|
---|
Category:- No Document Type Applies
MONTHYEARML22034A3952022-02-16016 February 2022 Enclosure 3 - IP 96001 CY2021 - IR 8 Baseline Inspection Completion ML22034A3972022-02-16016 February 2022 Enclosure 2 - IP 92707 CY2021 - IR 8 Baseline Inspection Completion ML22034A3992022-02-16016 February 2022 Enclosure 1 - IP 71130.03 Cy 2021 - IR 8 Baseline Inspection Completion ML17080A4762015-12-10010 December 2015 EA-14-193; Confirmatory Order Consent and Hearing Waiver Form - Monticello ML15014A1532015-01-14014 January 2015 Attachment 1- NEI Comments on NRC Working Group Recommendations to Revise the Substantive Cross-Cutting Issue Process ML15014A1602015-01-14014 January 2015 Attachment 2 - NRC Working Group Recommendations to Revise the Substantive Cross-Cutting Issue Process ML14345A6392014-12-11011 December 2014 Response to a Request for Additional Information for Proposed Revision to NSPM QATR ML13143A3312013-06-0606 June 2013 Operating Boiling-Water Reactor Licensees with Mark 1 and Mark 2 Containments Addresses List - Enclosure 2 L-MT-13-020, Enclosure 1 - Responses to the Gap Analysis2013-02-27027 February 2013 Enclosure 1 - Responses to the Gap Analysis ML12223A0912012-08-0909 August 2012 Revised IST Relief Request PR-06 ML12056A0522012-03-12012 March 2012 Enclosure 6 - List of Power Reactor Licensees and Holders of Construction Permits in Active or Deferred Status ML1131910172011-11-15015 November 2011 Note to Tennessee Valley Authority and Northern States Power Company ML1129103672011-10-18018 October 2011 Enormous Boost to the Gnp ML1120701752011-07-22022 July 2011 Response to Request for Additional Information Related to Decommissioning Funding Status Reports, Enclosure 1 ML1120701842011-07-18018 July 2011 2010 Taxes Paid, Enclosure 4 ML1019304602010-03-25025 March 2010 List of Historical Leaks and Spills at Us Commercial Nuclear Power Plants ML0923903332009-08-21021 August 2009 Enclosure - Detailed Industry Comments on Draft NUREG/CR-XXXX, Modeling a Digital Feedwater Control System Using Traditional Probabilistic Risk Assessment Methods. ML0817200752008-06-19019 June 2008 Document for Telephone Conference on 6/20/08 Re EPU Amendment Application ML0810101982008-03-31031 March 2008 Dryer Dynamic Stress Evaluation (Non-Proprietary Version of Enclosure 11) ML0806704192008-03-0707 March 2008 CDBI Findings ML0732400242007-10-25025 October 2007 Examples of Max Thermal Power License Conditions ML0721904952007-08-23023 August 2007 Revised Renewed Facility Operating License Pages to Reflect Issue B.5.b ML0635404332006-12-20020 December 2006 Enclosure 2 - Consent and Hearing Waiver Form - the Nuclear Management Company, LLC ML0626801502006-09-22022 September 2006 Escort Ratio for Visitors ML0613903922006-06-0808 June 2006 Web References for Monticello Dseis: Aquatic Ecology Part 1 ML0613104452006-04-13013 April 2006 Monticello - Full Scope Alternate Source Term - Supplemental Information, Description of Meteorological Data ML0602304322005-11-29029 November 2005 ITS Conversion Beyond Scope Issue 8 ML0532605572005-11-18018 November 2005 Signs on Owner Control Area Fence ML0613901442005-08-0404 August 2005 Web References for Monticello Dseis: Socioeconomics ML0520105032005-08-0101 August 2005 Xcel Energy - Migratory Bird Reporting Form and Flow Chart, Revised 2003 ML0613901332005-06-0808 June 2005 Web References for Monticello Dseis: Air Quality ML0613902252005-06-0808 June 2005 Web References for Monticello Dseis: Water Use/Water Quality ML0613902262005-06-0808 June 2005 Web References for Monticello Dseis: Related Federal Projects ML0613901282005-06-0808 June 2005 Web References for Monticello Dseis: Terrestrial Ecology ML0520103362004-12-31031 December 2004 Minnesota Department of Employment and Economic Development Community Profile Results on Mnpro - Part 2 ML0535300952004-12-0808 December 2004 Enclosure 1 - NRC Public Meeting on the Independent Spent Fuel Storage Installation (ISFSI) at Monticello December 8, 2004 - Sign in Sheet ML0520105872004-08-24024 August 2004 Web Reference - Local Area Unemployment Statistics for Wright and Sherburne Counties, Minnesota, Bureau of Labor Statistics ML0505404642004-02-0909 February 2004 Dynamic Web Page Printout Dated 02/09/2004 Regarding Applied Violations for Nuclear Power Plants ML0520103322004-01-0101 January 2004 Minnesota Department of Employment and Economic Development Community Profile Results on Mnpro - Part 1 2022-02-16
[Table view] |
Text
- 'I themselves to finance the con struction of power plants and var ious smaller industrial concerns or
'1 services connected with heavy in dustry. And they will need to 4*(
I obtain big loans abroad for this purpose. This ought not, however, to be too difficult, provided agree dl ments can be reached for the sale aN of the energy.
The financing of the Birfell project and the Straumsvik aluminium re J~ duction plant may. therefore be e , -a expected to provide the example for the organization of such matters in Iceland in the future. Iceland will import most of the necessary capital, in the form of loans for power plants and as private capital for heavy industry.
Enormous Boost to the GNP a
I*1 The new Ministry of Industry is now discussing with interested I.
1 foreign concerns the quIstion of
- 1 cooperation in these matters. Ice landers believe such cooperation could be extremely advantageous to both sides, not only because of the ease with which cheap energy ih can be obtained in Iceland, but also because of the stability of Icelandic society and the high stan dard of education. Iceland's entry into EFTA on 1st March 1970 will no doubt exert a positive influence on the development of this co operation, for it means that the country has now become part of a duty-free market of 100 million people foi manufactured goods.
K -~
V It is clear that cooperation of this sort would be of immense benefit to Iceland. It is estimated that the gross sales value of water pover N IN in Iceland could amount to $ 80 million per year and of steam N
energy 5 12 million per year. The initial cost of the hydro-electric N" ~k. r plants alone is estinated at $ 900 Na. million and of heavy industrial projects I 1800 million. The export value of the products of the latter is estimated at about $ 800 million per year, of which it is calculated that some $ 125 million per year would remain in the country in the form of wages, taxes and electricity sales. These are high figures, when it is borne in mind that the Gro;s N'ational Product in
-~ Vs .. .... P-Iceland is. because of the -,mall population, only about '- 300 milion per year.
a 35