Letter Sequence Response to RAI |
---|
|
|
|
Similar Documents at Cook |
---|
Category:Letter
MONTHYEARAEP-NRC-2024-62, Unit 2 Independent Spent Fuel Storage Installation - Registration of Dry Spent Fuel Storage Cask2024-08-0808 August 2024 Unit 2 Independent Spent Fuel Storage Installation - Registration of Dry Spent Fuel Storage Cask AEP-NRC-2024-47, Form OAR-1, Owners Activity Report2024-07-30030 July 2024 Form OAR-1, Owners Activity Report ML24183A0162024-07-25025 July 2024 Review of Reactor Vessel Material Surveillance Program Capsule W Technical Report ML24169A2142024-07-25025 July 2024 Issuance of Amendment No. 362 Regarding Change to Technical Specification 3.4.12, Low Temperature Overpressure Protection System IR 05000315/20240022024-07-24024 July 2024 Integrated Inspection Report 05000315/2024002 and 05000316/2024002 ML24197A1262024-07-15015 July 2024 Unit 2 - Request for Additional Information (RAI) for License Amendment Request for One-Time Extension of Completion Time for Inoperable AC Source - Operating ML24191A0692024-07-0909 July 2024 Operator Licensing Examination Approval - Donald C. Cook Nuclear Power Plant, July 2024 AEP-NRC-2024-56, Unit 2, Independent Spent Fuel Storage Installation, Registration of Dry Spent Fuel Storage Cask2024-07-0808 July 2024 Unit 2, Independent Spent Fuel Storage Installation, Registration of Dry Spent Fuel Storage Cask AEP-NRC-2024-48, Response to Request for Additional Information (RAI) for License Amendment Request for One-Time Extension of Completion Time for Inoperable AC Source - Operating2024-07-0202 July 2024 Response to Request for Additional Information (RAI) for License Amendment Request for One-Time Extension of Completion Time for Inoperable AC Source - Operating ML24176A1012024-06-21021 June 2024 57143-EN 57143 - Paragon Energy Solutions - Update 1 (Final) - 10CFR Part 21 Final Notification: P21-05242024-FN, Rev. 0 AEP-NRC-2024-45, Report Per Technical Specification 5.6.6 for Inoperability of Post Accident Monitoring Neutron Flux Monitoring2024-06-13013 June 2024 Report Per Technical Specification 5.6.6 for Inoperability of Post Accident Monitoring Neutron Flux Monitoring ML24163A0132024-06-12012 June 2024 Request for Information for the NRC Age-Related Degradation Inspection: Inspection Report 05000315/2024012 and 05000316/2024012 AEP-NRC-2024-23, Core Operating Limits Report2024-05-23023 May 2024 Core Operating Limits Report ML24141A2162024-05-20020 May 2024 —Information Request to Support the NRC Annual Baseline Emergency Action Level and Emergency Plan Changes Inspection AEP-NRC-2024-40, Unit 2 - Supplement to License Amendment Request for One-Time Extension of Completion Time for Inoperable AC Source - Operating2024-05-16016 May 2024 Unit 2 - Supplement to License Amendment Request for One-Time Extension of Completion Time for Inoperable AC Source - Operating AEP-NRC-2024-41, Annual Radiological Environmental Operating Report2024-05-15015 May 2024 Annual Radiological Environmental Operating Report IR 05000315/20244012024-05-14014 May 2024 – Security Baseline Inspection Report 05000315/2024401 and 05000316/2024401 AEP-NRC-2024-07, Unit 2 - Transmittal of Report of Changes to the Emergency Plan2024-05-14014 May 2024 Unit 2 - Transmittal of Report of Changes to the Emergency Plan AEP-NRC-2024-26, Transmittal of Donald C. Cook Nuclear Plant, Emergency Plan Revision 492024-05-14014 May 2024 Transmittal of Donald C. Cook Nuclear Plant, Emergency Plan Revision 49 IR 05000315/20240012024-05-14014 May 2024 Integrated Inspection Report 05000315/2024001 and 05000316/2024001 AEP-NRC-2024-24, Form OAR-1, Owners Activity Report2024-05-0707 May 2024 Form OAR-1, Owners Activity Report ML24115A2152024-05-0707 May 2024 LTR: CNP Non-Acceptance with Opportunity TS 3-8-1 ML24116A0002024-05-0202 May 2024 – Regulatory Audit in Support of Review of the Application to Adopt 10 CFR 50.69, Risk-Informed Categorization and Treatment of Structures, Systems and Components for Nuclear Power Reactors AEP-NRC-2024-35, Response to NRC Regulatory Issue Summary 2024-01 Preparation and Scheduling of Operator Licensing Examinations2024-04-30030 April 2024 Response to NRC Regulatory Issue Summary 2024-01 Preparation and Scheduling of Operator Licensing Examinations AEP-NRC-2024-28, 2023 Annual Radioactive Effluent Release Report2024-04-29029 April 2024 2023 Annual Radioactive Effluent Release Report AEP-NRC-2024-31, Annual Report of Individual Monitoring2024-04-24024 April 2024 Annual Report of Individual Monitoring AEP-NRC-2024-29, (CNP) Unit 2 - Request for Relief Related to American Society of Mechanical Engineers (ASME) Code Case N-729-6 Supplemental Examination Requirements, ISIR-5-072024-04-0303 April 2024 (CNP) Unit 2 - Request for Relief Related to American Society of Mechanical Engineers (ASME) Code Case N-729-6 Supplemental Examination Requirements, ISIR-5-07 AEP-NRC-2024-02, Unit 2 License Amendment Request for One-Time Extension of Completion Time for Inoperable AC Source - Operating2024-04-0303 April 2024 Unit 2 License Amendment Request for One-Time Extension of Completion Time for Inoperable AC Source - Operating AEP-NRC-2024-19, Annual Report of Property Insurance2024-04-0101 April 2024 Annual Report of Property Insurance AEP-NRC-2024-04, License Amendment Request Regarding a Change to Unit 1 Technical Specification 3.4.12, Low Temperature Overpressure Protection (LTOP) System2024-03-0606 March 2024 License Amendment Request Regarding a Change to Unit 1 Technical Specification 3.4.12, Low Temperature Overpressure Protection (LTOP) System ML24073A2342024-03-0606 March 2024 Application to Adopt 10 CFR 50.69, Risk-Informed Categorization and Treatment of Structures, Systems and Components for Nuclear Power Reactors IR 05000315/20230062024-02-28028 February 2024 Annual Assessment Letter for Donald C. Cook Nuclear Plant, Units 1 and 2 (Report 05000315/2023006 and 05000316/2023006) AEP-NRC-2024-11, Unit 2 - Response to Request for Additional Information on Requested Change Regarding Neutron Flux Instrumentation2024-02-27027 February 2024 Unit 2 - Response to Request for Additional Information on Requested Change Regarding Neutron Flux Instrumentation IR 05000315/20230042024-01-31031 January 2024 Integrated Inspection Report 05000315/2023004 and 05000316/2023004 ML24004A1582024-01-19019 January 2024 Exemption from Select Requirements of 10 CFR Part 73 (EPID L-2023-LLE-0039 (Security Notifications, Reports, and Recordkeeping and Suspicious Activity Reporting)) AEP-NRC-2024-01, Emergency Plan Revision 482024-01-0808 January 2024 Emergency Plan Revision 48 AEP-NRC-2023-56, Report Per Technical Specification 5.6.6 for Inoperability of Unit 1 Post Accident Monitoring Reactor Coolant (Loop 3 Cold Leg) Wide Range Temperature Recorder Thermal Sensor2023-12-20020 December 2023 Report Per Technical Specification 5.6.6 for Inoperability of Unit 1 Post Accident Monitoring Reactor Coolant (Loop 3 Cold Leg) Wide Range Temperature Recorder Thermal Sensor ML23352A3502023-12-19019 December 2023 Dc. Cook Nuclear Power Plant, Units 1 Biennial Licensed Operator Requalification Program Inspection and Request for Information ML23338A2642023-12-0505 December 2023 Confirmation of Initial License Examination AEP-NRC-2023-45, Unit 2 - Schedular Exemption for Enhanced Weapons, Firearms, Background Checks, and Security Event Notifications Implementation2023-11-16016 November 2023 Unit 2 - Schedular Exemption for Enhanced Weapons, Firearms, Background Checks, and Security Event Notifications Implementation IR 05000315/20234042023-11-0606 November 2023 Cyber Security Inspection Report 05000315/2023404 and 05000316/2023404 ML23310A1152023-11-0606 November 2023 Notification of the NRC Baseline Inspection and Request for Information, Inspection Report 05000316/2024002 IR 05000315/20234032023-09-19019 September 2023 Security Baseline Inspection Report 05000315/2023403 and 05000316/2023403 IR 05000315/20230112023-08-31031 August 2023 Functional Engineering Inspection - Commercial Grade Dedication Report 05000315/2023011 and 05000316/2023011 ML23242A1832023-08-30030 August 2023 Notification of NRC Baseline Inspection and Request for Information; Inspection Report05000315/2023004 AEP-NRC-2023-40, Annual Report of Loss-of-Coolant Accident Evaluation Model Changes2023-08-29029 August 2023 Annual Report of Loss-of-Coolant Accident Evaluation Model Changes IR 05000315/20234022023-08-11011 August 2023 Security Baseline Inspection Report 05000315/2023402 and 05000316/2023402 AEP-NRC-2023-34, Supplement to Request for Approval of Change Regarding Neutron Flux Instrumentation2023-08-0202 August 2023 Supplement to Request for Approval of Change Regarding Neutron Flux Instrumentation IR 05000315/20230022023-07-24024 July 2023 Integrated Inspection Report 05000315/2023002 and 05000316/2023002 ML23178A2422023-06-28028 June 2023 Reassignment of the U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission Branch Chief in the Division of Operating Reactor Licensing for Plant Licensing Branch III 2024-08-08
[Table view] Category:Response to Request for Additional Information (RAI)
MONTHYEARML24197A1262024-07-15015 July 2024 Unit 2 - Request for Additional Information (RAI) for License Amendment Request for One-Time Extension of Completion Time for Inoperable AC Source - Operating AEP-NRC-2024-48, Response to Request for Additional Information (RAI) for License Amendment Request for One-Time Extension of Completion Time for Inoperable AC Source - Operating2024-07-0202 July 2024 Response to Request for Additional Information (RAI) for License Amendment Request for One-Time Extension of Completion Time for Inoperable AC Source - Operating AEP-NRC-2024-11, Unit 2 - Response to Request for Additional Information on Requested Change Regarding Neutron Flux Instrumentation2024-02-27027 February 2024 Unit 2 - Response to Request for Additional Information on Requested Change Regarding Neutron Flux Instrumentation AEP-NRC-2022-03, Final Supplemental Response to NRC Generic Letter 2004-022022-01-20020 January 2022 Final Supplemental Response to NRC Generic Letter 2004-02 AEP-NRC-2021-68, Response to Request for Additional Information on Requested Change Regarding Containment Water Level Instrumentation2021-12-16016 December 2021 Response to Request for Additional Information on Requested Change Regarding Containment Water Level Instrumentation AEP-NRC-2021-43, Response to Request for Additional Information Regarding Relief Request for Limited Coverage Examinations Performed in the Fourth 10-Year Inspection Interval2021-07-21021 July 2021 Response to Request for Additional Information Regarding Relief Request for Limited Coverage Examinations Performed in the Fourth 10-Year Inspection Interval AEP-NRC-2021-16, Unit 2 - Response to Request for Additional Information Regarding CFR 50.55a Request Associated with the Fifth Ten-Year Inservice Testing Interval2021-02-25025 February 2021 Unit 2 - Response to Request for Additional Information Regarding CFR 50.55a Request Associated with the Fifth Ten-Year Inservice Testing Interval AEP-NRC-2021-18, Response to Request for Additional Information Regarding License Amendment Request for One-Time Extension of the Containment Type a Leak Rate Testing Frequency2021-02-18018 February 2021 Response to Request for Additional Information Regarding License Amendment Request for One-Time Extension of the Containment Type a Leak Rate Testing Frequency AEP-NRC-2020-50, Response to Request for Additional Information Regarding License Amendment Request for One-Time Extension of the Containment Type a Leak Rate Testing Frequency2020-07-0909 July 2020 Response to Request for Additional Information Regarding License Amendment Request for One-Time Extension of the Containment Type a Leak Rate Testing Frequency AEP-NRC-2019-56, Seismic Probabilistic Risk Assessment in Response to Near Term Task Force Recommendation 2.1: Seismic2019-11-0404 November 2019 Seismic Probabilistic Risk Assessment in Response to Near Term Task Force Recommendation 2.1: Seismic AEP-NRC-2019-32, Unit 2 - Response to Request for Additional Information Regarding Unit 2 Leak-Before-Break Analysis and Deletion of Containment Humidity Monitors for Unit 1 and Unit 22019-08-22022 August 2019 Unit 2 - Response to Request for Additional Information Regarding Unit 2 Leak-Before-Break Analysis and Deletion of Containment Humidity Monitors for Unit 1 and Unit 2 AEP-NRC-2019-40, Response to Request for Additional Information Regarding License Amendment Request to Address NSAL-15-1, Rev. 02019-07-30030 July 2019 Response to Request for Additional Information Regarding License Amendment Request to Address NSAL-15-1, Rev. 0 AEP-NRC-2018-81, Supplement to Response to Request for Additional Information Regarding License Amendment Request for Approval of Application of Proprietary Leak-Before-Break Methodology for Reactor Coolant System Small Diameter Piping2018-11-27027 November 2018 Supplement to Response to Request for Additional Information Regarding License Amendment Request for Approval of Application of Proprietary Leak-Before-Break Methodology for Reactor Coolant System Small Diameter Piping AEP-NRC-2018-82, Response to Request for Additional Information Regarding the Alternative Request for Elimination of the Reactor Pressure Vessel Threads in Flange Examination2018-11-20020 November 2018 Response to Request for Additional Information Regarding the Alternative Request for Elimination of the Reactor Pressure Vessel Threads in Flange Examination AEP-NRC-2018-64, Response to Request for Additional Information Regarding License Amendment Request for Approval of Application of Proprietary Leak-Before-Break Methodology for Reactor Coolant System Small Diameter Piping2018-09-27027 September 2018 Response to Request for Additional Information Regarding License Amendment Request for Approval of Application of Proprietary Leak-Before-Break Methodology for Reactor Coolant System Small Diameter Piping ML18334A2722018-09-18018 September 2018 LTR-SDA-II-18-41-NP, Revision 1, Responses to NRC Questions on the Expanded Scope Leak-Before-Break Evaluations for D.C. Cook, Units 1 and 2. AEP-NRC-2018-45, Response to Request for Additional Information Concerning 2017 Decommissioning Funding Status Report2018-08-0909 August 2018 Response to Request for Additional Information Concerning 2017 Decommissioning Funding Status Report AEP-NRC-2018-01, Response to Request for Additional Information Regarding Generic Letter 2016-012018-05-25025 May 2018 Response to Request for Additional Information Regarding Generic Letter 2016-01 AEP-NRC-2018-23, Response to Request for Additional Information Regarding Independent Spent Fuel Storage Installation Decommissioning Funding Plan2018-04-11011 April 2018 Response to Request for Additional Information Regarding Independent Spent Fuel Storage Installation Decommissioning Funding Plan ML18092A0842018-03-28028 March 2018 Donald C. Cook Nuclear Plant Unit 2, Response to Request for Additional Information Regarding Supplemental Information Regarding the Reactor Vessel Internals Aging Management Program ML17346A7662017-12-0808 December 2017 Enclosures 2 & 3 to AEP-NRC-2017-56 - Response to Request for Additional Information Regarding the License Amendment Request to Revise Emergency Action Levels and EAL Technical Basis Manual AEP-NRC-2017-56, Response to Request for Additional Information Regarding the License Amendment Request to Revise Emergency Action Levels2017-12-0808 December 2017 Response to Request for Additional Information Regarding the License Amendment Request to Revise Emergency Action Levels AEP-NRC-2017-30, Response to Request for Additional Information Regarding the License Amendment Request to Revise Technical Specification 3.9.3, Containment Penetrations2017-05-26026 May 2017 Response to Request for Additional Information Regarding the License Amendment Request to Revise Technical Specification 3.9.3, Containment Penetrations AEP-NRC-2017-16, Submittal of Focused Evaluation in Response to March 12, 2012, Request for Information Regarding Near- Term Task Force Recommendation 2.1: Flooding2017-05-11011 May 2017 Submittal of Focused Evaluation in Response to March 12, 2012, Request for Information Regarding Near- Term Task Force Recommendation 2.1: Flooding AEP-NRC-2017-09, Response to Request for Additional Information Regarding the License Amendment Request for the Containment Leakage Rate Testing Program2017-02-27027 February 2017 Response to Request for Additional Information Regarding the License Amendment Request for the Containment Leakage Rate Testing Program AEP-NRC-2016-81, Unit 2 - Supplemental Response to Request for Additional Information Regarding the License Amendment Request to Adopt TSTP-425, Relocate Surveillance Frequencies Program to Licensee Control-Risk Informed ...2016-11-0303 November 2016 Unit 2 - Supplemental Response to Request for Additional Information Regarding the License Amendment Request to Adopt TSTP-425, Relocate Surveillance Frequencies Program to Licensee Control-Risk Informed ... AEP-NRC-2016-80, Response to NRC Generic Letter 2016-01: Monitoring of Neutron-Absorbing Materials in Spent Fuel Pools2016-10-31031 October 2016 Response to NRC Generic Letter 2016-01: Monitoring of Neutron-Absorbing Materials in Spent Fuel Pools AEP-NRC-2016-79, Spent Fuel Pool Evaluation Supplemental Report, Response to NRC Request for Information Pursuant to 10 CFR 50.54(f) Regarding Recommendation 2.1 of the Near-Term Task Force Review of Insights from Fukushima Dai-ichi Accident2016-10-12012 October 2016 Spent Fuel Pool Evaluation Supplemental Report, Response to NRC Request for Information Pursuant to 10 CFR 50.54(f) Regarding Recommendation 2.1 of the Near-Term Task Force Review of Insights from Fukushima Dai-ichi Accident AEP-NRC-2016-69, Follow-up Response to Request for Additional Information Regarding License Amendment Request to Adopt TSTF-425, Relocate Surveillance Frequencies Program to License Control-Risk Informed Technical Specification Task Force.2016-09-0909 September 2016 Follow-up Response to Request for Additional Information Regarding License Amendment Request to Adopt TSTF-425, Relocate Surveillance Frequencies Program to License Control-Risk Informed Technical Specification Task Force. AEP-NRC-2016-56, Response to Seventh Request for Additional Information Regarding the License Amendment Request to Adopt TSTF-490 and Implement Alternative Source Term2016-07-12012 July 2016 Response to Seventh Request for Additional Information Regarding the License Amendment Request to Adopt TSTF-490 and Implement Alternative Source Term AEP-NRC-2016-54, Response to Request for Additional Information Regarding the License Amendment Request to Adopt TSTF-425, Relocate Surveillance Frequencies to Licensee Control - Risk Informed Technical Specification Task Force Initiative 582016-06-16016 June 2016 Response to Request for Additional Information Regarding the License Amendment Request to Adopt TSTF-425, Relocate Surveillance Frequencies to Licensee Control - Risk Informed Technical Specification Task Force Initiative 58 AEP-NRC-2016-48, Unit 2 - Response to Request for Additional Information Regarding the License Amendment Request to Adopt TSTF-425, Relocate Surveillance Frequencies Program to Licensee-Control...2016-06-16016 June 2016 Unit 2 - Response to Request for Additional Information Regarding the License Amendment Request to Adopt TSTF-425, Relocate Surveillance Frequencies Program to Licensee-Control... ML16169A1152016-05-0606 May 2016 Donald C. Cook Nuclear Plant Units 1 and 2 - Response to Sixth Request for Additional Information the License Amendment Request to Adopt TSTF-490 and Implement Alternative Source Term AEP-NRC-2016-24, Response to Fifth Request for Additional Information Regarding the License Amendment Request to Adopt TSTF-490 and Implement Alternative Source Term2016-02-19019 February 2016 Response to Fifth Request for Additional Information Regarding the License Amendment Request to Adopt TSTF-490 and Implement Alternative Source Term AEP-NRC-2016-14, Response to Request for Additional Information Regarding the License Amendment Request to Revise Technical Specification 3.3.2, Engineered Safety Feature Actuation System (ESFAS) Instrumentation2016-01-21021 January 2016 Response to Request for Additional Information Regarding the License Amendment Request to Revise Technical Specification 3.3.2, Engineered Safety Feature Actuation System (ESFAS) Instrumentation AEP-NRC-2015-11, Response (Part 2) to Fourth Request for Additional Information Regarding the License Amendment Request to Adopt TSTF-490 and Implement Alternative Source Term2015-12-17017 December 2015 Response (Part 2) to Fourth Request for Additional Information Regarding the License Amendment Request to Adopt TSTF-490 and Implement Alternative Source Term ML15323A4332015-11-16016 November 2015 Supplemental Response to Request for Additional Information on the Application for Amendment to Restore Normal Reactor Coolant System Pressure and Temperature Consistent with Previously Licensed Conditions. ML15323A4342015-11-16016 November 2015 Response (Part 1) to Fourth Request for Additional Information Regarding the License Amendment Request to Adopt TSTF-490 and Implement Alternative Source Term AEP-NRC-2015-98, Supplemental Response to Follow-Up Request for Additional Information Concerning the Reactor Vessel Internals Aging Management Program2015-10-30030 October 2015 Supplemental Response to Follow-Up Request for Additional Information Concerning the Reactor Vessel Internals Aging Management Program AEP-NRC-2015-99, Response to Request for Additional Information Re License Amendment Request to Revise Technical Specification Section 3.8.1, AC Sources - Operating, Surveillance Requirements 3.8.1.10, 3.8.1.11 and 3.8.1.152015-10-30030 October 2015 Response to Request for Additional Information Re License Amendment Request to Revise Technical Specification Section 3.8.1, AC Sources - Operating, Surveillance Requirements 3.8.1.10, 3.8.1.11 and 3.8.1.15 ML15308A0932015-10-15015 October 2015 Pressurized Water Reactor Owners Group (Pwrog), 15066-NP, Revision 1, Responses to Follow-Up NRC RAI 2 on the D.C. Cook, Units 1 and 2, Reactor Internals Aging Management Program. AEP-NRC-2015-86, Supplemental Response to Request for Additional Information on the Application for Amendment to Restore Normal Reactor Coolant System Pressure and Temperature Consistent With. Previously Licensed Conditions.2015-09-18018 September 2015 Supplemental Response to Request for Additional Information on the Application for Amendment to Restore Normal Reactor Coolant System Pressure and Temperature Consistent With. Previously Licensed Conditions. AEP-NRC-2015-80, Response to Third Request for Additional Information Regarding the License Amendment Request to Adopt TSTF-490 and Implement Alternative Source Term2015-08-28028 August 2015 Response to Third Request for Additional Information Regarding the License Amendment Request to Adopt TSTF-490 and Implement Alternative Source Term AEP-NRC-2015-88, Response to Request for Additional Information Regarding Proposed Alternative to the American Society of Mechanical Engineers Code, Section XI Repair Requirements2015-08-24024 August 2015 Response to Request for Additional Information Regarding Proposed Alternative to the American Society of Mechanical Engineers Code, Section XI Repair Requirements AEP-NRC-2015-75, Response to Second Request for Additional Information Regarding the License Amendment Request to Adopt TSTF-490 and Implement Alternative Source Term2015-08-24024 August 2015 Response to Second Request for Additional Information Regarding the License Amendment Request to Adopt TSTF-490 and Implement Alternative Source Term AEP-NRC-2015-69, Response to Follow-Up Request for Additional Information Concerning the Reactor Vessel Internals Aging Management Program2015-08-0606 August 2015 Response to Follow-Up Request for Additional Information Concerning the Reactor Vessel Internals Aging Management Program ML15223A4362015-07-28028 July 2015 PWROG-15066-NP, Revision 0, Responses to Follow-Up NRC RAI 2 on the DC Cook Units 1 and 2 Reactor Internals Aging Management Program. AEP-NRC-2015-63, Response to Request for Additional Information Regarding 2014 Unit 1 Steam Generator Tube Inspection2015-07-17017 July 2015 Response to Request for Additional Information Regarding 2014 Unit 1 Steam Generator Tube Inspection AEP-NRC-2015-64, Response to Request for Additional Information Regarding the License Amendment Request to Adopt TSTF-490 and Implement Alternative Source Term2015-07-17017 July 2015 Response to Request for Additional Information Regarding the License Amendment Request to Adopt TSTF-490 and Implement Alternative Source Term AEP-NRC-2015-60, Response to a Request for Additional Information Regarding the License Amendment Request to Revise Technical Specification Section 3.8.1, AC Sources - Operating, Surveillance Requirements 3.8.1.10, 3.8.1.11, and 3.8.1.152015-07-0909 July 2015 Response to a Request for Additional Information Regarding the License Amendment Request to Revise Technical Specification Section 3.8.1, AC Sources - Operating, Surveillance Requirements 3.8.1.10, 3.8.1.11, and 3.8.1.15 2024-07-02
[Table view] |
Text
A unit of American Electric Power February 27, 2017 Docket Nos. 50-315 50-316 U. S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission ATTN: Document Control Desk Washington, DC 20555-0001 Donald C. Cook Nuclear Plant Unit 1 and Unit 2 Indiana Michigan Power Cook Nuclear Plant One Cook Place Bridgman, Ml 49106
. AEP-NRC-2017-09 10 CFR 50.90 Response to Request.for Additional Information Regarding the License Amendment Request for the Containment Leakage Rate Testing Program
References:
- 1. Letter from Q. S. Lies, Indiana Michigan Power Company (l&M), to U. S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC), "Donald C. Cook Nuclear Plant Unit 1 and Unit 2 License Amendment Request Regarding Containment Leakage Rate Testing Program,"
dated October 18, 2016, Agencywide Documents Access and Management System Accession No. ML 16294A257.
- 2. E-mail capture from AW. Dietrich, NRC, to H. L. Kish, l&M, "D.C. Cook Nuclear Plant Units 1 and 2 -RAI regarding LAR to revise TS 5.5.14 (MF8483 and MF8484),"
dated January 26, 2017. This letter provides Indiana Michigan Power Company's (l&M), licensee for Donald C. Cook Nuclear Plant (CNP) Unit 1 and Unit 2, response to the Request for Additional Information
{RAI) by the U. S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC) regarding a license amendment request (LAR)' to revise Technical Specification (TS) 5.5.14, Containment Leakage Rate Testing Program.
By Reference 1, l&M submitted a request to amend the TSs to CNP Unit 1 and Unit 2 Renewed Facility Operating License DPR-58 and DPR-74. l&M proposes to change TS 5.5.14, Containment Leakage Rate Testing Program, to clarify the containment leak rate testing pressure criteria.
By Reference 2, the NRC transmitted an RAI from the Balance of Plant Branch regarding the LAR submitted by l&M in Reference
- 1. As part of the response to the RAI, a wording change has been made to TS 5.5.14. The wording change relates to the construction of the sentence and does not alter the No Significant Hazards Consideration.
- Enclosure 1 to this letter provides an* affirmation statement.
Enclosure 2 to this letter provides l&M's response to the NRC's RAI in Reference
- 2. Enclosures 3 and 4 to this letter provide a revised mark-up of the TS page. Copies of this letter are being transmitted to the Michigan Public Service Commission and Michigan Department of Environmental
- Quality, in accordance with the requirements of 1 O'CFR 50.91.
U. S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission Page 2 AEP:-NRC-2017-09 There are no new regulatory commitments made in this letter. Should you have any questions, please contact Mr. Michael K. Scarpello, Regulatory Affairs Manager, at (269) 466-2649.
Sincerely, Site Vice President DMB/mll
Enclosures:
- 1. Affirmation
- 2. Response to Request for Additional Information Regarding the License Amendment Request to Revise Technical Specification 5.5.14, Containment Leakage Rate Testing Program 3. Donald C. Cook Nuclear Plant Unit 1 Technical Specification Page Marked To* Show Proposed Changes 4. Donald C. Cook Nuclear Plant Unit 2 Technical Specification Page Marked To Show Proposed Changes c: R. J. Ancona, MPSC A. W. Dietrich, NRC, Washington, D.C. MDEQ -RMD/RPS NRC Resident Inspector C. D. Pederson, NRC, Region Ill
- A. J. Williamson, AEP Ft. Wayne, w/o enclosures Enclosure 1 to AEP-NRC-2017-09 AFFIRMATION I, Q. Shane Lies, being duly sworn, state that I am the Site Vice President of Indiana Michigan Power Company (l&M), that I am authorized to sign and file this request with the U. S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission on behalf of l&M, and that the statements made and the matters set forth herein pertaining to l&M are true and correct to the best of my knowledge, information, and belief. Indiana Michigan Power Company Site Vice President SWORN TO AND SUBSCRIBED BEFORE ME THIS DAY OF
, 2017
,,ii h 1 I Notary lie My Commission Expires --dS:::, \ i N DANIELLE BURGOYNE otary Public, State of M. h. C ic *Qan My C . ou_nty of Berrien omm1ss1on e
Enclosure 2 to AEP-NRC-2017-09 Response to Request for Additional Information Regarding the License Amendment Request to Revise Technical Specification 5.5.14, Containment Leakage Rate Testing Program By letter dated October 18, 2016, (Agencywide Documents Access and Management System Accession No. ML 16294A257)
(Reference 1), Indiana Michigan Power Company (l&M}, the licensee for the Donald C. Cook Nuclear Plant (CNP), Unit 1 and Unit 2, submitted a license amendment request (LAR). The proposed amendment would change Technical Specifications (TS) 5.5.14 for the Containment Leakage Rate Testing Program, to clarify the containment leak rate testing pressure criteria.
The U. S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission staff in the Balance of Plant Branch (SBPB) of the Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation is currently reviewing the submittal and has determined that additional information is needed in order to complete the review. The text of the requests for additional information (RAls) and l&M's responses are provided below. RAl-SBPB-1 ANSI 56. 8-2002 establishes Pa as the calculated peak accident
- pressure, and limits the Containment Leakage Rate Testing Program pressure to less than or equal to 1.1 Pa. As stated in the license amendment request (LAR), the calculated Pa for CNP is 10. 37 pounds per square inch gauge (psig) for Unit 1, and 10. 78 psig for Unit 2. l&M has requested to use 12 psig as Pa for the Containment Leakage Rate Testing Program, which is greater than 1. 1 times the CNP calculated peak accident pressure for both units. The LAR states that this "will not result in a significantly larger differential pressure to seal components whose characteristics result in improved sealing based on increased pressure."
- However, a test pressure greater than 1. 1 Pa may affect test results in a conservative manner. Demonstrate how testing at a pressure of 12 psig, which is greater than 1. 1 Pa. is acceptable as an exception to the standard.
l&M Response to RAl-SBPB-1:
The maximum allowable containment leakage rate from all of containment for either CNP unit can be approximated by a hole in containment of 0.1 inch diameter (0.0079 square inch). For consistency with test conditions, the calculated La value will continue to be determined using the test pressure of 12 psig. Although using the test conditions to determine La results in a proportional increase in allowable leakage when compared to using analytically derived pressure values calculated peak containment pressure (CPCP}, any benefit from the calculated increase in the La value would be offset by testing at the higher design pressure of 12 psig. Acceptable containment leakage is maintained by finding and repairing valve seat and disc seat scratches or other very small leaks in Local Leak Rate Testing (LLRT) components.
Given any containment boundary leakage pathway (hole, crack, scratch},
using a Pa of 12 psig versus a lower LLRT test pressure results in increased leakage.
The only way for LLRT results Enclosure 2 to AEP-NRC-2017-09 Page 2 to be non-conservative using Pa of 12 psig (12 psig vs 10.37 or 10.78 psig) is if the slight increase in Pa results in reducing the area of the leak pathway (further closing of valve disc) on the LLRT component.
Maximum test pressures are limited to 1.1 times Pa or 13.2 psig, 11.41 psig and 11.86 psig for the CPCP values listed above. Station LLRT procedures were reviewed for components where potential non-conservative results could be obtained.
CNPs LLRT program contains approximately 1, 130 components.
The components identified as potentially non-conservative in main process lines that penetrate containment are discussed below, and represent both units combined:
- Eight Airlock Door Seals Each of the eight airlock door seals has potentially non-conservative leakage during the barrel test. However, the airlock door seals are all tested individually also during the barrel LLRT procedure and on a frequent basis (weekly) to verify their condition.
- Forty-two check valve Containment Isolation Valves The low flow LLRT test equipment measures very small areas of imperfect seat contact, versus discs not fully closed. The Measuring and Test Equipment used to perform LLRTs uses small tubing (1/4" and 3/8") to direct flow through rotameters and out to the test volume. Since the total combined containment leakage allowed is approximated by a 0.1 inch diameter hole, it is known that a disc not fully closed will grossly fail LLRT by leaking greater than the LLRT equipment can measure (-55,000 seem). The test boundary will not pressurize without a closed disc and the desired test pressure is irrelevant.
- Four single wedge Motor-Operated Valve (MOV) gate valves LLRT test forces are inconsequential
(< 2psi delta between 12 psig and CPCP) versus minimum thrust at closed seat conditions of 4,837 pounds (i.e., the lowest required value of the four valves).
- Six double disc wedge MOVs gate valves Increase in the pressure on the discs (LLRT pressure applied between discs) is insignificant versus the forces generated by motor operated valve actuators.
Minimum thrust at closed seat conditions of 7,548 pounds (i.e., the lowest required value of the six valves).
- Four globe MOVs where pressure is applied above the seat The low flow LLRT rigs will not build up pressure if the disc is located off the seat. If there is a seat or disc imperfection that allows leakage, the larger test pressure will increase leakage results but will not shut the disc further than the actuator already closed the disc.
- Four 0.5" globe Air-Operated Valve (AOV)s where pressure is applied above the seat The seat load is 400 pounds. Ignoring the stem area, approximate worst case additional force is area of disc times worst case additional pressure (3.14159)(0.5)(0.5)(13.2-(10.37*1.1
)) I 4 = 0.4 pounds. Similar to the discussion above, the low flow LLRT rigs will not build up pressure if the disc is located off seat. If there is a seat or disc imperfection that allows leakage, the larger test pressure will increase the Enclosure 2 to AEP-NRC-2017-09 Page 3 leakage results but will not shut the disc further than the actuator already closed the disc.
- Two 1" globe AOVs where pressure is applied above the seat The seat load is 2,800 pounds. Ignoring the stem area, the approximate worst case additional force is (3.14159)(1
)(1 )(13.2-(10.37*1.1))
I 4 = 1.4 lbs. Similar to the discussion above, the low flow LLRT rigs will not build up pressure if the disc is located off seat. If there is a seat or disc imperfection that allows leakage, the larger test pressure will increase leakage results but will not shut the disc further than the actuator already closed the disc.
- Two 3" globe AOVs where pressure is applied above seat The seat load is 2,200 pounds. Ignoring the stem area, the approximate worst case additional force is (3.14159)(3)(3)(13.2-(10.37*1.1))
I 4 = 12. 7 pounds. Similar to the discussion above, the low flow LLRT rigs will not build up pressure if the disc is located off seat. If there is a seat or disc imperfection that allows leakage, the larger test pressure will increase leakage results but will not shut the disc further than the actuator already closed the disc.
- Four 2" globe AOVs where pressure is applied above the seat The seat load is 1,500 pounds. Ignoring the stem area, the approximate worst case additional force is (3.14159)(2)(2)(13.2-(10.37*1.1))
I 4 = 5.7 pounds. Similar to the discussion above, the low flow LLRT rigs will not build up pressure if the disc is located off seat. If there is a seat or disc imperfection that allows leakage, the larger test pressure will increase leakage results but will not shut the disc further than the actuator already closed the disc.
- One 1" globe AOV where pressure is applied above the seat The seat load is 300 pounds. Ignoring the stem area, the approximate worst case additional force is (3.14159)(1
)(1)(13.2-(10.37*1.1))
I 4 = 1.4 pounds. Similar to the discussion above, the low flow LLRT rigs will not build up pressure if the disc is located off seat. If there is a seat or disc imperfection that allows leakage, the larger test pressure will increase leakage results but will not shut the disc further than the actuator already closed the disc.
- Two manual 2.5" globe valves where pressure is applied above the seat Ignoring the stem area, the approximate worsr case additional force is (3.14159)(2.5)(2.5)(13.2-(10.37*1.1))
I 4 = 8.8 pounds. Seat load for manual valves can be estimated using handwheel size and rim pull force to determine stem torque and then applying a stem factor to determine the stem thrust. However, after seat to disc contact is reached by manual force the additional LLRT force being discussed here should not close the disc further and provide non-conservative LLRT results.
Similar to the discussion above, the low flow LLRT rigs will not build up pressure if the disc is located off seat. If there is a seat or disc imperfection that allows leakage, the larger test pressure will increase leakage results but will not shut the disc further.
Enclosure 2 to AEP-NRC-2017-09 Page4
- Three manual 0. 75" globe valves where pressure is applied above the seat Ignoring the stem area, approximate worst case additional force is (3.14159)(0.75)(0.75)(13.2-(10.37*1.1)) / 4 = 0.8 pounds. Seat load for manual valves can be estimated using handwheel size and rim pull force to determine the stem torque and then applying a stem factor to determine the stem thrust. However, after seat to disc contact is reached by manual force the additional LLRT force being discussed here should not close the disc further and provide non-conservative LLRT results.
Similar to the discussion above, the low flow LLRT rigs will not build up pressure if the disc is located off seat. If there is a seat or disc imperfection that allows leakage, the larger test pressure will increase leakage results but will not shut the disc further.
- One manual 0. 75" single wedge gate valve Seat load for manual valves can be estimated using handwheel size and rim pull force to determine stem torque and then applying a stem factor to determine the stem thrust. However, the additional approximately 0.8 pounds being applied to the wedge should not move the wedge and provides non-conservative LLRT results.
Additionally, some vent and drain lines (test connections) are potentially non-conservative.
These would consist of small globe or needle valves installed with packing facing the upstream side. Packing would be challenged by LLRT pressure and additional fo'rce on the seat is a maximum of 1.4 pounds for a 1" globe with smaller valves being even lower. l&M is not currently aware of any in this configuration and it would be unexpected for the containment isolation test valves. Test connection vent and drains that are gate valves will have an additional small force applied to the wedge (1.4 pounds for 1" valve}, but this should not move the wedge and provides non-conservative LLRT results.
CNP does have some test connection gate valves. Overall, even for the components and associated penetrations where increased test pressure could conceptually reduce leakage, the low flow test equipment will not result in conservative indicated containment leakage.
When all of the approximately 1, 130 components in the LLRT program are considered, the total containment leakage estimated by using Pa of 12 psig will be conservative.
CNP TS have always identified Pa as 12 psig. Nothing has changed physically on either unit. Refinements in calculation methodology have resulted in reduced calculated peak containment pressure
.. All plants use Pa equal to or greater than the highest calculated peak containment pressure based on loss of coolant accident analysis methodology that is biased high with respect to containment pressure by design. LLRT is therefore performed at pressures greater than the containment actual accident pressures by using Pa that is known to be conservative for the actual containment peak pressure.
Lastly a discussion of instrumentation accuracy is warranted to ensure a full understanding.
CNP currently only uses the flow makeup method for LLRTs. Pressure accuracy per ANSl/ANS-56.8-2002 is required to be 2% of Pa (0.24 psi at 12 psig). CNP LLRT procedures require this same pressure accuracy.
The pressure band of 12.3 -12.8 psig is procedurally provided for LLRTs to avoid going below 12 psig or above 13.2 psig (1.1(12)).
Enclosure 3 to AEP-NRC-2017-09 DONALD C. COOK NUCLEAR PLANT UNIT 1 TECHNICAL SPECIFICATION PAGE MARKED TO SHOW PROPOSED CHANGES Programs and Manuals 5.5 5.5 Programs and Manuals 5.5.14 Containment Leakage Rate Testing Program a. A program shall establish the leakage rate testing of the containment as required by 10 CFR 50.54(0) and 10 CFR 50, Appendix J, Option B, as modified by approved exemptions.
This program shall be in accordance with the guidelines contained in NEI 94-01, Revision 3-A, "Industry Guideline for Implementing Performance-Based Option of 10 CFR 50, Appendix J," dated July 2012, and Section 4.1, "Limitations and Conditions for NEI TR 94-01, Revision 2," of the NRC Safety Evaluation Report in NEI 94-01, Revision 2-A, dated October 2008. b. c. The maximum allowable containment leakage rate, La. at Pa. shall be 0.25% of containment air weight per day. d. Leakage rate acceptance criteria are: ' 1. Containment leakage rate acceptance criterion is 1.0 La. During the first unit startup following testing in accordance with this program, the leakage rate acceptance criteria are s 0.60 La for the Type B and C tests ands 0.75 La for Type A tests. 2. Air lock testing acceptance criterion is overall air lock leakage rate is s 0.05 La when tested at;:: P8. e. The provisions of SR 3.0.3 are applicable to the Containment Leakage Rate Testing Program.
Cook Nuclear Plant Uriit 1 5.5-14 Amendment No. m, m, Enclosure 4 to AEP-NRC-2017-09 DONALD C. COOK NUCLEAR PLANT UNIT2 TECHNICAL SPECIFICATION PAGE MARKED TO SHOW PROPOSED CHANGES Programs and Manuals 5.5 5.5 Programs and Manuals 5.5.14 5.5.15 Containment Leakage Rate Testing Program a. A program shall establish the leakage rate testing of the containment as required by 10 CFR 50:54(0) and 10 CFR 50, Appendix J, Option B, as modified by approved exemptions.
This program shall be in accordance with the guidelines contained in NEI 94-01, Revision 3-A, "Industry Guideline for Implementing Performance-Based Option of 10 CFR 50, Appendix J," dated July 2012, and Section 4.1; "Limitations and Conditions for NEI TR 94-01, Revision 2," of the NRC Safety Evaluation Report in NEI 94-01, Revision 2-A, dated October 2008. b. c. The maximum allowable containment leakage rate, La, at Pa, shall be 0.25% of containment air weight per day. d. Leakage rate acceptance criteria are: 1. Containment leakage rate acceptance criterion is 1.0 La. During the first unit startup following testing in accordance with this program, the leakage rate acceptance criteria are :s; 0.60 La for the Type B and C tests and :s; 0.75 La for Type A tests. 2. Air lock testing acceptance criterion is overall air lock leakage rate is :s; 0.05 La when Pa. e. The provisions of SR 3.0.3 are applicable to the Containment Leakage Rate Testing Program.
Battery Monitoring and Maintenance Program This program provides for battery restoration and maintenance, based on the recommendations of IEEE Standard 450-1995, "IEEE Recommended Practice for Maintenance,
- Testing, and Replacement of Vented Lead-Acid Batteries for Stationary Applications,"
or of the battery manufacturer including the following:
- a. Actions to restore batte'ry cells with float voltage < 2.13 V; and b. Actions to equalize and test battery cells that had been discovered with electrolyte level below the minimum established design limit. Cook Nuclear Plant Unit 2 5.5-14 Amendment No. 2W, m, JOO