CNS-14-021, Relief Request Serial Number 14-CN-001, Relief Request for Limited Volumetric Examination of Class 1 Welds
| ML14052A387 | |
| Person / Time | |
|---|---|
| Site: | Catawba  |
| Issue date: | 02/20/2014 |
| From: | Henderson K Duke Energy Corp |
| To: | Document Control Desk, Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation |
| References | |
| CNS-14-021 | |
| Download: ML14052A387 (85) | |
Text
Kelvin Henderson DUKE Vice President ENERGY. Catawba Nuclear Station Duke Energy CN01VP I 4800 Concord Road York, SC 29745 CNS-14-021 o: 803.701.4251 f: 803.701.3221 February 20, 2014 10 CFR 50.55a U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission Attention: Document Control Desk Washington, DC 20555-0001
Subject:
Duke Energy Carolinas, LLC (Duke Energy)
Catawba Nuclear Station, Units 1 and 2 Docket Numbers 50-413 and 50-414 Relief Request Serial Number 14-CN-001, Relief Request for Limited Volumetric Examination of Class 1 Welds Pursuant to 10 CFR 50.55a(g)(5)(iii), Duke Energy hereby submits Relief Request 14-CN-001 requesting relief from the volumetric examination coverage requirements of the ASME Code, Section Xl. The basis for the proposed relief request is provided in the enclosure to this letter.
Duke Energy requests NRC approval of this relief request at your earliest possible convenience.
There are no regulatory commitments contained in this relief request submittal.
If you have any questions or require additional information, please contact L.J. Rudy at (803) 701-3084.
Very truly yours, Kelvin Henderson Vice President, Catawba Nuclear Station LJR/s Enclosure www.duke-energy.com
U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission February 20, 2014 Page 2 xc (with enclosure):
V.M. McCree Regional Administrator U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission - Region II Marquis One Tower 245 Peachtree Center Ave., NE Suite 1200 Atlanta, GA 30303-1257 G.A. Hutto, III NRC Senior Resident Inspector Catawba Nuclear Station J.C. Paige (addressee only)
NRC Project Manager (Catawba)
U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission One White Flint North, Mail Stop 8 G9A 11555 Rockville Pike Rockville, MD 20852-2738
PagE / 0f 9 Enclosure Duke Energy Carolinas, LLC Catawba Nuclear Station, Units 1 and 2 Relief Request Serial No. 14-CN-001 Relief Request for Limited Volumetric Examination of Class 1 Welds, Submitted Pursuant to 10 CFR 50.55a(g)(5)(iii)
Relief Request 14-CN-001 Page 2 of 9
1.0 ASME Code Components Affected
" Unit 1 Reactor Vessel
- Unit 1 Pressurizer
- Unit 2 Pressurizer Specific component welds for which relief is requested are identified in Table 1.
2.0 Applicable Code Edition and Addenda
ASME Boiler and Pressure Vessel Code, Section Xl, 1998 Edition through the 2000 Addenda.
3.0 Applicable Code Requirements 3.1 IWB-2500, Table IWB-2500-1, Examination Category B-A, Item B1.40 requires a volumetric and surface examination of the Reactor Vessel Head-to-Flange Weld.
The required examination volume (A-B-C-D) is specified in Figure IWB-2500-5.
Footnote (2) requires examination of "essentially 100% of the weld length".
Relief is requested from the requirement of Table IWB-2500-1, Examination Category B-A, Item B1.40 to examine the volume A-B-C-D specified in Figure IWB-2500-5, and from the requirement of footnote (2) to examine "essentially 100%
of the weld length" for the Unit 1 Reactor Vessel Head to Flange Weld (Summary No. C1 .B1.40.0001, Weld No. 1-RPV-W08).
3.2 IWB-2500, Table IWB-2500-1, Examination Category B-D, Item B3.1 10 requires a volumetric examination of Pressurizer Nozzle-to-Vessel Welds. The required examination volume (A-B-C-D-E-F-G-H) is specified in Figure IWB-2500-7(b).
Relief is requested from the requirement of Table IWB-2500-1, Examination Category B-D, Item B3.110 to examine the volume A-B-C-D-E-F-G-H specified in Figure IWB-2500-7(b) for the Unit 1 and 2 Category B-D, Item B3.1 10 welds listed in Table 1.
Relief Request 14-CN-001 Page 3 of 9 Table 1 Code Volumetric Category/ Coverage Unit Component Item No. Summary No. Weld No. Description Obtained 1 Reactor B-A/B 1.40 C1 .B1.40.0001 1-RPV-W08 Head to 82.2%
Vessel Flange Weld 1 1 Pressurizer B-D/B3.110 C1.B3.110.0001 1-PZR-W1 Nozzle to 81.4%
Head Weld1 1 Pressurizer B-D/B3.110 C1.B3.110.0004 1-PZR-W4A Nozzle to 78.7%
Head Weld1 1 Pressurizer B-D/B3.110 C1.B3.110.0005 1-PZR-W4B Nozzle to 78.7%
Head Weld 1 1 Pressurizer B-D/B3.110 C11.B3.110.0006 1-PZR-W4C Nozzle to 78.7%
Head Weld1 2 Pressurizer B-D/B3.110 C2.B3.110.0001 2PZR-W1 Nozzle to 2 81.2%
Head Weld 2 Pressurizer B-D/B3.110 C2.B3.110.0003 2PZR-W3 Nozzle to 3 81.2%
Head Weld 2 Pressurizer B-D/B3.110 C2.B3.110.0004 2PZR-W4A Nozzle to 3 81.2%
Head Weld 2 Pressurizer B-D/B3.110 C2.B3.110.0005 2PZR-W4B Nozzle to 81.2%
1_ _ _ Head Weld 3 4.0 Impracticality of Compliance 4.1 Summary No. C1 .B1.40.0001, Weld No. 1-RPV-W08 This component was scanned manually with conventional methods. Scanning requirements are described in ASME Section V, Article 4, T-441.1.2(a),
T-441.1.3, T-441.1.4, T-441.1.5 and T-441.1.6. These requirements describe and are specific to scanning components in two axial and two circumferential directions. This component was scanned to the extent possible to meet these requirements, and the aggregate coverage for these welds was calculated as shown below. See Attachment 1 for additional information.
Coverage Calculations for Summary No.: C1 .B1.40.0001, Weld No. 1-RPV-W08:
0 Head Ring - Carbon Steel S Flange - Carbon Steel 0 Thickness: 6.89 in.
1 Examination performed during refueling outage 1EOC19 in 2011.
2 Examination performed during refueling outage 2EOC17 in 2010.
Examination performed during refueling outage 2EOC18 in 2012.
Relief Request 14-CN-001 Page 4 of 9 Calculation of Coverage of Area at 3 Lifting Lugs (3.3% of total weld length):
Weld coverage using 350 and 450 shear waves for axial scans, and 350 and 45' shear waves for clockwise (CW) and counterclockwise (CCW) circumferential scans obtained 68.1% coverage.
Base material coverage using 350, 450 and 600 shear wave for axial scans and 35' and 450 shear waves for circumferential scans (CW, CCW) obtained 34.0% coverage.
00 scan coverage obtained 39.3% coverage.
The aggregate coverage was calculated to be (68.1% + 34.0% + 39.3%)/3
= 47.1%.
Calculation of Coverage in Remainder of Area (96.7% of total weld length):
Weld coverage using 350 and 450 shear waves for axial scans, and 350 and 450 shear waves for circumferential scans (CW, CCW) obtained 88.1%
coverage.
Base material coverage using 350, 450 and 600 shear wave for axial scans and 350 and 450 shear waves for circumferential scans (CW, CCW) obtained 85.1% coverage.
00 scan coverage obtained 76.8% coverage.
The aggregate coverage was calculated to be (88.1% + 85.1% + 76.8%)/3
= 83.3%.
Calculation of Total Aggregate Coverage:
Coverage at Lugs = 47.1% x 3.3% of total weld length = 1.6%
Remainder of Coverage = 83.3% x 96.7% of total weld length = 80.6%
Total Aggregate Coverage = 80.6% + 1.6% = 82.2%
Discussion of Examinations and Impracticality:
The Catawba Inservice Inspection Plan allows the use of Code Case N-460, which requires greater than 90% volumetric coverage. Because the coverage obtained does not meet the requirements of this case, Code Case N-460 cannot be used to accept the limited volumetric coverage.
No indications were recorded during the examination of these welds.
The impracticality was caused by the configuration of the head ring to flange weld that does not allow meaningful interrogation from the flange side. There were also three permanent lifting lugs that did not allow scanning from the head ring side in the vicinity of these lugs. In order to scan all of the required volume for this weld, the head ring to flange weld and the permanent lifting lugs would have to be redesigned or replaced to allow scanning from both sides of the weld, which is impractical.
Relief Request 14-CN-001 Page 5 of 9 4.2 Summary No. C1..B3.110.0001, Weld No. 1-PZR-W1 This component was scanned manually with conventional methods in accordance with ASME Section V, Article 4, T-441.1.2(a), T-441.1.3, T-441.1.4, T-441.1.5 and T-441.1.6, which require scanning components in two axial and two circumferential directions. These components were scanned to the extent possible to meet these requirements, and the aggregate coverage for these welds was calculated as shown below. See Attachment 2 for additional information.
Coverage Calculations for Summary No.: C11.B3.110.0001, Weld No. 1-PZR-W1:
a Lower Head - Carbon steel
- Surge Nozzle - Carbon steel
- Head Thickness: 3.28 in.
Weld coverage using 350 and 450 shear waves for axial scans, and 350 and 450 shear waves for clockwise (CW) and counterclockwise (CCW) circumferential scans obtained 90.5% coverage.
Base material coverage using 350, 45 0and 60' shear wave for axial scans and 350 and 450 shear waves for circumferential scans (CW, CCW) obtained 77.0%
coverage.
00 scan coverage obtained 76.6% coverage.
The aggregate coverage was calculated to be (90.5% + 77.0% + 76.6%)/3 =
81.4%.
Discussion of Examinations and Impracticality:
The Catawba Inservice Inspection Plan allows the use of Code Case N-460, which requires greater than 90% volumetric coverage. Because the coverage obtained does not meet the requirements of this case, Code Case N-460 cannot be used to accept the limited volumetric coverage.
No indications were recorded during the examination of these welds.
The impracticality was caused by the weld taper configuration of the nozzle to head that does not allow meaningful interrogation from the nozzle side. In addition, Heater Wells limited access from the head side for approximately 53%
of the weld length. In order to scan all of the required volume for this weld, the head to nozzle weld would have to be redesigned or replaced and the heater wells redesigned and relocated to allow scanning from both sides of the weld, which is impractical.
Relief Request 14-CN-001 Page 6 of 9 4.3 Summary No. C1..B3.110.0004, Weld No. 1-PZR-W4A Summary No. C1.B3.110.0005, Weld No. 1-PZR-W4B Summary No. C1.B3.110.0006, Weld No. 1-PZR-W4C These components were scanned manually with conventional methods in accordance with ASME Section V, Article 4, T-441.1.2(a), T-441.1.3, T-441.1.4, T-441.1.5 and T-441.1.6, which require scanning components in two axial and two circumferential directions. These components were scanned to the extent possible to meet these requirements, and the aggregate coverage for these welds was calculated as shown below. See Attachment 3 for additional information.
Coverage Calculations for Summary No.: C1 .B3.110.0004, Weld No. 1-PZR-W4A, Summary No. C1.B3.110.0005, Weld No. 1-PZR-W4B, and Summary No.
C1..B3.110.0006, Weld No. 1-PZR-W4C:
" Safety/Relief nozzle - Carbon steel
" Upper Head - Carbon steel
- Head Thickness: 2.5 in.
Weld coverage using 350 and 450 shear waves for axial scans, and 350 and 450 shear waves for circumferential scans (CW, CCW) obtained 83.6% coverage.
Base material coverage using 350, 450 and 600 shear wave for axial scans and 350 and 450 shear waves for circumferential scans (CW, CCW) obtained 70.6%
coverage.
00 scan coverage obtained 82.0% coverage.
The aggregate coverage was calculated to be (83.6% + 70.6% + 82.0%)/3 =
78.7%.
Discussion of Examinations and Impracticality:
The Catawba Inservice Inspection Plan allows the use of Code Case N-460, which requires greater than 90% volumetric coverage. Because the coverage obtained does not meet the requirements of this case, Code Case N-460 cannot be used to accept the limited volumetric coverage.
No indications were recorded during the examination of these welds.
The impracticality was caused by the weld taper configuration of the nozzle to head that does not allow meaningful interrogation from the nozzle side. In order to scan all of the required volume for these welds, the head to nozzle welds would have to be redesigned or replaced to allow scanning from both sides of the weld, which is impractical.
Relief Request 14-CN-001 Page 7 of 9 4.4 Summary No. C2.B3.110.0001, Weld No. 2PZR-Wl Summary No. C2.B3.110.0003, Weld No. 2PZR-W3 Summary No. C2.B3.110.0004, Weld No. 2PZR-W4A Summary No. C2.B3.110.0005, Weld No. 2PZR-W4B These components were scanned manually with conventional methods in accordance with ASME Section V, Article 4, T-441.1.2(a), T-441.1.3, T-441.1.4, T-441.1.5 and T-441.1.6, which require scanning components in two axial and two circumferential directions. These components were scanned to the extent possible to meet these requirements, and the aggregate coverage for these welds was calculated as shown below. See Attachment 4 for additional information.
Coverage Calculations for Summary No. C2.B3.110.0001, Weld No. 2PZR-Wl:
- Lower Head - Carbon steel
- Surge nozzle - Carbon steel
- Thickness: 3.750 in.
Weld metal coverage using 350 and 450 shear waves in two axial and two circumferential directions obtained 90.5%.
Base metal coverage using 350, 450 and 600 shear waves in two axial directions, and 350 and 450 in two circumferential directions obtained 76.4%
00 coverage of weld and base metal obtained 76.6%.
The aggregate coverage was calculated to be (90.5% + 76.4% + 76.6%)/3 =
81.2%.
Coverage Calculations for Summary No. C2.B3.110.0003, Weld No. 2PZR-W3, Summary No. C2.B3.110.0004, Weld No. 2PZR-W4A, and Summary No.
C2.B3.110.0005, Weld No. 2PZR-W4B:
- Upper Head - Carbon steel
" Relief Nozzle - Carbon steel
" Thickness: 2.50 in.
Weld coverage using 350, 45 0and 600 shear waves for axial scans, and 450 and 600 shear waves for circumferential scans (CW, CCW) obtained 93.0% coverage.
Base material coverage using 45 0 and 600 shear wave for axial scans and 450 and 600 shear waves for circumferential scans (CW, CCW) obtained 76.2 %
coverage.
00 scan coverage obtained 74.3% coverage.
The aggregate coverage was calculated to be (93.0% + 76.2% + 74.3%)/3 =
81.2%.
Discussion of Examinations and Impracticality:
The Catawba Inservice Inspection Plan allows the use of Code Case N-460, which requires greater than 90% volumetric coverage. Because the coverage obtained does not meet the requirements of this case, Code Case N-460 cannot be used to accept the limited volumetric coverage.
No indications were recorded during the examination of these welds.
Relief Request 14-CN-001 Page 8 of 9 The impracticality was caused by the weld taper configuration of the nozzle to head that does not allow meaningful interrogation from nozzle side. In order to scan all of the required volume for these welds, the head to nozzle welds would have to be redesigned or replaced to allow scanning from both sides of the weld, which is impractical.
5.0 Proposed Alternatives and Bases for Use The welds identified in this request were examined to the maximum extent practicable utilizing approved examination techniques and equipment in accordance with requirements of the ASME Code,Section XI, IWB-2500, Table IWB-2500-1, Examination Category B-A, Item B1.40 and Examination Category B-D, Item B3.110, as applicable.
No substitution alternative for these welds is available that would provide better coverage. Radiography (RT) is not a desired option in lieu of ultrasonic examination because RT is limited in the ability to detect service induced flaws. Use of other manual or automated ultrasonic (UT) techniques, whether conventional or phased array, were considered, but would not increase coverage due to the limitation created by the component configuration. The use of any other currently available technique would incur the same physical scanning limitations.
System leakage tests are performed each refueling outage in accordance with the ASME Code,Section XI, Table IWB-2500-1; Examination Category B-P, during which a VT-2 visual examination is performed to detect evidence of leakage. These tests and the VT-2 visual examinations provide additional assurance of pressure boundary integrity.
In addition to the system leakage tests and VT-2 visual examinations, Reactor Building Containment Sump monitoring provides additional assurance that, in the event that leakage did occur through any of these welds, leakage would be detected.
Based on the acceptable results for the coverage obtained by the volumetric examination, system leakage testing and VT-2 visual examinations, and leakage monitoring, it is Duke Energy's position that the combination of these examinations and tests provides reasonable assurance of the continued structural and leak tight integrity of these welds.
Because the specified requirements of the ASME Code, Section Xl cannot be met without redesigning the components, and because there are no alternatives available that can be used to achieve greater volumetric coverage for the welds, compliance with the requirements specified in Section 3.0 of this request is determined to be impractical and relief is requested in accordance with 10 CFR 50.55a(g)(5)(iii).
6.0 Duration of Proposed Alternative The proposed alternative to the ASME Code is applicable for the remainder of the third 10-year Inservice Inspection (ISI) Intervals at Catawba Nuclear Station, Units 1 and 2.
" The Catawba Unit 1 third Inservice Inspection Interval began on June 29, 2005 and is currently scheduled to end on August 19, 2015.
- The Catawba Unit 2 third Inservice Inspection Interval began on October 15, 2005 and is currently scheduled to end on August 19, 2015.
Relief Request 14-CN-001 Page 9 of 9 7.0 Related Industry Relief Requests Similar requests were approved for Catawba Nuclear Station during the previous (second) inservice inspection intervals for Units 1 and 2 (See References 8.4 through 8.7).
8.0 References 8.1 1998 Edition through 2000 Addenda, ASME Code, Section Xl, "Rules for Inservice Inspection of Nuclear Power Plant Components."
8.2 1998 Edition through 2000 Addenda, ASME Code,Section V, "Nondestructive Examination" 8.3 ASME Code Case N-460, Alternative Examination Coverage for Class 1 and Class 2 Welds,Section XI, Division 1.
8.4 Catawba Nuclear Station Unit 1 Relief Request Serial No. 98-02 (TAC No.
MA1280), Safety Evaluation dated November 25, 1998.
8.5 Catawba Nuclear Station Unit 1 Relief Request Serial No. 05-CN-004 (TAC Nos.
MC8337, MC9171 through MC9179), Safety Evaluation dated September 25, 2006 (ADAMS Accession No. ML062390020) 8.6 Catawba Nuclear Station, Unit 2 Request For Relief NO.01-003 (TAC No.
MB3923) Safety Evaluation dated March 20, 2003 (ADAMS Accession No.
ML030790097) 8.7 Catawba Nuclear Station, Unit 2 Request For Relief No. 05-CN-003 (TAC Nos.
MC7004, MC9197 through MC9207), Safety Evaluation dated April 3, 2006 (ADAMS Accession No. ML053550370)
Relief Request 14-CN-001 Attachment 1 Data for Summary No. C1 .B1.40.0001, Weld No. 1-RPV-W08
RPV Flange to Head % of Coverage
- Item No. : C1.B1.40.0001 Weld No.: 1RPV-W08 Weld Coverage Scan Anale % Coverage Obtained S1 350 100 52 350 64.5 S1 450 100 S2 456 40.4 Cw 350 100 Cw 450 100 CCw 350 100 CCw 450 1oo Total 704.9 704.9 +8 = 88.1 % Coverage Base Material Coverage SI & S2 350,450&600 96.9 Cw & CCw 450&350 73.2 Total 170.1 170.1 + 2 = 85.05 % Coverage 00 Scan Coverage 76.8 % Coverage Aggregate Coverage = Weld + Base Material + 00 -14 3 83.3 % Coverage
- Inspector / Date: Ae&4 - 4A~- Page
- of j8.
3 RPV Flanae to Head % of Coverage a, Lifting Lu2s S Item No. : CI.B1.40.0001 Weld No.: 1RPV-W08 Weld Coverage Scan AngLe % Coverage Obtained Si 350 24.4 S2 350 64.5 SI 450 15.2 S2 450 40.4 Cw 350 100 Cw 450 100 CCw 350 100 CCw 450 100 Total 544.5 544.5 + 8 = 68.1 % Coverage Base Material Coverage SI &S2 350,450&600 38.5 Cw & CCw 450&350 29.5 Total 68 68 +2= 34.0 % Coverage 00 Scan Coverage 39.3 % Coverage Aggregate Coverage = Weld + Base Material + 00 + 3 47.1 %Coverap.
Inspector / Date":
Page _2 of /S
RPV Flanae to Head Aggre2ate % Coverage Item No.: C-1.1.40.0001 Weld No.: I RPV-WO8 Total Weld Length = 542" Limitation due to Lifting Lug = 6" x 3 Lugs -- 18" total limitation.
% of weld length limited due to Lugs = 18 / 542 x 100 = 3.3%.
Weld Coverage at Lugs = 47.1% coverage x 3.3% of the weld length = 1.6%.
Remainder of Coverage = 83.3% coverage x 96.7% of the weld length = 80.6%
Total Aggregate Coverage = 82.2%
0 Inspector / Date: s -/ P.,
Page 8 of _.j 8
Item No.: CL.B1.40.0001 RPV Head tofange Weld No.: I RPV-W08 Total Exam Area Surface Scale: 1P= 5" Base Metal Exam Area = 25.06 + 25.77 = 50.83 sq. in.
Weld Exam Area = 7.55 sq. in.
Total Exam Area = 58.38 sq. in.
7.55 sq. in.
I Inspector/i ateý-ýýý- */v Pagel of_(g
RPV Head toiPange Item No.: C3.B1.40.0001 Weld No.: 1RPV-W08 Base Metal Coverage - Axial Scans Scale: 1"= 5" Surface 1 Total Base Metal coverage with two angles from the same direction.
(24.17 + 25.06) / 50.83 x 100 = 96.9%
-.
Inspector / Date C .- s /,
450 Page4l_0 of (8
0 Item No.: C1.B1.40.0001 RPV Head to Flange Weld No.: IRPV-W08 Weld Coverage - Axial Scans Surface 1 Scale: I"= 5" Total Weld coverage from Surface I = 100%
Total Weld coverage from Surface 2 35 Degree = 4.87 / 7.55 x 100 = 64.5%
45 Degree- 3.05 / 7.55 x 100 = 40.4%
35-- 4.87 sq. in.
hispector/Date: , .$/2i/i Page1Itof~ -q
9 Item No. C1.B1.40.0001 RPV Head to'ange Weld No.: 1RPV-W08 Weld and Base Metal Coverage - Circ. Sc Surface Scale:-"I- 5" Total Base Metal Coverage (Circ. Scans with 35 & 45 Degree Angles
= (12.15 + 25.06) / 50.83 x I100 = 73.2%
E~ Total Weld Coverage Circ. $cans with 35 & 45 Degree Angles 1006/6 Inspector/ Date: S i/u, Surface 2 - Flange 350 & 450 PageL7- of l9 o0
Item No. : C1.B1.40.0001 RPV Head tokange Weld No.: 1RPV-W08 Coverage- 0 Degree Surface 1 Scale: 1"= 5" Total Coverage with 01)egree Angle
= 44.82 / 58.38 x 100= 76.8%
Inspector / Date: V Surface 2 - Flange 0o Pagef3_off? -
mm
0 Item No." C1 .B1.40.0001 RPV Head tofange Weld No.: 1RPV-W08 Weld Coverage - Axial Scans Scale:1" = 5" from Surface 2 @ Lifting Lug Surface Total Weld coverage from Surface 2 35 Degree = 4.87 / 7.55 x 100 = 64.5%
45 Degree = 3.05 / 7.55 x 100 = 40.4%
450 3.05 sq. in.
35o =4.87 sq. in.
Inspector / Date: - I Page Ilq of It 0
0 RPV Head to~ange Item No.: C1.B1.40.0001 Weld No.: 1RPV-W08 Weld Coverage - Axial Scans Scale: " - 5" from Surface 1 @ Lifting Lug Surface Total Weld coverage from Surface 1 35 Degree= 1.84/ 7.55 x 100=24.4%
45 Degree = 1.15 / 7.55 x 100 = 152%
450 = 1.15 Inspector / Dae: ./2Lf, 4 Page( of (6
0 Item No.: CI.B1.40.0001 RPV Head tofange Weld No.: IRPV-W08 Base Metal Coverage - Axial Scans Scale: I = 5" @ Lifting Lug Surface LIJ Total Base Metal coverage with 2 angles from the same direction or 1 angle from opposing directions.
= (8.85 + 10.70) / 50.83 x 100 = 38.5%
6&P 450 350 I Inspector / Date: - ',/*V Page 16 of (9 Pa
0 Item No.: C1.Bl.40.O0l RPV Head to ange 9 Weld No.: I RPV-W08 Weld amd Base Metal Coverage @ Lifting Lug Scale : P =5" 31 and 45 degree angle Circ. scans Surface Total Base Metal Coverage Cuc. Scans with 35 and 45 Degree Angles
= (12.01 + 3.00) / 50.83 x 100 = 29.5%
(2J Total Weld Coverage Circ. Scans with 35 and45 DegreeAng]es= 100%
&35o
&450 Inspector / Date: V -
350 &450 Page/V7of Nj
V a
ItemNo." C1.B1.40.0001 RP Head to(ange 0 Weld No.: 2RPV-W08 Coverage - 0 Degree @ Lifting Lug Surface 1 Scale: 1"= 5" Total Coverage with 0 Degree Angle
= 22.93 / 58.38 x 100 = 39.3%
00 r Inspector/I Date- T~ *-/z"/
Surface 2 - Flange Surface 2-Flange00 PgIo(
Page 19 of
Relief Request 14-CN-001 Attachment 2 Data for Summary No. C1..B3.110.0001, Weld No. 1-PZR-W1
PPressurizer S 0 e Nozze to Head Total Areai Weld & Bae Matei nt al lbalW~dAmMa5.35 sq.h TOtdlAt' a -aoD 3 6.71 -.6.9s*=13.66 sq. in.
STotlaI~mA*=-1S3,6gfifig0u~n ItemNo. e1/,,a
=2?
Scale 1" Clad I
page. (~/;e~i
Pressurizer Saure Rozzle to Head 00 Scan Coverage Item No.: C1.B3.110.0001 0* Scan TotalArea 14.57 sq. iu.
Total 0° Scan Coverage = 14.57 / 19.01 x 100 = 76.6 % Weld No.: IPZR-WI Scale 1" = 2" Clad Inspector I Date:.&Af'g-1 Pg f -~.I/Lý Page_-7 of.i.V
Pressurizer Spre *bzzle to Head Base Metal Coverage - Circumferential Item No.: C1.B3. 110.0001 Total Coverage with 350 and 450 CW and CCW (6.71 + 2.30) / 13.66 x 100 = 66.0% Weld No.: 1PZR-W1 Scale 1" =2" Clad Inspector / Date: Ly/ f -=
PW__8 of**
S Pressurizer S,,urie dzze to Head Weld Coverage from Surface 1- Axial 100% Coverage 350 Axial scan from Surface I 1000/c Coverage 45° Axial scan from Sudac 1 Item No. : C1.B3.110.0001 except at Heater Well Limitation Weld Coverage 450 Axial scan from Surface I Weld No.: 1PZR-W1
@ Heater Well = 4.89 /5.35 x 100 =91.4 % Seale 1" = 2" Heater Well Surface2 Nozzle 45-0
-"
a =4.891sq.it-45 ead H
I-e /
Clad--^_ urf sC Inspector / Date:
Page (2 of--&
S Pressurizer Surge %ozze to Head Base Metal Coverage - Axial (Areas not at Heater Wells)
Item No. : C1.B3.I10.0001 Weld No.: 1PZR-W1 Total Coverage with 2 angles from the same direction Se 1" =2" (6.71 + 5.69)/ 13.66 x 100 90.,%ar SSurface 2 Noz.le
°LO Surface I-Head ip i AMS609 450 Clad Inspector / Date: A.e Page-£LQ. Of -u(
4 Pressuizer Sureeozzle to Head Base Metal Coverage - Axial
- Heater Wells Total Coverage with 2 angles from the same direction or I angle from erm No.: C1.B3.110.0001 opposite directions = (5.96 + 5.69) / 13.66 x 100 = 85.3%
ked No.: 1PZR-W1 Scale 1" = 2" Clad 350 Inspeorl Date:
Page __ of _.y
Pressurizer SMuwie ozzle to Head 0 Weld Coverage fiom Surface 2 - Axial & Cm Scans I00M Coverage 350 & 450 Scans CW, CCW Item Ni
- C1.B3.110.0001 Total Weld Coverage 350 from Surface 2 = 3.90 / 5.35 x 100 = 72.9 %
Total Weld Coverage 45- from Surface 2 =-2.96 /15.35 x 100 = 55.3 % Weld No.: 1PZR-WI Scale 1" = 2" Clad IPspector/Date:
Page 1z of j.q
q Pressurizer Surge Nozzle to Head Limitations Item No.: C1.B3.110.0001 Weld No.: i-PzR-W1 The 35 and 45 scans are limited at 20 Heater Wells on the Surface 1 side. The limitation Is 2" at each well for a total of 40 ". The total weld length is 76". See attached drawings.
% of weld limited at heater wells = 40/76 x 100 = 52.6%
Base Metal Coveraee from Surface 1 At Heater Wells: 85.3% coverage for 52.6% of the weld length = 44.9%
Remainder of weld: 90.8% coverage for 47.4% of the weld length = 43.0%
Total Base Metal coverage = 87.9%
- Weld Coverage from Surface 1 At Heater Wells: 91.4% coverage for 52.6% of the weld length = 48.1%
Remainder of weld: 100% coverage for 47.4% of the weld length = 47.4%
Total Weld coverage:9S.5%
Inspector / Date A6 24W 1.tC c~ 1,, Page15of-.
0 /
flu3 Pressurizer Surge Nozzle to Head %of Coverage Item No. Cl.B3.110.0001 / Weld No. 1-PZR-W1 Weld Coverage Scan Angle % Coverage Obtained Si 350 100 52 350 72.9 Si 45° 95.5 S2 450 55.3 CW 350 100 CW 450 100 CCW 350 100 CCW 45* 100 723.7 Total Total Weld Aggregate Coverage = 723.7/8 = 90.5% "
Base Metal Coverage Scan _ ,_ __ __,
SI &$2 350, 450 & 600 87.9 CW & CCW 350 &45° 66.0 153.9 Total Total Base Metal Aggregate Coverage= 153.9/2 = 77.0%
0* Scan Coverage= 76.6M TotalAggregate Coverage = 90.5% + 77.0% = 76.6%= 244.1/3 = 1.4 Inspector / Date 5.A..
" Page j.ý of iL&
0
I Relief Request 14-CN-001 Attachment 3 Data for Summary No. C1..B3.110.0004, Weld No. 1-PZR-W4A Data for Summary No. C1.B3.110.0005, Weld No. 1-PZR-W4B Data for Summary No. C1 .B3.110.0006, Weld No. 1-PZR-W4C
0 PreMWMLerSafet ]Re.]*Nozzle to Head 00 Scan Coverage Item No. : Cl.B3.10.00104 Weld No.: IPZR-W4A O00Scm TOWa]Am -8.81 sq. in.
TotaOW "S(a CvaAg = 8. 8 / 10.75 x 10082.0%
00
- it? 21 Scale COad IRSPector /Date:G, Page~L of j~
Pressurizer Safety / Re# Noze to Head Total Area Weld & Base Material Item No.: C1.B3.110.0004 Weld No.: IPZR-W4A Total Weld Area = 3.29 sq. in.
Total Area of Base Mateial = 3.59 + 3.87 = 7.46 sq. in.
Total ExamArea - 3.59 + 3.29 + 3.87 = 10.75 sq. in. Surface 2 Nozzle Ata-329sq. IL
- An-3.97sq.9,i Arm -3M59sq. l.
Scale 1"= 2" Inspector / Date: ia4. *i4Lr//
Cad Page __L of j-
Pressurizer Safety / RA Nozle .to Head Weld Material Coverage -Axial Scans Item No.: C1.B3.110.0004 Weld No.: 1PZR-W4A 100I/. Coverage 350, 45-, 600 Scans CW, CCW from Surface I Total Weld Coverage 450 from Surface 1 = 3.13 / 3.29 x 100 = 95.1%
Total Weld Coverage 60 0 from Surce I = 3.06 / 3.29 x 100 = 93.0%
Surface 2 Nozzle Am 6DO-3.06 sq. bx Scale 1" = 2" Inspwtor / Date: - ,, ,
Page i of _a. 4 Clad
Pressurizer Safe / Re1i Nozzle to Head Weld Coverage -Axial & Cirnumferential Scans ItemNo,: CI.B3.110.0004 100%a Coverage 350, 450, & 600 Scans CW, CCW, from Surface 2 Weld No.: 1PZR-W4A Total Weld Coverage 35 0from Surface 2 = 1.51 / 3.29 x 100---45.91/o Total Weld Coverage 45- fiom Surface 2 = 1.14 / 3.29 x 100 =34.7%
Surface 2 Nozzle Scale lf1=2"t Inspector / Dafte:"
Clad Pagejo of
Pressurizer Safe / Re& Nozzle to Head Base Material Coverage -Axial Scans ItemNo.: C1.B3.110.0004 Weld No.: IPZR-W4A Total Area of Base Material = 3.59 + 2.23 = 5.82 sq. in.
Total Base Material Scan Coverage = 5.82 / 7.46 x 100 = 78.0 %
Surface 2 Nozzle A*wa3.59sq.in -
Arm -2.23 sq. im Scale 1I = 2" Inspector / Date: "'
Clad Page /I of is
Pressurizer Saf / Rel Nozele to Head $
Base Material Coverage - Crcumferential Scans ItemNo.: C1.B3.11O.0004 Weld No.: IPZR-W4A TotalArea ofBase Material = 3.59 + 1.12 = 4.71 sq. in.
Total Base MaterialScan Coverage = 4.71 / 7.46x 100=63.1%
Surface 2 Nozzle 450, 350, 600, & 60P Near Surface Scale 1" =2- Inspector/IDate:d.,?21 Cad Pw I.,Of 13
Pressurizer Safety/Relief Nozzle to Head % of Coverage 0 Item No. C1.B3.110.0004 / Weld No. 1-PZR-W4A Weld Coverage Scan Angle % Coverage Obtained Si 45" 95.1 /
S2 600 93.0 S$ 350 45.9 52 450 34.7 CW 350 100 CW 450 100 CCW 350 100 CCW 450 100 1668.7 Tota I Total Weld Aggregate Coverage - 668.7/8 = 83.6%
0 Base Metal Coverage Scan ___
S1 & S2 350, 45O & 600 78.0 CW & CCW 350 & 450 63.1 141.1 Total Total Base Metal Aggregate Coverage = 141.1/2 70.6%
0* Scan Coverage = 82.0% ,
Total Aggregate Coverage =83.6% + 70.6%; 82. 0% = 236.213 a Z8.7 Inspector / Date Pape ._LL of _a.~
I, 0
SPressizer Safe / Re&Nozze to Head 00 Scan Coverage Item No.: C1,B3.110.0005 Weld No.: 1PZR-W4B O0 Scan Total Area =-8.81 sq.m.
Total 00 Scan Coverage = 8.81 / 10.75 x 100 = 82.0 %
Surfae 2 Nozzle 00.
Scale I" =if inspector / Date : e_.& _
Clad Page ._Z. of.1
Pressurizer S&ety / RA&Nozde to Head 0 Total Area Weld & Base Material Item No.: C1.B3.110.0005 Weld No.: 1PZR-W4B Total Weld Area-=3.29 sq. in.
Total Area of Base Material 3.59 + 3.87 = 7.46 sq in.
Total ExamArea = 3.59 + 3.29 + 3.87 = 10.75 sq. i1 Surmfe 2 Nozzle Are -329&a%i Am -c 3t sDt.e:
Ai~a= 3.59 sq~
in.
Scle 1"= 2" Imeo- ae Clad Page __a of Qad
Pressurizer Safe ty/ Re# Noe to Head Weld Material Coverage - Axial Scans Item No.: C1.33.110.0005 Weld No.: 1PZR-W4B 1000/ Coverage 350, 450, 600 Scans CW,CCW from Surface 1 Total Weld Coverage 450 from Surface I3.13 /3.29x 100=95.1%
Total Weld Coverage 600 from Surface 1 = 3.06 / 3.29 x 100 = 93.0%
Surface 2 Nozzle Scale 1"= 2" Inspector / Date: g.
Clad Page C7 of A
Pressurizer Safety I Rel Nozze to Head Weld Coverage -Axial & Circumferential Scans Item No.: C1.B3.110.0005 100% Coverage 350,450, & 60r Scans CW, CCW, from Surface 2 Weld No.: 1PZR-W4B Total Veld Coverage 35c from Surface 2 = 1.51 / 3.29 x 100 = 45.9%/
Total Weld Coverage 450 frm Surface 2 = 1.14 / 329 x 100 = 34.7%
Surface 2 Nozzle Scale 101 =2" Inspector / Date : I clad Page ic of.i3
Pressuizer Safety ReftNozzle to Had Base Material Coverage -Axial Scans Item No.: C1.B3.110.0005 Weld No.: 1PZR-W4B Total Aea of Base Material = 3.59 + 2.23 = 5.82 sq. in.
Total Base Material Scan Coverage = 5.82-/ 7.46 x 100 = 78.0 %
Surface 2 Nozzle Ama - 2.M3sq. ia.
Scale 1" =2" Inspector / Date:: AMC Clad Page it off
Pressuizer Safety A to Base Material Coverage - Circumferential Scans Item No.: C.B3.110.0005 Weld No.: 1PZR-W4B Total Area of Base Material =3.59 + 1.12 =4.71 sq. in.
Total Base Mateial Scan Covege = 4.71/7.46x 100=63.1%
Surface 2 Nozzle 450, 350, 60P, & 600 Near Surface Scale 1" =2" Ipector Date: I aad Page -u of 13
1:9 Pressurizer Safety/Relief Nozzle to Head % of Coverage 0 Item No. C1.B3.110.0005 / Weld No. 1-PZR-W4B Weld Coverage Scan Angle %Coverage Obtained Si 450 95.1 S2 600 93.0 Si 350 45.9
[$2 450 34.7 CW 350 100 CW 450 100 CCW 35° 100 CCW 450 100 668.7 Total Total Weld Aggregate Coverage =668.7/8=83.6%
Base Metal Coverage .
Scan
$1_&_S2 350, 450 & 600 78.0 CW & CCW 350 & 450 63.1
_141.1 Total Total Base MetalAggregate Coverage 141.1/2 = 70.6%
00 Scan Coverage= 82.0%
TotalAggregate Coverage= 83.6%+ 70.6M = 82.0%= 236.2/,3 = Z.%
Inspector / Date ' i -J h , Page /_L...3 of /-T.
,
11-ý (
/
Pr. uzer Saf / Reioze to Head 0 Scan Coverage Item No.: ICMB3.110,0006 Weld No.: 1PZP.-W4C O0 SewnTOWArm =-8.81 sq. in, TOW 00 ScaanCOVmr~e = .81/ 10.75 x 100=82.0%
Suxfae 2 Nozzle 00 Scale 1" =2" IDate InsPector_
Cad Page 2L. of~
Pressurizer Safety / Refli'Tozzle to Head 0 Total Area Weld & Base Material ItemNo.: C1.B3.110.0006 Weld No.: IPZR-W4C Total WeldArea = 3.29 sq. in.
Total Area of Base Material = 3.59 + 3.87 - 7.46 sq. in.
Total ExamArea = 3.59 + 3.29 + 3.87-- 10.75 sq. in. Surface 2 Nozzle Arm 3.29 sq. 12.
/ i-.~q l I
Am = 3.59 sq. imn Scale 1"= 2" IPepector Date:
Clad Page 8- of I;
-4
Pressurizer Safet/ Refii[o~zbe to Head 6 Weld Material Coverage -Axial Scans ItemNo.: CI.B3.110.0006 Weld No. : 1PZR-W4C 100W Coverage 350, 450, 600 Scans CW CCW from Surface 1 Total Weld Coverage 45* fi-om Surface 1 = 3.13 / 3.29 x 100 = 95.1%
Total Weld Coverag 60P from Surface 1 = 3.06 / 3.29 x 100= 93.0%/0 Surface 2 Nozzle 450, Am 6V - 3.06 s4 i.
Scale 1" =-2" Inspector/Date:
Clad Page_5 of 1
0 Pressurizer Safety / Redi&'[o02le to Head Weld Coverage -Axial & Circumferential Scans Item No.: CI.B3.110.0006 100% Coverage 350, 450, & 600 Scans CW, CCW, from Surface 2 Weld No.: 1PZP,-W4C Total Weld Coverage 350 from Surface 2 = 1.51 / 3.29 x 100 = 45.9%
Total Weld Coveage 450 from Surface 2 = 1.14/3.29 x 100 = 34.7%
Surface 2 Nozzle 350 450 60*-
Ana35. 1S.1sVin.
Scale 1" = 2" Ipector / Date: A M Clad PageL f1
Pressurizer SaWe / Reliekozze to Head 0 Base Material Coverage -Axial Scans ItemNo.: C1.B3.11O.0006 Wdd No.: IPZR-W4C Total Area of Base Material = 3.59 + 2.23 = 5.82 sq. in.
Total Base Mateial ScanCoverage = 5.82 i 7.46 x 100 = 78.0 %
N_.-- Am-=4ixu k Scale 1" =2" Inspector / Date:
Clad Page 1 of--- y, O
0 Pressizer Safety / ReliPeozie to Head 0 Base Material Coverage - Oircmferential Scans Item No.: CI.B3.110.0006 Weld No.: 1PZR-W4C Total Area of Base Mateial = 3.59 + 1.12 =-4.71 sq. in.
Total Base Material Scan Coverage = 4.71 / 7.46 x 100 = 63.1%
Surfiace 2 Nozzle 450, 350,60P, & 600 Near Surface Scale 1" = 2" Inspector/a Date:
Page / 2of 13
Pressurizer Safety/Relief Nozzle to Head % of Coverage Item No. C1.B3.110.0006 / Weld No. 1-PZR-W4C Weld Coverage Scan Angle % Coverage Obtained Si 450 95.1 S2 600 93.0 Si 350 45.9 S2 450 34.7 CW 350 100 CW 450 100 CCW 350 100 CCW 450 100 668.7 Total Total Weld Aggregate Coverage ='668.7/8= 83.6%
Base Metal Coverage -7 0 Scan S1 & S2 35", 450 & 60" 78.0 CW & CCW 350 & 450 63.1
,__.._ _. l,141.1 Total Total Base Metal Aggregate Coverage = 141.1/2 = 70.6%
0* Scan Coverage = 82.O%
TotalAggregate Coverage 83.6X + 70.6%= 82.0% = 236.2/3 = L8.7%
Inspector / Date ML~~~F'i/ /1 Page. Lj of /1.3 I.
I Relief Request 14-CN-001 Attachment 4 Data for Summary No. C2.B3.1 10.0001, Weld No. 2PZR-W1 Data for Summary No. C2.B3.1110.0003, Weld No. 2PZR-W3 Data for Summary No. C2.B3.110.0004, Weld No. 2PZR-W4A Data for Summary No. C2.B3.1110.0005, Weld No. 2PZR-W4B
PZR Surge Nozzle to Head % of Coverage item No.: C2.B3.110,0001 Weld No. : 2PZR-W1 Weld Coverage Scan % Coverage Obtained S1 350 100 S2 350 72.9 S1 450 95.5 S2 450 55.3 350 100 Cw 450 Cw 100 CCw 350 100 CCW 450 100 Total 723.7 723.7 + 8 90.5 % Coverage Base Material Coverave SI &S2 35* 450 & 600 86.9 Cw & CCw 450 & 350 Total 152.8 152.8 +2= 76.4 % Coverage
- 0. Scan Coverage 76.6 % Coverage Aggregate Coverage = Weld + Base Material + 00 ÷ 3 243.5/3 = 81.2 81.2 %Coverage Inspector / Date :!Z4.
"// 0 q,ýSr (,ý A 14 7/ý
0 Pressurizer Surge Nozzle to Read Limitations
[temn No.: C-).3.1flnmI WeldNo.: ýPZI?-LJI The 350 and 450 scans are limited at 20 Heater Wells on the Surface I s.de. The limitation is 2" at each well for a total of 40". The total weld length is 76"1 See attwbAl drawings.
%ofWeld limited at Heater Wells =40/76 x 100 52a%.
Base Metal coverae from Surface I AtHeater Wells - 83A% coverage for 526% ofthe weld length 43.9%
Remainder of weld - 90.8% coverage for 47.4% of the weld length = 4AM.
Total Coverage 86.9%
Weld coerafe from Surface I At Heater Wells = 91.4% coverage for S2-6% of the weld length = 48.1%
Remainder of weld - 100%/ coverage for 47.4% of the weld length = 427,A.
0 Total Coverage = 95.5%
inspector / page *7iof -L 0.
k0
PressUiZer Surge Nozze S .5 to Head 00 Scan Coverage Item No. : *Z;Sc.ae
ý 83.
0Scmn TotalAmea 14.57 sq.in.
Weld No. *'2-<
-P -
Total 00 Scan Covcrag = 14.57 / 19.01 x 100 = 76.6 %
Scale II" M211 Clad Inspector/IDate:
page 3- of~
fl,0
D 0 Pressurizer SureNozzle to Head Total Area Weld & Base Material TotlWV~dAm-3535 sq. in IftemNo.:.,:2 AJWA~. 900 To Alm ofBoseMftW =a6.71 +6.95 -13.66sq. in.
TotslxamAre -6.71+5.35+6,95 19.01 sq.in. i-i Weld No.:
Scale lot 2'=
Inspettor/I ate: 01/
Page .6. of r--tkl\-ý
ýWx \
0 Pressurizer Surge Nozzle tO Head Weld Coverage from Surface 2 -Axial & lrc. Scans 1000/9Cavmp 50& 450 SmasCW, CCW ItemNo.:Q33 Ji-Ap.8ea Total Weld Coverage35 0 ftm Surface 2 - 3.9015.35 x JOD -72.9%
Total WeldCovpc4P fiom Surice 2 -2196/5.35 x 100 = 55.3% WeIdNo.::Ž?-R-W scale 1"I =2" Clad specor /aDate -. oj_ _.
page if)Ofa LY
Pressurizer Surge Nozzle to Head Base Metal Coverage -Axial (Areas not at Heater Wells)
Item2No.: seS l. h"* j WeldNo.: -PZý-LAZ Total( :overag A& 2 anges fiun the same &dicton Sae1 2
=(6.71 + 5.69) /13.66 x 100 -f90.8%
Smf I---Hea Inspector / Date: 5#w Page I. of _._V
Pressurizer Surge Nozzle to Head Base Metal Coverage - Circumferential ItemNo. : , g.J.^m Total Coverage with 350 and 450 "W and (CW
= (6.71 +2.30)/ 13.66x 100 = 65.9% Weld No.:. ZIRWI Scale 1I =.2"
&nfmI - Head I+,
I I
I
!
....
........
I...............................................
.................
r 'ý, ý .. ......
A -f7 Inspfttor/]DOW':
Pagej.kotj..( 00
.,0 V
0 Pressu&zer Sure-Nozzle to Head Base Metal Coverage - Axial @ Heater Wells Total Coverge wth 2 angles from the sme dirction cr I angle from teniNo.: bt.0po opposite directions - (5.96 + 5.69) 13.66 x 100 85.3%
, VVeld No.: 1W scale 1"21 Heater Well Sa-ce -Head Clad35 IU4)eor /Date:
Page J3of V
-.0
0 0 Pressurizer Surge Nozzle to Head Weld Coverage from Surface 1 - Axial 1000/6 Coveae 35° Axial scan from Sufae 1 ItemNo.: CQ. 1.t3/0,oo,I 1005/ C*vep 450 Axial scan from Surface I except at Heater Well Limiion Wed No.: D P Z F1,- P.
Weld Covetage 4r Axial scan ftom Surface 1
@ HeaterWel 4.89/5.35x 100 -91.A%
Scale 1" =.2" Clad Inspectr./ Date:_______
Page L4 Of2, s/I-.
w\
Pressurizer Safe / Relief Nozzle to Head Total Area Weld & Base Material Item No. : C2.B3.110.0003 Total Weld Area= 329 sq. in. Weld No. : 2PZR-W3 Total Area of Base Material = 3.59 + 3.87 = 7.46 sq. in.
Total Exam Area = 3.59 + 3.29 + 3.87 - 10.75 sq. in. Scale 1" = 2"
- = I"in scale, .5" actual Calibration Block: 50338 Surface 2 Nozzle Am - 3.29sq. in.
Inispector/ Date: 6 1 z Clad Pagec..ý1of /
0 Pressurizer Safety / Relief Nozzle to Head Weld Coverage - Axial & Circumferential Scans Item No. : C2.B3.110.0003 Weld No. : 2PZR-W3 W00% Coverage 350 & 450 Scabs CW, CCW ans Axial from Surface I Scale 1" = 2" Total Weld Coverage 350 from Surface 2 = 2.71 / 3.29 x 100 = 82.4%
Total Weld Coverage 450 from Surface 2 = 2.02 / 3.29 x 100 = 61.4%
Surface 2 Nozzle 350 Area 5* 2.71 ns.i Inspector / Date: 7 /
Clad Page* of I
Pressurizer Safet I keli'f Nozzle to Head Base Material Coverage - Axial Scans Item No. : C2.B3.110.0003 Weld No. : 2PZR-W3 Scale 1" = 2" Total Area of Base Material = 3.59 + 3.07 = 6.66 sq. in.
Total Base'Material Scan Coverage = 6.66 / 7.46 x 100-=89.3 %
Surface 2 Nozzle Inlspedtor //Date: __"_________
Clad Page. 9 Of f ..
0 Pressurizer Safe / Relief Nozzle to Head Item No. : C2.13.110.0003 Base Material Coverage - COrcumferential Scans Weld No. : 2PZR-W3 Scale 1"= 2" Total Area of Base Material = 3.59 + 1.12 = 4.71 sq. in.
Total Base Material Scan Coverage = 4.71 / 7.46 x 100 = 63.1%
Surface 2 Nozzle 450 & 600 Inspector Date: _
Clad Page .I of r
0 rtessurizer Safe / Relief Nozzle to Head 00 Sant Coverage Item NO. : C2.B3.116.0003 Weld No. : 2PZR-W3 00 9 0 sq. Hin.
canTlOtajl Aiea=.
Scale P = 2" TotaIOO Scan Cverge ?-.9 9 / 10.75 x1001= 4.3%
Surface 2 Nozzle 0o IMlP e~O r/ DAte: _______________
Clad Page LO of
Pressurizer Safety/Relief Nozzle to Head % of Coveragoe Item No. : C2.B3.110.0003 Weld No. -2PZR-W3 0
Weld Coverage Scan Angle % Coverage Obtained SI .600 100 S2 350 82.4 SI 450 100 S2 450 61.4 Cw 600 100 Cw .450 100 CCw 600 100 CCW 450 100 Total. 743.8 743.8 +8 = 93.0 % Coverage Base Material Coverage SI *450&600 89.3 Cw & CCw *450&600 63.1 Total 1'52.4 152.4 + 2 = 76.2 % Coverage 00 Scan Coverame 74.3 % Coverage Aggregate Coverage = Weld + Base Material + 00 + 3 81.2 % Coverage Inspector/ Date(. Page (_ of _
(
- J
0 Prsuie Sae .0 Pressurizer Safy / Relief Nozzle to Head Total Area Weld & Base Material Item No. : C2.B3.110.0004 Total Weld Area = 3.29 sq. in. Weld No.: 2PZR-W4A Total Area of Base Material = 3.59 + 3.87 = 7.46 sq. in.
Total Exam Area = 3.59 + 3.29 + 3.87 = 10.75 sq. in.
Scale III = 2" Ihickness:2.5" Calibration Block: 50338 = P"in scale, .5" actual Surface 2 Nozzle Area= 3.29 q.in.
Inspector / Date:
Clad Page (a of Jf Z4
0 0 Pressurizer Safey / Relief Nozzle to Head Weld Coverage - Axial & Circumferential Scans Item No. : C2.B3.110.0004 Weld No. : 2PZR-W4A 100% Coverage 350 & 450 Scans CW, CCW ans Axial from Surface I Scale 1" = 2" Total Weld Coverage 350 from Surface 2 = 2.71 / 3.29 x 100 = 82.4%
total Weld Coverage 450 firom Surface 2 = 2.02 / 3.29 x 100 61.4%
Surface 2 Nozzle Inspector bi te: _________
94-71/ Clad Page 7 of 11
0 Prssurizer Safet&/ Relief Nozzle to Head Base Material Coverage - Axial Scans Item No. : C2.B3.110.0004 Weld No. : 2PZR-W4A Scale 1" = 2" Total Area of Base Material = 3.59 + 3.07 = 6.66 sq. in.
Total Base Material Scan Coverage = 6.66 / 7A6 x 100 = 89.3 %
Surface 2 Nozzle Insiector / Date: I!, y"//'.2.-.
Clad Page ._ of _*J
-p
0 Pressurizer Safety / Relief Nozzle to Head Item No.: C2.B3.110.0004 base Material Cbverage - Circumferential Scans Weld No. : 2PZR-W4A Scale 1" = 2" Total Area of Base Material = 3.59 + 1.12 = 4.71 sq. in, Total Base Material Scan Coverage = 4.71 / 7.46 x 100 = 63.1%
Surface 2 Nozzle 450 & 600 Inspector / Date Clad Pages of__
V
0 Pressurizer Safety / Relief Nozzle to Head 00 Scan Coverage Item No. : C2.83.110.0004 Weld No. : 2PZR-W4A O1 Scan Total Area 7.99 sq. inf.
S&ale 1" = 2" Total 0* Scan toverage = 7.99 / 10.75 x 100 = 74.3 %
Surface 2 Nozzle 0o hbspector / Date:
t'.-**_
Clad 9C i-V IUI -.LL
Pressurizer Safety/Relief Nozzle to Head % of Coverage Item No.: C2.B3.110.0004 Weld No. : 2PZR-W4A Weld Coverave
'Scan Anale % Coverage Obtained S1 600 100 S2 350 '82.4 SI 450 100 S2 450 61.4 Cw 600 100 Cw 450 100
.CCw 600 1.00 CCw 450 100 Total 743.8 743.8 +8= 93.0 % Coverage Base Material Coverage Sl 450&600 89.3 Cw & Ccw 450&600 63.1 Total 152.4 1*52.4 + 2 = 76.2 % Coverage 00 Scan Coverage 74.3 % Coverage Aggregate Coverage = Weld + Base Material + 00 + 3 81.2 % Coverage Inspector / Date L- - )--. -z / _ Pagc,,e Ll of IL1
w Pressurizer Safe / Relief Nozzle to Head Total Area Weld & Base Material Item No. : C2.B3.110.0005 Total Weld Area = 3.29 sq. in.
Weld No.: 2PZR-W4B Total Area of Base Material = 3.59 + 3.87 = 7.46 sq. in.
Total Exam Area = 3.59 + 3.29 + 3.87 = 10.75 sq. in. Scale 1" = 2" Thickness:2.5" Calibration Block: 50338 - 1"in scale, .5" actual Suiface 2 Nozzle Area - 3.29 sq. In.
Inspector/fDate:
O:eZ /41Z.?
pige 6 Of //
Clad
0 Pressurizer Safety / Relief Nozzle to Head Weld Coverage - Axial & Circumferential Scans Item No. : C2.13.110.0005 Weld No. : 2PZR-W4B I00%o Coverage 350 & 450 Scans CW, CCW ams Axial from Surface I Scale 1" = 2" Total Weld Coverage 350 from Surface 2 = 2.71/ 3.29 x 100 = 82.4%
Total Weld Coverage 450 from Surface 2 = 2.02/ 3.29 x 100 =61.4%
Surface 2 Nozzle Inspector / Date: /I2.-.
Clad Page J of ILI
Pressurizer Safety / Relief Nozzle to Head Base Material Coverage - Axial Scans Item No.: C2.B3.110.0005 Weld No.: 2PZR-W4B Scale 1" =2" Total Area of Base Material = 3.59 + 3.07 = 6.66 sq. in.
Total Base Material Scan Coverage = 6.66 / 7.46 x 100 = 89.3 %
Surface 2 Nozzle ALM -3.07sq. in, Inspector / Date: ~?/ L Clad Page _6 of I
0 0 Pressurizer Safety / Relief Nozzle to Head Item No. : C2.B3.110.0005 Base Material Coverage - Circumferential Scans Weld No. : 2PZR-W4B Scale 1" =2" total Area of Base Material = 3.59 + 1.12 = 4.71 sq. in.
Total Base Material Scan Coverage - 4.71/7.46 x 100 = 631 %
Surface 2 Nozzle 450 & 600 Inspector / Date :
Clad "'age _. of ._
Pressurizer Safe / Relief Nozzle to Head 00 Scan Coverage Item No. : C2.JB3.110.0005 Weld No.: 2PZR-W4B 0 Scah Total Area = 7.99 sq. in. Scale 1" = 2" Total 00 Scan Coverage = 7.99 / 10.75 x l0- 74.3 %
Surface 2 Nozzle 610 i.spe r / Date: . .
Clad of..
Pa74j Page_1~ot~J
Pressurizer Safety/Relief Nozzle to Head % of Coverage 0 Item No. : C2.B3.110.0005 Weld No. : 2PZR-W4B Weld Coverag~e Scan Angle % Coverage Obtained Sl 600 100 S2 350 82.4 SI 450 100 S2 450 61.4 Cw 600 100 Cw 450 100 CCW 600 100 CCw 450 100 Total 743*.8 743.8 - 8 = 93.0 % Coverage Base Material Coverage S1 450&600 89.3 CW&CCW 450&600 63.1 Total 152.4 1752.4 1.2 = 76.2 % Coverage 00 Scan Coverafe 74.3 % Coverage Aggregate Coverage = Weld + Base Material + 00 + 3 81.2 % Coveragie Inspector / Date Ale 4 3 -Z-- Page II of 'H