|
---|
Category:License-Operator
MONTHYEARIR 05000458/20243012024-04-0202 April 2024 Notification of NRC Initial Operator Licensing Examination 05000458/2024301 ML23130A2732023-05-10010 May 2023 and Waterford 3 Steam Electric Station - Response to Regulatory Issue Summary 2023-01, Preparation and Scheduling of Operator Licensing Examinations ML23031A0132023-02-14014 February 2023 Examination Confirmation Letter No. 50-186/OL-23-01, University of Missouri-Columbia ML22354A2582022-12-15015 December 2022 10_RBS-2022-12 Post-Exam Comments ML23004A1922022-12-14014 December 2022 11_RBS-2022-12 Public Forms ML22075A3442022-03-16016 March 2022 Response to Regulatory Issue Summary 2022-01, Preparation and Scheduling of Operator Licensing Examinations ML21320A3692021-11-30030 November 2021 Notification of NRC Initial Operator Licensing Examination 05000458/2022301 2CAN042102, 10 AN2-2021-03 Post-Exam Comments2021-04-16016 April 2021 10_AN2-2021-03 Post-Exam Comments ML21106A1512021-04-16016 April 2021 and Waterford 3 Steam Electric Station - Response to Regulatory Issue Summary 2021-01, Preparation and Scheduling of Operator Licensing Examinations ML21096A0212021-02-19019 February 2021 RB-2021-02 Draft Operating Test Comments ML21111A1472021-02-19019 February 2021 RB-2021-02 Public Forms ML21096A0282021-02-19019 February 2021 RB-2021-02 Final Written Exam ML21096A0272021-02-19019 February 2021 RB-2021-02 Final Outlines ML21095A0532021-02-19019 February 2021 RB-2021-02 Final Op Test ML21096A0262021-02-19019 February 2021 RB-2021-02 Draft Written Exam ML21096A0322021-02-19019 February 2021 RB-2021-02 Post Exam Comments ML21096A0252021-02-19019 February 2021 RB-2021-02 Draft Written Exam Comments ML21096A0232021-02-19019 February 2021 RB-2021-02 Draft Outline Comments ML21096A0242021-02-19019 February 2021 RB-2021-02 Draft Outlines ML20072L2192020-03-12012 March 2020 Response to Regulatory Issue Summary 2020-01, Preparation and Scheduling of Operator Licensing Examinations ML20015A4712019-11-26026 November 2019 2019-11-Public Forms ML20006C6592019-11-26026 November 2019 2019-11-Post Exam Comments ML19312B5852019-11-0808 November 2019 NRC Initial Operator Licensing Examination Approval 05000458/2019301 ML19135A6642019-05-15015 May 2019 Units 2 & 3; River Bend, and Waterford 3 - Response to RIS 2019-02, Preparation and Scheduling of Operator Licensing Examinations ML19011A3712019-01-10010 January 2019 Announcement of Generic Fundamentals Examination Section of the Written Operator Licensing Examination for 2019 ML18340A0892018-12-0606 December 2018 Notification of NRC Initial Operator Licensing Examination 05000458/2019301 ML18198A2172018-07-16016 July 2018 NRC Initial Operator Licensing Examination Approval 05000458/2018301 ML18135A0672018-05-14014 May 2018 Response to Regulatory Issue Summary 2018-02 ML18086B0842018-02-16016 February 2018 Facility Cover Letter - Riv - March 2018 - GFE ML18009A9852018-01-0808 January 2018 Announcement of Generic Fundamentals Examination Section of the Written Operator Licensing Examination for 2018 ML17361A0422017-12-26026 December 2017 Notification of NRC Initial Operator Licensing Examination 05000458/2018301 ML17048A3562017-02-17017 February 2017 Generic Fundamentals Examination Results ML17013A5482017-01-13013 January 2017 Generic Fundamentals Section of the Written Operator Licensing Examination Scheduled for 2017 ML16280A4602016-09-30030 September 2016 2016-09 Draft Outlines ML16285A0172016-09-30030 September 2016 2016-09 Public Forms ML16280A4652016-09-30030 September 2016 2016-09 Final Outlines ML16280A4642016-09-30030 September 2016 2016-09 Draft Written Exam ML16280A4492016-09-30030 September 2016 2016-09-Written Handouts Package ML16280A4352016-09-30030 September 2016 2016-09 Final Written Exam ML16280A4622016-09-30030 September 2016 2016-09 Draft Written Comments ML16280A4592016-09-30030 September 2016 2016-09 Draft Outline Comments ML16280A4562016-09-30030 September 2016 2016-09 Draft Op Test ML16280A4532016-09-30030 September 2016 2016-09 Draft Op Test Comments ML16280A4372016-09-12012 September 2016 2016-09 Final Op Test ML16246A0012016-09-0101 September 2016 NRC Initial Operator Licensing Examination Approval 05000458/2016301 ML15351A0282015-12-17017 December 2015 Generic Fundamentals Section of the Written Operator Licensing Examination Scheduled for 2016 ML15180A0512015-06-29029 June 2015 Generic Fundamentals Examination Results June 2015 ML16043A0022015-06-19019 June 2015 May 2015 Draft Written Initial License Retake Exam, Reactor Operator ML16043A0012015-06-19019 June 2015 2015-05-DRAFT Outline ML16043A0002015-06-19019 June 2015 2015-05 - Draft Outline Comments 2024-04-02
[Table view] Category:Part 55 Examination Related Material
MONTHYEARIR 05000458/20243012024-04-0202 April 2024 Notification of NRC Initial Operator Licensing Examination 05000458/2024301 ML23130A2732023-05-10010 May 2023 and Waterford 3 Steam Electric Station - Response to Regulatory Issue Summary 2023-01, Preparation and Scheduling of Operator Licensing Examinations ML23031A0132023-02-14014 February 2023 Examination Confirmation Letter No. 50-186/OL-23-01, University of Missouri-Columbia ML22354A2582022-12-15015 December 2022 10_RBS-2022-12 Post-Exam Comments ML23004A1922022-12-14014 December 2022 11_RBS-2022-12 Public Forms ML22075A3442022-03-16016 March 2022 Response to Regulatory Issue Summary 2022-01, Preparation and Scheduling of Operator Licensing Examinations ML21320A3692021-11-30030 November 2021 Notification of NRC Initial Operator Licensing Examination 05000458/2022301 ML21106A1512021-04-16016 April 2021 and Waterford 3 Steam Electric Station - Response to Regulatory Issue Summary 2021-01, Preparation and Scheduling of Operator Licensing Examinations 2CAN042102, 10 AN2-2021-03 Post-Exam Comments2021-04-16016 April 2021 10_AN2-2021-03 Post-Exam Comments ML21095A0532021-02-19019 February 2021 RB-2021-02 Final Op Test ML21096A0232021-02-19019 February 2021 RB-2021-02 Draft Outline Comments ML21096A0282021-02-19019 February 2021 RB-2021-02 Final Written Exam ML21096A0272021-02-19019 February 2021 RB-2021-02 Final Outlines ML21111A1472021-02-19019 February 2021 RB-2021-02 Public Forms ML21096A0322021-02-19019 February 2021 RB-2021-02 Post Exam Comments ML21096A0252021-02-19019 February 2021 RB-2021-02 Draft Written Exam Comments ML21096A0262021-02-19019 February 2021 RB-2021-02 Draft Written Exam ML21096A0242021-02-19019 February 2021 RB-2021-02 Draft Outlines ML21096A0212021-02-19019 February 2021 RB-2021-02 Draft Operating Test Comments ML20072L2192020-03-12012 March 2020 Response to Regulatory Issue Summary 2020-01, Preparation and Scheduling of Operator Licensing Examinations ML20015A4712019-11-26026 November 2019 2019-11-Public Forms ML20006C6592019-11-26026 November 2019 2019-11-Post Exam Comments ML19312B5852019-11-0808 November 2019 NRC Initial Operator Licensing Examination Approval 05000458/2019301 ML19135A6642019-05-15015 May 2019 Units 2 & 3; River Bend, and Waterford 3 - Response to RIS 2019-02, Preparation and Scheduling of Operator Licensing Examinations ML18340A0892018-12-0606 December 2018 Notification of NRC Initial Operator Licensing Examination 05000458/2019301 ML18198A2172018-07-16016 July 2018 NRC Initial Operator Licensing Examination Approval 05000458/2018301 ML18135A0672018-05-14014 May 2018 Response to Regulatory Issue Summary 2018-02 ML18009A9852018-01-0808 January 2018 Announcement of Generic Fundamentals Examination Section of the Written Operator Licensing Examination for 2018 ML17361A0422017-12-26026 December 2017 Notification of NRC Initial Operator Licensing Examination 05000458/2018301 ML17048A3562017-02-17017 February 2017 Generic Fundamentals Examination Results ML16280A4532016-09-30030 September 2016 2016-09 Draft Op Test Comments ML16280A4652016-09-30030 September 2016 2016-09 Final Outlines ML16285A0172016-09-30030 September 2016 2016-09 Public Forms ML16280A4492016-09-30030 September 2016 2016-09-Written Handouts Package ML16280A4352016-09-30030 September 2016 2016-09 Final Written Exam ML16280A4562016-09-30030 September 2016 2016-09 Draft Op Test ML16280A4592016-09-30030 September 2016 2016-09 Draft Outline Comments ML16280A4602016-09-30030 September 2016 2016-09 Draft Outlines ML16280A4642016-09-30030 September 2016 2016-09 Draft Written Exam ML16280A4622016-09-30030 September 2016 2016-09 Draft Written Comments ML16280A4372016-09-12012 September 2016 2016-09 Final Op Test ML16246A0012016-09-0101 September 2016 NRC Initial Operator Licensing Examination Approval 05000458/2016301 ML15351A0282015-12-17017 December 2015 Generic Fundamentals Section of the Written Operator Licensing Examination Scheduled for 2016 ML15180A0512015-06-29029 June 2015 Generic Fundamentals Examination Results June 2015 ML15220A1382015-06-19019 June 2015 2015-05-POST-EXAM Comments Analysis ML15220A1392015-06-19019 June 2015 June 2015 Initial License Retake Exam, Reactor Operator, with Answer Key ML16043A0002015-06-19019 June 2015 2015-05 - Draft Outline Comments ML16043A0012015-06-19019 June 2015 2015-05-DRAFT Outline ML16043A0022015-06-19019 June 2015 May 2015 Draft Written Initial License Retake Exam, Reactor Operator ML16043A0032015-06-19019 June 2015 2015-05 - Final Outline 2024-04-02
[Table view] |
Text
S:\DRS\OB\EXAMS\rb\RB-INIT-EXAM 09-2004\RB 2004 - NRC DRAFT EXAM COMMENTS\RB 2004 -Draft-JPM ADM App E Review.wpd APPENDIX E - REGION IV OPERATING TEST JOB PERFORMANCE MEASURE QUALITY REVIEW MATRIX
- 1. 2. 3. Attributes 4. Job Content 5. 6.
JPM# Dyn LOD Errors U/E/S Explanation (D/S) (1-5) (See below for instructions)
IC Cues Critical Scope Over- Job- Minutia Focus Steps (N/B) lap Link ADM-R01 S 3 X S ADM-R02 S 3 E(S) The JPM has tolerances on some inputs used to compute the RPV water level, however, the RPV water level answer does not have a tolerance. FIXED ADM-R03 S 3 S ADM-RS04 S 2 S ADM-S01 S 3 X E(S) Time after shutdown is different in Steps 1 and 2. They both should be 40 hours4.62963e-4 days <br />0.0111 hours <br />6.613757e-5 weeks <br />1.522e-5 months <br />. FIXED ADM-S02 S 3 X E(S) JPM Step1 directs the completion of Blocks 5, 6, and 8, however, 5 and 6 are blank on the master.
The same problem also exists with JPM Step 5. FIXED ADM-S03 S 3 S ADM-S05 S 3 E(S) Should the scram time be identified? In Step 1 of JPM, uses Procedure EIP--2-001 for the standard X section whereas Procedure EIP-0-001 is used for the comment section. Procedure. JPM Step 3 says to use Form GSUN0952.1-99-93 (Dec). This form is for a General Emergency instead of the Site Area Emeragency. FIXED Instructions for Completing Matrix This form is not contained in or required by NUREG-1021. Utilities are not required or encouraged to use it. The purpose of this form is to enhance regional consistency in reviewing operating tests. Additional information on these areas may be found in Examination Good Practices Appendix D. Check or mark any item(s) requiring comment and explain the issue in the space provided.
- 1. Determine whether the task is dynamic (D) or static (S). A dynamic task is one that involves continuous monitoring and response to varying parameters. A static task is basically a system reconfiguration or realignment.
- 2. Determine level of difficulty (LOD) using established 1-5 rating scale. Levels 1 and 5 represent inappropriate (low or high) discriminatory level for the license being tested.
- 3. Check the appropriate box when an attribute weakness is identified:
- The initiating cue is not sufficiently clear to ensure the operator understands the task and how to begin.
- The JPM does not contain sufficient cues that are objective (not leading).
- All critical steps (elements) have not been properly identified.
- Scope of the task is either too narrow (N) or too broad (B).
- Excessive overlap with other part of operating test or written examination.
- 4. Check the appropriate box when a job content error is identified:
- Topics not linked to job content (e.g., disguised task, not required in real job).
- Task is trivial and without safety significance.
- 5. Based on the reviewers judgment, is the JPM as written (U)nacceptable (requiring repair or replacement), in need of (E)ditorial enhancement, or (S)atisfactory?
- 6. Provide a brief description of problem in the explanation column. Provide conclusion on whether JPM SET criteria satisfied (i.e., number/distribution of safety functions, A.3 and A.4 integrated with parts B/C, Admin topics per section meet ES).
- Page 1 -
S:\DRS\OB\EXAMS\rb\RB-INIT-EXAM 09-2004\RB 2004 - NRC DRAFT EXAM COMMENTS\RB 2004 -Draft-JPM SYS App E Review.wpd APPENDIX E - REGION IV OPERATING TEST JOB PERFORMANCE MEASURE QUALITY REVIEW MATRIX
- 1. 2. 3. Attributes 4. Job Content 5. 6.
JPM# Dyn LOD Errors U/E/S Explanation (D/S) (1-5) (See below for instructions)
IC Cues Critical Scope Over- Job- Minutia Focus Steps (N/B) lap Link CRS-01 S 3 S CRS-02 D 3 S CRS-03 D 3 S CRS-04 D 3 S CRS-05 S 3 X E(S) not sure step 1 should be critical FIXED CRS-06 S 3 S CRS-07 D 2 S CRS-08 S 1 X U(S) low discriminatory value; only 3 steps (performed twice) with little-or-no opportunity to fail.
REPLACED IPS-01 S 3 S IPS-02 S 3 S IPS-03 S 3 X S BU-01 D 3 S BU-02 D 3 X E(S) not sure step 1 should be critical FIXED Instructions for Completing Matrix This form is not contained in or required by NUREG-1021. Utilities are not required or encouraged to use it. The purpose of this form is to enhance regional consistency in reviewing operating tests. Additional information on these areas may be found in Examination Good Practices Appendix D. Check or mark any item(s) requiring comment and explain the issue in the space provided.
- 1. Determine whether the task is dynamic (D) or static (S). A dynamic task is one that involves continuous monitoring and response to varying parameters. A static task is basically a system reconfiguration or realignment.
- 2. Determine level of difficulty (LOD) using established 1-5 rating scale. Levels 1 and 5 represent inappropriate (low or high) discriminatory level for the license being tested.
- 3. Check the appropriate box when an attribute weakness is identified:
- The initiating cue is not sufficiently clear to ensure the operator understands the task and how to begin.
- The JPM does not contain sufficient cues that are objective (not leading).
- All critical steps (elements) have not been properly identified.
- Scope of the task is either too narrow (N) or too broad (B).
- Excessive overlap with other part of operating test or written examination.
- 4. Check the appropriate box when a job content error is identified:
- Topics not linked to job content (e.g., disguised task, not required in real job).
- Task is trivial and without safety significance.
- 5. Based on the reviewers judgment, is the JPM as written (U)nacceptable (requiring repair or replacement), in need of (E)ditorial enhancement, or (S)atisfactory?
- 6. Provide a brief description of problem in the explanation column. Provide conclusion on whether JPM SET criteria satisfied (i.e., number/distribution of safety functions, A.3 and A.4 integrated with parts B/C, Admin topics per section meet ES).
- Page 1 -
S:\DRS\OB\EXAMS\rb\RB-INIT-EXAM 09-2004\RB 2004 - NRC DRAFT EXAM COMMENTS\RB 2004 -Draft-Scenario App N Review.wpd APPENDIX N - REGION IV OPERATING TEST SCENARIO REVIEW MATRIX Scen 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 Explanation (See below for instructions)
Set ES TS Crit IC Pred TL L/C Eff U/E/S 1 E(S) ES-301-4 lists 3 abnormal events, but only 2 seem to be in scenario.
FIXED 2 E(S) ES-301-4 lists 3 abnormal events, the scenario tally claims 4, and the reviewer only sees 2; form also lists 2 malfunctions after EOP entry, but scenario only includes 1; FIXED 3(B/U) E(S) ES-301-4 lists 2 abnormal events, but the reviewer does not see any AOP entries. FIXED; B/U scenario switched with #2 during validation week to eliminate excessive overlap with audit exam.
Instructions for Completing Matrix This form is not contained in or required by NUREG-1021. Utilities are not required or encouraged to use it. The purpose of this form is to enhance regional consistency in reviewing operating test scenario sets. Additional information on these areas may be found in Examination Good Practices Appendix D. Check or mark any item(s) requiring comment and explain the issue in the space provided.
- 1. ES: ES-301 checklists 4, 5, & 6 satisfied.
- 2. TS: Set includes SRO TS actions for each SRO, with required actions explicitly detailed.
- 3. Crit: Each manipulation or evolution has explicit success criteria documented in Form ES-D-2.
- 4. IC: Out of service equipment and other initial conditions reasonably consistent between scenarios and not predictive of scenario events and actions.
- 5. Pred: Scenario sequence and other factors avoid predictability issues.
- 6. TL: Time line constructed, including event and process triggered conditions, such that scenario can run without routine examiner cuing.
- 7. L/C: Length and complexity for each scenario in the set is reasonable for the crew mix being examined, such that all applicants have reasonably similar exposure and events are needed for evaluation purposes.
- 8. Eff: Sequence of events is reasonably efficient for examination purposes, especially with respect to long delays or interactions.
- 9. Based on the reviewers judgment, is the scenario set as written (U)nacceptable (requiring repair or replacement), in need of (E)ditorial enhancement, or (S)atisfactory?
- 10. Provide a brief description of problem in the explanation column
- Page 1 -