

    ~

    the roadside, residences, and farmlands in the vicinity of the ROW, results in a general ecosystemgeneral

    ROW, with diverse animal species. There is only limited represen-tation by species requiring larger tracts of mature forest, whereas those found in old fields, old field and forest shrub, and woodlots are common.

    Im ortant Vertebrate Fauna Vertebrate fauna can be considered important because of their status as endangered or threatened, because of their commercial or recreational value, or because they support either of the preceding groups.

    Endan ered or Threatened S ecies Except for occasional transient species, no federally listed endangered or threatened wildlife species are known to exist within the transmission ROW'. Information concerning possible transients is presented in Section 2.4.1.1.3.

    Commerciall or Recreationall Si nificant S ecies Small game species that are likely to be found in the area of the 345-kV transmission corridor are similar to those using the site (Section 2 4. 1.1.3) . Important species in-

    ~

    clude the gray squirrel, cottontail rabbit, waterfowl, and possibly snowshoe hare. Ruffed grouse and woodcock use of the area is generally seasonal. Table 2.4-7 provides a list of important game and furbearer species occurring in Oswego County and an estimate of the numbers taken in the area each year'~,~~'. The possible distribution of species by habitat is presented in Table 2 '-6.

    Zarger game species are also found along the ROW. Beaver use is prevalent in the Black Creek area, located about 2.4-19

    Nine Mile Point Unit 2 ER-OLS

    9. 4 km (5. 9 mi ) south of the site. Signs of deer are also present. This species is the only large game species found in the area, but their concentration is considered to be low. The estimated density is 1 buck/sq mi'. Additional life history and habitat utilization information for impor-tant vertebrate species in the area is found in Sections 2.4.1.1.3.1 and 2.4.1.1.3.2.

    Im ortant Invertebrate Fauna NYSDEC at Cortland, NY, indicates that there are no known occurrences of important invertebrate fauna along the 345-kV ROW from Unit 2 to the Volney substation'. This includes major endangered or threatened species, commercially or rec-reationally important species, and potentially limiting com-ponents of the food chain. There are also no pest or disease vectors affecting wildlife or vegetation that would classify as invertebrates of concern.

    2.4.1.2.4 Special Habitats According to NYSDEC, no wildlife refuges or concentration areas are traversed by the ROW'~~'. The nearest significant terrestrial habitat is a deer concentration area located ap-proximately ll km (7 mi) west of the ROW (Figure 2.4-3)'~'.

    There are no,other significant or irreplaceable terrestrial resources in the vicinity of the transmission corridor.

    2.4.1.2.5 Stressed Areas There are no indications of environmental stresses to forest vegetation or wildlife along the ROW that could be at-tributed to pest or disease vectors, ice., naturally induced stresses'~ '. However, there are areas along the ROW that are currently managed for agricultural use and maintenance of the existing 345-kV ROW. Continued management of the existing ROW will maintain it in the early stages of secon-dary succession (e.g., old field and low-growing shrub communities) and will provide useful habitat for several forms of wildlife, including raptors, field-dwelling birds, small mammals, deer, and herpetof auna.

    2. 4. 2 Aquatic Ecology 2.4.2.1 The Site and Vicinity Niagara Mohawk Power Corporation (NMPC) has conducted yearly biological studies in the vicinity of Unit 1 since 1969. A comprehensive ecological survey of Lake Ontario was con-ducted in the Nine Mile Point vicinity during the years 1973 2.4-20

    Nine Mile Point Unit 2 ER-OLS through 1978. A reduced program, reflecting modifications made in the Unit 1 technical specifications in 1978, was conducted from 1979 through 1981. During the 6-yr intensive study, the major t'rophic levels of the aquatic ecosystem were sampled extensively to determine any impacts of the operation of Unit 1 and the James A. Fitzpatrick (JAF)

    ~

    plant, and to conduct preoperational studies for Unit 2.

    Each trophic level (phytoplankton, microzooplankton,.

    macrozooplankton, ichthyoplankton, benthos, and nekton) was examined for spatial and temporal trends in distribution and abundance. Populations in nature vary according to inherent life history characteristics and interactionand with other density-trophic levels, and with density-dependent independent factors. In Lake Ontario, overfishing and the introduction of exotic species have further disrupted the .

    stability of the fish community. Therefore, to explain variations in population distribution and abundance, it is necessary to consider the natural factors as well as the ef-fect of power plant operations.

    The sampling programs designed to evaluate the population distribution and abundance relative to plant operation are summarized in Section 6.5.2.1 and provided in detail in the annual interpretive reports for each of the sampling years(27 35) ~

    The following sections present. summaries of study results by trophic category.

    2.4.2.1.1 Phytoplankton The data collected between 1973 and 1978 have been examined for abundance, distribution, and productivity of 'he phytoplankton community in the Nine Mile Point vicinity. A total of 187 genera from seven divisions were identified during this period. The species assemblage remained con-sistent throughout the study period and was similar to that described in previous most abundant taxa studies'.

    identified during The following are the the study:

    Blue-Green Algae Diatoms Cyclotella sp.

    Chroococcus sp. Melosira sp.

    Coelos haerium sp. Ste hanodiscus sp.

    Gom hos haeria sp. Asterionella sp.

    Oscillatoria sp. Diatoma sp.

    Anabaena sp.

    A hanizomenon sp. Tabellaria sp.

    2.4-21,

    Nine Mile Point Unit 2 ER-OLS Green Algae Others Eudorina sp. Ochromonas sp.

    Rhodomonas sp.

    Coelastrum stis sp.

    sp.'Ooc Scenedesmus sp.

    Phytoplankton abundance generally cycled two to four times each year, with the maximum abundances generally occurring during the summer'". These seasonal patterns reflect similar patterns previously reported in Lake (diatoms) bloomed in the spring, then de-Ontario'acillariophyta clined until late fall when they again became abundant.

    Green algae were generall'y most abundant during the summer; blu'e-green algae, during late summer and early fall.

    Analysis of spatial distribution showed that abundances were generally lower offshore than onshore',

    supported by the results of other researchers an observation on Lake Ontario'~. Longshore trends indicated a generally higher phytoplankton standing crop west of Unit 1 compared to other transects, and this was attributed to the influence of the Oswego River, which affects this area more than the other stations'"

    Since chlorophyll a is common to all phytoplankton taxa, it is regularly used as an indicator of phytoplankton standing crop'""'. Generally, values in the Nine Mile Point vicinity were higher during the spring and summer than during the fall, but within each year the number of peaks varied'".

    Chlorophyll a was chosen for examination of long-term trends because the techniques used to collect and analyze the data did not change significantly over the 6-yr duration of the program; consequently, the trends exhibited should be related to changes in the community standing crop rather than to methodology.

    The long-term trends, as indicated by chlorophyll a concentrations, denoted a cyclic pattern, with low values occurring during 1975 and 1978 and highest values during 1974' ' . The remaining 3 yr (1973, 1976, and 1977) demon-strated intermediate values. Annual temperature cycles, in combination with annual light cycles, have been reported as being responsible for the gross seasonal changes in phytoplankton communities ' ' No definite relationship between water temperature and chlorophyll a concentrations was found for the Nine Mile Point vicinity'~. Similar species and seasonal patterns were observed each year, and Supplement 2 2.4-22 June 1983

    Nine Mile Point Unit 2 ER-OLS no apparent changes in abundance or population structure were attributed to plant operations.

    2.4.2.1.2 Microzooplankton Lake zooplankton are separated into two groups based on size, with microzooplankton ranging from 76 to 571 um and macrozooplankton larger than 571 um. A total of 51 genera were identified from the microzooplankton sampling program conducted from 1973 through 1978. Rotifers were the most numerous taxa. Many of the same species occurred each year, and the common genera reported near Nine Mile Point were also reported to be common in Lake Ontario and the Great Lakes in general'~ '. This section discusses the three major taxa present in the Nine Mile Point.

    vicinity: rotifers, cladocerans, and copepods. The dominant genera of each group are as follows:

    Rotifers Cladocerans Keratella sp.

    Brachionus sp. ~Da hnia sp.

    Trichocerca sp. Bosmina sp.

    Pleosoma sp. ~Ch dorus sp.

    Copepods Strong seasonal trends were evident in all studies, with the maximum microzooplankton total abundance occurring in June or July and secondary peaks either in the spring or fall'". Rotifers and, more specifically, Keratella sp. 2 were typically the dominant group, except during the fall when crustaceans (cladocerans and copepods) sometimes dominated.

    Watson'" 'nd Microzooplankton abundances were lower at offshore stations than at nearshore Patalas'" 'escribed stations'.

    similar results in their studies. No f I

    consistent longshore trends were evident for the major groups; that is, over several years, no one transect showed either higher or lower abundance than any other.

    The microzooplankton community observed each year was similar, with variations between years caused by a general reduction of all components of the community rather than a reduction of a specific component'". The mean mi-Supplement 2 2.4-23 June 1983

    Nine Mile Point Unit 2 ER-OLS crozooplankton abundance (indicative of the standing crop) increased throughout. the first four study years (1973-1976),

    but dropped significantly in 1977 and 1978. This decrease corresponds to a general reduction in water temperature (increased cloud cover, less solar input). The reduced tem-perature during this period may have affected the mi-crozooplankton standing crop either directly, by causing a reduction in their reproduction and/or growth, or indirectly, by reducing their primary food source, the phytoplankton. No effect. of operation of the generating stations was observed in microzooplankton abundance or com-munity structure 2.4.2.1 ~ 3 Macrozooplankton Macrozooplankton, defined as invertebrate animal plankton larger than 571 um, community structure, and temporal/

    spatial distribution in the Nine Mile Point vicinity were investigated during the 1973 through 1978 study period.

    A total of 26 genera from the phyla Coelenterata, Platyhelminthes, Aschehelminthes, Mollusca, Annelida, and Arthropoda were represented, with the arthropod classes In-secta and Crustacea contributing the greatest number of genera'~. The dominant taxa are listed as follows:

    Hydrozoa Crustacea Cord lo hora sp. ~Da hnia sp.

    Insecta (Diptera)

    Chaoborus sp. Limnocalanus sp.

    Chironomidae ~Cclc s sp.

    Gammarus sp.

    ~Nsis sp.

    Quantitative evaluation of the macrozooplankton community is extremely difficult because of the behavior of the species involved and their normal temporal and spatial cycles'~.

    Quantitative estimates are further affected by retention of specific organisms by the sampling gear and loss of many of the young through the collection net. Therefore, to evaluate the trends over the 6-yr period, three dominant Diptera) are discussed.

    primary constituent of the macrozooplankton) was basically Supplement 2 2. 4-24 June 1983

    Nine Mile Point Unit 2 ER-OLS unimodal, with peak numbers occurring in late summer'".

    Temporal variability was caused by diel trends and local hy-of the year, with copepods and amphipods contributing sub-stantial numbers during early spring and late summer/fall, respectively.

    Concentrations of the selected taxa typically increased with depth and were more abundant in the nearshore stations than terans were more abundant at night than during the day( l2 l 3)

    Although spatial distribution was variable, Gammarus abun-dance tended to increase from west to east in the study area, reflecting the substrate preferences of this toward the western end of the study area, but high concen-trations were also noted immediately to the east of Unit 1.

    Dipterans, like Gammarus, tended to be more abundant at eastern than western transects.

    On a long-term basis (1973 through 1978), Gammarus and dip-teran concentrations in the water column consistently de-creased from year to year at all depth contours; by 1977 Gammarus had essentially disappeared from the water column during the day'~. However, Gammarus abundance in benthic collections showed no consistent changes during the same time period (Section 2.4.2.1.5). Concentrations of ~Le todora consistently increased as Gammarus declined.

    reduction in grazing pressure due to locally reduced fish stocks (Section 2.4.2.1.6). It is possible that local en-vironmental changes were selective against Gammarus, but benthic data showed no consistent reductions in their abundance. With reference to overall abundance of macrozooplankton, these data do not support any consistent long-term changes attributable to power plant operation.

    2.4.F 1.4 Ichthyoplankton Ichthyoplankton represent the vertebrate portion of the macrozooplankton collection and include eggs, larvae, and juvenile fish. The species composition and spatial/temporal distribution of ichthyoplankton in the Nine Mile Point area were investigated from 1973 through 1978. A total of 31 species of ichthyoplankton (eggs and/or larvae) were identified, of which 11, including the bluegill, smallmouth bass, white bass, and walleye, were rare'~. The dominant Supplement 2 2.4-25 June 1983

    Nine Mile Point Unit: 2 ER-OLS species in the area throughout the study period were alewife, rainbow smelt, and to a lesser degree threespine stickleback and yellow perch.

    Alewife spawning takes place along gravelly or sandy shallow areas in Lake Ontario between April and June'~ '. Broadcast at random, the eggs are demersal and essentially non-adhesive. The rainbow smelt migrate inshore to spawn in streams or near the lake's shore during April or May. Eggs are demersal, adhesive, and,hatch in 2 to 3 weeks, after which growth is fairly rapid'~ '. Both the threespine stickleback and yellow perch prefer shallow waters. The yellow perch spawns during spring, usually near rooted aquatic vegetation to which the egg masses can adhere. The stickleback spawns later in shallow water, preferably over a sandy bottom'he seasonal pattern of ichthyoplankton involved the succes-sion of three groups of species: the early spring group group dominated by rainbow smelt (Osmerus mordax); and the late spring/summer group dominated by alewife. Peak concen-trations of eggs and larvae coincided with the occurrence of the late spring/summer group and consisted primarily of alewife larvae'~

    Analyses of selected dominant taxa (alewife and rainbow smelt,) indicated that alewife eggs were most abundant in bottom samples collected from nearshore waters at night.

    Rainbow smelt eggs were rare in the study area and occurred primarily in surface waters. Since smelt spawning typically occurs at the bottom of streams or along the shoreline, the eggs collected within the area, particularly at the surface, most likely were dislodged from their natural habitat by strong currents or storms. Fertility of these eggs was not determined.

    The larvae of rainbow smelt and alewife, predominantly post-yolk-sac phase, were more abundant at night than during the day. While alewife larvae were more abundant in surface waters, rainbow smelt larvae were more abundant in mid-depth and bottom waters. There was no consistent east/west pat-tern in the distribution of alewife or rainbow smelt larvae'patial variability for both the alewife and the rainbow smelt was minimal between the 6-m (20-ft), 12-m (40-ft), and offshore contours. Seasonal distribution of alewife and smelt remained similar in each of the 6 yr, with peak abun-dances in June and July, respectively.

    Supplement 2 2. 4-26 June 1983

    Nine Mile Point Unit 2 ER-OLS The yearly mean larval concentration reported in the, Nine Mile Point vicinity from May through November increased throughout the study period'~ ' Except for a slight de-crease in smelt larval abundance in 1975, both the alewife and smelt larvae showed increasing abundances from 1974 through 1978. Thus, based on the maintenance of a diverse species inventory and an increasing stock of the two dominant larval species, the operation of the ,generating stations has no observable impact on the ichthyoplankton communi ty.

    2.4.2.1.5 Benthic Organisms Periphyton and invertebrate populations inhabit the Lake On-tario bottom, residing either on (epifaunal/epifloral) or within (infaunal) the substratum. In Lake Ontario, seasonal environmental changes influence the deposition of bottom sediments which, in turn, affects the spatial distribution of the organisms that have specific substrate requirements for burrowing or feeding activities. The bottom in the study area is characteristically bedrock, with varying amount's of rubble, sand, and,silt. Sand and silt typically represented less than 10 percent of the bottom substrate of the NMPW and NMPP transects, while it often represented 80 to 90 percent of the substrate at the NMFE and FITZ tran-sects (See Section 6.5.2.1 for station locations).

    A cumulative macroinvertebrate species inventory for the period 1973 through 1978 showed large diversity of benthic invertebrates, Oligochaete including worms and 124 dipteran a

    genera larvae from were ll the phyla'~.

    dominant forms. The studies show no changes in benthic taxa over the 6 yr period'~.

    Spatial variability between transects differed by taxon.

    Amphipoda and Platyhelminthes abundances were similar for each transect each year, while Nematoda, Gastropoda, and Felecypoda abundances were consistently highest and lowest at the NMPE and NMPP transects, respectively. Diptera, Polychaeta, and Oligochaeta showed variable spatial dis-tribution over the 6-yr study. The increased abundances, particularly of the Nematoda, Gastropoda, and Pelecypoda, at, the easternmost transect (NMPE) probably relate to the predominantly soft substrate, which is more suitable for supporting the infaunal forms than is the hard substrate, which is more characteristic of the NMPP transect'"

    Taxon-specific, long-term (1973 through 1978) trends were demonstrated. Except for an increased abundance in 1974, Oligochaeta abundances remained similar throughout. the study Supplement 2 2.4-27 June 1983

    Nine. Mile Point Unit 2 ER-OLS period. Amphipoda abundances also remained constant.

    Gastropoda, Nematoda, Diptera, and Platyhelminthes varied, but demonstrated no singular trend or population shift.

    Mean Pelecypoda abundance decreased throughout the study with the lowest abundances occurring at the NMPP transect; most likely attributable to the loss of suitable habitat for this infaunal taxon. The bottom substrate (predominantly bedrock) at, the NMPP transect was not capable of supporting the burrowing Pelecypoda. These benthic dynamics indicate viable and persistent communities, with no trend toward anomalous declines or increases in densities.

    Sampling of the periphyton community was conducted from 1973 through 1978. Species assemblages attached to glass or Plexiglas substrates located near the surface and at the bottom were identified and enumerated.

    The periphyton species inventory is extensive, indicating a diverse and viable assemblage of periphytic algae in the Nine Mile Point vicinity'". The periphyton community was composed primarily of diatoms in the spring, green and/or blue-green algae during the summer months, and diatoms again in the fall. While not identified and enumerated, protozoa, primarily ciliates and suctorians, were common components of the periphyton community, particularly at the greater depths where light intensity was lower.

    The pattern of algal succession was similar for both the phytoperiphyton and the phytoplankton communities and typ-ical of conditions in temperate water bodies'"~'. The presence of a relatively large blue-green algal component is consistent with reports of increasing eutrophication of Lake Ontario, particularly in the nearshore waters'~ '. Seasonal growth patterns of the bottom periphyton community indicated peak biomass during July or August, depending on water tem-perature and depth. Bottom periphyton biomass and chloro-phyll a values decreased as the depth contours increased, but no consistent pattern was discernible among the four transects tested'~ '.. Increased biomass on artificial surface substrates at the NMPP and FITZ transects is most likely a result of a stimulatory effect of the Cooling water system discharge mixing zone'".

    The species composition and standing crop (biomass and ch-lorophyll a) of the periphyton community have remained relatively constant over the 6-yr study period. The various groups of periphyton showed some spatial variability among the transects; however, the seasonal fluctuations far ex-ceeded the spatial variability and were typical of those described in other long-term studies Thus, the peri-Supplement 2 2.4-28 June 1983

    Nine Mile Point Unit 2 ER-OLS phyton community was composed of a diverse assemblage of or-ganisms with a dynamic seasonal variability that was much more extensive than the spatial or long-term temporal variability observed.

    2.4.2.1.6 Fish The fish community of Lake Ontario has undergone major changes, beginning before 1850 and continuing to the present. The community can be described as unstable and dominated by exotic species that were either accidentally or purposely introduced. The commercially important deep-water assemblage of salmonids has been lost, and many other species are greatly reduced in abundance. Pesticides have entered the lake and produced unacceptably high concen-trations in a number of commercially and recreationally im-portant species. In recent years, large numbers of salmonids have been stocked in the lake to prey upon the abundant. alewives and produce a sport fishery.

    A total of 82 species were collected from Lake Ontario during aquatic surveillance programs conducted from 1972 through 1981'" ~ The following information represents a summary of the results of fish sampling conducted during this period on eight of these species identified as re-presentative and important by the EPA: alewife, rainbow smelt, yellow perch, white perch, smallmouth bass, coho salmon, brown trout, and threespine stickleback. Limited data were obtained on threespine stickleback, brown trout, and coho salmon because few specimens of these species were collected. This summary concentrates on the relative abun-dance and temporal and spatial distribution of the aforemen-tioned species in the vicinity of Nine Mile Point. Site-specific life history information, including age and growth studies, fecundity, coefficient of maturity, and food habits, is available in the annual reports'lewife (Alosa seudoharen s)

    Alewife in the Nine Mile Point area exhibited seasonal as well as diel variations in distribution and abundance.

    Alewife wer'e more abundant during spring and summer than during the fall or winter. The bottom gill nets indicate that alewife remains inshore of this depth during its spring/early summer spawning period'~. Longshore dis-tribution 'ndicates that alewife utilize the entire shoreline during their spawning period and show no preference or dependence on any given area.

    Supplement 2 2.4-29 June 1983

    Nine Mile Point Unit 2 ER-OLS Gill net sampling at four transects in the vicinity of Nine Mile Point. provides a basis for examining the trend in relative abundance of alewife from 1973 through was a decline in alewife abundance at Nine Mile Point 1981'here after a peak in 1974. This decrease is reported to be a lakewide phenomenon as a result of heavy alewife mortality during the winter of 1974-1975. Gill net catches from 1980 and 1981 indicate that the population has recovered.

    Rainbow Smelt (Osmerus mordax)

    The vast majority of adult rainbow smelt from the Nine Mile Point area were collected by surface and bottom gill nets'. Trawl and seine collections caught few rainbow smelt. The very low abundance of this species in seine col-lections suggests that spawning is not occurring in the lit-toral area near Nine Mile Point. Scott and Crossman reported that rainbow smelt in the Great Lakes spawn in streams or, under adverse weather conditions, in the off-shore areas on gravel shoals'" '. The predominance of bedrock and large cobble bottom substrate within the Nine Mile Point vicinity limit this area for smelt spawning.

    There is no consistent pattern in the catch rate between depth contours or transects, indicating that the rainbow smelt move freely within the Nine Mile Point area.

    The bottom gill nets fished consistently from 1973 through 1981 indicate peaks in abundance in 1974 and 1981, with low abundances in 1975 and 1980. The peaks in 1974 and 1981 coincide with the peaks in alewife abundance during this 9-yr period.

    Yellow perch are able to tolerate a wide variety of environ-mental conditions and are a commercially valuable species in the Great Lakes and elsewhere'. They are generally found in water less than 9.2 m (30 ft) deep and aggregate in schools of 50-200 individuals of approximately the same size'ill net sampling in the Nine Mile Point vicinity indicated peaks in abundance of yellow perch in 1974 and 1981 and low abundance in 1977, except for the 5-m (16-ft) depth contour'~. The 5- and 9-m (16- and 30- ft) depth stations showed the greatest abundance of yellow perch, reflecting their preference for shallow water. There was no consistent pattern in the abundance of yellow perch among transects.

    The vast majority of yellow perch collected in the vicinity of Nine Mile Point was obtained in bottom gill 2.4-30 June 1983 nets'upplement 2

    Nine Mile Point Unit 2 ER-OLS Yellow perch were obtained in July through September, not coincident with the timing of their reproductive behavior (April). This suggests that spawning does not, take place in the area; Between 1972 and 1976, 4,107 yellow perch were tagged in the vicinity of Nine Mile Point to determine their distribution and movements. Returns showed regular seasonal 2 movements between the Nine Mile Point area and the eastern end of Lake Ontario. During fall, yellow perch moved east-ward from Nine Mile Point, and concentrated in the area of Sandy Pond, where they overwintered and probably spawned the following spring. In spring, they moved westward along the south shore of the lake and were recaptured in the Nine Mile Point area in greatest numbers from June through October.

    White Perch (Morone americana)

    White perch are a common brackish-water species in the nor-theastern coastal area of North America. Not. a native of the Great Lakes, this species presumably gained access to Lake Ontario via the Oswego River, resulting from Hudson River populations moving northward and westward through the Mohawk River and Erie Barge Canal'"

    White perch were generally more abundant at the 5- and 9-m (16- and 30-ft) stations than at the deeper stations. They were abundant in the east side of the study area, par-ticularly in 1973 and 1974 when overall abundance was high.

    White perch were more abundant near the bottom than at the surface throughout a diel cycle. Although seasonal dis-tribution was exhibited in the day collections, summer night collections were larger than either spring or fall night collections. Gill net sampling from 1973 through 1981 showed a peak in abundance in 1974, with lower but stable abundance for the remaining 7 yr'~.

    t Smallmouth bass are distributed in North America from southern Canada to Alabama and west to Oklahoma'.

    an important sport fish and piscivore in the nearshore It is waters of Lake Ontario.

    In the Nine Mile Point, area, smallmouth bass were collected almost exclusively with bottom gill nets. Compared to other abundant species, the catch rate of smallmouth bass has al-ways been quite low, although they were found in the near-shore area and in impingement collections. Catches at the 5-, 9-, and 12-m (16-, 30-, and 39-ft) contours were con-Supplement 2 2.4-31 June 1983

    Nine Mile Point Unit 2 ER-OLS sistently greater than at the 18-m (59-ft) contour, reflect-ing the nearshore distribution of this species. There was no consistent pattern in the catch rate when transects were compared. Gill net catches were consistently higher during the summer than during spring and fall'~. The sampling from 1973 through 1981 indicates a trend of decreasing abun-dance through 1979, with increasing abundances recorded for 1980 and 1981'~.

    Threes ine stickleback (Gasterosteus aculeatus)

    The threesp'ine stickleback is widely distributed in fresh and marine waters of North America, ranging from Chesapeake Bay north to the Hudson Bay region. Although threespine stickleback are relatively abundant in impingement samples, they are not collected in large numbers with the fishing gear employed at Nine Mile Point; therefore, there are very limited data available for the Nine Mile Point vicinity.

    The total numbers of threespine stickleback collected by various fishery gear at Nine Mile Point from 1973 through 1978 (sampling in 1979 through 1981 used only the bottom gill net which does not effectively collect this species) were highest during 1976 and 1978; however, there was no discernible trend in abundance over the years of sampling'~.

    The coho salmon is an anadromous species occurring naturally in the Pacific Ocean and in rivers that drain northwestern North America. Attempts to establish this species in the Great Lakes were unsuccessful until the 1960s'. NYSDEC annually stocks coho salmon in New York State tributary streams of Lake Ontario.

    Only 223 coho salmon were collected at Nine Mile Point with various fishery gear from 1973 through 1981'~. They were most abundant in 1975 and were not collected at all in 1977 through 1981. This is attributed to a reduction in the sam-pling effort starting in 1979 and a reduction in coho stock-ing by NYSDEC subsequent to 1975. Because of the small num-ber collected, no distributional or seasonal trends were determined.

    Brown Trout '(Salmo trutta)

    The total number of brown trout collected at Nine Mile Point by various fishery gear from 1973 through 1981 was 587.

    Brown trout were most abundant in 1975, reflecting the Supplement 2 2.4-32 June 1983

    Nine Mile Point Unit 2 .ER-OLS stocking rate. There is no obvious trend in the abundance of brown trout over the years of study. The low catch in 1977 and 1979 through 1980 is the result of reduced sampling effort. Because of, the low numbers collected, no dis-tributional trends were demonstrated; however, they were typically present within the study area throughout the year<so)

    Existing and Planned Man-Induced Manipulations Affectin Fish Po ulation-There are a number of factors that may significantly affect the aquatic biota of Lake Ontario through trophic interactions. Past species composition changes are at-tributed to the destabilize;ng influence of overfishing.

    Commercial- fishing is now greatly reduced from past levels, but in conjunction with other factors it apparently has produced some effects. Although these changes have been oc-curring over a long period of time, there is no indication that the fish community has stabilized. A number of exotic species have been so successful that they now dominate the fish community.

    The reintroduction of salmonids has produced a highly suc-cessful sport fishery and should help control alewife abundance, which has sometimes been a nuisance problem.

    Ecological succession in the f'ish community of Lake Ontario has been altered by man. The water quality of Lake Ontario is generally good and apparently would be adequate to sup-port the original fish stocks if they were still abundant.

    There are, however, localized areas of pollution; the discovery of unacceptably high levels of mirex in fish in-dicates that water quality may be influencing the fish com-munity in unknown ways.

    Based on the long-term trends established over the 9 yr of study presented in the preceding sections, power plants re-present a minor influence on the lake aquatic community.

    Thermal discharges are a highly localized effect that may affect localized seasonal fish distribution, but no con-sistent species-specific distribution was identified with the thermal discharges. Direct mortality as a result of impingement and entrainment has had no appreciable effect on the fish populations as demonstrated by long-term abundances. Naturally occurring seasonal and yearly cycles account for most'f the variability observed in the monitored aquatic communities.

    Supplement 2 2.4-33 June 1983

    Nine Mile Point Unit 2 ER-OLS Endan ered S ecies Table 2.4-16 provides a list of the fish species classified by the NYSDEC as endangered or threatened. Only three species (longjaw cisco, shortnose sturgeon, and blue pj.ke) reported at one time in New York State or the Great Lakes are listed by the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service as endangered or threatened. These three are also present on the New York State list. Of the 15 species listed on the N.Y. State list, eight are located in areas outside of Lake Ontario. The remaining seven species have been reported from Lake Ontario by various researchers over the years. However, their behavior or low numbers have precluded all hut the lake chuhsucker (~Erim zcn sucetta) from occurrence from the nine-year lake sampling program or the impingement sampling at Unit 1 or the JAF plant. A single lake chubsucker was collected during the summer of 1975 in a seine haul conducted at the mouth of the Salmon River (approximately 5 km (8 mi j from the Nine Mile Point vicinity). The preference of this species for a shallow weedy habitat precludes species entrapment at the proposed offshore velocity cap intake.

    Supplement 6 2.4>>34 March 1984

    Nine Mile Point Unit 2 ER-OLS Commercial and S ort Fisheries of Lake Ontario Commercial fishery and sportfishing in Lake Ontario have un-dergone major changes with the reduction in abundance (and, in some cases, extin'ction) of many important species and the introduction of exotic game species'. Species com-position changes have shifted the emphasis of the commercial fishery from one that =relied on relatively small numbers of large, valuable fish to a fishery that captures large num-bers of small, lower value fish.

    A wide variety of species are taken in sportfishing at various times and locations around the lake. Centrarchids, especially the smallmouth bass, as well as yellow perch, catfish, bullheads, and white perch are probably taken by sportfishermen over a broad area. Rainbow trout, northern pike, and muskellunge are important in restricted areas.

    The walleye was once an abundant and popular sport fish, especially in the 1950s; however, it decreased in abundance after 1959 and is just recently returning to its previous levels.

    Recently, large numbers of salmonids, including lake trout, splake, coho salmon, chinook salmon, Atlantic salmon, steel-head trout, and brown trout have been stocked in the lake to take advantage of the food base provided by the alewife and to create recreational fisheries. The coho, chinook, and brown trout, have survived well, and an important sport fishery on these species has developed. New York State has recently constructed a large hatchery for salmon production on the Salmon River, and large numbers of coho, chinook, and steelhead trout will be stocked in- the future.

    2.4.2.2 Transmission Corridors and Offsite Areas The following description of the aquatic ecology of the transmission corridor is based on the Article VII Ap-plication filed with the New York State Public Service Com-mission in 1982' and on a field reconnaissance survey conducted in October 1981. The only aquatic habitats poten-tially affected are those that abut or are crossed by the existing transmission corridor which will be utilized for the new transmission line from Unit 2 to the Volney Sub-station site (Section 3.7)'~~'. 2 While the transmission corridor crosses several wetland habitats, drainage ditches, and intermittent streams, there Supplement 2 2.4-35 June 1983

    Nine Mile Point Unit 2 ER-OLS are only two prominent aquatic habitats encountered: an un-named stream (and tributaries) designated Ontario 62 by NYSDEC, and tributaries of Black Creek (Ontario 66).

    Figure 2.4-4 shows the locations of these streams in relation to the transmission corridor. All streams encoun-tered have been designated Class D by NYSDEC. Class D waters are not considered to be conducive to the propagation of fish; however, the waters must be suitable for fish survival'oving southward from Units 1 and 2 along the transmission route, the first stream encountered is the main channel of the unnamed stream designated Ontario 62 (Figure 2.4-4).

    This stream, with several small branches originating near Hammond's Corner, drains the farm and pastureland to the south and flows into Lake Ontario at the end of Lakeview Road. The transmission route crosses the stream about 0.5 km (0.3 mi) north of Miner Road. At this location, the stream flows through existing double 1.2-m (48-in) culverts.

    During the 1981 field reconnaissance performed by Stone Webster Engineering Corporation, it was noted that several acres were flooded upstream of the culverts. In April 1977, Sc stream through the culverts. NYSDEC has noted that, any small stream in this area may have rainbow trout in the

    ~ l spring and brown trout (S. trutta) in the fall'~~' A very small branch of the stream (Ontario 62-3) is crossed twice by the transmission line farther to the south, once about, 0.7 km (0.4 mi) south of Miner Road where it. flows through a culvert. In October 1981, this stream was very shallow (about 5 cm [2 in] deep) and less than 1 m (3 ft) across.

    It is crossed again about O.l km (0.06 mi) north of Middle Road, at which point no flows are likely during dry periods.

    No information is available about the biota of this branch of the stream.

    The second area of aquatic habitat along the transmission route is one of the main tributaries of Black Creek (Ontario 66-2) . Black Creek, originating in Volney and South Scriba, flows into the Oswego River north of'usion:

    At the point where it is crossed by the existing and future transmission lines (about 0.1 km [0.06 mi] north of O'Conner Road), the tributary flows through a dredged channel. When viewed in October 1981 (following a period of rain), the stream was about 2.4 m (8 ft) wide, 15 cm (6 in) deep, and flowed at a rate of about 30 to 60 cm/sec (1 to 2 fps). The bottom consisted of gravel and silt. Trout have been reported to occur in this section of Black Creek'~~'.

    Supplement 2 2. 4-36 June 1983

    Nine Mile Point Unit 2 ER-OI'S South of O'Conner Road and north of Hall Road, another tributary of Black Creek (Ontario 66-2-6) flows through a ditch along the center of the ezisting transmission line corridor, providing drainage for surrounding farm and pastureland. In October 1981, this ditch (about 1.8 m

    [6 ft] deep) contained a stream about 1.2 m (4 ft) wide and 13 cm (5 in) deep. No information is available on the biota of this tributary of Black Creek.

    There are no other prominent aquatic habitats along the transmission route from Unit 2 to the Volney Substation.

    All other areas that were observed to contain water were small intermittent wetlands, streams, and drainage ditches.

    None of these are likely to support an eztensive fish community, but probably provide breeding and nursery areas for some amphibians,and insects. No aquatic species on the federal list of endangered and threatened species' are known to inhabit the aquatic habitats crossed by the trans-mission route'~~'.

    Supplement 2 2.4-37 June 1983

    Nine Mile Point Unit 2 ER-OLS 2.4.3 References Bieber, A.; Bollenbacker, M. K.; Brown, J. D.; Dillon, T. A.; Dosch, D.; Elliott, C. J.; Giordano, A.; Meier, P. T.; and Smith, G. A. Habitat and Wildlife Inventory:

    Guide to Coastal Zone Lands, Oswego County, New York.

    Rice Creek Biological Field Station, Bulletin No. 4, 1976.

    2. Gotie, R. P. Port Ontario Harbor Terrestrial Vertebrate Study. New York State Department of Environmental Conservation, Bureau of Wildlife, Cortland Office, NY, 1977.
    3. Ontario Ministry of Natural Resources. Napanee District Land Use Strategy: Background Information, Ministry of Natural Resources, 1980.

    Telephone communication between T. Humberstone, Wildlife Officer, Ontario Ministry of Natural Resources, and G. Jacob, Stone 6 Webster Engineering MA, August 4, 1981.

    Corporation,'oston,

    5. Fish and Wildlife Service. List of Endangered and Threatened Wildlife and Plants. Republication, U.S.

    Department of Interior, 44FR3635-3654, January 17, 1979.

    6. Letter from P. Hamilton, U.S. Fish and Wildlife Services, Department of Interior, Cortland, NY, Septem-ber 24, 1982.
    7. Telephone communication between R. Mitchell, New York State Botanist and G. Jacob, Stone Ec Webster Engineering Corporation, Boston, MA, October 13, 1982.
    8. Burt, W. H. and Grossenheider, R. P. Field Guide to the Mammals. Houghton MifflinCompany, Boston, MA, 1964.
    9. Niagara Mohawk Power Corporation. Environmental Report, Nine Mile Point Nuclear Station, Unit 2, Construction Permit Stage, 1972.
    10. Telephone communication between A. Hicks, New York State Department of Environmental Conservation, Endangered Species Unit, Delmar, NY, and G. Jacob, Stone Sc Webster Engineering Corporation, Boston, MA, December 2, 1981.
    11. Mohr, C. ED The Status of Threatened Species of Cave-Dwelling Bats. Bulletin, National Speleological Society Vol. 34, No. 2, p 33-47

    '.4-38

    Nine Mile Point Unit 2 ER-OLS

    12. Fenton, B. and Downs, C. M. A Study of Summer Populations of the Endangered Indiana Bat, otis sodali s, near Watertown, New York. NYSDEC Wildlife

    ~M Resource Center, .Delmar, NY, 1980.

    13. Personal communication between Gary Jacobs, Stone 6 Web-ster Engineering Corporation, and Jack Moser, Wildlife Resource Center, New York Department of Environmental Conservation, Delmar, NY, December 21, 1982.
    14. Telephone communication between P. Nye, New York State Department of Environmental Conservation, Endangered Species Unit, and G. Jacob, Stone 6 Webster Engineering Corporation, Boston, MA, April 9, 1982.
    15. Endangered Species Unit. New York's Bald Eagle Restoration Project. New York State Department of En-vironmental Conservation, Division of Fish and Wildlife.

    Pamphlet FW-P137(7/80), 1980.

    16. Telephone communication between P. Bague, Cornell University Peregrine Release Program, and G. Jacob, Stone Sc Webster Engineering Corporation, Boston, MA.
    17. Smith, G. A. and Muir, D. G. Derby Hill Spring Mi-gration Update, The Kingbird Vol. 28, No. 1,, 1978, p 5-25.
    18. Conant, R. A. Field Guide to Reptiles and Amphibians of Eastern Northern America. Houghton Mifflin Company, Boston, MA, 1958.
    19. Division of Fish 6 Wildlife. Significant Wildlife Habitats in New York. New York State Department of En-vironmental Conservation. No date.
    20. Odum, E. P. Fundamentals of Ecology, Third Edition.

    W. B. Saunders Co., Philadelphia, PA, 1971.

    21. Article VII Application for Proposed Nine Mile 2-Volney 4

    765-kV Transmission Facility, Niagara Mohawk Power Corporation, March 1978.

    22. Amended Article VII Application for Proposed Nine Mile 2-Volney 345-kV Transmission Facility, Niagara Mohawk Power Corporation, April 1982.

    2.4-39

    Nine. Mile Point Unit 2 ER-OLS

    23. Telephone communication between R. P. Gotie, New York State Department of Environmental Conservation, Cortland Office, and G. Jacob, Stone 6 Webster Engineering Corporation, Boston, MA, December 7, 1981.
    24. Letter from V. Gannon and M. Corey, Oswego County En-vironmental Management, Council, Oswego, NY, December 8, 1981 Letter from R. P. Gotie, New York State Department of

    '5.

    Environmental Conservation, Bureau of Wildlife, Cortland Office, NY, November 6, 1981 Telephone communication between J. Proud, New York State

    '6.

    Department of Environmental Conservation, Cortland Office, and G. Jacob, Stone Sc Webster Engineering Corporation, Boston, MA, December 3, 1979 Quirk, Lawler Sc Matusky Engineers. 1973 Nine Mile Point

    '7.

    Aquatic Ecology Studies Nine Mile Point Generating Station. Prepared for Niagara Mohawk Power Corporation and Power Authority of the, State of New York, 1974.

    28. Lawler, Matusky 6 Skelly Engineers. 1974 Nine Mile Point Aquatic Ecology Studies. Prepared for Niagara Mohawk Power Corporation and Power Authority of the State of New York, 1975.
    29. Lawler, Matusky 6 Skelly Engineers. 1975 Nine Mile Point Aquatic Ecology Studies. Prepared for Niagara Mohawk Power Corporation and Power Authority of the State of New York, 1976.
    30. Lawler, Matusky 6 Skelly Engineers. 1976 Nine Mile Point Aquatic Ecology Studies. 2 Vols. Prepared for Niagara Mohawk Power Corporation and Power Authority of the State of New York, 1977.
    31. Texas Instruments, Inc. Nine Mile Point Aquatic Ecology Studies 1977 Annual Report. Prepared for Niagara Mohawk Power Corporation and Power Authority of the State of New York, 1978 Texas Instruments,

    '2.

    Inc. Nine Mile Point Aquatic Ecology Studies 1978 Annual Report. Prepared for Niagara Mohawk Power Corporation and Power Authority of the State of New York, 1979.

    2.4-40

    Nine Mile Point Unit 2 ER-OLS

    33. Texas Instruments, Inc. Nine Mile Point Aquatic Ecology Studies 1979 Annual Report. Prepared for Niagara Mohawk Power Corporation and Power Authority of the State of New York, 1980.
    34. Texas Instruments, Inc. Nine Mile Point Aquatic Ecology Studies 1980 Annual Report. Prepared for Niagara Mohawk Power Corporation and Power Authority of the State of New York, 1981.
    35. Texas Instruments, Inc. Nine Mile Point, Aquatic Ecology Studies 1981 Annual Report. Prepared for Niagara Mohawk Power Corporation and Power Authority of the State of New York, 1982.
    36. Reinwand, J. F. Planktonic Diatoms of Lake Ontario. In Limnological Survey of Lake Ontario, 1964. Great. Lakes Fish. Comm. Tech. Rept., 1969, Vol. 14, p 19-26.
    37. Nalewajko, C. Composition of the Phytoplankton in Sur-face Waters of Lake Ontario. J. Fish. Res. Bd. Can.,

    1966, Vol. 23, p 1715-1725.

    38. Nalewajko, C. Phytoplankton Distribution in Lake Ontario. Proc. 10th Conf. Great Lakes Res., 1967, p 63-69.
    39. Munawar, M. and Nauwerck, A. The Composition and Horizontal Distribution of Phytoplankton in Lake Ontario During the Year 1970. Proc. 14th Conf. Great Lakes Res., 1971, p 69-78.
    40. Lawler, Matusky 6 Skelly Engineers. Nine Mile Point Aquatic Ecology Study Summary (1973-1981). Prepared for Niagara Mohawk Power Corporation, 1982.
    41. Munawar, M.; Stadelman, P.; and Munawar, I. F.

    Phytoplankton Biomass, Species Composition, and Primary Production at a Near-Shore and a Mid-Lake Station of Lake Ontario During IFYGL. Proc. 17th Conf. Great Lakes, 1974, p 629-652.

    42. Lawler, Matusky Ec Skelly Engineers. 316(a) Demon-stration Submission: NPDES Permit NY 0001015: Nine Mile Point Unit 1 ~ Prepared for Niagara Mohawk Power Corporation, 1975.

    2.4-41

    Nine Mile Point Unit 2 ER-OLS

    43. Lawler, Matusky Sc Skelly Engineers. James A.

    FitzPatrick Nuclear Power Plant 316(a) Demonstration Submission: Permit, NY 0020109. Prepared for Power Authority of the State of New York, 1977.

    Smith, G. M. The Fresh-Water Algae of the United States. 2nd Edition. McGraw Hill Book Co., New York, 1950.

    45 'utchinson, G. E. A Treatise on Limnology. Chapter II.

    Introduction to I ake Geology and Limnoplankton. John Wiley and Sons, Inc., New York, 1967.

    46. Watson, N. H. F. and Carpenter, G. F. Seasonal Abun-dance of Crustacean Zooplankton and Net Plankton Biomass of Lakes Huron, Erie and Ontario. J. Fish. Res. Bd.

    Can., 1974, Vol. 31(3),, p 309-317.

    47. Patalas, K. Composition and Horizontal Distribution of Crustacean Plankton in Lake Ontario. J. Fish. Res. Bd.

    Can., 1969, Vol. 26, p 2135-2146.

    48. Scott, W. B. and Crossman, E. J. Freshwater Fishes of Canada. Fish. Res. Bd. Can. Bull., 1973, Vol. 184.
    49. Stoermer, E. F.; Bowman, M. M.; Kingston, J. C.; and Schaedel, A. L. Phytoplankton Composition and Abundance in Lake Ontario During IFYGL. U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, Environmental Monitor Ser., 1975, Vol. 660/3-75-004.
    50. Boesch, DE F.; Wass, M. L.; and Virnstein, R. W. The Dynamics of Estuarine Benthic Communities. In M. Wiley (ed.), Estuarine Processes. Vol. I. Uses, Stresses, and Adaptation to the Estuary. Academic Press, New York, 1976.
    51. Storr, J. F. Lake Ontario Fish Tag Report Summary 1972-1976. Prepared for Niagara Mohawk Power Corporation, 1977.
    52. Scott, W. B. and Christie, W. J. The Invasion of Lower Great Lakes by the White Perch 'occus americanus (Gmelin). J. Fish. Res. Bd. Can., 1963, Vol .20(5), ~

    p 1189-1195.

    53. Hubb s, C. L. and Lagler, K. F. Fishes of the Great Lakes Region. University of Michigan Press, Ann Arbor, MI, 1958.

    2.4-42

    Nine Mile Point Unit 2 ER-OLS

    54. Christie, W. J. A Review of the Changes in the Fish Species Composition of Lake Ontario. Great Lakes Fish Comm. Tech. Rept., 1973, No 23. ~
    55. New York Classification and Standards, Part 701, Title 6, Official Compilation of Codes, Rules and Regulations; amended February 21, 1974; September 20, 1974. Copyright 1975, Bureau of National Affairs, Inc.
    56. Telephone Communication between R. Unsworth and Leigh Lenard. Oswego County Environment Management Council. October 25, '1983.

    Supplement 6 2.4-43 March 1984

    Nine Mile Point Unit 2 ER-OLS TABLE 2.4-1 PHYLOGENETIC SPECIES LIST OF PLANTS RECORDED DURING 1979 FIELD SURVEY UNIT 2 SITE AND ENVIRONS'~'ycopodiaceae Polypodiaceae Onoclea m"

    sensibilis

    ~

    Sensitive fern P "" "

    Pinaceae Tsucaa canadensis Canadian hemlock Gramineae Grasses Cyperaceae Carex spp. Sedges Araceae Juncaceae

    ~Scir us spp.' Rushes Liliaceae Smilacinca racemosa -'alse Solomon's seal Trillium sp. - Trillium'~'--

    Salicaceae

    ~po ulus srremuloides Quaking aspen Salix nicira Black willow 1 of 4

    Nine Mile Point Unit 2 ER-OLS TABLE 2.4-1 (Cont)

    Juglandaceae

    ~Car a spp. Hickory Corylaceae Ainus sp. Alder Betula alle heniensis Yellow birch IBP"

    ~Car inus caroliniana Ironwood (American hornbeam)

    Fagaceae 9

    guercus velutina Black oak Ulmaceae Celtis occidenta'is Hackberry Polygonaceae Rumex acetosella Sheep sorrel Hamamelidaceae Rosaceae Amelanchier sp. Shadbush Potentilla canadensis Dwarf cinquefoil Prunus serotina Black cherry Malus sp. Apple Rubus spp. Blackberry Oxalidaceae Oxalis sp. Wood sorrel 2 of 4

    Nine Mile Point, Unit 2 ER-OLS TABLE 2.4-1 (Cont)

    Anacardiaceae, Rhus radicans Poison ivy Rhus ~t hing Staghorn sumac Aceraceae Acer saccharum Sugar maple Acer enns lvanicum Striped maple Acer rubrum Red maple Acer saccharinum Silver maple Balsaminaceae Vitaceae Vitis sp. Grape Umbelliferae Dau~s carota Wild carrot (Queen Anne's lace)

    Cornaceae Comus amomum Silky dogwood Oleaceae Fraxinus americana White ash Verbenaceae Verbena sp. Vervain Scrophulariaceae Linaria ~i@gris Toadflax (butter-and-eggs)

    Verbascum ~tha sus Common mullein Veronica officinalis Common speedwell Rubiaceae Mitchel la ~re ens Partridgeberry e 3 of 4

    Nine Mile Point Unit 2 ER-OLS TABLE 2.4-1 (Cont)

    Caprifoliaceae Viburnum acerifolium Maple-leaved viburnum Viburnum dentatum Arrowood Compositae Ambrosia artemisiifolia Ragweed Aster spp. Aster Erechtites hieracifolia Pilewort Chr santhemum leucanthemum Ox-eye daisy Solidacpo altissima Tall goldenrod

    See also Reference 1, Table 2.

    '~'Plant protected by New York State Environmental Conserva-tion Law, Section 9-1503. These plants may not be picked, plucked, severed, removed, or carried away without consent of the property owner (NMPC).

    Nine Mile Point Unit 2 ER-OLS TABLE 2 4-2

    SUMMARY

    OF OVERSTORY VEGETATION EARLY SECOND-GROWTH FOREST COVER TYPE TRANSECT 1 Relative Relative Dominance Relative Tree S ecies Density Density Frequency (Basal Area) Dominance importance Mean dbh Scientific Name Common Name ~stems/ha prepueutut ~a~a/ha Value ~cm Fraxinus americana White ash 58. 1 224. 26 90. 9 50- 0 5. 49 63 1 171 2 17 66 Malus sp. Apple 18. 6 71 79 45 4 24 9 1 68 19 3 62. 8 17. 31

    ~po ulnas Quaking aspen 16. 2 62. 53 27. 2 14 9 1 26 14 4 45. 5 16. 05 tremuloides Crataecrus sp. Hawthorn 6 9 26 63 18. 1 9.9 0 27 3 1 19.9 11 43 Total 99 8 99 7 8 7 99 9 299.4

    Nine Mile Point Unit 2 ER-OLS TABLE 2 4-3

    SUMMARY

    OF OVERSTORY VEGETATION MIXED FOREST AND SHRUBLANDS COVER TYPE TRANSECT 2 Relative Relative Dominance Relative Tree S ecies Density Density Frequency (Basal Area) Dominance Importance Mean dbh Scientific Name Common Name ~stems/ha Preguency m~/ha Value ~cm Fraxinus americana White ash 35. 0 155. 0 40 20 2.2 21 2 76. 2 13 58 prunus serotina Black cherry 22. 5 99 7 50 25 1 92 18 5 66.0 15 65 Acer saccharum Sugar maple 10 0 44 3 30 15 3 57 34 4 59 4 32. 03 Malus sp. Apple 12. 5 55.4 20 10 0.62 5 9 28 4 11 99

    ~PO ulna Quaking aspen 10. 0 44 3 20 10 0 72 6.9 26.9 14. 34 tremuloides

    ~Tsu a canadensis Eastern 2.5 11 08 10 0. 66 6.3 13. 8 27. 68 hemlock

    ~nereus velutina Black oak 2 5 11 08 10 0 44 2 11.7 22 60 Betula ~ouliyolia Gray birch 2.5 11. 08 10 0 13 1 2 8 7 12. 19 Unknown 2.5 11 08 10 0. 10 0.9 8 4 10 92 Total 100 0 100 10.36 99 5 299. 5

    Nine Mile Point Unit 2 ER-OLS TABLE 2 4-4

    SUMMARY

    OF OVERSTORY VEGETATION MIXED HARDROOD FOREST COVER TYPE TRANSECT 3 Relative Relative Dominance Relative Tree S cies Density Density Frequency (Basal Area) Dominance Importance Mean dbh Scientific Name Common Name ~% ~stems/ha Preiueuoy m~/ha ~ Value ~cm Acer saccharum Sugar maple 47 7 373.0 90 9 34. 5 6.74 24 5 106.7 37 07

    ~Po ulus Quaking aspen 15.9 124.3 54.5 20 7 8 20 29 8 66.4 29 04 tremuloides Eraxinus white ash 136 106 0 27 2 10e 3 3. 29 11 9 35 8 19 91 americana Betula Yellow birch 6 8 53 1 27 2 10 3 2 80 10- 1 27 2 26 03 Eacaus Beech 4 5 35.2 18 2 6 9 3 98 14 4 25 8 35 94 Nrandifolia setula Gray birch 68 53 1 27. 2 10. 3 1 80 6.5 23 6 20 91 Nonuiisooliilaa Salix nicira Black willow 22 172 9 0 3 4 0 45 1 6 7 2 18. 28 Acer rubrum Red maple 2 2 17 2 9 0 3~ 4 0 20 0 7 6 3 12 19 Total 99. 7 99. 8 27.46 99 5 299 0

    Nine Mile Point Unit 2 ER-OLS TABLE 2.4-5 SHALL-MAHMALTRAPPING RESULTS Transect 1 Transect 2 Transect 3 Transec 4 No. /100 No. /100 No./100 No. /100 Percent Mammal No ~Tra ni hts No. ~Tra ni h s No, ~rra ni h s No ~Tra ni h s ~oom osition

    ~Parce acus ~ieuco <<s 2 0.83 4 1.66 30 (White-footed mouse)

    ~Parce acus ~mancuia us 0.83 2.50 40 (Deer mouse)

    ~Za us hudsonicus 1. 25 15 (Meadow jumping-mouse)

    Hicrotus enns Ivanicus 0.83 10 (Meadow vole)

    Tamiasclurus hudsonicus 0.41

    ( Red squirrel)

    KEY TO TRANSECTS:

    1 = Early second-growth forest (24.9g) 2 = Transmission line ( 15.0$ )

    3 = Mixed hardwood forest (50.0'g) 4 = Open field (9.9g) 1 of 1

    'l Nine Mile Point Unit 2 ER-OLS TABLE 2. 0-6 MAMMALIANSPECIES AND MAJOR HABITAT ASSOCIATIONS IN OSWEGO COUNTY COASTAL ZONE, 1976<>>

    Mature Intermediate Shrub- New Aquatic

    ~secies scads Woods lands Field ~eetlands Moles Hairjj tail mole<i,<i Starnose moleci,<l Shrews Masked shrewcI,<>

    Smoky shrew N. water shrew Thompson's pygmy shrew Least shrew Shorttail shrew<<t>>

    Bats Silver-haired bat<<,>> X X X Keen' myotisc i> X X X Small-footed myotis X X E. Pipistrelle<<i X X Red bat X X Little brown myotis<<,>> X X Big brown bat<<i X X Hoary bat <>> X X Indiana myotis X X Carnivores Shorttail weasel<<,~>

    Longtail weasel<<,i>

    Mink<< i Red fox<<,i>

    Gray fox<<i Bobcat Coyote River otter 1 of 2

    Nine Mile Point Unit 2 ER-OLS TABLE 2.4-6 (Cont)

    Mature . Intermediate Shrub- New Aquatic

    ~secies Woods Woods lands Field dse~edacds S uirrels and Relatives Red squirrel<i,>> X X E. gray squirrel<<,~> X X E. chipmunk<<,~> X X S. flying squirrel<>> X X N. flying squirrel<<i X X Mice Voles and Rats Woodland deermouse<<>

    Prairie deermouseci) X X White-footed mouse<<,<> X X X Woodland jumping mouse<<t<> X X X Meadow jumping mouse<<,>> X X X Meadow vole<<,>> X X Boreal redback vole~i,~i X Pine vole X X House mouse and Norway Associated with human habitats rat<< ~

    Miscellaneous E. cottontail<i,ii X X Snowshoe hare X X Striped skunk<<,i> X X Porcupine<i,~i X X Muskrat<~,>>

    Virginia opossum<i,>>

    Woodchuck<<,ii Beaver<<i Whitetail deer<<,~i Raccoon<<,~>

    <<~Species likely to occur in 1.6-km (1-mi) radius of Unit 2.

    <>>Designates species that were captured or observed during Oswego inventory.

    SOURCE: Reference 1 2 of 2

    Nine Mile Point Unit 2 ER-OLS TABLE 2. 4-7 GAME AND FURBEARER SPECIES OF IMPORTANCE IN OSWEGO COUNTY Estimated Harvest Common Name Scientific Name 1980-81 Game S ecies Eastern cottontail 69, 642 Ruffed grouse Bonasa umbellus 57,970 Woodcock ~Socio ax minor 11,283 Gray squirrel Sciurus carolinensis 72,365 Varying hare ~Le us americanus 20,620 Ring-necked pheasant Phasianus colchicus 14,395 Raccoon ~Proc on inter 39,684 Red fox V~ul es fulva 2,334 Gray fox ~Uroc on cinereoar enteus 2,334 Coyote Canis latrans sp. 389 Common snipe Virginia rail Rallus limicola 2.723 Sora rail Porzana carolina Gallinule 0 Crow Corvus brach rh nchos 0 White-tailed deer (380)(2)

    Canada goose Branta canadensis 31,903 (2,575)'3i Approximately 28 species 90, 262 of waterfowl (15,141)'3'urbearer S ecies Mink Mustela vison 2, 897 Muskrat Beaver Ondatra zibethica Castor canadensis ill, 435 (322) ( 2 )

    River otter Lutra canadensis (8)(2)

    Raccoon ~Proc on later 23,416 Striped skunk ~Me hitis ~me hitis 3,530 Red fox V~ul es fulva 4,307 Gray fox proc on cinereoar enteus 3 '71 1 of 2

    Nine Mile Point Unit 2 ER-OLS TABLE 2.4-7 (Cont)

    Estimated Harvest Common Name Scientific Name 1980-81<~'oyote Canis latrans, sp. (26)<a>

    Fisher Martea pennanti (19)<a>

    Bobcat ~Lnx rufus (0)<2)

    Opossum 5,703

    'Game species survey area includes the Lake Plain physiographic region within Region 7 of NYSDEC.

    Furbearer species survey area includes all of Region 7.

    'Survey area includes licensed trappers in Oswego County only.

    'Waterfowl harvested in Oswego County.

    NOTE: Importance defined by protection through regu-lated hunting and trapping seasons established by NYSDEC.

    SOURCES: References 2 and 25 2 of 2

    Nine Mile Point Unit 2 ER-OLS TABLE 2.4-8 CHECKLIST OF AVIAN SPECIES AND THEIR OCCURRENCE IN OSWEGO COUNTY COASTAL ZONE

    ~sec ice Common Name Sea sona I Status Gav a immer Common loon W H eau e ~s ella a Red-throated loon H

    ~Pod ce s ~rise ena Red-necked grebe H

    ~fod ce s auri tus Horned grebe W H

    ~Pod l mbus ~od i ca s Pied-billed grebe 8 W H Pulmarus Blacialis Northfulmar fulmar V Pelecanus occidental is Brown pel ican V Phalacrocorax carbo Great cormorant V phalacrocorax a~ul'i us Double-crested corm orant W H S Ardea herodias Great blue heron M S

    ~eu orides str atua Green heron 8 M Flor da caerulea Little blue heron V Bubu cus ibis Cattle egret H Casmerodius albus Great egret H S

    ~dretta thule Snowy egret V

    ~Hdramassa tricolor Louisiana heron V

    ~ll cticorax ~nc icorax Black-crowned night heron H S

    ~lxobr cus exl is Least bittern 8 H American bittern 8 M

    ~Ple adis rale nel los Glossy ibis V Canus otor Mute swan V Olo columbianus .Whistling swan M

    ~Bran a cansdensis Canada goose 8 W M Branta bernicla Brant H Chen caerulescens Snow goose H Ha I lard 8 W H Anas ~rubr es Black duck 8 W M Anas ~stre era Gadwall W M Anas acuta Pintail W H Anas crecca Green-winged teal H Anas discors Blue-winged teal 8 M Anas americana American widgeon H Anas c~l eats Northern shoveler H Aix s onsa Wood duck 8 H

    ~A~h americana Redhead W H

    ~Ash co I a ris Ring-necked duck H

    ~At~h va I sineria Canvasback W H

    ~Ash mar la Greater scaup W H

    ~At~h aff nis Lesser scaup W H A~t~ha ~fu i << la Tufted duck V

    ~ence naia ~clan uia Common g rack I e W H

    ~ence hale islandica Barrow's goldeneye W M 1 of 7

    Nine Mile Point Unit 2 ER-OLS TABLE 2.4-8 (Cont)

    ~eec ice Common Name Seasona I a us

    ~B<<ce hats a loco la Bufflehead W

    ~lan ula ~hams is Oldsquaw W Histrionicus h strionicus Harlequin duck V Somateria mol I ss ma Common eider V Somateria ~sectah i is King eider W Melan rta d~e land White-winged scoter W Melan tta ers ic I lata Surf scoter W Melan tta nicira Black scoter W

    ~ox ura jamaicensis Ruddy duck W

    ~to hod tes ~c<<cells us Hooded merganser W M~ar <<s ~mer sneer Common merganser W M~er <<s serrator Red-breasted merganser W Catha tes aura Turkey vulture 8 CoracrOps atra tus Black vulture V slane des ~rorfica <<s Swallow-tailed kite V A~co ter Gentii is Goshawk W M A~co ter ~stria us Sharp-shinned hawk 8 W H A~cc iter choo erii Cooper's hawk 8 W H

    ~eu eo jamaicensis Red-tailed hawk 8 W M Buteo lineatus Red-shouldered hawk M a<<tao ~lac rerus Broad-winged hawk 8 H Buteo swa insoni Swainson's hawk V euteo ~ia o us Rough-legged hawk W H A~ui la c~hr saetos Golden eagle M Ha liaeetus leucoce halus Bald eagle W M S

    <<i rcus c~aneus Ma rsh hawk 8 H Pandion ha I iaetus Osprey H S Fa leo rusticolus Gyrfa Icon V Fa co ~ere rinus Peregrine falcon M Fa co columba rius Meri in Fa co ~sar<<eries American kestrel 8 W H Bonasa umbellus Ruffed grouse Phasianus colchicus Ring-necked pheasant Grus canadensis Sandhill crane V Ra llus limicola Virginia rail 8 H Porzana carol ina So ra 8 H Ga I I inula ~chl ore <<s Common gallinule 8 H Fulica americana American coot W M Cha radr us semi a Imatus Semipa lmated plover H Cha radr us melodus Piping plover H Cha radr us vociferus Killdeer 8 M Pul via I s dominica American golden plover H Pulvia I s ~sua arola Black-bellied plover M Arenaria ~inter res Ruddy turnstone M Philohela minor American woodcock 8 M 2of7

    Nine Mile Point Unit 2 ER-OLS TABLE 2.4-8 (Cont)

    ~aectes Common arne Seasonal atus

    ~Ca ella ~al I ina o Common snipe H Numenius ~haeo <<s Whimbre I H

    ~ear ramie ~Ion icauda Upland sandpiper H

    ~Ac is macularla Spotted sandpiper M

    ~Tr n a sol i teria Solitary sandpiper H

    ~Tr n a melanoleuca Greater yellowlegs H

    ~Tr n a ~f la<<i es Lesser yellowlegs H Willet V Ca ladr s canutus Red knot H Ca ladr s ~mari ima Purple sandpiper M Ca ladr s melanotos Pectora I sandpiper H Ca ladr s fuscicollis Wh i te- rump ed sandpiper H Ca ladr s bairdii Baird's sandpiper H Ca ladr s minutilla Least sandpiper H Ca lad r s ~al ina Ounlin H Ca I adr a p<<s I is Semipa Imated sandpiper H Ca ladr s mauri Western sandpiper H Caladr s alba Sander I ing H L mnodromus gr acus Short-billed dowitcher M L mnodromus ~sco le ace<<a Long-billed dowitcher H

    ~Nero slams ~<<mant<< <<s Stilt sandpiper H

    ~Tr n es subruficollis Buff-breasted sandpiper H Limosa fedoa Marbled godwit V Limosa ~haemas ica Hudsonian godwit H

    ~fhalaro <<s ful carius Red phalarope H

    ~Ste sno us tricolor Wilson's phalarope H

    ~Lob es I<<bat<<a Northern phalarope H Stercorar us gomarinus pomarine jaeger M Stercorar us paresis icus parasitic jaeger H Stercorar <<s ~ton casu<<a Long-tailed jaeger V Larus ~barbarous Glaucous gull W H Larus glee<<<<ides Iceland gull W M t.a rus ma r inus Great black-backed gull W M S Larus ~ar en a <<s Herrin~ gull W M S Larus ~tha eri Thayer s gull W La rus de I awa rens i s Ring-billed gull W H S Larus rid bundus Black-headed gull V Larus atr ci I la Laughing gull V La rue ~xcan Franklin's gull M S Bonapartes gull H S Larus minutus Little gull M R ssa ~tridact la Black-legged kittiwake H Sterna ~fors eri Forster's tern H Sterna hirundo Common tern H Sterna ~cas ia Caspian tern M 3of7

    Nine Mile Point Unit 2 ER-OLS TABLE 2.4-8 (Cont)

    ~secies Common Name Sea sona I Status Chlidonias ~ni er Black tern 8 M Columba livia Rock dove R Zenaida macroura Hourning dove 8 W M

    ~coco zes americanus Yellow-billed cuckoo 8 M

    ~Cocc zus e thro ha lmus Black-billed cuckoo 8 M Otus asio Screech owl Bubo ~vir inianus Great horned owl

    ~Hc ea scendiaca Snowy owl W M Strix varia Barred owl 8 W H As o otus Long-eared owl W M S As o f lammeus Short,-eared owl M A~callus funereus Boreal owl V A~eol ius acadicus Saw-whet owl W C~ar mul <<s vociferus Whippoorwill M Chor.eiles minor Common nighthawk 8 M Cnaetura ~eia ca Chimney swift 8 M Archilochus colubris Ruby-throated hummingbird 8 M Neceacer le ~ale on Belted kingfisher 8 W M

    ~Cola tes auratus Common flicker 8 M

    ~or oco us ~iles us Pileated woodpecker

    ~xelaner es carol inus Red-bellied woodpecker

    ~Melaner es er threes holus Red-headed woodpecker 8

    ~eh ra icus varius Yellow-bellied sapsucker P coides villosus Hairy woodpecker 8 W P co des Bubescens Downy woodpecker 8 W p co des a~re cus Black-backed three-toed V woodpecker T~ranncs ~trannus Eastern kingbird 8 M

    ~xiarchus crinitus Great crested flycatcher 8 M ornis phoebe Eastern phoebe 8 M Ye I I ow-be I I i ed f I yea tche r

    ~Sa

    ~Em idonax flaviventris M

    ~Em donax virescens Acadian flycatcher V

    ~Em idonax trail I i i Wi I low flycatcher 8 M

    ~Em idonax a lnorum Alder flycatcher 8 H

    ~Em idonax minimus Least flycatcher 8 M C~onto us v rene Eastern wood pewee 8 H Nuttal lornis borealis Olive-sided flycatcher M

    ~Eremo hi la ~al es ris Horned lark 8 W M

    ~Trido rocne bicolor Tree swa I low 8 M

    ~Rar a ~ri ar a Bank swa I low 8 M S el ido ter x ruficollis Rough-winged swa I low 8 M H rundo rustica Barn swa I low 8 M Petrochel don BErrhonota Cliff swallow M

    ~Pro ne subis Purple martin 8 M

    ~Canocitta cristata Blue jay 8 W M 4of7

    Nine Mile Point Unit 2 ER-OLS TABLE 2.4-8 (Cont)

    ~secies Common Name Seasonal Status Corvus corax Common raven V Corvus brach rh nchos Common crow B W H Parus atrica i I lus Black-capped chickadee B W H Parus hudsonicus Borea I chickadee W H Parus bicolor Tufted titmouse B W H

    ~SI a carol inensis White-breasted nuthatch B W M Sitta canadensis Red-breasted nuthatch B W H Certhia fami I iaris Brown creeper B W M

    ~Tro lod tes aedon House wren B M

    ~Too lod tes ~ro lod tes Winter wren B M

    ~fhr othorus ludovicianus Carolina wren B W H cistothorus palustris Long-billed marsh wren B H Himus gcollloottttuuss Mockingbird H Dumetella carolinensis Gray catbird B H Toxostoma rufum Brown thrasher B M Turdus ~mi ratorius Amer ican robin B W H

    ~Havoc chla ~mus el ina Wood thrush B H catharus gout<<sue Hermit thrush H oathares ~<<st<<la <<s Swainson's thrush M Catharus minimus Gray-cheeked thrush H Catharus fuscescens Vee ry B H Sial ia sial is Eastern bluebird B M

    ~relic t ia caerutea Blue-gray gnatcatcher B H Relllltus ~astra a Golden-crowned kinglet B W H Rereulus calendula Ruby-crowned kinglet H

    ~an hus ~sino letta Water pipit H B~omb cilia garrulus Bohemian waxwing W M

    ~Bomb ci I la cedrorum Cedar waxwing B W M Lan us ~excubi or Northern shrike W M Lanius Iudovicianus Loggerhead shrike H arum<<a ~vugg ar s Starl ing R H V reo flavifrons Yel low-throated vireo B H V reo sol itarius Sol itary vireo H V reo ol ivaceus Red-eyed vireo H V reo hi ladel hicus Philadelphia vireo H V reo g Ivus Warbl ing vireo H Hnioti I lta var Ia Black-and-white warbler M Protonotaria citrea Prothonotary warbler V

    ~Helm heros vermivorus Worm-eating warbler V Verm vora c~hr so tera Golden-winged warbler H Ve rm vora ~inus Blue-winged warbler M Ve rm vora ~ere rina Tennessee wa rb le r M Verm vora celata Orange-crowned warbler H Verm vora ~rufica illa Nashvi I le warbler M Parula americana Northern parula H 5of7

    Nine Mile Point Unit 2 ER-OLS TABLE 2.4-8 (Cont)

    ~aecies Common Name Seasona I Status Oendroica petechia Yel low warbler Oendroica ~ma nolle Magnol ia warbler Dendroica ~i rina Cape May warbler Oendroica caerulescens Black-throated blue wa rb le r Oendroica ~corona a Yellow-rumped warbler W Oendroica virens Black-throated green 8 wa rb I er Oendro ca cerulea Cerulean warbler H Oendro ca fusca Blackburnian warbler M Oendro ca dominica Yellow-throated warbler V Oendro Chestnut-sided warbler M Oendro ca castanea Bay-breasted warbler Dendro ca ~sr ata Blackpol I warbler H Oendro ca prnus Pine warbler H Oendro ca discolor Prairie warbler V Oendro ca galmarum Palm warbler H Ovenbird M Se urus noveboracensis Northern waterthrush M Se urus motacilla Louisiana waterthrush V

    ~Goree s alt I is Connecticut warbler H

    ~corno s h ladel hia Mourning warbler H

    ~Geo th I is trichas Common yellowthroat H W I son a citrrna Hooded warbler H W Ison a pus I la Wilson's warbler M W Ison a canadensis Canada warbler H

    ~Se >~o>hara rutici I la American redstart H Passer domesticus House sparrow

    ~pc I i on x o~rzivorus Bobolink 8 M Sturne I I a ~arcana Eastern meadowlark 8 W H

    ~aurne I I a nece I acta Western meadowlark 8 V

    ~Ae la us phaeniceus Red-winged blackbird 8 W M Icterus ~surius Orchard oriole V

    ~lc erus ga ionia Northern oriole 8 M

    ~Eu ha <<s carol nus Rusty blackbird M guiscatus gulscula Common grackle 8 W Molothrus ater Brown-headed cowbird 8 W M

    ~Pil'an a olivacea Scarlet tanager 8 H Cardinalis cardinal is Cardina I

    ~pheon icos I idovicianus Rose-breasted grosbeak 8 Passerine c~anea Indigo bunting 8

    ~Siza americana Oickcissel V Evening grosbeak W

    ~Car odacus ~ur ursus Purple finch 8 W

    ~car odacus mexicanus House finch V 6of7

    Nine Hi le Point Unit 2 ER-OLS TABLE 2.4-8 (Cont)

    ~zecies Common Name Seasonal S atus Pinicola enucleator Pine grosbeak W M Carduel s hornemannii Hoa ry redpo I I Carduel s flammea Common redpoll W H Ca rd uel s ginus Pine siskin W H Ca rd ue I s tristis American goldfinch B W H Lox a curvirostra Red crossbill W H Lox a ~leuco tera White-winged crossbill W H

    ~pi I o er thro h ha lmus Rufous-sided towhee B H Passerculus sandwichensis Savannah sparrow B M Ammodramus savanna rum Grasshopper sparrow B H Ammodramus henslowii Henslow's sparrow B M

    ~samos iza caudacuta Sharp-tailed sparrow V Pooecetes ramineus Vesper sparrow B H dunce ~hema I is Dark-eyed junco B W H

    ~ate l la aroo res Tree spa rrow W H

    ~stella passerine Chipping sparrow B H

    ~ate l la da I I ida Clay-colored sparrow

    ~Szet a pus i ta Field sparrow B M zonotr ch a pustule Harris's sparrow M Zonotr ch a ~leuco hr s White-crowned sparrow H Zonotr ch a albicol I is White-throated sparrow B W M Passerel la i I iaca Fox spa r row

    ~neios za I inco lni I Lincoln's sparrow H

    ~halos za ~ocr ana Swamp spa rrow B M

    ~helot za melod a Song spa rrow B W H Ca lear us ~la onicus Lapland longspur W H Plectro henax niva lis Snow bunting W KEY: R = Resident H = Migrant B = Breeder V = Vagrant W = Winterer S = Summering nonbreeder SOURCE: Reference 1 7of7

    n Nine Mile Point Unit 2 ER-OLS TABLE 2 0-9 GENERALIZED HABITAT ASSOCIATIONS OF MAJOR BREEDING SPECIES IN THE VICINITY OF UNIT 2 Lake Ontario Littoral and Shore Killdeer Belted kingfisher Rough-winged swallow Spotted sandpiper Bank swallow Barn swallow sasshes Pied-billed grebe Blue-winged teal Black tern Least bittern Marsh hawk Long-billed marsh wren American bittern Virginia rail Common yellowthroat Canada goose Sora Red-winged blackbird Mallard Common gallinule Swamp sparrow Black duck Common snipe Other Wetlands Pied-billed grebe Blue-winged teal American woodcock Green heron Wood duck Common snipe American bittern Turkey vulture Belted kingfisher Canada goose Marsh hawk Alder flycatcher Mallard Virginia rail Red-winged blackbird Black duck Common gallinule Swamp sparrow Swam Woodlands and Ve Wet Woods Wood duck Barred owl Northern waterthrust Screech owl Other Woodlands Sharp-shinned hawk<<> Least flycatcher Red-eyed vireo Cooperls hawk Eastern wood peewee Black-and-white warbler Red-tailed hawk Blue jay Black-throated green Broad-winged hawk Black-capped chickadee warbler<< i Ruffed grouse White-breasted nuthatch Cerulean warbler Screech owl Red-breasted nuthatch<<i Blackburnian warbler<<>

    Great horned owl Brown creeper Pine warbler Ruby-throated hummingbird Winter wren<< > Ovenbird Pileated woodpecker Wood thrush Hooded warbler Red-bellied woodpecker Veery canada warbler Red-headed woodpecker Blue-gray gnatcatcher American redstart Hairy woodpecker Golden-crowned Northern oriole Downy woodpecker kinglet<>> Scarlet tanager Great crested flycatcher Yellow-throated vireo Rose-breasted grosbeak 1 of 2

    Nine Mile Point Unit 2 ER-OLS TABLE 2.4-9 (Cont) shrublands Red-tailed hawk Willow flycatcher Chestnut-sided warbler American kestrel Blue jay Common yellowthroat Ring-necked pheasant House wren Cardinal American woodcock Gray catbird Indigo bunting Mourning dove Brown thrasher Rufous-sided towhee Yellow-billed cuckoo American robin Dark-eyed junco Black-billed cuckoo Cedar waxwing Chipping sparrow Ruby-throated hummingbird Golden-winged warbler White-throated sparrow Common flicker Blue-winged warbler Song sparrow Downy woodpecker Yellow warbler Active Farmlands and Associated Areas Red-tailed hawk Barn swallow Eastern meadowlark American kestrel Purple martin<>> Red-winged blackbird King-necked pheasant Common crow Common grackle Killdeer House wren Brown-headed cowbird Upland sandpiper American robin American goldfinch Mourning dove Eastern bluebird Savannah sparrow Common flicker Starling Grasshopper sparrow Eastern kingbird Warlling vireo Henslow's sparrow Eastern phoebe Yellow warbler Vesper sparrow Horned lark Common yellowthroat Chipping sparrow Tree swallow House sparrow Field sparrow Residential and Develo ed Areas Rock dove Eastern phoebe House sparrow Common nighthawk American robin Red-winged blackbird Chimney swift Starling Common grackle

    <<~Present only in mixed areas with hemlock and/or other conifers present.

    <<>Present only in mixed areas with pine present.

    <>>Breeds only adjacent to water.

    SOURCE: Reference 1 2 of 2

    Nine Mile Point, Unit. 2 ER-OLS TABLE 2.4-10 HABITAT ASSOCIATIONS FOR AVIAN SPECIES OCCURRING DURING NONBREEDING SEASONS IN THE VICINITY OF UNIT 2 Lake Ontario Wet- Wood- Shrub- Farm- Developed

    ~seciee Shore Lands Lands Lands Lands Areas Common loon Red-throated loon Red-necked grebe X Horned grebe X Pied-billed grebe Double-crested comorant Great blue heron X X Green heron X X Cattle egret X X Great egret X Black-crowned night heron X Least bittern X American bittern Whistling swan X X Canada goose X X Brant X Snow goose X X Mallard X X Black duck X X Gadwall X X Pintail X X Green-winged teal Blue-winged teal American widgeon Northern shoveler X X Wood duck X X Redhead X X 1 oS 10

    Nine Mile Point Unit 2 ER-OLS TABLE 2.4-10 (Cont)

    Lake Ontario Wet- Wood- Shrub- Farm- Developed

    ~Secies Shore Lands Lands Lands Lands Areas Ring-necked duck X X Canvasback X X Greater scaup X Lesser scaup X Common goldeneye Barrow's goldeneye X Bufflehead X Oldsquaw X King eider X White-winged scoter X Surf scoter X Black scoter X Ruddy scoter X Hooded merganser Common merganser Red-breasted merganser Turkey vulture X Goshawk X Sharp-shinned hawk X X X Cooper's hawk X X X Red-tailed hawk X Red-shouldered hawk Broad-winged hawk X Rough-legged hawk X X X Golden eagle X X X Bald eagle X X Marsh hawk X Osprey X Peregrine falcon X .X Merlin X X 2 of 10

    0 Nine Mile Point Unit 2 ER-OLS TABLE 2.4-10 (Cont)

    Lake Ontario Wet- Wood- Shrub- Farm- Developed

    ~Secies. Shore Lands Lands Lands Lands Areas American kestrel X Ruffed grouse Ring-necked pheasant Virginia rail X Sora X Common gallinule X American coot X Semipalmated plover X Piping plover X Killdeer X American gold-en plover Black-bellied plover X Ruddy turnstone American woodcock X X Common snipe X X Whimbrel Upland sandpiper Spotted sandpiper Solitary sandpiper Greater yellowlegs Lesser yellowlegs X Redknot X Purple sandpiper Pectoral sandpiper White-rumped sandpiper Baird's sandpiper 3 of 10

    Nine Nile Point Unit 2 ER-OLS TABLE 2.4-10 (Cont)

    Lake Ontario Wet- Wood- Shrub- Farm- Developed

    ~Sec ice Shore Lands Lands Lands Lands Areas Least sandpiper X Dunlin X Semipalmated sandpiper Western sandpiper X Sanderling X Short-billed dowitcher Stilt sandpiper Buff-breasted sandpiper Hudsonian godwit X Red phalarope X Wilson's phalarope Northern phalarope Pomarine jaeger X Parasitic jaeger X Glaucous gull X X Iceland gull X X Great black-backed gull X X Herring gull X X Ringed-billed gull Franklin' gull Bonaparte's gull X Little gull X Black- legged kittiwake Forster's tern X Common tern X X Caspian tern X X Black tern X X 4 of 10

    Nine Mile Point. Unit 2 ER-OLS TABLE 2.4-10 (Cont)

    Lake Ontario Wet- Wood- Shrub- Farm- Developed

    ~Secies Shore Lands Lands Lands Lands Areas Rock dove Mourning dove X Yellow-billed cuckoo X Black-billed cuckoo Screech owl Great horned owl Snowy "owl Barred owl Long-eared owl X(1)

    Short-eared owl X X Saw-whet owl X X Whippoorwill X Common nighthawk Chimney swift Ruby-throated hummingbird Belted kingfish Common flicker Pileated woodpecker Red-bellied woodpecker Red-headed woodpecker Yellow-bellied sapsucker Hairy woodpecker Downy woodpecker Eastern kingbird X 5 of 10

    0 Nine Mile Point Unit 2 ER-OLS TABLE 2.4-10 (Cont)

    Lake Ontario Wet- Wood- Shrub- Farm- Developed

    ~Secies S11cre Lands Lands Lands Lands Areas Great crested flycatcher Eastern phoebe Yellow-bellied flycatcher X Trail's (type) flycatcher'~'east X

    flycatcher Eastern wood peewee X Olive-sided flycatcher Horned lark X X X Tree swallow X X X X X Bank swallow X X X X X Rough-winged swallow X X X X Barn swallow X X X X Cliff swallow Purple martin X X X X Blue Common j aycrow X X X X

    X X

    X X

    Black-capped chickadee X Boreal chickadee Tufted titmouse White-breasted nuthatch Red-breasted nuthatch Brown creeper X X X House wren X X X Winter wren X X X Carolina wren X X Long-billed marsh wren 6 of 10

    0 Nine Mile Point Unit 2 ER-OLS TABLE 2.4-10 (Cont)

    Lake Ontario Wet- Wood- Shrub- Farm- Developed

    ~S'ecies Shore Lands Lands Lands Lands Areas Short-billed marsh wren X Mockingbird X X Gray catbird X X Brown thrasher American robin X X X Wood thrush X X Hermit thrush X X Swainson's thrush Gray-cheeked thrush X X Veery X X Eastern bluebird Blue-gray gnatcatcher X-Golden-crowned kinglet Ruby-crowned kinglet Water pipit Cedar waxwing Northern shrike Loggerhead shrike X X X Starling X X X Yellow-throated vireo Solitary vireo Red-eyed vireo Philadelphia vireo Warbling vireo Black- and-white warbler 7 of 10

    Nine Mile Point Unit 2 ER-OLS TABLE 2.4-10 (Cont)

    Lake Ontario Wet- Wood- Shrub- Farm- Developed

    ~seciee Shore Lands Lands Lands Lands Areas Golden-winged warbler Blue-winged warbler Tennessee warbler Orange-crowned warbler Nashville warbler Northern parula X Yellow warbler Magnolia warbler Cape May warbler Black-throated blue warbler Yellow-rumped warbler Bl ack- throated green warbler Cerulean warbler Blackburnian warbler Chestnut-sided warbler X Bay-breasted warbler Blackpoll warbler Pine warbler Palm warbler X X Ovenbird X X Northern waterthrush X' Connecticut warbler X X 8 of 10

    0 Nine Mile Point Unit 2 ER-OLS TABLE 2.4-10 (Cont)

    Lake Ontario Wet- Wood- Shrub- Farm- Developed

    ~sec ice Shore Lands Lands Lands Lands Areas Mourning warbler X Common yellowthroat Hooded warbler Wilson's warbler Canada warbler American redstart House sparrow X Bobolink X Eastern meadowlark Red-winged blackbird Northern oriole X Rusty blackbird Common grackle Brown-headed cowbird X Scarlet tanager X X Cardinal X X Rose-breasted grosbeak Ind3.go bunting Evening grosbeak X X X Purple finch X X X Pine grosbeak Common redpoll Pine siskin 9 of 10

    Nine Mile Point Unit 2 ER-OLS TABLE 2.4-10 (Cont)

    Lake Ontario Wet- Wood- Shrub- Farm- Developed

    ~secies Shore Lands Lands Lands Lands Areas American goldfinch X Red crossbill X White-winged crossbill Rufous-sided towhee X Savannah sparrow Grasshopper sparrow Henslow's sparrow Vesper sparrow X Dark-eyed junco X X X Tree sparrow'hipping X X sparrow Field sparrow .

    White-crowned sparrow White-throated sparrow X X Fox sparrow X X Lincoln's sparrow Swamp sparrow X Song sparrow X Lapland longspur X Snow bunting X

    Pine plantations.

    '~'Includes willow and alder flycatcher.

    SOURCE: Reference 1 10 of 10

    Nine Hi le Point Unit 2 ER-OLS TABLE 2.4-11 ROADSIDE COUNT AND BREEDING BIRD CENSUS FOR AREAS ADJACENT TO UNIT 2 SITE, 1976 Roadside Count Town of Scriba Breedin Bird Stri Census Individua ls hr

    ( Individuals Wa lker West Bayshore Scriba

    ~Sec ies Observed Ra i I road Nine Hi le Beach Shrub Woods Green heron 0.8 0.2 Ma I la rd 0.3 0.2 2.0 Wood duck 0.3 Red-tailed hawk 0.3 Broad-winged hawk 0.3 Harsh hawk 0.3 Ruffed grouse 0.5 Killdeer 1 0.3 2.0 Rock dove 0.2 1.0 Hourning dove 3 0.5 1.0 Common flicker 4 0.8 1.0 1.0 Hairy woodpecker 1 0.5 1.0 Downy woodpecker 1 0.5 0.3 1.0 Great-crested f'lycatcher 12 0.3 2.0 1.0 2.0 Eastern phoebe 2 0.5 1.0 1.0 Willow flycatcher 5 0.3 1.2 3.0 2.0 Least flycatcher 2 0.6 2.0 3.0 Eastern wood peewee 10 0.6 2.7 3.0 Tree swa I low 0.5 Ba rn swa I I ow 31 0.5 Purple martin 0.5 Blue jay 12 0.5 0.8 1.0 2.0 Common crow 11 0.5 0.6 1.0 Black-capped chickadee 2 0.6 0.6 1.0 House wren 26 3.6 5.6 2.0 5.0 Gray catbird 24 3.6 2.4 2.0 5.0 American robin 40 1.5 9.6 2.0 Wood thrush 31 2.1 2.6 1.0 2.0 Swainson's thrush 0.1 Vee ry 16 2.7 4.4 4.0 Cedar waxwing 14 0.4 2.0 1.0 2.0 Starl ing 17 0.9 1.0 4.0 1.0 Ye I I ow-throa ted v i reo 0.5 Red-eyed vireo 18 2.1 7.4 1.0 3.0 Warbling vireo 6 0.3 1.0 1.0 Black and white warbler 1.4 Golden-winged warbler 3 0.3 1.0 2.0 Ye I low wa rb le r 46 6.0 3.8 6.0 6.0 1 of 2

    Nine Nile Point Unit 2 ER-OLS TABLE 2.4-11 (Cont)

    Roadside Count Town of Scr Iba Breedin Bird Stri Census Individuals hr

    ( Individuals Wa I ke r west Bayshore Scriba

    ~Secies Observed Ra i I road Nine Mile Beach Shrub Woods Black-throated green wa rb le r 0.3 Cerulean warbler 0.8 Ruby-throa ted hummingb i rd 4 East,em kingbird 6 White-breasted nuthatch 2 Brown thrasher 1 Ovenbird 2 0.5 1.8 2.0 Common yellow throat 22 1.3 2.0 2.0 5.0 Hooded warbler 0.3 2.0 American redstart 10 2.3 10. 4 1.0 9.0 Bobolink 13 0.3 1.0 Eastern meadow lark 10 0.3 2.0 House spa rrow 9 Red-winged blackbird 45 1.1 8.0 4.0 Northern oriole 15 2.3 1.0 2.0 Common grackle 7 0.5 2.0 1.0 Brown-headed cowbird 8 0.3 2.0 1.0 Scarlet tanager 1 1.0 2.0 Card ina I 0.5 1.0 Rose-breasted grosbeak 2 0.5 2.0 Indigo bunting 2.0 3.0 Purple finch 0.5 American goldfinch 22 1.0 3.0 2.0 3.0 Rufous-sided towhee 12 0.5 0.8 1.0 1.0 Savannah sparrow 1.0 Dark-eyed junco 0.3 Chipping sparrow 0.3 1.0 Field sparrow 0.5 1.0 1.0 White-crowned sparrow 1.0 Swamp sparrow 2.1 Song sparrow 1.0 3.0 3.0 SOURCE: Reference 1 2of2

    Nine Mile Point Unit 2 ER-OLS TABLE 2.4-12 BIRD OF PREY NESTING IOCATIONS

    ~sec ice Location and Comment Turkey vulture 1. Butterfly Swamp Pair present

    2. Deer Creek Marsh Pair present Sharp-shinned hawk Milea Beach Woods, north of Alcan-Pair present, defense behavior against, intruders
    2. Noyes Woods - Pair present
    3. Kelley Road Woods - Pair present Cooper's hawk 1. Milea Beach Woods Adult female present
    2. Butterfly Swamp Two adults at nest containing two well-grown young. Located in a hemlock on old dunes in northern section, at least one fledged.

    Ped-tailed hawk Snake Swamp Woods Pair present, nest found

    2. Milea Beach Woods, near Central Teal Marsh Pair present
    3. Walker Woods Pair present*
    4. Scriba Woods Pair at nest con-taining two well-grown young*
    5. Shore Oaks Woods Pair present
    6. Butterfly Swamp Wood Fringe Pair present
    7. Sage Creek Woods - Pair present
    8. Deer Creek Area Two pairs present Broad-winged hawk South Blind Creek Cove Woods Pair present Marsh hawk Deer Creek Marsh Adult female present
    2. South Pond Wetlands Pair present at nest with three large young; All young fledged American kestrel Camp Hollis Area Pair present at nest
    2. West Campus Brushlands Pair present 1 of 2

    'I Nine Mile Point Unit 2 ER-OLS TABLE 2.4-12 (Cont)

    ~sec ice Location and Comment American kestrel 3 ~ East Oswego Shrublands Pair (Cont) present Central Teal Marsh Fringe Pair present

    5. Bayshore Shrublands Pair present*,
    6. Power Line Corridor Pair present*
    7. South Miner Farm Area Pair present at nest,
    8. North New Haven Farmlands at Demster Beach Pair present
    9. Central Butterfly Swamp Pair present
    10. Rose's Farmlands Pair present
    11. East Sandy Pond Farmlands Pair present Screech owl l. Snake Swamp Two birds present bird present
    2. Teal Marsh One
    3. Nine Mile Point Woods Two birds present*

    Great hor'ned owl 1. Snake Swamp Two birds present

    2. Milea Beach Woods Two adults, one fledged young 3 ~ Parkhurst Woods Two birds present*

    4, Shore Oaks Woods Two birds present

    5. Sage Creek Woods Two birds present Barred owl 1. Health Camp Marsh Pair present
    2. Butterfly Swamp Pair present
    3. Deer Creek Marsh Pair present
    • Proximal to Unit 2 site.

    NOTE: Nesting definite only where nest found; other breeding is assumed by adult presence.

    SOURCE: Reference 1 2 of 2

    Nine Mile Point Unit 2 ER-OLS TABLE 2.II-13 HERPETOFAUNA COMMONLY OCCURRING IN THE OSWEGO COUNTY. COASTAL ZONE Occurrence on Unit 2 Site or in Common Name Scientific Name Ad 'acen Env i rons

    ~Re tiles Snapping turtle ~Che l dra ~ser entina Likely Bog turtle ~clean s m~uhlenber Unlikely Wood turtle ~ciemm s ~inscul a Likely Spotted turtle ~Gleam s guttata Likely Map turtle ~Gra tern s ~eo ra hica Unlikely Midland painted turtle ~chr sem s Dier.a m~ar inata Most likely Easter spiny softshell ~Triton x ~siniferus ~sn ferus Unlikely turtle Red-bellied snake Storeria occi i omaculata Likely Northern brown snake Storeria ~deka Host I ikely Northern water snake Ratr x ~si edox Most likely Eastern garter snake ~fhamno h s serta lie Host likely Eastern ribbon snake ~Thamno h s sauritus Host likely Eastern hognose snake Reterodon ~lat rh nos Unlikely Northern r ingneck snake ~cade h s ~uncta <<s Likely Northern black racer Coluber ~cons ric or Unlikely Smooth green snake ~Oheodr s vernal is Most likely Black rat snake ~tla he obsolete Unlikely Eastern mi lk snake Most likely Timber rattlesnake Crota lus horridus Likely A~m hlblsns Hudpuppy Nectionus maculosus Likely Red-spotted newt ~Diem ct lus v ridescens Most likely Blue-spotted salamander ~Amb stoma latera le Likely Jefferson salamander ~Amb stoma effersonianum Likely Dusky salamander Likely Allegheny mountain Likely salamander Red-backed salamander Plethodon cinereus Most I ikely Slimy salamander flethodon glutinosus Likely Northern spring Like ly salamander Four-toed sa lamander Likely Spotted sa lamander A~me stoma maculatum Likely Northern two-I ined Rurucea ~bi el Ines a Most likely sa I amander American toad Bufo americanus Most likely 1 of 2

    0 Nine Mi le Point Unit 2 ER-OI.S TABLE 2.4-13 (Cont)

    Occurrence on Unit 2 Site or in Common Name Scien ific Name Ad acent Environs

    ~nm hibians (Cont)

    Northern spring peeper ~Hla crucifer Most l ikely Gray tree f rog ~Hla versicolor Likely Western chorus frog Pseudacris tr iseata Likely Pickerel frog Rane ~slee cia Likely Nor them leopard frog Rane ~liens Host likely Bul I frog Green frog Rane ~ca esbeians Host likely Wood frog Rane ~clami ans Rane ~slvatica Host iikely Most likely KEY TO OCCURRENCE:

    Host likely = Record of species on Unit 2 site or surrounding environs.

    Likely = Geographic range includes Oswego County, and suitable habitat is available.

    Unlikely = Geographic range includes Oswego County, but suitable habitat is unavailable or no record of species from the county.

    SOURCES: References 1 and 18 Supplement 2 2of2 June 1983

    Nine Mile Point, Unit 2 ER-OLS TABLE 2.4-14 COMMON VEGETATION SPECIES LIKELY TO OCCUR WITHIN THE UNIT 2-VOLNEY 345-KV RIGHT-OF-WAY Scientific Name Common Name Ainus spp. Alder

    ~Prus malus Apple Malus pumila Apple Ulmus americana American elm Arrowwood Beech Rubus spp. Blackberry

    ~Car a cordiformis Bitternut hickory Prunus serotina Black cherry Choke cherry Aronia spp. Chokeberry Sambucus canadensis Elderberry Comus racemosa Gray dogwood TsucSa canadensis Hemlock Hawthorn Highbush blueberry Viburnum trilobum Highbush cranberry Viburnum alnifolium Hobblebush Creeping juniper

    ~Po ulus randidentata Large-toothed aspen Viburnum aceri folium Maple-leaved viburnum Viburnum lentaceo Nannyberry Pin cherry

    ~Prus communis Pear Ribes spp. Ribes Comus stolonifera Red osier dogwood Red cedar guercus rubra Red oak Pinus resinosa Red pine Acer rubrum Red maple Picea rubens Red spruce Acer saccharinum Silver maple Acer saccharum Sugar maple Amelanchier spp. Serviceberry Comus spp. Silky dogwood Lindera benzoin Spicebush

    ~Siraea spp. Spiraea Acer ens lvanicum Striped maple Rhus ~thing Staghorn sumac Witch hazel Salix spp. Willow Fraxinus americana White ash 1 of 2

    Nine Mile Point Unit 2 ER-OLS TABLE 2.4-14 (Cont)

    Scientific Name Common Name T~hu a occidentalie White cedar Pinus strobus White pine Betula lutea Yellow birch SOURCES: Re'ferences 21 and 22 2 of 2

    Nine Mile Point Unit 2 ER-OLS TABLE 2 4-15 PRELIMINARY VEGETATION ANALYSIS SURVEY OF THE RIGHT-OF-WAY OF THE UNIT 2-VOLNEY 345-KV TRANSMISSION FACILITY Estimated Cover Age Undesirable Desirable Merchant-Location<<) secticn<>> Acreacce rise<>> class s acies Densi~t ~sanies ~nenslt an~lilt 1- 4. 13 1 3/4 1 3/4 0 10 S,P white ash Nannyberry NM Red maple Elderberry Hawthorn 1 3/4- 1. 05 Large-toothed aspen L Alder L-M NM 2 Silky dogwood 2- 1 07 White ash Arrowwood L-M NM 2 1/2 Large-toothed aspen Silky dogwood Red maple Hawthorn 2 1/2 1 72 White ash Serviceberry NM Large-toothed aspen Arrowwood Hawthorn 2 1/2- 1. 64 H,C P Beech Hawthorn NM 3 Hemlock Apple 2 1/2- 2 24 S White ash Arrowwood NM 3 1/4 Red maple Hawthorn Large-toothed aspen Apple 3 1/4- C 3. 39 HsC P, M Hemlock Hawthorn NM 3 3/4 Red maple White ash 3 3/4 0. 83 P,M White ash Willow L-M NM Red maple Witch hazel Arrowwood 3 3/4- 5 51 P,M Sugar maple Arrowwood 4 3/4 Red maple Witch hazel Red oak Hawthorn 4 3/4- 5 32 H . P White ash Arrowwood NM 5 3/4 Red maple Apple Large-toothed aspen Nannyberry 1 of 8

    Nine Mile Point Unit 2 ER-OI.S TABLE 2. 4-15 (Cont)

    Estimated Cover Age Undesirable Desirable Merchant-Location<<> Section<a) ~acres e Types>> Class S ecies ~sensit ~Sanies ~sensit ~atilit 5 1/4- 0 37 HiC PiM sugar maple D Striped maple 5 1/2 Hemlock 5 3/4 1 32 H,C SiP Hemlock M Arrowwood NM White ash Silky dogwood Red maple Willow 5 3/4 0. 23 SiP Large-toothed aspen L-M Arrowwood NM Sugar maple Alder Pin cherry Staghorn sumac 0-32 Red maple M Willow NM White ash sugar maple Black 'cherry Arrowwood 6- 0. 92 White ash L Willow NM 6 1/4 Red maple Redosier dogwood American elm Alder 6 1/4 1. 01 S,P White ash L-M Arrowwood NM Red maple Apple Black cherry Juniper 6 1/4 0.32 Large-toothed aspen L Willow NM Apple Arrowwood 6 1/4- 4 42 CiH PiM Red maple D Willow NM 7 1/4 Black cherry Hawthorn sugar maple Arrowwood 7 1/4 0 55 H,C Hemlock M-D Willow NM White ash Arrowwood Yellow birch 7 1/4- 2 98 PiM Sugar maple D Witch hazel 7 1/2 Red maple Apple Large-toothed aspen 7 1/2- 3. 21 Pis sugar maple M-D Arrowwood NM 8 Red maple Witch hazel White ash Silky dogwood 2 of 8

    Nine Mile Point Unit 2 ER-OLS TABLE 2.4-15 (Cont)

    Estimated Cover Age Undesirable Desirable Merchant-Location<<> Section<~> ~Acres e T~<>> Class S ecies ~sensit ~eecies ~sensit ~atilit 8- 1 24 Large-toothed aspen Willow M-D NM 8 1/4 White ash Arrowwood Highbush blueberry 8 1/4- 2-29 Large-toothed aspen M-D Arrowwood NM 8 1/2 White ash Hawthorn Sugar maple Elderberry 8 1/2 0. 55 Sugar maple Sugar maple NM Black cherry Highbush blueberry 8 1/2- 1. 65 White ash Redosier dogwood NM 9 1/4 Bitternut hickory Sugar maple Arrowwood 8 1/2- 7. 40 S,P White ash Arrowwood NM 9 3/4 Large-toothed aspen Chokeberry Sugar maple Apple 9 3/4- 7. 57 M Sugar maple Arrowwood 10 1/2 White ash Chokeberry Bitternut hickory 10 1/2 0. 57 P,M Red spruce D Highbush cranberry L 10 3/4 0. 46 P Black cherry M Sugar maple NM Red maple Blackberry 10 3/4- 3. 13 S,P Black cherry M Apple L-M NM 11 Large-toothed aspen Willow Alder 11- 90 P White ash D Arrowwood NM 11 3/4 Sugar maple Willow Beech Juniper 11 3/4 0 96 C,H S,P Hemlock M-D Witch hazel Large-toothed aspen Maple-leaved White Ash viburnum Alder 11 3/4- 3 99 Large-toothed aspen M Witch hazel NM 12 1/2 White ash Silky dogwood Bitternut hickory Juniper 3 of 8

    Nine Mile Point Unit 2 ER-OIS TABLE 2 4-15 (Cont)

    Estimated Cover Age Undesirable Desirable Merchant-roost<on<<a Section<>> ~Acrea e DDDe<>> class ~acies ~Deceit ~ancien ~Densit ~ac<lit 12 1/2- 5 05 Red maple Arrowwood M NM 13 American elm silky dogwood White ash Redosier dogwood 13 1/4 0 45 White ash Arrowwood L-M NM Black cherry Silky dogwood American elm Elderberry 13 1/4 0 34 13 1/4- 1 61 S,P Large-toothed aspen Silky dogwood L-M NM 13 3/4 White ash Willow Spiraea 13 1/4 0 64 Large-toothed aspen -Willow NM Alder Silky dogwood 13 3/4 1. 04 SDP Red maple Willow NM Silver maple Silky dogwood White ash Arrowwood

    \

    13 3/4 0. 60 Silver maple M-D Arrowwood L-M Large-toothed aspen Spiraea Red maple Willow 13 3/4- 5 85 Black cherry Sugar maple M-D NM 14 3/4 Red maple Arrowwood White ash Redosier dogwood 14 3/4- 2. 57 S,P,M White ash M-D Arrowwood NM 15 1/4 Red maple Gray dogwood Black cherry Sugar maple 15 1/4 0. 56 Red maple Willow NM Redosier dogwood Arrowwood 15 1/4- 5. 17 S,P Large-toothed aspen Apple L-M NM 16 1/4 White ash Arrowwood Sugar maple Sugar maple 4 of 8

    Nine Mile Point Unit 2 ER-OLS TABLE 2. 4-15 (Cont)

    Estimated Cover Age Undesirable Desirable Merchant-Location<<~ Section<>> ~Acrea e DD<<e<>> class S cies ~Deceit ~acies ~censit ~atilit 16 1/4- 3. 61 CDH PDM Hemlock D Chokecherry 17 Yellow birch Arrowwood Sugar maple 17 K 0 23 P,M Yellow birch M Witch hazel NM Sugar maple Arrowwood White ash 17- 7. 23 SDP Sugar maple M-D Witch hazel NM 18 1/2 White ash Arrowwood Black cherry Apple 18 1/2 1 89 Large-toothed aspen L Alder M-D NM American elm Arrowwood Hemlock Apple 18 3/4 0 46 S . Red maple L Apple NM 19 0 23 Black cherry L Apple NM Arrowwood Pear 19- 2 24 S Red maple L Willow NM 19 1/4 Large-toothed aspen Arrowwood Alder 19 1/4- 1 09 CDH S,P Large-toothed aspen M-D Witch hazel NM 19 1/2 Yellow birch Apple White cedar Juniper 19 1/2- 2 73 SDP Large-toothed aspen M-D Arrowwood NM 20 Red maple Witch hazel White cedar Chokecherry 20 1 38 CDH PiM White pine D Arrowwood e

    Black cherry Witch hazel Large-toothed aspen Chokecherry 20- 3 12 HDC PDM Red maple L-M Arrowwood L-M 20 1/2 Black cherry Witch hazel White ash Spiraea 5 of 8

    0 Nine Mile Point Unit 2 ER-OLS TABLE 2.4-15 (Cont)

    Estimated Cover Age Undesirable Desirable Merchant-Location<<> Section<>> ~acrea e ~es a ~ Class ~acies ~Deceit Soecies ~Densit . ~abilit 20 1/2 0. 31 H StP Red maple Gray dogwood L NM Silver maple Highbush cranberry Elderberry 20 3/4 1. 03 Black cherry Arrowwood White ash Chokecherry Silver maple 20 3/4 0 01 Silver maple M Arrowwood NM Red maple Willow 20 3/4 0. 62 S,P Red maple M Highbush cranberry L-M NM 20 3/4- 0.69 S,P,M Black cherry L-M Arrowwood M NM 21 1/4 White ash Redosier dogwood Red maple Silky dogwood 20 3/4 0. 41 Silver maple M-D Arrowwood NM Red maple White ash 20 3/4 0 24 Red maple M-D Arrowwood NM White ash 21 1/2 1. 24 S,P Large-toothed aspen Arrowwood M-D NM Red -maple Willow Red pine Juniper 21 1/2 0. 57 Black cherry Alder NM Hemlock Ribes 21 1/2- 2. 52 Red maple Alder NM 22 1/4 Large-toothed aspen Arrowwood White ash Hawthorn 22 1/4- 3 51 ST P Large-toothed aspen Arrowwood L-M NM 22 3/4 White ash Silky dogwood Red maple Willow 22 3/4 1. 40 SiP American elm Alder NM white ash Arrowwood Willow 6 of 8

    Nine Mile Point Unit. 2 ER-OLS TABLE 2. 4-15 (Cont)

    Estimated Cover Age Undesirable Desirable Merchant-Location Section(~) AcreacCe XlDe<>> class ~seciee ~Dell sit ~acies ~secsit ~atilit 22 3/4 0. 62 S,P Large-toothed aspen Arrowwood L NM White ash Apple Redosier dogwood 22 3/4 5. 51 Large-toothed aspen Alder M-D 24 1/4 White ash Willow Red cedar Gray dogwood 24 1/4 1. 55 White ash Alder NM 24 1/2 American elm sugar maple 24 1/2- 1 38 24 3/4 24 3/4 0 34 Red maple Alder NM White ash Willow American elm 25 2. 39 Red maple L Alder NM Black cherry Willow Apple 25 1/4 1 05 White ash M Arrowwood NM American elm Sugar maple 25 1/4- 7 23 Onions 26 1/2 Lettuce 26 1/2- 0 5. 88 S, P White ash M Elderberry NM 27 3/4 Red maple Arrowwood Black cherry Willow 27 1/2- 0 2. 62 S Red maple L M Willow L-M NM 28 1/2 Large-toothed aspen Elderberry White ash 27 1/4- 2 75 HtC P,M Hemlock M-D Striped maple 28 1/2 Sugar maple Spicebush Yellow birch 7 of 8

    Nine Mile Point Unit 2 ER-OLS TABLE 2-4-15 (Cont)

    Estimated Cover Age Undesirable Desirable Merchant-Location<<> Section<< ~ AcrearCe ~er>> riess ~Sanies ~Deceit ~Sanies ~censit ~atilit 28 1/2- 2.98 H,C PiM White ash M-D Witch hazel L M 29 Hemlock Hobblebush Yellow birch striped maple 28 1/2 2 02 S,P White ash Witch hazel NM 29 1/4- 3 10 HiC SiP Large-toothed aspen M-D Serviceberry NM 29 3/4 White ash Witch hazel White cedar Arrowwood 29 3/4- 2 83 S~P Large-toothed aspen M-D Serviceberry L-M NM 30 1/4 White ash spicebush Sugar maple Witch hazel 30 1/4- 3 51 Red maple Apple NM 31 White ash Arrowwood Large-toothed aspen Willow 31 1/4 0 86 Red maple Witch hazel L-M NM White ash Willow Pin cherry Arrowwood 4 0 H Sugar maple Hawthorn NM Large-toothed aspen Arrowwood American elm Willow

    <<>Location is keyed to transmission tower numbers associated with original 765-kV Article VII filing..

    <<)Sections refer to general vegetation groupings shown on Figure 2.4-4.

    <>>Wetlands information provided on Figure 2.4-4 from the Oswego County Environmental Management Council (OCEMC).

    KEY TO COVER TYPE: KEY TO AGE CLASS: KEY TO DENSITY. KEY TO MERCHANTABILITY:

    A = Agricultural S = Sapling L = Light M = Merchantable H = Hardwoods P = Pole Size M = Moderate NM = Nonmerchantable C = Coniferous M = Mature Sawlog D = Dense SOURCE: Reference 21 8 of 8

    Nine Mile Point Unit 2 ER-OIS TABLE 2.4-16 NEW YORK STATE ENDANGERED AND THREATENED FISH SPECIES~~'ommon Reported In Site Name ~Vicinit Scientific Yes No Endangered Longjaw Etizostedion vitreum Hlaucum cisco'lue pike'~'Shortnose X

    whitefish sturgeon'~'ound Pugnose shiner ~Notre is anocnenus X Eastern sand darter X Bluebreast darter Etheostoma camurum X Gilt darter Percina evides X Spoonhead sculpin Cottus ricei Deepwater sculpin Threatened Lake sturgeon X Mooneye Hiodon ~erceiaus X Lake chubsucker ~Erim zon sucetta X Mud sunfish Acantharchus pomotis Longear sunfish X

    SOURCE: New York State Register; February 9, 1983 p. 7-9.

    'Listed by the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service as an en-dangered or threatened species (Federal Register, 2-25-83).

    NOTE: All fish species listed by the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service as endangered or threatened and at one time re-ported in New York or the Great Lakes are included in, the NY State list.

    Supplement 2 1 of 1 June 1983

    C t

    P

    ~I t

    ~

    F I GUR E 2A-I 1000 AER I A L PHOTOG RAP H SCALE-METERS I000 2000 3000 SCALE-FEET NIAGARA MOHAWK POWER CORPORATION NINE MILE POINT UNIT 2 ENVIRONMENTAL'EPORT OLS

    0 N TA R/0 1Mi

    <<QSE$ ,kp CVQFP<

    Ui i

    . av0 y,q ', F TIPjg + Pyi jqglg.

    A c ~+~/

    SiAj'WATT, TC

    ~)3'p>'gq MATURE FOREST TC TC fig/4~ FOREST SHRUB SHRUB OLD FIELD SHRUB ORCHARD SHRUB ORCHARD SCALE-METERS OLD FIELD 1000 WOODED SWAMP SCALE-FEET GRASS UNTYPED (INDUSTRIAL)

    UNTYPED (RECREATIONAL)

    BARE SPOIL PILE WATER F IGURE 2.4-2 TC TRANSMISSION CORRIDOR 8 METEOROLOGICAL TOWER VEGETATION TYPES

    + UNIT 2 NIAGARA MOHAWK POWER CORPORATION NINE MILE POI NT 0 N IT 2 E N V I RON ME NTAL RE PORT 0 LS SUPPLEMENT 2 JUNE 1985

    %je MKI tlt; CGR1 IDENTIFICATION 1.EGENO I A IN STACK N I 284 000: REACTOR U I BUILDING EBLIS~.

    TURBINE BUILDING py.E UNIT 2 REVETMENT DITCH SYSTEM UNIT C RADWASTE BUILD!NG TOP EL 263.00' 0 0 HEATER BAYS i

    0 N E SCREENWELL BUILDING E.

    CONDENSATE STORAGE TANK BLDG L

    CONTROL BUILDING SHORE LINE~

    r \

    ggAC<

    ) 88 NORMAL SW ITCHGEAR ADMINISTRATION BUILDING BUILDING INFO/MATION CENTER I WARE HOUSE It2 r /G

    / / I 08 2 / tto NI 283000 I SE V

    / TRE TM HT T

    I I 08

    /

    Pl.'((

    j(

    j//

    SK I Y.V )

    'It l I2

    ~

    TRAHSMISSON LINES CENTERUNE CF L EG END ORIGINAL GROUND COII'CUII pVE FLOOD CONTROL I

    /., tOGO

    /

    g j

    j I

    M

    \ ARRI Lpl BERMS NEW GROUND I

    CONTOI

    ~k

    ~

    I FENCE UHE CENT FL U E OF T

    ll )i~

    ~ \

    UN))

    ,J ppV8 C pp,RKI G I.OT i TOWER j I I jl .

    N I 282 000 ~ jr 11 NOTES I. GRID COORDINATES REFER IO ANSMMSO NEW YORK STATE COORDINATE SYSTEM

    2. ELEVATIONS REFER TO MEAN t~

    RAILROAD SEA LEVEL

    ') r Il 3- ORIGINAL CONTOUR 2 FEET I HTERVAL 1

    I j I

    P>""'Rc

    ~ tt.o CAT I

    N I 281 000 "APERTUDF cARD'FIGURE 3.1-2 200 0 200 400 100 I 00 SITE PLAN SCALE IN FEET NIAGARA MOHAWK POWER CORPORATION iso Available On NINE MILE POINT-UNIT 2 Aperture Card ENVIRONMENTAL REPORT OLS SUPPLEMENT 2 JUNE 1983

    0

    ~ )

    il

    ~

    v xm I

    A, IH I

    gled

    O 8

    IDENTIFICATION LEGEND STACK TOP/BERM 000 EL 263.00 263.00'AIN N I 284 A REAC TOR BUILDING 8 TURBINE BUILDING Opt.E. UNIT 2 REVETMENT-DITCH SYSTEM Uglt I C RAOWASTE BUILDING EXISt TOP EL 0 0 HEATER BAYS 0 a E SCREENWELL BUILDING N

    E, TOP/BERM lfi EL 265.00 F CONDENSATE STORAGE TANK BLDG L

    G CONTROL - BUILDING H NORMAL SWITCHGEAR BUILDING SHORE LINE GOO J ADMINISTRATION BUILDING INFO MATION CENTER 99 OGO 'LG2 4

    8 08 NI 283000 SE T ATM NT P T TRANSMISSION LINES L EGEND P/BERM l/ v4 ORIGINAL GROUNO CONTOUR 256.00 AVE NEW GROUND CONTOUR O

    t OLGI I LPt ll

    'l

    ~l FENCE UNE l

    AA

    4G PAVE TOP/BERM PARKI G l TOWER EL 2.00 LOT ~ 1 ~

    l t I G.G t

    NI 282 000 NOTES 266 I. GRID COORDINATES REFER TO P/ BER NEW YORK STATE COORDINATE 273.0 ANSM 0 Y SYSTEM l ~ ~ LINE

    2. ELEVATIONS REFER TO MEAN RAILROAD SEA LEVEL 111
    3. ORIGINAL CONTOUR INTERVAL tOG$ ~~ 2 FEET

    'l~ \ ~

    ))i )

    EXISt NG

    ~ ttO t ttGG, N I 28 I 000 tFIGURE 3.1-2 TOP/ RM RAILROAD EL 27 00 SITE PLAN 200 0 200 400 I I NIAGARA MOHAWK POWER CORPORATION SCALE IN FEET

    ,NINE MILE POINT-UNIT 2 ENVIRONMENTAL REPORT-OLS'

    ~ )

    Nine Mile Point Unit 2 ER-OLS condenser at two points. Approximately 0.06 l/s (1 gpm) of 93 percent sulfuric acid is added to the circulating water system at the discharge side of each condenser. Acid addition is continuous and manually controlled.

    The sulfuric acid storage tanks are installed in an acid-resistant building and have inherent design features that contain any spillage due to rupture or leakage of a tank.

    Sodium H ochlorite Addition Biofouling in the circulating water system is controlled by using sodium hypochlorite, which acts essentially the same as chlorine, but: is safer to handle. Sodium hypochlorite reduces reproduction of algae, fungi, and bacteria. The condenser and cooling tower will be treated daily with sodium hypochlorite within the limits prescribed by the EPA. These limits are 2 hr/day of chemical treatment, not to exceed a total residual chlorine level of 0.2 mg/l (average) and 0.5 mg/1 (maximum) in accordance with SPDES permi't re'quirements.

    Sodium hypochlorite is produced onsite by the reaction of salt and water in an electrolytic cell. The equipment has the capacity to generate sodium hypochlorite at a maximum rate of 907 kg (2,000 lb) of chlorine equivalent per day.

    The hypochlorite produced is stored in a hypochlorite storage tank from which system as needed.

    it is fed into the circulating water Similar to the acid storage tanks, the hypochlorite storage tank is also designed to contain any spillage. Sodium hypochlorite solution is injected into the circulating water system directly ahead of the condenser.

    The amount of hypochlorite added depends on the chlorine demand of the circulating water as well as the frequency and duration of chlorination. The rate of chlorine addition is co'ntrolled automatically by a continuous chlorine analyzer, located immediately downstream of the condenser, to ensure that the concentration of free available chlorine is below 0.5 mg/l at the outlet of the condenser, in conformance with EPA standards. Automatic feedback control is performed by the free chlorine analyzer. The circulating water system is expected to be chlorinated once a day for a 30-min period.

    Based on the preceding chlorination characteristics and the EPA Residual Model'~', calculations indicate that both free available and total residual chlorine concentrations comply with. applicable federal effluent regulations specified in 40CFR423~~>>.

    Supplement 3 3 3 3

    ~ September 1983

    Nine Mile Point Unit 2 ER-OLS 3.3.2.2 Makeup Water Treatment System

    'he makeup water treatment system is designed to remove dissolved and suspended solids from raw lake water to produce high-quality filtered demineralized water.

    Demineralized water is necessary for use during plant operation as makeup or washdown by various systems in the turbine, reactor, and radwaste buildings'he makeup water system is composed of:

    1. Pretreatment process - an anthracite and an activated carbon filter.
    2. Demineralizer process degasifer, weak and strong cation, weak and strong anion, and mixed-bed ion exchange units.

    The demineralized water product is pumped to the makeup water system and distributed as required or stored for subsequent use.

    The 'expected makeup water system product water quality is as listed in Table 3.3-3.

    Essentially, all dissolved constituents present in water are removed by the cation and anion demineralizers. The mixed-bed demineralizers serve a., a polishing unit to remove trace quantities of dissolved solids that may 'pass through the cation or anion demineralizers.

    The cation-anion and mixed-bed demineralizers require periodic regeneration using sulfuric acid and sodium hydroxide to restore resins to the hydrogen and hydroxyl form. During normal operation, it is expected that the makeup 'emineralizer system will require regeneration approximately twice a month. During startup, the demineralizers may be regenerated as frequently as once a day to provide sufficient demineralized water to the steam generator. The approximate quantities of chemicals expected to be used per regeneration are as follows:

    1. Sulfuric acid (489 kg [1,079 lb] as 93% HzSO<).
    2. Sodium hydroxide (267 kg [589 lb] as 50% NaOH).

    3.3.2.3 Condensate Demineralizer System The 'ondensate demineralizer system demineralizes and polishes water from the condensate system. The expected condensate 'emineralizer system product water quality is as listed in Table 3.3-4.

    3.3-4

    Nine Nile Point Unit 2 ER-OLS TABLE 3 3-1 NONTELY WATER USE DATA FOR UNIT 2 Est Average Teapot Service Total Service water Wet Bulb Tempera-Relative Humidity I kec>>

    Teapera-Lake Level Water Plow Fish System Plow ing Water Flov Cooling Tower Evaporation Lake Intake

    ~l Plow Cooling Tover Flow Blovdovn CLT Combined Plant I

    ture (4?) (>) tuc'e (4?) (f0) (g ) (gpa) (g ) (g ) (g ) (gpa) (4?) (gpa) (4?) (4?)

    h ~B ~rl ~F ~G ~I ~F ~L ~N ~N (9pa)

    ~O January 41.0(Nax) 47 oh(in) 32 0(Min) 244 63 39,600 14,925 4r960 10, 550 (Max) 49 '65 14 '00 17 35 9,490 35. 8 24,090 24 62 21 5(hvg) 78 3 (Avg) 35 0(Avg) 244 63 39,600 14,925 3 ~ 210 7,800(hvg) 5 I ~ 315 14 ~ 600 14 35 13r990 24. 0 28,590 19 07

    '16.0(Nin) 100 0(Nax) 42 ~ 0 (Nax) 244 63 39 '00 14 ~ 925 4 ~ 560 (Nin) 54r525 14 ~ 600 11 ~ 35 20,440 10 6 35,040 10 56 February 43. 0 (Nax) 33. 0 (Nin) 32. 0 (Nin) 244 63 39,600 14,925 5,050 11 ~ 200 (Max) 49,640 14 ~ 600 17 35 8,915 37 2 23.0(hvg)

    -15. 0 (Hin) 78 4(hvg) 33 0(hvg) 244 '3 39r600 14r925 4,885 8 F 000(hvg) 49 '75 14,600

    '00 16 ~ 35 11 ~ 950 27 0 23,515 26,550 24 90 2'I 14 100. 0 (Max) 41 ~ 0 (Nax) 244,63 39,600 lsr925 4 r731 (Nln) 54 F 525 14 11 35 20,269 12 0 34 '69 11 ~ 15 Narch 57 O(Nax) 37. 0 (Nin) 32. 0 (Nin) 244 73 39 ~ 610 14,925 4,305 12,250 (Nax) 50 '30 14r 610 17 35 Br445 46 4 23,055 27 99 29 4(Avg) 7 5. 0 (hvg) 34 0(Avg) 244,73 39r610 lsr925 3r830 8,650 (Avg) 50,705 14r 610 15. 35 12,520 30 0 27r 130 22 11 4 0(Min) 100 0(Nax) 02.O(Max) 240 73 39 ~ 610 14r 925 3,928(Nin) 50,535 10 ~ 610 11 35 19,072 11 0 .33 '82 11 ~ 73 April 63,0(Nax) 24 0(H(n) 3 ~ 0 (N in) 245 43 39 '82 14 ~ 925 2, 730 13, 150 (Max) Slr877 10 ~ 682 15 33 9r 120 ~6 4 23,802 27 23 4'I 5(Avg) 69. 9 (Avg) 38. 0 (Avg) 245.43 39,681 14 ~ 925 9 '50(hvg) 54 '07 14,682 11 33 lsroso 32. 0 29,732 21. 79 1 6. 0 (Nin) 100 0(Max) ~2 0(Max) 245 03 39 '82 14r 925 7,'SOB(Min) 54,607 14 ~ 682 I1 33 17r ~ 92 11 ~ 7 32r 174 11 69

    76. 0 (Max) 28 0(Nin) ~ 0. 0 (Hin) 246 13 39,754 14,925 13,700 (Max) 54 '79 14 ~ 754 11 ~ 31 11 ~ 300 47 2 26,054 26 88 59 0(Avg) 66.9 (hvg) 43 0(Avg) 246 13 39,754 14,925 I or 850 (hvg) 54 '79 10 r750 11 31 14 ~ 150 33.0 18,904 21 93 28 0(Min) 100. 0 (Nax) 52. 0 (Nax) 246 13 39,754 14r 925 8 ~ 100 (Nin) 54r679 14r754 11 ~ 31 16r900 10 0 31 ~ 65 ~ 10 61 June 71 0(Nax) 29. 0 (Min) ~ 2.0(Nin) 246 43 39,784 14r 925 13 ~ ~ 00 (Max) 54r709 14,784 11 30 11,600 46 1 26r384 26 60
    59. 0 (hvg) 36 0(Hin) 67.6 (hvg) 100. 0 (Nax) 56 0(hvg) 63.0(Nax) 246 43 246. 43 39,784 39,784 14,925 14,925 11, 500 (Avo) 8,750 (Nin) 5'09 54,709 14r784 lsr784 11 30 11 30 13,500 25 0 28 '80 17 84 16,250 3.0 31 ~ 034 6 95 July 79. 0 (Max) 28.0(Nin) 46 0(Mln) 246 43 39,784 14,925 13,800 (Hax) 54,709 10r784 11 30 11,200 45. 0 25,984 25 83 6 3. 4 (hvg) 68. 9 (Avg) 69 0(hvg) 246 43 39r784 14 ~ 925 11 ~ 750 (Avg) 54,709 14 '84 11 30 13r 250 14 0 28,034 41 0 (Min) 10 0. 0 (Nax) 78 ~ 0 (Nax) 2 ' 43 43,316 14 ~ 925 9r 100 (Nin) 59 '86 18 ~ 316 10 38 15,900 -9 0 34r216 12 58 1 37 August 79. 0 (aax) 27 0(Nin) 48. 0 (Mln) 246. 13 39,754 14,925 13 ~ 800 (Nax) 5'79 14 F 750 O'1.31, 11 ~ 200 39 6 25,954 23 52 62 4(Avg) 72. 4 (Avg) 70. 0 (hvg) 246. 13 39,750 10r925 11 550(Avg) 54,679

    '679 14r754 11 ~ 31 13r 450 12 0 28 '04 11 ~ 64 43 0(Nin) 100 0(Nax) 74 '(Nax) 246 13 39,754 14,925 9,300(Nln) 5 14r754 11 31 15,700 -4 0 30 '54 3 42 September 76.0(Nax) 27. 0 (Min) 45.0 (Hin) 245 63 39r702 14r925 13 ~ 700 (Nax) 54 ~ 627 14,702 11,32 11 ~ 300 36. 0 26 F 000 22 05 56 2(Avg) 73 7 (Avg) 63 ~ 0 (Avg) 245 63 39 '02 14,925 11, 100 (Avg) 54 '27 14r702 11 ~ 32 13r900 16 0 28,602 13. 59 30 0(Nin) 100 0(Nax) 72 0(Nax) 245 63 39r702 14,925 8 ~ 200 (Nin) 5'27 10r702 11 32 16r800 -8 0 31 ~ 502 1. 02 October 71.0(Nax) 33 0(Nin) 42 0(Nin) 245, 13 390651 14r925 13 ~ 300 (Hax) 54,576 14r651 11 30 llr700 34 5 26,351 21 ~ 62 4 7. 1 (Avg) 72 8(Avg) 54 0(Avg) 245 13 39,651 14r 925 10 ~ 350 (hvg) 5'76 14r651 11.34 14,650 19 0 29r301 15 17 2 5. 0 (Nin) 100 0(Nax) 63 ~ 0(Hax) 245 13 39,651 10,925 7, 80 0 (Nin) 5'76 14 ~ 651 11 ~ 30. 17r 200 -2. 0 31r 851 4 14 Noveaber 60 0(Nax) 38.0 (Nin) 38 0(Nin) 244 83 39r620 14,925 12 ~ 600 (Nax) 5 '545 10r 620 'I'I 35 12,400 37 3 27,020 23 26 37 4 (Avg) 76 1(hvg) 45 0(Avg) 200 ~ 83 39r620 14,925 9r 300 (hvg) 54 F 505 10r620 11 ~ 35 15,700 23 0 30,320 17 38 9 0(Nin) 100. 0 (Nax) 52.0(Max) 244 83 39 '20 14r925 6, 816 (Nin) 54,545 14 '20 11 35 18, 180 1 0 32,804 5 61 December 52. 0 (Nax) 46 O(Min) 35 0(Nin) 240 83 39 '20 14 ~ 925 2,340 11 ~ 550 (Max) 52,205 14 '20 14 35 11 ~ 110 34 2 25,730 22 92

    25. 9 (Avg) 78 3(hvg) 38 0(hvg) 244 83 39 '20 14,925 Br250(hvg) ss,sss 10 ~ 620 11 ~ 35 16r750 23. 0 31,370 17 57 7 0 (Nin) 100. 0 (Nax) ~ 3 0(Max) 204 83 39,620 14,925 5,586(Nin) 50,505 10 ~ 620 11 ~ 35 19 ~ 014 13 5 3'34 12 58 Cc>(E) through (0) indicate reference points on?igure 3.3-1 (A through D are not shovn).

    ca>Based on data from 1972 Nine Mile point Unit 1 for maximum and minimus temperatures and Unit 2 Envlronaental Report Construction Permit Stage Figure 2.5-1 for average temperature.

    csIhverage and maximus cooling tover blowdown flows are based on Rochester, Nev York, weather data from 1955 to 1964.

    Cooling tover blowdovn flows for maximum AT are based on Rochester, Nev York, veather data for 1955.

    Maxiaum discharge flov vill not be exceeded during normal operation.

    crIAT is the difference between discharge temperature and lake temperature. Maximum AT vill be exceeded in a maximum less than 5% of the tiae. Maximum AT could occur during the month of Hay, resulting blovdovn dT of 494? and a combined plant AT of 27.664P-CsIThese f love are associated vith normal plant operation. The aaxiaum combined plant discharge flov will during a normal plant shutdovn.

    Nine Mile Point Unit. 2 ER-OLS as follows: for the January-March period, 1.48; April-June, 1.76; July-September, 1.85; and October-December, 1.60.

    3.6.1.1.5 Operating Cycles for Each Waste Treatment System or Discharge The cooling tower blowdown represents a continuous and relatively constant flow waste stream during normal Unit 2 operation. The average blowdown rate is 950 1/s (15,068 gpm); the minimum blowdown rate, which dictates the maximum chemical concentrations, is 706 1/s (11,188 gpm).

    Sodium hypochlorite addition is not constant and depends on the chlorine demand of the circulating water. In addition, the duration and frequency of sodium hypochlorite addition are altered to ensure compliance with SPDES permit requirements of 0. 2 mg/1 (average) and 0. 5 mg/1 (maximum) total residual chlorine for no longer than 2 hr/day.

    Sulfuric acid additions to the circulating water system are likewise controlled by demand, in this case, alkalinity.

    Quantities are not likely to fluctuate to any great degree, due to the rather narrow range of alkalinity values reported for Lake Ontario's Nine Mile Point region (Section 2.3.3).

    Makeup demineralization wastewaters are generated approximately once per month. During startup, the large additional demand of high-quality water necessitates regeneration once a day. The quantities of sodium hydroxide and sulfuric acid per regeneration are listed in Section 3.3.2.

    3.6.1.2 Discharges to Land: Characteristics and Quantities of Sludges and Proposed Methods of Ultimate Disposal Sludge and sediment accumulated in the cooling tower basin are projected to be removed at 5-yr intervals. These materials consist of solids including chemicals and biocides, concentrated through the evaporative cooling process and collected in the cooling tower basin. The 5-yr estimated volume is 1,668 cu m (58,900 cu ft) . The sludge will be chemically analyzed, removed, and disposed of offsite in a New York State-licensed disposal facility suitable for wastes of this nature. With the exception of the sanitary waste sludge and miscellaneous solid waste, there are no other planned discharges to land.

    Supplement 3 3. 6-3 September 1983

    Nine. Mile, Point Unit'2'R-OLS 3.6.1.3 Discharges to Air'he natural-draft cooling tower requires 19 to 38 million 1/s (40 to 80 million cfm) of ambient air to .dissipate the waste heat from the main condenser in the circulating water system. The airflow rate is dependent on ambient at-mospheric conditions and therefore 'varies throughout the year, reaching a maximum in the winter. The effluents are commonly described as cooling tower drift and visible plumes.

    3.6.1.3.1 Cooling Tower Drift As the circulating water flows throu'gh the cooling tower, the action of the -falling water over the 1

    fill section of a splash bars= creates small water droplets, some of which are entrained in the air flowing through .the tower. The size distribution of these droplets is given in Section 5.3.3.1.1.2. Most droplets are between 10 and 600 micron'hose droplets which leave the tower in the exit airflow are referred to as drift: The drift rate for natural-draft cooling towers varies with the exit airflow.

    Based 'on manufacturers'tandard designs for natural-draft cooling towers, a maximum drift rate of 0.005 percent of the circulating water flow is assumed. This results in a maximum drift emission rate of about 0.76 l/s (12 gpm).

    3.6.1.3.2 Evaporation Ambient air induced through a cooling tower becomes heated and moisture-laden as a result of the evaporative cooling process, and a visible plume is formed when the air is dis-charged from the tower. The frequency of occurrence and ex-tent of the visible plume depend upon meteorological con-ditions existing at the time and upon the design and phys-ical parameters of the cooling tower. A detailed evaluation of visible plume occurrences is presented in Section 5.3.3.1.1.1.

    For a given ambient wet-bulb temperature, an increase in relative humidity of ambient air results in a decrease in total moisture removed by cooling tower exit air and a de-crease in the evaporative cooling. Conversely, a decrease in ambient relative humidity results in an increase in

    . cooling tower exit air moisture content and an increase'n the evaporative cooling. At the design wet-bulb temperature of 23 C (74 F) and a relative humidity of 50 percent, the increase in moisture content of air in the tower is 0.018 kg (0.039 lb) of water per 0.454 kg (1 lb) of dry air. Nith ambient relative humidities of 25 and . 100 percent, the Supplement 1 3 '-4 May 1983

    Nine Mile Point Unit, 2 ER-OLS increases in moisture content. are 0.024 and 0.012 kg (0.053 and 0.026 lb) of water per 0.454 kg (1 lb) of dry air, respectively. The effects of these additional amounts of moisture added to the atmosphere on ground-level ambient relative humidity are discussed in Section 5.3.3.1.1.5.

    3.6.2 Sanitary Waste Treatment The normal sanitary waste flow from Unit 2, based on a nor-mal operating force of 300 people and an estimated 124 l/day/person (33 gpd/person), is 37,472 1/day (9,900 gpd). The maximum flow, based on an estimated maintenance outage work force of 1,500 people, is 187,358 l/day (49,500 gpd)

    Sanitary wastes from Unit 2 will be treated along with sanitary wastes generated at Unit 1. The combined sanitary waste flows will be treated and monitored to comply with the following State Pollutant Discharge Elimination System (SPDES) permit effluent limitations:

    Parameter Limits Settleable solids mg/l maximum daily Total suspended solids 25 mg/1 average '.1 45 mg/1 maximum daily'~'aily' I.

    5-day biochemical 25 mg/1 average oxygen demand (BOD>) 45 mg/l maximum Chlorine residual 0.5 ppm maximum daily pH 6.0-9.0 Fecal coliforms 200 MPN/100 ml 30-day geomet-ric mean 400 MPN/100 ml 7-day geomet-ric mean Sanitary waste sludge will be disposed of by a contractor in accordance with NYCRR,'itle 6, Chapter 360.

    Daily average calculated by dividing monthly discharge by number of days in month.

    '.~'Daily maximum is maximum discharged in one day.

    Supplement 3 3.6-5 September 1983

    Nine Mile Point Unit 2 ER-OLS 3.6.3 Other. Wastes 3.6.3.1 Descriptions of Miscellaneous Wastes Waste. streams discussed in this section include filter backwash, storm water, roof drains, nonradioactive plant drains, treated radioactive wastewater, transfer pit drain, and cooling tower sludge. Filter backwash consists of resuspended filtered lake water solids. The quality and quantity of storm water and roof drains are essentially that of incident precipitation. -The nonradioactive plant drains consist of administration building, service building, and water treatment and demineralizer building floor drains.

    (Turbine and reactor building drains go to the radwaste treatment system.) Treated radioactive wastewater is composed of drains and reject waters treated for removal of radioactive substances (Section 3.5). The floor drain for the diesel generator building'nd the transfer pit drain have the potential for contamination with oil. Cooling tower sludge consists of suspended solids retained in the cooling basin.

    3.6.3.2 Estimates of Waste Quantities to be Disposed and Their Pollutant Concentration at Points of Release The filter backwash generates 0. 032 cu m/sec (50 gpm) of wastewater for a 15-min period once every 3 weeks. The suspended solids concentration will vary as a function of the quantity of suspended matter in the lake water filtered to supply the makeup water system.

    The quantities of storm water and roof drainage vary and are directly dependent, upon the storm event that generates them.

    The design flow is based on,a maximum daily (24-hr) rainfall of 12.7 cm (5 in), with a return frequency of 100 yr.

    Nonradioactive floor drains are discharged to the storm drain system at variable, flow rates, dependent upon maintenance and cleaning schedules for the facility. The combined nonradioactive floor drains, storm water, and transfer pit and roof drains are estimated to generate a flow not greater than 14,000 cu m/day (3.7 mgd). Treated radioactive wastewaters are quantified in Section 3.5. The volume of cooling tower sludge generated in 5 yr is estimated to be approximately 1,668 cu m (58,900 cu ft).

    The cooling tower sludge removal frequency from the cooling tower basin is anticipated to be once every 5 yr.

    3. 6-6

    Nine Mile Point Unit 2 ER-OLS 3.6.3.3 Procedures by Which All Effluents Will be Treated, Controlled, and Discharged to Comply with Effluent Limitation Guidelines Filter backwash, treated radioactive wastewaters, and nonradioactive floor drains discharges are limited to concentrations prior to dilution of 15 mg/l oil and grease, 30 mg/l average and 50 mg/1 maximum suspended solids, and a pH of 6.0 to 9.0.

    The filter backwash is discharged to the lake via the discharge tunnel. The storm water is discharged from one outfall location to Lake Ontario. Diesel generator building floor drainage and transfer pit drainage flow through oil-water separators, where oil is recovered; treated drainage is discharged with uncontaminated floor and equipment drains to the storm water drain system. Collected oil will be removed by a New York State Department of contractor.

    Environmental Conservation-approved disposal Filter backwash, storm water, roof drains, of and nonradioactive floor drains, with the exception the diesel generator building floor drainage, transfer pit drainage, and turbine building and reactor building drainage, are discharged directly to the lake without treatment.

    The cooling tower sludge will be removed, tested, and disposed of without treatment in a New York State-licensed disposal facility, suitable for disposal of wastes of this quality.

    3.6.3.4 Estimation of Gaseous Effluents Auxiliar Boilers Two auxiliary electric boilers that, have no direct exhaust emissions are provided at the station. Since the auxiliary boilers are electrically operated, resulting in no gaseous emissions, current state and federal new-source performance standards for electric utility generating units do not apply.

    Standb Diesel Generators and Diesel Fire Pum Exhaust.

    Two standby diesel generators and one high-pressure core spray (HPCS) syst: em diesel generator are used only under emergency conditions, but are tested for approximately 2 hr per month. The generators are used to provide electric power for essential onsite needs when offsite power is not available. The standby diesel generators and the HPCS Supplement 2 3.6-7 June 1983

    Nine Mile Point Unit 2 ER-OIS system diesel generator burn No. 2 diesel fuel oil, which typically contains 0.5 percent sulfur and 0.08 percent ash.

    The exhaust from each of the two standby diesel generator engines is discharged to the atmosphere through two short stacks projecting from the roof of the diesel generator building. The exhaust from the HPCS system diesel generator is discharged to the atmosphere through a separate stack.

    The standby diesel generator and HPCS system diesel generator specifications and the fuel and flue gas parameters are listed in Table 3.6-2.

    There are no federal new-source performance standards or

    .state emission standards applicable to the standby diesel generators, except for the State of New York limit for a stationary combustion installation of 40 percent. opacity for any time period or 20 percent opacity for a period of 3 or more minutes during any continuous 60-minute the diesel generators are emergency standby units, period'ecause they are exempt from the prevention of significant deterioration (PSD) requirement.

    The diesel-operated fire protection pump is normally operated only during fire emergencies. The pump burns No. 2 diesel fuel oil and is tested approximately 1/2 hr per week.

    Emissions from the diesel-operated fire protection pump are discharged to the atmosphere through a separate stack. Pump specifications and fuel parameters are listed in Table 3.6-3. The emission contributions from these units are listed in Table 3.6-4.

    3. 6-8

    Nine Mile Point Unit 2 ER-OLS CHAPTER 5 ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACTS OF STATION OPERATION 5.1 LAND USE IMPACTS 5.1.1 The Site and Vicinity

    \

    Principal onsite land uses during station operation will be in the categories of utilities, transportation, and communication. Main plant structures and the cooling tower occupy approximately 9.3 ha (22.9 acres), or 2.6 percent of total site area of 364 ha (900 acres).

    the committed to major Table 5.1-1.

    plant structures Of this 9.3 ha (22.9 acres),

    are given 'n Hectares access roads occupy approximately 3.41 ha (8.43 acres); onsite transmission corridors and switchyards, 0.71 ha (1.74 acres).

    Land uses in the vicinity of Unit 2 are not exp'ected to be significantly affected by the plant's operation. The character of the vegetation and topography throughout the area surrounding the station is expected to screen or block most views of the facility from residential, recreational, or other sensitive land use areas. Section 5.3.3.1 indicates that visible plumes from the cooling tower could extend beyond a distance of 1.6 km (1 mi). Since expected . that the visible plume will rarely descend below it is heights of 91.4 m (300 ft) above ground and will not impinge upon the ground surface, it is not likely to create ground fogging or icing. Agriculture in the site vicinity will be subject to minimal or no impacts as a result of station operation.

    C Deliveries to the station are expected to arrive by truck and rail transport. Since impacts on local transportation facilities were minimal during the higher level of activity which occurred during plant construction, it is expected that there will be no significant impacts on transportation resources during operation.

    Operations personnel are expected to number approximately 300 and will be hired, to the extent possible, from the local area. All operations personnel are expected to reside in communities throughout the region surrounding Unit 2. As a result, impacts on land use will be dispersed and therefore minimized.

    5.1-1

    Nine Mile Point Unit 2'ER-OLS 5.1.2 Transmission Corridors and Offsite Areas Transmission corridors and offsite areas are discussed in Section 2.2.2. An existing right-of-way (ROW) was utilized for the construction of the Nine Mile 2-Volney 345-kV transmission line. There should be no adverse impacts associated with maintenance of the line, since existing local roads and access roads will be used.

    Farming and grazing land crossed by the transmission lines will not be significantly impacted, as these activities will be able to continue with, at most, short-term disruptions for maintenance activities and minor 'ong-term inconveniences on farming operations due to the presence of transmission structures in the fields.

    5.1.3 Historic and Archeological Sites None of the historically or archeologically significant sites discussed in Section 2.5.3 will be directly affected, relocated, or removed by the operation of Unit 2.

    As di.scussed in Section 3.1, vegetation and topography screen or block views of station facilities from'ost visually .sensitive sites in the Unit 2 vicinity. Of the historical sites in .the vicinity of Unit 2, the cooling tower will only be visible from Fort Ontario. Visitors to Fort Ontario will not be adversely affecte'd, however, by the view of the tower. Historic sites in the area are listed in Tables 2.5-34 and 3.1-1.

    Section 2.5.3 discusses historic and archeological sites along -the transmission ROW. These sites will not be disturbed during operation. When maintenance is required near a historic or archeological site, the guidelines followed during construction to 'minimize impacts and preserve these sites will be adhered to.

    5. 1-2

    Nine Mile Point Unit 2 ER-OLS An estimated 256 brown trout were impinged from 1976 through 1981 at Unit 1 and the JAF plant'. NYSDEC stocked 1,881,000 brown trout from 1975 through and im-cropping therefore represents 1980'ingement less than 0.02 percent of the stocked fish. Unit 2 represents a small addition to this estimated cropping.

    Endan ered S ecies pike (Ztizoetedion vitreum ~laucum), at one time common to Lake Ontario, are currently listed by the U.S. Fish and Nildlife Service and New York State as endangered and threatened. Neither species has been collected in im-pingement at Unit 1 or the JAF plant nor is anticipated to be collected at Unit 2.

    Summar of Im in ement Im act The preceding analyses indicate that the total annual mor-tality at Unit 2 is expected to be very low for all species.

    This mortality relative to various measures of abundance in the vicinity of Nine Mile Point indicates that plant effects will be insignificant at the population level. Previous analyses',, ' have indicated that the impingement crop-ping due to the operation of three major power plants at the eastern end of Lake Ontario has a minimal effect on fish populations. Because the cropping at Unit 2 is an extremely small increment of mortality, the conclusions of the previous analyses are not changed when Unit 2 mortality is added to the existing effect. This is also true for the conclusions of an analysis of the lakewide effects of crop-ping which included all operating power plants on Lake Ontario'~'.

    5.3.2 Discharge System 5.3.2.1 Thermal Description and Physical Impacts 5.3.2.1.1 Hydrothermal Description of Affected Area The Unit 2 discharge consists of cooling tower blowdown flow, service water bypass flow, and waste treatment system and liquid radwaste discharge flow which pass through a 1.4-m (4.5-ft) diameter pipe within one of the Unit 2 intake tunnels. The pipe emerges from the lake bed at a point ap-proximately 450 m (1,500 ft) from the existing shoreline, where the discharge flow enters a 1. 4-m (4. 5-ft) diameter steel riser leading to a two-port diffuser located on the lake bottom. Section 3.4 provides a complete description of 5.3-19

    Nine Mile Point Unit 2 ER-OLS the cooling system and its expected flow rate and associated temperature rises for different, operating conditions.

    The discharge consists of a two-port diffuser, each 0.5 m (1. 5 ft) in diameter, of f a common header with a horizontal angle of 120 deg between the ports (Figure 5.3-4).'ach port is located 1. 1 m (3.8 ft) above the lake bottom and an-gled 5 deg up to reduce jet contact with the bottom, which could result in local scour. The centerline submergence of the ports at the point of discharge is 10.7 m (35.2 ft),

    relative to the minimum controlled lake level (el 74. 4 m

    [244.0 ft] ) .

    To evaluate the performance of the discharge system, maximum surface temperatures and associated dilution factors were computed for a range of total discharge flows and associated temperature rises. The range was selected to include normal seasonal operating modes as well as low probability extreme conditions.

    5.3 '.1.2 Theoretical Framework of Mathematical Model The theory of submerged discharges indicates that effluent dilution is dependent on the exit densimetric Froude number, relative port spacing, and relative submergence of the dis-charge when momentum and buoyancy forces dominate the plume

    . dynamics. The Froude number represents the ratio between the discharge inertial force and buoyancy and is given by:

    Where:

    V = Exit velocity D = Port diameter G = Gravitational acceleration

    = Density difference of the effluent relative to the ambient water Relative port spacing is the ratio of the port centerline spacing to the port diameter; relative submergence is the ratio of the port centerline submergence to the port diameter.

    5.3-20

    Nine Mile Point Unit 2 ER-OLS In addition, ground icing due to cooling tower drift was as-sessed and found to be of little consequence. This con-clusion was based on the results of the modeling analysis presented in Section.5.3.3.1.1.2, in which a maximum annual surface accumulation of water due to drift was estimated to be 0.08 mm (0.003 in). Assuming that this entire ac-cumulation 'of water occurred during freezing conditions, is still an insignificant amount compared with a light ice it storm; which is defined as one that deposits less than 2.5 mm (0.1 in) of ice per hour'.

    highway or lake traffic are not expected.

    Therefore, impacts to f

    5.3.3.1.1.2 Annual and/or Monthly Amount of Drift Deposition in g/sq m or Drift Concentration in mg/cu m A mathematical model is developed to determine the downwind distribution of salt, the water deposition, and the concen-tration of airborne salt resulting from cooling tower operation. A detailed description of the model and results are contained in FSAR Appendix 2D. The model takes the following into account: I Configuration of the tower.

    1.

    Drift rate.

    and performance

    3. Exit velocity.
    4. Total dissolved solids (TDS) level.
    5. Droplet size distribution.
    6. Evaporation rate.
    7. . Plume buoyancy.
    8. Wind speed.
    9. Wind direction.
    10. Wet-bulb temperature.
    11. Relative humidity.

    The amount of drift leaving the cooling tower is assumed to be 0.002 percent of the circulating water flow through the tower. This number is less than that guaranteed by the cooling tower manufacturer, and in fact even lower drift rate percentages may be achieved. Monthly average TDS 5.3-35

    Nine Mile Point Unit 2 ER-OLS concentrations in the blowdown and 3 yr of onsite, hourly average meteorological data (January 1, 1974, through December 31, 1976) are used as input to the salt drift model.

    The meteorological input data used in the model consist of wind speed, wind direction, dry-bulb temperature, wet-bulb temperature, and relative humidity at the 61-m (200-ft) level. The difference between the dry-bulb temperatures at 61 m (200 ft) and at 8 m (27 ft) (bT) is also used.

    Normally, the low level relative humidity would be used to determine tower performance, but due to the large amount of missing data for this parameter, the upper- level relative humidity is chosen. A comparison of the relative humidities at these two levels shows an average difference of only 4.6 percent, which has little effect on the salt drift model results. The results of a sensitivity test of the drift model to relative humidity, using 1 month (December 1974) of meteorological data, show an ll-percent decrease in the maximum salt deposition rate and an 8.7-percent decrease in the maximum water deposition rate by using the 61-m (200-ft) relative humidity in place of the 9.1-m (30-ft) relative humidity.

    There is also a substitution of the 31-m (100-ft) wind direction when the 61-m (200-ft) wind direction is missing to ensure that a high percentage of data is used. This practice does not significantly affect the salt drift results because of the very small changes in wind direction with height between these levels.

    Predicted average annual salt deposition rates in lb/acre/yr are shown on FSAR Figure 2.3-26. The maximum salt deposition rate is predicted to be 0.03 g/sq m/yr (0.27 lb/acre/yr), occurring approximately 2,000 m (6,562 ft) northwest of the tower. FSAR Figure 2.3-27 presents annual water deposition rates in lb/acre/yr, with a maximum value of 77.4 g/sq m/yr (690. 6 lb/acre/yr) occurring 2,000 m (6,562 ft) northwest of the tower. This amount corresponds to 0.08 mm (0.003 in) of water per year.

    Predicted average monthly salt deposition rates in lb/acre/yr are shown on FSAR Figures 2 '-28 through 2.3-39.

    Monthly and seasonal water deposition rates are not shown because the maximum annual amount of 0.08 mm (0.003 in) is insignificant compared to annual precipitation at the site of over 76 cm (30 in).

    5.3-36

    Nine Mile Point Unit 2 ER-OLS In addition to the drift deposition rates, airborne salt concentrations at ground level are calculated. The maximum annual average airborne salt- concentration is predicted to be 0;83xlO mg/cu m (5.18x10 '" lb/cu ft) at a distance of 2,400 m (7,874 ft) northwest of the tower. The~ highest value over land is predicted to be 5.6x10 mg/cu m (350xlO ~~ lb/cu ft) at 1,067 m (3,500 ft) south of the tower. A value of 1.22x10 mg/cu m (7.62x10 lb/cu ft) is predicted for the maximum hourly airborne salt concen-tration which occurs at a distance of 500 m (1,640 ft) west-northwest from the tower. The maximum hourly airborne salt concentration over land is predicted to be 1.19xlO mg/cu m (7.43x10 lb/cu ft) at a distance of 1,067 m (3,500 ft) west-southwest of the tower.

    5.3.3.1.1.3 Cloud Development. and Cloud Shadowing The extent to which natural-draft cooling tower plumes con-tribute to cloud formation can be qualitatively assessed based on observational studies conducted at three operating, natural-draft, cooling tower sites, 'ooling tower sites'.

    plumes were At each of these observed to occasionally cause broken cloud decks to become overcast and to make thin clouds thicker. Separate cloud formations were sometimes observed to result from visible plume formation from the cooling towers but usually at altitudes of several thousand feet above ground. Therefore, the potential for increased cloud development due to cooling tower operation appears to be minimal compared to the potential for development due to natural causes.

    The impact of plume shadowing depends highly on the extent and duration of visible plume formation. The results of the analysis presented in Section 5.3.3.1.1.1 provide a quan-titative assessment of the configuration and frequency of occurrence of visible plumes resulting from the operation of the Unit 2 tower. FSAR Figure 2.3-25 indicates that any shadowing effects of the visible plumes on the region would be very localized, since less than 10 percent of the plumes extend beyond 1.6 km (1 mi) from the tower. Likewise,,the infrequent. occurrence of plumes longer than 1.6 km (1 mi) would most likely be on naturally cloudy days, which would not contribute to shadowing. Therefore, likely that cooling tower plume s.shadowing it is highly un-would have an ad-verse impact on any offsite locations.

    5.3-37

    Nine Mile Point Unit 2 ER-OLS 5.3.3.1.1.4 Weather Modification in Terms of Increased Precipitation The natural-draft: cooling tower at Nine Mile Point could create an insignificantly small increase in precipitation, primarily during the winter months. Sufficient research and field data are now available to rule out the triggering of violent storms such as thunderstorms or squalls.

    Observations of precipitation falling from natural-draft plumes are very limited. Kramer and Seymour have documented one observation of light rain falling from a natural-draft cooling tower plume and several observations of light snowfall'. Though it may be possible for a cooling tower to modify the precipitation pattern immediately downwind of the tower, it will not alter the total precipitation in the region, as the water vapor emissions from the tower are small compared to natural fluxes'uring the winter of 1975-1976, Kramer et al observed light snow from several different cooling tower plumes on 10 separate days'. Furthermore, only light, fluffy snowfall has been observed in studies of natural-draft cooling tower plumes associated with power plants of a size similar to Unit 2. These events have been of short duration, and the area affected by the precipitation has been confined to the region under the visible plume. None of these occurrences took place during the agricultural season.

    Though little is known about the actual precipitation mechanisms causing the snowfall, it was found to occur only during stable atmospheric conditions with temperatures below

    -12 C (10 F) at the height of the plume centerline. These observations have been theoretically substantiated by Koenig'~~'.

    While studies of actual natural-draft cooling tower plumes have not documented any cases of the plumes triggering a

    -thunderstorm or squall, the potential for a cooling tower plume to trigger such an event has been analytically considered. Hanna has compared the energy produced by natural phenomena such as thunderstorms and Great Lakes snowsqualls and found that the energy produced by these phenomena is 10 to 10,000 times the energy released by a wet cooling tower at, a 1,000-MW generating effects require concentrated heat releases in a small area, station'. Such substantially larger than those from the Unit 2 cooling tower.

    5.3-38

    Nine'ile Point Unit 2 ER-OLS TABLE OF CONTENTS Section Title Volume.

    Chapter 1 INTRODUCTION 1.1 Proposed Project 1.2 Status of Reviews and Approvals 1.3 Cross Reference to Regulatory Guide 4.2, Revision 2 1 Appendix 1A 1.

    Appendix 1B 1 Chapter 2 ENVIRONMENTAL DESCRIPTIONS 2.1 Description of the Station Location 1 2.2 Land Use 1 2.3 Water 1 2.4 Ecology 1 2.5 Socioeconomics F 1

    2.6 Geology 2 2.7 Meteorology 2 2.8 Related Federal Project Activities 2.

    2.9 Ambient Air Quality 2 2.10 Noise 2 Chapter 3 PIANT DESCRIPTION 3.1 External Appearance and Plant Layout 3.2 Reactor Steam-Electric System 3.3 Plant Water Use 3.4 Cooling Systems 3.5 Radioactive Waste Management, Systems 3.6 Nonradioactive Waste Systems 3.7 Power Transmission Systems 3.8 Transportation of Radioactive Materials Chapter 4 ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACTS OF CONSTRUCTION

    ,Nine'Mile Point Unit 2 ER-OLS TABLE OF CONTENTS (Cont)

    Section Title Volume Chapter 5 ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACTS OF STATION OPERATION 5.1 Land Use Impacts 5.2 Hydrological Alterations, Plant Water Supply, and Water Use Impacts 5.3 Cooling System Impacts 5.4 Radiological Impacts from Routine Operation 5.5 Nonradioactive Waste System Impacts 5.6 Transmission System Impacts 5.7 Uranium Fuel Cycle I'mpacts 5.8 Socioeconomic Impacts 5.9 Decommissioning and Dismantling 5.10 Measures and Controls to Limit Adverse Impacts Appendix 5A Chapter 6 ENVIRONMENTAL MEASUREMENTS AND MONITORING PROGRAMS 6.1 Thermal 6.2 Radiological 6.3 Hydrological 6.4 Meteorological Monitoring 6.5 Biological 6.6 Chemical 6.7 Other Monitoring Programs, 6.8 Environmental Measurements and Monitoring Programs Chapter 7 ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACTS OF POSTULATED ACCIDENTS INVOLVING RADIOACTIVE MATERIALS 7.1 Plant Accidents 7.2 Transportation Accidents Appendix 7A Appendix 7B Appendix 7C Chapter 8 THE NEED FOR THE PIANT

    Nine Mile Point Unit 2 ER-OLS

    6. Turbine building (estimates of interior noise levels propagating through the turbine building walls) .
    7. Large ventilation supply and exhaust fans for the turbine, reactor, and radwaste buildings.

    Unit 2 operational noise levels for each of the preceding noise sources were calculated at =the ambient measurement locations shown on Figure 2.10-1. The predicted Unit 2 noise levels are given in Table 5.8-1, which also includes the measured ambient noise levels (including the operating noise levels from Unit 1 and the JAF plant) for comparison.

    At all offsite locations, Unit 2 noise levels are predicted to be less than 40 dBA. Predicted noise levels along the southwest boundary of the power plant (Lakeview Road) range from 33 dBA at location 2 to 37 dBA at location 1.

    Predicted noise levels along Miner Road, south of the plant, range from 28 dBA at location 3 to'2 dBA at location 9.

    Along the southeast boundary of the power plant (Route 29),

    predicted noise levels range from 28 dBA at location 3 to 39 dBA at location 6.

    An analysis of the predicted noise levels from each of the primary noise sources indicates that, in areas east of the power plant (locations 4, 5, and 6), the reactor building venti'lation system supply fans located at the rear of the standby gas treatment building are the dominant noise source (above 30 dBA), with a level of 37 dBA at location 6. At all other locations, the noise levels from each of the in-dividual noise sources were less than 30 dBA. However, the total noise level obtained by logarithmically adding these noise sources generally produced noise levels in the range of 25-39 dBA, depending on the distance of each location from Unit 2. Also, because of the distance of the natural-draft cooling tower from the nearest property line (approximately 1. 6 km [1 mi ] to locations 1 and 6),

    predicted noise levels from this source are expected to be less than 29 dBA.

    Combining (logarithmically adding) the predicted Unit 2 operational noise levels (Table 5.8-1, column 7) and the measured ambient noise levels (Table 5.8-1, column 5, without crickets) results in the expected overall noise levels listed in Table 5.8-1, column 8. These results in-dicate that, with Unit 2 operating, the expected noise levels at each of the measurement locations will increase between 1 and 4 dBA, except at location 6 where the increase will be approximately 7-8 dBA. This increase at location 6 5.8-3

    Nine Mile Point Unit 2 ER-OLS is primarily due to the expected impact from the reactor building ventilation supply fans. Although the addition of Unit 2 will result in a general increase in ambient sound levels, these levels are in compliance with both HUD (45 dBA) and EPA (49 dBA) noise guidelines, discussed in Section 2.10.3, which are used to define community noise acceptability.

    5.8.2 Social and Economic 5.8.2.1 Direct Impact of Station Operation Ad valorem taxes for Unit 2 have been estimated for the first 10 yr of plant operation. The estimated payments are listed in Table 5.8-2 and apply only to Unit 2. Estimated tax payments range from $ 15,147,586 in the first year of station operation to $ 29,3.49,859 in the tenth year (1982 dollars).

    Effects of these revenues on the town of Scriba and Oswego County depend on local planning of capital expenditures. The potential exists for the town of Scriba and the county of Oswego to gain significant benefits from the taxes generated by Unit 2.

    In addition to local property tax benefits, the local economy will also benefit from revenues generated by the purchase of goods and services for Unit 2. Based on expen-ditures made at Unit 1, ditures of approximately it is'estimated one million that dollars annual expen-will be made for goods and services purchased for Unit 2 within a 50-mile radius of the site.

    5.8.2.2 Impacts Associated With Operating Staff Operating phase manpower levels for the Unit 2 site are presented in Table 5.8-3. As indicated in this table, the operating staff will progressively increase from ap-proximately 235 employees during the preoperational testing phase (1983) to 645 employees in 1986 when startup testing will be conducted. The estimated payroll for the full com-plement of regular Unit. 2 operating employees is 18 .million dollars (expressed in 1982 dollars and based on 635 employees).

    To the extent possible, operating personnel will be drawn from the local area. Other personnel are expected to settle in communities surrounding Unit 2 throughout the county.

    Supplement 2 5 '-4 June 1983

    Nine Mile Point Unit 2 ER-OLS TABLE 5A-2 DILUTION FACTORSt POPULATION SERVED'ND TRAVEL TIMES FROM THE SITE Approximate Distance From Transit Time Site to Point of Intake Population Served to Intake Public Water S stems(i) mi Dilution Factor ~people/~r~ ~hag Ontario Water District 46 WSW 871 5,000 225 Williamson Water District 41 WSW 826 4i700 200 Wolcott Village 25 WSW 647 2i500 122 City of Oswego 11 WSW 471 32 F 000 Metropolitan Water Board 8 WSW 464 120,000 39 Onondaga County<>>

    Sackets Harbor Village 32 NNE 487 1,200 156 Chaumont Village 38 NNE 531 550 186 Sodus Village 36 WSW 773 4 500 176 Sodus Point 33 WSW 743 1,800 161 Cape Vincent Village 41 N 550 750 200 R. J. Sweezy 49 N 606 170 244 Township of Ernestown 48 NNW 606 892 Kingston Water Intake 47 N 582 77,000 Plant, Kingston Ontario Pickton Public Utility 48 NW 606 6,000 Kingston Township 46 N 582 22,000 244 Sandhurst Water Works 48 NNW 606 200 1 of 2

    E Nine Nile >oint Unit 2 Ew-OLS TABLE 5A-2 (Cont)

    Population Usage Transit Time Incremental Regions<>>

    Approximate Distance Prom Site to Point of Analysis eo lc r to >oint of

    >ecreation Analysis km Dilution Factor ~loatin Shoreland hr 0 to 10 738 1. 5+04 15 10 to 20 15 %07 1. 5+04 3 1+05 20 to 30 25. 348 1 5+04 4.7+05 30 to 40 404 1 5+04 6.9+04 107 40 to 50 457 1. 5+04 1 9+05 137 50 to 60 55 504 1 5+04 1. 8+04 168 60 to 70 65 1 5+04 1. 2+04 199 70 to 80 75 589 l. 5+04 1. 4+05 229 Approximate Distance From Transit Time Site to >oint of Intake to Intake Other Locations<>> km Dilution Pactor Edge of zone<~>

    initial dilution 5.9 0.0 (assumed)

    Closest accessible 15 307 shoreline<<>

    NOTE: 1. 5+ 04 = 1. Sx10i

    <>>Public water supply systems used to calculate 80-km (50-mi) radius

    ~>>Public water supply system ased to calculate the dose to the maximumpopulation doses from ingestion of potable water.

    offsite individuals from the ingestion of potable water and irrigated foods.

    <>>megions used to calculate 80-km (50-mi) radius population doses from ingestion of fish, boating, shoreline recreation (assumed one-eighth of fish caught in each region), and swimming.

    <~>Locations used to calculate doses to maximum offsite individuals from ingestion of aquatic foods, and from swimming and boating.

    <<>Location used to calculate doses to maximum offsite individuals from shoreline recreation. Closest accessible shoreline - closest occupied beach.

    Sup pl em en t 1 2 of 2 Nay 1983

    Nine Mile Point Unit 2 ER-OLS

    .CHAPTER 7 ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACTS OF POSTULATED ACCIDENTS INVOLVING RADIOACTIVE MATERIALS TABLE OF CONTENTS Section. Title ~acae 7.1 PLANT ACCIDENTS 7. 1-1 7.1.1 Identificati:on-of Design Basis Accidents 7. 1-1 7.1.1.1 Trivial Incidents (Class 1, Accidents) 7.1-1 7.1.1.2 Small Releases Outside Containment (Class 2 Accidents) 7.1-2 7.1.1.3 Radwaste System Failures (Class 3 Accidents) 7.1-2

    7. 1. l.3. 1 Equipment Leakage or Malfunction 7.1-2 7.1.1.3.2 Release of Waste Gas Storage Tank Contents 7 1 2

    ~

    7.1.1.3.3 . Release of Liquid Waste Storage Tank Contents 7.1-2 7.1.1.4 Fission Products to Primary System (Class 4 Accidents) 7.1-3 7.1.1.4.1 Fuel Cladding Defects 7.1-3 7.1.1.4 ' Off-Design Transients That Induce Fuel Failures Above Those Expected 7.1-3 7.1.1.5 Refueling Accidents (Class 6 Accidents) 7.1-3 7.1.1.5.1 Fuel Bundle Drop 7.1-3 7.1.1.5.2 Heavy Object Drop Onto Fuel in Core 7.1-4 7.1.1.6 Spent Fuel Handling Accident (Class 7 Accidents) 7.1-4 7.1.1.6,1 Fuel Assembly Drop in Fuel Storage Pool 7.1-4

    7. 1. 1. 6.2 Heavy Object Drop Onto Fuel Rack 7.1-4 7.1.1.6.3 Fuel Cask Drop 7.1-4 7.1.1.7 Accident Initiation Events Conside red in Design Basis Evaluation in the Safety Analysis Report (Class 8 Accidents ) 7.1-5 7.1.1.7.1 Loss-of-Coolant Accidents 7.1-5 7.1.1.7.1.1 Small Pipe Break 7.1-5 7 '.1.7.1.2 Large Pipe Break 7.1-5 7.1.1.7.2 Break in Instrument Line From Primary System That Penetrates the Primary Containment 7.1-6 7.1.1.7.3 Rod Drop Accident 7.1-6 7-i

    Nine Mile Point Unit 2 ER-OLS CHAPTER 7

    'TABLE OF CONTENTS (Cont)

    Section Title Pacae 7.1.1.7.4 Steam Line Breaks 7.1-6

    7. 1. 1. 7.4. 1 Small Pipe Break 7.1-6 7.1.1.7.4.2 Large Pipe Break 7.1-7 7.1.2 Discussion of Plant Accidents and Methodology Used to Calculate Doses 7.1-7 7.1.2.1 Estimates of Doses for Accidents 7.1-7 7.1 2.2

    ~ Man-Rem Values for Accidents 7.1-7 7.1.3 Class 9 Accidents Analysis 7.1-7 7.2 TRANSPORTATION ACCIDENTS 7.2-1 APPENDIX 7A PROBABALISTIC RISK ANALYSIS APPENDIX 7B MAIN STACK AND COMBINED RADWASTE AND REACTOR BUILDING'VENT ANNUAL AND GRAZING SEASON X/Q AND D/Q AT GROUND LEVEL FOR LOCATIONS OF MILK ANIMALS, MEAT ANIMALS, VEGE-TABLE GARDENS AND RESIDENCES BY SECTOR APPENDIX 7C POPULATION DISTRIBUTION CLASS 9 ACCIDENTS

    Nine Mile Point Unit 2 ER-OLS 7.1.1.7.4.2 Large Pipe Break This event is postulated as the sudden, complete severance of a main steam line in the turbine building. The isolation signal is expected to occur within 0.5 sec after the break, and an additional 5 sec are assumed for effecting full closure of the main steam isolation valve. During this 5.5-sec period, an integrated quantity of 4.1x10 kg (9.13x10 lb) of water and 7.1x10 kg (1.56x10 lb) of steam are estimated to be released in the turbine building.

    The representative source has been defined as 100 percent of the expected noble gas activity in the reactor steam and 50 percent of the halogens in the fluid exiting the break.

    The halogens and noble gases are released to the environment via the turbine building blowout panels.

    7.1.2 Discussion of Plant Accidents and Methodology Used to Calculate Doses Doses are calculated for a representative accident from each accident class defined in ESRP Section 7.1. Calculations of doses to individuals and the population are performed in ac-cordance with the method and assumptions of ESRP Section 7.1 and Regulatory Guides 1.3 and 1.145. Population doses are calculated by adjusting the individual doses by a factor that incorporates population density and X/Q values for each sector.

    7. 1.2. 1 Estimates of Doses for Accidents A summary of the radiological doses to an individual at the EAB is provided in Table 7.1-2. For each accident, the resultant thyroid, beta, and gamma doses are listed.

    7.1.2 ' Man-Rem Values for Accidents A summary of the population doses within an 80-km (50-mi) radius of Unit 2 is provided in Table 7.1-3. For each accident, the resultant thyroid, beta, and gamma population doses are listed.

    7.1.3 Class 9 Accidents Analysis The effect of Class 9 accidents at Unit 2 is analyzed probabilistically by comparing the Unit, 2 plant with a reference BWR plant for which a full analysis has been completed. The reference BWR plant chosen for accident/event and system analyses is the Grand Gulf 1 (GGl) plant. The reference BWR chosen for primary containment 7.1-7

    Nine Mile Point Unit 2 ER-OLS analysis is the Limerick plant. The consequence analysis is plant and site specific to Unit 2. Analysis methods are similar to those presented in the GCl study (NUREG/CR-1659/4 of 4), WASH-1400 (NUREG-75/014), and the Limerick probabilistic risk assessment (Docket Nos. 50-352 and 50-353). Details of the analysis, results, and conclusions are'resented in Appendix 7A.

    7. 1-8

    Nine Mile Point Unit 2 ER-OLS QUESTIONS AND RESPONSES Question Supplement Series Number Number E100 E240 E240.1 E240.2 E240.3 E240.4 E240.5 E240.6 E290 E290.1 2 E290.2 2 E290.3'290.4"

    .2

    '2 E290.5 2 E291 E291.1 3 E291.2 1 E291.3 2 E291.4 1 E291.5 2 E291.6 2 E291.7 4 E291.8 1 E291.9 3 E291.10 1 E291.11 2 E291.12 2 E291.13 3 E291.14 3 E291.15 2 E291.16 2 E291.17 2 E291.18 2 E291.20 2 E291.21 4 E291.22 4 E310 E310.1 E310.2 E310.3 E310.4 E310.5 E310.6 E320 E320.1 E320.2 E320.3 Suppl'ement .5 EQR-i December 1983

    Nine Mile. Point Unit 2 ER-OIS QuESTIONS AND RESPONSES (CONT)

    Question Supplement Series Number Number E450 E450.1 E450.2 E450.3 E450.4 E451 E451.1 3 E451.2 2 E451.3 2 E451.4 2 E451.5 2 E451.6 2 E451.16(a) 4 E451.16(b) 4 E451.17 4 E451.18 5 E460 E460.25 E470 E470.1 E470.2 E470.3 E470.4 E470.5 E470.6 Supplement 5 EQR-ii'ecember 1983

    Nine Nile Point. Unit 2 ER-OLS QUESTION E240.1 (3.3)

    Update the water use data (including temperature in Table 3.3-1) to include historical meteorologic and hydrologic data recorded up to calendar year 1082 (or for as recently as available data will permit).

    RESPONSE

    The water use data (Table 3.3-1) is being updated, using current meteorological and hydrological data, and will be provided in an ER-OLS supplement during the first quarter of 1984.

    Supplement 5 QSR E240.1-1 December 1983

    0 Nine Mile Point Unit, 2 ER-OLS QUESTION E291.20 Identify, by means of specific references, all areas of outdated information as indicated in your letter of February 3, 1982 in the NRC report entitled "Evaluation of the Environmental Effects Due to the Change in Cooling Systems at Nine Mile Point, Unit 2, from a Once-Through System to a Closed Cycle System Utilizing a Natural Draft Cooling Tower.'" References should identify specific items of outdated information in that report 'and the specific references in the ER or FSAR that contain the correct and updated information.

    RESPONSE

    Cooling tower design information given in the NRC report entitled, "Evaluation of the Environmental Effects Due to the Change in Cooling Systems at Nine Mile Point, Unit 2, from a Once-Through System to a Closed Cycle System Utilizing a Natural Draft Cooling Tower," which has been updated in the ER-OLS is given below with reference to the applicable ER-OLS sections.

    Item Section

    1. Cooling tower Figure 2 Figure 3.1-1 3.1 location
    2. Cooling tower 500 541 3.4 '.3 height (ft)
    3. Bottom diameter (ft) 450 405 3.4.2.3
    4. Top diameter (ft) 220 273 3.4.2 '
    5. Circulating water 579,909 580, 000 3.4. 1. 1.2 flow (gpm)
    6. Drift rate (% of 0.002 0 '05 3.4.1.1.4 circulating water flow)
    7. Maximum evaporation 12,000 13,800 3.4.1.1.4 rate (gpm)

    Supplement 2 QS(R E291.20-1 June 1983

    Nine Mile Point Unit 2 ER-OIS QUESTION E291.22 Describe procedures for disposal of preoperational cleaning solution wastes.

    RESPONSE

    NMPC is presently evaluating proposed preoperational cleaning and flushing activities to determine (1) the quantities of wastewater that will result, (2) the concentration of contaminants in these wastewaters (e.g.,

    suspended solids, oil and grease, cleaning agents, etc.) and (3) appropriate alternatives for the disposal of the resulting wastewaters. One objective of this evaluation is to explore methods of reusing cleaning and flushing solutions in order to minimize the quantity of wastewater requiring disposal. NMPC will work closely with the New York State Department of Environmental Conservation to identify acceptable wastewater disposal procedures consistent with water quality standards. Finali,zed procedures are anticipated to be available by the first quarter of 1984.

    Supplement 4 QS(R E291.22-1 October 1983

    Nine Mile Point. Unit 2 ER-OLS QUESTEON E470.6 (5A)

    Describe how the dilution factors and transit times for Lake Ontario water flow specified in Table 5A-2 were determined.

    RESPONSE

    Response will be submitted in the first quarter of 1984.

    Supplement 4 QEcR E470.6-1 October 1983

    Nine Mile Point Unit 2 ER-OKS QUESTION E470.7 (SA)

    Describe why the dilution factor for the 0-10 kilometer range in Table 5A-2 is greater, for example, than the 70-80 kilometer range in that same table.

    RESPONSE

    Response will be submitted in the first quarter of 1984.

    Supplement 4 QGR E470.7-1 October 1983

    b Also AvaBaMe 6n.

    Apertme Ged. +~ A lhV>W~Pf&'Q+4P ~ ><+>ygr-"'~et&'~gp'sty'CP gP~+g PA'v+g~JlQ .> .w1t~Qs1

    +PAL 4 t 2 Jg~kf g %e v~+Pa% $i "/V,- Q" ~~Pi~9 ~+ g .+ $ '~~~ g0i +c ~w P T T

    ~

    c-tw ~p~ ~,~~

    Z ~g'/Q 7,

    "~~t

    =$ Q:,

    ',:. >W~EC'~::. '" - '":

    m~ g .

    g -

    "'j"';~j,~~~:;

    I .

    ARCHITECTURAL RENDERING OF THE PLANT ENVIRONMENTAL REPORT-OLS SUPPLEMENT 2 JUNE 1983

    4 ~

    ~:

    I

    ~ ~ ~

    sW

    ~%

    Nine Mile Point Unit 2 ER-OLS 3.2 REACTOR STEAM-ELECTRIC SYSTEM 3.2.1 Number of Units and Description of Reactor Unit 2 utilizes. a boiling water nuclear steam-generating system manufactured by the General Electric Company (GE),

    with a rated core thermal power of 3,323 MW. The electrical output of the turbine generator is approximately 1,100 MW.

    The unit is designed and constructed by Stone Ec Webster En-gineering Corporation (SWEC) ~ The principal components are the turbine generator and nuclear steam-generating system.

    The major components and operation of a boiling water reac-tor (BWR) power station are shown diagrammatically on Figure 3.2-1.

    The BWR is a direct-cycle, light water moderated, thermal reactor. Heat is produce'd in the reactor vessel by the fis-sion of Uranium-235, which is contained within 764 fuel as-semblies in the reactor core.

    Each fuel assembly contains 62 fuel rods and 2 "water rods" arranged in an 8 by 8 fuel rod configuration. A fuel rod is a Zi rcaloy-2 clad tube that contains fuel pellets composed of UOz stacked vertically in the tube. Fuel enrichment varies .from initial core to subsequent reload cores. For the initial core, three average fuel bundle enrichments are utilized, with an initial average enrichment of 1.88 percent.

    Uranium-235. The anticipated initial core irradiation is approximately 9,600 MWd/short ton. The weight of UOq in the core is approximately 349,000 lb (158,300 kg).

    Water enters the reactor from the feedwater system and is circulated through the core, where it receives heat from the fission reaction and vaporizes into steam. The steam is directed through moisture separators and steam dryers in the top of the reactor vessel. The water also serves as a moderator to slow the fast neutrons emitted during fission to the thermal range, where they can be captured by Uranium-235 to continue the fission process.

    The reactor vessel is fabricated from low-alloy steel, the interior of which is clad with stainless steel. It has an inside diameter of 251 in (638 cm) and an overall height of approximately 74 ft (22.5 m). The top head is flanged and removable for access to the core for refueling and servicing. The bottom head is fixed and contains pene-trations for the 185 control rod drive (CRD) mechanisms that position control rod blades within the core.

    3. 2-1

    Nine Mile Point Unit 2 ER-OLS Two reactor recirculation pumps take suction from the an-nulus between the core region and the reactor vessel wall and return flow to nozzles on the reactor vessel that are connected to a total of 10 pairs of internal jet pumps. The high-velocity water flowing from the jet pump nozzle en-trains the balance of the feedwater flow and directs it to the plenum at the bottom of the vessel as coolant for the reactor core.

    The CRD 'system is composed of 185 CRD mechanisms with hy-draulic control units, each servicing a control rod within the core. The system uses a double-acting hydraulic piston which uses water supplied from the condensate system as the operating fluid. The drive mechanisms can position the rods at intermediate increments over the entire core length, thus allowi'ng selection of the desired thermal neutron flux pat-tern within the core. Nitrogen-charged accumulators provide stored energy for rapid insertion (scram) of the control 1 od.

    Reactor water quality is maintained by the reactor water cleanup system, which removes fission products, corrosion products, and other soluble and insoluble impurities. Reac-tor water to be processed is taken from the suction side of each of'he two reactor water recirculation pumps and from the bottom of the reactor pressure vessel. The temperature of- the water is reduced to. 120 F by first passing the water through the tube side of the regenerative heat exchanger and then through the tube side of the nonregenerative heat exchanger. After filtration and deionization by the filter/

    demineralizer units, the water is reheated when passed through the shell side of the regenerative heat exchanger and returned to the reactor vessel by way of the feedwater system.

    The filter/demineralizer units are a pressure precoat type, with holding elements coated with Solka-Floe and powdered ion exchange resins that serve as filter media and a demineralizing agent, . respectively. Upon exhaustion, backwashing, and storage for radioactive decay, the precoat is conveyed to the radwaste system for disposal.

    The residual heat removal (RHR) system .removes both decay heat and sensible heat from the reactor water within the nu-clear boiler syst: em during reactor shutdown. The shutdown cooling mode has the capability of reducing the reactor ves-sel to a temperature of 125 F, including draining and flushing, in approximately 20 hr after the control rods are inserted for shutdown and then maintaining the water at this temperature or lower (FSAR Section 5.4.7). The reactor 3.2-2

    Nine Mile Point Unit 2 ER-OLS water is taken from one of the reactor water recirculation loops, pumped through the RHR heat exchangers, and returned to the reactor vessel via the reactor water recirculation loop. Flow from the RHR system during the shutdown cooling mode can be diverted to the spray nozzle located above the core in the reactor vessel to condense steam while the .ves-sel is being flooded.

    In the event that the reactor vessel becomes isolated from the main condenser and the feedwater becomes unavailable, to maintain reactor vessel water level, the reactor 'core isolation cooling (RCIC) system is initiated automatically:

    to allow the complete, orderly shutdown of the plant. After reactor pressure has decreased to a predetermined value, the shutdown cooling mode of the RHR system is initiated.

    manually. The RCIC system maintains sufficient water in the reactor pressure vessel to cool the core and maintain the, reactor plant in standby condition. It includes a steam turbine which drives the RCIC pump and necessary accessories, instrumentation, and controls. The pump sup-plies makeup water from the condensate storage tank, the steam condensed in RHR heat exchangers, or, in the emergency case, from the suppression pool within the containment. The.

    turbine is driven by part of the decay heat steam generated within'he reactor vessel and exhausts to the suppression pool within the containment. The RCIC pump discharge water flows into the reactor vessel through a connection on the reactor head. The water is distributed to obtain mixing with the hot water or steam.

    The steam produced in the reactor flows to the turbine generator, which is part of the station power conversion system, for conversion to electrical energy.. The station power conversion system consists of components of conven-tional design proven by use in large power stations.- Where necessary, equipment is modified and shielded to conform to federal rules and=regulations on radiation standards.

    In addition to the preceding systems used for normal power generation, standby conditions, and shutdown cooling, several systems are installed to provide emergency core cooling in the unlikely event of a reactor accident. These systems include the high-pressure core spray system, low-pressure core spray system, and the low-pressure coolant injection mode of the RHR system. These systems function to provide cooling water for the reactor core to restore and maintain, if necessary, the water inventory in the reactor vessel after a design basis loss-of-coolant ac- .

    cident so that the core is sufficiently cooled to prevent fuel cladding damage.

    3.2-3

    Nine Mile Point Unit 2 ER-OLS 3.2.2 Description of the Turbine Generator and Condenser The turbine generator, manufactured by- GE, is an 1,800-rpm tandem compound unit consisting of one double-flow, high--

    pressure casing and three double-flow, low-pressure casings.

    The turbine and generator design information is detailed in FSAR Table 10.1-1 and Section 8.3.1. The turbine provides extraction steam for six stages of feedwater heating. Com-bination moisture-separator reheaters located on each side of the high-pressure turbines are in the steam path between the high-pressure and low-pressure sections. Each com-bination moisture-separator reheater contains one stage of moisture separation and one stage of reheat in one shell.

    There are three one-third capacity feedwater heater trains that receive .extraction steam from the high- and low-pressure turbines. For additional information, refer to the feedwater and condensate system description in FSAR Section 10.4.7.

    Steam exhausting from the low-pressure turbines flows to the main surface 'ondenser and is condensed by circulating water. The condenser is a three-shell, single-pass, divided water box arrangement with a surface of approximately 672,000 sq ft (62,430 sq m). The shells are set transverse to ..the turbine shafts.

    Radiolytically generated oxygen and hydrogen and air in-leakage to each condenser are removed to the off-gas system by one of two two-stage steam jet-air ejectors during normal operation.

    C Two motor-driven mechanical vacuum (hogging) pumps ex-hausting to the main stack are used during startup to evacuate the condenser and turbine casing.

    The condensate stored in each condenser is pumped via three condensate pumps through the condensate-demineralizer system; two (one spare) steam jet-air ejectors arranged in parallel; two gland steam leakoff condensers; three conden-sate booster pumps; second and third point external drain coolers; first, second, third, fourth, and fifth point heaters; and then to the suction of the three reactor feed pumps. The feedwater discharge from each of the three feed pumps passes through the sixth point high-pressure feedwater heater and flows to the reactor.

    The condensate demineralizer system consists of nine mixed-bed, equally sized ion exchange units (two as spares).

    3.2-4

    DIFFUSER IL COORDINATES N I285 070 N 43'7 36 E 545 880 W 7'4 37

    / pi~~

    ~a~

    INTAKE FL COORDFIATE

    < EXISTING LAND GRANT{4-9-65) N Qel CCC rgrg ~ /

    lll284 740 E 545 965 W F43'l &

    76'24'~ INTAKE COORDINATES N-l284 870 435 W 76~ 24'Rf N4Ã3I'34'-546 TINNEL N0.2

    <meE Nal EXST

    ~INTAKE q. COORDINATES SHORE N l284 493 IPSE E 545 533 LAKE CNTAIIO

    ~I lO C4

    ~INTAKE TUNNEL FENCE E 548300 OUTLET C COORDINATES N I283 94I E 5455I4 EXST DCCE UAKT N I283 7I749 E 546 089.24

    'Ll 4'I I

    4 g l~

    US LAKESURYEY LI II MON ARMY Xa 546 I2I.N Y~ l283685 85 IL 9

    0 II L'I PRg L EXST8IG

    ',APERTURE STONE FACED DIKE CARD UNT I DIAT 2 FIGURE 3.4-2 Q N l283 I73 REACIDR Q E 545 760 N 1283 6.99 $

    E 546 658.30 UNIT 2 LAKE USE PLAN

    ~ >va8abfeoa Aperture Card; NIAGARA MOHAWK POWER CORPORATION NINE MILE POINT-UNIT 2

    ,'NVIRONMENTALREPORT-OLS

    ,'UPPLEMENT 2 JUNE 1983 9'3L4~<o /8 7- 67

    . ~ ~-

    + 'ts e

    'l

    E ATING LICENSE STAGE NINE MILEPOINT NUCLEAR STATION UNIT 2 o Q~[g SUPPLEMENT 2 J

    8306220i07 830606 PDR ADOCK 050004iO C PDR

    I II I e C

    'I T

    1

    NINE MILE POINT NUCLEAR STATION UNIT 2 NIAGARA MOHAWK POWER CORPORATION FSAR AMENDMENT/ER-OLS SUPPLEMENT RECEIPT ACKNOWLEDGMENT hlame of set. holder Set No.

    I acknowledge receipt of:

    Amendment Supplement My copy has been updated, and superseded pages have been removed and destroyed.

    Set Reassi nment and or Set Holder Chan e of Address (if necessary)

    Please reassign this manual to, and/or change my address as follows:

    Please sign, date, and return to:

    R. H. Pinney Lead Licensing Engineer Stone 6 Webster Engineering Corporation .

    3 Executive Campus P.O. Box 5200 Cherry Hill, NJ 08034 Signature Date

    Nine Mile Point Uni ER-OLS SUPPLEMENT 2 INSERTION INSTRUCTIONS The following instructions are for the insertion of Supplement 2 into the Unit. 2 ER-OLS. Remove pages, tables, and/or figures listed:in the REMOVE column and replace them with the pages, tables and/or figures listed in the INSERT column. Dashes ( -) in, either column indicate no action required.

    Vertical bars have been .placed .in the margins of inserted pages and .tables to indicate revision locations.

    ar

    ~inc Mile Point Unit 2 ER VOLUME 1 REMOVE INSERT 2-i/2-ii 2-i/2-ii 2-vii/2-viii Z-vii/2-viii 2-xi/2-xii 2-xi/2-xii 2-xiii/ 2-xiii/2-xiv 2.2-3/2.2-4 2.2-3/2.2-4 2.2-5/2.2-6 2.2-5/2.2-6 Table 2.2-7 (1 of 1) Table 2.2-7 (1 of 1)

    Fig. 2.2-1 Fig. 2.2-1 Fig. 2.2-2 Fig. 2.2-2 Fig. 2.2-5 Sheet "Fig. 2.2-5 has been deleted."

    Fig. 2.2-6 Sheet "Fig. 2.2-6 has been deleted."

    Fig. 2.2-8 Fig. 2.2-8 2.3-1/2.3-2 2.3-1/2.3-1a 2.3-1b/2.3-lc 2.3-1d/2.3-2 2.3.3/2.3-4 2.3-3/2.3-4 2.3-5/2.3-6 2.3-5/2.3-6 2.3-7/2.3-'8 2.3-7/2.3-7a 2.3-7b/2.3-8 2.3-9/2.3-10 2.3-9/2.3-10 2,3-11/2.3-12 2.3-11/2.3-12 2.3-13/2.3-14 2.3-13/2.3-14 2.3-15/2.3-16 2.3-15/2.3-16 2.3-17/2.3-18 2.3-17/2.3-18 2.3-19/2.3-20 2.3-19/2.3-20 2.3-21/2.3-22 2.3-21/2.3-22 2.3-23/2.3-24 2.3-23/2.3-24 2.3-25/ 2.3-25/2.3-26 Table 2.3-1 (2 of 2) Table 2.3-1 (2 of 2)

    Table 2.3-3 (2 of 4) Table 2.3-3 (2 of 4)

    Table 2.3-3 (4 of 4) Table 2.3-3 (4 of 4)

    Table 2.3-4 (1 of 1) Table 2.3-4 (1 of 1)

    Table 2.3-5 (1 of 1) Table 2.3-5 (1 of 1)

    Table 2.3-6 (1 of 1) Table 2.3-6 (1 of 1)

    Table 2.3-7 (2 of 2) Table 2.3-7 (2 of 2)

    Table 2.3-8 (1 of 1) Table 2.3-8 (1 of 1)

    Table 2.3-9 (2 of 2) Table 2.3-9 (2 of 2)

    Table 2.3-10 (1 of 1) Table 2.3-10 (1 of 1)

    Table 2.3-11 (1 of 1) Table 2.3-11 (1 of 1)

    Table 2.3-13 (7 of 7) Table 2.3-13 (7 of 7)

    Table 2.3-14 (2 of 2) Table 2.3-14 (2 of 2)

    Fig. 2.3-1 Fig. 2.3-1 Fig. 2.3-2 Fig. 2.3-2 Fig. 2.3-3 Fig. 2.3-3 Fig. 2.3-4 Fig. 2.3-4

    l Nine Mile Point Unit VOLUME 1 (Cont) 2 OLS REMOVE INSERT Fig. 2.3-5 Fig 2. 3-5 o

    Fig. 2.3-6 Fig. 2.3-6 Fig. 2 3 7 ~

    Fig. 2.3-8 Fige 2.3-9 Fig. 2.3-10 Fig. 2 3 1 1

    ~

    Fig 2 3 1 2 o ~

    Fig. 2 3 1 3

    ~

    Fig 2.3-14 o

    2.4-13/2.4-14 2.4-13/2.4-14 2.4-17/2.4-18 2.4-17/2.4-18 2.4-21/2.4-22 2.4-21/2.4-22 2.4-23/2;4-24 2 '-23/2.4-24 2.4-25/2.4-26 2.4-25/2.4-26 2.4-27/2.4-28 2.4-27/2.4-28 2.4-29/2.4-30 2.4-29/2.'4-30 2.4-31/2.4-32 2.4-31/2.4-32 2.4-33/2.4-34 2.4-33/2.4-34 2.4-35/2.4-36 2.4-35/2.4-36 2.4-37/2.4-38 2.4-37/2.4-38 2.4-43/--- 2.4-43/---

    Table 2.4-13 (2 of 2) Table 2.4-13 (2 of 2)

    Table 2.4-16 (1 of 1)

    Fig. 2.4-2 Fig. 2.4-2 Table 2.5-24 (1 of 1) Table 2.5-24 (1 of 1)

    0 e VOLUME 2 REMOVE INSERT 3.6-7/3.6-8 3.6-7/3.6-8 Fig. 3.1-2 Fig. 3.1-2 Fig. 3.1-8 Fig. 3.1-8 Fig. 3.4-2 Fig. 3.4-2 5-iii/5-iv 5-iii/5-iv 5 v11/5-vi1i 5-vii/5-viii 5.2-1/5.2-2 5.2-1/5.2-2 5.3-47/5.3-48 5.3-47/5.3-48 5..8-3/5.8-4 5.8-3/5.8-4 5.8-5/- 5.8-5/---

    Table 5.8-3

    Ca tg,

    Ls EQ

    ~ Nine Mile Point Unit 2 E LS VOLUME 3 REMOVE INSERT Fig. 6.5-1 Fig. 6.5-1 7A-iii/7A-iv 7A-iii/7A-iv 7A.1-1/7A.1-2 7A.1-1/7A.1-2 Fig. 7A.4-2 Fig. 7A.4-2 7A.6-1/7A.6-2 ~

    7A.6-1/7A.G-la 7A.6-1b/7A.6-2 7A.6-3/7A.6-4 7A.6-3/7A.6-4 7A.6-4a/7A.6.-4b.

    7A. 6-5/7A. 6-6 7A.6-5/7A.6-6 7A.6-7/7A.6-8 7A.6-7/7A.6-8 7A.6-9/ - 7A.6-9/

    Table 7A.6-2 (1 of 1) Table 7A.6-2 (l.of 1)

    Table 7A.6-6 (1 of .1) Table 7A.6-6 (1 of 1)

    Table 7A.6-7 -(1 of 2, 2 Of 2) Table 7A.6-7 (1 of 2; 2 of 2)

    Table 7A.6-9 (1 of 1) Table 7A.6-.9 (1 of 1)

    Fig. 7A.6-3 Fig. 7A.6-3 Fig. '7A.6-4 Fig. 7A.6-4 Fig. 7A.6-5 Fig. 7A.6-5 Fig. 7A.6-. 6 Fig. 7A.6-6 Fig. 7A.6-7 Fig. 7A.6-7 Fig. 7A.6-8 Fig. 7A.6-8 Fig. 7A.6-9 Fig. 7A.6-9 Fig. 7A.6-10 Fig. 7A.6-10 Fig. 7A.6-11 Fig. 7A.6-11 Fig. 7A.6-12 Fig. 7A.6-12.,

    Fig. 7A.6-13 7A. 7-1/7A. 7-2 7A.7-1/7A.7-2 7A.7-3/ - 7A.7-3/-

    2 ERLS QUESTIONS AND RESPONSES REMOVE INSERT EQR- 1/EQR- 2 E240. 1-1 E240.2-1 E240.'4-1 E240.5-1 E240.6-1 E290.1-. 1 E290.2-1 E290.3-1 E290.4.-1 E290.5-1 E291. 1-1.

    E291. 3-1, E291. 5-1 E291. 6-1/E291. 6-2 E291.6-3/E291.6-4 E291.6-5/E291.6-6 E291.6-7/E291.6-8 E291.6-9/E291.6-10 E291.6-11/E291.6-12 E291.6-13/E291.6-14 E291.6-15/E291.6-16 E291.7-1 E291.9-1 E291.11-1/E291.11-2 E291.12-1/E291.12-2 E291.13-1 E291.14-1 E291. 15-1 E291. 16-1 E291. 17-1 E291. 18-1 E291.20-1

    ine Mile. Point Unit 2 ER S QUESTIONS AND RESPONSES (Cont)

    REMOVE INSERT E310.3-1 E310.4-1 E310.5-1 E310.6-1 E320.1-1 E320.2-1 E320.3-1 E450. 1-1 E450. 2-1 E450. 3-1

    ~y~y., g - //<WDI, Q-K E451.2-'1/E453..2-2 E451.3-'

    E451.4-1/E451.4-2 E451.4-1/E451.4-2 E451.4-3/E451.'4-'4 E451.4-3/---

    E451.5-1 t

    E451. 6-1 E470.1-1 E470. 1-1 E470.2-1

    " ck