ML053220399

From kanterella
Revision as of 12:12, 23 March 2020 by StriderTol (talk | contribs) (StriderTol Bot insert)
(diff) ← Older revision | Latest revision (diff) | Newer revision → (diff)
Jump to navigation Jump to search
Allegation Review Board Dispostion Record, Regarding Allegation R1-2002-A-0113.Allegation Review Board Disposition Record, Regarding Allegation R1-2002-A-0113
ML053220399
Person / Time
Site: Salem, Hope Creek  PSEG icon.png
Issue date: 09/22/2003
From:
NRC Region 1
To:
References
1-2002-A-0113, FOIA/PA-2004-0191
Download: ML053220399 (1)


Text

  • g:\alleg\panel\2002011I3arb6.wpd ALLEGATION REVIEW BOARD DISPOSITION RECORD Allegation No.: RI-2002-A-011'3 Branch Chief (AOC):,Meyer Site/Facility: 'Salem & Hope Creek Ackno'wledged: Yes' ARB Date: 9122103 Confidentiality Granted: No I Issu6edisciusse6d: The alleger w;as orilginally concerned withmjbility to perform .duties In rda'nce' with the Transient
  • Assessnient Response Plan (TAR-P tem formation procedure. Wheni contace by0~h'sie-q6t be' interviewed 'and s hWould

.td tiy to resolve nchems within the PSEG corwct~ive ~6io prcs. NRC Issue d a 66nditional closeout etetothe alle er taling that the NRC'will conslder this allegation lsduls~tcsu within 30 days of the date of the Ietter.f Idcontact NRC In i Novembiter~ 20.- 2002, letter and stated ih t~nte'd the'NRC to' keep the issue' open. A ..

Inatelephone call and subsequent letter dated12/20/02. the alleger wanted the NRC to pursue claim and w~anted

&iIl to address the TARP Issue. 4-'

DRP reviewed a 2)19103 01 transcript (prevlously'complieited) ~ani thie final 01 Report (01 Cas-nio.1-2003-010) and did not identify any new technical Issues. Intheir final report, 01 did -not~substanitiate -that H&i took place.

In a 912)03 information package, the alleger lndii~ted "thatP1SEG Is howing acontinuing ate of dsrmnto i he/sbelIstakIngimedication that precludes him/hef frop beling on the'TARP team (Medical Departmient at PSE.G is al~vare) but yet the Individual re~elved an un'satisifacitory- mld-yelzr performance appraiisal on 8/28/03.

Alleger contacted prior to referral to Iiensee`(if 'applicable)? Yes ALLEGATION REVIEW BOARD DECISIONS Attendees: Chair - Crleniak -Branch Chief (AOC) - Barber SAC -Vito. Harrison 01 Rep.,- Wilson'. "RI Counsel - Farrar Others - Conte, Caron. Holody DISPOSITIO~ ACTIONS:.

1).  ;DRP.,completed review. of -the 913/03 iniformation package and did not identify any new

-technical issues.

Respons~ible Person: --,Bar'ber ECD: 09/22/03 Closure Documentation:- Completed: 09/11/03

2) 01 to reiview the :9/3/03- informhation .package to de'termine if the unsatisfactory mid-year*

performance appraisal related -to hi/e naeeti rtce'atvties'. Provide documentation of review to SAC.b~y-e_7-i-a'il for file.

Responsible Person:.-%- Wils6n/Mo'nroe ECD: -9/26/03 Closure Docum'hentation: C A 44l4cr wadeee SAF~lY SINIFICANCEini accordance with the Fre~noIfrnan ASESMET:Act exemptworis .L+/--

PRIORITY OF 01 INVESTIGATION: - IA-.

Allbeger initially declined tohave the NRC Pursue his discriminationi-issue. ,Thus, -the -oriia 0 Case (120-3)ws os'ed sind'hdal~egerdid 'rnot want to beTtriwdn 6ged no injrediate safety iJus5cse whe~n scoitate b-yOL' le"tte'r,io in22 'i~technical

i forpain a p~rovidedit6Warrant ras bing0's prirt "nhiscse.-L~ate~r', -libsherequested tat 01Pusue HS.Ii hi eort, b1 did noti subst-antiate "thatH&I fo--ie.

rina ARB'MINUTES'ARE REVIEWED AN1A3TE rf