(diff) ← Older revision | Latest revision (diff) | Newer revision → (diff)
Letter Sequence Request |
---|
TAC:MC8971, Revise Containment Requirements During Handling Irradiated Fuel and Core Alterations (Approved, Closed) |
|
MONTHYEARML0534003682005-12-12012 December 2005 Request for Withholding Information from Public Disclosure Project stage: Withholding Request Acceptance ML0604502112006-02-17017 February 2006 Notice of Meeting with Nuclear Management Company, LLC, Monticello Nuclear Generating Plant, Regarding Full-Scope Application of Alternative Source Term Methodology Project stage: Meeting ML0613104452006-04-13013 April 2006 Monticello - Full Scope Alternate Source Term - Supplemental Information, Description of Meteorological Data Project stage: Request ML0611103102006-05-11011 May 2006 Withholding from Public Disclosure, Compact Disk 2 of 2, Alternative Source Term Supplemental Information, Submitted by Letter Dated 04/13/2006 in Support of Application for Amendments to Use Alternative Source Term Methodology Project stage: Other ML0618604632006-06-29029 June 2006 Draft RAI (Radiological) Re. Full-Scope Application of Alternative Source Term Project stage: Draft RAI ML0623500462006-08-21021 August 2006 Supplemental Submittal Regarding Full Scope Application of an Alternative Source Term (AST) Project stage: Supplement L-MT-06-054, Supplemental Submittal Regarding Full Scope Application of an Alternative Source Term (AST)2006-08-21021 August 2006 Supplemental Submittal Regarding Full Scope Application of an Alternative Source Term (AST) Project stage: Supplement L-MT-06-059, Response to Request for Additional Information to License Amendment Request for Full Scope Alternative Source Term2006-08-22022 August 2006 Response to Request for Additional Information to License Amendment Request for Full Scope Alternative Source Term Project stage: Response to RAI ML0628606312006-10-0606 October 2006 Draft SE for Alternative Source Term Amendment, Monticello Nuclear Generating Plant Project stage: Draft Approval ML0627900152006-12-0707 December 2006 License Amendment 148 Regarding Full-Scope Implementation of the Alternative Source Term Methodology Project stage: Approval ML0624105072006-12-0707 December 2006 Exemption from Certain Requirements of 10 CFR 50, Appendix J Project stage: Approval ML0634205172006-12-0707 December 2006 Tech Spec Pages for Amendment 148 Regarding Full-Scope Implementation of the Alternative Source Term Methodology Project stage: Acceptance Review ML0709900892007-04-17017 April 2007 Correction of Errors in Safety Evaluation Associated with Amendment No. 148 Regarding Alternative Source Term Project stage: Approval ML0906100352009-03-0909 March 2009 Correction of Inadvertent Errors on Two TS Pages in Amendment No. 148 Project stage: Other 2006-05-11
[Table View] |
|
---|
Category:- No Document Type Applies
MONTHYEARML22034A3952022-02-16016 February 2022 Enclosure 3 - IP 96001 CY2021 - IR 8 Baseline Inspection Completion ML22034A3972022-02-16016 February 2022 Enclosure 2 - IP 92707 CY2021 - IR 8 Baseline Inspection Completion ML22034A3992022-02-16016 February 2022 Enclosure 1 - IP 71130.03 Cy 2021 - IR 8 Baseline Inspection Completion ML17080A4762015-12-10010 December 2015 EA-14-193; Confirmatory Order Consent and Hearing Waiver Form - Monticello ML15014A1532015-01-14014 January 2015 Attachment 1- NEI Comments on NRC Working Group Recommendations to Revise the Substantive Cross-Cutting Issue Process ML15014A1602015-01-14014 January 2015 Attachment 2 - NRC Working Group Recommendations to Revise the Substantive Cross-Cutting Issue Process ML14345A6392014-12-11011 December 2014 Response to a Request for Additional Information for Proposed Revision to NSPM QATR ML13143A3312013-06-0606 June 2013 Operating Boiling-Water Reactor Licensees with Mark 1 and Mark 2 Containments Addresses List - Enclosure 2 L-MT-13-020, Enclosure 1 - Responses to the Gap Analysis2013-02-27027 February 2013 Enclosure 1 - Responses to the Gap Analysis ML12223A0912012-08-0909 August 2012 Revised IST Relief Request PR-06 ML12056A0522012-03-12012 March 2012 Enclosure 6 - List of Power Reactor Licensees and Holders of Construction Permits in Active or Deferred Status ML1131910172011-11-15015 November 2011 Note to Tennessee Valley Authority and Northern States Power Company ML1129103672011-10-18018 October 2011 Enormous Boost to the Gnp ML1120701752011-07-22022 July 2011 Response to Request for Additional Information Related to Decommissioning Funding Status Reports, Enclosure 1 ML1120701842011-07-18018 July 2011 2010 Taxes Paid, Enclosure 4 ML1019304602010-03-25025 March 2010 List of Historical Leaks and Spills at Us Commercial Nuclear Power Plants ML0923903332009-08-21021 August 2009 Enclosure - Detailed Industry Comments on Draft NUREG/CR-XXXX, Modeling a Digital Feedwater Control System Using Traditional Probabilistic Risk Assessment Methods. ML0817200752008-06-19019 June 2008 Document for Telephone Conference on 6/20/08 Re EPU Amendment Application ML0810101982008-03-31031 March 2008 Dryer Dynamic Stress Evaluation (Non-Proprietary Version of Enclosure 11) ML0806704192008-03-0707 March 2008 CDBI Findings ML0732400242007-10-25025 October 2007 Examples of Max Thermal Power License Conditions ML0721904952007-08-23023 August 2007 Revised Renewed Facility Operating License Pages to Reflect Issue B.5.b ML0635404332006-12-20020 December 2006 Enclosure 2 - Consent and Hearing Waiver Form - the Nuclear Management Company, LLC ML0626801502006-09-22022 September 2006 Escort Ratio for Visitors ML0613903922006-06-0808 June 2006 Web References for Monticello Dseis: Aquatic Ecology Part 1 ML0613104452006-04-13013 April 2006 Monticello - Full Scope Alternate Source Term - Supplemental Information, Description of Meteorological Data ML0602304322005-11-29029 November 2005 ITS Conversion Beyond Scope Issue 8 ML0532605572005-11-18018 November 2005 Signs on Owner Control Area Fence ML0613901442005-08-0404 August 2005 Web References for Monticello Dseis: Socioeconomics ML0520105032005-08-0101 August 2005 Xcel Energy - Migratory Bird Reporting Form and Flow Chart, Revised 2003 ML0613901332005-06-0808 June 2005 Web References for Monticello Dseis: Air Quality ML0613902252005-06-0808 June 2005 Web References for Monticello Dseis: Water Use/Water Quality ML0613902262005-06-0808 June 2005 Web References for Monticello Dseis: Related Federal Projects ML0613901282005-06-0808 June 2005 Web References for Monticello Dseis: Terrestrial Ecology ML0520103362004-12-31031 December 2004 Minnesota Department of Employment and Economic Development Community Profile Results on Mnpro - Part 2 ML0535300952004-12-0808 December 2004 Enclosure 1 - NRC Public Meeting on the Independent Spent Fuel Storage Installation (ISFSI) at Monticello December 8, 2004 - Sign in Sheet ML0520105872004-08-24024 August 2004 Web Reference - Local Area Unemployment Statistics for Wright and Sherburne Counties, Minnesota, Bureau of Labor Statistics ML0505404642004-02-0909 February 2004 Dynamic Web Page Printout Dated 02/09/2004 Regarding Applied Violations for Nuclear Power Plants ML0520103322004-01-0101 January 2004 Minnesota Department of Employment and Economic Development Community Profile Results on Mnpro - Part 1 2022-02-16
[Table view] |
Text
Description of Meteorological Data:
As requested, data files of MNGP meteorological data taken at 100 meters for 1998-2002 in ARCON96 format are provided. Files with nomenclature "100MARCON.xx" are
the original data files compiled from the MNGP MIDAS meteorological database in the ARCON96 file format specified in Appendix A of Regulatory Guide 1.194, "Atmospheric Relative Concentrations For Control Room Radiological Habitability Assessments At Nuclear Power Plants," June 2003. Files with nomenclature "100M New ARCON.xx"
have added "9"s to indicate invalid data as described in Appendix A of RG 1.194. Wind speeds are given in meters/second entered to the nearest tenth of the reporting unit with the decimal point assumed. Wind direction is given in degrees from which wind is
blowing as an integer. The upper-level data was taken at 100 meters; the lower level
data was taken at 10 meters.
The following is taken from RAI response dated February 28, 2005 and is provided here for information, as the discussion also applies to the 100 meter data files described
above."Discussion of Differences in ARCON96 and PAVAN Data GenerationIn response to the question above, the ARCON96 (Reference 6) input files were compared with the PAVAN (Reference 7) joint frequency distribution input files. The comparison displayed minor differences due to the data selection process used to
create the files. Meteorological data for MNGP is collected in data files created by the Meteorological Information and Dose Assessment System (MIDAS). The MNGP primary meteorological tower has two redundant trains of sensors, and data from both trains are stored in the
MIDAS data files. The programs that generated the ARCON96 input data and PAVAN
joint frequency distribution tables used the same MIDAS data files but each program
used a slightly different data selection process. The PAVAN joint frequency distribution tables created by the MIDAS software report data for only one instrument train. Annual joint frequency distribution data from the instrument train with the highest data recovery rate during the year of interest was
utilized as input to PAVAN. Conversely, the ARCON96 input data generation program accessed data from both instrument trains. The program reported data from one train unless the hourly data status code was "bad," in which case data from the alternate train were reported. The
availability of the alternate train data for the ARCON96 files resulted in a higher data recovery rate. Therefore, the ARCON96 data reflect a slightly higher number of hours for calm winds as well as other wind categories when compared to the joint frequency
distribution tables.
The ARCON96 input files and PAVAN joint frequency distribution table input files were compared; both were found to be representative of the unprocessed meteorological data for the period 1998 - 2002. Small differences in hours of missing data, calm winds, or particular stability classes were determined to be due to the data selection process
described above."