ML090200091

2008-12-Draft Outline Comments

ML090200091
Person / Time
Site:	River Bend
Issue date:	11/21/2008
From:	- No Known Affiliation
To:	NRC Region 4
References
Download: ML090200091 (4)

Text

DRAFT OUTLINE COMMENTS Rev 0 Facility: RB First Exam Date: 11/21/2008 Written Exam Outline (Date)

Comment Resolution 1 Put revision number on all forms. Done.

2 Add RO to title of written exam outline Done.

Tier 3 - RO: K/As 2.2.12 and 2.3.11 Done.

3 were on both the 2004 and 2007 NRC Re-selected KA 2.2.3 and 2.3.7.

exams. Randomly select different K/As.

For the K3s that were oversampled, add Done.

4 in T2G1 for clarification. K3s were oversampled in T2G1 while K5 The bottom entry of ES-401-4 has the Done.

5 E/APE designator of 295022. This should be 295002.

Reword the reason for rejection of T3 Done.

G.2.2.5. RBS surely considers 6 knowledge of the process for making design or operating changes to the facility important - maybe not for ROs?

Administrative JPM Outline (9/3/08)

Comment Resolution 1 Use A designators (A1, A2, etc) Done.

Is SRO Conduct of Ops Determine Alt. Yes. For resolution, see comment #3 below.

2 DHR method a repeat from 2004 NRC exam?

SRO - K/A 2.1.25 has been used on last Done. Selected KA 2.1.20. Completion of two NRC exams. Select another K/A. GOP-0004 calculations when entering Single 3 This exam will be the second time it has Loop Operation for SRO exam.

been used on the RO exam (dont select No change to RO exam. Will not use it next it for the next NRC exam). exam. OBDI 202 - IOLE Process

Control Room / In-Plant System JPM Outline (Date)

Comment Resolution Use C S and P designators (C for Done.

1 Control Room, S for Simulator, and P for In-Plant JPMs)

Reduce CR JPMs from 4 to 2 Done.

Eliminated the following control room JPMs Shedding of DC Loads during a SBO Resetting APRM power supplies.

2 Replaced with the following simulator JPMs:

Aligning Fuel Bldg Ventilation into Fuel Handling Lineup Resetting a scram per AOP-0001.

3 Simplify JPM titles Done.

Have a backup N and A control room Disregarded per chief examiner.

4 system JPM (minimum is 2)

Have a backup RCA JPM (minimum is Disregarded per chief examiner.

5 1)

Have a backup L control room system Disregarded per chief examiner.

6 JPM (minimum is 1) (SROU) 7 What is HVK? (see JPM d) Control Room Ventilation & Chilled Water What is IAS and SVV (see JPM i) Instrument Air System and Air supply to 8

Safety Relief Valves Simulator Scenario Outline Comments (Date)

Comment Resolution Was facility-specific or industry-generic Not specifically during development, however operating experience used in many of the events have occurred in the development of the scenarios? industry and at RBS 1 Single Rod scram (RBS)

Turbine failure due to MSRs not balanced (Nine Mile Point)

ATWS (Browns Ferry)

Was PRA used to identify risk-important Loss of offsite power (Scenario 2) is highest operator actions? contributor to core damage frequency.

Important Operator actions in PSA include:

Recovery of Offsite Power (Scenario 2)

Recovery of Feedwater (Scenario 1) 2 Start of suppression pool cooling (Scenario 1)

Also reviewed PRA prior to rejecting KAs with IR <2.5 to ensure those tasks were not considered important operator actions. OBDI 202 - IOLE Process

Simplify ES-301-5 form (well discuss) Re-submitting Rev 1 to ES-301-5 forms.

Candidate names are removed. A separate 3

form is completed for each combination of candidates for a total of 3 forms.

Scenario 2 - what is major event? Also, Outline was not annotated correctly major convert to low power (<5%) scenario event is the Loss of offsite power.

4 The backup scenario outline has been changed to a low power scenario.

Scenario 3 - Event 2: APRM F upscale Records indicate that the APRM F/Single failure and Event 3: Single rod scram rods scram failure was on the 2004 backup were a combined event on 2004 NRC scenario which was not used. Per chief 5 exam and was a Tech Spec call. The examiner, it is acceptable to use this APRM failure was also on the 2007 NRC malfunction on the 2008 exam.

exam - replace this event with another TS event.

Scenarios 1 no Tech Specs Done.

6 identified For each scenario, complete Target Originally misunderstood the comment. TQA 7 Quantitative Attributes from ES-301-4 are included on Revision 1 submission of (see D-1s from 2007 NRC exam) outline.

Scenario 2 - contains CRD pump trip. Done.

The SRO written exam contains a Selected a different KA 295034 G 2.4.6.

question dealing with EOP mitigation Knowledge of EOP mitigation strategies 8

strategies for this event. Select a regarding Secondary Containment Ventilation different event or different KA on the High Radiation.

written exam.

Backup scenario - event 8 has UO in Done.

9 the Event Type column - what is UO? UO = BOP Outline adjusted for consistency.

Both scenarios 1 and the backup have Scenario 1 is a leak in the drywell resulting in steam leaks as the Major Transient. elevated containment parameters (EOP-2).

Explain the differences (operator actions, Backup scenario is a leak (failure to isolate) in 10 procedure usage, etc) to preclude the RCIC room which is in Secondary repetitive scenarios. Containment (EOP-0003). Different strategies used to combat the events.

When preparing Draft Op Test, identify N/A 11 all Tech Specs and action statement(s) in the D-2 for each TS call When preparing Draft Op Test, Critical N/A 12 Tasks must be carefully defined, including time limits where applicable.

When preparing Draft Op Test, identify N/A 13 all procedure transitions in the D-2s. OBDI 202 - IOLE Process

Exam Outline Revision 1 Summary of Changes Written Exam Outlines RO

• Updated Revision Number (Comment #1)

• Added RO to outline title (Comment #2)

• Re-selected KA 2.2.3 & 2.3.7 (Comment #3)

• Added T2G1 for clarification on oversampled K3s (Comment #4)

• Corrected E/APE designator from 295022 to 295002 (Comment #5)

• Reworded reason for rejection of KA T3 G 2.2.5 (Comment #6)

SRO

• Rejected 295022 G2.4.6 due to overlap with Operating Test. Re-selected 295034 G 2.4.6 (Comment #8 on Scenario Outline Comments)

Admin JPM Outlines

• Added A designators (Comment #1)

• SRO Exam - Selected alternate KA for 2.1.25 due to use on previous 2 exams.

New KA is 2.1.20 (Comment #2 & #3)

Control Room / In-Plant Systems Outlines

• Added C, S, and P designators (Comment #1)

• Reduced Control Room JPMs from 4 to 2 (Comment #2)

• Simplified JPM titles (Comment #3)

Simulator Scenario Outlines

• Identified Tech Spec events on each scenario outline (Comment #6)

• Added Target Quantitative Attributes to each scenario (Comment #7)

• Backup scenario contain reference to UO. Changed to BOP for consistency (Comment #9)

• Scenario 2 did not have a Major event identified. Major event is Loss of Offsite Power. It is now annotated correctly. (Comment #4)

• Changed backup scenario to a low power scenario (Comment #4)

• Scenario 3 - Changed MSS-MOV111/112 failures. As originally submitted, these failures brought in no alarms and did not change plant conditions enough to be noticed by the crew. Remove these failures and replaced with Isophase Bus Duct Cooling Fan 1 & 2 failures. This change does not affect the Transient and Event Checklist.