|
---|
Category:E-Mail
MONTHYEARML24036A0162024-02-0101 February 2024 NRC Email - Acknowledge and Accept the Indian Point Energy Center Request to Be Removed from NRC Headquarters Operation Officer (Hoo) Morning Authentication Code Calls ML23341A2002023-12-0707 December 2023 Email - Indian Point Energy Center Generating Units 1, 2, and 3 – Implementation Notice of Amendment No. 67, 300 and 276 to Independent Spent Fuel Storage Installation Only Emergency Plan (Ioep) ML23332A0802023-11-0808 November 2023 Email from State of New York on the Revised License Amendment for Indian Point Energy Center ISFSI Only Emergency Plan ML23331A9542023-11-0808 November 2023 Email - State of New York Comments on the Revised License Amendment for Indian Point Unit 2 and 3 Technical Specification Changes Reflecting Permanent Removal of Spent Fuel ML23325A1632023-11-0808 November 2023 State of New York Comments on the Revised License Amendment for Indian Point Unit 2 and 3 Technical Specification Changes Reflecting Permanent Removal of Spent Fuel ML23144A3382023-05-25025 May 2023 Dawn Giambalvo of Jersey City, New Jersey Email Against Treated Water Release from Indian Point Site ML23144A3422023-05-25025 May 2023 Peter Duda of Pearl River, New York Email Against Treated Water Release from Indian Point Site ML23144A3452023-05-25025 May 2023 Adam Kahn of Monsey, New York Email Against Treated Water Release from Indian Point Site ML23144A3502023-05-25025 May 2023 Dan Kwilecki of Montebello, New York Email Against Treated Water Release from Indian Point Site ML23144A3392023-05-25025 May 2023 David Morris of New City, New York Email Against Treated Water Release from Indian Point Site ML23144A3442023-05-25025 May 2023 Peggy Kurtz of Rockland County, New York Email Against Treated Water Release from Indian Point Site ML23136B1622023-05-15015 May 2023 Town of North Salem, County of Westchester, New York Board Resolution Letter Regarding Treated Water Release from Indian Point Site ML23109A0632023-04-17017 April 2023 Email Acceptance Review for IP2 and IP3 Amended Facility License and Technical Specification to Reflect Permanent Removal of Spent Fuel from Spent Fuel Pits ML23055A1112023-02-23023 February 2023 Alyse Peterson Email- NYSERDA No Comments on Indian Point Unit 2 - Regarding Holtec License Amendment Request to Revise Permanently Defueled Technical Specifications and Staffing Requirements with Spent Fuel Transfer to ISFSI (Dockets 50-24 ML23049A0032023-02-14014 February 2023 NRC Acceptance Email to Holtec for License Amendment Request for Approval of New ISFSI-Only Emergency Plan and Associated EAL Scheme ML22313A1682022-11-0909 November 2022 NRC Response to Updates to the Proposed Amended IP2 Master Trust ML22308A0912022-11-0303 November 2022 Email Acknowledgement for IP2 and IP3 Amended Facility License and Technical Specification to Reflect Permanent Removal of Spent Fuel from Spent Fuel Pits ML22276A1642022-09-29029 September 2022 New York State Revised Draft EA Response E-Mail ML22271A8492022-09-28028 September 2022 E-Mail Transmitting Revised Indian Point Exemption Draft EA ML22269A3452022-09-22022 September 2022 Email Objection to Holtec IP2 Master Decommissioning Trust Agreement for Indian Point Nuclear Generating Facility Unit 1 and 2, EPID L-2022-LLA-0072 ML22259A1992022-09-0202 September 2022 Acceptance for License Amendment Request to Modify Staffing Requirements Following SFP Transfer to Dry Storage ML22265A0142022-08-31031 August 2022 Email Acknowledgement for Amended and Restated Holtec IP3 Master Decommissioning Trust Agreement for Indian Point Nuclear Generating Facility Unit 3 ML22242A2592022-08-19019 August 2022 E-mail from K. Sturzebecher, NRC, to B. Noval, HDI, Acknowledgement for Amended and Restated Holtec IP2 Master Decommissioning Trust Agreement for Indian Point Nuclear Generating Facility Unit 1 and 2 ML22228A1332022-08-0909 August 2022 Acknowledgement for License Amendment Request to Modify Staffing Requirements Following SFP Transfer to Dry Storage ML22215A0432022-08-0101 August 2022 E-Mail Transmitting NYS NSA Exemption Comments & Draft EA Review Completion ML22208A0292022-07-19019 July 2022 E-Mail Transmitting Indian Point Exemption Draft EA ML22168A0072022-06-16016 June 2022 Acceptance Review for License Amendment Request to Revise License Condition to Eliminate Cyber Security Plan Requirements ML22112A0102022-04-21021 April 2022 Acceptance Review: Request for Exemption from 10 CFR 50.54(w)(1) Concerning Indian Point Energy Center Onsite Property Damage Insurance ML22112A0122022-04-21021 April 2022 Acceptance Review: Request for Exemption from 10 CFR 140.11(a)(4) Concerning Primary and Secondary Liability Insurance for Indian Point Energy Center ML22103A2432022-04-13013 April 2022 E-mail - Request for Additional Information - License Amendment Request to Revise Emergency Plan and Emergency Action Level Scheme for Permanently Defueled Condition for Indian Point Energy Center ML22104A0342022-04-13013 April 2022 E-mail from Z. Cruz, NRC to J. Fleming, Holtec - Request for Additional Information Related to Request for Exemption from Portions of 10 CFR 50.47 and Part 50 Appendix E for Indian Point Energy Center ML22038A2572022-02-0707 February 2022 E-mail from Z. Cruz, NRC, to J. Fleming, HDI - Acceptance Review: License Amendment Request to Revise Emergency Plan and Emergency Action Level Scheme to Address Permanently Defueled Condition for Indian Point Energy Center ML22035A1862022-02-0404 February 2022 E-mail to J. Fleming, Holtec, from Z. Cruz Perez, NRC - Acceptance Review: Exemption Requests from Portions of 10 CFR 50.47 and 10 CFR Part 50, Appendix E, Section IV for Indian Point Energy Center ML22028A1032022-01-28028 January 2022 E-mail Dated 1/28/2022, Transmittal of Draft Safety Evaluation for Proposed License Amendment Revision to Licensing Basis to Incorporate the Installation and Use of of New Auxiliary Lifting Device ML22038A1592022-01-24024 January 2022 NRR E-mail Capture - (External_Sender) 2021 IPEC Annual Sturgeon Impingement Report ML22006A0442022-01-0505 January 2022 Email from Z Cruz to J Fleming Request for Additional Information - HDI Indian Point Post-Shutdown Decommissioning Activities Report ML21337A2952021-12-0303 December 2021 Subsequent Request for Additional Information License Amendment Request to Revise Licensing Basis for New Auxiliary Lifting Device (E-mail Dated 12/3/2021) ML21335A3692021-12-0101 December 2021 Acceptance Review: Indian Point Energy Center - Exemption Request from 10 CFR Part 20 App G Section Iii.E ML21266A2972021-08-18018 August 2021 8/18/2021 E-mail from H. Specter to R. Guzman Public Comments to NRC, Indian Point Post-Shutdown Decommissioning Activities Report Public Meeting on July 29, 2021 ML21225A5012021-08-0909 August 2021 Email from NRC to the Shinnecock Indian Nation Announcing the IPEC PSDAR Public Meeting on August 18, 2021 ML21224A3032021-08-0909 August 2021 Email from NRC to the Mashantucket Pequot Tribe of Connecticut Announcing the IPEC PSDAR Public Meeting on August 18, 2021 ML21225A6142021-08-0909 August 2021 Email from NRC to the Tuscarora Nation Announcing the IPEC PSDAR Public Meeting on August 18, 2021 ML21225A5682021-08-0909 August 2021 Email from NRC to the Stockbridge-Munsee Community Band of Mohican Indians Announcing the IPEC PSDAR Public Meeting on August 18, 2021 ML21225A4252021-08-0909 August 2021 Email from NRC to the Oneida Nation of Wisconsin Announcing the IPEC PSDAR Public Meeting on August 18, 2021 ML21225A3142021-08-0606 August 2021 Email from NRC to the Oneida Indian Nation Announcing the IPEC PSDAR Public Meeting on August 18, 2021 ML21225A4402021-08-0606 August 2021 Email from NRC to the Onondaga Nation of Wisconsin Announcing the IPEC PSDAR Meeting on August 18, 2021 ML21225A5352021-08-0606 August 2021 Email from NRC to the Tonawanda Band of Seneca Announcing the IPEC PSDAR Public Meeting on August 18, 2021 ML21225A5462021-08-0606 August 2021 Email from NRC to the St. Regis Mohawk Tribe Announcing the IPEC PSDAR Public Meeting on August 18, 2021 ML21266A2942021-07-25025 July 2021 E-mail from Paul Blanch to NRC (N. Sheehan, D. Screnci) Public Comments to NRC, Indian Point Post-Shutdown Decommissioning Activities Report Public Meeting, July 29, 2021 ML21197A2002021-07-16016 July 2021 (E-mail 7/16/2021) NRC Staff Assessment and RAI Closeout HDI Fleet Decommissioning Quality Assurance Program and Indian Point Energy Center Quality Assurance Program Manual 2024-02-01
[Table view] |
Text
Fage 1 ot 1
'John White - meeting handout for 9:00 From: "Timothy Rice" <tbrice@gw.dec.state.ny. us>
To: "Robert P. Snyder" <rps02@health.state.ny.us>, "James Noggle"
<JDN@nrc.gov>, "John White" <JRW1 @nrc.gov>, "Jay Adler"
<adler@tlgservices.com>
Date: 01/31/2007 8:43 AM
Subject:
meeting handout for 9:00 See attached.
file://C:\temp\GW 100001 .HTM 04/09/2007
P White - handout for 1-31 -07 IP fish conf caII.wpd Pagel1 Indian Point Fish Sampling Conference Call 1/31/07 9:00 - 11:00 AM NRC, DEC, DOH, Entergy The Issues The recent Entergy REMP fish sampling on the Hudson has raised concerns over the possibility of Sr-90 impacts to humans and the biota of the River. The limited data from that sampling supports the position that there is no measurable impact from plant releases and groundwater, but several questions need to be addressed to provide a sufficient level of confidence in the data interpretation.
A. Primary Questions to be Answered:
- 1. Is IP making a measurable contribution to Sr-90 concentrations in Hudson River fish?
- 2. If so, does that additional Sr-90 pose a human health threat?
B. In order to answer those questions we have to ask:
- 1. Is Roseton a viable control location.
- a. Are the control and indicator fish separate populations?
- b. Is Roseton impacted by IP discharges?
- 2. Are the appropriate species being collected?
- 3. Is fish flesh the only needed sample?
- 4. Have the indicator and control samples been compared on a species by species basis?
Recommendations
- 1. Institute a second control location upstream of Roseton, at least for this round.
- 2. Focus fish sampling on Carp, Sunfish (pumpkin fish), White Perch, Catfish (channel or white),
and American Eel.
- 3. Analyze both flesh and bone/organs for this round.
- 4. Composite all members of the same species at each location into one sample for splitting.
ex: All Carp at lIP location composited and separated into flesh and bone/organs, and each split 3 ways.
- 5. Analyze all samples for Sr-90, Cs-137, and other routine REMP analytes.
lIJohn White - TEXT.htm Page 111 Attached is a draft of the outcomes from yesterdays fish sampling conf call.
Please review and provide feedback.
Make sure you check your organizations participant names and add their respective program identifications.
Thank you, Tim
IFJohn
-White - !56-mimury-of-r-e-sults-frorn 1-31-07 IP fish con f c a II.wpd Page lil I John White-Summary of results from 1-31-07 IP fish conf call.wpd Page 1 II New York State Department of Environmental Conservation Division of Solid and Hazardous Materials Bureau of Hazardous Waste and Radiation Management, 9 625 Broadway, Albany, New York 12233-7258 th Floor lw Phone: (518) 402-8594 - FAX: (518) 402-9024 Website: www.dec.state.ny.us DRAFT Outcome of the 1/31/07 Indian Point Hudson River Fish Sampling Conference Call PARTICIPANTS DEC NRC Tim Rice, Radiation John White, Barbara Youngberg, Radiation Jim Noggle, Larry Skinner, Fish & Wildlife Jim Kottan, Larry Wilson, Fish & Wildlife Tim Frye Larry Rosenmann, Geologist Adam Schwartzman, Alex Czuhanich, Geologist Steve Geary, DOH Entergy Robert Snyder, Jay Adler, Toni Forti, Pat Donahue, Ed Horn, Dennis Quinn, Gary Hinrich, Don Croulet, Jim Ferfarro, Dara gray, Tom Bums, Gary Ray.
BACKGROUND Entergy's 2006 Radiological Environmental Monitoring Program (REMP) Hudson River fish sampling effort generated data showing that one of five samples at the indicator location near the plant discharge, and three of five samples from the control location upriver near Roseton, contained concentrations of Sr-90 in fish flesh above their analytical detection limits. Entergy has concluded this data, and data provided by the State on control samples from Brookhaven National Lab and the West Valley site, indicate that concentrations near the plant are indistinguishable from background levels. The NYS Department of Environmental Conservation (DEC) and NYS Department of Health (DOH) reviewed the available data and agreed that it appears to support Entergy's conclusion. However, the agencies also concluded that additional work was needed to enhance the level of confidence in the data and the conclusi6ns that had been drawn. DEC held preliminary discussions with the Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC) who agreed that an enhanced sampling effort was appropriate. Both agencies later discussed the issue with Entergy, who agreed that there was a need to bring all parties together to discuss the potential of enhancing the next round of Hudson River fish sampling.
[IJohn White - Summary of results from 1-31-07 IP fish conf call.wpd Page=e2 DRAFT DISCUSSION Due to the presence of new participants on this call DEC and NRC started by reviewing the circumstances resulting in contaminated groundwater reaching the Hudson River that resulted in Entergy adding Sr-90 to their list of REMP fish sample analytes. The NRC reviewed the purpose behind REMP sampling at power reactors (to validate the dose/pathway to man calculated by their licensees based upon plant effluents) and the relevant requirements (include commercially important species in sample collection and focus analysis on edible portions of fish). DEC laid out the questions that the State agencies believe need to be answered and presented their list of recommendations for supplemental sampling during the spring REMP sampling that are designed to try to answer those questions (see attached handout). A general discussion ensued focused on State recommendations and NRC REMP requirements. The NRC and Entergy were in general agreement with the State recommendations.
OUTCOME The outcome of this conference call was an agreement on how to proceed with the enhanced Spring REMP fish sampling effort in the Hudson River.
Agreement
- 1. The enhanced round of sampling will be in addition to the routine NRC required REMP sampling program, but is to take place in conjunction With the REMP sampling effort. This effort is not intended as an expansion of the REMP protocols developed to comply with NRC requirements.
- 2. An additional sampling location further upstream of the Roseton location will be established for the round of sampling. DEC and DOH staff with extensive experience in fish behavior and sampling efforts in the Hudson will work with representatives of the NRC, Entergy, and Entergy's fish sampling contractor to establish the appropriate sampling location.
- 3. Every reasonable effort will be made to collect enough sample volume at each location to provide sufficient sample mass to allow for three-way splits for analysis by laboratories used by Entergy, the NRC, and analysis by the DOH Wadsworth Laboratory.
- 4. Sampling will focus on the species selected by the State biologists as relevant for this sampling effort as well as those required to be collected as part of Entergy's REMP program in order to comply with NRC requirements. These include: Carp, Pumpkinseed, White Perch, catfish (channel or white), American Eel, Shad, and Blue Crab.
- 5. All members of each species collected at a given location will be composited into one sample, homogenized, and split three ways for analysis by Entergy, NRC, and State labs.
- 6. All samples will be analyzed for Sr-90, Cs-137, and other routine REMP analytes.
- 7. The State will analyze both fish flesh and a sample consisting of fish bone and organs.
Entergy and the NRC will continue to analyze edible portions only, as indicated in NRC REMP requirements.
- 8. Entergy will share for review a copy of a draft sampling plan which be based upon their REMP program.
- 9. We will hold follow up conf calls to address issues such as the location of the upstream sample location and the laboratory needs for sample preparation and detection limits. In addition to the staff who are routinely work on the Indian Point investigative efforts, the laboratory call on sample preparation and analysis will include representatives of the three laboratories who will be performing the sample analyses.