05000269/FIN-2011018-02
From kanterella
Revision as of 15:05, 30 September 2017 by StriderTol (talk | contribs) (Created page by program invented by StriderTol)
(diff) ← Older revision | Latest revision (diff) | Newer revision → (diff)
Finding | |
|---|---|
| Title | Failure to Perform an Adequate Operability Evaluation for the SSF |
| Description | An NRC-identified NCV of 10 CFR 50, Appendix B, Criterion V, Instructions, Procedures, and Drawings, was identified when the licensee failed to perform an adequate operability evaluation and failed to perform a 50.59 evaluation for a compensatory measure for the SSF ASW subsystem in accordance with Nuclear System Directive (NSD) 203, Operability/Functionality. The failure to perform an adequate operability evaluation for the SSF ASW subsystem in accordance with NSD 203 was a PD. There were two examples of this PD. The first example was more than minor because it was associated with the Design Control attribute of the Mitigating System Cornerstone and adversely affected the cornerstone objective in that the licensee failed to assure the SSF pressurizer heater breakers would function under expected environmental conditions before declaring the SSF operable. The second example was more than minor because it was associated with the Procedure Quality attribute of the Mitigating Systems Cornerstone and adversely affected the cornerstone objective in that the compensatory measure used to support the SSF as operable but degraded non-conforming (OBDN) required prior NRC review and approval. The finding was determined to be of very low safety significance (Green) because it did not result in an actual loss of safety function of the SSF ASW system. The PD was related to the cross-cutting aspect of using conservative assumptions in decision-making in the Decision-Making component of the Human Performance cross-cutting area in that the licensee declared the SSF OBDN without validated testing to demonstrate the SSF pressurizer heater breakers would function under design basis conditions and relied on an unapproved analysis method to support a compensatory measure. |
| Site: | Oconee  |
|---|---|
| Report | IR 05000269/2011018 Section 4OA5 |
| Date counted | Sep 30, 2011 (2011Q3) |
| Type: | NCV: Green |
| cornerstone | Mitigating Systems |
| Identified by: | NRC identified |
| Inspection Procedure: | |
| Inspectors (proximate) | A Sabisch R Bernhard R Croteau |
| CCA | H.14, Conservative Bias |
| INPO aspect | DM.2 |
| ' | |
Finding - Oconee - IR 05000269/2011018 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Finding List (Oconee) @ 2011Q3
Self-Identified List (Oconee)
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||