|
|---|
Category:General FR Notice Comment Letter
MONTHYEARML19087A2182019-03-0707 March 2019
Comment (7) of John Gauley on PSDAR License Transfer Application -Entergy to Holtec at Pilgrim Nuclear Power Plant
ML19065A1932019-03-0404 March 2019
Comment (10) of J. B. Lampert on Pilgrim Nuclear Power Station; Consideration of Approval of Transfer of License and Conforming Amendment
ML19065A1962019-03-0404 March 2019
Comment (11) of Guy Page on Pilgrim Nuclear Power Station; Consideration of Approval of Transfer of License and Conforming Amendment
ML19065A1982019-03-0404 March 2019
Comment (12) of Brad Ferland on Pilgrim Nuclear Power Station; Consideration of Approval of Transfer of License and Conforming Amendment
ML19065A1882019-03-0303 March 2019
Comment (8) of Mary Gatslick on Pilgrim Nuclear Power Station; Consideration of Approval of Transfer of License and Conforming Amendment
ML19065A1922019-03-0303 March 2019
Comment (9) of James B. Lampert on Pilgrim Nuclear Power Station; Consideration of Approval of Transfer of License and Conforming Amendment
ML19065A1802019-03-0101 March 2019
Comment (6) of David Noyes Supporting Pilgrim Nuclear Power Station; Consideration of Approval of Transfer of License and Conforming Amendment
ML19065A1872019-03-0101 March 2019
Comment (7) of Henrietta Cosentino on Pilgrim Nuclear Power Station; Consideration of Approval of Transfer of License and Conforming Amendment
ML19059A0232019-02-27027 February 2019
Comment (5) of Rebecca Chin on Pilgrim Nuclear Power Station; Consideration of Approval of Transfer of License and Conforming Amendment
ML19057A1882019-02-24024 February 2019
Comment (3) of Anonymous Individual on Pilgrim Nuclear Power Station; Consideration of Approval of Transfer of License and Conforming Amendment
ML19057A1902019-02-24024 February 2019
Comment (4) from Anonymous Regarding Pilgrim Nuclear Power Station; Consideration of Approval of Transfer of License and Conforming Amendment
ML19046A0172019-02-13013 February 2019
Comment (2) from Anonymous on Pilgrim Nuclear Power Station; Consideration of Approval of Transfer of License and Conforming Amendment
ML19057A1852019-02-13013 February 2019
Comment (1) from Anonymous on Entergy Nuclear Operations, Inc.; Pilgrim Nuclear Power Station
ML19032A0732019-01-31031 January 2019
Comment (1) from Anonymous on Pilgrim Nuclear Power Station; Consideration of Approval of Transfer of License and Conforming Amendment
ML18191B1332018-07-0606 July 2018
Comment (83) of Anonymous on Draft Letter to the Nuclear Energy Institute Regarding the Clarification of Regulatory Paths for Lead Test Assemblies
ML18187A2052018-07-0505 July 2018
Comment (21) of Mary Lampert & Rebecca Chin on Draft Letter to Nuclear Energy Institute Regarding Clarification of Regulatory Paths for Lead Test Assemblies
ML18187A3432018-07-0505 July 2018
Comment (46) of James Garb on Draft Letter to the Nuclear Energy Institute Regarding the Clarification of Regulatory Paths for Lead Test Assemblies
ML14304A5432014-10-25025 October 2014
Comment (00004) of Heather Lightner on Entergy Nuclear Operations, Inc.; Pilgrim Nuclear Power Station; Extension of Public Comment Period
ML14281A2572014-09-25025 September 2014
Comment (00002) of David Lochbaum on Entergy Nuclear Operations, Inc.; Pilgrim Nuclear Power Station
ML14107A0222014-04-0808 April 2014
Comment (15) of Janet Azarovitz on Emergency Planning Exemption Requests for Decommissioning Nuclear Power Plants
ML13007A4062013-01-0202 January 2013
Comment (136) of Thomas J. Calter, State Representative on Environmental Impacts of Temporary Storage of Spent Fuel After Cessation of Reactor Operation
ML1001302102010-01-12012 January 2010
Comment (05) of Mary Lampert on Behalf of Pilgrim Watch on Revisions to Environmental Review for Renewal of Nuclear Power Plant Operating License
ML0804203042008-01-21021 January 2008
Comment (1) of Tom Gurdziel Opposing the Inclusion of Vermont Yankee, Indian Point Unit 1, Indian Point Unit 2, and Indian Point Unit 3 in a Holding Company Owned by Entergy
ML0729604572007-10-12012 October 2007
Comment (28) of Susan Shapiro on Behalf of Friends United for Sustainable Energy USA, Inc., Supporting Environmental Impact Statement and Scoping Process of Indian Point, Units 2 and 3
ML0706601332007-02-28028 February 2007
Comments (9) of Diane Curran and Matthew Brock on Behalf of Massachusetts Attorney General Martha Coakley Opposing Draft Supplemental 29 to Generic EIS for License Renewal of Pilgrim Nuclear Power Plant
ML0706603262007-02-28028 February 2007
Comment (15) of Robert S. Knorr on the Draft Supplemental Environmental Impact Statement on the Pilgrim Nuclear Power Station Located in Plymouth Massachusetts (NUREG-1437, Supplement 29)
ML0706601352007-02-28028 February 2007
Comment (10) of Robert W. Varney on Behalf of United States Environmental Protection Agency, Region 1 Regarding Generic Environmental Impact Statement for License Renewal of Nuclear Power Plants Supplement 29 Regarding Pilgrim Nuclear Power
ML0706602732007-02-28028 February 2007
Comment (11) of Pine Dubois on Behalf of Jones River Watershed Association on Nrc'S NUREG-1437, Supplement 29 Draft Report Regarding Pilgrim Nuclear Power Station
ML0706602932007-02-28028 February 2007
Comment (14) of Diana L. Woebcke Opposing Application Renewal for Pilgrim Nuclear Power Station
ML0706602402007-02-28028 February 2007
Comment (13) of Brian Thurber, Frank Gorke and Alyssa Schuren Opposing the NUREG-1437, Supplement 29 Draft
ML0706602852007-02-28028 February 2007
Comment (12) of Paul E. Mccormack Opposed to Permanent Storage of Nuclear Waste at Pilgrim Nuclear Power Plant
ML0706601222007-02-27027 February 2007
Comment (8) of Millie Morrison Opposing Relicensing of Pilgrim Nuclear Power Station
ML0706600592007-02-27027 February 2007
Comment (17) of Mary Osborn Opposing Relicensing of Pilgrim Nuclear Power Plant (NUREG-1437, Suppl. 29)
ML0706600792007-02-27027 February 2007
Comment (16) of Stephen J. Bethay, on Behalf of Entergy Nuclear Operations, Inc., on NUREG-1437, Supplement 29, Regarding Generic Environmental Impact Statement for License Renewal of Pilgrim Nuclear Power Station
ML0706601172007-02-25025 February 2007
Comment (7) of Lilias Cingolani Opposing Re-Licensing of Pilgrim Nuclear Plant in 2008
ML0706601142007-02-23023 February 2007
Comment (6) of Rebecca Chin Opposing Re-Licensing of Pilgrim Nuclear Plant in 2008
ML0706601072007-02-18018 February 2007
Comment (5) of Heidi Mayo Opposing Draft Supplemental Environmental Review of NUREG-1437, Supplement 29
ML0704704062007-02-14014 February 2007
Comment (4) of Mary Lampert on Behalf of Pilgrim Watch Regarding Draft NUREG-1437, Supplement 29
ML0704302632007-02-0505 February 2007
Comment (3) of Mary Lampert on Draft Supplemental Environmental Review - Draft NUREG-1437, Supplement 29 -Summary
ML0704302602007-01-28028 January 2007
Comment (2) of Rebecca Hall Opposing the Re-Licensing of Pilgrim Nuclear Plant in 2008
ML0704302542007-01-18018 January 2007
Comment (1) of Joan Bartlett Re Pilgrim Power Plan in Plymouth, Requesting Part of the Negotiations Between Entergy and Town of Plymouth Include Preservation of Entergy Land So That for Safety Reasons, No More Development Will Take Place Ne
ML0630703232006-06-26026 June 2006
E-MaiI: Fwd: Comment (1) of Alex Marion on Behalf of Nuclear Energy Institute (NEI) on Proposed ISG LR-ISG-2006-01
ML0617703952006-06-20020 June 2006
2006/06/20-Comment (5) of Frank Gorke and Stephanie Abrahams on Scope of Environmental Review for the Pilgrim Nuclear Power Station License Renewal Application - Federal Register Notice, April 14, 2006
ML0617700452006-06-16016 June 2006
Comment (7) of Elizabeth A. Higgins, Re Scoping Comments in Response to Notice of Intent to Prepare Environmental Impact Statement for Pilgrim Nuclear Power Station in Plymouth, Massachusetts
ML0617700432006-06-16016 June 2006
Comment (4) of Sheila S. Hollis, Re Pilgrim Power Station Regarding Renewal of Facility Operating License DPR-35 for a 20 Year Period
ML0617702772006-06-15015 June 2006
2006/06/15-Comment (3) of Diane Curran, and Matthew Brock, Re EIS Scoping Process for Pilgrim Nuclear Plant License Renewal, Proceeding, 71 Fed. Reg. 19,554 (April 14, 2006)
ML0617704072006-06-15015 June 2006
2006/06/15-Comment (6) of R. J. Chin, H Chang, M. Lampert, M. Morrison, & B. Pye on Scope of Environmental Review for the Pilgrim Nuclear Power Station'S License Renewal Application-Federal Register Notice, April 14, 2006
ML0617101042006-06-14014 June 2006
2006/06/14-Comment (2) of Mary Lampert on Behalf of Pilgrim Watch Regarding Scope of the Environmental Review for Pilgrim License Renewal Application - Direct Torus Vent System
ML0616701012006-06-12012 June 2006
2006/06/12-Comment (1) of Mary Lampert, Re Scope of the Environmental Review for Pilgrim'S License Renewal Application
ML0511202392005-04-15015 April 2005
Comment (3) of Mary Lampert, Deborah Katz, Rochelle Becker, Brendan Hoffman, David Agnew, Jed Thorp and Jim Warren on Federal Register Notice Dated 02/28/2005 Re Station Blackout Risk Evaluation for Nuclear Power Plants (Draft), January 200
2019-03-07
[Table view] |
Text
Page 1 ot I Doris Mendiola -Massachusetts Attorney General Comments on Draft EIS From: "Diane Curran" <dcurran@harmoncurran.com>
To: <PilgrimEIS
@nrc.gov>
7'/A g'-Date: 02/28/2007 10:46 AM
Subject:
Massachusetts Attorney General Comments on Draft EIS CC: <matthew.brock@ago.state.ma.us>, "Diane Curran" <dcurran@harmoncurran.com>
Dear Madam/Sir:
Attached please find the Massachusetts Attorney General's comments on the Draft Supplemental GElS for the Pilgrim nuclear power plant license renewal application.
Please acknowledge receipt of this message.Thank you very much.Sincerely, Diane Curran 717 77T1'JJ'JJ C-7r Cr)(66' L2Y/ e ,<,, /",/L5 file://C:\temp\GW 10000 I.HTM 02/28/2007 Ii cAtemp\GWJ0001 4.TMP Page 111 I c:\tem~ p\W001.M Pge f11"" Mail Envelope Properties (45E5A3C2.A97
- 7 51863)
Subject:
Creation Date From: Created By: Massachusetts Attorney General Comments on Draft EIS 02/28/2007 10:46:17 AM"Diane Curran" <dcun'an @harmoncurran.com>
dcurran @harmoncurran.com Recipients nrc.gov TWGWPO02.HQGWDO01 PilgrimEIS ago.state.ma.us matthew.brock CC Post Office TWGWPO02.HQGWDOO1 Files MESSAGE TEXT.htm 1266 DC Mass AG comments Mime.822 Route nrc.gov ago.state.ma.us Size Da 297 02/3022 on Draft EIS 2-28-07.pdf 29589 te & Time 28/2007 10:46:17 AM 17452 Options Expiration Date: Priority: ReplyRequested:
Return Notification:
Concealed
Subject:
Security: None Standard No None No Standard HARMON, CURRAN, SPIELBERG EISENBERG, LLP 1726 M Street, NW, Suite 600 Washington, DC 20036 (202) 328-3500 (202) 328-6918 fax February 28, 2007 By first-class mail and e-mail to: Michael Lesar Chief, Rules and Directives Branch Division of Administrative Services Office of Administration, Room T-6D59 Two White Flint North 11545 Rockville Pike Rockville, MD 20852-2746 PilgrimEIS( ,nrc.gov
SUBJECT:
Comments on Draft Supplement 29 to Generic EIS for License Renewal of Nuclear Plants, Pilgrim Nuclear Power Plant
Dear Mr. Lesar:
On behalf of Massachusetts Attorney General Martha Coakley, we are writing to submit comments on Draft Supplement 29 to the Generic Environmental Impact Statement for License Renewal of Nuclear Plants (December 2006) ("Draft Supplemental GELS"), which purports to evaluate the environmental impacts of renewing the operating license for the Pilgrim nuclear power plant. The Draft Supplemental GEIS is inadequate to satisfy the requirements of the National Environmental Policy Act ("NEPA") or NRC regulations for the implementation NEPA, because it fails to address new and significant information regarding the potentially severe adverse environmental impacts of continued high-density pool storage of spent fuel at the Pilgrim nuclear power plant.We hereby renew the Attorney General's June 15, 2006, comments on the scope of the Draft Supplemental GETS, including our previous request that you consider the technical information contained in the Hearing Request which was attached to our Scoping comments.'
Our Scoping Comments were summarily dismissed in the NRC Staff's September 26, 2006, scoping decision and ignored in the Draft Supplemental GEIS.2 Letter from Diane Curran and Matthew Brock to Chief, NRC Rules and Directives Branch (June 15, 2006) ("Scoping Comments"), enclosing Massachusetts Attorney General's Request for a Hearing and Petition to Intervene With Respect to Entergy Nuclear Operations Inc.'s Application for Renewal of the Pilgrim Nuclear Plant Operating License, etc. (May 26, 2006) ("Hearing Request").
The Attorney General is Michael Lesar Chief, Rules and Directives Branch February 28, 2007 Page 2 As stated in our Scoping Comments, the Supplemental GEIS for the Pilgrim nuclear power plant should-address the environmental impacts of a severe accident in the Pilgrim fuel pool, including accidents caused by equipment failures, natural disasters, and intentional malicious acts. The Supplemental GEIS should also consider a reasonable array of alternatives for avoiding or mitigating the impacts of a severe pool fire, including combined low-density pool storage and dry storage of spent fuel.3 In addition, the Draft Supplemental GEIS should incorporate the Commission's decision to consider the issues raised by the Attorney General's Scoping Comments and Hearing Request in a generic rulemaking proceeding.
4 The Commission initiated the rulemaking proceeding in November of 2006 by publishing the Attorney General's August 29, 2006 rulemaking petition in the Federal Register for public comment. It is therefore premature for the Draft Supplement GEIS to reach any conclusions regarding the environmental impacts of high-density pool storage of spent fuel at the Pilgrim nuclear power plant.Finally, the Staff should confirm that under NEPA, the Staff is precluded from issuing a permit for renewed operation of the Pilgrim nuclear power plant unless and until the results of the rulemaking proceeding have been taken into account in the Pilgrim license renewal case.not re-submitting the Scoping Comments or the Hearing Request, because the NRC already has copies.2 Letter from Rani Franovich, Branch Chief, Environmental Branch B, to Michael R. Kansler, President of Entergy Nuclear Operations, Inc. ("Entergy"), attachment at 4-45; Draft Supplemental GEIS, Section 4.7.3 In addition, we wish to inform you that on January 16, 2007, the U.S. Supreme Court denied a petition for review of a decision by the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit that was cited in our Scoping Comments, San Luis Obispo Mothers for Peace v. Nuclear Regulatory Commission, 449 F.3d 1016 (9 th Cir. 2007). The decision is reported at 2007 U.S. LEXIS 1028.4 Entergy Nuclear Vermont Yankee L.L. C. and Entergy Nuclear Operations, Inc.(Vermont Yankee Nuclear Power Station) and Entergy Nuclear Generation Company and Entergy Nuclear Operations, Inc. (Pilgrim Nuclear Power Station), CLI-07-03, _NRC ,slip op. at 8 (January 22, 2007).See Notice of Petition for Rulemaking, Docket No. PRM-51-10, 71 Fed. Reg.64,169 (November 1, 2006).
Michael Lesar Chief, Rules and Directives Branch February 28, 2007 Page 3 Sincerely,/s/Diane Curran/s/Matthew Brock, Assistant Attorney General Environmental Protection Division Office of the Attorney General One Ashburton Place Boston, MA 02108