ML15321A470

From kanterella
Revision as of 07:29, 5 February 2020 by StriderTol (talk | contribs) (Created page by program invented by StriderTol)
(diff) ← Older revision | Latest revision (diff) | Newer revision → (diff)
Jump to navigation Jump to search
Lr Hearing - Draft Audit Plan
ML15321A470
Person / Time
Site: Indian Point  Entergy icon.png
Issue date: 11/17/2015
From:
Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation
To:
References
Download: ML15321A470 (11)
v • d • e


Text

IPRenewal NPEmails From: Wentzel, Michael Sent: Tuesday, November 17, 2015 4:17 PM To: Louie, Richard (rlouie@entergy.com)

Subject:

Draft Audit Plan Attachments: Draft Audit Plan for the Service Water System and Fire Water System Aging Management Programs.docx

Rich, As discussed, here is a draft of the audit needs list for the audit that we are proposing. Once you've had a chance to review, let me know and we can further discuss logistics.
Thanks, Mike 1

Hearing Identifier: IndianPointUnits2and3NonPublic_EX Email Number: 5366 Mail Envelope Properties (9157016903354384b018511c880c0e27)

Subject:

Draft Audit Plan Sent Date: 11/17/2015 4:17:02 PM Received Date: 11/17/2015 4:17:05 PM From: Wentzel, Michael Created By: Michael.Wentzel@nrc.gov Recipients:

"Louie, Richard (rlouie@entergy.com)" <rlouie@entergy.com>

Tracking Status: None Post Office: HQPWMSMRS02.nrc.gov Files Size Date & Time MESSAGE 202 11/17/2015 4:17:05 PM Draft Audit Plan for the Service Water System and Fire Water System Aging Management Programs.docx 346347 Options Priority: Standard Return Notification: No Reply Requested: No Sensitivity: Normal Expiration Date:

Recipients Received:

UNITED STATES NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION WASHINGTON, D.C. 20555-0001 Vice President, Operations Entergy Nuclear Operations, Inc.

Indian Point Energy Center 450 Broadway, GSB P.O. Box 249 Buchanan, NY 10511-0249

SUBJECT:

PLAN FOR THE REGULATORY AUDIT OF THE SERVICE WATER SYSTEM AND FIRE WATER SYSTEM AGING MANAGEMENT PROGRAMS PERTAINING TO THE INDIAN POINT NUCLEAR GENERATING UNIT NOS. 2 AND 3 LICENSE RENEWAL APPLICATION (CAC NOS. MD5407 AND MD5408)

Dear Sir or Madam:

By letter dated April 23, 2007, as supplemented by letters dated May 3, 2007, and June 21, 2007, Entergy Nuclear Operations, Inc. (Entergy), submitted an application pursuant to Title 10 of the Code of Federal Regulations Part 54 the U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC) for renewal of the operating licenses for Indian Point Nuclear Generating Unit Nos. 2 and 3 (IP2 and IP3). The NRC staff documented its findings in the Safety Evaluation Report (SER) related to the license renewal of IP2 and IP3, which was issued August 11, 2009 and supplemented August 30, 2011 (SER Supplement 1), and November 6, 2014 (SER Supplement 2). Subsequent the issuance of SER Supplement 1, the NRC staff identified additional operating experience at several nuclear power plants regarding recurring internal corrosion, corrosion occurring under insulation, and managing aging effects for fire water system components. To address this operating experience, on November 22, 2013, the NRC staff issued interim staff guidance document LR-ISG-2012-02, "Aging Management of Internal Surfaces, Fire Water Systems, Atmospheric Storage Tanks, and Corrosion Under Insulation.

In accordance with the enclosed audit plan, the NRC staff plans to conduct an onsite audit of the service water system and fire water system aging management programs during the week of FILL IN DATE. If you have any questions, please contact me by telephone at 301-415-6459, or by e-mail at michael.wentzel@nrc.gov.

Sincerely, Michael J. Wentzel, Project Manager Projects Branch 2 Division of License Renewal Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation Docket Nos. 50-247 and 50-286

Enclosure:

As stated cc w/encl: Listserv

  • concurrence via email OFFICE LA:DLR* PM:RPB2:DLR BC:RARB:DLR BC:RPB1:DLR PM:RPB2:DLR NAME IBetts MWentzel DMorey YDiaz MWentzel DATE Letter to Vice President, Operations, Entergy from M. Wentzel dated XXXXXX

SUBJECT:

PLAN FOR THE REGULATORY AUDIT OF THE SERVICE WATER SYSTEM AND FIRE WATER SYSTEM AGING MANAGEMENT PROGRAMS PERTAINING TO THE INDIAN POINT NUCLEAR GENERATING UNIT NOS. 2 AND 3 LICENSE RENEWAL APPLICATION (CAC NOS. MD5407 AND MD5408)

DISTRIBUTION:

HARD COPY:

DLR RF E-MAIL:

PUBLIC RidsNrrDlr Resource RidsNrrDlrRpb1 Resource RidsNrrDlrRpb2 Resource RidsNrrDlrRarb Resource RidsNrrDlrRasb Resource RidsNrrDlrRerb Resource RidsNrrDlrRsrg Resource RidsNrrDraAfpb Resource RidsNrrDeEvib Resource RidsNrrDeEeeb Resource RidsNrrDssSrxb Resource RidsNrrDssSbpb Resource RidsNrrDssScvb Resource RidsOgcMailCenter Resource RidsNrrPMIndianPoint Resource YDiaz MWentzel WHolston DPickett STurk, OGC DRoth, OGC BHarris, OGC SBurnell, OPA DMcIntyre, OPA JWeil, OCA MGray, RI GDentel, RI DonaldJackson, RI MModes, RI NSheehan, RI OPA DScrenci, RI OPA DTifft, RI NMcNamara, RI BHaagensen, RI GNewman, RI SRich, RI

Audit Plan Service Water System and Fire Water System Aging Management Program Review for the Indian Point Nuclear Generating Unit Nos. 2 and 3 License Renewal Application INSERT DATES Division of License Renewal Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission ENCLOSURE

Service Water System and Fire Water System Aging Management Program Audit Plan Indian Point Nuclear Generating Unit Nos. 2 and 3

1. Background By letter dated April 23, 2007, as supplemented by letters dated May 3, 2007, and June 21, 2007, Entergy Nuclear Operations, Inc. (Entergy), submitted an application pursuant to Title 10 of the Code of Federal Regulations Part 54 the U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC) for renewal of the operating licenses for Indian Point Nuclear Generating Unit Nos. 2 and 3 (IP2 and IP3). The NRC staff documented its findings in the Safety Evaluation Report (SER) related to the license renewal of IP2 and IP3, which was issued August 11, 2009 and supplemented August 30, 2011 (SER Supplement 1), and November 6, 2014 (SER Supplement 2).

Subsequent the issuance of SER Supplement 1, the NRC staff identified additional operating experience at several nuclear power plants regarding recurring internal corrosion, corrosion occurring under insulation, and managing aging effects for fire water system (FWS) components. To address this operating experience, on November 22, 2013, the NRC staff issued interim staff guidance document LR-ISG-2012-02, "Aging Management of Internal Surfaces, Fire Water Systems, Atmospheric Storage Tanks, and Corrosion Under Insulation.

The NRC staff from the Division of License Renewal will lead a supplemental regulatory audit to gain a better understanding of Entergys responses to requests for additional information (RAIs) related to LR-ISG-2012-02, submitted by letters dated December 16, 2014, and August 18, 2015 (ADAMS Accession Nos. ML14365A069 and ML15236A017, respectively). The audit will cover the aging management programs (AMPs) for managing recurring internal corrosion in the service water system (SWS) and FWS.

2. Regulatory Audit Bases License renewal requirements are specified in Title 10 of the Code of Federal Regulations (CFR), Part 54 (10 CFR Part 54), Requirements for Renewal of Operating Licenses for Nuclear Power Plants. Guidance is provided in NUREG-1800, Rev. 2, Standard Review Plan for Review of License Renewal Applications for Nuclear Power Plants (SRP-LR), dated December 2010, NUREG-1801, Rev. 2, Generic Aging Lessons Learned (GALL) Report, dated December 2010, and LR-ISG-2012-02, "Aging Management of Internal Surfaces, Fire Water Systems, Atmospheric Storage Tanks, and Corrosion Under Insulation, dated November 2013.
3. Regulatory Audit Scope The scope of this audit is to examine Entergys RAI response, associated materials, and supporting documentation for the SWS and FWS AMPs. Audit team members will focus on reviewing the documents and requested information listed in the Audit Needs section of this plan and discussing the information with Entergys subject matter experts.
4. Information and Other Material Necessary for the Regulatory Audit As described in the Audit Needs List.
5. Team Assignments Area of Review Assigned Auditor Project Manager Michael Wentzel Technical Reviewer James Gavula

Area of Review Assigned Auditor Technical Reviewer William Holston Technical Reviewer Brian Allik

6. Logistics The audit will be conducted on location at the IP2 and IP3 site from DATE to DATE. Entrance and exit briefings will be held at the beginning and end of the audit, respectively.
7. Special Requests The NRC staff request a suitable facility for the audit team to caucus during the audit. In addition, the NRC staff request Entergy have one or more break-out rooms available for meetings between staff and Entergy personnel.
8. Deliverables The NRC staff will issue an audit report to Entergy, which normally occurs within 90 days from the end of the audit.
9. References
a. Periodic Summary Report of NRC Regulatory Commitment Changes at Indian Point 1 and 2, Letter NL-01-088, dated July 3, 2001.
b. Reply to Request for Additional Information Regarding License Renewal Application -

Operating Experience, Letter NL-08-091, dated June 5, 2008.

c. NUREG 1930, Safety Evaluation Report Related to the License Renewal of Indian Point Nuclear Generating Unit Nos. 2 and 3, dated November 2009.
d. Reply to Request for Additional Information Regarding the License Renewal Application, Indian Point Nuclear Generating Unit Nos. 2 & 3, Letter NL-14-147, dated December 16, 2014.
e. Reply to Request for Additional Information Regarding the License Renewal Application, Indian Point Nuclear Generating Unit Nos. 2 & 3, Letter NL-15-092, dated August 18, 2015.

Service Water System and Fire Water System Aging Management Programs Audit Needs List DATE

1. Documents or Information for Review:
a. Plant-specific leak-related operating experience for the FWS and city water system (CWS), and all associated corrective action entries for the past 10 years. This should include all leaks with the exception of packing leaks.
b. Inspection reports for the 14 non-destructive evaluation (NDE) inspections for FWS (9 IP1 and 5 IP2).
c. Tmin computations and stress reports to determine longitudinal pipe stress in the vicinity of the 14 NDE inspections.
d. Copy of preventive maintenance for charcoal replacement and sampling for the IP2, IP3, and Technical Support Center (TSC) charcoal filter units.
e. Drawings of charcoal filter units in relation to location of deluge piping.
f. Drawings showing the number and location of all in-scope wet pipe sprinkler systems.
g. A copy of the Service Water Inspection Program
h. For the leaks discussed in response to RAI 3.0.3-4, request 4b (NL-15-092):
i. Provide associated corrective action documents for all service water system leaks within the past 10 years. In addition to these documents, also include a summary of all corrective action documents associated with the service water system within the past 10 years.

ii. Distinguish between those leaks associated with internal lining/coating issues (i.e.,

gaps in concrete lining, or failed coating) and those leaks not associated with internal coating issues.

iii. For any of the in-service inspection (ISI) Class 3 leaks where American Society of Mechanical Engineers (ASME) Code Case 513-3 was used, provide the locations of the augmented sample(s) examined and the engineering evaluations that identified these locations as being the most susceptible.

2. Interview and Discussion Meeting:
a. Discuss the adequacy of the number of inspections conducted to date to manage loss of material due to recurring internal corrosion in the fire water and city water systems.

It is not clear to the staff that sufficient inspections have been conducted to justify a one-time based exclusion of future inspections (i.e., 9 inspections at Unit 1, 5 at Unit 2, none at Unit 3).

b. Discuss: 1) the effect of leakage on nearby safety-related components; 2) acceptance criteria in relation to the pressure boundary function and structural integrity (attached) function of the piping; 3) the lack of specificity related to extent of condition inspections that would occur if opportunistic inspections or leakage events reveal wall loss sufficient to cause leakage, loss of pressure boundary function; or loss of structural integrity (attached) function; and 4) based on the probable lack of volumetric wall thickness data from original construction, specifically how inspection results were projected to 60 years.
c. Describe the configuration of the water distribution piping inside each of the in-scope charcoal filter units. For example, is the water distributed by nozzles, or flow holes?

Is the piping above or within the charcoal beds? Will the piping be inspected during charcoal replacement or sampling? What is the periodicity of replacement and sampling? Reference enhancements appearing in Attachment 2, page 10 of 13 of letter NL-15-092.

d. Describe the periodicity of deluge valve testing for all in-scope charcoal filter beds and the method of conducting the testing. Exception No. 3, Attachment 2, page 57 of 66 of letter NL-14-147 states that, [t]he deluge valve for the IP2 primary auxiliary building exhaust, containment building purge exhaust and containment building pressure relief charcoal units are tested each refueling outage, which is every two years.
e. Describe the number of wet pipe sprinkler systems in each building and the basis for inspecting one-third of the systems instead of one-half as cited by NFPA 25, Standard for the Inspection, Testing, and Maintenance of Water-Based Fire Protection Systems, Section 14.2.
f. Reconcile the response to RAI 3.0.3-4, request 4b (NL-15-092), which reported three ISI Class 3 leaks identified in 2013, with the statement in Licensee Event Report (LER) 247/2013-004 that eight pin hole leaks were discovered during an engineering walkdown of the service water system where seven leaks were on socket welds and one was on an elbow with all located in the ASME Section XI Code boundary.
g. In context of the following statement (NL-01-088, Attachment 1), provide details relating to the radiographic inspections of the service water piping welds that are performed as part of the Generic Letter (GL) 89-13 program:

The exam is also more sophisticated than a random 10% of welds. For example, the exam for 10 inch piping inside containment is as follows:

20% of welds that have shown moderate scalloping, 5% of the welds that have shown scalloping, 1% of welds that have minor scalloping and 1% of previously accepted or repaired welds.

h. Provide details relating to the internal visual inspections performed by the Service Water Integrity program (i.e., how much piping is inspected and frequency of inspections). Describe the process for using the results from the visual inspections to directing volumetric inspections.
i. Identify the approximate number of safety-related locations and nonsafety-related locations that are in-scope for the Service Water Integrity Program. Response 4c to RAI 3.0.3-4 (NL-15-092) states that 20 to 30 locations are inspected each outage; what percentage of the total locations does this number represent?
j. The response to RAI AUX-2 (NL-08-091, Attachment I) states that the Service Water Integrity Program is credited for managing the effects of aging on components as listed in LRA Section 3 Tables regardless of safety classification. LER 286/2011-003 states that the GL 89-13 program will be revised to include nonsafety-related service water lines 1221 and 1222. Provide discussion relating to how these piping segments will be treated differently in the GL 89-13 program as compared to how they were treated in the Service Water Integrity Program. Are these now the only nonsafety-related piping segments included in the GL 89-13 program?
k. LER 286/2014-002 states that procedure 3-PT-185B was specifically developed to address problems with leaks developing in stagnant vent and drain connection piping and it is the main line of defense for preventing future leaks. The response to RAI 3.0.3-4 (NL-15-092) states that the flushing and inspections performed under 3-PT-185B have been effective at managing the effects of aging; however, leaks continue to occur in the associated piping. Of the leaks that occurred in the past 10 years, provide information about the leaks that occurred in the piping segments where 3-PT-185B was or should have been used.
l. Inspections of the service water intake structure are included as part of GL 89-13. If these inspections are not part of the Service Water Integrity Program, which aging management program do these inspections fall under? Discuss the differences/similarities between the silting issue that is documented in LER 247/2011-003 and the silting levels seen in 2007. Discuss corrective actions from 2007, and whether these should have prevented the 2011 event.

IPRenewal NPEmails From: Wentzel, Michael Sent: Tuesday, November 17, 2015 4:17 PM To: Louie, Richard (rlouie@entergy.com)

Subject:

Draft Audit Plan Attachments: Draft Audit Plan for the Service Water System and Fire Water System Aging Management Programs.docx

Rich, As discussed, here is a draft of the audit needs list for the audit that we are proposing. Once you've had a chance to review, let me know and we can further discuss logistics.
Thanks, Mike 1

Hearing Identifier: IndianPointUnits2and3NonPublic_EX Email Number: 5366 Mail Envelope Properties (9157016903354384b018511c880c0e27)

Subject:

Draft Audit Plan Sent Date: 11/17/2015 4:17:02 PM Received Date: 11/17/2015 4:17:05 PM From: Wentzel, Michael Created By: Michael.Wentzel@nrc.gov Recipients:

"Louie, Richard (rlouie@entergy.com)" <rlouie@entergy.com>

Tracking Status: None Post Office: HQPWMSMRS02.nrc.gov Files Size Date & Time MESSAGE 202 11/17/2015 4:17:05 PM Draft Audit Plan for the Service Water System and Fire Water System Aging Management Programs.docx 346347 Options Priority: Standard Return Notification: No Reply Requested: No Sensitivity: Normal Expiration Date:

Recipients Received:

UNITED STATES NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION WASHINGTON, D.C. 20555-0001 Vice President, Operations Entergy Nuclear Operations, Inc.

Indian Point Energy Center 450 Broadway, GSB P.O. Box 249 Buchanan, NY 10511-0249

SUBJECT:

PLAN FOR THE REGULATORY AUDIT OF THE SERVICE WATER SYSTEM AND FIRE WATER SYSTEM AGING MANAGEMENT PROGRAMS PERTAINING TO THE INDIAN POINT NUCLEAR GENERATING UNIT NOS. 2 AND 3 LICENSE RENEWAL APPLICATION (CAC NOS. MD5407 AND MD5408)

Dear Sir or Madam:

By letter dated April 23, 2007, as supplemented by letters dated May 3, 2007, and June 21, 2007, Entergy Nuclear Operations, Inc. (Entergy), submitted an application pursuant to Title 10 of the Code of Federal Regulations Part 54 the U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC) for renewal of the operating licenses for Indian Point Nuclear Generating Unit Nos. 2 and 3 (IP2 and IP3). The NRC staff documented its findings in the Safety Evaluation Report (SER) related to the license renewal of IP2 and IP3, which was issued August 11, 2009 and supplemented August 30, 2011 (SER Supplement 1), and November 6, 2014 (SER Supplement 2). Subsequent the issuance of SER Supplement 1, the NRC staff identified additional operating experience at several nuclear power plants regarding recurring internal corrosion, corrosion occurring under insulation, and managing aging effects for fire water system components. To address this operating experience, on November 22, 2013, the NRC staff issued interim staff guidance document LR-ISG-2012-02, "Aging Management of Internal Surfaces, Fire Water Systems, Atmospheric Storage Tanks, and Corrosion Under Insulation.

In accordance with the enclosed audit plan, the NRC staff plans to conduct an onsite audit of the service water system and fire water system aging management programs during the week of FILL IN DATE. If you have any questions, please contact me by telephone at 301-415-6459, or by e-mail at michael.wentzel@nrc.gov.

Sincerely, Michael J. Wentzel, Project Manager Projects Branch 2 Division of License Renewal Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation Docket Nos. 50-247 and 50-286

Enclosure:

As stated cc w/encl: Listserv

  • concurrence via email OFFICE LA:DLR* PM:RPB2:DLR BC:RARB:DLR BC:RPB1:DLR PM:RPB2:DLR NAME IBetts MWentzel DMorey YDiaz MWentzel DATE Letter to Vice President, Operations, Entergy from M. Wentzel dated XXXXXX

SUBJECT:

PLAN FOR THE REGULATORY AUDIT OF THE SERVICE WATER SYSTEM AND FIRE WATER SYSTEM AGING MANAGEMENT PROGRAMS PERTAINING TO THE INDIAN POINT NUCLEAR GENERATING UNIT NOS. 2 AND 3 LICENSE RENEWAL APPLICATION (CAC NOS. MD5407 AND MD5408)

DISTRIBUTION:

HARD COPY:

DLR RF E-MAIL:

PUBLIC RidsNrrDlr Resource RidsNrrDlrRpb1 Resource RidsNrrDlrRpb2 Resource RidsNrrDlrRarb Resource RidsNrrDlrRasb Resource RidsNrrDlrRerb Resource RidsNrrDlrRsrg Resource RidsNrrDraAfpb Resource RidsNrrDeEvib Resource RidsNrrDeEeeb Resource RidsNrrDssSrxb Resource RidsNrrDssSbpb Resource RidsNrrDssScvb Resource RidsOgcMailCenter Resource RidsNrrPMIndianPoint Resource YDiaz MWentzel WHolston DPickett STurk, OGC DRoth, OGC BHarris, OGC SBurnell, OPA DMcIntyre, OPA JWeil, OCA MGray, RI GDentel, RI DonaldJackson, RI MModes, RI NSheehan, RI OPA DScrenci, RI OPA DTifft, RI NMcNamara, RI BHaagensen, RI GNewman, RI SRich, RI

Audit Plan Service Water System and Fire Water System Aging Management Program Review for the Indian Point Nuclear Generating Unit Nos. 2 and 3 License Renewal Application INSERT DATES Division of License Renewal Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission ENCLOSURE

Service Water System and Fire Water System Aging Management Program Audit Plan Indian Point Nuclear Generating Unit Nos. 2 and 3

1. Background By letter dated April 23, 2007, as supplemented by letters dated May 3, 2007, and June 21, 2007, Entergy Nuclear Operations, Inc. (Entergy), submitted an application pursuant to Title 10 of the Code of Federal Regulations Part 54 the U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC) for renewal of the operating licenses for Indian Point Nuclear Generating Unit Nos. 2 and 3 (IP2 and IP3). The NRC staff documented its findings in the Safety Evaluation Report (SER) related to the license renewal of IP2 and IP3, which was issued August 11, 2009 and supplemented August 30, 2011 (SER Supplement 1), and November 6, 2014 (SER Supplement 2).

Subsequent the issuance of SER Supplement 1, the NRC staff identified additional operating experience at several nuclear power plants regarding recurring internal corrosion, corrosion occurring under insulation, and managing aging effects for fire water system (FWS) components. To address this operating experience, on November 22, 2013, the NRC staff issued interim staff guidance document LR-ISG-2012-02, "Aging Management of Internal Surfaces, Fire Water Systems, Atmospheric Storage Tanks, and Corrosion Under Insulation.

The NRC staff from the Division of License Renewal will lead a supplemental regulatory audit to gain a better understanding of Entergys responses to requests for additional information (RAIs) related to LR-ISG-2012-02, submitted by letters dated December 16, 2014, and August 18, 2015 (ADAMS Accession Nos. ML14365A069 and ML15236A017, respectively). The audit will cover the aging management programs (AMPs) for managing recurring internal corrosion in the service water system (SWS) and FWS.

2. Regulatory Audit Bases License renewal requirements are specified in Title 10 of the Code of Federal Regulations (CFR), Part 54 (10 CFR Part 54), Requirements for Renewal of Operating Licenses for Nuclear Power Plants. Guidance is provided in NUREG-1800, Rev. 2, Standard Review Plan for Review of License Renewal Applications for Nuclear Power Plants (SRP-LR), dated December 2010, NUREG-1801, Rev. 2, Generic Aging Lessons Learned (GALL) Report, dated December 2010, and LR-ISG-2012-02, "Aging Management of Internal Surfaces, Fire Water Systems, Atmospheric Storage Tanks, and Corrosion Under Insulation, dated November 2013.
3. Regulatory Audit Scope The scope of this audit is to examine Entergys RAI response, associated materials, and supporting documentation for the SWS and FWS AMPs. Audit team members will focus on reviewing the documents and requested information listed in the Audit Needs section of this plan and discussing the information with Entergys subject matter experts.
4. Information and Other Material Necessary for the Regulatory Audit As described in the Audit Needs List.
5. Team Assignments Area of Review Assigned Auditor Project Manager Michael Wentzel Technical Reviewer James Gavula

Area of Review Assigned Auditor Technical Reviewer William Holston Technical Reviewer Brian Allik

6. Logistics The audit will be conducted on location at the IP2 and IP3 site from DATE to DATE. Entrance and exit briefings will be held at the beginning and end of the audit, respectively.
7. Special Requests The NRC staff request a suitable facility for the audit team to caucus during the audit. In addition, the NRC staff request Entergy have one or more break-out rooms available for meetings between staff and Entergy personnel.
8. Deliverables The NRC staff will issue an audit report to Entergy, which normally occurs within 90 days from the end of the audit.
9. References
a. Periodic Summary Report of NRC Regulatory Commitment Changes at Indian Point 1 and 2, Letter NL-01-088, dated July 3, 2001.
b. Reply to Request for Additional Information Regarding License Renewal Application -

Operating Experience, Letter NL-08-091, dated June 5, 2008.

c. NUREG 1930, Safety Evaluation Report Related to the License Renewal of Indian Point Nuclear Generating Unit Nos. 2 and 3, dated November 2009.
d. Reply to Request for Additional Information Regarding the License Renewal Application, Indian Point Nuclear Generating Unit Nos. 2 & 3, Letter NL-14-147, dated December 16, 2014.
e. Reply to Request for Additional Information Regarding the License Renewal Application, Indian Point Nuclear Generating Unit Nos. 2 & 3, Letter NL-15-092, dated August 18, 2015.

Service Water System and Fire Water System Aging Management Programs Audit Needs List DATE

1. Documents or Information for Review:
a. Plant-specific leak-related operating experience for the FWS and city water system (CWS), and all associated corrective action entries for the past 10 years. This should include all leaks with the exception of packing leaks.
b. Inspection reports for the 14 non-destructive evaluation (NDE) inspections for FWS (9 IP1 and 5 IP2).
c. Tmin computations and stress reports to determine longitudinal pipe stress in the vicinity of the 14 NDE inspections.
d. Copy of preventive maintenance for charcoal replacement and sampling for the IP2, IP3, and Technical Support Center (TSC) charcoal filter units.
e. Drawings of charcoal filter units in relation to location of deluge piping.
f. Drawings showing the number and location of all in-scope wet pipe sprinkler systems.
g. A copy of the Service Water Inspection Program
h. For the leaks discussed in response to RAI 3.0.3-4, request 4b (NL-15-092):
i. Provide associated corrective action documents for all service water system leaks within the past 10 years. In addition to these documents, also include a summary of all corrective action documents associated with the service water system within the past 10 years.

ii. Distinguish between those leaks associated with internal lining/coating issues (i.e.,

gaps in concrete lining, or failed coating) and those leaks not associated with internal coating issues.

iii. For any of the in-service inspection (ISI) Class 3 leaks where American Society of Mechanical Engineers (ASME) Code Case 513-3 was used, provide the locations of the augmented sample(s) examined and the engineering evaluations that identified these locations as being the most susceptible.

2. Interview and Discussion Meeting:
a. Discuss the adequacy of the number of inspections conducted to date to manage loss of material due to recurring internal corrosion in the fire water and city water systems.

It is not clear to the staff that sufficient inspections have been conducted to justify a one-time based exclusion of future inspections (i.e., 9 inspections at Unit 1, 5 at Unit 2, none at Unit 3).

b. Discuss: 1) the effect of leakage on nearby safety-related components; 2) acceptance criteria in relation to the pressure boundary function and structural integrity (attached) function of the piping; 3) the lack of specificity related to extent of condition inspections that would occur if opportunistic inspections or leakage events reveal wall loss sufficient to cause leakage, loss of pressure boundary function; or loss of structural integrity (attached) function; and 4) based on the probable lack of volumetric wall thickness data from original construction, specifically how inspection results were projected to 60 years.
c. Describe the configuration of the water distribution piping inside each of the in-scope charcoal filter units. For example, is the water distributed by nozzles, or flow holes?

Is the piping above or within the charcoal beds? Will the piping be inspected during charcoal replacement or sampling? What is the periodicity of replacement and sampling? Reference enhancements appearing in Attachment 2, page 10 of 13 of letter NL-15-092.

d. Describe the periodicity of deluge valve testing for all in-scope charcoal filter beds and the method of conducting the testing. Exception No. 3, Attachment 2, page 57 of 66 of letter NL-14-147 states that, [t]he deluge valve for the IP2 primary auxiliary building exhaust, containment building purge exhaust and containment building pressure relief charcoal units are tested each refueling outage, which is every two years.
e. Describe the number of wet pipe sprinkler systems in each building and the basis for inspecting one-third of the systems instead of one-half as cited by NFPA 25, Standard for the Inspection, Testing, and Maintenance of Water-Based Fire Protection Systems, Section 14.2.
f. Reconcile the response to RAI 3.0.3-4, request 4b (NL-15-092), which reported three ISI Class 3 leaks identified in 2013, with the statement in Licensee Event Report (LER) 247/2013-004 that eight pin hole leaks were discovered during an engineering walkdown of the service water system where seven leaks were on socket welds and one was on an elbow with all located in the ASME Section XI Code boundary.
g. In context of the following statement (NL-01-088, Attachment 1), provide details relating to the radiographic inspections of the service water piping welds that are performed as part of the Generic Letter (GL) 89-13 program:

The exam is also more sophisticated than a random 10% of welds. For example, the exam for 10 inch piping inside containment is as follows:

20% of welds that have shown moderate scalloping, 5% of the welds that have shown scalloping, 1% of welds that have minor scalloping and 1% of previously accepted or repaired welds.

h. Provide details relating to the internal visual inspections performed by the Service Water Integrity program (i.e., how much piping is inspected and frequency of inspections). Describe the process for using the results from the visual inspections to directing volumetric inspections.
i. Identify the approximate number of safety-related locations and nonsafety-related locations that are in-scope for the Service Water Integrity Program. Response 4c to RAI 3.0.3-4 (NL-15-092) states that 20 to 30 locations are inspected each outage; what percentage of the total locations does this number represent?
j. The response to RAI AUX-2 (NL-08-091, Attachment I) states that the Service Water Integrity Program is credited for managing the effects of aging on components as listed in LRA Section 3 Tables regardless of safety classification. LER 286/2011-003 states that the GL 89-13 program will be revised to include nonsafety-related service water lines 1221 and 1222. Provide discussion relating to how these piping segments will be treated differently in the GL 89-13 program as compared to how they were treated in the Service Water Integrity Program. Are these now the only nonsafety-related piping segments included in the GL 89-13 program?
k. LER 286/2014-002 states that procedure 3-PT-185B was specifically developed to address problems with leaks developing in stagnant vent and drain connection piping and it is the main line of defense for preventing future leaks. The response to RAI 3.0.3-4 (NL-15-092) states that the flushing and inspections performed under 3-PT-185B have been effective at managing the effects of aging; however, leaks continue to occur in the associated piping. Of the leaks that occurred in the past 10 years, provide information about the leaks that occurred in the piping segments where 3-PT-185B was or should have been used.
l. Inspections of the service water intake structure are included as part of GL 89-13. If these inspections are not part of the Service Water Integrity Program, which aging management program do these inspections fall under? Discuss the differences/similarities between the silting issue that is documented in LER 247/2011-003 and the silting levels seen in 2007. Discuss corrective actions from 2007, and whether these should have prevented the 2011 event.
Retrieved from "https://kanterella.com/w/index.php?title=ML15321A470&oldid=2446317"