Semantic search

This page or action requires JavaScript to work. Please enable JavaScript in your browser or use a browser where it is supported, so that functionality can be provided as requested. For further assistance, please have a look at the noscript help page.

Options | Search Clear all entries |

Condition

Printout selection

Options

Parameters [+]

limit:

The maximum number of results to return

offset:

The offset of the first result

link:

Show values as links

headers:

Display the headers/property names

mainlabel:

The label to give to the main page name

intro:

The text to display before the query results, if there are any

outro:

The text to display after the query results, if there are any

searchlabel:

Text for continuing the search

default:

The text to display if there are no query results

class:

An additional CSS class to set for the table

transpose:

Display table headers vertically and results horizontally

sep:

The separator between results

prefix:

Control display of namespace in printouts

Sort options

Delete

Add sorting condition

ResultCodeDebugExtra

To embed this query inline into a wiki page use the code below.

{{#ask: [[Category:PUBLIC COMMENTS ON PROPOSED RULES & PETITIONS FOR]] [[Site::Grand Gulf||Arkansas Nuclear||Waterford]]
 |?Issue date
 |?Title
 |?Topic
 |format=table
 |limit=50
 |offset=0
 |sort=
 |order=asc
 |mainlabel=
 |searchlabel=[Table view]
}}

Results 1 – 41 previous 50 20 50 100 250 500 next 50

JSON CSV RSS RDF

Query log

{
    "query_string": "[[Category:PUBLIC COMMENTS ON PROPOSED RULES &amp; PETITIONS FOR]] [[Site::Grand Gulf||Arkansas Nuclear||Waterford]]",
    "query_source": "SMWSQLStore",
    "query_time": "0.6140",
    "from_cache": false
}

	Issue date	Title	Topic
0CAN049709, Comment Supporting Proposed Rev 3 to Reg Guide 1.134, Medical Evaluation of Licensed Personnel at Nuclear Power Plants	21 April 1997	Comment Supporting Proposed Rev 3 to Reg Guide 1.134, Medical Evaluation of Licensed Personnel at Nuclear Power Plants
0CAN059206, Comment Supporting Proposed Rule Re Elimination of Requirements Marginal to Safety	28 May 1992	Comment Supporting Proposed Rule Re Elimination of Requirements Marginal to Safety
0CAN088804, Comment Opposing Proposed Rules 10CFR170 & 171 Re License & Annual Fees.Nrc Portion of Cooperative Programs Should Be Taken from Remaining 55% of Funds Appropriated by Congress	4 August 1988	Comment Opposing Proposed Rules 10CFR170 & 171 Re License & Annual Fees.Nrc Portion of Cooperative Programs Should Be Taken from Remaining 55% of Funds Appropriated by Congress
0CAN119504, Comment Opposing Proposed Rule 10CFR60,72,73 & 75 Re Requirements for Spent Nuclear Fuel or high-level Radwaste Stored as ISFSI	13 November 1995	Comment Opposing Proposed Rule 10CFR60,72,73 & 75 Re Requirements for Spent Nuclear Fuel or high-level Radwaste Stored as ISFSI
AECM-87-0187, Comments on Draft NUREG-1150, Reactor Risk Ref Document. Review of Document Indicates That Ability of Facility to Cope W/Severe Accidents Underestimated Due to Conservative Assumptions	2 October 1987	Comments on Draft NUREG-1150, Reactor Risk Ref Document. Review of Document Indicates That Ability of Facility to Cope W/Severe Accidents Underestimated Due to Conservative Assumptions
AECM-88-0229, Comment Supporting Proposed Rule 10CFR26 Re Fitness for Duty Program.Attachment to Ltr Provides Answers to Specific Questions Posed by Commission in Proposed Rule	18 November 1988	Comment Supporting Proposed Rule 10CFR26 Re Fitness for Duty Program.Attachment to Ltr Provides Answers to Specific Questions Posed by Commission in Proposed Rule	Fitness for Duty Backfit
AECM-89-0045, Comment Supporting Proposed Rule 10CFR50 Re Ensuring Effectiveness of Maint Programs for Nuclear Power Plants	25 February 1989	Comment Supporting Proposed Rule 10CFR50 Re Ensuring Effectiveness of Maint Programs for Nuclear Power Plants
ML19353B200	4 December 1989	Comment Supporting Opinions Expressed by NUMARC on Draft Reg Guide DG-1001, Maint Programs for Nuclear Power Plants. Util Supports Philosophy of Proper Maint as Important Part of Safe & Reliable Nuclear Power Plant Operation
ML19353B224	1 December 1989	Comments on Draft Reg Guide,Task DG-1001, Maint Programs for Nuclear Power Plants. Util Endorses NUMARC Comments
ML20006A548	8 January 1990	Comment Supporting Proposed Rule 10CFR50, Stabilization & Decontamination Priority,Trusteeship Provisions & Amount of Property Insurance Requirements.
ML20006C572	15 January 1990	Comment Supporting Proposed Rule 10CFR50, Stabilization & Decontamination Priority,Trusteeship Provisions & Amount of Property Insurance Requirements.
ML20043D478	19 May 1990	Comments on Notice Re Grand Gulf Document Collection
ML20055E987	29 June 1990	Comment Opposing Proposed Rule 10CFR55 Re Mod for fitness-for-duty Programs & Licensed Operators.Util Believes That High Stds of Conduct Will Continue to Be Best Achieved & Maintained by Program That Addresses Integrity
ML20056F348	23 August 1993	Comment Opposing NRC Draft GL 89-10,suppl 6
ML20058D858	26 November 1993	Comment on Proposed Rule 10CFR72 Re Notification of Events at Isfsi.Believes General Licenses Should Not Be Required to Use New 10CFR72.75
ML20058E025	12 October 1990	Comment Supporting Proposed Rule 10CFR51 Re Renewal of Nuclear Plant OLs & NRC Intent to Prepare Generic EIS
ML20058G621	6 December 1993	Comment on Draft NUREG/BR-0058, Regulatory Analysis Guidelines,Rev 2. Concurs W/Numarc & Nubarg Comments
ML20065P412	25 April 1994	Comment on Proposed Rule 10CFR50 Rule Re Code & Stds Re Subsections IWE & Iwl.Expresses Deep Concern About Ramifications of Implementing Proposed Rule	Coatings VT-2 Exemption Request Dissimilar Metal Weld Backfit
ML20072B852	5 August 1994	Comment Opposing Proposed Rule 10CFR26 Re Consideration of Changes to FFD Requirements.Licensee Believes Reduction in Amount of FFD Testing Warranted & Can Best Be Achieved in Manner Already Adopted by Commission	Fitness for Duty Contraband
ML20072S543	30 August 1994	Comment Supporting Petition for Rulemaking 9-2 Re Public Access to Documents Maintained by Licensees But Not Submitted to NRC
ML20073M326	3 October 1994	Comment on Pilot Program for NRC Recognition of Good Performance by Nuclear Power Plants
ML20077E823	8 December 1994	Comment Supporting Proposed Rules 10CFR2,51 & 54 Re Rev to NRC NPP License Renewal Rule	License Renewal
ML20080A133	21 October 1994	Comment Supporting Proposed Rule 10CFR2 Re Reexamination of NRC Enforcement Policy.Advises That Util of Belief That NRC Focus on Safety Significance in Insps & Enforcement Policy Can Be Achieved by Utilization of Risk Based Techniques	Fitness for Duty Stroke time Enforcement Discretion Systematic Assessment of Licensee Performance
ML20085E589	9 June 1995	Comment Supporting Proposed Rule 10CFR73 Re Changes to NPP Security Requirements Associated W/Containment Access Control
ML20086D884	29 June 1995	Comments on Proposed Rule Re, Review of NRC Insp Rept Content,Format & Style
ML20086N655	14 July 1995	Comment on Proposed Generic Ltr Re 10CFR50.54 Process for Changes to Security Plans W/O Prior NRC Approval. Agrees W/ Proposed Clarification of Language & W/Provided Screening Criteria in Notice
ML20098D027	2 October 1995	Comment on Draft Reg Guide DG-1038 (Proposed Rev 2 to Reg Guide 1.82), Water Sources for Long-Term Recirculation Cooling Following Loca
ML20099M492	18 December 1995	Comment on Draft Suppl to GL 83-11, Licensee Qualification for Performing Safety Analyses
ML20116G943	7 August 1996	Comment Supporting Proposed Rule 10CFR26 Re, Mods to Fitness-For-Duty Program Requirements
ML20128M341	30 September 1996	Comment on Proposed Generic Communication, Primary Water Stress Corrosion Cracking of Control Rod Drive Mechanism & Other Vessel Head Penetrations
ML20136E759	7 March 1997	Comment Supporting Proposed Generic Communication, Effectiveness of Ultrasonic Testing Systems in Inservice Inspection Programs	Backfit
ML20141D735	19 June 1997	Comment Supporting Bulletin 96-001,suppl 1, Control Rod Insertion Problems. Reactor Operating W/Framatome Cogema Fuels Mark-B Fuel Requested to Be Excluded from Final Bulletin Suppl
ML20205P969	26 October 1988	Comment Supporting Proposed Rule 10CFR50 Re NUREG-1317, Regulatory Options for Nuclear License Renewal. Supports Contents of NUREG-1317 & Endorses NUMARC Comments on Rulemaking & Position Paper by NUMARC Nuplex Working Group
ML20206M617	17 November 1988	Comment Supporting Proposed Rule 10CFR26 Re NRC Rulemaking on Fitness for Duty Programs.Endorses NUMARC 881118 Comments on Subj Proposed Rule & Suggests Incorporation of NUMARC Suggested Changes	Fitness for Duty
ML20235T414	24 February 1989	Comment Supporting Proposed Rule 10CFR50 Re Ensuring Effectiveness of Maint Programs for Nuclear Power Plants
ML20235V457	27 February 1989	Comment Supporting Proposed Chapter 1 Re Policy Statement on Exemption from Regulatory Control.Agrees W/Recommendations & Limits Proposed by Health Physics Society in L Taylor Ltr to Commission
ML20236A044	13 October 1987	Comment Opposing Proposed Rule 10CFR50 Re Rev to Backfitting Process for Power Reactors.Proposed Rule Devoid of Objective Guidance or Criteria for Distinguishing Between Cases Where cost-benefit Analysis Permissible & Where Not
ML20247N131	7 July 1989	Comment on Proposed Rule 10CFR50, Acceptance of Products Purchased for Use in Nuclear Power Plant Structures,Sys & Components. Existing Regulations,Codes & Stds Including Industry Procurement Improvement Activities Are Adequate
TXX-9522, Comment Opposing Proposed GL on Testing of safety-related Logic Circuits.Believes That Complete Technical Review of All Surveillance Procedures Would Be Expensive & Unnecessary Expenditure of Licensee Resources	26 August 1995	Comment Opposing Proposed GL on Testing of safety-related Logic Circuits.Believes That Complete Technical Review of All Surveillance Procedures Would Be Expensive & Unnecessary Expenditure of Licensee Resources	Backfit
W3P88-1366, Comment Supporting Proposed Rule 10CFR50 Conserning Policy Statement Re Cooperation W/States at Commercial Nuclear Power Plants or Utilization Facilities	13 July 1988	Comment Supporting Proposed Rule 10CFR50 Conserning Policy Statement Re Cooperation W/States at Commercial Nuclear Power Plants or Utilization Facilities
W3P89-0196, Comment Opposing Proposed Rule 10CFR50 Re Maint Programs at Nuclear Plants.Proposed Rule Would Require Establishment of Maint Programs Based on Reg Guides That Have Not Been Developed,Proposed or Approved	28 February 1989	Comment Opposing Proposed Rule 10CFR50 Re Maint Programs at Nuclear Plants.Proposed Rule Would Require Establishment of Maint Programs Based on Reg Guides That Have Not Been Developed,Proposed or Approved

Semantic search

Query log

Navigation menu

Search