Text

Springville Dam Bud Sampling and Analysis Plan
	ML17347A152
Person / Time
Site:	West Valley Demonstration Project
Issue date:	07/01/2017
From:	; US Dept of the Army, Corps of Engineers, Buffalo District
To:	; Division of Decommissioning, Uranium Recovery and Waste Programs
	AMSnyder NMSS/DUWP/MDB 5th floor
Shared Package
ML17347A124	List: ML17347A125; ML17347A142; ML17347A152; ML17347A198;
References
	Download: ML17347A152 (36)
	v • d • e

1 Design-Level Sediment Sampling and Analysis Plan Springville Dam and Cattaraugus Creek Sediment Sampling

Authorized under GLFER

Springville Dam Project Springville, NY Prepared by:

U.S. Army Corps of Engineers Buffalo District 1776 Niagara Street Buffalo, N.Y. 14207

July 201 7 2 EXECUTIVE

SUMMARY

The United States Army Corps of Engineers (USACE) will perform pre-construction sediment sampling up-stream of the Springville Dam in the Cattaraugus Creek, which is located south of Springville, N Y. Th e investigation is being performed under the Great Lakes Fisheries Restoration Program (GLFER).

The project goal is to retrieve sediment samples from the channel of the Cattaraugus Creek at specific locations to determine whether sediments targeted for future removal meet the NYS criteria for a positive beneficial use determination (BUD) and thus uncontrolled re

-use at an upland site

. Sediment samples will be collected to meet several Data Quality Objectives (DQOs) that include chemical and physical characterization of the sediment for decision making purposes. The Corps will sample surface and subsurface sediment behind the Springville Dam by opening the dam penstocks to lower creek elevations and expose sediment for drilling and sampling. The field work (sediment sampling) will be scheduled for mid- to late-20 1 7 to coincide with seasonal low-water condition s in the creek. The effort will include systematic samples that meet the NYSDEC requirements for a case-specific BUD under 6 NYCRR Part 360

-1.15(d). The Corps will contract a drilling service and self-perform the field sampling, sample management, and data management; a separate contract for analytical services will be let and electronic data deliverables of the results will be processe d and evaluated by USACE-Buffalo personnel. The stakeholder group will be provided access to all datasets to ensure transparency.

3 TABLE OF CONTENTS ACRONYMS, FORMULAS, AND SYMBOLS

................................

...........

5 1.0 GENERAL ................................

................................

..........................

6 2.0 SITE BACKGROUND

................................

....... 6 2.1 SITE LOCATION

................................

...........

6 2.2 PREVIOUS INVESTIGATIONS

................................

...................

6 3.0 PHYSICAL SETTING

................................

....... 8 4.0 SAMPLING RESPONSIBILITIES

................................

....................

8 5.0 PROJECT SCOPE AND OBJECTIVES

................................

............

9 5.1. PROJECT OBJECTIVES

................................

...............................

9 5.2. TASK DESCRIPTION

................................

. 10 5.3. SCHEDULE ................................

................................

..................

12 5.4. Quality Control Plan and Independent Technical Review

................................

............

12 5.4.1. Quality Control Plan

................................

.............................

12 5.4.2. Independent Technical Review

................................

.............

13 6.0 NON-MEASUREMENT DATA ACQUISITION

................................

...........................

13 6.1. RECORDS REVIEW AND EVALUATION

................................

...............................

13 6.2. DATA

SUMMARY

AND DATA NEEDS DETERMINATION

................................

14 7.0 PRELIMINARY DATA QUALITY OBJECTIVES

................................

........................

14 7.1. IDENTIFY THE CURRENT PROJECT

................................

...... 15 7.2. DETERMINE DATA NEED S ................................

................................

.....................

15 7.3. DEVELOP DATA COLLECTION OPTIONS

................................

............................

15 7.4. FINALIZE DATA COLLECTION PROGRAM

................................

..........................

15 8.0 SITE INVESTIGATION FIELD PROCEDURES

................................

...........................

16 8.1. DATA QUALITY CONTROL

................................

.....................

16 8.2. PROJECT INVESTIGATION LEVELS/SCREENING LEVELS

..............................

18 9.0 FIELD MEASUREMENTS

................................

..............................

19 9.1. SAMPLE COLLECTION, CONTAINERIZATION AND PRESERVATION

...........

19 9.2. SAMPLE PACKAGING AND SHIPPING REQUIREMENTS

................................

.. 20 9.2.1. Sample Packaging

................................

. 20 9.2.2. Sample Shipping

................................

... 20 10.0 CHEMICAL QUALITY CONTROL

................................

...............

21 10.1. QUALITY CONTROL PROGRAM

................................

............

21 10.1.1. Preparatory Phase

................................

.. 21 10.1.2. Initial Phase

................................

...........

21 10.1.3. Follow-up Phase................................

................................

.... 21 11.0 FIELD OPERATIONS DOCUMENTATION

................................

. 22 11.1. DAILY LOGBOOK AND QUALITY CONTROL REPORTS

................................

... 22 11.1.1. Photographs

................................

...........

22 11.2. SAMPLE DOCUMENTATION

................................

...................

22 11.2.1. Sample Numbering System

................................

...................

23 11.2.2. Sample Labels

................................

....... 23 11.2.3. Chain-of-Custody (COC) Records

................................

........ 23 12.0 DATA MANAGEME NT................................

................................

.. 24 12.1. INVESTIGATION DATA

................................

............................

24 4 12.2. CRITICAL PROJECT RECORDS

................................

...............

24 12.3. SAMPLING AND ANALYSIS PLANNING

................................

..............................

25 12.4. CHAIN-OF-CUSTODY (COC) DOCUMENTATION

................................

...............

25 12.5. ANALYTICAL LABORATORY DOCUMENT AND DATA SUBMISSION

..........

25 12.6. DATA VERIFICATION AND REVIEW

................................

.... 26 12.7. DATA CENTRALIZATION AND STORAGE

................................

...........................

26 12.7.1. Data Summarization and Reporting

................................

...... 26 12.7.2. Records Management and Document Control

................................

......................

26 13.0 INVESTIGATION

-DERIVED WASTE MANAGEMENT

................................

............

26 14.0 DELIVERABLES

................................

.............

27 15.0 SUBMITTALS

................................

.................

27 16.0 PROJECT PROGRESS REPORTING

................................

.............

27 16.1. Progress Reporting / Meetings

................................

......................

27 17.0 PUBLIC AFFAIRS ................................

................................

...........

27

18.0 REFERENCES

................................

.................

28 5 LIST OF TABLES Table 1. Springville Dam Analytical Requirements For Sediment Sampling Table 2. Springville Dam Sediment Data Quality Objectives And Sampling Summary LIST OF FIGURES Figure 1.

Proposed Sediment Sampling Area by Dam Figure 2.

Project Sediment Sampling Locations APPENDICES Appendix A. Safety Checklist, Forms and Reports ACRONYMS, FORMULAS, AND SYMBOLS AOC Area of Concern AHA Activity hazard Analysis b gs Below-ground Surface cpm counts per minute CF R Code of Federal Regulations COC Chain of Custody DMP Data Management Plan DoD Department of Defense D OE Department of Energy DQCR Daily Quality Control Report DQO Data Quality Objective EDD Electronic Data Deliverable EPA Environmental Protection Agency FSP Field Sampling Plan f t Feet GIS Graphical Information System HAZWOPER Hazardous Waste Operations and Emergency Response Regulations HTRW Hazardous, Toxic, Radioactive Waste IA Investigation Area IDW Investigation

-Derived Waste MDC Minimum Detectable Concentration MDL Method Detection Limits amsl Above Mean sea level MS/MSD Matrix Spike/Matrix Spike Duplicate NYSDEC New York State Department of Environmental Conservation pH Potential of Hydrogen PID Photoionization Detector PPE Personal Protective Equipment QA Quality Assurance QC Quality Control QCP Quality Control Plan RSO Radiation Safety Officer SAP Sampling and Analysis Plan SOW Statement of Work SSHM Site Safety and Health Manager SSHP Site Safety and Health Plan SSHO Site Safety and Health Officer SVOC Semi-Volatile Organic Compound USACE U.S. Army Corps of Engineers VOCs Volatile Organic Compound

6 1.0 GENERAL The U.S. Army Corps of Engineers (USACE) shall provide all contract and Governmental labor, material, and equipment necessary to perform the professional services described in this Sampling and Analysis Plan (SAP). The drilling Contractor shall furnish the required personnel, equipment, instruments, and transportation, as necessary to accomplish the required services. The analytical laboratory Contractor(s) shall provide all analytical services and produce electronic data deliverables (EDDs) that will be provided to the USACE for database population and analysis. The USACE will be the overall recipient of Contractor deliverables and ancillary data and supporting material. During the execution of the work, the USACE will perform Contractor oversight to ensure adequate professional supervision and quality control to assure the accuracy, quality, completeness and progress of the work.

2.0 SITE BACKGROUND Th e sediment sampling behind the Springville Dam on Cattaraugus Creek will support the construction of dam modification s that will expand fisheries in the upper Cattaraugus Creek system.

The dam was an electro-power facility that went off line in 1997 due to the costs required to upgrade and relicens e the facility were not an efficient expenditure for the Village of Springvill e, who later deeded the facility to Erie County, NY.

The USACE require s sediment data to perform a beneficial use determination that will allow targeted excavation and re

-use of approximately 20,000 cubic yards of sediment from behind the dam. The removal of this volume will also support construction (crest lowering) and the re

-contouring of the creek bed to promote channel stability.

The dam is downstream of a rural watershed that also contains the Western New York Nuclear Service Center (WNYNSC), where the U.S. Department of Energy (USDOE) is conducting the West Valley Demonstration Project (WVDP). Consequently, sediment samples will be analyzed for chemical, radiologic, and physical constituents. The drilling Contractor will be responsible for sediment sample retrieval. The USACE will perform sample logging (material description s), selection, containerization, packaging and shipping

a laboratory results report and tabular database deliverable will be generated by the USACE.

This Sampling and Analysis Plan is prescriptive to ensure all stakeholder requirements are met.

2.1 SITE LOCATION The Springville Dam is located along the border of Erie and Cattaraugus Counties, NY, just south of Springville, NY. Figure s 1 and 2 show the site location and the upstream extents of the sediment sampling. 2.2 PREVIOUS INVESTIGATIONS The USDOE via the WVDP environmental monitoring program and the NYS Department of Health (NYSDOH) periodically sampled the sediments behind the Springville Dam for over 25 years and 10 year s, respectively. The results are summarized in the 2010 WVDP Annual Site Environmental Report (DOE 2011) and more comprehensively evaluated in the 2012 USACE Phase 1, Environmental Site Assessment. The 2012 USACE Phase 1 document was updated in 2015 to clarify language for the Project Partnership Agreement (PPA), thus referenced herein as USACE 2015

. The USACE has not evaluated whether other sources for radionuclides are present in the upper Cattaraugus Creek watershed , but may assess this option per the results of the data

-evaluation process discussed in Section 8.2.

7 In addition to the routine WVDP-centric sampling , s Sixteen (16) surface sediment sampling locations were sampled by USACE in 2007 for a wide array of chemical constituents, radionuclides, and metals. No evidence of contamination above hum an-health risk levels were encountered (USACE 20 15 07 includes these data

). The USACE contracted SOMAT in 2011 to collect 22 sediment samples in the Cattaraugus Creek (Figure 3) (S O M A T , 2 0 1 2) . Samples were collected using a vibracore , hand-auger, and ponar grab (Figure 3)

(USACE 2015

). Thirteen (13) surface sediment samples collect ed via ponar for grain-size analyses included locations that extend ed from the Town of Gowanda up

-stream through the Springville Dam area and up to the Route 219 Bridge. Sample locations for chemical and radiologic constituents suffer ed from poor sample recovery due to coarse-grained textures, so only one sample was analyzed for chemical and radiological constituents. An 18-inch deep sample of finer grained sediment was taken from core location C6, which is immediately upstream of the dam. The C6 sample was tested for organochlorine pesticides, PCBs, chlorinated herbicides, reactivity

-corrosivity

-ignitability

, reactivity of cyanide, metals, silver, antimony, mercury, semi

-volatile organic compounds (sVOCs), percent moisture, TOC, reactivity/corrosivity/ignitability reactivity of sulfide, and radiological analysis. RTI Laboratories of Livonia, Michigan analyzed the sediment samples for all parameters except the radiological analysis, which was conducted by Outreach Laboratory of Broken Arrow, Oklahoma.

The resulting reports (USACE 2015) concluded that the dam sediments are not an ecologic or human

-health risk to the construction worker that would perform the dam modifications (see Appendix 4 of USACE 2015)

. The USACE and NYSDEC believe s the sediment behind the dam may be partially scoured by high

-volume, low

-frequency flow events and replaced by new basin derived sediment.

PIn addition, previous maintenance of the dam (at least through 1998) included routine (annual ly) draining the pool to flushing of accumulated sediment downstream to optimize electrical generation , thereby dispersingmitigating potential accumulations within the creek channel below the damof historic basin derived contaminants

. The USACE and NYSDEC assume s th e surface sediment results from routine and USACE sampling 2007 to present reflect a sediment surface at a point in time; the over 25 year s of sediment sampling therefore represents an array conditions deeper in the current sediment levels (pa l eo-surfaces) accumulations behind the dam (i.e., a previous channel bottom overlain by newer sediments has been sampled throughout the accumulation period

). The current sampling effort is designed to verify this assumption for sediment management purposes.

The USACE contracted SOMAT in 2011 to collect 22 sediment samples in the Cattaraugus Creek (Figure 3) (SOMAT, 2012). Samples were collected using a vibracore , hand-auger, and ponar grab.

Thirteen (13) surface sediment samples collect ed via ponar for grain-size analyses included locations that extend ed from the Town of Gowanda up

-stream through the Springville Dam area and up to the Route 219 Bridge. Sample locations for chemical and radiologic constituents suffer ed from poor sample recovery due to coarse-grained textures, so only one sample was analyzed for chemical and radiological constituents. An 18-inch deep sample of finer grained sediment was taken from core location C6, which is immediately upstream of the dam. The C6 sample was tested for organochlorine pesticides, PCBs, chlorinated herbicides, reactivity

-corrosivity

-ignitability

, reactivity of cyanide, metals, silver, antimony, mercury, semi-volatile organic compounds (sVOCs), percent moisture, TOC, reactivity/corrosivity/ignitability reactivity of sulfide, and radiological analysis. RTI Laboratories of Livonia, Michigan analyzed the sediment samples for all parameters except the radiological analysis, which was conducted by Outreach Laboratory of Broken Arrow, Oklahom

a.

8 The resulting reports (USACE 2015) concluded that the dam sediments are not an ecologic or human

-health risk to the construction worker that would perform the dam modifications.

3.0 PHYSICAL

SETTING The Springville Dam on Cattaraugus Creek is located in a steep-sided valley incised into shale bedrock; the location is accessed via Scoby Hill Road. Upstream of the dam and bedrock valley , floodplains are more prevalent and evidence of high flow is common (i.e., flood debris elevations). The Cattaraugus Creek watershed is rural and contains notable cold water fishing habitats. The expected sediment behind the dam will vary in texture (silt layers to loose silty gravel) and thickness (0 to 40 feet), thus the USACE shall prepare to collect sediment of such variable conditions. The depth of the creek will vary from less than two to over ten feet, thus sediment sampling will require a maximum lowering of the dam pool to allow standard drilling (hollow

-stem augers) and/or direct penetration technologies (DPT or Geoprobe) access to the sediments

. The sampling will require low

-water periods with minimal rainfall responses from the watershed, thus be constrained to the summer and early fall season s, when soil

-moisture deficits are highest (i.e., rainfall will be preferentially absorbed by soils)

. 4.0 SAMPLING RESPONSIBILITIES The overall sediment sampling project organization and responsibilities are USACE and Contractor specific. The USACE Project Manager, technical field lead, sampling team (field crew), and Contractor (drilling) team will be familiar with sediment sampling in riverine systems, specifically the variable texture of likely samples. The field activities executed during th e sampling effort will follow a site-specific Abbreviated Accident Prevention Plan (APP) and abbreviated APP checklist in accordance with the requirements found in the "U. S. Army Corps of Engineers Safety and Health Requirements Manual, EM 385 1" (30 NOV 2014), which is available on

-line at: http://www.publications.usace.army.mil/Portals/76/Publications/EngineerManuals/EM_385 1_2008Sep_Consolidated_2011Aug.pdf

. The Abbreviated APP shall have components designed to protect on

-site personnel, the environment

, and potential off

-site receptors from an array of hazards that could arise during the execution of this plan (e.g., all hydraulic line connections on a drill rig will be inspected for leaks to preclude discharges to the riverine environment). If the project scope changes, the USACE will coordinate with the drilling Contractor and stakeholders to make appropriate changes to the Abbreviated APP. The Abbreviated APP will be reviewed by USACE Buffalo District Safety Office (DSO) for technical accuracy and compliance with USACE and OSHA regulations prior to performing any field activities.

The Abbreviated APP shall be prepared following the format found in USACE publication U.S. Army Corps of Engineers (USACE)

Safety and Health Requirements Manual ER 385 1, Appendix A, Paragraph 2

.

The following documents shall be considered in the preparation of the Abbreviated APP:

USACE EM 385 1 (30 NOV 2014) Safety and Health Requirements Manual

UFGS-01 35 26 (April 2014) Governmental Safety Requirements USDOL OSHA 29 CFR 1910 Occupational Safety and Health Standards 9 All Contractor accidents involving injuries or property damage during the execution of this contract shall be reported to USACE within 4 hours4.62963e-5 days 0.00111 hours 6.613757e-6 weeks 1.522e-6 months of the contractor becoming aware of its occurrence. The initial USACE contact must be made personally (telephone or email messages only are not acceptable) to one of the following

1. Contracting Officer

Frank D'Andrea

a. Work Phone: (716) 879-4245 b. Email: Frank.J.Dandrea@usace.army.mil

2. Project Manager

Geoffrey Hintz

a. W o rk Phone: (716) 879-4155 b. Blackberry

(716) 445-7722 c. Email: Geoffrey.K.Hintz@usace.army.mil Required Safety Submittals:

Abbreviated APP Abbreviated APP Checklist (reference Appendix A, Safety Checklist, Forms and Reports

) Activity Hazard Analysis (AHA) for the drilling Contractor (reference Appendix A)

Engineering Form 3394 Accident Investigation Report as incidents occur

reference Appendix A, Safety Checklist, Forms and Reports available at: http://www.poa.usace.army.mil/Portals/34/docs/safety/ENGForm3394AccidentInvestigationForm.pdf During the performance of work, the drilling Contractor shall comply with procedures prescribed for control and safety of persons visiting the site. Contractor is responsible for contract personnel and for familiarizing each of his subcontractors and visitors with safety requirements. Contractor shall advise the USACE Contracting Officer of any special safety restriction (e.g., corporate policy) so that Government personnel can be notified of these restrictions. The Contractor shall permit safety inspections of all work being performed.

5.0 PROJECT

SCOPE AND OBJECTIVES This section of the SAP describes project objectives, tasks, and schedule.

5.1. PROJECT

OBJECTIVES The principal goal of th e sediment sampling effort is to obtain representative samples of surface and subsurface sediment that will be analyzed for chemical compounds and radionuclides to define whether the sediment exceeds potential risk standards and background levels common to the Cattaraugus Creek

. The data will be used to determine whether the sediment is eligible for a case

-specific BUD issued by the NYSDEC in accordance with 6 NYCRR Part 360

-1.15(d). The following steps will determine if sediment goals are met: Determine if contamination i s present in sediments near the dam

Define the human

-health and ecologic risks of constituents (above background and exposure)

and Provide sufficient characterization data to obtain a BUD and progress with construction

. The NYSDEC Region 3 issued guidance regarding the upland disposal and management of dredge sediments; see http://www.dec.ny.gov/chemical/8734.html. This guidance recommends that undisturbed dredge cores (samples) be collected to represent the entire depth interval and the entire project area (or the 10 dredge prism). The sample requirements table within the guidance indicates that eight (8) samples should be minimally collected from a dredge prism ranging between 20,000 and 30,000 cubic yards, which is th e range expected at the Springville Dam. To minimize the uncertainty associated with this project, the USACE recommends 1 1 locations that will yield four (4) samples each, or 4 4 primary samples (about 5-times the minimum), analyzed according to Tables 1 a nd 2. This will create a definitive data set for project risk definition and the beneficial use determination.

Section 4.2 describes the sampling methodology.

5.2. TASK DESCRIPTION The following section describe s the field investigation results that the USACE and drilling Contractor must plan and execute using cost

-effective methods.

The drilling Contractor shall provide the following plans to support project execution:

Health & Safety Plan (for sample-collection and safety near water) Completed AHA The USACE will provide previously approved Health and Safety Plans and AHAs as examples to optimize the contracted effort

. The sediment sampling method will include a USACE

-contracted hollow

-stem auger drill rig that will continuously advance a minimum diameter 2-inch split spoon sampler to collect sediment throughout the vertical profile at each targeted location (i.e., the USACE drilling contract s include options for larger diameter split spoons that would produce larger sample volumes to meet laboratory needs

). Previous geotechnical sampling of fill and sediment adjacent to the dam indicates the sample retrieval method (wide-diameter split spoon) provides adequate sediment recovery and volumes. The USACE will specifically scope that the drilling contractor use a track

-mounted or all

-terrain vehicle (ATV) rig that can enter and maneuver in the creek channel and possibly on soft sediments. The contract will include a contingency option to place a temporary wooden platform atop soft

-sediment areas to allow rig access to the location(s) (e.g., a temporary timber bridge common to stream

-channel crossings at construction sites). The drilling rig must have the ability to self

-evacuate from the creek channel on a daily basis (i.e., the rig will not be left in the channel at the end of each work day); a winch mechanism to support daily evacuation is desirable.

This does not preclude a drilling contractor to propose an alternately effective platform to retrieve the samples (e.g., floating platform containing a drill rig). Generally, sediment samples will be targeted and collected from all locations shown in Figure

2. These location s are intended to provide representative samples of the dredge pris m (interior and exterior) outlined in Figure s 1 and 2. The vertical profiling will be completed by combining three 24-inch split-spoon sample intervals (totaling 6 feet of penetration) into one field container (clean stainless steel bowl), which are then homogenized to emulate the mixing of dredge material during sediment excavation , and handling, dewatering, and transportation for disposition under a BUD

. The USACE will not collect discreet vertical samples, but rely on the vertical 6

-foot composites at each location to produce the This sediment volume that will will be placed into the respective laboratory containers.

Sediment will not be composited between locations (e.g., sediment from intervals at SVD-SD001 will NOT be composited with intervals from SVD-SD002). Since volatile organic compounds (VOCs) are not normally taken from homogenized samples, the VOC sample will be collected directly from a discrete sediment segment within the three split spoons from the targeted six

-foot interval. Once all three split spoons are retrieved and screened with a PID, any sediment exhibiting a unique PID detection will be collected using a discrete sampling device, such as an Encore 11 sampler. If no unique PID detection is seen, then an interval will be chosen based upon professional judgement (e.g., finer grained interval or discolorations). VOC (volatile organic comp ound) samples will be discreetly collected only if field screening instruments (e.g., photo

-ionizing detector

- PID) indicate chemical impacts in a segment of the split

-spoon core; at that point, the USACE intends to employ En-Core or Terra Core (or alike method) to sample the discreet interval. Should the PID not detect VOCs in any of the three split spoons per composite interval, then the VOC sample will be collected from the composited sediment (as noted in Section 8.1

).Since volatile organic compounds (VOCs) are not normally taken from homogenized samples, the VOC sample will be collected directly from a discrete sediment segment within the three split spoons from the targeted six

-foot interval. Once all three split spoons are retrieved and screened with a PID, any sediment exhibiting a unique PID detection will be collected using a discrete sampling device, such as an Encore sampler.

The current USACE drilling contract provides the option to use a 24-inch long split spoon, so the composite intervals will be 6-f ee t depth increments

. The planned intervals (totaling four at each 1 1 location s) are listed below and will be sampled for the chemicals an d radionuclides listed in Table 1:

1. One composite sample derived from the homogenization of all sediment retrieved from the top three split

-spoon samples (nominally zero 6.0 feet deep)

. 2. One composite sample derived from the homogenization of all sediment retrieved from the subsequent three samples (nominally 6.0 feet to 12.0 deep). 3. One composite sample derived from the homogenization of all sediment retrieved from the third set of three split

-spoon samples (nominally 12.0 to 18.0 feet deep)

. 4. One composite sample derived from the homogenization of all sediment retrieved from th e fourth set of three split

-spoon samples (nominally 18.0 or 24.0 feet deep)

. Geotechnical borings through the right bank plateau by the dam indicates that bedrock is at 1,067 ft elevation, which generally coincides with bedrock outcrop at 1,064 ft elevation downstream of the dam.

Th e planned creek-bank and in

-channel sampling locations appear to have topographic or bathymetric elevations varying between 1,080 ft and 1,090 ft. The sampling depth s list ed above indicate the full sediment wedge behind the dam will be penetrated to bedrock at all locations, thus conservatively characterizing a greater volume than is planned for excavation and re

-use. This added information will provide flexibility during construction, especially if greater channel excavation or contouring is required.

The anticipated volume of sediment required to fill all laboratory

-supplied containers for each method listed in Table 2 data should not be problematic with the 2-inch diameter (or greater

) split-spoon sampler and composite sampling method. Should extremely poor sediment recovery occur at any given location, a nearby alternative location (nominally +/-10 feet from the original) will be selected by the on-site USACE technical representative to meet project goals

. High-percentage core recovery is a priority for the sampling program, thus core recovery and sample number will be maximized via contingency penetrations that will be included in the drilling contract. For example, the contract will have a specific number of optional penetrations that would be actuated during the drilling period in accordance with the Triad philosophy, which is available at the following link: http://www.itrcweb.org/Guidance/GetDocument?documentID=90

. Field reconnaissance of the dam area and previous bathymetry were used to place the locations on Figures 1 and 2 without deference to the potential thalweg of the creek once the dam pool is released for mobilization. Should a location be inaccessible (submerged in creek), a nearest available location will be chosen in a manner that maximizes areal coverage of the sampling configuration and proposed dredge prism. The on-site USACE representative will assist the drilling Contractor in identifying these field 12 locations.

Real-time communication with the stakeholder group will be made to ensure concurrence, especially the NYSDEC representatives.

Grain-size analyses (ASTM D422) will be performed for each composite sample comprised of three split-spoon samples. This testing will include hydrometer analyses for samples containing significant amounts of material passing the #200 sieve. These analyses are listed on Table 2.

The drilling contractor's inspector shall provide full time oversight of drilling operations, preparation of field logs, and collection and protection of grain-size samples. The on-site USACE representative shall supply the drilling Contractor with USACE

-based geologic logs to supplement the Contractor borehole records. The drilling contractor shall combine these field records into boring logs using a version of gINT software, compatible with Version 8i Professional, using a library file provided by USACE. All grain-size data shall be included in the gINT project file.

5.3. SCHEDULE

The sediment sampling is based upon the following assumptions:

The Right of Entry to the necessary properties is in place by mobilization.

Sufficient funds are available to perform the work. All necessary subcontracts are in place at the time of mobilization.

If all of the above items are completed, it is anticipated that th e field work will occur during the late summer or fall of FY17 (optimally the August

-September 2017 timeframe), dependent upon dam-pool lowering and the quiescence of creek level

s. The period of performance of the drilling Contractor will be 90 calendar days, commencing on the date of Award, to ensure flexibility and success (i.e., account for potential delays due to creek flows).

5.4. Quality

Control Plan and Independent Technical Review 5.4.1. Quality Control Plan The USACE shall prepare and execute a single Quality Control Plan (QCP) to cover development of all products. The QCP describes the deliverables and the steps that shall be taken to control product quality and the Independent Technical Review (ITR) required under USACE processes. The QCP shall contain the following items

, but shall not be interpreted as excluding others:

5.4.1.1. Management Philosophy. Discuss the organization's technical management philosophy relative to its commitment to quality, staff organization, and practices and procedures.

5.4.1.2. Management Approach. Define the specific management methodology to be followed during the performance of the work, including such aspects as documentation management and control, communications, design coordination 13 procedures, checking, and managerial continuity and flexibility. References to approved USACE policy and procedures are appropriate.

5.4.1.3. Management Structure. Delineate the organizational composition of the USACE team to clearly show the interrelationship of management and the execution team. 5.4.1.4. Project Risks. List and describe the risks inherent to the project that may affect quality. 5.4.1.5. Schedule. Project submittals and review periods on the USACE schedule will provide a critical path showing the sequence of events involved in carrying out specific tasks within the specified period of activity. Identify activities/tasks, their expected duration, both planned and actual accomplishment s, along with any milestones to be met in order to successfully complete the work. Either Oracle Primavera or Microsoft Office Project software are preferred.

5.4.1.6. Communications. Discuss the methods by which clear and accurate communications are to be achieved within the organization, and outside the organization (especially during field mobilization)

. 5.4.2. Independent Technical Review 5.4.2.1. The USACE will perform an Independent Technical Review (ITR) of all key deliverables before they are submitted to the stakeholder group for review to ensure completeness and technical competence. 5.4.2.2. Performance of the ITR shall not be accomplished by the same personnel that produced the product and must have different supervision than those individuals producing the product to ensure that a truly independent technical review is accomplished.

The ITR team member(s) shall be identified in the QCP.

5.4.2.3. It is understood that performance of the ITR on the work product may result in the generation of comments and/or concerns that would normally be addressed during subsequent finalization of the work product. These comments and/or concerns shall nevertheless be addressed in the final report. 6.0 NON-MEASUREMENT DATA ACQUISITION Several types of non

-measurement data will be reviewed by the USACE before and during the sampling event, such as historic documents, aerial photographs (orthophotos), geospatial (GIS) data, and land ownership parcels. 6.1. RECORDS REVIEW AND EVALUATION The records that will be reviewed prior to mobilization include: Results from the 2007 and 2011 sediment sampling event s; Electronic GIS files available from the USACE project team for planning and execution support.

14 The information will be used to plan site access and sampling execution, as well as serve as components in the sampling report

. 6.2. DATA

SUMMARY

AND DATA NEEDS DETERMINATION Previous analytical data generated in 2007 and 2011 indic ated surface and near-surface sediments both upstream and downstream of the Springville Dam are not impacted with chemical or radiologic elements that pose a risk to human health and the environment. The USACE design package that serves as a basis for the stakeholder cost

-share agreement, "Springville (Scoby) Dam Fish Passage Project

- Detailed Project Report and Environmental Assessment" (USACE 2015

) includes a Phase I E nvironmental Site Assessment a s Appendix 4. This appendix provides a combined analysis of sediment, water, and fish data collected near the dam and determined that a Construction Worker receptor will not be exposed to hazardous or radiologic materials that would pose an unacceptable risk throughout construction

. Comparative standards for chemicals include USEPA regional screening levels for both residential and industrial environments (USEPA 2012) and NYSDEC values for soil remediation (NYSDEC 2006

). For radionuclides, the EPA's preliminary remediation goals (PRG) for both residential and outdoor workers were used (USEPA 2010

). Like the chemical risk

-based screening levels, these were developed to meet the lower end of the EPA's acceptable range of extra cancer risks, i.e., 1 in a million. The outdoor worker PRG assumes that a worker spends 8 hours9.259259e-5 days 0.00222 hours 1.322751e-5 weeks 3.044e-6 months a day, 225 days a year at the site for a total of 25 years whereas the residential soil PRG assumes that a person spends 24 hours2.777778e-4 days 0.00667 hours 3.968254e-5 weeks 9.132e-6 months a day, 350 days a year for a total of 30 years at the site. The construction at the Scoby Dam is not expected to last longer than 18 months, so the Construction Worker would not be exposed to unacceptable risk

. This sediment sampling eventstudy will confirm that the same conditions exist at greater depth s and aerial extent. Additional geotechnical data will be collected to further identify sediment characteristics that are related to design components (i.e., slope stability, erodibility, and compaction)

. The work product will be considered definitive and provide the information needed to determine path

-forward actions (i.e., compile BUD documents and actuate project construction)

. 7.0 PRELIMINARY DATA QUALITY OBJECTIVES This section presents preliminary data quality objectives (DQOs) for this sediment sampling even

t. Formal DQOs are structured according to EM 200 2 Technical Project Planning Process (USACE 1998), which incorporates the basic components of the seven

-step DQO process described in Guidance for the Data Quality Objective Process (USEPA 1994).

Additionally, EM 200-1-3 Requirements for the Preparation of Sampling and Analysis Plans and EM 1110-2-4000 Sedimentation Investigations of Rivers and Reservoirs(e.g., Form ENG 1787) will be employed to guide the sampling effort.

This event will employ a subset of the DQO process for the sediment screening for potential contaminants and design data needs; these processes include

Identify the current project

Determine project data needs

Develop data collection options; and Finalize the data collection progra

m. The following sections summarize these four phases.

Formatted:

Not Highlight 15 7.1. IDENTIFY THE CURRENT PROJECT Summaries of site

-specific operational and environmental information gathered during fact-finding meetings and local environmental experience indicate the following:

The dam was operated by the Village of Springville until 1998, when it was deeded to Erie County; Previous sediment sampling results did not indicate risks from contamination

The sediment behind the dam was routinely flushed and replaced with basin sediment; Environmental artifacts of historic discharges from basin sources may exist in the sediment s , which, if discovered, may require follow

-on action (e.g., more targeted sampling or remedial actions by a responsible party)

. This sampling effort is designed to obtain analytical data to confirm that no chemical and radiologic constituents exist, along with physical characteristics important to future construction efforts. 7.2. DETERMINE DATA NEEDS The project-specific data will be collected for and by the USACE to confirm chemical and radiologic contamination does not exist above risk

-based and background levels for sediment common to the Cattaraugus Creek system, as outlined in Table 3. The vertical sampling data will be used to determine whether project-related sediment can be beneficial ly use d as land-surface grading material at an upland site via a case

-specific BUD issued by the NYSDEC in accordance with 6 NYCRR Part 360

-1.15(d). The use of risk-based and watershed

-background criteria are requested by NYSDEC to support the 6 NYCRR Part 360 determination and assess appropriate compliance with 6 NYCRR Part 380 criteria (radiologic materials handling and disposition)

. 7.3. DEVELOP DATA COLLECTION OPTIONS General sediment sampling and analysis employs industry-standard practices and USACE guidance. Subsequent sections describe the following components

Data collection methods Sample location reasoning Number of samples needed to meet project objectives Analytes and characteristics of interest Analytical methods employ ed Method detection limits and quantitation limits Data report with tabular database Data collection options may be modified b y the on-site USACE representative if site conditions or project data warrant change during the course of the sediment sampling. Project stakeholders will be informed of such modifications (e.g., a storm event requires sample

-point movement, access to a sample point becomes impossible due to geomorphic or structural reasons, a sample

-point location poses unsafe conditions, etc.)

. 7.4. FINALIZE DATA COLLECTION PROGRAM Project data needs required by the USACE are listed in Table 2 and include the following elements:

16 Rationale Radiologic parameters Sample location map reference Number of sample locations Total number of samples Where possible, proposed sample locations were chosen to provide data that will satisfy project needs and minimize , to the extent possible , field and laboratory analytical costs.

In general, these sediment sampling location s can be considered observational, as opposed to targeted or confirmatory (assumes contamination identified previously)

. The field sampling and analytical laboratory methods used for the Springville Dam project must meet USACE standards and, in general, CERCLA requirements for risk assessments an d site characterization reports. The data will be considered definitive and useable in decision making

.

Numerous field photographs will be generated during the sampling activities.

Digital cameras will be utilized to allow for regular downloading and backup. Field photographs will be logged for future use and routinely transferred t o the USACE servers for storage

. 8.0 SITE INVESTIGATION FIELD PROCEDURES The following sections present specific procedures and detailed information associated with the sediment investigation

. All samples will be analyzed by a NELAP accredited lab with hazardous and radiologic materials license s and samples will have a 21-day turn-around period. The USACE Buffalo District has a standing task

-order contract with RTI Labs of Livonia, MI (chemicals) and Pace Analytical of Greensburg, PA (radiologic). QA/QC samples will accompany the primary samples.

Tables 1 and 2 present the analytical methods to be used and subsequent sections detail the analysis needs. 8.1. DATA QUALITY CONTROL The following analytical (laboratory) data quality controls will be used during sediment sampling and subsequent data-quality analyses (see Table 2 for summary)

A minimum of ten percent field duplicate samples (eight) and five percent field QA split samples (four) will be collected for field quality control purposes (only for analytical laboratory samples)

. A minimum of five percent matrix-spike/matrix

-spike duplicates (MS/MSD) will be collected for laboratory quality control purposes (only for analytical laboratory samples)

. Laboratory precision will be determined by comparison of QA split and field duplicate sample values with an objective of a relative percent difference of 30% or less at 50% of the criterion value when reported activities are greater than five times their minimum detectable activities (MDAs); if sample results are less than five times their respective MDA, the normalized absolute difference (NAD) will be used with an objective of NAD less than 1.96. Accuracy will be plus or minus (+/-) 30 pe rcent at 50 percent of the screening level value

. The percentage of data acceptable for use will be 90 percent or higher.

The total number of primary sediment samples planned for collection is 44 for each analytical test and 44 for physical (grain-size) tests. The discreet samples will be assessed for eight (8) field duplicates and the composite samples for four (4) split samples to ensure QA needs. Table 2 presents the number of QA/QC samples to be collected to meet the minimum data quality control measures commonly required under 17 CERCLA guidance (a relevant guidance for this p roject). The QA/QC samples were "round ed up" to ensure that data quality can be defended in subsequent decision documents. Sediment obtained fr om the subsurface intervals (individual split spoons) will be screened with the following field instruments This screening step will occur when the sediment is exposed in the split spoon device and prior to homogenizing into a clean stainless steel bowl, as discussed in (see Section 4.2

). : 1. P photo-ionizing detector (PID) to detect volatile organic compounds chlorinated solvents or alike chemicals;

2. Geiger-Mueller meter to detect alpha, beta , and gamma radiation; and

3. Sodium-iodide (NaI) scintillation detector to optimally detect gamma radiation.

The USACE also will consider the use of a n alpha-beta phosphor sandwich (or phoswich) detector to distinguish between alpha and beta signatures in total radioactivity; such instruments include Ludlum 43

-89 or 43-93 series detectors.

The intent of the chemical and radiological scanning is three-fold: 1. Indicates where discre te VOC sampling may occur (see Section 5.2).

2. Provides on

-site health and safety monitoring of working conditions that may affect sample retrieval and handling (e.g., should personally protective equipment be upgraded), and 3. Indicates where samples may produce above

-background laboratory results that are integral to project planning (e.g., provides evaluation targets when the results are delivered by the lab

). The Geiger

-Mueller meter is the primary device expected to recognize field radioactivity and provide decision-making capabilities for the field staff, whereas the NaI scintillation detector simply provides a secondary check that is not part of the safety decision-making process. The USACE plans to employ in-house (Federal) Health Physicists to self-execute the scanning (and support sample preparation)

. Field scanning results will be recorded in 6

-inch to 1-foot intervals on the boring logs depending on observed variation or homogeneity of the readings (i.e., more variation equates to 6

-inch intervals)

. To identify "site background" radiation levels for soils , the USACE normally selects an uncontaminated site reference area that is scanned daily to provide a statistical mean for observed background (alpha, beta, gamma) and associated standard deviation.

This daily approach accounts for temperature and humidity variations that may influence meter performance

. The USACE commonly defines an above

-background detection as the average of the reference area plus two standard deviation s; past experience indicates this value may be represented also as a multiple of the average during field execution

. For example, field scanning of construction and soil

-like materials at project sites under the Formerly Utilized Sites Remedial Action Program (FUSRAP) have used X.X- to Y.Y-time s (verifying at press JUL-2017) the reference average to bound background

-level radiation for waste disposition

. In this case, a NYSDEC BUD for sediment re

-use. This screening step will occur when the sediment is exposed in the split spoon device and prior to homogenizing into a clean stainless steel bowl (see Section 4.2

). Upon completion of field scanning and sediment compositing, s Sample jars/containers will be filled with the homogenized sediment in the order of most volatile to least:

1. Volatile Organic Compounds (VOCs)

- Unless uniquely detected by PID per Section 5.2 2. Semi-volatile Organic Compounds (SVOCs)

Formatted:

HighlightFormatted:

Font: 11 pt 18 3. PCB (Aroclors)

4. Pesticides

5. Radionuclides

6. TAL metals 7. Mercury 8. Cyanide 9. Total Organic Carbon Since volatile organic compounds (VOCs) are not normally taken from homogenized samples, the VOC sample will be collected directly from a discrete sediment segment within the three split spoons from the targeted six

-foot interval. Once all three split spoons are retrieved and screened with a PID, any sediment exhibiting a unique PID detection will be collected using a discrete sampling device, such as an Encore sampler. If no unique PID detection is seen, then an interval will be chosen based upon professional judgement (e.g., finer grained interval or discolorations

). The 6-foot composite sample for grain-size analyses, as discussed in Section 4.2, will be packaged from the balance of the homogenized sediment that remain s after analytical samples are taken.

The trowel s and bowl s will be cleaned after completion of each location in accordance with industry protocols (e.g., an Alconox wash and thorough rinse with de-ionized water, then paper towel dry

). 8.2. PROJECT INVESTIGATION LEVELS/SCREENING LEVELS The initial exposure risk and radiologic background criteria to be used for screening the analytical results are summarized in Table 3. These criteria will be used to provide approval of the case-specific BUD

chemical criteria are guidance

-base d or promulgat ed, whereas the radiologic criteria are derived from WVDP-specific sampling analyzed in the 2012 WVDP Annual Site Environmental Report (ASER Tables F-2D and F-2E). The primary screening ranges for radionuclides reflect Cattaraugus Creek sediment background (10-year averages) at the Bigelow Bridge location, whereas the secondary screening criteria reflects background soils near a distal air monitoring station.

The radiologic sampling radiologic results will includebe screened against the WVDP

-specific radionuclides that are listed for sediment in the 2012 WVDP Annual Site Environmental Report (ASER Table F-2E). T the entire gamma

-spectroscopy library noted on Table 1, although only will be reported by the laboratory, but only WVDP

-related radionuclides noted below Table 1 and listedthe radionuclides listed in on Table 3 will be assessed for the BUD.

This narrower list focuses on available comparative data (2012 WVDP ASER) that are signature contaminants at the WVDP. Both gross alpha and gross beta radiation are included in Tables 1 and 3. These results will be compared to the summary of individual alpha and beta emitting radionuclides to assess whether other radionuclides are present at unusual concentrations in the sediment samples. For example, if the summary of alpha-emitting radionuclide resu lts in a sample is much smaller than the gross alpha result, then a non

-sampled alpha-emitting radionuclide may occur in the sediment, which may be retested for additional alpha

-spectroscopy result s. The comparison of chemical sampling results to acceptable chemical concentrations referenced in Table 3 will be a "value to value" for the BUD (e.g., lead results will be compared to allowable lead values).

However, the radiological sampling results will be compared to the background range provided in Table 3 (e.g., average K-40 background for sediment is 13.7+1.5 pCi/g, so a value up to 15.2 pCi/g is considered background)

. Data comparison table s will be compiled and USEPA tools, such as ProUCL, will be 19 employed to evaluate the overall sampling dataset against the background ranges (e.g., do the sample and background data ranges represent similar populations)

. This is important for the BUD application since NYSDEC requires beneficially re

-used material to reflect background ranges for radionuclides, rather than site-specific risk-based analys e s. If chemical and/or radionuclide results exceed the screening criteria , then the NYSDEC (and secondarily other stakeholders) will be notified, which would lead to discussions with USACE management, who may re-evaluate project risk and act accordingly (e.g., suspend project work and communicate USACE options with the land owner or other responsible parties

). The USACE laboratories (RTI and Pace) will be contracted to meet detection levels for all analytes t o ensure the results can 1) meet DQOs, 2) be compared to referenced standards & guidance , and 3) be used in screening

-level risk assessments (human and ecological)

. Should the radiologic laboratory be unable to meet a detection criteria listed in Table 3 for a specific methodology listed in Table 1, than an alternate method will be assessed to achieve desired results (e.g., should alpha spectroscopy not achieve a radiologic background value, then ICP

-MS may be assessed and the mass

-based results would be converted to activity results via specific activity).

9.0 FIELD

MEASUREMENT S Field measurements to be performed during the sampling effort include the screening of sediment cores and sediment

-contact materials (split spoons) with chemical and radiation detectors that are discussed in Section 7.1. This step will allow the USACE to bias the VOC sampl es and plan for the dispos al of u nsampled sediment. Remaining sediment will be containerized (drummed) as investigation derived waste (IDW) until the analytical data are evaluated and logical disposition can be arranged (e.g., shipped as a waste product or spread in the project area

.

All sampling locations will be surveyed via GPS to sub-meter levels and the coordinates shall be provided in New York State Plane, NAD 1983, FIP 3103. The sampling log book or collection record/form shall contain these coordinates; the coordinates will be included in the database deliverable and report

. 9.1. SAMPLE COLLECTION, CONTAINERIZATION AN D PRESERVATION Sediment sampling (retrieval), sample homogenization, sample containers, chemical preservation techniques, and holding times for sediment samples are described herein. The specific number of preserved and unpreserved containers required for this study will be estimated and supplied by RTI and Pace Laboratories upon contractual agreement. Additional sample volumes will be collected and provided for laboratory QC protocols (field and laboratory duplicates).

All filled sample containers will be preserv ed, if applicable, according to standard laboratory protocols (and standard methods) to ensure sample integrity. In the event that sample integrity, such as holding times, cooler temperatures, etc., is compromised, re-sampling will occur as directed by the on-site USACE representative or Project Manager (i.e., the risk of data loss or lower quality data will be assessed). Sediment coring will be the responsibility of the drilling Contractor, whereas core and sample descriptions, retrieval , packaging , and shipping to the laboratory is USACE responsibility. The drilling Contractor will assume responsibility of the grain

-size analysis samples and generate the deliverables 20 discussed at the end of Section 4.2, in coordination with the USACE. The drilling Contractor will work with the on

-site USACE representative to ensure sufficient retrieval of the sampling interval in the field.

Table s 1 and 2 list the sampling program requirements and laboratory protocols.

9.2. SAMPLE

PACKAGING AND SHIPPING REQUIREMEN TS The following section describe s common sediment sample packaging and shipping requirements for sediment sampling projects

. 9.2.1. Sample Packaging Sediment sample containers will be packaged in thermally insulated coolers that are sealed with evidence tape an d shipped in accordance with applicable DOT and USACE specifications (e.g., EM 200 3). Packaging and shipping procedures should minimally include the following:

All individual sample containers will be sealed with screw tops

. Each sample container will be wrapped in or placed inside a bubble

-wrap or similar protective wrap. Each sample container, or small groups of containers, will be placed into a plastic bag that will then be devoid of excess air and sealed. Trip blank s are required when shipping VOC containers; temperature blanks will be included in all cooler shipments

. Each sample container will be placed upright in the shipping cooler along with wet ice sealed in double plastic bags that will be placed around, among, and on top of the sample containers. Inert packing material (such as bubble wrap) will be placed into the cooler, if required, to prevent shifting of the sample containers during transport.

All required laboratory paperwork, including the Laboratory Chain of Custody (COC) form(s), will b e placed inside a plastic bag and taped to the inside of the cooler lid. If a laboratory provided courier is used, the paperwork will be attached to the outside of the cooler to facilitate exchange of sample custody.

Upon completion of the packing process, the cooler lid will be sealed with strapping tape and two signed & dated custody seals will be placed on the cooler, one across the front and one across the side. The air bill for the shipment (when applicable) will be completed and attached to the top of the shipping box/cooler or handle, which will then be transferred to the courier for delivery to the laboratory.

The above checklist is suggested for packing and shipping environmental samples to verify the completeness of sample shipment preparations.

9.2.2. Sample

Shipping Sediment samples collected during the project will be shipped as soon as possible, normally the same day as sample collection.

Samples may be held in a secure area for a longer period of time, provided that analyte-specific holding times are not jeopardized, especially for VOCs

. During the time period between collection and shipment, all samples will be stored in ice

-filled coolers and maintained in a secure area to control the chain of custody

. All coolers containing sediment samples will be shipped overnight to the laboratory by commercial or laboratory courier.

Chains of custody (USACE copy) shall be maintained by the USACE field team during mobilization (this team will include a Project Chemist)

.

21 10.0 CHEMICAL QUALITY CONTROL This SOW section summarizes the chemical quality control program that will be implemented for the sediment sampling program

. 10.1. QUALITY CONTROL PROGRAM The Quality Control (QC) Program should consist of three phases

the preparatory phase, the initial phase, and the follow-up phase, as discussed below

. 10.1.1. Preparatory Phase The preparatory phase of the QC program will be conducted by the USACE prior to beginning each definable feature of work.

A summary of all activities performed during each preparatory phase meeting will be documented and address the following:

Review of all pertinent sections of th e SAP and other work plans to ensure that all field personnel are cognizant of the data quality objectives, specific project activities to be accomplished, and specific sampling and analysis requirements.

Review of calibration procedures for all instruments to be used for measurement of field parameters, where applicable

. Physical examination of all materials and equipment required to accomplish the specific project activities

. Review of equipment decontamination procedures in accordance with CERCLA-level protocols

. Review of how each sample is to be collected, containerized, documented and packaged.

Review of proper IDW management and documentation.

Review of the procedure for completing all required information to be recorded on sample custody forms, and discussion of the project sample numbering system.

Review/discussion of any other activities to be performed as necessary by the USACE-QC representative or project team

. Examination of the work area(s) to ascertain if all preliminary work is complete.

Review of preparatory phase field equipment and support materials checklists.

10.1.2. Initial Phase The initial phase of the USACE-led QC program will include the following

Inspection of sampling equipment for cleanliness and adequate supply.

Inspection of individual sample labels and COC forms for accuracy, completeness, and consistency.

Inspection of sample packaging and shipping activities.

Observation, verification, and documentation of initial and ongoing field instrument calibration.

Routine review of field logbooks/forms and other field records/sketches to assure that all pertinent data are recorded in accordance with project requirements.

Inspection of the QA sample match

-up table to ensure that all samples collected during each day are properly documented.

10.1.3. Follow-up Phase The follow

-up phase of the QC program will include USACE/drilling Contractor meetings to fine tune the performance of the various field activities until all work components are completed

.

22 11.0 FIELD OPERATIONS DOCUMENTATION This section of the SAP describes the field documentation that will be maintained during the sediment sampling field work.

11.1. DAILY LOGBOOK AND QUALITY CONTROL REPORTS The USACE field team will maintain a daily logbook and/or binder of field forms of field investigation activities that will be available for QC inspection

. When a sample is collected or a measurement is made, a detailed description of the location will be recorded. The equipment used to collect samples will be noted, along with the time of sampling, sample description, depth at which the sample was collected, volume, and number of containers. A sample identification number will be assigned before sample collection. Field duplicate samples and QA split samples, which will receive an entirely separate sample identification number, will be noted under sample description. Equipment employed to make field measurements will be identified along with their calibration dates and daily background readings

.

This logbook will be the basis for the preparation of a Daily Quality Assurance Report (DQ A R) for the USACE Project Manager upon request; this report also may be a simple email from the USACE field team leader and/or drilling contractor, if requested. The DQ AR will include a summary of activities performed at the project site, weather information, results of the team activities, departures from the approved SAP , problems encountered during field activities, and any instructions received fro m USACE project-team representative

s. The drilling Contractor shall report to on

-site USACE representative any deviations that may affect the project data quality objectives.

11.1.1. Photographs All sample locations will be documented on film or with a digital camera. For each photograph taken, the following items will be noted in the field logbook and/or on the sampling or geologic logging form: Date Time Sample location ID General description of the subject Sequential number of the photograph.

After the pictures are downloaded, the photographer will review the photographs and compare them with the photographic log to confirm that the log and photographs match.

11.2. SAMPLE DOCUMENTATION This section describes the sample documentation requirements that will be followed during the field sampling activities associated with sediment sampling

.

23 11.2.1. Sample Numbering System A sample numbering system will be used to enable the efficient tracking and management of all samples and the resulting laboratory and/or field analytical data. Each sample will be assigned a unique alpha

-numeric sample number and a sample station location.

Each sample number will include a matrix

-specific code and a unique numeric code.

Numeric codes will run consecutively through the entire course of the project and will never be re

-used for the same sample matrix.

Separate groups of numeric codes will be used for regular field samples, USACE QA split samples, and field duplicate samples for ease of identification and tracking in the field. Sample station locations will include a project code in addition to matrix and numeric codes.

As with sample numbers, each sample location station will be unique and will not be repeated throughout the course of the sampling. The following sections describe all of the components of the sample numbering system and provide examples of sample numbers and sample station locations; these are considered guidance. 11.2.1.1. Sample and Location Numbers The database will include both sample location indicators and associated unique sample identifiers for the samples from each location.

Project ID Code:

S V D (for Springville Dam

) Sample Matrix Codes:

SD - Sediment Sample Numbers: 0001

- 7999 Regular field samples 8000 - 8999 Field QA split samples 9000 - 9999 Field duplicate samples Depth: 0-0.5 (representing zero to one

-half foot depth)

Example: Second sediment sample location, 0 to 6 feet deep: S V D-SD 0002-0.0-6.0 Should a location and depth require a twinned boring at a specific depth to achieve sample volume requirements, the combined media shall have the same identifiers, although the twinning will be recorded on field logs and/or forms.

11.2.2. Sample Labels Labels will be affixed to all sample containers during sampling activities.

Some information may be preprinted on each sample container label.

Information that is not pre

-printed will be recorded on each sample container label at the time of sample collection.

The information to be recorded on the labels will be as follows: USACE name (customer)

Sample identification number (as previously discussed

) Analysis to be performed (commonly pre

-printed on lab containers)

Type of chemical preservative present in container (commonly pre

-printed on lab containers)

Date and time of sample collection Sampler's name or initials 11.2.3. Chain-of-Custody (C OC) Records It is USACE policy to follow EPA policy regarding sample custody and COC protocols as described in NEIC Policies and Procedures (EPA 1985).

This custody is in three parts: sample collection, laboratory analysis, and final evidence files.

Final evidence files, including originals of laboratory reports and electronic files, are maintained under document control in a secure area.

A sample or evidence file is under an individual's custody when it is:

24 In your possession

, In your view, after being in your possession

, In your possession and you place them in a secured location, or In a designated secure area

. In addition to the COC record, there is also a COC (custody) seal.

The COC seal is an adhesive seal placed in areas such that i f a sealed cooler is opened, the seal would be broken.

The COC seal ensures that no sample tampering occurred between the field collection and laboratory analysis.

12.0 DATA MANAGEMENT Th e data management activities performed by the USACE will include the planning, collection, tracking, verification, validation, analysis, presentation, and storage of site characterization data to ensure high

-quality laboratory data reporting. The characterization data will be a manageable amount of information that will influence the course of future activities. The information collected will provide the foundation for determining the presence of contamination in site sediments and the constructability of the dam project. All electronic data stored solely on field instruments or computers will be downloaded and backed

-up on removable storage media (such as a compact disc or DVD) or uploaded to the USACE network system on a daily basis during work periods. This will ensure that computer loss or failure will not destroy or corrupt project data. 12.1. INVESTIGATION DATA Any mapping data (i.e., GPS locations of sampling points) will be compiled in a site base map to identify discrete sediment sampling locations.

The base coordinate system for the characterization work is New York State Plane in fe et (FIPS 3103) and topographic data will be reported in North American Vertical Datum (NAVD 1983) in feet. A project geodatabase will be created and managed through ArcGIS (version 10.2 or later

). The sediment data will be delivered under hardcopy and electronic format (laboratory electronic data deliverable or EDD). The number of samples and resulting parameter records will be handled via spreadsheet analyses software, such as Microsoft Excel, for the data validation process

. The final validated data will the n be imported into the overall project database (likely Microsoft Access based), which will be the basis for data reporting and GIS interfacing (via geodatabase links).

Chemical and radiological screening data

, including PID and field radiologic metering of the sediment cores , will be recorded in appropriate field logbooks

/boring-log forms, all of which will be submitted to the stakeholder group at project completion (via project data report).

12.2. CRITICAL PROJECT RECORDS Critical project records such as survey reports, COC forms, laboratory data packages, and verification results will be maintained by the USACE. The final project geodatabase and analytical database will be shared with the project stakeholders. To meet this requirement, a data management process will be followed throughout the collection, management, storage, analysis, and presentation of the site environmental characterization data.

25 12.3. SAMPLING AND ANALYSIS PLANNING The USACE field personnel shall have all the required training to execute the project and maintain records. These activities ensure that standard procedures will be followed when using boring log forms, sample collection field logbooks/sample forms , COC forms, labels, and custody seals.

The master field investigation recor d will include the site field logbook/sample forms that will record each day's field activities, personnel on each sampling team, and any administrative occurrences, conditions, or activities that may have affected the field work or data quality of any sediment samples for any given day.

As samples are collected in the field, sampling team members will complete the logbooks/forms with sample collection data and required field measurements

. Completed logbooks and appropriate field forms will be electronically scanned and submitted to the project file upon completion of the project.

The digital files will be stored on a USACE network and become part of the electronic deliverable to the project stakeholders.

12.4. CHAIN-OF-CUSTODY (COC) DOCUMENTATION Sample containers will be tracked from the field collection activities to the analytical laboratory following proper COC protocols and using standardized COC forms (normally lab

-specific). The USACE contract s with RTI and Pace Laboratories require full sample tracking: 1) samples are received at the laboratory, 2) the laboratory receiving staff will check and document the condition of the samples upon arrival, 3) check that the sample identification numbers on containers and chain of custody forms match, and 4) assign laboratory sample identification numbers traceable back to the field identification numbers.

Within 24 hours2.777778e-4 days 0.00667 hours 3.968254e-5 weeks 9.132e-6 months of receipt of the sample containers, the laboratory will send a letter of receipt (or email) to the USACE contract representative (normally project chemist). This letter provide s the following information:

Sample receipt date Problems noted at the time of receipt (if any) List of sample identification number and corresponding laboratory identification numbers for all samples received Analysis requested for each sample received Completed cooler receipt checklists for each cooler received The letter/email of receipt will be accompanied by the completed and signed COC form(s) for the samples (scanned attachments with an email), and both documents will be submitted to the project file.

This process allow s the tracking of samples from the time of collection through analysis and verification

. 12.5. ANALYTICAL LABORATORY DOCUMENT AND DATA SUBMISSION The USACE shall ensure data quality by reviewing data packa ge s for precision, accuracy, and completeness and will attest that it meets all data analysis and reporting requirements for the specific method used, including detection limits and practical quantitation limits.

26 Laboratories shall prepare and submit analytical and QC data reports, where applicable

. All electronic copy of data (EDD s) shall be provided as a hierarchical text file consisting of the required data elements , usually in XML format. The USACE is responsible for data formatting for reporting and later use.

12.6. DATA VERIFICATION AND REVIEW Data verification and validation will be performed on all sample data. Data packages received from the analytical laboratory will be validated per CERCLA guidance

. A full EPA Level II validation will be performed by the USACE project chemist and the analytical data will be flagged accordingly in the project database

. 12.7. DATA CENTRALIZATION AND STORAGE The USACE shall cross check all sample data with logbooks and other field records to ensure analytical data packages are complete and accurate in the digital database

. 12.7.1. Data Summarization and Reporting Project data will be screened for potential data errors and corrected to facilitate data interpretation (e.g., ensure location identifiers are properly linked to associated analytical data). Data reduction and summation will be accomplished using quality

-controlled and documented reporting software programs (e.g., Microsoft Excel or Access)

. 12.7.2. Records Management and Document Control Hard copies of all original site and field logbooks, COC forms, data packages with analytical results and associated QA/QC information, data verification forms, and other project

-related information will be indexed, catalogued into appropriate file groups and series, and retained by the USACE. A sample tracking database or spreadsheet will be created to ensure laboratory delivery, analysis, and results are fully accounted for during the post

-sampling phase.

Sufficient documentation will accompany the archived data to fully describe the source, contents, and structure of the data to ensure future usability.

Noncommercial computer programs used to manipulate or report the archived data will also be included in the data archive information package to further enhance the data's future usability.

13.0 INVESTIGATION

-DERIVED WASTE MANAGEMENT The USACE is responsible to control and dispose of any investigation derived waste (IDW), including materials generated during performance of an investigation that cannot be effectively reused, recycled, or decontaminated in the field.

IDW consists of materials that could potentially pose a risk to human health and the environment (e.g., sampling and decontamination wastes) as well as materials that have little potential to pose risk to human health and the environment (e.g., sanitary solid wastes).

Although existing data do not indicate contamination exists at concerning levels, IDW (mainly sampling residuals) will be containerized (drummed) and sample

-specific analytical data will be used to disposition sediment IDW in concurrence with NYSDEC (e.g., licensed commercial disposal or spread in the project area)

. Although existing data do not indicate contamination exists at concerning levels, IDW (mainly sampling residuals) will be containerized (drummed) and sample

-specific analytical data will be used to disposition 27 sediment IDW in concurrence with NYSDEC (e.g., licensed commercial disposal or spread in the project area). 14.0 DELIVERABLES The sediment sampling for the Springville Dam project will require a final data report and electronic database of results. The sampling results, both analytical and physical, shall be delivered in a format that allows the USACE and project stakeholders to efficiently evaluate sediment quality and characteristics

. The USACE will compile and maintain a critical path method (CPM) schedule (via Oracle Primavera or Microsoft Project) to best forecast project-component start and completion dates, duration of each item on the schedule, projected manpower to perform the work, critical activities, and milestones.

The drilling Contractor and the USACE shall maintain daily quality control and safety logs for each field day. These records shall identify the current activities, any unanticipated delays or occurrences, and any needed corrective actions.

15.0 SUBMITTALS All reports presenting methods and data shall be prepared in the following standard format.

All site drawings shall be of engineering quality with sufficient detail to show interrelations of major features on the site map (i.e., north arrows, keys, scales, etc.)

When drawings are required, data shall consist of 8

-1/2-inch by 11-inch pages , with larger drawings folded to this size.

A decimal paragraphing system shall be used.

The reports shall be submitted in three

-ring hardcover binders. A report title page shall identify the report title, the USACE, Buffalo District, and the date.

Report hard copies will be accompanied by electronic submittals in Adobe Acrobat Portable Document Format (PDF).

All original (native software) files, including, but not limited to, documents and databases, shall be provided to the stakeholder group by the USACE. Original files shall include working copies of any documents/data in the appropriate Microsoft format (i.e. Word, Excel, Access, etc.). Documents shall be screened for potential violation of the 1974 Privacy Act prior to submittal (e.g., redaction of signatures, personally identifiable information, purchase records, etc.)

. 16.0 PROJECT PROGRESS REPORTING 16.1. Progress Reporting / Meetings The USACE shall initiate and conduct a biweekly telephone conference calls with the stakeholder group to discuss work status and progress during the field mobilization. The USACE shall summarize the meetings and distribute to all involved parties not more than fiv e working days later.

17.0 PUBLIC AFFAIRS

28 The USACE Project Manager shall be the project voice for the news media or publicly disclose any data generated or reviewed under this plan. Formatted:

Normal 29

18.0 REFERENCES

New York Department of Environmental Conservation (NYSDEC), 2006. 6 NYCRR Part 375 Environmental Remediation Programs.

Division of Environmental Remediation. December 14, 2006.

NYSDEC, 2004. New York Department of Environmental Conservation. Technical & Operational Guidance Series (TOGS) In

-Water and Riparian Management of Sediment and Dredged Material. 2004.

http://www.dec.ny.gov/docs/water_pdf/togs519.pdf Unites State Army Corps of Engineers (USACE), 1998. EM 200-1-2 Technical Project Planning Process.

USACE, 2001. EM 200-1-3 Requirements for the Preparation of Sampling and Analysis Plans

. USACE, 2014. EM 385-1-1, Safety and Health Requirements Manual (30 NOV 2014 Or Revised).

USACE, 2015. Springville (Scoby) Dam Fish Passage Project , Section 506 Great Lakes Fishery and Ecosystem Restoration, Detailed Project Report and Environmental Assessment. July 2015.

USACE, 1995. EM 1110-2-4000 Sedimentation Investigations of Rivers and Reservoirs, ENG 1787

. United States Department of Energy (USDOE), 2011. West Valley Demonstration Project Annual Site Environmental Report (ASER). Prepared by CH2MHill, and B&W West Valley LLC, September 2011.

USDOE , 2013. West Valley Demonstration Project Annual Site Environmental Report (ASER). Prepared by CH2MHill, and B&W West Valley LLC, September 2013. United States Environmental Protection Agency (USEPA), 1994. Guidance for the Data Quality Objective Process

. (1994). USEPA 2003. EPA Region 5 Ecological Screening Levels for RCRA.

2003. http://epa.gov/region05/waste/cars/pdfs/ecological

-screening-levels-200308.pdf USEPA , 2010. Resident and Outdoor Worker Soil Preliminary Remediation Goals (PRG) Supporting Tables in activity (pCi) units. August 2010. http://epaprgs.ornl.gov/radionuclides/

USEPA , 2012. Regional Screening Levels (RSL) Summary Table.

November 2012.

http://www.epa.gov/reg3hwmd/risk/human/rbconcentration_table/Generic_Tables/pdf/master_sl_table_run_NOV2012.pdf USACE, EM 200 2 Technical Project Planning Process (1998) USACE, EM 200 3 Requirements for the Preparation of Sampling and Analysis Plans USACE, EM 385 1, Safety and Health Requirements Manual (30 NOV 2014). USACE, EM 1110 4000 Sedimentation Investigations of Rivers and Reservoirs, ENG 1787 Formatted:

Left 28

T A B L E S

TABLE 1. SPRINGVILLE DAM ANALYTICAL REQUIREMENTS FOR SEDIMENTAnalytical MethodHASL 300 Gamma Spectral MethodGA-01-R (EPA 901.1 Equivalent)ASTM C1507-07e1 or EPA 905.0KPA - ASTM D5174Alpha-particle Spectroscopy DOE EML HASL 300 SeriesAlpha-particle Spectroscopy DOE EML HASL 300 SeriesEPA 900.0/9310EPA 900.0/93106010 (B)EPA 8260 (B)EPA 8270 (C)EPA 8081AEPA 8151AEPA 8082EPA 9060NOTES:@ Gamma spectroscopy report will include the following library of radionuclides: Uranium isotopes will be analyzed by both alpha and gamma spectroscopy.Analytical GroupGamma Spectroscopy Suite @

(Cs-137 Primary Analyte)TAL Metals (23 Analytes), Hg, ZnTotal Organic Carbon (TOC)PesticidesHerbicidesPCBs (Aroclors)Gross AlphaGross Beta TABLE 2. SPRINGVILLE DAM SEDIMENT DATA QUALITY OBJECTIVES AND SAMPLING

SUMMARY

Project ObjectiveTarget MediaRationaleAnalytical Parameter/SuiteSample Locations MapSediment Sample LocationsSamples per LocationTotal Number of SamplesContaminant PresenceSedimentPrimary ScreeningGamma Spectroscopy Suite Figure 2 11 4 44Contaminant PresenceSedimentPrimary ScreeningStrontium-90Figure 2 11 4 44Contaminant PresenceSedimentPrimary ScreeningTotal Uranium (elemental)Figure 2 11 4 44Contaminant PresenceSedimentPrimary ScreeningIsotopic Plutonium (Pu-238, Pu-239/240)Figure 2 11 4 44Contaminant PresenceSedimentPrimary ScreeningUranium-232, -234, -235, -238Figure 2 11 4 44Contaminant PresenceSedimentPrimary ScreeningGross AlphaFigure 2 11 4 44Contaminant PresenceSedimentPrimary ScreeningGross BettaFigure 2 11 4 44Contaminant PresenceSedimentPrimary ScreeningTAL Metals (23 Elements), Hg, ZnFigure 2 11 4 44Contaminant PresenceSedimentPrimary ScreeningFigure 2 11 4 44Contaminant PresenceSedimentPrimary ScreeningFigure 2 11 4 44Contaminant PresenceSedimentPrimary ScreeningPesticidesFigure 2 11 4 44Contaminant PresenceSedimentPrimary ScreeningHerbicidesFigure 2 11 4 44Contaminant PresenceSedimentPrimary ScreeningPCBs (Aroclors)Figure 2 11 4 44Contaminant PresenceSedimentPrimary ScreeningTotal Organic Carbon (TOC)Figure 2 11 4 44Physical CharacteristicsSedimentPrimary ScreeningParticle Size Analysis - ASTM D422Figure 2 11 4 44Total Primary Samples:

660ReproducibilitySedimentField QA Split Sample (10%)See Analytes Above (sans Particle Size Analaysis)N/A 4 1 4ReproducibilitySedimentField Duplicate Sample (5%)See Analytes Above (sans Particle Size Analaysis)N/A 2 1 2ReproducibilitySedimentMS/MSD Sample (5%)See Analytes Above (sans Particle Size Analaysis)N/A 2 2 4Total Laboratory QA/QC Samples:

10Total Laboratory Samples:

670Field Sample Collection SummaryQA/QC Sample Detail TABLE 3. SPRINGVILLE DAM SEDIMENT SCREENING VAUES FOR BENEFICIAL USE DETERMINATIONConstituentCyanide, TotalTAL Metals(23 Elements), Hg, ZnIndividual Polycyclic Aromatic Hydrocarbons (Semi-volatile PAHs)Volatile Organic Compounds (VOCs)PesticidesTotal PCBsAluminumAntimonyCalciumCobaltIronMolybdenumThalliumVanadiumMagnesiumPotassiumSodiumWVDP RadionuclidesSymbolPrimary Screening RangeUnitsPrimary Screening SourceSecondary Screening RangeUnitsSecondary Screening SourcePotassium-40K-4013.7+/-1.5pCi/g10.6+/-1.3pCi/gCobalt-60Co-600.0002+/-0.0162pCi/g0.0005+/-0.0261pCi/gStrontium-90Sr-900.0004+/-0.0497pCi/g0.0349+/-0.0403pCi/gCesium-137Cs-1370.0373+/-0.0227pCi/g0.350+/-0.058pCi/gUranium-232U-2320+/-0.0552pCi/g-0.0034+/-0.0273pCi/gUranium-233/234U-233/2340.542+/-0.119pCi/g0.80+/-0.12pCi/gUranium-235/236U-235/2360.0573+/-0.0388pCi/g0.0371+/-0.037pCi/gUranium-238U-2380.53+/-0.114pCi/g1.01+/-0.13pCi/gTotal Uranium (elemental)Total U1.91+/-0.04mg/kg2.26+/-0.14mg/kgPlutonium-238Pu-2380.0111+/-0.0186pCi/g0.00275+/-0.00934pCi/gPlutonium-239/240Pu-239/2400.0144+/-0.0144pCi/g0.0165+/-0.0170pCi/gAmercium-241Am-2410.017+/-0.0224pCi/g0.0061+/-0.0106pCi/gGross Alpha ActivityGross Alpha11.6+/-3.5pCi/g25.1+/-7.0pCi/gGross Beta ActivityGross Beta16.9+/-2.9pCi/g29.3+/-4.5pCi/gNOTES:DOE 2013 Reference at: http://www.wv.doe.gov/Secondary Screening SourcePrimary Screening Sourcea - Reference at: https://govt.westlaw.com/nycrr/Document/I4eadfca8cd1711dda432a117e6e0f345?viewType=FullText&originationContext=documenttoc&transitiob - Reference at:http://www.dec.ny.gov/docs/remediation_hudson_pdf/cpsoil.pdfFor TAL Metals not listed in 6 NYCRR Part 375, useCP-51, Soil Cleanup Guidance Policy (2010)Residential for Co, Fe, V (b)For TAL Metals not listed in 6 NYCRR Part 375, useCP-51, Soil Cleanup Guidance Policy (2010)Ecologic for Al, An, Ca, Mo, Th (b)6 NYCRR Part 375-6.8(b):Restricted Use Soil Cleanup ObjectivesResidential Protection (a)6 NYCRR Part 375-6.8(b):Restricted Use Soil Cleanup ObjectivesGroundwater Protection (a)Nutrient MetalsNo Comparative Goals AvailableNutrient MetalsNo Comparative Goals AvailableWVDP ASER 2012 (DOE 2013) Table F-2E, Bigelow Bridge 10-year Average for Cattaraugus Creek Background(Sediment last collected in 2012 on five-year periodicity.)WVDP ASER 2012 (DOE 2013) Table F-2D, 10-year Average for Background Soil at Great Valley Air Monitor(Soil last collected in 2012 on five-year periodicity.)

29 F I G U R E S

Estimated Sediment Management ZoneFigure 1 F I G U R E 2 P r o p o s e d B U D S e d i m e n t S a m p l i n g L o c a t i o n s S p r i n g v i l l e D a m - G L F E R D o c u m e n t N a m e: S V D_2 0 1 6_B U D_S e d i m e n t_S a m p l i n g_R 0.m x d D r a w n B y: h 5 t d e w t f D a t e S a v e d: 1 7 J u l 2 0 1 7 T i m e S a v e d: 1: 4 0: 3 4 P M!A!A!A!A!A!A!A!A!A!A!A S V D-S D 0 1 1 S V D-S D 0 1 0 S V D-S D 0 0 9 S V D-S D 0 0 8 S V D-S D 0 0 7 S V D-S D 0 0 6 S V D-S D 0 0 5 S V D-S D 0 0 4 S V D-S D 0 0 3 S V D-S D 0 0 2 S V D-S D 0 0 1 S o u r c e: E s r i , D i g i t a l G l o b e , G e o E y e , E a r t h s t a r G e o g r a p h i c s , C N E S/A i r b u s D S , U S D A , U S G S , A E X , G e t m a p p i n g , A e r o g r i d , I G N , I G P , s w i s s t o p o , a n d t h e G I S U s e r C o m m u n i t y L e g e n d!A P r o p o s e d B U D S e d i m e n t S a m p l i n g L o c a t i o n s S V D D e s i g n T h a l w e g S V D S e d i m e n t M a n a g e m e n t Z o n eµ0 2 5 5 0 7 5 1 0 0 1 2 5 F e e t

ML17347A152

Contents

Text

SUMMARY

SUMMARY

18.0 REFERENCES

3.0 PHYSICAL

5.0 PROJECT

5.1. PROJECT

5.3. SCHEDULE

5.4. Quality

SUMMARY

9.0 FIELD

9.2. SAMPLE

9.2.2. Sample

18.0 REFERENCES

SUMMARY

Navigation menu

ML17347A152

Text

SUMMARY

SUMMARY

18.0 REFERENCES

3.0 PHYSICAL

5.0 PROJECT

5.1. PROJECT

5.3. SCHEDULE

5.4. Quality

SUMMARY

9.0 FIELD

9.2. SAMPLE

9.2.2. Sample

18.0 REFERENCES

SUMMARY

Navigation menu

Search