|
---|
Category:LEGAL TRANSCRIPTS & ORDERS & PLEADINGS
MONTHYEARML20210B8491999-07-21021 July 1999 Exemption from Certain Requirements of 10CFR50.54(w),for Three Mile Island Nuclear Station Unit 2 to Reduce Amount of Insurance for Unit to $50 Million for Onsite Property Damage Coverage ML20206D4141999-04-20020 April 1999 Exemption from Requirements of 10CFR50,App R,Section III.G.2 Re Enclosure of Cable & Equipment & Associated non-safety Related Circuits of One Redundant Train in Fire Barrier Having 1-hour Rating ML20206T7211999-02-11011 February 1999 Memorandum & Order (CLI-99-02).* Denies C George Request for Intervention & Dismisses Subpart M License Transfer Proceeding.With Certificate of Svc.Served on 990211 ML20198A5111998-12-11011 December 1998 Comment Opposing Proposed Rule 10CFR50.65 Re Requirements for Monitoring Effectiveness of Maintenance at Nuclear Power Plants.Proposed Rulemaking Details Collaborative Efforts in That Rule Interjects Change ML20154G2941998-09-17017 September 1998 Transcript of 980917 Public Meeting in Rockville,Md Re License Transfer of TMI-1 from Gpu Nuclear,Inc to Amergen. Pp 1-41 ML20199J0121997-11-20020 November 1997 Comment on Pr 10CFR50 Re Financial Assurance Requirements for Decommisioning Nuclear Power Reactors.Three Mile Island Alert Invokes Comments of P Bradford,Former NRC Member ML20148R7581997-06-30030 June 1997 Comment on NRC Proposed Bulletin 96-001,suppl 1, Control Rod Insertion Problems. Licensee References Proposed Generic Communication, Control Rod Insertion, & Ltrs & 961022 from B&W Owners Group ML20078H0431995-02-0101 February 1995 Comment Opposing Proposed Rule 10CFR50 Re Shutdown & Lowpower Operations for Nuclear Reactors ML20077E8231994-12-0808 December 1994 Comment Supporting Proposed Rules 10CFR2,51 & 54 Re Rev to NRC NPP License Renewal Rule ML20149E2021994-04-20020 April 1994 R Gary Statement Re 10 Mile Rule Under Director'S Decision DD-94-03,dtd 940331 for Tmi.Urges Commissioners to Engage in Reconsideration of Author Petition ML20065Q0671994-04-0707 April 1994 Principal Deficiencies in Director'S Decision 94-03 Re Pica Request Under 10CFR2.206 ML20058A5491993-11-17017 November 1993 Exemption from Requirements in 10CFR50.120 to Establish, Implement & Maintain Training Programs,Using Sys Approach to Training,For Catorgories of Personnel Listed in 10CFR50.120 ML20059J5171993-09-30030 September 1993 Transcript of 930923 Meeting of Advisory Panel for Decontamination of TMI-2 in Harrisburg,Pa.Pp 1-130.Related Documentation Encl ML20065J3461992-12-30030 December 1992 Responds to Petition of R Gary Alleging Discrepancies in RERP for Dauphin County,Pa ML20065J3731992-12-18018 December 1992 Affidavit of Gj Giangi Responding to of R Gary Requesting Action by NRC Per 10CFR2.206 ML20198E5581992-12-0101 December 1992 Transcript of Briefing by TMI-2 Advisory Panel on 921201 in Rockville,Md ML20210D7291992-06-15015 June 1992 Exemption from Requirements of 10CFR70.24 Re Criticality Accident Requirements for SNM Storage Areas at Facility Containing U Enriched to Less than 3% in U-235 Isotope ML20079E2181991-09-30030 September 1991 Submits Comments on NRC Proposed Resolution of Generic Issue 23, Reactor Coolant Pump Seal Failure. Informs That Util Endorses Comments Submitted by NUMARC ML20066J3031991-01-28028 January 1991 Comment Supporting SECY-90-347, Regulatory Impact Survey Rept ML20059P0531990-10-15015 October 1990 Comment Opposing Proposed Rules 10CFR2,50 & 54 Re Nuclear Power Plant License Renewal ML20059N5941990-10-0404 October 1990 Transcript of 900928 Public Meeting in Rockville,Md Re Studies of Cancer in Populations Near Nuclear Facilities, Including TMI ML20055F4411990-06-28028 June 1990 Comment Supporting Petition for Rulemaking PRM-50-55 Re Revs to FSAR ML20248J1891989-10-0606 October 1989 Order.* Grants Intervenors 891004 Motion for Permission for Opportunity to Respond to Staff Correspondence.Response Requested No Later That 891020.W/Certificate of Svc.Served on 891006 ML20248J1881989-10-0303 October 1989 Motion for Permission for Opportunity to Respond to Staff Correspondence in Response to Board Order of 890913.* Svc List Encl ML20248J0301989-09-29029 September 1989 NRC Staff Response to Appeal Board Order.* Matters Evaluated in Environ Assessment Involved Subjs Known by Parties During Proceeding & Appear in Hearing Record & Reflect Board Final Initial Decision LBP-89-7.W/Certificate of Svc ML20247E9181989-09-13013 September 1989 Order.* Requests NRC to Explain Purpose of 890911 Fr Notice on Proposed Amend to Applicant License,Revising Tech Specs Re Disposal of Accident Generated Water & Effects on ASLB Findings,By 890929.W/Certificate of Svc.Served on 890913 ML20247G0361989-07-26026 July 1989 Transcript of Oral Argument on 890726 in Bethesda,Md Re Disposal of accident-generated Water.Pp 1-65.Supporting Info Encl ML20247B7781989-07-18018 July 1989 Certificate of Svc.* Certifies Svc of Encl Gpu 890607 & 0628 Ltrs to NRC & Commonwealth of Pa,Respectively.W/Svc List ML20245D3651989-06-20020 June 1989 Notice of Oral Argument.* Oral Argument on Appeal of Susquehanna Valley Alliance & TMI Alert from ASLB 890202 Initial Decision Authorizing OL Amend,Will Be Heard on 890726 in Bethesda,Md.W/Certificate of Svc.Served on 890620 ML20245A5621989-06-14014 June 1989 Order.* Advises That Oral Argument on Appeal of Susquehanna Valley Alliance & TMI Alert from Board 890202 Initial Decision LBP-89-07 Authorizing OL Amend Will Be Heard on 890726 in Bethesda,Md.W/Certificate of Svc.Served on 890614 ML20247F3151989-05-22022 May 1989 NRC Staff Response to Appeal by Joint Intervenors Susquehanna Valley Alliance/Tmi Alert.* Appeal Should Be Denied Based on Failure to Identify Errors in Fact & Law Subj to Appeal.W/Certificate of Svc ML20246Q2971989-05-15015 May 1989 Comment Opposing Proposed Rule 10CFR50 Re Ensuring Effectiveness of Maint Programs for Nuclear Power Plants ML20246J6081989-05-12012 May 1989 Licensee Brief in Reply to Joint Intervenors Appeal from Final Initial Decision.* ASLB 890203 Final Initial Decision LBP-89-07 Re Deleting Prohibition on Disposal of accident- Generated Water Should Be Affirmed.W/Certificate of Svc ML20247D2761989-04-20020 April 1989 Transcript of 890420 Briefing in Rockville,Md on Status of TMI-2 Cleanup Activities.Pp 1-51.Related Info Encl ML20244C0361989-04-13013 April 1989 Order.* Commission Finds That ASLB Decision Resolving All Relevant Matters in Favor of Licensee & Granting Application for OL Amend,Should Become Effective Immediately.Certificate of Svc Encl.Served on 890413 ML20245A8381989-04-13013 April 1989 Transcript of Advisory Panel for Decontamination of TMI-2 890413 Meeting in Harrisburg,Pa.Pp 1-79.Supporting Info Encl ML20245A2961989-04-13013 April 1989 Transcript of 890413 Meeting in Rockville,Md Re Affirmation/Discussion & Vote ML20248H1811989-04-0606 April 1989 Valley Alliance/Tmi Alert Motion for Leave to File Appeal Brief out-of-time.* W/Certificate of Svc.Served on 890411.Granted for Aslab on 890410 ML20248G0151989-04-0606 April 1989 Valley Alliance/Tmi Alert Motion for Leave to File Appeal Brief out-of-time.* Requests to File Appeal Brief 1 Day Late Due to Person Typing Document Having Schedule Problems ML20248G0261989-04-0606 April 1989 Susguehanna Valley Alliance/Tmi Alert Brief in Support of Notification to File Appeal & Request for Oral Argument Re Appeal.* Certificate of Svc Encl ML20248D7211989-04-0404 April 1989 Memorandum & Order.* Intervenors Application for Stay Denied Due to Failure to Lack of Demonstrated Irreparable Injury & Any Showing of Certainty That Intervenors Will Prevail on Merits of Appeal.W/Certificate of Svc.Served on 890404 ML20247A4671989-03-23023 March 1989 Correction Notice.* Advises That Date of 891203 Appearing in Text of Commission 890322 Order Incorrect.Date Should Be 871203.Certificate of Svc Encl.Served on 890323 ML20246M2611989-03-22022 March 1989 Order.* Advises That Commission Currently Considering Question of Effectiveness,Pending Appellate Review of Final Initial Decision in Case Issued by ASLB in LBP-89-07. Certificate of Svc Encl.Served on 890322 ML20236D3821989-03-16016 March 1989 Valley Alliance & TMI Alert Motion for Extension of Time to File Brief in Support of Request for Appeal in Matter of 2.3 Million Gallons Of....* Certificate of Svc Encl.Served on 890316.Granted for Aslab on 890316 ML20236D3121989-03-15015 March 1989 Licensee Answer to Joint Intervenors Motion for Extension of Time to File Brief on Appeal.* Motion Opposed Based on Failure to Demonstrate Good Cause.W/Certificate of Svc ML20236D2901989-03-11011 March 1989 Valley Alliance/Tmi Alert Motion for Extension of Time to File Brief in Support of Request for Appeal in Matter of Disposal of 2.3 Million Gallons of Radioactive Water at Tmi,Unit 2.* Svc List Encl ML20236A3761989-03-0808 March 1989 Licensee Answer Opposing Joint Intervenors Motion for Stay.* Stay of Licensing Board Decision Pending Appeal Unwarranted Under NRC Stds.Stay Could Delay Safe,Expeditious Cleanup of Facility.Certificate of Svc Encl ML20236C2441989-03-0808 March 1989 NRC Staff Response in Opposition to Application for Stay Filed by Joint Intervenors.* Application for Stay of Effectiveness of Final Initial Decision LBP-89-07,dtd 890202 Should Be Denied.W/Certificate of Svc ML20235V2641989-03-0202 March 1989 Notice of Aslab Reconstitution.* TS Moore,Chairman,Cn Kohl & Ha Wilber,Members.Served on 890303.W/Certificate of Svc ML20235V2161989-02-25025 February 1989 Changes & Corrections to Susquehanna Valley Alliance/Three Mile Island Alert Documents Submitted on 890221.* Certificate of Svc Encl 1999-07-21
[Table view] Category:TRANSCRIPTS
MONTHYEARML20154G2941998-09-17017 September 1998 Transcript of 980917 Public Meeting in Rockville,Md Re License Transfer of TMI-1 from Gpu Nuclear,Inc to Amergen. Pp 1-41 ML20059J5171993-09-30030 September 1993 Transcript of 930923 Meeting of Advisory Panel for Decontamination of TMI-2 in Harrisburg,Pa.Pp 1-130.Related Documentation Encl ML20198E5581992-12-0101 December 1992 Transcript of Briefing by TMI-2 Advisory Panel on 921201 in Rockville,Md ML20059N5941990-10-0404 October 1990 Transcript of 900928 Public Meeting in Rockville,Md Re Studies of Cancer in Populations Near Nuclear Facilities, Including TMI ML20247G0361989-07-26026 July 1989 Transcript of Oral Argument on 890726 in Bethesda,Md Re Disposal of accident-generated Water.Pp 1-65.Supporting Info Encl ML20247D2761989-04-20020 April 1989 Transcript of 890420 Briefing in Rockville,Md on Status of TMI-2 Cleanup Activities.Pp 1-51.Related Info Encl ML20245A2961989-04-13013 April 1989 Transcript of 890413 Meeting in Rockville,Md Re Affirmation/Discussion & Vote ML20245A8381989-04-13013 April 1989 Transcript of Advisory Panel for Decontamination of TMI-2 890413 Meeting in Harrisburg,Pa.Pp 1-79.Supporting Info Encl ML20235N2161989-02-17017 February 1989 Follow-up Testimony Clarifying Position on Question of Disposition of Over 2 Million Gallons of Accident Generated Water.Related Documentation & Certificate of Svc Encl ML20235S9911989-02-16016 February 1989 Transcript of 890216 Public Meeting of Advisory Panel for Decontamination of TMI-2 in Harrisburg,Pa.Pp 1-119. Supporting Documentation Encl ML20206C9391988-11-0707 November 1988 Transcript of 881107 Hearing in Lancaster,Pa.Pp 1,122- 1,417.Witnesses:JA Auxier,Ji Fabrikant,Skolnik & Mather ML20235M7601988-11-0303 November 1988 Transcript of 881103 Public Hearing in Lancaster,Pa for Presentation of Limited Appearance Statements.Pp 998-1,121 ML20206C2801988-11-0303 November 1988 Transcript of 881103 Hearing in Lancaster,Pa Re TMI-2 License Amend Application.Pp 859-997.Witnesses:JA Martin, SS Yaniv,F Skolnik,S Lewis & a Bhattacharyya ML20205Q6581988-11-0202 November 1988 Transcript of 881102 Hearing in Lancaster,Pa Re TMI-2 License Amend Application.Pp 573-858.Supporting Documentation Encl.Witnesses:Gg Baker,Wj Cooper & L Munson ML20205Q6441988-11-0101 November 1988 Transcript of 881101 Hearing in Lancaster,Pa Re TMI-2 License Amend Application.Pp 288-572.Supporting Info Encl. Witnesses:K Hofstetter,Kl Harner,L Thomas & M Masnik ML20205N5791988-10-31031 October 1988 Transcript of ASLB 881031 Meeting in Lancaster,Pa Re License Amend Application.Pp 87-287 ML20205P0451988-10-25025 October 1988 Transcript of 881025 Periodic Briefing by TMI-2 Advisory Panel in Rockville,Md.Pp 1-30 ML20205G1851988-10-25025 October 1988 Licensee Testimony of GG Baker & Wj Cooper on Dose Assessments & Microorganisms (Contentions 2,3 & 5d).* Supporting Documentation Encl.Related Correspondence ML20205E5021988-10-24024 October 1988 Licensee Rebuttal Testimony of Ji Fabrikant on Health Effects of Tritium (Contention 5d).* Related Correspondence ML20155H1751988-10-11011 October 1988 Licensee Testimony of GG Baker & Wj Cooper on Dose Assessments & Microorganisms (Contentions 2,3 & 5d).* Related Correspondence ML20155H1531988-10-11011 October 1988 Licensee Testimony of Ww Weaver on Accident Risks (Contention 2).* Related Correspondence ML20155H1901988-10-11011 October 1988 Licensee Testimony of Ja Auxier & Ji Fabrikant on Effects of Tritium (Contentions 3 & 5d).* Supporting Info Encl.Related Correpondence ML20155H1661988-10-11011 October 1988 Licensee Testimony of Kl Harner & Kj Hofstetter on Sampling & Analysis of accident-generated Water (Contentions 3 & 4b).* Related Correspondence ML20155H1401988-10-11011 October 1988 Licensee Testimony of Je Tarpinian on Occupational Dose Assessments (Contention 2).* Related Correspondence ML20155H1281988-10-11011 October 1988 Licensee Testimony of Dr Buchanan on Evaporation Proposal & Joint Intervenors Alternative (Contentions 2 & 3).* Related Correspondence ML20155H4751988-10-10010 October 1988 Testimony.* Discusses Environ Impact of Force Evaporation of 2.3 Million Gallons of accident-generated Water by Licensee. W/Certificate of Svc.Related Correspondence ML20155H4711988-10-10010 October 1988 Affidavit of Cw Huver (Contention 5):further Considerations of Biological Effects & Health Hazards of Tritium.* Copyrighted Matl Encl.Related Correspondence ML20154D5201988-09-0707 September 1988 Transcript of Advisory Panel for Decontamination of TMI-2 880907 Meeting in Harrisburg,Pa.Pp 1-109.Supporting Documentation Encl ML20151G6951988-07-14014 July 1988 Transcript of Advisory Panel for Decontamination of TMI-2 880714 Meeting in Harrisburg,Pa.Pp 1-140.Related Documentation Encl ML20196B6041988-05-26026 May 1988 Transcript of 880526 Advisory Panel Meeting in Harrisburg, PA to Discuss Decontamination of TMI-2.Pp 1-117.Supporting Documentation Encl ML20154N4101988-04-14014 April 1988 Transcript of 880414 Advisory Panel for Decontamination of TMI-2 Public Meeting in Lancaster,Pa.Related Info Encl. Pp 1-100 ML20148F2351988-03-17017 March 1988 Transcript of 880317 Briefing in Washington,Dc Re Status of TMI-2.Pp 1-51.Supporting Documentation Encl ML20236Y1061987-12-0808 December 1987 Transcript of Special Prehearing Conference on 871208 in Harrisburg,Pa Re Disposal of accident-generated Water. Pp 1-86 ML20238C6981987-10-0505 October 1987 Deposition of a Beach.* Transcript of 871005 Deposition in Washington,Dc Re R Parks Allegations.Pp 1-244.Supporting Documentation Encl ML20235J7071987-09-30030 September 1987 Transcript of 870930 Prehearing Conference in Bethesda,Md. Pp 225-343 ML20238D4641987-09-0909 September 1987 Transcript of 870909 Oral Argument in Bethesda,Md.Pp 1-57 ML20238C7531987-08-20020 August 1987 Vol II to Transcript of Hl Hofmann 870820 Deposition in San Francisco,Ca Re Civil Penalty.Pp 208-471 & 489-494. Supporting Documentation Encl ML20238C7891987-08-18018 August 1987 Deposition of Rd Parks.* Vol IV to Transcript of 870818 Deposition in San Francisco,Ca Re Civil Penalty.Pp 551-818. Supporting Documentation Encl ML20238C7651987-06-25025 June 1987 Deposition of Hl Hofmann.* Transcript of 870625 Deposition in San Francisco,Ca Re Civil Penalty.Pp 1-206 ML20238C8041987-06-24024 June 1987 Deposition of Rd Parks.* Vol III to Transcript of 870624 Deposition in Newport Beach,Ca Re Civil Penalty.Pp III-1 - III-89 ML20235J1271987-06-24024 June 1987 Deposition of Rd Parks.* Vols II & III of Transcript of Rd Parks 870624 Deposition.Related Correspondence ML20238C7981987-06-23023 June 1987 Deposition of Rd Parks.* Vol II to Transcript of 870623 Deposition in Newport Beach,Ca Re Civil Penalty.Pp II-1 - II-263.Supporting Documentation Encl ML20238C7941987-06-22022 June 1987 Deposition of Rd Parks.* Vol I to Transcript of 870622 Deposition in Newport Beach,Ca Re Civil Penalty.Pp 1-199. Supporting Documentation Encl ML20238C5921987-06-16016 June 1987 Deposition of R Meeks.* Transcript of 870616 Deposition in Washington,Dc Re Allegations of Harassment Against R Parks. Pp 1-198.Supporting Documentation Encl ML20238C6171987-06-16016 June 1987 Deposition of R Meeks.* Corrected Title Page of 870616 Deposition ML20215L2731987-05-0808 May 1987 Transcript of 870508 Prehearing Conference in Bethesda,Md.Pp 19-224.In Camera Session (Pp 101-138) Bound Separately ML20238C7331987-04-24024 April 1987 Deposition of Rc Arnold.* Transcript of 870424 Deposition in Washington,Dc Re Civil Penalty.Pp 1-224.Supporting Documentation Encl ML20212Q9801987-04-16016 April 1987 Transcript of 870416 Periodic Meeting W/Advisory Panel for Decontamination of TMI-2 in Washington,Dc.Pp 1-50.Supporting Documentation Encl ML20212Q8021987-04-15015 April 1987 Transcript of 870415 Briefing by DOE in Washington,Dc Re TMI-2 Core Exam Program.Pp 1-64.Viewgraphs Encl ML20238C6521987-04-10010 April 1987 Deposition of Bk Kanga.* Transcript of 870410 Deposition in Gaithersburg,Md Re R Parks.Pp 1-151.Supporting Documentation Encl 1998-09-17
[Table view] Category:DEPOSITIONS
MONTHYEARML20154G2941998-09-17017 September 1998 Transcript of 980917 Public Meeting in Rockville,Md Re License Transfer of TMI-1 from Gpu Nuclear,Inc to Amergen. Pp 1-41 ML20059J5171993-09-30030 September 1993 Transcript of 930923 Meeting of Advisory Panel for Decontamination of TMI-2 in Harrisburg,Pa.Pp 1-130.Related Documentation Encl ML20198E5581992-12-0101 December 1992 Transcript of Briefing by TMI-2 Advisory Panel on 921201 in Rockville,Md ML20059N5941990-10-0404 October 1990 Transcript of 900928 Public Meeting in Rockville,Md Re Studies of Cancer in Populations Near Nuclear Facilities, Including TMI ML20247G0361989-07-26026 July 1989 Transcript of Oral Argument on 890726 in Bethesda,Md Re Disposal of accident-generated Water.Pp 1-65.Supporting Info Encl ML20247D2761989-04-20020 April 1989 Transcript of 890420 Briefing in Rockville,Md on Status of TMI-2 Cleanup Activities.Pp 1-51.Related Info Encl ML20245A2961989-04-13013 April 1989 Transcript of 890413 Meeting in Rockville,Md Re Affirmation/Discussion & Vote ML20245A8381989-04-13013 April 1989 Transcript of Advisory Panel for Decontamination of TMI-2 890413 Meeting in Harrisburg,Pa.Pp 1-79.Supporting Info Encl ML20235N2161989-02-17017 February 1989 Follow-up Testimony Clarifying Position on Question of Disposition of Over 2 Million Gallons of Accident Generated Water.Related Documentation & Certificate of Svc Encl ML20235S9911989-02-16016 February 1989 Transcript of 890216 Public Meeting of Advisory Panel for Decontamination of TMI-2 in Harrisburg,Pa.Pp 1-119. Supporting Documentation Encl ML20206C9391988-11-0707 November 1988 Transcript of 881107 Hearing in Lancaster,Pa.Pp 1,122- 1,417.Witnesses:JA Auxier,Ji Fabrikant,Skolnik & Mather ML20235M7601988-11-0303 November 1988 Transcript of 881103 Public Hearing in Lancaster,Pa for Presentation of Limited Appearance Statements.Pp 998-1,121 ML20206C2801988-11-0303 November 1988 Transcript of 881103 Hearing in Lancaster,Pa Re TMI-2 License Amend Application.Pp 859-997.Witnesses:JA Martin, SS Yaniv,F Skolnik,S Lewis & a Bhattacharyya ML20205Q6581988-11-0202 November 1988 Transcript of 881102 Hearing in Lancaster,Pa Re TMI-2 License Amend Application.Pp 573-858.Supporting Documentation Encl.Witnesses:Gg Baker,Wj Cooper & L Munson ML20205Q6441988-11-0101 November 1988 Transcript of 881101 Hearing in Lancaster,Pa Re TMI-2 License Amend Application.Pp 288-572.Supporting Info Encl. Witnesses:K Hofstetter,Kl Harner,L Thomas & M Masnik ML20205N5791988-10-31031 October 1988 Transcript of ASLB 881031 Meeting in Lancaster,Pa Re License Amend Application.Pp 87-287 ML20205P0451988-10-25025 October 1988 Transcript of 881025 Periodic Briefing by TMI-2 Advisory Panel in Rockville,Md.Pp 1-30 ML20205G1851988-10-25025 October 1988 Licensee Testimony of GG Baker & Wj Cooper on Dose Assessments & Microorganisms (Contentions 2,3 & 5d).* Supporting Documentation Encl.Related Correspondence ML20205E5021988-10-24024 October 1988 Licensee Rebuttal Testimony of Ji Fabrikant on Health Effects of Tritium (Contention 5d).* Related Correspondence ML20155H1751988-10-11011 October 1988 Licensee Testimony of GG Baker & Wj Cooper on Dose Assessments & Microorganisms (Contentions 2,3 & 5d).* Related Correspondence ML20155H1531988-10-11011 October 1988 Licensee Testimony of Ww Weaver on Accident Risks (Contention 2).* Related Correspondence ML20155H1901988-10-11011 October 1988 Licensee Testimony of Ja Auxier & Ji Fabrikant on Effects of Tritium (Contentions 3 & 5d).* Supporting Info Encl.Related Correpondence ML20155H1661988-10-11011 October 1988 Licensee Testimony of Kl Harner & Kj Hofstetter on Sampling & Analysis of accident-generated Water (Contentions 3 & 4b).* Related Correspondence ML20155H1401988-10-11011 October 1988 Licensee Testimony of Je Tarpinian on Occupational Dose Assessments (Contention 2).* Related Correspondence ML20155H1281988-10-11011 October 1988 Licensee Testimony of Dr Buchanan on Evaporation Proposal & Joint Intervenors Alternative (Contentions 2 & 3).* Related Correspondence ML20155H4751988-10-10010 October 1988 Testimony.* Discusses Environ Impact of Force Evaporation of 2.3 Million Gallons of accident-generated Water by Licensee. W/Certificate of Svc.Related Correspondence ML20155H4711988-10-10010 October 1988 Affidavit of Cw Huver (Contention 5):further Considerations of Biological Effects & Health Hazards of Tritium.* Copyrighted Matl Encl.Related Correspondence ML20154D5201988-09-0707 September 1988 Transcript of Advisory Panel for Decontamination of TMI-2 880907 Meeting in Harrisburg,Pa.Pp 1-109.Supporting Documentation Encl ML20151G6951988-07-14014 July 1988 Transcript of Advisory Panel for Decontamination of TMI-2 880714 Meeting in Harrisburg,Pa.Pp 1-140.Related Documentation Encl ML20196B6041988-05-26026 May 1988 Transcript of 880526 Advisory Panel Meeting in Harrisburg, PA to Discuss Decontamination of TMI-2.Pp 1-117.Supporting Documentation Encl ML20154N4101988-04-14014 April 1988 Transcript of 880414 Advisory Panel for Decontamination of TMI-2 Public Meeting in Lancaster,Pa.Related Info Encl. Pp 1-100 ML20148F2351988-03-17017 March 1988 Transcript of 880317 Briefing in Washington,Dc Re Status of TMI-2.Pp 1-51.Supporting Documentation Encl ML20236Y1061987-12-0808 December 1987 Transcript of Special Prehearing Conference on 871208 in Harrisburg,Pa Re Disposal of accident-generated Water. Pp 1-86 ML20238C6981987-10-0505 October 1987 Deposition of a Beach.* Transcript of 871005 Deposition in Washington,Dc Re R Parks Allegations.Pp 1-244.Supporting Documentation Encl ML20235J7071987-09-30030 September 1987 Transcript of 870930 Prehearing Conference in Bethesda,Md. Pp 225-343 ML20238D4641987-09-0909 September 1987 Transcript of 870909 Oral Argument in Bethesda,Md.Pp 1-57 ML20238C7531987-08-20020 August 1987 Vol II to Transcript of Hl Hofmann 870820 Deposition in San Francisco,Ca Re Civil Penalty.Pp 208-471 & 489-494. Supporting Documentation Encl ML20238C7891987-08-18018 August 1987 Deposition of Rd Parks.* Vol IV to Transcript of 870818 Deposition in San Francisco,Ca Re Civil Penalty.Pp 551-818. Supporting Documentation Encl ML20238C7651987-06-25025 June 1987 Deposition of Hl Hofmann.* Transcript of 870625 Deposition in San Francisco,Ca Re Civil Penalty.Pp 1-206 ML20238C8041987-06-24024 June 1987 Deposition of Rd Parks.* Vol III to Transcript of 870624 Deposition in Newport Beach,Ca Re Civil Penalty.Pp III-1 - III-89 ML20235J1271987-06-24024 June 1987 Deposition of Rd Parks.* Vols II & III of Transcript of Rd Parks 870624 Deposition.Related Correspondence ML20238C7981987-06-23023 June 1987 Deposition of Rd Parks.* Vol II to Transcript of 870623 Deposition in Newport Beach,Ca Re Civil Penalty.Pp II-1 - II-263.Supporting Documentation Encl ML20238C7941987-06-22022 June 1987 Deposition of Rd Parks.* Vol I to Transcript of 870622 Deposition in Newport Beach,Ca Re Civil Penalty.Pp 1-199. Supporting Documentation Encl ML20238C5921987-06-16016 June 1987 Deposition of R Meeks.* Transcript of 870616 Deposition in Washington,Dc Re Allegations of Harassment Against R Parks. Pp 1-198.Supporting Documentation Encl ML20238C6171987-06-16016 June 1987 Deposition of R Meeks.* Corrected Title Page of 870616 Deposition ML20215L2731987-05-0808 May 1987 Transcript of 870508 Prehearing Conference in Bethesda,Md.Pp 19-224.In Camera Session (Pp 101-138) Bound Separately ML20238C7331987-04-24024 April 1987 Deposition of Rc Arnold.* Transcript of 870424 Deposition in Washington,Dc Re Civil Penalty.Pp 1-224.Supporting Documentation Encl ML20212Q9801987-04-16016 April 1987 Transcript of 870416 Periodic Meeting W/Advisory Panel for Decontamination of TMI-2 in Washington,Dc.Pp 1-50.Supporting Documentation Encl ML20212Q8021987-04-15015 April 1987 Transcript of 870415 Briefing by DOE in Washington,Dc Re TMI-2 Core Exam Program.Pp 1-64.Viewgraphs Encl ML20238C6521987-04-10010 April 1987 Deposition of Bk Kanga.* Transcript of 870410 Deposition in Gaithersburg,Md Re R Parks.Pp 1-151.Supporting Documentation Encl 1998-09-17
[Table view] Category:NARRATIVE TESTIMONY
MONTHYEARML20154G2941998-09-17017 September 1998 Transcript of 980917 Public Meeting in Rockville,Md Re License Transfer of TMI-1 from Gpu Nuclear,Inc to Amergen. Pp 1-41 ML20059J5171993-09-30030 September 1993 Transcript of 930923 Meeting of Advisory Panel for Decontamination of TMI-2 in Harrisburg,Pa.Pp 1-130.Related Documentation Encl ML20198E5581992-12-0101 December 1992 Transcript of Briefing by TMI-2 Advisory Panel on 921201 in Rockville,Md ML20059N5941990-10-0404 October 1990 Transcript of 900928 Public Meeting in Rockville,Md Re Studies of Cancer in Populations Near Nuclear Facilities, Including TMI ML20247G0361989-07-26026 July 1989 Transcript of Oral Argument on 890726 in Bethesda,Md Re Disposal of accident-generated Water.Pp 1-65.Supporting Info Encl ML20247D2761989-04-20020 April 1989 Transcript of 890420 Briefing in Rockville,Md on Status of TMI-2 Cleanup Activities.Pp 1-51.Related Info Encl ML20245A2961989-04-13013 April 1989 Transcript of 890413 Meeting in Rockville,Md Re Affirmation/Discussion & Vote ML20245A8381989-04-13013 April 1989 Transcript of Advisory Panel for Decontamination of TMI-2 890413 Meeting in Harrisburg,Pa.Pp 1-79.Supporting Info Encl ML20235N2161989-02-17017 February 1989 Follow-up Testimony Clarifying Position on Question of Disposition of Over 2 Million Gallons of Accident Generated Water.Related Documentation & Certificate of Svc Encl ML20235S9911989-02-16016 February 1989 Transcript of 890216 Public Meeting of Advisory Panel for Decontamination of TMI-2 in Harrisburg,Pa.Pp 1-119. Supporting Documentation Encl ML20206C9391988-11-0707 November 1988 Transcript of 881107 Hearing in Lancaster,Pa.Pp 1,122- 1,417.Witnesses:JA Auxier,Ji Fabrikant,Skolnik & Mather ML20235M7601988-11-0303 November 1988 Transcript of 881103 Public Hearing in Lancaster,Pa for Presentation of Limited Appearance Statements.Pp 998-1,121 ML20206C2801988-11-0303 November 1988 Transcript of 881103 Hearing in Lancaster,Pa Re TMI-2 License Amend Application.Pp 859-997.Witnesses:JA Martin, SS Yaniv,F Skolnik,S Lewis & a Bhattacharyya ML20205Q6581988-11-0202 November 1988 Transcript of 881102 Hearing in Lancaster,Pa Re TMI-2 License Amend Application.Pp 573-858.Supporting Documentation Encl.Witnesses:Gg Baker,Wj Cooper & L Munson ML20205Q6441988-11-0101 November 1988 Transcript of 881101 Hearing in Lancaster,Pa Re TMI-2 License Amend Application.Pp 288-572.Supporting Info Encl. Witnesses:K Hofstetter,Kl Harner,L Thomas & M Masnik ML20205N5791988-10-31031 October 1988 Transcript of ASLB 881031 Meeting in Lancaster,Pa Re License Amend Application.Pp 87-287 ML20205P0451988-10-25025 October 1988 Transcript of 881025 Periodic Briefing by TMI-2 Advisory Panel in Rockville,Md.Pp 1-30 ML20205G1851988-10-25025 October 1988 Licensee Testimony of GG Baker & Wj Cooper on Dose Assessments & Microorganisms (Contentions 2,3 & 5d).* Supporting Documentation Encl.Related Correspondence ML20205E5021988-10-24024 October 1988 Licensee Rebuttal Testimony of Ji Fabrikant on Health Effects of Tritium (Contention 5d).* Related Correspondence ML20155H1751988-10-11011 October 1988 Licensee Testimony of GG Baker & Wj Cooper on Dose Assessments & Microorganisms (Contentions 2,3 & 5d).* Related Correspondence ML20155H1531988-10-11011 October 1988 Licensee Testimony of Ww Weaver on Accident Risks (Contention 2).* Related Correspondence ML20155H1901988-10-11011 October 1988 Licensee Testimony of Ja Auxier & Ji Fabrikant on Effects of Tritium (Contentions 3 & 5d).* Supporting Info Encl.Related Correpondence ML20155H1661988-10-11011 October 1988 Licensee Testimony of Kl Harner & Kj Hofstetter on Sampling & Analysis of accident-generated Water (Contentions 3 & 4b).* Related Correspondence ML20155H1401988-10-11011 October 1988 Licensee Testimony of Je Tarpinian on Occupational Dose Assessments (Contention 2).* Related Correspondence ML20155H1281988-10-11011 October 1988 Licensee Testimony of Dr Buchanan on Evaporation Proposal & Joint Intervenors Alternative (Contentions 2 & 3).* Related Correspondence ML20155H4751988-10-10010 October 1988 Testimony.* Discusses Environ Impact of Force Evaporation of 2.3 Million Gallons of accident-generated Water by Licensee. W/Certificate of Svc.Related Correspondence ML20155H4711988-10-10010 October 1988 Affidavit of Cw Huver (Contention 5):further Considerations of Biological Effects & Health Hazards of Tritium.* Copyrighted Matl Encl.Related Correspondence ML20154D5201988-09-0707 September 1988 Transcript of Advisory Panel for Decontamination of TMI-2 880907 Meeting in Harrisburg,Pa.Pp 1-109.Supporting Documentation Encl ML20151G6951988-07-14014 July 1988 Transcript of Advisory Panel for Decontamination of TMI-2 880714 Meeting in Harrisburg,Pa.Pp 1-140.Related Documentation Encl ML20196B6041988-05-26026 May 1988 Transcript of 880526 Advisory Panel Meeting in Harrisburg, PA to Discuss Decontamination of TMI-2.Pp 1-117.Supporting Documentation Encl ML20154N4101988-04-14014 April 1988 Transcript of 880414 Advisory Panel for Decontamination of TMI-2 Public Meeting in Lancaster,Pa.Related Info Encl. Pp 1-100 ML20148F2351988-03-17017 March 1988 Transcript of 880317 Briefing in Washington,Dc Re Status of TMI-2.Pp 1-51.Supporting Documentation Encl ML20236Y1061987-12-0808 December 1987 Transcript of Special Prehearing Conference on 871208 in Harrisburg,Pa Re Disposal of accident-generated Water. Pp 1-86 ML20238C6981987-10-0505 October 1987 Deposition of a Beach.* Transcript of 871005 Deposition in Washington,Dc Re R Parks Allegations.Pp 1-244.Supporting Documentation Encl ML20235J7071987-09-30030 September 1987 Transcript of 870930 Prehearing Conference in Bethesda,Md. Pp 225-343 ML20238D4641987-09-0909 September 1987 Transcript of 870909 Oral Argument in Bethesda,Md.Pp 1-57 ML20238C7531987-08-20020 August 1987 Vol II to Transcript of Hl Hofmann 870820 Deposition in San Francisco,Ca Re Civil Penalty.Pp 208-471 & 489-494. Supporting Documentation Encl ML20238C7891987-08-18018 August 1987 Deposition of Rd Parks.* Vol IV to Transcript of 870818 Deposition in San Francisco,Ca Re Civil Penalty.Pp 551-818. Supporting Documentation Encl ML20238C7651987-06-25025 June 1987 Deposition of Hl Hofmann.* Transcript of 870625 Deposition in San Francisco,Ca Re Civil Penalty.Pp 1-206 ML20238C8041987-06-24024 June 1987 Deposition of Rd Parks.* Vol III to Transcript of 870624 Deposition in Newport Beach,Ca Re Civil Penalty.Pp III-1 - III-89 ML20235J1271987-06-24024 June 1987 Deposition of Rd Parks.* Vols II & III of Transcript of Rd Parks 870624 Deposition.Related Correspondence ML20238C7981987-06-23023 June 1987 Deposition of Rd Parks.* Vol II to Transcript of 870623 Deposition in Newport Beach,Ca Re Civil Penalty.Pp II-1 - II-263.Supporting Documentation Encl ML20238C7941987-06-22022 June 1987 Deposition of Rd Parks.* Vol I to Transcript of 870622 Deposition in Newport Beach,Ca Re Civil Penalty.Pp 1-199. Supporting Documentation Encl ML20238C5921987-06-16016 June 1987 Deposition of R Meeks.* Transcript of 870616 Deposition in Washington,Dc Re Allegations of Harassment Against R Parks. Pp 1-198.Supporting Documentation Encl ML20238C6171987-06-16016 June 1987 Deposition of R Meeks.* Corrected Title Page of 870616 Deposition ML20215L2731987-05-0808 May 1987 Transcript of 870508 Prehearing Conference in Bethesda,Md.Pp 19-224.In Camera Session (Pp 101-138) Bound Separately ML20238C7331987-04-24024 April 1987 Deposition of Rc Arnold.* Transcript of 870424 Deposition in Washington,Dc Re Civil Penalty.Pp 1-224.Supporting Documentation Encl ML20212Q9801987-04-16016 April 1987 Transcript of 870416 Periodic Meeting W/Advisory Panel for Decontamination of TMI-2 in Washington,Dc.Pp 1-50.Supporting Documentation Encl ML20212Q8021987-04-15015 April 1987 Transcript of 870415 Briefing by DOE in Washington,Dc Re TMI-2 Core Exam Program.Pp 1-64.Viewgraphs Encl ML20238C6521987-04-10010 April 1987 Deposition of Bk Kanga.* Transcript of 870410 Deposition in Gaithersburg,Md Re R Parks.Pp 1-151.Supporting Documentation Encl 1998-09-17
[Table view] |
Text
Y n._....__..~._._._____. I 1
Sefare \
.:. . . 9 2 TI'E ?ENirIST.UTANIA PUELIC UTILITY C0:GIISSION (v3
--oCo--
[ '. .
~t F
- q. In re: I-79040308 -
g C-80072105 - Metrorolitan Edison Compan7 3 !:
vs . Pertnsylvania Public Utility Cetmincion.
[ Alleging temporary rates fixed by the Commission M.
in its order of May 23,1980 at I-790403c8 are unjust and unreasonable, and do not provide 7i for company operating and capital costs.
i 3i Prahearing conference.
--oCo--
i 10 !' Stonographic repcrt of hearing held in
[ Hearing Room No. 1 3 North Offics Building, 11 c Harrisburg, Pennsylvania, L,,
1% l,' Monday, F September 22, 1980 t 10:15 o' clock a.m.
p" 2c 1
I? --ooo--
ti 15 j; .TOSEP3 P. MATUSCI!AK, AD'ENISTRATIVE LAW Ji.iDGE 16 --oCo-~
a 17.1 APPr.APAzcz.3 : THIS DOCUMENT CONTAINS P0OR QUAUTY PAGES !
Li p; '
RYA 3, RUSSELL a: McCONAGEEY I t
530 Penn Square Center j
'? 7 O. Obx 699 i l l Icad'ng, Pennsylvr.nia 19603 l '6 4: SA:1UEL B. RUSSELL, ESQUIRE
! 11. EDWIN CGDEN, ESQUIRE
. ALAN MICHAEL SELTZER, ESQUIRE f i For - Metropolitan Edison Company }
2 l ,
, .~l l
GTL7Eli A. McCLAREII, ESQITIRE ,
2 Tay2ty Chief Counnel (
.ily.1DD ?IIIIICE, ESQITIRE {
- ~
>ortoe=at coanoel !
O-j - I.TDAI? 2. PANKIW, ESQUIRE
- ' ' . J . Ex: 32o5, Harrisburg, Pennsylvania 17120 f
- - -..- -- a : .: 3 For -;-Cor.aliscica s:v :. u : ..:.2 Tris.1
- -;;.ury ,c. Staff
_ :;.n=er, : _.:c:.n _-.--- _
8102120$
2 .
_.._.___..q
, 1 zj'APPEARAUC1:S: (Continued) n
!i DUAUE, MORPJ.S.6 HECIC3CHER
~'; P. 0. Box 1003 Har:.'isburg, Penncylvania 17108 h
~l nl Ey: ROEAUD MORRIS, ESQUIRE
- 4. .
RO3ERT E. KELLY, JR. , ESQUIRE 4 For - Victaulic Company of America
.7 jf:
EcHPZS, WALLACE & ITURICK P. O. Box 1166 Gl lH Harrisburg, Pennsylvania 17108
'j !! Sy: MAURICE A. FRATER, ESQUIRE
[ For - St. Regis Paper Company 60 f DECliERT, PRICE & RHOADS o/ 800 liorth Third Street y IIarcisb'trg, Pennsylvania 17102 10i! Ey: Gl.If L. JAMES, ESQUIRE l For - Bethlehem Steel
.4 -4
! ).
DAVID P'tRASCH, ESQUIRE 12 ., CRAIG EURGRAFF, ESQUIRE
- ASE3EY SCIIANNAUER, ESQUIRE
(
13!{
P 1423 Strat1 berry Square Harcisbars, Pennsylvania 17013 O UN For - Office of Consumer Advocate Hi) GISILD GORNISH, ESQUIRE
- 12t'.1 Floor, Fackard Building PJ;j Philadelphia, Pennsylvania 19102 Fo
- c - Citibank, N.A ., Agent and
[ Chemical Bank, Co-Agent 17ll o 13.I 19k
'i i
7 g '1 1
il -
Ul 0
l D.
4 C3
! L-1 6
i
- ------ - < c; ): c.r:c: i. ::::. - r.: ::. :.:::::.r: .c ; f ;;. - : . . ,; :::c:=, ; 3::;. . -.. _ .
I q i THE ADMIIIISTRATIVE LAW JUDGE: We have before il g j us this mo: ning two matters involved in the prehearing a
a e!' conference, lion one is the general rate investigation pro-
~!1 j, ceeding at R-8co51196 and complaints in connection therewith, 5[.andtheotheristhecomplaintofMetropolitanEdisonCompany
.g]againsttemporaryratesgrantedbytheCommissionatInvestiga-
?!
t 9Ution No. 79040308, with the Complaint at C-80072105
- 1-i gl Before we proceed on the rate case itself, 9[l I wculd like to have this discussion on the temporary rat'es.
il 1gltlIwouldliketohavesomeexpressionofcounselastotheir e
$1 suggestiona as to the procedure that may be advisable to
-r 17,j follow at the inception'of the relationship 'oetween these J
13 i- .<o ta t t e rn . IIr. Russell, would you have any statement in
- 14) that recard?
4 r
i 13! MR. RUSS11L: As far as Met-Ed is concerned, saI:its view would be that they are two different matters, the
~
m t gj Comtission has not seen fit at this point to consolidate them n
.; rp in ene proceeding for the purpose of hea ing or otherwise, and O
e
.i.n. ,' it is IIet-Ed 's view that the matters should remain separate 2C, and proceed independently with the complaint against temporary 9
,g]ratesgettingexpeditedtreatment.
'^
~uc, . " THE ADMIIIISTRATIVE LAW JUDGE: Cou1 mission yystaff?
.. .e MR. McCLAREN: I think our position depent.s, Osj "$
3 3:3 soreshat Your Honor, on what sort of presentation the company v
o..--.- -. : : ;- 4, f e . 3 ": ::m., ::c,-:,y y. ,: m- r: .t.cz i. 7., ".J c.::ti.-*.0, .'. . O* : ?, -- I t
4
= - ~ - >%- -- _ _- _ . _ . m__
We could foresee they may be making a 3 intends to take.
g.precentation on a different time period than the test year e,4in this race case, that they may be presenting other facts.
,1 e
,,. j THE ADMINISTRATIVE LAW JUDGE: Well, it seems n
5 i.j quite obvious to us that if there is any change made in the a
gqtemporaryrates,thatthatmayaffectallthepresentations 4
7 j of the company as to the data, don't you think, Mr. Russell?
I 8 Wo'11dn't that require a change in your data?
g MR. RUSSELL: Hell, if there uere a change
- f; in ';iet-Ed 5 a ba se rates, for example, then certainly there uculd be e change in the expected revenue picture, for example ,
- 3
- g i in the fut 2re test year.
,I 73 ' But I would submit that so far as the future
(_. " ; g
- g. test year is concerned, and the monitoring of it is concerned, 1
- .5:] there is all manner of items in the income statement that vill j [ be subject to fluctuations anyway, of which Your Honor would l '
'.7. , be kept a6ctise 1 as to the actual results from ttenth to month
..n. ,as na progress.
,gj So this vould be just one of the many variables
,r,that roult; be reflected in the actual experience of the
- .;g ,compacy and what the projections would be for the actual
'I 8
r.e.f } results .
m! MR. McCLAPJi.N: The staff would also raise i
,g; , the question, Tcur Honor, with respect to the complaint g
.J IW m mattar thacher under the statute the company is prevented
_ _ _ . _ .m. ,. = _ = . _ _ .. ,. _ ..m =. . _.
5
- ,_ - . . - - - . - ,- .- =
'i g!from receiving a change in its temporary rates since Section 1
- l 3* 2 1 1308(d) provides that the Commission ~has no authority to r I 3j . prescribe, determine or fix at any time during the pendency i
4' of a general rate increase proceeding temporary rates.
5' THE ADMINISTRATIVE LAW JUDGE: What is your 6i position as to whether or not these two matters could be 1
71 consolidated in the rate proceeding and whether the complaint 8i proceeding should be treated separately by other presiding offic ers ?
9) i -
MR. McCLAREN: I think ue would be in a much 10:I
\
11j better position to address that, Your Honor, if we could have i:
3?d a statement of counsel for the company as to what sort of i
13 presentation they intend to make with respect to their li complaint, t; hat is to be their case in that complaint, what 1
15l} nature of evidence are they going to present.
I 16! That then gives us a basis, and I think for 1? y Your Honor as nell, to iludge whether these are appropriately 1
!?gl consolidated or whether they are to be dealt with separately, l.
19; becausa it is the company, I think, in the first instance 10 ' that frames the issues by the nature of their prima facie t-.
case on the cooplaint.
Oly! . .
22 THE ADMINISTRATIVE LAW JUDGE: Mr. Russell ISG seems to indicate that the matters should be kept separate d
?(andth2.titwouldbeinadvisabletoconsolidatethem.
3 While they are conversing, does the Consuner 23h
. . - - . - er;;: 2 : w,ac:::.:.. :.:a :., ::. :.==cz.t.cy: ::2 - n: ==:w c. ..,:. =~ m --
- 6. .
.I l Advocate hcVe any positin?
~lu ,
2, {
1:
MR. EURGRAFF: Just a moment, Your Honor.
g i 3 MR. MORRIS: The industrial representatives i r
/,. and the residential users represented by our firm, sir, are 5[ prepared to state their position after others have conferred.
i i
d jj THE ADMINISTRATIVE LAW JUDGE: I could not d
7 j hear the last portion.
0 6j; MR MORRIS: I am sorry, we are prepared to li c ( state our position, sir, if you want to entertain that before 1
10 F staff is through.
3 1! .
THE ADMINISTRATIVE LAW JUDGE: You may state 9
a 12 ,' i t .
N
- G ti MR. MORRIS: Sir, we think that the issues g
14 j presented in the rate application and the petition for
?
s f
15 y, emergency relief present fundamental issues uhich will
$f 16.'l eventuall,'f determine what financial road Met-Ed and GPU go F
17 g do;m, and 7:ith respect to rates, the applications are all
- i Ig? bottom line to the users, they are net to the users.
?
19 Therefore we think that severance or failure
- o[,toconsolidatethetwocasessimplypresentsyouwithaset d
7,1l', of analyses of various detail in two different contexts which
'I l
.2,must be put together.
i 1
d
- ,3 ; We do not think there is any formal way to i .; proceed which can divorce the two, or now three, separate g g3C Met-Ed applications, and that to de other than to consolidcte
-..._..+: : =-. , e.nxv ;,; :, : ,, v. i.:..v:ws:: v.z :.n ;==u .a. n. = ::: - ---.
. 7
. , - _ _ _ _ ___ -- ..- -- 1 a !
.t. c them takes no fundamental sense, because eventually we are 3)goingtocomedowntowhatthestatuterequires,andperhaps 3 the Constitution, for ratepayers, and that is a net ftem.
,g. ! So we formally request that the matters be i
5l consolidated.
i THE ADMINISTRATIVE LAW JUDGE: Do other 6l 7' ccunsel have any expression?
t 0l MR. EURGRAFF: On behalf of the Advocate, i
9 Your Honor, if we could, it is our position that there is no -
il 10 'particular practical basis for not nonsolidating the two matters, as I believe has been alluded to by both the staff lll, 12 ! and by counsel who just spoke.
13 Also, we are not particularly sure that there 14l 1s any particular thing to be gained by not consolidating i
15 j, froa the point of view of what we have jus t gone through with il 15ll the emergency petition.
17! It seems to us that not quite half of i
I ig}MetropolitanEdisonCompany'srateincreaseinthissituation il loijis tied up with the re-inclusion of TMI-1 in both rate base I
!j 20qand base rates for that company. That is also the basis for i
31: the complaint a6ainst temporary rates because ' temporary rates g!!; were set based upon the removal of that plant from both base
.I 25 ', ratcs in rate base.
I!
,g.l Hence, if we are going to not consolidate, 33:d:if we are (;oing to run the risk of having different test u m.e: xmmu.. n=. = n. :.:c.c.ru ... .w.- mai== =. =
b
8
. o
-3 9 i d '
.: .\ periods and different data over the same matter that applies 3
'g . in both instance , and if we are going to try and expedite ti G 3 ' the complaint against temporary rates as opposed to running I.
the full base rate case, it seems to us that once again we 4
t 5 1i are back in a posture of seeking extraordinary rate relief f! and not going under the statute for extraordinary rate relief i
7ybutattackingitfromthepointofviewoftemporaryrates, 1
Bfwhichishalfoftheratecasetobeginwith.
I i
9 So we would suggest that it would be a
1 10 ! EPProPriate, as f'.r as we are concerned, to see the matters i
- ! consolidated.
.. - 3
- 1 n i. MR. McCLAREN: Your Honor, the Trial Staff b
13 f would support consolidation for this reason. We think it is
~'
Y both impractical and unnecessary to have separate cases, that 14q!i 15 i the tcst year in the rate proceeding is an appropriate period gg to determine whether there need be any change in teaporary 17 rates, and that if the coupany wishes expedited consideration it jg,of its complaint, it has the appropriate vehir)e to petition t
13iaEain for extraordinary rate relief which was previously
- g i denied without pre, judice.
7,1 So unless the company can state some g convincin6 reason as to why there has to be a differett 33ffactualpresentationandadifferenttitsperiodandseparate 34,; tree.trent for some other reason, it appears to us that it is g
_ W 33- appropriate to consolidate the matters, and whatever determina-
--- - - e n nr -2 2 x.: r a:.. u:c. . .n:. .e::cecc.rer e :. - : =mr=: .- . mu
. 9-li j 0 tion is reached in the rate case will essentially be a i
2 determination of the complaint against temporary rates.
THE ADMINISTRATIVE LAW JUDGE: Mr. Reissell, 3 ff 4 3 what subj ects or issues do you intend to raise in your 5' temporary rate complaint that you have not already raised 6 in your petition for extraordinary rate relief?
7 MR. RUSSELL: We have raised a number of .
S issues with respect to the temporary rates. I would say, 9 first of all, procedurally I think they simply do not bear 10 a constitutional analysis for the manner in which they were 11 a dopted .
17, On the matter of substance, there was no 13} consideration whatsoever as to what the base rate requirements il of Met-Ed should be under a then current picture of its 14 I
15 h operations.
Il And, 'very fiankly, the issue is, I think, one 15[ :
!?q that cries out for prompt adjudication and relief against what t'
13N are literally very oppressive and terribly inadequate and 1?( confiscatory rates.
[
20! So far as the method of presentation in 9
v 21;j support of it is concerned, I don't think I am prepared to
- t .
22ffsayatthispointpreciselywhatitwouldhavetobe,butit I
33.';l cast assuradly., for purposes of it, need not necessarily be 11 the fucure test year we are utilizing in this proceeding as Q' 2j I.
33' the basis for the claim.
- m:a== 1 :. ze: >, .. m m n I
- - :n . u.cmr.:.1.cu r : : :: : ::ma r.~
10 -
't
( - . - -
J
- 1. : It would be, I think, much more expeditious b 2 Ito use a historical period. And perhaps the cost expeditious g
! thing would be to use the historical test period which was 3
,}, filed here pursuant to the Commission's regulations as against 3 a future test year which we think would be the appropriate Sf level to go into effect when the suspension period of this
}
?[ rate filing runs out next "pring.
F o
S. So it s a more present and pressing need i
9i tnan the ultimate resalution of the rate requirements that 10, should go into effect next spring.
11 [ We think they are needs that should havs 12- gone into effect on June the 1st instead of the level that (j, 13. was fixed under the temporary rates. g 14f While all of the rate applications are i
15, precsing, we think the complaint against temporary rates 16{ is by far the most pressing of any of the issues in these l'/ l proceedings assigned to Your Honor, and we think, therefore, gg it shculd be given expedited treatment.
19 ' MR. MORRIS: In taking a decision on this, 20jsir, I uould like to ask you to look at it in another context 21fl than one, I think, suggested by counsel for Met-Ed.
i
,g This is a record which will, because of the
,?3] unprccedented and unfortunate nature of the commercie !. posture
'l 7,) here, raise statutory and constitutional issues which I think I
h JJ ' inevitably - and I would guess Mr. Russell agreed -- likely
a mv.=: a :n:t=u u:c. - m:. :n=c:n::.= .:::. --. :::x:=:c, n m ::
11 o
d g q at least trill be adjudicated in part in a judicial context in g}0court.
It seems to me that the Comaission' ou6ht, 3l ;
when this record goes up following whatever decision it is, 4[
5 lto have all of the record that is available in one place.
6 } I think unless you do that it is going to
? create a question in the minds of the courts, when the 8' statutory and constitutional issues are isolated, as to why 9 the whole ball of wax is not before them to look at all the 10 t details, both in Mr. Russell's favor, and I believe as it 1,, .ould ' support the position of the ratepayers.
12 i THE ADMINISTRATIVE LAW JUDGE: It has been 13,3 indicated that there may be some question of the propriety
.J 14 : and the legality of the complaint against the temporary rates.
15 ; In view of that suggestion or position of Commission staff, i.
165 and in vieu of the fact that we won't have the hearings in i
17 L the rate case imaediately, we would suggest and require 13 counsel to submit to us, on or before October 2, a memorandum E
19 of law in regards to consolidation of the complaint against 20;; temporary rate increases, and also, if counsel have any 21h objection to the legality or the propriety of tha complaint 220 for temtorcry rate increase at this time, that that position k
2Sb and that response to the complaint be filed on or before the
' 0'; -
->!: sa=e a=te -
23 MR. MORRIS: Sir, I am not sure I understand m :==e wwus uw. - w ::. u=n.tn n=. -r=====. = n= -
I
12 yjthesecondrcquestyoumade.
Are you asking whether counsel I
24 have objections to a temporacy --
3 THE ADMINISTRATIVE LAW JUDGE: The Commission
/,. , staff indicated there may be some question as to the legality 5[ of the request for change in temporary rates while the general 4
Sj rate increase proceeding is in effect.
7i In view of the fact that there has been a
Sf suggested there may be come question as to the propriety or I
i 91 the legality of the complaint itself at this time, we would i
10 want that position stated within the same time frame.
I-,
11' MR. MORRIS: I think I understand, sir, but i.
12 [ to be sure that I do, let me stato a position and see if it 13[ answers your question.
E4:
d The ratepayers whom we represent have no 15;!.j objection to your entertaining as soon as p;ssible, whether 16[ornotthestatutepermitsit,therequestwhichhasbeen 4
17 j: filed. If that answers your question --
n 18 THE ADMINISTRATIVE LAW JUDGE: I e.m not u
2.f;jrequiringboth. I am requiring either one or both as the 2h position of counsel. If there is cny contest, if there is
?.l g any position that the complaint itself is illegal or not n
i 32 , lau:.'ul or improper at this tine, then we unnt that position 33 tested primarily before we proceed.
24 "i MR. MORRIS : As long as the entire record ggg 3ri hat t has been made to the date you make a decision is cade
- = =v :n :. .w=w w:. - zw. u. c:. . w:: z.n. - w. m::v==, :~.s m -- - -
13 a
if 1: and is available for any tests that follow, then I see no
. L O 2L reeson uhr envene shou 1d odsect to that. This oushe to be 3 handled as expeditiously as possible.
4b THE ADMINISTRATIVE LAW JUDGE: Well, my 3 position is, if the complaint itself is improper or illegal 0{ at this time, then there is no need to proceed any further I
I if we rule on that portion of the matter.
6 MR. MORRIS : That is simply a position I 9 think we don't wish to take.
Ib MR. RUSSELL: Is there any possibility you
- 11. might move up in time the request for these mesos? I would i
12l say this is an issue of some importance. Could we do it in
. I G 13 ' less than October the 2nd?
fg -
l
^4!' THE ADMIITISTRATIVE LAW JUDGE: What is your Oli suggestion, Mr. Russell? -
i ,
1 NR. RUSSELL: Well, I would say either the 1?[endofthisweekorbeginningofnextweek.
li 183 THE ADMINISTRATIVE LAW JUDGE: End of next V)a week would be Friday, October the 3rd. ,,
3 2N! MR. RUSSELL: Fardon? I was going to 1
r Ja
,, pi suggest possibly the end of this ucek.
22} THE ADMINISTRATIVE LAW JUDGE: 'I beg your a
pardon?
/3 V,-
3'1 'j
- l MR. RUSSELL
- I was going to suggest the end of thiGWeek, the 26th.
- -- = m , m e m m = - m u m m .t.= . = _ ex mi = .=. t m .
14 1 1
1
.,. it, MR. McCLAREN: That would be difficult for i i
l
,C u to meet, Your Honor. We have commitments in other proceed-: 1 2:
i ings, G
o
,,, Personally, Iwi.11 be in hearings three days y this week following this prehearing in another case.
,g I would have no objection to moving it to 7 ,,
September 30th to give us two working days next week. But i
g; I think sooner than that would be entremely difficult for the p staff to meet.
I yn. THE AD.'4INISTRATIVE LAW JUDGE: Is there any t
i 3..; i objection to the date of September 30th?
. .. l t
2Z it 3
MR. BURGRAFF: We would have none, Your Honor.
, ,tj ,- MR. MORRIS : No, sir.
.. t THE ADMINISTRATIVE LAW JUDGE: Very well, we
.q g!3 will amend the time period to submit a memorandum of law and 3j;any objection to the complaint on or before Tuesday, September'
,7,7 the 30th, i r.
gj We will proceed now into the investigation jp l of the rate case itself. ,
l :
20
,j -----
,. ,. u (The prehearing conference adjour .d at 10:39 a.m.)
l "2L"I o'cloch a.m.)
I :
l
'G :; _____ ,
l o z<.S; l \) v a
l 4'
_.- cen:7.::: a r m=:t.: ::::._27 ::. :.oc,:cs.t.o e xn:. _ m.=c:une. r.s : ::: -
ff 1 __oco_.
2 I hereby certify that the proceedings and 3 evidence tre contained fully and accurately in the notes I
4 tahan by me on the hearing of the within cause before the O Pennsylvania Public Utility Cc:miission, and that this is a 0 cur rect transcript of the san.e.
7 I ,
O M0HREACH & MARSHAL, INC.
9 10 By kk N g - Official Reporter .
I 11 f-A 9'- fo U REPORTED DY:
l JAMES P. O'HARA l
Mohrbach & Marshal, Inc.
74 27 Eorth Lockvillow Avenue Harrisburg, Pennsylvania 17112 la-16 i 17 13 19 20 (Tne foregoing certification of this transcript 21 dces not apply to any reproduction of the saune by any means unicss under the direct control and/or supervision of the d' certifying reporter.)
23 l
o C 24 25- Date nev.u.:n a n na u.: ere.-n n. s.om:w u.cw mr. - ex:wrun, rA m n
- _ - - - - -