|
---|
Category:TECHNICAL SPECIFICATIONS
MONTHYEARML17059C7911999-09-30030 September 1999 Proposed Tech Specs Re Rev B to Conversion of Unit 2 Current TS to ITS ML20211P5931999-09-10010 September 1999 Marked-up Tech Specs Pages Reflecting Conforming Administrative License Amend Associated with Proposed Transfer of Facilities to Amergen Energy Co,Llc ML20211H2231999-08-26026 August 1999 Proposed Tech Specs,Supporting Implementation of Noble Metal Chemical by Raising Reactor Water Conductivity Limit in TSs 3.2.3.a,3.2.3.c.1 & 3.2.3.b ML20206P2661998-12-30030 December 1998 Proposed Tech Specs Making Application of Emergency Condenser Vent Ng Activity Monitor Channel Operability Requirement & Daily Sensor Check SR Consistent with Conditions Stated in LCO 3.1.3.a Re Emergency Cooling Sys ML20197K1041998-12-0404 December 1998 Revised Proposed TS Bases Reflecting Previous Removal of Condenser Low Vacuum Scram Function from TS as Well as Plant Design & Changes to EDG Ratings,Design Basis Load Limits & Loading Profiles ML20196H0671998-11-30030 November 1998 Proposed Tech Specs,Correcting LCO & Associated Bases for TS Section 3.1.2, Liquid Poison Sys, That Had Been Incorporated Into TS as Part of NMP Unit 1 TS Amend 101 ML20196D2081998-11-24024 November 1998 Proposed Tech Specs B 2.1.1, Fuel Cladding - Safety Limit, B 3.2.5 & 4.2.5, Reactor Coolant Sys Leakage Rate ML20154R1101998-10-16016 October 1998 Proposed Ts,Revising LCO 3.7.1.1 & Associated Actions & SRs to Provide Assurance That Four SW Pumps Are Operable & Are Operating within Acceptable Sys Parameters,With Divisional Cross Connect Valves Open ML20217N7911998-04-24024 April 1998 Revised Pages 2-1,3/4 4-1 & B2-1 to Replace Previously Submitted Pages Contained within Attachment a of 971215 Proposed Change to TS to License NPF-49 ML20202G3751998-02-0505 February 1998 Proposed Tech Specs Pages,Reflecting References to 10CFR50.55a(f) & (G) as Well as Terminology Used in Second Ten Year Isi/Ist,Beginning on 980405 ML20197H3371997-12-15015 December 1997 Proposed Tech Specs Revising SLMCPR from 1.07 to 1.09 for Two Recirculation Loop Operation & from 1.08 to 1.10 for Single Loop Operation ML20211M5231997-10-0707 October 1997 Proposed Tech Specs Section 4.9.6,reflecting New Setpoints Due to Difference in Weights of Two Existing Triangular Refueling Platform Masts ML20217G9011997-07-31031 July 1997 Proposed Tech Specs Changing Wording in Action 36 of TS Table 3.3.3-1, Emergency Core Cooling Sys Actuation Instrumentation ML20148A7751997-04-30030 April 1997 Proposed Change to Tech Specs,Removing Section 3.3.7.3 & Associated Surveillance Section 4.3.7.3,associated Tables 3.3.7.3-1 & 4.3.7.3-1,Bases Section 3.4.3.7.3 & Revising Section 0.0 (Index) Pages VII & Xvii ML20116D8121996-07-26026 July 1996 Proposed Tech Specs Re Option B of App J to 10CFR50 ML20115H1521996-07-12012 July 1996 Proposed Tech Specs Section 6.2.2.i Re App a ML20117F9501996-05-15015 May 1996 Proposed Tech Specs Section 3/4.3.2 Re Isolation Actuation Instrumentation ML20101F4281996-03-20020 March 1996 Proposed TS 3/4.3.1 Re RPS Instrumentation,Deleting Operability Requirements for APRM Neutron flux-upscale, Setdown & Inoperative Functions in Operational Conditions (Oc) 3 & 4 & Modifying Operability Requirements in Oc 5 ML20101D7551996-03-15015 March 1996 Proposed Tech Specs Section 4.6.2 Re Depressurization Sys - Suppression Pool ML20097D2391996-02-0707 February 1996 Proposed Tech Specs Re Administrative Controls ML20100C1021996-01-25025 January 1996 Proposed Tech Specs Table 3.3.3-1 Re Emergency Core Cooling Sys Actuation Instrumentation ML20096G8401996-01-17017 January 1996 Proposed Tech Specs,Representing Revs to Specs 3/4.3.1, 3/4.3.2,3/4.3.3,3/4.3.4.2 & Associated Bases to Relocate Response Time Limit Tables from TSs to Plant USAR ML20094B5421995-10-25025 October 1995 Proposed Tech Specs Re Position Title Changes & Reassignments of Responsibilities at Upper Mgt Level ML20091Q9571995-08-28028 August 1995 Proposed TS 3.6.1.7,increasing Time 12-inch & 14-inch Containment Purge Sys Supply & Exhaust Valves May Be Open in Operational Condition 1,2 & 3 from 90 H Per 365 Days to 135 H Per 365 Days & Deleting Expired Footnotes for Clarity ML20081E2491995-03-0909 March 1995 Proposed Tech Specs,Revising SR 4.6.1.2.a,allowing Second Primary Containment ILRT (Type a) to Be Performed at Refueling Outage 5 or 72 Months After First Type a Test ML20077N1591995-01-0606 January 1995 Proposed Tech Specs Re Min Gallons of Fuel Oil Required in Day Tanks & Storage Tanks ML20077N2071995-01-0606 January 1995 Proposed Tech Specs Re Deletion of Certain Instruments Not Classified as Category 1 ML20078Q9241994-12-13013 December 1994 Proposed Tech Specs Re Change to Table 3.6.1.2-1 That Will Allow Maximum Leakage of 24.0 Scfh for Each of Eight MSIVs ML20077E1561994-12-0202 December 1994 Proposed TS Page 3/4 1-20,reflecting Rev of SLCS Relief Valve Setpoint to Show Influence of Back Pressure & Rev of Bases Page B3/4 5-2 to Show That Hpsc Sys Designed to Supply 517 Gpm Flow Rate at 1,200 (Instead of 1,175) Psid ML20078J3781994-11-14014 November 1994 Proposed Tech Specs Reducing Leak Rate Test Pressure for Safety Related ADS Nitrogen Receiving Tanks from 385 Psig to 365 Psig ML20078E0331994-10-28028 October 1994 Proposed Tech Specs 1.0, Definitions, 3/4.3.2, Isolation Actuation Instrumentation & 3/4.9.3, Control Rod Position ML20078B9841994-10-21021 October 1994 Proposed Tech Specs SR 4.8.1.1.2.e.8,reflecting Addition of Footnote Re 24 H Functional Test of DGs ML20073L8781994-10-0505 October 1994 Proposed TS Table 3.3.7.1-1 Re Radiation Monitoring Instrumentation ML20072U3491994-09-0202 September 1994 Proposed Tech Specs Re 18 Month Operability Test of Svc Water Pumps Sys & Resistance Test of Intake Deicing Heater Sys ML17059A4471994-09-0101 September 1994 Proposed Tech Specs Section 3.2.2, Minimum Reactor Vessel Temperature for Pressurization, & Associated Bases ML20072P6211994-08-26026 August 1994 Proposed TS 3/4.6.1.3, Primary Containment Air Locks, Allowing Continued Plant Operation If Interlock Becomes Inoperable as Long as Operable Door Locked Shut & Periodically Checked as Being Locked Shut ML20071G2771994-07-0101 July 1994 Proposed Tech Specs Surveillance Requirements 4.6.5.1.c.1 & 4.6.5.1.c.2 ML20029D4001994-04-27027 April 1994 Proposed Tech Specs Re Drawdown Time Testing & Inleakage Testing for Secondary Containment Integrity ML20058N3491993-12-14014 December 1993 Proposed Tech Specs 3/4.8.2, DC Sources, 3/4.8.4, Electrical Equipment Protective Devices & Bases for 3/4.6.3, Primary Containment Isolation Valves ML20056G9391993-09-0202 September 1993 Proposed Tech Specs Section 3/4.1.3.5, CR Scram Accumulators ML20056G1951993-08-27027 August 1993 Proposed Tech Specs,Revising TS 4.8.1.1.2.e, AC Sources - Operating & Adding TS 4.8.1.1.2.f ML20044G6261993-05-26026 May 1993 TS Section 6.8 Re Review & Approval Process for Procedure Changes ML20044F7421993-05-21021 May 1993 Proposed Tech Specs Pages 2-3,3/4 2-2,3/4 3-60,3/4 3-62, 3/4 3-63,3/4 3-64,3/4 3-65 & 6-22 & Bases Page B3/4 2-1 ML20044F3041993-05-19019 May 1993 Proposed Tech Specs Sections 3.4.3.1 & 3.4.3.2 Re Generic Ltr 88-01,drywell Leak Detection Requirements ML17058B7751993-05-14014 May 1993 Proposed Tech Specs,Reflecting Editorial Changes, Administrative Corrections & Retyping of TS ML17056C3281993-03-29029 March 1993 Proposed TS Pages 139 & 140 Re LCO SR for Type a & Local Leak Rate Type B & C Tests ML20012G5441993-02-27027 February 1993 Proposed TS Sections 1.0, Definitions & 3/4.3.6, Control Rod Block Instrumentation. ML17056C2741993-02-18018 February 1993 Proposed TS Table 3.2.7 Re RCS Isolation Valves,Table 3.2.7.1 Re Primary Coolant Sys Pressure Isolation Valves & Table 3.3.4 Re Primary Containment Isolation Valves,Lines Entering Free Space of Containment ML17056C2571993-02-12012 February 1993 Proposed,Revised TS Pages 204,204a,207,225a & 230 to Clarify Operator Actions in Event of Loss of Two Instrument Channels ML20126H9941992-12-30030 December 1992 Proposed Tech Specs 3.4.3.1 & 3.4.3.2 Re RCS Leakage Detection Sys & Operational Leakage to Conform W/ Recommendations of Generic Ltr 88-01 1999-09-30
[Table view] Category:TECHNICAL SPECIFICATIONS & TEST REPORTS
MONTHYEARML17059C7911999-09-30030 September 1999 Proposed Tech Specs Re Rev B to Conversion of Unit 2 Current TS to ITS ML20211P5931999-09-10010 September 1999 Marked-up Tech Specs Pages Reflecting Conforming Administrative License Amend Associated with Proposed Transfer of Facilities to Amergen Energy Co,Llc ML20211H2231999-08-26026 August 1999 Proposed Tech Specs,Supporting Implementation of Noble Metal Chemical by Raising Reactor Water Conductivity Limit in TSs 3.2.3.a,3.2.3.c.1 & 3.2.3.b ML18041A0731999-07-27027 July 1999 Rev 1 to NMP2-ISI-006, Second Ten Year Interval Inservice Insp Program Plan for Nine Mile Point Nuclear Power Station Unit 2. ML20206P2661998-12-30030 December 1998 Proposed Tech Specs Making Application of Emergency Condenser Vent Ng Activity Monitor Channel Operability Requirement & Daily Sensor Check SR Consistent with Conditions Stated in LCO 3.1.3.a Re Emergency Cooling Sys ML20197K1041998-12-0404 December 1998 Revised Proposed TS Bases Reflecting Previous Removal of Condenser Low Vacuum Scram Function from TS as Well as Plant Design & Changes to EDG Ratings,Design Basis Load Limits & Loading Profiles ML20196H0671998-11-30030 November 1998 Proposed Tech Specs,Correcting LCO & Associated Bases for TS Section 3.1.2, Liquid Poison Sys, That Had Been Incorporated Into TS as Part of NMP Unit 1 TS Amend 101 ML20196D2081998-11-24024 November 1998 Proposed Tech Specs B 2.1.1, Fuel Cladding - Safety Limit, B 3.2.5 & 4.2.5, Reactor Coolant Sys Leakage Rate ML20154R1101998-10-16016 October 1998 Proposed Ts,Revising LCO 3.7.1.1 & Associated Actions & SRs to Provide Assurance That Four SW Pumps Are Operable & Are Operating within Acceptable Sys Parameters,With Divisional Cross Connect Valves Open ML20217N7911998-04-24024 April 1998 Revised Pages 2-1,3/4 4-1 & B2-1 to Replace Previously Submitted Pages Contained within Attachment a of 971215 Proposed Change to TS to License NPF-49 ML20202G3751998-02-0505 February 1998 Proposed Tech Specs Pages,Reflecting References to 10CFR50.55a(f) & (G) as Well as Terminology Used in Second Ten Year Isi/Ist,Beginning on 980405 ML20197H3371997-12-15015 December 1997 Proposed Tech Specs Revising SLMCPR from 1.07 to 1.09 for Two Recirculation Loop Operation & from 1.08 to 1.10 for Single Loop Operation ML20211M5231997-10-0707 October 1997 Proposed Tech Specs Section 4.9.6,reflecting New Setpoints Due to Difference in Weights of Two Existing Triangular Refueling Platform Masts ML20217G9011997-07-31031 July 1997 Proposed Tech Specs Changing Wording in Action 36 of TS Table 3.3.3-1, Emergency Core Cooling Sys Actuation Instrumentation ML20148A7751997-04-30030 April 1997 Proposed Change to Tech Specs,Removing Section 3.3.7.3 & Associated Surveillance Section 4.3.7.3,associated Tables 3.3.7.3-1 & 4.3.7.3-1,Bases Section 3.4.3.7.3 & Revising Section 0.0 (Index) Pages VII & Xvii ML17059B2911996-09-0404 September 1996 NMP Nine Mile Point Nuclear Station Unit 2,Pump & Valve First Ten-Yr Inservice Testing Program Plan. ML20116D8121996-07-26026 July 1996 Proposed Tech Specs Re Option B of App J to 10CFR50 ML20115H1521996-07-12012 July 1996 Proposed Tech Specs Section 6.2.2.i Re App a ML20117F9501996-05-15015 May 1996 Proposed Tech Specs Section 3/4.3.2 Re Isolation Actuation Instrumentation ML20101F4281996-03-20020 March 1996 Proposed TS 3/4.3.1 Re RPS Instrumentation,Deleting Operability Requirements for APRM Neutron flux-upscale, Setdown & Inoperative Functions in Operational Conditions (Oc) 3 & 4 & Modifying Operability Requirements in Oc 5 ML20101D7551996-03-15015 March 1996 Proposed Tech Specs Section 4.6.2 Re Depressurization Sys - Suppression Pool ML20097D2391996-02-0707 February 1996 Proposed Tech Specs Re Administrative Controls ML20100C1021996-01-25025 January 1996 Proposed Tech Specs Table 3.3.3-1 Re Emergency Core Cooling Sys Actuation Instrumentation ML20096G8401996-01-17017 January 1996 Proposed Tech Specs,Representing Revs to Specs 3/4.3.1, 3/4.3.2,3/4.3.3,3/4.3.4.2 & Associated Bases to Relocate Response Time Limit Tables from TSs to Plant USAR ML20094B5421995-10-25025 October 1995 Proposed Tech Specs Re Position Title Changes & Reassignments of Responsibilities at Upper Mgt Level ML20091Q9571995-08-28028 August 1995 Proposed TS 3.6.1.7,increasing Time 12-inch & 14-inch Containment Purge Sys Supply & Exhaust Valves May Be Open in Operational Condition 1,2 & 3 from 90 H Per 365 Days to 135 H Per 365 Days & Deleting Expired Footnotes for Clarity ML20081E2491995-03-0909 March 1995 Proposed Tech Specs,Revising SR 4.6.1.2.a,allowing Second Primary Containment ILRT (Type a) to Be Performed at Refueling Outage 5 or 72 Months After First Type a Test ML17059B0221995-02-15015 February 1995 Rev 0 to UT-NMP-311V0, Procedure for Manual Ultrasonic Exam of Nozzles Inner Radius & Bore. ML17059B0211995-02-10010 February 1995 Rev 0 to UT-NMP-309V0, Procedure for Manual Ultrasonic Exam of Planar Flaw Sizing for Nozzle Inner Radius & Bore Regions. ML17059B0201995-02-10010 February 1995 Rev 0 to UT-NMP-703V0, Procedure for Geris 2000 Ultrasonic Exam of RPV Nozzle Inner Radius & Bore Regions. ML17059A8881995-01-18018 January 1995 Rev 0 to Field Disposition Instruction 0245-90800, Shroud. ML20077N1591995-01-0606 January 1995 Proposed Tech Specs Re Min Gallons of Fuel Oil Required in Day Tanks & Storage Tanks ML20077N2071995-01-0606 January 1995 Proposed Tech Specs Re Deletion of Certain Instruments Not Classified as Category 1 ML20078Q9241994-12-13013 December 1994 Proposed Tech Specs Re Change to Table 3.6.1.2-1 That Will Allow Maximum Leakage of 24.0 Scfh for Each of Eight MSIVs ML20077E1561994-12-0202 December 1994 Proposed TS Page 3/4 1-20,reflecting Rev of SLCS Relief Valve Setpoint to Show Influence of Back Pressure & Rev of Bases Page B3/4 5-2 to Show That Hpsc Sys Designed to Supply 517 Gpm Flow Rate at 1,200 (Instead of 1,175) Psid ML20078J3781994-11-14014 November 1994 Proposed Tech Specs Reducing Leak Rate Test Pressure for Safety Related ADS Nitrogen Receiving Tanks from 385 Psig to 365 Psig ML17059A5661994-11-0909 November 1994 Rev 2 to Emergency Plan Maint Procedure EPMP-EPP-08, Maint, Testing & Operation of Oswego County Prompt Notification Sys. ML20078E0331994-10-28028 October 1994 Proposed Tech Specs 1.0, Definitions, 3/4.3.2, Isolation Actuation Instrumentation & 3/4.9.3, Control Rod Position ML20078B9841994-10-21021 October 1994 Proposed Tech Specs SR 4.8.1.1.2.e.8,reflecting Addition of Footnote Re 24 H Functional Test of DGs ML20073L8781994-10-0505 October 1994 Proposed TS Table 3.3.7.1-1 Re Radiation Monitoring Instrumentation ML20072U3491994-09-0202 September 1994 Proposed Tech Specs Re 18 Month Operability Test of Svc Water Pumps Sys & Resistance Test of Intake Deicing Heater Sys ML17059A4471994-09-0101 September 1994 Proposed Tech Specs Section 3.2.2, Minimum Reactor Vessel Temperature for Pressurization, & Associated Bases ML20072P6211994-08-26026 August 1994 Proposed TS 3/4.6.1.3, Primary Containment Air Locks, Allowing Continued Plant Operation If Interlock Becomes Inoperable as Long as Operable Door Locked Shut & Periodically Checked as Being Locked Shut ML17059A4241994-07-0606 July 1994 Rev 14 to Nine Mile Point Nuclear Station Unit 1 Odcm. ML20071G2771994-07-0101 July 1994 Proposed Tech Specs Surveillance Requirements 4.6.5.1.c.1 & 4.6.5.1.c.2 ML20029D4001994-04-27027 April 1994 Proposed Tech Specs Re Drawdown Time Testing & Inleakage Testing for Secondary Containment Integrity ML18040A2941993-12-17017 December 1993 Rev 13 to Nine Mile Point Nuclear Station Unit 1 Odcm. ML20058N3491993-12-14014 December 1993 Proposed Tech Specs 3/4.8.2, DC Sources, 3/4.8.4, Electrical Equipment Protective Devices & Bases for 3/4.6.3, Primary Containment Isolation Valves ML17059A0971993-10-25025 October 1993 Rev 4 to NMP2-IST-001,NMP,Nine Mile Point Nuclear Station, Unit 2,Pump & Valve First Ten-Yr Inservice Testing Program Plan. ML20056G9391993-09-0202 September 1993 Proposed Tech Specs Section 3/4.1.3.5, CR Scram Accumulators 1999-09-30
[Table view] |
Text
_ _ _ -. ._
ATTACHMENT A NIAGARA MOHAWK POWER CORPORATION LICENSE NO. NPF-69 DOCKET NO. 50 410 Proposed Channe to Technical Snecifications The existing pages 3/4 3-33 and 3/4 3-44 will be replaced with the attached revised pages. These pages have been retyped in their entirety with marginal markings to indicate changes to the text.
1 9601300082 960125 PDR ADOCK 05000410 P PDR ,
, TABLE 3.3.3-1 (C:ntinued)
EMERGENCY CORE COOLING SYSTEM ACTUATION INSTRUMENTATlON TABLE NOTATIONS
- When the system is required to be OPERABLE per Specification 3.5.2 or 3.5.3.
- Required when the associated diesel generator is required to be OPERABLE.
(a) When a channel is placed in an inoperable status solely for performance of required surveillances, entry into associated Conditions and required ACTIONS may be delayed for up to 6 hours6.944444e-5 days <br />0.00167 hours <br />9.920635e-6 weeks <br />2.283e-6 months <br /> provided the associated function or the redundant function maintains ECCS initiation capability.
(b) Also actuates the associated division diesel generator.
(c) Not required to be OPERABLE when reactor steam dome pressure is less than or equal to 100 psig.
(d) The injection function of Drywell Pressure High and Manual Initiation is not required to be OPERABLE with indicated reactor vessel water level on the wide range instrument greater than level 8 setpoint coincident with the vessel pressure less than 600 psig because of hot calibration / cold operation level error.
(e) Provides signal to close HPCS pump injection valve only.
(f) Provides signal to HPCS pump suction valves only. l ACTION ACTION 30 - With the number of OPERABLE channels less than required by the Minimum I OPERABLE Channels per Trip Function requirement: I
- a. With one channel inoperable, place the inoperable channel in the tripped condition within 24 hours2.777778e-4 days <br />0.00667 hours <br />3.968254e-5 weeks <br />9.132e-6 months <br />
- or declare the associated sysum ;
inoperable. j i
- b. With more than one channel inoperable, declare the associated system inoperable.
I l
ACTION 31 - With the number of OPERABLE channels less than required by the Minimum OPERABLE Channels per Trip Function requirement, r!?ce the inoperable channelin the tripped condition within 24 hours2.777778e-4 days <br />0.00667 hours <br />3.968254e-5 weeks <br />9.132e-6 months <br />; restore the inoperable channel to OPERABLE status within 7 days or declare the associated system inoperable.
- The provisions of Specification 3.0.4 are not applicable.
l NINE MILE POINT - UNIT 2 3/4 3-33 AMENDMENT NO. N
l
. TABLE 4.3.3.1-1 (C$ntinued) j l
EMERGENCY CORE COOLING SYSTEM ACTUATION INSTRUMENTATION SURVEILLANCE REQUIREMENTS l TABLE NOTATIONS ,
- When the system is required to be OPERABLE per Specification 3.5.2.
- Not required to be OPERABLE when reactor steam dome pressure is less than or equal to l 100 psig.
t Required when the associated diesel generator is required to be OPERABLE.
l (a) Manual initiation switches shall be tested at least once per 18 months during shutdown.
All other circuitry associated with manualinitiation shall receive a CHANNEL FUNCTIONAL TEST at least once per 92 days as part of the circuitry required to be tested for automatic system actuation.
(b) The injection function of Drywell Pressure - High and Manual Initiation is not required to be OPERABLE with indicated reactor vessel water level on the wide range instrument greater than Level 8 setpoint coincident with the vessel pressure less than 600 psig due to the hot i calibration / cold operation level error.
(c) Perform the calibration procedure for the Trip Setpoint et least once per 92 days.
l l
l 1
l NINE MILE POINT - UNIT 2 3/4 3-44 AMENDMENT NO. //
~._.._.._;
l ATTACHMENTB NIAGARA MOHAWK POWER CORPORATION LICENSE NO. NPF-69 !
DOCKET NO. 50 410 l Suncorting Information and no Sinnificant Hazards Consideration Analypig .i INTRODUCTION
-l The loss of voltage and degraded voltage instruments function to assure a reliable source !
. of electrical power to the divisional emergency switchydars during abnormal offsite power l conditions. Specifically, the Loss of Power instrumentation initiates an automatic j sequence to remove loads from the emergency bus and another automatic sequence to 1' start the diesel generator. Once power is restored to the emergency switchgear from the diesel generator, loads essential to operation of the diesel (i.e., service water pumps) are :
automatically reconnected to the emergency switchgear. Ultimately, it is the associated '
diesel generator that supplies the reliable electrical power when offsite power is not i available; therefore, without an OPERABLE diesel generator, the Loss of Power i instrumentation cannot perform this function. Removing the Loss of Power relays from f service for calibration during Operational Conditions 4 and 5 will not prevent any other ESF functions. The Loss of Power relays do provide a redundant equipment protection function (i.e., undervoltage protection) for various loads on the emergency buses, however, this equipment protective function is not required for OPERABILITY of these loads. The proposed change will tie the required OPERABILITY of the Loss of Power instrumentation ,
directly to the OPERABILITY requirement of the associated diesel generator. This change i will clarify when the Loss of Power instruments are required to be OPERABLE in Operational Conditions 4 and 5.
The Channal Calibration Surveillance test requires that all three loss of voltage or all three degraded vcitage relays for a given Divisional 4.16 kv electrical bus be removed from service simultaneously. The Channel Calibration takes approximately three hours to perform and requires the associated diesel generator be declared inoperable. If any ESF equipment powered by this Division was required to be OPERABLE, the loss of voltage and degraded voltage relays would be required to be tripped within one hour (ACTION 39 of Technical Specifications). If the relays are placed in the tripped condition, the Channel Calibration cannot be performed. In the past, the Channel Calibration for the Loss of Power relays was only performed when the core was completely offloaded, and the ESF functions were not required to be OPERABLE.
During refueling outage RF05, Niagara Mohawk intends to perform a fuel shuffle versus a complete core offload. Without completely offloading the core, the Channel Calibration for the Loss of Power instrumentation would be very difficult to schedule because of the overly restrictive Applicability footnote in Operational Conditions 4 and 5. The proposed change would allow completion of maintenance and surveillance testing on the Loss of Page 1 of 4
^
Power instruments when the associated diesel generator is out of service for maintenance !
' and testing. !
I DESCRIPTION OF CURRENT AND PROPOSED TECHNICAL SPECIFICATIONS !
Current version of double-asterisk footnote to Table 3.3.3-1 and dagger footnote to Table .
4.3.3.1-1: !
Required when ESF equipment is required to be OPERABLE.
Proposed version of double-asterisk footnote to Table 3.3.3-1 and dagger footnote to .
Table 4.3.3.1 ;
Required when the associated diesel generator is required to be OPERABLE. l l
EVALUATION The Loss of Power instrumentation is required to automatically initiate diesel generator start and load. The diesel generator then supplies reliable power for the Engineered Safety Features (ESF) to function during any accident with a loss of offsite power. The Loss of ;
Power instruments initiate the start and load sequence of the associated diesel generator. ,
when the offsite power supply to the Division I,11, or ill electrical buses is insufficient to ,
supply the electricalloads. The diesel generators are then capable of supplying electrical power to Emergency Core Cooling Systems (ECCS) and other ESF loads. The initiation and l continued operation of ECCS ensures that the plant will maintain safe shutdown a conditions. The Loss of Power instrumentation assures the diesel generator start and load I sequence initiates on a loss of voltage and degraded voltage on the associated Divisional 4.16 kv electrical bus. Removing the Loss of Power instruments from service has a direct '
effect on the safety function of the diesel generators, but would not prevent any other ESF functions. Accordingly, the proposed change will continue to require the Loss of Power instruments to be OPERABLE in Operational Conditions 4 and 5, but only when the ,
associated diesr,I generator is required to be OPERABLE. The Loss of Power relays do '
provide a redundant eouipment protection function for various loads on the emergency buses, however, this equipment protective function is not required for OPERABILITY of these loads. The Loss of Power relays will continue to support emergency switchgear operability and reliability. This revision to the Technical Specifications will clarify the OPERABILITY requirements for the Loss of Power instruments by specifying the associated diesel generator as the required ESF equipment.
CONCLUSIONS The Loss of Power instrumentation directly affects the safety function of diesel generators on a loss of offsite power. Remova! of the Loss of Power instrumentation from service will not prevent any other ESF function. During Operational Conditions 4 and 5, the i proposed change will require the Loss of Power instruments to be OPERABLE when the associated diesel generator is OPERABLE. This revision to the Technical Specifications will l clarify the OPERABILITY requirements for Loss of Power instrumentation, and allow flexibility in scheduling the Channel Calibrations to support the intended fuel shuffle during RF05. The proposed change will not affect the safety function of any ESF in Operational j Page 2 of 4 m . ..- _ __. _ _. __
Conditions 4 and 5. This change is consistent with the improved Standard Technical Specifications (NUREG 1434).
Therefore, the proposed change will not be inimical to the common defense and security, or the health and safety of the public.
NO SIGNIFICANT HAZARDS CONSIDERATION ANALYSIS 10 CFR 50.91 requires that at the time a licensee requests an amendment, it must provide to the Commission its analysis using the standards in Section 50.92 about the issue of no significant hazards consideration. Therefore,in accordance with 10 CFR 50.91 and 10 ,
CFR 50.92, the following analysis has been performed. ;
The operation of Nine Mile Point Unit 2, in sccs -der.cs with the oroaae-d amendment, wl!1 not involve a sianificant increase in the orobability or conseauence of an meddant previousiv evaluated.
The proposed change would require the Loss of Power instruments to be OPERABLE in Operational Conditions 4 and 5 only when the associated diesel generator is required to be OPERABLE. The Loss of Power relays provide a suppcrt function to initiate the associated i diesel generator start and bus unloading sequences. If that diesel generator is not in service, the loss of power relays perform no safety function. Therefore, relating diesel generator OPERABILITY and Loss of Power instrument OPERABILITY will not involve an increase in the probability of an accident previously evaluated.
i The proposed change does not affect the requirements for ESF OPERABILITY. The change !
does not affect diesel generator response to a loss of voltage or degraded voltage on the !
Divisional 4.16 kv electrical buses when the diesel generator is required to be OPERABLE. !
Automatic response of the ESF functions is unaffected by removing the Loss of Power relays from service under these conditions, therefore, the proposed change will not involve a significant increase in the consequences of an accident previously evaluated.
The onoration of Nine Mile Point Unit 2, in accordance with the nronosed amendment, will :
not create the nossibility of a new or different kind of accident from any accident !
oreviousiv evaluated. l The proposed change does not involve a modification of plant equipment nor does it change the way the equipment will be maintained or operated. The revision to Technical Specifications will continue to require the Loss of Power instrumentation to be OPERABLE ,
when the associated diesel generator is required to be OPERABLE. The Loss of Power l instruments will continue to perform their safety function of initiating the diesel generator start and bus unloading sequences. ,
l Therefore, this proposed change will not create the possibility of a new or different kind of accident from any previously evaluated.
i The oneration of Nine Mile Point Unit 2,in accordance with the oronosed amendment, will !
not involve a sianificant reduction in a marain of safety.
The proposed change will not affect the OPERABILITY, operation or reliability of any ESF l function including the diesel generators. All ESF functions will remain available during l postulated accidents with a loss of offsite electrical power. The change simply clarifies !
l Page 3 of 4 f
_ _ . - __._ . _ _ _.__._. __ _ . _ . _ . _ ..__....m_. _. ._.
- t when the Loss of Power instruments are required to be OPERABLE during Operational Conditions 4 and 5. Therefore, the proposed change will not involve a significant j reduction in a margin of safety.
Niagara Mohawk's evaluation of this proposed amendment to Technical Specifications pursuant to 10 CFR 50.91 has determined that it involves no significant hazards ;
consideration.
P r
i P
t i
f l
i Page 4 of 4 i
. _ , . -, . - . - - -. .- .