ML053220399
| ML053220399 | |
| Person / Time | |
|---|---|
| Site: | Salem, Hope Creek  |
| Issue date: | 09/22/2003 |
| From: | NRC Region 1 |
| To: | |
| References | |
| 1-2002-A-0113, FOIA/PA-2004-0191 | |
| Download: ML053220399 (1) | |
Text
- g:\\alleg\\panel\\2002011I3arb6.wpd ALLEGATION REVIEW BOARD DISPOSITION RECORD Allegation No.: RI-2002-A-011'3 Branch Chief (AOC):,Meyer Site/Facility: 'Salem & Hope Creek Ackno'wledged: Yes' ARB Date: 9122103 Confidentiality Granted: No I
Issu6edisciusse6d: The alleger w;as orilginally concerned withmjbility to perform.duties In rda'nce' with the Transient
- Assessnient Response Plan (TAR-P tem formation procedure. Wheni contace by0~h'sie-q6t be' interviewed 'and s
.td hWould tiy to resolve nchems within the PSEG corwct~ive ~6io prcs.
NRC Issue d a 66nditional closeout etetothe alle er taling that the NRC'will conslder this allegation lsduls~tcsu within 30 days of the date of the Ietter.f Id contact NRC In i Novembiter~ 20.- 2002, letter and stated ih t~nte'd the'NRC to' keep the issue' open.
A In atelephone call and subsequent letter dated12/20/02. the alleger wanted the NRC to pursue
&iIl claim and w~anted to address the TARP Issue.
4-'
DRP reviewed a 2)19103 01 transcript (prevlously'complieited) ~ani thie final 01 Report (01 Cas-nio.1-2003-010) and did not identify any new technical Issues. In their final report, 01 did -not ~substanitiate -that H&i took place.
In a 912)03 information packa ge, the alleger lndii~ted "thatP1SEG Is howing acontinuing ate of dsrmnto i
he/sbelIstakIngi medication that precludes him/hef frop beling on the'TARP team (Medical Departmient at PSE.G is al~vare) but yet the Individual re~elved an un'satisifacitory-mld-yelzr performance appraiisal on 8/28/03.
Alleger contacted prior to referral to Iiensee`(if 'applicable)?
Yes ALLEGATION REVIEW BOARD DECISIONS Attendees: Chair - Crleniak -Branch Chief (AOC) - Barber SAC -Vito.
Harrison 01 Rep.,- Wilson'. "RI Counsel - Farrar Others - Conte, Caron. Holody DISPOSITIO~ ACTIONS:.
1).
- DRP.,completed review. of -the 913/03 iniformation package and did not identify any new
-technical issues.
Respons~ible Person: --,Bar'ber ECD:
09/22/03 Closure Documentation: -
Completed: 09/11/03
- 2) 01 to reiview the :9/3/03-informhation.package to de'termine if the unsatisfactory mid-year*
performance appraisal related -to hi/e naeeti rtce'atvties'.
Provide documentation of review to SAC.b~y-e_7-i-a'il for file.
Responsible Person:.-%- Wils6n/Mo'nroe ECD: -9/26/03 Closure Docum'hentation:
C A 44l4cr wadeee SAF~lY SINIFICANCEini accordance with the Fre~noIfrnan ASESMET:Act exemptworis
.L+/--
PRIORITY OF 01 INVESTIGATION:
IA-.
Allbeger initially declined tohave the NRC Pursue his discriminationi-issue.,Thus, -the -oriia 0 Case (120-3)ws os'ed sind'hdal~egerdid 'rnot want to beTtriwdn 6ged no injrediate safety iJus5cse whe~n scoitate b-yOL' in22 le"tte'r,io
'i~technical
- i forpain a p~rovidedi t6Warrant ras bing0's prirt "nhis cse.-L~ate~r', -libsherequested tat 01Pusue HS.Ii hi rina eort, b1 did noti subst-antiate "that H&I fo--ie.
ARB'MINUTES'ARE REVIEWED AN1A3TE rf