ML18211A569

From kanterella
Revision as of 00:32, 7 November 2018 by StriderTol (talk | contribs) (Created page by program invented by StriderTol)
(diff) ← Older revision | Latest revision (diff) | Newer revision → (diff)
Jump to navigation Jump to search
APR1400 Chapter 5, Reactor Coolant System and Connecting Systems, Final Safety Evaluation Report
ML18211A569
Person / Time
Site: 05200046
Issue date: 09/28/2018
From: Brian Hughes
NRC/NRO/DLSE/LB2
To:
Hughes B / NRO/415-6582
Shared Package
ML18087A364 List:
References
APR1400 Chapter 5
Download: ML18211A569 (143)


Text

Code of Federal Regulations **Compliance with the Codes and Standards Rule, 10 CFR 50.55a Introduction Boiler and Pressure Vessel Code Code for Operation and Maintenance of Nuclear Power Plants Summary of Application Regulatory Basis

Technical Evaluation Code of Record The components and code classes that are listed in Table 5.2-1 are in accordance with the provisions of 10 CFR 50.55a with this exception: the applicable ASME Code edition for the APR1400 is the 2007 Edition with 2008

Addenda. Pressure Boundary Definition ASME Boiler Pressure Vessel Code,Section III Conditions Combined License Information Items Conclusions Applicable Code Cases Introduction Summary of Application **

  • Regulatory Basis Technical Evaluation When not exempted by 15.2.1 above, the post weld heat treatment must be performed in accordance with NF-4622 except that ASTM A-710 Grade A Material must be at least 1000°F (540°C) and must not exceed 1150°F (620°C) for Class 1 and Class 2 material and 1175°F (640°C) for Class 3 material.

N-60-5 N-71-18 N-249-14

Combined License Information Items Conclusion Introduction Summary of Application

Regulatory Basis Technical Evaluation Design Bases

Technical Report APR1400-Z-M-NR-14008

Overpressure Protection at Power Low Temperature Overpressure Protection

Initial Testing Program

ITAAC Technical Specifications Combined License Information Items Conclusion Summary of Application

Regulatory Basis

  • Technical Evaluation Material Specifications Compatibility of Materials with the Reactor Coolant Fabrication and Processing of Ferritic Materials Fabrication and Processing of Austenitic Stainless Steel Prevention of PWSCC for Nickel-Based Alloys Threaded Fasteners Reactor Coolant Chemistry
  • Combined License Information Items Conclusions Introduction Summary of Application

Regulatory Basis ******Technical Evaluation Inservice Inspection and Testing Program

Preservice Inspection Program Combined License Information Items

Conclusion Introduction Summary of Application

Regulatory Basis Technical Evaluation Leakage Detection Capability, Sensitivity, and Response Time Leakage Detection System

Leakage Instrumentation in the Main Control Room

Prolonged Low-Level RCS Leakage Leakage Separation (Identified and Unidentified Leakage) Intersystem Leakage Technical Specifications

GDC 2 and Seismic Qualification Initial Testing Program ******

Inspections, Tests, Analyses and Acceptance Criteria Combined License Information Items The COL applicant is to address and develop the milestones for the preparation and implementation of the procedure for operator responses to prolonged low-level leakage per guidance in RG 1.45, Revision 1. Conclusion Introduction Summary of Application

  • Regulatory Basis

Technical Evaluation Materials Specifications S m S mS m Special Processes Used for Manufacture and Fabrication of Components Special Methods for Nondestructive Examination Special Controls for Ferritic and Austenitic Stainless Steels Fracture Toughness Material Surveillance

Reactor Vessel Fasteners Combined License Information Items Conclusion Introduction Summary of Application

Regulatory Basis

Technical Evaluation Pressure-Temperature Limits Pressurized Thermal Shock

Charpy Upper-Shelf Energy Combined License Information Items Conclusion Introduction Summary of Application

Regulatory Basis

Technical Evaluation

          • Accessibility to Inspect the Reactor Vessel Special Considerations Related to Fracture Toughness Shipping and Installation Combined License Information Items Conclusion RCP Flywheel Introduction Summary of Application

Regulatory Basis Technical Evaluation K IC of the flywheel material at the normal operating temperature of the flywheel is greater than 165 MPam (150 ksiin). Conformance is demonstrated by an indirect test. Justification is provided to establish the equivalence of fracture toughness in the proposed flywheel material and certain steels (ASME SA-533-B Class 1, ASME SA-508 Class 2, ASME SA-508 Class 3, and ASME SA-516

Grade 65). The RT NDT (nil-ductility reference temperature) of the flywheel materials is determined in accordance with NB-2320 and NB-2330 of the ASME Section III.

-past evaluations have shown that ASME SA-533-B Class1 and SA-508 Classes 2 and 3 materials generally have suitable toughness for typical flywheel applications provided stress concentrations are kept within reasonable limits and the reference temperature RT NDT, determined in accordance with Article NB-2331(a) of Section III of the ASME Code, is at least 50°C (90°F) below the lowest temperature at which operating speed is achieved. For other materials that may be considered for flywheels, the strength and toughness properties should be evaluated and justified for this application.

Combined License Information Items Conclusion RCP Design Introduction Summary of Application

Regulatory Basis Technical Evaluation **

  • Pump Seal Cooling A summary report of the test results for the 22 °F temperature margin has been uploaded to [electronic reading room] ERR, titled "Justification that the APR1400 RCP seals will not exceed the exit temperature specification limit" which is proprietary and not intended to be included in DCD. This report provides
1) documentation of the basis for the 22 °F margin and 2) a justification that this margin is applicable to the APR1400 RCP seals. APR1400 RCP specification identifies the same 180 °F limit for the RCP outlet temperature as the System 80 RCP specification and similar loss of component cooling water and/or loss of seal injection tests have been performed on both pumps to sufficiently justify the 22°F margin for the APR1400 RCPs.

Loss of Seal Injection Loss of Component Cooling Water RCP Seal Protection Internal Motor Parts Cooling Shaft and Frame Vibration Monitoring Pump and Motor Bearings

Oil Lift SystemOil Collection System Anti-Reverse Rotation Device The only functional requirement of the anti-reverse rotation device for APR1400 RCP Motor is to prevent rotation in the reverse direction without damage when reverse torques are induced as described in Section 5.4.1.2 of DCD. Safety and function of APR1400 are not affected by the type of an anti-reverse rotation device. The document that was reviewed by staff in the non-Chapter 15 audit is actually proprietary as opposed to nonproprietary. Thus the details on the design of the device are vendor specific data; therefore, APR1400 DCD will not incorporate the details on the device. Motor/Pump Sensors

            • Pump Performance RCP Seal Integrity during Station Black-Out (SBO) Coastdown Capability Rotor Seizure/Shaft Break Events Initial Test Program Technical Specifications Combined License Information Items Conclusion Steam Generator Materials Introduction Summary of Application

Regulatory Basis

Technical Evaluation

Combined License Information Items Conclusion Steam Generator Program Introduction Summary of Application Regulatory Basis Technical Evaluation

Combined License Information Items Conclusion **

            • Introduction Summary of Application

Regulatory Basis Technical Evaluation

When a containment spray (CS) pump requires maintenance or failure during plant MODES 1, 2, 3 and the maintenance or failure require a breach of pressure boundary of the CS pump, the shutdown cooling pumps cannot perform its interchangeable function. Therefore, the affected train will be isolated and the plant will operate under LCO (TS 3.6.6). However, if the CS pump maintenance or failure during plant MODES 1, 2, 3 and the maintenance or failure does not require a pressure boundary breach, the shutdown cooling pumps can perform its interchangeable function. In this case, the plant would not need to operate under LCO. Natural Circulation Cooldown Gas Accumulation Preoperational Testing and Post-Core Hot Functional Testing Combined License Information Items Conclusion ******

Introduction Summary of Application Regulatory Basis *******

Introduction Summary of Application

Regulatory Basis

Technical Evaluation System Design

RCGVS Operation

RCGVS Tests and Requirements

Tier 1 Information Combined License Information Items Conclusion *****

  • "**

Shutdown Cooling System Safety Injection System

Letdown Line ***Charging Line