ML12356A176

From kanterella
Revision as of 02:03, 18 March 2019 by StriderTol (talk | contribs) (Created page by program invented by StriderTol)
(diff) ← Older revision | Latest revision (diff) | Newer revision → (diff)
Jump to navigation Jump to search
Kld TR-505, Rev. 1, Development of Evacuation Time Estimates, Part 6 of 8
ML12356A176
Person / Time
Site: Browns Ferry Tennessee Valley Authority icon.png
Issue date: 11/30/2012
From:
KLD Engineering, PC
To:
Northern States Power Co, Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation, Xcel Energy
References
L-MT-12-112 KLD TR-505, Rev 1
Download: ML12356A176 (60)
v • d • e


Text

APPENDIX J Representative Inputs to and Outputs from the DYNEV II System J. REPRESENTATIVE INPUTS TO AND OUTPUTS FROM THE DYNEV II SYSTEM This appendix presents data input to and output from the DYNEV II System. Table J-1 provides the volume and queues for the ten highest volume signalized intersections in the study area.Refer to Table K-2 and the figures in Appendix K for a map showing the geographic location of each intersection.

Table J-2 provides source (vehicle loading) and destination information for several roadway segments (links) in the analysis network. Refer to Table K-1 and the figures in Appendix K for a map showing the geographic location of each link.Table J-3 provides network-wide statistics (average travel time, average speed and number of vehicles) for an evacuation of the entire EPZ (Region R03) for each scenario.

As expected, Scenarios 8 and 11, which are snow scenarios, exhibit slower average speeds and longer average travel times than good weather and rain scenarios.

Scenario 13, which is the special event, exhibits a similar average speed and travel time as Scenario 3. This is because the special event does not have an impact on the ETE (see Section 7.5). Scenario 14, which is the roadway impact scenario, shows a significantly longer network-wide average travel time and a significantly slower network-wide average speed than the comparable Scenario 1. As discussed in Section 7.5, the roadway impact has a significant impact on the ETE.Table J-4 provides statistics (average speed and travel time) for the major evacuation routes -US-lO, 1-94, SR-24, SR-55, SR-25, US-169, SR-101, CR-5 and CR-11 -for an evacuation of the entire EPZ (Region R03) under Scenario 1 conditions.

As discussed in Section 7.3 and shown in Figures 7-3 through 7-9, 1-94 EB, US-la EB and SR-101 SB are congested for most of the evacuation.

As such, the average speeds are comparably slower (and travel times longer) than other evacuation routes.Table J-5 provides the number of vehicles discharged and the cumulative percent of total vehicles discharged for each link exiting the analysis network, for an evacuation of the entire EPZ (Region R03) under Scenario 1 conditions.

Refer to Table K-1 and the figures in Appendix K for a map showing the geographic location of each link.Figure J-1 through Figure J-14 plot the trip generation time versus the ETE for each of the 14 Scenarios considered.

The distance between the trip generation and ETE curves is the travel time. Plots of trip generation versus ETE are indicative of the level of traffic congestion during evacuation.

For low population density sites, the curves are close together, indicating short travel times and minimal traffic congestion.

For higher population density sites, the curves are farther apart indicating longer travel times and the presence of traffic congestion.

As seen in Figure J-1 through Figure J-14, the curves are spatially separated as a result of the traffic congestion in the EPZ, which was discussed in detail in Section 7.3.Monticello Nuclear Generating Plant J-1 KLD Engineering, P.C.Evacuation Time Estimate Rev. 1 Table J-1. Characteristics of the Ten Highest Volume Signalized Intersections Aproc Toa T ur Ib4 ll, lbb it, 237 US-10 & Main St Actuated Signal 236 2,337 0 758 247 0 TOTAL 13,750 238 10,968 178 Actuated 237 2,340 0 754 US-1O & Jackson Ave Signal 7 20 4 Signal 756 203 4 TOTAL 13,511 -240 10,817 83 Actuated 238 2,351 0 Signal 822 178 2 TOTAL 13,346 -240 2,393 0 241 10,625 351 990 ~~Actuated 927 990 US-10 & Co Rd 44 Signal 992 79 0 991 116 2 TOTAL 13,213 -243 10,310 257 Actuated 242 2,414 0 993 US-10 & Joplin St Sga 9 0 Signal 994 304 1 TOTAL 13,028 -1155 10,239 96 Actuated 244 2,428 0 245 US-10 & Waco St Sga 00 1 Signal 1000 19 0 TOTAL 12,686 -233 8,839 0 US-10 & 171st Ave Actuated 231 2,306 0 NW Signal 989 0 0 TOTAL 11,145 -255 4,100 69 253 2,518 15 254 US-10 & CR-43 Actuat 1002 2,075 21 Signal 1097 730 10 TOTAL 9,423 Monticello Nuclear Generating Plant Evacuation Time Estimate J-2 KLD Engineering, P.C.Rev. 1 Max.Approach Total Turn Intersection (up Volume Queue Node Location Control Node) (Veh) (Veh)200 5,545 51 255 US-10 & CR-S Actuated Signal 279 1,261 30 254 2,533 0 TOTAL 9,339 199 842 44 200 US-10 & SR-25 Actuated 256 5,044 574 Signal 255 2,729 0 TOTAL 8,615 -Monticello Nuclear Generating Plant Evacuation Time Estimate J-3 KID Engineering, P.C.J-3 KLD Engineering, P.C.Rev. I Table J-2. Sample Simulation Model Input 8003 4,500 122 80 NW______8087 1,700 8003i4,50 8003 4,500 256 20 W 8087 1,700 8412 1,700 449 31 NW 8658 3,800 8518 1,700 616 9 SW 8464 1,700 8411 1,700 779 16 W 8412 1,700 912 13 SW 8528 1,700 8657 1,700 8045 4,500 1139 213 SE 8166 3,800 8196 1,700 8873 1,700 1239 162 N 8302 1,700 1307 86 E 8739 3,800 8045 4,500 1397 298 E 8166 3,800 8230 3,800 Monticello Nuclear Generating Plant KLD Engineering, P.C.Monticello Nuclear Generating Plant Evacuation Time Estimate J-4 KLD Engineering, P.C.Rev. 1 Table J-3. Selected Model Outputs for the Evacuation of the Entire EPZ (Region R03)Network-Wide Average 2.4 2.8 2.4 2.9 2.4 2.3 2.8 Travel Time (Min/Veh-Mi)

Network-Wide Average 25.5 21.4 24.8 21.0 25.0 25.7 21.3 Speed (mph)Total Vehicles Exitin Network 64,920 64,969 64,035 64,189 52,762 65,087 65,243 Exiting Network Network-Wide Average 2.9 2.4 2.8 2.9 2.4 2.5 3.5 Travel Time (Min/Veh-Mi)

Network-Wide Average 20.6 25.2 21.2 20.8 24.9 24.1 17.0 Speed (mph)Total Vehicles Exitin Network 65,461 63,370 63,592 63,866 52,798 64,364 65,158 Exiting NetworkIIIII Monticello Nuclear Generating Plant Evacuation Time Estimate J-5 KLD Engineering, P.C.Rev. I Table J-4. Average Speed (mph) and Travel Time (min) for Major Evacuation Routes (Region R03, Scenario 1)US-1O EB 13.5 12.1 66.9 10.5 77.5 20.6 39.3 61.1 13.3 65.3 12.4 US-10 WB 12.4 67.0 11.1 66.8 11.2 65.8 11.3 68.8 10.8 69.6 10.7 1-94 EB 16.8 53.6 18.8 18.6 54.1 30.8 32.8 75.0 13.5 75.0 13.5 1-94 WB 16.7 71.6 14.0 71.9 13.9 74.6 13.4 75.0 13.4 75.0 13.4 SR-24 SB 12.4 48.5 15.3 48.7 15.3 48.9 15.2 49.8 14.9 49.8 14.9 SR-55 EB 6.9 53.5 7.8 54.4 7.6 56.3 7.4 59.0 7.0 59.0 7.0 SR-25 SB 8.3 25.6 19.5 49.9 10.0 55.0 9.1 56.0 8.9 56.9 8.8 SR-25 NB 6.9 50.9 8.2 58.0 7.1 58.3 7.1 59.0 7.0 60.0 6.9 US-169 NB 8.8 65.9 8.0 45.6 11.6 64.2 8.2 65.2 8.1 66.3 7.9 US-169 SB 3.4 43.9 4.6 43.9 4.6 47.4 4.3 54.3 3.8 65.5 3.1 SR-101 SB 6.6 10.5 37.9 3.3 119.6 3.2 125.3 9.6 41.4 16.8 23.5 CR-5 NB 7.4 59.1 7.5 59.6 7.5 59.3 7.5 60.0 7.4 60.0 7.4 CR-11 NB 9.5 56.2 10.2 58.9 9.7 58.9 9.7 59.4 9.6 60.0 9.5 Monticello Nuclear Generating Plant Evacuation Time Estimate J-6 KLD Engineering, P.C.Rev. 1 Table J-5. Simulation Model Outputs at Network Exit Links for Region R03, Scenario 1 CumultiveEhilapes Discared by(heou diatdsim Cumlaiv Percen of 1 Vehiles ishrebyteIdcedTm 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 998 2,452 3,572 3,972 3,972 2 7 6 6 6 6 2,642 5,525 6,926 6,938 6,938 17 14 12 11 11 98 3,394 7,313 11,258 13,755 15,093 22 19 20 22 23 101 63 155 180 182 182 0 0 0 0 0 167 257 709 848 868 868 2 2 2 1 1 308 452 1,206 1,807 1,893 1,895 3 3 3 3 3 351 517 1,326 1,925 1,957 1,958 3 3 3 3 3 1,502 4,306 7,013 8,847 8,854 10 11 13 14 14 483 535 1,431 1,926 1,971 1,971 4 4 3 3 3 516 1,378 1,616 1,639 1,639 3 4 3 3 3 519 58 148 187 192 192 0 0 0 0 0 624 144 472 624 636 636 1 1 1 1 1 625 329 1,076 1,306 1,339 1,340 2 3 2 2 2 662 434 2,118 3,342 3,382 3,383 3 5 6 5 5 689 165 424 488 494 494 1 1 1 1 1 690 209 519 645 660 660__ _ 1 1 1 1 1 Monticello Nuclear Generating Plant Evacuation Time Estimate J-7 KLD Engineering, P.C.Rev. 1 CumulativEVeilapes Discared by(heoIdiatdsim New r 1 1 231 599 896 937 938 711 23 59 89 93 i 3 2 2 2 2 1 746 350 1,111 1,495 1,512 1,512 2 3 3 2 2 767 179 505 581 592 592 1 1 1 1 1 915 218 585 694 708 708 1 1 1 1 1 249 530 598 601 601 950 2 1 1 1 1 1004 782 2,521 3,676 3,794 3,799 5 6 7 6 6 0 0 0 0 0 1317 0 0 0 0 0 398 1,487 1,866 1,931 1,934 1474 3 4 3 3 3 634 1,411 2,214 3,319 4,547 1483 4 4 4 5 7 Monticello Nuclear Generating Plant Evacuation Time Estimate J-8 KLD Engineering, P.C.Rev. 1 ETE and Trip Generation Summer, Midweek, Midday, Good (Scenario 1)-Trip Generation -ETE IA100%80%60%0' 40%C 20%a-0%0 30 60 90 120 150 180 210 240 270 Elapsed Time (min)Figure J-1. ETE and Trip Generation:

Summer, Midweek, Midday, Good Weather (Scenario 1)ETE and Trip Generation Summer, Midweek, Midday, Rain (Scenario 2)-Trip Generation

-ETE 100%80%" 60%4-0 0 40%C 20%0%0 30 60 90 120 150 180 210 240 270 Elapsed Time (min)Figure J-2. ETE and Trip Generation:

Summer, Midweek, Midday, Rain (Scenario 2)Monticello Nuclear Generating Plant Evacuation Time Estimate J-9 KLD Engineering, P.C.Rev. 1 ETE and Trip Generation Summer, Weekend, Midday, Good (Scenario 3)-Trip Generation 1ETE 100%80%60%4'20 , 40%41 C 20%0%0 30 60 90 120 150 180 210 240 270 Elapsed Time (min)Figure J-3. ETE and Trip Generation:

Summer, Weekend, Midday, Good Weather (Scenario 3)ETE and Trip Generation Summer, Weekend, Midday, Rain (Scenario 4)-Trip Generation 1ETE 100%80%o 60%0 40%4-C R 20%0%0 30 60 90 120 150 180 210 240 270 Elapsed Time (min)Figure J-4. ETE and Trip Generation:

Summer, Weekend, Midday, Rain (Scenario 4)Monticello Nuclear Generating Plant Evacuation Time Estimate J-10 KLD Engineering, P.C.Rev. I ETE and Trip Generation Summer, Midweek, Weekend, Evening, Good (Scenario 5)-Trip Generation

-ETE 100%IA E 0%S60%40%U20%0%0 30 60 90 120 150 180 210 240 270 Elapsed Time (min)Figure J-5. ETE and Trip Generation:

Summer, Midweek, Weekend, Evening, Good Weather (Scenario 5)ETE and Trip Generation Winter, Midweek, Midday, Good (Scenario 6)-Trip Generation -mETE 100%7 80%(U 60%4.0 I-w 40%4-.C20%0%0 30 60 90 120 150 180 210 240 270 Elapsed Time (min)Figure J-6. ETE and Trip Generation:

Winter, Midweek, Midday, Good Weather (Scenario 6)Monticello Nuclear Generating Plant Evacuation Time Estimate J-11 KLD Engineering, P.C.Rev. 1 ETE and Trip Generation Winter, Midweek, Midday, Rain (Scenario 7)-Trip Generation -ETE 100%"L0 80%60%4o-0 0t 40%20%0%0 30 60 90 120 150 180 210 240 270 Elapsed Time (min)Figure J-7. ETE and Trip Generation:

Winter, Midweek, Midday, Rain (Scenario 7)ETE and Trip Generation Winter, Midweek, Midday, Snow (Scenario 8)-Trip Generation -ETE (U 100%80%60%40%20%0%0 30 60 90 120 Ela 150 180 psed Time (min)210 240 270 300 Figure J-8. ETE and Trip Generation:

Winter, Midweek, Midday, Snow (Scenario 8)J-12 KID Engineering, P.C.Monticello Nuclear Generating Plant Evacuation Time Estimate J-12 KLD Engineering, P.C.Rev. I ETE and Trip Generation Winter, Weekend, Midday, Good (Scenario 9)-Trip Generation mETE 100%"O 80%>m 60%0' 40%20%0%0 30 60 90 120 150 180 210 240 270 Elapsed Time (min)Figure J-9. ETE and Trip Generation:

Winter, Weekend, Midday, Good Weather (Scenario 9)ETE and Trip Generation Winter, Weekend, Midday, Rain (Scenario 10)-Trip Generation

-ETE 100%80%60%0 0, 40%48 20%0%0 30 60 90 120 150 180 210 240 270 Elapsed Time (min)Figure J-1O. ETE and Trip Generation:

Winter, Weekend, Midday, Rain (Scenario 10)Monticello Nuclear Generating Plant Evacuation Time Estimate J-13 KLD Engineering, P.C.Rev. 1 ETE and Trip Generation Winter, Weekend, Midday, Snow (Scenario 11)-Trip Generation -ETE 100%80%60%* 40%p 20%0%0 30 60 90 120 150 180 210 240 270 300 Elapsed Time (min)Figure J-11. ETE and Trip Generation:

Winter, Weekend, Midday, Snow (Scenario 11)ETE and Trip Generation Winter, Midweek, Weekend, Evening, Good (Scenario 12)-Trip Generation 1 ETE 100%80%60%I--40%C 2 20%0%0 30 60 90 120 150 180 210 240 270 Elapsed Time (min)Figure J-12. ETE and Trip Generation:

Winter, Midweek, Weekend, Evening, Good Weather (Scenario 12)Monticello Nuclear Generating Plant Evacuation Time Estimate J-14 KLD Engineering, P.C.Rev. I ETE and Trip Generation Summer, Weekend, Midday, Good, Special Event (Scenario 13)-Trip Generation 1ETE 100%(U u 80%60%0 I.-Z5 40%4-u 20%a'0%0 30 60 90 120 150 180 210 240 270 Elapsed Time (min)Figure J-13. ETE and Trip Generation:

Summer, Weekend, Midday, Good Weather, Special Event (Scenario 13)ETE and Trip Generation Summer, Midweek, Midday, Good, Roadway Impact (Scenario 14)-Trip Generation m ETE 100%80%60%0%0 30 60 90 120 150 180 210 240 270 300 Elapsed Time (min)Figure J-14. ETE and Trip Generation:

Summer, Midweek, Midday, Good Weather, Roadway Impact (Scenario 14)Monticello Nuclear Generating Plant Evacuation Time Estimate J-15 KLD Engineering, P.C.Rev. I APPENDIX K Evacuation Roadway Network K. EVACUATION ROADWAY NETWORK As discussed in Section 1.3, a link-node analysis network was constructed to model the roadway network within the study area. Figure K-1 provides an overview of the link-node analysis network. The figure has been divided up into 41 more detailed figures (Figure K-2 through Figure K-42) which show each of the links and nodes in the network.The analysis network was calibrated using the observations made during the field survey conducted in February 2012. Table K-1 lists the characteristics of each roadway section modeled in the ETE analysis.

Each link is identified by its road name and the upstream and downstream node numbers. The geographic location of each link can be observed by referencing the grid map number provided in Table K-1. The roadway type identified in Table K-1 is generally based on the following criteria:* Freeway: limited access highway, 2 or more lanes in each direction, high free flow speeds* Freeway ramp: ramp on to or off of a limited access highway* Major arterial:

3 or more lanes in each direction* Minor arterial:

2 or more lanes in each direction* Collector:

single lane in each direction* Local roadways:

single lane in each direction, local roads with low free flow speeds The term, "No. of Lanes" in Table K-1 identifies the number of lanes that extend throughout the length of the link. Many links have additional lanes on the immediate approach to an intersection (turn pockets);

these have been recorded and entered into the input stream for the DYNEV II System.As discussed in Section 1.3, lane width and shoulder width were not physically measured during the road survey. Rather, estimates of these measures were based on visual observations and recorded images.Table K-2 identifies each node in the network that is controlled and the type of control (stop sign, yield sign, pre-timed signal, actuated signal, traffic control point) at that node.Uncontrolled nodes are not included in Table K-2. The location of each node can be observed by referencing the grid map number provided.Monticello Nuclear Generating Plant K-1 KLD Engineering, P.C.Evacuation Time Estimate Rev. 1 Figure K-1. MNGP Link-Node Analysis Network K-2 KID Engineering, P.C.Monticello Nuclear Generating Plant Evacuation Time Estimate K-2 KLD Engineering, P.C.Rev. 1 Figure K-2. Link-Node Analysis Network -Grid 1 Monticello Nuclear Generating Plant Evacuation Time Estimate K-3 KLD Engineering, P.C.Rev. I Figure K-3. Link-Node Analysis Network -Grid 2 Monticello Nuclear Generating Plant Evacuation Time Estimate K-4 KLD Engineering, P.C.Rev. 1 7Th St So*MNP 7W Shadow Region*Node '2, ,10, 15We RInp-IN. Lnk Water~ISub-Area t7hde. Grid Figure K-4. Link-Node Analysis Network -Grid 3 K-5 KID Engineering, P.C.Monticello Nuclear Generating Plant Evacuation Time Estimate K-5 KLD Engineering, P.C.Rev. 1 37Th St Se* " -Sadow Region*Node _2,S, 10, 15 Wie Rings SSub-Aroa I2Jndex Grid Figure K-S. Link-Node Analysis Network -Grid 4 Monticello Nuclear Generating Plant K-6 KLD Engineering, P.C.Evacuation Time Estimate Rev. 1 Figure K-6. Link-Node Analysis Network -Grid 5 K-7 KID Engineering.

P.C.Monticello Nuclear Generating Plant Evacuation Time Estimate K-7 KLD Engineering, P.C.Rev. I 6ri* MNGP LZ baw -to 0 N~Od Z~,S, 10, IS Mk ifnp--b Unk VAtW 63 6A J~kdmnrw Figure K-7. Link-Node Analysis Network -Grid 6 Monticello Nuclear Generating Plant Evacuation Time Estimate K-8 KLD Engineering, P.C.Rev. 1 22Ný St:1 Gr-id* W~ -w Sdoftag~n* Node ,, 10, s MIle tInpUnk Water (Sub-Area Index &ri MNGP Evacuation Time Estimate Unk-Node Analysis Network Rgures Grid 7 Figure K-8. Link-Node Analysis Network -Grid 7 Monticello Nuclear Generating Plant Evacuation Time Estimate K-9 KLD Engineering, P.C.Rev. 1 Figure K-9. Link-Node Analysis Network -Grid 8 Monticello Nuclear Generating Plant Evacuation Time Estimate K-10 KLD Engineering, P.C.Rev. 1 Figure K-10. Link-Node Analysis Network -Grid 9 Monticello Nuclear Generating Plant Evacuation Time Estimate K-11 KLD Engineering, P.C.Rev. 1 Figure K-11. Link-Node Analysis Network -Grid 10 Monticello Nuclear Generating Plant Evacuation Time Estimate K-12 KLD Engineering, P.C.Rev. 1 Figure K-12. Link-Node Analysis Network -Grid 11 K-13 KLD Engineering, P.C.Monticello Nuclear Generating Plant Evacuation Time Estimate K-13 KLD Engineering, P.C.Rev. 1 4 5p) St Se f5hS~~0-7ý"I ý'87Th S N1r1/st 897Th St So 7Th S 95 8-S th 26IStA 4 2587ý)JE, A" F3 971W SI ,29 A. 61 Av 9b 7Th St a 2 -I 4Th St-. .9~lo2N.%e 142-A GrI-5ns,1F2, 117Th 2 fl4Th 4 246Th Ave 243dAve 2lt"~~Z -Ar F I t~'W0-N- -CoomlyRoodOt

".TF -1132"3 Sub-Am SE 261 4 ~ 30 10632 21ý~ 22t&AooAm J'I 1285 1124K LOO-d Evacuation Time Estimate ShadowAsoonLink-Node Analysis Network Figures a Node ", 5,10, 15Msi R-Inp-P., Ufk Wrw Grid 12&&,b-Area C2 lindexGrid

__ _ 0._ I__ _ _ _ T r -- -Figure K-13. Link-Node Analysis Network- Grid 12 Monticello Nuclear Generating Plant Evacuation Time Estimate K-14 KLD Engineering, P.C.Rev. 1 Figure K-14. Link-Node Analysis Network -Grid 13 Monticello Nuclear Generating Plant Evacuation Time Estimate K-15 KLD Engineering, P.C.Rev. 1 Figure K-15. Link-Node Analysis Network -Grid 14 Monticello Nuclear Generating Plant Evacuation Time Estimate K-16 KLD Engineering, P.C.Rev. 1

!531 Legend Y** MNP UShadow Retgion N tode 2, 5, 10, IS MkIteings-1. Unk Water~ISub-Area f>1Index Grid MNWp tvacuation Time Estimate Unk-Node Analysis Network Figures 0 0.i I Grid 15 Figure K-16. Link-Node Analysis Network -Grid 15 Monticello Nuclear Generating Plant K-17 KLD Engineering.

P.C.Evacuation Time Estimate Rev. 1 I Figure K-17. Link-Node Analysis Network -Grid 16 Monticello Nuclear Genarntinn D ----L Ii ii +Evacuation Time Estimate A-J16 KLD Engineering, P.C.Rev. 1 I I1 ;0 5T h/676 143Th St Nw 137Th Sf Nw N 673 Ro72#t3T 1~q 713111 ý26 l37rh StSe 12 Ih St 201 42NdS lo 210 149Th StSe 2___!5T h 1 e I N7 Ac 11 Paik i_6.Ceim Subý-Ares 5W 12e s+/-3' StN.r 14A St NWO L~AL too~h t Ne ~ Mud akei Sub-AraiS

-7,.Lake 4 901T- 87T St Ai U W 5h StNe 1144 ....... 114\-7 8o0h Lesend MNGP Evacuation Time Estimate* Unk-Node Analysis Network Figures-,MNGP Shadow Regon'=Node '5, to, 15 Mile AinmS -I. Unk water 4>- Grid 17 Sub-Area f Index Grid 0 Figure K-18. Link-Node Analysis Network -Grid 17 Monticello Nuclear Generating Plant Evacuation Time Estimate K-19 KLD Engineering, P.C.Rev. I t06 t0o* MNGF E] Shadow oIon A Node 2 $s 10. iS Mile Rlnp--w Uk WaWer 4? sub-Area index Crid Figure K-19. Link-Node Analysis Network -Grid 18 Monticello Nuclear Generating Plant Evacuation Time Estimate K-20 KLD Engineering, P.C.Rev. 1 Figure K-20. Link-Node Analysis Network -Grid 19 Monticello Nuclear Generating Plant Evacuation Time Estimate K-21 KLD Engineering, P.C.Rev. 1

'-L 21n Radt ANW ntRod83 q 4t m, 1714 i 212Th Ave N* 21 /71321 711)IA 209Th At's T1$ Ave o Grid 20 t/7h Ave TsM 7 OLSIA-as/ /VI8T A-700 -Sh~m S~onLink-Node Analysis Network Figures 0 N ode 2, S, 10, 1S M kl R in gs b ,r d 2-o-ý. unk W& w, "1 ri 2 Index 0 us7 Figure K-21. Link-Node Analysis Network -Grid 20 Monticello Nuclear Generating Plant K-22 KLD Engineering, P.C.Evacuation Time Estimate Rev. 1 4.7$14/* MNGP ShadowRegion 0 Node 2, 5, 10, 15 Mile Rings-0 Unk o Water 0 Sub-Area £12 Index Grid Figure K-22. Link-Node Analysis Network -Grid 21 Monticello Nuclear Generating Plant K-23 KLD Engineering, P.C.Evacuation Time Estimate Rev. 1 Figure K-23. Link-Node Analysis Network -Grid 22 Monticello Nuclear Generating Plant Evacuation Time Estimate K-24 KLD Engineering, P.C.Rev. 1 193RdA_-_197Th Ave Sub-Area SE J Lagand* MIVINGP Shad"wRgi 0 Node _ 2, 5, 10,15 Mile Rings-t- Unk Water 0'~ Sub-Area Ej tndexGirld Figure K-24. Link-Node Analysis Network -Grid 23 Monticello Nuclear Generating Plant K-25 KLD Engineering.

P.C.Evacuation Time Estimate Rev. 1 Figure K-25. Link-Node Analysis Network -Grid 24 K-26 KID Engineering, P.C.Monticello Nuclear Generating Plant Evacuation Time Estimate K-26 KLD Engineering, P.C.Rev. 1 Figure K-26. Link-Node Analysis Network -Grid 25 Monticello Nuclear Generating Plant Evacuation Time Estimate K-27 KLD Engineering, P.C.Rev. 1 NC~fft Le*A RidýI ~ ~ I~~MNGP Evacuation Time Estimate Link-Node Analysis Network Figure+ 0 Figure K-27. Link-Node Analysis Network -Grid 26 Monticello Nuclear Generating Plant Evacuation Time Estimate K-28 KLD Engineering, P.C.Rev. 1 tAgefid fop- ji* MF4GP [~Strdow ftgoll* Node ' 2, S, 10,1 MIS Weinp Unk Water 63 Sub-Area Index Grid MN.V tvacuatlon INT"n tstimite Link-Node Analysis Network FiSures 0 05 1 Grid 27 Figure K-28. Link-Node Analysis Network -Grid 27 K-29 KID Engineering, P.C.Monticello Nuclear Generating Plant Evacuation Time Estimate K-29 KLD Engineering, P.C.Rev. I Figure K-29. Link-Node Analysis Network -Grid 28 Monticello Nuclear Generating Plant Evacuation Time Estimate K-30 KLD Engineering, P.C.Rev. 1 9It.N LA. hStN w ~ ~ ~ ~~1 5ý'_'UbýAn V OTh sfZ\'loto Suli 7'00 J II Qip isT Subs-Area SOT h)St N w.425 5114 4OhS I--.s 114 Tw 07 8FOBh St 464 AF 17 M 50niy Road 37 N 4r63 ~ 7"" i w ~ ~ f l m A1?'4ee I WMWN.r Th Sir, h-VIINo 1 1180 47th St No___L 80.i1~~-i~; ~a38 40Th St P 37 No k ii 50Th St No I a as5-1r e.ai *9 r/1 '. 27Th St N.I VOndefi, NS-w *lfts 1136'0 S 1135 Legend K" MNGP Evacuation Time Estimate"* MNGP [L Siadow Unk-Node Analysis Network Filures* Node 2, .10, IS Me Ringp X, 29I-1i Unki Water Grid 29 i .Sub-Areia Indexl G'r 0 0.5 Figure K-30. Link-Node Analysis Network -Grid 29 Monticello Nuclear Generating Plant Evacuation Time Estimate K-31 KLD Engineering, P.C.Rev. I Figure K-31. Link-Node Analysis Network -Grid 30 Monticello Nuclear Generating Plant Evacuation Time Estimate K-32 KLD Engineering, P.C.Rev. 1 1 5Th~t No 64 _ýVg 1j 154 I 21 9Th S IN N.f I 87Th St W.85Th.// e-BOTh St NQWS WLirj Zgý .;;::LSI-~ S ~1~d 2K AM 947 4*"a 640 1A ITS Sub-Am /lOSE~1 St N7 Ad IL -'Smh 3.; 'Lak LkeT S Li GlfGot)041, Gonz ~' ~ I29h~r7 L*9-d MNGP Evacuation Time Estimnate* E ow [ Link-Node Analysis Network Figures NO 2' 10, ismlSe ,rip-No. utik WatIr Grid 31 J2 Sub-Areia

[7" Inde. Grid 0 0 Figure K-32. Link-Node Analysis Network -Grid 31 Monticello Nuclear Generating Plant Evacuation Time Estimate K-33 KID Engineering, P.C.K-33 KLD Engineering, P.C.Rev. 1

'7 <'17OA A-h 1,~~"I 6v Nh ,V W 77bL NLp4 LPd-oeAayi ewr lue*~ ~ ~ ~~~~jIf Lp ,1, $M 16M A- .{M l ...*,,,liil Figure K-33. Link-Node Analysis Network -Grid 32 Monticello Nuclear Generating Plant K-34 KLD Engineering, P.C.Evacuation Time Estimate Rev. 1 Figure K-34. Link-Node Analysis Network -Grid 33 Monticello Nuclear Generating Plant Evacuation Time Estimate K-35 KLD Engineering, P.C.Rev. 1 Figure K-35. Link-Node Analysis Network -Grid 34 Monticello Nuclear Generating Plant Evacuation Time Estimate K-36 KLD Engineering, P.C.Rev. 1 512 Sub-Arm S.S"., IOSW .......... ._Y _-1~fj Si 27Th StNw N " .<II 5----- -----Time Estimate Legend* ~G [:] Shadow Region 0 Node 2' S,, 10, is Male-lo Lnk ~,Watef 42 sub-Ar ED12 Index Grid Figure K-36. Link-Node Analysis Network -Grid 35 K-37 KID Engineering, P.C.Monticello Nuclear Generating Plant Evacuation Time Estimate K-37 KLD Engineering, P.C.Rev. 1 Figure K-37. Link-Node Analysis Network -Grid 36 Monticello Nuclear Generating Plant Evacuation Time Estimate K-38 KLD Engineering, P.C.Rev. 1 Figure K-38. Link-Node Analysis Network -Grid 37 Monticello Nuclear Generating Plant Evacuation Time Estimate K-39 KLD Engineering, P.C.Rev. 1 11/ ~*'Grid 3~8/ /~151 Figure K-39. Link-Node Analysis Network -Grid 38 Monticello Nuclear Generating Plant Evacuation Time Estimate K-40 KLD Engineering, P.C.Rev. 1 me.- School -----~976 Like 0* Ole Sub-Area 3 SOSE-7/LagaI d MNGP Evacuation Time EstimateMNG L[odOWShadow Unk-Node Analysis Network Figures* Node 2,5S, 10, S MileRingsGrd3

---Aub L wndex Grid 39fiz Figure K40. Link-Node Analysis Network- Grid 39 Monticello Nuclear Generating Plant K-41 KLD Engineering, P.C.Evacuation Time Estimate Rev. 1

__ 'C-w '4Wdýo4'3, ~ ~4 ~ ~7 I7 (hS : N.5Th SI N, RIV 09STh A"O T nrj______-129-,h Avee Wbass.n cod , NI", IN A ,4 109Th Ave N lk r £ I 10Th l'41;i AclR I -~~---i TaemorRd 3T A13' Th Ave h 4-9 7 I 04 c,- Ro-d 10 Lake nVoaCeno In, i{, j;V"I __ft_T_LOrse Rd 15.I1 93Rd An J 0--~-~.~~SeIel1I-Lo

~ I I A '~~-~!5de ALak.O Co I!1R 5-a Node ~2, ' o, sMel Lik WaLe'~?5b-ra~

Index Grid __________

Figure K-41. Link-Node Analysis Network -Grid 40 Monticello Nuclear Generating Plant Evacuation Time Estimate K-42 KLD Engineering, P.C.Rev. 1 Figure K-42. Link-Node Analysis Network -Grid 41 K-43 KID Engineering, P.C.Monticello Nuclear Generating Plant Evacuation Time Estimate K-43 KLD Engineering, P.C.Rev. 1

Retrieved from "https://kanterella.com/w/index.php?title=ML12356A176&oldid=1362883"