ML20080Q846
| ML20080Q846 | |
| Person / Time | |
|---|---|
| Site: | Millstone  |
| Issue date: | 04/06/1981 |
| From: | William Allen, Kelly R, Laura Smith STONE & WEBSTER ENGINEERING CORP. |
| To: | |
| Shared Package | |
| ML20080Q833 | List: |
| References | |
| NUDOCS 8310170198 | |
| Download: ML20080Q846 (589) | |
Text
{{#Wiki_filter:r, 4 (E
ATTACHMENT 1 o.
l l UNCONTR0llED l
. j QUALITY ASSURANCE PROGRAM MANUAL !
MILLSTONE NUCLEAR POWER STATION I UNIT 3 t em a NORTHEAST UTILITIES SERVICE COMPANY t l r STONE & WEBSTER ENGINEERING CORPORATION 1-1 s31017019e 830930 PDR ADOCK 05000423 A PDR
F 4 4 , e
- STONE 6 WEBSTER ENGINEERING CORPORATION 245 SUMMER STREET. BOSTON. M ASS ACHU SETTS M ASS. 02107 ADDRESS ALL CORRESPONDENCE TO P.O. BOK 2325. BOSTON.
9 0 7 otSiam eOSTON
"' L "",u. .
*!"#"t*" "
0"c'.'"o
"'L"<^A o"'
"#A'.~"........
W.SH4 o O N. D C. April 6, 1981 TO WHOM IT MAY CONCERN: The policies, requirements and tasks described in this Quality Assurance Program Manual, Millstone Nuclear Power Station - Unit 3 have been developed to fulfill a recognized need for assurance that requisite quality is achieved in design, procurement and construction. Stone & Webster Engineering Corporation procedures which implement this program are described in various manuals which are referenced herein. The development and overall responsibility for this Quality Assurance Program lies with the Vice President of Quality Assurance; who shall report conditions adverse to quality and/or in conflict with these program requirements to the President and affected Department Heads as appropriate. The Manager, Quality Assurance is responsible for the administration and management of the Quality Assurance Program as applied to procurement .and construction activities. The Chief Engineer, Engineering Assurance Division of the Engineering Departmer.t is responsible for the administration and management of the Quality Assurance Program as applied to engineering and design activities. Revisions, additions to, and audits of this program are the responsibility of the Manager, Quality Assurance and the Chief Engineer, Engineering Assurance Division, for their respective assigned areas. Any revisions or additions shall be approved by affected Departments prior to the incorporation of such changes into the Program. 8/b. R.B. Kelly N/A( '
/MA Vice President and Manager Quality Assurance l
1 l l 11-1
r 4 Revision F 4/6/81 MILLSTONE 3 PROGRAM MANUAL TABLE OF CONTENTS EFFECTIVE SECTION TITLE REV DATE PAGES i TITLE PAGE B 2/28/75 1 11 POLICY LETTER - 4-6-81 1 iii TABLE OF CONTENTS F 4-6-81 1-2 iv INTRODUCTION C 4-6-81 1 1 ORGANIZATION E 4-6-81 1-9 2 QUALITY ASSURANCE C 4-20-79 1-5 PROGRAM 3 ENGINEERING AND B 2/28/75 1-3 DESIGN CONTROL 4 PROCUREMENT DOCUMENT C 4-20-79 1-3 CONTROL 5 INSTRUCTIONS, PRO- C 4-20-79 1-2 CEDURES, AND DRAWINGS 6 DOCUMENT CONTROL C 4-20-79 1-2 7 CONTROL OF PURCHASED C 4-20-79 1-7 MATERIAL, EQUIPMENT, AND SERVICES 8 IDENTIFICATION AND C 4-20-79 1-2 CONTROL OF MATERIALS, PARTS, AND COMPONENTS 9 CONTROL OF SPECIAL C 4-20-79 1-3 PROCESSES 10 INSPECTION C 4-20-79 1-5 11 TEST CONTROL C 4-20-79 1-2 12 CONTROL OF MEASURING C 4-20-79 1-2 AND TEST EQUIPMENT 13 HANDLING, STORAGE, C 4-20-79 1-3 AND SHIPPING iii-1 a ,
. y b .b
.. t,:
Revision F TABLE OF CONTENTS (Cont'd) EFFECTIVE
- SECTION -TITLE REV DATE PAGES 14 INSPECTION, TEST, AND C 4-20-79 1-2 OPERATING STATUS 15- NONCONEORMING MATERIALS, C 4-20-79 1-3 PARTS, OR COMPONENTS 16 CORRECTIVE ACTION C 4-20-79 1-2
=17 QUALITY ASSURANCE C 4-20-79 1-3 RECORDS 18 AUDITS E 4-20-79 1-4 19 CONTROL OF THE MILLSTONE C 4-6-81 1-3 F UNIT-3 QA PROGRAM MANUAL APPENDIX I IMPLEMENTING DOCUMENTS D 4-6-81 I-2 II QUALIFICATION AND D 4-6-81 II-7 EXPERIENCE REQUIREMENTS, STONE & WEBSTER QUALITY ASSURANCE PERSONNEL III GLOSSARY D 4-6-81 III-24 IV. -ENGINEERING DESIGN B 4-6-81 IV-2 REVIEW V SPECIFICATION AND N/A 2/28/75 V-1 BIDDERS REVIEW VI APPROVALS AND CON- B 4-6-81 VI-4 CURRENCE FOR QUALITY ASSURANCE SYSTEM p DOCUMENTATION VII RESPONSE TO REGULA- A 4-6-81 VII-5 TORY GUIDES iii-2 L_
e 2 F d' Revision C 4/6/81 INTRODUCTION It is the policy and objective of the Stone & Webster Engineering Corporation to engineer and construct a quality in accordance with
. power station, on a timely basis, contractual and regulatory requirements. To this end the company has established this Millstone Unit-3 Nuclear C Quality Assurance Program which delineates the requirements and tasks assigned to the various elements of the Stone &
Webster organization to achieve our stated objectives. This program is organized into 18 basic sections which C the management principles delineated in correspond to Appendix B to 10CFR50 and is responsive both to Appendix B and to the regulatory guide positions taken in Appendix VII of this Program. This Program is based on Stone & Webster's Standard N'uclear Revision N/A, Quality Assurance Program SWSQAP l-74A, C approved by the NRC and adopted by the Millstone are Project.
"found in Actions to implement the assigned tasks departmental procedures delineatea in Appendix I. ?
iv-1 8-
?
J
r A i
. ' T-l52 l
I STONE & WEBSTER ENGINEERING CORPORATION QUALITY ASSURANCE DEPARTMENT QUALITY ASSURANCE PROGRAM ! l l MILLSTONE NUCLEAR POWER STATION - UNIT 3 NUMBER: TITLE: SECTION 1 REVISION: E ORGANIZATION EFFECTIVE DATE: April 6, 1981 APPROVALS [ MAN AGER, QUALITY ASSU ANCE
/ i (g '.s CHIEF ENGINEER, ENGINEERING ASSURANCE PROJECT MANAGER
.a j lr
. . . . - - - - . . . - . - - - - _ . - . - . , - _ - _ . - . _ . _ . . . . _ . . . . - - - - _ _ . . . , . . - - . _ , ,- -. J
~
- y. g 1-1 Revision E SECTION 1 ORGANIZATION 1.0 REQUIREMENTS .
1.1 An S&M organization shall be established to develop and implement the quality assurance program. 1.2 The authority and duties of individuals and groups performing the required quality assurance functions shall be documented. 1.3 Individuals or groups who check, audit, inspect, or otherwise verify a quality activity shall not be the same individuals or groups responsible for performing the specific activity. 2.0 TASKS
- responsibilities for the administration and The program have management of the S&W quality assurance The been set forth in the introduction to this manual.relationship S&W quality assurance organization and its !
to- the project organization is shown in Figure 1. The shown in Quality Assurance Department organization is The qualifications and experience level Figure 2. requirements for quality assurance personnel are contained in Appendix II. . The Engineering Assurance Division, Engineering Department organization is shown in Figure 3. Figure 4 shows interrelationships within the company organization. 2.1 Engineering Assurance Division (EA), Engineering Department shall: 1 2.1.1 Assure the implementation and operation of management systems for the control of technical work. Assure that completed designs and 2.1.2 specifications conform to S&W procedures. Perform source control for engineering 2.1.3 service suppliers.
*See Appendix I for reference to implementing documents.
t V.
s L i' e
- 1-2 Revision E 2.2 Quality Systems Division (QSD), Quality Assurance Department shall:
2.2.1 Develop, establish, and improve standardized quality systems. 2.2.2 Analyze data and prepare reports for S&W management on quality related activities. 2.3 Procurement Quality Assurance Division (PQAD), Quality Assurance Department shall: 2.3.1 Perform inspections, verifications, and other tasks at Seller facilities to ensure that the quality of materials, components, and. equipment meets the requirements of drawings, specifications, and other procurement documents. 2.3.2 Establish and maintain district offices in major manufacturing centers in the United States to carry out the required ' tasks at Seller facilities. 2.4 Field ' Quality Control Division (FQCD), Quality Assurar,ce Department shall: 2.4.1 Assure, through inspection activities and document review, that the requirements of drawings, specifications, instructions, and procedures are fulfilled during fabrication, erection, and installation at the site. 2.4.2 Establish and maintain a field quality control organization at the site for the implementation of the quality control systems. 2.5 Nondestructive Test Division (NDTD), Quality Assurance Department shall establish and maintain qualification of a systems which control the personnel and equipment, test methods, and documentation of required nondestructive test activities. 2.6 The Project Quality Assurance Program Administrator shall: 2.6.1 Assist the Project in implementing all phases of the quality assurance program. t
c r - p o3 1-3 Revision E 2.6.2 Perform liaison between the Quality Assurance Department, Project, Westinghouse (NSSS Supplier), and other Sellers regarding quality assurance activities. 2.6.3 Furnish information to the Project on matters pertaining to quality assurance. 2.6.4 Coordinate the project quality assurance program with the NUSCo quality assurance program. 2.6.5 Provide quality assurance inputs for ; safety analysis reports, using material provided by QSD. 2.6.6 Assure that quality assurance reviews of specifications have been conducted. 2.6.7 Assist NUSCo in modifying their quality assurance program, as requested. 2.6.8 Prepare monthly quality assurance activity reports, for submission to NUSCo, based on inputs from EA, QSD,
- FQCD, PQAD, and NDTD.
2.6.9 Attend regulatory agency audits as the quality assurance representative, if requested. Assist the Project in providing effective and timely corrective action replies for deficiencies found in e these audits. 2.6.10 Coordinate all applicable quality control procedures and Project procedures. 2.6.11 Assist in assuring that the quality assurance program fulfills the Safety Analysis Report commitment. The Quality Assurance Cost and Auditing Division 2.7 (QACAD), Quality Assurance Department shall provide evaluation, Department cost control, program special management studies and audits, information, and support services within this program. The of following summarizes the specific activities QACAD. 2.7.1 DEPARTMENT COST CONTROL - The Cost Con-trol Section maintains the internal QA e u Department cost control system, providing n
)
4 .0 1-4 Revision E inputs'for the QA program estimates to Stone & Webster management as required. 2.7.2 EVALUATION AND SPECIAL STUDIES - The Eval- ~ uation and Special Studies Sections have investigative responsibilities, manage- - ment and/or quality related, to determine the adequacy, effectiveness of, and adherence to- quality related procedures and systems; these include PSAR/FSAR evaluations, project quality program evaluations, ASME Section III program audits, and Quality Assurance Departmental performance, as well as the appraisal of a quality system or function, to determine adequacy and effectiveness of implementation. 2.7.3 INFORMATION - The- information section maintains the QA Department central files containing all incoming and outgoing general and project correspondence. In addition, it maintains the QA Department library providing reference material such as PSAR/FSARs, technical literature, and Project manuals. 2.7.4 SUPPORT SERVICES - The support services section provides clerical and steno support to the overall QA Department. 3.0 DISCUSSION 3.1 Reference Paragraphs 1.2 and 1.3 The authority and organizational freedom of personnel and organizations which perform quality assurance functions to identify problems, initiate, recommend, or provide solutions, and verify implementation of solutions is delineated in the charter of each organization performing these functions. Failure to satisfactorily resolve a quality problem on the lowest appropriate r management level will result in an escalation to the next higher level. This could ultimately result in the problem being brought to the attention of the President by the Vice President of Quality Assurance for resolution. These documents can be found in the manuals shown in Appendix I. The assurance that the above fulfills Criteria I of Appendix B to 10CFR50 is gained through the audit program delineated in Section 18. L
F 3 1-5 - Revision E 3.2 Reference Paragraph 2.4.2 The Superintendent of Field Quality Control has total authority for the management and implementation of the Quality Assurance Program at the construction Site. 4.0 CLIENT CONSIDERATIONS Organization charts, Figures 1, 2, 3, and 4 have been updated to reflect organizational changes.
~
4 A t [ 5.'l
$1 Sh,I on ,
COMPANY ORGANIZATION FOR QUALITY ASSUR ANCE STONE & WEBSTER ENGINEERING CORPORATION OFFICE OF THE CHAIRMAN AND PRESIDENT I E I I I I CE PRESIDENT M NSWW DIRECTOR OF QUALITY ASSURANCE DEPT STAFF GROUP. DIRECTOR OF MANAGER OF ENGINEERING I PROJECTS
---..---f CONSTRUCTION VICE PRESIDENT VICE PRESIDENT VICE PRESIDENT {------
g GE ASST.MGRS. QA DEPT. OF PURCHASING I -J u I i l 2 I I CHIEF ENGINEER i MANAGER MANAGER l CONSTRUCTION ENGINEERING E INEER NG PROCUREMENT DIVISION FIELD l MANAGER CHIEFS Q C DIVISION Q A DIVISION l DIVISION
! I I l 5 t I DISTRICT CHIEFS D
STAFF l SUPT OF FOC PPOCUREMENT l S PROJECT Iu [ MANAGER S PEC I A t.,l ST S l QC S E ICES 2 EA u 0 ! t.-
'.O R _+- __a
=- PO LICY l y
{ --- 1 - ---- - -
+-Q.A y
CHIEF ENGINEER ' QA COST L AUDITING D4 VISION
$ll yg PROJECT ,, t, POLICY l yg RESIDENT 8 MANAGER ENGINEER
] i Sl PROJECT 0A CHIEF ENGINEER E i l l PROGRAM CHIEF ENGINEER QUALITY SYSTEMS NOT g h DESIGN ENGINEERING D I V I SION DIVISION A DMINIST R ATOR CONSTRUCTION l _ _ _ . l , , CONSTRUCTION RESIDENT FIELD SUPERVISORS ENGINEER PU RCH ASING AGENT rp Y 2
<oc LEGEND 7 s*
Q R-QUALITY REQUIREMENTS 6 O A-QUALITY ASSURANCE E A-ENGINEERING ASSURANCE m
- FUNCTIONAL AND ADMINISTATIVE DIRECTION I -. COMMUNICATION p
--- PROJECT DIRECTION 79- 13578
- A
/
, ' 4 > v j?,1
.) ; .
~
i
- 6 QUALITY' ASSURANCE DEPARTMENT ORG ANIZ ATION STONE G WEBSTER ENGINEERING CORPORATION VICE PRESIDENT, QUALITY ASSURANCE I
MAN AGER, QUALITY ASSURANCE ASSISTANT MANAGER, QUALITY ASSURANCE CHIEF ENGINEER, MANAGER, PROJECT OA CHIEF ENGINEER, CHIEF ENGINEER, MANAGER, NDT FIELD QC PROGRAM QUALITY SYSTEMS PROCUREMENT QA QA COST f. AUDITING DIVISION ADMINISTRATO RS DIVISION DIVISION DIVISION DIVISION CLIENT SERVICES HEADQUARTERS-BOSTON OTHER LOC ATIONS SUPERINTENDENTS, OPERATIONS FIELD CENTER QU ALITY CONTROL SUPPORT SY2 I 5. "? TESTING INSPECTION - DOCUMENTATION $, y 8 m
~
I I I I CHERRY HILL ATLANTA BOSTON LOS ANGELES PITTSBURGH HOUSTON CHIC AGO i OPE R ATIO N S CENTER
s A N O M ST I T A E L B R O 28w R O P 5 T R E 528m SI P R NI M D A D S E E R R 1 U C E C VI F. S O R T N N R E NI O I P S AG T TN S A l I E U S L N SF A / AE V N O I I H E OACS I T I C S D T N I V U A O DkA I ZIT I A NR AO GPR R O T C lS OC E i J D NG O U ON I I R A P R - S E E I V I N I DG N E E C R NR F E AE E E N R TS I HG I U B C N S E E S A W S
& TTE I G CR EOI T
INEN JPV OPI RO RUT ET PSC A ES N I G N N E RI O UT R E DU E EB T C N - R O E - E R C T E S P i N AI N M D T G E - S E I N T S S SF Y S S AE L E I H NO R C GRT UD I S N E E D O C C OR , P ,
~
S K N S T S R E O N E R E L OCD YI T IE MO UR FN AT E R D R T E W FA RN U N C E O EE C O OC O N PC O R R P P
. I iI
' W, . ,
QUALITY ASSURANCE INTERRELATIONSHIPS l . STONE & WEBSTER ENGINEERING CORPORATION PROJECT M AN AGE R 4 1 I JL ASSIST , RESIDENT PROJECT g ST F MANAGER ENGINEER r m is Jk g AUDIT PROJECT Q A MANAGER QUALITY ASSURANCE QUALITY ASSURANCE ENGINEERING 2 POLICY ASSURANCE PROGRAM CLIENT CONTACT ASST.MGR. QUALITY ASSURANCE ADMINIST RATOR VICE DRESIDENT,Q A. DIVISION ND P Ll MANAGER, Q.A./ ASST MGR.,0.A. J Jk dk k QA COST AU H Ty Q.A. PROGRAM ADMINISTRATOR g 2 g r PROJECT MANAGER
- AUDIT 4 AUDIT w 6 AUDITING ,
r DIVISION PROJECT ENGINEER 1 F SUPERINTENDENT FIELD Q.C. l ASSIST / AUDIT QUALITY AUDIT l l ' SYSTEMS DIVISION II SUPERINTENDENT PROCUREMENT , FIELD QUALITY ASSURANCE mm DISTRICT CHIEF QUALITY CONTROL AUDIT g 7 J L A k J L JL g8 PROCUREMENT ME POLICY ASSIST QUALITY ASSURANCE I E AUTHORITY DIVISION 2 g ';* 2.
' 1*$
a
. 2 NDT O
- DIVISION rv,
' FIELD QUALITY g, POLICY AUTHORITY CONTROL DIVISION
r >
, T-152 A I STONE & WEBSTER ENGINEERING CORPORATION QUALITY ASSURANCE DEPARTMENT QUALITY ASSURANCE PROGRAM MILLSTONE NUCLEAR POWER STATION-UNIT 3 TITLE: NUMBER:
SECTION 2 REVISION: QUALITY ASSifRANCE PROGRAM EFFECTIVE DATE: APRIL 20, 1979
- APPROVALS s
7 l MANAGER, QUALITY ASS ANCE l l
> ( w . .,
CHIEF ENGINEER, ENGINEERING ASSURANCE i NM UQYbs / - PROJECT MANAGER i _ _ _ . _ __ . . . _ - , _ _ . , _ . _ _ . , _ , . . . . . , _ - - _ _.._, ,... . , _ . . _ _ , _ _ , . ~
a J 2-1 Revision C SECTION 2 QUALITY ASSURANCE PROGRAM 1.0 REQUIRDIENTS 1.1 This program applies to SSW design, procurement, construction and testing responsibilities for the Millstone Nuclear Power Stati_on__ Unit.3 as defined in the Preliminary Safety Analysis Report. 1.2 The design, procurement, construction and testing of Category I structures, components and systems shall be controlled through implementation of the criteria of Appendix B, 10CFR50. Category I structures, components, and systems are designated in the Millstone 3 PSAR and are further defined in applicable drawings and specifications. Applicable criteria of Appendix B, 10CFRSO shall be imposed on sellers. 1.2.1 Activities affecting quality shall be documented, as appropriate, in drawings, specifications, instructions, and procedures. 1.2.2 Activities affecting quality shall be conducted under controlled conditions. These shall include appropriate equipment, such as tools and test equipment, suitable environmental conditions and assurance that all specified conditions have been met. Specified conditions include such items as qualification of personnel and processes and verification that required inspection or test operations have been satisifactorily completed. 1.3 The design, procurement, constrection, and testing of Category II and Category III structures, components, and systems shall meet applicable codes and standards and good design and construction practices (see Appendix III, Glossary for definitions applied to various Categories) .
6 s 2-2 Revision C 1.4 All construction work at the site, which falls within the scope of Section III, ASME Boiler and Pressure Vessel Code shall be controlled by S&W in compliance with tne Ssw certificate (s) of Authorization issued by ASME. 1.5 S&W shall, as directed by NUSCo, audit and witness tests of selected Westinghouse NSSS equipment. 1.6 Sellers employed >at the site shall be required to comply with applicable parts of this program and use applicable S&W manuals and procedures or their own S&W approved manuals and procedures. 1.7 Indoctrination and education programs shall be established, as appropriate, for S&W personnel performing activities affecting quality. 1.8 An annual report of this program's status shall be provided to NUSCo. 2.0 TASKS
- 2.1 Project Engineering shall ensure that design and engineering activities affecting quality are documented, as appropriate, in drawings, I specifications, instructions, and procedures.
These documents shall, as appropriate: 2.1.1 Designate the category of structures, components, and systems. 2.1.2 . Extend applicable criteria of Appendix B, 10CFR50, to sellers. 2.1.3 Indicate applicable codes and standards. 2.1.4 Include requirements for controlled conditions. I 2.2 Engineering Assurance shall: 1 2.2.1 Develop management systems and methods to implement the quality assurance program for engineering and design activities, and document these procedures in the Engineering ! Assurance Manual. 2.2.2 Indoctrinate and provide continuing education for personnel performing CSee Appendix I for reference to implementing docisnents. I
o e l l 2-3 Revision C l activitiies affecting the quality of
- engineering and design.
2.2.3 Coordinate the tormulation of SSW's position
- with respect to code requirements and the preparation of requests for codes, special rulings or interpretations of codes and standards, all upon request.
2.3 Quality Systems Division shall:
- 2.3.1 Publish and control the issue of all manuals, excluding the Engineering Assurance Manual, needed to implement the quality assurance program.
2.3.2 Establish and maintain a program for the indoctrination and continuing education of Quality -Assurance Department personnel, and maintain program records. 2.3.3 Maintain qualification / certification records of personnel qualified by QSD. 2.4 Procurement Quality Assurance Division shall: 2.4.1 Periodically review procedures affecting procurement quality control and provide input to QSD for necessary updating. 2.4.2 Audit and witness tests of selected equipment procured by Westinghouse, as requested by NUSCo. 2.4.3 Employ and maintain a staff of qualified inspection personnel. 2.4.4 Maintain qualification / certification records of personnel qualified by PQAD. 2.5 Field Quality Control Division shall: 2.5.1 Periodically review procedures affecting field quality control and provide inputs to QSD for necessary updating. 2.5.2. Employ and maintain a staff of qualified inspection personnel. 2.5.3 Maintain qualification / certification records of personnel qualified by FQCD. (C
-,N,_.., - ,,- ,y.. - . , , _.,,.,,..-e. , . - , , ,,,e y,.,, . , n.. ,._,,_,.,,__ng.n.,n,_
,,.,.-,,,.,,.,_,,,-n.e,,_ , ,.,,.,,,., - ,.,,, , , ,,~ m-pw-
4 6
. ??
2-4 Revision C 2.6 Nondestructive Test Division shall: 2.6.1 Periodically review procedures affecting nondestructive testing and provide input to QSD for necessary updating. 2.6.2 Establish _and maintain a training program for the qualification and certification of i S&W personnel involved in nondestructive testing and evaluation. 2.6.3 Maintain and control a file of all records documenting competency of S&W personnel performing nondestructive testing and evaluation. 2.6.4 Perform surveillance of nondestructive test operations, including periodic review of examinations, and provide technical assistance,,as required. 2.7 QA Cost and Auditing Division shall: 2.7.1 Periodically review procedures affecting QACAD activities and provide input to QSD for necessary updating. 2.7.2 Employ and maintain a staff of qualified audit personnel. 2.7.3 Maintain qualification / certification records of personnel qualified by QACAD. 2.8 ~ Licensing Division shall coordinate the program of establishing a Stone & Webster position guideline on each NRC Regulatory Guide, publish and maintain the listing of these Guides, and inform Stone & i Webster personnel of newly issued and proposed Regulatory Guides.. 2.9 The Project Quality Assurance Program Administrator shall coordinate the preparation of an annual report to NUSCO on the S&W Quality Assuranco Program, for the Manager, Quality Assurance Department, based on inputs from S&W quality assurance organizations. 3.0 DISCUSSION Reference Paragraph 1.2 This program document communicates the corporate QA policy and commitments to department heads who develop
4 e 2-5 Revision C the implementing procedures. These are in manuals wh..; a controlled distribution to all affected departments as determined by department management. Scheduled training is conducted within the department on applicable quality policies, manuals, and procedures. A scheduled audit program assures that they are implemented. 4.0 CLIENT CONSIDERATIONS NUSCO Quality Assurance Specification "Requiremen:.s for an Engineering-Constructor's Quality Assurance Program," dated 8/27/75, shall be adhered to. W I
.k
(_
. T - 152 A
STONE & WEBSTER ENGINEERING CORPORATION QUALITY ASSURANCE DEPARTMENT QUALITY ASSURANCE i PROGRAM i I MILLSTONE NUCLEAR POWER STATION - UNIT 3 TITLE: NUMBER: SECTION 3 REVISION: ! ENGINEERING AND DESIGN CONTROL l B f EFFECTIVE DATE: FEBRUARY 28, 1975 APPROVALS ff A MAN AGER, OUALITY ASSURANCE M .O..h.b nOO m 1 CHIEF ENGINEER, ENGINEERING ASSURANCE L PROJECT MAfAGER
e o 3-1 Revision B SECTION 3 ENGINEERING AND DESIGN CONTROL 1.0 REOUIREMENTS 1.1 An engineering and design control system shall be established to scope and document the method of accomplishing the essential engineering and design
- tasks.
1.2 The system shall control the development of the design, from the initial authorization to the obtaining of the operating license. The system shall ensure that the applicable design requirements such as design bases, regulatory requirements, codes, standards and quality requirements are correctly translated into drawings, specifications, instructions and procedures. The design documentation shall specify the quality characteristics and quality standards, including acceptance criteria. The system shall include a review and approval cycle. 1.3 Design controls shall be imposed on the following: stress , thermal , hydraulic- and accident-analysir; compatibility of materials; accessibility for in-service inspection; repairs; and acceptance criteria for inspections and~ tests. 1.4 Alternate or simplified solution methods may be used for design verification when accompanied by justification of the methods used. 1.5 Design control measures shall include review and use of accepted industrial standards and practices, prototype evaluation and approval, design reviews and selection and review of the suitability of materials, parts, equipment or processes that are essential to the functions of structures, systems. or components. 1.6. Engineering drawings shall be reviewed by an individual, other than the originator, for adequacy of design.
, -- v. -
- .,- ..--,,w., . . - , . - - . , , - - . , = - , - - , , - , - - ..n, ~ , ,- - . - , , - - - , , .
- yV 3-2 -
Revision B shall be 1.7 Manual and computerized calculations preparer. reviewed by an individual other than the The reviewer shall be responsible for u complete check of the preparer's approach and~ the accuracy and technical adequacy of the calculations. 1.8 If prototype testing is required to confirm the requirements and-adequacy of the design, the acceptance criteria for such testing shall be included in the specification. Testing shall be performed under the most adverse design conditions. approved procedures, instructions, 1.9 Changes to calculations, drawings and specifications shall be permitted only after a review and approval by the the same individual or group responsible for original work. govern the review,. approval, 1.10_ Instructions shall release, distribution and revision of documents all for the participating design organizations. control with 1.11 SSW is responsible for interface a review of Westinghouse. This control includes Westinghouse desgriptions, drawings, specifi-cations, manuals and other correspondence. I 2.0 TASKS
- l shall prepare procedures, as necessary, to 2.1 EA and l
l establish a control system for engineering l design. l
.3.0 DISCUSSION 3.1 Reference Paragraph 1.1 l & Webster's System of Engineering and Design l
Stone Control is graphically depicted in Appendix IV. ( 3.2 Reference Paragraph 1.2 Stone & Webster assures that design characteristics can be controlled, inspected and/or testedaand that Quality are identified through test criteria and Assurance review and sign off of procurement to issue; and a QA erection specifications prior l ' review of all changes to such specifications and to such the disposition of all nonconformances Quality requirements / parameters l specifications. o See Appendix I for reference to implementing documents.
~
l
6 d 3-3 Revision B are established in the specification, the primary engineering document. Drawings convey quality requirements by reference to the appropriate specification. 3.3 Reference Paragraph 1.5 Standard "off the shelfa cannercial or previously approved items essential to safety related functions are reviewed for suitability prior to selection by the cognizant engineering equipment specialist. The procurement document is further reviewed and approved by Quality Assurance personnel to assure that essential quality control features have been included. 3.4 Reference Paragraph 1.6 Feedback information on nonconformances is transmitted from shop and field activities to headquarters. This data, plus audit data on Engineering / Design activities, is analyzed and evaluated by quality assurance personnel, after <d(' whic.1 corrective action is recommended to assist in preventing recurring nonconformances. 3.5 Reference Paragraph 1.10 Design documents and changes thereto are maintained and filed by project in accordance with the requirements of ANSI Standard N45.2.9. Design documents are considered to be specifications, drawings, procedures and instructions. 4.0 CLIENT CONSIDERATIONS Selected design documents, such as drawings and specifications, shall be submitted to NUSCo for their review, comment and affirmation of acceptability to assure Category I systems, structures, and components conform to design requirements, that the licensing commitments are incorporated and that de sign /regul ato ry/ cod e /stan d ard /qua lity assurance requirements are specified. o
, , T-ise l A
STONE & WEBSTER ENGINEERING CORPORATION QUALITY ASSURANCE DEPARTMENT QUAUTY ASSURANCE PROGRAM MILLSTONE NUCLEAR POWER STATION-UNIT 3 TITLE: NUMBER: SECTION 4 REVISION: C PROCUREMENT DOCUMENT CONTROL EFFECTIVE DATE: APRIL 20, 1979 APPROVALS l MANAGEE, QUALITY ASS RANCE A .. CHIEF ENGINEER, ENGINEERING ASSURANCE jy / L < j ~ P u .-. PROJECT MANAGER l
)
l
c o es u-1 Revision C t SECTION 4 PROCUREMENT DOCUMENT CONTROL 1.0 REOUIREMENTS 1.1 Procurement documentation shall include the requirements necessary for establishing the quality , of the procured material, equipment, and services. 1.2 Design criteria, including applicable codes,
- standards, and regulatory requirements shall be translated into procurement specifications and the associated design drawings. Items not procured with a specification, i.e., a purchase order, shall contain all necessary quality provisions.
be to 1 1.3 Procurement documents shall subject appropriate reviews as indicated in Appendix V. 1.4 Sellers who perform Category I work shall be required to have quality assurance programs consistent with applicable provisions of 7.ppendix B, 10CFR50. These provisions shall be imposed on their suppliers, as appropriate. 4 2.0 TASKS
- 2.1 QSD shall review and concur in all procurement documents (specifications and requisitions when no specification exists) for Category I items originated by Project Engineering prior to their issuance. Concurrence shall indicate that the specifications include aufficient infornation l
pertaining to codes, standards, methods of testing, inspection, and documentation so that quality assurance activities can be performed. 2.2 Procurement Quality Assurance Division shall: 2.2.1 Review procurement specifications for procurement quality assurance requirements C when requested by QSD. 2.2.2 Review and approve quality assurance manuals for shop fabrication of Category I items submitted by sellers in accordance with procurement specifications.
- See Appendix I for reference to implementing documents.
.- i hs 4-2 **
, Revision C p
2.3 Field Quality Control Division shall: 2.3.1 Review procurement specifications or field quality control requirements when requested by QSD. 2.3.2 Review and approve purchase requisitions issued at the site. 2.3.3 Review and approve subcontractors' quality assurance manuals and changes submitted thereto for field erection work. 3 2.4 Nondestructive Test Division shall review i procurement specifications for subcontractor nondestructive test requirements when requested by QSD. 2.5 Engineering Assurance Division shall: (j 2.5.1 Review and approve QA requirements of Engineering Service Scopes of Work (ESSON) i and Purchase Requisitions when procuring engineering services. 2.5.2 Review and approve quality assurance
- programs of suppliers of engineering i
services and supply this information to PQAD. I j 3.0 DISCUSSION 3.1 Reference Paragraph 1.1 Changes and/or revisions to procurement documents (i.e., procurement specifications) are accomplished by either an addendum to the specification, or a disposition of a nonconformance or Engineering and Design Coordination Report. All three methods have the same review and approval requirement as the original documents which includes a Quality l Assurance Department sign off. The implementation l and operation of these methods are subject to l audit. I t 3.2 Reference Paragraoh 2.0 3.2.1' Procurenent specifications identify the documentation to be prepared, controlled, retained, and submitted, when required, to SSW for review and/or approval. The review, approval, and sign of f of the procurement j document by the Quality Assurance Department c
*e 4-3 Revision C auditing activity delineated in and the Section 18 provide the required assurance.
3.2.2 Quality requirements for spare or replacement parts are normally delineated in the original equipment procurement specification which is reviewed and signed off by the Quality Assurance Department for "QA" requirements and acceptance criteria. Field procurement documents are reviewed and signed off by the Quality Assurance Department. 4.0 CLIENT __ CONSIDERATIONS When deviations trom the requirements of the NUSCO purchase order / contract are identified -by SSW, they shall be submitted in writing to NUSCo for their review and approval. 1 l
).
m
?-492 A
STONE & WEBSTER ENGINEERING COltPORATION QUALITY ASSURANCE DEPARTMENT QUALITY ASSURANCE PROGRAM MILLSTONE NUCLEAR POWER STATION-UNIT 3 TITLE: NUMBER: ' SECTIO!! 5 REVISION: INSTRUCTIONS, PROCEDURES, AND DRAWINGS EFFECTIVE DATE: APRIL 20, 1979 APPROVALS 1 / MANAGER, QUALITY ASSUR CE j 1 w _:_=-_s _ CHIEF ENGINEER, ENGINEERING ASSURANCE
- 7. L ] n 1( U 0u L PROJECT MANAGER l
e a 5-1 Revision C SECTION 5 I INSTRUCTIONS, PROCEDURES, AND DRAWINGS 1.0 REQU1REMENTS 1.1 Quality activitles shall be based on engineering specifications, drawings, procedures, and instructions, as appropriate. These documents shall indicate any necessary special process controls, the applicable codes and standards and qualitative and quantitative acceptance criteria. Further, they shall establish which documents prepared by sellers must be submitted to SSW for review before use. 1.2 Quality activities shall be conducted in accordance with quality assurance procedures which shall identify individuals or groups responsible for performing specific tasks and indicate quality record requirements. The procedures shall include sufficient definition to ensure that activities affecting quality have been satisfactorily performed in accordance with the specified requirements. 2.0 TASKS
- 2.1 Project Engineering shall:
2.1.1 Indicate necessary quality activities (including spccial controls) in drawings, specifications, and procedures, as appropriate. Criteria for the acceptance of specific tasks shall be included in the related document. 2.1.2 Establish which documents prepared by sellers must be submitted to S&W for review before use.
- See Appendix I for reference to implementing procedures.
a . e
- 5-2 Revision C l l
2.1.3 Conduct reviews of drawings prepared by Design to provide an independent review and i sign-off. 2.2 QSD shall prepare and publish procedures governing the performance of quality activities, excluding engineering and design (see Paragraph 2, Section 3) . 3.0 DISCUSSION Reference Paragraph 2.2 i The normal sequence of events in the preparation, review, approval, publication, and revision of procedures is as follows: 3.1 A preparer develops the procedure. 3.2 A lead Engineer or supervisor reviews the preparer's material. 3.3 A draft is then circulated within the discipline or department for internal review. 3.4 Internal review comments are incorporated or resolved -by the preparer and a preliminary procedure is prepared for external (outside discipline or department) review. 1 l 3.5 A preliminary procedure is then circulated for comment by signature authority personnel. i 3.6 Comments are received, incorporated, or resolved by l the preparer. 3.7 A final or original issue of the procedure is then circulated for signature. 3.8 Revisions are processed in a similar manner except that the draft stagn may be eliminated if the procedure is not significantly altered. I 4.0 CLIENT CONSIDERATIONS Instructions and procedures describing the quality related activities performed by SSW at the construction l site shall be submitted to NUSCo for review, comment, and affirmation of acceptability prior to the start of the associated activity at the construction site. L
7 152 A STONE & WEBSTER ENGINEERING CORPORATION QUALITY ASSURANCE DEPARTMENT QUALITY ASSURANCE PROGRAM MILLSTONE NUCLEAR POWER STATION-UNIT 3 TITLE: NUMBER: SECTION 6 REVISION: C DOCUMENT CONTROL EFF m lW M APRIL 20,1979 APPROVALS
.. 3 i
t
/Y//
MANAGER, OUAbTY ASSUR) ICE e c~~m . - CHIEF ENGINEER, ENGINEERING ASSURANCE
T,.n 'fw/1!% '
PROJECT MANAGER
6-1 Revision C SECTION 6 DOCUMENT CONTROL l 1.0-RBOUIREMENTS l l 1.1 The review, approval, and distribution of l documents, including changes thereto, which-prescribe activities affecting quality shall be controlled. These documents include drawings, specifications, instructions, procedures and test procedures. 1.2 The procedures for the preparation of documents shall include reviews to ensure adequacy before release as well as requirements for the approval of each document by authorized personnel through signatures or initials. 1.3 A method of change control shall be established that includes approval by the same individuals or groups having responsibility for the initial document issue. The method shall include a revision identification system so that the effective revisions can be readily determined. 1.4 Document control shall be accomplished in a manner which ensures timely inclusion of changes into the parent document. 1.5 The distribution of documents shall be controlled to ensure that only authorized documents are in use at the locations where the prescribed activities are being performed. Provisions shall be included for the retrieval, control, or destruction of out-dated documents. 2.0 TASKS *- 2.1 EA shall prepare and issue procedures for establishing a control system for engineering assurance and engineering and design documents which prescribe activities affecting quality. 2.2 QSD shall prepare and issue procedures which provide control over documents which are used by Quality Assurance Department personnel and which prescribe quality assurance activities.
- See Appendix I for reference to implementing documents.
e , e
- 6-2 Revision C 3.0 DISCUSSION Reference Paragraph 1.1 Applicable procedures in Section 5 of the Quality Standards Manual, Engineering Assurance Manual, and the Quality Assurance Directives Manual establish the requirements to maintain master indexes of instructions, procedures, drawings, and procurement documents and to publish updated indexes in a scheduled manner. Ibr example, the quality standard entitled " Quality Standards Procedural System" states as follows:
"4.4.1D - Applicability - The applicability of a <(
specific QS to a Project shall be established in the Table of Contents and Project Applicability Matrix, Attachment 3.2. Actual usage in part or whole will depend upon other project documents which establish the scope of work to be done by Stone & Webster. This matrix shall be reviewed on a monthly basis and updated periodically depending on activity, with an annual update as a minimum..." 4.0 CLIENT CONSIDERATIONS There are no additional client considerations. t l t l L i l l l l t l l. l
o a 1-152 A STONE & WEBSTER ENGINEERING CORPORATION QUALITY ASSURANCE DEPARTMENT QUALITY ASSURANCE PROGRAM MILLSTONE NUCLEAR POWER STATION-UNIT 3 TITLE: NUMBER: SECTION 7 REVISION: C CONTROL OF PURCHASED MATERIAL, EQUIPMENT, AND SERVICES EFFECTIVE DATE: APRIL 20,1979 APPROVALS q
/ k MANAGER, QUkLITY ASS NCE
^
l (y/ V
- l- m' &. ,
CHIEF ENGINEER, ENGINEERING ASSURANCE EAJrp A/&_ , . ! > PROJECT MANAGER
7-1 Revision C SECTION 7 _ CONTROL OF PURCHASED MATERIAL, EQUIPMENT, AND SERVICES 1.0 REQUIREMENTS 1.1 Controls shall be established to ensure that purchased material, equipment, and services, whether purchased directly or through sellers, conform to procurement documents. These controls shall include source evaluation and recommendations, periodic source assessment and inspection, and site receiving inspection, as applicable. 1.2 A proprietary Quality Rating List shall be prepared and maintained which shall indicate the capability of a seller's quality assurance program. The , assessment of his capability may be based on past ' performance and/or a review of the quality assurance manual, as applicable. 1.3 Bid specifications shall be submitted to NUSCo with a list of recommended sellers based on an evaluation of the capability of the sellers to meet the specification quality requirements. Bids may be solicited from sellers whose quality programs have not been evaluated and approved; however, before placing a purchase order for Category I work, the seller's program shall be evaluated. and approved. If a plant survey is necessary, NUSCo 4 shall be cotified so that they may participate. I 1.4 Field purchase orders for Category I items shall be placed only with approved Category I sellers. In establishing that a seller for Category I items is approved, the following guidance may be used in . addition to the Quality Rating List: 1.4.1 If the seller is a distributor and does not handle the item, and if the source of the item is an approved SSW supplier, then the seller (distributor) need not be on the 4 approved list, provided that the seller furnishes copies of documentation to i
a . 7-2 i Revision C indicate that the items were obtained from the approved SSW source supplier. Example: Company A is an approved SSW supplier for Category 5 electrodes. Company B is a distributor that sells company A electrodes. Further, Company B does not handle these electrodes (i.e., they are shipped directly from Company A) . Company B need not be on the. Quality Rating List, provided that Company B furnishes objective evidence to <( show .that the electrodes supplied came from Company A and that applicable documentation is furnished by Company A. 1.4.2 If the acceptability of an item is based on inspections and tests performed after the item has been delivered to the site and before its use, then the seller need not_ be on the approved list. <(f 1.4.3 Sellers who furnish items which are referenced in a specification by (C manufacturer and specific model or other identification are considered as approved for the specified items. By referencing a specific manufacturer's product, approval of the product is established during the review of the specification. Example: Type X admixture is supplied by Company A and is specified as an acceptable- product in a specification. Company A is an approved seller for Type X admixture. However, if Company A were to offer Type Y admixture as "an approved equal", then Type Y would have to be evaluated and approved by Project Engineering before it could be used and before Company A could be accepted as an approved seller for Type Y admixture. 1.5 NUSCo may designate " notification points" for specific operations performed at seller's
' facilities NUSCO shall be advised by S&W when <(f
" notification point" operations are scheduled.
1.6 Westinghouse is responsible for source inspection and documentation of all Westinghouse procured items.
7-3 Revision C 1.7 Receipt inspection includes verification that all required documentation has been received and that the items conform to the procurement documents. Inspections for conformance shall make use of objective quality evidence received with the items, as well as selected physical inspection. 1.7.1 Receipt inspection activities shall be documented. 1.7.2 Acceptable Category I items received at the site shall be identified. 1.7.3 Items received at the site without the required documentation or items for which receipt inspection cannot be perscrmed within a reasonable time shall be placed in a hold status and segregated, when practicable. Items which do not conform to the specified requirements shall be tagged, reported as nonconformances, and segregated when practicable. 1.7.4 Unsatisfactory items or items in a hold status may be released on a risk basis. <$( Items shall not be released for any operation when rework, replacement, or certification of acceptability of the item is impossible after the operation is performed. Copies of risk release documentation shall be provided to NUSCo. 2.0 TASKS
- 2.1 Procurement Quality Assurance Division shall:
2.1.1 Establish criteria for source evaluation and conduct source evaluations. 2.1.2 Maintain a Quality Rating List. (( 2.1.3 Assess active sellers, generally on a 12-month basis. While PQAD is responsible for seller evaluation, PQAD, may request the assistance of other Quality Assurance Department divisions to conduct the evaluation. 2.2 Bid specifications shall be submitted to NUSCo with a list of recommended suppliers by Project See Appendix I for reference to implementing documents.
7-4 Revision C Engineering. In preparing this list, an evaluation by PQAD on the capability of each seller to meet the specification quality requirements shall be used. 2.3 If bids are solicited from sellers whose quality assurance programs have not been evaluated and approved for Category I work, the seller's quality assurance program shall be evaluated and approved by PQAD before the purchase order is placed. If a plant survey is necessary, PQAD shall notify NUSCo (C so that they may participate, if desired. 2.4 For field purchases, FQCD shall: 2.4.1 Review and approv'e purchase requisitions and assure they contain the necessary quality assurance requirements, including inspection forms,.when applicable. This review and approval applies to revisions to field purchase requisitions. 2.4.2 Review all field purchase orders for Category I items and verify that an approved seller has been engaged. 2.5 PQAD shall visit seller facilities to verify, witness, and perform the various tasks required by procurement documents. 2.5.1 NUSCo shall inform PQAD of their designated
" notification points". When the visit includes client designated " notification points", PQAD shall advise them for their participation.
2.5.2 NUSCo's Manager of Quality Assurance may request additional seller visits. These will be conducted by PQAD on a basis mutually agreed to by NUSCo and SSW. 2.5.3 PQAD shall document visits to seller facilities. Copies of visit reports shall be provided to NUSCo. 2.5.4 When source inspection by PQAD is required by the procurement document or requested by the Project Engineer or site Resident Manager, PQAD shall identify all acceptable C source inspected items with a SHIPPING RELEASE TAG.
, - , - - , - - - - - -.-a, -- -
---.-..,-=_7-, ,, , - - , - , - . - - . - - - . , --
. e 7-5 Revision C 2.6 FQCD shall perform site receipt inspection for Category I and specified Category II items.
2.6.1 FQCD shall document receipt inspection activities. 2.6.2 SHIPPING RELEASE TAGS affixed by PQAD shall be used by FQCD as objective quality evidence of previous SSW inspection during receipt inspection. Operations performed by PQAD during source inspection need not be repeated. 2.6.3 Westinghouse source inspection tags applied to their procured items shall not be used by FQCD as objective quality evidence during receipt inspection. Also, FQCD shall check the documentation received with the items against the Procurement Quality Check List supplied by Westinghouse (i.e . , check that listed documents are accounted for). Any items received without a source inspection tag and the correct documentation shall be placed in a hold status and the problem shall be referred to Client for resolution. 2.6.4 FQCD shall indicate by appropriate means, items or groups of items found acceptable. 2.6.5 FQCD shall tag and segregate, when practicable, items which do not conform to the specified requirements and report them as nonconformances. 2.6.6 Nonconforming items and items in a hold status may be released by FQCD on a risk t basis when a formal written request is submitted to FQCD by Construction (field) and concurred in by Project Engineering and FQCD (field) . FQCD shall provide copies of risk release documentation to NUSCo. 2.7 Engineering Assurance Division shall: 2.7.1 Establish criteria for source evaluation and conduct source evaluations of engineering services suppliers. I 2.7.2 Supply. information on evaluations of < engineering services suppliers to PQAD for I maintenance of the Quality Rating List. '
P 7-6 Revision C 3.0 DISCUSSION 3.1 Reference Paracraph 1.4 3.1.1 The Engineering Department (i.e. , Project Engineering) is responsible for the preparation of a recommended bidders list, the evaluation of the bidder's proposal, and the . final determination of the specific bidder to be recommended to NUSCo. The
' Procurement Quality Assurance Division of the Quality Assurance Department is responsible to evaluate recommended bidders quality assurance programs and their ability to perform to the program. Engineering Department participation in the Quality Assurance bidder evaluation is to the extent deemed necessary by the Project Engineer.
During the conduct of the work the engineer is responsible for the review and approval of supplier provided technical documentation as specified in the procurement specification. 3.1.2 An exception to the policy of buying Category I items only from sellers on the approved Quality Rating List may be made under - the following conditions. This exception provides for controls which complies with the requirements of Criteria 7 . to Appendix B to 10CFR50. If the Engineering Department, in the development of a Category I specification or purchase i requisition, makes the determination that the acceptability of an item can be adequately judged by inspections and tests performed by SSW in the seller's shop or after delivery, the seller need not be prequalified by survey or audit. Quality Assurance, by their review of purchase documents as delineated in Section 4 assures that appropriate inspections and tests are specified. 3.2 Reference Paragraph 2.5 Parameters to be inspected, tests to be witnessed, and documents to be reviewed by Procurement Quality Assurance Division shop inspectors are delineated in the Test, Inspection, and Documentation section
<(
. of procurement specifications, which have been reviewed and- approved by the Quality Assurance l
. a 7-7 Revision C l Department. The detailed techniques for the perfornance and doctamentation of these inspections are delineated in applicable Quality Assurance Department procedures.
4.0 CLIENT CONSIDERATIONS NonconformiwJ material may not be installed at the site without prior approval by NUSCo. l l l l i l l
T=1G2 A
~
STONE & WEBSTER ENGINEERING CORPORATION QUALITY ASSURANCE DEPARTMENT QUALITY ASSURANCE PROGRAM MILLSTONE NUCLEAR POWER STATION-UNIT 3 TITLE: NUMBER: SECTION 8 REVISION: C IDENTIFICATION AND CONTROL OF MATERIALS, PARTS, AND COMPONENTS EFFECTIVE DATE: APRIL 20, 1979 APPROVALS m
/ Y/
hANAGER, QU bhY ASSU NCE w .r CHIEF ENGINEER, ENGINEERING ASSURANCE
,. ,g f(/27k&.A1.
PROJECT MANAGER
. s 8-1 Revision C SECTION 8 IDENTIFICATION AND COtFfROL OF MATERIALS, PARTS, AND COMPONENTS 1.0 REOUIREMENTS 1.1 Identification and control measures shall be established as necessary to prevent the uncontrolled use of nonconforming materials, parts, and components, including partically fabricated assemblies. 1.2 Identification and control of material, parts, and components which are to meet the requirements of ASME Section III shall be accomplished during field fabrication and erection in accordance .ith w the Company Quality Assurance and Control mnual-ASME Section III. 1.3 Category I materials, parts, and components shall be identified by heat number, serial number, part number, or other appropriate means. The identification may be on the item (physical markings are preferred) or on records directly and readily traceable to the item. 1.3.1 The type of identification shall be established by specifications, drawings, instructions, or procedures. 1.3.2 Traceability to records which will verify conformance of the materials, parts, and components to specified requirements (e .g . . . chemical and physical properties, tests, inspections, etc.) shall be provided from initial receipt of materials to installation and use, or up to user testing, if applicable. For consumable materials (e . g . , cadweld powder), traceability requirements shall be met by ?.ocumentation which indicates that only acceptable materials have been used, unless requirements of codes and standards dictate otherwise. 1.4 Category II and Category III materials, parts, and components shall be identified by type and status or as required by the specifications.
i . e
- 8-2 Revision C 2.0 TASKS
- 2.1 Project Engineering shall establish requirements for the identification of materials, parts, and components in applicable drawings, specifications, instructions, and procedures.
2.2 PQAD shall perform tasks at coller facilities C relative to the identification and control of materials, parts, and components in accordance with the procurement documents. 2.3 Field Quality Control Division shall: 2.3.1 Verify, during receiving inspection, that materials, parts, and components are properly identified and when applicable, traceable to supporting documentation. 2.3.2 Ensure that the required identification and traceability of materials, parts, and components is maintained from receipt through completion of construction. 3.0 DISCUSSION None. 4.0 CLIENT CONSIDERATIONS t There are no additional client considerations. I l , *See Appendix I for reference to implementing documents. l l
T'- t 5 2 i STONE & WEBSTER ENGINEERING CORPORATION QUALITY ASSURANCE DEPARTMENT QUALITY ASSURANCE PROGRAM MILLSTONE NUCLEAR POWER STATION-UNIT 3 TITLE: NUMBER: REVISION: C CONTROL OF SPECIAL PROCESSES EFFECTIVE DATE: APRIL 20,1979 APPROVALS
/ bef MAN AGER, QUALITY ASSU NCE u
L. LM_ t -_n _ . CHIEF ENGINEER, ENGINEERING ASSURANCE ( Jf i ffk / ' PROJECT MANAGER
l
.
- l l
. i 9-1 Revision C 1
SECTION 9 CONTROL OF SPECIAL PROCESSES 1.0 REOUIREMENTS shall be controlled to ensure 1.1 Special processes are used that approved special process procedures by qualified personnel in accordance with specified SSW codes, standards, and any additional requirements. The requirements for special process shall control, including personnel qualifications be imposed by _ specifications, procedures, instructions, or other applicable documents. are unique manufacturing, 1.2 Special processes written inspection, or test processes where procedures are deemed necessary to accomplish a Welding, welding repair, task affecting quality. heat treating, coatings, cadwelding, studwelding, testing, and cleaning, leak nuclear system examples of special nondestructive testing are processes. 2.0 TASKS
- Department (Materials Engineering 2.1 Engineering Division) shall:
and approve all special process 2.1.1 Review procedures excluding nondestructive test submitted by sellers in c procedures, accordance with specification requirements. Review, approve, and maintain all special ' 2.1.2 SSW. process procedures prepared for use by 2.2 QSD shall review and concur in SSW generated including special process procedures, are to be nondestructive test procedures, which used at the site. 2.3 Nondestructive Test Division shall: 2 qualification testing and 2.3.1 Provide perform certification of SSW personnel who nondestructive testing (see also Paragraph 2.6, Section 2) .
- See Appendix I for reference to implementing documents.
i . 9-2 - Revision C 2.3.2 Review and evaluate nondestructive testing procedures subunitted by sellers in accordance with specification requirements; and prepare and maintain nondestructive testing procedures used by S&W in accordance with specification and code requirements. l 2.4 When required by the procurement documents, PQAD shall verify that qualified personnel have performed special process work at sellers facilities using approved procedures. 2.5 Field Quality Control Division: 2.5.1 Is responsible for qualification testing which is required of personnel who perform special process work at the site in accordance with specifications, procedures, ~ instructions, or other applicable documents. 2.5.2 Shall maintain qualification records. , 2.5.3 Has the authority to re-test or revoke the 4 qualification of personnel whose special process work is not in accordance with established quality standards that define qualification requirements. 2.6 FQCD shall verify that only qualified personnel l perform special process work at the site using approved procedures. 27 For special process work which is not covered by codes and standards, or when it is desired that an item's quality requirements exceed those in codes or standards, the necessary qualification of procedures, personnel, and equipment shall be defined by Project Engineering in specifications, procedures, or other appropriate documents. 3.0 DISCUSSION Reference Paragraph 1.1 Audits are conducted to assure implementation of and conformance to approved procedures / specifications and that special processes are ac::omplished with written process daets, procedures, check lists, travelers, or the equivalent, with recorded evidence of verifications. The audit. activity is described in Section 18 of the program while the implementing procedures are found in appropriate manuals indicatcd in Appendix I.
9-3 Revision C ' I l i 4.0 CLIMif CONSIDERATIOtIS
} There are no additional client considerations.
f e i i i 1 i f i l l l /
T - 152 A STONE & WEBSTER ENGINEERING CORPORATION QUALITY ASSURANCE DEPARTMENT QUALITY ASSURANCE PROGRAM MILLSTONE NUCLEAR POWER STATION-UNIT 3 TITLE: NUMBER: SECTI0tl 10 REVISION: C INSPECTION EFFECTIVE DATE: APRIL 20, 1979 APPROVALS 0 - W Y!Y) $ M AN AGER, QU AllTY ASSU[ANCE
.A c-A w _.
CHIEF ENGINEER, ENGINEERING ASSURANCE JA_SrT._ \tI X,CCy A t _. PROJECT MANAGER
/
. , e 10-1 Revision C SECTION 10 INSPECTION 4
1.0 REQUIREMENTS 1.1 Drawings, specifications, instructions, and procedures shall include the necessary inspection requirements, with acceptance criteria, to provide assurance that material, equipment, and work conform to quality requirements. Acceptance and inspection activities : hall not be performed by personnel who have performed the work to be inspected. 1.1.1 Inspections shall be performed at seller facilities in accordance with the requirements of the procurement documents. 1.1.2 Inspections shall be performed at the site on material, equipment and work to ensure
< conformance to applicable specifications, instructions, codes, standards, and procedures.
i 1.2 Inspection requirements shall be translated into procedures and inspection reports to provide
- documentation of the inspection work required to ensure the specified quality. While direct in-process and final inspections are preferred, indirect control by monitoring of the process,
- equipment and personnel may be rsed when direct inspection is impossible or not i vsible. Direct and indirect controls shall be *en.' when control is inadequate without both metMb
- 1.3 Sampling methods may be used for inspecting a group of homogeneous items which are received from one source, excluding Category I items unless the method for specific Category I items is approved by the ' Client. When a sampling method is used to verify the acceptability of items, the sampling plan shall be based on a recognized stanoord sampling plan. The methods of applying the standard sampling plan shall be documented to
. . - - . .- - - , . . . ~ . - . - . - . - . . - . - - . - - - . - . - - . _ . . - - . - , , . . . . . - , - , .
4 10-2 - - Revision C prevent misinterpretation of the plan or the sample results. 1.4 When notification or hold points have been established, the process control procedure or checklist shall include provisions to ensure that work does not progress beyond these points until released by the designated authority. Notification or hold points may be established by specifications, procedures, construction (field) , , Quality Assurance Department, or Authorized Nuclear Inspectors. 1.5 Individuals or _ groups who have been designated to evaluate inspection data by specifications, procedures, or instructions shall indicate the conformance or nonconformance on the data sheet or } .other appropriate documents. 1.6 The Quality Assurance Department shall have the authority to stop work in those situations where continued work could cause damage, preclude further inspection, or preclude effective corrective action. 2.0 TASKS
- Project Engineering shall include the necessary 2.1 inspection requirements, with acceptance criteria, in drawings, specifications, instructions, and procedures.
at seller C 2.2 PQAD shall perform inspection tasks facilities in accordance with the procurement documents (see Paragraph 2.5 Section 7) . perform the following field quality 2.3 FQCD shall control inspections as required. NO'fE See Paragraph 2.6 Section 7, for FQCD receipt inspection tasks. 2.3.1 shall perform inspection / testing of FQCD steel, soils, concrete, reinforcing structural steel and special coatings in accordance with applicable specifications, instructions and procedures. O See Appendix I for reference to implementing documents.
10-3 Revision C 2.3.2 FQCD shall perform specified inspections and tests of all Category I equipment. Unless there are specific requirements in applicable specifications, instructions, or , procedures, Category II equipment shall be inspected on a sampling basis to a degree consistent with the relationship of the equipment to plant operational performance and Category III equipment shall be inspected on a surveillance basir,. . 2.3.3 FQCD shall perform inspection of welding in accordance with applicable specifications, instructions, or procedures. As a minimum, all Category I and Category II welding shall be visually inspected and Category III welding shall be visually inspected on a surveillance basis. 2.3.4 FQCD shall perform required liquid penetrant, magnetic particle, ultrasonic, and radiographic testing and examinations. 2.3.5 FQCD shall make all necessary arrangements with, and assist, the Authorized Nuclear Inspector so that SSW may obtain code certification of fabricated and erected
-piping systems which are specified to meet the requirements of ASME Section III.
2.3.6 FQCD shall document inspection / testing tasks performed, including monitoring, witnessing, auditing, etc. 2.4 NDTD shall provide inspection services in specialty areas of nondestructive testing when adequate equipment and capability are not available in PQAD And FQCD. 3.0 DISCUSSION 3.1 Reference Paragraphs 1.1.1 and 1.1.2 The Quality Assurance Department, as part of the planning activity in both it's Field Quality control and Quality Systems Division, performs an ongoing review of construction schedules versus our inspection procedure / instruction library in order that the procedural needs are identified and the procedures completed well in advance of required dates. Inspections, as well as the work, are performed to specifications / drawings; therefore, a S , ~-- ,o_ - ,- -.y,e. r.,. -
, - . ..,.,,,.,_s ,.,..-.,y-m , . . . - . - - , ., - - . , , , . - . - . -
a . { 10-4 Revision C lack of specification or drawing would preclude either work or inspections being performed. 3.2 Reference Paragraph 1.2 Assurance that inspection procedures, instructions following is contain the and/or check lists obtained as indicated next to each item: be Inspected - 3.2.1 Ouality Characteristics to These are delineatedisinreviewed the appropriate specification which and signed by Quality Assurance personnel. Individuals or Groups Responsible for 3.2.2 Performing the Inspection - Delineated in the appropriate Quality Standard. 3.2.3 Acceptance and Reiection Criteria - Same as one (1) above. 3.2.4 A Description of the Method of Inspections - Delineated in the appropriate Quality Department procedure; i.e., Assurance Quality Assurance Directive, Quality Control Instruction, etc. 3.2.5 Evidence of Completions and Certification of Inspection Operations - An inspection report prepared in accordance with Quality Stan-dard 14.2 " Inspection Report System" or other documentation as may be specified in the particular specification. 3.2.6 Record of the Results of the Inspection Operation - same as five (5) above. 3.2.7 verification that all Inspection Operations are Complete and Acceptable - By a compari-son of the inspection reports / documentation prepared to the attribute list of inspections to be performed developed during the inspection planning stage by Quality Assurance. Final' assurance of the satisfactory implementation of items 3.2.1 through 3.2.7 is gained through an independent audit of the above activities performed by the Quality Assurance Cost and Auditing Division.
10-5 Revision C 3.3 Reference Paragraph 2.1 Modifications, repairs, and replacements are performed in accordance with approved engineering l specifications, which are reviewed by Quality
-Assurance personnel. Such work is inspected in accordance with the specified requirements, which if changed from the original, would require a change to the specification and a subsequent Quality Assurance review.
4.0 CLIENT CONSIDERATIONS 4.1 Inspections of Category I, II, and III material and equipment by FQCD shall be performed as directed by NUSCo. 4.2 The comitment to Paragraph 2.3.3 is intended to be conformed to as follows: 4.2.1 Applicable to all welding performed on or to Category I systems, structures, and components. These welds shall be subjected to 100 percent visual inspection as a minimum. 4.2.2 Applicable to all welding performed on or to Category II fluid carrying systems. These welds shall be subjected to 100 percent visual inspection as a minimum. A. The above war intended to require that any welding involving a fluid boundary such as a butt or socket weld is to be subject to 100 percent visual inspection as a minimum. B. Additionally, the word "toa requires that any attachment weld to a fluid system also requires 100 percent visual inspection as a minimum. C. All other welds, on a hanger for example, except those interfacing with the fluid boundary (pipe wall) come under Paragraph 4.2.3. 4.2.3 Applicable to all welding performed on or to Category II (other than fluid carrying) and Category III systems, structures, and components. These welds shall be subjected to surveillance inspection.
T-152 A
~
STONE & WEBSTER ENGINEERING CORPORATION QUALITY ASSURANCE DEPARTMENT QUALITY ASSURANCE PROGRAM MILLSTONE NUCLEAR POWER STATI0ff-UNIT 3 TITLE: NUMBER: SECTION 11 REVISION: C TEST CONTROL EFFECTIVE DATE: APRIL 20, 1979 APPROVALS 0
/b h/ 2ll 7 ANAGER, QUALITY ASS RANCE
,s W-t w .
CHIEF ENGINEER, ENGINEERING ASSURANCE
' A- 96. ,Y ),r& ., i PROJECT MANAGER
+
i 11-1 Revision C f i l l i SECTION 11 TEST CONTROL 1.0 REOUIREMENTS required to demonstrate that structures, 1.1 Testing systems and components will perform satisfactorily in service shall be identified in applicable documents such as drawings, specifications, procedures, and instructions. Category I items shall be performed in 1.2 Tests for accordance with written test procedures and by trained personnel. When the test procedures described in codes and identified are those standards (e.g. , ACI, ASTM, etc. , tests) , they need not be duplicated in written procedures if such codes and standaros are available to the personnel conducting the test. 1.3 Test procedures shall include the following: to ensure that all test 1.3.1 Provisions prerequisites have been met prior to the start of the test. 1.3.2 Requirements and acceptance limits from the applicable design documents. Required accuracy and type of test 1.3.3 instrumentation to be used. Required environmental conditions, if 1.3.4 applicable. 1.3.5 Inclusion as applicable, of mandatory hold points for witnessing by NUSCo, Authorized Nuclear Inspectors, and SSW QA Department. 1.4 Test results shall be documented in sufficient shall detail to prevent misinterpretation and results by include an evaluation of the test qualified / responsible groups.
11-2 Revision C 2.0 TASKS
- 2.1 PQAD -shall perform tasks at seller facilities as C required by the specifications or purchase orders.
2.2 QSD shall prepare any necessary procedures, excluding preoperational proof test procedures. 2.3 FQCD shall perform or witness tests at the site which are required by the specifications and Project Engineering procedures and instructions. FQCD shall release systems after erection completion. 3.0 DISCUSSION Reference Paragraph 1.3.1 Test prerequisites, as used herein, are those items specified in the individual test procedure that must be accomplished prior to the start of a specific test. SSW considers ANSI N45.2.8, Draft 3, Rev. 3, April 1974, as promulgated in WASH 1309, UC80, to cover the major prerequisites to be addressed. 4.0 CLIENT CONSIDERATIONS Initial system checkout through preoperational testing is the responsibility of the client. l 0 See Appendix I for reference to implementing documents.
T - 152 A STONE & WEBSTER ENGINEERING CORPORATION QUALITY ASSURANCE DEPARTMENT QUALITY ASSURANCE PROGRAM MILLSTONE NUCLEAR POWER STATION-UNIT 3 TITLE: NUMBER: SECTION 12 REVISION: C CONTROL OF MEASURING AND EFFECTIVE DATE: TEST EQUI N APRIL 20,1979 APPROVALS
/ d MANAGER, QUALITY ASSdRANCE L. M : =_ u .-..
CHIEF ENGINEER, ENGINEERING ASSURANCE
. % 'yusg.~ >~
PROJECT MANAGER
12-1 Revision C SECTION 12 CONTROL OF MEASURING AND TEST EQUIPMENT 1.0 REOUIREMENTS 1.1 When tools, gages, instruments, and measuring and testing equipment are used for measurements, inspections, and tests performed to document compliance with specified requirements, the calibration and use of such equipment shall be controlled. 1.2 The control program shall include the following: 1.2.1 Positive identification of the equipment and its calibration status. 1.2.2 A frequency of calibration schedule for types of equipment based on recognized , industry standards, manufacturers' recommendations, or usage factors. 1.2.3 Wi-itten procedures describing the calibration control system. Standards traceable to national standards shall be used, when appropriate. 1.2.4 A records system which will indicate the calibration dates and the identification of personnel performing the calibration. 1.2.5 A recall system to prevent use of equipment beyond the calibration due date. 1.2.6 A_ system for corrective action when uncalibrated or damaged measuring and test equipment has been used. Inspection records shall include traceability identification of the specific equipment used.
- p. --my m, - -y,-y.- . - , , - , --
. , - - - , , ,e,, ,,,y. ,_,,,v,, www,.,- *-erw.w- --er, , ,,-,-- ,
e . 12-2 - Revision C 2.0 TASKS
- 2.1 EA shall establish procedures for the control and calibration of measuring and test equipment use in Engineering Department activities affecting quality.
2.2 PQAD shall perform tasks at seller facilities <$ relative to the control of measuring and test equipment in accordance with requirements of the procurement documents. 2.3 Construction (field) shall control measuring and test equipment used by Construction forces at the site and forward equipment due for calibration to FQCD. 2.4 QSD shall establish calibration control systems for measuring and test equipment used at the site. 2.5 At the site, FQCD shall: 2.5.1 Calibrate, or have calibrated by approved calibration laboratories, measuring and test equipment. 2.5.2 Verify that properly calibrated equipment is used. 2.5.3 Ensure that measuring and test equipment is indentified. 2.5.4 Maintain calibration records. 3.0 DISCUSSION Reference Paragraph 1.2.6 , " Corrective actiona as used herein requires that an l investigation be conducted and documented to determine l the validity of previous inspections performed when uncalibrated, damaged or out of calibration measuring i and test equipment has been used. 4.0 CLIENT CONSIDERATIONS l There are no additional client considerations. cSee Appendix I for reference to implementing documents.
T.-152 A
- STONE & WEBSTER EN'GINEERING CORPORATION QU ALITY ASSURANCE DEPARTMENT QUAUTY ASSURANCE PROGRAM MILLSTONE NUCLEAR POWER STATION-UNIT 3 TITLE: NUMBER:
SECTI0il 13 HANDLING, STORAGE, AND SHIPPING C EFFECTIVE DATE: APRIL 20,1.979 APPROVALS
}
. Nbac'thWi MANAGER, QU ALITY ASSU NCE
&s_ - Lem n--
CHIEF ENGINEER, ENGINEERING ASSURANCE i D D c 'y jj}9., , PROJECT MANAGER
-,-<na--y.. -. -
~
13-1 Revision C SECTION 13 HANDLING, STORAGE, AND SHIPPING 1.0 REQUIREP1ENTS 1.1 The handling, storage, shipping, cleaning, and preservation of material and equipment shall be controlled, to prevent damage or deterioration. The specified work shall be accomplished by qualified individuals in accordance with the preplanned work and inspection instruction. 1.2 Procurement documents shall include the following: to establish any 1.2.1 Requirements for special procedures which may be necessary to sellers (C prevent damage or deterioration of the supplied items. 1.2.2 Requirements for the preparation of items for shipment, as necessary, to ensure cleanliness, identification, and proper handling. 1.2.3 Requirements for installation, operation, and maintenance instructions, when specified, to be available at the site on a timely basis. maintenance program shall be 1.3 A preventive established at the site. This program shall include a schedule of maintenance operations to be performed and documentation of maintenance operations performed. The maintenance program shall be based on the manufacturers
- or Project Engineering recommendations instructions.
1.4 The preventive maintenance program shall be applied to materials and equipment in storage and work areas, and after installation up to the time of release for preoperational testing. e -n - -- ,- , ,, a- , , -,,-,,,----,.--,---,---r,w,-
.r. --,.---,----,m, . - - - - - - ,
4 13-2 Revision C 2.0 TASKS
- Project Engineering shall prepare procurement
-2.1 4
documents, provide criteria for the storage level of items at the site, and resolve any problems relative to the assignment of storage levels. 2.2 PQAD shall perform required verification at seller facilities relative to the handling, cleaning, and preparation of items for shipment as required by the procurement documents. 2.3 PQAD shall audit the maintenance program ofon items an in long term storage at seller facilities required by specific individual ' case basis as requests from NUSCo. 2.4 Construction (field) shall establish and implement a storage and preventive maintenance program of items stored at the site and at specified nearby locations, and maintain appropriate maintenance records. Construction (field) shall assign levels of strorage for items based on criteria provided by Project Engineering. 2.5 FQCD shall ensure that the quality of items is storage so that no maintained throughout Field degradation or deterioration is evident. Quality Control Division shall: Concur- in the level of storage of items 2.5.1 assigned by Construction (field) . 2.5.2 Verify implementation of the maintenance program by Construction (field) . 2.5.3 Verify that only acceptable items are released for installation (risk released items are considered acceptable within the conditions of the risk release). 2.5.4 Document FQCD storage inspections /verifica-tions. 3.0 DISCUSSION None. l-0 See Appendix 1 for reference to implementing documents.
13-3 Revision C 4.0 CLIENT CONSIDERATIONS . There are no additional client considerations. l l
T$152 _
\
STONE & WEBSTER ENdINEERING CORPORATION QUALITY ASSURANCE DEPARTMENT QUALITY ASSURANCE PROGRAM MILLSTONE NUCLEAR POWER STATION-UNIT 3 TITLE: NUMBER: SECTION 14 REVISION: INSPECTION, TEST, AND OPERATING STATUS EFFECTIVE DATE: - APRIL 20, 1979 APPROVALS 0 ,
/5Ab,J'l$bX' l fnANAGER, QUblTY ASSU NCE A
tn +-~-~ . CHIEF ENGINEER, ENGINEERING ASSURANCE l}f! E. (jl M > PROJECT MANAGER l
, e 14-1 Revision C SECTION 14 INSPECTION, TEST, AND OPERATING STATUS 1.0 R_EQUIREMENTS 1.1 The status of inspections and test operations shall be identified during manufacturing, construction, installation, and test. The status shall be
-indicated by tags, markings, shop travelers, stamps, route cards, inspection records, or checklists, or other suitable means, provided that the method used ensures that only accepted items are used, installed or operated. The removal of such tags, shop traveler, route cards, checklists, etc., shall only be performed by authorized personnel. Removal by unauthorized personnel shall be prohibited.
1.2 Nonconforming items shall be uniquely identified and controlled. 2.0 TASKS
- 2.1 In addition to the tasks listed in Section 7, PQAD shall:
2.1.1 Perform tasks relative to the assurance of inspection, test and operational status of items at seller facilities in accordance with procurement documents. 2.1.2 Verify during inspections, audits, and i surveys of Category I sellers that the seller is properly using a system for the identification of inspection and test operations, as appropriate, or as required by the procurement documents.
- 2.2 In addition to the tasks listed in Section 7, FQCD shall:
2.2.1 Identify the status of inspections and tests performed during construction, l ! installation, and test operations at the site.
- See Appendix I for reference to implementing documents.
I
14-2 Revision C 2.2.2 Ensure that only accepted items are used, installed, or operated. 2.2.3 Maintain current documentation regarding the status of inspections and tests. 3.0-DISCUSSION Reference Paragraph 1.1 The bypassing or waiver of a required inspection, for rejection, test or critical operation shall be cause unless Quality Assurance has reviewed and signed off on i.e., the document that authorized the bypass or waiver, an addenda to a specification and/or an ESDCR. 4.0 CLIENT CONSIDERATIONS There are no additional client considerations. l j l
, a T-152 A
STONE & WEHSTER ENdlNEERING CORPORATION QUALITY ASSURANCE DEPARTMENT QUALITY ASSURANCE PROGRAM MILLSTONE f0 CLEAR POWER STATION-UNIT 3 TITLE: NUMBER: SECTION 15 NONCONFORMING MATERIALS, PARTS, REVISION: c OR COMP 0NENTS EFFECTIVE DATE: APRIL 20,1979 : APPROVALS O
/ W +/'O ANAGER, ObALITY SURANCE cc L t +- h . ,_
CHIEF ENGINEER, ENGINEERING ASSURANCE 4
/*^ _ _a _
PROJECT MANAGER I l
< e 15-1 Revision C SECTION 15 NONCONFORMING MATERIALS, PARTS. OR COMPONENTS 1.0 REQUIREMENTS 1.1 Nonconforming items shall be controlled to prevent
, their inadvertent use or installation. The controls shall include measures for
-identification, documentation, segregation (as appropriate) , disposition, and notification to affected organizations.
1.2 While physical segregation and marking are preferred, other .means of identification (e .g. , marking, tagging, etc.) are acceptable when physical segregation is impracticable. 1.3 Dispositions authorizing a change in requirements shall be made by the same (or equally authorized) organization or group responsible for establishing the original requirements. 1.4 A system shall be established for reporting significant nonconformances as defined in Paragraph 50.55 (e) of 10CFR50, and in 10CFR21. 2.0 TASKS
- 2.1 EA shall establish a system for complying with Paragraph 50.55 (e) of- 10CFR50 regarding the reporting of significant deficiencies in design and construction. The system shall include notification to NUSCo.
- 2.2 Project Engineering shall develop and approve dispositions for Nonconformance & Disposition (NSD) reports which originate from nonconformances noted in seller shops and submitted by PQAD, and those which originate from nonconformances observed at
' the site and submitted by FQCD. 2.3 PQAD shall prepare, issue, distribute and control NGD reports which originate from nonconformances noted in seller facilities and which cannot be C corrected within the scope of the applicable drawings and specifications. Copies of all NSD
- See Appendix I for reference to implementing documents.
, y + , ..--.-. - w. ,---e- ,,-,.-.,..----.r ----,.,-,,.-.,,,-.,,,%.r-.,- , .,,,_,y-, . , , - , - , - , . , _ _ , . . , , - , . - - . . - . .
15-2 Revision C reports including those dispositioned as " accept-as-isa or " repair" shall be provided to NUSCO. 2.4 Field Quality Control Division shall: 2.4.1 Prepare, issue, distribute, and control NSD reports which originate from nonconformances - noted at the site which cannot be corrected within the scope of the applicable drawings and specifications. 2.4.2 Review all dispositions and close out all reports when actions have been NSD completed. 2.4.3 Provide copies of NSD reports to NUSCO, if <( required. Construction (field) shall request Engineering 2.5 which cannot be dispositions for nonconformances applicable resolved within the scope of the drawings and specifications. They shall review dispositions made by Project Engineering to determine that the disposition can be implemented. 3.0 DISCUSSION 3.1 Reference Paraaraph 1.1 Nonconformances are analyzed by Quality Assurance on a monthly basis for each project. Copies of the quality index trend charts for each activity are the monthly project report and made part of forwarded to appropriate client and S&W management (Vice President Quality Assurance, Project Manager, Engineering Manager, Quality Manager, Project semi-Engineer, Construction Manager) is . Further, made a of all annual summary review nonconformances to ascertain significant trends or conditions and a summary report, with recommended courses of action, is forwarded to the President of level and other appropriate top the company management. 3.2' Reference Paragraph 1.2 Nonconforming aterial is rejected, identified, and segregated, if practicable, until the nonconforming condition is corrected either by rework to return ' it to the specified condition or by a change in the Engineering )
~ requirement by the specified change in ;
Department. Both the rework and/or the 1
e
- 15-3 Revision C the specified requirement is subject to Quality Assurance review or sign off as specified herein.
, Assurance of complicance is gained through the audit program delineated in Section 18. 3.3 Reference Paragraph 2.2 Reinspection of rework and repair activities is conducted in accordance with the requirements of the engineering specification / procedure. The work is evaluated to the accept / reject criteria delineated in the engineering specification / pro-cedure and is documented in inspection reports. 3.4 Reference Paragraph 2.3 and 2.4 Each N6D report identifies and describes the nonconformance, the disposition of the nonconformance, the appropriate inspection requirement either directly or by reference and includes signature approval of the disposition. 4.0 CLIENT CONSIDERATIONS 4.1 Nonconforming material may not be installed at the construction site without prior approval by NUSCO. 4.2 For Category I nonconformances disposit i oned
" Repair" or " Accept As Is," prior approval by ".JSCo is required.
4.3 Trend charts do not have to be part of the monthly project report but may be issued as a separate document. d r ev v w -- v-- - -r- --'*+e e m----i--------w ---e ------+----*--------------*e+w- - + - - -
1 -132 A l STONE & WEBSTER ENGlhEERING CORPORATION QUALITY ASSURANCE DEPARTMENT l l QUALITY ; ASSURANCE l PROGRAM l MILLSTONF NUCLEAR POWER STATION-UNIT 3 NUMBER: TITLE: SECTION 16 REVISION: C CORRECTIVE ACTION EFFECTIVE DATE: APRIL 20, 1979 APPROVALS O ,
/ [
MAN AGER, QU ALITY ASS RANCE
/
. lm- s .-
CHIEF ENGINEER, ENGINEERING ASSURANCE
'f; 7.{ _ ~j. } ) Ib/ /
}-
PROJECT MANAGER
16-1 Revision C SECTION 16 CORRECTIVE ACTION 1.0 RBOUIREMENTS 1* Major and recurring conditions, adverse to quality, deficiencies, such as failures, malfunctions, defective material and equipment, and nonconformances shall be identified, the main causes determined and corrective action taken to preclude repetition. These conditions include failures of the quality system. 1.2 The conditions, their cause, and the corrective action taken shall be documented and reported to responsible management. The area of concern shall be audited in a timely manner to assure that the corrective action has been accomplished. 1.3 Measures shall be taken to keep appropriate S&W personnel informed of potential problems by a feed-back system of reports on significant and S&W recurring problems encountered in other
'~
projects and in government and industry as determined from published literature. 2.0 TASKS
- 2.1 The Quality Assurance Department and Section, EA shall in fulfill the requirements of this general, by. implementing the tasks of Sections 15 and 18 of this manual.
2.2 EA shall analyze EA audit data to determine significant conditions and trends. Reports of findings shall be prepared for management. 2.3 EA shall review published government and industry literature for problems related to quality assurance so that applicable potential problems are brought to the attention of appropriate personnel. EA shall establish a feed-back system for the 2 . 86 reporting of significant and recurring problems for preventive action.
- See Appendix I for reference to implementing documents.
r-
. _ . . , , , , , _ _ _ . _ . . , , _ . _ _ _ _ _ . _ _ . , _s _,_ , _ . _ _ , , ~ , . , ,_.,__.. ,_m _, ,. , , _ _ . , _ . , , , - _ , . _ _ _ _ _ . . _ . . . _ _ , . , , . - _ . , - -
16-2 Revision C 2.5 QSD shall analyze inspection and audit data based on' inputs from FQCD and PQAD, evaluate the cause of <( major and recurring nonconformances and submit reports to management with recoerrended corrective action. 3.0 DISCUSSION 3.1 Reference Paragraph 1.3 Corrective action is verified by the performance of corrective action audits to assure that the agreed These upon corrective action has been implemented. audits, in conjunction with the completed in-fraction notices / corrective action correspondence, corrective action are considered to close out the documentation. 4.0 CLIENT CONSIDERATIONS S&W shall report significant deficiencies adverse to quality to NUSCO. promptly as well as the cause and corrective action relating to these significant deficiencies. This requirement is addressed in Paragraph 2.1, Section 15 l i l l
l I T - 152 A-STONE & WEBSTER ENGINEERING CORPORATION QU ALITY ASSURANCE DEPARTMENT ! QUALITY ASSURANCE PROGRAM MILLSTONE NUCLEAR POWER STATION-UNIT 3 TITLE: NUMBER: SECTION 17 REVISION: C QUALITY ASSURANCE RECORDS EFFECTIVE DATE: APRIL 20,1979 APPROVALS i
'/,c Le f A
- MANAGER, QUALITY ASSURANCE bO ~.
CHIEF ENGINEER, ENGINEERING ASSURANCE n >cyui s; , PROJECT MANAGER
. 4 17-1 Revision C SECTION 17 QUALITY ASSURANCE RECORDS 1.0 REOUIREMENTS 1.1 . Measures shall be established for the collection, collation, and maintenance of quality records which furnish objective evidence of the quality affecting.
of items or the completion of those activities quality. 1.2 Measures shall be established for the maintenance to SSW by of those quality records furnished Westinghouse. 1.3 Applicable specifications and procurement documents be generated shall specify the quality records to and their disposition. 1.4 Inspection and test records shall be reviewed to as a- minimum, they identify the ensure that, inspector or data recorder, the type of operations, the action the results, the acceptability, and These records taken if deficiencies were noted. shall be signed by the reviewer. They 1.5 Permanent plant records shall be identified. shall be stored in an area satisfactory to NUSCO in the temporary construction facility andloss. issued on a Records controlled basis to prevent designated by NUSCO shall be transferred to the NUSCo . permanent plant records area as directed by 1.6 Permanent plant records, as appropriate, shall be to microfilmed and cardmounted with identification include component and system. 1.7 Records shall be identifiable and retrievable. 2.0 TASKS
- 2.1 Construction (field) shall:
2.1.1 Establish, centrol, and maintain the file system for the permanent plant records at the site.
- See Appendix for reference to implementing documents.
17-2 Revision C permanent plant records to 2.1.2 Transfer NUSCo. 2.2 Project Engineering shall: 2.2.1 Specify records to be generated and their disposition. 2.2.2 Establish, control, and maintain a file system for documents pertaining to design and engineering. 2.3 Procurement Quality Assurance Division shall: 2.3.1 Ensure that specified quality records are released for available before items are facilities, shipment from seller as required by procurement documents. 2.3.2 Release quality records required by procurement documents to FQCD (at the site) . 2.3.3 Maintain a Headquarters (Boston) working file of quality related procurement documents. 2.4 Field Quality Control Division shall: Implement, control, and maintain a 2.4.1 for quality working file at the site records. 2.4.2 Assemble and verify the completeness of quality records. 2.4.3 Release quality records, as designatedfor by NUSCo, to Cbnstruction (field) inclusion in the permanent plant files. 2.4.4 Release quality records, as designated by to NUSCo, furnished by Westinghouse Construction (field) for inclusion in the permanent plant files. Division shall develop a site 2.5 Quality Systems working file system for quality records. 2.6 QA Cost and Auditing Division shall maintain a Quality Assurance Department (Headquarters) working file 'for quality documents, excluding procurement activities. l l
. s 17-3 Revision C 3.0 pISCUSSION Reference Paragraph 1.7 Quality Assurance records are maintained in accordance with the latest guidance provided in WASH 1283 Rev. 1 dated May 24, 1974.
4.0 CLIENT CONSIDERATIONS There are no additional client considerations.
T-tS2 A STONE & WEBSTER ENGINEERING CORPORATION QUALITY ASSURANCE DEPARTMENT QUALITY ASSURANCE PROGRAM MILLSTONE NUCLEAR POWER STATION-UNIT 3 TITLE: NUMBER: SECTION 18 REVISION: AUDITS E EFFECTIVE DATE: AFRIL 20,1979 APPROVALS 3 Lc / MAN AGER, QUALITY / ASSURANCE F L W . .- CHIEF ENGINEER, ENGINEERING ASSURANCE i')- ? ?9 ~ [ .>' 1 , & . ?....' PROJECT MANAGER
)
18-1 , Revision E SECTION 18 AUDITS 1.0 REOUIREMENTS 1.1 Audit programs shall be established to ensure that quality activities are in compliance with the requirements of this manual and related the procedures, quality and to determine the effectiveness of assurance program. , 1.2 The audit programs shall provide a planned and scheduled system of audits on both Stone & Webster internal operations and sellers. The programs include provisions for reporting shall nonconforming conditions to the responsible level of management for any necessary corrective action. Deficient areas shall be promptly audited to assure accomplishment of the corrective action, 1.3 Audits shall be performed in accordance with written procedures or checklists by appropriately trained personnel having no direct responsibility in the activity being audited. 1.4 Records shall be maintained of all audits performed. 1.5 Audit schedules shall be provided to NUSCo. 1.6 Audit reperts, of their project, shall beat made the available to NUSCo for review, upon request, Stone & Webster office having custody of the audit report files. 1.7 Upon request, Stone & Webster may act as NUSCo's agent and perform special audits in activities in which Stone & Webster has no direct responsiblity. 2.0 TASKS
- 2.1 The Vice President, Quality Assurance shall periodically assess the implementation of the quality assurance program for compliance with the Preliminary Safety Analysis Report, and Appendix B to 10CFR50. Copies of the audit findings and
- See Appendix I for reference to implementing documents.
r - 18-2 Revision E reconunendations shall be submitted to the President of Stone & Webster, the Manager of Projects, and the Project Manager. 2.2 Engineering Assurance shall: 2.2.1 Establish audit schedules and provide copies to the Project Quality Assurance Program Administrator for forwarding to NUSCo. 2.2.2 Conduct audits of engineering and design activities including activities that determine site features that affect plant safety. 2.2.3 Maintain records of audits performed. 2.2.4 Conduct post-award audits of suppliers for procured engineering services. Conduct audits of the QA Cost and Auditing E 2.2.5 Division of the Quality Assurance Department. 2.3 Procurement Quality Assurance Division shall: <(h 2.3.1 Establish audit schedules and provide copies to NUSCo. 2.3.2 Conduct audits of sellers, after award of <(f purchase orders for Category I items, to determine whether the sellers are complying with their approved quality assurance programs. 2.3.3 Maintain records of audits performed. 2.4 QA Cost and Auditing Division shall: <(( 2.4.1 Establish audit schedules and provide copies to NUSCo. 2.4.2 Conduct audits of Stone & Webster indoctrination and training programs to qualify individuals performing inspection, examination, and testing activities. 2.4.3 Conduct audits of all Quality Assurance Department programs, including Engineering Assurance Division activities. 2.4.4 Maintain records of audits performed.
18-3 Revision E 2 . 86 . 5 Report to the QA Department Manager on adherence to quality related procedures and systems. 2.5 QA Department personnel shall support audits on request. 3.0 DISCUSSION 3.1 Reference Paragraph 1.2 3.1.1 Project audits are generally conducted on a quarterly basis and cover the scope of work being performed by the project at the time of the audit. The audit schedule starts at the time S&W is awarded the work and runs until the project is completed. Additional audits, relating to specific areas of interest, are conducted as determined by appropriate management. , 3.1.2 Engineering audit data is analyzed by the Engineering Assurance Division and reported to the Engineering Manager with copies to the Quality Assurance Department. QA Department audit data is analyzed by the' Reports Section of the Quality System Division and/or the QA Cost and Auditing Division and reported to the Manager and Vice President of Quality Assurance. 3.2 Reference Paragraph 2.1 This item requires that the Vice President, Quality Assurance, periodically assess the total Quality Assurance program for compliance and effectiveness. During this revirw the audit program is evaluated against the characteristics delineated below:
. work areas
. activities
. processes items (hardware)
, . documents and recorda
. quality related practices, procedures and instructions
18-4 Revision E effectiveness of QA Program implementation conformance with policy objectives These characteristics are made part of the
-evaluation plan. This evaluation has in the past been conducted either by an independent review group made up of personnel within the company or has been contracted to an independent third party consultant.
4.0 CLIENT CONSIDERATIONS All quality related activities performed by S&W or their contractors, suppliers, or engineering service organizations within the scope of the NUSCo purchase order / contract shall be subject to NUSGo or their authorized representative audit / inspection / surveillance at all reasonable times. At the conclusion of the audit, a post-audit conference shall be held.
T-152 A STONE & WEBSTER ENGINEERING CORPORATION QUALITY ASSURANCE DEPARTMENT l QUALITY ASSURANCE ! PROGRAM l MILLSTONE NUCLEAR POWER STAT 10N - UNIT 3 TITLE: NUMBER: SECTION 19 CONTROL OF THE MILLSTONE UNIT 3 QUALITY ASSUKANCt;
>C PROGRAM MANUAL C EFFECTIVE DATE:
April 6,1981 APPROVALS MANAGER, QUALITY / ASSURANCE
.. (1
?
,9; o ?i M
/ ^
CHIEF ENGINEER, ENGINEERING ASSURANCE
- =m PROJECT MANAGER y.--- - _ , w --- - , - - - . . - - . , , , ,, w - - . . , , , _ _ _ _ - , _ _ . , - --_ -- -y
_. 4 19-1 Revision C SECTION 19 CONTROL OF THE MILLSTONE UNIT 3 QUALITY ASSURANCE PROGRAM MANUAL 1.0 REQUIREMENTS 1.1 1This Program Manual, including portions thereof,- is prepared and controlled by the Quality Systems Division. and will be- issued only to those individuals named by either the Vice President or Manager of the Quality Assurance Department. 1.2 Program Manual . holders- are responsible for maintaining their assigned documents. 1.3 The Vice President of Quality Assurance shall be responsible. for, as a minimum, an annual (12-month) interval review of this program and direct upgrading as appropriate. l'. 4 This Program' Manual, modeled after Stone & i Webster's Standard Nuclear Quality Assurance Program (SWSQAP 1-74A, Revision December 31', 1974) shall be reviewed.. by N/A dateu the Construction Manager and approved by the Project Manager, Manager Quality Assurance, and Chief Engineer, Engineering Assurance. With the exception of the Introduction, Client considerations and- this Section, the basic 18 sections including the Policy letter and the Appendixes to this Manual shall be consistent with the above . revision of SWSQAP 1-74A which was accepted by the licensee. This Manual shall be-the governing QA document for the Project. (f 1.5. Any degradation of the above SWSQAP 1-74A in the conversion *o this Project QA Program Manual or by subsequent revision of this Project QA Program Manual shall be detailed in writing by the QA Manager and brought' to the attention of the licensee for SAR change and/or approval by NRC before adoption. 1.6 Licensee additions to this Project QA Program Manual- shall be entered in part 4.0, " Client Considerations," within each section or as a separate section within each appendix and shall not be considered as a program revision provided
l 19-2 Revision C they do not result in' a degradation of SWSQAP-1-74A. 1.7 Revisions to SWSQAP 1-74A,. Revision N/A subsequent
.to initial. issue of this Project QA Program Manual shall be brought to the licensee's attention for.
consideration in adopting the changes to this Project QA- Program Manual. Such changes may-be made on a section basis by inclusion in the Client i considerations part of the Section/ Appendix. I Adoption of subsequent- complete SWSQAP 1-74A sections. approved' by NRC shall be by publication
- of. the complete .section 'with a Client considerations part documenting the adoption.
Adoption of subsequent NRC approved SWSQAP 1-74A sections in. this manner shall not constitute a Project QA Program Manual degradation. 2.0 . TASKS 2.1 The QSD shall: 2.1.1 -Assign unique identification numbers for each document issued. 2.1.2 Maintain a distribution list of' all document holders and their locations.
.2.1.3 Maintain history files for the originals, ;
revisions, and cancellations issued against I each section of the program document. l 2 .1 ~. 4 Maintain history files of any degradation in the conversion from the~ Standard Program
)> to the Project QA Program Manual.
l 2.1.5 Distribute documents and record or file receipt acknowledgments. 2.1.6 Issue an updated Table of Contents with each new section or revision issued. 2.2 ~All Program Manual Holders shall: 2.2.1 Upon receipt of their assigned program document, -acknowledge receipt and completeness by_ signing, dating, and l returning the. attached letter of l transmittal. 1
4 8 19-3 Revision C 2.2.2 Notify QSD of any discrepancies and changes of address. x(f 2.2.3 Maintain the Manual by replacing superseded material immediately with updated material ' upon receipt. _ k i 2.2.4 Destroy all superseded material immediately except for site history file copies. C 2.2.5 Return the Program Manual to Q5D when it is c no longer needed, requested by the Quality Assurance Department, or upon termination. l
T-isz A STONE & WEBSTER ENGINEERING CORPORATION QUALITY ASSURANCE DEPARTMENT QUALITY ASSURANCE PROGRAM MILLSTONE NUCLEAR POWER STATION - UNIT 3 TITLE: NUMBER: APPENDIX I REVISION: IMPLEMENTING DOCUMENTS D EFFECTIVE DATE: April 6,1981 APPROVALS, ( MANAGER, QUALITY ASSURANCE ( l )?5 CHIEF ENGINEER, ENGINEERING ASSURANCE s - PROJECT MANAGER 1
APPENDIX l-l Revision D
= =
$180 Av
- = = =- _ O
- O ~ ~
- = =
2 LIT 5011315
$030313 1*nft.155V " " * * ~ * ~
- a
=
J
~
1111VAD. Z11 t0lt315
.e
. '. 2 0 50ll3V 1 All318 03 ** ** = = 2 -
; e a gy gggggjg ~
.a e ,,,, ,
6 5141404:33 4 e ~. ~.
= = = ~t -
O O d 30 SlIVJ *11TilitVn ~~
tilNtoJ>0*no t - II 134t311
= . .
- O, ~= 2. ~
StiV113411V83431 *1$11 . 2 = 2 2 O. . U. =*
% '8011314181 - 2!I 83i131i
=
p
" C .
=
351441141 Giv 13V1015 = = . e = 2 .Sil1GtVE - E I 10113)$ O w = ,,, ~~ T y 183Nd180) 1511 1 Mit35 Vin * * * ~
- f O
~ C* M =7,. 5 "=
- f" 30 10 tit 03 -III 4311315 1011403 1$11 . .
~
~ . =$=
~
. = -." = = - ;5 =
~
=
w " II 30113)$ M
=
a 4011314581 " *
- O O
= 3 I 30l!3]!
- J
$31532:14 1V13145 = =. 4 d c :c=
=
a -
~
.1 -
30 1031503 - II E31131t "_.. . e
- =
$11]tCJN33 ott 119V4 = gg O
., ,,, ..- d -
.$1VI11Vn Jo 19 1933 :i4: s 4.; 4 5011V311114131 -I*.~! talt311 g
1331 Alii 1 1914414!) = =
, 2
'1VililVN 011V43ded 4 "-
oM 10 10X15 03 -IT I311315 XF 2 7ggggg) ggj,g.gg g
. _ ~
;;7 g
=
gw * * * * **
- d. "_'. % 5,
>- 2 II N011111 -
47 8 !$4188301 Sit 33330' ed - = - - 4
=0 % E{
- - r,- Og i wa si0u3nisii .1 tmm -= - 5_ 5 5_ !. -= I O
ZO , ~ wz 1081433 init A330 * " " " a' ~ ~ g 3 h5
- u. 2 it]N]Ill3333- 2! t311333 WW 1011:03 831530 ,
~ ~
= =
t a. =. g2 g = I2 101131$ w r - M .J .
=. .t Ma EV13314 13tVI3SSV a. .
~
~ , s =. 4. ~'.
o2 - == =
~. n~O E- 1111VA0 - E 4"11315 o
toliv!stV3a3 - ~
- . ~ ,,
- - = -.
=
I 5 01 315 n Bd D
- E r
- C s- U a Mo
'A b5k 5 Ub s 55 5 1 UE9dk N3
"% = I .~, 0 E , , 3 % t 3
"' 3 352
~;;= 3 3 5 -$- . ; a e- :; 1 ~ 3F " u= ;I
~4D
,, ,, ,=. . _ = . , < O. = . -
** =
UC s I O e- m_ ' U. ~. . %. ".",, =o 7 .-* *J '
. . * , =
= = "= = :; . . , ~ s.
a -. -$~~ . ." G,M =. O '" o I m;ee =, ac ng,=
-- =. p.N=* a == a s, . *,= n maZ . . =
J .-. 65
?, - ,
O2
- E G a. , .O ; "' a-O o o
= .
I- 2 Clirnt Cencidarationo Revision D
- 1. The cross-reference matrix of implementing documents published as Appendix I to- SWSQAP 1-74A, Revision C, is adopted for the Millstone 3 project with the excepti,on of:
- a. The- referenced Standard Nuclear Test Program Directives (or Project TPDs) which are. replaced with the Project Test Program-Manual.
- b. The ASME_ Section III, Division 2 Manual, which'is not applicable for work cn1 the Millstone 3 project. '
t i i i I L
T-152 l A STONE & WEBSTER ENGINEERING CORPORATION , QUALITY ASSURANCE DEPARTMENT QUALITY ASSURANCE PROGRAM MILLSTONE NUCLEAR POWER STATION - UNIT 3 TITLE: NUMBER: APPENDIX II QUALIFICATION AND EXPERIENCE REQUIREMENTS REVISION: S&W QUALITY ASSURANCE PERSONNEL D EFFECTIVE DATE: April 6,1981 APPROVALS MANAGER, QUALITY ASS [RANCE [.Q L l [ - CHIEF ENGINEER, ENGINEERING ASSURANCE l l
^ ~ ~
PROJECT MANAGER l l _ -
II-1 Rsvision D APPENDIX II
- QUALIFICATION AND EXPERIENCE REQUIREMENTS
, S&W QUALITY ASSURANCE PERSONNEL TITLE EDUCATION
- BACKGROUND EXPERIENCE V.P., Quality Assurance BS/BA Minimum of ten years in re-sponsible D assignments in heavy construction manage-ment, engineering, or quality assurance. At least two years of this time should be- in the nuclear field with emphasis on project /divicion management.
3 1 Manager, Quality Assurance BS/BA Minimum of ten years in re-sponsible assignments in engineering or i
' D quality assurance and control, power station construction, or operation.
1 Assistant Manager, Quality Assurance BS/BA Minimum of seven years in responsible assignments in engineering or quality assurance and control, power station construction, or operation. Chief Engineer, Engineering Assurance BS/BA Minimum of five years in re-sponsible assignments in engineering, quality assur-ance and control, in-spection, or auditing. D Chief Engineer, Quality Systems BS/BA Minimum of five years in re-sponsible assignments in quality assurance and control or construction of a D power station. a sy- +- q w9 y---- -,n + , *
-ww ,as-e-e+y w-m --yymy-nmwy---g-y wwwwvv-ww= ww+g-ww-wmyyvy-g --
l II-2 Revision D APPENDIX II (Cont'd) l TITLE _ EDUCATION
- BACKGROUND EXPERIENCE Manager, Procurement ~
Quality Assurance BS/BA Minimum of five years in re-sponsible assignments in ! D guality assurance and ; control or shop inspection. Manager, Field _ Quality Control BS/BA Minimum of five years in re-sponsible assignments in quality assurance and D control or construction of a power station. Chief Engineer, NDT Division BS/BA Minimum of five years in re-sponsible assignments in nondestructive testing of D materials or metallurgy. Chief Engineer, QA Cost and Auditing BS/BA Minimum of five years in re-D Division sponsible assignments in quality assurance and control or construction of a power station. D Quality Assurance Program Adminis-trator BS/BA Minimum of five years in quality assurance and re-lated fields including manufacturing, construction, and/or installation activi-ties. At least two years should be associated with the nuclear field. D Assistant Manager FQCD/PQAD and BS or Supt. of FQC High School A degree and five years' ex-perience in quality assur-ance and related fields including tecting or inspection (or both) of manufacturing, construction, and installation activi-ties. At least two years
II-3 Rcvision D APPENDIX II (Cont'd) TITLE EDUCATION
- BACKGROUND EXPERIENCE shall be in a ~ supervisory fe capacity in the nuclear <
pD field. \ OR High school graduate plus 10 years of experience in general quality assurance or equivalent engineering, manufacturing, construction, and installation activities. Five years of total experience is required in quality assurance, including testing or inspection (or both) of equivalent manu-facturing, construction, and installation activities. At least two years should be ,- associated with the nuclear ' field. Assistant Supt. BS or of FQC High School A degree and five years of experience in quality assurance, including testing and/or inspection of equivalent manufacturing, construction, and instal-lation activities. At least two years of this experience should be with the nuclear D field. OR High school graduate and ten years of experience in general quality assurance or equivalent engineering, manufacturing, construction, and installation activities. Five years of this experience is required in quality assurance, including testing and/or inspection of equivalent manufacturing,
, , , - - - - ,p-y ,- --+r
II-4 Revision D APPENDIX II (Cont'd) TITLE EDUCATION
- BACKGROUND EXPERIENCE construction, and instal-lation activities. At least two years of this experience
' should be with the nuclear field.
Sr.- QC Engineer;. BS or QC Inspection High School Supervisor A degree and five years of experience in quality
. assurance, including testing and/or inspection- of equivalent manufacturing, construction, and instal-lation activites. At least
-two years of this experience should be associated with the nuclear field.
OR High school graduate and ten
- " years of. experience in general quality assurance or equivalent engineering, manufacturing, construction,
- and installation activities.
Five years of this-experience is- required in ' quality assurance, including testing and/or inspection of- ! equivalent manufacturing, L construction, and installa-
- tion activities. At least j two years of this experience
- l. should be associated with L the nuclear field.
Sr. QA Engineer BS/BA Minimum of five years' experience in quality t assurance and related L fields. The individual shall hold a P.E.
- registration or ASQC Certification as a Quality Engineer.
i
II-5 Revision D APPENDIX II (Cont'd) TITLE EDUCATION
- BACKGROUND EXPERIENCE QC Engineer BS or A degree and two years of High Sc:ool D experience in quality assur- -
ance including testing and/or inspection of equivalent construction and installation activities. OR High school graduate and five years of experience in D testing and/or inspection of power and/or nuclear plants, heavy industrial, or other similar equipment or facilities. QA Engineer BS/BA Associate Degree Minimum of five years' ex-perience in quality assur-ance and related fields. OR An Associate Degree and eight years' experience and hold a P.E. registration or ASQC certification as a quality engineer. Sr. QC Inspector High School High school graduate and four years of experience in D quality assurance, including testing and/or inspection of equipment, construction, and installation activities. Assistant QC BS Engineer A degree. No experience is required. D
' Quality Data BS or High High school graduate and Supervisor School four years of experience in testing and/or inspection of ,
power and/or nuclear stations, heavy industrial D or other similar equipment ' G - n yw go., m-,m , -_s_n -
-p- -
.y --,
n n y
II-6 Revision D APPENDIX II (Cont'd) TITLE EDUCATION
- BACKGROUND EXPERIENCE or facilities, or one year catisfactory performance as a Quality Data Reviewer.
QC Inspector II High School High school graduate and D four years of experience in testing and/or inspection of power and/or nuclear stations, heavy industrial or other similar equipment or facilities, or one year satisfactory performance as a QC Inspector I. QC Inspector I High School High school graduate and two Quality Data years' experience in quality Reviewer assurance including testing and/or inspection of equipment, construction, and installation activities, or one year satisfactory performance as a QC Technician. QC Technician High School High school graduate and one year experience in quality assurance concepts such as testing or inspection. Assistant QC Technician High School High school graduate; no D Quality Data Clerk experience is required.
- Equivalent qualifications may be substituted based on other educational accomplishments, experience in related fields, and technical achievements, cuch as holding a license as a Professional Engineer or Certification as a Quality or Reliability Engineer by the American Society for Quality Control.
Assignment of S&W personnel to any position D described in this Appendix is a management prerogative within the indicated guidelines. l l
, o l II-7 Revision D Client Considerations The Qualification and Experience Requirements for S&W Quality Assurance Personnel published as Appendix II to SWSQAP 1-74A, Revision C, is adopted for the !!illstone 3 project and published in this Appendix with the following addition. J. A new title " Assistant Manager, QA" along with the appropriate Education and Background Experience Requirements, has been added.
T - 152 A STONE & WEBSTER ENGINEERING CORPORATION QUALITY ASSURANCE DEPARTMENT QUALITY ASSURANCE PROGRAM tilLLSTONE NUCLEAR POWER STATION - UNIT 3 TITLE: NUMBER: APPENDIX III REVISION: GLOSSARY D EFFECTIVE DATE: April 6,1981 APPROVALS ( '
/
MANAGER, QUALITY ASSURANCE
,( sb CHIEF ENGINEER, ENGINEERING ASSURANCE PROJECT MANAGER
III-l Rcvision D APPENDIX III - GLOSSARY INTRODUCTION The primary reference or source of each definition included in this glossary is identified next to the term using the following
" Base Source Acronym Key Code":
ANSI -American National Standards Institute N45.2.10-1973; Quality Assurance Terms & Definitions. ASME -American Society of Mechanical Engineers, Boiler and Pressure Vessel Code, Section III, Division 1 and D Division 2, 1977, including all applicable addenda. ASQC -American Society for Quality Control; A3-1971 (ANSI Z1.7-1971) General Terms Used in Quality Control. EOQC -European Organization for Quality Control; Glossary of Terms Used in Quality Control, Third Edition - Rotterdam - 1972. NRC -United States Nuclear Regulatory Commission. f( RDT -Reactor Development and Technology (D S&W -Stone & Webster Engineering Corporation. The definitions are based on current and past acceptance usage at Stone & Webster. 10CFR50 -Appendix B to Part 50, Title 10, Code of Federal Regulations, " Quality- Assurance Requirements for ' O Nuclear Power Plants" as published June 27, 1970, in the Federal Register, as amended.
r- -
- e III-2 Revision D GLOSSARY Accept-As-Is (S&W)
A disposition requiring Engineering Department justification and approval which is applied to nonconforming material that does not meet all specified requirements but will continue to meet its intended use and continue to meet applicable Code and functional requirements including safety. Acceptance Criteria (S&W) A limit placed on the variation permitted in the characteristics of an item expressed in definite quantitative terms or qualitative terms by use of comparative samples. Accuracy (EOQC) The degree of conformity of a measurement with a standard or true value. Action Party (S&W) The individual' who is assigned responsibility by virtue of his position or capability which makes him able to take corrective or preventive action to rectify the deficiencies disclosed during an audit. Advisory Operations Division (S&W) A Division of the Engineering Department which is responsible for test and start-up activities for power plants, including l
>D preparation of test procedures and qualification of test personnel.
Approval (ANSI) The act of endorsing or adding positive authorization or both to an action or document. Approved Procedures (S&W) A written . document, signed by authorized personnel, which prescribes actions required to implement a program, specification, method, or technique.
III-3 RGvicion D Apportenance (ASME) An appurtenance is an item similar to a part (NA-1231) which is attached to a completed and stamped component. , l As Built Drawing (S&W) A drawing altered or suitably appended with related Engineering & Design Coordination Reports and Nonconformance and Disposition Reports to reflect actual installed conditions. ASME Nuclear Symbol (ASME) D Ses " Code N-Symbol Stamp." ASME Section III (S&W) American Society of Mechanical Engineers, Boiler and Pressure Vessel Cade, Section III, Nuclear Power Plant Components, Division 1, Metal Components, or Division 2, Concrete Reactor Vessels and Containments, as applicable. D Assembly (ANSI) A combination of subassemblies or components, or both, assembled to form a unit. Attribute (EOQC) A quality characteristic which may be qualitatively evaluated in terms of a yes or no decision. Audit (ASME) A documented activity performed in accordance with written procedures or checklists to verify by examination or evaluaticn D of cbjective evidence that applicable elements of the quality program have to be developed, documented, and implemented in accordance with specified requirements. Audit, Corrective Action (S&W) A follow-up audit to verify that corrective action on discrepancies disclosed by prior audits have been taken and implemented. Audit, Division (S&W) See Division Performance Evaluation.
1 III-4 I l Revision D Audit, External (S&W) l Audit of those portions of an organization's quality assurance program not retained under its direct control and not within its organizational structure. Audit Guideline (S&W) An Engineering Assurance Division document which instructs the Auditor how to perform an audit. Audit, Internal (S&W) Audit of those portions of an organization's quality assurance program retained under its direct control and within its organizational structure. Audit Observation (S&W) A description of each program deficiency in sufficient detail to O assure that corrective action can be effectively carried out by the audited organization. Adequatt. supporting data will be maintained in audit records. Audit Plati (S&W) A list of attributes for a particular audit developed from applicable procedures, instructions, codes, or regulations. Audit, Project (S&W) A major audit covering work performed by a particular Project Group and by other groups in support of that Project. Audit Report (S&W) An in-depth report which states the purpose of the audit, the auditors and personnel contacted, the observations listing details of deficiencies in systems or procedures requiring corrective action, recommendations for corrective or preventive action, names of action parties responsible for corrective or preventive action, and date by which action replies are expected. Audit, Seller / Contractor (S&W) An audit of a Seller or Contractor providing material or services to Stone & Webster.
III-5 Ravicion D Audit, Special (S&W) An audit .of a particular management or engineering function involving one or more Divisions and Projects. Authorized Inspection Agency (ASME) <( The agency designated as such by the appropriate legal authority of a state or municipality of the United States or Province of Canada. For Stone & Webster Engineering Corporation, this agency is the Hartford Steam Boiler Inspection and Insurance Company, Hartford, Connecticut, 06102. Authorized Nuclear Inspector (ASME) Inspectors who perform the inspections required by the ASME
.Section III Code. These inspectors shall have been qualified by written examination under the rules of any State of the United States or Province of Canada which has adopted the ASME Code.
The Inspector shall be an employee of an Authorized Inspection Agency and shall not be an employee of the Certificate of Authorization holder. Calibration (S&W) Comparison of a measuring or test device with a standard of - sufficient accuracy to determine whether the device is within specified limits of accuracy over a required range of values and, if not, repairing and/or adjusting the device to conform to requirements. Category I (S&W) Plant systems, or portions of systems, structures, and equipment whose failure or malfunction could cause a release of radioactivity that would endanger public safety. This category also includes equipment which is vital to a safe shutdown of the plant and the removal of decay and sensible heat, or equipment which is necessary to mitigate consequences to the public of a postulated accident. This category includes Code items, D regardless of Code class, fabricated or installed under Section III of the ASME Code. Category II (S&W) Plant systems, portions of systems, structures, and equipment essential for the reliable generation of electric power but which are not essential for a safe shutdown. Failure of this equipment could result in loss of power generation but would not endanger public safety. Equipment and systems which contain radioactive
III-6 Revision D materials but whose failure could not release quantities sufficient to prejudice public safety are included in this category. NOTE: The term " essential for the reliable generation of electric power" should be interpreted to mean structures, systems, and components whose failure would result in the halt of electric power generation in approximately eight hours or less. Category III (S&W) Plant systems, portions of the systems, structures, and equipment which are not essential for the reliable generation of electric power and which do not contain radioactive material or whose failure could not result in the release of radioactive material. NOTE: The term "not . essential for the reliable generation of electric power" should be interpreted to mean structures, systems, and components whose failure would not result in the halt of electric power generation in approximately eight hours or less. Certificate of Authorization (ASME) A document evidencing permission to perform a scope of work an'd to certify items or to use an appropriate symbol, expiring not later than the triennial anniversary date, signed by the Chairman l h 7 and Secretary, or other duly authorized officers of the Boiler and Pressure Vessel Committee of the American Society of Mechanical Engineers. Certificate of Compliance (ANSI) A written statement, signed by a qualified party, attesting that the items or services are in accordance with specified requirements and accompanied by additional to substantiate the statement. This may also be known as a Certificate of Product Quality. Certificate of Compliance (ASME) A document which certifies compliance with purchase order requirements and specifies the material specification, grade, class, heat treated condition, and Quality System Certificate (Materials) number and expiration date. The Certificate of Compliance is used in lieu of a Certified Material Test Report for material 3/4 inch nominal pipe size and less (pipe, fittings, flanges, materials for valves and tubes except heat-exchanges tubes) for bolting 1 inch nominal diameter and less.
l III-7 Rsvision D Certificate of Conformance (ANSI) A. written statement, signed by a qualified party, certifying that O 4
, the items or services comply with specific requirements.
Certifications (ANSI)
! The action of determining, verifying, and attesting in writing to the qualification of personnel, material,.and documentation.
CFR (S&W)- Code of Federal-Regulations
. Characteristic (ANSI)
Any property or attribute-of an item, process, or service that is distinct, describable, and measurable,- as conforming or nonconforming to specified requirements. Quality characteristics are generally identified in specifications and drawings 'which describe the item, process, or service. Checks.(ANSI) The tests,. measurements, verifications, or controls made on an activity by means of investigations, comparisons, or examinations to determine satisfactory condition, accuracy, safety, or parformance. Client (S&W)
.The owner, person, group, company, or corporation who has or will have title to the Power Plant under construction or constructed
. with Stone & Webster under contract as Architect / Engineer, l Constructor,.and/or Consultant. O Code (S&W) A set of specific requirements, published under the cognizance of a recognized Technical Society or Trade Association, invoked to the degree' stated'in applicable Engineering Documents. The word , is, capitalized when describing ASME Section III. D
. Code N-Symbol Stamp (ASME)
The official- ASME stamp .which is applied to pressure vessels, components,- parts, .and appurtenances that are certified to Section III of the ASME Boiler and Pressure Vessel Code. 1
. . . . , . _ . . . _ _ , . . . . - . , . . . . . . _ . . _ . ...,_.-.._._.__m._,., . . _ . . - - . . - . . . . . _ , , - . , . - _
- i. .
III-8 Revision D
. Company (S&W)
Refers to Stone & Webster Engineering Corporation. Component (ASME) Items such as vessels, piping systems, pumps, valves and storage tanks, and core support structures. Each component shall bear D the required code N-type symbol and hanufacturer's Data Reports shall be prepared. Component (S&W) Any individually manufactured or fabricated unit or piece of a system which is identifiable and installable. For ASME III work, see definition of component above. Component Support (S&W) Those metal supports which are designed to transmit loads froia D the pressure-retaining barrier of the component to the load-carrying building structure. Construction Drawing (S&W) An approved engineering design drawing used for the fabrication or installation of parts, appurtenances, components, structures, or plant. Construction Hold Point (S&W) s A preplanned point assigned by the Construction Department to DN verify that the construction activities have been accomplished in d accordance with applicable requirements. See also " Hold Point." Construction Phase (NRC)
'Those activities associated with fabrication and manufacturing in addition to site-related construction activities. From a Quality Assurance viewpoint, the construction phase commences with Limited Work Authorization (LWA), if granted, and continues on from first erection of safety-related structures, systems, and components to fuel loading.
Construction-Site (S&W) Designates responsibility for actions required of the Stone & Webster Engineering Corporation construction forces at the jobsite under the direction of the Senior Construction Site Representative.
. ~ III-9 Rsvision D Contract (S&W) A form of agreement used to procure services or labor and may include the procurement of material and/or equipment. Contractor (S&W) The business entity which enters into a Contract and becomes the primary obligor for the supply of labor and materials equipment) associated therewith and is deemed to be a principal (or Contractor. Controlled Copy (S&W) A copy of a procedure or a manual that is systematically updated and whose custodian is listed in the appropriate distribution list. - Controlled Documentation (S&W) A document whose distribution, updating, and use is to be regulated. Corrective Action (ASME) D Action taken and documented to determine the cause and correct deficiencies or nonconformances adverse to quality preventive action). (see Defective Material (S&W) Material which has one or more characteristics that do not comply with specified requirements; also, termed to be unsatisfactory material. Design (used as a verb) (S&W) Technical and management processes, which lead to and include the issuance of documents such as drawings, specifications, and other documents, specifying technical requirements of structures, systems, and components. Design Engineering (ASME)
'Those engineering functions contractually assigned to S&W to 'ND fulfill the responsibilites of the Owner's agent as defined in 'Ns ASME Section III.
s v . O III-10 Revision D Deviation (ANSI) A nonconformance or departure of a characteristic from specified requirements considered to be synonymous with defective- or unsatisfactory material.
)> Disposition (S&W)
'The decision determining how to resolve a nonconformance.
Division Guideline (S&W) In the S&W Engineering Department, a document issued by a Division Chief which establishes administrative or technical methods and controls within a Division. Division Performance Evaluation (S&W) An evaluation of a particular Quality Assurance Department, Division, or Section or of the EA Division to determine if
>D management policies have been effectively implemented.
Documentation (ANSI) Any written or graphic information describing, defining, specifying, reporting, or certifying activities, requirements, procedures, or results. Engineering Assurance Division (S&W) A Division of the Engineering Department which is responsible for establishing a system of management control within the Engineering Department, including preparation of procedures, personnel. training, and auditing to assure compliance. Engineering Guidelines (S&W) A set of uniform criteria and engineering principles established by the Engineering Department to provide technical guidance. Engineering Service (S&W) Work performed by others in connection with the design and
-licensing of-power plants.
Engineering Service Scope of Work (ESSOW) (S&W) A procurement document used to describe, in detail, an engineering service to be performed by an engineering service supplier.
III-ll Rsvicion D Engineering Service Supplier (S&W) The engineering consultant, contractor, scientist, mathematician, or other individual, group, or company that performs the engineering service under a contract or purchase' order. Engineering Standards (S&W) A set of uniform criteria and engineering principles established by Stone & Webster's Engineering Department to provide technical direction. Equipment (S&W) Items or apparatus used as part or in connection with an installation. Erection (S&W) The process of constructing systems and structures in the field using manufactured or fabricated materials, components, assemblies, and subsystems. Synonymous with " Installation" as used by ASME Code. o Examination (ANSI) An element of inspection consisting of investigation of materials, components, suppliers, or services to determine conformance to those specified requirements which can be determined by such investigation. Examination is usually nondestructive and includes simple physical manipulation, gaging, and measurements. Fabrication (S&W) The process of producing completed components, assemblies, or subsystems using material and/or other documents. Fabrication / Installation Control Drawing (S&W) A structural or isometric drawing used at the construction site for fabrication / installation of piping and components ,- together with the installation of hangers, supports, anchors, and guides D which serve as a traveler for a controlled manufacturing system. Failure (RDT) The inability of an item to perform within specified limits.
r - III-12 Revision D 4 Field Quality Control Division (S&W) A division of the Quality Assurance Department responsible for,
>D or.the assurance of, the implementation of the- S&W Quality Assurance Program at the sites.
Hold Point'(S&W) A preestablished point in the production process which requires inspection, approval, and release by the Quality Assurance Department, Construction Department,. Engineering Department, 7, .and/or the Authorized l Nuclear Inspector prior to further processing. Noncompliance by Sellers, Construction, or 3 >D Contractors in failing to stop at a hold point will be cause for rejection and may further result in- a stop work order; also
-termed Inspection Hold Point, when describing a QA Department
! established Hold Point. Inspection (ANSI) A phase of. quality control which by means of examination, observation, .or measurement determines the conformance .of materials, supplies, components, parts, appurtenances, systems, processes, or structures to predetermined quality requirements.
~ Inspection Notification Point (S&W)
A preplanned point,. reached during the manufacturing and/or testing phase at which time the Stone & Webster' Quality Assurance , Department requires notification according to the terms of the contract, purchase order, or specification. Inspector (S&W) A qualified inspector, employed by Stone & Webster Engineering Corporation, whose duties include the verification of quality-i related activities or installations or both.
- . Item (S&W)
Any _ level of unit assembly, including structure, system, subsystem, subassembly, component, part, or material including Code items. Joint Identification Number (S&W) A unique number assigned to a specific welded or bolted joint. I
III-13 Ravision D Licensing Division (S&W) A Division of the Engineering Department which is responsible for coordinating all licensing activity for power plants, including D establishment of licensing policy, and guidance and assistance of all licensing and safety matters. Manufacturer (S&W) One who constructs a component, part, or appurtenance to meet prescribed design requirements. Material (ANSI) A substance or combination of substances forming components, parts, pieces, and equipment items. (Intended to include such as machinery, castings, liquids, formed steel shapes, aggregates, and cement.) Material (ASME) D Material is manufactured to SA, SEA, SB, SEB specifications, or any other material specification permitted by ASME Section III. Materials Certification (S&W) i Certification by the materials manufacturer or others by test and inspection that all specified requirements have been complied with (also see Certificate of Compliance). Measuring and Test Equipment (M&TE) (S&W) Tools, gages, instruments, and other measuring and testing devices used for acceptance' inspection and/or testing. Modification (S&W) A planned and documented change in plant design or operation and accomplished in accordance with the requirements and limitation of applicable codes, standards, specifications, licences, and predetermined safety restrictions. Monitor (S&W) To watch, keep track of, observe, regulate, or control any i activity.
III-14 Revision D Nonconformance (S&W) Any item conditions or materials which deviate from drawings, specification, or engineering requirements and cannot be corrected within the scope of such requirements. Nonconformance and Disposition (N&D) (S&W) A report requesting an Engineering Department disposition of a nonconforming condition. Nondestructive Test Division (NDTD) (S&W)
-A division of the Quality Assurance Department responsible for defining and implementing a system which provides technical and administrative direction for all company activities concerned with using nondestructive testing to verify compliance to engineering requirements. ,NSSS (S&W)
Nuclear Steam Supply System Objective Evidence (ANSI) Any statement of fact, information, or record either quantitative or qualitative, pertaining to the quality of an item or service based on observations, measurements, or , tests which can be verified. Owner (ANSI) The person, group, company, or corporation who will have or has title to the facility or installation under construction. Part (ASME) A part has work performed on it requiring the presence of or verification by an Authorized Nuclear Inspector and is furnished to a component manufacturer by other manufacturers or by the same manufacturer under a separate Certificate of Authorization. A D part is attached to or be comes a part of a component or component support before completion and stamping of the component or component support.
III-15 Rsvicion D Permanent Plant File (S&W) A file established for or by the Client for the receipt and storage of QA records received from all S&W offices that are required to be retained for the Client or which the Client wishes to retain. Piping System (S&W) A configuration of materials and components which, when installed, provides a flow path for a fluid or gas. D Plant-(ANSI) The equipment, piping, structures, buildings, and property that comprise an installation or facility. Post Audit Conference (S&W) Communications held between the auditing and audited organizations to review the audit observations and clarify any (/D s misunderstandings. s Power / Process Piping System (S&W) Piping systems which are necessary or are required for the I generation of electric power and which require formal control, inspection, testing, and documentation. Pre-audit Conference (S&W) Communications held between the auditing and audited organizations prior to the conduct of the audit to outline the scope of the Audit, personnel to be contacted, and establish the lines of communication during the audit. Precision (EOQC) The degree of resolution and repeatability of measurements made under prescribed like conditions. Pressure Boundary (S&W) Any surface which is subjected to differential fluid or gaseous pressure. Preventive Action (S&W) Action taken and documented to preclude recurrence of deficiencies or nonconformances.
o . III-16 Revision D Procedure (ANSI) A document that specifies or describes how an ac~ivity c is to be performed. It may include methods to be employed, equipment or materials to be used, and sequence of operations. Procedure Qualification (S&W) Testing a process as outlined in a procedure to assure that the prescribed results will be accomplished. Procurement Documents (S&W) Contractual documents that identify and define the requirements
> which items or services must meet in order to be considered acceptable by the contracts, letters of award, and purchase orders which authorize purchaser. Procurement documents include the Seller or Contractor to perform services or supply equipment, material, or facilities on behalf of the purchaser.
Procurement Quality Assurance Division (PQAD) (S&W) A division of the Quality Assurance Department responsible for Seller control activities for procured items as required by specification. the Program (S&W) A plan or procedure instituted to provide materials or services in accordance with specified procurement, design, and regulatory requirements.
' Project (S&W)
A planned series of design, engineering, and construction activities necessary to provide, utilize, and maintain a facility or portion thereof. Project Engineering (S&W) The group consisting of the Project Engineer, Assistant Project
. Engineer (s), Lead Engineers, and support engineers for engineering and design activities on the Project. responsible
>D guidance is drawn from the various Technical Engineering Department Divisions represented on the Project. l
III-17 Rsvision D Project Ge,neral Instructions (S&W) Administrative and Technical instructions for personnel assigned
~
to a specific Project, prepared by S&W Engineering Department personnel. Project Management Department (S&W) The Project . Management Department has the authority for the overall planning, organizing. staffing, directing, and controlling those activities required to achieve project objectives within approved schedules, budgets, and product specifications. Specifically assigned to the Project Management Department as functional operations are:
- 1. Development and implementation of Project Management Systems.
- 2. Development and implementation of records oriented business management systems.
Project' Quality Assurance Program Administrator (S&W) An individual who reports to the Assistant Manager, Quality Assurance Department and has direct responsibilities for coordinating quality-related activities between Quality Assurance, Engineering, Construction, and Client personnel. Purchaser (S&W) One who assumes the obligation of payment pursuant to a Purchase Order or Contract and accepts title to equipment and/or material. Purchase Order (S&W) A form of agreement used to procure material, equipment, and ancillary services or for the procurement of professional and technical services. Qualification (Personnel) (S&W) The characteristic or abilities gained through training, experience, or both that enable an individual to perform a required function. This capability, when required, shall be indicated by comparison to an established or defined standard of performance.
III-18 Revision D Qualified Party (ANSI) competent and recognized as A person or organization knowledgeable to perform certain functions. Qualified Procedure (ANSI) A procedure which incorporates all applicable codes and and engineering standards, manufacturer's parameters, adequate for its intended specifica. tions and has been proven purpose. Quality (ASQC) totality of features and characteristics of a product or The service that bear on its ability to satisfy a given need. Quality Assurance (10CFR50) All those planned and systematic actions necessary to provide component will adequate confidence tiaat a structure, syst?m,Quality or Assurance includes perform satisfactorily in service. Quality Control. Quality Assurance Directive (QAD) (S&W) A procedure applicable only to the Quality Assurance Department quality-related }> describing actions necessary to implement its activities. QA Cost and Auditing Division (QACAD1 (S&W) A Division of the Quality Assurance Department responsible for developing QA cost estimates,technical maintenance the QA Department of and correspondence files and library, implementing a quality audit program. Quality Assurance Department (S&W) Within the Stone & Webster Engineering Corporation, the quality department responsible for effective implementation of assurance functions. Quality Assurance Records (ANSI) Those records which furnish documentary evidence of the quality of items and of activities affecting quality.
-e III-19 Rsvicion D Quality Assurance Site File (S&W) file maintained by FQC containing all working documents D A
required to implement the QC Program and to properly document the performance of QC activities. Quality Control (10CFR50)
<j related to .the physical Those quality assurance actions system characteristics of a material, structure, to control the component, quality of the ormaterial, a
which provide a means structure, component, or system to predetermined requirements. Quality Control Instructions (QCI) (S&W) A procedure, applicable only to the Quality Assurance Department, which provides specific guidance for local implementation of higher level procedures. Quality Department Management (QDM) (S&W) All QA Department Chief Engineers and Managers responsible for a This includes the QA Department Assistant D specific Division. Manager. Quality Standard (QS) (S&W)
- A corporate standard procedure which defines the responsibilities involved in a and interfacing activities of the departments specific quality-related activity.
Quality Systems Division (QSD) (S&W) A division of the Quality Assurance Department responsible for the establishment and control of standardized quality systems. Quality Verification Inspection (S&W) is a Quality Control action by Quality verification inspection which the work performed, inspected, and accepted by others such ' g Ny as contractors, is subject to verification as defined herein on a sampling, surveillance, or hold point basis, as appropriate. Random (S&W) selection, on an unbiased basis, giving each item in a The equal chance of being collection of units of similar items an selected. l
~
+
III-20 Revision D
. Receiving (ANSI)
Taking delivery of an item at a designated location. Regulatory (S&W) Any of the several controlling organizations - federal, industry, state, or_ local'which impose specific requirements on_the design or construction _of a nuclear-power plant. Regulatory Guide (NRC). Regulatory Guides are issued to describe and make available to the public, methods acceptable to the NRC Staff of implementing specific. parts of the Nuclear Regulatory Commission's Regulations, to delineate techniques used by Staff in evaluating specific problems or postulated accidents, or to provide guidance h 7 to applicants.
. regulations and Regulatory Guides are not substitutes compliance. with them is not required. Methods for and solutions different from those set out in the Guides will be acceptable if.they provide a basis for the findings requisite to the issuance or continuance of a permit or license by the Commission. Compliance to Regulatory Guides is mandatory when a commitment to comply is made by S&W in this program or other authoritative document.
Reliability (general definition) (ASQC) Ability .of an item to perform a required function under stated conditions for a stated period of time. f Reject (S&W) [> An' item, system, structure, material, or service found to be unsatisfactory or nonconforming. Repair (ANSI) The process of restoring a nonconforming characteristic to an approved acceptable condition, even though that item still may l _not conform to the original requirement. (A class of
- nonconformance disposition.)
Rework (ANSI) D The process by which an unsatisfactory or nonconforming item is made to conform to a prior specified requirement by completion, remachining, reassembly conditions, or other corrective means. 9 4
, , ._ . _ _ , _m., - - , - - - - *
+ + 111-21 Rsvision D Sampling Inspection (S&W) An inspection technique in which random samples are selected in D accordance with an approved sampling plan to determine the acceptability of the lot. Scrap'(S&W) A disposition imposed on a nonconforming item when it is established that the discrepancy renders the item unfit for_ its intended use and it is uneconomical to correct. Seller-(S&W) The business entity providing materials, equipment, or services pursuant to a contractual agreement. When a Seller furnishes construction labor, he may be referred to as a Contractor. Source Inspection (S&W) An inspection activity performed at the manufacturing location on material or components. Source Surveill~ance (S&W) A review, observation, or inspection for the purpose of verifying i that an action has been accomplished, as specified, at the ' location of material procurement or manufacture. Special Process (S&W) An operation performed under controlled conditions in accordance with specified requirements utilizing qualified procecure=, equipment, and personnel. Special processes may include, but are not limited to, welding, brazing, soldering, cleaning, heat treating, and NDT. Specification (S&W) Engineering document specifying essential and technical requirements for materials, items, or services and indicating, when appropriate, the procedure by which it will be determined that'the requirements have been met.
+ +
l III-22 Revision D
~
Standard (Calibration) (S&W) Calibrated measuring or test equipment whose calibration is traceable to the National Bureau of Standards, where such standards exist, physical constants, or recognized industrial standards and used for the calibration of Measuring and Test Equipment. Standard (Reference Document) (S&W) A recognized reference document which establishes a set of rules, goals, or objectives published by a recognized Technical Society i or Trade Assocation such as ANSI, ASTM, ASME, ASQC, and IEEE. Storage (S&W). The act of placing or leaving items in a suitable location for preservation or later use or disposal. Subassembly (S&W)
-A section of an assembly consisting of materials or components and which may be fabricated in a shop or the field.
Subcontractor (S&W) The business entity deriving its authority to perform work under the Contract from the Contractor after approval by the Purchaser. It includes Contractors who furnish materials worked to a special design according to the plans and specifications, but does not include Contractors who merely furnish materials not so worked. Subsystem (ANSI) A group of assemblies or components or both combined to perform a single function. Supports (S&W) Includes all hangers, restraints, guides, and anchors used to D support or restrain a component or piping system. Surveillance (S&W) The system of continuing analysis and evaluation of records, methods, and procedures to assure conformance with technical s,)> D ' requirements. Also, a random inspection of records and physical check that a Seller's in-process inspections and tests being performed in accordance with his approved Quality Control Program.
, + III-23 Rsvision D Survey (S&W) A review of the capability of a bidder or potential bidder, contractor, or subcontractor which is conducted at his facility D to establish his qualification and appraise his Quality Control Program. System (ANSI) A group of subsystems united by some interaction or interdependence, performing many duties but functioning as a single unit. Test (ANSI) The determination or verification of the capability of an item to meet specified requirements by subjecting.the item to a set of physical, chemical, environmental, or operating conditions. Unsat.(S&W)
<{
A deficiency in characteristic, documentation, or procedure which renders the quality of an item unacceptable or indeterminate. Examples of unsats include: physical defects, test failures, incorrect or inadequate documentation, or deviation from prescribed processing, inspection, or test procedures, i Unusual Occurrence (RDT) -
'An unusual or unplanned event having programmatic significance such that it adversely affects or potentially affects the '
performance, reliability, security, or safety of a reactor or <sD' test facility, or causes injury or potential hazard to personnel, which may require special evaluation, correction, or preventive actions to be taken. Vendor (S&W) See'" Seller." Verification (S&W) An act of ' conforming, substantiating, and assuring that an activity or condition has been implemented in conformance with the specified requirements. Verifying evidence may be in the form of documentation or confirmed by witnessing or performing a J function.
o - III-24 Revision D Verify (SSW) The act of proving that a function or requirement has been met by examining objective evidence. This evidence can be in the form of documentation or confirmed by witnessing or performing a function. Witness (SSW) The act of observing and giving an account of inspections and/or tests performed by others. Client Considerations s The Glossary published as Appendix III to SNSQAP 1-74A, D Revision C, is adopted for the Millstone 3 project and puolished in this Appendix with the following considerations:
- 1. Category II has been subdivided into an A and B subcategory for this project.
i
- 2. Subcategory A (Category IIA) will be applied to a selected list of Category II equipment and will require that Sellers have Quality Assurance programs which meet the requirements of ANSI Z1.8. Assignment to Category IIA is based on cost of equipment and/or its importance to power generation.
- 3. Subcategory B (Category IIB) includes all Category II equipment not assigned to Category IIA by agreement between NUSCO and Stone & Webster. No Quality Assurance program requirements are required by specification.
However, the Seller *s quality system will be evaluated against MIL-I-45208A.
T-152 A
~
STONE & WEBSTER ENGINEERING CORPORATION QUALITY ASSURANCE DEPARTMENT QUAUTY ASSURANCE PROGRAM MILLSTONE NUCLEAR POWER STATION - UNIT 3 i TITLE: NUMBER: APPENDIX IV REVISION: ENGINEERING DESIGN REVIEW 3 i EFFECTIVE DATE: April 6, 1981 APPROVALS (' l MANAGER, QUALITY ASS ANCE
,f I
* ~.
CHIEF ENGINEER, ENGINEERING ASSURANCE PROJECT MANAGER
4 e PROFESSIONAL SOCIETIE S (ASME, ANS, ETC.) ~ REGULATORY REQUIREMENTS A QT QggjS p tArouTS EtRC , EPA, ETC.) - 8 ARRANGE ME NT S OPERATING EXPERIENCE ~ ~
- SYSTEM .
FEEDBACK DESCRIPTIONS CONCEPTUAL ,, D E_S,1G,N , , (REVIEW) CONCEPTUAL CONSTRUCTION EXPERIENCE - PROJECT ARRANGEMENTS + DESIGN FEEDBACK - ENGINEERING CRITERIA ~ ~ FLOW DI AGRAMS .l INTERNAL EXPERIENCE @ (PROJECTS) - V MASTER PROJECT INTERNAL EXPERIENCE
- SPECIFICATION ENGINEERING SPECIFICATION MANAGEMENT (DESIGN) -
w 4 I INTERNAL EXPERIENCE Q hh MEETING $
- (SPECIALISTS) O M NOTE
- THIS REVIEW ENCOMPASSES ALL PLOT H PLANS AND ARR AN'sEMENTS FOR ADEQUACY OF DESIGN AND COMPATIBILITY WITH hf h EXISTING Sf>W EXPEHIENCE.
(REVIE W) m (REVIEW) CONCEPTUAL M PROJECT : ENGINEERING $ ENGINEER 0
~ ~
CONSTRUCTION DRAWINGS y DETAILED ENGINEERING SKETCHES DESIGN (REVIEW) U CLIENT = ENGINEERING ------- COMPUTERIZED E. MANUALCALCULATIONS OUTPUT $ AND PRODUCTION MANUFACTURERS' DR AWINGS l DESIGN SPECIFICATIONS E
- 1 j
i SUPPLIER DR AWINGS. . . . ... u 9 g ~l $ Te 4
@ ENGINEERING CHANGES l
PROJECT l @ NONCONFORMITY & O- CLIENT ENGINEER
@ DISPOSITION REPORTS LEGEND: ASSURANCE ACTIVITIES O
lOPER ATING LICENSE l<s- lNRCl1 N2
@ - ENGINEERING ASSURANCE AUDITS h1
@ - O. A. REVIEW E. SIGN- OFF
@ - O. A. AUDIT h o
02
IV-2 Revision B ENGINEERING AND DESIGN REVIEW Client Considerations The reference to the AEC in the Engineering and Design Review. chart.was changed to NRC and the corrected chart .
. published in this' appendix.
e
k LEGEND h ENG'R ASSURANCE AUDIT
@ Q. A. REVIEW & SIGN-OFF Q.A. AUDIT MASTER h Q. A. INSPECTION REVIEW OF PROJECT ; Pr!OJECT i SPECIFICATION h
QA INPUT gg SinW APPROVED PROJECT SPECIFICATION AND LIST OF-RECOMMENDED BIDDERS PURCHASING INPUT y ( BIDS FROM RECOMMENDED APPROVAL OF SPECIFICATION CLIENT PROJECT BID PROJECT RECOM NDED " ENGINEER REVIEW SUPPLIER BY < COMP ARISON PURCHASING RECOMMEN DED PROJECT BIDDERS DEPARTMENT I vD@ . D CLIENT CLIENT PROJECT l VL ENGIN EER REVIEW OF UPP IER I AUTHORIZED PURC4ASE REQUISITION E'? U l U PURCHASING l PURCHASE @ z 4 SUPPLIER'S DRAWINGS DETAILED ENGR'G S e SUPPLIER S PROCESS @ @ (NDT) & AND PRODUCTION l' APPROV ED 4 PROCEDURES AA 4 DESIGN l SUPPLIER WV ASUPPLIER,S TEST PROCEDURES y @@ CONSTRUCTION AMATERIALS AND/OR SERVICES
T - 152 f h \ l STONE & WEBSTER ENGINEERING CORPORATION QUALITY ASSURANCE DEPARTMENT i l QUALITY ASSURANCE ! PROGRAM MILLSTONE NUCLEAR POWER STATION - UNIT 3 TITLE: NUMBER: APPENDIX VI APPROVALS AND CONCURRENCE FOR QUALITY REVISION: ASSURANCE SYSTEM DOCUMENTATION s EFFECTIVE DATE: April 6,1981 APPROVALS i
/)
' /
MANAGER, QUALITY ASSURANCE I l rl [!. N l [ LtA'T CHIEF ENGINEER, ENGINEERING ASSURANCE \ ? :' r ! PROJECT MANAGER
, v. VI-l I Revision B APPROVALS AND CONCURRENCES FOR QUALITY ASSURANCE SYSTEM DOCUMENTATION Program Documents Approval Concurrences
- 1. Standard S&W Nuclear President-(sec- ---
Quality Assurance tions approved by Program Vice Presidents of affected departments)
- 2. Project QA Program Manager, QA --- B Department; Ch.
Eng., Engr. As-surance; Project Manager Standard Nuclear Test Vice Presidents --- 3. Program Directives of Quality As- (jfN surance and Engi-neering Departments and Vice Presi- . dents of Construc-tion and Project Management, TQlen Affected
- 4. Project Test Program Senior Construc- ---
Directives tion Representa-tive, if affected, Senior QA Repre-sentative, Senior Engineering Test Representative. The above person-nel shall be specifically iden-tified in the ap-propriate Project Test Program Directive.
- 5. Company Quality Assurance and Control Manual - ASME Section III Policy President ---
~ ~
VI-2 Revision B Program Documents Approval Concurrences Procedures, Manager, QA De- Vice Presi-originals, partment dents of Af-changes, and fected De-revisions partments (Acceptance by the Authorized Nuclear Inspector) Procedural Documents Approval Concurrence
]>
- 1. Quality Standards Charter (QS-5.1) President ---
Originals, Revisions, Vice Presidents and Changes of Affected De-partments
- 2. Quality Assurance Directives Original, Revision, Manager, QA De- Div. Mgr./
and Changes partment Ch. Eng, of Affected QA Division All NDT QADs Chief Engineer, Chief Engin-
>B NDTD, in addition eer, QSD to the Manager, QA Cancellation. Manager, QA De- Div. Mgr./
partment Ch. Eng. of Affected QA Division
- 3. Quality Control FQC Supt. of FQC ---
Instructions and Manager FQCD or PQA - District Chief and Manager, PQA or
a v VI-3 Revision B Procedural Concurrence Documents Approval Headquarters and Operation Centers - Quality Department g Management
- 4. Calibration Metrology Standards Manager, QA De- Div. Mgr./ 8 partment Ch. Eng. of Affected QA Div.
Div. Mgr./Ch. Div. Mgr./Ch. Calibration Procedure Eng. of Af-Eng. of Preparing Div. fected QA Div.
- 5. Engineering Assurance Procedures
- Originals and Vice President, ---
Revisions Eng. Dept. Change Vice President, --- l( Eng. Dept. or Chief Engineer, EA Cancellations Chief Engineer, EA
- 6. Project Manual Project Manager
- 7. Standard Construction Vice President, ---
Methods Procedures Construction De-(CMPs), or Project partment Construction Methodo Procedures **
- 8. Engineering Management Vice President, ---
Guidelines Engineering De-partment
- Reviewed by the QA Department with comments resolved prior to issue.
** Reviewed by the QA and Engineering Departments with comments resolved prior to issue.
v . VI-4 Revision B Client Considerations Approvals and concurrencec for Quality Assurance System Documentation published as Appendix VI to SWSQAP 1-74A, Revision C, is adopted for the Millstone 3 project with the following additions and deletions: Additions Procedural Documents Approval Concurrence 1A Projectized Quality Vice President, QA --- Standards Superintendent of FQC, Project Engi-Originals, Revisions, neer, and Changes Resident Manager 2A Projectized Quality Manager, QA --- Assurance Directives Superintendent of FQC Originals, Revisions, and Changes Deletions Item 8 Engineering Management Guidelines are not applicable to the Millstone Unit 3 Project and are replaced by other Engineering Department Procedures 1 approved by the Vice President, Engineering.
. ~
1 T - 152 A STONE & WEBSTER ENGINEERING CORPORATION QUALITY ASSURANCE DEPARTMENT ! l l QUALITY l ASSURANCE i PROGRAM : l MILLSTONE NUCLEAR POWER STATION - UNIT 3 TITLE: NUMBER: APPENDIX VII REVISION: RESPONSE TO REGULATORY GUIDANCE A EFFECTIVE DATE: April 6, 1981 APPROVALS
./) ~ f/ . ,
MANAGER, QUALITY ASSURANCE 0j ~l x CHIEF ENGINEER, ENGINEERING ASSURANCE PROJECT MANAGER
t VII-1 RESPONSE TO REGULATORY GUIDANCE Details of Stone & Webster responses to U.S.A.E.C. Regulatory Guides, Gray Book (Wash 1283, Rev. 1), Green Book (Wash 1309), and all provisions of Regulatory Guide 1.70.6 are as follows:
- 1. Regulatory Guide A. Regulatory Guide No. 1.28, dated June 7, 1972 (N45.2-1971), " Quality Assurance Program Requirements" - complies.
B. Regulatory Guide No. 1.30, dated August 11, 1972 (N45.2.4-1972), " Quality Assurance Requirements for the Installation, Inspection, and Testing of Instrumentation and Electric Equipment" - complies.
-C. Stone & Webstcr's QA program requirements comply with the quality assurance provisions of the following guides (RG 1.37, 1.38, 1.39, and 1.54).
LAW's response to the technical (engineering, design, and construction) provisions to the following guides (RG 1.37, 1.38, 1.39, and 1.54) is given in Appendix 3A of SWESSAR or the comparable section of a utility - applicant's SAR. Regulatory Guide No. 1.37, dated March 16, 1973,
" Quality Assurance Requirements for Cleaning of Fluid Systems and Associated Components of Water-Cooled Nuclear Power Plants."
- Regulatory Guide No. 1.38 dated March 16, 1973,
" Quality Assurance Requirements for Packaging, Shipping, Receiving, Storage, and Handling of Items for Water-Cooled Nuclear Power Plants."
Regulatory Guide No. 1.39, dated March 16, 1973, "IIousekeeping Requirements for Water-Cooled Nuclear Power Plants."
* ~ Regulatory Guide No. 1.54, dated June 1973 (N101.4-1972), " Quality Assurance Requirements for Protective Coatings Applied to Water-Cooled Nuclear Power Plants."
D. Regulatory Guide No. 1.58, dated August 1973,
" Qualification of Nuclear Power Plant Inspection, Examination, and Testing Personnel" - complies.
E. Regulatory Guide 1.64, dated October 1973, " Quality Assurance Requirements for the Design of Nuclear Power Plants" - complies.
VII-2 Revision A F. Guide No. 1.70.6, dated July 1974, " Additional Information Quality Assurance During Design and Construction" (replaces Guide No. 1.70.xx) - complies. J. Regulatory Guide 1.74 (ANSI N45.2.10-1973), dated February 1974, " Quality Assurance Terms and Definitions." Appendix III " Glossary" has been submitted as an acceptable alternative. H. Regulatory Guide 1.88, dated August 1974 (ANSI N45.2.9-1974), " Collection, Storage, and Maintenance of Nuclear Power Plant Quality Assurance Records" - complies.
- 2. Additional Guidance c
A. N45.2.5, Draft 3, Revision 1, January 1974,
" Supplementary Quality Assurance Requirements for Installation, Inspection, and Testing of Structural Concrete and Structural Steel During the Construction Phase of Nuclear Power Plants".
Stone & Webster Engineering Corporation will comply with the requirements of ANSI N45.2.5, Draft 3, Revision 1, January 1974. Implementing procedures and specifications will achieve compliance effective January 1, 1975. B. N45.2.8, Draft 3, Revision 2, September 1973,
" Supplementary Quality Assurance Requirements for Installation, Inspection, and Testing of Mechanical Equipment and Systems for the Construction Phase of Nuclear Power Plants."
Stone & Webster Engineering Corporation will comply with the requirements of ANSI N45.2.8, Draft 3, Revision 2, September 1973. Implementing procedures and specifications will achieve compliance effective 4 June 1, 1975. C. N45.2.12, Draft 4, Revision 1, November 1, 1974,
" Requirements for Auditing of Quality Assurance Programs for Nuclear Power Plants" - complies Client Considerations
- 1. The Green Book (WASH 1309) referred to in the opening paragraph of this Appendix, is dated May 10, s )> 1974.
- 2. In paragraph 1A, "(N45.2-1971)" should read (ANSI N45.2-1971)."
- n.
- VII-3 .
~
Revision A
- 3. In paragraph IB, " ( N45. 2. 4-1972 )" should read
"( ANSI N45.2.4-1972 ). "
- 4. In paragraph IC, fourth bullet, "(N101.4-1972)"
should read "(ANSI N101.4-1972)." i 5. Regulatory Guide 1.123, Revision 1, " Quality Assurance Requirements for Control of Procurement Items and Services for Nuclear Power Plants "(ANSI N45.2.13-1976) - cm911es.
- 6. As stated in paragraph 2A, Stone & Webster will comply with the_ requirements of ANSI.N45.2.5, Draft 3, Revision 1, January 1974, with the exception to include the substitution of Section 6.11 from N45.2.5-1978 for Section'4.8.
- 7. In paragraph 2B, "N45.2.8" should read
" ANSI N45.2.8."
- 8. Paragraph 2C is superseded by:
ANSI K45.2.12, Draft 3, Revision 4, February 22, 1974, " Requirements for Auditing of Quality Assurance Programs for Nuclear Power Plants" - A commit to comply with standard. Stone & Webster's QA program requirements commits to this Draft Standard subject to the following alternative which addresses:
- 1. The requirement to conduct an annual audit of approved Sellers as stated in paragraph 3.4.2 of ANSI N45.2.12, Draft 3, Revision 4.
- 2. Audit Conferences.
Annual Audits To assure that a Seller has established and is maintaining an acceptable Quality Assurance Program, Stone & Webster performs the following actions to evaluate the Sellers: An initial audit of the implementation of the Seller's Quality Assurance Program is conducted to determine its acceptability. If the program is accepted, the Seller is included in the Stone & Webster Quality Rating List. A formal evaluation of the Seller's Quality Assurance Program is performed annually to determine if reaudit is required for the following year. Included in this evaluation is a review of:
VII-4 Revision A .
- Prior quality program audits Seller surveillance activities
- Nature and frequency of hardware UNSATS and nonconformances
- Results of audits from other sources '
(i.e., Client, CASE, .ASME, NRC, etc) when available ,
- Significant changes in the Seller's Quality Assurance Program
- Seller's responsiveness and cooperation in resolving questions or problems related to quality assurance The final evaluation, which is documented and approved by responsible management, will A determine if the Seller's Quality Assurance Program requires reaudit.
A reaudit. of the Seller will, in all instances, be conducted at 3 yr intervals from the previous quality assurance program audit. Audit Conferences Pre- ~a nd post-audit conferences may be fulfilled by a variety of communications, such as telephone conversation; see Appendix III. l The triennial period shall begin with performance of an audit when sufficient work is in progress to demonstrate that the Seller is implementing a QA l Program having the required scope for purchases placed during the triennial period. When a i subsequent contract or contract modification that significantly enlarges the scope of activities performed by the same supplier is executed, an audit shall be conducted to the increased requirements, thus starting the new triennial period. I Regularly scheduled audits shall be supplemented by additional audits when the following conditions occur: l~ A. When significant changes are made in functional areas of the Seller's QA Program. B..When it is suspected that safety, performance,-or reliability of the item is in jeopardy due to deficiencies and nonconformances in the Seller's l QA Program. f
- -. . = - . . __ ...__ _ _ _ ._ . _ _ - . . . - . -- .. .
- l e **
VII-5 { Revision A
)
C. When systematic, independent assessment of t program effectiveness or item quality or both is i I considered necessary- A D. When it is considered necessary to verify implementation of required corrective action. E. Applicable NSSS facilities shall be audited on an annual basis. e u 1
- 1 l
1 l 4 i _+ - - - , . ~ , . . . _ . ,-,_,-_..m. - m .<y-... . , , - , _ - . - , - - _ _ _ . . - . . --, - . , , - . , . . ~ , _ _ - - .
SWSQAP l-74 p 3 7 mF.Oq bd$) 3 b 4.bl ..L December 31, 1974 TO WHOM IT MAY CONCERN:- - The Policies, requirements and tasks described in this Stone & Webster Engineering Corporation standard Nuclear Quality Assurance - Program (SWSQAP) have been developed to fulfill a reengnized need for assurance that requisite quality is achieved in design, pro-curement and construction. Stone & Webster Engineering Corporation procedures which implement this program are described in various manuals which are referenced herein. The development and overall responsibility for this Quality Assurance Program lies with the Vice President of Quality Assurance; who shall report conditions adverse to quality and/or in conflict with these program requirements to the President and affected Department Heads as appropriate. The Manager, Quality Assurance is responsible for the administration and management of the Quality Assurance Program as applied to pro- . curement and construction activities. The Chief Engineer, Engineer -
.ing Assurance-Division of the Engineering Department is responsible for the administration and management of the Quality Assurance Program as applied to engineering and design activities. Revisions, additions to, and audits of this program are the responsibility of the Manager, Quality Assurance and the Chief Engineer, Engineering Assurance Division, for their respective assigned areas. Any revisions or additions shall be approved by affected Departments prior to the incorporation of such changes into the Program.
h/ n W. F. All en ,/ Jr.
, President 11-1
;? .E SWSQAP l-74 12/31/74 TABLE OF CONTENTS EFFECTIVE SECTION TITLE REV DATE PAGES i TITLE PAGE N/A 12/31/74 1 11 POLICY LETTER N/A 12/31/74 1 lii TABLE OF CONTENTS N/A 12/31/74 1-2 iv INDEX OF FIGURES N/A 12/31/74 1 l
l l v INTRODUCTION N/A 12/31/74 1 1 ORGANIZATION N/A 12/31/74 1-8 2 QUALITY ASSURANCE PROGRAM N/A 12/31/74 1-4 3 ENGINEERING AND DESIGN CONTROL N/A 12/31/74 1-3 4 PROCUREMENT DOCUMENT CONTROL N/A 12/31/74 1-2 5 INSTRUCTIONS, PROCEDURES AND N/A 12/31/74 1-2 DRAWINGS 6 DOCUMENT CONTROL N/A 12/31/74 1-2
, 7 CONTROL OF PURCHASED MATERIAL, N/A 12/31/74 1-6 EQUIPMENT AND SERVICES 8 IDENTIFICATION AND CONTROL OF N/A 12/31/74 1-2 MATERIALS, PARTS AND COMPONENTS 9 CONTROL OF SPECIAL PROCESSES N/A 12/31/74 1-2 10 INSPECTION N/A 12/31/74 1-4 l l
11 TEST CONTROL N/A 12/31/74 1-2 l 12 CONTROL OF MEASURING AND TEST EQUIPMENT N/A 12/31/74 1-2 iii-1
I q SWSQAP l-74 j 12/31/74 . TABLE OF CONTENTS (Cont'd) EFFECTIVE SECTION TITLE REV DATE PAGES 13 HANDLING, , STORAGE AND SHIPPING N/A 12/31/74 1-2 14 INSPECTION, TEST AND OPERATING N/A 12/31/74 1-2 STATUS 15 NONCONFORMING MATERIALS, PARTS N/A 12/31/74 1-3 OR COMPONENTS 16 CORRECTIVE ACTION N/A 12/31/74 1-2 17 QUALITY ASSURANCE RECORDS N/A 12/31/74 1-2 18 AUDITS N/A 12/31/74 1-3 19 CONTROL OF THE QA PROGRAM N/A 12/31/74 1-2 MANUAL APPENDIX - I IMPLEMENTING DOCUMENTS N/A 12/31/74 I-l N/A II-4 II QUALIFICATION AND EXPERIENCE 12/31/74 REQUIREMENTS, STONE & WEBSTER QUALITY ASSURANCE PERSONNEL III GLOSSARY N/A 12/31/74 III-3 IV ENGINEERING DESIGN REVIEW N/A 12/31/74 IV-1 V SPECIFICATION AND BIDDERS REVIEW N/A 12/31/74 V-1 VI APPROVALS AND CONCURRENCE FOR N/A 12/31/74 VI-2 QUALITY ASSURANCE SYSTEM DOCUMENTATION VII RESPONSE TO REGULATORY GUIDES N/A 12/31/74 VII-4 iii-2
F 9 ]
,4 , i SWSQAP l-74 12/31/74 1
lilSIORICAL ! INDEX OF FIGURES FIGURE TITLE SECTION PAGE NO i 1 COMPANY ORGANIZATION FOR QUAI.ITY l 1-5 ASSURANCE 2 QUALITY ASSURANCE DEPARTMENT ORGANI- 1 1-6 ZATION 3 ENGINEERING ASSURANCE DIVISION 1 1-7 ORGANIZATION 4 QUALITY ASSURANCE INTERRELATION- 1 1-8 SHIPS 9 iv.-l
- *- ,- . s., - , ,e- - . . . . . ,y % -- -- -, -, c,ev -
SWSQAP l-74 December 31, 1974 p 5c 7F'c'" q q'p' _ INTRODUCTION ,.{ l!i ' } : b.' C; t
-~v-.ua.n It is the policy and objective of the Stone & Webster Engineering Corporation to engineer and construct a quality power station, on a timely basis, in accordance with contractual and regulatory requirements. To this end the company has established this standard-fiuclear Quality Assurance Program which delineates the requirements and tasks assigned to the various elements of the Stone & Webster organization to achieve our stated objectives.
This program is organized into 18 sections which correspond to the management principles delineated in Appendix B to 10CFR50 and is responsive both to Appendix B and the guidance put forth in WASH 1283, Rev. 1 dated May 24, 1974 and WASH 1309 dated May 10, 1974. Actions to implement the assigned tasks are found in departmental procedures delineated in Appendix I. t g O f v-1
1-12 0 . , A - STONE & WERSTER ENGINEERING COllPORATION QUALITY ASSURANCE DEPARTMENT f((0ff ASSURANCE PROGRAM TITLE: NUMBER: 3ECTION 1 REVISION: ORGANIZATION N/A EFFECTIVE DATE: December 31, 1974 APPROVALS V.P. QU ALITY ASSUR ANCE V.P. ENG NEERING
=
V.P. CONSTRUCTION
1 [ 1_1
.: * ' """ ^" ~"
HST)RCAL l SECTION 1 ORGANIZATION 1.0 REQUIREMENTS 1.1 A S&W orcanization shall be established to develop and implement the quality assurance program. 1.2 The authority and duties of individuals and groups perf:rming the required quality assurance functions shall be documented. 1.3 Individuals or groups who check, audit, inspect or other-wise verify a quality activity shall not be the same individuals or groups responsible for performing the specific activity. 2.0 TASKS
- The recponsibilities for the administration and management of l i
the S&W quality assurance program have been set forth in the introduction to this manual. The S&W quality assurance organization and its relationship to the project organization is shown in Figure 1. The Quality Assurance Department or-l ganization is shown in Figure 2. The qualifications and i experJence level requirements for quality assurance personnel are contained in Appendix II. The Engineering Assurance Division, Engineering Department organization is shown in ~ Figure 3. - Figure 4 shows interrelationships within the company organization. 2.1 Engineering Assurance Division (EA), Engineering Department shall: 2.1.1 Assure the implementation and operation of management systems for the control of technical work. 2.1.2 Assure that completed designs and specifications conform to S&W procedures 2.1.3 Perform source control for engineering service suppliers. 0 See Appendix I for reference to implementing documents. D A - .. ...
. .' i 1-2 , -
SWSQAP l-74 ,. 2.2 Quality Systems Division (QSD) , Quality Assurance Department shall: 2.2.1 Develop, establish and improve standardized quality systems. 2.2.2 Analyze data and prepare reports for S&W manage-ment on quality related activities. 2.3 Procurement Quality Control Division (PQCD) , Quality - Assurance Department shall: 2.3.1 Perform inspections, verifications and other tasks at vendor facilities to ensure that the quality of materials, components and equipment, meets the requirements of drawings, specifications and other procurement documents. 2.3.2 Establish and maintain district offices and resident inspectors in major manufacturing centers in the United States to carry out the required tasks at vendor facilities. 2.4 Field Quality Control Division (FQCD) , Quality Assurance Department shall: 2.4.1 Ensure by audits, inspection activities and document review, that the requirements of drawings, specifications, instructions and pro-cedures are fulfilled during fabrication, erection and installation at the site. 2.4.2 Establish and maintain a field quality control organization at the site for the implementation of the quality control systems. 2.5 Nondestructive Test Division (NDTD) , Quality Assurance Department shall establish and maintain systems which control the qualification.of personnel and equipment, test methods and documentation of required nondestructive test activities. 2.6 The Project Quality Assurance Coordinator shall: 2.6.1 Assist the Project in implementing all phases of the quality assurance program. l 2.6.2 Perform liaison between the Quality Assurance De- ! partment, Project, Nuclear Steam Supply System l (NSSS) supplier and other vendor- regarding quality assurance activities. 1 L.
8 6 ~ l-3
' SWSQAP l-74 2.6.3 Furnish information to the-Project on matters pertaining to quality assurance.
2.6.4 Coordinate the project quality assurance program with the Client quality assurance program. 2.6.5 Provide. quality assurance inputs for safety analysis reports, using material provided by QSD.
-2.6.6 Assure that quality assurance reviews of specifi-cations have been conducted.
2.6.7 Assist the Client in modifying his quality assurance program, as requested. Prepare monthly quality assurance activity reports, for
- 2.6.8 submission to the Client, based on inputs from EA, QSD, FQCD, PQCD and-NDTD.
2.6.9 Attend regulatory agency audits as the quality . assurance representative, if requested. Assist the Project in providing effective and timely corrective -l > action replies for deficiencies found in these audits.
~
2.6.10 Coordinate all applicable quality control procedures and Project procedures. 2.6.11 Assist in assuring that the quality assurance program fulfills the Safety Analysis Report commitment. 2.7 The Department Services Group (DSG) shall provide Depart-ment cost control, program evaluation, special management studies and audits, information and support services within this program. The following summarizes the specific activities of the Department Services Group. 2.7.1 DEPARTMENT COST CONTROL - The Cost Control Section maintains the internal Q/A Department cost control system, providing inputs for the 0/A program estimates to Stone & Webster management as required. 2.7.2 EVALUATION AND SPECIAL STUDIES - The Evaluation and Special Studies Sections have investigative responsibilities, management and/or quality related, to determine the adequacy, effectiveness of, and adherence to quality related procedures and systems;
- these include PSAR/FSAR evaluations, project quality 4
-- program evaluations, ASME Section III program audits l ~ -- , - - . - . - . _ _ _ _ , _ _ _ _ , . _ _ _
1-4 '. SWS0hP l-74
- and Quality Assurance Departmental performance, as well as the appraisal of a quality system or function, to determine adequacy and effectiveness of imple-mentation.
2.7.3 INFORMATION - The Information Section maintains the 0/A Department central files containing all incoming and outgoing general and project correspondence. In addition it maintains the Q/A Department library providing reference material such as PSAR/FSAR's, technical literature j and Project manuals. 2.7.4 SUPPORT SERVICES - The support services section provides clerical and steno support to the over-all O/A Department. 3.0 DISCUSSION 3.1 Reference Paragraphs 1.2 and 1.3 The authority and organizational freedom of personnel and organizations which perform quality assurance functions to identify problems, initiate, recommend or provide solutions and verify implementation of sclutions is delineated in the charter of each organization performing these functions. Failure to satisfactorily resolve a quality problem on the lowest appropriate management level will result in an escalation to the next higher level. This could ultimately result in the problem being brought to the attention of the President by the Vice President of Quality Assurance for reso.ution. These documents can be found in the manuals snown in Appendix I. The assurance that the above fulfills Criteria I of Appendix B to 10CFR50 is gained through the audit program delineated in Section 18, 3.2 Reference paragraph 2.4.2 The Superintendent of Field Quality Control has' total authority for the management and implementation of the Quality Assurance Program at the Construction Site. 9 L
COMPANY ORGANIZ ATION . FOR QUALITY ASSURANCE 4 STONE 0. WEBSTER ENGINEERING CORPORATION e . PRESICENT I I E E I E SENIOR VICE PRESIDENT VICE PRESIDENT VICE PRESIDENT ' VICE PRESIDENT AND AND QUALITY ASSURANCE AND MANAGER EN GIN E E RIN G ,,,,,,__,_q y DIRECTOR OF MANAGER OF PROJECTS M AN AGER OUALITV MANAGER CONSTRUCTION l ASSURANCE OF PURCMASING
, _.a . I I
i
. I . . i C ON S T RUC TIO N .
- ENGINEERING CHIEF ENGikEER l MANAGER DIVISION ENGINEER 4NG FIELD PR OC U RE M EN T C ril E F S ASSURANCE O C DIVtSION O C DivlSION l
'6 I-1 I I I I l PROJECT ,
STAFF FIELD Q D STR l 1[z WANAGER SPECI A LI STS l 0 C SITE OFFICES t 5 EA l l0 'OR*b . =*..PO .g 8
.- LIC.Y I .
ysg Tlo I h " "" ~ *'* *" ~ *" e N "' g
~
QUALITY SYSTEMS DEPARTMENT QA NDT zg DIVISION SEAvlCES OROUP DIVISION $5 PROJECT = PO LICY I I RE $1DE N T MANAGER ENGINEER l yl g I O El
- m-m 1 E a i OF o CON ST R UC TION DE SIGN I
ENGINEERING COOPDIN ATOR c" c I 3= -t 7 m i
, p__--------------.,_----.s CONSTHUCTION R E SIDE N T FIELD SUPERVISORS E NGIN EE N PUNCHASING ,
AGENT w CHART A LEGtND CHART EFFECTIVITY Q R-QUAll1Y HEQUIRE MENT S O A -QUAlli f ASSURANCE eMsW 3 DA M TMM E A -ENGINEERING ASSUNANCE
- DINE CTHm WP GA (jj
.- COMMUNICATION 1%
- ~ - GAesta
4 , QUALITY ASSURANCE DEPARTMENT ORGANIZ ATION ) STONE C WE BSTER ENGMEERING CORPORATION a VICE PHESIDENT QUAL 1iV ASSUHANCE I MANI.G(R QU A LIT V ASSURANCE I E I E E I I MANAGER CHIEF f NGINEER A 55 T. M GM CHtEF ENGINEER MANAGER CedlEF ENGINEE f4 GuALif y FIELD LEPARTMENT Ph0 CURE ME NT QA NOT QUALITY SYSTEMS O C CIVISION OlVISION A " *.UR ANCE OlV 6 SION O C DIVISION SERV):ES GROUP I l l NETHODS & SYSTEMS -, C D S FF C T T E C H u.CA!.SJPPORT SERVICES g [1 p I . H E AOQU A RT ER S -80STON i
. CONSTMUCTION SITE SUPT FIELD QUALIT Y CONTROL 4
1 T E S T IN G --- - - IN SPI C T ION---DOCUME N T A T ION us
- 1 xe - ,
vi m o J") C INSPECTOR LOCATeONS 2 7 PROCUREMENT OC "
- 4 I I I I I I I I CH4C AGO ATLANTA SAN FR ANC'SCO BOSTON LOS ANGELES l WYNCOTE PI I T SBURGH HOdSTON l a 1 N 1
Il CHART 8 1 CHART E F FEC TIVIT Y 4
. . .. s.o. 8 _ lo..ei t_r/is/ 74
~
,'[. ." b_ M.bk '
. . . . . M+ -
1 l I
~ '
ORGANIZATION . .
~
ENGINEERING ASSURANCE DIVISION ,
.- CHIEF ENGINEER -
l . ,
- ASSISTANT '-
i CHIEF ENGINEER - . OPERATIONS * .
~~~~~~~~~~~
l , CENTERS
\ e -
. ~n . ,
^
l , s i METHODS AUDITING SERVICES . t . 1
~
-l SPEC /
l l..I I i l- l
, 1-co n PROCURE PROCEDURES STUDIES STANDARDS AUDITS AUDITS REPORTS ED'OCATION b08C PROCEDURES AU DIT,S SERVICES Q' o
- u
} .
. .. r i
MPROJECT SERVICES REPRESENTATIVES l . -
}
2 (- 1
QUALITY ASSURANCE INTERRELATIONSHIPS 4 - STONE & WEBSTER ENGINEERING CORPORATION 1 PROJECT MANAGER F 4 l A k I j PROJECT g ASSIST ASSIST , RESIDENT ENGINEER $ r
- MANAGER E!
7 h ) AUDIT - 4 l ENGINEERING QA POLICY M NAGER QUALITY ASSURANCE j ASSURANCE COOR DIN ATOR Q LITY CLIENT CONTACT
- DIVISION ASSURANCE POLICY AND P IDW A
, 4k Ib MANAGER Q A QA AUTHORITY RblNOR s DEPARTMENT C PROJECT MANAGER E SERVICES PROJECT ENGINEER O ASSIST / AUDIT U SUPERINTENDENT FIELD Qt QUALITY l l AuotT SYFTEMS , SUPERINTENDENT PROCUREMENT Dr ION d FIELD QUALITY CONTROL 'mm j QUALITY CONTROL l '. C. DISTRICT CHIEF Ah th AuulT p,
# h g8 wo j ASSIST POLICY PROCUREMENT p E g
. A'JTHORITY QUALITY CONTROL g cap p j j w 4 2 I
- NDT -
CHART C 4 DIVISION FIELD Q U ALITY l CHART E FF ECTIVIT Y POLICY AUTHORITY CONTROL DIVISION ' I erwistor A luTE* C[Ilf 74 APPMOVALS< VP Q A **d ,.
, " ""E~oZdW l/ .
V i
,, . ' Tgo 1
STONE & WEBSTEll ENGINEERING CORPOllATION QUALITY ASSURANCE DEPARTMENT . QUALITY
^ I J '1 ASSURANCE PROGRAM TITLE: NUMBER:
SECTICN 2 REVISION: QUALITY ASSUPANCE PROGRAM N/A EFFECTIVE DATE: December 31, 1973 APPROVALS
.k k. w4 V.P. QU ALITY ASSUR ANCE V.P. ENGINEERING
)[5 )>n&
V.P. C N STRUCTION
2-1 SWSQAP l-74 RSTOR cal.
~
SECTION 2 QUALITY ASSURANCE PROGRAM 1.0 REQUIREMENTS 1.1 This program applies to S&W design, procurement, con-struction and testing responsibilities for nuclear power stations as defined in utility's Prelbminary Safety Analysis Report. 1.2 The design, procurement, construction and testing of Category I structures, components and systems shall be controlled through implementation of the criteria of Appendix B, 10CFR50. Category I structures, com'onents p and systems are designated in the utilities' PSAR and are further defined in applicable drawings and specifications. Applicable criteria of Appendix B, 10CFR50 shall be imposed on vendors. 1.2.1 Activities affecting quality shall be documented, as appropriate, in drawings, specifications, in-structions and procedures. 1.2.2 Activities affecting quality shall be conducted under controlled conditions. These shall include appropriate equipment, such as tools and test l equipment, suitable environmental conditions and { assurance that all specified conditions have been met. Specified conditions include such items as qualification of personnel and processes and !
- verification that required inspection'or test i operations have been satisfactorily completed. !
1.3 The design, procurement, construction and testing of l Category II and Category III structures, components and systems shall meet applicable codes and standards ! l and good design and construction practices (see Appendix ! III, Glossary for def_nitions applied to various Categories). , i 1.4 All construction work at the site, which falls within the , scope of Section III, ASME Boiler and Pressure Vessel Code shall be controlled by S&W in compliance with the SSW Certificate of Authorization issued by ASME.
e .e 2-2
-. SWSQAP 1-74 '
1.5- S&W shall, as directed by the client, audit and witness' tests lof selected Nuclear Steam Supply System equipment.
-1.6 Vendors employed at the site shall be required to comply with applicable parts of-this program and use applicable S&W~ manuals and procedures or their own S&W approved .
manuals and procedures.
- 1.7-' Indoctrination and education programs.shall be established, as. appropriate, for S&W personnel performing activities affecting quality.
11.8 An annual report of this program's status shall be ... provided to the client. ' 2.0 TASKS *
- L2.1 Project Engineering shall ensure that design and engineering
< activitic affecting quality cre documented, as appropriate,. j in drawings, specifications, instructions and procedures. !: These documents shall, as appropriate: f2.1.11 Designate the Category of structures, components ! and systems. i 2.1.2- Extend applicable criteria of Appendix B, 10CFR50, to vendors. 2.1.3 Indicate applicable codes and standards. l 2.1.4 Include requirements for controlled conditions. i- 2.2 Engineering Assurance shall: 2.2.1 Develop management systems and methods to implement the quality assurance program for engineering and design. activities. Document these procedures in the Engineering Assurance Manual. . 2.2.2 Indoctrinate and provide continuing education for personnel performing activities affecting quality of engineering.and design. 2.2.3 ' Coordinate the program of establishing a S&W position
. guideline on each AEC Regulatory Guide and publish and maintain the listing of these Guides. Inform S&W personnel of newly issued and proposed Regulatory
. Guides.
- 4 See Appendix I for reference to imp 12menting documents.
s a ! l 2-3 SWSQAP l-74 2.2.4 Coordinate the formulation of S&W's position with respect to code requirements and the preparation t of requests for codes, special rulings or inter-
,pretations of codes and standards, all upon request.
2.3 Quality Systems Division shall: 2.3.1 Publish and control the issue of all manuals, excluding the Engineering Assurance Manual, needed to implement the quality assurance program. 2.3.2 Establish and maintain a program for the indoc-trination and continuing education of Quality Assurance Department personnel, and maintain program records. 2.3.3 Establish and maintain the records of each inspector's qualification and certification for all Divisions / Groups and notify personnel when requalification is required. 2.4 Procurement Quality Control Division shall: 2.4.1 Periodically review procedures affecting procure-
~
ment quality. control and provide input to OSD for necessary updating. 2.4.2 Audit and witness tests of selected equipment pro-cured by the NSSS supplier, as requested by the Client. 2.4.3 Employ and maintain a staff of qualified inspec-tion personnel. 2.5 Field Quality Control Division shall: 2.5.1 Period'cally review procedures affecting field quality control and provide inputs to QSD for necessary updating. 2.5.2 Employ and maintain a r.taff of qualified inspec-tion personnel. 2.6 Nondestructive Test Division shall: 2.6.1 Periodically review procedures affecting nondestruc-tive testing and provide input to QSD for necessary updating.
~
2.6.2 Establish and maintain a training program for the qualification and certification of S&W personnel involved in nondestructive testing and evaluation.
- 6 s a 2-4
- SWSQAP l-74 2.6.3 Maintain and control a file of all records docu-menting competency of S&W personnel performing nondestructive testing and evaluation.
2.6.4 Perform surveillance of nondestructive test opera-tions, including periodic review of examinations, and provide technical assistance, as required. 2.7 -The Project Quality Assurance Coordinator shall coordinate the preparation of an annual report for thetoManager, the ClientQuality on the S&W Quality Assurance Program, Assurance Department, based on' inputs from S&W quality assurance organizations. 3.0 DISCUSSION 3.1 Reference Paragraph 1.2 This program document communicates the corporate QA policy and commitments to Department heads who develop the imple-menting procedures. These are in manuals with a controlled distribution to all affected departments as determined by department management. Scheduled training is conducted within the department on applicable quality policies, manuals and procedures. A scheduled audit program assures
.that they are implemented.
1 a 5 0 e
- l. ' ' T-12 0 l
STONE & WEllSTER ENGINEERING COllPollATION QUALITY ASSURANCE DEPARTMENT
~
~~
QUALITY 'l
- c. . . . .
ASSURANCE PROGRAM TITLE: NUMBER: SECTION 3 REVISION: ENGINEERING AND DESIGN CONTROL N/A EFFECTIVE DATE: December 31, 1974 APPROVALS N. 3 I Smdt( V.P. QU AllTY ASSUR ANCE
#& A D V.P. ENGINEERING X> La V.P. CONSTRUCTION
~- - -
. e c'
- 3-1 SWSQAP l-74 SECTION 3 c _ a .., .i __ , ,
ENGINEERING AND DESIGN CONTROL 1.0 REQUIREMENTS 1.1 An engineering and design control system shall be establish-ed to scope and document the method of accomplishing the essential engineering and design tasks. 1.2 The system shall control the development of the design, ! from the initial authorization to the obtaining of the operating license. The system shall ensure that the applicable design requirements such as design bases, regulatory requirements, codes, standards and quality requirements are correctly translated into drawings, specifications, instructions and procedures. The design documentation shall specify the quality characteristics and quality standards, including acceptance criteria. The system shall include a review and approval cycle. 1.3 Design controls shall be imposed on the following: stress , thermal - hydraulic- and accident-analysis; compatibility of materials; accessibility for in-service inspection; repairs; and acceptance criteria for in-spections and tests. 1.4 Alternate or simplified solution methods may be used for design verification when accompanied by justification
, of the methods used.
1.5 Design control measures shall include review and use of accepted industrial standards and practices, prototype evaluation and approval, design reviews and selection and
. review of the suitability of materials, parts, equipment or processes that are essential to the functions of structures, systems or components.
1.6 Engineering drawings shall be reviewed by an individual, otner than the originator, for adequacy of design. 1.7 Manual and computerized calculations shall be reviewed by an individual other than the preparer. The reviewer shall be responsible for a complete check of the preparer's approach . and the accuracy and technical adequacy of the calculations. 1.8 If prototype testing is required to confirm the adequacy of the design, the requirements and acceptance criteria for such testing shall be included in the specification. Tasting shall be performed under the most adverse design conditionc.
s s 3-2
- SWSQAP l-74
. - e "' '
~
L 1.9 Changes to approved procedures, instructions, calculations, drawings and specifications shall be permitted only after a review and approval by the same individual or group responsible for the original work. 1.10 Instructions shall govern the review, approval, release, distribution and reviLion of uocuments all for the parti-cipating design organizations. 1.11 S&W is responsible for interface centrol with the NSSS supplier. This control includes a review of NSSS des-criptions, drawings, specifications, manuals and other correspondence. 2.0 TASKS
- 2.1 EA shall prepare procedures, as necessary, to establish a control system for engineering and design.
3.0 DISCUSSION 3.1 Reference Paragraph 1.1 Stone & Webster's System of Engineering and Design Control is graphically depicted in Appendix IV. 3.2 Reference Paragraph 1.2 Stone & Webster assures that design characteristics can be controlled, inspected and/or tested and that test criteria are identified through a Quality Assurance review and sign off of procurement and erection specifications prior.to issue; and a QA review of all changes to such specifications and the disposi-tion of all nonconformances to such specifications. Quality requirements / parameters are established in the specification, the primary engineering document. Drawings convey quality requirements by reference to the appropriate specification.
- 3. 3, Reference Paracraph 1.5 Standard "off the shelf" comr.ercial or previously approved items essential to safety related functions are reviewed for suitability prior to selection by the cognizant engineering equipment specialist. The procurement document is further reviewed and approved by Quality Assurance personnel to assure that essential quality control features have been included.
- S;e Appendix I for reference to implementing documents.
4 4
- 3-3 SWSQAP l-74
[1 ; _ ra ia t, p i 3 "I"'---->. -" 3.4 Reference Paragraph 1.6 Feedback information on nonconformances is transmitted from shop and field activities to headquarters. This data, plus audit data on Engineering / Design activities, is analyzed and evaluated by quality assurance personnel, after which corrective action is recommended to assist in preventing recurring nonconformances. 3.5 Reference Paragraph 1.10 Design documents and changes thereto are maintained and filed by project in accordance with the requirements of ANSI Standard N45.2.9. Design documents are considered to be specifications, drawings, procedures and instructions. b e O
. ', r-no A STONE & WEllSTER ENGINEERING CORPORATION QUALITY ASSURANCE DEPARTMENT QUALITY
-e- ,.. , m .,
ASSURANCE . - r .. ., PROGRAM TITLE: N UfABER: SECTION 4 REVISION: PROCUREMENT DOCUMENT CONTROL N/A EFFECTIVE DATE: December 31, 1974 APPROVALS
- b. m -
V.P. QU AllTY ASSUR ANCE
# c2 V.P. ENGINEERING s
K A u. V.P. CONSTRUCTION
- ,. , --W _
..__--.,_.m_ - _ , _ - _ _ , . _ _ , , . . _ _ . _ _ . . _ _ - . _ . . - - - . . - - _ . .
,a 6
~ '
4-1 SWSQAP l-74 SECTION 4 .n . PROCUREMENT DOCUMENT CONTROL e.. ,, ,, 1.0 REQUIREMENTS . 1.1 Procurement documentation shall include the requirements necessary for establishing the quality of the procured material, equipment and services. 1.2' Design criteria, including applicable codes, standards and regulatory requirements shall be translated into procurement specifications and the associated design drawings. Items not procured with a specification, i.e., a purchase order, shall contain all necessary quality provisions. 1.3. Procurement documents shall be subject to appropriate reviews as indicated in Appendix V. 1.4 Vendors who perform Category I work shall be required to have quality assurance programs consistent with applicable provisions of Appendix B, 10CFR50. These provisions shall be imposed on their suppliers, as appropriate. 2.0 TASKS
- 2.1 QSD shall review and concur in all procurement documents (specifications and requisitions when no specification exists) for Category I items originated by Project Engineering prior to their issuance. Concurrence shall indicate that the specifications include sufficient information pertaining to codes, standards, methods of testing, inspection and documentation so that quality assurance activities can be performed.
2.2 Procurement Quality Control Division shall: 2.2.1 Review procurement specifications for procurement quality control requirements when requested by QSD. 2.2.2 Review and approve quality assurance manuals for shop fabrication of Category I items submitted by vendors in accordance with procurement specifications. 2.3 Field Quality Control Division shall: 2.3.1 Review procurement specifications or field quality control requirements when requested by QSD.
- See Appendix'I for reference to implementing documents.
4 . e 4-2 n q y, p 7 n F. [ SWSQAP l-74 j . . ;J C u. C i ;L . 2 . U.' ih 2.3.2 Review and approve purchase requisitions issded at the site. 2.3.3 Review and approve subcontractors' quality assurance manuals and changes submitted thereto for field erection work. 2.4 Nondestructive Test Division shall review procurement
~ ~ specifications for subcontractor nondestructive test requirements when requested by QSD.
3.0 DISCUSSION 3.1 Reference Paragraph-1.1 Changes and/or revisions to procurement documents (i.e., procurement specifications) are accomplished by either an addendum to the specification, a disposition of a non-conformance, or Engineering and' Design Coordination Report. All three methods-have the same review and approval requirement as the original documents which
-includes a Quality Assurance Department sign off. The implementation and operation of these methods are subject to audit.
3.2 Reference Paragraph 2.0 3.2.1 Procurement specifications identify the documentation-to be prepared, controlled, retained and submitted, when required, to S&W for review and/or approval. The review, approval and sign off of the procure-ment document by the Quality Assurance Department and the auditing activity delineated in Section
- 18. provide the required assurance.
3.2.2 Quality requirements'for spare or replacement parts are normally delineated in the original equipment procurement specification which is reviewed and signed off by the Quality Assurance Department for "QA" requirements and acceptance criteria. Field procurement documents are reviewed and signed off by the Quality Assurance Department. 1
.- Y2o l A
STONE & WEllSTEll ENGINEERING CORPOllATION QUALITY ASSURANCE DEPARTMENT QUALITY -". - - - " ASSURANCE PROGRAM TITLE: N UM BER: SECTION 5 INSTRUCTIONS, PROCEDURES AND REVISION: DRAWINGS N/A EFFECTIVE DATE: December 31, 19'74 APPROVALS I V.P. QU ALITY ASSUR ANCE y V.P. ENGINEERING A l / V.P. CONSTRUCTION '
. _ - - ._ _ . _ _ , _ _ . _ - . . _ _ _ _ _ . _ _ . , - - _ _ _ - _ ~ ,_ - - - - - _, . _ . _ , _. . _ . - . _
-. l
- 5-1 SWSQAP l-74
,nr, I
w..), . . . _ _ _ _ . SECTION 5 INSTRUCTIONS, PROCEDURES AND DRAWINGS 1.0 REQUIREMENTS 1.1 Quality activities shall be based on engineering specifications, drawings, procedures and instructions, as appropriate. These documents shall indicate any necessary special process controls, the applicable codes
.amd standards and. qualitative and quantitative acceptance criteria. Further, they shall establish which documents prepared by vendors must be submitted to S&W for review before use.
1.2 Quality' activities shall be conducted in accordance with quality assurance procedures which shall identify indivi-duals or groups responsible for performing specific tasks and indicate quality record requirements. The procedures shall include sufficient definition to ensure that activities affecting quality have been satisfactorily performed in accordance with the specified requirements. 2.0 TASKS
- 2.1 Project Engineering shall:
2.1.1 Indicate necessary quality activities (including special controls) in drawings, specifications and procedures, as appropriate. Criteria for the acceptance of specific tasks shall be included in the related document. 2.1.2 Establish which documents prepared by vendors must
- be submitted to SSW for review before use.
2.1.3 Conduct reviews of drawings prepared by Design 4 to provide an independent review and sign-off. 2.2 OSD shall prepare and publish procedures governing the performance of quality activities, excluding engineering and design (see Paragraph 2, Section 3).
- See Appendix I for reference to implementing procedures.
t
-.__. .__.. _ . _ .- _ _. ._ ~
e . 5-2 SWSQAP l-74 P'ro i n 3 , c3, ,- , 3.0 DISCUSSION , u>> ~ ~ . . . . , 3.1 Reference Paragraph 2.2 - The normal sequence of events in the preparation, review', approval, publication and revision of procedures is as follows: *
, (a) A preparer develops the procedure.
(b) A lead Engineer or supervisor reviews the preparers material. (c) A draft is then circulated within the discipline or department for internal review. (d) Internal review comments are incorporated or resolved by the preparer and a preliminary procedure is prepared for external (outside discipline or Depart-ment) review. (e) A preliminary procedure is then circulated for commert by signature authority personnel. (f) Comments are received, incorporated or resolved by the preparer. (g) A final or original issue of the procedure is then circulated for signature. (h) Revisions are processed in a similar manner except that the draft stage may be eliminated if the procedure is not significantly altered. e
~ ' , T-12 0 _
STONE & WEBSTEll ENGINEElllNG COllPORATION QUALITY ASSURANCE DEPARTMENT l QUALITY ,. ., . . _ _ ASSURANCE PROGRAM TITLE: N UM BER: SECTION 6 REVISION: DOC'UMENT CONTROL N/A EFFECTIVE D ATE: December 31, 1974 APPROVALS
. b. b. S V.P. QU ALITY ASSUR ANCE V.P. ENGINEERING
.. .,J .
V.P. CONSTRUCTION
-.; =
6-1 SWSQAP l-74
, -- , . 3 , 2 q SECTION 6 ,,
- a . . . .> r - . . _ . . a DOCUMENT CONTROL 1.0 REQUIREMENTS l.1 The review, approval and distribution of documents, including changes thereto, which prescribe activities affecting qualityLshall be controlled. These documents
' include drawings, specifications, instructions, procedures and test procedures.
1.2 The procedures for the preparation of documents shall include reviews to ensure adequacy before release as well as requirements'for the approval of each document by authorized personnel through signatures or initials. 1.3 A method of change' control shall be established that in-cludes approval by the same individuals or groups having responsibility for the initial document issue. The method'shall include a revision identification system so that the effective revisions can be readily determined. l'. 4 Document control shall be accomplished in a manner which. ensures timely inclusion of changes into the parent document. l.5 'The distribution of documents shall be controlled to ensure that only authorized documents are in use at the locations where.the prescribed activities are being performed. Pro-
-visions shall be included for the retrieval, control or destruction of out-dated' documents.
. :2. 0 TASKS
- 2.1 EA shall prepare and issue procedures for establishing a control system for engineering assurance and engineering and design' documents which prescribe activities affecting
_ quality. 2.2 QSD shall prepare and issue procedures which provide con-trol'over documents which are used by Quality Assurance Department personnel and which prescribe quality assurance activities.
- See Appendix I.for reference to implementing documents.
6-2 . SWSQAP l-74
- r , . - , . ,, _ ,
. ' -- ' - - . . . . i, 3.0 DISCUSSION
. 3.1 Reference Paragraph 1.1 Applicable procedures in Section 5 of the Quality Standards Manual, Engineering Assurance Manual and the Quality Assurance Directives Manual establish the
_ requirements to maintain master indexes of instructions, procedures, drawings and procurement documents and For to publish updated indexes in a scheduled manner. example the quality standard untitled " Quality Standards Preparation and Control" states as follows:
"4.11 - Table of Contents - An updated Table of Contents shall be issued quarterly by the Quality Systems Division if there has been'any change in the preceding quarter. This Table of Contents shall list the status of all current QS's,,
changes, revisions and cancellations." 9 e
, T-120 __
A STONE & WEllSTEll ENGINEERING CORPORATION QUALITY ASSURANCE DEPARTMENT QUALITY _ .
. . . ., p ASSURANCE PROGRAM l 4
TITLE: N UMBER: SECTION~7 CONTROL OF PURCHASED MATERIAL, p, EQUIPMENT AND SERVICES EFFECTIVE DATE: December 31, 1974 APPROVALS V.P. QU ALITY ASSUR ANCE V.P. ENGINEERING
. . ,4 5 ,
V.P. CONSTRUCTION
7-1
. SWSQAP l-74 SECTION 7 CONTROL OF PURCHASED MATERIAL, EQUIPMENT AND SERVICES 1.0 REQUIREMENTS 1.1 Controls shall be established to ensure that purchased material, equipment and services, whether purchased directly or through vendors, conform to procurement
. documents. These controls shall include source evalua-tion and recommendations, periodic source assessment and inspection and site receiving inspection, as applicable.
1.2 A proprietary vendor rating list shall be prepared and maintained which shall indicate the capability of a vendor's quality assurance program. The assessment of his capability may be based on past performance and/or a review of the quality assurance manual, as applicable. 1.3 Bid specifications shall be submitted to the Client with a list of recommended vendors based on an evaluation of the capability of the vendors to meet the specification
~
quality requirements. Bids may be solicited from vendors whose quality programs have not been evaluated and approved; however, before placing a purchase order for Category I work, the vendor's program shall be evaluated and approved. If a plant survey is necessary, the Client shall be notified so that he may participate. 1.4 Field purchase orders for Category I items shall be placed only with approved Category I vendors. In establishing that a vendor for Category I items is approved, the follow-ing guidance may be used in addition to the vendor rating list: 1.u.1 If the vendor is a distributor and does not handle the item, and if the-source of the item is an approved SSW supplier, then the vendor (distributor) need not be on the approved list, provided that the vendor furnishes copies of documentation to indicate that the items were obtained from the approved SSW source supplier. Example: Company A is an approved SSW supplier for Category I electrodes. Company B is a distributor that sells Company A electrodes. Further, Company B does not handle these electrodes (i.e., they are shipped directly from Company A). Company B need not be on th,e
= .
7-2 *
.- .:' l-74
~
' SWSQAP , ,
... N /
N,/ approved vendor list, provided that Company B furnishes objective evidence.to show that
. the electrodes supplied came from Company A and that applicable documentation is furnished by Company A.
.1.4.2 If the acceptability of an item is based on inspec-tions and tests performed after the item has been then the delivered to the' site and before its use, vendor need not be on the approved list.
Vendors, who furnish items which are referenced in
~
1.4.3 a specification by manufacturer and specific model or 6ther identification are considered as approved for the specified items. By referencing a specific manufacturer's product, approval of the product is established during the review of the specification.
. Example: Type X admixture is supplied by Company
'A and is specified.as an acceptable product in a specification. Company A is an approved vendoc for Type X admixture. However, if Company A were tc offer Type Y admixture as "an approved equal", then Type . would have to be evaluated and approved by Project Engineering'before it could be used and before Company A could be accepted as an approved vendor for Type Y admixture.
1.5 The Client may designate " notification points"The forClient specific operations performed at vendor's facilities. shall-be advised by S&W when " notification point" opera-tions are' scheduled. 1.6 The NSSS supplier is responsible for source inspection and documentation of all NSSS procured items. 1.7 Receipt inspection includes verification that all required documentation has been received and that Inspections for the items conform conformance to the procurement documents.shall make use of objective quality evidence receiv the items, as well as selected physical inspection. 1.7.1 Receipt inspection activities shall be documented. 1.7.2 Acceptable Category I items received at the site shall be identified. 1.7.3 Items received at the site without the required documentation or items for which receipt inspection cannot be performed within a reasonable time shall be placed in a hold status and segregated, when , t
- a. =
7-3 SWSQAP l-74
** ***Ts n . . . _ i practicable. Items which do not conform to the specified requirements shall be tagged, reported as nonconformances, and segregated when practicable.
1.7.4 Nonconforming items or items in a hold status may be released on a risk basis. Items shall not be released for any operation when rework, replace-ment or certification of acceptability of the item is impossible after the operation is per-formed. . Copies of risk release documentation shall be provided to the Client. 2.0 TASKS
- 2.1 Procurement Quality Control Division shall:
2.1.1 Establish criteria for source evaluation and con-duct source evaluations. 2.1.2 Maintain a vendor rating list. 2.1.3 Assess active vendors, generally on a 12-month basis. While PQCD is responsible for vendor eva' ation, PQtD may request the assis,tance of other Quality Assurance Department divisions to' conduct the evaluation. 2.2 Bid specifications shall be submitted to the Client with a list of recommended suppliers by Project Engineering. In preparing this list, an evaluation by PQCD on the capability of each vendor.to meet the specification quality requirements shall be used. 2.3 If bids are solicited from vendors whose quality assurance programs have not been evaluated and approved for Category
~
I work, the vendor's quality assurance program shall be evaluated and approved by PQCD before the purchase order is placed. If a plant survey is necessary, PQCD shall notify the Client so that they may participate, if desired. 2.4 For field purchases, FQCD shall: 1 I 2.4.1 Review purchase requisitions and assure they contain the necessary quality assurance require-ments, including inspection forms, when applicable. This review and approval applies to revisions to field purchase requisitions.
~
- See Appendix I for reference to implementing documents.
i
~
7-4 . SWSOAP l-74 . 2.4.2 Review all field purchase orders for Category I items and verify that an approved vendor has been engaged. 2.5 PQCD shall visit vendor facilities to verify, witness and perform the various tasks required by procurement documents. 2.5.1 The Client shall inform PQCD of their designated
" notification points". When the visit includes Client designated " notification points", PQCD shall advise them for their participation.
2.5.2 The Client's Manager of Quality Assurance may request additional vendor visits. These will be conducted by PQCD on a basis mutually agreed to by the Client and S&W. 2.5.3 PQCD shall document visits'to vendor facilities. Copies of visit reports shall be provided to the Client. 2.5.4 When source inspection by PQCD is required by the procurement document or requested by the Project Engineer or site Resident Manager, PQCD shall identify all acceptable source inspected items with a SHIPPING RELEASE TAG. 2.6. FQCD shall perform site receipt inspection for Category I and specified Category II items. 2.6.1 FQCD shall document receipt inspection activities. 2.6.2 SHIPPING RELEASE TAGS, affixed by PQCD shall be used by FQCD as objective quality evidence of previous
, S&W inspection during receipt inspection. Operations performed by PQCD during source inspection need nct be repeated.
2.6.3 NSSS supplier's source inspection tags applied to their procured items shall not be used by FQCD as objective quality evidence during receipt inspection. Also, FQCD shall check the documentation received with the items against the Procurement Quality Check List supplied by the NSSS supplier (i.e., check that listed documents are accounted for). Any items received without a source inspection tag and the correct documentation shall be placed in a hold status and the problem shall be referred to the Client for resolution. 2.6.4 FQCD shall indicate by appropriate means, items or groups of items found acceptable.
- e
. .. v 7-5 7 -
SWSQAP l-74 B " , 2.6.5 FQCD shall place items received without the required
-documentation, or tiems for which required receipt inspection cannot be performed within a reasonable time, in a hold status and segregate them, when practicable.
2.6.6 FQCD shall tag and segregate, when practicable, j items which do not conform to the specified require- ! ments and report them as nonconformances. 2.6.7 Nonconforming items and items in a hold status may be released by FQCD on a risk basis when a formal written request is submitted to FQCD by
- Construction (field) and concurred in by Project Engineering and FQCD (field).
FQCD shall provide copies of risk release documenta-tion to the Client. 3.0 DISCUSSION 3.1 Reference Paragraph 1.4 3.1.1 The Engineering Department (i.e., Project Engineering) is responsible for the preparation of a recommended bidders list, the evaluation of the bidder's proposal and the final determination of the specific bidder to be recommended to the Client. The Procurement Quality Control Division i of the Quality Assurance Department is responsible to evaluate recommended bidders quality assurance programs and their ability to perform to the pro-gram. Engineering Department participation in j the Quality Assurance bidder evaluation is to the extent deemed necessary by the Project Engineer. During the-conduct of the work the engineer is i I responsible for the review and approval of supplier provided technical documentation as specified in the procurement specification. 3.1.2 An exception to the policy of buying Category I items only from vendors on the approved vendor rating list may be made under the following conditions. This ) exception provides for controls which complies with the requirements of . Criteria 7 to Appendix B to 10CFR50. If the Engineering Department, in the development of a Category I specification or purchase requisition, makes the determination that the accent-ability of an item can be adequately judged by inspec-tions and tests performed by S&W in the vendor's
~
shop or after delivery, the vendor need not be pre-qualified by survey or audit. Quality Assurance, by their review of purchase documents as delineated in Section 4 assures that appropriate inspections and tests are specified.
7-6 SWSQAP l-74 s
. . .J b .~.>. . .-
3.2 Reference Paragraph 2.5 Parameters to be inspected, tests to be witnessed and documents to be reviewed by Procurement Quality Control Division shop inspectors are delineated in the Test, Inspection and Documentation section of procurement specifications, which have been reviewed and approved by the Quality Assurance Department. The detailed techniques for the performance and documentation of these inspections are delineated in applicable Quality Assurance Department procedures. . O e 0
-==
, [ T-120 A
STONE & WEllSTER ENGINEERING CORPORATION QUALITY ASSURANCE DEPARTMENT QUALITY . ASSURANCE PROGRAM - TITLE: N UM BER: SECTION 8 , IDENTIFICATION AND CONTROL OF REVISION: MATERIALS, PARTS AND COMPONENTS EFFECTIVE DATE: December 31. 1974 APPROVALS 1 O { I s V)- 43 Y N ith I V.P. QU ALITY ASSUR ANCE
-%a V.P. ENGINEERING
/
&ks V.P. CONSTRUCTION t i l
a r *
.. 8-1 SWSQAP l-74 SECTION 8 IDENTIFICATION AND CONTROL OF MATERIALS, PARTS AND COMPONENTS 1.0 REQUIREMENTS 1.1 Identification and control measures shall be established as necessary to prevent the uncontrolled use of noncon-forming materials, parts and components, including partially fabricated assemblies.
1.2 Identification and control of material, parts and components which are to meet the requirements of ASME Section III . shall be accomplished during field fabrication and erection in accordance with the Company Quality Assurance and Control Manual-ASME Section III. 1.3 Category I materials, parts and components shall be iden-tified by heat number, serial number, part number, or other appropriate means. The identification may be on the item (physical markings are preferred) or on records directly and readily traceable to the item. 1.3.1 The type of identification shall be established by specifications, drawings, instructions or procedures. 1.3.2 Traceability to records which will verify conformance of the materials, parts and components to specified requirements (e.g., chemical and physical properties, cests, inspections, etc) shall be provided from initial receipt of materials to installa-tion and use, or up to user testing, if applicable. For consumable materials (e.g. , cadweld powder) , traceability requirements shall be met by documenta-tion which indicates that only acceptable materials ) have been used, unless requirements of codes and ' standards dictate otherwise. , 1.4 Category II and Category III materials, parts and components shall be identified by type and status or as required by the specifications. 2.0 TASKS * , 2.1 Project Engineering shall establish requirements for the identification of materials, parts and components in
'~
applicable drawings, specifications, instructions and procedures. ]
- See Appendix I for reference to implementing documents.
, s
" 8-2 SWSQAP l'-74
. 2.2 PQCD shall perform tasks at vendor facilities relative t'o
.the identification and control of materials, parts and components in accordance with the procurement documents.
2.3 Field Quality Control Division shall: 2.3.1 Verify , during receiving inspection, that materials, parts and components are properly identified and
- when applicable, traceable to supporting docu-mentation.
2.3.2 Ensure that the required identification and traceability of materials, parts and components is maintained from receipt through completion of , construction. 9
I* .
,. 1,12 0 A
STONE & WEllSTElt ENGINEElllNG COltPOllATION QUALITY ASSURANCE DEPARTMENT QUALITY - i i _ _ _ i ASSURANCE PROGRAM . TITLE: NUMBER: SECTION 9 REVISION: CONTROL OF SPECIAL PROCESSES - M/A EFFECTIVE DATE: December 31, 1974 APPROVALS
-b b. h-V.P. QU ALITY ASSUR ANCE NC sd 4
V.P. ENGINEERING
't Y 0*
/* I /
V.P. CONSTRUCTION
--- -, ,,,-,,..v,.,,,, , . . , ----,,,,-,,,,..a - - , - , , ,-- -- - - - - - - - - , , - - - , , ,
=L. '.
A' ' 9-1 SWSQAP l-74 l l-v- , , , - - l . !- SECTION 9 - '
-CONTROL OF SPECIAL PROCESSES 1.0 REQUIREMENTS I
1.1 Special processes shall be controlled to ensure that approved special process procedures are.used by qualified personnel in accordance with specified codes, ] 4
. standards, and any additional S&W requirements. The l requirements for special process control, including personnel qualifications shall be imposed by specifications pro- !
cedures, instructions, or other applicable documen,ts. ! f 1.2 Special. processes are unique manufacturing, inspection, or-test processes where written procedures are deemed necessary to accomplish a task affecting quality. Weld-ing, welding repair, cadwelding, studwelding, heat treating, coatings, nuclear system cleaning, leak testing and nondestructive testing are examples of special processes. 2.0 TASKS
- 2.1 Engineering Department (Materials Engineering Division) shall:
2.1.l~ Review and approve all special process procedures, excluding nondestructive test procedures, submitted by vendors in accordance with specification re-quirements. 2.1.2 Review, approve and maintain all special process procedures prepared for use by S&W. 2.2 QSD shall review and concur in SSW generated special process procedures, including nondestructive test procedures,'which are to be used at the site. 2.3 Nondestructive Test Division shall: 2.3.1 Provide qualification testing and certification of S&W personnel who perform nondestructive testing (see also Paragraph 2.6, Section 2) .
.~
*LSee Appendix I for-reference to implementing documents.
- k. - . - i.....
19-2 . . SWSQAP l-74 . t
~ '
w = ' t 2.3.2 Review and evaluate nondestructive testing procedures submitted by vendors in accordance with speci'fi-cation requirements; and prepare and maintain nondestructive testing procedures used by S&W in accordance with specification and code require-ments. 2.4 When required by the procurement documents, PQCD shall verify that qualified personnel have performed special process work at vendors facilities using approved procedures. 2.5 Field Quality Control Division: 2.5.1 Is responsible for qualification testing,which is required of personnel who perform special pro-cess work at the site in accordance with specificationa., procedures, instructions, or other applicable documents. 2.5.2 Shall maintain qualification records. 2.5.3 Has the authority to re-test or revoke the quali-fication of personnel whose special process work is not in accordance with established quality standards that define qualification requirements. 2.6 FQCD shall verify.that only qualified personnel perform special process' work at the site using approved procedures. 2.7 For special process work which is not covered by codes and standards, or when it is desired that an item's quality requirements exceed those in codes or standards,
- the necessary qualification of procedures, personnel and -
equipment shall be defined by Project Engineering in specifications, procedures or other appropriate documents. 3.0- DISCUSSION 3.1 Reference Paragraph 1.1 Audits are conducted to assure implementation of and conformance to approved procedures / specifications and that special processes . are accomplished with written process sheets, procedures, check lists, travelers, or the equivalent, with recorded evidence of verifications. The audit activity is described in Section 18 of the program while the implementing procedures are found in appropriate manuals indicated in Appnedix I.
T-120 A STONE & WEllSTER ENGINEERING CORPORATION QUALITY ASSURANCE DEPARTMENT QUALITY
\q{
Jn ASSURANCE PROGRAM TITLE: NUMBER: SECTION 10 REVISION: INSPECTION N/A EFFECTIVE DATE: December 31, 1974 APP ROV Al.S
- ) I- ) ~,dA-V.P. QU AllTY ASSUR ANCE l -
4* V.P. ENGINEERING tb FC V.P. CONSTRUC ION
- i
.- 10-1 -
SWSQAP l-74 H3 TOR E SECTION 10 INSPECTION 1.0 REQUIREMENTS 1.1 Drawings, specifications, instructions and procedures shall include the necessary inspection requirements, with acceptance criteria, to provide assurance that material, equipment and work conform to quality requirements. Acceptance and inspection activities shall not be performed by personnel who have performed the work to be inspected. 1.1.1 Inspections shall be performed at vendor facilities in accordance with the requirements of the pro-curement documents. 1.1.2 Inspections shall be performed at the site on material, equipment and work to ensure conformance to applicable specifications, instructions, codes, standards and procedures. 1.2 Inspection requirements shall be translated into pro-cedures and inspection reports to provide documentation of the inspection work required to ensure the specified quality. While direct in-process and final inspections are preferred, indirect control by monitoring of the process, equipment.and personnel may be used when direct inspection is impossible or not feasible. Direct and indirect controls shall be used when control is inadequate without both methods. 1.3 Sampling methods may be used for inspecting a group of homogeneous items which are received from one source, excluding Category I items unless the method for specific Category I items is approved by the Client. When a sampling method is used to verify the acceptability of items, the sampling plan shall be based on a recognized standard sampling plan. The methods of applying the standard sampling plan shall be documented to prevent misinterpretation of the plan or the sample results. 1.4 When notification or hold points have been established, the process control procedure or checklist shall include provisions to ensure that work does not progress beyond these points until released by the designated authority. Notification or hold points may be established by specifications, procedures, Construction (field), Quality
10-2 - SWSQAP l-74 . Assurance Department or authorized Code Inspectors.
~1.5 Individuals or groups who have been designated to evaluate inspection data by specifications, procedures, or instructions shall indicate the conformance or noncon-formance on the deta sheet or other appropriate documents.
1.6 The Quality Assurance Department shall have the authority to stop work in those situations where continued work could cause damage, preclude further inspection, or preclude effective corrective action. 2.0 TASKS
- 2.1 Project Engineering shall include the necessary inspection requirements, with acceptance criteria, in drawings, specifications, instructions and procedures.
12 . 2 PQCD shall perform inspection tasks at vendor facilities in accordance with the procurement documents (see Para- ) graph 2.5 Section 7) . 2.3 FOCD shall perform the following field quality control inspections as required. NOTE See Paragraph 2. 6 Section 7. for FQCD receipt inspection tasks. 2.3.1 FQCD shall perform inspection / testing of soils, concrete, reinforcing steel, structural steel and special coatings in accordance with applicable specifications, instructions and procedures.
- 2.3.2 FQCD shall perform specified inspections and tests of all Category I equipment. Unless there are specific requirements in applicable specifications, instructions or procedures, Category II equipment shall be inspected on a sampling basis to a degree consistent with the relationship of the equipment to plant operational performance and Category III equipment shall be inspected on a surveillance basis.
2.3.3 FOCD shall perform inspection of welding in accord-ance with applicable specifications, instructions or procedures. As a minimum, all Category I and Category II welding shall be visually inspected and Category III~ welding shall be visually inspected on a surveillance basis. O Sre Appendix I for reference to impl,ementing documents.
'8 .
10-3
.SWSQAP l-74 2.3.4 FQCD shall perform required liquid penetrant, magnetic particle, ultrasonic and radiographic test-ing and examinations.
2.3.5 FQCD shall make all necessary arrangements with, and assist, the authorized Code Inspector so that S&W may obtain code certification of fabri-cated and erected piping systems which are speci-fled to meet the requirements of ASME Section III. 2.3.6 FQCD shall document inspection / testing tasks per- - formed, including monitoring, witnessing, auditing, etc. 2.4 NDTD shall provide inspection services in specialty areas of nondestructive testing when adequate equipment and capability are not available in PQCD and FQCD. 3.0 DISCUSSION 3.1 Reference Paragraphs 1.1.1 and 1.1.2 The Quality Assurance Department as part of the planning activity in both it's Field Quality Control and Quality Systems Division, performs and ongoing review of construc-tion schedules versus our inspection procedure / instruction library in order that the procedural needs are identified and the procedures completed well in advance of required dates. Inspections, as well as the work, are performed to specifications / drawings; therefor, a lack of a speci-fication or drawing would preclude either work or inspec-tions being performed. 3.2 Reference Paragraph 1.2 l Assurance that inspection procedures, instructions and/or i check lists contain the following is obtained as indicated next'to each item:
- 1. Quality Characteristics to be Inspected - These are delineated in the appropriate specification which is reviewed and signed by Quality Assurance personnel.
- 2. Individuals or Groups Responsible for Performing the .
Inspection - Delineated in the appropriate Quality Standard.
- 3. Acceptance and Rejection Criteria - Same as one (1) above.
s 10-4 - SWSQAP l-74
- 4. A Description of the Method of Inspections -
Delineated in the appropriate Qualf,ty Assurance Department procedure; i.e., Quality Assurance Directive, NDT Procedure, etc.
- 5. Evidence of Completions and Certification of Inspection Operations - An inspection report prepared in accordance with Quality Standard 14.2
" Inspection Report System" or other documentation as may be specified in the particular specification.
- 6. Record of the Results of the Inspection Operation -
same as five (5) above.
- 7. Verification that all Inspection Operations are .
Complete and Acceptable - By a comparison of the inspection reports / documentation prepared to the attribute list of inspections to be performed developed during the inspection planning stage by Quality Assurance. Final assurance of the satisfactory implementation of items one (1) through seven (7) is gained through an in-dependent audit of the above activities performed by the Quality Assurance Department Services Group. 3.3 Reference Paragraph 2.1 Modifications, repairs, and replacements are performed in accordance with approved engineering specifications, which are reviewed by Quality Assurance personnel. Such work is' inspected in accordance with the specified requirements, which if changed from the original, would require a change to the specification and a. subsequent Quality Assurance review. a .
..m
.TJno-STONE & WEllSTER ENGINEERING CORPORATION QUALITY ASSURANCE DEPARTMENT
,p-
-~, n . ;-
$ d Ci~ A QUALITY ASSURANCE PROGRAM .
N UMBER:
- TITLE:
SECTION 11 REVISION: TEST CONTROL N/A EFFECTIVE DATE: 1 December 31, 1974 l APPROVALS l T. . . V.P. QU ALITY ASSUR ANCE l l
#c h, eAZ ,
V.P. ENGIN. ERING E I
] 1AI' (
r
/ ' ;
\ V.P. C ONSTRUCTION l
. - - . . - . ~. ._. _. .._
l o . \
- 11-1
.' SWSQAP l-74 1 1 l SECTION 11 6-.- -..-a TEST CONTROL 1.0 REOUIREMENTS 1.1 Testing required to demonstrate that structures, systems and components will perform satisfactorily in service shall be identified in applicable documents such as drawings, specifications, procedures and instructions. 1.2 Tests for Category I items shall be performed in accord- - ance with written test procedures and by trained personnel. When the test procedures identified are those described in codes and standards (e.g., ACI, ASTM, etc, tests), they
' need not be duplicated in written procedures if such codes and standards are available to the personnel conducting the test.
1.3 Test procedures shall include the following: 1.3.1 Provisions to ensure that all test prerequisites have been met prior to the start of the test. 1.3.2 Requirements and acceptance limits from the applicable design documents. 1.3.3 Required accuracy and type of test instrumentation to be used. 1.3.4 Required environme3tal conditions, if applicable. 1.3.5 Inclusion as applicable, of mandatory hold points for witnes, sing by the utility, author'ized Inspectors and SSW QA Department. 1.4 Test results shall be documented in sufficient detail to prevent misinterpretation and shall include an evaluation of the test results.by qualified / responsible groups. 2.0 TASKS
- 2.1 PQCD shall perform tasks at vendor facilities as required by the specifications or purchase orders.
2.2 QSD shall prepare any necessary procedures, excluding preoperational proof test procedures.
- See Appendix I for reference to implementing documents.
1 11-2 . SWSQAP l-74 c., .
.1 i
2.3 FQCD shall perform or witness tests at the site which are required by the specifications and Project Engineering procedures and instructions. FOCD shall release systems for preoperational tests when construction work and required tests have been satisfactorily completed. 3.0 DISCUSSION 3.1 Reference Paragraph 1.3.1 Test prerequisites, as used herein , are thosc items specified in the individual test procedure that must be accomplished prior to the start of a specific s
^
test. S&W considers ANSI N45.2.8, Draft 3, Rev. 3 April 1974 as promulgated in WASH 1309, UC80, to cover the major prerequisites to be addressed. . w l
1-12 0 A STONE & WEllSTEll ENGINEERING COltPOllATION QUALITY ASSURANCE DEPARTMENT l QUALITY
-r- -
" " " ' ' ~^ ~~~
ASSURANCE PROGRAM . TITLE: NUMBER: SECTION 12 REVISION: CONTROL OF MEASURING AND N/A EFFECTIVE DATE: December 31, 1974 APPROVALS ! d. d. ) V.P. QU ALITY ASSUR ANCE I va.&,A/D V.P. ENGlkEERING
/4 '] /J --%
4 / V.P. CONSTRUCTION h - - -
.. e 12-1
, SWSOAP l-74
. t SECTION 12 "
CONTROL OF MEASURING AND TEST EQUIPMENT 1.0 REQUIREMENTS 1.1 When tools, gages, instruments and measuring and testing ' equipment are used for measurements, inspections and tests performed to document compliance with specified require-ments, the calibration and use of such equipment shall be controlled. 1.2 The control' program shall include the following: 1.2.1 Positive identification of the equipment and its
' calibration status.
1.2.2 A frequency of calibration schedule for types of equipment based on recognized industry standards, manufacturers' recommendations, or usage factors. 1.2.3 Written procedures describing the calibration control system. Standards traceable to national
- standards shall be used, when appropriate.
1.2.4 A records system which will indicate the calibration dates and the identification of personnel performing the calibrations. 1.2.5 A recall system to prevent use of equipment beyond the calibration due date. 1.2.6 A system for corrective action when uncalibrated or damaged measuring and test equipment has been used. Inspection records shall include traceability identification of the specific equipment used. 2.0 . TASKS
- R2.1 EA shall establish procedures for the control and calibra-tion of measuring and test equipment used in Engineering Department activities affecting quality.
2.2 PQCD shall perform tasks at vendor facilities relative to the control of measuring and test equipment in accordance See Appendix I for reference to implementing documents. L
- l 12-2 - '
SWSQ5P l-74
,. l with the requirements of the procurement documents.
2.3 Construction (field) shall control measuring and test equipment used by construction forces at the site and forward equipment due for calibration to FQCD. 2.4 QSD shall establish calibration control systems for I measuring and test equipment used at the site. . 2.5 At the site, FOCD shall: 2.5.1 Calibrate, or have calibrated by approved calibra-tion laboratories, measuring and test equipment. l l 2.5.2 Verify that properly calibrated equipment is used. . l l 2.5.3 Ensure that measuring and test equipment 3s ! identified. i 2.5.4 Maintain calibration records.
. 0 DISCUSSION 3.1 Reference Paragraph 1.2.6
" Corrective action" as used herein requires that an j investigation be conducted and documented to determine '
the validity of previous inspections performed when uncalibrated, damaged or out of calibration measuring i and test equipment has been used. I i l O
+
Y
'.- T-120 _ ;
~
STONE & WEllSTER ENGINEElllNG COIIPORATION QUALITY ASSURANCE DEPARTMENT QUALITY --- - d b - w _ 1. i u.2 ASSURANCE 1 PROGRAM - TITLE: IN UMBER: SECTION 13 REVISION: HANDLING. STORAGE AND SHIPPING N/A EFFECTIVE DATE: December 31, 1974 APPROVALS b h. bub V.P. QU ALITY ASSUR ANCE ge4-E2D
~
V.P. ENGINEERING
, . - .I . ,19 ,
V.P. CONSTRUCTION
13-1
.- SWSQAP l-74
., y , - ..~.s SECTION 13 -
l HANDLING, STORAGE AND SHIPPING 1.0 REQUIREMENTS 1.1 The handling, storage, shipping, cleaning and preserva-tion of material and equipment snall ne controlled, to prevent damage or deterioration. The specified work shall be accomplished by qualified individuals in accordance with the preplanned work and inspection instruction. 1.2 Procurement documents shall include the following: 1.2.1 Requirements for vendors to establish any special procedures which may be necessary to prevent damage or deterioration of the supplied items. 1.2.2 Requirements for the preparation of items for shipment, as necessary,to ensure cleanliness, identification and proper handling. 1.2.3 Requirements for installation, operation and maintenance instructions, when specified, to be available at the site on a timely basis. l 1.3 A preventive maintenance program shall be established at i the site. This program shall include a schedule of i maintenance operations to be performed and documentation I of maintenance operations performed. The maintenance l program shall be based on the manufacturers' recommendations i or Project Engineering instructions. I 1.4 The preventive maintenance program shall be applied to materials and equipment in storage and work areas , and after installation up to the time of release for pre-operational testing. 2.0 TASKS
- 2.1 Project Engineering shall prepare procurement documents, provide criteria for the storage level of items at the site and resolve any problems relative to the assignment of storage levels.
2.2 PQCD shall perform required verification at vendor facili-ties relative to the handling, cleaning and preparation of
- See Appendix I for reference to implementing documents.
- O 13-2 .
SWSQAP l-74 - items for shipment as required by the procurement documents. 2.3 PQCD shall audit the maintenance program of items in long term storage at vendor facilities on an individual case basis as required by specific requests from the Client. 2.4 Construction (field) shall establish and implement a storage and preventive maintenance program of items stored at the site and at specified nearby locations, and maintain appropriate maintenance records. Construction (field) shall assign levels of storage for itemc based on criteria provided by Project Engineering. 2.5 FQCD shall ensure that the quality of items is maintained throughout storage so that no degradation or deterioration is evident. Field Quality Control Division shall: 2.5.1 Concur in the level of storage of items assigned
'by Construction (field).
2.5.2 Verify implementation of the maintenance program by Construction (field). 2.5.3 Verify that only acceptable items are released for installation (risk released items are considered acceptable within the conditions of the risk
)
release). , i 2.5.4 Document FQCD storage inspections / verifications. i
t , T-120 _ A ( STONE & WEllSTER ENGINEEl(ING CORPOllATION ' QUALITY ASSURANCE DEPARTMENT
~ ~~
QUALITY = _ ; _) i '. .": A ASSURANCE PROGRAM TITLE: N UM BER: SECTION 14 REVISION: INSPECTION, TEST AND OPERATING N/A STATUS EFFECTIVE DATE: December 31, 1974 APPROVALS h h. ). d V.P. QU AllTY ASSUR ANCE s V.P. ENGINEERING
] c'
,. . .s V.P. CONSTRUCTION
.ur+uk mwas anma - .m .ks n wra . =w m +a ,sn m,, s a.s. a s- . s- = n.,s o m, aw .a a, wa n w a e-m.m.m .wu .e x . a -s .- . + - . . -. ., m.-me-_._-,,,-__n,_
e 4 e 4 4 I r 9 l l l l t k I 1 4 i e t i I t 9
e .
.' 14_1 cWSQAP l-74
? l
,...a.J. '
SECTION 14 INSPECTION, TEST AND OPERATING STATUS 1.0 REQUIREMENTS 1.1 The status of inspections and test operations shall be identified during manufacturing, construction, installation and test. The status shall be indicated by tags, markings, shop travelers, stamps, route cards, inspection records or checklists, or other suitable means, provided that the method used ensures that only accepted items are used, installed or operated. The removal of such tags, shop l l traveler, route cards, checklists, etc., shall only be per-formed by authorized personnel. Removal by unauthorized personnel shall be prohibited. l 1.2 Nonconforming items shall be uniquely identified and controlled. 2.0 TASKS
- l 2.1 In addition to the tasks listad in Section 7, PQCD shall:
l 2.1.1 Perform tasks relative to the assurance of l inspection, test and operational status of items l at vendor facilities in accordance with procurement documents. 2.1.2 Verify during inspections, audits and surveys of Category I vendors that the vendor is properly using a system for the identification of inspection and test operations, as appropriate, or as required by the procurement documents. 2.2- In' addition to the tasks listed in Section 7, FQCD shall: 2.2.1 Identify the status of inspections and tests per-formed during construction, installation and test operations at the site. 2.2.2 Ensure that only accepted items are used, installed or operated. 2.2.3 Maintain current documentation regarding the status of inspections and tests.
- See Appendix I for reference _to implementing documents.
t 14-2 -
; SWSQAP l-74 -
3.0 . DISCUSSION (: - . h* L a - L>. a s.,..m . . 'a 4 3.1 Reference Paragraph 1.1 The bypassing'or waiver of a required inspecticn, test or critical operation shall be cause for rejection, un-less Quality Assurance has reviewed and signed off on the document that authorized the bypass or waiver; i.e., an addenda to a specification and/or an ESDCR. t 4 4-t d I l t 4 9 e
'T-120 A
STONE & WEllSTER ENGINEERING CORPORATION QUAllTY ASSURANCE DEPARTMENT
- -- i QUALITY
. 2 . . ~..
l ASSURANCE PROGRAM ! TITLE: N UM BER: SECTION 15 NONCONFORMING MATERIALS, PARTS OR COMPONENTS N/A EFFECTIVE DATE: December 31, 1974 APPROVALS k.h. $ V.P. QU ALITY ASSUR ANCE WA _ #4h V.P. ENGINEERING h A- 7
/I '
V.P. CONSTRUCTION
!d . 15-1 SWSQAP l-74
.- s - . : . .. ..,
SECTION 15 i NONCONFORMING MATERIALS, PARTS OR COMPONENTS l 1.0 REQUIREMENTS 1.1 Nonconforming items shall be controlled to prevent their inadvertent use or installation. The controls shall include measures for identification, documentation, segregation (as appropriate) , disposition and notification to affected organizations. 1.2 While physical segregation and marking are preferred, other means of identification (e.g., marking, tagging, etc.) are acceptable when physical segregation is impracticable. 1.3 Dispositions authorizing a change in requirements shall be made by the same (or equally authorized) personnel or group responsible for establishing the original require-ments. ,
?
1.4 A system shall be established for reporting significant nonconformances as defined in Paragraph 50.55(e) of 10CFR50. i 2.0= TASKS
- 2.1 EA shall establish a system for complying with Paragraph !
- 50. 55 (e) of 10CFR50 regarding the reporting of significant ;
deficiencies in design and construction. The system. shall include notification to the Client . 2.2 Project Engineering shall develop and approve dispositions _ for Nonconformance & Disposition (NSD) reports which i originate from nonconformances noted in vendor shops and submitted by PQCD, and those which originate from noncon- g formances observed at the site and submitted by FOC. g
- See Appendix I for reference to implementing documents.
b
. . ]
15-2 , 9750AP l-74 i
~
..a e
2.3 PQCD shall prepare, issue, distribute and control NSD reports which originate from nonconformances noted in ; vendor facilities and which cannot be corrected within the scope of the applicable drawings and specifications. Copies of all NSD reports including those dispositioned as
" accept-as-is" or " repair" shall be provided to the client.
2.4 Field Quality Control Division shall: 2.4.1 Prepare, issue, distribute and control N6D reports which originate from nonconformances noted at the site which cannot be corrected within the scope of the applicable drawings and specifications. 2.4.2 Review all' dispositions and close out all NGD reports when actions have been completed. 2.4.3 Provide copies of NGD reports to the client, if required. 2.5 Construction (field) shall request Engineering dispositions for nonconformances which cannot be resolved within the scope of the applicable drawings and specifications. They shall review dispositions made by Project Engineering to determine that the disposition can be implemented. D.0 DISCUSSION 3.1 Reference Paragraph 1.1 Nonconformances are analyzed by Quality Assurance on a monthly basis for each project. Copies of the quality index trend charts for each activity are made part of the monthly project report and forwarded to appropriate client and SSW management (Vice President Quality Assurance, Project Manager, Engineering Manager, Quality Manager, Project Engineer', Construction Manager). Further, a semi-annual summary review is made of all noncon-formances to ascertain significant trends or conditions and a summary report, with recommended courses of action, is forwarded to the President of the company and other appropriate top level management.
e- .
- 15-3
-r-
,- 4 SWSQAP l-74
- : .i L .. . . ' J L . . J . _ a 3.2 Reference Paragraph 1.2 Nonconforming material is rejected, identified and segregated, if practicable, until the nonconforming condition is corrected either by rework to return it to the specified condition or by a change in the specified requirement by the Engineering Department.
Both the rework and/or the change in the specified requirement is subject to Quality Assurance review or sign off as specified herein. Assurance of compliance is gained through the audit program delineated in Section 18. 3.3 Reference Paragraph 2.2 Reinspection of rework and repair activities is conducted in.accordance with the requirements of the engineering speci-fication/ procedure. The work is evaluated to the accept / reject criteria delineated in the engineering specification / procedure and is documented in inspection reports. 3.4 Reference Paragraphs 2.3 and 2.4 Each NED report identifies and describes the noncon-forniance, the disposition of the nonconformance, the appropriate inspection requirement either directly or by reference and includes signature approval of the disposition. 9 D 9 k.
. ' T-no A
STONE & WEBSTER ENGINEERING CORPORATION QUALITY ASSURANCE DEPARTMENT I QUALITY ASSURANCE PROGRAM TITLE: N UMBER: SECTION 16 REVISION: CORRECTIVE ACTION N/A EFFECTIVE DATE: December 31, 1974 APPROVALS b.bNw$ V.P. QU AllTY ASSUR ANCE h& Ad V.P. ENGINEERING U V.P. CONSTRUCTION
. 16-1
, SWSQAP l-74
, s
.... .w.... -
SECTION 16 CORRECTIVE ACTION 1.0 REQUIREMENTS 1.1 Major and recurrf.ng conditions, adverse to quality, such as failures, malfunctions, deficiencies, defective material and equipment and nonconformances shall be identified, the main causes determined, and corrective action taken to preclude repetition. These conditions include failures of the quality system. 1.2 The conditions, tneir cause and the corrective action taken shall be documented and reported to responsible management. The area of concern shall be audited in a timely manner to assure that the corrective action has been accomplished. 1.3 Measures shall be taken to keep appropriate S&W personnel informed of potential problems by a feed-back system of reports on significant and recurring problems encountered in other Ssw projects and in government and industry as determined from published literature. 2.0 TASKS
- 2.1 The Quality Assurance Department and EA shall fulfill the requirements of this Section, in general, by implementing the tasks of Sections 15 and 18 of this manual.
2.2 EA shall analyze EA audit data to determine significant conditions and trends. Reports of findings shall be prepared for management. 2.3 EA shall review published government and industry literature for problems related to quality assurance so that appli-cable potential problems are brought to the attention of appropriate personnel. 2.4 EA shall establish a feed-back system for the reporting of significant and recurring problems for preventive action. 2.5 QSD shall analyze inspection and audit data based on in-puts from FOCD and PQCD, evaluate the cause of major and recurring nonconformances and submit reports to management with recommended corrective action.
- See Appendix I for reference to implementing documents.
- 16-2 .
SWSQAP l-74 .
,3.0 DISCUSSION ,
'2"'-"--'
3.1 Reference Paragraph 1.3 corrective action is verified by the performance of corrective action audits to assure that the agreed upon corrective action has been implemented. These audits, in conjunction with the completed infraction notices / corrective action correspondence, are considered to close out the corrective action documentation. a
T-120 + A STONE & WEllSTER ENGINEERING CORPORATION QUALITY ASSURANCE DEPARTMENT QUAUTY _. ASSURANCE PROGRAM TITLE: N UMBER: SECTION 17 REVISION: QUALITY ASSURANCE RECORDS N/A EFFECTIVE DATE: December 31, 1974 APPROVALS k b bub 0 V.P. QU ALITY ASSUR ANCE l M4 '? o V.P. ENGINEERING
) .AE 4 V.P. CONSTRUCTION
e . 17-1 1
.- I
' SWSQAP l-74 I
f SECTION 17 ,
~~'
QUALITY ASSURANCE RECORDS l.0 REQUIREMENTS ' l 1.1 Measures shall be established for the collection, collation and maintenance of quality records which furnich objective evidence of the quality of items or the completion of those activities affecting quality. 1.2 Measures shall be established for the maintenance of those quality records furnished to S&W by the NSSS supplier. 1.3 Applicable specifications and procurement documents shall specify the quality records to be generated and their disposition. 1.4 Inspection and test records shall be reviewed to ensure that, as a minimum, they identify the inspector or data recorder, the type of operations, the results, the acceptability and the action taken if deficiencies were noted. These records shall be signed by the reviewer. j 1.5 Permsnent plant records shall be identified. They shall be stored in an area satisfactory to the Client in the temporary construction facility and issued cn a controlled basis to prevent loss. Records designated by the client shall be transferred to the permanent plant records area
'as directed by the Client. .
1.6 Permanent plant records, as appropriate, shall be microfilmed and cardmounted with identification to include. component and system. 1.7 Records shall be identifiable and retrievable, 2.0 TASKS
- 2.1 Construction (field) shall:
2.1.1 Establish, control and maintain the file system for the permanent plant. records at the site. 2.1.2 Transfer permanent plant records to the client.
- See Appendhc for reference to implementing documents.
L
17-2 . __,. SWSQAP l-74
..s 2.2 Project Engineering shall:
2.2.1 Specify records to be generated and their disposition.
- 2.2.2' Establish, control and maintain a file system for documents pertaining to design and engineering.
2.3 Procurement Quality Control Division shall: 2.3.1 Ensure that specified quality records are available before items are released for shipment 4 from vendor facilities, as required by procure-ment documents. 2.3.2 Release quality records required by procurement documents to FQCD (at the site). 2.3.3 Maintain a Headquarters (Boston) working file of quality related procurement documents. 2.4 Field Quality Control Division shall: 2.4.1 Implement, control and maintain a working file at the site for quality records. 2.4.2 Assemble and verify.the completeness of quality records. 2.4.3 Release quality records, as d_esignated by the Client, to Construction (field) for inclusion in the permanent plant files. 2.4.4 Release quality records, as designated by the Client, furnished by. the NSSS supplier to Construction (field) for inclusion in.the permanent plant files. 2.5 . Quality Systems Division shall develop a site working file system for quality records. 2.6 Department Services Group shall maintain a Quality Annurance Department (Headquarters) workino file for quality documents, excluding procurement activities. 3.0 DISCUSSION 3.1 Reference Paragraph 1.7 Quality Assurance records are maintained in accordance with
' the latest guidance provided in WASH 1283 Rev.1 dated May.24, 1974.
l T-120 A l STONE & WEllSTEll ENGINEEltlNG CollPollATION ' QUALITY ASSURANCE DEPARTMENT . i QUALITY , I L 's . . - . . a _* ; , 1 ASSURANCE PROGRAM N UMBER: TITLE: SECTION 18 AUDITS N/A EFFECTIVE DATE: December 31, 1974 APPROVALS 4 YmNx V.P. QU ALITY ASSUR ANCE sa. &nM . V.P. ENGINEERING
.X. A n. -
V.P. CONSTRUCTION
s . 18-1 SWSQAP l-74 SECTION 18 AUDITS - ( ,, L--J' i - '- U' 1.0 REQUIREMENTS 1.1 Audit programs shall be established to ensure that quality activities are in compliance with the requirements of this manual and'related procedures,and to determine the effec-tiveness of the quality assurance program. 1.2 The-audit programs shall provide a planned and scheduled system of audits on both Stone & Webster internal operations and vendors. The programs shall include provisions for : reporting nonconforming conditions to the responsible level l of management for any necessary corrective action. l Deficient areas shall be promptly audited to assure accom-plishment of the corrective action. 1.3 Audits shall be performed in accordance with written pre-cedures or checklists by appropriately trained personnel
.having no direct responsibility in the activity being audited.
1.4 Records shall be maintained of all audits performed. 1.5. Audit schedules shall be provided to the client if requested, f 1.6 Audit reports, of his project, shall be made available to the client for review, upon request, at the Stone & Webster office having custody of the audit report files. 1.7 -Upon request, Stone & Webster may act as the client's agent
.and perform special audits in activities in which Stone &
Webster has no direct responsibility. 2.0 TASKS
- 2.1- The Vice President, Quality Assurance shall periodically assess the implementation of the quality assurance program for- compliance with the Preliminary Safety Analysis Report, and Appendix B to 10CFR50. Copies of the audit findings and recommendations shall be submitted to the President of Stone & Webster, the Manager of Projects and the Project Manager.
- See Appendix.I for reference to implementing documents.
L.. .
2 18-2 1 74
. - s e - . _
. . . _. Sygggp 2.2 Engineering Assurance shall:
2.2.1 Establish audit schedules and provide copies to the Project Quality Assurance Coordinator for forwarding to the client. 2.2.2 Conduct audits of engineering and design activities including activities that determine site features that affect plant safety. 2.2.3 Maintain records of audits performed.
~
2.2.4 Conduct post-award audits of suppliers for procured engineering services. 2.2.5 Conduct audits of the Department Services Group of the Quality Assurance Department. 2.3 Procurement Quality Control Division shall: . 2.3.1 Establish audit schedules and provide copies to the client. 2.3.2 Conduct audits of vendors, after award of purchase orders for Category I items, to determine whether the vendors are complying with their approved quality assurance programs.
'2.3.3 Maintain records of audits performed.
2.4 Department Services Group shall: 2.4.1 Establish audit schedules and provide copies to the client. 2.4.2 Conduct audits of Stone & Webster indoctrination and training programs to qualify individuals performing inspection, examination and testing activities. 2.4.3 Conduct audits of all' Quality Assurance Department programs, including Engineering Assurance Division
- activities.
2.4.4 Maintain records of audits performed. 2.4.5 Report to the QA Department Manager on adherence to quality related procedures and systems. 2.5 QA Department personnel shall support audits on request.
18-J SWSQAP l-74 3.0 DISCUSSION ,'" Reference Paragraph 1.2 '--a- . , , , , , 3.1 3.1.1 Project audits are generally conducted on a quarterly basis and cover the scope of work being performed by the project at the time of the audit. The audit schedule starts at the time S&W is awarded the work and runs until the project is completed. Additional audits, relating to specific arean'of interest , are conducted as determined by appropriate management. 3.1.2 Engineering audit data is analyzed by the Engineer-ing Assurance Division and reported to the Engineering Manager with copies to the Quality Assurance Department. QA Department audit data l is analyzed by the Reports Section of the Quality System Division and/or the Department Services group and_ reported to the Manager and Vice President of Quality Assurance. 3.2 Reference Paragraph 2.1 This item requires that the Vice President, Quality Assurance, periodically assess the total Quality Assurance program for compliance and effectiveness. During this review the audit program is evaluated against the characteristics delineated below:
- a. work areas
- b. activities
- c. processes
- d. items (hardware)
- e. documents and records
- f. quality relates practices, procedures and instructions effectiveness of QA Program implementation g..
- h. conformance with policy objectives These characteristics are made part of the evaluation plan.
This evaluation has in the past been conducted either by an independent review group made up of personnel within the Company or has been contracted to an independent third party consultant,
- t. . .. . .
T.120 '
\
\
STONE & WEllSTEll ENGINEEll1NG COltPOllATION QUAL.lTY ASSURANCE DEPARTMENT QUALITY . ASSURANCE HIS"0R*'il PROGRAM TITLE: NUMBER: SECTION 19 REVISION: CONTROL OF THE STANDARD QA PROGRAM N/A U EFFECTIVE DATE: December' 31, 1974 APPROVALS b . m t0-V.P. QU ALITY ASSUR ANCE V.P. ENGINEERING l di 1 V.P. CONSTRU,CTION
a o 19-1 SWSQAP l-74 Q HIu(TOjglff'lyjig i SECTION 19 CONTROL OF TiiE QUALITY ASSURANCE PROGRAM DOCUMENT 1.0 REQUIREMENTS 1.1 The Standard Nuclear Quality Assurance Program and all revisions to Sections therein shall be approved, prior to issue, by the Vice President of Quality Assurance, the Vice President of Engineering, and the Vice President Construction. "ach revision along with an analysis with (1) compliance to Appendix B to 10CFR50, and respect to (2) the program effectiveness, shall be provided to the Director of Licensing at least 30 days prior to the revision's effective date. 1.2 A Project Quality Assurance Program Manual, modeled after this Standard Nuclear Quality Assurance Program, shall be approved by the Project Manager, Manager Quality Any Assurance and Chief Engineer, Engineering Assurance. degradation of the Standard Program in the conversion to the Project Manual, shall be approved by the Vice President of the affected department. Each revision along with an analysis with respect to, (1) compliance to Appendix B to 10CPR50, and (2) the program effectiveness shall be provided to the Director of Licensing at least 30 days prior to the revision's effective date. 1.3 The Vice President of Quality Assurance shall be responsible for, as a minimum, an annual (12 month interval) review of this program cnd direct upgrading as appropriate. 1.4 This Program document, including portions thereof, is controlled by the Quality Systems Division and will be issued only to those individuals named by either the Vice President or Manager of the Quality Assurance Department. 1.4.1 Program documents shall be returned to the QSD, Publication Supervisor upon requcst, or at the or time of project completion, project reassignment, termination of employment. 1.4.2 Program document holders are responsible for main-taining their assigned documents and for protecting the proprietary information they contain. 4
s . 19-2 SWSQAP l-74 ..J TASKS 2.1 The.QSD - Publication Supervisor shall: 2,1.1 Assign unique identification numbers for each document issued.
.2.1.2 Maintain a distribution list of all document holders and their locations.
2.1.3 -Maintain history files for the originals, revisions, and cancellations issued against each section of the program document.
'2.1.4 Maintain history files of any degradation in the
. conversion from the Standard Program to the Project Manual.
2.1.5. Distribute documents'and record or file receipt acknowledgments. 2.1.6 Issue an updated Table of Contents with each new Section or Revision issued. a 2.2' All Program Document Holders shall: 2.2.1 Upon receipt of their assigned program document, acknowledge receipt and completeness by signing, dating and returning the attached letter of trans-mittal. 2.2.2 Notify the Publication Supervisor of any discrepan-cies and changes of address. 2.2.3 Maintain the manual by replacing sup'erseded material with the revised material received'. 2.2.4 Destroy all superseded material, immediately. 2.2.5 Return the program document to the Publication Supervisor when it is no longer needed, requested by.the Quality Assurance Department, or upon termination. 9
r
?.
E O C B b E'E 95 I5 tocmso E'I eg 8 8 g E Me s. gs muma g NN d g B dp$ $U hgg i
*.l s
h og n,E tuAuTr AmmAm2 Mg@ 8 "Dlo bjo sp s <e N 8 n 0 5, 5$
,, > p c g
o -4 E g %pyg or5 0 5 q5 B I! i Mg Bo e U<gg 5 g RO 5 hr: A 5 fl*- a ig : E 8 E 53 85 5 5- 5 5 U 5 g E ga ME L J [J , 1,1 11 'gj 9:0 4 p5 - no n , ab n il la d2E 0a.92 Ni 'sE qE
- a. 1E HR i .
E! . lis. M3 M! is X X X X X X X X X X X X
'X X m swcm X X X X crIE.AR QUAUTY G:I:R/J 3 X X X X X X Elt0 CPM X X X X X %
X X X X X X QUAu ff MTVJIX3 E/A 5,11 1 5,10 6,10 s/A 10 N/A mU
%AK1,U.
6 6,10
- 1,2 1, 3, N/A 7 4 4 6 10 su m m ~18 SW (UARTY 18 18 18 k,5 7,8, 8,l' Air.ws or 21,22 , 10,16 18 13 wecx 7,8, 11 16,19 , 7,8, 1T,20 d,7,8, 7,8,1c , 23 MU 5 1 15 7,8, 6 8,15 10,15 17,18 10,16 mu 20 19 20 56 5 AllDGT. r
- 15,16, mU 'DIRU 20 4LALI*Y COMCL 19 27 19 mU 19 3,15,16 15,16, 5 18 1,4 4,12 4 N/A m M1AL 8 1,3, 4 1 3,4 3,4, 3,b,5 3,4,5 1,2, 3 , 3,4, ,
6,9 5,6, 18 sw r.A i 5,9 6,9 8mu 8,15 15 k,5 5 T,13 16 8 23 P.A.41AL 8,9 10,12 5,13 , 13, 16, 5 5,19, 7,8,9 1T 1,L 5,19 5 7 14 17 c x A1:r ;UAuTY 20 n.2mcs An c1 C M. MAltAL A.XE MON III X - mtAL sseTIcri mwa DilGCT CmRELATICE %
- To be replaced by CROSS REFERENCE MATRIX OF_
IMPI.EMtNTING DOCUMENTS QS's and QAD'S C3 @ 2 x wx- p.( 5
- 1.
c .. p-r-- E
II-l _ SWSQAP l-74 APPENDIX II --
-s - , q QUALIFICATION AND EXPERIENCE REQUIREMENTS - - -- -1 S&W QUALITY ASSURANCE PERSONNEL TITLE EDUCATICM* '
BACKGROUND EXPERIENCE V.P., Quality A2surance BS/BA Minimum of 10 years in resp 0n-sible assignments in heavy construction management, engineer-ing, or quality assurance. At least two years of this time should be in the nuclear field with emphasis on project / divi-sion management. Manager, Quality Assurance BS/eA Minimum of 10 years in respon-sible assignments in engineering and design, quality assurance and control, power station construction and/or operation. Chief Engineer, Engineering Assurance BS/BA Minimum of five years in respon-sible assignments in engineering, qua'lity assurance and control, inspection, and/or auditing. Chief Engineer, Quality Systems BS/BA Minimum of five years in respon-sible assignments in quality assurance and control, and/or construction of a power station. Manager, Procurement Quclit'y Control BS/BA Minimum of five years in respon-sible assignments in quality assurance and control, a,v/or shop inspection. M2 nager, Field Quality Control BS/BA Minimum of five years in respon-sible assignments in quality assurance and control, and/or construction of a power station.
II-2 SWSQAP l-74 APPENDIX II (Cont'd) u_, , _ , , . _ _ , TITLE EDUCATION BACKGROUND EXPERIENCE ChiOf Engineer, NDT Division BS/BA Minimum of five years in respon-sible assignments in nondestructive testing of materials and/or metallurgy. Project Quality Accurance Coordinator BS/BA Minimum of five years in quality assurance and related fields in-cluding manufacturing, construction, and/or installation activities. - At least two years should be associated with the nuclear field. A3010 tant Manaaer, .FQCD, Sr. Supt. of Field
- Q'uality Control and BS or luct. of FQC High School A degree plus five years experi-ence in quality assurance and related fields, including testing or inspection (or both) of man-ufacturing, construction, and installation activities. At least two years should be associ-ated with a nuclear facility.
ur High school graduate plus 10 years of experience in general quality assurance or equivalent engineer-ing, manufacturing, construction and installation activities. Five years of total experience is required in quality assurance, including testing or inspection (or both) of equivalent manufactur-ing, construction and installation activities. At least two years should be associated with a nuclear facility. g -
Eb . II-3 } l-74 o SWSQAP
. rtf 7.-
,0:' ' . .; _ .
t APPENDIX II (Cont'd) L .; d v . . .s G % TITLE EDUCATION
- BACKGROUND EXPERIEMCE ;
l Assistant Sr. BS FQC Engineer High School A degree and four years of e.yperi-ence in quality assurance, includ- ' ing testing and/or inspection of equivalent manufacturing, construc-tion and installationtactivitics. At least two years of this experi-
- ence should be associated with a nuclear facility.
OR High school graduate and eight years of experience in general qualley assurance or equivalent engineering, manufacturing, construction, and i I installation activities.. Five years of this experience is required in ; quality assurance, including testing and/or inspection of equivalent manufacturing, construction and installation activities. At least two years of this experience sliculd be associated with a nuclear facil-ity. QC Engineer BS or
. ' High School A degree and 0-2 years of experi-ence in quality assurance including
. testing and/or inspection of equivalent construction and'in-stallation activities.
OR High school graduate and 5 years of experience in testing and/or in- i spection of power and/or nuclear plants, heavy industrial, er other similar equipraent or facilities. Assistant CC BS cr Engineer High School A degree. No experience is required
. OR High school graduate and four years '
of experience in testing and/or in-spection of power and/or nuclear stations, heavy industrial, or other similar equipment or fac111-ties. - G* k.
II-4
- l. .
SWSQAP l-74
, ,3 ,- ,- , q i j f G , q .: : .e ;c
;__Da----'
APPENDIX II (Cont'd) TITLE EDUCATION
- BACKGROUND EXPERIENCE Sr. QC Inspector High School High school graduate and two years of experience in quality assurance, including testing and/or inspec-tion of equipment, construction and installation activities.
QC Inspector High School High school graduate and one year . of experience in quality assurance, including testing and/or-inspection of equipment, construction, and installation activities. QC Technician High School High school graduate, preferably with some knowledge of quality assurance concepts such as testing or inspection.
.rocistant QC Tzchnician High School High school graduate; no experience is required.
Equivalent qualifications may be substituted based on other educational accomplishments, experience in related fields and technical achievements, such as holding a license as a Professional Engineer or Certification as a Quality or Reliability Engineer by the American Society for Quality Control.
. III-l SWSQAP-1/74 APPENDIX III '
" ' ' ^ "
HISTOR CAL The primary reference or source of each definition included in this glossary is identified next to the term using the following " Base Source Acronym Key Code. AEC - United States Atomic Energy Commission; WASH-1309 Guidance on Quality Assurance Requirements Dur ing the Construction
. Phase of Nuclear Power Plants, May 10, 1974.
ANSI - American National Standard Institute N45.2.10-1973; Quality Assurance Terms & Definitions. l l ASME - The American Society of Mechanical Engineers Section III, 1971; Boiler and Pressure Vessel Code for Nuclear Power Plant Components. l Articles -
- 1. NA-1240 Appurtenances
- 2. Fig.-8220-1 (note)
- 3. NA-4700 Audits
- 4. NA-5112 Qualification of Inspectors
- 5. NA-5111 Authorized Inspection Agency
- 6. NA-4610 Calibration of Measurement and Test Equipment, General Requirements
- 7. NA-3000 Responsibilities & Duties
- 8. NA-8000 Name Plates, Stamping and Reports '
- 9. NA-4800 Corrective Action
-10. NA-3200 Owner's Responsibility
-11. NA-4500 Examinations, Test and Inspection
-12. NA-1231 Parts
-13. NB-2110 Materials, Scope & Principal Terms Employed ASQC - American Society for Quality Control; A3-1971 (Z1.7-1971)
General Terms Used in Quality Control. E0QC - European Organization for Quality Control; Glossary of Terms Used in Quality Control, Third Edition - Rotterdam - 1972. S&W - Stone & Webster Engineering Corporation. The definitions are based on current and past acceptance usage at Stone & Webster. 10CFR50 - Appendix B, Atomic Energy Commission; Ouality Assurance Criteria for Nuclear Power Plants as published June 27, 1970 in the Federal Register. L _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _
l . . III-2 SWSQAP-1/74 Accept-As-Is (S&W) A disposition requiring Engineering Department justification and approval which is applied to nonconforming material that does not meet all specified requirements but will continue to meet its in-tended use and continue to meet all functional requirements including safety. Acceptance Criteria (S&W) A limit placed on the variation permitted in the characteristics of an item expressed in definitive quantitative terms or qualitative terms by use of comparative samples. Ar. curacy _(E0QC) The degree of conformity of a measurement with a standard or true value. Action Party (S&W) The individual who is assigned responsibility by virtue of his position or capability which makes him able to take corrective or preventive action to rectify the deficiencies disclosed during an audit. Approval (ANSI) The act of endorsing or adding positive authorization or both to an action or document. Approved Procedures (S&W) A written document, signed by authorized personnel, which prescribes actions required to implement a program , specification, method or technique. Appurtenance (ASME-1) A part that is' attached to a component which has been completed and previously stamped with the required Code N-type symbol. For ASi1E III work, an appurtenance requires its own ASME Nuclear Symbol Stamp. As Built Drawing (S&W) A drawing altered or suitably appended with related Engineering & Design Coordination Requests and Nonconformance & Disposition Reports to reflect actual installed conditions.
~-- - - - - - _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ . _ _
III-3 SWSQAP-1/74 aq ASME Nuclear Symbol _ (ASME-2) N= _The ASME Code Symbol Stamp granted by the AmericaMWc'th df Mechanical Engineers, pursuant to the requirements of ASME Section III, for application to Code certified nuclear pressure vessels, i components, appurtenances, subassemblies and assemblies. ASME Section III_(S&W) American Society of Mechanical Engineers, Boiler and Pressure Vessel Code, Section III, Nuclear Power Plant Components, Division I, Metal Components. l Assembly (ANSI) A combination of subassemblies or components, or both, assembled to form a unit. L L Attribute (E00C) A quality characteristic which may be qualitatively evaluated in terms j of a yes or no decision. Audit (ASME-3) An investigative activity to determine the adequacy of, and adherence to, established procedures and -instructions, and the effectiveness of implementation. Audit, Corrective Action (S&W) A follow-up audit to verify that corrective action on discrepancies disclosed by prior audits has been taken and implemented. Audit, Division (S&W) See Division Performance Evaluation. Audit, External (S&W) Audit of those portions of an organization's quality assurance pro-gram not retained under its direct control and not within its organizational structure. Audit Guideline (S&W) An Engineering Assurance Division document which instructs the Auditor how to perform an audit.
~ -- _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _
III-4 SWSQAP-1/74 Audit, Internal (5&W) , Audit of those portions of an organization's quality assurance pro-gram retained under its direct control and within its organizational structure. Audit Plan (S&W) A list of attributes. for a particular audit developed from applicable procedures, instructions, codes or regulations. Audit, Project (S&W) A major audit covering work performed by a particular Project Group, and by other groups in support of that Project.
~ Audit Report (ASME-3)
An indepth report which states the purpose of the audit, the auditors and personnel contacted, the' findings listing details of deficiencies in systems or procedures requiring corrective action, recommendations for corrective or preventive action, names of action parties responsi-ble for corrective or preventive action, and date by which action replies are expected. Audit, Special _ (S&W) An audit of a particular management or engineering function involving one or more Divisions and Projects. 3 Audit, Vendor / Contractor _(S&W) An audit of a vendor / seller or contractor providing material or services to Stone & Webster. Authorized Code Inspector (ASME-4) h I A qualified inspector employed by a state or municipality of the United States,_a Canadian Province, or an inspector regularly employed by an insurance company having jurisdiction at the place { of manufacture or installation. Authorized Inspection Agency (ASME-5) The agency designated as such by the appropriate legal authority of , a state or municipality of the United States or Province of Canada. ( For Stone & Webster Engineering Corporation, this agency is The l Hartford Steam Boiler Inspection and Insurance Company, Hartford, Connecticut, 06102. a _
III-5 SWSQAP-1/74 Calibration (ASME-6). Comparisonlof'a measuring or test device with a standard of sufficient accuracy to determine'whether the device is within specified limits-of accuracy over a required range of values and, if not, repairing
'and/or adjusting the device to conform to. requirements.
. Category-I-(S&W)
Plant systems, or-portions of systems, structures, and equipment
~
whose failure or malfunction could cause a release of radioactivity that.would endanger public safety. This' category also includes equipment which is vital to a safe shutdown of the plant and the removal of decay and sensible heat, or equipment which is necessary
.to miti. gate consequences to the public of a postulated accident.
Category II-(S&W) Plant ' systems, portions of systems, structures, and equipment essential.for the reliable generation of electric power but which are not essential for a safe shutdown. Failure of this equipment could result in loss of power generation but would not endanger public safety. Equipment and. systems which contain radioactive materials ~but whose failure could not release quantities sufficient to prejudice public safety are included:in-this category. NOTE: 'The term " essential for the reliable generation of ! electric power" should be interpreted to mean l- structures, systems, and components whose failure . would result in the halt of electric power genera- L l tion in approximately eightl hours or less . Category"III~(S&W) Plant systems, portions of the systems, structures and equipment which are not essential for the reliable generation of electric l power and which.do not contain radioactive material or whose failure j
.could not result in the release of radioactive material.
-NOTE:- The term "not essential for the reliable genera-tion of electric power" should be interpreted to mean structures, systems and components whose
! failure would not result in the halt of electric power generation in approximately eight hours or less. ,
Certificate of Authorization (ASME-7) . A. signed official certificate, issued by ASME to a qualified applicant upon completion of a successful' survey, which defines the i scope and: authorizes the use of the proper ASME Code symbol stamp in accordance'with the applicable rules of ASME Section III. - t u . -.- .
III-6 SWSQAP-1/74
~
Certificate of Compliance (ANSI) HlSTORICA!. . A written statement, signed by a qualified party, attesting that the items or services are in accordance with specified requirements and accompanied by additional i nformation to substantiate the statement. This may also be known as a Certificate of Objective Quality Evidence. Certificate of Conformance (ANSI) A written statement, signed by a qualified party, attesting that the items or services are in accordance with specified requirements and accompanied by additional information to substantiate the statement. Certifications (ANSI) The action of determining, verifying, and attesting in writing to
- the qualification of personnel, materici and documentation.
CFR (S&W) Code of Federal Regulations Characteristic (ANSI) Any property or attribute of an item, process or service that is distinct, describable, and measurable, as conforming or nonconforming to specified requirements. Quality characteristics are generally identified in specifications and drawings which describe the item, process or scryice. . Checks (ANSI) The tests, measurements, verifications or controls made on an activity by means of investigations, comparisons or examinations, to determine satisfactory condition, accuracy, safety or performance. Client (S&W) The owner, person, group, company or corporation who has, or will have title to .the Power Plant under construction or constructed with Stone & Webster under contract as Architect / Engineer. Code (S&W) A set of specific requirements, published under the cognizance of a recognized Technical Society or Trade Association, invoked to the degree stated in applicable Engineering Documents. m_____..___ _ _ _ _ _ _ _
III-7 SWSQAP-1/74
". Code N-Symbol Stamp _(ASME-8)
The official ASME stamp which is applied to pressure vessels, components, parts and appurtenances that are certified to Section III of the ASME Boiler and Pressure Vessel Code. Company (S&W) Refers-to Stone & Webster Engineering Corporation Component (S&W) Any individually manufactured or fabricated For unit ASMEorIII piece of a work, a system com-which is identifiable and installable. or core support ponent is any vessel, piping system, pump, valve structure that requires a Code N-Symbol Stamp. Construction-Site _(S&W) Designates responsibility for actions required of the Stone & Webster Engineering Corporation construction forces at the jobsite under the direction of the Senior Construction Site Representative. Construction Drawing (S&W) An approved engineering design drawing used for the installation, erection or fabrication of oarts, appurtenances, components, structures or plant. . Design Engineering (ASME-10) These engineering functions required to fulfill the responsibilities of the Owner or Owner's Agent as defined in ASME Section III, NA3210 through NA?270. Design Review (S&W) A formal management review of a design with respect to technical adequacy, quality and cost prior to release for production. Deviation - ( ANSI) A nonconformance or departure of a characteristic from specified i requirements; considered to be synonymous with defective or un-satisfactory material. . Disposition (ASME-11) The decision determining how to resolve a nonconformance. ! I e -
- e. . -.
.III-8 SWSQAP-1/74
~
Division Guideline _-(S&W) ~ In the S&W-Engineering Department, a document issued by a Division Chief which establishes administrative or technical methods and controls within a Division.
~
- Division Performance Evaluation-(S&W)
An evaluation of' a particular Quality Assurance Department Division, Group', or Section to determine if management policies have been effectively implemen'.ed. Documentation _1(ANSI)
'Any written or graphic information describing,' defining, specifying, or
-reporting or~ certifying activities, requirements, procedures results.
Engineering Assurance Division _(S&W) A Division:ofLthe~ Engineering Department which is responsible for establishing a system of management' control within_the Engineering
-Department,
'in their content and auditing to assure compliance.
, Construction Hold Point (S&W)
. A preplanned' point assigned by the Company Construction Department
-to verify'that the construction activities have been accomplished -
in accordance with applicable requirements. Construction Phase (AEC) Those activities associated'with f abrication and.manuf acturing From in a Quality addition to site related ~ construction activitics.the construction phase commences
' Assurance viewpoint, first
. Work Authorization (LWA),..if grantediand continues on from erection -of safety related structures, systems and components to fuel-loading.
Controlled Copy _(S&W) A copy of Jatprocedure or a manual that is systematically upd
- Controlled-Documentation _(S&W)
A document whose distribution, updating and use is to be regulated. 1
III-9 SWSQAP-1/74
, Corrective Action (ASME-9) ~
Action taken to determine the cause and correct deficiencies or nonconformances adverse to quality (see preventive action).
~
Defective Material _ (S&W) Material which has one or more characteristics that do not comply with specified requirements; also termed to be unsatisfactory material. Design [used as a verb] (S&W) Technical and management process, which lead to and include the issuance of documents such as drawings, specifications and other documents, specifying technical requirements of structures, systems and components. Engineering Guidelines (S&W) A set of uniform criteria and engineering principles established by the Engineering Department to provide technical guidance. . Engi nee ri ng Standards _(S&W) A set of uniform criteria and engineering principles established by Stone & Webster's Engineering Department to provide technical direction. Equipment (S&W) Items or apparatus used as part or in connection with an installation. l Erection (S&W) The process of constructing systems and structures in the field using manuf actured or fabricated materials, components, assemblies and subsystems. ! Examination (ANSI) ' An element of inspectior, consisting of investigation of materials, ; components, supplies or services to determine conformance to those specified requirements which can be determined by such investigation. Examination is usually nondestructivt and includes simple physical manipulation, gaging and measurements. I Fabrication (S&W) I The process of producing completed components, assemblies or subsystems using material and/or other components. I
III-10 SWSQAP-1/74 Isometric _(S&W) Fabrication / Erection Control i / i . An isometric drawing used at the construction site therforwith fabricat on erection of piping and/or fabrication of' components, toge ih serves as a traveler for a controlled manuf acturing sys the Fiold Quality Centrol Div'ision (S&W) Used to designate responsibility for actions the required jobsite, of the Stone & Webster Field Quality Control Forces at Hold Point (S&W) hich e A pre-established inspection pointNoncompliance in the d/or production pr Department, Construction Department, Engineering Department an the Authorized Inspector prior to fur;her processing. t by vendors / sellers, construction or contractors insult failing to s op at a hold point will be cause for rejection and may further re kl in a stop work order; also termed Inspection Hold Point. Inspection (ANSI) tion A phase of quality control which by means of examination, t uctures F obs or measurement components, parts, appurtenances, systems, processes or s r I1 to predetermined quality requirements. . (S&W) Inspection Notification Point i . A preplanned point, reached during the manufacturing lity Control and/or test ng L F hase phase at which time the Stone & Webster Procurement Q order / contract. Inspector (S&W) lated A qualified inspector, employed by Stone & Webste activities or installations or both. Item _(S&W)
~
including structure, system, subsystem, . Any level of unit assembly, or material. subassembly, component, part f Joint Identification Numbe_r (S&W) A unique number assigned to a specific welded or bolted joint. I
III-11 SWSQAP-1/74 Manufacturer _(S&W) One who constructs any class of component, part or appurtenance to meet prescribed design _ requirements. Material (ANSI) A tubstance or combination of substances formir.g components, parts, pieces, and equipment items. (Intended to include such as machinery, castings, liquids, formed steel shapes, aggregates and cement. . Material _(ASME-13) Any item which is manufactured to SA, SFA, SB, SFB specifications or any other material specification permitted by ASME Section III. Materials Certification (S&W) Certification by the materials manuf acturer or others by test and inspection that all specified requirements have been compiied with (also see Certificate of Compliance). Measuring and Test Equipment [M&TE] (S&W) Tools,-gages, instruments and other measuring and testing devices used for acceptance inspection and/or testing. Modification (S&W)
- A planned and documented change in plant design or operation and accomplished in accordance with the requirements and limitation of applicable codes, standards, specifications, licenses and pre-determined safety restrictions.
Monitor (S&W) To watch, keep track of, observe, regulate or control any activity. Nonconformance'(S&W) Any item conditions or materials which deviate from drawings, specifications or engineering requirements and cannot be corrected within.the scope of such requirements. Nonconformance and Disposition [N&D] (S&W) _A report requesting an Engineering Department disposition of a nonconforming condition. Nondestructive Test Division [NDTD] (S&W) A division of the Quality Assurance Department responsible for defining and implementing a system, which provides technical and
III-12 SWSQAP-1/74 administrative direction for all company activities concerned with using nondestructive testing to verify compliance to engineering . requirements. .; NSSS_(S&W) Nuclear Steam Supply System Objective Evidence (ANSI) Any statement of fact, information _ or record either quantitative 4 or qualitative, pertaining to the quality of an item or servicebased on o . Owner (ANSI) The person, group, company or corporation who will have, or has ! title to the .f acility or installation under construction. $ Part (ASME-12) g An item which has work performed on it and which is attached to and For' becomes part of a component before completion of the component. ASME Section III work, a part require, its own Code symbol stamp when manufactured by others or under a different ASME Certificate of Authorization. n Permanent Plant Files (S&W)
'A file comprised of documentation required by Code Statute Regulations, etc., as specified by the Client for plant, design, construction, testing and operation records.
l Piping-System (S&W) A configuration of materials and components which, when installed, provides a flow path for a fluid. Plant (ANSI) The~ equipment, piping, structures, buildings and property that
. comprise an-installation or f acility.
. Post' Audit Conference (S&W)
A optional meeting between the auditing and audited organizations and to to review the audit findings, clarify any misunderstandings assign personnel responsible for corrective or preventive action. l'
III-13 SWSQAP-1/74 Power / Process Piping System (S&W) Piping systems which are necessary,or are required,for the generation of electric power and which require formal control, inspection, testing and documentation. Pre- Audit Conference (S&W) A optional meeting held between the auditing and audited organizations prior to the conduct of the audit to outline the scope of the Audit, personnel .to be contacted, and establish the lines of communication during the . audit. Precision-(E0QC) The degree of resolution and repeatability of measurements made under prescribed like conditions, Pressure Boundary (S&W) Any surface which is subjected to differential fluid or gaseous pressure. Pressure Retaining Parts (S&W) Those parts making up a piping system either directly retaining pressure or welded to the pressure-boundary so that the weld affects the metallurgy of the pressure retaining part. , Preventive Action (ASME-9) Action taken to preclude recurrence of deficiencies or nonconformances. Procedure (ANSI) A document that specifies or describes how an activity is to be per-formed. It may include methods to be employed, equipment or materials
-to be used and sequence of operations.
Procedure Qualification (S&W) Testing a process as outlined in a procedure to assure that the prescribed results will be accomplished. Procurement Documents (S&W) . Contractually binding documents that identify and define the require-ments which items or services must meet in order to be include considered acceptable by the purchaser. Procurement documents or proposals contracts, and letters of intent, work orders, purchase orders their acceptance which authorize the seller to perform services or supply equipment, material or facilities on behalf of the purchaser.
% ~ __
III-14 SWSQAP-1/74 Program (S&W) A planaor procedure instituted to provide materials or services in ' accordance with specified procurement, design and regulatory requirements. Project (S&W). A planned series of design, engineering and construction activities necessary to provide, utilize and maintain a facility or portion thereof. Project General Instructions (S&W) Administrative and Technical instructions for personnel assigned to a specific Project; prepared by S&W Engineering Department personnel. Project Quality Assurance Coordinator (S&W) An individual who reports to the Manager, Quality Assurance Department and has direct responsibilities for coordinating quality related activities between Quality Assurance, Engineering, Construction and Client personnel. Purchaser (ANSI) The organization or organizations responsible for issuance and administration of a contract, subcontract or purchase order. Procurement Quality Control Division [PQC] (S&W) A divisionuof the Quality Assurance Department responsible for seller control activities for procured items as required by the specification. Qualification (Personnel) (S&W) The chsracteristic or abilities gained through training or experiance or both that enable an individual to perform a required function. This capability, when required, shall be indicated by comparison to an established or defined standard of perfccmance. Qualified Party (ANSI) A person or organization competent and recognized as knowledgeable to perform certain functions. ,
.;. .w ,
- III-15 SWSQAP-1/74 Qualified Procedure (ANSI)
A procedure which incorporates all applicable codes and standards, manufacturer's parameters, and engineering specifications and has been proven adequate for its intended purpose. I ! . Quality (ASQC) i i The totality of features and characteristics of a product or service
-that bear on its ability to satisfy a given need.
Quality Assurance-(Appendix B to 10CFR50) All those planned and systematic quality assurance actions required to provide _ adequate confidence that a structure, system or component will perform satisfactorily in service. Quality Assurance includes Quality. Control.
' Quality Assurance Department [QAD] (S&W)
Within'the' Stone & Webster Engineering Corporation, the department responsible for effective implementation of quality assurance functions. Quality Assura'nce Records (ANSI) Those records which furnish documentary evidence of the quality of , items and of activities affecting quality. Quality Assurance Site File.(S&W) .
.A-file. maintained by FQC containing all working and record documents
. required to implement the QC Program and to properly document the performance of QC activities.
Quality Systems Division (S&W) A division of the Quality Assurance Department responsible for the establishinent and control of standardized quality systems. Quality Control-(Appendix B to 10CFR50)
-Those quality assurance actions related to the physical characteristics of'a material, structure, _ component or a system which provides a means'to control the quality of the material structure, component or
-system'to predetermined requirements.
Random-(S&W) The selection, on an unbiased basis, giving each item in a collection
.of' units of-similar items an equal chance'of being selected.
III-16 SWSQAP-1/74
-Receiving (ANSI)
Taking delivery of an item at a designated location. , Rsquiatory (S&W) Any of-the several controlling organizations --- Federal, industry, state or local, which impose specific requirements on the design or construction of a nuclear power plant. Reliability [ general definition] (ASQC) Ability of an item to perform a required function under stated conditions for a stated period of time. Repair (ANSI) The process of restoring a nonconforming characteristic to an approved acceptable condition, even though that item still may not conform to the original requirement. (A class of nonconformance disposition ). Rework (ANSI) The process tdr which a nonconforming item is made to conform t'o a prior specified requirement by. completion, remachining, reassembly _ conditions or'other corrective means. (A class of nonconformance disposition). Sampling Inspection (S&W) An inspection technique in which random samples from a collection of units of similar items are selected in accordance with an approved l sampling plan to determine the acceptability of the lot. Scrap (S&W) A _ disposition- imposed on a nonconforming item when it is established i that the discrepancy renders the item unfit for its intended use and it is uneconomical or impossible to correct. l _ Seller (S&W) An individual or organization which is under contract for furnishing materials, equipment,-items, work, services and/or installation; and may refer to contractors, subcontractors and subtier levels, where appropriate. Source Inspection _(S&W) An inspection activity performed at the manufacturing location on material or components.
< a .
III-17
- SWSQAP-1/74 Source Surveillance (S&W)
A review, observation or inspection for the purpose of verifying that an action has been accomplished, as specified,at the location of material procurement or manufacture. , . - Special Process (S&W) An operation performed under controlled conditions in accordance with specified requirements utilizing qualified procedures, equip-ment and personnel. Special processes may include, but are not limited to; welding, brazing, soldering, cleaning, heat treating and NDT. Specification (S&W) Engineering document specifying essential and technical requirements for materials, items or services and indicating, when appropriate, the procedure by which it will be determined that the requirements have been met. Standard (Reference Document)_(S&W) A recognized reference document which establishes a set of rules, goals or objectives published by a recognized agency such as ANSI, ASTM, ASME, ASQC, and IEEE. Standard-[ Calibration] (S&W) Calibrated measuring or test equipnent whose calibrationoris recognized traceable to the National Bureau of Standards, physical constant industrial standard and used for the calibration of Measuring & Test Equipment. Storage.(S&W)
.The act of placing or leaving items in a suitable location for preservation or later use or disposal. .
Subassembly (S&W) A-section of an assembly consisting of materials or components and which may be fabricated in a shop or in the field. Subsystem (ANSI) A group of assemblies or components or both, combined to perform a single function. W______.__________.__.__________________m._..___.
III-18 SWSQAP-1/74 Supports (S&W) Includes all hangers, restraints, guides, and anchors used.to support ~ or contain a piping system. Surveillance (S&W) Tho system of continuing analysis and evaluation of records, methods and procedures to assure conformance with technical requirements.
' Also, a records audit and physical check -that a Vendor's in-process ' inspections and tests are being performed in accordance with his approved Quality Control Program.
Survey _(S&W) A review of the capability of a bidder or potential bidder, contractor, , or subcontractor which is conducted to establish his qualification and appraise his Quality Control Program. System (ANSI) A group of subsystems united by some interaction or interdependence, performing many. duties but functioning as a single unit. Test (ANSI) The determination or verification of the capability of an item to
-meet specified requirements by subjecting the item to a set of physical, chemical, environmental or operating conditions.
Unsat (ANSI) A deficiency in characteristic, documentation, or procedure which renders the- quality of an item unacceptable or indeterminate. Examples of unsats include: physical defects, test f ailures, incorrect or inadequate documentation, or deviation from prescribed processing, inspection or test procedures. Vendor (S&W) An individual or organization which is under and/or contract for furnishing installations; materials, equipment, items, work, services and.may refer to contractors, subcontractors and-subtier levels, where appropriate. Verification (S&W) An act of confirming, substantiating and assuring that an activity, or condition,has been implemented in conformance with the specified
-requirements. Verifying evidence may be in the form of documentation or confirmed by witnessing or performing a function.
- - , _ - - - - - - - - _ - _ - - _ _ _ _ _ - - - - _ - - _ - - - - . _ - _ _ _ _ _ Y
< o .
III-19 ! SWSQAP-1/74 l Verify (S&W) 1 The act of proving that a function or requirement has been met by examining objective evidence. This evidence can be in the form of documentation or confirmed by witnessing or performing a function. Witness (S&W) The act of observing and giving an account of inspections and/or tests performed by others. f
,t R '
A ...slX IV , ENGINEERING AND DESIGN REVIEW , PROFESSIONAL SOCIETIES (ASME, ANS, ETC.) - REGULATORY REOUIREMENTS s
@Jp('g?7tavouTS (AEC, EPA, ETC.) -
OPERATING EXPERIENCE - ~ FEEDBACK - SYSTEM CONCEPTUAL , , D E,S I G,N, , _ (REVIEW) DESCRIPTIONS CONCEPTUAL ! CONSTRUCTION EXPERIENCE - ENGINEERING CRITERIA PROJECT 7 ARRANGEMENTS + DESIGN FEEDBACK - ~ ~
@ FLO W DIAGR AMS l INTERNt.L EXPERIENCE
(PROJECTS) - @ U MASTER PROJECT INTERNAL EXPERIENCE
- SPECIFICATION ENCINEERING SPECIFICATION (DESIGN) -
{
; INTERNAL EXPERIENCE Q M "
MEETING EW (SPECIALISTS) M NOTE: THIS REVIEW ENCOMPASSES ALL PLOT PLANS AND ARRANGEMENTS FOR ADEQUACY hjf OF DESIGN AND COMPATtBluTY WITH ExtSTING S&W EXPEnlENCE. (REVIEW) (REVIEW) CONCEPTUAL . PROJECT : ENGINEERING i ENGINEER CONSTRUCTION DRAWINGS DETAILED ENGINEERING SKETCHES DESIGN (REVIEW) CLIENT = ENGINEERING - - - - - - - COMPUTERIZED & MANUAL CALCULATIONS OUWT AND PRCDUCTION MANUFACTURERS' DRAWINGS i DESIGN SPECIFICATIONS ~ 1 SUPPLIER DRAWINGS. .....
-Q i
mm- k Mf @ ENGINEERING CHANGES l _ PROJECT -
@ ~i ~' @ NONCONFORMITY & ~ ' CL .HT ENGiHEER ..
g]-.
@ DISPOSITION REPORTS ;
LEGEND: ASSURANCE ACTIVITIES j
- _g ggN A
- li43 a.lf.yl3ijj.cp Q_,e,r - _;
j @ - ENGINEERING ASSURANCE AUDITS 7w (2) - Q. A. REVIEW & SIGN- OFF
- @ - Q. A. AUDIT 4
l l
LEGEND ENG'R ASSUR ANCE AUDIT
@ Q. A. REVIEW 6. SIGN-OFF MASTER h O.A. AUDIT h Q.A. INSPECTION If REVIEW OF q y PROJECT PROJECT SPECIFICATION h
QA INPUT - gg S6W APPROVED PROJECT SPECIFICATION AND LIST OF-RECOMMENDED BIDDERS PURCH ASING INPUT APPROVAL OF If
$ BIDS FROM PECIFICATION CLIENT RECOMMENDED PROJECT RECOM PROJECT BlD REVIEW I
SUPPLIER BY NDED< COMPARISON ENGINEER RECOMM EN DED , PURCHASING PROJECT 1 BIDDERS DEPARTM ENT vD@ b .
- CLIENT CLIENT PROJECT i
APPROVAL > ENGI N EER REVIEW O I O AUTHORIZED PURCHASE REQUISITION .
+
PURCHASING
$$7 PURCHASE b b d
**" ORDER
@7 4 SUPPLIER'S DR AWINGS
" DETAILED ENGR'G.
i SUPPLIER'S PROCESS
" AND PRODUCTION PROCEDURES '
' APPROVED SUPPLIER bb y @@
EC > ASUPPLIER'S TEST PROCEDURES CONSTRUCTION AMATERIALS AND/OR SERVICES A \ t
- a. a * .
VI-1 SWSQAP l-74 I i l APPROVALS AND CONCURRENCES FOR QUALITY ASSURANCE SYSTEM DOCUMENTATION Program Documents Approval Concurrence
- 1. Standard S&W Nuclear President (Sections -------------
Quality Assurance approved by_Vice Program. Presidents of affected Departments
- 2. Project GA Program QA Manager -------------
Ch Eng, Engrg Assurance Project Manager
- 3. ASME Section III President ----.--------
Manual VP, Quality Assurance
--VP, Engineering Sr. VP, SR Const Mgr General Purchasing Agent HQA Manager
, Procedural Documents Approval Concurrence
- 1. Quality Standards Vice President of Vice President affected Depart- of affected ments Departments NDT Procedures Ch Engr NDT Division QA Manager
- 2. Ch Materials Engr.
Original and Ch Engr, Quality Sys-Revision tems Division (when a priate)ppro-QA manager (ini- ! tial) '
. Procurement Quality Manager, PQC Division QA Manager 3.
Control Ch Engr, Quality Systems Division
-4. Quality Assurance Directives I
Original & Revision QA Manager Ch of Cognizant Div. l i m._
4 m VI-2 SWSQAP l-74 2 Procedural Documents QA Manager Ch of Cognizant Change Div. QA Manager ---------------- Cancellation
- 5. NDT Instructions Original & Revision Ch Engr, NDT Div. QA Manager Ch Engr, QSD (initial)
Ch Engr, NDT Div. QA Manager Change Ch Engr, QSD (initial) Cancellation Ch Engr, NDT Div. ----------------
-Quality Control Supt. of FQC Manager, FQC Div.
- 6. or Instructions or District Chief PQC Manager Engineering Assurance Senior Engineering Engineering Mgr
- 7. Manager and Asst.
Procedures Engineering Mgr. Senior Engineering ---------------- Change Manager l l l f I
.)
C k < VII-l l . 4- SWSQAP l-74 a .. ., . RESPONSE TO REGUI ATORY GUIDANCE Dstails of Stone S Webster responses to U.S.A.E.C. Regulatory and all Guides, pro-1 Gray Book (Wash 1283, Rev.1) , Green' Book (Wash 1309) visions of regulatory Guide 1.70.6 are as.follows:
- 1. Regulatory Guide Regulatory Guide No. 1.28, dated June 7,1972 (N 45.2 - 1971)
A. 1
" Quality Assurance Program Requirements" - complies n
- B. Regulatory Guide No. 1.30, dated August 11, 1972 (N 45.2.4 -
1972) " Quality Assurance Requirements for the Installation, Inspection and Testing of Instrumentation and Electric Equipment" - complies. C. Stone & Webster's QA program requirements comply with(RG the 1.37, quality assurance provisions of the following guides
- 1. 3 8, .1. 3 9, and 1. 54) . S&W's response to the technical (engineering, design and construction) provisions to the following guides (RG 1.37,-1.38, 1.39, and 1.54) is given in Appendix ~3A of SWESSAR or the comparable section of a utility -
applicant's SAR..
" Quality e Regulatory Guide No. 1.37, dated March 16, 1973
- Assurance Requirements for Cleaning of Fluid Systems and f
l Associated Components of Water-Cooled Nuclear Power Plants". e Regulatory Guide No. 1.38 dated March 16, 1973 " Quality ' Ascurance Requirements for Packaging, Shipping, Receiving, Storage, and Handling of Items for Water-Cooled Nuclear Power Plants".. ! e Regulatory Guide No. 1.39, dated March 16, 1973 " House keeping Requirements for Water-Cooled Nuclear Power Plants". o Regulatory Guide No. 1.54, dated June 1973 (N 101. 4 - 197 2)
" Quality Assurance Requirements for Protective Coatings Applied to Water-cooled Nuclear Power Plants".
D. Regulatorh Guide No. 1.58, dated August 1973, " Qualification of Nuclear Power Plant Inspection, Examination and Testing Personnel - complies E. Regulatory Guide 1.64, dated October 1973, " Quality Assurance Requirements for the Design of Nuclear Power. Plants" -
~
complies
.F. Guide No. 1.7 0.6, dated July 1974, " Addition Information (replaces Quality Assurance During Design and Construction" Guide No. 1.70.xx) - complies
' m, -e VII-2 SWSQAP- 1-73 6~. . . _ . , . - ,
4 G._-Regulatory Guide 1.74, (ANSI N45.2.10-1973) dated February . s1974, " Quality Assurance-Terms and Definitions". Appendix III " Glossary" has been submitted as an acceptable alternative. H.- Regulatory Guide 1.88, dated August 1974, (ANSI N45.2.9 -1974)
" Collection, Storage, and Maintenance of Nuclear Power Plant Quality Assurance-Records" - complies
- 2. Additional duidance A. N45.2.5, Draft 3, Revision 1, January 1974, " Supplementary Quality Assurance Requirements for Installation, Inspection and Testing of Structural Concrete and Structural Steel During the Construction Phase of Nuclear Power Plants".
Stone & Webster Engineering Corporation will comply with the requirements of1 ANSI N45.2.5, Draf t 3, Revision 1, January 1974. Implementing procedures and specifications will achieve compliance effective January 1, 1975. B.- _N45.2.8, Draft 3, Revision 2, September 1973,
'" Supplementary Quality Assurance Requirements for Installation, Inspection, and-Testing of. Mechanical Equipment and Systems for the Construction Phase of Nuclear Power Plants".
Stone 5 Webster Engineering Corporation will' comply with the requirements of ASSI N45.2.8, Draft 3, Revision 2, September 1973. Implementing procedures and specifications-will achieve compliance effective June 1,
-1975.
C. N45.2.12, Draft 4, Revision 1, November 1, 1974,
" Requirements for Auditing of Quality Assurance
. Programs for Nuclear Power Plants" - complies h
J
ATTACHMENT *2 4 49,[b9?., . UNITED STATES
. g f$/ 'ji4 ATOMIC ENERGY COMMISSION [i r g S r=o ' n . p I
',( , ;,* l $ $'c
*\
l WASH NGTO'N, D.C. 20515 i - i N L 6 ..! 3; dk.. .; R f, . '.. ris#t DEC 311974 Mr. E. T. Trainor, Manager Quality Assurance Stone & Webster Engineering Corporation P. O. Box 2325 Boston, Massachusetts 02107
Dear Mr. Trainor:
We have reviewed and evaluated the Stone & Webster Topical Report SWSQAP 1-74, " Standard Nuclear Quality Assurance Program." We find that it describes an acceptable qualitj Assurance Program for the design, procurement, and construction cctivities which are within the Stone & Webster scope of work for nuclear power plants. For the Stone & Webster Quality Assurance Program, applicants need only reference this Topical Report in Section 17 of license applications. We do not intend to repeat our review of this Topical Repert : hen it is refert.: ecd in 'an application. Should regulatory criteria or regulations change such that cur conclusions about this Topical Report are invalidated, we vill no tify you. You will be given the opportunity to revise and resubmit it should you so desire.
~
Please include a copy of this letter and our evaluation in each of the reports and resubmit 90 copies to the AEC. Siricerely, a % B2 m Richard H. Volliner, Chief Quality Assurance Branch Directorate of Licensing
Enclosure:
AEC Topical Report Evaluation of SWSQAP 1-74 9
$ > O
]
DEC 311974
~
TOPICAL REPORT EVALUATION ((',
. L t. J a - 22mL..,
4 __ Report Number: SWSQAP l-74, Nonproprietary , Report
Title:
Standard Nuclear Quality Assurance Program Report Date: December 1974 Originating Organization: Stone & Webster Engineering Corporation Reviewed By: Quality Lasurance Branch ,
SUMMARY
OF TOPICAL REPORT Topical Report SWSQAP 1-74 describes the Quality Assurance (QA) Program which the Stone & Webster Engineering Corporation (S&W) applies to those design, procurement, and constructica activities involving safety related structures, systems, and components of nuclcar power plants within the S&W s-ope of work. SWSQAP l-74 commits S&W to comply with the require-ments of Appendix B to 10 CFR Part 50 and to follow the QA guidance provided by the AEC in:
- 1. " Guidance on Quality Assurance Requirements During Design and Procurement Phase of Nuclear Power Plants," WASH 1283, Rev. 1, May 24,1974, and
- 2. " Guidance on Quality Assurance Requirements During the Construction Phase of Nuclear Power Plants," WASH 1309, May 10,1974.
S&W has provided for our evaluation a detailed organizational description of those individuals and groups involved in carrying out activities required by the QA Program and a delineation of duties, responsibilities, and authority of those organizational elements involved in the QA Program. SWSQAP l-74 contains a description of ehe measures used to carry out the S&W QA Program activities and describes how applicable requirements of Appendix B will be satisfied by the administration and implementation of these measurec.
SUMMARY
OF REGULATORY EVALUATION We have evaluated the QA Program and the organizations responsible for QA functions as described in SWSQAP l-74. We find that QA policy and direction originate at an acceptably high management level and are ef fectively communicated to other parts of the organization. Those performing QA functions have responsibility' and authority commensurate with their duties in implementing the QA Program. We also find that measures have been establf shed, to be implemented by writter. procedurec and instructions, which address each of the criteria of Appendix B and demonstrate conformance with each criterion.
#9 q
~
Based on our review and evaluation of SWSQAP l-74, we conclude that: +
- 1. The organizations and persons performing QA functions within S&W '
have the required independence and authority to effectively carry out the QA Program without reservation or undue influence from those directly responsible for costs and schedules, and
- 2. The S&W QA Progrr.m contains the necessary requirements, procedures, and controls to demonstrate that quality related activities will be conducted in accordance with the requirements of Appendix B to 10 CFR Part 50.
REGULATORY POSITION It is the staff's position that the S&W Topical Report SWSQAP l-74,
" Standard Nuclear Quality Assurance. Program," is acceptable for use in the design, procurement, and construction of nuclear power plants. The Topical Report can be referenced by report number in Section 17 of future Safety Analysis Reports.
O W . e 1
[ ATTACHMENT 3
- )
l,ihl ti diribs h i QUALITY ASSURANCE PROGRAM MANUAL MILLSTONE NUCLEAR POWER STATION UNIT 3 l l NORTHEAST UTILITIES SERVICE COMPANY STONE & WEBSTER ENGINEERING CORPORATION e 9 p,e--,------m--w-mvg e ,,w, ww, -- --- ,
. +-e , - e ,--.---m--r-- -.--,._e-.---p ,y e-. --- ny--,, - - .--, -.pn w + e-
O e g i fb Rev: 0 QUALITY ASSURANCE PROGRAM MANUAL MILLSTONE NUCLEAR STATION - UNIT 3 NORTHEAST UTILITIES SERVICE CORPORATI0IT (NUSCO) STONE & WEBSTER ENGI?!EERING CORPORATION
{e . a STONE 5 WEBSTER ENGINEERING CORPORATION
, 245 SUMMER STREET. BOSTON. M ASS ACHU S ETTS ADDRESS ALL CORRESPONDENCE TO P.O. BOX 2325. SCSTON. M ASS. 02107 W U TELEX. 94-000t C EsGN osm
'"C"i, "'" " ' ' Co' " * '
^
'"J'S n'.0^r.!' ,".
gry., .r'o.M.. o. ..o M cNom c N W ASMINGrON, D C.
. . , - . ;- - - - ~
TO WHOM IT MAY CONCERN: - The policies, requirements and tasks described in this Quality Assurance Program Manual, Millstone Nuclear Power Station - Unit 3 have been developed to fulfill a recognized need for assurance that requisite quality is achieved in design, pro-curement and construction. Stone & Webster Engineering Corporation procedures which implement this program are described in various manuals which are referenced herein. The development and overall responsibility for this Quality Assurance Program lies with the Vice President of Quality Assurance; who shall report conditions adverse to quality and/or in conflict with these program requirements to the President and affected Department Heads as appropriate. The Manager, Quality Assurance is responsible for the administration and management of the Quality Assurance Program as applied to pro-curement and construction activities. The Chief Engineer, Engineer-ing Assurance Division of the Engineering Department is responsible for the administration and management of the Quality Assurance Program as applied to engineering and design activities. Revisions, additions to, and audits of this program are the responsibility of the Manager, Quality Assurance and the Chief Engineer, Engineering Assurance Division, for their respective assigned areas. Any revisions or additions shall be approved be affected Departments prior to the incorporation of such changes into the Program.
% ^
L.S.S. Smith Vice President Quality Assurance Department 11-1
l _. 4 l 3e a -,. I
' ffj f ~ j ln ~, ,, , - ,.NJ.Y E ?
u s sD' d G: k hiRh, l 7/19/74 TO WHOM IT MAY CONCERN:
.The policies, requirements and tasks described in this Quality Assurance Program Manual have been approved by the Stone & Webster Engineering Corporation.
Stone & Webster Engineering Corporation procedures which imple-ment this program are described in various manuals which are referenced herein. The Manager, Quality Assurance is responsible for the
' administration and management of the Quality Assurance Program as applied to procurement and construction activi-ties. The' Chief Engineer, Engineering Assurance Division of the Engineering Department ^is responsible for.the administration and management of the Quality Assurance Prograra as applied to engineering and design activities.
The Project Manager is responsible for project conformance to the Quality Assurance Program.- The implementation of this program is the responsibility of the individual Department Managers. Revisions, additions to, and audits of this program are the responsibility of the Manager, Quality Assurance, and the Chief. Engineer,' Engineering Assurance Division, for their respective assigned areas. Any revisions or additions shall be approved by participating Departments prior to the incorporation of such changes into the manuals.
] Lt.
Project Managerjf Manager, Quality Assurance
%.s. WW Chief Engineer, Engineering Assurance
Ih6 h.:hl:. eu STONE 8 WEBSTER ENGINEERING CORPORATION 225 FRANKLIN STREET. BOSTON. MASSACHUSETTS ADDRESS AI.t. CORRESPONDENCE TO P.O. BOX 2325. B 3STON. M ASS. 02107 st % C mstmuctrom
- Jt#~ s ":: 271.
0 ;;f0fico n".'"Jr"J. o E N GI N E E RING Page: 11 Rev: 0 TO WHOM IT MAY CONCERN: The policies contained in this QUALITY ASSURANCE PROGRAM MANUAL Corporation.have been approved by the Stone & Webster Engineering Stone & Webster Engineering Corporation quality assurance program procedures which are used to implement this program are described in the following manuals: the ENGINEERING ASSURANCE MANUAL, the PROCUREMENT QUALITY CONTROL MANUAL, the FIELD QUALITY CONTROL MANUAL the COMPANY QUALITY ASSUR-ANCE AND CONTROL MANUAL - ASME S$:CTION III, and the COMPANY QUALITY ASSURANCE NONDESTRUCTIVE TEST MANUAL. The Manager, Quality Assurance, is responsible for the administration and management of the Company quality assur-ance program, with the exception of the Engineering assur-ance program which is administered and managed by the Chief Engineer, Engineering Assurance Division of the Engineering Department. The revisions policies and procedures are, additions, and audits of these the responsibility of the Manager, Quality Assurance, and the Chief Engineer, Engineering Assur-ance Division, for their assigned areas of responsibility. Any revisions or additions shall be approved by participating Departments prior to insertion of such changes into the man-uals. The enforcement of these policies and procedures is the responsibility of the Departmental Managers. L , fg R. M. Car /pbell E. F. Trainor Project Manager Manager, Quality Assurance G. K. A. Mch'ullin W5n -
>b Chief Engineer L. S. S. Smith Engineering Assurance Vice President Quality Assurance
r<~.-...,,.,
.,3 Revision E
- ~ . i a L. 4/20/79 MILLSTONE 3 PROGRAM MANUAL TABLE OF CONTENTS SECTION EFFECTIVE TITLE REV DATE PAGES i TITLE PAGE B 2/28/75 1 ii POLICY LETTER A, 2/28/75 1 iii TABLE OF CONTENTS E 4/20/79 1-2 iv INDEX OF FIGURES C 4/20/79
( 1 v INTRODUCTION B 2/28/75 1 1 ORGANIZATION D 4/20/79 1-9 2 QUALITY ASSURANCE C 4/20/79 1-5 PROGRAM 3 ENGINEERING AND B 2/28/75 1-3 DESIGN CONTROL 4 PROCUREMENT DOCUMENT C 4/20/79 1-3 CONTROL 5 INSTRUCTIONS, PRO- C 4/20/79 1-2 CEDURES, AND DRAWINGS 6 DOCUMENT CONTROL C 4/20/79 1-2 7 CONTROL OF PURCHASED C 4/20/79 1-7 MATERIAL, EQUIPMENT, AND SERVICES 8 IDENTIFICATION AND C 4/20/79 1-2 CONTROL OF MATERIALS, PARTS, AND COMPONENTS 9 CONTROL OF SPECIAL C 4/20/79 1-3 PROCESSES 10 INSPECTION C 4/20/79 1-5 11 TEST CONTROL C 4/20/79 1-2 12 CONTROL OF MEASURING C 4/20/79 1-2 AND TEST EQUIPMENT l iii-1 t
. . . - . - - _= -- . .- --.
n-e . Revision E - 4/20/79 TABLE OF CONTENTS (Cont ' d) EFFECTIVE SECTION TITLE REV DATE PAGES 13 HANDLING, STORAGE, C 4/20/79 1-3 AND SHIPPING (E 14 INSPECTION, TEST, AND C 4/20/79 1-2 OPERATING STATUS 15 NONCONFORMING MATERIALS, C 4/20/79 1-3 PARTS, OR COMPONENTS 16 CORRECTIVE ACTION C 4/20/79 1-2 17 QUALITY ASSURANCE C 4/20/79 1-3 RECORDS 18 AUDITS E 4/20/79 1-4 19 CONTROL OF THE QA B 2/28/75 1-3 PROGRAM MANUAL APPENDIX I IMPLEMENTING DOCUMENTS C 4/20/79 I-1 ( II QUALIFICATION AND C 4/20/79 II-6 EXPERIENCE REQUIREMENTS, STONE & WEBSTER QUALITY ASSURANCE PERSONNEL III GLOSSARY C 4/20/79 III- 21 IV ENGINEERING DESIGN A 4/20/79 Iy-1 REVIEW V SPECIFICATION AND N/A 2/28/75 V-1 BIDDERS REVIEW VI APPROVALS AND CON- A 4/20/79 VI-2 ( CURRENCE FOR QUALITY ASSURANCE SYSTEM DOCUMENTATION VII RESPONSE TO REGULA- N/A 2/28/75 VII-3 TORY GUIDES 3p
l
,i, i;pg,A_ ara 1i1-2
l . o -
,. . Revision D 4/11/77
, MILLSTONE 3 PROGRAM MANUAL d ) 4. . u .. .,
}jjdI-d;,[jdfi.,. TABLE OF CONTENTS EFFECTIVE SECTION TITLE REV- DATE PAGES i TITLE PAGE 2-28-75 1 ii POLICY LETTER 2-28-75 1 iii TABLE OF CONTENTS D 4-11-77 1-2 iv INDEX OF FIGURES B 2-28-75 1 v INTRODUCTION A 2-28-75 1 1 ORGANIZATION C 2-28-75 1- 9 2 QUALITY ASSURANCE B 2-28-75 1-4 PROGRAM 3 ENGINEERING AND B 2-28-75 1-3 DESIGN CONTROL 4 PROCUREMENT DOCUMENT B 2-28-75 1- 3 CONTROL
. 5 INSTRUCTIONS, PROCEDURES B 2-28-75 1- 3 AND DRAWINGS 6 DOCUMENT CONTROL B 2-28-75 1-2 7 CONTROL OF PURCHASED B 2-28-75 1- 7 MATERIAL, EQUIPMENT AND SERVICES 8 IDENTIFICATION AND B 2-28-75 1-2 CONTROL OF MATERIALS, PARTS AND COMPONENTS 9 CONTROL OF SPECIAL B 2-28-75 1- 3 PROCESSES 10 INSPECTION B 2-28-75 1- 5 11 TEST CONTROL B 2-28-75 1-2
-12 CONTROL OF MEASURING B 2-28-75 1-2 AND TEST EQUIPMEh"r iii-1 l
l l
- ., --,.-. n . .. ,-
.5 [ . 'OP ) Revision D .
$ w : v m u ri? 4/11/77 .
TABLE OF CONTENTS - (Cont'd) EFFECTIVE SECTION TITLE REV DATE PAGES
-13 HANDLING, S'IORAGE ~ B 2-28-75 1-3 AND SHIPPING 14 INSPEC'" ION, TEST AND B 2-28-75 1-2 OPERATING STATUS 15 NONCONFORMING MATERIALS, B 2-28-75 1-3 CH.#1 6/18/76 PARTS OR COFPONENTS ,
16 CORRECTIVE ACTION B 2-28-75 1-2 17 QUALITY ASSURANCE B 2-28-75 1-3 RECORDS 18 AUDITS _D 12-11-75 1-4 19 CONTROL OF THE QA B 2-28-75 1-3 PROGRAM MANUAL APPENDIX I IMPLEMENTING DOCUMENTS B 2-28-75 I-1 II QUALIFICATION AND B 2-28-75 II-5 EXPERIENCE REQUIREMENTS, STONE S-WEBSTER QUALITY ASSURANCE PERSONNEL III_ GLOSSARY B 2-28-75 III-21 IV ENGINEERING DESIGN N/A 2-28-75 IV-1 REVIEW V SPECIFICATION AND N/A 2-28-75 V-1 BIDDERS REVT ' VI APPROVAI.S AND CON- N/A 2-28-75 VI-2 CURRENCE FOR QUALITY ASSURANCE' SYSTEM DOCUMENTATION VII RESPONSE TO REGULA- N/A 2-28-75 VII-2 TORY GUIDES iii- 2
Revision C 2/28/75 MILLSTONE 3 PROGRAM MANUAL , [.I.! 5 II TABLE OF CONTENTS g j';g sMj)jl S.{= EFFECTIVE SECTION TITLE REV DATE PAGES i TITLE PAGE 2-28-75 1 ii POLICY LETTER 2-28-75 1 iii TABLE OF CONTENTS C 2-28-75 1-2 iv INDEX OF FIGURES B 2-28-75 1 v INTECDUCTION A 2-28-75 1 1 ORGANIZATION C 2-28-75 1- 9 2 QUALITY ASSURANCE B 2-28-75 1-4 PROGRAM 3 + ENGINEERING AND B 2-28-75 1-3 DESIGN CONTROL , 4 PROCUREEENT DOCUMENT B 2-28-75 1- 3 CONTROL 5 INSTRUCTIONS, PROCEDURES B 2-28-75 1- 3 AND DRAWINGS 6 DOCUMENT CONTROL B 2-28-75 1-2 7 CONTROL OF PURCHASED B 2-28-75 1- 7 MATERIAL, EQUIPMENT AND SERVICES 8 IDENTIFICATION AND B 2-28-75 1-2 CONTROL OF MATERIALS, PARTS AND COMPONENTS 9 CONTROL OF SPECIAL B 2-28-75 1- 3 PROCESSES 10 INSPECTION B 2-28-75 1- 5 11 TEST CONTROL B 2-28-75 1-2 12 CONTROL OF MEASURING B 2-28-75 1-2 AND TEST EQUIPMENT iii-1
~
T gen 1 . i n s; s bc Revision C 2/28/75 TABLE OF CONTENTS (Cont 'd) EFFECTIVE SECTION TITLE REV DATE PAGES 13 HANDLING,' STORAGE B 2-28-75 1-3
'AND SHIPPING 14 INSPECTION, TEST AND B 2-28-75 1-2 OPERATING STATUS 15 NONCONFORMING MATERIALS, B 2-28-75 1-3 PARTS OR COMPONENTS 16 CORRECTIVE ACTION B 2-28-75 1-2 17 QUALITY ASSURANCE B 2-28-75 1-3 RECORDS 18 AUDITS C 2-28-75 1-4 19 CONTROL OF THE QA B 2-28-75 1-3 PROGRAM MAhUAL APPENDIX I IMPLEMENTING DOCUMENTS B 2-28-75 I-1 II' QUALIFICATION AND B 2-28-75 II-5 EXPERIENCE REQUIRDfENTS, STONE S WEBSTER QUALITY ASSURANCE PERSONNEL III GLOSS $RY B 2-28-75 III-21 IV ENGINEERING DESIGN N/A 2-28-75 IV-1 REVIEW V SPECIFICATION AND N/A 2-28-75 V-1 BIDDERS REVIEW VI APPROVALS AND CON- N/A 2-28-75 VI-2 CURRENCE FOR QUALITY ASSURANCE SYSTEM DOCUMENTATION VII RESPONSE TO REGULA- N/A 2-28-75 VII-2 TORY GUIDES iii-2
v Revision B e MILLSTONE 3 PROGRAM MANUAL TABLE OF CONTENTS EFFECTIVE
.SECTION TITLE REV DATE TITLE PAGE 7/19/74 POLICY LETTER 7/19/74 TABLE OF CONTENTS B 10/7/74 INDEX OF FIGURES A 7/19/74 INTRODUCTION A 7/19/74 1
-1 ORGANIZATION B 10/7/74 2 QUALITY ASSURANCE PROGRAM A
, 7/19/74 3 ENGINEERING AND DESIGN CONTROL A 7/19/74 4 PROCUREMENT DOCUMENT CONTROL A 7/19/74 5 INSTRUCTIONS, PROCEDURES AND A 7/19/74 DRAWINGS 6 DOCUMENT CONTROL A 7/19/74 7 CONTROL OF PURCHASED MATERIAL, A 7/19/74
' EQUIPMENT AND SERVICES 8 IDENTIFICATION AND CONTROL OF A 7/19/74 MATERIALS, PARTS AND COMPONENTS 9 CONTROL OF SPECIAL PROCESSES A 7/19/74 10 INSPECTION A 7/19/74 11 TEST CONTROL A 7/19/74 l 12 CONTROL OF MEASURING A 7/19/74 AND TEST EQUIPMENT
. Ji 10/7/74 s
TABLE OF CONTENTS (CONT.) l EFFECTIVE SECTION TITLE REV DATE 13 HANDLING, STORAGE AND SHIPPING A 7/19/74 14 INSPECTION, TEST AND OPERATING A 7/19/74 STATUS 15 NONCONFORMING MATERIALS, PARTS A 7/19/74 OR COMPONENTS 16 CORRECTIVE ACTION A 7/19/74 17 QUALITY ASSURANCE RECORDS A 7/19/74 18 AUDITS B 10/7/74 19 CONTROL OF THE Q/A PROGRAM A 7/19/74 MANUAL APPENDIX I IMPLEMENTING DOCUMENTS A 7/19/74 II QUALIFICATION AND EXPERIENCE A 7/19/74 REQUIREMENTS, STONE & WEBSTER QUALITY ASSURANCE PERSONNEL III CATEGORY I STRUCTURES, COMPONENTS A 7/19/74 AND SYSTEMS IV GLOSSARY A 7/19/74
.* * {} m e, n w, n ~
A } } .,(
-1...
. . c. A TABLE OF CCMTENTS EFFECTIt.'E SECTICN TITLE REV DATE TITLE P..3Z , ':. Z ,'7 -
POLICY LETTER 7/19/73 TABLE OF CCNTENTS A 7/19/74 INDEX OF FIGURES A 7/19/7a INTRODUCTION A 7/19/74 1 ORGANIZATION A 7/19/74 2 QUALITY ASSURANCE PROGRAM A 7/19/74 3 ENGINEERING AND DESIGN CONTROL A 7/19/74 4' PROCUREMENT DOCUMENT CONTROL A 7/19/74 5 INSTRUCTIONS, PROCEDURES AND A 7/19/74 DRAWINGS 6 DOCUMENT CONTROL A 7/19/74 7- CONTROL OF PURCHASED MATERIAL, A 7/19/74 EQUIPMENT AND SERVICES 3 IDENTIFICATION AND CONTROL OF A 7/19/74 MATERIALS, PARTS AND COMPCNENTS 9 CONTROL OF SPECIAL PRCCESSES A 7/19/73 10 INSPECTION A 7/19/74 11 TEST CONTROL A 7/19/74 12 CONTROL OF MEASURING A 7/19/74 AND TEST EQUIPMENT I
.. . . _ . . . . . _ , , . . . . -m
(2.1s cn ? .
- 6 .IL TABLE OF CCNTENTS (CONT.)
ErrECTIJE SFOTION TITLE EEV D.'.TE 13 HANDLING, STORAGE AND SHIPPING A 7/19/74 14- INSPECTICM, TEST AND CPERATIMG # A ' /1^ / 7 ?i STATUS 15 NONCONFORMING MATERIALS, PARTS A 7/19/74 OR COMPCNENTS 16 CORRECTIVE ACTION A 7/19/74 17 QUALITY ASSURANCE RECORDS A 7/19/74 18 AUDITS A 7/19/74 19 CONTROL OF THE Q/A PROGRAM A 7/19/74 MANUAL APPENDIX I IMPLEMENTING DOCUMENTS A 7/19/74 II QUALIFICATION AND EXPERIENCE A 7/19/74 REQUIREMENTS, STONE S WEBSTER QUALITY ASSURANCE PERSONNEL III CATEGORY I STRUCTURES, COMPOMENTS A '/19/72 AND SYSTEMS IV GLOSSARY A ~/l's/70
I
. rase: iv
# I Rev: 0 TABLE OF CONTENTS INDEX OF FIGURES
' INTRODUCTION SECTION TITLE I ORGANIZATION II QUALITY ASSURANCE PROGRAM
-III ENGINEERING AND DESIGN CONTROL IV PROCUREMENT DOCUMENT CONTROL V INSTRUCTIONS, PROCEDURES, AND' DRAWINGS VI DOCUMENT CONTROL VII CONTROL OF PURCHASED MATERIAL, EQUIPMENT AND SERVICES VIII- IDENTIFICATION OF. MATERIALS, PARTS AND COMPONENTS IX CONTROL OF SPECIAL PROCESSES X INSPECTION XI TEST CONTROL XII CONTROL OF TEST AND MEASURING EQUIPMENT XIII- HANDLING, STORAGE, SHIPPING AND PRESERVATICN XIV INSPECTION, TEST AND OPERATING STATUS XV NONCONFORMING MATERIAIS, PARTS OR COMPONENTS XVI CORRECTIVE ACTION XVII QUALITY ASSURANCE RECORDS XVIII AUDITS
Revision C 1 4/20/79 4 INDEX OF FIGURES PAGE FIGURE TITLE SECTION REVISION NO. 1 COMPANY ORGANIZATION EUR 1 D 1-6 QUALITY ASSURANCE 2 1 D 1-7 QUALITY ASSURANCE DEPARTMENT ORGANIZATION 3 ENGINEERING ASSURANCE DIVISION 1 D 1-8 ORGANIZATION 4 QUALITY ASSl'RANCE INTERRILATION- 1 C 1-9 SHIPS 1 E
. , , {
h,*6iOd%- 1 4 iv-1
'n , nr , a y, -,----,-v -
- -m , . , . . , , - - - , - - , , , - - ,4 m,- - . . - , e p - , , . . ,------,,---,..---,,.-,,w. wen- ,---e--
a > e D Revision B 2/28/75
'l]i??''.Tjt
dhid u in f & INDEX OF FIGURES FIGURE TITLE SECTION PAGE NO 1 COMPANY ORGANIZATION FOR 1 1-6 QUALITY ASSURANCE 2 QUALITY ASSURANCE DEPARTMENT 1 1-7 ORGANIZATION 3 ENGINEERING ASSURANCE DIVISION 1 1-8 ORGANIZATION 4 QUALITY ASSURANCE INTERRELATION- 1 1-9 SHIPS iv 1
. Revision A II
{}-]!O 7'9 q = % ;E lj ** I - l 1 j .' INDEX OF FIGURES
-FIGURE TITLE SECT. PAGE
- 1. COMPANY ORGANIZATION FOR QUALITY l 5 ASSURANCE 2
QUALITY ASSURANCE DEPARTMENT ORGANI- 1 6 ZATION
- 3. ENGINEERING ASSURANCE DIVISION 1 7 ORGANIZATION 4 -QUALITY ASSURANCE INTERRELATION- 1 8 SHIPS i
l i l l I' I I
Page: v ^ ' Rev: 0 , INDEX OF FIGURES fjQfD 9,3 U? Y2M [! hill. FIGURE PAGE ~ A 1-6 COMPANY ORGANIZATION FCR QUALITY ASSURANCE B 1 -- 7 QUALITY ASSURANCE DEPARTMENT ORGANIZATION C 1- 8 ENGINEERING ASSURANCE DIVISION ORGANIZATIO: D 2- 4 QUALITY PROGRAM PROCEDURAL MATRIX ,
, ,-~.r-- - . , . - .-- . , - - , . , - - - , - - - - ,m,,,,,- ,,m,ye -~ _~ -
, _ . - - . - - - - , - . . .-_r- ,e- - - - -
Revision B 2/28/75 INTRODUCTION It is the policy and objective of the Stone & Webster Engineering Corporation to engineer and construct a quality power station, on a timely basis, in accordance with contractual and regulatory requirements. To this end the company has established this Nuclear Quality Assurance Program which delincates the requirements and tasks assigned to the various elements of the Stone & Webster organization to achieve our stated objectives. This program is organized into 18 sections which correspond to the management principles delineated in Appendix B to 10CFRSO and is responsive both to Appendix B and the guidance put forth in WASH 1283, Rev. 1 dated May 24, 1974 and WASH 1309 dated May 10, 1974. Actions to implement the assigned tasks are found in departmental proccdures delineated in Appendix I. j* ! - d}y lijarbh - 9 v-1 n e---, - - - . ,- - - - - - -
R2 Vision A H!STOR!CR INTRODUCTION The Quality Assurance Program Manual describes the quality assurance requirements and tasks of Stone & Webster Engineering Corporation (S&W) in the design, procurement, construction and testing of Millstone Nuclear Power Station - Unit 3. This program is implemented by specific S&W organizations through drawings, specifications, instructions and procedures which prescribe requirements to be met and tasks to be performed. The quality assurance requirements and general tasks of this manual are organized into 18 sections which correspond to the criteria of Appendix B, 10CFR50. Additional manuals which detail the implementation of these tasks are delineated in Appendix I. Part 50, Title 10 of the Code of Federal Regulations (10CFR50) establishes the licensing requirements for nuclear power plants. Appendix B, thereto, contains quality assurance criteria to be applied to the design, procurement, construction and testing of the structures, systems and components of the facility which are essential to safety. This Manual complies with the provisions of Appendix B, 10CFR50. The inputs from that document resulted in the requirements established in this Quality Assurance Program Manual.
inm p3 Page vi
- 4 kl\ l' e L}
~
Rev: 0 INTRCDUCTION Section 50, Title 10 of the Code of Federal Rehulations establishes the licensing requirements pertaining to nuclear power plants. Appendix B thereto lists the quality assurance criteria upon which the Millstone #3 program is based. This QUALITY ASSURANCE PROGRAM MANUAL encompassing the Stone & Webster assigned activities, has been, formulated to comply with the provisions of Appendix B to 10CFR50 and the requirements of the Northeast Utilities Service Corporation (NUSCO) Quality Assur-ance Manual. The quality assurance program description expresses in greater detail, Section 17 of the Preliminary Safety Analysis Report (PSAR). Additional detail may be found in the various documents referenced 4 herein, including but not limited to: Project Manual Division Guides issued by each Engineering Division Engineering Assurance Manual Procurement Quality Control Manual Field Quality Control Manual Company Quality Assurance and Control Manual - ASME Section III Company Nondestructive Test Manual Directive for the Preparation of Specifications
~ A STONE & WEBSTER ENGINEERING CORPORATION QUALITY ASSURANCE DEPARTMENT QUALITY ASSURANCE
. , , ,r: w . , ,
PROGRAM
!.00 a.e a . 1 MILLST0!IE flUCLEAR POWER STATION-UNIT 3 TITLE:
NUMBER: SECTI0tl 1 REVISION: D ORGAllIZATION EFFECTIVE DATE: APRIL 20, 1979 g APPROVALS,
.hN !Y. /
M ANAGER, QUALITY AhRANCE 1 7 {. u c. nc % - - CHIEF ENGINEER, ENGINEERING ASSURANCE ( > NPQ NLix.~L . PROJECT MANAGER
, 1-1 4
Revision D SECTION 1 ORGANIZATION 1.0 REOUIREMENTS 1.1 A S&W organization shall be established to develop and Lmplement the quality assurance program. 1.2 The authority and duties of individuals and groups performing the required quality assurance functions shall be documented. 1.3 Individuals or groups who check, audit, inspect or otherwise the same individuals or groups verify a quality activity shall not be i responsible for perforndng the specific activity. 2.0 TASKS
- The responsibilities for management of the SSW quality assurance the administration and been program have S&W set forth in the introduction quality assurance organization and its relationship to this manual. The to the project organization is shown in Figure 1.
The Quality Assurance Department organization Figure 2. is shown in The qualifications and experience level requirements for quality 3 contained in Appendix II. assurance The Engineering Assurance personnel are Division, in Figure 3. Engineering Department organization is shown the company organization. Figure 4 shows interrwelationships within 2.1 Engineering Assurance Division (EA) , Engineering Department shall: 2.1.1 Assure t the implementation and operation of management systems for the control of [ technical work. 2.1.2 Assure that completed designs and specifications conform to S&W procedures. 2.1.3 Perform source control for engineering service suppliers.
, ~ ' q ' ~1 0 1 l . ..DU$ A
*See Appendix I for reference to implementing documents.
.w, , ~ , , , -..v .n. ,, ,--,.v, , - - - - - ,v.-,~,~,..,-,,,~,,m ,,.e.n.-, -,--,-n -,-n,. ,,.,---. ,,.-- --n - - - . -
+
C 1-2 Revision D 2.2 Quality. Systems Division (QSD) , Quality Assurance Department shall: 2.2.1 Develop, establish, and improve standardized quality systems. 2.2.2 Analyze data and prepare reports for S&W management on quality related activities. 2.3 Procurement. Quality Assurance Division (PQAD) , Quality Assurance Department shall: 2.3.1 Perform inspections, verifications, and other tasks at seller facilities to ensure that the quality of materials, <($ ' components, and equipment meets the requirements of drawings, specifications and other procurement documents. 2.3.2 Establish and maintain district offices in major manufacturing centers in United States to carry out the required tasks at seller facilities. the ( ,
<g3 2.4 Field Quality Control Division (FQCD) , Quality Assurance Department shall:
2.4.1 Assure through inspection activities and document review, that the requirements of <${ drawings, specifications, instructions and proceduren are fulfilled during fabrication, erection, and installation at the site. 2.4.2 Establish and maintain a field quality control organization at the site for the implementation of the quality control systems. 2.5 Nondestructive Test Division (NDTD) , Quality Assurance Department shall establish and maintain systems which control the qualification of personnel and equipment, test methods, and documentation of required nondestructive test activities. 2.6 The Project Quality Assurance Program Administrator D shall: 2.5.1 Assist the Project in implementing all i phases of the quality acsurance program. 4 4
,,,,,s- e*-- -
1-3 1 Revision D 2.6.2 Perform liaison between the Quality Assurance Department, Projeet, Westinghouse (NSSS Supplier) , and other sellers regarding quality activities. assurance , 2.6.3 Furnish information to the Project on matters pertaining to quality assurance. 2.6.4 Coordinate the project quality assurance i program with the NUSCo quality program. assurance 2.6.5 Provide quality assurance inputs for I safety analysis reports, using material provided.by QSD. 2.6.6 Assure that quality assurence reviews of specifications have been cc,nducted. 2.6.7 Assist NUSCo in nodifying their quality assurance program, as requested. 2.6.8 Prepare monthly activity reports, for quality assurance
, s ,i NUSCo, based on inputs from submission to
'- EA, QSD,
,., FQCD, PQAD and NDTD.
. , .f~' ' 2.6.9 Attend regulatory agency I
et quality assurance audits as the representative, if requested. Assist the Project in
- providing effective and timely corrective action replies for deficiencies found in these audits. ,
2.6.10 Coordinate all applicable quality control procedures and Project procedures. 2.6.11 Assist in assuring that the quality assurance program fulfills the Safety i Analysis Report commitment. 2.7 The Quality Assurance Cost and Auditing Division (QACAD) , Quality Assurance Department shall provide Department cost control, program evaluation, i special and support management studies and audits, information, services within this program. The i following summarizes the specific ! activities of i QACAD. D 2.7.1 DEPARTMENT COST CTFI'ROL - The Cost Con-trol Section maintains the internal QA Department cost control system, providing 4
- , - , . ,.r._ c 3.r, - + . .,-- ...- ---.w . _ - , , , . , _ . ,-,--r-.--....r,%---.,,,,,,-.-w., -
my,,w,.y,,--g.p%...,~
1-4
- l Revision D inputs for the QA program estimates to Stone & Webster management as required.
t 2.7.2 _ EVALUATION AND SPECIAL STUDIES - The Eval-uation and Special Studies Sections have l investigative responsibilities, manage-ment and/or quality related, to determine the adequacy, effectiveness of, and adherence to quality related procedures ! and systems; these include PSAR/FSAR evaluations, project quality program evaluations, ASME Section III program audits and Quality Assurance Departmental { performance, as well as the appraisal or a quality system or function, to determine adequacy and effectiveness ! of ' implementation. t 2.7.3 INFORMATION - The information section maintains the QA Department central files containing all incoming and outgoing general and project correspondence. In
^
, ; addition, it maintains the QA Department
'\ library providing reference material such
-)v as PSAR/FSAR's, technical literature, and
,s./"' Project manuals.
2.7.4 SUPPORT SERVICES - The support services section provides clerical and steno support to the overall QA Department. 9 3.0 DISCUSSION 3.1 Reference Paragraphs 1.2 and 1.3 The authority and organizational freedom of personnel and organizations which perform quality assurance functions to identify problems, initiate, recommend or provide solutions and verify implementation of solutions charter of each organization performing inthese is delineated the functions. Failure to satisfactorily resolve a quality problem on the lowest appropriate management level will result in an escalation to the next higher level. This could ultimately result in the problem being brought to the attention of the President by the Vice President of Quality Assurance for resolution. These documents can be found in the manuals shown in Appendix 1. The assurance that the above tulfills Criteria I of Appendix B to 10CFR50 is gained through the audit program delineated in Section 18.
O ' 1-5 Revision D Reference Paraoraph 2.4.2 3.2 The Superintendent of Field total Quality Control has authority for the implementation management and the constructionofSite. the Quality Assurance Program at 4.0 CLIENT CONSIDERATIONS There are no additional client considerations. I g 4
, ' \/
- i M
I
- - - - - -n, .-- ,,-,,n.,,- , ,, - - - - - -,, - , - , , , , , , --,--..,,--r,- , . - - . . , - -, -e,
COMPANY ORGANIZATION FOR QUALITY ASSUR ANCE 1
> r4 t . ... . . . STONE & WEBSTER ENGINEERING CORPORATION PRESIDENT -
I I I I I I VICE PRES! DENT VICE PRESIDENT VICE PRESIDENT VICE PRESIDENT VICE PRESIDENT PROJECT ENGINEERING CONSTRUCTION MANAGEMENT DEPT - I DEPT DEPT f f.9 AN AG ER g p,, A N A G E R g QUALITY ASSURANCE DEPT OF PORCH Ast?!G I J i . i l I i i i CONSTRUCTION ENGINEERING CHIEF ENGINEER MANAGER MANAGER MANAGER DIVISION N E FIELD PROCUREMENT l A A CHIEFS O C DIVISION O A DIVISION DIVISION l
'e i I I I I U DISTRICT CHIEFS lS PROJECT STAFF l PT OF FOC PPOCURE ME N T MANAGER SPECI ALISTS p l l 7, 2
l 0 C S TE OF 1 ES I O
- EA l ~
5 O POLICY 8 i.. L .R -+-._ + o l"E l I
= = - CHIEF ENGINEER $[
* - 0. A . I OA COST E.
3l RE SIDE N T PROJECT ,,,_t POLICY l AUDITING DIVISION j MANAGER ENGINEER l y I I fj I l SUPT OF i E PROJECT OA PROGRAM CHIEF ENGINEER CHIEF ENGINEER E h72 [ CONSTRUCTION DESIGN ENGINEERING OUALITY SYSTEMS DIVISION OA NDT g <c@ l ADMINISTRATOR DIVISION j g a { s. g I 1 r-'-'---'--------'-"'-'--'-"-'~'--'----""---------"C CONSTRUCTION l RESIDENT FIELD L SUPERVl50RS l ENGINEER PURCHASING AGENT , CHART A i LEGtND O R-OUALITY REQUIREMENTS CHART EFFECTIVITY O A-OUALITY ASSURANCE E A-ENGINEERING ASSURANCE ** 12/1/~
"[,f[
Dlin CTIGN j;p g 7(), 'fl ., y' COf.WONICATION V" Q A __ O A M O Ft -' ' ' ' " " " '
O QUALITY ASSURANCE DEPARTMENT ORGANIZATION . STONE 6 WEBSTER ENGINEERING CORPORATION VICE PRESIDENT OUALITY ASSL'RANCE MANAGER QUALITY ASSURANCE I a A SST. M G R ' OUALITY ASSURANCE I ^ I CHIEF ENGINEER MANAGER MANAGER CHIEF ENGINEER CHIEF EfJGINEER QUALITY SYSTEMS FIELD PROCUREMENT OA NDT DIVISlON O C DIVISION QA COST L OA DIVISION DIVISION AUDITING PROJECT QA PROGRAM l l ADMINISTRATORS
.I O -DOSTON CLIENT _
FIELD POA SERVICES O C STAFF _ STAFF HEADOUARTERS-80STOff OTHER LOCATIONS OPER ATIONS SUPT CENTER FIELD 4 SUPPORT OUALITY CONTROL I Th
< - ;=
T E STI N G ---I N SPEC TIO N --- DOCUM ENTATION b b c " l u i
\ ~
DISTRICT OFFICE LOCATIONS l-. i I I I I I CHARTB C "' L O PITTSBURGH HOUSTON CHIC AGO ATLANTA BOSTON LOS Af1GELES CHART EFFECTIVITY S CENTER REVtslON:D Cf.T E : 12/1[7b A PPHOVA L S * < s . - ' // g' VPQA
^
'~- *N"'
gg pgg .N ? t ve 7 *"
STONE a WEBSTER ENGINEERING CORPORATION - L 4 .. ORGANIZATION ENGINEERING ASSURANC . DIVISION CHIEF ENGINEER OPERATIONS CENTERS CHERRY HILL NEW YORK DENVER ASSISTANT ASSISTANT CHIEF ENGINEER CHIEF ENGINEER PROJECT / DIVISION ASSISTANT ENGINEERING METHODS SERVICES AUDITING TO ASSURANCE SECTION SECTION SECTION CHIEF ENGINEER ENGINEERS NT Et GI 4EERING PROJECT fTR _ _ ADMINISTRATION PROCEDURES
<o o Y2 DESIGN PROBLEM DlWSION
" E m
CONTROL - REPORT - f PROCEDURES SYSTEM AUDITS g w C
^
- EDUCATION -
AUDI S
_ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ . . - _ . - - - _ = - - - - - - - - - - QUALITY ASSURANCE INTERRELATIONSHIPS STONE E. WEBSTER ENGINEERING CORPORATION ' PROJECT ,, . - , . MANAGER I 4 l AA I PROJECT ASSIST ASSIST RESIDENT ENGINEER r so MANAGER L *. AUDIT . , ENGINEERING PROJECT Q A ASSURANCE pot,ey MANAGER QUALITY ASSURANCE PROGRAM 4 QUALITY DIVISION ADMINISTRATOR CLIENT CONTACT ASSURANCE d b'T O POL'CY " P Dm o A l MANAGER,QA. g QA COST gUTH0R TY AUDIT < AUDIT
,, g Q.A. PROGRAM ADMINISTRAT(
s E. AUDITING 4 7 PROJECT MANAGER V DIVISION ASSIST / AUDIT PROJECT ENGl."EER V SUPERINTENDENT FIELD Q.C. l QUALITY AUDIT A SYSTEMS ] SUPERINTENDENT PROCUREMENT Y DIVISION FIELD QUALITY ASSURANCE mm QUAllTY CONTROL DISTRICT CHIEF AUDIT x h ] n 41 n n #
- y8 ASSIST POUCY PROCUREMENT $8 AUTHORITY QUALITY ASSURANCE b E ET DIVISION ,,
*~. < i N
l , $ 2 NDT 4 v ' DIVISION E CHART C " FIELD OU ALITY ~ CHART EFFECTIVITY POLICY AUTHORITY " CONTROL DIVISION yy,,,ow C loam 12/1/78 a, NN.0 ^'?v-:. &. 0
., _ . s w
w l-15z A STONE & WEBSTER ENGINEERING CORPORATION QUALITY ASSURANCE DEPARTMENT QUALITY Djljj bn:v~,.@.ff ASSURANCE
, PROGRAM MILLSTONE NUCLEAR POWER STATION - UNIT 3 TITLE: NUMBER:
SECTION 1 REVISION: ORGANIZATION C EFFECTIVE DATE: FEBRUARY 28, 1975 APPROVALS MANAGER, QUALITY ASSURANCE l G. AL4SimuD D u CHIEF ENGINEER, ENGINEERING ASSURANCE
. q I , /
PROJECT NANAGER n- -w-- ,- -y--p -m, ,- w- wg---, , -----m--- >--wp
1 l~I 3 OS . .
)]ilY'id)UJr D C h[l,{! Revision C SECTION 1 ORGANIZATION 1.0 REQUIREMENTS 1.1 A SSW organization shall be established to develop and implement the quality assurance program.
1.2 The authority and duties of individuals and groups performing the required quality assurance functions shall be documented. 1.3 Individuals or groups who check, audit, inspect cr otherwise verify a quality activity responsible shall not be the same individuals or groups for performing the specific activity. 2.0 TASKS
- The responsibilities for the administration and management of the SSW quality assurance program have The been set forth in the introduction to this manual. relationship SSW quality assurance organization and its 1. The to the project organization is shown in Figure is shown in Quality Assurance Department organization level Figure 2. The qualifications and experience assurance personnel are requirements for quality contained in Appendix II. The Engineering Assurance Division, Engineering Department organization is shown in Figure 3. Figure 4.shows interrelationships within the company organization.
Engineering Assurance Division (EA) , Engineering 2.1 Department shall: 2.1.1 Assure the implementation and operation of management systems for the control of technical work. that completed designs and 2.1.2 Assure specifications. conform to SSW procedures. 2.1.3 Perform source control service suppliers. for engineering ( I
- See Appendix I for reference to implementing documents.
1
U' , [ C ' W1 i.l s.l 2 - j_~3 32 "J } U3 L4)/L . . Revision C 2.2 Quality Systems Division (QSD) , Quality Assurance i Department shall: 2.2.1 Develop, establish and improve standardized quality systems. 2.2.2 Analyze data and prepare reports for SSW management on quality related activities. 2.3 Procurement Quality Control Division (PQCD) , Quality Assurance Department shall: 2.3.1 Perform inspections, verifications and other tasks at vendor facilities to ensure that the quality of materials, components and equipment, meets the requirements of drawings, specifications and other procurement documents. 2.3.2 Establish and maintain district offices and resident inspectors in major manufacturing centers in the United l States to carry out the required tasks at I vendor facilities. 2.4 Field Quality Control Division (FQCD) , Quality i i Assurance Department shall: 2.4.1 Ensure by audits, inspection activities and document review, that the requirements of drawings, specifications, instructions and procedures are fulfilled during fabrication, erection and installation at the site. 2.4.2 Establish and maintain a field quality control organization at the site for the implementation of the quality control systems. 2.5 Nondestructive Test Division (NDTD) , Quality Assurance Department shall establish and meintain systems which control the qualification of personnel and equipment, test methods and documentation of required nondestructive test activities. 2.6 The Project Quality Assurance Coordinator shall: 2.6.1 Assist the Project in implementing all phases of the quality assurance program. l
, , s Hyp %
a I Re ision C 2.6.2 Perform liaison between the Quality Assurance Department, Project, Westinghouse (NSSS Supplier) and other vendors regarding quality assurance activities. 2.6.3 Furnish information to the Project on matters pertaining to quality assurance. 2.6.4 Coordinate the project cuality assurance program with the NUSCo quality assurance program. 2.6.5 Provide quality assurance inputs for safety analysis reports, using material provided by QSD. 2.6.6 Assure that quality assurance reviews of specifications have been conducted. 2.6.7 Assist NUSCo in modifying their cuality assurance program, as requested. 2.6.8 Prepare monthly quality assurance activity reports, for submission to NUSCo, based on inputs from EA, QSD, B2CD, PQCD and NDTD. 2.6.9 Attend regulatory agency audits as the quality assurance representative, if requested. Assist the Project in providing effective and timely corrective action replies for deficiencies found in these audits. 2.6.10 Coordinate all applicable quality control procedures-and Project procedures. 2.6.11 Assist in assuring that the quality assurance program fulfills the Safety Analysis Report commitment. 2.7- The Department Services Group (DSC) shall provide Department cost control, program evaluation, special management studies and audits, information and support services within this program. The following summarizes the specific activities of the Department Services Group. 2.7.1 DEPARTMENT COST CONTROL - The Cost Con-trol Section maintains the internal Q/A Department cost control system, providing
r 1v..,--%,%,cdd,]
!-}L'aydj;hIb b.l Re ision C inputs for the Q/A program estimates to Stone & Webster management as required.
2.7.2 EVALUATION AND SPECIAL STUDIES - The Eval-uation and Special Studies Sections have investigative responsibilities, manage-ment and/or quality related, to determine the adequacy, effectiveness of, an adherence to quality related procedures C and systems; these include PSAR/FSAR evaluations, project quality program evaluations, ASME Section III program audits and Quality Assurance Departmental performance, as well as the appraisal of a quality system or function, to determine adequacy and effectiveness of implementation. 2.7.3 INFORMATION - The information section maintains the Q/A Department central files containing all incoming and outgoing genc'ral and project correspondence. In addition it maintains the Q/A Department library providing reference material such as PSAR/FSAR's, technical literature, and Project nanuals. 2.7.4 SUPPORT SERVICES - The support services section provides clerical and steno support to the over-all Q/A Department. 3.0 DISCUSSION 3.1 Reference Paracraphs 1.2 and 1.3 The authority and organizational freedom of personnel and organizations which perform quality assurance functions to identify problems, initiate, recommend or provide solutions and verify implementation of solutions is delineated in the charter of each organization performing these functions. Failure to satisfactorily resolve a quality problem on the lowest apprcpriate management level will result in an escalation to the next higher level. This could ultimately result in the problem being brought to the attention of the President by the Vice President of Quality Assurance for resolution. These documents can be found in the manuals shown in Appendix 1. The assurance that the above fulfills Criteria I of I
,f7 -
;.) . ,,,,..,,,]
F i., N ,j 4 :: O j .') 1.. , a,s: J. 3_5 Revision C Appendix B to 10CFR50 is gained through the audit program delineated in Section 18. 3.2 Reference Paragraoh 2.u.2 s The Superintendent of Field Quality Control has total authority for implementation of the Quality Assurance Program at the management and M the Construction Site. 4.0 CLIENT CONSIDERATIONS There are no additional client considerations. 4 t
, . , , - , - . - - - ,. ---,--.-.,-c. - - , .
'- s.
COMPANY ORGANIZ ATION FOR QUALITY ASSUR ANCE r '-erg 4 .s STONE E. WE3 STER ENGINEERING CORPORATION 5 "~~- t&Rhlh ! a Lid dl Ullsidh. PRESIDENT I I I I I I VICE PRESIDENT SE NIOR vlCE PRESIDENT VICE PRESIDENT ' AND AND QUALIT Y ASSURANCE VICE PRESIDENT g MANAGER E N GIN E E RIN G AND DIR E C T OR OF MANAGER f _ ,,,, _ , _ ,,, _ _ _ ,,, .,AGER M AN 4 QUALIT Y MANAGER OF PROJFCTS $ ASSURANCE O F PUR C H A $leeG CONSTRUCTION === ==$ 5 u i I I . . I C ON S TRUC TIO N .
- ENGINEERING CHIEF ENGINEER PR OCU RE M EN T l
DivlSION ENGINEERING eIELD MANAGEM CHIEFS ASSURANCE Q C DIVISION O C DIVISION l
'5 I I I I I l PROCUR E MENT l5 I3 lm PROJECT , STAFF . FIELD 0 C DISTRICT MANAGER SPECIALISTS l 0 C SITE OF FICES I N 3 I EA E
l8y ( R --- *-POLICbl I QUALIT Y SYSTEMS DEPARTMENT QA NOT c8 I I"""""""""""" DIVISION SERvtCES JROUP DivlSION h POL CY l r RE SiOE N T PROJECT E NG'NE E R 3 l yl g MANAGER 2l i I I ' - * "Tl I E E E COO D NATOR CONS RUC180N 7 g .__,__------~~~~~~~~.a to CON S1 RUC T IUN MtSIDEN1 FIELD f NGINL1H PU NCH ASIN G S U P L R VI S ') H S f
- AGENT l CH ART A LLGtNO CHART EFTECTivlTY O H -QUAT t i v HLQUINt Mt NIS O A -QUAll! Y ASSU RANCE a vision 3 nav e 12/5 8/ 74 t A -LNGINt EHING ASSUHANFL
- DlHf C T KWe "0'
(hjjdf
- COMMUNICATION QA asen a.
i . A
4 QUALITY ASSURANCE - DEPARTMENT ORGANIZ ATION STONE C WEBSTER ENGINEERING CORPORATION ppp s.- ...s .,.3
! h VICt PHt SIDE N T L g -i,3) $ U$ NJdL QUAT 11Y ASSUHANCE I
M AN AGE R QUALITY ASSURANCE I E E I I I E CHIEF ENGINEER MANAGER CHIEF ENGINEE R MANAGLH CHlf f f NGINEER ASSI M GH QU A LI T Y SYSTEMS FIELD DEPARTMENT Ph0 CURE ME N T QA NOT uu ALI T Y DIVISION Q C DIVISICN SERvlCES GROUP Q C CIVISION filV MI ON A YiURANCE I 1 l WETHODS & SYSTEk* T E C H0dBCAL EIPPORT SERVICb - OC AFF S FF C T 9 HE ADQU A RT E M S -uOS TO N CONSTNUCTION SITE FIELD a OUALIT Y CONIROL 1 T E S TING --- - - IN S PT C T ION---DOCUME N T A T OON
*m 4 "
NC PROCUREMENT QC INSPECTOR L OC A TION S c I I I I I I I I 2 WYNCOTE PI T T SBURGH HOUSTON CHIC A GO ATLANTA SAN FRANCISCO 80STON L OS ANGELES y CHART 8 CHART E F F ECT4 WIT V af vissom.S oa s e ;l f /l 1/ F4 i
, le ,"' _.b ,L
. . . . . Ma
ORGANIZATION ENGINEERING ASSURANCE DIVISl~0N
- r --
,3.,,,.. , CHIEF ENGINEER
- 4 - $- l ASSISTANT
, CHIEF ENGINEER OPERATIONS ADMINISTRATION f I I METHODS AUDITING SERVICES I . l
- 1 I I I I I ~I SPEC / * *
- PROCURE PROCEDt HE3
'" um STANDARDS PROCEDURES STUDIE S AUDITS AUDITS AUDITS REPORTS EDUCATION SERVICES
$8 S
[ i b 2.6.3 Furnish information to the Project on matters pertaining to quality assurance.
'2.6.4
, Coordinate the project quality assurance program with the NUSCo. quality assurance program.
2.6.5 Provide quality assurance inputs for safety analysis reports, using material provided by QAD. 2.6.6 Assure that quality assurance reviews of specifi-4 cations have been conducted. 2.6.7 Assist NUSCO. in modifying their quality assurance program, as requested. 2.6.8 Prepare monthly quality assurance activity reports, for submission to NUSCo. based on inputs from EA, QSD, FQCD, PQCD and NDTD. 2.6.9 Attend regulatory agency audits as the quality assurance representative, if requested. Assist the j Project in providing effective and timely corrective action replies for deficiencies found in these audits. 2.6.10 Coordinate all applicable quality control procedures and quality related Project precedures. 2.6.11 Assist in assuring that the quality assurance program fulfills the Safety Analysis Report commitment. 2.7 The Department Services Group (DSG) shall provide Depart-ment cost control, program evaluation, special management 1 studies and audits, information and support services i within this program. The following summarizes the specific activities of the Department Services Group. 2.7.1 DEPARTMENT COST CONTROL - The Cost Control Section maintains the internal O/A Department cost control system, providing inputs for the Q/A program estimates to Stone & Webster management as required. 2.7.2 EVALUATION AND SPECIAL STUDIES - The Evaluation
- - and-Special Studies Sections have investigative responsibilities, management and/or quality related,
^ to determine the adequacy, effectiveness of, and adherence to quality related procedures and systems; these include, but are not limited to, PSAR/FSAR evaluations, project quality program evuluations, 3
~
w + -.,-r,- -- r . - - ,,-,g- .-,,-n,- r ----n e yrm .rrw.,,n-,- --,--,,n.- ,-n------,
. . ~
Section 1 - I ' ' . ',7 ":P ' S , s Revision ~B
;~, ,,',\ !
-J s a ! @5.illu'2 '. ' b; .,m(s d.
ASME Section III prog.an audits, Quality Assurance Division performance, as well as the appraisal of a quality system or function to determine adequacy and effectiveness of implementation. 2.7.3 INFORMATION - The Information Section maintains the Q/A Department central files containing all incoming and outgoing general and project correspondence. In addition it maintains the Q/A Department Library providing reference material such as PSAR/FSAR's, technical literature, and Project manuals. 2.7.4 SUPPORT SERVICES - The support services section provides clerical and steno support to the over-all Q/A Department. W I I Is l-I t 1 I l 4
COMPANY ORGANIZ ATION
- FOR QUALITY ASSUR ANCE -
STONE E. WEBSTER ENGINEERING CORPORATION PRESIDENT I I I E I E SENIOR VICE PRESIDENT VICE PRESIDENT VICE PRESIDENT SENIOR VICE PRESIDENT AND AND QUALITY ASSUR ANCE VICE PRESIDENT AND MANAGER E NGIN E E RING SENIOR OF MANAGER g l CONSTRUCTION PROJECTS M AN AGER QUALITY MANAGER MANAGER ASSURANCE OF PURCHACING i I I i i l CONSTRUCTICN ENGINEERING CHIEF ENGINEER MANAGER DIVISION ENGINEERING FIELD PROCUREMENT l CHIEFS ASSURANCE Q C DIVISION O C DIVISION l j! I I I I l l:. l PROJECT STAFF FIELD Q D STR l [ MANAGER SPECIALISTS l 0 C SITE OFFICES j $
$ EA 3
, O R --=- + POLICY I e '-
Iv b J i i l s o Ul c [ g q g QUALITY SYSTEMS DEPARTMENT QA NOT U' D1 VISION SERVICES GROUP DivlSION RE SIDE N T PROJECT _t POLICY l [ . MANAGER ENGINEER l y I l r I a l 2l DESIGN ENGIN E ERIN G o CONSTRUCTION COORDIN ATOR i i r---------------------------------' s:
<ae CONSTRUCTION RESIDENT FIE .D P- et C S UPE RVI S O R S ENGINEER PU RCH A dlNG AGENT f, { y op LEGEND CHART A U g" to Q R-QUALITY REQUIREMENTS CHART E F FEC TIVI T Y O A -OUALI T Y ASSURANCE i E A -ENGINEERING ASSUttANCE "f W'S '0": O joare: >/ t apenovat s: ,
=== DIR E C TION \ ,
k, 4
- I ,a, COMMUNICATION VP Q A _
o....~ /w-s m, -
i u u oLl i I n adus t 41% L DEPARTMENT ORGANIZATION STONE C WEBSTER ENGINEERING CORPORATION VICE PRESIDENT OUALITY ASSURANCE I MANAGER QUALITY ASSURANCE I I I I I I I CHIEF ENGINEER MANAGER CHIEF ENGIN EER MANAGER CHIEF ENGINEER ASST.M G R CUALITY SYSTEMS FIELD DEPARTMENT PROCUREMENT Q A NDT QUALI T Y DIV'SION Q C DIVISION SERVICES GROUP Q C DIVISION DIVISION ASSURAhCE I I I I ' METHODS TECHNICAL ~ FIELD SUPPORT Q C STAFF QUALITY CONTROL STAFF COORDIN ATORS H EADQU A RTER S -BOSTO N CONSTRUCTION SITE SUPT FIELD QUALITY CONTROL TES TING --- -- INSPEC TION---DOCUMEN TATION
- f, PROCUREMENT OC INSPECTOR LOCATIONS I I I I I I I I WYNCOTE PI TT SBURGH HOUSTON CHICAGO AT L A NTA SAN FRANCISCO BOSTON LO3 ANGELES $ $ ).
<: O io Y (1 P cn P rt noO OP D N CHART B m CHART EFFECTIVITY nrvisicies A , loaren O/3 /7k
,n . .A k ,b"
. , .. /.xz= > ,
e e ORG ANIZ AT ION ENGINEERING ASSURANCE DIVISION (40) CHIEF ( 7. ;s - ENGINEER l' I, 77,I}r { 5 J
'Ls $ ?[ IL.
, , A SSISTAN T OPER ATIONS CENTERS j CHIEF ENGINEER jl ENGINEERING ASSUR ANCE l COO R DIN ATORS l l l LONGISLAND CHERRY HILL h ----
ADMINISTRATION { ] . I I METHODS EVALU ATION I I I I I I PROCEDURES S PECI AL STANDARDS EL E CTRICAL POWER STRUCTURAL EDUCATION ENGINEERING ST U DIES AUDITS AUDITS AUDITS SERVICES lc 03 9 4 d3 lIn ir 8 W
- l3 to Mn 31,1974
QU ALITY ASSURANCE INTERRELATIONSHIPS STONE E. WEBSTER ENGINEERING CORPORATION PROJECT M AN AGE R s; +4 . . ., V 1.. s . :n , \ , I ' b I EditV is C,ik;;;hh; PROJECT ASSIST ASSIST , RESIDENT ENGINEER r P MANAGER a A b { AUDIT ENGINEERING gg poticy MANAGER - QUALITY ASSURANCE ASSURANCE COORDIN AT OR OA Y CLIENT CONTACT DIVISION ASSURANCE p J k J k POLICY AND MANAGER, Q A QA A U T HORIT Y Q A COORDINATOR s D E PAR TME N T 4 PROJECT MANAGER E SERVICES PRO;gcT ENGINEER
$ ASSIST / AUDIT 1 / SUPERINTENDENT FIELD Q C QUALITY
""D'I g SYST E MS SUPERINTENDENT PROCUREMENT DIVISION FIELD QUALITY CONTROL mm QUALITY CONTROL DISTRICT CHIEF audit g J k A k "
J k .4 gS t; ASSIST ( POLICY PROCUREMENT p {" AUTHORITY QUALITY CONTROL
)
g y ,
;iat NDT 0- o N DIVISION C"^"
O#P s. FIELD QU ALITY cHANr F r r rcrivir Y w POLICY AUTHORITY CONTROL DIVISION ,,m,,,,, a h,c,/n/74 , 7,'.".[~,$. .\ J \... A
.- ~.gd:a- p ,
! r.isz . . . ,-
-- ' . s i
., fild ! wilbin A
' STONE & WEBSTER ENGINEERING CORPORATION QUALITY ASSURANCE DEPARTMENT QUALITY ASSURANCE PROGRAM MILLSTONE NUCLEAR POWER STATION - UNIT 3 TITLE:
NUMBER: SECTION 1 ORGANIZATION REVISION: A j EFFECTIVE DATE: 7/19/74 APPROVALS YV
- MANAGER, QUALITY ASSURANCE i
I A uD9d - CHIEF ENGINEER, ENGINEERING ASSURANCE
. 7
%vt ' vv1 u l i PROJECT MANAGEk
Revision A nqJsM
\NY SECTION 1 ORGANIZATION 1.0. REQUIREMENTS 1.1 A S&W organization shall be established to develop and implement the quality assurance. program.
1.2 The authority and duties of individuals and groups in performing the: required quality assurance functions shall be documented. 1.3 Individuals or groups who check, audit, inspect or other-wise verify a quality activity shall not be the same individuals or groups responsible for performing the specific activity.
=2.0 TASKS
- The responsibilities.for the administration and management of the S&W' quality assurance program have been set forth in the introduction of this manual. The S&W quality assurance organization and its relationship to the project organization are shown in Figure 1. The' Quality Assurance Department or-ganization is shown in Figure 2. The qualifications and experience level requirements for' quality assurance personnel are contained in Appendix II. The Engineering Assurance Division, Engineering Department organization is shown'in Figure 3. Figure 4 shows interrelationships of the company organization.
2.1 Engineering Assurance Division (EA), Engineering Department shall: - 2.1.1 Assure the implementation and operation of management systems for the control of technical work. 2.1.2 Assure that completed designs and specifications conform to S&W procedures. 2.1.3 Source control for engineering service suppliers. See Appendix I for reference to implementing documents.
'l
Section 1 , Ravision A ErJiUnwnl khhd0 2.2 Quality Systems Division (QSD) , Quality Assurance Department shall: 2.2.1 Develop, systems. establish and improve standardized quality 2.2.2 Analyze data and prepare reports for SSW manage-ment on quality related activities. 2.3 Procurement Assurance Quality Control Department shall: Division (PQCD) , Quality 2.3.1 Perform inspections, verficiations and other tasks at vendor facilities to ensure that the quality of materials, components and equipment meets the requirements of drawings, specifications and other procurement documents. 2.3.2 Establish and maintain district offices and resident inspectors in major manufacturing centers in the United States to carry out the required tasks at vendor facilities. 2.4 Field Quality Control Division (FQCD) , Quality Assurance Department shall: 2.4.1 Ensure by audits, inspection activities and-document review, that the requirements of drawings, specifications, instructions and pro-cedures are fulfilled during fabrication, erection and installation at the site. 2.4.2 Establish and maintain a field quality control organization at the site for the implementation of the quality' control systems. 2.5 Nondestructive Test Division (NDTD), Quality Assurance Department shall establish and maintain systems which control the qualification of personnel and equipment, test methods and documentation of required nondestructive test activities. 2.6 The Project Quality Assurance Coordinator shall: 2.6.1 Assict the Project in implementing all phases of the quality assurance program.
'2.6.2 Perform liaison between the Quality Assurance Department, Project, Northeast Utilities Service Company, Westinghouse, and other vendors regarding quality assurance activities.
2
- 7. .. .
# section 1 33W4V??
- v. , , y . A. ? 3 ,g,f n Ravision A Iinj i IdN;:: fdk L
4
~
l2.6.3 Furnish information to the Project on matters j pertaining to quality assurance. 2.6.4 j Coordinate the project quality assurance program 2 with the NUSCo. quality assurance program. 2.6.5 Provide quality. assurance inputs for safety analysis reports, using material provided by QAD. 2.6.6
-Assure that quality assurance-reviews of specifi-
~
cations have been conducted. 2.6.7 Assist NUSCO. in modifying their quality assurance program, as requested. t 2.6.8 Prepare monthly quality assurance activity reports, for submission to NUSCo. based on inputs from EA, QSD, FQCD, PQCD and NDTD. 2.6.9 Attend regulatory agency audits as the quality assurance representative, if requested. Assist the Project in providing effective and timely corrective action replies for deficiencies found in these audits. 2.6.10 Coordinate all applicable quality control procedures and quality related Project procedures. 2.6.11 Assist in assuring that the quality assurance program fulfills the Safety Analysis Report commitment. , 2.7 The Department Services Group (DSG) shall provide Depart-ment cost control, program evaluation, special management studies and audits, information and support services within this program. The following summarizes the specific activities of the Department Services Group. i 2.7.1 DEPARTMENT COST CONTROL - The Cost Control Section maintains-the internal Q/A Department cost control system,.providing inputs for the Q/A program estimates to Stone & Webster management as required. 2.7.2 EVALUATION AND SPECIAL STUDIES - The Evaluation l and Special Studies Sections have investigative responsibilities, management and/or quality related, to determine the adequacy, effectiveness of, and adherence to quality related procedures and systems; these include, but are not limited to, PSAR/FSAR evaluations, project quality program evuluations, 3
e . Section 1 ' Ravision A
- r ~y T 13<i 9,3 '
, .s ; anon.-
; i
..]
ASME Section III program audits, Quality Assurance Division performance, as well as the appraisal of a quality system or function to determine adequacy and effectiveness of implementation. 2.7.3 INFORMATION - The Information.Section maintains the Q/A Department central files containing all incoming and outgoing general and project correspondence.
~
In addition it maintains the 0/A-Department Library providing reference material such as.PSAR/FSAR's, technical literature, and' Project manuals. 2.7.4 SUPPORT SERVICES - The support services section provides clerical and steno support to the over-all Q/A Department. 4
COMPANY ORGANIZ ATION FOR QUALITY ASSURANCE _ STONE E. WEBSTER ENGINEERING CORPORATION
' a' . . T:amrw PRESIDENT 1
I I SENIOR I I I E VICE PRESIDENT VICE PRESIDENT VICE PRESIDENT VICE PRESIDENT AND SENIOR AND QUALITY ASSURANCE AND MANAGER E N GIN EE RING , v!CE PRE SIDENT SENIOR g OF MANAGER y CONSTRUCTION PROJECTS M AN AGER QUALITY MANAGER MANAGER ASSURANCE OF PURCH ASIP)G 1 i I c e i i i CONSTRUCTICN , ENGINEERING CHIEF ENGIN EER MANAGER ; DIVISION EN GIN EERING l FIELD PROCUREMENT CHIEFS ASSURANCE Q C DIVISION Q C DIVISION l
'5 I" I I I I l m l PROJECT STAFF FIELD l ly 2 MANAGER SPECIALISTS EA l O C SITE Q D STR T OFFICES le g
g b I ~7 o5 l i'j o g g g, y QUALITY SYST EM S DEPARTMENT Q '. N D T 2 DIVISION '" g RE SIDE N T PROJECT POLICY l SERVICES GROUP DIVISION u i ,,;L-MANAGER ENGINEER Eg l y3 I I I ' ' ' f CONSTRUCTION DESIGN ENGINEERING
^ klu '
COORDIN ATOR o I
- - . --- - -.e CON S TRUCTIC,N RESIDENT FIELD S UPERVIS O R S ENGINEER PU RCHASIN G $$$
P- rt c AGENT I g g-] LEGEND CHART A OD D H Q R-QUALITY REQUIREMENTS CHART EFFEC TIVI T Y H O A -OUALI T Y ASSURANCE E A -ENGINEERING ASSURANCE ""* .
- DIRECTION I, l*s"",
COMMUNICATION '# 2^ ' ,\ 'j o ...- M . m .. _
U UAA LI I I A dbult al4 Lr_ DEPARTMENT ORGANIZATION SVONE C WEBSTER ENGINEERING CORPORATION ~ - VICE PRESIDENT QU ALI T Y ASSURANCE --
.; . I' .' , t, il
?
- I) k$') .. ; '. ;'. . .,
MANAGER QUALITY ASSURANCE I I I I I I I FIELD OEPARTMENT' PROCUREMENT Q A NDT PROJECT QA QU At.lT Y SYSTEMS O C DIVISION SERVICES GROUP Q C DIVISION Div!SION COORDIN ATORS DivlSION I I I TECHNICAL FIELD METHODS QUALITY CONTF:OL STAFF SUPPORT Q C STAFF HEADQU A RTER S -BOSTON
- CONSTRUCTION SITE FIELD QUALITY CONTROL SITE STAFF T E S TIN G --- - - INS PE C TION---DOCUMEN TATION PROCUREMENT QC INSPECTOR LOC ATION S I I I I i 1. I I WYNCOTE PI IT SBllRGH HOUSTON CHICAGO ATLANTA SAN FRANCISCO BOSTON LOS' ANGELES w (n m O G P-4OC
- e. gt c tn H r1 CHART 8 POO OD CHART E FFECTIVIT Y U N envision, O loAv e __
A PPR OW AL $: e e' QA Q A MGR C O
' maeCsD n
- C w
uDn+r - O3 nt< o a. m *~ O 3 '> 4 G T N 9 IS 1 REC , E 1 5 I EIV NR Y IE G A N S M iig 6
;{
E 7fy 7 iG, N t . i O
- p. /},
I
- k!,g T N I A O C
- Ng I U
T D
'j .g A R E n g T S
I
-lh N
I N L M O A D I RS A T UT A TI U CD L UU A RA V T
) S .
0 E . 4 ( N O RS I S ET I I I WD OU VI PA N D R O I E E T C R TE A N NN F E A I L Z A E E T G A R I N I S N IN H I I E CS A U C G S SF I T S N RI G R A S E AE I H
~ I TD CU O C EA G L N E IR E
E N I G N S E - D l R h] lj A I D N E A C T S S R N E A T RS N USO RNLDL E C SA T A I A H S LS L D AE S N SY O I I N G ID I R I H I I CD O NI R G ER EU I T PT T RO N H E SS A EO O C M R EC L E N I P G O N S E E lll { R U D I E C O R
" P
O QU ALITY ASSURANCE INTERRELATIONSHIPS - STONE C WEBSTER ' ENGINEERING CORPORATION
# l" s*
1s PROJECT sg3y g j .: M AN AGE R - ~ . ,
. [f l I 4A
[ ASSIST , RESIDENT PROJECT a ASSIST
- MANAGER
- r ENGIN EER m b
[s y AUDIT I MANAGER QUALITY ASSURANCE POLICY ENGINEERING OA i OUALITY CLIENT CONTACT ASSURANCE d COORDIN ATOR ASSURANCE VICE PRESIDENT,0 A. DIVISION POLICY AND MANAGER, O A.
/ ,\ iT '
Au T HORITY OA Q A. COORDINATOR F DEPARTMENT 4 - - PROJECT MANAGER m SERVICES PROJECT ENGINEER E 57 SUPERINTENDENT FIELD Q C. 0 ASSIST / AUDIT , QUALITY AuDir SYSTEMS
! ! h, DIVISION SUPERINTENDENT PROCUREMENT '
mm FIELD QUALITY CONTROL OUALITY CONTROL DISTRICT CillEF AUDIT y i;s n n g3 n y. o POLICY PROCUREMENT s "8 ASSIST 7% AU1HORITY OUALITY CONTROL .1 y ni f _ N
-o 0"
NDT w CHART C 3 DIVISION CHART E FF ECTIVIT Y > FIELD OU ALITY ' POLICY AUTHORITY CONTROL DIVISION yy y,,,ou. a lour G / tt / T4 wruove. v g
- t. *i *
.r QA Q A MGH _ h .%c ,
' @,][QW'N G ,") 2 Ih'db Jll!. Page: 1-1 Rev: 0 I
ORGANIZATION The Stone & Webster Engineering Corporation quality assur-ance program which is designated in this manual is intend-ed to ensure that the required effort equipment, procedures and management are directed toward pro,perly designing and constructing the fullstone #3 Nuclear Station to conform with the requirements of Appendix B to 10CFR50 and with NUSCO's Quality Assurance Manual to ensure reliable power generation as well as safety. , The program recognizes that quality is obtained most effect-ively by well directed engineering, procurement and con-struction activities, and emphasizes these positive aspects
-while providing adequate checks and audits to ensure that the intentions are, in fact, executed.
Figure A illustrates the Stone & Webster Organization for Quality Assurance and its relationship to the project organization. Page 1-6 Figure B illustrates the Quality Assurance Department Organization. Page 1-7 The four major quality assurance areas of activity within the Company are: e ' Engineering Assurance (Figure C illustrates the Engineering Assurance Division organization Page l-~8 e Procurement Quality Control e Field Quality Control e Quality Support Activities
~
T QOu
*rW' g n j(( & _, j U s D X i L rage:
,s .L - 2 d y". .
Rev: 0 A. ENGINEERING ASSURANCE DIVISION (Engineering Department) The Engineering Assurance Division is responsible for assuring the implementation and proper functioning of management systems for the control of technical work of the Engineering Divisions, and to assure that completed designs and specifications comply
~
with Stone & Webster Proce'dures.' The activities which are necessary to ensure compliance with the preceding paragraph are stipulated in the EUGIUEERIHG ASSUP.AUCE IG.IiUAL procedures and related Engineering Department instructions. (Technical guidance is provided to the Project Engineer and the lead engineer of each discipline by the Chief Engineer and staff specialists in each of the Engineering Divisions.)
- 3. PRCCUREMENT CUALITY CONTROL DIVISION (Quality Assurance Departmen*
The Procurement Quality Control Division headquarters is in Boston. There are additional district offices and resident inspectors strategically located near major manufacturing canters in the United States. A District Chief directs each district office with direction from the Chief, Frocurement Quality Control. The procurement quality control program is designed to provide the type of inspection and verification of the quality of materials, components and equipment in compliance with Engineer-ing requirements as designated in specifications, drawings and procurement documents. The extent of inspection and verification implemented by the Procurement Quality Control Divisien are indicated in the governing specification. Procedures to control the quality requirements for the procure-ment of materials, components and equipment are included in the PRCCUREMENT QUALITY CONTROL MANUAL. C. FIELD QUALITY CONTROL DIVISION (Quality Assurance Departtent) A field quality control program is provided to assure the require-ments of specifications and drawings are met by Stone a Webster Construction Department and its subcontractors. Quality control programs of subcontractors, must be acceptable to Stone a Webster prior to contract award. The FIELD QUALITY COUTROL MANUAL l provides detailed procedural requirements. 1 1
= ,
"E** '3 ylM@] ;{ j i nddilijilj flL. Rev: O If it is determined that a subcontractor's quality control program cannot be accepted, Stone & Webster will advise NUSCO and recommend that Stone a Webster provide a program and the perscnnel to implement it at the construction site.
If this recommendation is accepted, an applicable quality control program will be added to the FIELD QUALITY CONTROL MANUAL. NUSCO will be notified when a subcontractor is unable to perform quality control activities as required in his accept-able program. The Field Quality Control Division will in-crease its staff to perform detailed inspections and documen-tations in accordance with the Stone & Webster Field Quality Control program. Compliance audits will be conducted in specific areas by Headquarters. All construction operations will comply with the.reauirements of the . FIELD QUALITY CONTROL MANUAL (or subcontractor's approved quality control program where applicable). The activities which are necessary to implement the Stone a Webster site quality control program are designated in the FIELD QUALITY CONTROL MANUAL. D. CUALITY ASSURANCE COORDINATION . The Project Quality Assurance Coordinator is responsible for assisting the Project Manager and other project staff in implementing all phases of the quality assurance program and is supported and directed as necessary in this effort by the Manager, Quality Assurance Department. The Project Quality
' Assurance Coordinator assists in liaison between the Quality Assurance Department, the Project, NUSCO, Westinghouse and other vendors and. subcontractors regarding quality activities.
The Project Quality Assurance Coordinator assists the Project team by:
- 1. Furnishing information and guidance to the Project on regulatory matters pertaining to quality assurance.
-2. Coordinating the project quality assurance program with the NUSCO quality assurance program and other Stone &
Webster directives and manuals. 3 Providing Quality Assurance sections and revisions for Safety Analysis Reports.
- 4. Assuring that Quality Assurance reviews of Project spec-ifications have been conducted.
Page: 14 . p ,,. 7 , __ ? E 0 W. ,, it.. niu e$ UnidfL Rev: 0
$. Assisting NUSCO in modifying its quality assurance and coordinating'resulting program if requested, modifications to the Stone & Webster quality assur-
! :ance. program.
- 6. LPreparing the Quality Assurance Activity Reports
-which are submittmt to NUSCO.
7 Attending regulatory agency audits as a quality assurance spokesman,-and testifying at hearings. Assisting project team to ensure follow through of corrective actions which result from the~ audits.
- 8. Coordinating all applicable quality control procedures and the Project procedures.
~
9 Assists in assuring that the Project quality assurance program fulfills the Safety Analysis Report (SAR) commitments. i
- E.: CUALITY SYSTEMS DIVISION -
The Quality Systems Division (QSD) is the quality engineering
-arm of-the Quality Assurance Department and is responsible for s
the establishment and control of standardized quality systems. Standardized quality systems shall be. developed, implemented and controlled by methods education t i L and. records activities. bataanalys1s'echnicalsupport, cost and reporting of Stone i .& Webster performance.to management shallLbe undertaken to assure that the:above efforts are accomplishing the intended !. function. 4
'F. SUPPORT ACTIVITIES
' TheQualityAssuranceDepartment,HondestructiveTestGroupkon is responsible for the systems which control the qualificat of personnel and equipment, safety, test methods, review and approval of vendor NDT procedures, and application of documentation related to nondestructive test methods. Such activities. affect Procurement Quality Control and are applicable to Stone & Webster site personnel. The instructions for nondestructive tests which are performed by Stone & Webster personnel are included in the COMPANY QUALITY ASSURANCE UCU-DESTRUCTIVE TEST MANUAL. The Quality Assurance Department technical support activities, available as required, incle.de proficiency in:
.o o o ,
Page: 1-3 0 Rev: a .:...pr,3,l3
, . - n . u " .p iu G J UndjX11.
e klelding e Auditing e Reporting e Training e Publications e Metrology
PRESIDENT I i I I I I GENERAL VICE PRESIDENT VICE PRESIDENT SENIOR VICE PRESIDENT PURCHASING VICE PRESIDENT AND AND QUALITY ASSURANCE ENGINEERING g AGENT AND MANAGER g SENIOR OF MANAGER M ANAGER QUAllTY CONSTRUCTION PROJECTS '- O/A ASSURANCE ! MANAGER l -== I l
-Ig I i F-CHIEF- ENGINEER i i CHIEF i
g ENGINEERING CHIEF ENGINEER l l o;- DIVISION ENGINEERING FIELD PROCUREMENT s lE CHIEFS ASSURANCE l O/C DIVISION Q/C DIVISION l
- Is i i 1 1 I i PRUCUREMENT l0 l l SENIOR FIELD Q/C Q/CINSPECTOR l
A R SPEC AL STS l ^
!E E/A -
9To'.'EY sl 12'.". a1 - - l lo hl QUALITY SYSTEMS CHIEF ENGINEER z ol l g g g DIVISION Q/A NDT GROUP Qa.
*I zl CONST RUCTION MANAGER PROJ ECT ENGINEER
_r_l (I, o ! n n ! SUPT OF ROJECT Q/A o l DESIGN ENGINEERING CONSTRUCTION COORDINATOR l 1 I 1 CO N ST RUCT ION RESIDENT FIELD SUPERVISORS ENGINEER PURCH ASI N G AGENT , s ?- NOTE: O/R-OUALITY REQUIREMENTS COMPANY ORGANIZATION O/A -OUALITY ASSUR ANCE E/A - ENGINEERING ASSUR ANCE FOR QUALITY ASSURANCE STONE G WEBSTER ENGINEERING CORPORATION Figure A Page 1-6 J 'uly 27, 19'/3 O E
e 4 VICE PRESIDENT QUALITY ASSURANCE I M AN AGER QU ALIT Y ASSURANCE I I I I I I CHIEF ENGINEER PROJECT O/A CHIEF PROCUREMENT C OOR DIN ATORS CHIEF ENGINEER CHIEF FIELD O/C DIVISION O/A NDT 'ROUP QUALITY SYSTEMS O/C DIVISION DIVISION I i l TECHNIC AL FIELD QUALITY CONTROL STAFF METHODS SUPPORT O/C STAFF H EADQU AR T E RS-BOSTON CONSTRUCTION SITE SUPT. OF FIELD O/C
. p k'3 " 4s? f *U l g jg i
OUALITY CONTROL QUALITY CONTROL O/C MATERIAL CONT ROL INSPECTORS h,~yg) [ >r {A ! J4 TRADE INSPECTORS NOT INSPECTORS PROCUREMENT O / t' INSPECTOR LOCATIONS i I I -I I I I I I BOSTON LOS ANGELES CHIC AGO ATLANTA SAN FRANCISCO WYNCOTE PITTSBURGH HOUSTON - QU ALITY ASSURANCE DEPARTMENT ORGANIZATION STONE E. WEBSTER ENGINEERING CORPORATION July 27, 1973 Fig. B Page 1-7
, s
. 3 7
A H 2 I 1 S - O 4 N O I T I A C 3 U - D 1 E
- {E - e i-b i L a
N A 3 d l i$ O I ~ R U
- P t
i T T .
-$ ) A I I
C . 1 U U
-uib '
L R -. '( A S T
- 2 .
V C S S E - j E C TI IT -
. N I DS O V UI l'
.L I R AT .
T E A A S . T R S T T L A S R C I N OI S R PR T E
)
MI D PE UL I D I _ W 0 A SC U O A P 4 t N O I 1 S VI - NI D R R O E E L A E E TI E N MS C
-N ET AC I G T I
G LR I R Z N N S N I T S E BO N A I E OP C R A RE E A U F F E PR L G S E I I H E RS H OA C C G IN R E E N I G N E S D R A 1 D . _ N .S A .N
.S T .O
_ S I . E
.T .
N E
,A
. SIL V SL .E E I
T EUAD D I - A DG HUI T OE STU N CROSG E S E R P S E D R I O S H E _ C T I V E R M E S S T E C R E U J D O l E R C P O R P
, i !
I-152 O A STONE & WEBSTER ENGINEERING CORPORATION QUALITY ASSURANCE DEPARTMENT QUAUTY ASSURANCE PROGRAM lilSTORICal Mil l STONE N1101 F AR POWFR STATION IIN T T 't TITLE: NUMBER: SECTION 2 QUALITY ASSURANCE PROGRAM REVISION: EFFCCTIVE DATE: FEBRUARY 28, 1975 APPROVALS
=
MANAGER, QUALITY ASSURANCE M. O..kkiyh m t M 1 - CHIEF ENGINEER, ENGINEERING ASSURANCE O V PROJECT MAhAGER
l e 2-1 Revision B MT0ER . l l SECTION 2 OUALITY ASSURANCE PROGRAM 1.0 REOUIREMENTS 1.1 This program applies to S&W design, procurement, construction and testing responsiblities for nuclear power stations as defined in utility's Preliminary Safety Analysis' Report. 1.2 The design, procurement, construction and testing of Category I structures, components and systems shall be controlled through ituplementation of the criteria of Appendix B, 10CFR50. Category I structures, components and systems are designated in the Millstone 3 PSAR and are further defined in applicable drawings and specifications. Applicable criteria of Appendix B, 10CFR50 shall be imposed on vendors. 1.2.1 Activities affecting quality shall be documented, as appropriate, in drawings, specifications, instructions and procedures. 1.2.2 Activities affecting quality shall be conducted under controlled conditions. These shall include appropriate equipment, such as tools and test equipment, suitable environmental conditions and assurance that all specified conditions have been met. Specified conditions include such items as qualification of personnel and processes and verification that required inspection or test operations have been satisifactorily completed. 1.3 The design, procurement, construction and testing Category II and Category III structures, of components and systems shall meet applicable codes and standards and good design and construction for practices (see Appendix III, Glossary definitions applied to various Categories) .
---m -- -_ _;-- _ _ . _ _ _ . _ _ , _ _ _ , _ _ _ . , _
e e rision B i
>or'k at the site, which falls 1.4 All construction ASME Boiler and within the scope of Section III, Pressure Vessel Code shall be controlled by S&W of in compliance with the S&W Certificate Authorization issued by A.9tE.
1.5 S&W shall, as directed by NUSCo, audit and witness tests of selected Westinghouse NSSS. equipment. employed at the site shall be required to 1.6 Vendors comply with applicable parts of this program and use applicable SSW manuals and procedures or their own SSW approved manuals and procedures. 1.7 Indoctrination and education programs shall be established, as appropriate, for Ssw personnel performing activities affecting quality. 1.8 An annual report of this program's status shall be provided to NUSCo.
- 2.0 TASKS
- 2.1 Project Engineering shall ensure that design and affecting quality are engineering activities in drawings, documented, as appropriate, specifications, instructions and procedures. These documents shall, as appropriate:
- Category of structures,.
2.1.1 Designate the caponents and systems. Extend applicable criteria of Appendix B, 2.1.2 10CFR50, to vendors. 2.1.3 Indicate applicable codes and standards. requirements for . controlled 2.1.4 Include conditions. 2.2 Engineering Assurance shall: 2.2.1 Develop management systems and methods to for implement the quality assurance program Document engineering and design activities.Engineering these procedures in the Assurance Manual. and provide continuing 2.2.2 Indoctrinate performing education for personnel
- See Appendix I for reference to ' implementing documents.
e a 2-> filSTOR"A1 . Revision B activities affecting quality of engineering and design. 2.2.3 Coordinate the program of establishing a SSW position guideline on each AEC Regulatory Guide and publish and maintain the listing of these Guides. Inform SSW personnel of newly issued and proposed Regulatory Guides. 2.2.4 Coordinate the formulation of S&W's position with respect to code requirements and the preparation of requests for codes, special rulings" or interpretations of codes and standards, all upon request. 2.3 Quality Systems Division shall: 2.3.1 Publish and control the issue of all manuals, excluding the Engineering Assurance Manual, needed to implement the quality ' assurance program. 2.3.2 Establish and maintain a program for the indoctrination and continuing education of Quality Assurance Department personnel, and maintain program records. 2.3.3 Establish and maintain the records of each inspector's qualification and' certification for all Divisions / Groups .and notify personnel when requalification is required. 2.4 Procurement Quality Control Division shall: 2.4.1 Periodically review procedures affecting procurement quality control and provide input to QSD for necessary updating. 2.4.2 Audit and witness tests of selected equipment procured by Westinghouse, as requested by NUSCo. 2.4.3 Employ and maintain a staff of qualified - inspection personnel. 2.5 Field Quality Control Division shall: 4 2.5.1 Periodically review procedures affecting field quality control and provide inputs to QSD for necessary updating.
..._.._.._.._._._._ ._..;..__. .__=-_;.--_.g...;.-..g......_
. l 2-4 5 41J Revision B 2.5.2 Employ and maintain a staff Of qualified inspection personnel.
2.6 Nondestructive Test Division shall: 2.6.1 Periodically review procedures affecting nondestructive testing and provide input to QSD for necessary updating. 2.6.2 Establish and maintain a training program for the qualification and certification of S&W personnel involved in nondestructive testing and evaluation. 2.6.3 Maintain and control a file of all records documenting competency of SSW personnel 1 performing nondestructive testing and i evaluation. 2.6.4 Perform surveillance of nondestructive test operations, including periodic review of examhations, and provide- technical assistance, as required. 2.7 The Project Quality Assurance Coordinator shall coordinate the preparation of an annual report to NUSCo on the SSW Quality Assurance Program, for the Manager, Quality Assurance Department, based on inputs from SSW quality assurance organizations. 3.0 DISCUSSION 3.1 Reference Paragraph 1.2 This program document consuunicates the corporate QA policy and commitments to department heads who develop the implementing procedures. These are in manuals with a controlled distribution to all affected departments as determined by department management. Scheduled training is conducted within k the department on applicable quality policies, manuals and procedures. A scheduled audit program assures that they are implemented. 4.0 CLIENT CONSIDERATIONS There are no additional client considerations.
T-152
~
ETDRlCAL /A STONE & WEBSTER ENGINEERING CORPORATION QUALITY ASSURANCE DEPARTMENT QUALITY ASSURANCE P,n3 ERIF,A! f
, PROGRAM MILLSTONE NUCLEAR POWER STATION - UNIT 3 TITLE: NUMBER:
SECTION 2 REVISION: QUALITY ASSURANCE PROGRAM A EFFECTIVE DATE: 7/19/74 APPROVALS l f fw MANAGER, QUALITY ASSURANCE
% .cL a&O m
- CHIEF ENGINEER, ENGINEERING ASSURANCE lA~L Did PROJECT MANAGER [
l
- R&vicion A I
i { 6 SECTION 2 QUALITY ASSURANCE PROGRAM 1.0 REQUIREMENTS 1.1 This program applies to Ssw design, procurement, con-struction and testing responsibilities for Millstone Nuclear Power Station Unit 3, as defined in the Prelimin-ary Safety Analysis Report. 1.2 The design, procurement, construction and testing of Category I structures, components and systems shall be controlled by implementation of the criteria of Appendix
; B, 10CFR50. Category I structures, components and systems are identified in Appendix III and are further defined in applicable drawings and specifications.
Applicable criteria of Appendix B, 10CFR50 shall be imposed on vendors. 1.2.1 Activities affecting quality shall be documented,
- - as appropriate, in drawings, specifications, in-structions and procedures.
1.2.2 Activities affecting quality shall be conducted under controlled conditions. These shall include appropriate equipment, such as tools and test equipment, suitable environmental conditions and assurance that all specified conditions have been met. Specified conditions include such items as qualification of personnel and processea and verification that required inspection or test operations have been satisfactorily completed. I 1.3 The design, procurement, construction and testing of i Category II and Category III structures, components and i systems shall meet applicable codes and standards and good design and construction practice (see Appendix IV, Glossary for definitions applied to various Categories). 1.4 All construction work at the site, which falls within the scope of Section III, ASME Boiler and Pressure Vessel Code shall be controlled by SsW in compliance with the SsW Certificate of Authorization issued by ASME. l i -
S cticn 2 aP R;vicion A i, 1.5 Ssw shall audit and witness tests of selected Nuclear , steam Supply System equipment procured by Westinghouse as advised by NUSCo. 1.6 Vendors employed at.the site shall be required to comply with applicable parts'of this program and use applicable S&W manuals and procedures or their own S&W approved manuals and procedures. 1.7 Indoctrination and education programs shall be established as appropriate, for SEW personnel performing activities affecting quality. 1.8 An annual report of this program's status shall be provided to NUSCo. 2.0 TASKS
- 2.1 Project Engineering shall ensure that design and engineering activities affecting quality are documented, as appropriate, in drawings, specifications, instructions and procedures. These documents shall, as appropriate:
2.1.1 Designate the Category of structures, components and systems. 2.1.2 Extend applicable criteria of Appendix B, 10CFR50, to vendors. 2.1.3 Indicate applicable codes and standards. 2.1.4 Include requirements for controlled conditions. 2.2 Engineering Assurance shall: 2.2.1 Develop management systems and methods to imple-ment the quality assurance program for engineering and design activities. Document these procedures in the Engineering Assurance Manual. 2.2.2 Indoctrinate and provide continuing education for , personnel performing activities affecting quality of engineering and design. 2.2.3 Coordinate the program of establishing a S&W position guideline on each AEC Regulatory Guide and publish and maintain the listing of these Guides. Inform SSW personnel of newly issued and proposed Regulatory Guides.
- See Appendix I for reference to implementing documents.
2 l
Wl Secticn 2 i 1}Efde-esggggllU Rsvision A ' f 4 l 2.2.4 Coordinate the formulation of S&W's position with 1 respect to code requirements and the preparation , of requests for codes, special rulings or inter-pretations of codes and standards, all upon request. 2.3 Quality Systems Division shall: 2.3.1 Publish and control the issue of all manuals, , excluding the Engineering Assurance Manual, needed to implement the quality assurance program. 2.3.2 Establish and maintain a program for the indoc- i l trination and continuing education of Quality Assurance Department personnel, and maintain program records. ! 2.4 Procurement Quality Control Division shall: 4 2.4.1 Pesiodically review procedures affecting procure- , ment quality control and provide input to QSD for necessary updating. > 2.4.2 Audit and witness tests of selected equipment pro-l cured by Westinghouse, as requested by NUSCo. , 2.5 FQCD shall periodically review procedures affecting field quality control and provide inputs to QSD for necessary i updating. 2.6 Nondestructive Test Division shall: 2.6.1 Periodically review procedures affecting nondes~ tructive testing and provide input to QSD for necessary updating. 2.6.2 Establish and maintain a training program for the 1 qualification and certification of S&W personnel ' involved in nondestructive testing and evaluation. 2.6.3 Maintain and control a file of all records docu-I menting competency of S&W personnel performing ' nondestructive testing and evaluation. 2.6.4 Perform surveillance of nondestructive test opera-tions, including periodic review of examinations, I and provide technical assistance, as required. i 3 _ , _ . , _ . . _ . - . , , _ . ~ . _ . , _ _ . _ _ _ . _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ . _ _ _ . _ _ _ . -
Scction 2
. R;vicion A ESTORiOAL 2.7 The Project Quality Assurance Coordinator shall coordinate the preparation of an annual report to NUSCo.
on the S&W Quality Assurance Program, for the Manager, Quality Assurance Department, based on inputs from S&W quality assurance organizations. I 1 i i I 1 l l l i
Paga 2-1 J i- Rev: 0 II QUALITY ASSURANCE PROGRAM The quality assurance program provides direction and control throughout the following phases of the project: e Conceptual design e Detailed engineering and design e Equipment specifications (1) Vendor selection (2) Surveillance of suppliers (3) witnessing of key shop tests e Installation specifications (1) Vendor selection (2) Field inspection activities e Quality related records and documentation e Construction testing, and preoperation testing to the extent required by the client. The program comprises planned and systematic actions which provide confidence that structures, systems, or components required for safe and reliable plant operation will perform satisfactorily in service. l The following activities are included:
- e Design e Purchasing e Fabrication e Handling e Shipping e Storage l
,y-y w a-- ---
Paga: 2-2 5 , k e Cleaning e Erection e Installation 5 e ~ Inspection e Testing
\; 3 \
The quality as'surance program provides written policies,
'and instructions throughout the construction phases of $heprojcet. They are covered in greater detail procedures in the following documents:
e FIELD QUALITY CONTROL MANUAL e PROCUREMENT QUALITY CONTROL MANUAL e- ENGINEERING ASSURANCE MANUAL e ' COMPANY-QUALITY ASSURANCE AND CONTROL MANUAL - ASME SECTION III e COMPANY QUALITY ASSURANCE NONDESTRUCTIVE TEST MANUAL H0IE Figure D illustrates the basic documentation of the major quality assurance areas of activity, and the procedural relationships to Appendix B to 10CFR50. The structures, systems and components for Category I included g in this program are lisded on Table 3 2-5-1 of the PSAR. The three categories for structures, systems and components are: A. Category I or portions of systems structures, and
~equipment Plant systems,hich of w failure or malfuncE1on could cause release of radioactivity that would endanger public safety.
This Category also includes equipment which is vital to a safe shutdown of the plant and the removal of decay and sensible heat, or equipment which is necessary to mitigate the consequences to the public of_a postulated accident.
.. o s .
- Page: 2-3 Rev: 0 g i B. Category II portions of systems, structures and Plant equipment whic are essential for the reliable, generation systems,h of electric power; but are not essential for a safe ;
shutdown. Failure of this equipment could result in loss of power generation; but would not endanger public safety. - Equipment and materials which contain radioactive mater-ials; but whose failure could not release sufficient quantities to endanger public safety are included in tV s Category. r C. Category III portions of systems structures, and Plantsystems,harenotessentialforthereliable equipment whic generation of electric power and which do not contain radioactive material; or where failure could not result in the release of radioactive material. Project Technical Memo NETM 11 provides a list'of Category
< I, II, and III structures, systems, and components. ,
A controlled system of audits is required by the Company Manuals to assure that the execution of activities is in compliance with the prescribed program. The status and adequacy of the project quality assurance program is regu4rly reviewed through the audit requirements of the Quality Assurance Program. Manual. ' Compliance with requirements by inspection and tests is accom-plished through Procurement; Quality Control and Field Quality Control as required by the policies and procedures of the applicable manuals. Periodically after the application for the construction permit, the Manager, Quality Assurance, shall audit the Project Quality Assurance Program for compliance with the PSAR and Appendix B l to 10CFR50. Copies of this audit report and recommendations 1 will be submitted to the Project Manager, the Vice President of Quality Assurance, the Manager of Projects, the President (all of Stone & Webster).
/
+..
rm - y +-4ew e g--.y,-y,- wwemm-p- w - -
-,ww--wm ew--ew-,m....-m-mmn+
--w r--w--y-vm
~
QUALITY PROGRAM PROCEDURAL MATRIX FIELD ENGINEERING PROCUREMENT QUALITY ASSURANCE NDT MANUAL Q/C~ MANUAL CONTROL MANUAL MANUAL NO. 1.1, 2.1 5 1.1, 2.1 1.1, 1.2 I ORGANIZATION QUALITY ASSURANCE PROGRAM 1 2b 1, 6 1 _II ' 3'" " ''8.'- 31, 32, 3 3, JN ENGINEERING AND DESION 15 'and SWEC - ASME III Manual 5.1, 5.2, 6.1 3 6, 3 9, 3.10 III CONTROL - 7, b , 15, 16, 19 71 9.1, +.lu IV PROCUREMENT DOCUMENT CONTROL V INSTRUCTIONS, PROCEDURES, AND DRAWINGS 6 thru 27 6.3, 5515, 5 2 4.1, 5.1, 5.2, 5.3 5A. 5.8 51, 5.2,'5 3- 6.2, 6.3, 6.4 VI DOCUMENT CONTROL 4.1 8, 15 thru 19 5. 5 CONTROL OF PURCHASED 6, VII MATERIAL EQUIP. & SERVICES 157,thru 8,1910, 7.1 IDENTIFICATION OF MATERIAIB PARTS AND COMPONENTS 7, 8, 10, 17, 18 6.1, 7.1 8.1 _VIII 91,92 IX CONTROL OF SPECIAL PROCESSES 10.1, 11.1 7, 8, 10, 16 12.1, 12.2 12.4 12.3, 13.2 13 1, 17.2 14.1, X INSPECTION 5.1 12 thru 20 XI TEST CONTROL 16, 19, 20 Later XII CONTROL OF TEST AND MEASURING EQUIPMENT 7, 8, 19 12.1 XIII HANDLING STORAGE, SHIPPING AND PRES $31VATION 21, 22, 23 XIV INSPECTION TEST AND OPER-ATING STATbS 10, 16 thru 20 XV NONCONFORMING MATERIAIS, PARTS OR COMPONENTS 18 20.1, 6.1 15.1 XVI CORRECTIVE ACTION 18 20.1, 6.1 16.1, 16.2
~
XVII QUALITY ASSUR11NCE RECORDS 7, 8, 17, 20 53 XVIII AUDITS 8, 16 20.1 18.1 H3TORCL Fig. D Page 2-4 , e
. e, *
. T - 152 HISTORICAL A
STONE & WEBSTER ENGINEERING CORPORATION QUALITY ASSURANCE DEPARTMENT QUALITY ASSURANCE PROGRAM MILLSTONE NUCLEAR POWER STATION - UNIT 3 TITLE: NLIMBER: SECTION 3 REVISION: ENGINEERING AND DESIGN CONTROL A EFFECTIVE DATE: 7/19/74 APPROVALS MANAGER, QUAI.lTY ASSURANCE
%.q. uE CHIEF ENGINEER, ENGINEERING ASSURANCE IL PROJECT MANAGER I M
em w iv -- - - - + - , --.-&*- ,,g, y,. _ _ _ , - . _ , , p-.,_- ,% y, _,.7--y...y.,.-c-.--,., - - -v-- , . ,-y-- --,-,,-
,e .-
Rsvision A 4 SECTION 3 ENGINEERING AND DESIGN CONTROL [
- 1.0 REQUIREMENTS ,
- 1.1 An engineering and design control system shall be estab-lished to scope and document the method of accomplishing i the essential engineering and design tasks.
1.2 The system shall control the development of the design, from the initial authorization to the obtaining of the operating license. The systen shall erasure that the applicable design requirements such as design beses, j regulartory requirements, codes, standards and quality requirements are correctly translated into drawings, specifications, instructions and procedures. The design documentation shall specify the quality characteristics and quality standards, including acceptance criteria. The system shall include a review and approval cycle. 1.3 Design controls shall be imposed on the following: . stress , thermal , hydraulic , and accident-analysis; compatibility of materials; accessibility for in-service inspection; repairs; and acceptance criteria for in-spections and tests. I 1.4 Alternate or simplified solution methods may be used for design verification when accompanied by justification of the methods used. 1.5 Design control measures shall include provisions for the , ~ selection and review of the suitability of materials, l parts, equipment or processes that are essential to the ' functions of structures, systems or components. j l.6 Engineering drawings shall be reviewed by an individual, other than the originator, for adequacy of design. ! 1. 7_ Manual and computerized calculations shall be reviewed by l .an individual other than the preparer. The reviewer shall ! be responsible for a complete check of the preparer's approach and the accuracy and technical adequacy of the calculations t i 1 l
- Snction 3 R; vision A M
1.8 If prototype testing is required to confirm the adequacy , of the design, the requirements and acceptance criteria for such testing shall be included in the specification. Testing shall be performed under the most adverse design conditions. 1.9 Changes to approved procedures, instructions, calculations, drawings and specifications shall be permitted only after a review and approval by the same individual or group responsible for the original work. 1.10 Instructions shall govern the review, approval, release distribution and revision of documents all for the parti-cipating design organizations. 1.11 S&W is responsible for interface control with Westinghouse. This control includes a review of NSSS descriptions, drawings, specifications, manuals and other correspondence. 2.0 TASKS
- 2.1 EA shall prepare procedures, as necessary, to establish a control system for engineering and design.
I l l l l
- See Appendix I for reference to implementing documents. ,
2 I
',<' . Pagos 3-1 lilSTORICH III ENGINEERING AND DESIGN CONTROL Engineering and design control is established by the procedures inithe_ ENGINEERING ASSURANCE. MANUAL. These procedures establish the methods of scoping and of accomplishing the essential engineerh g and design tasks, and assure that the plant design bases are
, correctly translated into specification, drawings, procedures, and instructions. The system of thorough review and checks by competent technical personnel are included in the procedures.
An Engineering Assurance Division training and audit program is also provided to ensure compliance with program requirements. Project specifications and drawings which detail the requirements applicable to this station are developed in accordance with these procedures. Additionally, the procedures in the PROJECT MANUAL are established by the Project Engineer for the identification and control of engineering and design interface between Stone & Webster NUSCO and Westinghouse. The procedures establish instructions which govern the review, approval, release, distribution and revision of documents which transmit technical information related to design interface with all participating design organizations. Technical guidance is provided by written technical guides issued by each Engineering Division, supplemented by frequent oral communication between Lead and supporting engineers with the Chief Engineers in the division of their own disciplines. Design Criteria Documents Design are reviewed criteriaand documents,by approved the Project Engineer, and the Leade.g.,PSAR, desig Engineer of the appropriate discipline, before they are submitted to NUSCO for review and app'roval. Design criteria documents include, but are not limited to, evaluation of: e Accident Analysis e Compatibility of materials e Compatibility of design interface with Westinghouse and other responsible personnel e Accessibility for inservice inspection, maintenance, and repair e Acceptance criteria for inspections and tests em- e
Page: 3-2 Rev: 0 Engineering Calculations All manual calculations are reviewed, approved, and signed by a qualified person other than the preparer. The review consists of a complete check of the preparer's approach, and the general technical adequacy of the calculation.
~
Machine calculations are prepared with a Summary Sheet, including all pertinent design criteria and other design input and results, reviewed by other than the originator, and are signed by both the originator and the reviewer. Filing of all calculations will be in accordance with EAP 5i.3 of the ENGINEERING ASSURANCE FANUAL; also, see Project Manual. Engineerine Eauionent and Installation Specifications The assurance methods for controlling Procurement Specifications are designated in Section IV of this manual. If prototype testing is required to confirm the adequacy of a design the requirements and acceptance criteria for such testing w111 be included in the Procurement Specification. Personnel who are directly responsible for conducting prototype tests will not be
.those persons who performed the original design.
Engineerine Drawings . After a drawing is produced it is thoroughly reviewed by a designer (otherthantheorlginator)forconformancetostandards, supporting calculations, engineering instructions, comparison
- with other drawings, mahtainability of equipment, and correctness of dimensions. The drawing is then verified and initialed by the Design Supervisor, the Responsible Engineer, the Project Engineer, and (when required by code, standard or statute) signed by the responsiole registered Professional Engineer who affixes his
- j. seal prior to issue.
Engineering and Design Change Control p All technical changes to approved procedures, instructions, calculations, drawings, and specifications are permitted only after review end approval in accordance with the change control procedures for engineering and design documents in the ENGINEERING ASSURANCE MANUAL.
e
- _,
, T - 152 O
A STONE & WEBSTER ENGINEERING CORPORATION QUALITY ASSURANCE DEPARTMENT QUALITY ASSURANCE nna p PROGRAM 04 U n-lUih 31. MILLSTONE NUCLEAR POWER STATION - UNIT 3 TITLE: NUMBER: SECTION 4 REVISION: PROCUREMENT DOCUMENT CONTROL B EFFECTIVE DATE:
, FEBRUARY 28, 1975 APPROVALS
[ W MANAGER, QUALITY ASSURANCE
%.CN , % sk &D w:-
CHIEF ENGINEER, ENGINEERING ASSURANCE o \ PROJECT MANAGER _ _ _ __ _ _ , . , - _ _ . . .,.,. ,._. _, .,,.. ,_.__,__,, ,.._____,.~ . ._ _._._ _ _. ___.__.._._ ______.- ___,.,-. _
e e *
. erision B SECTION 4 PROCUREMENT DOCUMENT CONTROL 1.0 REQUIREMENTS 1.1 Procurement documentation shall include the requirements necessary for establishing the quality of the procured material, equipment and services.
1.2 Design criteria, including applicable codes, standards and regulatory requirements shall be translated into procurement specifications and the associated design drawings. Items not procured with a specification, i.e., a purchase order, shall contain all necessary quality provisions. 1.3 Procurenkant documents shall be subject to - appropriate reviews as indicated in Appendix V. f' 1.4 Vendors required to have who perform Category I work shall be quality assurance programs
, g' consistent with applicable provisions of Appendix B, 10CFR50. These provisions shall be
~ imposed on their suppliers, as appropriate.
2.0 TASKS
- 2.1 QSD shall review and concur in all procurement doctanents (specifications and requisitions when no specification exists) for Category I items
, originated by Project Engineering prior to their Concurrence shall indicate that the issuance.
specifications include sufficient information pertaining to codes, standards, methods of testing, inspection and documentation so that quality assurance activities can be performed. 2.2 Procurement Quality Control Division shall: 2.2.1 Review procurement specifications for procurement quality control requirements when requested by QSD.
- See Appendix I for reference to implementing documents.
e
~
FilSIDECAl. -2 Revision B 2.2 2 Review and approve quality assurance shop fabrication of manuals for Category I items submitted by vendors in accordance with procurement speci-fications. 2.3 Field Quality Control Division shall: procurement specifications or 2.3.1 Review field quality control requirements when requested by QSD. 2.3.2 Review and approve purchase requisitions issued at the site. 2.3.3 Review and approve subcontractors 8 , quality assurance manuals and changes snhei tted thereto for field erection work. Nondestructive Test Division shall review 2.4 subcontractor procurement specifications for nondestructive test requirements when requested by QSD. 3.0 DISCUSSION 3.1 Reference Paragraph 1.1 Changes andA>r revisions to procurement documents (i.e., procurement specifications) are accomplished by either an addendum to the specification, a disposition of a nonconformance, or Engineering and Design Coordination Report. All three methods have the same review and approval requirement as the ( documents which , includes a Quality original Assurance Department sign off. The implementation subject to and operation of these methods are audit. 3.2 Reference Parsgraph 2.0 specifications identify the 3.2.1 Procurement documentation to be prepared, controlled, retained and submitted, when required, to SSW for review and/or approval. The review, approval and sign off of the the Quality procurement document by auditing Assurance Department and the activity delineated in Section 18 provide the required assurance. l
_..t.?.. :. -- - - - - - - - 4-3 Revision B 3.2.2 Quality requirements for spare or replacement parts are normally delisated in the original equipment procurement specification which is reviewed and signed off by the Quality Assurance Department for "QA* requirements and , acceptance criteria. Field procurement documents are reviewed and signed off by the Quality Assurance Department. 4.0 CLIENT CONSIDERATIONS When deviations from the requirements of the NUSCO purchase order / contract are identified by S6W, they shall be submitted in writing to NUSCo for their review and approval.
#13TORfgAt .
k
! T - 152 HISTORICAL /A STONE & WEBSTER ENGINEERING CORPORATION QUALITY ASSURANCE DEPARTMENT QUALITY ASSURANCE PROGRAM MILLSTONE NUCLEAR POWER STATION - CNIT 3 TITLE: NUMBER: ,- SECTION 4 PROCUREMENT DOCUMENT CONTROL REVISION: A EFFECTIVE DATE: 7/19/74 APPROVALS C MANAGER, OUALITY ASSURANCE
% .o. _O u s%l -
CHIEF ENGINEER, ENGINEERING ASSURANCE PROJECT MANA R
Revicion A i SECTION 4 PROCUREMENT DOCUMENT CONTROL , 1.0 REQUIREMENTS
. 1.1 Procurement documentation shall include the requirements j necessary for establishing the quality of the procured .
material, equipment and services. ' l.2 Design criteric, including applicable codes, standards and regulatory requirements shall be translated into [ procurement specifications and the associated design i drawings. Items not procured with a specification, i.e., j.
~ a purchase order, shall contain all necessary quality provisions.
I 1.3 Vendors who perform Category I work shall be required to have quality assurance. programs consistent with applicable ! provisions of Appendix B, 10CFR50. These provisions shall be imposed on their. suppliers, as appropriate. , 2.0 TASKS * ! i- q l 2.1 QSD shall review and concur in all procurement specifica-tions originated by Project Engineering prior to their issuance. Concurrence shall indicate that the specifica- , l tions include sufficient information. pertaining to codes, standards, methods of testing and inspection and docu-l mentation so that quality assurance activities can be l performed. I 2.2 Procurement Quality Control Division shall: j 2.2.1 Review procurement specifications for procurement j quality control requirements when requested by QSD. ! 2.2.2 Review and approve quality assurance manuals for shop fabrication of Category I items submitted by r vendors in accordance with procurement specifica-j tions. 2.3 Field Quality Control Division shall: l 2.3.1 Review procurement specification for field quality
- control requirements when requested by QSD.
i
- See Appendix I for reference to implementing documents.
l 1 _.,_...i... _,_. . _ _ _ _ . _ . _ , . _ . _ . _ _ . . _ _ _ . . _ _ _ . _ . . . _ . _ _ _ . _ . - _ ,
Ssction 4 R2 vision A L 2.3.2 Review and approve all purchase requisitions issued at the site. 2.3.3 Review and approve the subcont*4 actor's quality assurance manual, and changes submitted thereto, for field erection work. 2.4 Nondestructive Test Division shall review procurement specification for subcontractor nondestructive test requirements when requested by QSD. 2
Page: 4-1 HISTORICAL IV PROCUREMENT DOCUMENT CONTROL Engineering requirements of Categories I and II materials, equip-ment, and services are indicated in the procurement specifications and associated design drawings. All quality requirements are included in the procurement specification. Quality requirements chall appear in the purchase order for any item procured without a specification. The control over preparation, input, review, and approval of requirements which are established in specifications and design drawings, is designated in Section 4 and 5 of the ENGINEERING ASSURANCE MANUAL. ' ~ The Quality Assurance Department reviews and concurs in Stone & Webster developed Categories I and II specifications prior to their issuance. The concurrence indicates that the specification includes sufficient information pertaining to codes, standards, and methods of testing so that quality control activities can be performed. Vendors, contractors, and subcontractors who perform work on Categories I and II items are required to submit their Quality Assurance Program Manuals for review and comment by the Quality Assuranco Department prior to contract award. Additional re-quirements are described in NEAM-14, to incorporate supple-mentary NUSCO requirement for vendors programs. The review of Vendor's quality assurance programs will be performed by Procure-ment Quality Control personnel or personnel who are designated by the Manager Quality Assurance. All Category I and Category II specifications,will indicate that all applicable requirements including those for a quality assurance program, shall be pass,ed on to contractors and subcontractors who supp3y materials, com-ponents, and services.
. \
T ,tS2 O A STONE & WEBSTER ENGINEERING CORPORATION QUALITY ASSURANCE DEPARTMENT QUALITY ASSURANCE PROGRAM HISTORICAL MILLSTONE NUCLEAR POWER STATION - UNIT 3 NUMBER: TITLE: INSTRUCTIONS, PROCEDURES AND SECTION 5 DRAWINGS REVISION: B O
- EFFECUVE DATE FEBRUARY 28, 1975 APPROVALS f s MAN AGER, QUALITY ASSURANCE 9 % n_\ u. L M O2 m CHIEF ENGINEER, ENGINEERING ASSURANCE 4
PROJEC1 MANAGER
e * . . 5-1 Revision B lilITORBAL . SECTION 5 INSTRUCPIONS, PROCEDURES AND DRAWINGS 4 1.0 REQUIREMENTS 1.1 Quality activities shall be based on engineering specifications, drawings, procedures and instructions, as appropriate. These documents shall indicate any necessary special process controls, the applicable codes and standards and qualitative and quantitative acceptance criteria. Further, they shall establish which 6ocuments l prepared by vendors umst be sulunitted to SSW foir review before use. 1.2 Quality activities shall be conducted in accordance with quality assurance procedures which shall identify individuals or groups responsible for indicate quality performing specific tasks and record requirements. The procedures shall include sufficient definition to ensure that activities quality have been satisfactorily affecting accordance with the specified performed in i requirements. , 2.0 TASKSa 2.1 Project Engineering shall: , Indicate necessary quality activities l 2.1.1 (including special specifications controls) and procedures, in drawings, as ( appropriate. Criteria for the acceptance of specific tasks shall be included in the related document. 2.1.2 Establish which documents prepared by vendors must be submitted to SSW for review before use.
- See Appendix I for reference to implementing procedures.
e
~
ESTORICAL s-2 Revision B 2.1.3 Conduct reviews of drawings prepared by l Design to provide an independent review and l sig w ff. 2.2 QSD shall prepare and publish procedures governing the performance of quality activities, excluding engineering and design (see Paragraph 2, Section
- 3) .
3.0 DISCUSSION 3.1 Reference Paragraph 2.2 The normal sequence of events in the preparation, review, approval, publication and revision of procedures.is as follows: (a) A preparer develops the procedure. (b) A lead Engineer or supervisor reviews the preparer's material. (c) A draft is then circulated within the discipline or department for internal review. (d) Internal review comunents are incorporated or resolved by the preparer and a preliminary procedure is prepared for external (outside
~
discipline or department) review. ! (e) A preliminary procedure is then circulated authority for comunent by signature , l personnel. l are received, incorporated or l (f) Comments resolved by the preparer. (g) A final or original issue of the procedure is then circulated for signature. (h) Revisions are processed in a similar manner except that the draft stage may be l eliminated if the procedure is not significantly altered. l 4.0 CI.IENT CONSIDERATIONS I Instructions and procedures describing the quality related activities performed by Sf,W at the construction site shall be submitted to NUSCo for review, comment, l 3
Re sion B
. J and affirmation of acceptability prior to the start of the. associated activity at the construction site.
e e t e i O 1 o 9 1
~ ' ' *" **-~e-~- - - , - _ _ _ _ , _ _ _ _ __ '*M T'-'emw r-- ,% ,,,,
=* '
~
~
HISTORICAL A STONE & WEBSTER ENGINEERING CORPORATION ' QUALITY ASSURANCE DEPARTMENT ' QUALITY ASSURANCE PROGRAM MILLSTONE NUCLEAR POWER STATION - UNIT 3 TITLE: NUMBER: SECTION 5 REVISION: INSTRUCTIONS, PROCEDURES AND A EFFECTIVE DATE: 7/19/74 APPROVALS MANAGER, QUALITY ASSURANCE l
% .c W w%D:.
CHIEF ENGINEER, ENGINEERING ASSURANCE PROJECT MAhGER
' - ' ' = -- -- ,- - -
a N g . - ' RsviGion A m .a a SECTION 5 INSTRUCTIONS, PROCEDURES AND DRAWINGS 1.0 REQUIREMENTS 1.1 Quality activities shall be based on engineering specifications and drawings, procedures and instructions, as appropriate. These documents shall indicate any necessary special process controls, the applicable codes and standards and qualitative and quantitative acceptance criteria. Further, they shall establish which documents prepared by vendors must be submittud to S&W for review before use. 1.2 Quality activities shall be conducted in accordance with quality assurance procedures which shall identify indivi-duals or groups responsible for performing specific tasks and indicate quality record requirements. The procedures shall include sufficient definition to ensure that activities affecting quality have been satisfactorily performed in accordance with the specified requirements. 2.0 TASKS
- 2.1 Project Engineering shall:
2.1.1 Indicate necessary quality activities to include special controls, in drawings, specifications and procedures, as appropriate. Criteria for the acceptance of specific tasks shall be included in i the related document. 2.1.2 Establish which documents prepared by vendors must be submitted to S&W for review before use. 2.2 QSD shall prepare and publish procedures governing the performance of quality activities, excluding engineering and design (see Paragraph 2, Section 3).
- See Appendix I for reference to implementing procedures.
1 ,
Pags: Si-1 lilSTOR CAL V INSTRUCTIONS, PROCEDURES, AND DRAWINGS All quality assurance activities are in accordance with written Engineering Assurance and Quality Assurance procedures as in-dicated in Figura D, Page 2Ji, and as established in Project procedures, specifications and instructions. engineeringdrawing1onsanddrawingsareissued,whennecessary, Procedures instruct to control,special processes, e.g., nondestructive testing and welding. These include the appropriate acceptance criteria to determine that such activities have been satisfactorily performed in accordance with specified requirements. Generally activities, instructions or activitiesthat are issued associated with to aexplain single complex or infrequent event, include appropriate inspection hold points and check off signatures to verify procedure compliance. i
. _ , , . . - - . . -- ~~ ~-
-. ~ . . . - - - - -
\.. . T - 152 O A STONE & WEBSTER ENGINEERING CORPORATION QUALITY ASSURANCE DEPARTMENT QUALITY ASSURANCE HIS10RgL,i . PROGRAM MILLSTONE NUCLEAR POWER STATION - UNIT 3 TITLE: NUMBER: SECTION 6 REVISION: DOCUMENT CONTROL B O E,EECuvE oA1E: FEBRUARY 28, 1975 APPROVALS [i => MANAGER QUALITY ASSURANCE
%<..% hA vDo m =>
CHIEF ENGINEER, ENGINEERING ASSURANCE O Y / PROJECT MANdER
e, . l 6-1 HISO3 g , AAm Revision B SECTION 6 DOCUMENF CONTROL 1.0 REOUIREMENTS 1.1 The review, approval and distribution of documents, including changes thereto, which prescribe activities affecting quality shall be controlled. These documents include drawings, specifications, instructions, procedures and test procedures. 1.2 The procedures for the preparation of documents
,shall include reviews to ensure adequacy before
' release as well as requirements for the approval of each document by authorized personnel through signatures or initials.
1.3 A method of change control shall be established that includea approval by the sa,me individuals or 4 groups having responsibility for the initial , document issue. The method shall include a revision identification system so that the effective revisions can be readily determined. 1.4 Document control shall be accomplished in a manner which ensures timely inclusion of changes into the parent doctanent. 1.5 The distribution of documents shall be cont'olled r to ensure that only authorized documents are in use at the locations where the prescribed activities % are being performed. Provisions shall be included for the retrieval, control or destruction of out-dated documents. 2.0 TASKS
- 2.1 EA shall prepare and issue procedures for establishing a control system for engineering assurance and engineering and design documents which prescribe activities affecting quality.
2.2 QSD shall prepare and issue procedures which provide control over documents which are used by Quality Assurance Department personnel and which prescribe quality assurance activities.
- See Appendix I for reference to implementing documents.
e ion B 3.0 DISCUSSION 3.1 Reference Paractraph 1.1 Applicable procedures in Section 5 of .the Quality Standards Manual, Engineering Assurance Manual and the Quality Assurance Directives Manual establish the requirements to maintain master indexes of instructions, procedures, drawings and procurement documents and to publish updated indexes in a scheduled manner. Per example the quality standard entitled " Quality Standards Preparation and ( Cbntrol" states as follows:
"4.11 - Table of Contents - An updated Table of Contents shall be issued quarterly by the Quality Systems Division if there has been any change in the preceding quarter. This Tab',e
, of Contents shall list the status of all
- current QS's, changes, revisions and
! cancellations." l l 4.0 CLIENT CONSIDERATIONS There are no additional client considerations. i
. T - 15 2
= -
. , , q.
~
I!g ~$. 7! llNdb,[d STONE & WEBSTER ENGINEERING CORPORATION QU ALITY ASSURANCE DEPARTMENT QUALITY ASSURANCE PROGRAM MILLSTONE NUCLEAR POWER STATION - UNIT 3 NUMBER: TITLE: SECTION 6 REVISION: DOCUMENT CONTROL A f EFFECTIVE DATE: 7/19/74 APPROVALS d MAN AGER, QU ALITY ASSURANCE m.a.Wm: . - CHIEF ENGINEER, ENGINEERING ASSURANCE
, /^ - ,
j?f A .t L b G L h.l bf PROJECT MANfGER
T Ravicion A 1
.c k
,l\;iu SECTION 6 DOCUMENT CONTROL 1.0 REQUIREMENTS
.l.1 The review, approval and distribution of documents, including changes thereto, which prescribe activities affecting quality shall be controlled. These documents include drawings, specifications, instructions and pro-cedures.
1.2 The proceudres for the preparation of documents shall include reviews to ensure adequacy before release as well as requirements for the approval of each document by authorized personnel through signatures or initials. 1.3 A method of change control shall established that includes approval by the same individuals or groups havingThe responsibility for the initial document issue. method shall include a revision identification system
.so that the proper revision can be readily determined.
1.4 The distribution of documents shall be controlled to ensure that only authorized documents are in use at the locations where the prescribed activities are being performed. Provisions shall be included for the retrieval, control or destruction of out-dated documents. 2.0 TASKS
- 2.1 EA shall prepare and issue procedures for establishing a control system for engineering assurance and engineering and design documents which prescribe activities affecting quality.
2.2 QSD shall prepare and issue procedures which provide controls over documents which are used by Quality Assurance Department personnel and which prescribe quality assurance activities.
- See Appendix I for reference to implementing documents.
1
Page: 6-1 Rev: 0 VI DOCUMENT CONTROL Instructions for implementing document control measures (including control, review, approval and destruction of obsolete documents) are included in the various manuals in either the procedures for that document or in a separate procedure which governs the admin-istrative control of the document. The prccedures assure that instructions, procedures, and drawings, includingand change thereto, approved by are properly authorized controlled, personnel for reviewed release. for adequacy, Approval is c learly indicated
.o.n each document by an authorized signature or initials. Dis;
__tribution of control documents to designated personnel is controlled fiy records or signed receipts. e
t-is2 O A STONE & WEBSTER ENGINEERING CORPORATION QU ALITY ASSURANCE DEPARTMENT QUALITY ASSURANCE filS70Rigq PROGRAM MILLSTONE NUCLEAR POWER STATION - UNIT 3 Tl1LE: NUMBER: SECTI0ii 7 CONTROL OF PURCHASED MATERIAL, REVISION: B EQUIPMENT AND SERVICES EFFECTIVE DATE: FEBRUARY 28. 1975 APPROVALS f _-? MANAGER, QUALITY ASSURANCE M . ck . Lab,pDO mi_ CHIEF ENGINEER, ENGINEERING /4SSURANCE b PROJECT MhAGER
i e 7-1 l i Revision B i MST0EL SECTION 7 CONIROL OF PURCHASED MATERIAL, EOUIPMENT AND SERVICES
- 1.0 REOUIREMENTS 1.1 Controls shall be established to ensure that purchased material, equipment and carvices, whether purchased directly or through vendors, conform shall to procurement documents. These controls include source' evaluation and recommendations, periodic source assessment and inspection and site receiving inspection, as applicable.
1.2 A proprietary vendor rating list shall be prepared and maintained 'which shall
- indicate the capability The of a vendor's quality assurance program.
assessment of his capability may be based on past performance and/or a review of the. quality assurance manual, as applicable. 1.3 Bid specifications shall be sulmitted to NUSCo with a list of recommended vendors based on an evaluation of the capability of the vendors to meet the specification quality requirements. Bids may be solicited from vendors whose quality programs have not been evaluated and approved; however, before placing a purchase order for Category I work, the vendor's program shall be evaluated and approved. If a plant survey is necessary, NUSCO shall be notified so that they may participate. . 1.4 Field purchase orders for Category I items shall be In placed only with approved Category I vendors. establishing that a vendor for Category I items in is approved, the following guidance may be used addition to the vendor rating list: 1.4.1 If the vendor is a distributorsourceand does of the not handle the item, and if the item is an approved SSW supplier, then the vendor (distributor) need not be on the approved list, provided that the vendor furnishes copies of documentation to indicate that the items were obtained from
~ w- * ' - - - - - ' - ._ , ,,, , _ , y m no o_e _
, * * * * * =
e Fll810RIMI. ~ Revision B the approved SSW source supplier. Example: Company A ,is an approved SSW supplier for Category I electrodes. Company B is a distributor that sells Company A electrodes. Further, Company B does not handle these electrodes (i.e., they are shipped directly from O'==aany A) . Company B need not be on the approved vendor list, provided that Company B furnishes objective evidence to show that the electrodes supplied came from Company A and that applicable documentation is furnished by Company A. 1.4.2 If the acceptability of an item is based on inspections and tests performed after the item has been delivered to the site und be-fore its use, then the vendor need not be on the approved list. - 1.4.3 Vendors, who furnish items which are referenced in a specification by manufacturer' and specific ::odel or other identification are considered as approved for the specified items. By referencing a specific manufacturer's product, approval of I the product is established during the review of the specification. Example: Type X admixture is . supplied by Company A and is specified as an acceptable product in a specification. Company A is an approved vendor for Type X admixture. However, if Company A were to offer Type Y admixture as "an approved equal", then Type Y would have to be evaluated and approved by Project Engineering before .it could be used and before C<wan=ny A could be accepted as an approved vendor for Type Y admixture. 1.5 NUSCO may designate " notification points" for specific operations performed at vendor's l facilities. NUSCO shall be advised by SSW when
" notification point" operations are scheduled.
1.6 Westinghouse is responsible for source inspection and documentation of all Westinghouse procured items. i l
7-3 SI , , Revision B 1.7 Receipt inspection includes verification that all required documentation has been received and that - the items conform to the procurement documents. Inspectims for conformance shall make use of objective quality evidence received with the items, as well as selected physical inspection. 1.7.1 Receipt inspection activities shall be documented. 1.7.2 . Acceptable Category I items received at the
, site shall be identified.
1.7.3 Items received at the site without the required documentation or items for which
, receipt inspection cannot be performed within a reasm able time shall be placed in a hold status and segregated, when practicable. Items which do not conform to the specified requirements shall be tagged, reported as nmconformances, and segregated when practicable.
1.7.4 Nm conforming items or items in a hold status may be released on a risk basis. Items shall not be released for any operation when. rework, replacement or certification of acceptability of the item is impossible after the operation is performed. Copies of risk release documentation shall be provided to NUSCo. 2.0 TASKS
- 2.1 Procurement Quality Control Division shall:
2.1.1 Establish criteria for source evaluation and conduct source evaluations. 2.1.2 Maintain a vendor rating list. 2.1.3 Asses 3 active vendors, generally on a 12-month basis. While PQCD is responsible for vendor evaluation, PQCD, may request the assistance of other Quality Assurance Department divisions to conduct the evaluation. 2.2 . Bio specifications shall be submitted to NUSCo with a list of recommended suppliers by Project See Appendix I for reference to implementing documents.
..... n n . ~. ... ~ . - - - - -
Revision B Engineering. In preparing this list, an evaluation by PQCD on the capability of each vendor to meet the specification quality requirements shall be used. 2.3 If bids are solicited from vendors whose quality assurance programs have not been ovaluated and approved for Category I work, the vendor's quality assurance program shalr be evaluated and approved by PQCD before the purchase order is placed. If a plant survey is necessary, PQCD shall notify NUSCo so that they may participate, if desired. 2.4 For field purchases, FQCD shall: 2.4.1 Review purchase requisitions and assure they contain the necessary quality assurance requirements, including inspection forms, when applicable. This review and approval applies to revisions to field purchase requisitions. 2.4.2 Review all field purchase orders for Category I items and verify that an approved vendor has been engaged. 2.5 PQCD shall visit vendor facilities to verify, witness and perform the various tasks required by procurement documents. 2.5.1 NUSCO shall inform PQCD of their designated
- notification points". When the visit includes Client designated
- notification points", PQCD shall advise them for their participation.
r 2.5.2 NUSGo's Manager of Quality Assurance may request additional vendor visits. These l will be conducted by~ PQCD on a basis j mutually agreed to by NUSCO and SSW. ! 2.5.3 PQCD shall document visits to vendor facilities. Copies of visit reports shall be provided to NUSCo. I 2.5.4 When source inspection by PQCD is required l by the procurement document or requested by I the Project Engineer or site Resident Manager, PQCD shall identify all acceptable inspected items with a SHIPPING l source ! RELEASE TAG. 1 -
4 -
= ' - - FilSiggg
~
2.6 FQCD shall perform site receipt inspection for Category I and specified Category II items. 2.6.1 FQCD shall document receipt ' inspection activities. 2.6.2 SHIPPING RELEASE TAGS, affixed by PQCD shall be used by FQCD as objective quality evidence of previous ssW inspection during receipt inspection. Operations performed by PQCD during source inspection need not be repeated. 2.6.3 Westinghouse source inspection tags applied to their procured items shall not be used by FQCD as objective quality evidence during <dk receipt inspection. Also, FQCD shall check the documentation received with the items against the Procurement Quality Check List supplied by Westinghouse (i.e. , check that listed documents are accounted for). Any items received without a source inspection tag and the correct > documentati6n shall be placed in a hold status and the problem ~~shall be referred to the Client for resolution. 2.6.4 FQCD shall indicate by appropriate means,
-items or groups of items found acceptable. 4 2.6.5 FQCD shall place items received without the required documentation, or items for which required receipt inspection cannot be performed within a reasonable time, in a hold status and segregate them when practicable.
2.6.6 FQCD shall tag and segregate, when , practicable, items which do not conform to ' 4 the specified requirements and report them as nonconformances. 2.6.7 Nonconforming items and items in a hold status may be released by FQCD on a risk ) basis when a formal written request is submitted to FQCD by Construction (field) <[f and concurred in by Project Engineering and FQCD (field). FQCD shall provide copies of risk release documentation to the Client. t
- . , . . - . . . , _ _ _ _ . _ _ - , , . , , . ~ , , , , . , _.._,.m... , _ . . _ - . . . , _ _ _ _ . _ _ .
. , , . _ _ . , . . . _ . , - . . .b _
~
. 7-6 Revision B
" c --
3.1 Reference Paragraph 1.4 MS13ng ( 3.1.1 The Engineering Department (i.e. , Project Engineering) is responsible for the preparation of a recoaumended bidders list, the evaluation of the bidder's proposal and the final determination of the specific bidder to be recommended to NUSCo. The Procurement Quality Control Division of the Quality Assurance Department is responsible to evaluate recommended bidders quality i assurance programs and their ability to perform to the program. Engineering Department participation in the Quality Assurance bidder evaluation is to the extent 4
- deemed necessary by the Project Engineer.
During the conduct of the work the engineer is responsible for the review and approval cf supplier provided technical documentation as specified in the procurement specification.
- 3.1.2 An exception to the policy of buying Category I items only from vendors on the approved vendor rating list may be made under the following conditions. This exception provides for controls which i complies with the requirements of Criteria 7 to Appendix B to 10CFR50., If the Engineering Department, in the development l
of a Category I specification or purchase requisition, makes the determination that the acceptability of an item can be adequately judged by inspections and tests i performed by SSW in the vendor's shop or after delivery, the vendor need not be prequalified by survey or audit. Quality Assurance, by their review of purchase documents as delineated in Section 4 assures
.. that appropriate inspections and tests are
. specified.
3.2 Reference Paragraph 2.5 Parameters to be inspected, tests to be witnessed and documents to be reviewed by Procurement Quality l Control Division shop _ inspectors are delineated in the Test, Inspection and Documentation section of ' procurement spec _ific.ations, which'have been reviewed and approved by the Quality Assurance Department.The l
7-7 Revision B detailed techniques for the performance and doctanentation of these inspections are delineated in applicable ~ Quality Assurance Department procedures. 4.0 CLIENT CONSIDERATIbNS 4.1 Nonconforming material may not be installed at the site without prior approval by NUSCo. Il!S13RICAL t 6
--- m_m m_ m_
w_,
STONE & WEBSTER ENGINEERING CORPORATION QUALITY ASSURANCE DEPARTMENT QUALITY ASSURANCE PROGRAM MILLSTONE NUCLEAR POWER STATION - UNIT 3 TITLE: NUMBER: SECTION 7 CONTROL OF PURCHASED MATERIAL, REVISION: A EQUIPMENT AND SERVICES EFFECTIVE DATE: 7/19/74 APPROVALS
-o MANAGER, QUALITY ASSURANCE
% .q.%> =%_OAD ~~- -
CHIEF ENGINEER, ENGINEERING ASSURANCE l Q PROJECT MANAG
Rsvision A 4- . . i i SECTION 7 CONTROL OF PURCHASED MATERIAL, EQUIPMENT AND SERVICES 1.0 REQUIREMENTS i 1.1 Controls shall be established to ensure that purchased material, equipment and services, whether purchased directly or through vendors, conform to procurement documents. These controls shall include source evalua- i tion and recommendations, periodic source assessment and inspection and site receiving inspection, as applicable. 1.2 A proprietary vendor rating list shall be prepared and maintained which shall indicate the capability of a vendor's quality assurance program. The assessment of his capability may be based on past performance; and a review of the quality assurance manual, as applicable. 1.3 Bid specifications shall be submitted to NUSCo, with a list of recommended vendors based on an evaluation of
- the capability of the vendors to meet the specification
[ quality requirements. Bids may be solicited from vendors 1 whose quality programs have not been evaluated and for. _ _
. approved; however, before placing a purchase order Category I work, the' vendor's program shall be evaluated i and approved. If a plant survey is necessary, NUSCo, shall be notified so that he may participate.
7 1.4 Field purchase orders for Category I items shall be placed ' only with approved Category I vendors. In establishing that a vendor for Category I items is approved, the following guidance may be used in addition to the vendor l rating list: i 1.4.1 If the vendor is a distributor and does not handle the item, and if the source of the item is an approved SSW supplier, then the vendor (distribu-tor) need not be on the approved list, provided that the vendor furnished copies of documentation to indicate that the items were obtained from tbs approved SSW source supplier. Example: Company A is an approved S&W supplier for Category I l electrodes. Company B is a distributor that sells ~ ~ ~ Company A electrodes. Further, Company B does not handle these electrodes (i.e., they are shipped directly from Company A). Company B need not be on 1 i ?
, - . - , . . - - - . -,--.-..,- - .-,.,_-..- -, --- - --.-.- -,,,.---, ---- :: L C --.
(-
- s o
Ssction 7 REvicion A ! i gs&) the approved vendor list, provided that Company B furnishes objective evidence to show that the electrodes supplied came from Company A and that applicable documentation is furnished by Company A. i l 1.4.2 If the acceptability of an item is basad on inspec-tions and tests performed after the item has been delivered to the site and before its use, then the vendor need not be on the approved list. 1.4.3 Vendors, who furnish items which are referenced in a specification by manufacturer and specific model or other identification are considered as approved for the specified items. By referencing a specific manufacturer's product, approval of the product is established during the review of the specifica-tion. Example: Type X admixture is supplied by Company A and is specified as an acceptable pro-duct in a specification. Company A is an approved vendor for Type X admixture. However, if Company A were to offer Type Y. admixture as "an approved equal", then Type Y would have to be evaluated and approved by Project Engineering before it could be used and before Company A could be accepted as an approved vendor for Type Y admixture.
- 1.5 NUSCo.'may' designate " notification points" for specific
~
operations performed at vendor's faci 11 ties. NUSCo shall l be advised by S&W when " notification point" operations i are scheduled. 1 1.6 Westinghouse is responsible for source inspection and documentation of all Westinghouse procured items. 1.7 Receipt inspection includes verification that required documentation has been received and that the items conform ' to the procurement documents. Inspections for conformance shall make use of objective quality evidence received with the items, as well as selected physical inspection. 1.7.1 Receipt inspection activities shall be documented. 1.7.2 Acceptable Category I items received at the site shall be identified. 1.7.3 Items received at the site without the required documentation or items for which reciept inspecci6n i cannot be performed within a reasonable time shall be placed in a hold status and segregated, when
- practicable. Items which do not conform to the specified requirements shall be tagged, reported 1
as nonconformances, and segregated when practicable. 2 i
- .....---+-m,-----om ,-.--m-n-n- -.- ,-.-w,-
h Snction 7
~
b Revision A f 1.7.4 Nonconforming items or items in a hold status may be released on a risk basis. Items shall not be released for any operation when rework, replace- _. _ ment _or certification of acceptabil.ity of.the item. is impossible after the operation is performed. Further, items governed by the company Quality Assurance and Control Manual-ASME Section III shall not be,rel. eased on a risk basis. Copies.of risk release documentation shall be provied to NUSCo. 2.0 TASKS
- 2.1 Procurement Quality Control Division shall:
2.1.1 Establish criteria for source evaluation and con-duct source evaluations. 2.1.2 Maintain a vendor rating list. 2.1.3 Assess active vendors, generally on a 12-month basis. While PQCD is responsible for vendor evaluation, PQCD may request the assistance of other, Quality Assurance Department divisions to conduct j , the evaluation. 2.2 Bid specifications shall be submitted to NUSCo. with a list of recommended suppliers by Project Enginesting.
~
In preparing this list, an evaluation by PQCD on the capability of each vendor to meet the specification quality requirements shall be used. 2.3 If bids are solicited from vendors whose quality assurance programs have not been evaluated and approved for Category I work, the vendor's quality assurance program shall be evaluated and approved by PQCD before the purchase order is placed. If a plant survey is necessary, PQCD shall notify NUSCo, so that they may participate, if desired. 2.4 For field purchases, FQCD shall: 2.4.1 Review all purchase requisitions and assure they contain the necessary quality assurance require-ments, including inspection forme when applicable. This review and approval applies to revisions to field purchase requisitions. 2.C.2 Review all field purchase orders for Category I items and verify that an approved vendor has been engaged.
- See Appendix I for reference to implementing documents.
3
d Ssetion 7 S Ph Revision A 2.5 PQCD shall conduct visits to vendor facilities to verify, witness and perform various tasks as required by the procurement documents. 2.5.1 NUSCo. shall inform PQCD of their designated
" notification points". When the visit includes NUSCo, designated " notification points", PQCD shall advise them for their participation.
2.5.2 NUSCo.'s Manager of Quality Assurance may request additional vendor visits. These will be conducted by PQCD on a basis mutually agreed to by NUSCo and SSW. 2.5.3 PQCD shall document visits to vendor facilities. Copies of visit reports shall be provided to NUSCO. 2.5.4 When source inspection by PQCD is required by the procurement document or requested by the Project
- Engineer or site Resident Manager, PQCD shall identify all acceptable source inspected items with a SHIPPING RELEASE TAG.
2.6 FOCD shall perform site receipt inspection for Category I and specified Category II items. 2.6.1 FQCD shall document receipt inspection activities. 2.6.2 SHIPPING RELEASE TAGS, affixed by PQCD shall be used by FQCD as objective quality evidence of previous SEW inspection during receipt inspection. Operations performed by PQCD during source inspection need not be performed by FQCD. I 2.6.3 Westinghouse's source inspection tags applied to their procured items shall not be used by FOCD as objective quality evidence curing reciept inspection. Also, FQCD shall check the ' documentation received with the items against the Procurement Quality Check List supplied by Westing-house (i.e., check that listed documents are accounted for). Any items rece'ived without a source inspection tag and the correct documentation snall be placed in a hold status and the problem shall be
~ ~
J referred to NUSCo. for resolution. 2.6.4 FQCD shall affix acceptance tags or stickers to the items or groups of items found acceptable.
.%:m_ u Jo' , a - _ - , . -__a Ssction 7 '
- R3 vision A 2.6.5 FQCD shall place items received without the required documentation, or items for which required receipt inspection cannot be performed within a reasonable time, in a hold status and segregate them, when practicable.
2.6.6 FQCD shall tag and segregate, when practicable, items which do not conform to the specified requirements and report them as nonconformances. 2.6.7 Nonconforming items and items in a hold status may be released by FQCD on a risk basis when a formal ~ written request is submitted to FQCD by Con-struction and concurred in by Project Engineering and FQCD. FQCD shall provide copies of risk release documentation to NUSCo. 2.7 EA shall conduct pre-award and post-award surveys and audits of suppliers for procured engineering services. i l J 9 5 a _
.t -* -~ - - - - , . , - , - - , , .,-..-.-,,..,,_,,,,c. - , , , - , . . , , , , _ , - , , - - - , - -
..-s- ,
[; h hnds( Pago: 7-1 , Rev: 0 VII CONTROL OF PURCHASED MATERIAL, EQUIPMENT, AND SERVICES Specifications for Millstone 3 Category I items and ' -~ ~ items in Category II include appendices covering quality ~ ~~ program requirements. These requirements are established consistent with the Category, code classification, function-al importance and complexity of the individual item, as well as the re,quirements of the appropriate instructions in the QUALITY ASSURANCE MANUALS. Compliance of purchased material, equipment, and/or services with specifications and purchase / document requirements is controlled through: e Vendor selection e Capability assessments 2 e Review of vendor submitted bid d'ata e Periodic vendor audits e Site receiving inspection 2 Although approved vendor lists are maintained by the Procure-ment Quality Control Division, suitability of vendors is re-assessed for each vendor of Category I and selected Category II equipment before soliciting bids, and in all Categroy I and II j equipment before an order is placed. Quality assurance capabilities are assessed by evaluating past performance, conducting plant surveys, surveillance and audit, and reviewing Quality Assurance Program Manuals, (if required by the specification). Bids from responsive bidders are evaluated on a technical basis to determine compliance with specification requirements. Comparison of bids for Category I, and selected Category II items is reviewed by the Project group, the appropriate Specialist group (technical aspects), the Quality Assurance Coordinator (quality aspects) and the Purchasing Department (commercial before a recommendation aspects),dation is made to includes an evaluation of the NUSCO. This recommen recommended Vendor's quality assurance program by the Stone
& Webster Quality Assurance Department.
Inspections will be performed at the vendor's facilities by ' . qualified Procurement Quality Control personnel to verify that the requirements of the specification and purchase orders are met. wu--- F .- em - *%,a- -pw-r--My--,- tg-i y-.y-.. +-
7-2
.. Pagos . p. o r.
h Rev: O dll i Specific instructions regarding all inspection activities are summarized and separately listed in the specification which is furnished to the Procurement Quality Control Inspector. Evidence that. tests and inspections have been satisfactorily performed, and documentation required by the specification pertaining to the delivered material or equipment has been verified will be The shop in-provided by a completed " SHIPPING RELEASE TAG." spector will attach the tag to the equipment or shipping con-tainer prior to shipping, in accordance with the PROCUREMENT OUALITY CONTROL MANUAL. In accordance with the PROCUREMENT QUALITY CONTROL MANUAL, the effectiveness of the vendor's quality assurance program will be audited at intervals consistent with specification requirements, the category classification, and the complexity of the furnished items. Vendor audits will be documented and will in'clude as a minimum:
. Test reports
. Inspections records
. Special process procedures
. Approvals Witnessing of all required tests including NDT Internal audit reports
. In-process checks of materials l
Other evidence regarding the vendor's compliance with l their Quality Assurance Program Manual requirements. In order to assure that damage has not occurred during shipping, inspection of materials and equipment upon delivery at the construction site will be performed by contractor personnel in accordance with the requirements of their acceptable Quality Program Manual or by Stone & Stone Webster personnelwill
& Webster in accordance with conduct receiving Stone & Webster procedures.
inspection of Boston procured items and, as invoked by NUSCO, contractor materials which are procured in accordance with the The procurement spec-Stone & Webster quality assurance program. ification on file at the construction site, together with the
" SHIPPING RELEASE TAG", and evidence of acceotable receiving inspection will fulfill the necessary requirements to permit equipment installation to proceed.
T-iS2 - O A STONE & WEBSTER ENGINEERING CORPORATION QUALITY ASSURANCE DEPARTMENT QUAllTY ASSURANCE PROGRAM F!l5TORiChl MILLSTONE NUCLEAR POWER STATION - UNIT 'l TITLE: NUMBER: SECTION 8
, REVISION:
IDENTIFICATION AND CONTROL OF MATERIALS B PARTS AND COMPONENTS O EFFECUVE DATE: FEBRUARY 28, 1975 APPROVALS t
.__t l
MANAGER, QUALITY ASSURANCE M , n . k t L o .0 0 . ' - CHIEF ENGINEER, ENGINEERING ASSURANCE l G f PROJECT MbAGER i
- . - _ = .- - - .
~...,~ . -. .- _ _ _ . . . . . . __._ _
e -, illSTORICAL Revision B SECTION 8 IDENTIFICATION AND CONTROL OF MATERIALS, PARTS AND COMPONENTS 1.0 REQUIREMENTS 1.1 Identification and control measures shall be established as necessary to prevent the uncontrolled use of nonconforming materials, parts and couponents, including partically fabricated assemblies. 1.2 Identification and control of material, parts and components which are to meet the requirements of ASME Section III shall be accomplished during field fabrication and erev-tion in accordance with the Company Quality Assurance and Control Manual-ASME Section III. 1.3 Category I materials, parts and components shall be identified by heat number, serial number, part number, or other appropriate means. The identification may be on the item (physical markings are preferred) or on records directly and readily traceable to the item. 1.3.1 The type of identification shall be established by specifications, drawings, j instructions or procedures.
.1.3.2 Traceability to the records which will verify conformance of materials, parts and components to specified requirements (e .g . ,
chemical and physical properties, tests, inspections, etc.) shall be provided from initial receipt of materials to installation i and use, or up to user testing, if applicable. For consunable materials (e .g . , cadweld powder) , traceability requirements I shall be met by documentation which indicates that only acceptable materials ' have been used, unless requirements of codes and standards dictate otherwise. 1.4 Category II and Category III materials, parts and components shall be identified by type and status or as required by the specifications.
F
;ilSTORiCAL 011- -
2.0 TASKS
- 2.1 Project Engineering shall establish requirements for the identification of materials, parts and components in applicable drawings, specifications, instructions and procedures.
2.2 PQCD shall perform tasks at vendor facilities relative to the identification and control of materials, parts and components in accordance with the procurement documents. 2.3 Field Quality Control Division shall: 2.3.1 Verify, during receiving inspection, that materials, parts and components are properly identified and when applicable, traceable to supporting documentation. 2.3.2 Ensure that the required identification and traceability of materials, parts and components is maintained from receipt
.. . through completion of construction.
3.0 DISCUSSION None. 4.0 CLIENT CONSIDERATIONS There are no additional client considerations.
- See Appendix I for reference to implementing documents.
WSIORICAL A STONE & WEBSTER ENGINEERING CORPORATION QUALITY ASSURANCE DEPARTMENT QUALITY ASSURANCE PROGRAM MILLSTONE NUCLEAR POWER STATION - UNIT 3 TITLE: NUMBER: SECTION 8 IDENTIFICATION AND CONTROL OF REVISION: MATERIALS, PARTS AND COMPONENTS A EFFECTIVE DATE: 7/19/74 APPROVALS
-+
MANAGER, QUALITY ASSURANCE - M. a ebED_C CHIEF ENGINEER, ENGINEERING ASSURANCE PROJECT MANAGh w a y y emg,-,,cgy,---y._,.__--.e,-_ey-, --g- , - - - - - -g-----n---- .,- -------,s- - ,-- ---- -
~
Rsvicion A SECTION 8 IDENTIFICATION AND CONTROL OF MATERIALS, PARTS AND COMPONENTS
' l.0 REQUIREMENTS j.
1.1 Identification and control measures shall be established as necessary to prevent the uncontrolled use of noncon-forming materials, parts and components, including partially fabricated assemblies. 1.2 Identficiation and control of material, parts and com-ponents which are to meet the requirements of ASME Section III shall be accomplished during field fabrication ' and erection in accordance with the Company Quality Assurance and Control Manual-ASME Section III. 1.3 Category I materials, parts and components shall be iden- ' tified by heat number, serial number, part number, or other appropriate means. The identification may be on the item (physical markings are preferred) or on records directly and readily traceable to the item. 1.3.1 The type of identification shall be established by specifications, drawings, in'structions or procedures.
- 1.3.2 Traceability to records which will verify
! conformance of the materials, parts and components to specified requirements (e.g., chemical and l physical properties, tests, inspections, etc.) shall be provided throughout, from initial receipt of materials to installation and use, or up to user testing, if applicable. For consumable materials (e.g. , cadweld powder) , traceability requirements l shall be met by documentation which indicates that only acceptable materials have been used, unless requirements of codes and standards dictate otherwise. I 1.4 Category II and Category III materials, parts and I components shall be identified by type and status or as required by the specification. e 1
-4 c
, - & - ,-.,,,m*.-,-.-m.- v-.. , . v.----7-,-.- ,. -..%.e.-.,--,., m.. ,, e-,-., - , ,,,.y -..%.y -vr.m. ,
.. Siction 8 . e5 I
2.0 TASKS
- 2.1 Project Engineering shall establish requirements for the identification of materials, parts and components in applicable drawings, specifications, instructions and procedures.
2.2 PQCD shall perform tasks at vendor facilities relative to the identification and control of materials, parts and components in accordance with the procurement documents. 2.3 Field Qu'ality Control Division shall: 2.3.1 Verify during receiving inspection that materials, parts and components are properly identified and when applicable, traceable to supporting docu-mentation. 2.3.2 Ensure that the required identification and traceability of materials, parts and components are maintained throughout, from receipt through completior. of construction.
- See Appendix I for reference to implementing documents.
2
Page: 8-1 Rev: 0 VIII IDENTIFICATION OF MATERIALS, PARTS AND COMPONENTS Stone & Webster has written procedures and instructions for identification and control of materials, parts, and components including partially fabricated assemblies, to ensure that only specified materials are used in construction. The identification system provides for the traceability of Category I items to records which will verify conformance of the item with specified requirements such as chemical and physical properties, tests, inspecticns, etc. The identification is maintained through all phases of construction, to a phase of the construction process when maintenance of identification is no longer required to comply with requirements; or the item becomes part of a larger identified assembly. Identification is provided by approved permanent methods such as impression stamps or by temporary methods such as tags, inspection records, color prints or tape coding, labels, etc. stickers,d The selecte permanent or temporary method is based on the importance of identification maintenance to the requirement that only specified materials are used in construction. In general, Category I items are permanently identified. Mark numbers and similar identification coding assigned to items are used for identification purposes on drawings, specifications, correspondence and reports pertaining to the item of equipment; andaremaintahedasrequiredfromthestartofdesignthrough manufacture, and throughout shipping, installation,lant. construction of the p operation, Markmaintenance, numbers or similar identification coding will permit traceability to documentation , prepared by the manufacturer attesting to compliance with specification requirements. or Category I materials are identified to its heat, run, batch,by lot number. Categories II and III materials are identified only type and status or as required hv the specification. Identification and control of Category I piping systems during construction and installation are accomplished by a system of~ control isometric drawings and Pipe Weld Data Sheets as specified in the COMPANY QUALITY ASSURANCE AND CONTROL MANUAL - ASME SECTION III.
~
T --
- -,~g.s %
e * ,
' T - t S 2.
O A STONE & WEBSTER ENGINEERING CORPORATION QUALITY ASSURANCE DEPARTMENT QUAUTY ASSURANCE PROGRAM I!STORiCAL MILLSTONE NUCLEAR POWER STATION - UNIT 3 TITLE: NUMBER: SECTION 9 REVISION: B CONTROL OF SPECIAL PROCESSES EFFECTIVE DATE: FEBRUARY 28, 1975 APPROVALS xa MANAGER, QUALITY ASSURANCE k n. t k iM l _ CHIEF ENGINEER, ENGINEERING ASSURANCE h _ PROJECT MANAGER
,-----.--m .,,,,.,--+,oy -
- e,,_a, - - - -, -mm-- mn- -- , - - - , , - ,--y--w---,,.gm ,
- m. ---.m, ,,.--y qw
=A+W a*M=AMMM5MA 25bMb4m
^
,_K E
I i , * . ;
, t 3
t j' i 1 I 4 l i f I ? I ' I i 1 t 1- ' f i I I. V t > b 1 j i $ s l_ l' t l i h ?' ' a f i I I L h 6 b b l M i l e
. e *,
filS70HIIit Revision B SEC1* ION 9 _COtMROL OF SPECIAL PROCESSES 1.0 REQUIREMRFCS 1.1 Special processes shall be controlled to ensure that approved special process procedures are used by qualified personnel in accordance with specified codes, standards, and any additional S&W requirements. The requirements for special process control, including personnel qualifications shall be israesed by specifications, procedures, instructions, or other applicable documents. 1.2 Special processes are unique manufacturing, inspection, or test processes where written gocedures are deemed necessary to accomplish a task affecting quality. Welding, welding repair, cadwelding, studwelding, heat treating, coatings, nuclear system cleaning, leak testing and nondestructive testing are examples of special processes. ! 2.0 TASKS _*
. 2.1 Engineering Department (Materials Engineering Division) shall:
! 2.1.1 Review and approve all special process
- procedures excluding nondestructive test procedures, submitted by vendors in accordance with specification requirements.
2.1.2 Review, approve, and maintain all special process procedures prepared for use by SSW. 2.2 QSD shall review and concur in S&W generated including special process procedures, nondestructive test procedures, which are to be used at the site.
- 2.3 Nondestructive Test Division shall
2.3.1 Provide qualification testing and certification of SSW personnel who perform nondestructive testing (see also Paragraph 2.6, Section 2) . 2.3.2 Review and evaluate nondestructive testing procedures submitted by vendors in
- See Appendix I for reference to implementing documents.
I
=
, ..l t 9-2 II , Revision B accoruance with specification requirements; and prepare and maintain nondestructive testing. procedures used by S6W in accordance
- with specification and code requirements.
2.4 When required by the procurement documents, PQCD shall verify that qualified personnel have performed special process work at vendors facilities using approved procedures. 2.5 Field Quality Control Division: 2.5.1 Is responsible for qualification testing which is required of personnel who perform special process work at the site in accordance with specifications, procedures, instructions, or other applicable documents. 2.5.2 Shall maintain qualification records. 2.5.3 Ecs the authority to re-test or revoke the qualification of personnel whose special process work is not in accordance with established quality standards that define qualification requirements. 2.6 FQCD shall verify that- only qualified personnel perform special process work at the site using approved procedures. 2.7 For special process work which is not covered by l codes and standards, or when it is desired that an item's quality requirements exceed those in codes or standards, the necessary qualification of procedures, personnel and equipment shall be defined by Project Engineering in specifications, procedures or other appropriate documents. 3.0 DISCUSSION 3.1 Reference Parac;' aph 1.1 Audits are conducted to assure implementation of and conformance to approved procedures / specifications and that special processes are accomplished with written process-sheets, procedures, check lists, travelers, or the ( equivalent, with recorded evidence of verifications. The audit activity is described in Section 18 of the program while the implementing procedures are found in appropriate manuals indicated in Appendix I. _ , - - - -y,,. - .,.m, , , , _ _ , . , . -
9-3 Revision B , i 4.0 CLIENT CONSIDERATIONS There are no additional client considerations. k
/
- yem O
e
~ - -
---yg,y se - . N NNMMMN eg_ -
+- - - ~ + - - - . . - . . . _ - , , _ - . , . . , , , _ _ , ,_ ,,,,,, _, _,, _ _ _ _
A
~
HISTORICAL STONE & WEBSTER ENGINEERING CORPORATION QUALITY ASSURANCE DEPARTMENT QUALITY ASSURANCE PROGRAM MILLSTONE NUCLEAR POWER STATION - UNIT 3 TITLE: NUMBER: SECTION 9 REVISION: CONTROL OF SPECIAL PROCESSES A EFFECTIVE DATE: 7/19/74 APPROVALS u : _-s MANAGER, QUALITY ASSURANCE
%.a tal uDA1 -
CHIEF ENGINEER, ENGINEERING ASSURANCE
'l /-
PROJECT MANAkR p,- w. -,a g _- _ ,---_.-,c. - w e m--
e- * , RIvision A g J SECTION 9 a CONTROL OF SPECIAL PROCESSES 1.0 REQUIREMENTS 1.1 Special processes shall be controlled to ensure that approved special process procedures are used by qualified personnel in accordance with specified codes, j standards, and any additional S&W requirements. The 2 requirement for special process control, including personnel qualification shall be imposed by specifications, procedures, instructions, or other applicable documents, d 1.2 Special processes are unique manufacturing, inspection, or test processes where written procedures are deemed 3' necessary to accomplish a task affecting quality. Weld-ing, welding repair, cadwelding, studwelding, heat treating, coatings, nuclear system cleaning, leak testing, and nondestructive testing are examples of special
- processes.
2.0 TASKS
- 2.1 Engineering Department (Materials Engineering Division)
I shall: Review and approve all special process procedures 4 2.1.1 excluding nondestructive test procedures, sub-mitted by vendors in accordance with specification requirements. 2.1.2 Review, approve and maintain all special process procedures prepared for use by S&W. j 2.2 QSD shall review and concur in S&W generated special process procedures, including nondestructive test l procedures, which are to be used at the. site. 2.3 Nondestructive Test Division shall: 1. 2.3.1 Provide qualification testing and certification L of S&W personnel who perform nondestructive testing (see also Paragraph 2.6, Section 2). l l
- See Appendix I for reference to implementing documente.
1
I
,a . .
- Szction 9
- R3vicion A 2.3.2 Review and evaluate nondestructive testing procedures submitted by vendors in accordance with specification requirements; and prepara and maintain nondestructive testing procedures used by S&W in accordance with specification and code requirements.
2.4 When required by the procurement documents, PQCD shall verify that qualified personnel have performed special process work at vendors facilities using approved procedures. 2.5 Field Quality Control Division: 2.5.1 Is responsible for qualification testing which is required of personnel who perform special process work at the site in accordance with specifications, procedures, instructions, or other applicable documents. 2.5. Shall maintain qualification records. 2.5.3 Has the authority to re-test or revoke the quali-fication of personnel whose special process work is not in accordance with established quality standards that define qualification requirements. 2.6 FQCD shall verify that only qualified personnel perform special process work at the site using approved procedures. 2.7 For special process work which is not covered by codes and standards, or when it is desired that en item's quality requirements exceed those in codes or standards, the necessary qualification of procedures, personnel and equipment shall be defined by Project Engineering in specifications, procedures or other appropriate documents. 2
- Pcgos 9-1 HISTORICAL IX CONTROL OF SPECIAL PROCESSES The control of special processes such as are welding, heat treating, stud welding cadwelding nondestructive and destructive testing is accomplish,ed by the us,e of written procedures which specify the control requirements in detail. Subcontractors and vendors will be required by specifications to submit such of their pro-cedures for review as are deemed necessary by the engineers.
Weld procedures are provided by the Materials Engineering Division for work performed by Stone & Webster forces. The Materials Engineering Division.will review and approve veld procedures developed by vendors and subcontractors. A. WELDING PROCESSES . Welding procedures are qualified by the subcontractors and vendors in accordance and represent withparameters the written applicable codes for all and standards, applicable wor k. The Quality Assurance Department reviews and concurs with S & W welding procedures prior to _their use at the construction site. To assure inspection requirements when required by the specification, the Stone & Webster Field Quality Control Division will witness the procedure qualification welding performed by the contractor.
~
'Vedd'orlsJand subcontractor's velding procedures are submitted for review to the Materials Engineering Division prior to use when required by the specification. All velders and welding operators cre qualified in accordance with applicable code requirements.
The Superintendent of Field Quality Control qualifies Stone
& Webster velders at the construction site in accordance with Field Quality Control Procedures and Materials Engineering Specifications, and has the authority to request a retest or revoke the qualification of any operator who does not perform welding in accordance with established quality standards.
The velding operator's qualification records for Stone & Webster welders are issued by Field Quality Control, and copies maintained in a permanent record file. Welders will be requalified for any process they have not performed for 90 days in order to assure proficiency. Vendor and subcontractor velders are qualified in accordance with specified codes and quality control requirements which are supplied by the vendor or subcontractor. Stone & Webster
CTORiCAL :':'
, l~
Field Quality Control personnel audit the qualification tests of subcontractor's welders. Procurement Quality Control will verify vendor's welder qualification as required by the PROCUREMENT QUALITY CONTROL MANUAL and the specification. The control of welding processes for Category I items includes documentation of welding processes by welder, date, procedure, inspection performed, records of specified parameters, and stress relief. These records document that the requirements of the weld procedure, specifications, standards, and special requirements have been met. B. NONDESTRUCTIVE TEST Vendor and~ subcontractor personnel who perform nondestructive tests are required to be qualified in accordance with the applicable codes which are established in the specification. The qualification verification and the results of the tests are reviewed and documented by Procurement Quality Control or Field Quality Control. The Stone & Webster Field Quality Control Division personnel who audit nondestructive tests at the construction site shall < be qualified in accordance with Section III of'the ASME Boiler and Pressure Vessel Code, and with the recommended practices of-the AmeTican Sociecy of Nondestructive Testing, SNT-TC-1A. Personnel who perform radiography shall also be qualified in accordance with the AEC regulations for safe hand-ling of radioactive material'. Nondestructive test procedures are documented in the COMPANY QUALITY ASSURANCE NONDESTRUCTIVE TEST MANUAL. Nondestructive Test Group TheQualityAssuranceDepartment,ichcontrolthequalificatlon is responsible for the systems wh of personnel and equipment, safety, test methods review
- and approval of vendor NDT procedures, and application of documentation related to nondestructive test methods.
C. MISCELLANEOUS SPECIAL PROCESSES Requirements for miscellaneous special processes, e.g., de-structive tests, forming, pipe bending, are in accordance with the applicable specification. The specifications which require the special processes will. include as appro-priate requirements for: 4 Vendor / Subcontractor procedure submittals g Personnel, equipment, or process qualification g Documentation a Special test parameters a
1 TstS2 i n STONE & WEBSTER ENGINEERING CORPORATION QU ALITY ASSURANCE DEPARTMENT : QUALITY ASSURANCE PROGRAM liSTORICAI. ! MILLSTONE HUCLEAR POWER STATION - UNIT 3 NUMBER: TITLE: SECTION 10 REVISION: INSPECTION B EFFECTIVE DATE: FEBRUARY 28, 1975 APPROVALS
!/ _e- 2 MAN AGER, QU ALITY ASSURANCE
%.qW% Ca! -
CHIEF ENGINEER, ENGINEERING ASSURANCE o } & JJ/ PROJECT MANkGER
10-1 HISTORICAL l I SECTION 10 ! INSPECTION 1.0 REQUIREMENTS 1.1 Drawings, specifications, instructions and procedures shall include the necessary isspecti6n requirements, with acceptance criteria, to provide assurance that material, equipment and work conform to quality requirements. Acceptance and inspection activities shall not be performed by personnel who have performed the work to be inspected. 1.1.1 Inspection shall be performed at ' vendor facilities in accordance with the requirements of the procurement documents. 1.1.2 Inspections shall be performed at the site on material, equipment and work to ensure conformance to applicable specifications, instructions, codes, standards and procedures. 1.2 Inspection requirements shall be translated into procedures and inspection reports to provide documentation of the inspection work required to ensure the specified quality. While . direct in-process and final inspections are preferred, indirect control by monitoring of the process, equipment and personnel may be used when direct inspection is impossible or not feasible. Direct and indirect controls shall be used when control is inadequate without both methods. 1.3 Sampling methods may be used for inspecting a group of homogeneous items which are received from one source, excluding Category I items unless the method for specific Category I items is approved by the Client. When a sampling method is .used to verify the acceptability of items, the sampling plan shall be based on a recognized standard sampling plan . The methods of applying the standard sampling plan shall be documented to prevent misinterpretation of the plan or the sample results.
._ ,~
T
~
~2 WSTORCAL Revision B 1.4 When notification or hold points have been established, the process control procedure or checklist shall include provisions to ensure that work does not progress beyond these points until released by the designated authority. Notification or hold points may be established by ,
specifications, procedures, Construction (field), Quality Assurance Department or authorized Code Inspectors. 1.5 Individuals or groups who have been designated to evaluate inspection data by specifications, procedures, or instructions shall indicate the conformance or nonconformance on the data sheet or other appropri' ate documents. 1.6 The Quality Assurance Department shall have the authority to stop work in those situations where continued work could cause damage, preclude further inspection, or preclude effective corrective action. 2.0 TASKS
- 2.1 Project Engineering shall include the necessary -
inspection requirements, with acceptance criteria, in drawings, specifications, instructions and procedures. 2.2 PQCD shall perform inspection tasks at vendor facilities' in accordance with the procurement doctanents (see Paragraph 2.5 Section 7) . 2.3 FQCD shall perform the following field quality control inspections as requir'ed. . NOTE See Paragraph 2.6 Section 7, for FQCD receipt inspection tasks. 2.3.1 FQCD shall perform inspection / testing of soils, concrete, reinforcing steel, structural steel and special coatings in accordance with applicable specifications, instructions and procedures. 2.3.2 FQCD shall perform specified inspections and tests of all Category I equipment. Unless there are specific requirements in
- See Appendix I for reference to implementing documents.
HIST 0ER :s- D appItcable specifications, instructions or premes, Category II equipment shall be inspected on a sampling basis to a degree 4 consistent with the relationship of the equipsient to plant operational performance and Category III equipment shall be inspected on a surveillance basis. ' 2.3.3 FQCD shall perform inspection of welding in accordance with applicable specifications, instructions or procedures. As a mi ni mi1= , all Category I and Category II welding shall be visually inspected and Category III welding shall be visually inspected on a surveillance basis. 2.3.4 FQCD shall perform required liquid penetrant, magnetic particle, ultrasonic and radiographic testing and aw==bations. 2.3.5 FQCD shall make all necessary arrangements with, and assist, the authorized Code Inspector so that S8W may obtain code certification of fabricated and erected piping systems which are specified to meet the requiremients of ASME Section III. 2.3.6 FQCD shall document inspection / testing tasks ; performed, including monitoring, witnessing, auditing, etc. 2.4 NDTD shall provide inspection services in specialty areas of nondestructive te' sting when adequate , equipment and capability are not available in PQCD AND FQCD. 3.0 DISCUSSION 3.1 Reference Paragraphs 1.1.1 and 1.1.2 , The Quality Assurance Department as part of the planning activity in both it 's Field Quality Control .and Quality Systems Division, performs an ongoing review of construction schedules versus our inspection procedure / instruction library in order ( that the procedural needs are identified and the procedures completed well in advance of required dates. Inspections, as well as the work, are performed to specifications / drawings; therefore, a lack of specification or drawing would precludo either work or inspections being performed. l t
,- -,-w .. e -,.-, ,.,-- , - . - , , , - , . , .,,--,_.-.m~.m ..,_,v , _ , , , , - - , _ , - _ - _ . - . . , , ,,_,.p,,,,,gm_e,.--.-----,,,m,,._, -
r lilS M M . 10-4 Revision B 3.2 Reference Paragraph 1.2 Assurance that inspection procedures, instructions and/or check lists contain the following is obtained as indicated next to each item: -
- 1. Quality Characteristics to be Inspected -
These are delineated in the appropriate specification which is reviewed and signed by Quality Assurance personnel.
- 2. Individuals or Groups Responsible for Performing the Inspection - Delineated in the appropriate Quality Standard. ,
- 3. Acceptance ~and Reiection Criteria - Same as one (1) above. .
- 4. A Description of the Method of Inspections -
Delineated in the appropriate Quality k Assurance Department procedure; i.e., Quality Assurance Directive,,NDT Procedure, etc.
- 5. Evidence of Completions and Certification Of Inspection Operations -
An inspection report prepared in accordance with Quality Standard 14.2 " Inspection Report System" or other documentation as may be specified in the particular specification.
- 6. Record of the Results of the Inspection Operation - same as five (5) above.
! 7. Verification tha't all Inspection Operations are Complete and Acceptable - By a compari-son of the. inspection reports / documentation prepared to the attribute list of inspections to be performed developed during ( the ' inspeci; ion planning stage by'1 Quality
~
Assurance. _f Final assurance of the satisfactory implementation of items one (1) through seven (7) is gained through an independent audit of the above activities performed by the Quality Assurance Department Services Group.
ee *
,e sion B I
3.3 Reference Paragraph 2.1 Modifications, repairs, and replacements are performed in accordance with approved engineering , specifications, which are reviewed by Quality Assurance personnel. Such work is inspected in i accordance with the specified requirements, whicha if changed form the original, would require change to the specification and a subsequent Quality Assurance review. 4.0 CLIENT CONSIDERATIONS There are no additional client considerations. G O
- 4 e
,e m *ew 4 e 4 e ee og e4=e e + e -ee=*=r
. e ,e . +
-m - % e.
T-isi HISTORICAL A l STONE & WEBSTER ENGINEERING CORPORATION ! QUALITY ASSURANCE DEPARTMENT j l QUALITY l ASSURANCE PROGRAM j i MILLSTONE NUCLEAR POWER STATION - UNIT 3 TITLE: NUMBER: SECTION 10 INSPECTION REVISION: A EFFECTIVE DATE: 7/19/74 APPROVALS
-- - ..- 1 MANAGER, QUALITY ASSURANCE l
% . 4.h t m_ uGb*m _ _ _ l CHIEF ENGINEER, ENGINEERING ASSURANCE l
fmS W PROJECT MANAGN
.-g ,e_ --c, , - - -,r--m- -,aw-- - - -
m ------r -e r--'r-----rw ---'n ' ' - = ' ~ ~~- - - " s'~-v-*
_ _. .. - . _ - . . _ _ _ . - - . . . - . - - _ .- - - - - - - ~ - .
<
- e R viDion A g
. SECTION 10 INSPE.CTION
~
) 1.0 REQUIREMENTS 1.1 Drawings, specifications, instructions and procedures shall include the necessary inspection requirements, with acceptance criteria, to provide assurance that material, ! equipment and work conform to the quality requirement. Acceptance and inspection activities shall not be per-formed by personnel who have performed the work to be inspected. 1.1.1 Inspections shall be performed at vendor facilities in accordance with the requirements of the pro-curement documents. 1 1.1.2 Inspections shall be performed at the site on material, equipment and work to ensure conformance to applicable specifications, instructions, codes,
- standards and procedures.
1.2 Inspection requirements shall be translated into pro-cadures and inspection reports to provide documentation < of the inspection work required to ensure the specified quality. While direct in-process and final inspections are preferred, indirect control by monitoring of'the process, equipment and personnel may be used when direct inspection is impossible or not feasible. Direct and indirect controls shall be used when control is inadequate ' without both methods.
- L l 1.3 Sampling methods may be used for inspecting a group i
of homogeneous items which are received from one source, excluding Category I items unless the method for specific Category I items is approved by NUSCo. When a sampling j method is used to verify the acceptability of items, the sampling plan shall be based on a recognized standard sampling plan. The methods of applying the standard '- sampling plan shall be documented to prevent misinterpre-L tation of the plan or the sample results. x , 1.4 When notification or hold points have been established,
- the process control procedure or checklist shall include
- = provisions to ensure that work does not progress beyond L the points until released by the designated authority.
Notification or hold points may be established by specifications, procedures, Construction (field), Quality Assurance Department or authorized Code Inspectors.
- 1 r
_-_._._._.__..______.____-_.--;.r- _ . _ _ . . . - - _ _
~ Section 10 Rsvicion A S3T0EAL 1.5 Individuals or groups who have been designated to evaluate inspection data by specifications, procedures, or instructions shall indicate the conformance or noncon-formance on the data sheet or other appropriate documents. 1.6 The Quality Assurance Department shall have the authority to stop work in those situations where continued work could cause damage, preclude further inspection, or pre-clude effective corrective action. 2.0 TASKS
- 2.1 Project Engineering shall include the necessary inspection requirements, with acceptance criteria, in. drawings, .
specifications, instructions and procedures. 2.2 PQCD shall perform inspection tasks at vendor facilities in accordance with the procurement documents (see Para-graph 2.5, Section 7). 2.3 FQCD shall perform the following field quality control inspections as required.
. NOTE See Paragraph 2.6, Section 7, for FQCD receipt inspection tasks.
9 2.3.1 FQCD shall perform inspection / testing of soils, concrete, reinforcing steel, structural steel and special coatings in accordance with applicable specifications, instructions and procedures. f 2.3.2 FOCD shall perform specified inspections and tests of all Category I equipment. Unless there are specific requirements in applicable specifications, instructions or procedures, Category II equipment shall be inspected on a sampling bmsis to a degree censistent with the relationship of the equipment
.to plant operational performance and Category III equipment shall be inspected on a surveillance basis.
2.3.3 FQCD shall perform inspection of welding in accord-ance with applicable specifications, instructions or procedures. As a minimum, all Category I and Category II welding shall be visually inspected ~and Category III welding shall be visually inspected on a surveillance basis.
- See Appendix I for reference to implementing documents.
2
S:cticn 10 ' R;vicion A kIgo--
,j 4alw IsthI)n /
2.3.4 FQCD shall perform required liquid penetrant, magnetic particle, ultrasonic and radiographic testing and examinations. 2.3 5 FQCD shall make all necessary arrangements with, and assist, the authorized Code Inspector so that S&W may obtain code certification of fabri-cated and erected piping systems which are speci-fied to meet the requirements of ASME Section III. 2.3.6 FQCD shall document inspection / testing tasks per-formed, including monitoring, witnessing, auditing etc. 2.4 NDTD shall provide inspection services in specialty areas of nondestructive testing when adequate equipment and capability are not available in PQCD and FQCD. O
(s, . Pago: 10-1 e Rev: 0
}fSTORICAL X INSPECTION Inspections are performed in vendor's shops by Stone & Webster Procurement Quality Control Inspectors in accordance with the re-quirements of the Stone & Webster Procurement Quality Control Manual and the applicable specification. Site inspections are conducted by Stone & Webster engineers and inspectors in accord-ance with the applicable procedures of their FIELD QUALITY CONTROL MANUAL.
Whenever requested by NUSCO, Stone & Webster will perform and surveillance monitoring, or auditing document activities as require d of Westingh,ouse or its subcontrcctor inspection, activities. A. SHOP INSPECTION , When specific inspections will be verified, performed, or witnessed by the Procurement Quality Control Inspector the inspections are summarized on the " Test Inspection and Documentation" (TID) Form of the procurement specification. ection verification for the The threerequired degree categories of insp(refer to Chapter II) is used in of items developing the TID Form. The detailed inspections are designated in the specification. Required shop inspections will be performed by manufacturer's inspection personnel; with those inspections indicated on the TID form being audited or repeated by the Procurement Quality Control Inspector. In addition to the specified tests, the Procure-ment Quality Control Inspector may be instructed to perform examination of lots of materials on a sampling basis. Equipment will not be released for shipment until the inspections and documentation have been TID Form tests,ification completed. Ver of the vendor's compliance with the specification requirements will be indicated by the
" Shipping Release Tag" which is attached to the item.
B. RECEIVING INSPECTION Inspection of material and components will continue when items are received at the construction site. Field Quality Control personnel will inspect _ material and components purchased by _ Stone & Webster, du_ ring. receiving. Items purchased by contractors will be subjected to their acceptance receiving inspection program. The inspected
F
~
,. . s f .
b Page: 10-2 Rev: O characteristics and tha criteria for acceptance will be as designated on approved drawings, specifications, manufacturer's special instructions, codes, and in the Stone & Webster FIELD QUALITY CONTROL MANUAL, as appropriate. C. IN PROCESS AND FINAL INSPECTION Stone & Webster, Field Quality Control Division will perform all inspections and nondestructive tests for field work. Specific inspection hold points shall be included in the specification or in project instructions which govern handling, installation, or preparation for operation. When a condition the Field existsEngineer Quality Control which is/ detrimental to observe Inspector who quality,d or was notified of the condition, shall initiate an N&D Report. He shall promptly transmit this information to the attention of the Superintendent of Ccnstruction or his designee. In situations where continued work would cause damage preclude further inspection, or make remedial act1on ineffective; and when there is no author-ized representative of the Superintendent immediately available at the work location the Inspector who is responsibleforinspectingtha$workshallhavethe authority to stop the work in progress. The Inspector shall then immediately notify the Construction Super-
'intendent or his designee as well as the Superintendent of Field Quality Control.
The specified inspection shall be documented, and evidence of compliance shall be maintained at the construction site in the Stone & Webster Master Quality Assurance and Control File, or in the subcontractor's record file
,T-132 O
A STONE & WEBSTER ENGINEERING CORPORATION QUALITY ASSURANCE DEPARTMENT QUALITY ASSURANCE PROGRAM Hl3TDMI. MILLSTONE NUCLEAR POWER STATION - UNIT 3 TITLE: NUMBER: TEST CONTROL B BR A Y 28, 1975
^
APPROVALS d_ w - MANAGER, QUALITY ASSURANCE
% ,CL. t LJO 2_ _
CHIEF ENGINEER, ENGINEERING ASSURANCE b d , PROJECT M[ NAGER
e t . a 11-1 i Revision B ET0RCAL SECTION 11
, TEST CONTROL 1.0 REQUIRDCDFFS a
1.1 Testing required to demonstrate that structures, systems and components will perform satisfactorily in service shall be identified in applicable documents such as drawings, specifications, procedures and instructions. 1.2 Tests for Category I items shall be performed in accordance with written test procedures and by trained personnel. When the test procedures identified are those described in codes and ' standards (e.g. , ACI, ASTM, etc. , tests) , they need - not be duplicated in written procedures if such codes and standards are available to the personnel conducting the test. 1.3 Test procedures shall include the following: 1.3.1 Provisions to ensure that all test prerequisites have been met prior to the start of the test. . 1.3.2 Requirements and acceptance limits from the applicable design documents. 1.3.3 Required accuracy and type of test instrumentation to be used. 1.3.4 Required environmental conditions, if applicable. 1.3.5 Inclusion as applicable, of mandatory hold points for witnessing by 'NUSCo, authorized Inspectors and S8W QA Dep.artment. k, 2 1.4 Test results shall be documented in sufficient detail to prevent misinterpretation and include an evaluation of the test results- by shall ( qualified / responsible groups. ,
- ~
r 11-2. Revision B 2.0 TASKS
- 2.1 PQCD shall perform tasks at vendor facilities as orders.
required by the specifications or purchase 2.2 QSD shall prepare any necessary procedures, excluding preoperational proof test procedures. B2CD shall perform or witness tests at the site I . 2.3 which are required by the specifications and l Project Engineering procedures and instructions. l FQCD shall release systems for preoperational tests i when construction work and required tests have been satisfactorily completed. 3.0 DISCUSSION 3.1 Reference Paragraph 1.3.1 Test prerequisites, as used herein, are those items ( specified in the must be specific test. individual test procedure accomplished prior to the start of a S&W considers that ANSI N45.2.8, (' Draft 3, Rev. 3 April 1974 as promulgated in WASH 1309, UC80,to cover the major prerequisites to be addressed. I 4.0 CLIENT CONSIDERATIONS I There are no additional client considerations. Fll810RIChl. l
- See Appendix I for' reference to implementing documents.
l i l m
'T-152.
Hi Riu A STONE & WEBSTER ENGINEERING CORPORATION QUALITY ASSURANCE DEPARTMENT QUALITY ASSURANCE PROGRAM MILLSTONE NUCLEAR POWER STATION - UNIT 3 TITLE: NUMBER: SECTION 11 REVISION: TEST CONTROL A EFFECTIVE DATE: 7/19/74 APPROVALS l MANAGER, QUALITY ASSURANCE l l m.a%um:. CHIEF ENGINEER, ENGINEERING ASSURANCE M u PROJECT MANAGER /
R; vision A GIDRiBil SECTION 11 TEST CONTROL 1.0 REQUIREMENTS 1.1 Testing required to demonstrate that structures, systems and components will perform satisfactorily in service shall be identified in applicable documents such as drawings, specifications, procedures and instructions. 1.2 Tests for Category I items shall be performed in accord-ance with written test procedures and by trained personnel. When the test procedures identified are those described in codes and standards (e.g. , ACI, ASTM, etc, tests) , they need not be duplicated in written procedures if such codes and standards are available to the personnel con-ducting the test. 1.3 Test procedures shall include the following: 1.3.1 Provisions to ensure that all test prerequisites have been met prior to the start of the test. 1.3.2 Requirements and acceptance limits from the applicable design documents. 1.3.3 Required accuracy and type of test instrumentation to be used. [ j 1.3.4 Required environmental conditions, if applicable. 1.4 Test results shall be documented in sufficient detail to ! prevent misinterpretation and shall include an evaluation l of the test results. 2.0 TASES* 2.1 PQCD shall perform tasks at vendor facilities as required by the specifications or purchase orders. 2.2 QSD shall prepare any necessary procedures, excluding preoperational proof test procedures.
- See Appendix I for reference to implementing documents.
l l 1
r Section 11 RLvision A
'li
'~?,T]R'!ua}{.
$ ;s i) i u 2.3 FOCD shall perform or witness tests at the site which are required by the specifications and Project Engineering procedures and instructions. FQCD shall release systems ,
for preoperational tests when construction work and l required tests have been satisfactorily completed. ) l i l l l 2
Page: 11-1 Rev: 0 XI TEST CONTROL All testing is perf_rmed in accordance with written procedures in applicable manuals (e. Company Quality Assurance Non-destructive Test Manual)org.,in the installation or equipment specification. These procedures include prerequisites to the tests, equipment and test instrumentation requirements and applicable special requirements such as environmental conditions. Verification that required tests have been performed in accordance with specifications and procedures will be determined by an audit or inspection by the Super-intendent of Field Quality Control at the site or an in-spection at vendor's facilities by Procurement Quality Control if required by the specification. All deviations or question-able test data will be classified as nonconformities. Dis- , position instructions for these nonconformities will be issued in accordance with written procedures. A. FABRICATION TESTING Fabrication testing is performed by the supplier or Procurement Quality Control personnel as designated in the Equipment Specification. B. IN-PROCESS TESTING & INSPECTION Site in-process testing and inspection shall be performed by Stone & Webster personnel. C. PREOPERATIONAL TESTING A Stone & Webster Advisory Operations Engineer and a group of plant start-up specialists shall be assigned to the construction site to act in an advisory capacity to NUSCO during preoperational activities. The preparation of preoperational and operational test specifications is performed by NUSCO in conjunction with Stone & Webster Advisory Operations Division Engineers, and representatives of Westinghouse and other equipment suppliers and/or contractors acting in an advisory capacity. Stone & Webster Field Quality Control will release systems for preoperational tests when all construction and required tests have been satisfactorily completed or waived by the Project Engineer. Stone & Webster Engineering Department will specify all construction tests, and will provide assistance to NUSCO in specifying preoperational tests. E.
~ ~
T - 152 O A STONE & WEBSTER ENGINEERING CORPORATION QUALITY ASSURANCE DEPARTMENT l
)
QUALITY . ASSURANCE l PROGRAM ggg l MILLSTONE NUCLEAR POWER STATION - UNIT 3 TITLE: NUMBER: SECTION 12 REVISION: B CONTROL OF MEASURING AND TEST O EQUIPMENT FEBRUARY 28, 1975 APPROVALS l MAN AGER, QUALITY ASSURANCE l M.G.b L.OO C CHIEF ENGINEER, ENGINEERING ASSURANCE O , [ PROJECT MAbAGER
_.. m . _ ._ . . _ _ . _. _ __ 12-1 m Revision B fils10RICAl. SECTION 12 CONTROL OF MEASURING AND TEST EQUIPMENT 1.0 REQUIREMENTS 4 1.1 When tools, gages, instruments and measuring and testing equipment are used for measurements, inspections and tests performed to document compliance with specified requirements, the calibration and use of such equipment shall be controlled. 1.2 The control program shall include the following:, 1.2.1 Positive identification of the equipment and its calibration status. 1.2.2 A ' frequency of calibration schedule for types of equipment based on recognized industry standards, manufacturers' recommendations, or usage factors. 1.2.3 Written procedures describing the calibration control system. Standards traceable to national standards shall be ' used, when appropriate. 1.2.4 A records system which will indicate the calibration dates and the identification
- of personnel performing the calibrations.
1.2.5 A recall system to prevent use of equipment beyond the calibration due date. 1.2.6 A system for corrective action when uncalibrated or damaged measuring and test equipment has been used. Inspection records shall include traceability identification of the specific equipment used. 2.0 TASKS
- 2.1 EA shall establish procedures for the control and calibration of measuring and test equipment use in Engineering Department activities affecting quality.
- See Appendix I for reference to implementing documents.
l . c- - _ -= --- m- -- . - - = . .-
( 12-2 Revision B 2.2 PQCD shall perform tasks at vendor facilities ralative to the control of measuring and test equipment in .accordance with requirements of the procurement documents. 2.3 Construction (field) shall control measuring and test equipment used by construction forces at the site and forward equipment due for calibration to INCD. 2.4 QSD shall establish calibration control systems for measuring and test equipnent used at the site. 2.5 At the site, FQCD shall: 2.5.1 Calibrate, or have calibrated by approved calibration laboratories, measuring and test equipment. 2.5.2 Verify that properly calibrated equipment is used. 2.5.3 Ensure that measuring and test equipment is indentified. . . 2.5.4 Maintain calibration records. 3.0 DISCUSSION 3.1 Reference Paragraph 1.2.6
" Corrective action a as used herein requires that an investigation be conducted and documented to determine the validity of previous inspections performed when uncalibrated, calibration measuring damaged or out of and test equipment has been k'
used. 4.0 CLIEUT CONSIDERATIONS There are no additional client considerations.
T - 152 , msIDEAL A STONE & WEBSTER ENGINEERING CORPORATION QUALITY ASSURANCE DEPARTMENT j QUALITY ASSURANCE PROGRAM MILLSTONE NUCLEAR POWER STATION - UNIT 3 TITLE: NUMBER: SECTION 12 . CONTROL OF MEASURING AND TEST REVISION: EQUIPMENT A EFFECTIVE DATE: 7/19/74 9 APPROVALS w MANAGER, QUALITY ASSURANCE
% . cL tat
- _
CHIEF ENGINEER, ENGINEERING ASSURANCE IA~ ~ L PROJECT MANAhR uR l e 9 +
- - ,e-. . , - -,-------.---,yv-- - .-----,-,.,m , - , - , - --,.,,n, - . , , , , - - , - - - - - - . - - - - - , . ,
4
- R; vision A t
SECTION 12 CONTROL OF MEASURING AND TEST EQUIPMENT 1.0 REQUIREMENTS 1.1 When tools, gages, instruments and measuring and testing equipment are used for measurements, inspections and tests performed to document compliance with specified require-ments, the calibration and use of such equipment shall be controlled. 1.2 The control program shall include the following: l 1.2.1 Positive identification of the equipment and its - calibration status. 1.2.2 A frequency of calibration schedule for types of equipment based on recognized industry standards, manufacturers' recommendations, or usage factors. 1.2.3 Written procedures describing the calibration control system. Standards traceable.to national standards shall be used, when appropriate. i 1.2.4 A records system which will indicate the calibration dates and the identification of personnel performing the calibrations. 1.2.5 A recall systed to prevent use of equipment beyond the calibration due date. i 1.2.6 A system for corrective action when uncalibrated or j damaged measuring and test equipment has been used. Inspection records shall include traceability identification of the specific equipment used. 2.0 TASKS
- l 2.1. EA shall establish procedures for the control and calibra-J tion of measuring and test equipment used in Engineering Department activities affecting quality.
2.2 PQCD shall perform tasks at vendor facilities relative to the control of measuring and test equipment in accordance i with the requirements of the procurement documents. i
- See Appendix I for reference to implementing documents.
1
Ssction 12
, R vision A b
g 2.3 Construction (field) shall control measuring and test equipment used by construction forces at the site and forward equipment due-for calibration to FQCD. 2.4 QSD shall establish calibration control systems for measuring and test equipment used at the site. 2.5 At the site, FQCD shall: 2.5.1 Calibrate, or-have calibrated by approved calibra-tion laboratories, measuring and test equipment. 2.5.2 Verify that properly calibrated equipment is used. 2.5.3 Ensure that measuring and test equipment is identified. 2.5.4 Maintain calibration records. 2
Pago: 12-1 Rev: O j a.he -.. XII CONTROL OF TEST AND MEASURING EQUIPMENT Specifications which require the vendor to have a quality assurance program, will require the control and calibration of tools, gauges, instruments, and other measuring an1 testing devices used in the acceptance inspection of those items. The control of measuring and testing device's used at the con-struction site will be by the use of written procedures of the Field Quality Control Manual. The procedures shall require that the measuring ar.d testing devices be calibrated and properly adjusted at established dates against certified measurement standards which have recognized relationships to national stan-dards. Each test and measuring instrument is specifically identified and traceable to its calibration history records. The control system shall require that test and measuring equipment be recalled for verification of accuracy at estao11shed intervals based upon previous adjustment requirements for that particular equipment. Inspection acceptance records, log books and data sheets shall indicate, by identification number, the test equipment which was actually used on specific tests; thereby providing trace-ability if the test equipment is discovered out of calibration; a condition which would require corrective action of the inspect-ed items. l
~~ ~~ ~' -- -
T - 152 O A STONE & WEBSTER ENGINEERING CORPORATION QUALITY ASSURANCE DEPARTMENT QUALITY ASSURANCE glgjg PROGRAM MILLSTONE NUCLEAR POWER STATION - UNIT 3 TITLE: NUMBER: SECTION 13 REVISION: HANDLING, STORAGE AND SHIPPING B O uncuvE oATE: FEBRUARY 28, 1975 APPROVALS x MANAGER, QUALITY ASSURANCE
% .CL , to D u S O s____
CHIEF ENGINEER, ENGINEERING ASSURANCE 0 h PROJECT MAdAGER ___ T . .._. ::_ . - _ - ___ _ , - - .-
13-1 133U I Ui{n; g }Jh{. Revision B i SECTION 13 HANDLING, STOPAGE AND SHIPPING 1.0 REQUIREMENTS 1.1 The handling, storage, shipping, cleaning, and preservation of material and equipment shall be controlled, to prevent damage or deterioration. The specified work shall be qualified individuals accomplished in accordance with the by g preplanned work and inspection instruction. 1.2 Procurement documents shall include the following: 1.2.1 Requirements for vendors to establish any
,special procedures which may be necessary to prevent damage or deterioration of the supplied items.
1.2.2 Requirements for the preparation of items for shipment, as necessary, to ensure cleanliness, identification, and proper handling. 1.2.3 Requirements for installation, operation and maintenance instructions, when specified, to be available at the site on i a timely basis. 1.3 A preventive maintenance program shall be established at the site. This program shall include a schedule of maintenance operations to be performed and documentation of maintenance I operations performed. The maintenance program shall be based on the manufacturers' recommendations., . or Project Engineering instructions. 1 1.4 The preventive maintenance program shall be applied to materials and equipment in storage and work areas, and after installation up to the time of release for preoperational testing. 6 J __.r-,- - . +
m 13-2 lilSTORDL 2.0 TASKS
- 2.1 Project . Engineering shall prepare procurement documents, provide criteria for the storage level of items at the site and resolve any problems relative to the assignment of storage levels.
2.2 PQCD shall perform required verification at vendor facilities relative to the handling, cleaning, and preparation of items for shipment as required by the procurenent documents. 2.3 PQCD shall audit the maintenance program of items in long term storage at vendor facilities on an individual case basis as required by~ specific requests from the Client. 2.4 Construction (field) shall establish and implement a storage and preventive maintenance program of items stored at the site and at specified nearby locations, and maintain appropriate maintenance records. Construction (field) shall assign levels of strorage for items based on criteria provided by Project Engineering. 2.5 B2CD shall ensure that the quality of items is maintained throughout storage so that no degradation or deterioration is evident. Field Quality Control Division shall: 2.5.1 Concur in the level of storage of items assigned by Construction '(field) . 2.5.2 Verify implementation of the maintenance program by Construction (field) . 2.5.3 Verify that only acceptable items are released for installation (risk released items are considered acceptable within the conditions of the risk release) . 2.5.4 Document FQCD storage inspec-tiorts/ verifications. 3.0 DISCUSSION None. N-1
- See Appendix I for reference to implementing documents. )
1
- 1 1
- _li e
e 13-3 Revision B 4.0 CLIENT CONSIDERATIONS There are no additional client considerations. k
+
9 e i e .r f a 1 g- - -- --- '- w e e me e w em>em es * *
- em es s -- _ me w m eeem meo - enem
T - 152 tilSTORICAL A STONE & WEBSTER ENGINEERING CORPORATION QUALITY ASSURANCE DEPARTMENT QUALITY ASSURANCE PROGRAM MILLSTONE NUCLEAR POWER STATION - UNIT 3 TITLE: NUMBER: SECTION 13 REVISION: HANDLING, STORAGE AND SHIPPING A EFFECTIVE DATE: 7/19/74 APPROVALS MANAGER, QUALITY ASSURANCE
.CL. h Ah *.
CHIEF ENGINEER, ENGINEERING ASSURANCE M e PROJECT MANAGER [
- . _ - __ __ _ _ -_ - - . - - .~ T - .
Rsvicion A t' * * -
, , , r-- s *31
[a J
~!
SECTION 13 HANDLING, STORAGE AND SHIPPING 1.0 REQUIC3MENTS ; 1.1 The handling, storage, shipping, cleaning and preser-vation of material and equipment shall be controlled, as necessary, to prevent damage or deticioration. 1.2 Procurement documents shall include the following: 1.2.1 Requirement of vendors to establish any special procedures which may be necessary to prevent damage or deterioration of the supplied items.
- 1.2.2 R=quirements for the preparation of items for
,' shipment, as necessary to ensure cleanliness, identification and proper handling. 1.2.3 Requirements for installation, operation and maintenance instructions, when.specified, to be l available at the site on a timely basis. 1.3 A preventive maintenance program shall be established at t the site. This program shall include a schedule of maintenance operations to be performed and and documenta-tion of maintenance operations performed. The maintenance program shall be based on the manufacturers' recommenda-tions or Project Engineering instructions. 1.4 The preventive maintenance program shall be applied to materials and equipment in storage and work areas and
- after installation up to the time of release for pre-operational testing.
2.0 TASKS
- 2.1 Project Engincering shall prepare procurement documents,
.i provide criteria.for the storage level of items at the j site and resolve any problems relative to the assignment of storage levels. 2.2 PQCD shall perform required verification at vendor facilities relative to the handling, cleaning and pre-paration of items for shipment as required by the pro-curement documents.
- See Appendix I for reference to implementing documents.
i
- 1
, ,y-w,+--r,,n--- -yw -m-,- ,y-yv.,-- ,
i,w-.y -~.-.-y- pw- , - -,,w.---- ,-,,,,~,&.--. ,.~,,,,,,we, ,_.p<-,.,.y,er,--,w,-.v-,,
.. . , i Scction 13 R3 vision A
. . , . s r- a , 9 fh l k L. *6
,g-2.3 PQCD shall audit the maintenance program of items in long term storage at vendor facilities on an individual case basis as required by specific requests from NUSCo.
2.4 Construction (field) shall establish and implement a storage and preventive maintenance program of items stored at the site and at specified nearby locations, and maintain appropriate maint". nance records. Construction (field) shall assign levels of storage for items based on criteria provided by Project Engineering. 2.5 FOCD shall ensure that the quality of items as maintained throughout storage so that no degradation or deterioration is evident. Field Quality Control Division shall: 2.5.1 Concur in the level of storage of items assigned by Construction (field). 2.5.2 Verify implementation of the maintenance program by Construction (field). 2.5.3 verify that only acceptable items are released for installation (risk released items are considered acceptable within the conditions of the risk release). 2.5.4 Document FQCD storage inspections / verifications. 2
Pago: 13-1
" v= o HISTORICAL XIII HANDLING, STORAGE, SHIPPING AND PRESERVATION Specifications for materials and equipment include appropriate requiremen+.s which pertain to the packaging, cleaning, prepar-ation for shipment, identification, cautionary marking, pro-tection against the weather, corrosion and damage, the avoid-ance of undue stressing, and other cautionary instructions and requirements for ensuring that materials and equipment are delivered at the jobsite as intended. Receiving inspection is performed at the construction site by Stone & Webster Field Quality Control personnel in accordance with procedures in the Stone & Webster FIELD QUALITY CONTROL MANUAL. The procedures shall assure that the material has been handled, shipped and preserved prior to receipt in accordance with the requirements of specifications.
When necessary, specifications for material and equipment will storage and preservation instruc-require tions be that special submitted by handlingdor the ven to the site prior to receipt in order to preclude deterioration. Storage of plant equipment and material is controlled to pre-clude deterioration. Materials shall be suitably preserved prior to storage. There are four classes of storage:
- 1. Special environment (special protection such as inert gas blanket, humidity level control, etc.)
- 2. Inside (heated) .
3 Inside (unheated)
- 4. Outside All storage areas are audited on a regular basis by Stone &
Webster Field Quality Control personnel to assure protection against material and equipment deterioration. The control of storage is continuous from receipt through installation, and until the material is released for preliminary operation.
. - - - - = * - * *~ ~ '~~~~*"~~"
,_ u .nn ..
T - 152 O STONE & WEBSTER ENGINEERING CORPORATION QUALITY ASSURANCE DEPARTMENT QUALITY ASSURANCE
; A MILLSTONE NUCLEAR POWER STATION - UNIT 3 TITLE: NUMBER:
SECTION 14 REVISION: INSPECTION, TEST AND OPERATING STATUS B O EFFECTIVE DATE: FEBRUARY 28, 1975 APPROVALS MANAGER, QUALITY ASSURANCE
% .Ck. h t A J E -
CHIEF ENGINEER, ENGINEERING ASSURANCE r O E PROJECT MANAGER
._ _ -_..__. _ _ .-_ _ ___. ___ _ _ -. _ T _ _ - . _ - ._. _
14-1 Revision B ; lllSIGRAl. ! l SECTION 14 l l INSPECTIOL TEST AND OPERATING STATUS 1,.0 REQUIREMENTS l 1.1 The status of inspections and test operations shall be identified during manufacturing, construction, installation, and test. The status shall be indicated by tags, markings, shop travelers, stamps , route cards, inspection. records, or checklists, or other suitable means, provided that the method used ensures that only accepted items are used, installed or operated. The removal of r such tags, shop traveler, route cards, checklists, etc., shall only be performed by authorized , personnel. Removal by unauthorized personnel shall be prohibited. 1.2 Nonconforming items shall be uniquely identified and controlled. 2.0 TASKS * . 2.1 In addition to the tasks listed in Section 7, PQCD shal-1: 2.1.1 Perform tasks relative to the assurance of inspection, test and operational status of items at vendor facilities in accordance with procurement documents. , 2.1.2 Verify during inspections, audits and surveys of Category I vendors that the vendor is properly using a system for the i identification of inspection and test operations, as appropriate, or as required by the procurement documents. 2.2 In addition to the tasks listed in Section 7, FQCD shall: , 2.2.1 Identify the status of inspections and tests performed during construction, installation and test operations at the
. site.
- See Appendix I for reference to implementing documents.
.i
. -- -~.._
--m-. . , _ . . _ - , - _
14-2 Revision B 2.2.2 Ensure that only accepted items are used, installed or operated. 2.2.3 Maintain current documentation regarding the status of inspections and tests. 3.0 DISCUSSION 3.1 Reference Para m ph 1.1 he bypassing or waiver of a required inspection, test or critical operation shall be cause for rejection, unless Quality Assurance has reviewed and signed off on the document that authorized the bypass or waiver; i . e., an addenda to a specification and/br an ESDCR. 4.0 CLIENT CONSIDERATIONS nere are no additional client considerations. lilSIDER e o O a
- , - ~ - - - -- -- - - ,----m, ,,.-,-n-- , - . - . - - - - . - - - , - - - . - - , ,
b T - 152 A
~
HISTORICAL STONE & WEBSTER ENGINEERING CORPORATION QUALITY ASSURANCE DEPARTMENT QUALITY ASSURANCE PROGRAM MILLSTONE NUCLEAR POWER STATION - UNIT 3 TITLE: NUMBER:
- SECTION 14 INSPECTION, TEST AND OPERATING REVISION:
STATUS A EFFECTIVE DATE: 7/19/74 APPROVALS
- N MAN AGER, QUALITY ASSURANCE D, T. q . 4u uDOmi CHIEF ENGINEER, ENGINEERING ASSURANCE n
4
,Re>Ec1 MANAeER
/
e, , , -
Rsvision A J % SECTION 14 INSPECTION, TEST AND OPERATING STATUF, 1.0 REQUIREMENTS 1.1 The status of inspections and test operations shall be identified during manufacturing, construction, installa-tion and test. The status shall be indicated by tags, markings, shop travelers, stamps, route cards, inspection records or checklists, or other suitable means, provided that the method used ensures that only accepted items are used, installed or operated. 1.2 Nonconforming items shall be uniquely identified and controlled. 2.0 TASKS
- 2.1 In addition to the tasks listed in Section 7, PQCD shall:
2.1.1 Perform tasks relative to the assurance of inspection, test and operational status of items at vendor facilities in accordance with procurement documents. 2.1.2 Verify during inspections, audits and surveys of Category I vendors that the vendor is properly using a system for the identification of inspection and test operations as appropriate or as required by the procurement documents. , 2.2 In addition to the tasks listed in Section 7, FQCD shall: 2.2.1 Identify the status of inspections and tests per-formed during construction, installation and test operations at the site. 2.2.2 Ensure that only accepted items are used, installed or operated. 2.2.3 Maintain current documentation regarding the status of inspections and tests.
- See Appendix I for reference to knplementing documents.
1
^
.aw-
e *
- Pags: 14-1
~
HISTORCAL XIV STONE & WEBSTER TNSPECTION, TEST, AND OPERATING STATUS The Field Q/C Manual provides measures for indicating the status of tests and inspections of materials, parts, and components; and the operating status of structures, systems, and components when required. The status of an item is indicated by stickers, tags, equipment record cards, preoperational test records, check-off lists, etc. There are'three general categories for inspection and test status:
- a. ACCEPT status will be assigned to materials, parts, and components which are inspected and determined satisfactory and are in conformance with applicable specification er purchase order. This status is recorded, and generally only accepted materials, parts, and components will be released to warehouse facilities, storage areas, or fabrication and erection areas,
- b. REJECT status will be assigned to materials, parts, components which are inspected and determined to be unsatisfactory and not in accordance with applicable specifications. This status will be recorded, and rejected items will be segregated in a controlled access If segregation reject area until a disposition is made.
of rejected materials is impractical, the items status will be indicated by physically tagging the item. If conditions warrant the installation of items in a reject status, the Stone & Webster Superintendent of Field Quality Control shall assure that the material con-ditional release status is clearly indicated, to control the rejection.
- c. HOLD status will be assigned to materials, parts, and components at the receiving inspection area while theyi are awaiting inspection, identification or documentat on, reword or disposition of an attribute which differs from specification requirements.
The HOLD status will be identified on a written record, and the item appropriately tagged.. Such items will be physically segregated from accept'ed items until a disposition of the HOLD status is made.
--me,
r-
/
. Pags: 11+-2 pg, Rev: 0
-1)f 7 The status of plant equipment during the preoperational test period shall be determined by Stone & Webster Field Quality Control personnel. Field Quality Control surveillance of a system shall terminate when the system is accepted by NUSCO for preoperational testing.
l l l l 1 l
._.: s
,.s -
A ! STONE & WEBSTER ENGINEERING CORPORATION QUALITY ASSURANCE DEPARTMENT QUALITY ASSURANCE PROGRAM HISTORICAL MILLSTONE NUCLEAR POWER STATION - UNIT 3 TITLE: NUMBER: SECTION 15 NONCONFORMING MATERIALS, PARTS REVISION: OR COMPONENTS B EFFECTIVE DATE: JUNE'18, 1976 APPROVED buth cW#/ PROJECT MANAGE'R ((_ _ .. MANAGER, QUALITY ASSURANCE 4 CHANGE NOTICE NO. 1 1.0 PURPOSE To update the procedure to reflect current policy. 2.0 GENERAL 2.1 File this Change Notice immediately preceding Section 15. 2.2 Replace old Page 3 with new Page 3. 3.0 CHANGES Paragraph 4.0 was changed to reflect the latest policy.
. . o.
e ._ 15-3 Revision B 3.2 Reference Paragraph 1.2 Nonconforming material is rejected, identified and i segregated, if practicable, until the nonconforming l condition is corrected either by rework to return it to the specified condition or by a change in the specified requirement by the Engineering l Depu. R .t. Both the rework and/br the change in !
. the specified requirement is subject to Quality j Assurance review or sign off as specified herein. ,
Assurance of , compliance is gained through the l audit program delineated in Section 18. ; l 3.3 Reference Paragraph 2.2 Reinspection of rework and repair activities is , conducted in accordance with the requirements of 1 the engineering specification / procedure. The work is evaluated to the accept / reject criteria 1 delineated in the engineering specification / pro- ! cedure and is documented in inspection reports. 3.4 Reference Paragraph 2.3 and 2.4 Each NSD report identifies and describes the nonconformance, the disposition of the nonconformance, the appropriate inspection requirement either directly or by reference and includes signature approval of the disposition. 4.0 CLIENT CONSIDERATIONS 4.1 Nonconforming material may not be installed at the construction site without prior approval by NUSCo. 4.2 For Category I nonconformances dispositioned " Repair" or " Accept as is", prior approval by NUSCO is required. u.-..- 7 . l
- ET0 RICE i
,. 3 l
l i t l i _-._,_. _..,__ _ _ ..._Z ._
I . p '.
' T - 15 2 ,' '
o-A STONE & WEBSTER ENGINEERING CORPORATION QUALITY ASSURANCE DEPARTMENT QUALITY ASSURANCE l PROGRAM i MILLSTONE NUCLEAR POWER STATION - UNIT 3 TITLE: NUMBER: SECTION 15 NONCONFORMING MATERIALS, PARTS OR REVISION: COMPONENTS B EFFECTIVE DATE: FEBRUARY 28, 1975
"" ~
Ill8TBRICAI.
/L MANAGER, QUALITY ASSURANCE M .CL, t= 0 = ~ A _
CHIEF ENGINEER, ENGINEERING ASSURANCE O [/ I PROJECT MANAGER
. I sion B 1
SECTION 15 i NONCGIFORMING MATERIALS, PARTS OR COMPONENTS
- 1.0 REQUIREMENTS J
1.1 Nonconforming items shall be controlled to prevent their inadvertent use or installation. The controls shall include measures for identification, documentation, segregation (as appropriate) , disposition,. and notification to affected organizations. 1.2 While physical segregation and marking are preferred, other means of identification (e .g . , marking, tagging, etc.) are acceptable when physical segregation is impracticable. 1.3 Dispositions authorizing a change in requirements shall be made by the same (or equally . authorized) personnel or group responsible for establishing the original requirements. 1.4 A . system shall be established for reporting significant nonmnformances as defined in Paragraph 50.55 (e) of 10CFR50. 2.0 TASKS
- 3 2.1 EA shall establish a system for complying with Paragraph 50.55 (e) of 10CFR50 regarding the reporting of significant deficiencies in design and construction. The system shall notification to NUSCo.
include 2.2 Project Engineering shall develop and approve dispositions for Nonconformance & Disposition (NSD) reports which originate from nonconformances noted in vendor shops and submitted by PQCD, and those which originate from nonconformances observed at the site and sulatitted by FQCD. 2.3 PQCD shall prepare, issue, distribute and control N6D reports which originate from nonconformances noted in vendor facilities and which cannot be corrected within the scope of the applicable drawings and specifications. Copies of all NSD
- See Appendix I for reference to implementing documents.
, . - . _ . - , - , ._. , , - . . = . . . _ - _ . - - . _ . _ - . . _ . - _ _ . - - - - - _.
. ..l 1 15-2 l Revision B reports including those dispositioned as " accept-as-is" or " repair" shall be provided to NUSCo. k1 2.4 Field Quality Control Division shall:
2.4.1* Prepare, issue, distribute, and control N8D reports which originate from nonconformances noted at the site which cannot be corrected within the scope of the applicable drawings and specifi-cations. 2.4.2 Review all dispositions and close out all NSD reports when actions have been completed., 2.4.3 Provide copies of NSD reports to the client, if required. 2.5 Construction (field) shall request Engineering dispositions for nonconformances which cannot be resolved within the scope of the applicable
, drawings and specifications. They shall review dispositions made by Project Engineering to determine that the disposition can be implemented.
3.0 DISCUSSION 1 a 3.1 Reference Paragrarh 1.1 Nonconformances are analyzed by Quality Assurance on a monthly basis for each project. Copies of the quality inder trend charts for each activity are made part of the monthly project report and forwarded to appropriate client and SSW management (Vice President Quality Assurance, Project Manager, Engineering Manager, Quality Manager, Project k Engineer, Construction Manager) . Further, a semi-annual sununary review is made of all noncondormances to ascertain significant trends or conditions and a summary report, with recommended courses of action, is forwarded to the President of the company and other appropriate top level management.
e F!l810RICjR "-" Revision B 3.2 Reference Paragraph 1.2 Nonconforming material is rejected, identified and segregated, if practicable, until the nonconforming mndition is corrected either by rework to return it to the specified condition or by a change in the specified requirement by the Engineering Department. Both the rework and/or the change in the specified requirement is subject to Quality Assurance review or sign off as specified herein. Assurance of complicance is gained through the audit program delineated in Section 18. 3.3 Reference Paragraph 2.2 Reinspection of rework and repair activities is conducted in accordance with the requirements of the engineering specification / procedure. The work is evaluated to the accept / reject criteria delineated in the engineering specification / pro-cedure and is documented in inspection reports. 3.4 Reference Paragraph 2.3 and 2.4 Each NSD report identifies and describes the ! ronconformance, the disposition of the nonconformance, the, appropriate inspection requirement either directly or by reference and includes signature approval of the disposition. 4.0. CLIENT CONSIDERATIONS - Nonconforming material may not be installed at the construction site without prior approval by NUSCO. l 1 M**
- 9D#W GD9D@ @p9WSu e @ P W @ m @ @#89******* ** * * *G ** 49 6 64
- 6 *W ********8 * *****W '* * * * * * * * * * * *
- T-tS2 A
HISTORICAL STONE & WEBSTER ENGINEERING CORPORATION QUALITY ASSURANCE DEPARTMENT QUALITY ASSURANCE PROGRAM MILLSTONE NUCLEAR POWER STATION - UNIT 3 TITLE: NUMBER: SECTION 15 NONCONFORMING MATERIALS, PARTS OR REVISION: COMPONENTS A EFFECTIVE DATE: 7/19/74 APPROVALS w MANAGER, QUALITY ASSURANCE l l I i ek. D Ah -% CHIEF ENGINEER, ENGINEERING ASSURANCE PROJECT MANAdER 1
____~ __ _ .. ._ . _ _ _ _ _ _ - _ _- Fr.vicion A SECTION 15 l NONCONFORMING MATERIALS, PARTS OR COMPONENTS 1.0 REQUIREMENTS 1.1 Nonconforming items shall be controlled to prevent their inadvertent use or installation. The controls shall include measures for identification, documentation, segregation (as appropriate), disposition and notifica-tion to affected organizations. 1.2 While physical segregation and marking are preferred, other means of identification (e.g., marking, tagging, etc.) are acceptable when physical segregation is impracticable. 1.3 Dispositions authorizing a change in requirements shall be made by the same (or equally authorized) personnel or group responsible for establishing the original requirements. 1.4 A system shall be established for reporting significant nonconformances as defined in Paragraph 50.55(e) of 10CFR50. 2.0 TASKS
- 2.1 EA shall establish a system for complying with Paragraph 50.55(e) of 10CFR50 regarding the reporting of significant deficiencies in design and construction. The system shall include notification to the NUSCo.
2.2 Project Engineering shall develop and approve dispositions for NSD reports which originate from nonconformances noted in vendor shops and submitted by PQCD, and those which originate from nonconformances observed at the site and submitted by FQCD. 2.3 PQCD shall prepare, issue, distribute and control NSD reports which originate from nonconformances noted in vendor facilities and which cannot be corrected within the scope of the applicable drawings and specifications. Copies of all NED reports shall be provided to NUSCo.
- See Appendix I for reference to implementing documents.
1 1
- ~ -
.' e , l S:ction 15.
R;vicion A e u Y" "1 ,5 7 s3-) Wat I8 5= . , + 2.4 Field Quality Control Division shall: 2.4.1 Prepare , distribute and control NED reports it . which originate from nonconformances noted at the
, ' ,ite which cannot be corrected within the scope of SN#h$ the applicable drawings and specifications.
2.4.2 Review all dispositions and close out all NSD reports when actions have been completed. l 2.4.3 Provide copies of NSD reports to NUSCo. 2.5 Construction (field) shall request, Engineering , dispositions for nonconformances which cannot be resolved within the scope of the applicable drawings and speci-
~
~-
l fications. They shall review dispositions made by Project Engineering to determine that the disposition can be implemented. 2
lilSTORiCAL Rev: 0 XV NONCONFORMING MATERIALS, PARTS OR COMPONENTS i Material and equipment which deviate from specifications, codes, drawings or other applicable documents, shall be rejected and specially controlled. Vendors and Subcontractors shall be required to use the Stone & Webster " Nonconformity and Dis-position" (N&D) form for determining the resolution of their nonconformities or may submit on their own form in which case Procurement Quality Control vill process using the Stone & Webster Form. These N&D's will be processed in accordance with pro-cedures of the PROCUREMENT QUALITY CONTROL or FIELD QUALITY CONTROL MANUAIS. Section 15 of the ENGINEERING ASSURANCE MANUAL establishes the requirements for processing N&D's by the Engineering Department. Hejectable conditions discovered during receipt,any phase of storage, manufacturing, installation, fhbrication, construction or shipment, testing, s hall reworked or scrapped in be reviewedwith accordance andprocedures accepted, repaired,d containe in applicable manuals. When repair or rework is the corrective action, and the repair or rework is not performed by the original manufacturer or erector, procedures for the repair or rework will be prepared and reviewed by the Project. The Quality Assurance Department reviews all repair / rework procedures for the inclusion of quality related activities prior to use.' The procedure 3 shall r.eference individual and group responsibilities for assigning corrective" ~actilofis~wh4n~ the acti~on ~is to "a'ccepta's"is?--"~ ~ '
~ ~
Complete written justification for " accept as is" action is
~
required as part of the record of that action. Only Engineering can effect an " accept as is" disposition. 1
+ c,,,,- - - ---m,-- W* m'm*
- r" F--W *f---' &-P-w-'
'-s'T N TT-*'-- T * --9" " '-+ = " -*' r== w
T 152 G' STONE & WEBSTER ENGINEERING CORPORATION QUALITY ASSURANCE DEPARTMENT QUALITY ASSURANCE PROGRAM I!3IDRiCAl. MILLSTONE NUCLEAR POWER STATION - UNIT 3 TITLE: NUMBER: SECTION 16 REVISION: CORRECTIVE ACTION B EFFECTIVE DATE: FEBRUARY 28, 1975 APPROVALS W/ _. MANEJER, QUALITY ASSURANCE
% CL. h t* L u h _____
CHIEF ENGINEER, ENGINEERING ASSURANCE b PROJECT MANAGER l l 1
, ,y , - - . - , - - - - , - - - _,,,.,-.,_y., _ _ _ - - - _ _
16-1 Revision B SECTION 16 CORRECTIVE ACTION
- 1.0 REQUIREMENTS i
1.1 Majbr and recurring conditions, adverse to quality, l such as failures, malfunctions, deficiencies, defective material and equipment, and nonconformances shall be identified, the main causes determined and corrective action taken to preclude repetition. These conditions include , failures of the quality system. ,
; 1.2 The conditions, their cause, and the corrective ; action taken shall be documented and reported to responsible management. The area of concern shall be audited in a timely manner to assure that the corrective action has been accomplished.
1.3 Measures shall be taken to keep appropria'te S&W personnel informed of potential problems by a feed-back system of reports on significant and recurring problems encountered in other S&W i projects and in government and industry as , determined from published literature. 1 2.0 TASKS
- 2.1 The Quality nasurance Department and EA shall fulfill the requirements of this, section, in general, by implementing the tasks of Sections 15 and 18 of this manual.
2.2 EA shall analyze EA audit data to determine significant conditions and trends. Reports of findings shall be prepared for management. I 2.3 EA shall review published government and industry literature for problems related to quality assurance so that applicable potential problems are i brought to the attention of appropriate personnel. 2.4 EA shall establish a feed-back system for the reporting of significant and recurring problens for preventive action. 1
- See Appendix I for reference to implementing documents.
16-2 Revision B 2.5 QSD shall analyze inspection and audit data based on inputs from FQCD and PQCD, evaluate the cause of major and recurring nonconformances and suhait reports to management with reconumended corrective action. 3.0 DISCUSSION 3.1 Reference Paragraph 1.3 Corrective action is verified by the performance of corrective action audits to assure that the agreed upon corrective action has been implemented. These audits, in conjunction with the completed in-fraction notices / corrective action correspondence, (IJ are considered to close out the corrective action documentation. 4.0 CLIENT CONSIDERATIONS SSW shall report significant deficiencies adverse to quality to NUSCo. promptly as well as the cause and corrective action relating to these significant deficiencies. This requirement is addressed in Paragraph 2.1, Section 15. t filSTORICAI. 1 l e
T - 152 HISTORICAL A STONE & WEBSTER ENGINEERING CORPORATION QUALITY ASSURANCE DEPARTMENT QUALITY ASSURANCE PROGRAM MILLSTONE NUCLEAR POWER STATION - UNIT 3 TITLE: NUMBER: SECTION 16 REVISION: CORRECTIVE ACTION A
. .. EFFECTIVE DATE:
7/19/74 APPROVALS ms w MANAGER, OUALITY ASSURANCE
% .q . k_1.hAS E __ -
CHIEF ENGINEER, ENGINEERING ASSURANCE
- n PROJECT MANAGl[R
. . _ _ . . _ . _ . _ _ . . _ , _ _ _ . - _ _ _ . - . _ - . .. _ _ _ _ _ __ _ _ _ _ _ _ -_ - - ~ J~. i ZlEl---
, Revision A 3
SECTION 16 j CORRECTIVE ACTION 1.0 REQUIREMENTS l.1 Major and recurring conditions, adverse to quality, such as failures, malfunctions, deficiencies, defective material and equipment and nonconformances shall be identified, the main causes determined and corrective action taken to preclude repetition. These conditions include failures of the quality system. 1.2 The conditions, their cause and the corrective action taken, shall be documented and reported to responsible management. 1.3 Measures shall be taken to keep appropriate Ssw personnel informed of potential problems by a feed-back system of reports on significant and recurring problems encountered in other SSW projects and in government and industry as determined from published literature. 2.0 TASKS
- 2.1 The Quality Assurance Department and EA shall fulfill the requirements of this Section, in general, by implementing the tasks of Sections 15 and 18 of this manual.
2.2 EA shall analyze EA audit dat a to determine significant conditions and trends. Reports of findings shall be prepared for management. 2.3 EA shall review published government and industry litera-ture for problems related to quality assurance so that applicable potential problems are brought to the attention of appropr1 ate personnel. 2.4 EA shall establish a feed-back system for the reporting of significant and recurring problems for preventive action. 2.5 QSD shall analyze inspection and audit data based on in-puts from FQCD and PQCD, evaluate the cause of major and i recurring nonconformances and submit reports to manage-ment with recommended corrective action.
- See Appendix I for reference to implementing documents.
1
.--.--....=.::---=--= . - - - - . . --
Page: 16-1 Rev: 0 HISTORICAL XVI CORRECTIVE ACTION The " NONCONFORMITY AND DISPOSITION" reports which are issued as a result of both Procurement and Field Quality Control rejected items are used by the Quality Assurance Eepartment for analysis. The re,sults of these analyses are used as a basis for assessing the adequacy of Stone & Webster programs, and to take the appropriate corrective actions to prevent recurrences. Correct-ive action is documented and the effectiveness of the correct-ive actions shall be revleved by the Quality Assurance Depart-ment. Other rejection information is furnished from the Procurement and Field Quality Control Divisions to the Quality Assurance Department. The data are analyzed and evaluated by qualified personnel; after which corrective action is recommended to the appropriate management personnel to assist in controlling and preventing recurrences of nonconformities. The effectiveness of recommended corrective actions is ascertained by an audit. Any significant engineering design, constr'ctionu or quality problemsfoundingovernmen$andindustryliteraturearedis-seminated by a "EROBLEM REPORT" to appropriate disciplines for action as established in Section 16 of the ENGINEERING ASSURANCE MANUAL. p -
- y _
y-7 -y
, s ,
^
T - 152 O A l STONE & WEBSTER ENGINEERING CORPORATION QUALITY ASSURANCE DEPARTMENT QUALITY ASSURANCE lilSTORiCAL MILLSTONE NUCLEAR POWER STATION - UNIT 3 TITLE: NUMBER: SECTION 17 REVISION: QUALITY ASSURANCE RECORDS B O EFFECTIVE DATE: FEBRUARY 28, 1975 APPROVALS 1
-e _ _-I-MAN AGER, QUALITY ASSURANCE
%.a .b. kuG Q 2 --
CHIEF ENGINEER, ENGINEERING ASSURANCE O I PROJECT MANAGED
. . - ==_.-- -_: === : _:_ : _.
, r
- 17-1
+
Revision B
's Jh]Uh3Uj i
SECTION 17 OUALITY ASSURANCE RE(X)RDS 1.0 REQUIREMENTS 1.1 Measures shall be established for the collection, collation, and maintenance of quality records which furnish objective evidence of the quality of items or the ccmpletion of those activities affecting quality. 1.2 Measures shall be established for the maintenance of those quality records furnished to SSW by Westinghouse.
- 1.3 Applicable specifications and procurement doctaments shall specify the quality records to be generated and their disposition.
1.4 Inspection and test records shall be reviewed to i ensure that, as a minimum, they identify the inspector or data recorder, the type of operations, the results, the acceptability, and the action taken if deficiencies were noted. These records shall be signed by the reviewer. 1.5 Permanent plant records shall be identified. They shall be stored in an area satisfactory to NUSCo in the temporary construction facility and issued on a controlled basis to prevent loss. Records designated by NUSCo shall be transferred to the permanent plant records area as directed by NUSCo. 1.6 Permanent plant records, as appropriate, shall be microfilmed and cardmounted with identification to
; include component and system.
1.7 Records shall be identifiable and retrievable. 2.0 TASKS
- 2.1 Construction (field) shall:
2.1.1 Establish, control and maintain the file system for the permanent plant records at the site. -
- See Appendix for reference to implementing documents.
i
. . . . . _ . _ . . - . . . . - _ . . _ . . . . . - - _ . . . . . - - - . - - .~- - - -_- - - _. - - - -.
. . . - - - _ _ - - , . . . . _ - - . - - - . . ~ . . . - _ . - _ _
. i ,
e f '3 IN iJ1 17-2 Revision B 2.1.2 Transfer permanent plant records to NUSCo. 2.3! Project Engineering shall: 2.2.1 Specify records to be generated and their disposition. 2.2.2 Establish, control, and maintain a file system for documents pertaining to design and engineering. 2.3 Procurement Quality Control Division shall: 2.3.1 Ensure that specified quality records are available before items are released for shipment from vendor facilities, as i required by procurement documents. 2.3.2 Release quality records required by procurement documents to FQCD (at the site). 2.3.3 Maintain a Headquarters (Boston) working file of quality related procurement documents. 2.4 Field Quality Control Division shall: 2.4.1 Ibiplement, control, and maintain a working, file at the site for quality records.
~ 2.4.2 Assemble and . verify the completeness of quality records.
2.4.3 Release quality records, as designated by NUSCo, to Construction (field) for inclusion in the permanent plant files. 2.4.4 Release quality records, as designated by NUSCo, furnished by Westinghouse to Construction (field) for inclusion in the permanent plant files. 2.5 Quality Systems Division shall develop a site w orking file system for quality records. 2.6 Department Services Group shall maintain a Quality Assurance Department (Headquarters) working file for quality documents, excluding procurement activities.
, e , _ -. .. _ _._.
17-3 l Revision B 3.0 DISCUSSION 3.1 Reference Paragraph 1.7 Quality Assurance records are maintained in accordance with the latest guidance provided WASH 1283 Rev. 1 dated May 24, 1974. in k 4.0 CLIENT CONSIDERATIONS There are no additional client considerations. e
*e. e e illSTORCAL 9
( e 9
T- t52 HISTORICAL A STONE & WEBSTER ENGINEERING CORPORATION QUALITY ASSURANCE DEPARTMENT QUALITY ASSURANCE PROGRAM MILLSTONE NUCLEAR POWER STATION - UNIT 3 TITLE: NUMBER: . SECTION 17 REVISION: QUALITY ASSURANCE RECORDS A EFFECTIVE DATE: 7/19/74 APPROVALS i MANAGER, QUALITY ASSURANCE
% . o. . eO_n__. h -__
CHIEF ENGINEER, ENGINEERING ASSURANCE PROJECT MANAGER
,,,,,,,s
Rsvicion A d ESTORiBR SECTION 17 QUALITY ASSURANCE RECORDS 1.0 REQUIREMENTS i 1.1 Measures ahall be established for the collection, collation and maintenance of quality records which furnish objective evidence of the quality of items or the completion of those activities affecting quality. 1.2 Measures shall be established for the maintenance of those quality records furnished to Ssw by Westinghouse. 1.3 Applicable specifications and procurement documents shall specify the quality records to be generated and their disposition. 1.4 Inspection and test records shall be reviewed to ensure , that, as a minimum, they identify the inspector or data recorder, the type of operations, the results, the acceptability and the action taken if deficiencies were noted. These records shall be signed by the reviewer. 1.5 Permanent plant records shall be identified. They shall be stored in an area satisfactory to NUSCo. in the temporary construction facility and issued on a controlled basis to prevent loss. Records designated by NUSCo. shall be transferred to the permanent plant records area when directed by NUSCo. but not later than ninety days after the start of commercial operation. 1.6 Permanent plant records shall be microfilmed and cardmounted with identification to include component and system. 1.7 Records shall be identifiable and retrievable. . 2.0 TASKS
- 2.1 Construction (field) shall:
2.1.1 Establish, control and maintain the file system j for the permanent plant records at the site. 1 2.1.2 Transfer permanent plant records to NUSCo.
- See Appendix for reference to implementing documents.
l 1 i l l _ . _ . _ , _ . . . - - _ - _ _ - _ _ . ~.T.__ZE _ _2_I l ... h _._.---.1 E. .-
. e.
Stction 17 Rivicion A f ' 5 9."P Mh ll' UER H= 2.2 Project Engineering shall: 2.2.1 Specify records to be generated and their disposition. 2.2.2 Establish, control and. maintain a file system for documents pertaining to design and engineering. 2.3 Procurement Quality Control Division shall: 2.3.1 Ensure that specified quality records are available before items are released for shipment from vendor facilities, as required by procure-ment. 2.3.2 Release quality records required by procurement documents to FQCD (at the site). 2.3.3 Maintain a Headquarters (Boston) working file of quality related procurement activities. 2.4 Field Quality Control Division shall:
- 2.4.1 Implement, control and maintain a working file at the site for quality records.
2.4.2 Assemble and verify the completeness of quality records. 2.4.3 Release quality records as designated by NUSCo. to construction (field) for inclusion in the permanent plant files. 2.4.4 Release quality records, as designated by NUSCo. furnished by Westinghouse to Construction (field) for inclusion in the permanent plant files. 2.5 Quality Systems Division shall develop a site working file system for quality records. 2.6 Department Services Group shall maintain a Quality Assurance Department (Headquarters) working file. for quality activities, excluding procurement activities. 2
i Page: 17-1 HISTORICAL XVII i QUALITY ASSURANCE RECORDS Quality Assurance (QA) Records-are those documents which define a design feature, or provide evidence of the accuracy and proper execution of engineering, design, quality assurance, construction, and testing. There.are three general types of Quality Assurance Records: l
- 1. PROCUREMENT records which verify the conformance of 4
purchased material, equipment, and services with applicable requirements. 4
- 2. FIELD records which verify the conformance of site activities with applicable requirements.
4 3 PROJECT records which support Engineering Department 4 activities of engineering and design. Procedures which govern the above are included in the PROCURE-MENT QUALITY CONTROL, FIELD QUALITY CONTROL and the ENGINEERING' ASSURANCE MANUALS. Quality assurance records shall be collected and maintained
- in a retrievable and accountable manner by Stone & Webster.
. Those quality assurance records designated by NUSCO will be presented to NUSCO for retention by mutual agreement. Pro- ' cedures in the ENGINEERING ASSURANCE MANUAL and PROJECT MAN-UAL outline the methods for identification, collection and turn-over to NUSCO of those records designated by NUSCO. \ t i
. , *_ _N,** g-e e , + - e e, me e =
e- m - e--e=_,e._ wa _ e -ew ~ . , ,
. T ~f52 A
STONE & WEBSTER ENGINEERING CORPORATION QUAll,TY ASSURANCE DEPARTMENT QUALITY ASSURANCE HISTDRiCAi. MILISTONE NUCLEAR POWER STATION-UNIT 3 TITLE: NUMgTION 18 AUDITS REVISION: EFFECTIVE DATE: DECEMBER 11, 1975 APPROVALS i MANAGER, QUALITY ASSURANCE I
- Q *
-+ 2:_2_
CHIEF ENGINEER, ENGINEERING ASSURANCE l e PROJECT MAN GER w -y-- -
- = - w
g . , 18-1 Revision- D G 4/ SECTION 18 a ] 1.0 REOUIREMEhTS 1.1 Audit programs shall be established to ensure that quality activities are in compliance with the requirements of this manual and related procedures, and to determine the effectiveness of the cuality assurance program. 1.2 The audit programs shall provide a planned and scheduled system of audits on both Stone & Webster internal operations and vendors. The programs shall include provisions for reporting nonconforming conditions to the responsible level of management for any necessary corrective action. Deficient areas shall be promptly audited to assure accomplishment of the corrective action. 1.3 Audits shall be performed in accordance with I written procedures or checklists by . appropriately trained personnel having no direct responsibility O in the activity being audited. , 1.4 Records shall be maintained of all audits ; performed. 1.5 Audit schedules shall be provided to NUSCo. 1.6 Audit reports, of their project, shall be made available to NUSCo for review, upon request, at the Stone & Webster office having custody of the audit report files. 1.7 Upon request, Stone & Webster may act as NUSCo's agent and perform special audits in activities in which Stone & Webster has no direct responsibility. 2.0 TASKS
- 2.1 The Vice President, Quality Assurance shall periodically assess the implementation of the quality assurance program for compliance with the Preliminary Safety Analysis Report, and Appendix B to 10CFR50. Copies of the audit findings and 3
- See Appendix I for reference to implementing documents.
.) %/
- i r:
) 18-2 1 0
. I[kle Revision D l recomunendations shall be submitted to the President of Stone & Webster, the Manager of Projects, and~
the Project Manager. 2.2 Engineering Assurance shall: 2.2.1 Establish audit schedules and provide copies to the Project Quality Assurance Coordinator for forwarding to NUSCo. 2.2.2 Conduct audits of engineering and design activities including activities that determine site features that affect plant safety. 2.2.3 Maintain records of audits performed. 2.2.4 Conduct post-award audits of suppliers for procured engineering services. 2.2.5 Conduct audits of the Department Services Group of the Quality Assurance Department. 2.3 Procurement Quality Control Division shall: 2.3.1 Establish audit schedules and provide copies to NUSCo. 2.3.2 Conduct audits of vendors, after award of purchase orders for Category I items, to determine whether the vendors are complying with their approved quality assurance programs. 2.3.3 Maintain records of audits performed. 2.4 Department Services Group shall: 2.4.1 Establish audit schedules and provide copies to NUSCo. 2.4.2 Conduct audits of Stone & Webster indoctrination and traning programs te qualify individuals performing in.cpe c-- tion, examination, and testing activities. 2.4.3 Conduct audits of all Quality Assurance Department programs, including Engineer-(N ing Assurance Division activities.
o . Jj , 18-3 Revision D 2.4.4 Maintain records of audits performed. 2.4.5 Peport to the QA Department Manager on adherence to quality related procedures and systems. 2.5 QA Department personnel shall support audits on request. . 3.0 DISCUSSION 3.1 Reference Paragraph 1.2 3.1.1 Project audits are generally conducted on a quarterly basis and cover the scope of work being performed by the project at the time of the audit. The audit schedule starts at the time SSW is awarded the work and runs until the project is completed. Additional audits, relating to specific areas of interest, are conducted as determined by appropriate management. 3.1.2 Engineering audit data is analyzed by the O Engineering Assurance Division reported to the Engineering Manager with and copies to the Quality Assurance Department. QA Department audit data is analyzed by the Reports Section of the Quality System Division and/or the Department Services group and reported to the Manager and Vice President of Quality Assurance. 3.2 _ Reference Paragraph 2.1 This item requires that the Vice President, Quality Assurance, periodically assess the total Quality Assurance program for compliance and effectiveness. During this review the audit program is evaluated against the characteristics delineated below:
- a. work areas
- b. activities
- c. processes
- d. items (hardware)
(./
18 -3 Revision D O
- e. documents and records
- f. quality rel Eed practices, procedures and ineL uctions
- g. effectiveness of QA Program implementation
- h. conformance with policy objectives These characteristics are made part of the evaluation plan. This evaluation has in tlie past been conducted either by an independent review group made up of personnel within the company or has been contracted to an independent third party consultant.
4.0 CLIENT CONSIDERATIONS All quality related activities performed by SSW or their contractors, suppliers, or engineering service organizations within the scope of the NUSCO purchase order / contract shall be subject to NUSCo or their authorized representative audit / inspection / surveillance at all reasonable times. At the conclusion of the audit 4 o a post audit conference shall be held, l FilSTBRl%I. I i I V I
H!B!J! M!GM - O A STONE & WEBSTER ENGINEERING CORPORATION QUALITY ASSURANCE DEPARTMENT QUALITY ASSURANCE PROGRAM MILLSTONE NUCLEAR POWER STATION - UNIT 3 TITLE: NUMBER: SECTION 18 REVISION: AUDITS C O E ,r E CTi v E o 4 c FEBRUARY 28, 1975 APPROVALS SMr" MANAGER, QUALITY ASSURANCE
% .a . h t. A uh ? ___
CHIEF ENGINEER, ENGINEERING ASSURANCE C PROJECT MANAGER
~~
, e '. 18-1 Revision C ETBRM SECTION 18 AUDITS 1.0 REOUIREMENTS 1.1 Audit programs shall be established to ensure that quality activities are in compliance with the requirements of this manual and related procedures, and to determine the effectiveness of the quality assurance program. 1.2 The audit programs shall provide a planned and l scheduled system of audits on both Stone & Webster internal operations and vendors. The programs ' shall include provisions for reporting l nonconforming conditions to the responsible level of management for any necessary corrective action. Deficient areas shall be promptly audited to assure accomplishment of the corrective action. 1.3 Audits shall be performed in accordance with written procedures or checklists by appropriately trained personnel having no direct responsibility in the activity being audited. 1.4 Records shall be maintained of all audits performed. ' 1.5 Audit schedules shall be provided to NUSCo. 1.6 Audit reports, of their project, shall be made available to NUSCo for review, upon request, at'the Stone & Webster office having custody of the audit report files. 1.7 Upon request, Stone & Webster may act as NUSCo os agent and perform special audits in activities in which Stone & Webster has no direct responsibility. 2.0 TASKS
- 2.1 The Vice President, Quality Assurance shall periodically assess 'the- implementation of the quality assurance program for compliance with the ,
Preliminary Safety Analysis Report, and Appendix B to 10CFRSO. Copies of the audit findings and Coe Appendix I for reference to implementing documents.
ision C reconsnendations shall be submitted to the President of Stone S Webster, the Manager of Projects, and the Project Manager. 2.2 Engineering Assurance shall: 2.2.1 Establish audit schedules and provide copies to the Project Quality Assurance Coordinator for forwarding to NUSCo. 2.2.2 Conduct audits of engineering and design activities including activities determine site features that affect plant that k. safety. 2.2.3 Maintain records of audits performed. 2.2.4 Conduct post-award audits of suppliers for procured engineering services. 2.2.5 Conduct audits of the Department Services Group of the Quality Assurance Department. 2.3 Procurement Quality Control Division shall: 2.3.1 Establish audit schedules and provide copies to NUSCo. 2.3.2 Conduct audits of vendors, after award of purchase orders for Category I items, to determine whether the vendors are complying with their approved quality assurance programs. 2.3.3 Maintain records of audits perforrr.ed. 2.4 Department Services Group shall: 2.4.1 Establish audit schedules and provide copies to NUSCo. 2.4.2 Conduct audits of Stone & Webc ter indoctrination and traning programs to qualify individuals performing inspec- ( tion, examination, and testing activities. 2.4.3 Conduct audits of all Quality Assurance Department programs, including Engineer- ( ing Assurance Division activities.
e ETORICal. Revision C l l 2.4.4~ Maintain records of audits performed. ( 2.4.5 Report to the QA Department Manager on ac21erence to qualitf related procedures and systerm.. 2.5 QA Department personnel shall support audits on request. 3.0 DISCUSSION 3.1 Reference Paragraph 1.2 3.1.1 Project audits are generally conducted on a quarterly basis and cover the scope of work being performed by the project at the time of the audit. The audit schedule starts at the time SSW is awarded the work and runs until the project is completed. Additional audits, relating to specific areas of interest, are conducted appropria,te management. as determined by k 3.1.2 Engineering audit data is analyzed by the
. Engineering Assurance Division and reported to the Engineering Manager with copies to the Quality Assurance Department. QA Department audit data is analyzed by the Reports Section of the Quality System Division and/or the Department Services group and reported to the Manager and Vice President of Quality Assurance.
3.2 _R,eference Paragraph 2.1 This item requires that the Vice President, Quality Assurance, periodically assess the total Quality Assurance program for compliance and effectiveness. l During this review the audit program is evaluated against the characteristics delineateC below:
- a. work areas -
- b. activities
- c. processes
- d. items (hardware)
o . j ision C i 4
- e. documents and records i l
- f. quality related practices, procedures and instructions
- g. effectiveness'of QA Program implenentation
- h. conformance with policy objectives These characteristics a.;e made part of evaluation plan. This evaluation has in the past the d' -
been conducted either by an independent review group made up of personnel within the Company .or has been contracted to an independent third party consultant. f4.0 CLIENT CONSIDERATIONS All quality related activities performed by SSW or their contractors, suppliers, or engineering serrice organizations within the scope of the NUSCo purchase order / contract shall be subject to NUSCo or their authorized representative audit / inspection / surveillance at all reasonable times. e
o
"~
iiisielliML g l STONE & WEBSTER ENGINEERING CORPORATION QUALITY ASSURANCE DEPARTMENT ! QUAUTY ASSURANCE PROGRAM MTT.T.RTOMR Ni1CT. PAR POWER STATTON - f1MTT 1 TITLE NUMBER: SECTION 18 AUDITS REVISION: B EFFECTIVE DATE: 10/7/74 APPROVALS MANAGER, QUALITY ASSURANCE Y CL L _ mC CHIEF ENGINEER, ENGINEERING ASSURANCE r PROJECT MAN AGER
, Rsvision B SECTION 18 AUDITS 1.0 REQUIREMENTS ! 1.1 Audit programs shall be established to ensure that quality activities are in compliance with the requirements of this manual and related procedures, and to determine the effec-tiveness of the quality assurance program.
1.2 The audit programs shall provide a planned and scheduled system of audits on both Stone & Webster internal opera-tions and vendors. The programs shall include provisions for reporting nonconforming conditions to the appropriate- - level of management for any necessary corrective action. .i Follow-up audits shall be performed to determine correc-tive action effectiveness. 1.3 Audits shall be performed in accordance with written pro-cedures or checklists by appropriately trained personnel l having no direct responsibility in the activity being audited. _ _ . _ j 1. l4 Records shall be maintained of all audits performed. 1.5 Audit schedules shall be provided to NUSCo. 1.6 Audit reports of his; project shall be made available to NUSCo. for review, upon request, at the Stone & Webster office having custody of the audit report files. - 1.7 Upon request, Stone & Webster may act as NUSCo.'s agent and perform special audits in activities in which Stone & Webster has no direct responsibility. 2.0 TASKS
- 2.1 The Vice President, Quality Assurance shall periodically assess the implementation of the quality assurance program for compliance with the Preliminary Safety Analysis Repdit-and Appendix B to 10CFR50. Copies of the audit fiEdIngi ~ B and recommendations shall be submitted to the President of Stone & Webster, the Manager of Projects and the Project Manager.
l l
- See Appendix I for reference to implementing documents.
1.
. __ . _ _ . _ _ . _ . _ . _ .___. __ _ ___.__ __ ______ _.__,_._ _.... _ ;n.
i
"[g'jy'TOROL Section 18 !
Revision B l 2.2 Engineering Assurance shall: 2.2.1 Establish audit schedules and provide copies to the Project Quality Assurance Coordinator for forwarding to NUSCo. 2.2.2 Conduct audits of engineering and design activities. 2.2.3 Maintain records of audits performed. 2.2.4 Conduct post-award audits of suppliers for procured engineering services.
~
2.2.5 Conduct audits of the Department Services Group of the Quality Assurance Department. 2.3 Procurement Quality Control Division..shall: 2.3.1 Establish audit schedules and provide copies to NUSCo. 2.3.2 Conduct audits of vendors after award of purchase orders for Category I items to determine whether the vendors are complying with their approved quality assurance programs. 2.3.3 Maintain records of audits performed. 2.4 Department Services Group shall: 2.4.1 Establish audit schedules and provide copies to NUSCo. 2.4.2 Conduct audits of all Quality Assurance Department programs, including Engineering Assurance Division activities. 2.4.3 Maintain records of audits performed. 2.4.4 Report to the QA Department Manager on adhercnce to quality related procedures and systema. 2.5 QA Department personnel shall support audits on request. 2
i '
~
illsialucat A STONE & WEBSTER ENGINEERING CORPORATION QUALITY ASSURANCE DEPARTMENT QUALITY ASSURANCE PROGRAM MILLSTONE NUCLEAR POWER STATION - UNIT 3 TITLE: NUMBER: SECTION 18 REVISION: AUDITS A EFFECTIVE DATE: 7/19/74 APPROVALS MANAGER, QUALITY ASSURANCE
%.cl ek t Eh'-
CHIEF ENGINEER, ENGINEERING ASSURANCE PROJECT MANAGER _. - _ , , , , . , _ . _ , _ _ _ _ . . . _ . . _ _ . - _ - _ _ _ _ _ ,._____,.,__.__._.,.,m _ - . , y_ _ _ - - -. _ _ _ _ - , . . ____-..-
R; vision A
. 1 QTDEAL :
SECTION 18 AUDITS 1.0 REQUIREMENTS 1.1 Audit programs shall be established to ensure that quality activities are in compliance'with the requirements of this manual and related procedures, and to determine the effec-tiveness of the quality assurance program. 1.2 The audit programs shall provide a planned and scheduled system of audits'on both S&W internal operations and on S&W venders. The programs shall include provisions for reporting nonconforming conditions to the appropriate level of management for any necessary corrective action. Follow-up audits shall be performed to datermine correc-tive action effectiveness. 1.3 Audits shall be performed in accordance with written pro-cedures or checklists by appropriately trained personnel having no direct responsibility in the activity being audited. 1.4 Records shall be maintained of all audits performed. 1.5 Audit schedules shall be provided to NUSCo. 1.6 Audit reports of his project shall be made available to - NUSCo. for review, upon request, at the S&W office having l custody of the audit report files. 1.7 Upon request, S&W may act as NUSCo.'s agent and perform special audits in activities in which S&W has no direct responsibility. 2.0 TASKS
- 2.1 The Manager, Quality Assurance Department is responsible to periodically audit the quality assurance program for compliance with the Preliminary Safety Analysis Report, Appendix B to 10CFR50, and the S&W Project Quality Assurance Program Manual. Copies of the audit findings l
and recommendations shall be submitted to the S&W President, Vice President of Quality Assurance, the Manager of Projects and the Project Manager.
- See Appendix I for reference to implementing documents.
1
- Srction 18
- R; vision A
}
2.2 Engineering Assurance shall: 2.2.1 Conduct audits of engineering and design activities. 2.2.2 Establish audit schedules and provide copies to the Project Quality Assurance Coordinator for forward-ing to NUSCo. 2.2.3 Maintain records of audits performed. 2.2.4 ' Conduct post-award audits of suppliers for procured enginearing services. 2.2.5 Conduct audits of the Department Services Group of the Quality Assurance Department.
- 2.3 Procurement Quality Control Division shall
l 2.3.1 Conduct audits of vendors after award of purchase orders for Category I items to determine whether ! the vendors are complying with their approved l quality assurance programs. I l 2.3.2 Establish audit schedules and provide copies to NUSCo. l i 2.3.3 Maintain records of audits performed. i 2.4 Department Services Group shall: 2.4.1 Conduct audits of all Quality Assurance Depart-ment programs, including Engineering Assurance l Division activities. 2.4.2 Establish audit schedules and provide copies to NUSCo. 2,a.3 Maintain records of audits performed. l
.2.4.4 Report to the QA Department Manager on adherence to quality related procedures and systems.
2.5 QA Department personnel may support audits on request. 1 i l 2 _ a
Page: 18-1 Rev: 0 XVIII AUDITS The Stone & Webster audit program for Millstone 3 is established to verify compliance with all aspects of the quality assurance program, and to determine the overall effectiveness of the pro-gram. Field Quality Control shall audit all aspects of the Field Quality Assurance activities. personnel shall audit Field Quality ControlThe Stone & Webster, heBoston, activities. T Engineering Assurance Division shall audit the Engineering Department activities. The methods for conducting audit programs are:
- 1. A formal schedule of audits of which the frequency is based upon:
- a. The results of previous audits
- b. The significance of previous audit nonconformities
- c. The sequence of work accomplishment
- 2. Audits performed by impartial personnel to preplanned audit attributes 3 Assignment of audit infractions to appropriate levels of management for resolution upon the severity of the infraction
- 4. Formal reports of audit results to Ma nagement 5 A " closed cycle" of corrective action to ensure resolution of audit nonconformities
- 6. Analyses of audit information for ascertaining overall program effectiveness Follow-up audits are conducted to determine corrective action effectiveness. The results of such follow-up auditing are reported to management and other personnel who are directly concerned. A complete record file of all audits is maintained.
Special audits will be conducted of any administrative or technical subject on which plant quality may be particularly dependent. The administration of reports, infraction resolutions, analyses, etc., for special audits is similar to scheduled audits.
" ~~~ ~ ~
- L --. . - . . - - . . - . . -
~T . ._-
~
. *: Paga: 18-2
~
"~
adiDRIM The Manager, Quality Assurance, L'.s the responsibility to periodically audit for compliance with the Preliminary Safety Analysis Report, Appendix B to 10CFR50, and this Quality Assurance Program. Copies of hin audit findings and recommend-ations are submitted to the Stone & Webster Project Manager, Vice President, Quality Assurance, President, and the Manager of Projects. Vendor audits also will be performed, for Category I and II, for conformance to vendor program manual. I l i i I
. t.
T - tS2 O A STONE & WEBSTER ENGINEERING CORPORATION QUALITY ASSURANCE DEPARTMENT QUALITY
. ASSURANCE PROGRAM r virp7r D nJ isedWU.LiiJhk MILLSTONE NUCLEAR POWER STATION - UNIT 3 TITLE: NUMBER:
SECTION 19 CONTROL OF THE QUALITY ASSURANCE PROGRAM DOCUMENT REVISION: B ; O EFFECRVE DATE: FEBRUARY 28, 1975 APPROVALS M '= MANAGER, QUALITY ASSURANCE M .Cl . LOC CHIEF ENGINEER, ENGINEERING ASSURANCE h PROJECT MANAGER [
I I l 19-1 : Revision B SECTION 19 CONTROL OF THE OIDLLITY ASSURANCE PROGRAM DOCUMENT ; 1.0 REOUIREMENFS 1.1 The Standard Nuclear Quality Assurance Program and all revisions to Sections therein shall be approved, prior to issue, by the Vice President of l Quality Assurance, the Vice President of Engineering, and the Vice President Construction. l Each revision along with an analysis with respect to (1) compliance to Appendix B to 10CFR50, and (2) I the program effectiveness, shall be provided to the Director of Licensing at least 30 days prior to the revision's effective date. t 1.2 A Project Quality Ass'arance Prw s-n Manual, modeled after the Standard Nuclear Quality Assurance Program, shall be approved by the Project Manager, llanager Quality Assurance and Chief Engineer, Engineering Assurance. Any degradation of the Standard Paws.im in the conversion to the Project Manual, shall be approved by the Vice President of the affected department. Each revision along with an analysis with respect to, (1) compliance to Appendix B to 10CFR50, and (2) the program effectiveness shall be provided to the Director of Licensing at least 30 days prior to the revision's effective date. 1.3 The Vice President of Quality Assurance shall be responsible for, as a minimum, an annual (12- month interval) review of this program and direct upgrading as appropriate. 1.4 This Program document, including portions thereof, is controlled by the Quality Systems Division and will. be issued only to those individuals named by either the Vice President or Manager of the Quality Assurance Department. 1.4.1 Program- documents shall be returned to the QSD, Publication Supervisor upon request, or at the time of project completion, project reassignment, or termination of employment. 3 mn mp,'g 3 , k5 3 k
I 19-2 Revision B 1.4.2 Program document holders are responsible for maintaining their assigned documen ts and for protecting the proprietary information they contain. 2.0 TASKS 2.1 The QSD '- Publication Supervisor shall: 2.1.1 Assign unique identification numbers for each document issued. 2.1.2 Maintain a distribution list of all document holders and their locations. 2.1.3 Maintain history files for the originals, revisions, and cancellations issu~ed against each section of the program document. 2.1.4 Maintain history files of any degradation in the conversion from the Standard Program to the Project Mahual. 2.1.5 Distribute ' documents and record or file receipt acknowledgments. 2.1.6 Issue an updated Table of Contents with each new Section or Revision issued. 2.2 All Program Document Holders shall: - 2.2.1 Upon receipt of their assigned program document, acknowledge receipt, and completeness by signing, dating, and returning the attached letter of transmittal. 2.2.2 Notify the Publication Supervisor of any discrepancies and changes of address. 2.2.3 Maintain the manual by repL d og superseded material with the reviset, material received. 2.2.4 Destroy all superseded material, immediately. g9?
\
(; )1La. A b 1
19-3 Revision B 2.2.5 Return the program d'cument o to the Publication Supervisor when it is no longer needed, requested by the Quality Assurance Department, or upon termination. e e Y e om% e
, -,1? ) 1 ... . '.. .; -
1 1
********====-=~en-. _ _ ___ _ _ _ ___ __
_ . ~ . - = _ - - - - . _ _ , , , _ , ,
~
'~ ""
iiiSI0iiick g STONE & WEBSTER ENGINEERING CORPORATION QUALITY ASSURANCE DEPARTMENT QUALITY ASSURANCE PROGRAM MILLSTONE NUCLEAR POWER STATION - UNIT 3 TITLE: NUMBER: SECTION 19 REVISION: CONTROL OF THE Q/A PROGRAM A . MANUAL EFFECTIVE DATE: 7/19/74 APPROVALS n ~ MANAGER, QUAUTY ASSURANCE M .CL D . 3 D ." - _ t CHIEF ENGINEER, ENGINEERING ASSURANCE w PROJECT MANAGER
- =_ =. . ==== = = = = -
- e. , !
r g w e, Rsvision A M10RiCAL . SECTION 19 CONTROL OF THE QUALITY ASSURANCE PROGRAM MANUAL l 1.0 REQUIREMENTS _ 1.1 The Standard Nuclear Quality Assurance Program Manual, and all revisions to Sections therein shall be approved, prior to issue, by the Vice President of Quality Assurance, the Vice President of Engineering and the Vice President of Construction. Any degradation that might occur in the adaptation of the Standard Manual to the Project Manual shall be approved by the Vice President of the affected department. 1.2 The Quality Assurance Program Manual for Millstone Nuclear Power Station Unit 3 and all revisions to Sections therein shall be approved, prior to issue, by the Manager of Quality Assurance, the Chief Engineer, Engineering Assurance, and the Project Manager. 1.3 Manuals, including portions thereof, are controlled by the Quality Systems Division and will be issued only to those individuals named by either the Vice President or Manager of the Quality Assurance Department. 1.3.1 Manuals shall be returned to the QSD - Publication Supervisor upon request or at the time of project completion, project reassignment, or termination of employment. 1.3.2 Manual holders are responsible for maintaining their assigned manuals and for protecting the proprietary information it contains. 2.0 TASKS 2.1 The QSD - Publication Supervisor shall: 2.1.1 Assign unique identification numbers for each manual issued. 2.1.2 Maintain a distribution list of all manual holders and their locations. 2.1.3 Maintain history files for the originals, revisions, and cancellations issued against each section of the manual. 1
r l . .
. . . , - , , Section 19 J1 l.
2.1.4 Maintain history files of any degradation in the conversion from the Standard Manual to the Project Manual. 2.1.5 Distribute manuals and record or file receipt acknowledgments. 2.1.6 Issue an updated Table of Contents with each new Section or Revision issued. 2.2 All Manual Holders shall: 2.2.1 Upon receipt of their assigned manual acknowledge receipt and completion by signing, dating and returning the attached letter of transmittal. 2.2.2 Notify the Publication Supervisor of any discrepan-cies and changes of address. 2.2.3 Maintain the manual by replacing superseded material with the revised material received. 2.2.4 Destroy all superseded material, immediately. NOTE The Superintendent of Field Quality Control shall not destroy any material that has been superseded, since he is required to maintain a history file on all Quality Assurance Department manuals that are l applicable to the site. l l 2.2.5 Return the manual to the Publication Supervisor when it is no longer needed, requested by the Qualtiy Assurance Department, or upon termination oof employment. I i 2
i 1-3 l Revision C ! 11108v . M 3011331
" " " ** * ~
E ' E
- l
$8H3]I 130Vist1T =
1111V90* BI 50111H
" " " " * ~
si 00113V 1All335500 2
. m Hu2H - - - -
= - - =
3 115384db83 3 . g H $15V4 '31TII11TE == == = 4 g sol 5 H J80000s- 2E 8011339
=.
2
$ e =
[- [ talvit 9811V53d01 '1931 . . 8
- X, '801133dSIl-2IE M11331 = = =
2.[
- 2. _-
= StIddiH GH 33V8018 2 '33110gv3 -3IIE 3011333
= = . a =
s . - -
=
I 1835d1001 1831138ttelv3R g
~
.5Ej
$ JG 1951503-3IE B011331 #
MyEj *
- I 1981000 1831 E
.. f.g%.)
ll., . m 3E 5411331
~ ~ " "
E E I 5I= " N 3 . r 2n G*** B011334tel . 3 3'"" r HUSH - - - " '
- - - 2
$3113305d 19:33d8
" " ~ "
= (*- . . 2
.'OM. JG 1981503-X B011331 $. [ ">[ E -
E [- [g* $18]I0dN03 GOV SIIVd
'llfiglive AG 10als93 dev 44 , =
== .= = 4g= ; . .
50l1V31J11B301 -IIII 5011331 -44' 4 13314839 1 153 N41003 h* X F
*1VII]1VE 03tVN3884 JG 1981003-3IE 8011011
= = =
4 ~
. E 2
"g* w 19818H 1I350300 4 a, E3 gg m u2H :.- ::
5g 2 E$ Ej g 2O tSelaVM 1 130083305d
'$80113081381 - I B011331 4,
[. ~$] 33 [, 0
~
a-2 g5 y 1981300 153503 H 1535380300d- R 30113H
# ~ ~
$ 2
- h. Z g3 w
1HIEN 031$30 M N11331
,, ,, ,, ,, [. g
= "
, g
=
=,
c W .J ma "- = 02 E-EVIsted 30Bv5011V 3 ,
=. .= : =.
u 1111100-X B01133t _ . ..- " 4 *{ E Bel 19118velt =
" " ~ ** ~
+ I 50uS31 E E " ** 4 h
=
U N
=
g- g _. gg g =.a i
=5 =
=
5:
~
, m == : =
- i mi-3 3=. . ==
2" c W
=
- 2.s = 3- 5:" a" c= = = -
b i IEE.= *E == 5 :; -= l = 3~= E== =--=======5-
=r a 2%33 = == = = ;-
==3 4: z == =
- 3 =s E 33= 32 E= s32e s ." . 3: : E : 03 CROSS REFERENCE MATRIX OF IMPLEMENTING DOCUMENTS s
} ' --
- . . . _ _ , . . . _ , - _ . - . . _ _ _ -,._..m_ , . . , ,,,_.,..,w., .,,,.m,--_,..,_-,,r._ .,..-.----.--...-,,...,.mm,_ .w-_-.
G
,I X
1, al 8 a I 1 8 1 le! 1 ,2, 0 ,
- o -
1 8,7 6,3 ,
- X I 5 71 5 52 o
- . o
- g=EsI .
O X I
/
s A 5 1 6 1, 11 1 5 , ?I
= 6 1,
X 5 A 1, l's, el
" tn! e /f8 5 3 3 8 uo
/ 6 el
- 1, U A n,
!0a"l=k
! X 0 0IE0 / m 811 37 I 1 1T2 s!! ! =
2 A 2, aE9 S / E 13 22 4 8 "l O ab X I ggl 0 , 2 l9 X 1, 8,9 1, 6 I 6 T1 4 1 aal 9 3 0 1, 8go I p nI X I 1,f 60 5 12 4, 1 1, T F O S X T 3 I N s
~ sl
- X I 1,f 0
6 190 112 0 1 1 4 1,7 51 R E T " A U M C
,6 2 O 3,9, 1, 1, E D 8 l m n!
m X I 6 f 8,0 71 16 04 11 C N G E N O R I 0 g! 1,8 E T 1, 9, F N Y X 0 8,7 E E 8 8 sS"l- I 1 71 R M E 9 S L
, 1 9, S P gk . elE. 8,1, u 5 5, OM 1 X 7,0 s t 4, 8, RI I 6 61T i
3 7 C 9 sI v n0 5U I 5, 9 ggg g8 X 1, D 9 4,9, 1, 0 , c o0 I 4 3D1 36 !2 U , y
!$ m X E 7 4,9, b EE$ > sk I 4 6D2 35 5
, ds 6 e'
,1, m cD g g:g$ 6,59 k ei sA eE/j 4ek
. X I 7 711 L 7
_ nIQT 1 Q p mL A 89g h
- sk X
I
/
A 3 5 1 4, 35 5 m_ I E T
- r. E sC G
ed rn e a
. a: t cs 3, ) t W J
o 'S P gD 1, F,Hnpaksh X y 1 3, ** 1 2,5 14 5 uI nD TQ
- t. x
- sp4 h 2, 1 3k (
)
x 1 5 1 l- ~ O J C
'
- r .
ra n) 1 t1 u 7
- cm nFO uycJ C
.e $3 L N s o
W* M uC Af u a-2M A
.C D x ^ O r t s an" A
nanL uq uWL . AL r:Ag )A a 2 yTs _ T A EA t I A usU I Us 3 u eimE Tu" iq" h u M i% t u ann ws uTA aSM wAu sQn U WA SM n o cm m rM as cal
./ j I
m
i C '
.Y d 1=mo B 11 - -
- i.! d 8 Up - E APITNUIX 3 g h ,1 do d 9ab "Ig 1 d M~ D autTr Azu==
caImuA a h'N 5 g r; e p.h pH tie en pi 4 s % Iwrrm.r.unon . O 9N
- g. gpd Qa d4 $.
gg a b p, ri n b$c F-J gG j$ g jM
"" dg p hg R OTR22iCr.S " " M O M '8 du Mi d >< o h 4 4..
-D g A"Ik3 g D > "
C p:. "qp p wB nd pgg n :2
>
- F3 Ra g g R$ p i! t E EN
- u E J
- a En E !.1 5)' : 80 0 Q b bd E :t BM 5- 8 E (1 5 5
- 0 11 P d r: t n h On : re 8-
- :ng E B 3-hf D M5 ;]o .5 9 l:t 5 ?- r
,j 3 :
J. rd 2 L d tf b:O w<a f2 ..r J.l.q 6as2 d 'ia 3 ilat !; 6 23 e d
- o a ,!.i
!{ l a .n o 4
vio v 4 . ? sr.w 1 2,9 3,6 4 5,6 3,5,6, 4,T,8, 7,8 12, 9 7,10 11 12- 8,13 14 T,14, quA!JT! 15,16 17 18
- 19 13 1h 15,16
,,itt(M;(,1 ntW,1W4 MA20AL
,4UA!lTr I X X X X X X X X X X X X X GTfd!MtDS X X X X MiaW.
?
S&W 4tWITY 1,2 1,3, N/A T 4 4 6 10 6 6,10 6,10
& Igwx2 NDr 4,5 Nio m/A lo N/A N/A 5,11 1
! mr. TAI, SQiu tlRU 'lHRU TEU 18 18 18 18 cr.x EA 1 1,2,3, 3,4, 3,4 3,4, L4,5, 3,4,5 8 1,3, 4 1,4 4,12 4 g :'Aru. 4,5 5 5,9 6,9 N/A 3,15,16 15 5 18 6,9 18,16, ctmAxt outI.Irr 1,4 5,19 5 7 5 5,19, T,8,9 8,9 10,12 Asuuw A E AND 5,13, T,13 16 8 8 sunu 8,15 5,6, 20 14 15 18 cannot, MANUAL 17 13, 16, 20 Ass 1:cenow III 17 t X MAltjAI, SECTION DUMJER masc 7 cmacArron CROSS REFERENCE MATRIX OF IMPLEMENTING DOCUMENTS 2
~4 5'5 m <v
_C "lll 0
.= o.
M 3== n i e
II-1 Revision C g m e- ~ ,~. 3. _ p2.!ij ' !. .) k h D. j APPENDIX II QUALIFICATION AND EXPERIENCE REQUIREMENTS SSW OUALITY ASSURANCE PERSONNEL TITLE EDUCATION
- BACKGROUND EXPERIENCE V.P., Quality Assurance BS/BA Mininnan of 10 years in res-ponsible assignments in heavy construction manage-ment, engineering, or quality assurance. At least two years of this time should be in the nuclear field with emphasis on project /
division management. Manager, Quality Assurance BS/BA Minimum of 10 years in res-ponsible assignments in engineering and design, quality assurance and control, power station con-struction, and/or operation. Chief Engineer, Engineering
- Assurance BS/BA Minimum of five years in res-ponsible assignments in engineering, quality assurance and control, in-spection, and/or auditing.
Chief Engineer, Quality Systems BS/BA Minimum of five years in res-ponsible assignments in quality assurance and control, and/or construction of a power station. Manager, Procurement Quality Assurance BS/BA Minimum of five years in res-ponsible assignments in 1 quality assurance and control, and/or shop inspec- - tion.
...----.e m-, ~., ....w . ,e.,, ,,. ,-_._,---.m.__,,-.y,-,-
%,.- -. - - . - - _ _ , - , - - - , _ , - - , - , . , . ~ , , , , . . y9 y,% .m-._._, --
l-II-2 Revisiori C APPENDIX II (Cont'd) e TITLE EDUCATION
- BACKGROUND EXPERIENCE _
Manager, Field Quality Control BS/BA Min 4==. of five years in res-ponsible assignments in quality assurance and control, and/or construction of a power station. Chief Engineer, NDT Division BS/BA Minimum of five years in res-ponsible assignments in non-destructive testing of materials and/or metallurgy. Chief Engineer, QA ( Cost and Auditing BS/BA Minimum of five years in < responsible assignments in quality assurance and con-trol, or construction of a power station. Project Quality - - - - Assurance Program Administrator BS/BA Minimum of five years in quality assurance and re-lated fields including manu-facturing, construction,
- q. 3 i
h-,gmQ$ and/or installation activi-1LJb b d' s ud Uj f I6 ties. At least two years should be' associated with the nuclear field. Assistant Manager, FQCD/PQAD; Sr. Sopt. of Field
'(
Quality Control; Supt. of MC BS or High School A degree plus five years experience in quality assur-ance and related tiolds, in-cluding testing er inspec-tion (or both) of manufactur-ing, construction, and in-stallation activities. At least two years should be associated with a nuclear facility. OB
. - _ - - - - - - - b
II-3 Revision C APPENDIX II (Cont'd) TITLE EDUCATION
- BACKGROUND EXPERIENCE High school graduate plus 10 years of experience in gene-ral quality assurance or equivalent engineerinc., man-facturing, construction, and installation activities.
Five years of total 4 4 experience is required in
.. quality assurance, includ-71! ing testing or inspection (or both) of equivalent manu-
.Q{ M 6..
facturing, construction, and
- installation activities. At least two years should be
'?
associated with a nuclear facility. 3 :, Assistant Supt. BS or ' of PQC C s High School A degree and five years of experience in quality assur-
' ance, including testing
' - and/or inspection of equiva-lent manufacturing, construc-tion, and installation activ-ities. At least two years of this experience should be associated with a nuclear n facility.
i[fj ) OR E , _ . ,, 3 3 High school graduate and
-. > 1 '" g ,d j ten years of experience in 1 ; w "p a wa 4. general quality assurance or l i equivalent engineering, manu-
! f4 facturing, construction, and ! i4 Ib @I installation activities. l Five years of this experience
- g is required in quality l " C 0 4' assurance, including testing
, ") and/or inspection of equiva-
! lent manufacturing, construc- 'kg Z-tion, and installation activ-ities. At least two years of l Tydy;f e this experience should be associat.ad with a nuclear ! h:DJP 4 d) facility. 4 1: f ____ _ _ _ _ _ _
l II-4 Revision C APPENDIX II (Cont 'd) TITLE EDUCATION
- PACKGROUND EXPERIENCE Sr. QC Engineer; BS or QC Inspection High School (4 ,
Supervisor A degree and five years of experience in quality assur-ance, including testing and/ or inspection of equivalent manufacturing, construction, and installation activites. At least two years of this experience should be asso-ciated with the nuclear field. OR - High school graduate and ten years of experience in gen-eral quality assurance or equivalent engineering, manafacturing, construction, and installation activities. Five years of this experience is required in quality assur-
' ' ance, including testing and/
or inspection of equivalent v-ep{
- f. \
di!TJ ".6 lh'e.
}d {h manufacturing, construction, and installation activities.
At least two years of this experience should be asso-ciated with the nuclear field, i SR. QA Engineer BS/BA Minimum of five years ex-perience in quality astmr- '! ance and related fields. The individual anall he,ld a P.E. registration or ASQC Certification as a Qual uy Engineer. QC Engineer BS or High School A degree and 2 years of experience in quality assur- 4 ance including testing and/or inspection of equivalent construction and installation aetivities.
II-5 Revision C APPENDIX II (Cont 'd), TITLE EDUCATION
- BACKGROUND EXPERIENCE OR High school graduate and 5 years of experience in test-
, ing and/or inspection of power and/or nuclear plants, lpfJ iS .. heavy industrial, or other similar equipment or y facilities.
i' % v., MMi QA Engineer BS/BA . dI!U Associate W[' Degree Minimum of five years ex-l
' perience in qualiy assurance and related fields.
OR r 1 An Associates Degree and ! eight years experience and ! hold a P.E. registration or ASQC certification as a quality engineer. Assistant QC BS or Engineer High School A degree. No experience is s.: required.
- n;s og i
High school graduate and
- four years of experience in
' testing and/or inspection of
, ,v , ,,e___
- g. t . ,,Q G 9, , power and/or nuclear sta-
$ dgy d 6;hph tions, heavy industrial, or other similar equipment or 3 facilities.
hM} Sr. QC Inspector
, y34 4 High School High school graduate and two gj:/ years of experience in N if quality assurance, including 4f$h{.
jf g,r$g " testing and/or inspection of equipment, construction, and installation activities. ,q u ff gd ' QC Inspector High School High school graduate and 3 one year of experience in [ quality assurance, including i M ms mes
* ""F
.M [
II-6 ,
;c '
Revision C N!, APPENDIX II (Cont *d) ' y;, [ TITLE EDUCATION
- BACKGROUND EXPERIENCE testing and/or inspection of equipment, construction, and installation activities.
QC Technician High School High school graduate, pre- " ferably with some knowledge of quality assurance concepts such as testing or inspec- ' tion. ,, Assistant QC ,, Technician High School High school graduate; no f ,; experience is required. Q 4, _
- Equivalent qualifications may be substituted Insed on other educational accomplishments, experience in related fields and technical achievements, such as holding a license as a Professional Engineer or certification as a Quality or Reliability Engineer by the American Society for Quality Control.
9 -- 8 73 3 ' h g! . . ! QGhfo d u;-
s , II-1 Revision B 13 TORI &1 APPENDIX II QUALIFICATION AND EXPERIENCE REQUIREMENTS SsW OUALITY ASSURANCE PERSONNEL TITLE EDUCATION
- BACKGROUND EXPERIENCE KQ:S
):i ? 't V.P., Quality 1 ~- Assurance BS/BA Minimum of 10 years in res-fj i ponsible assignments in
'kl 4' jl$ heavy construction manage-ment, engineering, or quality
- 1. , ; 77 assurance. At least two
, W,y years of this time should be in the nuclear field with emphasis on project /
division management. Manager, Quality Assurance BS/BA Minimum of 10 years in res-
,' ponsible assignments in engineering and design, quality assurance and
- control, power station con-
- gj'.
struction and/or operation. Chief Engineer,
;[ . e' , 1', Engineering Assurance BS/BA Minimum of five years in res-f[ 1r .
ponsible assignments in V engineering, quality R assurance and control, in-spection, and/or auditing. ea ,. !)
,% % Chief Engineer, j Quality Systems BS/BA Mininnna of five years in res- -
p .;; ponsible assignments in
.f 6%
quality assurance and control, and/or construction j..@$ of a power station. Manager, Procurement
- s?'J D Quality Control BS/BA Minimum of five years in res-M{ dh ponsible assignments in quality assurance and VIk*3 ME control, and/or shop inspec-tion.
1 . 1 i t
~*= ---
y m .,i; 4" y = . vision B - APPENDIX II (Cont e d)
- -)g TITLE EDUCATION
- BACKGROUND EXPERIENCS Manager Field Quality I:
Control BS/BA Mini == of five years in res- j'$ ponsible assignments in V quality assurance and
- w,'
control, and/or construction of a power station. y Chief Engineer, f NIYP Division BS/BA Mini == of five years in res- .D ,' 1 ponsible assignments in non- : , destructive testing of materials and/or metallurgy. Project Quality Assurance Coordinator BS/BA Minimum of five years in quality assurance and re-lated fields including manu-facturing, construction, and/or installation activi-ties. At least two years should be associated with the' nuclear field. Assistant Manager, FQCD Sr. Supt. of Field Quality Control and Supt. of FQC BS or High School A degree plus five years experience in quality ascur-ance and related fields, in-cluding testing or inspec-tion (or both) of manuta wz-ing, construction, and in~ stallation activities. At least two years should be associated with a nuclear facility. , or . High school graduate plus 10 years of experience in gene-ral quality-assurance or equivalent engineering, man-facturing, construction and installation activities.
I!ISTORICAL m -> Revision B APPENDIX II (Cont 'd) m EoucATION* BACKGROUND EXPERIENCE Five, years of total experience is required in quality assurance, includ-ing testing or inspection 1 (or both). of equivalent ' man-i facturing, construction and installation activities. At least two years should be -
- associated with a nuclear facility.
l Assist m Sr. BS or l FQC Engineer High School A degree and four years of experience in quality assur-ance, including testing and/or inspection of equiva-lent manufacturing, construc-tion and installation activi-ties. At least two years of this experience should be associated with a nuclear facility. I OR High school graduate and eight years of experience in general quality assurance or equivalent engineering, manu-facturing, construction, and installation activities. Five years of this experience is required in quality assurance, including testing and/or inspection of equiva- , lent manufacturing, construc-tion and installation activi-ties. At least two years of this experience should be associated with a nuclear facility.
l 81 M q
' t ; II-4 ia i i j Revision D APPENDIX II (Cont 'd)
TITLE
- EDUCATION
- BACKGROUND EXPERIENCE QC Engineer BS or Righ School A degree and 0-2 years of experience in quality assur-ance including testing and/or inspection of equivalent construction and installation activities.
OR High school graduate and 5 years of experience in test-ing and/or inspection of - power and/or nuclear plants, heavy industrial, or otner similar equipment or facilities. Assistant QC . BS or Engineer High School A degree. No experience is required. OR High school graduate and four years of experience in testing and/or inspection of power and/or nuclear sta-tions, heavy industrial, or other similar equipment or facilities. Sr. QC Inspector High School High school graduate and two years of experience in quality assurance, including testing and/or inspection of equipment, construction and installation activit.:.1-a. QC Inspector High School High school graduate and one year of experience in quality assurance, including testing and/or inspection of equipment, construction, and installation activities. J
II-5 Revision B APPENDIX II (Cont 'd) TITLE EDUCATIO,1,i* BACKGROUND EXPERIENCE QC Technician High School High school graduate, pre-ferably with some knowledge of quality assurance concepts.
, 'such as testing or inspec-tion.
Assistant QC Technician High School High school graduate; no experience is required.
- Equivalent qualifications may be substituted based on other educational accomplishments, experience in related fie).ds and technical achievements, such as holding a license as a Professional Engineer or Certification as a Quality or Reliability Engineer 1rf the American Society for Quality contrel.
IIISTORICAl e 9 . ee e- _ _ emme *M*
. , ,- -,.,g -
,-,w- ,.._e
-,g....__.--y
e 'r, RGviDion A HISTORICAL APPENDIX II QUALIFICATION AND EXPERIENCE REQUIREMENTS S&W QUALITY ASSURANCE PERSONNEL TITLE EDUCATION
- BACKGROUND EXPERIENCE V.P., Quality Assurance BS/BA Minimum of 10 years in respon-sible assignments in heavy j construction management, I engineering, or quality assur-ance. At least two years of i this time should be in the nuclear field with emphasis on project / division management.
Manager, Quality BS/BA Assurance Minimum of 10 years in respon-sible assignments in engineering
~ and design, quality assurance
~
and control', power statien con-struction and/or operation. Chief Engineer, BS/BA Engineering Assurance Minimum of five years in respon-sible assignments in engineering, l quality assurance and control, inspection, and/or auditing. Chief Engineer, BS/BA Qnality Systems Minimum of five years in respon-sible assignments in quality s assurance and control, and/or construction of a power station. Manager, Procurement BS/BA Quality control Minimum of five years in respon-sible assignments in quality assurance and control, and/or shop inspection. Manager, Field BS/BA Minimum of five years in respon-l Quality control l sible assignments in quality assurance and control, and/or construction of a power station. Chief Engineer, BS/BA NDT Division Minimum of five years in respon-sible assignments in nondestruc-tive testing of materials and/or metallurgy. Project Quality BS/BA Assurance Coordinator Minimum of five years in quality assurance and related fields in-cluding manufacturing, construc-tion, and/or installation activi-ties. At least two years should be associated with the nuclear field. 1
R;vicion A = qi APPENDIX II (Cont'd)
, TITLE EDUCATION
- BACKGROUND EXPERIENCE Assistant Manager, BS or A degree plus five years experi-FQCD, FCCD, Sr. High School ence in quality assurance and Supt. of FQC and related fields, including test-Supt. of FQC ing or inspection (or both) of manufacturing, construction, and installation activities. At least two years should be asso-ciated with a nuclear facility.
or High school graduate plus 10 years of experience in general quality assurance or equivalent engineering, manufacturing, con-struction and installation act-ivities. Five years of total experience is required in quality assurance, including testing or inspection (or both) of equiva-lent manufacturing, construction and installation activities. At least two years should be associ-ated with a nuclesr facility. Assistant Supt. BS or A degree and four years of of FQC High School experience in quality assurance, including testing and/or inspec-tion of equivalent manufacturing, construction and installation activities. At least two years of this experience shculd be associated with a nuclear facility. or High school graduate and eight years of experience, in general quality assurance or equivalent engineering, manufacturing, con-struction, and installation acti-vities. Five years of this ex-perience is required in quality assurance, including testing and/or inspe7 tion of equivalent manufacturing, construction and installation acLivities. At least two years of this experience should be with a nuclear facility. 2 J
e , RsviDion A 9 APPENDIX II (Cont'd) TITLE EDUCATION
- BACKGROUND EXPERIENCE Sr. QC Engineer BS or. A degree and three years of ex-High School perience in quality assurance, including testing and/or inspec-tion of equivalent manufacturing, construction and installation activities. At least two years I of this experience should be associated with a nuclear facility.
is High school graduate and seven years of experience in general quality assurance or equivalent engineering, manufacturing, con-struction, and installation activities. experience isFive yearsinof this l required quality assurance, including l testing and/or inspection of equivalent manufacturing, con-struction and installation acti-vities. At least two years of this experience should be asso- " ciated with a nuclear facility. QC Engineer BS or .A degree and 1-2 years of ex-
- High School perience in quality assurance including testing and/or inspec-tion of equivalent construction
' and installation activities. or or High school graduate and five years of experience in testing and/cr inspection of power and/ or nuclear plants, heavy indus-trial, or other similar equip-ment or facilities. Sr. QC Inspector High School High school graduate and four years of experience in quality assurance, including testing and/or inspection of equipment, construction and installation activities. 3
j APPENDIX II (Cont'd) TITLE EDUCATION
- BACKGROUND EXPERIENCE Assistant QC BS or A degree. No experience is Engineer and High School required.
Quality Data Supervisor or High school graduate and two years of experience in testing and/or inspection of power and/or nuclear stations, heavy industrial, or other similar equipment or facilities. QC Inspector High School High school graduate and one year of experience in quality assurance, including testing and/or inspection of equipment,
- construction, and installation activities.
QC Technician High School High school graduate, prefer-ably with some knowledge of
- -quality assurance concepts such as testing or inspection.
Assistant QC High School High school graduate; no experi-Technician ence is required.
- Equivalent qualification may be substituted based on other edu-cation accomplishments, experience in related fields and technical achievements, such as holding license as a Professional Engineer or Certification as a Quality or Reliability Engineer by the American Society for Quality Control.
4
.J
r-
) -o ' ,-
III-1 , kevision C i APPENDIX III GLOSSARY The primary reference or source of each definition included in this glossary is identified next to the term using the following " Base Source Acronym Key Code:" NRC - United States Nuclear Regulatory Commission; WASH-1309 Guidance on Quality Assurance Requirements During the Construction Phase of Nuclear Power Plants, May 10, 1974. ANSI - American National Standard Institute N45.2.10-1973; Quality Assurance Terms & Definitions. ASME - The American Society of Mechanical Engineers Section III, 1971; Boiler and Pressure Vessel Code for Nuclear Power Plant Components. Articles
- 1. NA-1240 Appurtenances
-2. Fig.-8220-1 (note)
-3. NA-4700 Audits
-4. NA-5112 Qualification of Inspectors
- 5. NA-5111 Authorized Inspection Agency
- 6. NA-4610 Calibration of Measurement and Test Equipment, General Requirements
- 7. NA-3000 Responsibilities & Duties
-8. NA-8000 Name Plates, Stamping, and Reports
- 9. NA-4800 Corrective Action
-10. NA-3200 Owner *s Responsibility
-11. NA-4500 Examinations, Test, and Inspection
-12. NA-1231 Parts 1
-13. NB-2110 Materials, Scope, S Principal Terms Employed ASQC -
American Society for Quality Control; A3-1971 (Z1.7-1971) General Terms Used in Quality Control. EOQC - European Organization for Quality Control; Glossary of Terms Used in Quality Control, Third Edition - Rotterdam - 1972.
,,,---w ,_--m--+ -,-,,,,--,-c-,
III-2 Revision C SCW - Stone & Webster Engineering Corporation. The definitions are based on current and past acceptance usage at Stone & Webster. 10CFR50- Appendix B, Atomic Energy Commission; Quality Assurance Criteria for Nuclear Power Plants as published June 27, 1970 in the Federal Register. Accept-As-Is (S$W) A disposition requiring Engineering Department justification and approval which is applied to nonconforming material that does not meet all specified requirements but will continue to meet its intended use and continue to meet all functional ! requirements including safety. Acceptance Criteria (S&W) A limit placed on the variation permitted in the characteristics of an item exprecsed in definitive quantitative terms or qualitative terms by use of comparative samples. Accuracy (EOQC) The degree of conformity of a measurement with a standard or true value. Action Party (SSW) The individual who is assigned responsibility by virtue of his position or capability which makes him able to take corrective or preventive action to rectify the deficiencies disclosed during an audit. Aporoval (ANSI) The a ct of endorsing or adding positive authorizatn.a er both to an action or document. Approved Procedures (S&W) A written document, signed by authorized personnel, which prescribes actions required to implement a program, specification, method or technique.
)
III-3 Revision C Appurtenance (ASME-1) A part that is attached to a component which has been completed and previously stamped with the required Code N-type symbol. For ASME III work, an appurtenance requires its own ASME Nuclear Symbol Stamp. As Built Drawino (SSW) A drawing altered or suitably appended with related Engineering & Design Coordination Reports and Nonconformance
& Disposition Reports to reflect actual installed conditions.
ASME Nuclear Symbol (ASME-2) The ASME Code Symbol Stamp granted by the American Society of Mechanical Engineers, pursuant to the requirements of ASME Section III, for application to Code certified nuclear pressure vessels, components, appurtenances, subassemblies, and assemblies. ASME Section III (SSW) American Society of Mechanical Engineers, Boiler and Pressure Vessel Code, Section III, Nurlear Power Plant Components, Division I, Metal Components. Assembly (ANSI) A combination of subassemblies or components, or both, assembled to form a unit. Attribute (EOQC) A quality characteristic which may be qualitatively evaluated in terms of a yes or no decision. Audit (ASME-3) An investigative activity to determine the adequacy of, and adherence to, established procedures and instructions, and the effectiveness of implementation. Audit, Corrective Action (S&W) A follow-up audit to verify that corrective action on discrepancies disclosed by prior audits has been taken and implemented. _ ,,y ,.,,.y--.-,---y--- . . - _ , , . - , - -
s' . III-4 Revision C Audit, Division (SSW) See Division Performance Evaluation. Audit, External (SSW) Audit aof those portions of an organization's quality assurance program not retained under its direct control and not within its organizational structure. Audit Guideline (SSW) An Engineering Assurance Division document which instructs the Auditor how to perform an audit. Audit, Internal (SSW) Audit of those portions of an organization's quality assurance program retained under its direct control and within its organizational structure. Audit Plan (S&W) A list of attributes for a particular audit developed from applicable procedures, instructions, codes, or regulations. Audit, Proiect (SSW) A major audit covering work performed by a particular Project Group, and by other groups in sttpport of tha*, Project. Audit Report (ASME-3) An indepth report which states the purpose of the audit, the auditors and personnel contacted, the findings listing details of deficiencies in systers or procedures requir ing corrective action, recommendations for co rrectivt or preventive action, names of action parties responsible ror corrective or preventive action, and date by which action replies are expected. Audit, Special (SSW} An audit of a particular management or engineering function involvina one or more Divisions and Projects. Audit, Seller / Contractor (SSW) <k An audit of a seller or contractor providing material or services to Stone & Webster. j
f ',
/. .
III-5 l Revision C l l
Authorized Nuclear Insoector (ASME-4) rocors Piping System (SSW)
Piping systems which are necessary, or are required, for the generation of electric power and which require fortal I control, inacection, testing and documentatio: . . !
l Pre - Audi;_ponference (SSN) l l
A cptional meeting held between the auditing and audited organ:.za+ ",3 orior to the conduct of the audit to outline the scope of the Audit, personnel to be contacted, and establish the lines of communication during the audit.
e -
v , III-15 Revision C Precision (EOQC) The degree of resolution and repeatability of measurements made under prescribed like conditions. gessure Boundary (SSW) Any surface which is subjected to differential fluid or gaseous pressure. Pressure Retaining Parts (SSW) Those parts making up a piping system either directly retaining pressure or welded to the pressure boundary so ' that the weld affects the metallurgy of the pressure retaining part. Preventive Action (ASME-9) Action taken to preclude recurrence of deficiencies or nonconformances. Procedure (ANSI) A document that specifies or describes how an activity is to . be performed. It may include methods to be employed, equipment or materials to be used and sequence cf operations. . Procedure Oualification (SSW) Testing a process as outlined in a procedure to assure that the prescribed results will be accomplished. Procurement Documents (SSW) Contractually binding documents that identify and define the requirements which items or services must meet in order to be considered acceptable by the purchaser. Procurement , documents include contracts, letters of intent, work orders, i purchase orders or proposals and their acceptance which authorize the seller to perform services or supply equipment, material or facilities on behalf of the purchaser. Program (SSW) A plan or procedure instituted to provide materials or services in accordance with specified procurement, design and regulatory requirements. 1
1 III-16 Revision C Proiect (S&W) A planned series of design, engineering and construction activities necessary to provide, utilize and maintain a facility or portion thereof. Proiect General Instructions (S&W) Administrative and Technical instructions for personnel I assigned to a specific Project; prepared by S&W Engineering l Department personnel. , l Proiect Quality Assurance Program Administrator (SSW) <( An individual who reports to the Manager, Quality Assurance Department and has direct responsibilities for coordinating quality related activities between Quality Assurance, Engineering, Construction and Client personnel. Purchaser (ANSI) The organization or organizations responsible for issuance and administration of a contract, subcontract or purchase order. Procurement Ouality Assurance Division i POAD1 (SSW) A division of the Quality Assurance Department responsible for seller control activities for procured tiema as required by the specification. Qaalification (Personnel) (SSW) The characteristic or abilities gained through training or experience or both that enable an individual to perform a required function. This capability, when required, shall be indicated by comparison to an established or defined standard of performance. Qualified Party (ANSI) A person or organization competent and recognized as knowledgeuMe to perform certain functions. Qualified Procedure (ANSI) A procedure which incorporates all applicable codes and standards, uanufacturer's parameters, and engineering specifications an6 has been proven adequate for its intended purpose. j
r o .
. l III-17 Aevision C Quality (ASQC)
The totality of features and characteristics of a product or service that bear on its ability to satisfy a given need. Quality Assurance (Appendix B to 10CFR50) All those planned and systematic quality assurance actions required to provide adequate confidence that a structure, i system or component will perform satisfactorily in service. Quality Assurance includes Quality control. Quality Assurance Department (S&W) Within the Stone & Webster Engineering Corporation, the department responsible for effective implementation of quality assurance functions. QA Cost and Auditing Division (S&W) ( A division of the Quality Assurance Department responsible for developing QA cost estimates, maintenance of the Department correspondence files and technical library, andQA implementing a quality audit program. Quality Assurance Records (ANSI) Those records which furnish documentary evidience of the quality of items and of activities affecting quality. Quality Assurance Site File (SSW) A file maintained by FQC containing all working and record documents required to implement the QC Program and to properly document the performance of QC activities. Quality Systems Division f0SD) (SSW) A division of the Quality Assurance Department responsible for the establishment and control of standardized quality systems. Quality Control (Appendix L to 10CFR50) Those quality assurance actions related to the physical characteristics of a material, structure, component or a system which provides a means to control the quality of the material structure, component or system to predetermined requirements . m
e s
. III-18 Revision C kandom (SSW)
The selection, on an unbiased basis, giving each item in a collection of units of similar items an equal chance of being selected. Receiving (M9SI) Taking delivery of an item at a designated location. Requ]atory (S&W) Any of the several controlling organizations --- Federal, industry, state or local, which impose specific requirements on the design or construction of a nuclear power plant. Reliability faeneral definitioni (ASQC) Ability of an item to perform a required function under stated conditions for a stated period of time. Repair (ANSI) The process of restoring a nonconforming characteristic to an approved acceptable condition, even though that item still may not conform to the original requirement. (A class of nonconformance disposition.) . Rework (ANSI) The process by which a nonconforming item is made to conform to a prior specified requirement by completion, remachining, reassembly conditions or other corrective means. (A class of nonconformance disposition.) Samplinn Inspection (S&W) An inspection technique in which random sanplen u m a collection af units of similar items are selected in accordance with an approved sampling plan to determine the . acceptability of the lot. Scrap (S C W) A disposition imposed on a nonconforming item when it is established that the discrepancy renders the item unfit for its intoneed use and it is uneconomical or impossible to correct. _.)
e . 111-19 Revision C Seller (SSW) An individual or organization which is under contract for furnishing materials, equipment, items, work, services and/or installation; and may reter to contractors, subcontractors and subtier levels, where appropriate. Source Inspection (S&W) An inspection activity performed at the manufacturing location on material or components. Source Surveillance (SSW) A review, observation or inspection for the purpose of verifying that an action has been accomplished, as specified, at the location of material procurement or manufacture. Special Process (SSW) An operation performed under controlled conditions in accordance with specified requirements utilizing qualified procedures, equipment and personnel. include, .but are not limited Special processes may to, welding, brazing, soldering, cleaning, heat treating and NDT. Specification (SSW) Engineering document specifying essential and technical requirements for materials, items or services and indicating, when appropriate, the procedure by which it will be determined that the requirements have been met. Standard (Reference Document) (SSW) A recognized reference document which establishes a set of rules, goals or objectives published by a recognized agency such as ANSI, ASTM, ASME, ASQC, and IEEE. l Standard iCalibration1 (SSW) Calibrated measuring or test equipment whose calibration is traceable to the National Bureau of Standards, physical constant or recognized industrial standard and used for the calibration of Measuring & Test Equipment. Storage (SSW) The act of placing or leaving items in a suitable location for preservation or later use or disposal.
, a III-20 Revision C Suba ssembly (SSW)
A section of an assembly consisting of materials or components and which may be f abricated in a shop or in the field. Subcystem (ANSI) A group of assemblies or components, or both, combined to parform a single function. Supports (SSW) Includes all hangers, restraints, guides, and anchors used to support or contain a piping system. Surveillance (SSW) The system of continuing analysis and evaluation of records, methods and procedures to assure conformance with technical requirements. Also, a records audit and physical check that a seller's in-process inspections and tests are being c performed in accordance with his approved Quality Control Program. Survey (SSW) A review of the capability of a bidder or potential bidder, contractor, or subcontractor which is conducted to establish his qualification and appraise his Quality control Program. System (ANSI) A group of subsystems united by some interaction or interdependence, performing many duties but functioning as a single unit. Tent -mNSI: The determination or verification of the capability of an ite:r to meet specitied requirements by subjecting the iter to a set. of physical, chemical, environmental or operating conditions.
III-21 Revision C
-Unsat (ANSI)
A deficiency which in characteristic, documentation, or procedure renders the quality of an item unacceptable indeterminate. or Examples of unsats include: physical defects, test failures, documentation, or deviation incorrect or inadequate from prescribed processing inspection or test procedures. Vendor (S6W) See " Seller" Verification - (SSW) An act of confirming, substantiating and assuring that an activity, or condition, has been implemented in conformance with the specified requirements. Verifying evidence may be in the form of documentation or confirmed by witnessing or performing a function. Verify (SSW) The act..of proving that a function or requirement has been met by examining objective evidence. This evidence can be in the form of documentation or confirmed by witnessing or performing a function. Witness (S&W) The act of observing and giving an account of inspections and/or tests performed by others. CLIENT CONSIDERATIONS - add the following: Category II has been subdivided into an A and B subcategory for this project. Subcategory A (Category IIA) will be applied to a selected list of Category II equipment, and will require that sellers have Quality Assurance programs which meet the requirements of ANSI Z1.B. Assignment to Category IIA is based on cost of equipment and/or its importance to power generation. ' Subcategory B (Category IIB) includes all Category II equipment not assigned to Category IIA by agreement between NUSCO and Stone & Webster. No Quality Assurance program requirements are required by specification. However, the seller's quality system will be evaluated against MIL-I-145208A. t
* .s III-1 Revision U d
e ;D * '
$ Q. 3 0 )mef&
A APPENDIX III GLOSSARY The primary reterence or source of each definition included in this glossary is identified next to the term using the following " Base Source Acronym Ney Code:" AEC - United States Atomic Energy Commission; WASH-1309 Guidance on Quality Assurance Requirements During the Construction Phase of Nuclear Power Plants, May 10, 1974. ANSI - American National Standard Institute N45.2.10-1973; Quality Assurance Terms & Definitions. ASME - The American Society of Mechanical Engineers Section III, 1971; Boiler and Pressure Vessel Code for Nuclear Power Plant Components. Articles
- 1. NA-1240 Appurtenances
- 2. Fig.-8220-1 (note)
- 3. NA-4700 Audits
-4. NA-5112 Qualification of Inspectors
- 5. NA-5111 Authorized Inspection Agency
! - 6. NA-4610 Calibration of Measurement and Test Equipment, General Requirements
- 7. NA-3000 Responsibilities & Duties
- 8. NA-8000 Name Plates, Stamping and Reports
-9. NA-4800 Corrective Action
-10. NA-3200 Owner's Responsibility
-11. NA-4500 Examinations, Test and Inspection
-12. NA-1231 Parts
-13. NB-2110 Materials, Scope 6 Principal Terms Employed ASQC - American Society for Quality Control; A3-1971 (Z1.7-1971) General Terms Used in Quality Control.
EOQC - Europec.n Organization for Quality Control;Edition Glossary-of Terms Used in Quality Control, Third Rotterdam - 1972.
Isi" aa i ion L SSW - Stone & Webster Engineering Corporation. The definitions are based on current and past acceptance usage at Stone & Webster. 10CFP50- Appendix B, Atomic Energy Commission: Quality i Assurance Criteria fcr Nuclear Power Plants as I published June 27, 1970 in the Federal Register. j Accept-As-Is (S&W) A disposition reouiring Engineering Department justification and approval which is applied to nonconforming material that does not meet all specified requirements but will continue to meet its intended use and continue to meet all functional requirements including safety. Acceptance Criteria (S&W) A limit placed on the variation permitted in the characteristics of an item expressed in definitive quantitative terms or cualitative terms by use of comnarative samples. Accuracy (EOQC) The deuree or conformity of'a measurement with a standard or true value.
~
hetion Party (SSW) The indivioual who is assigned responsibility by virtue of his position or capability which makes him able to take corrective or preventive action to rectify the deficiencies disclosed ciuring an audit. Aporoval (ANSI) The act of endorsing or adding positive authorization or both to un action or document. T.puroved a wndures (S&W} A written uocument, signed by authorized personnel, which prescr.tbes actions required to implement a prociram, spec 1ricaLicr., method or technique. Appurtenancs ( ASm.-1) A part ti,a t is attached to a component which has been completed and previously stamped with the required Code N-type symbol. For ASM1 III work, an appurtenance requires its own ALML 1,uclear Symbol Stamp.
/
$' Q
,, ..q. 7.j
. g l '[7
'g - .
III-3 y,i"J 5 '(/E iL Eevision B As built Drawino (S6W) A crawing altered or suitably uppended with related Engineering & Design Coordination Recuests and honconformance & Disposition Reports to reflect actual installed conditions. ASI:E Nuclear Symbol (ASME-2) i The ASME Code Symbol Stamp granted by the American Society of Mechanical Engineers, pursuant to the recuirements of ASME Section III, for application to Code certified nuclear pressure vessels, components, appurtenances , subassemblies and assemblies. l ASME Section III (SSW) American Society of Mechanical Engineers, Boiler hnd Pressure Vessel Code, Section III, Nuclear Power Plant Components,. Division I, Metal Components. Assembly (AhSI) A combination of subassemblies or components, or both, assembled to form a unit. Attribute (EO(gC) i A quality characteristic which may be qualitatively evaluated in terms c,1 a yes or no decision. Audit (AShE-3) An investigative activity to determine the adequacy of, and adherence to, established procedures and instructions, anc the effectiveness of implementation. Audit, Corrective Action (S6W) A follow-up audit to verify that corrective action on discrepancies disclosed by prior audits has been taken and implementec. Audit, Division (SSW) See Division Performance Evaluation. Aucit, Lxternal (SSE) Audit of those portions of an organization's quality ussurance program not retained under its direct control and not within its orcanizational structure. L -. - -
l e *
.q :
i r "- ~ '.}I,aj g 'd)B III-4 { , .} ; 'AGI'*b hevision E
- Audit Guideline- (SLW)
An Engineering P.ssurance Division document which instructs the Auditor how to perform an audit. Audit, Internal (SLW) Audit of those portions of an organization's cuality assurance program retained under its direct control and within its organizational structure. Audit Plan (SSW) Is list of attributes for a particular audit developed from applicable procedures, instructions, codes or regtilations.
, Audit, Pro-iect (SSW)
A wajor audit covering work performed by a particular Pro]ect Group, and by other groups in support of that Project. Audit Reoort (ASME-3) An Indepth report which states the purpose of the audit, the auditors and personnel contacted, the findings listing cetails ot deficiencies in systems or procedures requiring corrective action, recommendations for corrective or preventive action, -names of action parties responsible for corrective or preventive action, and dnte by .hich w action replies are expected. Audit, Special (S6W) An audit of a particular management or engineering function involving one or more Divisions and Projects. Aud i_t n ondor/ V Contractor (S T.W) An audit of a rendor/ seller or contractor providing material or services to Stone & Webster. Authorr._z et 'pd e Insrector (ASME-4) A qualitied II...pector employed by a state or nunicipality of the-United States, a Canadian Province, or an inspector regularly Sploye(. by an insurance campany having jurisdictior. c.t the place of m<mufacture or installation. y
e
- III-5 Ravision B
.....g**.',)b*
h
. ;o,.s ~ k [l Authorized Inspection Agency (ASME-5)
The agency designated as such by the appropriate-legal authority ofofa state or municiplaity of the United States or Province Canada. For Stone & Webster Engineering Corporation, this agency is The Inspection and Insurance Company, Hartford Steam Boiler 06102. Hartford, Connecticut,
, Calibration (ASME-6)
Comparison of a measuring or test device with a standard of sufficient accuracy to determine whether the device is within specified_ limits of accuracy over a required range of values and, if not,~ repairing and/or adjusting the device to conform to requirements. Category I (S&W) Plant- systems, or portions of systems, ' structures, and equipment whose failure or malfunction could cause a release of radioactivity that would endanger public safety. category also includes equipment which is vital to a This safe shutdown of the plant and the removal of decay and sensible heat, or equipment which is necessary to mitigate consequences to the public of a postulated accident.
' Category II (S&W)
Plant systems, portions of systems, structures, and equipment essential for the reliable generation of electric power but which are not essential Failure of this equipment could result for a safe shutdown. in loss of power generation but would not endanger public safety. Equipment and systems which contain radioactive materials but whose failure could not release quantities sufficient to prejudice public safety are included in this category. NOTE: The term " essential for the reliable generation of electric power" should be interpreted to mean structures, systems, and components whose failure would. result in the halt of electric power generation in approximately eight hours or less.
,,.g.-.,,,,-m-r --ev~r -r-* "'*"*~ "* "*"*'"~
e s III-6
.' .4 ?i.
=-
. cf , !y>p.h.
*. iYe R;vicion B Category III (S&W)
Plant systems, portions of systems, structures and equip-ment which are not essential for the reliable generation of electric power and which do not contain r&dioactive material or - whose failure could not result in the release of radioactive material. NOTE: The term "not essential for the reliable generation of electric power" should be interpreted to mean structures, systems and components whose failure would not result in the halt of electric power generation in approximately eight hours or less. Certificate of Authorization (ASME-7) A signed official certificate, issued by ASME.to a qualified applicant upon completion of a successful survey, which defines the scope and authorizes the use of the proper ASME Code symbol stamp in accordance with the applicable rules of ASME Section III. Certificate of Complianca (ANSI) A written statement, signed by a qualified party, attesting that the items or services are in accordance with specified requirements and accompanied by additional information to substantiate the statenent. This may also be known as a Certificate of Objective Quality Evidence. Certificate of Conformance (ANSI) A written statement, signed by a qualified party, attesting that the items or services are in accordance with specified requirements and accompanied by additional information to substantiate the statement. Certifications (ANSI) The action of determining, verifying, and attesting in writing to the qualification of personnel, ratarial and documentatica. CFR (S&W) Code of Fcderal Regulations j
r i e (gSTORMI Revision B Characteristic (ANSI) Any property or attribute of an item, process or service that is distinct, describable, and measurable, as conforming or. nonconforming to specified requirements. Quality characteristics are generally identified in specifications and drawings which describe the item, process or service. Checks (ANSI) The tests, measurements,' verifications or controls made on an activity by means of investigations, comparisons or evaminations, to determine satisfactory condition., accuracy, safety or performance. Client (S&W) The owner, person, group, company or corporation who has, or
- will have title to the Power Plant under construction or constructed with Stone & Webster under contract as Architect / Engineer. {
t code (SAW) A set of specific requirements, published under the cognizance of a 'recongnized Technical Society or Trade Association, invoked to the degree stated in applicable Engineering Documents. Code N-Symmhnl Stamp (ASME-8) The official 'ASME stamp which is applied to pressure vessels, components, parts and appurtenances that are certified to Section III of the ASME Boiler and Pressure Vessel Code. . Company (SSW) Refers to Stone & Webster Engineering Corporation Component (SSW) i Any individually manufactured or fabricated unit or piece of i a system which is identifiable and installable. For ASME III work, a component is any vessel, piping system, pump, valve or core support structure that requires a Code N--Symbol Stamp. l l
, s III-8 RIl -
Revision B _ Construction-Site (SSW) Designates respons2bility for. actions required of the Stone & Webster Engineering Corporation constulction forces at the jobsite under the direction of the Senior Construction Site Representative. Construction Drawing (S&W) An approved engineering design drawing uised for the installation, erection or fabrication of parts, f appurtenances, components, structures or plant. Design Engineering (ASME-10) Those engineering functions required to fulfill the responsibilities of the Owner or Owner's Agent as defined in ASME Section III, NA3210 through NA3270. Desian Review (S&W) , A formal management review of a design with respect to technical adequacy, quality and cost prior to r21 ease for production. Deviation (ANSI) A nonconformance or departure of a characteristic from specified requirements; considered to be synonymous with defective or unsatisfactory material. Disposition (ASME-11) The decision determining how to resolve a nonconformance. Division Guideline (SSW) In t 're 3 CIT Engineering Department, a document issm-3 by a Divisi w nief which establishes administrative or tecnnical methods and controls within a Division. Divisic11]ef ormaca f Evaluation (SSW)
~
An evaluation of a particular Quality Assruance Department Division, G:oup, or Section to determine if management policies have been effectively implemented. Documentatiop (AUSI) Any written or graphic information describing, defining, specitying, reporting or certifying activities, requirements, procedures or results.
r e 6 III-9 I3 . Revision B Engineering Assurance Division (S&W) A Division of the Engineering ' Department which, is responsible for establishing a system of management control within the' Engineering Department, including preparation of procedures, personnel training in their content and auditing to assure compliance. Construction Hold Point (SSW) A. preplanned point assigned by the Company Construction Department to verify that. the rnnstruction activities have been accomplished in accordance with applicable requirements. Construction Phase (AEC) Those activities associated with fabrication and manufacturing in addition to site related construction activities. From a Quality Assurance viewpoint, the construction phase mmmances with limited Work Authorization (LWA) , if granted,,and continues on from first erection of safety related structures, systems and components- to fuel loading. Controlled Copy (SSW) A copy of a procedure or a manual that is systematically updated and whose custodian is listed in the appropriate distribution list. Controlled Documentation (SSW) A document whose distribution, updating and use is to be regulated. j- Corrective Action (ASME-9) Action taken to determine the cause and correct deficiencies or nonconformances adverse to quality (see preventive action). Defective Material (SSW) Material which has one or more characteristics that do not comply with specified requirements; also termed to be unsatisfactory material. I
,w--, w -, ,,*w ,w-,,++-m ,---r,,w- ,--m-----,e, e ----r - ~--- w-w-,w --e-e - . - - - ,- n -- -
Y a s U IIIN9 Revision B Design f used as verbl (SSW) Technical and management process, which lead to and include the issuance of documants such as drawings, specifications and other documents, specifying technical requirements of structures, systems and components. Encineering Guidelines (SSW) A set of uniform criteria and engineering principles established by the Engineering Department to provide technical guidance. Engineering Standards (SSW) A set of uniform criteria and engineering principles established by Stone S Webster's Engineering Department to provide technical direction. Equipment (S&W) Items or apparatus used as part or in connection with an installation. Erection ~$6W) ( The process of constructing systems and structures in the field using manufactured or fabricated materials, cocponents, assamh1ies and subsystems. Examination (ANSI) An cler.ent of inspection consisting of investigation of materiala, ccroponents, supplies or services to determi.ne confomance to those specified requirements which can be detemiaed by such investigation. Examination is usually noneen .uc*ive and includes simple physical manipulation, gaging aca masurements. Fabricaticn (SSW) The procca af producing completed components, assemblies or subsysteme using material and/or other components. Fabricatj.o_nfyrection Control Isometric (S&W) An isomerzic drawing used at the construction site for . fabrication / erection of piping and/or fabrication of components, together with the installation of hangers, supports, anchors and guides which serves as a traveler for a controlled manufacturing system.
' ' ~
- ESIDRlCM. III-11 Revision B Field Ouality Control Division (S&W)
Used to designate responsibility for actions required of the Stone & Webster Field Quality Control Forces at the jobsite. ; Hold Point (SSW) A pre-established inspection point in the production process, which requires inspection, approval and release by l the Quality Assurance Department, Construction Department, I Engineering Department and/or the Authorized Inspector prior to further processing. Noncompliance by vendors / sellers, construction or contractors in failing to stop at a hold point will be cause for rejection and may further result in a stop work order; also termed Inspection Hold Point. Inspection (ANSI) A' phase of quality control which by means of examination,
' observation or measurement determines the conformance of materials, supplies x s-:-nents, parts, appurtenances, systems, processes or structures to predetermined quality requirements.
Inspection Notification Point (SSW) A preplanned point, reached during the manufacturing and/or
-testing phase at which time the Stone S Webster Procurement Quality Cbatrol Division requires notification according to the terms of the purchase order / contract.
Inswetor (SSW) A qualified iaspector, employed by Stone S Webster l Engineering Corporation,- whose duties include the verification of quality related activities or installations i or both. 1 Item (SSW) Any level of unit assembly, including structure, system, subsystem, subassembly, <v==nent, nart or material. Joint Identification Ni=her (SSW) A unique number assigned to a specific welded or bolted joint.
- Manufacturer (SSW) .
One who constructs any class of component, part or appurtenance to meet prescribed design requirements. E
4 % ll , III-12 II I Revision B Material (ANSI) A cubstance or combination of substances forming components, parts, pieces, and equipment items. .(Intended to include such as machinery, castings, liquids, formed steel shapes, aggregates and cement.) Material (ASME 13) Any item which is manufactured to SA, SFA, SB, SFB specifications or any other material specification permitted by ASME section III. Materials certification (SSW) Certification by the materials manufacturer or others by test and inspection that all ' specified requirements have been contplied with (also see Certifiate .of Compliance) . Measurinct and Test Equipment FMSTEl (SSW) Tools, gages, instruments and other measuring and *.esting devices used for acceptance inspection and/br testing. Modification _ (SSW) A planned and documented change in plant design or operation and accomplished in accordance with the requirements and limitation of applicable codes, standards, specifications, licenses and predetermined safety restrictions. Monitor (SSW) To watch, keep track of, observe, regulate or control any activity Nonce r q;pce (SSW) Any item conditions or materials which deviate from drawings, specifications or engineering requirements and canno* ne corrected within the scope of such requirements. Nonconforrapce and Disposition iNSD1 (SSW) A report requesting an Engineering Department disposition of a nonconioreing condition. i i
o I . gg ion B Nondestructive Test Division iNDTD1 (S&W) A division of the Quality Assurance Department responsible
. for defining and inplemanting a system, which 'provides technical and administrative direction for all comepony activities concerned with using nondestructive testing to i verify compliance to engineering requirements.
NSSS (S&W) Nuclear Steam Supply System Obiective Evidence (ANSI) I Any statament of fact, information or record either quantitative oc qualitative, pertaining to the quality of an item or service based on observations, measurements or tests which can be verified. Owner (ANSI) l i The persoit, group, company or corporation who will have, or has title , to the facility or installation under construction. , Part (ASME-12) , An itest which has work performed on it and which is attached to an becomes part of a component before completion of the component. I'br ASME Section III work,.a part requires its own Code symbol stamp when manufactured by others or under a different ASME Certificate of Authorization. Permanent Plant Files (S&W) A file comprised or documentation required by Code Statute Regulations, etc., as specified by the Client for plant, design, constructien, testing and operation records. Piping Systent (SSW) , A configuration of materials and components which, when installed, provides a flow path for a fluid.
. Plant (ANSI)
The equipment, piping,. structures, buildings and property
. that ccanprise an installation or facility.
6 k, . .
I. a n1 19 ' III-14 g l'{6 Revision B Post Audit Conference (S&W) A optional meeting between the auditing and audited organizations to review the audit findings, clarify any misunderstandings and to assign personnel responsible for corrective or preventive action. . Power / Process Piping System (SSW) Pipir.g systems which are necessary, or are required, for the generation of electric power and which require formal control, inspection, testing and documentation. Pre - Auclit Conference (SSW) A optional meeting held between the auditing and audited organizations prior to the conduct of the audit to outline the empe of the Audit, personnel to be contacted, and establish the lines of communication during the audit. Precision (EOQC) The degree of resolution and repeatability of measurements made under prescribed like conditions. Pgessure Boundary (SSW) Any surface which is subjected to differential fluid or gaseous pressure. Pressure Retaining Parts (S&W) Those parts making up a piping system either directly retaining pressure or welded to the pressure boundary so that the weld affects the metallurgy of the pressure retainir.g part. , Preyep 7 d ction (ASME-9) Action taken to preclude recurrence of deficiencies or noncon fcrnances. Procedure (AMSI) A document : Int specifies.or describes how an activi< v is to be pertonned. It may include methods to be employed, equipment oc raaterials to be used and sequence of operations.
r ( -i , III-15 ll ""g g ;
**'i' "8 siIU U Procedure Qualification (SSW)
Testing a process as outlined in a procedure to assure that the prescribed results will be accomplished. , Procuravnent Documents (SSW) . Contractually binding documents that identify and define the requirements which items or services must meet in order to be considered acceptable by the purchaser. Procurement documents include contracts, letters of intent, work orders, purchase orders or proposals and their acceptance whic h authorize the seller to perform services or supply equiper.nt, material or facilities on behalf of the purchaser. Program (SSW) A plan or procedure instituted to provide materials or services in accordance with specified procurement, design and regulatory requirements. Proiect (SSW) A planned series of design, engineering and construction activities necessary to . provide, utilize and maintain a facility or portion thereof. Proiect General Instructions (S&W) A&tinistrative and Technical in h uctions for personnel , Engineering 4 ' a.ssigned to a specific Project; prepared by SSW Department personnel. . Proiect Quality Assurance Coordinator (SSW) ! An individual who reports to the Manager, Quality Assurance Department and has direct responsibilities for coordinating quality related activities between Quality Assurance, Engineering, Construction and Client personnel, i Purchaser, (ANSI) The. organization or organizations responsible for issuance
- and administration of a contract, subcontract or purchase order.
l l l L.
** I %
[ ESTORiCAL
=--
Procurement Quality Control Division IPQCD3- (S&W)- A division of the Quality Assurance Department responsible for seller control activities for procured tiems as required 1;y the specification. Qualification (Personnel) (S&W) The characteristic or abilities gained through training or experience or both that enable an individual to perform a required function. This capability, when required, shall be indicated by comparison to .an established or defined standard of performance. Qualified Party (ANSI) A person or organization competent and recognized as knowledgeable t'o perform certain functions. Qualified Procedure (ANSI) . A procedure which incorporates all applicable codes and standards, manufacturer's parameters, and engineering specifications and has been proven adequate for its intended purpose. Quality (ASQC) The totality of features and characteristics of a product or service that bear on its ability to satisfy a given need. puali,ty Assurance (Appendix B to 10CFR50) All those planned and systematic quality assurance actions required to provide adequate confidence that a structure, syn:= or component will perform satisfactorily in serrice. Qualita Meurance includes Quality Control. Quality Assurance Department iQAD1 (SSW) Within the Stone & Webster Engineering Corporation, the departraent responsible for effective implementation of quality assurance functions. Quality Assurance Records (ANSI) Those recoron which furnish documentary evidience of the quality of itc:ns and of activities affecting quality.
f
/ f.
- III-17 Revision B i
i Quality Assurance Site File (SSW) A file maintained by FQC contairing all working and record documents required to implement the QC Program and to properly doctament the performance of QC activities. Quality Systems Division (QSD1 (ssW) _ A division of the Quality Assurance Department responsible for the establishanent and control of standardized quality systems. Quality Control (Appendix B to' 10CFR50) Those qua'.ity assurance actions related to the physical characterit: tics of a material, structural, tv=nanent or a system which provides a means to control the quality of the material structure, component or system to predetermined requirements. Random (SSW) The selection, on an unbiased basis, giving each item in a collection of units of similar items an equal chance of being selected. Receiving (ANSI) Taking delivery of an itec at a designated location. Regulatory (SSW) Any of the several controlling organizations -- Federal, industry, state or local, which impose specific requirements on the design or construction of a nuclear power plant. Reliability Tceneral definition 1 (ASQC) Ability of an iten to perform a required function under stated conditions for a stated period of time. Repair (ANSI) The process of restoring a nonconforming characteristic to an approved acceptable condition, even though that item still may not conform to the original requirement. (A class i of nonconformance disposition.) L _._ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _
. t 4 Re 1 on B k
Rework (ANSI) The process by which a nonconforming item is akt.de to conform t to a prior specified requirement by completion, remachining, reassembly conditions or other corrective means. (A class of nonconformance disposition.) Sartpling Inspection (S&W) An inspection technique in which random samples from a collection of units of similar items are selected in accordance with an approved sampling plan to determine the acceptability of the lot. Scrap (SSW) A disposition ~ imposed on a nonconforming item when it is
. established that the discrepancy renders the item unfit for its intended use and it is uneconomical or impossible to correct.
l l Seller (S&W) t l An individual or organ'ization which is under contract for furnishing materials, equipment, items, work, services installation; and may refer to contractors, and/or subcontractors and subtier levels, where appropriate. Source Inspection (SSW) l inspection activity performed at the manufacturing l An. location on material or components. Source Surveillance (S&W) observation or inspection for the purpose of A review, verity use; that an action has. been accomplished, as spec 3 ~
- at the location of material procarenent er i manutaeture.
SpeciM Process. (SSW) l An operatica performed under controlled conditions in i accordance with specified tequirements utilizing qualified proceduren, equipment and personnel. Special processes may include, but are not limited to, welding, brazing, soldering, cleaning, heat treating and NDT.
/ e
- 58}N(nlU N h III-19 Revision B Specification (S&W)
Engineering document specifying essential and technical I requirements for materials, items or services and indicating, when appropriate, the procedure by which it will be determined that the requirements have been met. Standard (Reference Document) (S&W) A recognized reference document which establishes a set of - rules, goals or objectives published by a recognized agency such as ANSI, ASTM, ASME, ASQC, and IEEE. Standard ICalibration1 (SSW) Calibrated measuring or test equipment whose calibration is traceable to the National Bureau of Standards, physical constant or recognized .inaustria3. standard and used for the calibrati m of Measuring & Test Equipment. Storage (S&W) The act of placing or leaving items in a suitable location for preservation or later use or disposal. Subassembly (S&W) A section of an assembly consisting of materials or
- components and which may ,be fabricated in a shop or i'n the field.
Subsystem * (ANSI) A group of assemblies or components, or both, combined to perform a. single function'. Supports (S&W) Includes all hangers, restraints, guides, and anchors used to support or contain a piping system. Surveillance (S&W) - , The-system of continuing analysis and evaluation of records, methods and procedures to assure conformance with technical requirements. Also, a records audit and physical check that a Vendor's in--process inspections and tests are being performed in accordance with his approved Quality Control Program. C ,
. . - _ . . _ . _ _ _ - _ . . _ _ ~ . . _ _ . _ - _ _ _ ~. . . . . _ _ - - . _ - _ . . - - - . - _
5 N 1$, }I i ng III-20 LU Revision B Survey (SSW) A review of the capability of a bidder or potential bidder, contractor, or subcontractor which is conducted to establish his qualification and appraise his Quality Control Program. System (ANSI) A group of subsystems united by some interaction or interdependence, performing many duties but functioning as a single unit. Test (ANSI) The determination or verification of th.e capability of an item to meet specified requirements by subjecting the item to a set of.p)1ysical, chemical, environmental or operating conditions. Unsat (AUSI) A deficiency in characteristic, documentation, or procedure which renders the quality of an item unacceptable or indeterminate. Rv===les of unsats include: physical detects, test failures, incorrect or inadequate documentation, .or deviation from prescribed processing inspection or test procedures. Vendcr (SSW) An individual or organization which is under contract for furnishing materials, equipment, items, work, services and/or installations; and may refer to contractors, succontractors and subtier levels, where appropriate. Verification (SSW) An : cf confirming, substantiating and assuring tru- an acting , < condition, has been implemented in conformnce with the specified requirements. Verifying evidence may be in tN forr, of documentation or confirmed by witnessing or perfondr" a function. Verify (SSW) The act of pro Q that a. function or requirement has been met by eranining objective evidence. This evidence can be in the torm of documentation or confirmed by witnessing or performing a function.
g: v- , 1 r
~^
,s.. III-21 i'* Bevision B l
l Witness (S6W) ! The act of observing and giving an account of inspections and/or tests performed by others. CLIENT CONSIDERATIONS - add the following: Category II has been subdivided into an A and B subcategory for this project. Subcategory A (Category IIA) will be applied to a selected list of category II equipment, and will require that vendors have Quality Assurance programs which meet the requirements of ANSI ~Zl.8. Assignment to Category IIA is based on cost of equipment and/or its importance to power generation. Subcategory B (Category IIB) includes all Category II equipment not assigned to Category IIA by agreement between NUSCo and Stone & Webster. No Quality Assurance program requirements'are required by specification. However, the vendor's quality system will be evaluated against MIL - I - 45208A.
( '
- r
~
" " " " ^
WSIORICAl. i APPENDIX TII ' Category I Structures Systems and Components A list of Catecjory I structures, systems and components is available in Table 3.2.5-1 of the Millstone Unit 3 PSAR. 1 (
y gi' p ' ,i j PROFESSIONAL qqh,I : SOCIETIE S (ASME, ANS, ETC.) - REGULATORY REQUIREMENTS (AEC, EPA , ETC.) - ($eUdN#Layouts OPERATING EXPERIENCE ~ tRRANGEM W S IFEEDBACK -l . . . . _ . . , _ _ _ SYSTEM
~
CONSTRUCTION EXPERIENCE I j CNCEPTUAL _ D E S_l G N, , (REVIEW) DESCRIPTIONS I_g ' "NG!!MERING -> CONCEPTUAL FEEDBACK CRITERIA PROJECT LARR ANGFW ENTS DESIGN INTERN AL EXPERIEtJCE b ; FLOW DIAGRAMS
~
(PROJECTS) INTERNAL EXPER!ENCE MASTER g PROJECT b I7 SPECIFICATION #
' (DESIGN)
- SPECIFICATION ENGINEERING w MANAGEMENT INTERNAL EXPERIENCE (SPECIALISTS) -
Q2 REVIEW MEETING M NOTE: THIS REVIEW ENCOMPASSES ALL PLOT PLANS AND ARRANGEMENTS FOR ADEQUACY OF DESIGN AND COMPATIBluTY WITH hf (REVIEW) EXISTING S&W EXPERIENCE. (REVIEW) PROJECT CONCEPTUAL . ENGINEER ENGINEERING
~ ~
17 CONSTRUCTION DRAWINGS (REVIEW) DETAlLED ENGINEERING SKETCHES i > ENGINEERING DESIGN CLIENT ------- COMPUTERIZED f. MANUAL CALCULATIONS E l AND PRODUCTION OUTPUT MANUFACTURERS' DRAWINGS , DESIGN SPECIFICATIONS I i SUPPLIER DRAWINGS. ...... n g -
- g
'l 1
i l @ ENGINEERING CilANGES i @ NONCONFORMITY a - m PROJECT ,
@ DISPOSITION HEPORr s ENGINEER -
CLIENT l . LEGEND: ASSUTONCE ACTIVITIES O l
]
@ - EfJG!NEERING ASSURANCE AUDITS
@ - O. A REVIEi G SIGN- OFF l OPER ATING LICENSE l<t---{NRC ]+. Q fE p
; @~OA AUDIT ',O W
l I I U s
[ APPENDlX IV
! ENGINEERING AND DESIGN REVIEW '.
PROFESSIONAL i l SOCIETIES (ASME, ANS, ETC,) ~ i REGULATORY REQUIREMENTS (AEC, EPA, ETC.) -
$ pug'n"yK s j OPERATING EXPERIENCE . .
ARRANGEMENTS
" ~
t FEEDBACK - SYSTEM l CONSTRUCTION EXPERIENCE - CONCEPTUAL ,, DESle,8l, , ,, (REVIEW) DESCRIPTIONS CONCEPTUAL
' ~
l FEED 8ACK - ENGINEERING CRITERIA PROJECT ARRANGEMENTS DESIGN l lNTERNAL EXPERIENCE @ ' ' TLOW DIAGRAMS" (PROJECTS) - MASTER II
. INTERNAL EXPERIENCE PROJECT ,
. (DESIGN) - SPECIFICATION " SPECIFICATION ENSINEERING j INTERNAL EXPERIENCE (SPECIALISTS) - Q N ' MEETING I N NOTE: THIS REVIEW ENCOMPASSES ALL PLOT PLANS AND ARRANGEMENTS FOR ADEQUACY hf (REVIEW) E185:$ 1 S N E E $[E E N (REVIEW)
- , PROJECT : CONCEP M
! ! ENGINEER ENGifEERING ! t'
~
" CONSTRUCTION DRAWMOS
+
(REVIEW) DETAILED ENGINEERING SKETCHES
- j ENG:NEERINS DESIGN CLIENT - - - - - - -
COMPUTERIZED & MANUALCALCULATIONS j AND PRODUCTION l MANUFACTURERS' DRAWINGS DESIGN SPECIFICATIONS
-I SUPPLIER DRAWINGS......f EUi I l i37 $
j i ,@? @ ENGINEERING CHANGES j @ NONCONF0dMITY & l PROJECT C" 7 f j 't ' _ , Cl. LENT
@ DISPOSITION REPORTS ENGINEER 'I 4 jt :s l l z LEGEND: ASSURANCE ACTIVITIES l l' s @ - ENGINEERING ASSURANCE AUDITS l0PERATING LICENSE ,
j @ - G. A. REVIEW & SIGN-0FF i f @ - Q.A. AUDIT . b I ! i !. I
( F o . ROvigion A E = l APPENDIX IV GLOSSARY ASME - The American Society of Mechanical Engineers . 1 Authorized Code Inspector - A qualified inspector employed by the i Hartford Steam Boiler Inspection and Insurance Company for the inspections required by ASME Section III. Audit - An investigative activity to determine the adequacy of, and adherence to, established procedures and instructions, and the effectiveness of implementation. Category I - Plant systems or portions of systems, structures and equipment whose failure or malfunction could cause a release of radioactivity that would endanger public safety. This Category also includes equipment which is vital to a safe shutdown of the plant and the removal of decay and sensible heat, or equipment which is necessary to mitigate consequences to the public of a postulated accident. Category II - Plant systems, portions of systems, structures and equipment essential for the reliable generation of electric power but which are not essential for a safe shutdown. Failure of this equipment could result in a loss of power generation, but would not endanger public safety. Equipment and systems which contain radioactive materials, but whose failure could not release quantities sufficient to prejudice public safety are included in this Category. Category II has been subdivided into an A and B subcategory for this project. Subcategory A (Category IIA) will be applied to a selected list of Category II equipment, and will require that vendors hava Quality Assurance programs which meet the requirements of ANSI Z l.8. Assignment to Category IIA is based on cost of equipment and/or its importance to power generation. Subcategory B (Category IIB) includes all Category II equipment not assigned to Category IIA by agreement between NUSCo., and Stone & Webster. No Quality Assurance program requirements are required by specification. How-ever, the vendor's quality systera will be evaluated against MIL - I - 45208A. 1 (. .
- r. r 3 9 -
App:ndix IV Revision A HISTORICAL Category III - Plant systems, portions of systems, structures and equipment which sre not essential for the reliable generation of electric power and which do not contain radioactive material or whose failure could not result in the release of radioactive material. . NOTE: The term "not essential for the reliable generation of electric power" should be interpreted to mean structures systems and components, whoce failure would not result in the halt of electric power generation in approximately eight hours or less. CFR - Code of Federal Regulations EAD - S&W Engineering Assurance Division FQCD - S&W Field Quality Control Division Hold Point - A preplanned stopping point during the manufacture, fabrication, erection, testing or any other activity from which a material, component, system or structure may not be further processed until cleared or released by proper inspection authority. Inspection - A phase of quality control which, by means of examina-tion or test, determines the conformance of materials, supplies, components, parts, appurtenances, : systems, processes or struc-tures to predetermined quality requirements. Item - Any level of unit assembly, including material, part, com-ponents, system, subsystem or structure. NUSCc. - Northeast Utilities Service Company NSSS - Nuclear Steam Supply System N&D - Nenccaformance & Disposition PQCD - SSW kIccarement Quality Control Division QAD - S W Cuality A_ssurance Department NDTD - Nondest;uctive Test Division QSD - S&W Quality Systems Division S&W - Stone S Webster Engineering Corporation 2 t iY
l ( T AppIndix IV
=
y l Survey - A review of the capability of a bidder or potential bidder, contractor or subcontractor which is conducted to establish his qualifications and approve his quality control program. Vendor - An individual or organization which is under contract for furnishing materials, equipment, items, work, services, and/or installations; and may refer to contractors, subcontrac-tors and subtier levels, where appropriate. Verify - The act of proving that a function or requirement is true by evidence. This evidence can be in the form of documentation or confirmed mont. by witnessing or performing a function or require-Witness - The act of observing and giving an account of inspections and/or tests performed by others. 3 N- _ _-
~
(* 7 VI-1 Revision A APPROVALS AND CONCURRENCES FOR QUALITY ASSURANCE SYSTEM DOCUMENTATION Program Documents Approval Concurrences
- 1. Standard S&W Nuclear President (Sections - - - - - - - - - -
Quality Assurance approved by Vice Program Presidents of affected Departments)
- 2. Proiect OA Program QA Manager /
Ch Eng., Engrg. Assurance / Project Manager
- 3. Proiect Test VP's of affected - -
Procram Manual Departments
- 4. Company Ouality
. Assurance and Control (',_g'7*p','.'a.'j Manual - ASME Section --J-----'-"
III Policy- President - - - - - - - - Procedure originals, QA Manager VPes of changes, and revisions affected Departments (Acceptance by the Authorized Inspection Agency) Procedural Documents Approval Concurrences
- 1. Quality Standards Charter (QS-5.1) President - - - - - - - - - -
Originals, Revisions, VP's of affected and Changes Departments
- 2. Quality Assurance Directives
- l Original and Revision QA Manager Ch of Cog-
[_ nizant Div. Change QA Manager Ch of Cog-nizant Div. Cancellation QA Manager Ch of Cog-nizant Div.
- The PQC and NDT Manuals have been deleted as these procedures are now incorporated in Quality Assurance Directives.
(. . . .
, . . . $ i VI-2 Revicion A Procedural Documents Approval Concurrences
- 3. Quality Control FQC-Supt. of PQC and - ~~
Instructions Manager FQCD ' PQA-District Chief and - - - - - - - - - - - Manager PQA Headquarters and Opera- ---------- tion Centers - QDM
- 4. Calibration Metrology Standards QA Manager Div. Mgr./Ch.
Eng. of affected QA Div. Calibration Procedure Div. Mgr./Ch. Eng. of Div. Mgr./Ch. preparing Div. Eng. of affected QA Div.
- 5. Engineerina Assurance Procedures Originals and Revisions Vice President, Eng. Mgr./ /A Director of Engineer- Asst. Eng. N ing Mgr., spon-I ' sors of
%)' jf K}})S
_ L ; . .l',,; affected Eng. Divisions Change Vice President, - Director of Engineer-ing/ Chief Engineer, EA l Cancellations Chief Engineer, EA - - - -
- 6. ,;i f Manual Project Manager - - - - - - - -
- 7. Standard Construction Vice President, -----
W thch Procedures Director of Construc-5 73 [' tion
- 8. Proiect Construction Construction Manager / - - - - - - - - -
Met _ hods P_rocedures Project Engineer / Chief (CMP 's) Engineer, Quality Systems Division Y
VI-1 HISTORICAL APPENDIX VI APPROYALS AND CONCURRENCES FOR QUALITY ASSURANCE SYSTEM DOCUMENTATION Progrant Docustents Approval Concurrence
- 1. Standard SSW Nuclear President (Sections ---
Cuality Assurance. approved by Vice Program . Presidents of affected Depart-ments)
- 2. Proiect QA Progrant QA Manager -
Ch Eng, Engrg Assurancei
' Project Manager
- 3. ASME Section III President - - -
Manual VP, Quality Assurance VP, Engineering Sr. VP, SR Const Mgr General Purchasing Agent QA Manager Procedural Documents Approvk1 Concurrence
. 1. Quality Standarda Vice President of Vice Presi-affected Depart- dent of ments affected Departments
- 2. NDT Procedures Ch Engr, NDT Divi- QA Manager Original and sion Ch Materials
~
Revision CH Enifr, Engr. (when l Qual ~ity Syst, ems appropriate) Division QA manager (initial)
- 3. Procurestent Quality Manager, PQC QA Manager Control Division ~
i _Ch Engr. Quality S'ys'tems Division
- 4. Quality Assurance Directives .
l Oric'nal i & Revision QA Manager Ch of Cog-l nizant Div. ! l
.. - .-_ --. - . - - - - - - = - - - - - - -
_--,.-~~-~~~---]
C \ 1 b VI-2 Revisi,n N/A 2 ab d Procedural Do w nts change QA Manager Ch of Cog-nizant Div. 1 Canee11ation QA Manager -- -- '
- 5. NDT Instructions Original & Revision Ch Engr, NDT Div. QA Manager Ch Engr, QSD (initial)
Change Ch Engr, NDT Div. QA Manager Ch Engr, QSD (initial) Cancellation Ch Engr, NDT Div.
- 6. Quality control Supt. of FQC Manager, Instructions or FQC Div.
District Chief or PQC Manager
- 7. Engineerina Assurance Senior Engineering Engineering Procedures Manager Mgr and Asst. Engin-eering Mgr.
Change Senior Engineering - - - - - - - Manager Y
r W C t-VII-1
' 71,5 I Revision N/A
, , ;- j i., a w # u i
APPENDIX VII RESPONSE TO REGUIA'!ORY GUIDANCE Details of Stone & Webster responses to U.S.A.E.C. Regulatory Guides, dray Book (Wash 1283, Rev. 1) , Green Book (Wash 1309) and all provisions of Regulatory Guide 1.70.6 are as follows:
- 1. Regulatory Guide A.' Regulatory Guide No. 1.28, dated June 7, 1972 (N 45.2 - 1971) " Quality Assurance Program Requirements" - complies.
B. Regulatory Guide No. 1.30, dated August 11, 1972 (N 45.2.4 - 1972) " Quality Assurance Requirements for the- Installation, Inspection and 'msting of Instrumentation and Electric Equipment" - complies. C. Stone & Webster's QA program requirements comply with the quality assurance provisions of the following guides (RG 1.37, 1.3 8, 1.39, and 1.54).. SSWes response to the technical (engineering, design and construction) provisions to the following guides (RG 1.37, 1.38, 1.39, and 1.54) is given in Appendix 3A of SWESSAR or the comparable section of a utility - applicant's SAR.
. Regulatory Guide No. 1.37, dated March 16, 1973 " Quality Assurance Requirements for Cleaning of Fluid Systems and Associated Components of Water-Cooled Nuclear. Power Plants."
. Regulatory Guide No. 1.38 dated March 16, 1973
" Quality Assurance Requirements for Packaging, Shipping, Receiving, Storage, and Handling of Items for Water-Cooled Nuclear Power Plants."
. Regulatory Guide No. 1.39, dated March 16, 1973 " Housekeeping Requirements for Water-Cooled Nuclear Power Plants."
. Regulatory Guide No. 1.54, dated June 1973 (N 101.4 ,1972) " Quality Assurance Requirements for Protective Coatings Applied to Water-Cooled Nuclear Power Plants."
( .. ._.. . _ . . _ __. _ _ _ _. _ _ .. ___ . . . . . . - - . . . . _ . , _ . . . . _ _ . . _ . _ . . _ . - . . . . . _ .
. 1 % )
VII-2 Revision N/A D. Regulatory, Guide No. 1.58, dated August 1973,
" Qualification of Nuclear Power Plant Inspection, Examination and Testing Personnel" - complies.
E. Regulatory Guide 1.64, dated October 1973, " Quality Assurance Requirements for the Design of m2 clear Power Plants" - maplies. F. Guide No. 1.70.6, dated July 1974, " Additional Information Quality Assurance During Design and Construction" (replaces Guide No . 1.70.xx) - complies. G. Regulatory Guide 1.74,
. Febnzary 1974, " Quality (ANSI N45.2.10-1973) dated Assurance Terms and Definitions."
Appendix III " Glossary" has been submitted as an
, acceptable alternative.
. H. Regulatory Guide 1.88, dated August 1974, (ANSI N45.2.9 -1974) " Collection, Storage, and Maintenance of Nuclear Power Plant Quality Assurance Records" - complies.
- 2. Additional Guidance A. N45.2.5, Draft 3, Revision 1, January 1974,
" Supplementary Quality Assurance Requirements for Installation, Inspection and Testing of Structural Cbncrete and Structural Steel During the Cbnstruction Phase of Nuclear Power Plants."
Stone & Webster Engineering Corporation will comply with the requirements of ANSI N45.2.S, Draft 3, Fevision 1, January 1974. Implementing procedures and specifications will achieve ceraplince effective January 1, 1975. B. Li45.2.8, Draft 3, Revision 2, September 1973,
" Supplementary Quality Assurance Requirements for Installation, Inspection, and Testing of Mechanical F giprdent and Systems for the Construction Phase of Nuclear Power Plants."
Stone S Webster Engineering Corporation will comply with the requirements of ANSI N35.2.8, Draft 3, Revision 2, September 1973. Implementing procedures and specifications will achieve ervagliance effective June 1, 1975.
, . ,sq ,- - m 3 } ,,}
2 ,
. j jI J
- l . een - w.. ,_.
g
(. ,y- ,-. . . . , i b. VII-3 Revision N/A C. N45.2.1,2, Draft 4, Revision 1, November 1, 1974,
" Requirements for Auditing of Quality Assurance Programs for Nuclear Power Plants" - complies. -
e L e O e e e 9 e 4 e e
'G}
'W'O 4 1' b jl.:_b_dk
..f4 D #
ATTACHMENT 4 LISTING OF CHANGES TO THE MILLSTONE UNIT No. 3 QUALITY ASSURANCE PROGRAM MANUAL (Manual Editions - Revision B through Revision F) l l
o e 1 ' MILLSTONE UNIT NO. 3 QA PROGRAM HISTORICAL BACKGROUND
. The first edition of the Project QA Program Manual (PQAPM), Table of Con-tents - Rev. O was issued in August, 1973. At this time neither the Stone &
Webster Standard Quality Assurance Program (SWSQAP Rev. N/A - the topical report to which the project is committed) nor the Preliminary Safety Analy-sis Report (PSAR - Section 17.1.2 containing a description of the SWEC QA Program to be implemented) had been approved by the NRC. As indicated in the " Introduction" to PQAPM, Revision 0, the manual was written to coin-cide with and express in greater detail the QA program description contained in Section 17 of the PSAR. At the time.PQAPM - Table of Contents, Rev. A was issued (7/19/74), the PSAR and SWSQAP had still not been approved by the NRC. During this revision a major. format change was made to the manual. For the sake of consistency and ease cf . reference between the PQAPH and SWSQAP the existing text in each section of the PQAPM was replaced with virtually verbatim text of SWSQAP (Subsections 1.0, " Responsibilities and 2.0, " Tasks"). Subsection 3.0
" Discussion" from SWSQAP apparently was not incorporated into the PQAPM since this section-does not add to or modify any of_the primary policies /
commitments delineated in Subsections 1.0 and 2.0. At the time of this revision, controls were established to ' require any degradation to the program occurring during the adaptation of SWSQAP to the PQAPM to be reported, evaluated for compliance to 10CFR50 Appendix B and approved by the Vice President of the affected department and the Di::ector of Licensing. In August, 1974 the PSAR was approved by the NRC. Minor changes were made to the PQAPM for consistency with this document and manual edition - Table of Contents, Revision B was issued in October, 1974. SWSQAP 1-74, Rev. N/A was approved _by the NRC on December 31, 1974. At this time, based on client direction, the PQAPM was revised to be a virtually verbatim copy of SWSQAP through the addition of SWSQAP subsection 3.0,
" Discussions" to the text of the PQAPM. Additionally, subsection 4.0, ; " Client Consideratiuns" was added to each section of the manual as appro-
! priate to address any supplementary client unique requirements established i- in NUSCO QA Specification No. 4.01A. Subsequent to PQAPM, Table of Contents - Rev. C the text has been reviewed I annually and the manual revised three times to the present Table of Contents ! - Revision F, in order to reflect the latest QA Organization, Controls and Policies established by SWEC and implemented on project. l
-B4-12179-6265A.
o e 1 8 GENERIC CHANGES The following changes were made throughout the entire manual, as appropri-ate, during the edition of the Project QA Manual indicated. A. Manual Edition - Table of Contents, Rev. C
- 1. Added subsection 3.0 entitled " Discussion", to provide supplemen-tary comments and clarification of the requirements and trsks in subsections 1.0 and 2.0.
- 2. Added subsection 4.0 entitled " Client Considerations", to pre-scribe any unique N'.'SCO supplementary requirements or consider-ations pertaining to the project. The additional requirements added during sarious editions to the manual are identified in the lists of changes generated for each section.
B. Manual Edition - Table of Contents, Rev. E
- 1. " Procurement Quality Control Division (PQCD)" was changed to
" Procurement Quality Assurance Division (PQAD)"
- 2. " Vendor" was changed to " Seller"
- 3. " Project Quality Coordinator" was changed to " Quality Assurance Program Administrator"
- 4. " Department Services Group (DSG)" was changed to " Quality Assur-ance Cost and Auditing Division (QACAD)"
- 5. " Vendor Rating List" chcrged to " Quality Rating List" i
I B4-12179-6213 1
e e
, e POLICY LETTER Dated July 19, 1974 (found in manual edition - Table of Contents Revi-sion B). Vertbatim of SWSQAP 1-74A, Revision N/A.
Dated February 28, 1975 (found in manual editions - Table of Contents, Revision C, D, and E). Rewritten to update and assign responsibility of the program from VP to Manager, Quality Assurance. Project Manager responsi-bility has been included. Dated April 6, 1981 (found in manual edition - Table of Contents, Revi-sion F). Updated and signed by Vice President and Manager of Quality Assurance. B4-12179-6213 2
o
- INTRODUCTION Revision A (found in manual edition - Table of Contents, Revision B). Verbatim of SWSQAP 1-74A, Revision N/A.
Revision B Found in manual edition - Table of Contents, Revisions C, D, and E). Rewritten to incorporate reference to WASH documents guidance. Revision C (found in manual edition - Table of Contents, Revision F). Related this program manual to ML-3, deleted reference to WASH documents, referencing Appendix VII instead. 9 B4-12179-6213 3
o . SECTION I ORGANIZATION Revision B (found in manual edition . Table of Contents, Revision B). The following changes were made to Section 1, Revision A, which was based on SWSQAP 1-74A, Revision N/A. Figures 2 & 3 Minor changes to detail departmental and title changes. Revision C (found in manual edition - Table of Contents, Revisions C and D). Paragraph 2.1.3 Inserted the word " perform" to clarify requirement. Paragraph 2.7.2 Deleted "but are not limited to" preceeding PSAR/FSAR evaluations and corrected Quality Assurance " Division" to read " Departmental." i2gure 1 Revision B. Title changes were incorporated and added "Commu-nications" line from Vice President Quality Assurance to Chief Engineer, Engineering Assurance. Figure 2 Revision B. Updated to reflect title and organization changes. Figure 3 Revision C. Updated to reflect title and organization changes. Figure 4 Revision A. Updated to reflect title and organization changes. Revision D (found in manual edition - Table of Contents, Revision E). ' Paragraph 2.3.2 Deleted reference to " resident inspectors." Paragraph 2.4.1 Changed " ensure by audits" to " assure through inspec-tion." Figure 1 Revision D. Revised to detail various departmental and title changes. Figure 2 Revision D. Revised to detail various departmental and title changes. Figure 3 Revision D. Revised to detail various departmental and title changes. Figure 4 Revision D. Revised to detail various departmental and title changes. B4-12179-6213 4
a , Revision E (found in manual edition - Table of Contents, Revision F). Paragrapa 4.0 Organizational charts updated. Figure 1 Revision E. Revised to detail departmental and title changes. Figure Revision E. Revised to detail departmental and title changes. Figure 3 Revision E. Revised to detail departmental and title changes. Figure 4 Revision E. Revised to detail departmental and title changes. l l ( B4-12179-6213 5 r
o
- SECTION 2 QUALITY ASSURANCE PROGRAM Revision A (found in manual edition - Table of Contents, Revision B). Based on SWSQAP 1-74A, Revision N/A.
Revision B (found in manual editions - Table of Contents, Revisions C and D). Paragraph 2.3.3 Added paragraphs to prescribe requirement to maintain 2.4.3, qualification, certification, and training records and 2.5.2 within the affected QA divisions. Revision C (found in manual editions - Table of Contents, Revisions E and F). Paragraph 1.1 Paragraph rewrittcn to relate the project program speci-fically to MP-3. Paragraph 2.2.3 Text relocated due to change in departmental respons-ibility. The requirements of this paragraph have been reassigned as the responsibility of the Licensing Department and the text has been relocated to Paragraph 2.8. The text formerly located in Subparagraph 2.2.4 is now located in this paragraph. Paragraph 2.3.3 Rewritten to pertain only to retention of Quality Systems personnel qualification records. Paragraph 2.4.4 Added paragraph to require retention of PQAD personnel qualification records. Paragraph 2.5.3 Added paragraph to require retention of FQCD personnel qualifications. Paragraph 2.7 Project Quality Assurance Coordinator has been re-numbered Paragraph 2.9. The responsibilities of the Quality Assurance Cost and Auditing Divsion have been inserted as Paragraph 2.7. Paragraph 2.8 Responsibilities of the Licensing Department to coordi-nate and disseminate Regulatory Guide information have been included. Paragraph 2.9 This paragraph was formerly Paragraph 2.7. Paragraph 4.0 Included NUSCO requirement that SWEC adhere to NUSCO Quality Assurance Specification for Engineering and Construction Quality Assurance Program. B4-12179-6213 6 ,
O e SECTION 3 ENGINEERING AND DESIGN CONTROL Revision A (found in manual edition - Table of Coritents, Revision B). Based on SWSQAP 1-74A, Revision Nf A. Revision B (found in manual edition - Table of Contents, Revisions C, D, E, and F). Paragraph 1.5 Expanded to incorporate industrial standards and prac-tices, prototype evaluations and approval and design reviews. Paragraph 4.0 Added requirement for selected design documents to be submitted to NUSCO for their review, comment, and affirmation of acceptability. l l l B4-12179-6213 7
, e SECTION 4 PROCUREMENT DOCUMENT CONTROL Revision A (found in manual edition - Table of Contents, Revision B). Based on SWSQAP 1-74A, Revision N/A. Revision B (found in manual editions - Table of Contents, Revisions C and D). Paragraph 1.3 Former Paragraph 1.3 renumbered Paragraph 1.4. New Paragraph 1.3 inserted to require that Procurement Documents be subject to appropriate reviews. Paragraph 2.1 Paragraph expanded to include requisitions when no specification exists and to restrict the paragraph to Category I items only Paragraph 4.0 Added requirement for deviations from NUSCO Purchase Order /Centract to be submitted in writing for their review and approval. Revision C (found in manual edition - Table of Contents, Revisions E and F). Paragtaphs 2.5, Added responsibility of Engineering Assurance Division 2.5.1, regarding Engineering Services Scopes of Work (ESS0W). and 2.5.2 B4-12179-6213 8
SECTION 5 INSTRUCTIONS, PROCEDURES, AND DRAWINGS Revision A (found in manual edition - Table of Contents, Revision B). Based on SWSQAP 1-74A, Revision N/A. Revision B (found in manual editions - Table of Contents, Revisions C and D). Paragraph 2.1.1 Edited to clarify requirement. Paragraph 2.1.3 Added paragraph to specify independent review and sign-off of drawings. Paragraph 4.0 Added requirement for NUSCO review and approval of procedures describing quality related activities per-formed by SWEC at the site prior to the start of the activity. Revision C (found in manual edition - Table of Contents, Revisions E and F). See " Generic Changes", Manual Edition - Table of Contents, Revision E, Page 1. B4-12179-6213 9 t _
t SECTION 6 DOCUMENT CONTROL I Revision A (found in manual edition - Table of Contents, Revision B). Based on SWSQAP 1-74A, Revision N/A. Revision B (found in manual edition - Table of Contents, Revisions C and D). Paragraph 1.4 Former Paragraph 1.4 renumbered 1.5. New Paragraph 1.4 inserted to require timely inclusion of changes into parent docucent. Revision C (found in manual editions - Table of Contents, Revisions E and F). Paragraph 3.0 Quote from Quality Standard updated due to revision of that procedure. Paragraph 3.1 Paragraph number deleted as unnecessary. B4-12179-6213 10 1 _ _ - _ - - _ _ . _ _ _ _ _ _ _ 1
SECTION 7 CONTROL OF PURCHASED MATERIAL, EQUJPMENT, AND SERVICES Revision A (found in manual edition - Table of Contents, Revision B). Verbatim of SWSQAP 1-74A, Revieinn N/A. Revision B (found in manual editions - Table of Contents, Revisions C and D). Paragraph 2.6.3 Changed "NUSC0" to " Client." Paragraph 2.6.4 Changed " tags or stickers" to " appropriate means." Paragraph 2.6.7 Provided clarification by inserting "(field)." Paragraph 4.1 Added requirement for NUSCO approval prior to instal-lation of nonconforming material at site. Revision C (found in manual editions - Table of Contents, Revisions E and F). Paragrcph 1.7.4 " Nonconforming items" has been changed to "ensatis-factory items." Paragraph 2.4.1 Amplified responsibility to review "and approve." Paragraph 2.6.5 Former paragraph was deleted as redundant. Paragraph 2.6.6 Paragraph was rentunbered 2.6.5. Paragraph 2.6.7 Paragraph was renumbered 2.6.6. Paragraph 2.7 Paragraph added to charge Engineering Assurance Division with responsibility to evaluate engineering services suppliers. l l l l l t B4-12179-6213 11
SECTION 8 IDENTIFICATION AND CONTROL OF MATERIALS PARTS AND COMPONENTS Revision A (found in manual edition - Table of Contents, Revision B). Verbatim of SWSQAP 1-74A, Revision N/A. Revision B (found in manual editions - Table of Contents, Revisions C and D). No change from Revision A. Revision C (found in manual editions - Table of Contents, Revisions E and F). See " Generic Changes". Manual Edition - Table of Contents, Revision E, page 1. i i l B4-12179-6213 12
SECTION 9 CONTROL OF SPECIAL PROCESSES Revision A (found in manual edition - Table of Contents, Revision B). Based on SW3QAP 1-74A, Revision N/A. Revision B (found in manual editions - Table of Contents, Revisions C and D). No change from Revision A. Revision C (found in manual editions - Table of Contents, Revisions E and F). See "Generie Changes", Manual Edition - Table of Contents Revision E, page 1. I E B4-12179-6213 13
i
=
- 1 i
i
)
SECTION 10 I INSPECTION Revision A (found in manual edition - Table of Contents, Revision B). Based on SWSQAP 1-74A, Revision N/A. Revision B (found in manual editions - Table of Contents, Revisions C and D). No change from Revision A. Revision C (found in manual editions - Table of Contents, Revisions E and F). Paragraph 1.4 " Authorized Code Inspector" changed to " Authorized and 2.3.5 Nuclear Inspector." Paragraph 3.2.4 " Nondestructive Test Procedures" changed to " Quality Con *,rol Instructions." Paragraph 4.0 The following Client considerations were added: Paragraph 4.1 " Inspections of Category I, II, and III material and equipment by FQCD shall be performed as directed by NUSCO." Paragraph 4.2 The frequency of FQCD visual inspection of Category II welding was clarified, with regards to fluid carrying systems and nonfluid carrying systems. l l f I l l l B4-12179-6213 14
SECTION 11 TEST CONTROL Revision A (found in manual edition - Table of Contents, Revision B). Based on SWSQAP 1-74A, Revision N/A. Revision B (found in manual editions - Table of Contents, Revisions C and D). Paragraph 1.3.5 Paragraph added to require mandatory hold points for witnessing. Paragraph 1.4 Extended paragraph to require evaluation by qualified / responsible groups. Revision C (found in manual editions - Table of Contents, Revisions E and F). Paragraph 1.3.5 " Authorized Inspector" changed to " Authorized Nuclear Inspector." Paragraph 2.3 Last sentence clarified the release of systems to preoperational test. Paragraph 4.0 Amended this subsection to recognize Client responsi-bility for initial system checkout through preopera-tional testing. i B4-12179-6213 15
SECTION 12 CONTROL OF MEASURING AND TEST EQUIPMENT Revision A (found in manual edition - Table of Contents, Revision B). Based on SWSQAP 1-74A, Revision N/A. Revision B (found in manual editions - Table of Contents, Revisions C and D). No change from Revision A. Revision C (found in manual editions - Table of Contents, Revisions E and F). See " Generic Changes", Manual Edition - Table of Contents, Revision E, page 1. B4-12179-6213 16
e
- SECTION 13 HANDLING. STORAGE, AND SHIPPING r Revision A (found in manual edition - Table of Contents, Ravision B). Based on SWSQAP 1-74A, Revision N/A.
Revision B (found in manual editions - Table of Contents, Revisions C and D). Paragraph 1.1 Expanded paragraph to require work to be accomplished by qualified individuals in accordance with preplanned instructions. Revision C (found in manual editions - Table of Contents, Revisions E and F). Paragraph 2.3 " Client" changed to "NUSCO." B4-12179-6213 17
SECTION 14 INSPECTION TEST AND OPERATING STATUS Revision A (found in manual edition - Table of Contents, Revision B). Based on SWSQAP 1-74A, Revision N/A. Revisf on D (found in manual editions - Table of Contents, Revisions C and D). Paragraph 1.1 Paragraph extended to restrict removal of status markers by authorized personnel only. Revision C (found in manual editions - Table of Contents, Revisions E and F). See " Generic Changes", Manual Edition - Table of Contents, Revision E, page 1. { i i ) l I i B4-12179-6213 18 I
o . SECTION 15 NONCONFORMING MATERIALS, PARTS _OR COMPONENTS Revision A (found in manual edition - Table of Contents, Revision B). Based on SWSQAP 1-74A, Revision N/A. Revision B (found in manual edition - Table of Contents, Revision C). Paragraph 2.3 Paragraph extended to require providing NUSCO N&Ds dispositioned " accept as is" or " repair." Paragraph 4.0 Added requirement for NUSCO approval prior to instal-lation of nonconformaing material at site. Revision B Change Notice No. 1 (found in manual edition - Table of Contents, Revision D). Renumbered paragraphs in Client Considerations Section to accomo-date subparagraph format due to the addition of the following. Paragraph 4.2 Included requirement for NUSCO to approve all Category I nonconformances dispositioned " repair" and " accept as is." Revision C (found in manual editions - Table of Contents, Revisions E and F). Paragraph 2.4.3 " Client" changed to "NUSCO." Paragraph 4.3 Clarified NUSCO requirement permitting trend charts to be submitted as separate documents. B4-12179-6213 19
e
- SECTION 16 CORRECTIVE ACTION Revision A (found in arc, val edition - Table of Contents, Revision B). Based on SWSQAP 1-74A, Revision N/A.
Revision B (found in manual editions - Table of Contents, Revisions C and D). Paragraph 1.2 Paragraph extended to require auditing areas of concern to assure corective action has been accomplished. Paragraph 4.0 Restated requirement from Section 15 to report signif-icant deficiencies and related information promptly to NUSCO. Revision C (found in manual editions - Table of Contents, Revisions E and F). See " Generic Changes" Manual Edition - Table of Contents, Revision E, page 1. b B4-12179-6213 20
SECTION 17 QUALITY ASSURANCE RECORDS Revision A (found in manual edition - Table of Contents, Revision B). Based on SWSQAP 1-74A, Revision N/A. Revision B (found in manual editions - Tab 2e of Contents, Revisions C and D). No change from Revision A. Revision C (found in manual editions - Table of Contents, Revisions E and F). See " Generic Changes" Manual Edition - Table of Contents, Revision E, page 1. 1 j l
)
l
)
B4-12179-6213 21
. . ~ . - - - - . _ , . - - - - - - _ . - - - - - - - -
., o
. < a SECTION 18 AUDITS Nevision A (found in manual edition - Table of Contents, Revision B). Based on SWSQAP l-74A, Revision N/A.
Revision B (found in manual edition - Table of Contents, Revisions B.) Paragraph 2.1 Title change from Manager to Vice President of the Quality Assurance Department. Revision C (found in manual editions - Table of Contents, Revision C). Paragraph 1.2 Revised last sentence to require audit to assure cor-rective action has been accomplished rather than to determine effectiveness of the corrective action. Paragraph 2.2.2 Expanded requirement to include auditing any site activity affecting plant safety. Paragraph 2.4.2 New paragraph inserted to require auditing of indoctri-nation and training programs for qualifying QA person-nel. Paragraph 2.4.3 Formerly Paragraph 2.4.2. Paragraph 4.0 Added statement that all quality related activities performed by SVEC on their contractors, suppliers, and service suppliers are subj ect to NUSCO audit inspec-tion / surveillance. Revision D (found in manual edition - Table of Contents, Revision D). Paragraph 4.0 Added NUSCO requirement to conduct post audit confer-ences. Revision E (found in manual editions - Table of Contents, Revisions E and F).
.See " Generic Changes" Hanual Edition - Table of Contents, Revision E, page 4.
B4-12179-6213 22
--_ _- . . _ . _ ..___ __ _ .._ _ - .._. _ _ ~ - - - - _.
o -
. e e SECTION 19 CONTROL OF THE QA PROGRAM MANUAL Revision A (found in manual edition - Table of Contents. Revision B). Based on SWSQAP 1-74A, Revision N/A.
Revision B (found in maaual editions - Table of Contents, Revisions C, D, and E). Paragraph 1.1 Paragraph rewritten te relate only to the SWEC Standard QA Progran and to include the requirenent to fu rnish analysis of revisions to the Director of Licensing. Paragraph 1.2 Paragraph rewr itten to relate to the Project Progran Manual and to include the requirement to furnish analy-sis of revisions to the Director of Licensing. Paragraph 1.3 New paragraph inserted to impose requirement on VP, QA to review progran at least annually. Paragraph'1.4 This paragraph and associated subsections were formerly Paragraph 1.3 and were renumbered to accommodate new insert. Pa rag raph 2. 2 Changed frcin "all manual holders shall" to "all progran document holders shall." Paragraph 2. 2.4 Deleted special note for Superintendent FQC to retain
~ superseded material which is redundant to re quiremen t contained in Section 17.
Revision C (found in manual edition - Table of Contents, Revision F). Text and fonna t were revised to be based on Section 19 to SWSQAP, Revision C. Para-graphs 1.1 (Projects. adopting SWSQAP without preparing a PQAPM) and 1.5 (Projects adopting SWSQAP without preparing a P@PM) frcan SWSQAP were not included due to their inapplicability to the Project. B4-12179-6213 23
., L APPENDIX I IMPLEMENTING DOCUMENTS Revision A (found in manual edition - Table of Contents, Revision B). Based on SWSQAP l-74A, Revision N/A.
Revision B (found in manual editions - Table of Contents, Revisions C and D). Revised matrix to reflect Proj ect Program manual and pending publication of Quality Standards and Directives to replace NDT and PQC Manuals. Revision C '(found in manual edition - Table of Contents, Revision E). Updated matrix to reflect the following:
- a. Replaced ML-3 Program Manual with SWSQAP Manual.
- b. Replaced SWEC NDT and PQC Manual with SWEC Quality Assurance Directives Manual and Quality Control Instructions Manual and deleted replacement note,
- c. 'Added SWEC Construction Methods Procedures Manual, Calibration Manual, Project Manual, and Project Test Program Manual.
- d. Updated ASME III Manual correlations.
Revision D (found in manual edition - Table of Contents, Revision F). The matrix from Revision C of SWSQAP 1-74A was used in this revision. This caused the following changes:
- a. Added Project Quality Assurance Program Manual to SWSQAP.
- b. Changed " Project Test Program Manual" to " Standard Nuclear Test Program Directives (or Project TPDs)."
- c. Added ASME Section III, Division II, Manual.
Additionally, a Client consideration section was added which took exception
-to "b" and "c" above.
I B4-12179-6213 24
- o APPENDIX II QUALIFICATION AND EXPERIENCE REQUIREMENTS STONE & WEBSTER QUALITY ASSURANCE PERSONNEL Revision A (found in manual edition - Table of Contents, Revision B). Based on SWSQAP 1-74A, Revision N/A. Revision B (found in manual editions - Table of Contents, Revisions C and D). Updated listing to reflect title changes and include additional position titles with experience requirements. Revision C (found in manual edition - Table of Contents, Revision E). Updated to reflect title changes and included additional titles with appropriate experience and qualification requirements. Revision D (found in manual edition - Table of Contents, Revisfor F). The requirements from SWSQAP 1-74A, Revision C, Appendix II, were published as this revision. A statement in which SWEC management retains the prerogative to assign personnel within the established guidelines was added, as well as additional titles and their corresponding education and experience guidelines. B4-12179-6213 25
)
,, a APPENDIX III GLOSSARY Revision A (found in manual edition - Table of Contents, Revision B). Appendix contained listing of Category I structures, systems, and components in lieu of the glossary contained in Appendix III of SWSQAP. The glossary for the project was contained in Appendix IV of the PQAPM.
Revision B (found in manual edition - Table of Contents, Revisions C&D). Deleted the Cateeory I listing as inappropriate to this document and replaced the text with the glossary (Appendix IV - Revision level B). Revision C (found in manual edition - Table of Contents, Revision E). Glossa ry has been revised to agree with organizational, departmental, and individual title changes described in revisions of the preceeding sections of this manual. Revision D (found in manual edition - Table of Contents, Revision F). Appendix III of SWSQAP 1-74A, Revision C, was published as this revision. This clarified the glossary and brought the definitions into conformance with source documents. B4-12179-6213 - 26 ( l
-v
\
u APPENDIX IV ENGINEER 1,NG DESIGN REVIEW Revision A (found in manual edition - Table of Contents, Revision B) based on "Clossary" contained in Appendix III of SWSQAP 1-74A Revision N/A. This text was relocated to Appendix III during the next revision. Revision N/A (first issue found in manual editions - Table of Contents, Revi-sions C and D). Added a flow chart of the review process described in Section 3. Revision A (found in manual edition - Table of Contents, Revision E). Updated reference from Atomic Energy Commission (AEC) to Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC) in Licensing phase. Revision B (found in manual edition - Table of Contents, Revision F). Changed "AEC" to "NRC" in input listing to conceptual engineering and indicated this change as a Client consideration. B4-12179-6213 27
o- .o s s
- APPENDIX V SPECIFIL. TION AND BIDDERS REVIEW Revision N/A (initial issue found in manual editions - Table of Contents, Revi-sions C, D, E, and F). Added flow chart of the review process described in Section 4.
e B4-12179-6213 28 i
a r
,s o APPENDIX VI APPROVALS AND CONCURRENCE FOR QUALITY ASSURANCE SYbTEM DOCUMENTATION Revision N/A (initial issue found in manual editions - Table of Contents, Revi-sions C and D). Added a listing of approval and concurrence requirements for Quality Assurance Department procedures.
Revision A (found in manual edition - Table of Contents, Revision E). I. Under Program Documents;
- a. added Project Test Progran Manual
- b. changed the title of the "ASME Section III Manual" to " Company Quality Assurance and Control Manual, ASME Section III."
II. Under Procedural Documents:
- a. deleted items 2, 3, and 5 fran the previoua revision. These procedures have been incorporated in to the Quality As surance Directive Manual
- b. added the Calibration Manual, Project Manual, Standard Construc-tion Methods Procedure Manual and the Project Construction &thods Procedure Manual
- c. upd a ted the approval / concurrence requ iremen ts for the following procedure s to be consistent with the re quirements specified in SWSQAP, Revision C
, Quality Standards
. Quality Assurance Directives
. Qaulity Control Instructions
. Engineering Assurance Procedures Revision B (found in manual edition - Table of Contents, Revision F) . Apper.-
dix VI of SWSQAP 1-74A, Revision C, was published as this revision. This updated manual ti tle s, organization and personnel titles to conform to changes in the Program Manual text. In Client considerations, two additional procedural docu-ments with corresponding approval re quirement s were listed and Engineering Managemen t Guidelines were dele ted and replaced with Engineering De par tmen t Procedures. B4-12179-6213 29 L -
y cw
,% =
APPENDIX VII RESPONSE TO REGULATORY GUIDES Revision N/A (initial issue found in manuel editions - Table of Contents, Revi-sions C, D, and E). Added details of SWEC responses to Regulatory Guides, WASH 1283, Revision 1, WASH 1309, and Regulatory Guide 1.70.6. Revision A (found in manual edition - Table of Contents, Revision F). Included the following NUSCO requirements under " Client Considerations:"
- a. Commitment to comply with Regulatory Guide 1.123, Revision 1.
- b. Commitment to comply with ANSI N45.2.5, Draft 3, Revision 4, January 1974 modified to replace Section 4.8 with Section 6.11 frca N45.2.5-1978.
- c. Commitment to comply with ANSI N45.2.12, Draft 4, Revision 1, November 1, 1974, replaced with commitment to comply with N45.2.12, Draft 3, Revision 4, February 4, 1974. Alternative methods are listed for complying with the requirements to conduct annual audits of approved Sellers and to conduct audit confer-enCes.
B4-12179-6213 30 J}}