ML083460022

From kanterella
Jump to navigation Jump to search
Enclosure 2 - Browns Ferry, Units 1, 2, & 3 - Technical Specifications Changes TS-418 and TS-431 - Extended Power Uprate - CDI Report 07-11NP, Revision 1, Dynamics of BWR Steam Dryer Components, Non-Proprietary Version
ML083460022
Person / Time
Site: Browns Ferry  Tennessee Valley Authority icon.png
Issue date: 11/30/2008
From: Boschitsch A, Danilov P, Kaufman A
Continuum Dynamics
To:
Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation
References
07-11NP, Rev 1
Download: ML083460022 (51)


Text

ENCLOSURE 2 TENNESSEE VALLEY AUTHORITY BROWNS FERRY NUCLEAR PLANT (BFN)

UNITS 1, 2, AND 3 TECHNICAL SPECIFICATIONS (TS) CHANGES TS-431 AND TS-418 EXTENDED POWER UPRATE (EPU)

CDI REPORT NO. 07-11NP, "DYNAMICS OF BWR STEAM DRYER COMPONENTS" (NON-PROPRIETARY VERSION)

Attached is the non-proprietary version of CDI Report No. 07-11, "Dynamics of BWR Steam Dryer Components."

This Document Does Not Contain Continuum Dynamics, Inc. Proprietary Information C.D.I. Report No. 07-1 1NP Dynamics of BWR Steam Dryer Components Revision 1 Prepared for and by Pavel Danilov Alexander Boschitsch Andrew Kaufman Continuum Dynamics, Inc.

34 Lexington Avenue Ewing, NJ 08618 Approved by Alan J. Bilanin Reviewed by Milton E. Teske November 2008

This Document Does Not Contain Continuum Dynamics, Inc. Proprietary Information Executive Summary Test data were obtained and analyzed to support structural modeling assumptions used in ANSYS based finite element analysis of steam dryer.

Er

)) These measurements

)) used in structural modeling, but provide the basis ((

are still conservative with respect to the levels measured.

This Document Does Not Contain Continuum Dynamics, Inc. Proprietary Information Table of Contents Section Page Executive Summ ary.........................................................................................................................

i Table of Contents............................................................................................................................

ii

1. Objective.....................................................................................................................................

1

2. Theory.........................................................................................................................................

2

3. Facility Description..............................................................................................................

5

4. Instrum entation.........................................................................................................................

10

5. Test M atrix................................................................................................................................

11

6. Test Procedure..........................................................................................................................

12

7. Test Results...............................................................................................................................

13

8. Data Analysis............................................................................................................................

22

9. Conclusions...............................................................................................................................

31

10. References...............................................................................................................................

32 Appendix A...................................................................................................................................

33 ii

This Document Does Not Contain Continuum Dynamics, Inc. Proprietary Information

1. Objective The objective of the test program was to provide data ((

)) The data were then used to verify a model

((

Structural damping in the ANSYS finite element model is defined as 1% of critical damping for all frequencies, consistent with guidance given in NUREG-1.61 [1]. ((

)) With this information, verified by test results, ((

)) could be specified and therefore provide a more realistic model of steam dryer stress response.

This test report summarizes the ((

)) theory, the laboratory measurements, and the resulting ((

I

This Document Does Not Contain Continuum Dynamics, Inc. Proprietary Information

2. Theory Er

)) with displacement f = woed". The configuration is sketched below:

Figure 1. Schematic ((

Er contribute ((

)) The variables that

)) are tabulated below along with their units:

Variable Dependent/Independent Units

((L))

dependent M/LT2 independent L/T 1[ ))independent M/L3 independent L/T

[J ))independent L

independent L

independent

(( ))independent L2/T Using a Buckingham fI approach, ((

function of four (4) dependent non-dimensional parameters.

((

)) is a The first parameter is a Reynolds number and measures the importance of viscous dissipation in the process. E[

)) is relatively insensitive to 2

This Document Does Not Contain Continuum Dynamics, Inc. Proprietary Information Reynolds number. The second parameter ((

((

((

The requirement that can be checked against finite element analyses completed for steam dryers. From the structural analysis carried out for Browns Ferry [5], Er

)) For these conditions w. must be less than ((

11 which is supported by calculated displacements from the finite element code. In fact, the largest plate motions are less than ((

)) inches so that the ratio in (2.3) is very small, ((

))

3

This Document Does Not Contain Continuum Dynamics, Inc. Proprietary Information

)) but will be measured directly with the rig sketched below.

Equations (2.5) and (2.6) form the basis of the tests to be conducted ((

)) This observation will be confirmed with tests.

A simple apparatus was constructed ((

)) typically used in a dryer ((

((

Figure 2. Schematic of apparatus ((

Er

))

4

This Document Does Not Contain Continuum Dynamics, Inc. Proprietary Information

3. Facility Description The experiment consisted of a series of tests ((

)) Tests were performed at the laboratory facilities of Continuum Dynamics, Inc. (C.D.I.) in Ewing, NJ.

((

)) This facility, shown schematically in Figure 3, ((

Er]

))

Figure 4 shows a drawing of the details

)) Figure 5 provides an overall picture of the test setup, ((

5

This Document Does Not Contain Continuum Dynamics, Inc. Proprietary Information rr Figure 3. Schematic of the test rig.

6

This Document Does Not Contain Continuum Dynamics, Inc. Proprietary Information

((

1]

Figure 4. Schematic ((

)) Dimensions are in inches.

7

This Document Does Not Contain Continuum Dynamics, Inc. Proprietary Information Figure 5. Photograph of test setup: ((

8

This Document Does Not Contain Continuum Dynamics, Inc. Proprietary Information

((

Figure 6. ((

9

This Document Does Not Contain Continuum Dynamics, Inc. Proprietary Information

4. Instrumentation

((

)) The data were recorded on a 16-bit data acquisition system calibrated to NIST traceable standards. ((

The accelerometer was mounted ((

)) The accelerometer was an Entran model EGA-10-/Z2. The accelerometer signal was amplified by an ADC instrument amplifier and the system was calibrated against gravity. The amplifier output was connected to the data acquisition system.

An Omega PX302 pressure transducer [

))

The pressure transducer had a 200 psig range and was calibrated to NIST traceable standards.

Air temperature was measured with a Type T thermocouple and Omega DP-41display.

[R

)) Both the display and thermocouple were calibrated to NIST traceable standards.

Er Table 1 summarizes the instrumentation specifications.

Certifications for these instruments are contained in Appendix A.

Table 1. ((

)) test instrumentation specifications.

Measurement Range Accuracy Acceleration

+/-10 g

+/-1% full scale Pressure 200 psig

+/-0.5%

Temperature

-100 to +200'F

+/-20F Length 0 to 16 feet

+/-1/16 inch 0 to 12 inches

+/-0.001 inch 10

This Document Does Not Contain Continuum Dynamics, Inc. Proprietary Information

5. Test Matrix

((

))

11

This Document Does Not Contain Continuum Dynamics, Inc. Proprietary Information

6. Test Procedure For each test the instrumentation and test setup was first verified and recorded. ((

12

This Document Does Not Contain Continuum Dynamics, Inc. Proprietary Information

7. Test Results Test data were entered into an Excel spreadsheet, ((

Sample fits are shown in Figure 7 ((

)) and Figure 8 ((

))

The estimate is obtained by of the squares between the measured, ym(k), and minimizing the error defined analytical, Ya(k), samples:

as the sum k2 2

X =

(ym (k) -ya (k))2 ki (7.3) 13

This Document Does Not Contain Continuum Dynamics, Inc. Proprietary Information

((

The least squares fit is obtained by adjusting ((

)) parameters: ((

)) The least squares fit was selected as a method to systematize the reduction of the data arid, by using all data points, ((

))

Two algorithms were considered to obtain the fit. The first was a 'brute force' method Er

)) a range. The parameter range is centered on the preliminary estimates obtained from the previous manual curve fits and the range made sufficiently large to encompass the anticipated final parameter values. In the innermost loop the error (7.3) is computed and the minimum value recorded together with the minimizing parameters. Upon termination of all ((

)) do-loops a new estimate, q1, of the minimizing parameter set will be available. In order to refine the estimate, the calculation is repeated using a narrower range centered about the optimizing parameters just obtained.

This produces a refined estimate, q2.

The calculation proceeds through several iterations with each iteration shrinking the parameter search range thus zooming in to the final optimal set of parameters, q*.

The second algorithm uses the conjugate gradient method to search for the minimum.

The conjugate gradient implementation requires knowledge of the gradients, &I'/aq, which are computed analytically. The conjugate gradient search algorithm is much faster than the brute force approach (by approximately three orders of magnitude). To verify the correct performance of the algorithm, the optimal fits, q*, were compared against the values obtained by the brute force approach for several cases. In all cases, good agreement (discrepancies occurred only in the third significant figure) was achieved. Also, plots for several of the data sets comparing the signal measurements against optimal curve fits were generated and examined to confirm good fits. Several of these are shown in Figure 9 and Figure 10 ((

14

This Document Does Not Contain Continuum Dynamics, Inc. Proprietary Information Figure 7. ((

15

This Document Does Not Contain Continuum Dynamics, Inc. Proprietary Infonnation

((

Figure 8. E[

))

16

This Document Does Not Contain Continuum Dynamics, Inc. Proprietary Infonnation

[1 Figure 9. ((

))

17

This Document Does Not Contain Continuum Dynamics, Inc. Proprietary Information

((

Figure 10. ((

1]

18

This Document Does Not Contain Continuum Dynamics, Inc. Proprietary Information

[Fi Figure 10 (continued). ((

19

This Document Does Not Contain Continuum Dynamics, Inc. Proprietary Information Fi Figure 11. ((I

))

20

This Document Does Not Contain Continuum Dynamics, Inc. Proprietary Information

[ II Figure 11 (continued). ((

1]

21

This Document Does Not Contain Continuum Dynamics, Inc. Proprietary Information

8. Data Analysis

((I 1]

Comparing ((

)) from theory to experimental measurement is important for application to steam dryer stress evaluation since it allows one to independently check the reliability of the theoretical predictions and also to adjust the theoretical prediction to both better correlate with measured results and account for uncertainty in the test procedure. Here the ratio

[))

is sought where (*)exp and (*)theory refer to experimental and theoretical estimates. ((

11 22

This Document Does Not Contain Continuum Dynamics, Inc. Proprietary Information 23

This Document Does Not Contain Continuum Dynamics, Inc. Proprietary Information Table 4. Summary of experimental and theoretical results ((

((

Figure 12 presents a comparison of theoretical and experimental ((

Table 4 ((

)) from 24

This Document Does Not Contain Continuum Dynamics, Inc. Proprietary Information Figure 12. ((

))]

25

This Document Does Not Contain Continuum Dynamics, Inc. Proprietary Infonnation 1]

Table 5. ((

Table 6. ((

26

This Document Does Not Contain Continuum Dynamics, Inc. Proprietary Information Figure 13. ((

27

This Document Does Not Contain Continuum Dynamics, Inc. Proprietary Infonnation

[r Figure 14. ((

28

This Document Does Not Contain Continuum Dynamics, Inc. Proprietary Information 29

This Document Does Not Contain Continuum Dynamics, Inc. Proprietary Information

((

))

Example for Browns Ferry Unit I Steam Dryer

[r Table 7. ((

1]

30

This Document Does Not Contain Continuum Dynamics, Inc. Proprietary Information

9. Conclusions

((I 1))

The test data obtained supported the structural model assumptions used in the ANSYS finite element model of the steam dryer. Analysis of these data showed the assumptions are conservative.

31

This Document Does Not Contain Continuum Dynamics, Inc. Proprietary Information

10. References
1. U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission. 1973. Regulatory Guide 1.61. Damping Values for Seismic Design of Nuclear Power Plants. October 1973.
2. Idel'chik, I. E. and E. Fried. 1989. Flow Resistance, A Design Guide for Engineers. Taylor and Francis: Washington, D.C. p. 260.
3. ((
4. Shapiro, A. 1953. The Dynamics and Thermodynamics of Compressible Fluid Flow. The Ronald Press Company: New York. Vol. 1, p. 85.
5. Continuum Dynamics, Inc. 2007. Finite Element Model for Stress Assessment of Browns Ferry Nuclear Unit 1 Steam Dryer to 250 Hz. C.D.I. Report No.07-05P (Proprietary).
6. Kayser, C.J. and R.L. Shambaugh. 1991. Discharge Coefficients for Compressible Flow Through Small-Diameter Orifices and Convergent Nozzles. Chemical Engineering Science 46:1697-1711.

32

This Document Does Not Contain Continuum Dynamics, Inc. Proprietary Information Appendix A Appendix A contains scanned copies of the certifications for the three instruments used in the ((

))tests.

33

This Document Does Not Contain Continuum Dynamics, Inc. Proprietary Information Accelerometer Certification Continuum Dynamics, Inc. Accelerometer Calibration Rerson for service: determine relation between voltage output and acceleration Type of cal: normal As found condition: in tolerance As left condition: in tolerance Instrument: EGA-10-/Z2 Instrument Identification Number: 0265 Instrument Serial Number:98G98B I 0-A14 Calibration Date:6/13/07 Calibration Due: 6/13/2008 Note: Accelerometer was calibrated with AD627 instrumentation amplifier with 21.94 K!) gain resistor. Accelerometer and AD627 were powered by 4.900V supply. Earth's gravitational field was used as a reference.

Acceleration Voltage Output g

volts I (arrow up) 3.054 0 (arrow right) 3.007

-1 (arrow down) 2.959 0 (arrow left) 3.002 1 (arrow up) 3.053

-I (arrow down) 2.959 I Instrument I Asset #

1 Cal Date I Due Date I Cal Cert Mul1imctcr 0379 7/11/06 7/11/07 31588581 Instrument used in the above calibration have traceability to NIST.

Performed by:

Verified by:

34

This Document Does Not Contain Continuum Dynamics, Inc. Proprietary Information Pressure Transducer Certification ALJL'NYA.., IA 111,11 CERM-FICA~TI OF MA~IEKTION FOR CON~TMI-1 D1IA1IICS, MY.

,C4;r.?UC--: OVEA EN3INEE21114.0-2CO FSV. PXESSURE CAGE. AIR "Tt WCWE POW0 lia-fi ISM C&=Entalzo 32C2715 S=.c=: n"35-33 Az.-ra C=Jz~:

swt.xg MEET$ MANUFACTURES-R8 S-EC' CALIERATED TO UWR SPEC,& CLEAN F'v:G& as

..s-CUIREV2 Vos___J~

~~'

A:c t',':

Th-:s i

DMM 1t4102U is VCV-1JJ~ppm IWH4.CA EatM 1U34412 11921,57 it DCV-.2.C.I%

26:144 -C4 Cndcra c-rA~iiPit ONDz~a~rA Cua5:m Pa,: ofZ l~IIIII 35

This Document Does Not Contain Continuum Dynamics, Inc. Proprietary Information g~ g 1

Cr:r~

32C2713 cERnflFcATr or cA1ImRATo.N FOR Ccz=.ra Aorm P3;4 1 I3 rnicur Dz=s pumtte Nm1 I:4 r--&e Wbor Mo,:.

A f-;: Te;=

FRESSUPE:

ISTANCARCI f(-.26%Mfl ZEPO:

0P4r.OMV0 L.00 0.00 NVLL METER 25% FS 40 ;0115 Inv' 20.0.2 4D FS to pg042 TV

£0.00 4000 05 % FS "204002 inV 10.00 68.14

  • 2.-.201oVC AD % FS ISOP3140 M~V 76.08 70.00 130 FS 20OlF0I10O0m 04.66 W440.0.1mra ID - F2 i$$pgt$2 mv 70.00 70.44
-.0n.0 40 % FS 121040c myV to.$$

60.00

  • .'.0.l2OVo4 I'D% F, 00 ri4042 mV

£0.00 40.00 1nd 2D % FS

'0 F411D mv 20.0:

20.02 0 % FS 0 pogn In'Xo 6.00 0.00 0~0 1EXCITATIONz 10 V4c.

Kzlort I. PoIluk KAo'bogd SAP Eohcoc -.scdo C( 1 V14)-rý S~hi~ ~ ~

sd.,~.eC.. :01?2.11X0~24~Iad.% CLZ~d.'.&Af4.caO.w l ~

~

~

Waeit g.*u

.ji i.o bAttnJ oils iw(U,?s inn its, Ir~.!

it4,dm umi S"1 SJu

.im"J~J "welt df*lrý's O'f.

a V A 0.sit J p-ml

&".rI. 1-s MHO) kk 4.f lktrsw 36

This Document Does Not Contain Continuum Dynamics, Inc. Proprietary Information Thermocouple Certification s<-= I ff v I 5so "143:.

If A I' W1 CERTIFICATE Or CA*UJR.ATION FOR CONT'L'tit. DYNAMICS, M'C.

u;cp": Cz OVE3A EN2IF1E.TO2*-118E*I=, TTt erm~ooamIe PrboS Sa."KO WCWE

.IAS*

(4iE

":D:

2012.-S?

r4;7 ICNE

?ONO 07-2:4 C*. ozrow: 0I2e.0?

Cabr!z, tMUM.: 12 MDR-N, MEET$ WANUFACTUR-qR I8EC*S.

CALIBRATED & CLEANED Taz*.-4:..-,:

?

DRY BEK.CALUEATO I-*4,140'Cl CALIBRATOR (8CE OPT)

IEMP A, CY.

DEG F.

TEMP ACCY.

3-.0 TEMP ACCY.

212.0 17021418 0 210.0,8 1713 1.48 080C07 111.82 1=1 1

TEM..'-J.1 CEO r.$t Ha8tt 14 TXC.-- 14SOC 166414-C4 CEO F.

$2.20

.'-1.g F

11.802
  • -1.C F Wcdk.*:kr=*d'*:

.r.

Jo-ecpk T. Sckv1AA-i R sond.eip r,. c a.scb =1cia B ( (11ff

)

W.4-V fit i21uj b1i~.t1.d1A.L. "J 7.a"'A~0.4T, L

L a

)1,UQ to,%

a.1Xk.

Sc.

ma w U yI&

Drat 03'2607 C --A,::.. 3.:,.

to-

'i rA Pa II lll IIIll I 37

This Document Does Not Contain Continuum Dynamics, Inc. Proprietary Information i

m r*

fCertificate No. 3166776 eloctrouics L1' 5 SW 2 I3'E S7P.-ET AULE.-,1,0W.

PA I: :-s3 CERTIFICATE OF CALIBRA-ITION FOR CON'TIINUUlM D YNAMICS, INC.

Dexr4yt~on: OMEGA ENGINEERING, DP41-TC-A, Digital Thermometer SeriWlNo: 2210646 A*'.etNo: 0101 Si.co ID: 20136-87 Der.: NONE FONc: 0-643 Ca-3ib.-aion Da:e: 07124!06 FCa~ib~aio-Iera1: 12 Months e

D.e: 07i2./07 AnIka Cenditicn:

Ienice:

MEETS MANUFACTURER'S SPEC'S.

CALIBRATED 8 CLEANED P oee:ure: 635-0071 REV 0 7e-zperaure: 730F St,*zaLd Used:

7 BCTe CALIBRATOR (SCOPE OPT)

Fe'afive Ei¢d.y: 55.;

Ca2ilcation Data:

P*rmnetEr TEMP ACCY.

TEMP ACCY.

TEMP ACCY.

TEMP ACCY.

TEMP ACCY.

Ncminal 32.0 F.

212.0 F.

500.0 F.

1000.0 F.

1400.0 F.

Si,"-o ID Due Date 17834*488 09:05107 Measred Befere 31.9 212.0 500.0 1000.2 1399.9 Mo-AcetnUn 14 DCV +1-50ppn, Measimed After 31.9 212.0 500.0 1000.2 1399.9 Irace No.

269.446-04 Tcleran:u

+1-0.3 F.

+1-0.3 F.

+1-0.3 F.

41-0.3 F.

+1-0.3 F.

Wetrk pe.fo-oed Ir-:

.lithaeL Sod]

Eleatrozic Teecn-d3-B ( 10996)

Re'iewed by:

Raymond Stip Drivei 5

h 1

.*ctom*-'

qtL-ty sy..k*.* cmrjte..

  • =.t Io ISO X0#1,% ISOEC U17025:19, =d V.K= Z74.13 -W-4. ATU tijbat-,n meIe:_-r eJc-i. :ent:.7:c mrd_-l.".te n J* I rc-+/-x*od, Sv.emo d oi:; (S. LL*,) T.'a*,*

i; z't

  • i ad..

" c o.).

cd.m C-- Lit cr'tyuk a n;

1 tpI

-a ted Cut --'2,-It I0 a: &A c

nrs Datec 07!'24.'06 htiplicate Ceitii a~e cat Pale I cf I NE II 11 11111 H

38

This Document Does Not Contain Continuum Dynamics, Inc. Proprietary Infonnation Data Acquisition System Certificate No. 3275966 electtronIcs 2125,W2STlSTRE1?r ALfI.NTOWN, PA 1810.

ON SITE CERTIFICATE OF CALIBRATION FOR CONTINUUM DYNAMICS, INC.

==

Description:==

CYBER RESEARCH INC, CMF3202DA, DATA AOUISITION BOARD Serial No: SR0430000539 Asset No: 0604 Sirnco ID; 20136-151 Dept: NONE PO No: 06-883 Calibration Date: 10/i2108 Calibration Interval: 12 Months Recall Date: 10/12W07 A'ival Condition:

Service:

MEETS MANUFACTURERS SPECS.

CALIBRATED & CLEANED Procedure: 635-0082 REV 5 Temperature: 73'F Stanchtds Used:

T__

Sirneo ID Due Dale CALIBRATOR (SCOPE OPT) 17834-488 09/05/07 CALIBRATOR (SCOPE OPT) 17834"488 09/05/07 Detail Of Work Performed:

PER CUSTOMER REQUEST CHANGED MODEL NUMBER Relative llumidity: 38%

Intvl Mos Acc/Une 14 DCV./-50ppm 14 Freq./-2.5ppm Trace No.

269446-04 LORAN(USNO)

Becisk"JeD 10,1110 Im.

Coniinued on next Page Page I of 6 flflflhIliluiJ 39

This Document Does Not Contain Continuum Dynamics, Inc. Proprietary Information

-u electronics 2125 SW 2MTh STREET ALLt.INrWN. 'A 18103 ON SITE CERTIFICATE OF CALIBRATION FOR CONTINUUM DYNAMICS, INC.

Continued rvrm Page I 1_

Certiricate No. 3275966 Calibration Data:

Parameter AM ACCY:

-5.0 to 5.0 Channel 0 Channel 0 Channel 0 Channel 0 Channel 0 Channel I Channel 1 Channel 1 Channel 1 Channel 1 Channel2 Channel2 Channel 2 Channel 2 Channel 2 Channel 3 Channel 3 Channel 3 Channel 3 Channel 3 Channel 4 Channel 4 Channel 4 Channel 4 Channel 4 Channel 5 Channell5 Channel 5 Channel 5 Channel 5 Channel 6 Channel 6 Channel 6 Channel 6 Channel 6 Channel 7 Channel 7 Channel 7 Channel 7 Channel 7 Nominal STD APPI VOLTAGE

-5.0000

-2.5000 0.0000 2.5000 5.0000

.5.0000

-2.5000 0.0000 2.5000 5.0000

-5.0000

-2.5000 0.0000 2.5000 5.0000

-5.0000

-2.5000 0.0000 2.5000 5.0000

-5.0000

-2.5000 0.0000 2.5000 5.0000

-5.0000

-2.5000 0.0000 2.5000 5.0000

-5.0000

-2.5000 0.0000 2.5000 5.0000

-5.0000

-2.5000 0.0000 2.5000 5.0000 LIED Measxtrcd BMfore Measured After Tolerance

-4.9991

-2.5001 0.0000 2.5000 4.9990

-4.9991

-2.5001 0.0000 2-5000 4.9990

-4.9992

-2.4999 0.0000 2.5000 4.9993

-4.9993

-2.5001 0.0000 2.5001 4.9991

-4.9992

.2.5000 0.0001 2.5001 4.9994

-4.9993

-2.5000

-4.9991 2.5000 4.9990

-4.9991

.2.4999 0.000 2.5001 4.9991

-4.9991 5001 0.0000 2.5000 4.9992 Continued on next Page Paee2 oF6

-4.9991

-2.5001 0.0000 2.5000 4.9990

-4.9991

-2.5001 0.0000 2.5000 4.9990

-4.9992

-2.4999 00000 2.5000 4.9993

-4.9993

-2.5001 0.0000 2.5001 4.9991

-4.9992

-2.5000 0.0001 2.5001 4.9994

.4.9993

-2.5000

-4.9991 2.5000 4.9990

-4.9991

-2.4999 2.5001 4.9991

-4.9991

-2.5001 0.0000 2.5000 4.9992 41-1.220&itV 4.1...208nV 41.1.. 208vnV

+1-1 -2~208mV 4i1.2208mV 41-1..220gnV 141-..2208mnV 4/1-.'208mnV

+1-1..t208mV

+1-1..2208mV 4-1. 2206mV

+/-1..220$mV 41.1..2208mV

+1.1..2208mV

.1.1-.2208mV

  • /-l..2208mnV

.1.1-.2208mV

+,1-1..220amV 41-1.2208mV 4l1-1-2208mV 41-1..22oarmv

..l-1..2208MV

-uI-l..220BrmV

..l1--2208mV 41-1-.2201)mV

-d1-.2206mV

.d-1..2209mV 41-1..2208mV 4.1-.2208mV

  • 1-1..220$mV

.- 1-.2208mV 41-1..2208mV

.1-1-.2208mV

+-1iI..2208mnV

+1-I..2208mV 41..2208mV 4-1.2208mV 4-1-.2O8mV 4-1.22O0MV 41--2208mV 40

This Document Does Not Contain Continuum Dynamics, Inc. Proprietary Information ImII 2125 SW 28111 SURT.J1 ALLFiN1I)WN, PA IS 103 Certificate No. 2-275966 ON SITE CERTIFICATE OF CALIBRATION FOR CONTINUUM DYNAMICS, INC.

Continued front Page 2 Calibrzlion Data-Paramewer Channel 8 Channel 8 Channel 8 Channel 8 Channel 8 Channel 9 Channel 9 Channel 9 Channel 9 Channel 9 Channel 10 Channel 10 Channel 10 Channel 10 Channel 10 Channel 11 Channel 11 Channel 11 Channel 11 Channel II Channel 12 Channel 12 Channel 12 Channel 12 Channel 12 Channel 13 Channel 13 Channel 13 Channel 13 Channel 13 Channel 14 Channel 14 Channel 14 Channel 14 Channel 14 Channel 15 Channel 15 Channel 15 Channel 15 Channel 15 Channet 16 Channel! 16 Nominal

-5.0000

-2.5000 0.0000 2.5000 5.0000

-5.0000

-2.5000 0.0000 2.5000 5.0000

-5.0000

-2.5000 0.0000 2.5000 5.0000

-5.0000

-2.5000 0.0000 2.5000 5.0000

-5.0000

-2.5000 0.0000 2.5000 5.0000

-5.0000

-2.5000 0.0000 2.5000 6.0000

-5.0000

-2.5000 0.0000 2.5000 5.0000

-5.0000

-2.5000 0.0000 2.5000 5.0000

-6.0000

-2.5000 Mcasurcd Before

-4.9990

-2.5000 0.0000 2.4999 4.9991

-4.9992

.2.4999 0.0000 2.5000 4.9992

-4.9993

-2.5001 0.0000 2.5000 4.9992

.4.9994

-2.5001 0.0000 2.5000 4.9993

-4.9990

-2.5001 0.0000 2.4999 4.9991

-4.9992

-2.5001 0.0000 2.5000 4.9991

-4.9994

.2.5001 0.0000 2.5000 4.9992

-4.9993

-2.5001 0.0000 2.5000 4.9991 "4.9992

-2.5001 Continued on next Page Page3or6 Mensured Aftcr

-4.9990

-2.5000 0.0000 2.4999 4.9991

.4.9992

-2.4999 0.0000 2.5000 4.9992

-4.9993

-2.5001 0.0000 2.5000 4.9992

.4.9994

-2.5001 0.0000 2.5000 4.9993

-4.9990

.2.5001 0.0000 2.4999 4.9991

-4.9992

-2.5001 0.0000 2.5000 4.9991

-4.9994

-2.5001 0.0000 2.5000 4.9992

-4.9993

.2.5001 0.0000 2.5000 4.9991

.4.9992

-2.5001 Thlcrancc

+1-I.2208mnV

./1-.2208mnV 4/1-2208mnV

.i1-1..220$MV 41-.1.2220BmV 4.1-.2208mV 41-1..2208mV

+/1-.2208mV

+1.1.2208mV

+/-1..2208mV

,/-1.2208inV

.4.I1..2208mV

+1-1..2208mV 41-1..220$mV 4e-1..2206mV 4-1-.2208mnV

.I-1..2208mV

  1. 1-1-.2208WV

.1-1-122OflnV 41-11-2208mV

  • l-1..2208mV

+I-1,42208WV

.i-1-..2208mnV

+1-1-.2208WV

+141.2208mV

  • !1... 206mV 4-1-.2208WV

+1-1.2208mnV 41.1.2208mV 1 -2208MV 4-1-.2208WV

+1-1-.2208WV 41-1..2208mV 41-1 -2208mV

./1-.2208mV 4-1-.2208WV 4/-1-.2208mV 4.-1-.2208mV

+1-1..2208MY

./-¶.22O8mV 4/1..2208mV 4-1-.2208WV 11111IM11110ftri 41

This Document Does Not Contain Continuum Dynamics, Inc. Proprietary Information elec I ron I es 2125 SW 2flTI STrhl.t ALLENTOWN. PA 14103 ON SITE CERTIFICATE OF CAIBRATION FOR CONTINUIUM DYNAMICS, INC.

Continued from Page 3 so Certificate No. 3275966 Calibration Data:

Paramnetr Channel 16 Channel 16 Channel 16 Channel 17 Channel 17 Channel 17 Channel 17 Channel 17 Channel 18 Channel 18 Channel 18 Channel 18 Channel 15 Channel 19 Channel 19 Channel 19 Channel 19 Channel 19 Channel 20 Channel 20 Channel 20 Channel 20 Channel 20 Channel 21 Channel 21 Channel 21 Channel 2t Channel 2t Channel 22 Channel 22 Channel 22 Channel 22 Channel 22 Channel 23 Channel 23 Channel 23 Channel 23 Channel 23 Channel 24 Channel 24 Channel 24 Channel 24 Nominal 0.0000 2.5000 5.0000

-6.0000

-2.5000 0.0000 2.5000 5.0000

-5.0000

-2.5000 0.0000 2.5000 5.0000

-5.0000

-2.5000 0.0000 2.5000 5.0000

-5.0000

-2.5000 0.0000 2.5000 5.0000

-5.0000

-2.5000 0.0000 2.5000 5.0000

.-. 000o

-2,5000 0.0000 2.5000 5,0000

-5,0000

-2.5000 0.0000 2.500 5.0000

-5.0000

-2.5000 0.00O0 2.500D Mcasurcd Before 0.0000 2A999 4.9991

-4.9990

-2.5000 0.0000 2.5000 4.9991

-4.9990

-2.5000 0.0000 2.5001 4.9992

-4.9994

-2.4999 0.0000 2.5000 4.9992

-4.9993

-2.5001

-4.9993 2.5000 4.9993

-4.9992

-2.4999 0.0000 2.5000 4.A991

-4.9993

-2.5001 0M0000 2.5000 4.9990

.4.9994

-2.5001 0.0000 2.4999

-4.9994

-2.4M9 0.0000 CotAiti*ed on next Page Page 4 of 6 Meia.urcd After 0.0000 2.4999 4.9991

-4.9990

.2.5000 0.0000 2.5000 4.9991

-4.9990

-2.5000 0.0000 2.5001 4.9992

-4.9994

-2.4999 0.00O0 2.5000 4.9992

-4.9993

-2.5001

-4.9993 2.5000 4.9993

-4.9992

-2.4999 0.0000 2.5000 4.9991

-4.9993

-2.5001 0.0000 2.5000 4.999W

-4.9994

-2.5001 0.0000 2.4999 4.9992

-4.9994 4999 0.0000

.2.4999 Tolerance

+l-1-2200mV

+/-1-..2208mV

+1-1..2208mV

+1-1..2208rnV

+1-1..2208mV

+1-1..220SmV

+/-1..2208mV 4/-1..2208mV

+/-1.2208mV

+1-1.2208mV

+1-1.2208mV

+1-1.2208mV 4/-1.220$mV 41-1..2208mV

+/-I..220BmV

+1-I..2208mV

./-1 -2208mV 4/1..2208mV 4.-1..2208mV 4/-1..2208mV

+1-1..2209mV

+/1-..2208mV

+/I1..2208mV

.1-1..2208mV

+1-1..2208mV

+/-1..2208mV 4/-1..2208mV 41-1.2208mV 4.-1..2208mV b1-,.2208mV

+1-1..208rnY

+1.1-2208mV

+I1..2208mV

+/.1..2208mV 4/-1i2208mV

+/.1.1.2208mV 4+1-1.220SmV

+1--.2208mV

+.-1-208mV

+-/-1-2208mV 16-eli.2208mV

+/-1.2208mV

+/-1..2208mV Illl ill~luil Wi.

42

This Document Does Not Contain Continuum Dynamics, Inc. Proprietary Informnation el ctrunicn 2125 SW 2,M1I STREhT AIJ.FY%'oWN. PA 1S10.(3 ON SITE CERI7JFICATE OF CALIBRATION FOR CONTINUUM DYNAMICS, INC.

Conlintrd from Page 4 Ccrtificate No. ')275966 Calibration Data:

PArame:Cr Channel 24 Channel 25 Channel 25 Channel 25 Channel 25 Channel 25 Channel 26 Channel 26 Channel 26 Channel 26 Channel 26 Channel 27 Channel 27 Channel 27 Channel 27 Channe! 27 Channel 28 Channel 28 Channel 28 Channel 28 Channel 28 Channel 29 Channel 29 Channel 29 Channel 29 Channel 29 Channel 30 Channel 30 Channel 30 Nominal 5.0000

-5.0000

-2.5000 0.0000 2.5000 5.0000

-5.0000

-2.5000 0.0000 2.5000 5.0000

-5.0000

-2.5000 0.0000 2.5000 5.0000

-5.0000

-2.5000 0.0000 2.5000 5.0000

-5.0000

-2.5000 0.0000 2.5000 5.0000

-5.0000

-2.5000 0.0000 Measmued Before 4.990

-4.9994

-2.5001 0.0000 2.5000 4.9993

-4.9991

-2.4999 0.0000 2.5001 4.9992

-4.9991

-2.4999 0.0000 2.4999 4.9991

-4.9992

-2.4999 0.0000 2.5000 4.9991

-4.9992

-2.4999 0.0000 2.5000 4.9991

-4.9992

-2.5002 0.0000 M6earsed Aflter 4.9990

-4.9994

-2.5001 0.0000 2.5000 4.9993

-4.9991

-2.4999 0.0000 2.5001 4.9992

-4.9991

-2.4999 0.0000 2.4999 4.9901

-4,9992

-2.4999 0.0000 2-5000 4.9991

-4.9992

-2.4999 0.0000 2.5000 4.9991

-4.9992

-2.5002 0.0000 Toleralnce 4-1..2208mV

+1-1.2208mV

+/-I..2208mV

+1.1..2208mV

+1-1..2208mV

+/-1..2208mV

÷l-...220fnV i/-I..220$mV

+/-1.2208mV

+/-1.2208mV

+/-1.220amV

+/-1. 2208mV

+1.1-2208mV

+/.1 -2208mV

+/-1.2208mV

+/1.1 2208mV 4+-1.2208mV

+1-1.220$mV

.1-1.2208mV

÷1-1.2208mV

+/-1.2208mV

+1-1.2208mV 41-1.2208mV

+/-1.2208mV

+1-1.2208mV

+1-i..2208mV

./-1.2208mV

+/-1.2208mV

  • +-1..2208mV Contirgued on ncxi Pare Mv Page, 5 Of6 E1111111111MMIJ 43

This Document Does Not Contain Continuum Dynamics, Inc. Proprietary Information

-- III WOM eI e I r otIS cm 2125 SW 2,T1rl SiRxl'r AUXIVN'WN, PA 18103 ON SITE CERTIFICATE OF CALIBRATION FOR CONTINUUM ]DYNAMICS, INC.

Continued from Page 5 so Cimtificnte No. 'Z275966 Calibration Datz:

Parameter Channel 30 Channel 30 Channel 31 Channel 31 Channel 31 Channel 31 Channel 31 Nominal 2.5000 5.0000

-5.0000

-2.5000 0.0000 2.5000 5.0000 Measured Before 2.4999 4.9994

-4.9991

-2.5000 0.0000 2.5002 4.9992 Measured After 2.4999 4.9994

-4.9901

-2.5000 0.0000 2.5002 4.9992 Tolerance

+1-1..2208mV

+/-12208mV

+.1I..2208mV

.1-1..2208mV

+1-1..2208mV

+1-1..2208mV

+/-1..2208mV Work performed by: /0 Reviewed by:

L Ak Martin LaGrange 6 et z

Annelle Singer 7/

Electronic Technkiian (11 Mechanical Tcchnician B SIMCO EL-arooks' quality. anag re saten cerbform to ISO 9h2O0.M WW/U 17I05l99. mid A%'bD4CSL ZM.1]l-l4. Al cz!ibraticns arc -pfomrid.Mdig giom4~y ona mmd st*nxlth ie to tic hacmioa Spi"m of Units (S; UWits, Tramtbirf k l.cdh,*e tugh csi~alibrs by the Nitiongl lsituie of Standards a Technology (NIST), odIw Natmil 151w.'cnt k,*zuto (N,*'), o"bywig naft' phykal conauaot, in:rfraie st~nat~lds or rnio ealibu

~~k c

es. larn. is c tcalknord with a ta m*'cy rati, or'4:1 or caeroeicm.rc'er uncertainly analysi-alr pud ban&w are applied dting dl4 =xatrc =t proccss. The ifrirn*amiol h o" twis cvuti. k q*hic oj, tb tbe h'mnumcnt ideatL'"cd auw¢ mtd may no lbe rqleuc.exorpt hi full. wiltbotljcior a'lara cIto:scn! ho~rn 5UvMX] -Ikdc~a.. TIt*c is n~o kmli~..

wa.rarty that the insinmeu t will maiamin its spccified Waines during.c lnijer. ltcaol due om posutbo c dr-t. eaniimacax. or cotrI bed 2oondiscomieoo.

Dated: 10/12A06 correction issued as of 11/20/06 I

Page 6 of 6 IIIW IE]!II I

44

ENCLOSURE 3 TENNESSEE VALLEY AUTHORITY BROWNS FERRY NUCLEAR PLANT (BFN)

UNITS 1, 2, AND 3 TECHNICAL SPECIFICATIONS (TS) CHANGES TS-431 AND TS-418 EXTENDED POWER UPRATE (EPU)

CDI AFFIDAVIT Attached is the CDI affidavit for the proprietary information contained in Enclosure 1.

40APXr Continuum Dynamics, Inc.

(609) 538-0444 (609) 538-0464 fax 34 Lexington Avenue Ewing, NJ 08618-2302 AFFIDAVIT I, Barbara Agans, being duly sworn, depose and state as follows:

I.

I hold the position of Director, Business Administration of Continuum Dynamics, Inc.

(hereinafter referred to as C.D.I.), and I am authorized to make the amended request for withholding from the Public Record for C.D.I. Report No. 07-1IP "Dynamics of BWR Steam Dryer Components," Revision 1, prepared by Continuum Dynamics, Inc., dated November 2008. C.D.I. was the developer of the information sought to be withheld and the author of the subject report, and the proprietary information contained therein for the facility on whose docket the information was submitted to the Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC).

This Affidavit is submitted to the NRC pursuant lo 10 CFR 2.390(a)(4) based on the fact that the attached information consists of trade secrets, and that the NRC will receive the information under privilege and in confidence. Being responsible for the development of the information and report sought to be withheld, and being knowledgeable of the potential financial impacts of public disclosure of the documents I am in the best position to provide the required information and execute this amended affidavit.

2.

The subject information summarizes:

(a) a process or method, including supporting data and analysis, where prevention of its use by competitors-constitutes a competitive advantage over other companies; (b) information which, if used by a competitor, would reduce its expenditure of resources or improve its competitive position in the design, manufactme, shipment, installation, assurance of quality, or licensing of a similar product;

3.

The information sought to be withheld has been held in confidence by C.D.I. The subject information has consistently been held in confidence, no public disclosure has been made and it is not available to the public. All disclosures to third parties, which have been limited, have been made pursuant to the terms and conditions contained in non-disclosure agreements or other legally binding agreements which must be fully executed prior to disclosure.

4.

The information is a type customarily held in confidence by C.D.I. and others in the field and there is a rational basis therefore. The subject information is a type, which C.D.I.

considers trade secret and is held in confidence because it constitutes a source of competitive advantage in the competition and performance of such work in the industry.

Public disclosure of the information is likely to cause substantial harm to the owner of the information's competitive position and foreclose or reduce the availability of profit-making opportunities.

5.

C.D.I. Report No. 07-IIP discloses that the dynamic condition of a particular BWR steam dryer component is not very well modeled by the conventional practice in the industry of assigning an accepted value to the component.

The Report discloses an analytical methodology, supported by tests and data, that provides a substantially better model of the actual condition of the component. Recognition of the inaccuracy of the accepted practice and knowing the improved value of C.D.I.'s methodology provides a significant competitive advantage over competitors who do not appreciate its significance. This breakthrough was based on the insights and technical creativity of C.D.I. employees and data developed and tests conducted by C.D.I. Based upon C.D.I review of the literature and C.D.I. knowledge of NRC filings by those not having access to the subject report, the information sought to be withheld is not available in public sources.

The information in the document sought to be withheld has provided a significant revenue stream for C.D.I. and has been demonstrated to have significant economic value, but only so long as the information is kept proprietary.

I declare under penalty of perjury that the foregoing affidavit and the matters stated therein are true and correct to the best of my knowledge, information and belief.

Executed on this 14 day of

(,

2008.

&A*CC,-

-0~

E4arbara Agans Continuum Dynamics, Inc.

Subscribed and sworn before me this day

?, "C) f*

EILEEN P. BURMEISTER NOTARY PUBLIC OF NEW JERSEY

-MY COMM. EXPIRES MAY 6, 2012