|
---|
Category:License-Operator
MONTHYEARML23130A2732023-05-10010 May 2023 and Waterford 3 Steam Electric Station - Response to Regulatory Issue Summary 2023-01, Preparation and Scheduling of Operator Licensing Examinations ML23031A0132023-02-14014 February 2023 Examination Confirmation Letter No. 50-186/OL-23-01, University of Missouri-Columbia ML22354A2582022-12-15015 December 2022 10_RBS-2022-12 Post-Exam Comments ML23004A1922022-12-14014 December 2022 11_RBS-2022-12 Public Forms ML22075A3442022-03-16016 March 2022 Response to Regulatory Issue Summary 2022-01, Preparation and Scheduling of Operator Licensing Examinations ML21320A3692021-11-30030 November 2021 Notification of NRC Initial Operator Licensing Examination 05000458/2022301 2CAN042102, 10 AN2-2021-03 Post-Exam Comments2021-04-16016 April 2021 10_AN2-2021-03 Post-Exam Comments ML21106A1512021-04-16016 April 2021 and Waterford 3 Steam Electric Station - Response to Regulatory Issue Summary 2021-01, Preparation and Scheduling of Operator Licensing Examinations ML21096A0322021-02-19019 February 2021 RB-2021-02 Post Exam Comments ML21096A0212021-02-19019 February 2021 RB-2021-02 Draft Operating Test Comments ML21096A0282021-02-19019 February 2021 RB-2021-02 Final Written Exam ML21096A0272021-02-19019 February 2021 RB-2021-02 Final Outlines ML21096A0242021-02-19019 February 2021 RB-2021-02 Draft Outlines ML21096A0232021-02-19019 February 2021 RB-2021-02 Draft Outline Comments ML21096A0252021-02-19019 February 2021 RB-2021-02 Draft Written Exam Comments ML21095A0532021-02-19019 February 2021 RB-2021-02 Final Op Test ML21111A1472021-02-19019 February 2021 RB-2021-02 Public Forms ML21096A0262021-02-19019 February 2021 RB-2021-02 Draft Written Exam ML20072L2192020-03-12012 March 2020 Response to Regulatory Issue Summary 2020-01, Preparation and Scheduling of Operator Licensing Examinations ML20006C6592019-11-26026 November 2019 2019-11-Post Exam Comments ML20015A4712019-11-26026 November 2019 2019-11-Public Forms ML19312B5852019-11-0808 November 2019 NRC Initial Operator Licensing Examination Approval 05000458/2019301 ML19135A6642019-05-15015 May 2019 Units 2 & 3; River Bend, and Waterford 3 - Response to RIS 2019-02, Preparation and Scheduling of Operator Licensing Examinations ML19011A3712019-01-10010 January 2019 Announcement of Generic Fundamentals Examination Section of the Written Operator Licensing Examination for 2019 ML18340A0892018-12-0606 December 2018 Notification of NRC Initial Operator Licensing Examination 05000458/2019301 ML18198A2172018-07-16016 July 2018 NRC Initial Operator Licensing Examination Approval 05000458/2018301 ML18135A0672018-05-14014 May 2018 Response to Regulatory Issue Summary 2018-02 ML18086B0842018-02-16016 February 2018 Facility Cover Letter - Riv - March 2018 - GFE ML18009A9852018-01-0808 January 2018 Announcement of Generic Fundamentals Examination Section of the Written Operator Licensing Examination for 2018 ML17361A0422017-12-26026 December 2017 Notification of NRC Initial Operator Licensing Examination 05000458/2018301 ML17048A3562017-02-17017 February 2017 Generic Fundamentals Examination Results ML17013A5482017-01-13013 January 2017 Generic Fundamentals Section of the Written Operator Licensing Examination Scheduled for 2017 ML16280A4592016-09-30030 September 2016 2016-09 Draft Outline Comments ML16285A0172016-09-30030 September 2016 2016-09 Public Forms ML16280A4652016-09-30030 September 2016 2016-09 Final Outlines ML16280A4642016-09-30030 September 2016 2016-09 Draft Written Exam ML16280A4492016-09-30030 September 2016 2016-09-Written Handouts Package ML16280A4352016-09-30030 September 2016 2016-09 Final Written Exam ML16280A4622016-09-30030 September 2016 2016-09 Draft Written Comments ML16280A4602016-09-30030 September 2016 2016-09 Draft Outlines ML16280A4562016-09-30030 September 2016 2016-09 Draft Op Test ML16280A4532016-09-30030 September 2016 2016-09 Draft Op Test Comments ML16280A4372016-09-12012 September 2016 2016-09 Final Op Test ML16246A0012016-09-0101 September 2016 NRC Initial Operator Licensing Examination Approval 05000458/2016301 ML15351A0282015-12-17017 December 2015 Generic Fundamentals Section of the Written Operator Licensing Examination Scheduled for 2016 ML15180A0512015-06-29029 June 2015 Generic Fundamentals Examination Results June 2015 ML16043A0022015-06-19019 June 2015 May 2015 Draft Written Initial License Retake Exam, Reactor Operator ML16043A0012015-06-19019 June 2015 2015-05-DRAFT Outline ML16043A0002015-06-19019 June 2015 2015-05 - Draft Outline Comments ML16043A0032015-06-19019 June 2015 2015-05 - Final Outline 2023-05-10
[Table view] Category:Part 55 Examination Related Material
MONTHYEARML23130A2732023-05-10010 May 2023 and Waterford 3 Steam Electric Station - Response to Regulatory Issue Summary 2023-01, Preparation and Scheduling of Operator Licensing Examinations ML23031A0132023-02-14014 February 2023 Examination Confirmation Letter No. 50-186/OL-23-01, University of Missouri-Columbia ML22354A2582022-12-15015 December 2022 10_RBS-2022-12 Post-Exam Comments ML23004A1922022-12-14014 December 2022 11_RBS-2022-12 Public Forms ML22075A3442022-03-16016 March 2022 Response to Regulatory Issue Summary 2022-01, Preparation and Scheduling of Operator Licensing Examinations ML21320A3692021-11-30030 November 2021 Notification of NRC Initial Operator Licensing Examination 05000458/2022301 ML21106A1512021-04-16016 April 2021 and Waterford 3 Steam Electric Station - Response to Regulatory Issue Summary 2021-01, Preparation and Scheduling of Operator Licensing Examinations 2CAN042102, 10 AN2-2021-03 Post-Exam Comments2021-04-16016 April 2021 10_AN2-2021-03 Post-Exam Comments ML21096A0282021-02-19019 February 2021 RB-2021-02 Final Written Exam ML21096A0272021-02-19019 February 2021 RB-2021-02 Final Outlines ML21111A1472021-02-19019 February 2021 RB-2021-02 Public Forms ML21096A0322021-02-19019 February 2021 RB-2021-02 Post Exam Comments ML21096A0242021-02-19019 February 2021 RB-2021-02 Draft Outlines ML21096A0212021-02-19019 February 2021 RB-2021-02 Draft Operating Test Comments ML21096A0232021-02-19019 February 2021 RB-2021-02 Draft Outline Comments ML21095A0532021-02-19019 February 2021 RB-2021-02 Final Op Test ML21096A0252021-02-19019 February 2021 RB-2021-02 Draft Written Exam Comments ML21096A0262021-02-19019 February 2021 RB-2021-02 Draft Written Exam ML20072L2192020-03-12012 March 2020 Response to Regulatory Issue Summary 2020-01, Preparation and Scheduling of Operator Licensing Examinations ML20006C6592019-11-26026 November 2019 2019-11-Post Exam Comments ML20015A4712019-11-26026 November 2019 2019-11-Public Forms ML19312B5852019-11-0808 November 2019 NRC Initial Operator Licensing Examination Approval 05000458/2019301 ML19135A6642019-05-15015 May 2019 Units 2 & 3; River Bend, and Waterford 3 - Response to RIS 2019-02, Preparation and Scheduling of Operator Licensing Examinations ML18340A0892018-12-0606 December 2018 Notification of NRC Initial Operator Licensing Examination 05000458/2019301 ML18198A2172018-07-16016 July 2018 NRC Initial Operator Licensing Examination Approval 05000458/2018301 ML18135A0672018-05-14014 May 2018 Response to Regulatory Issue Summary 2018-02 ML18009A9852018-01-0808 January 2018 Announcement of Generic Fundamentals Examination Section of the Written Operator Licensing Examination for 2018 ML17361A0422017-12-26026 December 2017 Notification of NRC Initial Operator Licensing Examination 05000458/2018301 ML17048A3562017-02-17017 February 2017 Generic Fundamentals Examination Results ML16280A4492016-09-30030 September 2016 2016-09-Written Handouts Package ML16280A4352016-09-30030 September 2016 2016-09 Final Written Exam ML16280A4532016-09-30030 September 2016 2016-09 Draft Op Test Comments ML16280A4562016-09-30030 September 2016 2016-09 Draft Op Test ML16280A4592016-09-30030 September 2016 2016-09 Draft Outline Comments ML16280A4602016-09-30030 September 2016 2016-09 Draft Outlines ML16280A4642016-09-30030 September 2016 2016-09 Draft Written Exam ML16280A4622016-09-30030 September 2016 2016-09 Draft Written Comments ML16285A0172016-09-30030 September 2016 2016-09 Public Forms ML16280A4652016-09-30030 September 2016 2016-09 Final Outlines ML16280A4372016-09-12012 September 2016 2016-09 Final Op Test ML16246A0012016-09-0101 September 2016 NRC Initial Operator Licensing Examination Approval 05000458/2016301 ML15351A0282015-12-17017 December 2015 Generic Fundamentals Section of the Written Operator Licensing Examination Scheduled for 2016 ML15180A0512015-06-29029 June 2015 Generic Fundamentals Examination Results June 2015 ML15220A1392015-06-19019 June 2015 June 2015 Initial License Retake Exam, Reactor Operator, with Answer Key ML16043A0052015-06-19019 June 2015 2015-05-PUBLIC Forms ML16043A0032015-06-19019 June 2015 2015-05 - Final Outline ML16043A0022015-06-19019 June 2015 May 2015 Draft Written Initial License Retake Exam, Reactor Operator ML16043A0012015-06-19019 June 2015 2015-05-DRAFT Outline ML16043A0002015-06-19019 June 2015 2015-05 - Draft Outline Comments ML15220A1382015-06-19019 June 2015 2015-05-POST-EXAM Comments Analysis 2023-05-10
[Table view] |
Text
-::::::-Entergy*River Bend Station -5485 US Highway 61 -St. Francisville, LA 70775 December 10,2010 Mr. Steve Garchow US Nuclear Regulatory Commission Region IV 612 East Lamar Blvd., Suite 400 Arlington, TX 76011-4125
SUBJECT:
River Bend Station -Unit 1 Docket No. 50-458 License No. NPF-47 DECEMBER 2010 EXAM KEY CHALLENGE Mr. Garchow: This letter transmits the exam analysis required by ES-403-1 for questions missed by >50% of the candidates as well as justification for accepting an alternate answer for question numbers 55 and 88 on the River Bend Station NRC Initial License Examination administered on December 2, 2010. If you have any questions or require additional information, please feel free to contact me by phone at (225) 378-3530 or bye-mail at jfralic@entergy.com or Angie Orgeron at 225-378-3561 or aorgero@entergy.com.
John Fralick Superintendent Operations Initial Training River Bend Station
Enclosures:
As stated 9 9/14 = 64% The station has reviewed the question The individuals who had a knowledge gap and believes it to be valid and have associated with the question were remediated only one correct answer. This on 9/13/2010.
knowledge item(s) was presented durin the trainin ro ram 12 12/14 = 85% The station has reviewed the question The individuals who had a knowledge gap and believes it to be valid and have associated with the question were remediated only one correct answer. This on 9/13/2010.
knowledge item(s) was presented durin the trainin ro ram 54 7/14 = 50% The station has reviewed the question The individuals who had a knowledge gap and believes it to be valid and have associated with the question were remediated only one correct answer. This on 9/13/2010.
knowledge item(s) was presented durin the trainin ro ram 58 7/14 = 50% The station has reviewed the question The individuals who had a knowledge gap and believes it to be valid and have associated with the question were remediated only one correct answer. This on 9/13/2010.
knowledge item(s) was presented durin the trainin ro ram 61 7/14 = 50% The station has reviewed the question The individuals who had a knowledge gap and believes it to be valid and have associated with the question were remediated only one correct answer. This on 9/13/2010.
knowledge item(s) was presented durin the trainin ro ram 81 6/8 = 75% The station has reviewed the question The individuals who had a knowledge gap and believes it to be valid and have associated with the question were remediated only one correct answer. This on 9/13/2010.
knowledge item(s) was presented durin the trainin ro ram 88 6/8 = 75% The station is proposing that this The individuals who had a knowledge gap question has two correct answer. associated with the question were remediated Justification is below. on 9/13/2010.
95 4/8 = 50% The station has reviewed the question The individuals who had a knowledge gap and believes it to be valid and have associated with the question were remediated only one correct answer. This on 9/13/2010.
knowledge item(s) was presented durin the trainin ro ram From this review the following challenge is presented for questions number 55 and 88 of the exam. The justification for the challenge is below: December 2010 RBS Initial NRC Written Exam Page 1 Question #55 -River Bend recommends both B & D be taken as acceptable answers. The question and the basis for accepting B & D follows: "The plant is operating at 100% power. A loss of RPS bus "B" has occurred.
Restoration of isolation has NOT been completed.
What is the expected response if a Recirculation Flow Control Runback occurs? A. Both FCVs runback to minimum position.
B. Both FCVs runback to the 60% drive flow position.
C. 'A' FCV runback to minimum position D. 'A' FCV runback to the 60% drive flow position.
Justification for B & D being
'A' and 'C' are clearly wrong because a FCV runback causes the FCVs runback to 60% drive flow -not minimum The question clearly tests the candidates knowledge of how a loss of RPS B affects FCV operation but in order to answer the question a assumption has to be made concering procedure implementation.
The question stem states "Restoration of isolation has NOT been completed." Upon a loss of RPS B there is an isolation of 10 systems / sub-systems.
The answer is dependent on the assumption the candidate makes concernil1g how much of the restoration has been completed per Abnormal Operating Procedure (AOP) 0010 "Loss of One RPS Bus". There is not enough information given in the stem to determine how many of the isolations caused by the loss of RPS B have been verified / restored -just that the isolation restoration is not complete.
B would be correct if the FCV isolation had been reset. D would be correct if the isolation had not been reset. Additionally the restoration of the FCV isolation would be restored relatively early in AOP implementation.
Recommendation is to accept both B & D answers as correct. December 2010 RBS Initial NRC Written Exam Page 2 Question #88 -River Bend recommends both C & D be taken as acceptable answers. The question and the basis for accepting C & D follows: A plant startup is in progress per GOP-OOl, PlANT STARTUP with the plant in Mode 2. All IRMs are on Range 8. IRM 'A ' is inoperable because it failed to cause an upscale trip during surveillance testing. Subsequently IRM 'C' experienced a power supply failure causing the instrument to be inoperable.
Which of the following describes the Technical Specification requirements and the effect on plant startup and entry into Mode I? The startup can not continue.
Conduct an orderly shutdown per GOP-0002, PlANT SHUTDOWN.
Be in Mode 3 in 12 hours1.388889e-4 days <br />0.00333 hours <br />1.984127e-5 weeks <br />4.566e-6 months <br />. The channel or trip system must be placed in trip within 6 hours6.944444e-5 days <br />0.00167 hours <br />9.920635e-6 weeks <br />2.283e-6 months <br />. Mode change is not allowed. Remain in GOP-OOOI, PlANT STARTUP but stabilize at the current power level until one of the IRMs ins restored to operable. The channel or trip system must be placed in trip within 12 hours1.388889e-4 days <br />0.00333 hours <br />1.984127e-5 weeks <br />4.566e-6 months <br />. Continue the plant startup per GOP-OOOI, PLANT STARTUP. No further actions required.
Entry into Mode I is allowed since the actions taken may continue for an unlimited period of time. The channel or trip system must be placed in trip within 12 hours1.388889e-4 days <br />0.00333 hours <br />1.984127e-5 weeks <br />4.566e-6 months <br />. Continue startup per GOP-0001, PlANT STARTUP after bypassing IRM C. Entry into Mode 1 is allowed since IRMs are not required in Mode 1. Justification for C & D being correct: Each choice (A-D) has individual statements that must be determined to be correct or incorrect. A & B contain clearly wrong statements.
A is wrong because a startup can continue.
B is wrong because the requirement to place the channel in trip is 12 hours1.388889e-4 days <br />0.00333 hours <br />1.984127e-5 weeks <br />4.566e-6 months <br /> not 6 and a Mode change is allowed. The individual statement intended to make C incorrect is "No further actions required".
This statement, based upon question construction, can be assumed to state that no further Tech Spec actions are required and this is correct. It could also be assumed that GOP-0001 PLANT STARTUP does not require any further action and this is correct. It is understood that IRM C will have to be bypassed to continue raising reactor power but this action is not directed by Tech Specs or GOP-0001 PLANT STARTUP. The construction of the question leads the candidate to answer based upon administrative requirements of Tech Specs and/or GOP-0001 PLANT STARTUP and not actual plant control manipulations.
Recommendation is to accept both C & D answers as correct. December 2010 RBS Initial NRC Written Exam Page 3