|
---|
Category:General FR Notice Comment Letter
MONTHYEARML19087A2182019-03-0707 March 2019 Comment (7) of John Gauley on PSDAR License Transfer Application -Entergy to Holtec at Pilgrim Nuclear Power Plant ML19065A1932019-03-0404 March 2019 Comment (10) of J. B. Lampert on Pilgrim Nuclear Power Station; Consideration of Approval of Transfer of License and Conforming Amendment ML19065A1962019-03-0404 March 2019 Comment (11) of Guy Page on Pilgrim Nuclear Power Station; Consideration of Approval of Transfer of License and Conforming Amendment ML19065A1982019-03-0404 March 2019 Comment (12) of Brad Ferland on Pilgrim Nuclear Power Station; Consideration of Approval of Transfer of License and Conforming Amendment ML19065A1882019-03-0303 March 2019 Comment (8) of Mary Gatslick on Pilgrim Nuclear Power Station; Consideration of Approval of Transfer of License and Conforming Amendment ML19065A1922019-03-0303 March 2019 Comment (9) of James B. Lampert on Pilgrim Nuclear Power Station; Consideration of Approval of Transfer of License and Conforming Amendment ML19065A1802019-03-0101 March 2019 Comment (6) of David Noyes Supporting Pilgrim Nuclear Power Station; Consideration of Approval of Transfer of License and Conforming Amendment ML19065A1872019-03-0101 March 2019 Comment (7) of Henrietta Cosentino on Pilgrim Nuclear Power Station; Consideration of Approval of Transfer of License and Conforming Amendment ML19059A0232019-02-27027 February 2019 Comment (5) of Rebecca Chin on Pilgrim Nuclear Power Station; Consideration of Approval of Transfer of License and Conforming Amendment ML19057A1882019-02-24024 February 2019 Comment (3) of Anonymous Individual on Pilgrim Nuclear Power Station; Consideration of Approval of Transfer of License and Conforming Amendment ML19057A1902019-02-24024 February 2019 Comment (4) from Anonymous Regarding Pilgrim Nuclear Power Station; Consideration of Approval of Transfer of License and Conforming Amendment ML19046A0172019-02-13013 February 2019 Comment (2) from Anonymous on Pilgrim Nuclear Power Station; Consideration of Approval of Transfer of License and Conforming Amendment ML19057A1852019-02-13013 February 2019 Comment (1) from Anonymous on Entergy Nuclear Operations, Inc.; Pilgrim Nuclear Power Station ML19032A0732019-01-31031 January 2019 Comment (1) from Anonymous on Pilgrim Nuclear Power Station; Consideration of Approval of Transfer of License and Conforming Amendment ML18191B1332018-07-0606 July 2018 Comment (83) of Anonymous on Draft Letter to the Nuclear Energy Institute Regarding the Clarification of Regulatory Paths for Lead Test Assemblies ML18187A2052018-07-0505 July 2018 Comment (21) of Mary Lampert & Rebecca Chin on Draft Letter to Nuclear Energy Institute Regarding Clarification of Regulatory Paths for Lead Test Assemblies ML18187A3432018-07-0505 July 2018 Comment (46) of James Garb on Draft Letter to the Nuclear Energy Institute Regarding the Clarification of Regulatory Paths for Lead Test Assemblies ML14304A5432014-10-25025 October 2014 Comment (00004) of Heather Lightner on Entergy Nuclear Operations, Inc.; Pilgrim Nuclear Power Station; Extension of Public Comment Period ML14281A2572014-09-25025 September 2014 Comment (00002) of David Lochbaum on Entergy Nuclear Operations, Inc.; Pilgrim Nuclear Power Station ML14107A0222014-04-0808 April 2014 Comment (15) of Janet Azarovitz on Emergency Planning Exemption Requests for Decommissioning Nuclear Power Plants ML13007A4062013-01-0202 January 2013 Comment (136) of Thomas J. Calter, State Representative on Environmental Impacts of Temporary Storage of Spent Fuel After Cessation of Reactor Operation ML1001302102010-01-12012 January 2010 Comment (05) of Mary Lampert on Behalf of Pilgrim Watch on Revisions to Environmental Review for Renewal of Nuclear Power Plant Operating License ML0804203042008-01-21021 January 2008 Comment (1) of Tom Gurdziel Opposing the Inclusion of Vermont Yankee, Indian Point Unit 1, Indian Point Unit 2, and Indian Point Unit 3 in a Holding Company Owned by Entergy ML0729604572007-10-12012 October 2007 Comment (28) of Susan Shapiro on Behalf of Friends United for Sustainable Energy USA, Inc., Supporting Environmental Impact Statement and Scoping Process of Indian Point, Units 2 and 3 ML0706601332007-02-28028 February 2007 Comments (9) of Diane Curran and Matthew Brock on Behalf of Massachusetts Attorney General Martha Coakley Opposing Draft Supplemental 29 to Generic EIS for License Renewal of Pilgrim Nuclear Power Plant ML0706603262007-02-28028 February 2007 Comment (15) of Robert S. Knorr on the Draft Supplemental Environmental Impact Statement on the Pilgrim Nuclear Power Station Located in Plymouth Massachusetts (NUREG-1437, Supplement 29) ML0706601352007-02-28028 February 2007 Comment (10) of Robert W. Varney on Behalf of United States Environmental Protection Agency, Region 1 Regarding Generic Environmental Impact Statement for License Renewal of Nuclear Power Plants Supplement 29 Regarding Pilgrim Nuclear Power ML0706602732007-02-28028 February 2007 Comment (11) of Pine Dubois on Behalf of Jones River Watershed Association on Nrc'S NUREG-1437, Supplement 29 Draft Report Regarding Pilgrim Nuclear Power Station ML0706602932007-02-28028 February 2007 Comment (14) of Diana L. Woebcke Opposing Application Renewal for Pilgrim Nuclear Power Station ML0706602402007-02-28028 February 2007 Comment (13) of Brian Thurber, Frank Gorke and Alyssa Schuren Opposing the NUREG-1437, Supplement 29 Draft ML0706602852007-02-28028 February 2007 Comment (12) of Paul E. Mccormack Opposed to Permanent Storage of Nuclear Waste at Pilgrim Nuclear Power Plant ML0706601222007-02-27027 February 2007 Comment (8) of Millie Morrison Opposing Relicensing of Pilgrim Nuclear Power Station ML0706600592007-02-27027 February 2007 Comment (17) of Mary Osborn Opposing Relicensing of Pilgrim Nuclear Power Plant (NUREG-1437, Suppl. 29) ML0706600792007-02-27027 February 2007 Comment (16) of Stephen J. Bethay, on Behalf of Entergy Nuclear Operations, Inc., on NUREG-1437, Supplement 29, Regarding Generic Environmental Impact Statement for License Renewal of Pilgrim Nuclear Power Station ML0706601172007-02-25025 February 2007 Comment (7) of Lilias Cingolani Opposing Re-Licensing of Pilgrim Nuclear Plant in 2008 ML0706601142007-02-23023 February 2007 Comment (6) of Rebecca Chin Opposing Re-Licensing of Pilgrim Nuclear Plant in 2008 ML0706601072007-02-18018 February 2007 Comment (5) of Heidi Mayo Opposing Draft Supplemental Environmental Review of NUREG-1437, Supplement 29 ML0704704062007-02-14014 February 2007 Comment (4) of Mary Lampert on Behalf of Pilgrim Watch Regarding Draft NUREG-1437, Supplement 29 ML0704302632007-02-0505 February 2007 Comment (3) of Mary Lampert on Draft Supplemental Environmental Review - Draft NUREG-1437, Supplement 29 -Summary ML0704302602007-01-28028 January 2007 Comment (2) of Rebecca Hall Opposing the Re-Licensing of Pilgrim Nuclear Plant in 2008 ML0704302542007-01-18018 January 2007 Comment (1) of Joan Bartlett Re Pilgrim Power Plan in Plymouth, Requesting Part of the Negotiations Between Entergy and Town of Plymouth Include Preservation of Entergy Land So That for Safety Reasons, No More Development Will Take Place Ne ML0630703232006-06-26026 June 2006 E-MaiI: Fwd: Comment (1) of Alex Marion on Behalf of Nuclear Energy Institute (NEI) on Proposed ISG LR-ISG-2006-01 ML0617703952006-06-20020 June 2006 2006/06/20-Comment (5) of Frank Gorke and Stephanie Abrahams on Scope of Environmental Review for the Pilgrim Nuclear Power Station License Renewal Application - Federal Register Notice, April 14, 2006 ML0617700452006-06-16016 June 2006 Comment (7) of Elizabeth A. Higgins, Re Scoping Comments in Response to Notice of Intent to Prepare Environmental Impact Statement for Pilgrim Nuclear Power Station in Plymouth, Massachusetts ML0617700432006-06-16016 June 2006 Comment (4) of Sheila S. Hollis, Re Pilgrim Power Station Regarding Renewal of Facility Operating License DPR-35 for a 20 Year Period ML0617702772006-06-15015 June 2006 2006/06/15-Comment (3) of Diane Curran, and Matthew Brock, Re EIS Scoping Process for Pilgrim Nuclear Plant License Renewal, Proceeding, 71 Fed. Reg. 19,554 (April 14, 2006) ML0617704072006-06-15015 June 2006 2006/06/15-Comment (6) of R. J. Chin, H Chang, M. Lampert, M. Morrison, & B. Pye on Scope of Environmental Review for the Pilgrim Nuclear Power Station'S License Renewal Application-Federal Register Notice, April 14, 2006 ML0617101042006-06-14014 June 2006 2006/06/14-Comment (2) of Mary Lampert on Behalf of Pilgrim Watch Regarding Scope of the Environmental Review for Pilgrim License Renewal Application - Direct Torus Vent System ML0616701012006-06-12012 June 2006 2006/06/12-Comment (1) of Mary Lampert, Re Scope of the Environmental Review for Pilgrim'S License Renewal Application ML0511202392005-04-15015 April 2005 Comment (3) of Mary Lampert, Deborah Katz, Rochelle Becker, Brendan Hoffman, David Agnew, Jed Thorp and Jim Warren on Federal Register Notice Dated 02/28/2005 Re Station Blackout Risk Evaluation for Nuclear Power Plants (Draft), January 200 2019-03-07
[Table view] |
Text
Page 1 of 1 Doris Mendiola - Pilgrim Watch- Draft NUREG-1437, Supplement 29 -Add itional Comment From: "Mary Lampert" <mary.lampert@comcast.net>
To: <PilgrimEIS @nrc.gov>
Date: 02/14/2007 5:14 PM
Subject:
Pilgrim Watch- Draft NUREG-1437, Supplement 29 -Add itional Comment Pilgrim Watch requests that the attached additional comment is added to comments we submitted on the Draft Supplemental Environmental Review (SEIS), February 5, 2007.
Please acknowledge receipt by return email.
Thank-you, Mary
_II C__
1 rn
~zJ CID
&z)1A) file://C:\temp\GW )0000 I.HTM 02/15/2007
Pilgrim Watch 148 Washington St., Duxbury MA 02332 Tel 781-934-0389 Fax 781-934-5579 E-Mail Mary.Lampert@comcast.net February 14, 2007 DRAFT SUPPLEMENTAL ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW (SEIS) -
Draft NUREG-1437, Supplement 29 -Additional Comment Pilgrim Watch requests that the following additional comment is added to comments we submitted on the Draft Supplemental Environmental Review (SEIS), February 5, 2007.
I. RADIOLOGICAL IMPACTS ON HUMAN HEALTH [4.2.2]
The Draft SEIS states the following:
4.2.2 Electromagnetic Fields-Chronic Effects In the GELS, the chronic effects of 60 hertz electromagnetic fields from power lines were not designated as Category 1 or 2, and will not be until a scientific consensus Is reached on the health Implications of these fields.
The potential for chronic effects from these fields continues to be studied and is not known at this time. The National Institute of Environmental Health Sciences (NIEHS) directs related research through the U.S. Department of Energy (DOE). The 1999 report of the NIEHS and DOE Working Group (Portler and Wolfe 1999) contains the following conclusion:
The NIEHS concludes that ELF-EMF (extremely low frequency-electromagnetic field) exposure cannot be recognized as entirely safe because of weak scientific evidence that exposure may pose a leukemia hazard. In our opinion, this finding Is Insufficient to warrant aggressive regulatory concern. However, because virtually everyone in the United States uses electricity and therefore Is routinely exposed to ELF-EMF, passive regulatory action is warranted such as a continued emphasis on educating both the public and the regulated community on means aimed at reducing exposures. The NIEHS does not believe that other cancers or non-cancer health outcomes provide sufficient evidence of a risk to currently warrant concern.
This statement Is not sufficient to cause the staff to change Its position with respect to the chronic effects of electromagnetic fields. The staff considers the GElS finding of "not applicable" still appropriate and continues to follow developments on this Issue.
i , 4 Pilgrim Watch disagrees with the staff's conclusion. The Draft SEIS states that, "The NIEHS concludes that ELF-EMF (electromagnetic fields from power lines) exposure cannot be recognized as entirely safe because of weak scientific evidence that exposure may pose a leukemia hazard." Pilgrim Watch argues that the evidence is not weak at all. In fact, the epidemiologic evidence is quite strong- virtually all studies, and there have been many, of this issue have found evidence that living within some distance of power lines increases the risk of childhood leukemia. It is very notable that not one but two pooled analyses, in which the results of multiple studies are statistically combined, have found evidence of a significant risk.1 The fact that we don't know why this happens mechanistically is irrelevant in light of such strong statistical evidence.
Therefore the chronic effects of electromagnetic fields should be considered; and especially as it adds to the cumulative health impact and burden on the population exposed to Pilgrim's releases of ionizing radiation.
Submitted by, Mary Mary Lampert Pilgrim Watch, Director 148 Washington Street, Duxbury MA 02332
'Greenland S, Sheppard AR, Kaune WT, Poole C, Kelsh MA, A pooled analysis of magnetic fields, wire codes, and childhood leukemia, Childhood Leukemia-EMF Study Group Epidemiology. 2000 Nov; 11(6):624-34. Review; and Ahlbom A, Day N, Feychting M, Roman E, Skinner J, Dockerty J, Linet M,McBride M, Michaelis J, Olsen JH, Tynes T, Verkasalo PK., A pooled analysis of magnetic fields and childhood leukaemia, Br J Cancer. 2000 Sep; 83(5):692-8.
2