ML17052A394

From kanterella
Revision as of 08:12, 30 October 2019 by StriderTol (talk | contribs) (Created page by program invented by StriderTol)
Jump to navigation Jump to search
University of Missouri - Written Communication Technical Specification 6.6.c(3) Regarding a Deviation from Technical Specification 3.7b
ML17052A394
Person / Time
Site: University of Missouri-Columbia
Issue date: 02/17/2017
From: Rhonda Butler
Univ of Missouri
To:
Document Control Desk, Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation
References
LER 17-03
Download: ML17052A394 (17)
v • d • e


Text

UNIVERSITY of MISSOURI RESEARCH REACTOR C~NTER February 17, 2017 U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission .

ATTN: Document Control Desk Mail Station Pl-37 Washington, ~C 2055.5-0001

REFERENCE:

Docket No. 50-186 University of Missouri-Columbia Research Reactor Renewed Facility Operating License No. R-103

SUBJECT:

Written communication as required by University of Missouri Research Reactor Technical Specification 6.6.c(3) regarding a deviation from Technical Specification 3.7.b The attached documents provide the University of Missouri~Columbia Research Reactor (MURR)

Licensee Event Report (LER) for an event that occurred on February 3, 2017, that resulted in a deviation from MURR Technical Specification 3.7.b.

If you have any questions regarding this report, please contact Nathan G. Hogue, the facility Reactor Health Physics Manager, at (573) 882-5358.

Sincerely, a~ Fut k*<Pn .O.r.t.""'

Ralph A. Butler, P.E.

  • Director RAB:jlm Enclosures xc: Reactor Advisory Committee Reactor Safety Subcommittee Isotope Use Subcommittee Dr. Hank Foley, Interim Chancellor Dr. Mark Mcintosh, Vice Chancellor for Research, Graduate Studies and Economic Development Mr. Geoffrey Wertz, U.S. NRC Mr. Johnny Eads, U.S. NRC 1513 Research Park Drive Columbia, MO 65211 Phone: 573-882-4211 Fax: 573-882-6360 Web: http://web.missouri.edu/-murrwww Fighting Cancer with Tomorrow's Technology

U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission February 17, 20 17 Licensee Event Report No. 17 February 3, 2017 University of Missouri Research Reactor Introduction On February 3, 2017, exhaust ventilation stack effluents from an Iodine-131(1-131) process the prior day exceeded the maximum controlled instantaneous release concentration limit - for particulates and halogens with half-lives greater than 8 days - as specified in Technical Specification (TS) 3.7.b by 7% for I-131.

At approximately 00:30 on February 3, 2017, Reactor Operations observed a count rate rise on the control room off-gas stack radiation monitor strip-chart recorder that corresponded to approximately 87% of the TS effluent release limit. Throughout the day, actions were taken to manage the release including swapping charcoal filter bank trains, decreasing exhaust ventilation flow rates, attempting to identify and encapsulate potential sources within the hot cells, and eventual complete isolation of hot cell exhaust flow. By calendar day February 4, 2017, releases returned to values below the TS limit.

Description of the Iodine-13 1 Process Efflu ent Traps and Filters The I-131 process is a dry distillation process evolving I-131 from heating of an irradiated tellurium dioxide (Te0 2) target. During the target heating process, the volatile I-131 flows from the process furnace through a quartz separator where any carryover of Te0 2 material is condensed. The exhaust stream then flows through an aqueous trapping solution containing sodium hydroxide (NaOH) followed by a multicomponent reducing diffuser trap consisting of a bubble counter trapping solution of sodium hydroxide (NaOH), sodium thiosulfate (Na2 S203) ,

and potassium iodide (KI), followed by two (2) HI-Q silver zeolite cartridge filters in series and a final bubble counter trap (See Figure 1).

Aqueous Trapping Solutions Figure 1 Reducing Diffuser Trap Page 1 of 10

U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission February 17, 2017 The reducing diffuser traps serve dual purposes: (1) provide visual indication of adequate flow through the system, and (2) provide increased capture efficiencies for organic species of iodine, mainly methyl iodide, to facilitate ALARA effluents from the process.

The process furnace housing also has an exhaust which directs flow through a nuclear grade, activated carbon filter followed by a reducing diffuser trap prior to venting to the hot cell atmosphere.

Upon release from the reducing diffuser traps, all effluents are discharged into the hot cell where the activities are then taken up by the hot cell exhaust system. The hot cell exhaust consists of a series of four (4) parallel banks of nuclear grade, activated carbon filters impregnated with TEDA (triethylenediamine) and KI (potassium iodide) . Filter Bank No. 2 in the series is monitored by a radiation detector to provide indication of filter loading during and post processing activities.

Any effluents that are not captured in Filter Bank No.1 through No. 4 then pass through a HEPA filter prior to exiting the MURR Iodine Processing Suite exhaust and mixing with the facility exhaust ventilation prior to discharge through the facility exhaust stack. Airborne radiation monitors are located in-line and immediately downstream of the HEPA filter and immediately prior to discharge from the facility exhaust stack. See Figure 2 for the hot cell exhaust ventilation system schematic.

Page 2of10

(") N

"""

zci zci zci zci

§ ~ro

~ro § a:l a:l a:l a:l

.... .... .... ....

~ ~ ~ ~

~ ~ ~ ~

I r----------*- --1 v.55 ""'" " ""' I I

STORAGE  :

! CABINET  !

I ROOM I I 199 V...&6 I

I

' '

r v155  !'  !'

"NOTEl V-08  ! CHAR  !

L---*- - *- ------J .....

C/}

V-87  ;:l C<:l v.. , v.. o

~

V-60 i:i:i

.::

'MAG'

.............

SHROUDED_/ .s

.....

PROBE ~

Rm 299U

  • e

> 0

.......

N Q) 4-<

<l)u

......... 0

.....Sn ~0

(")

<!)

~

f .S.

399U C299V µ.. 00 v...

.sC/}

0....

C/}

v.as <!)

()

2

~

=

0

  • a .c. . __

v... ..-<

t')

..-<

HOOO~

  • ~

I

<!)

SUPPLY AIR FROM BUILDING~

V-63

...::. .

"O 0 HVAC SYSTEM 0 u .......

c 0

Q.C.

SAMPLE

<;; STORAGE CABINET

~~<I.lo p:::

....

...., ro r-N

.

e o

..§ u

<I)

i

~

c ro Rm 299V ro

~ ..o2

{) CZl (4)FfVS <Jl1Ml1 ---..---

tl . <I)

-<  :::::> µ...

V-83 V..2

U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission February 17, 2017 Detailed Event Description Sequence of Events At approximately 00:30 on February 3, 2017, Reactor Operations observed a count rate rise on the control room off-gas stack radiation monitor strip-chart recorder that corresponded to approximately 87% of the TS effluent release limit. At approximately 03:30 the off-gas monitor filters were changed and confirmed the release. At approximately 08:30 charcoal Filter Bank No.

4 of the HC-11 exhaust ventilation train was swapped to a fresh, standby filter bank in an attempt to decrease the release rate. The release rate appeared to decrease for approximately 30 to 60 minutes but later returned to elevated values.

Action was then taken to gather and trend the data from the 1-131 hot cell radiation monitors (ALM0-6). See Figure 3 for a plot of the ALM0-6 data that includes the February 2, 2017, process and post-process exposure rates on HC-1 lB Filter Bank No. 2. A second plot is also provided as Figure 4 for comparison of the ALM0-6 data to a typical process and post-process exposure rates from November 17, 2016.

212/20171-131 Process Batch No.: 30013-17-001-X Target ID: 16-022 3.0 2.5 2.0

~

J 0 1.5

.c EQ) 0:: 1.0 E

0.5 0.0 0 200 400 600 800 1000 time in minutes (to = 2122017 at 06:00)

- HHC Filter (ALMO Channel 4)

- PHC Filter (ALMO Channel 5 )

- DHC Filter (ALMO Channel 6)

--- Target Can Opened (08 :54)

- Fumace Tumed On (09:37)

            • Fumace Reaches 734° C (10:11)

- Fumace Tu med Off (11 :31)

Figure 3 ALM0-6 Data from February 2, 2017 Process Page 4of10

U.S . Nuclear Regulatory Commission February 17, 2017 11-17-2016 Process Batch 30013-16-009-X 2.0 1.5

~

J 0

1.0

.c.

EQ)

~ 0.5 0.0 06:00:00 10:00:00 14:00:00 18:00:00 22:00:00 T ime

- HHC Filter

- PHCFiter

- DHC Filer Figure 4 ALM0-6 Data from a Typical Process After review of this data, it was clear that a markable increase in radiation exposure rates on HC-1lB Filter Bank No. 2 initiated at approximately 15:30 (t=575 min) on the day of the process. At this time it became clear the origin of the release was from HC-1 lB, the center cell in the hot cell train where the dry distillation process occurs.

In light of this data, the principal focus turned to identifying any actively emitting sources of effluents in HC-1 lB, followed by swapping Filter Bank No. 2 and No. 3 to the standby trains.

An inspection of the materials in HC-11 B identified that the tellurium dioxide target material from the prior day' s process was in its collection container in HC-1 lB, which is the typical storage location for the target material post processing. To confirm this was not the active source of the release, the target material was moved to HC-1 lA via the interstitial HC-1 lA/B pass-through. Also, at approximately 11 :50 on February 3, 2017, the standby filters in Filter Bank No.

2 and No. 3 were placed in service in an attempt to quarantine any I-131 currently breaking through the filter beds.

At this time, Health Physics had begun an hourly regiment of removing the facility stack monitor filter for analysis and trending the release concentrations relative to the system changes being made. See Table 1 for the results of each filter change throughout the duration of the event. The average percent of the daily TS limit was derived by summing the products of the filter run time and percent TS for each filter and dividing by the sum of the filter run times for the calendar day.

Page 5of10

U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission February 17, 2017 Table 1 Facility Off-Gas Stack Radiation Monitor Data 1-131 Release on 3-Feb-2017 Cone. Run Time Time Removed Filter No. %ofTS

(µCi/mL) (min) 3:28:00 939 l.758E-10 208 87.90 7:40:00 940 2.495E-10 252 124.75 11 :55:00 941 3.225E-10 255 161.25 13:15:00 942 3.766E-10 80 188.30 14:29:00 943 l.054E-10 74 52.70 15:34:00 944 2.534E-10 65 126.70 16:48:00 945 2.734E-10 70 136.70 18:07:00 946 2.249E-10 73 112.45 19:17:00 947 l.034E-10 68 51.70 20:17:00 948 8.176E-11 60 40.88 23:57:00 949 9.658E-11 216 48.26

% TS Average: 107.11 Total µCi Released: 274.41 The 11:50 s_witch to the standby filters on HC-llB had minimal effect. So, it was decided to minimize the flow rate from HC-llB and in the main 1-131 processing suite duct piping to increase residence time in HC-1 lB Filter Bank No. 2 and No. 3, and in duct piping Filter Bank No: 4. At 13:20, the 1-131 processing suite booster fans were secured and the HC-1 lB outlet valves were throttled. Caution was taken to not reduce the flow rate below the minimum required to maintain the hot cell differential pressures negative to the surrounding areas for fear that concentrated activities may leak from the hot cells into the ambient room air. Though this action reduced the 1-131 release out the facility exhaust stack in the short term, it was apparent by 15:00 that release concentrations were increasing again.

Filters 944 and 945 were removed from service at 15:34 and 16:48, respectively, and elevated release concentrations were confirmed which prompted preparations to completely isolate flow through HC-1 lB and submerge the container of spent tellurium dioxide target material, now in HC-1 lA, with activated carbon. To ensure early detection of airborne activities leaking from the isolated hot cell, four (4) additional ambient air monitors were stationed at strategic locations in conjunction with the two (2) permanently installed ambient air monitors for a total of six (6) monitoring locations.

At approximately 17:45, flow through HC-1 lB Filter Bank No. 2 and No. 3 were completely isolated, resulting in a flow path of air through the HC-1 lA/B interstitial pass-through. At approximately 20:30, activated carbon was passed into HC-1 lA and used to submerge the spent Page 6of10

- - --- -------- .-- - - - -* - *-

,_ - ----- -- --- --- ---*---- --- _-_ " -_ : _- - - ..: - - A - -

U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission February 17, 2017 tellurium dioxide container. Immediately after completion of this task, all hot cell flow was isolated, and access to the 1-131 processing suite was secured.

Filters 947, 948, and 949 provided indication that the releases returned to below the TS limit and by calendar day February 4, 2017, releases returned to sustained values under the TS limit. It should also be noted that all ambient air monitors deployed saw no elevation in derived air concentrations (DAC) above background, and in-vivo thyroid bioassay measurements of those individuals involved in the event corroborated that no measurable uptakes occurred. It should also be noted that there were no indications of personnel contamination germane to this process throughout the duration of this event and the days to follow.

On February 6, 2017, the next working day, an Event Review Team (ERT) meeting was convened to estimate the magnitude of release, determine if notification to the NRC would be required, and identify the event root cause. It was determined that releases for calendar day February 3, 2017, were approximately 107% of TS 3.7.b instantaneous release limit, and notification to the NRC would be made per TS 6.6.c.

Root Cause Several potential root causes were suggested during the ERT meeting; however, additional data continues to be needed to corroborate the exact root cause. A second, third, and fourth meeting were convened to review the collected data and go .through the process of elimination to identify the root cause.

At this time, there are two potential root causes continuing to be evaluated: (1) failure of the reducing diffuser traps resulting in elevated quantities of methyl iodide being released to the hot

  • cell, and (2) charcoal filter bypass resulting in unfiltered air bypassing the exhaust filters to a degree sufficient enough to result in elevated releases.

During the evolution to submerge the spent tellurium dioxide target container at approximately 20:30 on February 3, 2017, an observation was made by the hot cell operator that the flow through the reducing diffuser traps appeared to be significantly reduced based on observation of the bubble rate through the bubble counter. Further review identified that the pumps used to force flow through the reducing diffuser traps are positive displacement pumps with no variable speed setting, and consequently, a reduced flow through the bubble counter would be indicative of a leak between the pump and bubble counter. In the event process exhaust air was not in its entirety being driven through the reducing diffuser traps, a higher than typical concentration of process effluents containing methyl iodide would be released directly to the hot cell volume and then taken up by the facility exhaust ventilation system.

As discussed previously, the purpose of the reducing diffuser trap is to capture and retain organic species of iodine, specifically methyl iodide (CH 31-131 ). Historically, the reducing diffuser traps have performed extremely well for capturing and retaining effluents not captured by the product traps. Process commissioning data revealed that the product traps capture 99.8% of the iodine in

,.,

Page 7of10

U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission February 17, 2017 the gas stream while the multicomponent reducing diffuser trap captures an additional 0.19% of the iodine in the gas stream. With the combined removal efficiencies of the product traps and reducing diffuser traps typically 0.01 % of the total iodine activity or less is released into the HC-1 lB environment.

However, if we assume failure of the reducing diffuser trap, further attention concerning the evolution of methyl iodide from the process trap exhaust must be considered. Methyl iodide is created during the dry distillation process from elementary iodine (12) combining with methane (Clii) in the air. Using the total processing activity of 1-131 on February 2, 2017, of approximately 42 Curies and assuming the product trap performs normally collecting 99.8% of the total iodine activity and the reducing diffuser trap fails and provides minimal additional capture efficiency, no greater than 84 mCi of activity would be released to the cell environment.

Of which, we can conservatively assume 2% is converted to methyl iodide resulting in no greater than 1.68 mCi of methyl iodide activity in the cell environment. Comparing the total release activities to that of the maximum potential methyl iodide produced provides a factor of activity available for release of approximately six (6) times greater than what was released during the event, assuming the charcoal filter banks provide little efficiency for sustained retention of methyl iodide.

A review of the literature concerning the performance of charcoal filters for capture and retention of methyl iodide further substantiates the potential root cause that the activities released were from a failure of the reducing diffuser traps. The industry often uses ASTM D3803-91(2014),

"Standard Test Method for Nuclear-Grade Activated Carbon," where both methyl iodide and elementary iodine species are used to challenge the charcoal capture efficiency. This test consists of a 60-minute challenge period in which concentrations of methyl iodide or elementary iodine are fed into the system followed by a continuation of flow for an additional 60-minute elution period. At the end of the elution period, the test is complete, and analyses determine the percent efficiency and percent penetration of the charcoal being tested. Under these test conditions, nuclear grade charcoal often has an efficiency of >99% for methyl iodide and >99.9% for elementary iodine. However, the ASTM D3803-91 testing standard does not provide efficiencies for nuclear grade carbon beyond the elution test period of 60 minutes.

Furthermore, a paper entitled, "Effect of Temperature on the Adsorption* and Desorption Characteristics of Methyl Iodide over TEDA-Impregnated Activated Carbon," which is provided for reference as Attachment 2, describes a series of experiments to determine how methyl iodide breaks-through (penetrates) a nuclear grade charcoal bed over time, temperature ranges, and activity concentrations. As a baseline measurement, the researcher performs a test at 30 °C on a bed depth of 3 centimeters of 6.5 wt% TEDA-impregnated activated carbon, conditions relatively comparable to those for which the 1-131 processing hot cell exhaust ventilation filters are exposed. During this test, the researcher observed a relatively high efficiency and low penetration from initial feed of the activity to approximately 45 minutes after initial feed.

Between minutes 45 and 300 after initial feed of activity, the percentage of breakthrough rapidly increases and eventually appears to converge at 100% breakthrough with approximately 50%

breakthrough occurring at 100 minutes. Furthermore, this finding is corroborated by Flanders Page 8of10

U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission February 17, 2017 reference material on REGA filters which states, "Methyl Iodide adsorbs-desorbs-adsorbs through the bed, exchanging iodine at each juncture. That is to say, methyl iodide can be radioactive-stable-radioactive-stable until it decays into harmless xenon."

Consequently, a release of methyl iodide in the 1-131 processing hot cells would not be apparent until the methyl iodide activities have reached Filter Bank No. 2, where the ALM0-6 radiation monitor is located, after the release activity has traversed through 5 centimeters of bed depth on Filter Bank No. 1. Using the referenced data, the first indication of activity increase on Filter Bank No. 2 would occur at approximately 75 minutes after initial release, and 50% of the released activity would be observable on Filter Bank No. 2 at 170 minutes after initial release. These projected release times appear to be inline with the indications observed during the February 3, 2017,event.

For the potential root cause where exhaust flow bypasses the exhaust filters to a degree sufficient enough to result in elevated releases, we also assume a total failure of the reducing diffuser trap and consider two (2) of the four (4) exhaust filters are bypassing flow. In this case, we should expect to release 10 µCi of activity, which is .still well below any release limits with significant margin and a factor of 27 less than the release on February 3, 2017. Therefore, filter bypass cannot be definitively ruled out, but additional investigations are warranted to better understand the event. Furthermore, the delayed increase of exposure rates on Filter Bank No. 2 on the order of 1 to 4 hours4.62963e-5 days <br />0.00111 hours <br />6.613757e-6 weeks <br />1.522e-6 months <br /> post-processing is not indicative of a bypass in flow, as the activities .would be accumulated on the downstream filters at rates similar to the velocity of the air in the exhaust.

Corrective Action As discussed above, data is continuing to be gathered to finalize a root cause and develop appropriate and robust corrective actions to prevent recurrence. However, at this time MURR intends to implement the following additional controls prior to resuming routine processing at a minimum:

1. Return the reducing diffuser traps to full service to afford the greatest potential for capture and retention of methyl iodide from the process.
2. Install additional Filter Bank No. 5 and No. 6 to provide increased bed depth such that MURR will have additional time to respond, mitigate, and contain releases from methyl iodide desorption.
3. Filter Bank No. 4 and No. 6 will be equipped with radiation monitors to provide real-time indications of adsorption and desorption of released activities.
4. Perform a sequence of lower activity runs scaling up to full process activities to ensure the effectiveness of all implemented corrective actions.

Additionally, this event has been entered into the MURR Corrective Action Program as No.

17-0021, and any additional improvements or corrective actions will be considered and documented in the CAP entry.

Page 9of10

U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission February 17, 2017 Safety Analysis On calendar day February 3, 2017, it was determined that the average release concentration ofl-131 discharged from the MURR exhaust ventilation stack was 2.14 x 10- 10 µCi/ml or an estimated 274 µCi of total activity .. Utilizing the effluent concentration limits from 10 CFR 20, Appendix1 B, Table 2, Column 1; we can derive a maximum dose received by any member of the public.

Assuming an individual is positioned at the maximum receptor site from MURR's exhaust stack, for the duration of the release, and atmospheric conditions during the release provide the minimum potential dilution factor from the MURR stack to the receptor site, the maximum dose received by any member of the public would be 0.0005 mrem or less than 0.001 % of limits specified in 10 CFR 20.1301(a)(l). This dose value is derived in Equation 1 below.

[Eqn. l] = [(discharge concentration) I (dilution factor) I (APP. B Limit)] x (50 mrem I 365 days)

[(2.14 x 10- 10 µCi/ml) I (292) I (2.00 x 10- 10 µCi/ml)] x (50 mrem I 365 days)

[(0.00366)] x (0.137) 0.0005 mrem Furthermore, should the theoretical maximum amount of methyl iodide produced during the process be discharged from the reactor stack, 1.68 mCi, irrespective of any capture and retention efficiency from the reducing diffuser traps, the maximum hypothetical dose an individual positioned at the maximum receptor site from MURR's exhaust ventilation stack, for the duration of the release, and atmospheric conditions during the release provided the minimum potential dilution factor from the MURR exhaust stack to the receptor site, the maximum hypothetical dose received by any member of the public would have been no greater than 0.003 mrem, as calculated via the methodologies provided in Equation 1 above.

To corroborate the release resulted in no significant increase in doses to the public, MURR is expediting the analysis of 46 environmental TLD monitors positioned throughout the MURR site and surrounding areas. Environmental TLD monitors are analyzed by a third party, and results are reported to MURR after analysis. The results of this analysis are expected to be returned to MURR by the end of February 2017.

Sincerely,

    • /{~ -..._...---

-

,<:---

JACO LI EL. MATYAS, No

..UV./'.l'Wlmj,,cifln J:Ynil'A!l" MArril r"'1lfo1!!*"tQ.~~"" 73"~t5\-*

26* 2019 Nathan G. Hogue, CHP alph A. Butler, P.E.

Reactor Health Physics Manager Director JACQUELINE L MATYM My Comm1s5lon ExP\185 March 26, 2019 Howard County Page 10of10 CommlsSlon #15634308

ATTACHMENT 2 gcarbon Vol. 2, No. I March 2001 pp. 9-14 D!ilScience Effect of Temperature on the Adsorption and Desorption Characteristics of Methyl Iodide over TED A-Impregnated Activated Carbon Geun-U Park*, In-Tae Kim, Jae Kwang Lee*, Seung Kon Ryu* and Joo Hyung Kim Korea Atomic Energy Research Institute, Daejon 305-353, Korea

  • Dept. of Chemical Engineering, Chungnam National University, Daejon 305-764, Korea
  • e-mail: ngipark@kaeri.re.kr _

(Received February 16, 2001; accepted March 9, 2001)

Abstract Adsorption and desorption characteristics of methyl iodide at high temperature conditions up to 250°C by TEDA-impreg-nated activated carbon, which is used for radioiodine retention in nuclear facility, was experimentally evaluated. In the range of temperature from 30°C to 250°C, the adsorption capacity of base activated carbon decreased sharply with increasing tem-perature but that ofTEDA-impregnated activated carbon showed higher value even at high temperature ranges. Especially, the desorption amount of methyl iodide on TEDA-impregnated carbon represented lower value than that on unimpregnated car-bon. The breakthrough curves of methyl iodide in the fixed bed packed with base carbon and TEDA-impregnated activated*

carbon at high temperature were compared. TEDA-impregnated activated carbon would be applicable to adsorption process up to 150°C for the removal of radioiodine in a nuclear facility.

Keywords: TEDA~AC, High temperature, Methyl iodide, Adsorption, Desorption

1. Introduction During the operation of nuclear power plants or nuclear facility, various radioactive gaseous wastes are generated.

Because radioiodine among these gaseous wastes has radio-logical harm on the human body and environment, it is sig-nificantly considered that this gas must be removed below restriction of release even in the case of normal operating and accident conditions. Therefore, numerous studies for the removal of radioiodine from the off-gas stream of nuclear facilities have been performed with formation processes and chemical structure [1-6). Radioiodine generated from nuclear power plants are partially converted radioactive organic iodide, such as methyl iodide, by react with organic matter in process line. TEDA (TriEthyleneDiAmine) or KI-impreg-nated activated carbons are, in general, used to effectively removal, because of the low ignition point of TEDA and the remove the radioiodine under an accident of high humidity possible release of TEDA from the charcoal in continuously condition. flowing air streams. The ignition point of TEDA-irnpreg-TEDA, l,4-Diazabicyclo(2.2.2)octane(DABCO), has a nated carbon has been reported to be about l 90°C [7). It has molecular formula of C6H 12N 2 with a molecular efficiency been reported that the release of up to 1.2 µg TEDN(g car-by forming charge transfer complexes with organic iodies. bon, min) is observed from various TEDA at 90°C and a The impregnated TEDA on activated carbon is converted flow rate of 4.7 emfs [7, 8). Therefore, the TEDA-impreg-quaternary ammonium salts by react with organic iodies as nated activated carbon cannot use in high temperature sys-following [7). tems, such as the sintering step in DUPIC (Direct Use of There has been some concern regarding the use of TEDA- Spent PWR Fuel In CANDU Reactor) process, due to the impregnated activated carbon as an adsorbent for radioiodine rapid drop of the removal efficiency and the ignition possi-

ATTACHMENT 2 10 G.-1. Park et al. /Carbon Science Vol. 2, No. I (2001) 9-14 bility of activated carbon at this condition. Extensive studies Table I. Physical characteristics of Adsorbents in our laboratory were focused to perform the domestic self-TEDA-AC development of silver ion-exchanged inorganic solid adsor- Characteristic Base AC (6.5 wt%)

bent for the removal of radioiodine at high temperature.

These works include the adsorption characteristics and the Mean Pore Diameter (A) 12 13.2 overall evaluation of removal efficiency of radiodine in fixed Pore Volume (cm 3/g) 0.767 0.658 bed packed with silver ion-exchanged zeolite (9, 10]. Micro Pore Volume (cm3/g) 0.592 0.523 Silver zeolite is an expensive adsorbent due to the cost of Surface area (m 2/g) 1,483 1,275 silver reagent, compared to TEDA impregnated activated carbon whose application to high temperature has some limi- and surface area.

tations. It is obvious that high temperature can be expected during design basis loss-of-coolant accident (LOCA), which 2.2. Experimental Apparatus and Methods can be regarded as conservatively representing the tempera- A schematic diagram of experimental apparatus is shown ture in pressurized water reactor (PWR). Therefore, investi- in Fig. 1. All parts of the system, such as adsorption column gation on the retention of elemental radioiodine ( 131 I) by and gas flow lines, were made of pyrex glass to prevent the various activated carbons at high temperature has exten- elemental iodine plate-out and trapping. Gaseous methyl sively been performed so far (11-13]. But only a few results iodide is produced from an evaporation of methyl iodide on the adsorption of methyl iodide at high temperature con- solution. The gas-phase concentration is adjusted by control-dition have also been presented. ling the solution temperature and the nitrogen flow rate to In this study, the adsorption and desorption characteristics methyl iodide generators. Dry air was used as a carrier gas at of methyl iodide on the TEDA-impregnated activated carbon 4 //min, a superficial velocity of 0.18 m/sec.

in fixed bed at high temperature up to 250°C were evaluated The temperature inside the adsorbent was controlled up to with respect to the variation of temperature. Based on the 400°C by heating the column in an electric furnace. A con-removal efficiency and desorption amount of methyl iodide stant amount of the adsorbents is packed in a column with obtained from the experimental results, the temperature limit dimensions of 0.022 m I.D. and 0.6 m length, and these of TEDA impregnated activated carbon in application to adsorbents were thermally equilibrated with the gaseous-high temperature ranges is also suggested. phase. The effluent concentration of methyl iodide from the column was analyzed by the gas chromatography with a pulse discharged detector (PDD) and GS-Q capillary column

2. Experiment at an oven temperature of l 40°C as shown in Table 2. Both the breakthrough curve of methyl iodide adsorption and the 2.1. Materials weight change of the adsorbent were used to obtain the Base activated carbon (AC) and TEDA-impregnated acti- adsorption amount of the adsorbate. Also, desorption experi-vated carbon (TEDA-AC) were used to examine the adsorp- ment after adsorption of methyl iodide was conducted by tion capacity of methyl iodide at various temperature. controlling the column temperature.

Activated carbon made from coconut shells, supplied by Adsorbed amount of methyl iodide by chemical reaction Samchulri Carbon Co., Korea, with a particle size 8-16 with only TEDA is calculated by following equation, based mesh was used. on the experimental data obtained from fixed bed adsorption.

TEDA-impregnated activated carbons with 6.5 wt% of One mo! of TEDA can be stoichiomatically adsorbed the TEDA were made by impregnating with chemical reagents two mole of methyl iodide.

on the base carbon according to the method presented in a Adsorbed amount of methyl iodide by TEDA on TEDA-AC =

patent (14]. Virgin activated carbon was dried at l 10°C for 24 hours2.777778e-4 days <br />0.00667 hours <br />3.968254e-5 weeks <br />9.132e-6 months <br /> to remove moisture. The impregnation time was (Total adsorption amount by TEDA AC-Tcital adsorption amount by AC, mol/g) x about 30 minutes, and the ratio of TEDA solution volume to 100 TEDA amount on TEDA-AC(mol/g) weight of AC was 1.2 ml/g. After impregnation, TEDA-AC was dried at 70-80°C for 16 hrs. The amount of impregnant on TED A-AC was obtained by the extraction of TEDA with 3. Results and Discussion acetonitrile solution and then the analysis of solution con-centration using UV-Spectrophotometer. The physical prop- 3.1. Removal Efficiency of Methyl Iodide erty of two carbons with the aid of the BET-N 2 (Micro- In order to analyze the adsorption and desorption charac-meritics, ASAP 2400) analysis was obtained, as listed in teristics of methyl iodide by TEDA-AC at high temperature Table 1. range, adsorption behavior of methyl iodide on AC and The physical properties of TEDA-AC were similar to TEDA-AC at room temperature was evaluated at first. These these of the AC, except for a slight decrease on pore volume works were performed in a thin bed with the depth of 3 cm.

ATTACHMENT 2 Effect of Temperature on the Adsorption and Desorption Characteristics of Methyl Iodide over TED A-Impregnated Activated Carbon 11 MFC Insulation Linc ControDer i l!

1

!!

!11i I DI Vent4  ! I

!iiI ii 1-------+i!I 11 I ~put

+ MFC

_J iij -

Dry Air Fig. 1. Flow diagram of the experimental apparatus for methyl iodide.

Table 2. Experimental and gas chromatography conditions Experimental parameters Conditions Unit Process flow

  • 4.0 //min Superficial velocity 0.18 m/sec Bed depth 10 cm Input concentration 4 x 10-6-6 x 10-5 moVL Gas(CH 3I) generator temperature 30 oc Bed temperature 30-250 oc Relative humidity Dry  %

GC analysis conditions

- Capillary column GS-Q

- Detector PDD Pulse Discharged Detector

- Carrier gas(He) flow rate 6 ml/min

- Oven temperature 140 oc

- Detector temperature 160 oc

- Auto sampler volume 1.0 ml Fig. 2 and 3 represent the breakthrough curves of methyl This result will be discussed in the next section. In general, iodide adsorption on AC and 6.5 wt% TEDA-AC as a func- the amount of TEDA on carbon filter installed in nuclear tion of input concentration at 30°C. As the input concentra- facility ranges from 2 wt% to 5 wt% [12). The influence of tion is increased, it is normal that breakthrough time TEDA amount on adsorption of methyl iodide at 30°C was becomes short. At the same input concentration in thin bed evaluated. Fig. 4 shows that increase of TEDA amount made of 3 cm, adsorption capacity of AC is slightly higher than a short breakthrough time. Nevertheless, it is thought that the that of TEDA-AC due to the decrease of surface area as effect of TEDA inpregnation on the adsorption capacity at shown in Table I. This means that adsorption capacity at room temperature is minimal.

room temperature depends on both the physical adsorption During a postulated nuclear reactor accident, the radioiod-and chemical adsorption. However, TEDA-AC is more use- ine *buildup on carbon filters would be high. The highly ful to retain the adsorbed methyl iodide, because the reten- radioactive iodine would not only provide the intensive radi-tion .of methyl iodide by TEDA is due to chemical reaction. ation field within the carbon filter, but also it would signifi-

ATTACHMENT 2 12 G.-1. Park et al. /Carbon Science Vol. 2, No. 1 (2001) 9-14 1.0 1.0 0.9 0.9

        • 500~= ******-

. .i~o****"

.

0.8 0.0 eo.e

  • *o 0.7
    • 0.7
  • 0 0

0.6

  • 0
  • 0.6

0

(.) (.)

0.5 0.5 0 0 0 0

  • 0.4 0.4 *o.

0.3

  • 0 ** 0.3 0.2
  • ** e 4.0E-06 eo 0
    • o 3.8E-05 U.;!
  • *O wt%

02 wt%

0.1 lb *

  • 6.5E-05 0.1

0

  • 6.5 wt%

0.0 11~*

0.0 0 50 100 150 200 250 0 25 50 75 100 125 150 175 Time(min)

Time(min)

Fig. 2. Breakthrough curves of methyl iodide adsorption on AC Fig. 4. Breakthrough curves of methyl iodide adsorpt6ion on with input concentrations (Bed Depth=3 cm, Temp.=30°C).

various TEDA-AC at input concentration of 6.6xl 0-5 mol/l (Bed Depth=3 cm, Temp.=30°C).

1.0

      • **** 1.0 0.9

& **

0.8 0

    • 0.9

0 O.tl 0.7 0.6 0

  • 0.7 0

0 0.5

.._

0

  • a.er 0
  • 0

(.)

0.5 0.4 0 0 0.3

  • 0.4 0.2 0
  • O.:l 30'C 0.1
  • o 6.6E-05 0.2 -5o*c 0.0 0
  • 1.3E-05 0.1
    • illi ..

-1oo*c 75'C

    • D** 150'C 0 50 100 150 200 250 300 0.0 Time( min) 0  ;;5 50 75 100 . 1?5 150 Fig. 3. Breakthrough curves of methyl iodide adsorption on 6.5 Time(min) wt% TEDA-AC with input concentrations (Bed Depth=3 cm, Temp.=30°C). Fig. 5. Breakthrough curves of methyl iodide adsorption on AC with variation of adsorption temperature (Bed Depth=3 cm, Co=5xl0-5 mol/l).

cantly increase the carbon temperature because of decay heat. Therefore, *breakthrough curves of methyl iodide caused by the decrease of physisorption amount, the release adsorption on AC and 6.5 wt% TEDA-AC at high tempera- of TEDA and the increase of desorption rate of adsorbed ture ranges up to 150 °C were obtained in thin bed of 3 cm, methyl iodide with increasing temperature.

as shown in Fig. 5 and 6, respectively. Input concentration The carbon filter used in a nuclear facility has general was about 5 x 10-5 moll! in all experiments. Overall break- dimension, that is, bed depth is 25 cm and face velocity of through behavior was the same; as the temperature increases, air stream to carbon filter is about 25-50 cm/sec [12]. Fig. 7 the adsorption capacity decreases. Especially, above 75°C represents the breakthrough curves of methyl iodide adsorp-breakthrough time sharply decreased. This result would be tion on AC and 6.5 wt% TEDA-AC at temperature of 100°C

ATTACHMENT 2 Effect of Temperature on the Adsorption and Desorption Characteristics of Methyl Iodide over TEDA-lmpregnated Activated Carbon 13 1.0 2.0

-TEDA(100"c) 0.9 1.8 o**., -<>-TEDA(150"C)

Q **O**AC(100'\;)

0.8 1.6 ***** AC(1501;)

1.4 0.7 1.2

/

0.Ci 0

0 u 0.5

(.)

.....

(.)

1.0 "~

u 0.8 *'

"

  • '

,.

0.4

"

0.6 0.3 30"e 0.4 0.2 *** *

  • SO"e 75"C 0.1 ***** lOO"C

--a-1so*c 0.0 0 I0 20 30 40 50 60 lO 80 0 25 50 75 100 125 Time( min)

Time(min)

Fig. 8. Desorption curves of methyl iodide with temperature in Fig. 6. Breakthrough curves of methyl iodide adsorption on 6.5. deep bed packed with AC and 6.5 wt% TEDA-AC. (Bed wt% TEDA-AC with variation of adsorption temperature (Bed Depth=IO cm, Dry Air).

Depth=3 cm, Co=5x10-5 moll!).

0.6 1.0 ----TEDA-AC(Adsorbed)

- TEDA -AC( Residual) 0.9 * * * *

  • AC(Adsorbed) 0.5
  • 0 *
  • AC(Residual) 0.8
0. 7 a "'

TI 0.4 0.6

"'I

~

0 u i: 0.3 u 0.5

(.)

I a

0.4 ..,

0 cr 0.2 0.3 0 -TEDA-AC(IOO"C) 0.2

    • O**AC(100"C) 0.1 a 0.1 - TEDA-AC( I 50"C) *a
    • a** AC(150"C) *-o. ..

0.0 0.0 0 50 100 150 200 0 50 100 150 200 250 300 Time(min) Temperature(°C)

Fig. 7. Breakthrough curves of methyl iodide with temperature Fig. 9. Adsorption amount and residual amount after desorption in deep bed packed with AC and 6.5 wt% TEDA-AC. (Bed with temperature on AC and 6.5 wt% TEDA-AC. (Bed Depth Depth= IO cm, Co=5x10-5 mol/l). =3 cm, Co=5x10- 5 mol/l).

  • i and 150°C under the same input concentration in a deep bed ated from the chemical reaction. Fig. 8 shows the concentra-of 10 cm. Adsorption capacity of TEDA-AC at 100°C and tion variation with time during desorption test for TEDA-AC l 50°C was higher than that of AC, and the increased bed and AC adsorbed methyl iodide (refer to Fig. 7). TEDA-AC temperature reduced the adsorption capacity of TEDA-AC had a low desorption amount at high temperature, as com-for methyl iodide removal. A little difference on adsorption . pared with that of AC.

capacity at thin bed of 3 cm in the range of 100°C to l 50°C was observed, as shown in Fig. 6. This is likely due to an 3.2. Quantitative analysis of sorption amount increase of temperature inside bed by adsorption heat gener- The adsorbed amount and the residual amount of methyl

ATTACHMENT 2 14 G.-1. Park et al. /Carbon Science Vol: 2. No. I (2001) 9-14 Table 3. Adsorption amount and residual amount after desorp- impregnated activated carbon showed higher value even at ti on of methyl iodide (unit: gig-adsorbent) high temperature ranges. It was obvious that TEDA-AC had AC TED A-AC higher adsorption capacity than AC beyond 70°C, and a little Temp.

(OC) difference between the adsorbed amount and the residual Adsorption Residual Adsorption Residual amount after desorption was observed. These results suggest 30 0.529 0.105 0.470 0.199 that the adsorption capacity of AC is largely due to physical 50 0.350 0.041 0.320 0.172 adsorption, but TEDA is effective in strong fixation of 75 0.161 0.015 0.215 0.141 methyl iodide at higher temperature by chemical reaction.

100 0.074 0.008 0.155 0.115 Based on these results, TEDA-impregnated activated carbon 170 0.032 0.010 0.123 0.100 would be applicable to temperature up to 150°C for the 250 0.021 0.011 0.105 . 0.089 removal of radio iodine in nuclear facility. However, the pos-sibility of ignition due to adsorption heat and decay heat in deep bed should be confirmed.

iodide after desorption test on each of the adsorbents in the temperature range of 30°C to 250°C are shown in Fig. 9.

Quantitative data are listed in Table 3. Acknowledgment As mentioned before, the adsorption capacities of TEDA-AC and AC decrease with increasing temperature. TEDA- This project has been carried out under the Nuclear R&D AC had a higher adsorption capacity than AC beyond 70°C, program by MOST.

and a little difference between the adsorbed amount and the residual amount was observed. These results suggest that the adsorption capacity of AC results from almost physical References adsorption, but TEDA is effective in strong fixation of methyl iodide at higher temperature by chemical reaction. [!) Pence, D. T.; Staples, B. A. In Proc. 13th AEC Air Clean-Based on the. previous equation, the degree of contribution ing Conference, CONF-740807, Atomic Energy Commis-on the adsorbed amount of methyl iodide by only TEDA sion, Washington DC, 1974, 157.

was calculated at various temperatures. These results are [2) International Atomic Energy Agency, Design of Off-gas 25.4% at 75°C, 51.9% at 100°C, and 73.3% at 150°C, and Air Cleaning System at Nuclear Power Plant, 1987, respectively. Therefore, it would be confirmed that the IAEA Tech. No. 274.

impregnated TEDA contributes to the removal of methyl [3) Wilhelm, J. G.; Furrer, J. In CEC Seminar on Radioactive iodide at high temperature ranges. Effluents from Nuclear Fuel Reprocessing Plants, Kern-Although impregnated TEDA on TEDA-AC can be forschungszentrum, Karlsruhe, Federal Republic of Ger-released at high temperature, TEDA-methyl iodide complex many, 1977, 248.

due to chemical reaction was very stable. In the previous [4) Bellamy, R.H. Nucl. Safety 1974, 15, 16.

study [6], a pure TEDA begin to vaporize at 174°C, a [5) Wren, J. C.; Moore, C. J.; Rasmussen, M. T. Nuclear TEDA-methyl iodide complex begin at 270°C and a TEDA- Technology 1999, 125, 28-39.

methyl iodide on TEDA-AC begin to decompose at 200°C. [6] Park, S. W. Doctoral Thesis, Dept. of Chem. Engineering, Based on these results, TEDA-AC would be used to remove KAIST, Tae-Jon, Korea, 1993.

radioiodine below I 50°C. However, it is necessary to con- [7) Wren, J. C.; Moore, C. J. Whiteshell Nuclear Research firm the possibility of ignition by adsorption heat. Establishment, Manitoba Roe I LO, Pinawa, 1988, 113-122.

[8] Wood, G. USAEC Report, DP-1329, 1973.

4. Conclusion [9) Choi, B. S.; Park, G. I. Proceeding of the KNS Autumn Meeting, Vol. II, Taegu, Korea, 1997, 311-316.

TEDA-impregnated activated carbon is generally used to [10) Park, G. I:; Choi, B. S.; Cho, I. L.; Kim, J. H.; Ryu, S. K.

remove radioiodine generated from normal operating condi- Journal of Korea Nuclear Society 2000, 32(5), 504.

tions or accident conditions in a nuclear power plant. There- [11) Deuber, H. Nuclear Technology 1986, 72, 44.

fore, adsorption and desorption characteristics of methyl (12) International Atomic Energy Agency, IAEA Tech. No.

iodide at high temperature conditions up to 250°C by TEDA- 201, Vienna, 1980.

impregnated activated carbon, which represents the perfor- [13) Kovach, J. L. 16th DOE/NRC Nuclear Air Cleaning Con-mance test at accident condition, was experimentally evalu- ference, CONF-801308, 1981.

ated. In the range of temperature from 30°C to 250°C, the * [14) Lee, H. K.; Park, G. I.; Park, S. W. Patent, Korea, No.

adsorption capacity of base activated carbon sharply 072819.

decreased with increasing temperature but that of TEDA-

Retrieved from "https://kanterella.com/w/index.php?title=ML17052A394&oldid=2011547"