|
---|
Category:TECHNICAL SPECIFICATIONS
MONTHYEARML20210K3631999-07-30030 July 1999 Marked-up & Revised TS Bases Page B 3/4 5-2 Re ECCS ML20196G3671999-06-23023 June 1999 Proposed Tech Specs Increasing AOT for Crac from 30 Days to 60 Days on One Time Basis for Each Train to Facilitate on- Line Implementation of Design Enhancements During Current Operating Cycle ML20198E7411998-12-16016 December 1998 Proposed Tech Specs Pages Re LAR-98-15,involving Relocation of TS 3/4.7.10 & Associated TS Table 3.7-3 to Technical Requirements Manual ML20198E7831998-12-16016 December 1998 Proposed Tech Specs Pages to LAR 98-09,re Editorial & Administrative Changes to TS ML20155J1821998-11-0404 November 1998 Proposed Tech Specs 4.5.2b.1,removing Prescriptive Requirements of Using Venting Process as Sole Means to Verify That ECCS Piping Is Full of Water ML20249B4181998-06-17017 June 1998 Proposed Tech Specs 3.7.6 Re Control Room Emergency Makeup Air & Filtration Subsystem ML20247R7021998-05-20020 May 1998 Proposed Tech Specs Re Rev of Refueling Water Storage Tank low-low Level Setpoint ML20217E8871998-04-22022 April 1998 Proposed Tech Specs Re Surveillance Intervals to Accommodate 24-month Fuel Cycle,Per GL 91-04 ML20217F9651998-04-21021 April 1998 Proposed Tech Specs Page 3/4 5-5 Re Venting of Operating Chemical Vol & Control Sys Centrifugal Charging Pump ML20216C5921998-04-0808 April 1998 Proposed Tech Specs Changing Surveillance Intervals to Accommodate 24-month Fuel Cycle Per GL 91-04 ML20217Q2981998-04-0303 April 1998 Proposed Tech Specs Pages Re LAR 98-02,proposing Changes to TS to Accommodate Fuel Cycles of Up to 24 Months ML20217M3771998-03-27027 March 1998 Proposed Tech Specs 3.7.6 Re Control Room Emergency Makeup Air & Filtration Subsystem ML20217F0961998-03-23023 March 1998 Proposed Tech Specs Pages,Incorporating New Spec 3.0.5 Administrative Controls,Currently Approved for Use in NUREG-1431 ML20217Q1031998-03-0505 March 1998 Proposed Tech Specs Incorporating Programmatic Controls for Radioactive Effluents & for Environ Monitoring Conforming to Applicable Regulatory Requirements ML20217N7321998-03-0202 March 1998 Proposed Tech Specs Pages,Revising Frequency for Performance of Specific Surveillances & Deleting Requirements for Accelerated Testing When Number of Valid Test Failures Associated W/Edgs Is Met or Exceeded ML20217N8211998-03-0202 March 1998 Proposed Tech Specs 4.5.2B.1,excluding Prescriptive Requirement to Vent Operating CVCS CCP Casing ML20211E9981997-09-26026 September 1997 Proposed Tech Specs 3.7.6,separating Requirements for CR HVAC Sys Re Operation of CR Emergency Makeup Air & Filtration Sys Subsystem & CR Air Conditioning Subsystem ML20148G0011997-05-29029 May 1997 Proposed Tech Specs Replacing Term Zircaloy W/Terminology That Identifies NRC Approved Westinghouse Fuel Assembly Design Consisting of Assemblies W/Either ZIRLO or Zircaloy- 4 Fuel Cladding Matl ML20135C3541997-02-26026 February 1997 Proposed Tech Specs,Providing Retyped Page of Proposed Changes Re Design Features Fuel Assembly Reconstitution ML20134Q3451997-02-18018 February 1997 Proposed Tech Specs 5.3.1 Re Fuel Assemblies ML20134L8681997-02-12012 February 1997 Proposed Tech Specs 6.0 Re Administrative Controls ML20129B8361996-10-17017 October 1996 Proposed Tech Specs,Consisting of Change Request 96-02, Proposing Changes That Involve Relocation of Four TS Re Instrumentation Requirements Contained in TS Section 3/4.3 & Relocation of Selected Requirements ML20129B7761996-10-16016 October 1996 Proposed Tech Specs,Consisting of Change Request 96-06, Proposing Four Changes Re EDG Requirements Contained in TS 3/4.8.1, AC Sources ML20113B2031996-06-20020 June 1996 Proposed Tech Specs Re Svc Water Cooling Tower Loop Electrical Supply ML20117K3111996-06-0404 June 1996 Proposed Tech Specs Re Containment Leakage Testing Modifying Implementing Performance Based Program at Seabrook Station IAW 10CFR50,App J,Option B & Reg Guide 1.163 Requirements ML20094D5341995-10-30030 October 1995 Proposed Tech Spec 3.4.6.2, RCS Operational Leakage Pressure Isolation Valve Table ML20092M1071995-09-22022 September 1995 Proposed TS 3.3.2,Table 3.3-3, ESFAS Instrumentation, Correcting Action Ref for Functional Unit 8.b Re Automatic Switchover to Containment Sump/Rwst Level low-low ML20098A4721995-09-20020 September 1995 Proposed Tech Specs,Relocating Functional Unit 6.b, FW Isolation-Low RCS Tavg Coincident W/Rt from TS Requirements Manual Licensee Controlled Document ML20092K2201995-09-20020 September 1995 Proposed Tech Specs,Changing Plant TS Bases Section 3/4.9.1 for Refueling B Concentration ML20092F9171995-09-12012 September 1995 Proposed Tech Specs Bases Section Clarifying What Specifically Constitutes Operable Pressurizer Safety Valve in Mode 5 ML20092A6331995-09-0505 September 1995 Proposed Tech Specs,Revising Main Steam Safety Valve Setpoints & Max Allowable Power Range Neutron Flux High Setpoints W/Inoperable Main Steam Safety Valves ML20091S1601995-08-28028 August 1995 Proposed Tech Specs Re Positive Moderator Temp Coefficient ML20086R2111995-07-24024 July 1995 Proposed Tech Specs,Relocating Table 3.4-1, RCS PIVs from TS 3.4.6.2, RCS Operational Leakage to Techical Requirements Manual ML20085L1161995-06-16016 June 1995 Proposed Tech Specs Re Increased Requirements for Core Reactivity Control Available from Borated Water Sources ML20084U5521995-06-0707 June 1995 Proposed Tech Specs,Consisting of Amend Request 95-02, Revising Footnote to SR 4.4.7 & Table 3.4-2 to Increase Temp Limit at Which Rc O Levels Determined by Sampling from 180 Degrees F to 250 Degrees F ML20084N9561995-05-31031 May 1995 Proposed Tech Specs Re Operation of Core W/Positive Moderator Temp Coefficient ML20082L5211995-04-16016 April 1995 Proposed Tech Specs,Revising TS 3.9.4 That Addresses Containment Bldg Penetrations to Allow Use of Alternate Containment Bldg Penetration Closure Methodologies for Postulated Accident Scenarios During Core Alterations ML20078E0491995-01-25025 January 1995 Proposed Tech Specs Re Changing of Surveillance Requirement 4.6.1.2.a from Specific Schedule for Performance of Containment ILRTs ML20078L5561994-11-23023 November 1994 Proposed Tech Specs Re Independent Technical Reviews ML20076G4701994-10-0707 October 1994 Proposed Tech Specs Re Administrative Control Requirements for Emergency & Security Plans,Per GL 93-07 ML20072G0371994-08-15015 August 1994 Proposed Bases of TS 3/4.1.1.3, Moderator Temp Coefficient & 3/4.3.3.2, Incore Detector Sys ML20059H6381994-01-14014 January 1994 Proposed Tech Specs,Changing Administrative Controls in Section 6.0 to Redefine Composition of Sorc,Create Station Qualified Reviewer Program,Delete Requirement to Perform Periodic Procedure Reviews & Revise TS 6.4.2.9 ML20058C3161993-11-23023 November 1993 Proposed Tech Specs,Allowing Operation of Core within Axial Flux Difference Band Expanded from Current Band in TSs & Improved Fuel Cycle Mgt Through Implementation of Core Design Enhancements ML20059C5441993-10-28028 October 1993 Proposed Tech Specs Implementing Thirteen Line Item Improvements Recommended by GL 93-05, Line-Item TS Improvements to Reduce SRs for Testing During Power Operation ML20056F7671993-08-26026 August 1993 Proposed Tech Specs Requesting Exercise of Enforcement Discretion from Requirement to Perform Channel Check on Narrow Range RWST low-low Level Transmitters ML20045C5571993-06-18018 June 1993 Proposed Tech Spec 6.2.3 Reflecting Title Change to Independent Technical Reviews & Deletion of Requirement to Maintain Five Person Organization,Iseg ML20045D5841993-06-18018 June 1993 Proposed Tech Specs Reducing Frequency of Surveillances, Required to Verify Integrity of CST Enclosure ML20127F8101993-01-13013 January 1993 Proposed TS 6.8.1.4 Re Submittal Frequency of Semiannual Radioactive Effluent Release Rept ML20117A8041992-11-25025 November 1992 Proposed Tech Specs for Incore Detector Sys ML20106E4181992-11-0303 November 1992 Proposed TS Section 6.2.2.f Deleting Requirement That Operations Manager Hold or Have Held Senior Reactor Operator License Prior to Assuming Operations Manager Position 1999-07-30
[Table view] Category:TECHNICAL SPECIFICATIONS & TEST REPORTS
MONTHYEARML20210R8051999-08-10010 August 1999 Startup Test Rept for Cycle 7 ML20210K3631999-07-30030 July 1999 Marked-up & Revised TS Bases Page B 3/4 5-2 Re ECCS ML20196G3671999-06-23023 June 1999 Proposed Tech Specs Increasing AOT for Crac from 30 Days to 60 Days on One Time Basis for Each Train to Facilitate on- Line Implementation of Design Enhancements During Current Operating Cycle ML20198E7411998-12-16016 December 1998 Proposed Tech Specs Pages Re LAR-98-15,involving Relocation of TS 3/4.7.10 & Associated TS Table 3.7-3 to Technical Requirements Manual ML20198E7831998-12-16016 December 1998 Proposed Tech Specs Pages to LAR 98-09,re Editorial & Administrative Changes to TS ML20155J1821998-11-0404 November 1998 Proposed Tech Specs 4.5.2b.1,removing Prescriptive Requirements of Using Venting Process as Sole Means to Verify That ECCS Piping Is Full of Water ML20249B4181998-06-17017 June 1998 Proposed Tech Specs 3.7.6 Re Control Room Emergency Makeup Air & Filtration Subsystem ML20247R7021998-05-20020 May 1998 Proposed Tech Specs Re Rev of Refueling Water Storage Tank low-low Level Setpoint ML20217E8871998-04-22022 April 1998 Proposed Tech Specs Re Surveillance Intervals to Accommodate 24-month Fuel Cycle,Per GL 91-04 ML20217F9651998-04-21021 April 1998 Proposed Tech Specs Page 3/4 5-5 Re Venting of Operating Chemical Vol & Control Sys Centrifugal Charging Pump ML20216C5921998-04-0808 April 1998 Proposed Tech Specs Changing Surveillance Intervals to Accommodate 24-month Fuel Cycle Per GL 91-04 ML20217Q2981998-04-0303 April 1998 Proposed Tech Specs Pages Re LAR 98-02,proposing Changes to TS to Accommodate Fuel Cycles of Up to 24 Months ML20217M3771998-03-27027 March 1998 Proposed Tech Specs 3.7.6 Re Control Room Emergency Makeup Air & Filtration Subsystem ML20217F0961998-03-23023 March 1998 Proposed Tech Specs Pages,Incorporating New Spec 3.0.5 Administrative Controls,Currently Approved for Use in NUREG-1431 ML20217Q1031998-03-0505 March 1998 Proposed Tech Specs Incorporating Programmatic Controls for Radioactive Effluents & for Environ Monitoring Conforming to Applicable Regulatory Requirements ML20217N8211998-03-0202 March 1998 Proposed Tech Specs 4.5.2B.1,excluding Prescriptive Requirement to Vent Operating CVCS CCP Casing ML20217N7321998-03-0202 March 1998 Proposed Tech Specs Pages,Revising Frequency for Performance of Specific Surveillances & Deleting Requirements for Accelerated Testing When Number of Valid Test Failures Associated W/Edgs Is Met or Exceeded ML20217Q1111998-02-25025 February 1998 Rev 18 to Odcm ML20211F4401997-09-26026 September 1997 Cycle 6 Startup Test Rept for Seabrook Station,Unit 1 ML20211E9981997-09-26026 September 1997 Proposed Tech Specs 3.7.6,separating Requirements for CR HVAC Sys Re Operation of CR Emergency Makeup Air & Filtration Sys Subsystem & CR Air Conditioning Subsystem ML20195J1451997-07-23023 July 1997 Rev 15 to Seabrook Station Operating Experience Manual (Ssoe) ML20148G0011997-05-29029 May 1997 Proposed Tech Specs Replacing Term Zircaloy W/Terminology That Identifies NRC Approved Westinghouse Fuel Assembly Design Consisting of Assemblies W/Either ZIRLO or Zircaloy- 4 Fuel Cladding Matl ML20148K1251997-05-0707 May 1997 Rev 6 to Part I, Seabrook Station Pump & Valve IST Program Plan ML20135C3541997-02-26026 February 1997 Proposed Tech Specs,Providing Retyped Page of Proposed Changes Re Design Features Fuel Assembly Reconstitution ML20134Q3451997-02-18018 February 1997 Proposed Tech Specs 5.3.1 Re Fuel Assemblies ML20134L8681997-02-12012 February 1997 Proposed Tech Specs 6.0 Re Administrative Controls ML20138J3351996-12-19019 December 1996 Rev 16 to Offsite Dose Calculation Manual ML20129B8361996-10-17017 October 1996 Proposed Tech Specs,Consisting of Change Request 96-02, Proposing Changes That Involve Relocation of Four TS Re Instrumentation Requirements Contained in TS Section 3/4.3 & Relocation of Selected Requirements ML20129B7761996-10-16016 October 1996 Proposed Tech Specs,Consisting of Change Request 96-06, Proposing Four Changes Re EDG Requirements Contained in TS 3/4.8.1, AC Sources ML20113B2031996-06-20020 June 1996 Proposed Tech Specs Re Svc Water Cooling Tower Loop Electrical Supply ML20117K3111996-06-0404 June 1996 Proposed Tech Specs Re Containment Leakage Testing Modifying Implementing Performance Based Program at Seabrook Station IAW 10CFR50,App J,Option B & Reg Guide 1.163 Requirements ML20115J7481996-03-26026 March 1996 Procedure for Ultrasonic Examination of Centrifugally Cast Stainless Steel Piping Using Low Frequency SAFT-UT System ML20138J3621996-03-21021 March 1996 Process Control Program ML20100G8351996-02-16016 February 1996 Startup Test Rept,Cycle 5. W/ ML20094D5341995-10-30030 October 1995 Proposed Tech Spec 3.4.6.2, RCS Operational Leakage Pressure Isolation Valve Table ML20092M1071995-09-22022 September 1995 Proposed TS 3.3.2,Table 3.3-3, ESFAS Instrumentation, Correcting Action Ref for Functional Unit 8.b Re Automatic Switchover to Containment Sump/Rwst Level low-low ML20092K2201995-09-20020 September 1995 Proposed Tech Specs,Changing Plant TS Bases Section 3/4.9.1 for Refueling B Concentration ML20098A4721995-09-20020 September 1995 Proposed Tech Specs,Relocating Functional Unit 6.b, FW Isolation-Low RCS Tavg Coincident W/Rt from TS Requirements Manual Licensee Controlled Document ML20092F9171995-09-12012 September 1995 Proposed Tech Specs Bases Section Clarifying What Specifically Constitutes Operable Pressurizer Safety Valve in Mode 5 ML20092A6331995-09-0505 September 1995 Proposed Tech Specs,Revising Main Steam Safety Valve Setpoints & Max Allowable Power Range Neutron Flux High Setpoints W/Inoperable Main Steam Safety Valves ML20091S1601995-08-28028 August 1995 Proposed Tech Specs Re Positive Moderator Temp Coefficient ML20086R2111995-07-24024 July 1995 Proposed Tech Specs,Relocating Table 3.4-1, RCS PIVs from TS 3.4.6.2, RCS Operational Leakage to Techical Requirements Manual ML20085L1161995-06-16016 June 1995 Proposed Tech Specs Re Increased Requirements for Core Reactivity Control Available from Borated Water Sources ML20084U5521995-06-0707 June 1995 Proposed Tech Specs,Consisting of Amend Request 95-02, Revising Footnote to SR 4.4.7 & Table 3.4-2 to Increase Temp Limit at Which Rc O Levels Determined by Sampling from 180 Degrees F to 250 Degrees F ML20084N9561995-05-31031 May 1995 Proposed Tech Specs Re Operation of Core W/Positive Moderator Temp Coefficient ML20083K7351995-04-19019 April 1995 Rev 74 to Emergency Response Manual (Sser) ML20082L5211995-04-16016 April 1995 Proposed Tech Specs,Revising TS 3.9.4 That Addresses Containment Bldg Penetrations to Allow Use of Alternate Containment Bldg Penetration Closure Methodologies for Postulated Accident Scenarios During Core Alterations ML20081J6021995-03-22022 March 1995 Revised Table A.3-1, Radioactive Liquid Waste Sampling & Analysis Program, to ODCM ML20078E0491995-01-25025 January 1995 Proposed Tech Specs Re Changing of Surveillance Requirement 4.6.1.2.a from Specific Schedule for Performance of Containment ILRTs ML20079B2491994-12-27027 December 1994 Proposed Changes to Part a of ODCM 1999-08-10
[Table view] |
Text
__
- -.
[
I PLANT SYSTEMS l
') ' TURBINE CYCLE t
AUXILIARY FEEDWATER SYSTEM l-LIMITING CON 0! TION FOR OPERATION 3.7.1.2 At least three independent steam generator auxiliary feedwater pumps and associated flow paths shall be OPERABLE with: ;
- a. One motor-driven emergency feedwater pump, and one startup i feedwater pump capable of being powered from an emergency bus and capable of being aligned to the. dedicated water volume in the condensate storage tank, and b.. One steam turbine-driven emergency feedwater pump capable of being }
. powered from an OPERABLE steam supply system.
APPLICABILITY: MODES 1, 2, and 3.* l ACTION:
- a. With one auxiliary feedwater pump inoperable, restore the required auxiliary feedwater pumps to OPERABLE status within 72 hours8.333333e-4 days <br />0.02 hours <br />1.190476e-4 weeks <br />2.7396e-5 months <br /> or be in at least HOT STANDBY within the next 6 hours6.944444e-5 days <br />0.00167 hours <br />9.920635e-6 weeks <br />2.283e-6 months <br /> and in HOT SHUTDOWN !
within the following 6 hours6.944444e-5 days <br />0.00167 hours <br />9.920635e-6 weeks <br />2.283e-6 months <br />.
^
. b. With two emergency feedwater pumps inoperable, restore at least one ,
'- emergency feedwater pump to OPERABLE status within 12 hours1.388889e-4 days <br />0.00333 hours <br />1.984127e-5 weeks <br />4.566e-6 months <br /> and restore both emergency feedwater pumps to OPERABLE status within 72 hours8.333333e-4 days <br />0.02 hours <br />1.190476e-4 weeks <br />2.7396e-5 months <br />, or be in at least HOT STANDBY within the next 6 hours6.944444e-5 days <br />0.00167 hours <br />9.920635e-6 weeks <br />2.283e-6 months <br /> and in COLD SHUTDOWN within the following 30 hours3.472222e-4 days <br />0.00833 hours <br />4.960317e-5 weeks <br />1.1415e-5 months <br />.
L c. With' one emergency feedwater pump and the startup feedwater pump inoperable, restore both emergency feedwater pumps to OPERABLE status wii.hin 24 hours2.777778e-4 days <br />0.00667 hours <br />3.968254e-5 weeks <br />9.132e-6 months <br /> and all three pumps to OPERABLE status within 72 hours8.333333e-4 days <br />0.02 hours <br />1.190476e-4 weeks <br />2.7396e-5 months <br /> or be in at least HOT STANDBY within the next 6 hours6.944444e-5 days <br />0.00167 hours <br />9.920635e-6 weeks <br />2.283e-6 months <br /> and in HOT ,
SHUTDOWN within the following 6 hours6.944444e-5 days <br />0.00167 hours <br />9.920635e-6 weeks <br />2.283e-6 months <br />,
- d. With three auxiliary feedwater pumps inoperable, immediately initiate corrective action to restore at least one auxiliary feedwater pump to OPERABLE status as soon as possible.
SURVEILLANCE REQUIREMENTS __
4.7.1.2.1 Each auxiliary feedwater pump shall be demonst' rated OPERABLE:
- a. At least once per 31 days on a STAGGERED TEST BASIS by:
- 1) Verifying that the motor-driven emergency feedwater pump develops a discharge pressure of greater than or equal to 1460 psig at a flow of greater than or equal to 270 gpm;
- =t r e ir d ir, i de 3 triil initi criticclity is a; hie ed.
INS TA SEABRO A - unii 1 ~
3/4 7-3 -
B912060238 891122 PDR ADOCK 05000443 P pon
i g.. .
C e
6 1
INSERT A FOR T/S 3.7.1.2 ;
- Entry into this MODE is permitted to perform post-modification ,
or post-maintenance testing to verify the OPERABILITY of the i turbine. driven' emergency feedwater pump. ACTION requirernents ;
shall not apply until OPERABILITY has been verified-. l l
i
-;
1 1
I i' -
f I
- i 9
h 1
i I
t
(.
l l l l-i-
-. 5 1
i 1
l l.-
1
7 ;
l PLANT SYSTEMS- *
- D- TURBINE CYCLE l ATMOSPHERIC RELIEF VALVES !
LINITING CONDITION FOR OPERATION l
- 3. 7.1. 6 At least four atmospheric relief valves and associated manual controls I including the safety-related gas supply systems shall be OPERABLE.
APPLICABILITY: MODES 1, 2, n ,
.e
-ACTION: 1 i a.
With one less than the required atmospheric relief valves OPERABLE, restore the required atmospheric relief valves to OPERABLE status within 7 days; or be in at least HOT STANDBY within the next 12 hours1.388889e-4 days <br />0.00333 hours <br />1.984127e-5 weeks <br />4.566e-6 months <br />.
b.
With two less than the required atmospheric relief valves OPERABLE, restore .
at least three atmospheric relief valves to OPERABLE status within 72 hours8.333333e-4 days <br />0.02 hours <br />1.190476e-4 weeks <br />2.7396e-5 months <br /> or be in at least, HOT STANDBY within the next 6 hours6.944444e-5 days <br />0.00167 hours <br />9.920635e-6 weeks <br />2.283e-6 months <br />. .
SURVEILLANCE REQUIREMENTS 4.7.1.6 Each atmospheric relief valve and associated manual controls including _
- the safety-related gas supply systems shall be demonstrated OPERABLE: .
a.
At least once per 24 hours2.777778e-4 days <br />0.00667 hours <br />3.968254e-5 weeks <br />9.132e-6 months <br /> by verifying that the nitrogen accumulator tank is at a pressure greater than or equal to 500 psig,
- b. Prior to startup following any refueling shutdown or cold shutdown .
- of 30 days or longer, verify that all valves will open and close '
fully by operation of manual controls.
I
\'
.(
3/4 7-10 SEABROOK - UNIT 1
. ., -.;
I q..
INSERT A FOR T/S 3.7.1.6 :
- Entry.into this MODE is permitted to perform post-modification ;
-or post-maintenance testing to verify the OPERABILITY of r components. ACTION requirements shall not apply until !
OPERABILITY has been verified. ,
i f
i l
i h
5 h
o P
G l
F Y
l l
)
, . . . . . . . _ - . , . . . . ._ _ . . _ . . _ . _ . . ._ _ . . . _ . _ . _ . . _ ~ _ __ _
m.- !
.. ;
New Hampshire Yankee !
November 22, 1989 l ENCLOSURE 2 TO NYN-89150 Backaround .
The steam turbine-driven emergency feedwater (EFW) pump steam supply -
system and the atmospheric steam dump valves (ASDVs)'are being modified during the current outage at Seabrook Station. Prior to declaring these components operable following modification, testing is required. This testing requires plant conditions not attainable prior to entry into MODE 33 however, the Technical Specifications associated with these items (3.7.1.2 and 3.7.1.6) require these systems to be operable prior to entry into ,
MODE 3. ,
Descriotion of Prooosed Channess l To facilitate the required post-modification testing of these systems, as well as future post-modification and post-maintenance operability testing, New Hampshire Yankee (NHY) proposes to modify these Technical Specifications by adding a note to the Applicability section of these Technical Specifications to allow entry into MODE 3, prior to declaring the affected components operable, where the required conditions exist to perfonn the necessary testing. :
Safety Evaluation of Proposed Channes New Hampshire Yankee has reviewed the proposed changes utilizing the criteria specified in 10 CFR 50.92 and has determined that the proposed change would not
- 1. Involve a significant increase in the probability of consequences of any accident previously evaluated. The change involves clarifications to the administrative rules concerning entry into MODE 4 or MODE 3 following a cold shutdown during which maintenance or modification work was performed on the turbine-driven EFW pump or the atmospheric steam dump valves. There are no physical changes to the facility. ,
The failure of an ASDVs to close is a condition analyzed in FSAR 15.1. Post maintenance / modification retests would normally involve an exercise test during which time there is a potentia!
for the valve to fail to close following an open stroke. The internal pilot arrangement and internal steam leakage characteristics of these valves make it necessary to perform retests at normal operating pressure and temperature (NOP/NOT) l with steam present rather than during cold plant conditions. This test would be performed while the plant is in a shutdown condition with all control rods inserted and suberiticality margin greater than or equal to the MODE 3 Technical Specification requirement.
1
- - . w - ~r e-- -..e--, -- - . - - w w n, y -w-- -
f1 1
'*: -;
I
i.
! New Hampshire Yankee !
November 22, 1989 l.
i t
In addition, the routine surveillance test which would be used as the retest method for almost all maintenance / repair situations :
involves stroking one ASDV at a time with the block valve closed. !
[ This would eliminate the potential for any cooldown effect. I f l l The failure of the turbine-driven EFW pump to operate when ;
required could involve a decrease in secondary heat removal b capability. However, the proposed change _ applies only to stable I
shutdown conditions where the two motor-driven AFW pumps, (the startup feed pump (SUFP) and the motor-driven EFW pump), are !
0PERABLE and the plant is preparing for a startup rather than performing a cooldown under emergency conditions. j The proposed change will not increase the consequences of an I accident previously evaluated in the FSAR. The proposed change l applies to MODE 3 therefore the reactor will be suberitical under ,
the conditions stated above. These tests would not be performed j with steam generator tube leakage or primary / secondary coolant '
activities in excess of technical specification limits.
ASDV or turbine-driven EFW pump post maintenance / modification l retests involve brief time intervals in stable shutdown plant !
conditions as described above. Multiple failures in both fuel integrity and primary to secondary boundary integrity (unrelated :
to a failure in either the ASDV or turbine-driven EFW pump) would i have to occur to cause an increase in the dose consequences.
- 2. Create the possibility of a new or different kind of accident from ,
any previously evaluated. The proposed change does not alter any physical components and the failure of these components has been previously analyzed. The test methods used for the ASDVs will only involve the test of a single valve at a time. In the case of the turbine-driven EFW pump, the SUFP and the motor-driven EFW pump are required to be operable. .
The possibility of a malfunction of a different type than any previously evaluated in the FSAR will not be increased. The failure of an ASDV to open when demanded or fail to close when required are the worst case failure modes for these valves and have been previously evaluated.
2
)
77 b'y ' ** .
- - -
1 I J
- New Hampshire Yankee
!. November 22, 1989
- 3. Involve a significant reduction in a margin of safety. The ,
,1 proposed changes apply to the administrative rules concerning ;
entry into MODES 3 and 4 under conditions where the components involved are expected to be capable of operation but have not ,
undergone a retest to actually demonstrate OPERABILITY. The ASDvs are not specifically mentioned in the Technical
. Specification Bases. However their primary purpose.is to facilitate a controlled plant cooldown if the condenser is . tot ;
available as a heat sink. The AFW pumps are mentioned in the bases for Technical Specification 3.7.1.2 as being required to support a cooldown of the reactor coolant system to less than 350 ,
degrees with a loss of all offsite power present.
l l
P l
l.
l l l
I L
l 3
e , - . -