ML16204A143: Difference between revisions

From kanterella
Jump to navigation Jump to search
(Created page by program invented by StriderTol)
(Created page by program invented by StriderTol)
Line 205: Line 205:
* Sketch FA: A-25 Slde1 .
* Sketch FA: A-25 Slde1 .
* Page B 13-25 of B 13-88 Appendix: 813 Review Distances (Refnnce IU63-00017A. f"9'87.2.3-1 ) 1(* Pipe L1 &L2 Temp. R1 Radius R2 Radius Dist. (ft) rFl (in) 0.5 1 1.5 2 2.5 3 3.5 4 4.5 5 6 6.5 17 7.5 ' ., r * ** . p.,. . . ., . *
* Page B 13-25 of B 13-88 Appendix: 813 Review Distances (Refnnce IU63-00017A. f"9'87.2.3-1 ) 1(* Pipe L1 &L2 Temp. R1 Radius R2 Radius Dist. (ft) rFl (in) 0.5 1 1.5 2 2.5 3 3.5 4 4.5 5 6 6.5 17 7.5 ' ., r * ** . p.,. . . ., . *
* c ...... ,*. I *, * *. ** * '1721 1539 1377 1233 11105 991 889 799 719 647 583 527 477 432 392 t * .. + -t 4.6 3.8 3 2.4 1.8 1.3 '0:9 0.4 0.1 Contact I FA:A-1 Slde2 (in) 5.9 5.1 4.4 3.8 3.2 2.7 2.2 1.8 L4 1.1 Q.8 0,6 0.3 10.1 Contact
* c ...... ,*. I *, * *. ** * '1721 1539 1377 1233 11105 991 889 799 719 647 583 527 477 432 392 t * .. + -t 4.6 3.8 3 2.4 1.8 1.3 '0:9 0.4 0.1 Contact I FA:A-1 Slde2 (in) 5.9 5.1 4.4 3.8 3.2 2.7 2.2 1.8 L4 1.1 Q.8 0,6 0.3 10.1 Contact}}
}}

Revision as of 06:26, 19 May 2018

Wolf Creek Generating Station Updated Safety Analysis Report (Usar), Revision 29, Drawing M-663-00017A, Rev. W01, Fire Protection Evaluations for Unique or Unbound Fire Barrier Configuration, Page B8-148 to B13-88
ML16204A143
Person / Time
Site: Wolf Creek Wolf Creek Nuclear Operating Corporation icon.png
Issue date: 05/31/2016
From:
Wolf Creek
To:
Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation
Shared Package
ML16203A351 List: ... further results
References
WM 16-0008
Download: ML16204A143 (166)
v • d • e


Text

M-663-000 17A, Revision W0 1 Page B8- 148 of B8-180 Penetration Seal Data Appendix: 58 Penetration #: Pi 338081 0 Penetration Type: RB-5A , I LocElev.: 2000'-0" Fire Area (Side I): A-25 M4X Dwg: M-OX1331 Fire Area {Side 2): A-I I. Barrier Thickness: 12" 2. Opening Sire: 24"D 3. Penetrants: (1) 10"P 4. Sealant Type: HDSEIHDLE. Ceramic Fiber 5. Damming Side1 : Boot 6. Damming Side 2: Boot 7. Damming Continuity (AcclRej): MA 8. Boot Condition (AcclRej): Accept 9. Sealant Depth; 13" ** 10. Annular Gap (smallest): 5" 1 1. Gap between pen: NIA 12. Barrier Type: F R 13. Opening Sleeved or Concrete; Steel 14. Pipe Insulated: Yes Wayne Aregood Prepared By: Jeff Suter Reviewed By: Walkdown Comments: Slab thickness determined by Drawing C-1 C1311. +' Sealant depth determined by inspection report. Sketch:

M-663-00017A, Revision WO 1 (Side 2) Flre Area A-25 (Side 1) Fire Area A-1 (Side 2) Page B8-149 of B8-180 Penetration Seal Data Appenciii: 88 Photos: PI335081 0 Fire Area A-25 (Side I ) Fire Area A-I

  • *
  • M-663-000I?A, Revision WOI Penetration Seal Data Heat Affected Zone Review: P133S0810 Fire Area (Side 1) A-25 No issues within heat affected zone Fire Area (Side 2) A-1 No issues within Heat Affected Zone Side1 Photo Side2Photo Sketch Page B8-150 ofB8-180 Appendix: B8 Review Distances 10" Pipe L1 &l2 Temp. R1 Radius R2Radlus Dist. (ft) ("F) (lnl (in) 0.5 1697 4.5 5.8 1 1497 3.6 4.9 1.5 1321 2.8 4.1 2 1167 2.1 3.5 2.5 1032 1.5 2.8 3 914 1 2.3 3.5 810 0.5 1.8 4 719 0.1 1.4 4.5 639 Contact 1.1 5 569 0.8 5.5 508 0.5 6 454 0.2 6.5 406 0 7 365 Contact No sketch r quir----.

M-663-00017A, Revision W0 1 Page B8-151 of B8-180 Fire Area (Side 1 ): A-25 MOX Dw: M-OX1331 Fire Area (Side 2): A-1 TO. Annular Gap {smallest): 6" 11. Gap between pen: NIA 12. Barrier Type: R 13. Opening Sleeved or Concrete: SW 14. Pipe Insulated: Yes Wayne Aregood Prepared By: Jeff Suter Reviewed By: Penetration Seal Data Appendix: ~8 Penetration #: P13380820 Penetration Type: RB-5A LoeAElev.: 2000'-0" 1. Barrier Thickness: 12" 2. Opening Sie: 24"D 3. Penetrants: (1) 1o"P 4. Sealant Type: HDSEIHDLE, Ceramic Fiber 5, Damming Side1 : Boot 6. Damming Side 2: Boot 7. Damming Continuity (AcdRej): NIA 8. Boot Condition (AcdRej): Accept 9. Sealant Depth: Assumed Per Detail Walkdown Comments; Slab thickness determined by Drawing C-f C1311 Sketch:

M-66340017A, Revision W0 1 Page B8-152 of B8-I80 Penetration Seal Data Appndix: 88 1 Photos: PI 33S0820 1 Fire Area A-25 (Side 1) Fire Area A-1 (Side 2) Fire Area A-25 (Side 1 ) Fire Area A-l (Side 2)

  • *
  • M-663-00017A. Revision WOl Penetration Seal Data Heat Affected Zone Review: P133S0820 Fire Area (Side 1) A-25 No issues within Heat Affected Zone Fire Area (Side 2) A-1 No Issues within Heat Affected Zone Side 1 Photo Side 2 .Photo Sketch Page 88-153 ofBS-180 Appendix: B8 Review Distances M-(;63.()()017A. figoft 7.2.3-1) 10* Pipe L1 & l2 Temp. R1 Radius R2 Radius Dist. (ft) (*F) (in) (in) 0.5 1697 4.5 5.8 1 1497 3.6 4.9 1.5 1321 2.8 4.1 2 1167 2.1 3.5 2.5 1032 1.5 2.8 3 914 1 :2.3 3.5 810 0.5 1.8 4 719 0.1 1.4 4.5 639 Contact u 5 569 0.8 5.5 508 0.5 6 . 454 0.2 6.5 406 0 17 '365 I Contact I I No sketch requir
  • M-663-000 17A, Revision W0 1 Page 88-154 of B8-180 Fire Area (Side 1): A-24 M-OXDwg: M-1x1341 Fire Area (Side 2): A-I 10. Annutar Gap (smallest}: 2" 1 1. Gap between pen: MIA 12. Barrier Type: R 13. Opening Sleeved or Concrete: Steel 14. PIpe Insulated: No' Wayne Aregood Prepamd By: Jeff Suter Reviewed BY: Penetration Seal Data Appendbr: 68 Penetration #: PI3480864 Penetration Type: RB-5A Loc.lElev.: 2000'-0" I. Barrier Thickness: 1 2" 2. Opening Si: 10" D 3. Penetrants: (? ) 4"P 4. Sealant Type: HDSEIHDLE, Ceramic Fiber 5. Damming Side1 : Boot 6. Damming Side 2: Boot 7. Damming Continuity (AcclRej): NIA 8. Boot Condition (AcclRej): Accept 9. Sealant Depth: 14-112" *' Walkdown Comments: Slab thickness based on drawing C-1 CI 35 1. ' Pipe not insulated locally a1 seal penetration. '* Sealant depth determined by inspection report. I Sketch:

M-663-00017A, Revision W01 Page B8- 155 of B8- 1 80 Penetration Seal Data Appendix: 88 1 Photos: Pf 3480864 Fire Am A-24 (Side 1) Fire Area A-1 (Side 2) Fire Area A-24 (Side 1) Fire Area A-I (Side 2)

  • *
  • M-663-00017A, Revision WOI Penetration Seal Data Heat Affected Zone Review: P134S0864 Fire Area (Side1) A-24 No issues within Heat Affected Zone Fire Area (Side 2) A-1 No issues wllhln Heat Affected Zone Side 1 Photo Side 2 Photo Sketch Page 88-156 ofBS-180 Appendix: B8 Review Distances 1,.,_ M-663-00017A. .... 7.2.1-1 t 4*p1pe L1 &L2 Temp. R1 Radius R2 Radius Dist. {ft) rFl {In) (In) 0.5 1625 4.2 5.5 1 1374 3 4.4 1.5 1163 2.1 3.4 987 1.3 2.6 839 0.6 2 3 715 0.1 1.4 3.5 610 Contact 0.9 4 523 0.6 4.5 450 0.2 -. 5 389 Contact No sketch requir
  • M-663-000 1 7A, Revision WO 1 Sketch: Fire Area (Side I): A-24 M4X Dwg: M-?Xi341 Fire Area (Side 2): A-4 10. Annular Gap (smallest): 2" 1 I. Gap between pen; NIA 12. Barrier Type: R 13. Opening Sleeved or Concrete: Steel q4. Pipe Insulate& Yes Wayne Aregood Prepared By: Jeff Suter Reviewed By: Penetration Seal Data Appendix: BB Penetration #: PI 3450865 Penetration Type: RB-5A toc.lElev.: 2000'-0" f . Barrier Thickness: 12" 2. Opening Size: 10" D 3. Penetrants: (1) 4"P 4. Sealant Type: HDSEMDLE, Ceramic Fiber 5. Damming Sidel: Boot 6, Damming Side 2: Boot 7. Damming Continuity (AcdRej): NIA 8. Boot Condition {AmRej): Accept 9. Sealant Depth: 14" ** Walkdown Comments: SIsb thickness based on drawing C-I C1311. '* Sealant depth determined by inspection report.

M-663-00017A, Revision W01 Penetration Seal Data Appnciix: ~8 1 Photos: PI 34S0865 Fire Area A-24 (Side 1 ) Fire Area A-1 (Side 2) Fire Area A-24 (Side 1) Fire Area A-l (Side 2)

  • *
  • M-663-00017A. Revision WOl Penetration Seal Data Heat Affected Zone Review: P134S0865 Fire Area (Side 1) A-24 No Issues wilhln Heat Affected Zone Fire Area (Side 2) A-1 No Issues within Heat Affected Zone Side 1 Photo Side2 Photo required Sketch Page 88-159 ofB8-J80 Appendix: B8 ,Review Distances M-e63-000 17A. .,... 7.2.3-1 ) .4"Pipe L1 &L2 Temp. R1 Radius R2Radlua Di&t. (ft) (Of) (In) (In) 0.5 1625 i 4.2 5.5 11 1374 3 4.4 1.5 1163 2.1 3.4 2 987 1.3 2.6 2.5 839 0.6 2 3 715 0.1 1.4 3.5 610 Contact 0.9 4 523 0.6 4.5 450 0.2 5 389 Contact No sketch required .

M-663-000 17A, Revision WO 1 Fire Area (Side 1): A-24 M-OX Dw~: M-1X134l Page B8-160 of B8-180 I Fire Area (Side 2): A-l 10. Annular Gap (smallest): 2" 41. Gap beiween pen: NIA 12. Barrier Type: R 13. Opening SIeeved or Concrete: steel 14. Pipe Insulated: Yes Wayne Aregood Prepared By: Penetration Seal Data Appendix: I% Penetration #: PI 34S0875 Penetration Type; RB-5A Lac.lElev.: 2000'-On 1. Barrier Thickness: 12" 2 Opening Size: 18"D 3. Penetrants: (1) 1OWP 4. Sealant Type: HOSUHDLE. Ceramic Fiber 5. Damming Sidel: Boot 6. Damming Sick 2: Boot 7. Damming Continuity {AceERej): NIA 8. Bod Condition (AcclRej): Accept 9. Sealant Depth: Assumed Per Detail Walkdown Comments: Slab thickness based on drawing C-1 C131 I. Sketch; Jeff Suter Reviewed By: FA: r - ' ! F& &I SmP M-663-00017A, Revision W01 PageB8-161afB8-I80 1 Penetration Seal Data Appendix: BS Photos: PI 34S0875 I Fire Area A-24 (Side 1 ) Fire Area A-24 (Side 1) Fire Area A-I (Side 2) Fire Area A-l (Side 2)

  • *
  • M-663-00017A, Revision WOl Penetration Seal Data Heat Affected Zone Review: P134S0875 Fire Area (Side 1) A-24 No issues within Heat Affected Zone Fire Area (Side 2) A-1 No Issues within Heat Affected Zone Side1 Photo Side2Photo Sketch Page 88-162 of 88-180 Appendix: B8 Review Distances (RefltBnoo f"lQIN T .2.3-1 ) 10" Pipe L1 &L2 Temp. R1 Radius R2Radlus 1 Oist. {ft) rF) (in) {In) 0.5 I 1697 4.5 5.8 1 1497 3.6 4.9 1.5 1321 2.8 4.1 2 1167 2:1 3.5 2.5 1032 1.5 2.'8 3 914 1 2.3 3.5 810 0.5 1.8 4 719 0.1 1.4 4.5 639 Contact 1.1 5 569 0.8 5.5 508 0.5 6 454 0.2 6.5 406 0 7 365 Contact I I No sketch requir d .

M-663-00017A, Revision W01 Page B8- 163 of B8- 1 80 Fire Area (Side 1 ): A-24 M-OX Dwg; M-1x1341 Fire Area (Side 2): A-I 10. Annular Gap (smallest): 3' 11. Gap between pen: NIA 12. Barrier Type: F R 13. Opening Sleeved or Concrete: Steel 14. Pipe Insulated: No Wayne Aregood Prepared By: Jeff Suter Reviewed By: Penetration Seal Data Appendix: ~8 Penetration #: Pi 348091 1 Penetration Type: RB-5A LoclElev.: 2000'-0" I. Barrier Thickness: f 2" 2. Opening Si: 12"D 3. Penetrants: (1) 4"P 4. Seatant Type: HDSEIHDLE, Ceramic Fiber 5. Damming Sidel; Boot 6. Damming Side 2: Boot 7. Damming Continuity (AcdRej}: NIA 8. Boot Condition (AcclRej): Accept 9. Sealant Depth: 1 3-1 12" ** Walkdown Comments: Slab thickness based on drawing C-1 C1311. *' Sealant depth determined by inspection report. Sketch:

M-663 -000 17A, Revision W0 1 Page B8-164 of B8-180 Fire Area A-24 (Side 1 ) Penetration Seal Data Appendix: 88 Photos: PI 34S0911 Fire Area A-24 (Side 1 j Fire Area A-1 Rre Area A-1 (Side 2)

M-663-00017A, Revision W01 Page BS-165 of B8-180 I Side 2 Photo , . No ., .photo required. NO photo requked. ,, . . . , . -. - , b.. . . ';,-: . -. ,: :. '.?-'+;. -, ', * .,,>--- ? .- 1 ,q , 1 L I .--' -!k:.3. .- . , .-. ,-*T. -. -. L1 & Li 0 5 1625 4.- I 1374 3 4.1 1.5 1163 2.t 3.d 2 987 1.3 j 2.5 839 0+6 z 3 715 0.7 2.4 3.5 610 Contact 0.9 4 523 0.6 4.5 450 02 5 389 Contact Penetration Seal Data Appendix: E- Heat Affected Zone Review: P134S091 t Fire Area (Side I) A-24 No Issues wimin Heat Affected Zone Fire Area (Side 2) A-1 No issues within Heat Affeeted tame Side 1 Photo L Sketch . . .. . . d, 4. I . , .. , , ., v, -!!*: .I -. m ' -. . .. . .: No s,ketch . required. . . , -, . . - ,. . - - .-

Fire Area (Side I): A-24 MDX Dwg: M-$Xi341 10. Annular Gap (smallest): 3" IT. Gap between pen: NIA 12. Barrier Type: R 13. Opening Steeved or Concrete: Steel 14. Pipe Insulated: No Wayne Aregod Prepared By: Jefi SSuter Revid By: Penetration Seal Data Appendix: ~8 Penetration #: PI 348091 2 Penetration Type: RB-5A Locmev.: 2000'-0" I. Barrier Thickness: 12" 2. Opening Size: 14"D 3. Penetrants: (1) 4'P 4. Sealant Type: HDSEIHDLE, Ceramic fiber 5. Damming Side1 : Boot 6. Damming Side 2: Boot 7. Damming Continuity (AcdRej): NIA 8. Ba Condifian (Adej): Accept 9. Sealant hpth: 13-112" ** Wal kdwn Comments: Slab thickness based on drawing C-1 Ct 37 1. ** Sealant depth determined by inspection report.

M-663-00017A, Revision WOI Page 88-167 ofBS-180

  • Seal Data Appendix: 88 Photos: P13450912 Fire Area A-24 (Side 1} Fire Area A-24 (Side 1)
  • Fire Area A-1 (Side 2) Fire Area A-1 (Side 2) *
  • *
  • M-663-00017A, Revision WOl Penetration Seal Data Heat Affected Zone Review: P134S0912 Fire Area (Side 1) A-24 No Issues within Heat Affected Zone FireArea(Side2) A-1 No Issues within Heat Affected Zone Side1 Photo Side2Photo Sketch Page B8-168 of B8-180 Appendix: B8 Review Distances (1Wwwa !Mi63-00017A. Fbft 7.23-1 ) 4"Pipe L1 &l2 Temp. R1 Radius R2 RHius Dlat. (ft) rF) (In) (In) 0.5 1625 4.2 ]5.5 1 1374 3 ]4.4 ]1.5 1163 2.1 3.4 '2 987 1.3 2.6 12.5 839 0.6 2 3 715 0.1 I 1.4 3.5 610 Contact 0.9 4 523 0.6 4.5 450 0.2 5 389 Contact No sketch required .

M-663 -000 17A, Revision WO I Page B8- 1 69 of B8- 1 80 Penetration Seal Data Appendix: ~8 Penetration #: PI 348091 8 Penetration Type: RB-5A toc.Elw.: 2000'-0" 1. Barrier Thickness: 5 2 2. Opening Size: f OaD 3. Penetrants: 4. Sealant Type: 5. Damming Side1 : fire Area (Side 1): A-24 M-OX Dwg: M-1x1341 Fire Area (Side 2): A-I HDSEIHDLE, Ceramic Fiber Boot 6. Damming Side 2: Boot 7. Damming Continuity (AcclRej): FUA 8. Boot Condition (AcclRej): Accept 9. Sealant Depth: 10. Annular Gap (smallest): 1-712" I 1. Gap between pen: NIA 12. Barrier Type: F R 13. Opening Sleeved or Concrete: Steel 14. Ape lnsutated: Yes Wayne Aregood Prepared By: Jeff Suter Reviewed By: Walkdown Comments: Slab thickness based on drawing C-1 C1311. " Sealant depth determined by inspection report. Sketch:

Penetration Sea1 Data Photos: PI 34S0918 Fire Area 24 (Side 4) (Side 2) Fire Area A-24 (Side f ) Fire Area A-1 (Side 2) I - .. I*, .A

  • *
  • M-663-00017A, Revision WOl Penetration Seal Data Heat Affected Zone Review: P1345'0918 Fire Area (Side 1) A-24 No issues within Heat Affected Zone Fire Area (Side 2) A-1 No issues within Heat Affected Zone Side 1 Photo Side2Photo hoto Sketch Page B8-17l ofB8-180 Appendix: ,88 Review Distances F1guta 7.2.3-1) 4"Pipe L1 & L2 Temp. R1 Radius R2 Radius Dist. (ft) ("F) (in) (in) 0.5 1625 4.2 5.5 1 1374 3 4.4 1.5 1163 2.1 3.4 2 987 1.3 2.6 -2.5 839 0!6 2 3 715 0.1 1.4 3.5 610 Contact 0.9 4 523 0.6 4.5 450 0.2 ... 5 389 Contact No sketch required .

M-663-000 17A, Revision WO I Sketch: Fire Area {Slde 1 ): A-24 M-OX Dw: M-1x1341 Page B8- 172 of 38- 1 84 Fire Area (Side 2): A-I 10. Annular Gap (smallest): 5" 11. Gap between pen: NIA 12. Barrier Type: F R 13. Opening Sleeved or Conerek Steet 14. Pipe Insulated: Yes Wayne Aregood Prepared By: Jeff Suter Reviewed By: Penetration Seal Data Appendix: BS Penetration #: P13480919 Penetration Type: RB-5A LocJElev.: 2000'-0" 1. Barrier Thickness: 12" 2. Opening Size: 10"D 3. Penetrants: (1) 4"P 4. Sealant Type: HDSEIHDLE, Ceramic Fiber 5. Damming Side1 : Boot 6. Damming Side 2: Boot 7. Damming Continuity (AccRej): NIA 8. Boot Condition (Ac-ej): Accept 9. Sealant Depth: 14" " Walkdawn Comments: Slab thickness based on drawing C-1 C1311. '* Sealant depth determined by inspection report. i M-663-08017A, Revision WD1 Page 58-173 of BS-180 (Side 2) Fire Area A-24 (Side 1 ) Penetration Seal Data Appendix BB Photos: PI 34S0919 Fi Area A-24 (Side 1) m m Fin3 rn A-I I Fire Area A-l (Side 2)

  • *
  • M-663-00017A, Revision WOl Penetration Seal Data Heat Affected Zone Review: P134S0919 Fire Area (Side 1) A-24 No Issues within Heat Affected Zone Fire Area (Side 2) A-1 No issues within Heat Affecte(S Zone Side 1 Photo Side2Photo Sketch Page 88-174 ofB8-180 Appendix: 88 Rev,iew Distances (Rafenlncll FJQwa 7.2.$-1) -4"Pipe L1 &L2 Temp. R1 Radius R2 Radius Dist. (ft) ("F) (in) (in) 0.5 1625 4.2 5.5 1 1374 3 4.4 1.5 1163 3.4 2 987 1.3 2.6 2.5 839 l 0.6 2 3 715 I 0.1 1.4 3.5 610 *Contact 0.9 4 523 0.6 4.5 450 0.2 5 389 Contact No sketch require
  • M-663-000 17A, Revision W01 Page B8-175 of B8-180 Rre Area (Side 1): A-8 M-OX Dwg: M-tX1918 Fiqi&a (Side 2): A9 10. Annular Gap (smallest): 2" f 1. Gap between pen: NlA 12. Barrier Type: R 13. Opening Sleeved or Concrete: Steel Id Pipe Insulated: Pb Wayne Aregood Prepared By: Jeff Suter Reviewed By: Penetration Seal Data Appendix: ~8 Penetration #: P141W1854 Peneiration Type: RB-5A 10~Elev.: 2034-1 1 I. Barrier Thickness: 36" 2. Opening Size: 26-0 3. Penetrants: (1) 18'P 4. Sealant Type: HDSEIHDLE. Ceramic Fiber 5. Damming Side1 : Boot 6. Damming Side 2: Boot 7. Damming Continuity (AcdRej): NIA 8. Boot Condition (AcdUej): Accept 9. Sealant Depth: 41" ** Watkdown Comments: Barrier thickness based on C-1 C1311. ** Sealant depth determined from inspection report. Sketch:

M463-000 17A, Revision WU1 Fire Area A-8 (Side 1) (Side 2) Rre Area A-9 (Side 2) Penetration Seal Data Appsndix: 88 Photos: PI41 W18a Fire Area A4 (Side I) Fire Area A-9 I

  • *
  • M-663-00017A, Revision WOl Penetration Seal Data Heat Affected Zone Review: P141W1854 Fire Area (Side 1) A-8 No issues within Heat Affected Zone Fire Area (Side 2) A-9 No issues within Heat Affected Zone Side 1 Photo Side 2 Photo I Sketch Page 88-177 ofBS-180 Appendix: B8 Review Distances (Refe""""' M-ll63-0001TA. FlgUI87.2.3-1 ) 18" Pipe L1 & L2 Temp. R1 Radius R2 Radius Dist. (ft) ("F) Jin) .(in) 0.5 1741 4.7 6 1 1576 3.9 5.3 1.5 1426 3.3 4.6 2 1292 2.7 4 2.5 1171 2.1 3.5 3 1062 1.6 3 3.5 964 1.2 2.5 4 875 0.8 2.1 4.5 795 0.4 1.8 5 724 0.1 1.5 5.5 659 Contact 1.2 6 600 0.9 6.5 548 0.7 7 501 0.5 7.5 458 0.3 8 419 0.1 8.5 385 Contact No sketch required .

M-663-00017A, Revision W01 Page 88- 1 78 of B8- 1 80 Fire Area (Side I): A-16 M4X Dwg: M-OX1920 Fire Area (Side 2); A-9 10. Annular Gap (smallest): 2" 11. Gap between pen: NIA 12. Barrier Type: R 13. Opening Sleeved or Concrete: Steel j4. Pipe Insulated: No Jeff Suter Prepared By: Wayne Aregwd Revlewed By: Penetration Seal Data Appendix: 88 Penetration #: PI 41 W4 980 Penetration Type: RB-5A LocJEle~.: 2028'-6" 1. Barrier Thickness: 36" 2. Opening Si: 26"D 3. Penetrants: (1) f8"P 4. Seatant Type: HDSEIHDLE, Ceramic Fiber 5. Damming Side1 : Boot 6. Damming Side 2: Boot 7. Damming Continuity (AcdRej): tWA 8. Boot Condition (AcclRej): Accept 9. Sealant Depth: Assumed per detail Walkdown Comments: Barrier thickness based an C-OC1411. Sketch:

M-663-000 1 7A, Revision W0 1 (Side 2) - - Penetration Seal Data Appendix: BS Photos: PI41 W1980 Fire Area A-16 (Side 1 ) 1 ,= 1 I 1 - !. I Fire Area A-9 . .. Fire Area A- 1 6 (Side I ) Fire Area A-9 (Side 2) Page B8-179 of B8-180

  • *
  • M-663-00017A. Revision WOl Penetration Seal Data Heat Affected Zone Review: P141W1980 Fire Area {Side 1) No Issues within Heat Affected Zone Fire Area (Side 2) A*9 No issues within Heat Affected Zone Side 1 Photo Side2Photo Sketch Page 88-! 80 of 88-180 Appendix: 88 Review Distances 18" Pipe L1 &L2 Temp. R1 Radius R2 Radius Dist. (ft) rF) {In* (In) 0.5 1741 4.7 6 1 1576 3.9 5.3 1.5 1426 3.3 4.6 2 1292 2.7 4 2.5 1171 2.1 3.5 3 1062 1.6 3 3.5 964 1.2 2.5 4 875 0.8 2.1 4.5 795 0.4 1.8 5 724 0.1 1.5 5.5 659 Contact 1.2 6 600 0.9 6.5 548 0.7 7 501 0.5 7.5 458 0.3 l .. ,8 419 0.1 8.5 385 Contact No sketch requir *

/L W@AF .-' CREEK 7,r NUCLEAR OPERATING CORPORATION M-663-00017A Attachment B9 Fire Protection Evaluation For Penetrant Size Exceeding Typical Detail RB-1 or RB-8 Limitation Page 1 Rev. No. W01 Prepared By & & Jeff Suter Date 08122105 Reviewed By lL..d/& Wayne S Aregood Date 08122105 M-663-00017A Attachment B9 Revision W01 Table of Contents Page 2 of 7 Revision Log ................................................................................................................................... 3 1.0 Purpose ............................................................................................................................... 4 .................................................................................................................................. 2.0 Scope 4 .......................................................................................................................... 3.0 References 4 4.0 Evaluation ........................................................................................................................... 5 5.0 Conclusions ......................................................................................................................... 7 ...................................................... Appendix B9, Penetration Seal Data (1 5 Total Pages)

M-663-00017A Attachment B9 Revision W01 Revision Log Revision W01 Reason for Revision Original Issue M-663-00017A Page 4 of 7 Attachment B9 Revision W01 I 1.0 Purpose 1 .I The purpose of this document is to evaluate existing penetration seals that are not directly bounded to the typical detail limitations established in M663-00017. This evaluation was conducted in effort to satisfy regulatory expectation regarding qualification and documentation of fire barrier penetration seals, as 1 I discussed in NRC lnformation Notice 88-04. This evaluation was conducted in accordance with the guidance of NRC Generic Letter 86-10. 2.0 Scope 2.1 The Table I penetrations in relation to the design requirements discussed in I Section 5.1. 2.2 Refer to Section 7.0 of M663-00017A for a cross-reference list of penetrations within Table I that are evaluated for additional seal parameters that do not satisfy the typical detail limitations of M-663-00017. In these instances, the potential cumulative affects of multiple unbounded attributes were considered for each I penetration of concern. 3.0 References 3.1 NRC Generic Letter 86-10, Implementation of Fire Protection Requirements, dated April 24, 1986 3.2 NRC lnformation Notice 88-04, Inadequate Qualification and Documentation of Fire Barrier Penetration Seals 3.3 10 CFR 50 Appendix R, Fire Protection Program For Nuclear Power Facilities Operating Prior To January 1, 1979 I 3.4 LER 87-10, Technical Specification Violations - Inoperable Fire Barriers Caused By Personnel Errors 3.5 NC663-00017, Penetration Seal Typical Details, Rev. W20 1 4.0 Assumptions 4.1 It is assumed that existing penetration seal materials have been installed as required by applicable typical design details and procedures. This is an acceptable assumption based on a review of the Quality Control documentation maintained during initial penetration seal installation activities and the intrusive inspections conducted to address LER 87-10, regarding seal material depth. I M-663-00017A Page 5 of 7 Attachment B9 Revision W01 5.0 Evaluation 5.1 Assessment of Condition to Design Requirements The penetration openings identified in Table I contain a pipe penetrant that exceeds the size limitation directly bounded by typical detail RB-1 or RB-8 from M-663-00017. RB-1 is sealed with Radflex between silicone impregnated fiberglass boots. RB-8 is also a Radflex seal, were interference does not allow the installation of boot on one or both barrier sides. In this case a minimum 1- 112" depth of Silicone Foam is utilized as a "plug" on the barrier side containing the interference. For both seal details, the maximum penetrant size is 10" in diameter. The topside boot for RB-1 may be omitted in floorlceiling orientations. Figures 1 and 2 depict typical RB-1 and RB-8 details, respectively. TABLE l Penetrations with Penetrant Size Exceeding Detail RB-I or RB-8 Limitations /- ""'""' FLOOR WALL CONFIGURATION CONFIGURATION Figure 1, Typical Detail RB-1 (Reference M-663-00017) Penetration Number PI21 SO277 PI 21 SO278 PI 22S0347 PI 34W2053 P142W1933

  • Barrier thickness is based on top of slab to recessed portion of corrugated metal deck. Communicating Fire Areas Typical RB-1 RB-1 RB-1 RB-8 RB-8 Side 1 A-I A-I A-I A-8 A-16 Side 2 A4 A4 A-2 A-24 A-10 Pipe Penetrant Diameter 14 14 12 12" 18 Barrier Thickness 19"
  • 19"
  • 22"
  • 36" 36 Radflex Seal Depth > 19 > 19" > 22" > 36" > 36 Comments I Disposition See 5.2 See 5.2 See 5.2 See 5.2 See 5.2 M-663-00017A Page 6 of 7 Attachment B9 Revision W01 INMRlEO IWT iT'r'P b FLOOR OR WALL CONFIGURATION Figure 2, Typical Detail RB-8 (Reference M-663-00017) 5.2 Evaluation of Condition Radflex has been utilized in boundaries providing fire and radiation protection where mechanical penetrant movement is likely. To satisfy radiation attenuation requirements, Radflex has typically been installed to the full depth of the barrier. The tested configurations bounding typical details RB-I and RB-8 contained a 12" depth of Radflex within the barrier plane (Radflex was also present in boots beyond the barrier plane). The Table I penetrations are provided with seal depths within the barrier plane that are at least 19". Consistent with the tested configurations, additional Radflex material is also present in the boots beyond the barrier plane. Radflex has a density (150 lb/ft3) comparable to concrete, with excellent fire test performance regarding material char and thermal transmission to the unexposed side seal surface. Considering this, and the substantial seal material depth increase over the tested configurations, there is reasonable assurance that penetrant thermal insult will not impact the fire resistive performance of the Table I penetrations. Therefore, the Table I penetrations are considered 3hour F and T rated. Conservatively, the heat affected zone for each of the Table I penetrations was reviewed in accordance with the criteria and methodology of established in M 663-00017A Section 7.2.3 for non-T rated penetrations. The review, documented in Appendix B9, identified that no exposed insitu combustibles or PFSSD circuits are located within the heat affected zone for the Table I penetrations. This further substantiates the acceptability of the Table I penetration seal configurations.

M-663-00017A Attachment B9 Revision W01 Page 7 of 7 5.3 Post Fire Safe Shutdown Impact There is no impact to PFSSD systems or components as a result of this evaluation. The Table I penetrations are considered 3-hour F and T rated. Additionally, as a conservative measure, comprehensive walkdown reviews for each of these penetrations revealed that no exposed insitu combustibles or PFSSD circuits are present within the heat affected zone for the Table I penetrations. 6.0 Conclusions Based on the above discussions, the Table I penetration seals are considered 3-hour F and T rated, consistent with regulatory requirements and commitments as well as WCNOC Fire Protection Program requirements.

M-663-00017A, Revision WO 1 Fire Area (Side I ): A-I MOX Dwg: M-OXI 21 1 Fire Area (Side 2): A-4 10. Annular Gap (smallest): 6" 11. Gap between pen: MIA 12. Barrier Type: RW 13. Opening Sleeved or Concrete: Steel t4. Pipe Insulated: Ye Wayne Aregood Prepared By: 7- Page B9- I of B9- 1 5 Jeff Suter Penetration Seal Data Appendix: ~9 Penetration #: PI 21 SO277 Penetration Type: RB-1 Loc.Elev.: 19#'-0" t. Barrier Thickness: 19" 2. Opening Sire; 30- D 3. Penetrants: (1) 14"P 4. Sealant Type: Radfl ex 5. Damming Sidel: Boot 6. Damming Side 2: Boot 7. Damming Continuity (AcelRejJ: Nlk 8. Boot Condition (Adej): Accept 9. Sealant Depth: Assumed Per Detail Walkdown Comments: Slab thickness determined from drawing G-OCl21 I. Insutation appears to tmsltion thraugh seal area. Penetrant appears to be concentrically pnsitianed and annulus is equal all the way around. Revlewed By: Sketch:

I Penetration Seal Data Appendix B8 1 Photos: Pd21 SO277 Fire Area A-1 (Side I) Fire Area A-1 (Side I) Fire Area A-4 (Side 2)

  • *
  • M-663-00017A, Revision WOl Penetration Seal Data Heat Affected Zone Review: P1215'0277 Fire Area (Side 1) A-1 No issues within Heat Affected Zone Fire Area (Side 2) A4 No issues within Heat Affected zone Side 1 Photo Side2 Photo qui Sketch Page B9-3 ofB9-15 Appendix: B9 Review Distances (IWerwnce 7 ) 14" Pipe L1 & L2 Temp. R1 Radius R2 Radius Dist. (ft) (In) _{in) 0.5 1721 4.6 5.9 1 1539 3.8 5.1 1.5 1377 3 4.4 2 ,1233 2.4 3.8 2.5 1105 1.8 3.2 3 991 1.3 12.7 3.5 889 0.9 12 .. 2 4 799 0.4 11.8 4.5 719 0.1 1.4 5 647 :Contact 1.1 5.5 583 I 0.8 6 527 I 0.6 6.5 477 0.3 7 432 I 0.1 7.5 392 Contact I ! I No sketch requir d .

M-663-00017A, Revision W01 Page Fire Area (Side 1): A-I M-OX Dwg: M-OX12I 1 Fire Area (Side 2): A4 10. Annular Gap (smallest): 2" 11. Gap between pen: NIA 42. Barrier Type: F RW 13. Opening Sleeved or Concrete: Steel 14. Pipe Insulated: No Wayne Aregood Prepared By: Jeff Suter Reviewed By: Penetration Seal Data Appendix: ~9 Penetration #: Pi 21 SO278 Penetration Type; RB-1 Loc.lElev.: 1 988'-0" I. Barrier Thickness: 19" 2. Opening Site: 22" D 3. Penetrants: (1) 14°F 4. Sealant Type: Radflex 5. Damming Sidef : Boot I 6. Damming Side 2: Boot 7. Damming Continuity (AccIRej): NIA 8. Bod Condition (AcdRej): Accept 9. Sealant Depth: Assumed Per Detail Watkdown Comments: Slab thickness determined from drawing C-OC1211. I I I Sketch:

M-663-000 17A, Revision WQ1 Page B9-5 of 39- 15 Penetration Seal Data Appendix: ~9 Photos: PI21 50278 Fire Area A-I (Side 1 ) (Side 2) Fire Area A-1 (Side 1) Fire Area A-4 (Side 2)

  • *
  • M-663-00017A, Revision WOI Penetration Seal Data Heat Affected Zone Review: P12150278 Fire Area {Side 1) A-1 No issues within Heat Affected Zone Fire Area (Side 2) A-4 1. 4U3F1N, 1-112" Cond.: Not within Heat Affected Zone. Side 1 Photo Side 2 Photo Sketch *c.. * * * . * **
  • a * ** * .. ,..., .r *: .. . ** b * ' , *. *. *-* . , .. l Page 89-6 of B9-15 Appendix: 89 Review Distances M-663<<1017A. fp 7.2.3-1) L1 &L2 Dist. (ft) 0.5 1 1.5 2 2.5 3 3.5 4 4.5 5 5.5 6 6.5 7 7.5 . *A.* * *u* . . . ' * ..... t& *n o .1, * * . . .. . . .... * .. *
  • 14" Pipe Temp. R1 Radius rF> (in) 1721 4.6 1539 3.8 1377 3 1233 2.4 1105 1.8 991 1.3 889 0.9 799 0.4 719 0.1 647 Contact 583 527 477 432 392 FA:M SJde2 R2Radlus (In) 5.9 5.1 4.4 3.8 3.2 2.7 2.2 1.8 1.4 1.1 0.8 0.6 0.3 0.1 Contact M-663 -000 1 74 Revision WO I Page B9-7 of B9- 1 5 1 Sketch: Fire Area (Side I): A-i M-OX OWQ: M-OX1221 Fire Area (Side 2): A-2 10. Annular Gap (smallest): 3 " I 1. Gap between pen: N IA 12. Barrier Type: RW f 3. Opening Sleeved or Concrete: Steel 14. Pipe- Insulated: No Wayne Aregood Prepared By: Jeff Sutet Reviewed By: Penetration Seal Data Appendix: 69 Penetration #: PI 2280347 Penetration Type: RB-1 Loe.lElev,; t 988'-OW 1. Barrier Thickness: 22" 2. Opening Size: 1 enD 3. Penetrants: (1) 12"P 4. Sealant Type: Radflex 5. Damming Sidel: Boot 6. Damming Side 2: Boot 7. Damming Continuity (AcclRej): N/A 8. Boot Condition (AcelRej): Accept 9. Sealant Depth: Assumed Per Detail Walkdown Comments: Slab thickness determined from drawing C-OC1211. I Page B9-8 of B9-15 I Penetration Seal Data mix: ~9 I Rre Area A-1 (Side 1) Fire Area A-2 (Side 2) Fire Area A-2 (Side 2)

M-663-00017A, Revision WOl Penetration Seal Data

  • Heat Affected Zone Review: P122S0347 Fire Area (Side 1) A-1 No Issues within Heat Affected Zone Fire Area (Side 2) A-2 No issues within Heat Affected Zone Side 1 Photo Side2Photo
  • Sketch No sketch r
  • Page 89-9 ofB9-15 Appendix: 89 Review Distances 12" Pipe L1 &L2 Temp. R1 Radius R2Radius Dist. (ft) (OF) (in) (in) 0.5 1712 4.6 5.'9 1 1524 3.7 5.1 1.5 3 4.3 2 1209 2.3 3.6 2.5 1078 1.7 3.1 3 962 1.2 2.5 3.5 860 0.7 2.1 4 769 0.3 1.7 4.5 689 Contact L3 5 618 1 5.5 555 0.7 6 499 0.4 6.5 450 0.2 7 406 0 7.5 368 Contact
  • M-663-00017A, Revision W01 Fire Area (Side l ): A-8 MOX Dwg; WiX1921 Page B9-10 af B9- 15 Fire Area (Side 21: A-24 f 0. Annular Gap (smallest): 2" I I. Gap between pen: NIA f 2. Barrier Type: Penetration Seal Data Appendix: ~9 Penetration #: P134W2053 Penetration Type: RB-8 Loc&le~.; 201 2'-3" 1. Barrier Thickness: 36" 2. Opening Sue: 18"D 3. Penetrants: ('t) 12"P 4. Sealant Type: Radflexlfoam 5, Damming Side1 : N /A I 6. Damming Side 2: NIA 7. Damming Continuity (AcdRej): MA 8. Boot Condition (AcdRej): Accept 9. Sealant Depth: 34" *+ Walkdown Comments: Barrier thickness determined by Drawing C-OC1341 (wsa). ** Sealant depth determined by inspection report. I I I 13. Opening Sleeved or Concrete: Steel 14. Pipe Insulated Wo Jeff Suter Pmpamd By: Wayne Aregood Reviewed By:

M-663-000 17A, Revision W0 1 Page 89- 1 1 of B9- 15 Penetration Seal Data Appendix: 69 1 Photos: P? 34W2053 Fire Area A-8 {Side 1) Fire Area A-24 (Side 2) Fire Area A-8 (Side I) Fire Area A-24 (Side 2)

  • *
  • M-663-00017A, Revision WOI Penetration Seal Data Heat Affected Zone Review: P134W2053 Fire Area (Side 1) A-8 1. 2" Cond. 5U3A1T. utility power. not within Heat Affected Zone 2. Two (2) 112" lighting conduit. not within Heat Affected Zone Fire Area (Side 2) A-24 No issues within Heat Affected Zone Side 1 Photo Sketch FA: A-1 Slde1 Side2 Photo
  • I>, . ' . *0 I .. (/ Page B9-12 of B9-15 Appendix: :89 Review Distances (Rtfnnoe M-663-00017A. Agule 7.2.3-1 ) 12-Pipe L1 &l2 Temp. R1 Radius R2 RadJUI Dlst. (ft) rFl (in) (in) 0.5 1712 4.6 5.9 1 1524 3.7 5.1 1.5 1357 3 I 4.3 2 1209 2.3 3.6 2.5 1078 1.7 3.1 3 962 1.2 2.5 3.5 860 0.7 2.1 4 769 0.3 1.7 4.5 689 Contact u 5 618 1 5.5 555 0.7 6 499 0.4 6.5 450 0.2 7 406 0 7.5 368 Contact I I I I M-663-00017A, Revision W0 1 Sketch: Fire Area (Side I): A-16 M-OX Dw~: M-1x1919 Fire Area (Side 2): A-1 0 10. Annular Gap (smallest): 1-t12* 1 1. Gap between pen: NIA 12. Barrier Type: R 13. Opening Sleewd or Concrete: Steel 14. Pipe insulated: Yes Jeff Suter Prepared By: Wayne Aregood Reviewed By: Penetration Seal Data Appendix: ~9 Penetration #: P142W1933 Penetration Type: RB-8 LoclElev.: 2035'4" 1. Barrier Thickness: 36" 2. Opening Size: 24"D 3. Penetrants: (1) 18"~ 4. Sealant Type: FoadRadflex 5. Damming Side1 : NIA 6. Damming Side 2: NIA 7. Damming Continuity (AcdRej): WIA 8. Boot Condition (AcdRej): Accept 9. Sealant Depth: 36.5" Radflex Walkdown Comments: Barrier thickness based on drawing C-1C1421. 1-112" foam damming per original inspection record and 2" sleeve extension will produce 8 36-112" radflex seal (wsa). Sleeve extender per FCR I-BBI-091.

M-663-000 1 7A, Revision W01 Fire Area A-1 6 (Side I) (Side 2) Fire Area A-10 (Side 2) Penetration Seal Data Appendix: ~9 Photos: P142W1933 Fire ha A-1 6 (Side 1) Fire Area A-1 0 I

  • *
  • M-663-000l?A, Revision WOl Penetration Seal Data Heat Affected Zone Review: P142W1933 Fire Area (Side 1) A-16 No issues within Heat Affected Zone Fire Area (Side 2) A-10 No issues within Heat Affected Zone Side 1 Photo Side 2Photo Sketch Page B9-J5 ofB9-15 Appendix: 89 Review Distances (IWeNnca M-663-00017A. 7 I 18" Pipe L1 & L2 Temp. R1 Radius R2 Radius Dist. (ft) ("F) (in) (in) 0.5 1741 4.7 6 1 1576 3.9 5.3 1.5 1426 3.3 4.6 2 1292 2.7 4 2.5 1171 2.1 3.5 3 1.6 3 3.5 964 1.2 2.5 4 875 0.8 2.1 4.5 795 0.4 Ul 5 724 0.1 1.5 5.5 659 Contact 1.2 6 600 0.9 6.5 548 0.7 7 501 0.5 7.5 458 I 0.3 8 419 0.1 8.5 385 Contact I No sketch requ*r
  • Page 1 -/ ?,r NUCLEAR OPERATING CORPORATION Attachment B10 Fire Protection Evaluation For Penetration Openings With Steel Plates Rev. No. wo1 Prepared By &d& Wayne S Aregood Date 08120105 Reviewed By Jeff Suter Date 08l20105 M-663-00017A Attachment B10 Revision W01 Table of Contents Page 2 of 7 ................................................................................................................................... Revision Log 3 1.0 Purpose ............................................................................................................................... 4 .................................................................................................................................. 2.0 Scope 4 3.0 References .......................................................................................................................... 4 4.0 Evaluation ........................................................................................................................... 5 5.0 Conclusions ......................................................................................................................... 7 Appendix B10-1, Penetration Seal Data ..................................................... (6 Total Pages)

Revision Log M-663-00017A Page 3 of 7 Attachment I31 0 Revision W01 Revision WO1 Reason for Revision Original Issue M-663-00017A Attachment B10 Revision W01 Page 4 of 7 1.0 Purpose 1.1 The purpose of this document is to evaluate existing penetration seals that are not directly bounded to the typical detail limitations established in M663-00017. This evaluation was conducted in effort to satisfy regulatory expectation regarding qualification and documentation of fire barrier penetration seals, as discussed in NRC lnformation Notice 88-04. This evaluation was conducted in accordance with the guidance of NRC Generic Letter 86-10. 2.0 Scope 2.1 The Table I penetrations in relation to the design requirements discussed in Section 5.1. 2.2 Refer to Section 7.0 of IM663-00017A for a cross-reference list of penetrations within Table I that are evaluated for additional seal parameters that do not satisfy the typical detail limitations of M663-00017. In these instances, the potential cumulative affects of multiple unbounded attributes were considered for each penetration of concern. 3.0 References 3.1 NRC Generic Letter 86-10, Implementation of Fire Protection Requirements, dated April 24, 1986 3.2 NRC lnformation Notice 88-04, "Inadequate Qualification and Documentation of Fire Barrier Penetration Seals". 3.3 10 CFR 50 Appendix R, Fire Protection Program For Nuclear Power Facilities Operating Prior To January 1, 1979 3.4 LER 87-1 0, Technical Specification Violations - Inoperable Fire Barriers Caused By Personnel Errors 3.5 M-663-00017, Penetration Seal Typical Details, Rev. W20 3.6 Underwriters Laboratory Fire Resistance Directory (UL System CAJOOIO), 2002 Edition 4.0 Assumptions 4.1 It is assumed that existing penetration seal materials have been installed as required by applicable typical design details and procedures. This is an acceptable assumption based on a review of the Quality Control documentation maintained during initial penetration seal installation activities and the intrusive inspections conducted to address LER 87-10, regarding seal material depth.

M-663-00017A Page 5 of 7 Attachment B10 Revision WOI 5.0 Evaluation 5.1 Assessment of Condition to Design Requirements Each penetration opening identified in Table I was sealed with a typical detail from W663-00017, with all or part of the annulus opening sealed on at least one barrier side by a welded steel plate. The steel plate protection ensures that that the opening portion protected by steel will not allow the passage of flame or hose stream comparable to UL System CAJ0010. This UL system, reveals that a minimum 0.057" (16 gauge) thick steel plate on one barrier side provides a 3 hour3.472222e-5 days <br />8.333333e-4 hours <br />4.960317e-6 weeks <br />1.1415e-6 months <br /> Fire (F) rated seal. In all cases, the steel plate thickness for the Table I penetrations exceed 0.057". Also, the plates are physically attached (welded) to sleeveslpenetrant such that fire exposure would not distort the plate protective closure. However, there is no direct testing demonstrating a Temperature (T) rating for the steel plates. Therefore, further review is required to assess acceptability. Additionally, the penetrant size for P141S1034 exceeds that allowed by assigned typical detail MI. This issue is addressed within this evaluation, since the heat affected zone review for the steel plate effectively bounds the review necessary for the large pipe penetrant. Table I identifies penetrations with steel enclosure plates. Penetration inspection results are documented in Appendix B10. TABLE l Penetrations with Steel Closure Plates Penetration Number PI 34W2653 P141S1034 penetrant Size (1) 314" P (1) 112" P 18 P Fire Areas Typical Detail FB-1 M-I Side 1 A-6 A-1 6 Primary Opening Size 10 24" Steel Plate Exposed Area 50 in2 198 in2 Side 2 T-2 A-8 CommentslDisposition: FB-1 seal with multiple penetrants and the secondary annulus gap sealed with steel plates on both sides of the barrier. See paragraph 5.2. M-I seal with a large bore pipe penetrant and the topside annulus sealed with closure plate. Bottom side damming found acceptable. See paragraph 5.2.

M-663-00017A Attachment B10 Revision W01 Page 6 of 7 5.2 Evaluation of Condition Penetration P134W2653 is a wall seal that is contains two separate penetration sleeves with end plates welded to the embedded sleeve and to the penetration sleeve. This design creates a secondary annular gap that is closed by a welded %" steel plate on both sides of the barrier. The primary penetration sleeve is sealed in accordance with the limitations of the FB-1 typical detail, and is bounded. Therefore, this evaluation cnly applies to the secondary annulus enclosure plates that are integral to the barrier and directly affect T rating requirements. Penetration P141S1034 is a floor seal that is constructed with a single sleeve. The topside of the sleeve is closed with a %" steel plate, welded from the pipe penetrant to the sleeve, thus establishing a pipe restraint at this location. This design creates a single annulus gap that is also sealed with an MI (Silicone Foam with bottom side damming) typical detail. Additional Silicone Foam fill could not be determined from the original inspection documents. Therefore, the sealant depth is assumed to be the minimum required 6". Because the annulus is sealed with at least 6" of RTV Foam with 1" damming board on the bottom side, it is reasonable to conclude that the topside steel plate will enhance the F rating performance of the installed MI detail. However, the penetration is not considered T rated due to the large unbounded penetrant size. M-663-00017 identifies that where piping penetrations exist that do not satisfy T rating requirements, a seal assembly with an F rating corresponding to the hourly rating of the associated barrier is acceptable, provided evaluation demonstrates that exposed insitu combustibles and redundant post fire safe shutdown (PFSSD) equipment/circuits on the unexposed barrier side will not be detrimentally affected by the increased penetrant temperatures. In effort to evaluate fire area impact, field walkdowns and comprehensive assessment reviews, documented in Appendix B10, were conducted for each penetration of concern. This review was completed in accordance with the criteria and review methodology established in M663-00017A Section 7.2.3 for non-T rated penetrations. The review identified that no exposed insitu combustibles or PFSSD circuits are located within the heat affected zone. Each of the penetrations satisfies the review criteria of M-663-00017 where T rating requirements are not met. Therefore, the penetrations are acceptable, as this evaluation demonstrates reasonable assurance that the penetration seals do not present a negative impact to PFSSD capability. 5.3 Post Fire Safe Shutdown Impact There is no impact to PFSSD systems or components as a result of this evaluation. The Table I penetrations are 3hour F rated. The comprehensive walkdown review for each of these penetrations revealed that no exposed insitu combustibles or PFSSD circuits are regatively affected by the non T rated penetrations.

M-663-00017A Attachment B10 Revision W01 Page 7 of 7 6.0 Conclusions Based on the above discussions, it is reasonable to conclude that the Table I penetration seals are acceptable as 3-hour F rated and will perform their intended function, regardless of not achieving a T rating. The penetration seals satisfy regulatory requirements and commitments as well as WCNOC Fire Protection Program requirements, to prevent spread of fire from one fire area to another. It has also been determined through this evaluation that the lack of a T rating will not affect the plant's ability to achieve and maintain PFSSD.

M-663-00017A, Revision W0 1 Page Sketch: Fire Area (Side I): A-6 M-DX Dwg: M-1 XI 950 Fire Area (Side 2): T-2 10. Annular Gap (smallest): 1 " 1 1. Gag between pen: 1 12" 12. Barrier Type: A F 13. Opening Sleeved or Concrete: Ski 14. Pipe Insulated: No Wayne Aregood Prepared By: Jeff Suter Reviewed By: Penetration Seal Data Appendii: BIO Penetration #: P134W2653 Penetration Type: FB-1 Loc3Uev.: 2007'-6" I. Barrier Thickness: 24" 2. Opening Si: 6"D 3. Penetrants: (I)WP, (1)ln"P 4. Sealant Type: Ceramic Fiber 5, Damming Side1 : Boot 6. Damming Side 2: Boot 7. Damming Continuity (AcclRej): NIA 8. Boot Condition (AcelRej): Accept 9. Sealant Depth: Assumed Per Detail Walkdown Comments: Sleeve annulus is sealed with welded 114" plate (from walt sleeve to penetrant sleeve) both sides, Internal sleeve space configuration is unknown.

M-663-000 17A, Revision W01 Page B 10-2 of B 1 0-6 Penetration Seal Data Appendix: Mo I Photos: Pi 34W2653 Fire Area A-6 (Side I j Fire Area T-2 (Side 2) Fire ha A4 (Side 1) Fire Area 2 (Side 2)

  • *
  • M-663..()(}0 17 A, Revision WO I Penetration Sea'l Data Heat Affected Zone Review: P134W2653 Fire Area (Side 1) A-6 No issues with Heat Affected Zone Fire Area (Side 2) T -2 No issues within Heat Affected Zone Side 1 Photo Side2 Photo Sketch Page BI0-3 ofBI0-6 Appendix: 810 Review Distances (RefeNnce M-8634CXI17A F"41\A 7.2.3-1 ) 112" & 3/4" Pipes (2" Pipe Data Used) l1 &L2 Temp. R1 Radius R2 Radius Dlst.ift) .1"8 _iii!)_ (in) 0.5 1557 3.9 5.2 1 1262 2.5 3.9 1.5 1026 1.5 2.8 2 836 0.6 2.0 2.5 684 Contact 1.3 3 562 0.7 3.5 465 0.3 4 386 Contact --No sketch requ*r
  • M-663-000 I7A, Revision W01 Page B 104 of B 10-6 Sketch: Fire Area {Side f ): A-1 6 MOX Dwg: WlX74l I Fire Area (Side 2): A-8 10. Annular Gap (smallest): 114" 1 I. Gap between pen: NIA 12. Barrier Type: 13. Opening Sleeved or Concrete: Steel 14. Pipe Insulated: No Jeff Sutsr Prepared By: Wayne Aregood Reviewed By: Penetration Seal Data Appendix: 810 Penetration #: PI 41 S1034 Penetration Type: MI LodEk~.: 2026'4" 1. Barrier Thickness: 20" 2. Opening Size: 24-0 3. Penetrants: (1)3 8"P 4. Sealant Type: Foam 5. Damming Sidel: Steel plate wetded to sleeve 6. Damming Side 2: Flush with barrier 7. Damming Continuity {AccMej): Accept 8. Boot Condition {AcclRej): NIA 9. Sealant Depth: 6" Walkdown Comments: Slab thickness based on C-OC141 I. Top side of penetration is covered with a welded steel plate. Foam depth is assumed to be the 6" minimum allowed for a mechanical detail. Original Inspection Record documents 6" blind seal depth d.ue to welded steel anchor plate (wsa). 1 . . . 1 "' I '

M-663-000 17A, Revision WQ 1 Fire Area A-16 (Side 1 ) (Side 2) Fire Area A-8 (Side 2) Penetration Seal Data Appendix: BIO Photos: P141S1034 Fire- A-16 (Sidel) F~E Area A-8 f age B 1 0-5 of B 1 0-6 I I 11 I I I I I -

M-663-00017A, Revision WOl Penetration Seal Data

  • Heat Affected Zone Review: P14151034 Fire Area (Side 1) A-16 No issues within Heat Affected Zone Fire Area (Side 2) No issues within Heat Affected Zone Side 1 Photo Side2Photo
  • Sketch No sketch r
  • Page B I 0-6 of B I 0-6 Appendix; B 10 Review Distances (Rer_,ce M-663-00017A. Flgur8 1 18" Pipe L1 &L2 Temp. R1 Radius R2 Radius ' Dist. (ft) rfl (in) (in) 0.5 1741 4.7 6 1 1576 3.9 5.-3 1.5 1426 3.3 4.6 2 1292 2.7 4 2.5 1171 2.1 '3.5 3 1062 1.6 3 3.5 964 1.2 2.5 4 875 0.8 2.1 4.5 795 OA 1.8 5 724 0.1 1.5 5.5 659 Contact 1.2 6 600 0.9 6.5 548 0.7 7 1501 0.5 7.5 458 0.3 8 419 0.1 8.5 385 Contact Attachment B11 Page 1 I I Fire Protection Evaluation For Penetrations Interfacing With Seismic Gap Seals Rev. No. wo1 Prepared By A- d& Wayne S Aregood Date 0811 9/05 Reviewed By & b Jeff Suter Date 08119105 Table of Contents Revision Log ................................................................................................................................... 3 1.0 Purpose ............................................................................................................................... 4 2.0 Scope .................................................................................................................................. 4 3.0 References .......................................................................................................................... 4 4.0 Evaluation ........................................................................................................................... 5 5.0 Conclusions ......................................................................................................................... 7 ...................................................... Appendix B11, Penetration Seal Data (12 Total Pages) M-663-00017A Page 2 of 7 Attachment B11 Revision W01 Revision Log M-663-00017A Page 3 of 7 I I Attachment B11 Revision W01 I I I I I I Revision WO1 Reason for Revision Original Issue W663-00017A Attachment B11 Revision W01 Page 4 of 7 1.0 Purpose 1.1 The purpose of this document is to evaluate existing penetration seals that are not directly bounded to the typical detail limitations established in M663-00017, or the penetration seal configuration is unique enough to potentially affect performance of the penetration seal. This evaluation was conducted in effort to satisfy regulatory expectation regarding qualification and documentation of fire barrier penetration seals, as discussed in NRC lnformation Notice 88-04. This evaluation was conducted in accordance with the guidance of NRC Generic Letter 86-1 0. 2.0 Scope 2.1 The Table I penetrations in relation to the design requirements discussed in Section 5.1. 2.2 Refer to Section 7.0 of NF663-00017A for a cross-reference list of penetrations within Table I that are evaluated for additional seal parameters that do not satisfy the typical detail limitations of M663-00017. In these instances, the potential cumulative affects of multiple unbounded attributes were considered for each penetration of concern. 3.0 References 3.1 NRC Generic Letter 86-10, Implementation of Fire Protection Requirements, dated April 24, 1986 3.2 NRC lnformation Notice 88-04, "Inadequate Qualification and Documentation of Fire Barrier Penetration Seals". 3.3 10 CFR 50 Appendix R, Fire Protection Program For Nuclear Power Facilities Operating Prior To January 1, 1979 3.4 LER 87-10, Technical Specification Violations - Inoperable Fire Barriers Caused By Personnel Errors 3.5 W663-00017, Penetration Seal Typical Details, Rev. W20 3.6 RER 2004-002, Reportability Review for PIR 2004-0234 3.7 PIR 2004-0234, Potential Unrated Seismic Gap Seal Design Detail 5 from C-1029. 4.0 Assumptions 4.1 It is assumed that existing penetration seal materials have been installed as required by applicable typical design details and procedures. This is an acceptable assumption based on a review of the Quality Control documentation maintained during initial penetration seal installation activities and the intrusive inspections conducted to address LER 87-10, regarding seal material depth.

M-663-00017A Page 5 of 7 Attachment 61 1 Revision W01 4.2 It is assumed that the entire Table I penetration seal and seismic gap interfaces were installed with similar vertically positioned ceramic fiberboard separators as found in the seismic gap between Penetration Seals P621S0179 and P621S0180. These seismic gap interfaces were examined internally during the seismic gap interface exploratory effort conducted in response to seismic gap seal continuity concerns documented in References 3.6 and 3.7. The intrusive inspections revealed vertically positioned ceramic fiberboard separators between the seismic gap seal and the Silicone Foam seal. This is an acceptable assumption based on installation techniques and practices that would necessitate the use of ceramic fiberboard to ensure containment of sealant material during initial Silicone Foam seal installation. 5.0 Evaluation 5.1 Assessment of Condition to Design Requirements Each penetration opening identified in Table I was sealed with an approved M-663-00017 typical detail. The seal interfaces with a fire rated seismic gap seal detail SG2. Each penetration seal type is independently bounded by the referenced typical detail. However, the Silicone Foam seal interface with a fire rated seismic gap seal is not directly bounded by testing. Refer to Appendix B11 for relevant Table I penetration seal data. TABLE l Penetration Seal and Seismic Gap Interfaces Penetration Number P621S0179 P621 SO1 80 P631 SO1 19 CommentlDisposition: 9" Silicone Foam with top cap and two separate bottom side damming boards. Vertical ceramic fiber damming board positioned on both sides separating seal from seismic gap design. Seismic gap and Silicone Foam interface was intrusively inspected in response to Ref 3.6 and 3.7. 9" Silicone Foam with top cap and two separate bottom side damming boards. Vertical ceramic fiber damming board positioned on both sides separating seal from seismic gap design. Seismic gap and Silicone Foam interface was intrusively inspected in response to Ref 3.6 and 3.7. 9" Silicone Foam with top cap and two separate bottom side damming boards. Vertical ceramic fiber damming board positioned on both sides separating seal from seismic gap design. Communicating Fire Areas Typical Detail E-2A M-6A E-2A Side 1 F-4 F-4 F-7 Penetrating Items Conduits: ) Cond, (2) 2 Cond. (1 ) 3 Cond. Spare Conduits: (3) 2" Cond. (1 ) 3 Cond. Side 2 F-2 F-3 F-4 M-663-00017A Page 6 of 7 Attachment B11 Revision W01 5.2 Evaluation of Condition The penetrations identified in Table I have unique design conditions where floor block-outs are incorporated within the seismic expansion gap of the Fuel Building to Auxiliary building interface. These common penetration and seismic gap openings were sealed with a fire rated detail in accordance with M663-00017. Ceramic fiberboard was vertically positioned on the sides of the blockout opening interface with the seismic gap in order to contain the Silicone Foam during seal installation. The existence of the added vertical ceramic fiberboard was confirmed during the seismic gap inspection and rework effort as discussed in Section 4.2. The vertically positioned ceramic fiberboard serves the following two significant functions: It prevents the Silicone Foam from spilling or expanding into the seismic gap air space between the topside ceramic fiber fill, and the bottom side backing rod and Dymeric Caulk. It separates the two designs (sealant materials) during fire exposure minimizing impact of performance characteristics (material char andlor consumption) from one another. Placement of the vertical ceramic fiberboards along the sides of the opening provides a basis for an acceptable 3hour fire rated configuration for both the penetration seal and seismic gap interfaces. The ceramic fiberboard is inert and does not change in physical characteristics when subjected to direct flame impingement. It will maintain the interface and sealant stability for both configurations during fire exposure. The primary seismic gap sealant (compressed ceramic fiber) tightly abuts the vertical ceramic fiberboard, thus establishing physical separation between both primary and secondary sealants that will minimize consumption of either penetration sealant (Silicone Foam) or seismic gap design (Dymeric compounds). Both these designs utilize fire resistant and compressible materials as the primary sealant and are both 3hour fire rated. The addition of the vertical ceramic fiberboards between the seismic gap detail and the penetration seal material ensures that both designs will Penetration Number P631 SO1 20 P641 SO051 P641 SO052 Communicating Fire Areas Typical Detail E-2A E-2A E-2A Side 1 F-7 F-I F-I Side 2 F-4 F-7 F-6 Penetrating Items Conduits: (1) 1% cond. (1) 3" Cond. Conduits: (1) 1% cond, (1 ) 3" Cond. Conduits: (1) 1% cond, (2) 2" Cond. (1 ) 3 Cond. CommentlDisposition: 9" Silicone Foam with top cap and two separate bottom side damming boards. Vertical ceramic fiber damming board positioned on both sides separating seal from seismic gap design. 9" Silicone Foam with bottom side damming board. Vertical ceramic fiber damming board positioned on both sides separating seal from seismic gap design. 9" Silicone Foam with bottom side damming board. Vertical ceramic fiber damming board positioned on both sides separating seal from seismic gap design.

M-663-00017A Attachment B11 Revision W01 Page 7 of 7 perform independent of each other during fire exposure and plant environments such as building moments. Additionally, ceramic fiberboard (damming) is typically used at WCNOC for penetration seal damming and has been extensively tested as part of penetration seal assemblies in accordance with ASTM El 19 time and temperature curves with consistent and acceptable results. Based on the above discussions, it is reasonable to conclude that both seal designs remain bounded and the addition of the vertical damming board ensures that the interface will not experience any negative interactions during fire exposure or plant environments such as building moments. Therefore, the seismic gap and penetration seal interfaces with ceramic fiberboard are acceptable. 5.3 Post Fire Safe Shutdown Impact There is no impact to PFSSD systems or components as a result of this evaluation. The penetration seal and seismic gap interfaces identified in Table I will perform their intended function for a 3-hour duration. 6.0 Conclusions Based on the above discussions, it is reasonable to conclude that the Table I penetration seals are 3-hour F and T rated, which satisfies regulatory requirements and commitments, as well as WCNOC Fire Protection Program requirements to prevent spread of fire from one fire area to another.

M-663-000 17A, Revision WO 1 Page B11-I ofB11-12 Penetration Seal Data Appendix: 611 Penetration #: P621 SO179 Penetration Type: E-2A LocJElev.: 2025'-0" P. Barrier Thickness: 10" 10. Annular Gap (smallest): 2" 2. Opening Sire: 1 2"X3'-OU 11. Gap between pen: 2' 3. Penetnnts: (4) ER 12. Barrier Type: W 4. Sealant Type: Foam 13. Opening Sleeved or Concrete: Concrete

  • 5. Damming Sidel: Top CaplFlush 14. Pipe Insulated: MA 6. Damming Side 2: Not Attached 7. Damming Continuity (AcdRej): Accept 8. Bwt Condition (AeclRej): NIA 9. Sealant Depth; 9" Walkdown Comments: " Seismic Gap Detail interface. Changed QTY of penetrants from "(3) ER" to "(4) ERn. There are two individual bottom side damming boards installed, one is friction fitted within the opening and the other is seen in the bottom side photo. This was confirmed during the Seismic Gap destructive examination effort. Fire Area (Side 11: F-4 MOX Dwg: M-OX6211 Wayne Aregood Prepad By: Jeff Suter Reviewed By: Sketch: ---- "--.---...-.~.., .-I"*..- I..........., IIIY.-.."II*...*C..".*, --...-.I- L-.----------. *--*.-----..-*-.* ..-- ---

M-663-00017A, Revision WO 1 Page B11-2 ofB11-12 Penetration Seal Data AppMix: 811 1 Photos: P621 SO1 79 Fire Area F-4 (Side 1) Fire Area F4 (Side 1) Fire Area F-2 (Side 2) Fire Area F-2 (Side 2)

M-663-00017A, Revision W01 Sketch: Fire Area (Side 1): F4 MOX Dwg: M-OX62f 1 Fire Area (Side 2): F Penetration Seal Data Appendix: BII Penetration #: P621 SO1 80 Penetration Type: &$A Loc.lElev.: 2025'0" 1. Barrier Thickness: 4 0" 2. Opening Si: 1 PX3-0" 3. Penetrants: SPARE W 4. Sealant Type; Foam Concrete' 5. Damming Sidel: Top Cap Flush 6. Damming Side 2: ' Flush wlQ-Deck Vatley 7. Damming Continuity (Adej): Accept 8. Boot Condition (AoelRej): NIA 9, Sealant Depth: 9" Wal kdown Comments:

  • Seismic Gap Detail interface. There are two individual bottom side damming installed, one is frietion fitted within the opening and the other is seen in the bottom side photo. This was conflrrned during the Seismic Gap destructive examination Mart 10. Annular Gap (smallest): NIA 11. Gap between pen: M/A 12. Barrier Type: 13. Opening Sleeved or Concrete: 14. Pipe Insulated: NIA Wayne Aregood Prepared By: Jeff Suter Revitwed By:

M-663-00017A, Revision W01 PageB11-4 ofBl1-12 Penetration Seal Data Appendix: BII Photos: P621 SO1 80 I (Side f ) Fire Area F-3 Fire Area F-4 (Side 1 ) (Side 2) Fire Area F-3 (Sick 2)

M-663-000 1 7A, Revision W0 1 Page Sketch: Fire Area (Side 1): F-7 M~XDWQ: M-1x6311 Fire Area (Side 2): F4 Wayne Aregood Prepared By: Jeff Suter Reviswed By: Penetration Seal Data Appendix: BI~ Penetration #: P631 SO1 1 9 Penetration Type: E-2A tO~.llEle~.: 2046'-6" I. Barrier Thickness: 1 On 10. Annular Gap (smallest): 2" 2. Opening Sue: 1 2"X 2'8" t I. Gap between pen: 1-112" 3. Penetrants: (4)ER f 2. Barrier Type: 4. Sealant Type: Foam 13. Opening Ueeved or Concrete: Concrete 5. Damming Sidel: Foam wrrop cap flush 14. Pipe Insulated: NIA 6. Damming Side 2:

  • Flush w/Q-Deck 7. Damming Continuity (AcdRej): Accept 8. Boot Condition (A-ej): NIA 9. Sealant Depth: 9" Walkdown Comments: ' Seismic Gap Detail interface. There are two individual bottom side damming installed, one is friction fitted within the opening and the other is seen in the bottom side photo. This was confirmed during the Seismic Gap destructive examination effort. I M-663-00017A, Revision W0 1 Page B11-6 ofBll-12 I Penetration Seal Data Appendix: ~11 I Photos: P631S0119 Fire Area F-7 (Side 1) Fire Area F-4 (Side 2) Fire Area F-7 (Side 1) Fire Area F4 (Side 2)

M-663-000 17A, Revision W01 Sketch: Fire Area (Sib I): F-7 M4X Dwg: M-1x6311 Fire Area (Side 2): F4 Penetration Seal Data Appendix: 811 Penetration #: P631 SO1 20 Penetration Type: E-2A Lelev.: 2046'-6" i. Barrier Thickness: 10" 10. Annular Gap (smatlest): 3" 2. Opening Size: 1 2"W-0" It. Gap between pen: 3" 3. Penetrants: $2. Barrier Type: 4. Sealant Type: Foam 13. Opening Sleeved or Conerek 'Concrete 5. Damming Sidel; Foam wrrop cap flush 14. Pipe Insulated: lrUA 6. Damming Side 2: Flush w/Q-Deck 7. Damming Continuity (A-ej): Accept 8. Boot Condition (AcclRej): NIA 9, Sealant Depth: 9- Walkdawn Comments: ' Seismic Gap Detail interface. There are two individual bottom side damming installed, one is friction fitted within the opening and the other is seen in the bottom side photo. This was confirmed during the Seismic Gap destructive examination effort. J Page 01 1-7 ofB11-12 Wayne Aregood Prepared By: J%fF sutsr Reviewed By:

M-663-000 17A, Revision W01 Page Bl1-8 ofB11-12 (Side 2) Fire Area F-7 (Side 1) Fire Area F-4 (Side 2) Penetration Seal Data Appendix: 611 Photos: P631SOiZO FIre Area F-7 (Side 4) FireArea F4 I M-663-000 17A, Revision WO 1 Fire Area (Side I): F-1 MQX Dwg: M-OX6411 Page B11-9 ofBl1-12 Fire Area (Side 2): F-7 Wayne Aregood Prepared By: Jeff Suter Reviewed By: Penetration Seal Data Appendix: 811 Penetration #: P641 SO051 Penetration Type: E-2A Lo~3Elev.: 2064'-OH 1. Barrier Thickness: 1 OM 10. Annular Gap (smallest): 3" 2. Opening Size: 1 P518"X3'-6" 11. Gap between pen: 15" 3. Penetrants: 12. Barrier Type: 4. Sealant Type: Foam 13. Opening Sleeved or Concrek Conmete 5. Damming Sidel: Foam flush wlSlab 14. Pipe Insulated: NIA 6. Damming Side 2: Flush wlQ-Deck Valley 7. Damming Continuity (AcclRej): Accept 8. Boot Condition (Adej): NIA 9. Sealant Depth: 9. Walkdown Comments: Seismic Gap Detail interface. There are two individual bottom side damming installed, one is friction fitted within the opening and the other is seen in the bottom side photo. This was confirmed during the Seismic Gap destructive examination effort. Sketch:

M-663-000 f 7A, Revision W01 Page Bll-10 ofB11-12 I Penetration Seal Data Appendlr: BO I Photos: P649 SO051 Fire Area F-1 (Side 1 ) Fire Area F-1 (Side 1) Fire Area F-7 (Side 2) FIE Area F-7 [Side 2)

M-663-00017A, Revision WO1 Page I31 1-1 I of Bf 1-12 Sketch: Fire Area (Side 1): F-I M4X Dwg: M4XMf 1 Fire Area (Side 2): F-6 Wayne Aregood Prepared By: Jeff Suter Reviewed By: Penetration Seal Data Appendix: B~I Penetration #: P641 SO052 Penetration Type; E-2A Ldlev.: 2064'-0" 1. Barrier Thickness: 1 0" 10. Annular Gap (smallest): 4" 2. Opening Sie: 1 2"X3'-On I 1. Gap between pen: 2" 3. Penetrants: (4)ER 12. Barrier Type: 4. Sealant Type: Foam 13. Opening Sleeved or Concrete: Concrete 5. Damming Sidel: Foam Flush wlslab 94. Pipe ksufated: NIA 6. Damming Side 2: F~am Flush wlQ-Deck Valley 7. Damming Continuity (AcdRej): Accept 8. Boot Condition (AcdRej): NIA 9. Sealant Depth: 9" Walkdown Comments:

  • Seismic Gap Detail interface. There are two individual bottom side damming installed, one is friction fitted within the opening and the other is seen in tho bottom side photo. This was confirmed during the Seismic Gap destructive examination effort. FA: F.l Fk N -2 M-663-000 17A, Revision WO I Page Bll-12 of Bll-12 I Penetration Seal Data Appendix: BII I Photos: P641 SO052 Fire Area F-1 (Side 1) Fire Area F-1 Fire Area F-6 (Side 2) Fire Area F-6 (Side 2)

F CREEK UCLEAR OPERATING CORPORATION Attachment B12 Page 1 I I I I I I ! i ! I I Fire Protection Evaluation For Penetration Openings Crediting Calcium Silica and Fiberglass Piping Insulation Rev. No. wo1 Prepared By Ld& Wayne S Aregood Date 08120105 Reviewed By & Jeff Suter Date 08120105 Table of Contents M-663-00017A Page 2 of 11 Attachment B12 Revision W01 i I Revision Log ................................................................................................................................... 3 1.0 Purpose ............................................................................................................................... 4 2.0 Scope .................................................................................................................................. 4 3.0 References .......................................................................................................................... 4 I 4.0 Evaluation ........................................................................................................................... 5 ..................................................................................................................... 5.0 Conclusions.. -l 'I ................................................... Appendix B12, Penetration Seal Data (24 Total Pages) I I I I 1 Revision Log M-663-00017A Page 3 of 1 1 I Attachment 61 2 I Revision W01 I I I I I I I i I I I Revision WOl Reason for Revision Original Issue M-663-00017A Attachment B12 Revision W01 Page 4 of 11 I 1.0 Purpose 1 .I The purpose of this document is to evaluate existing penetration seals that are not directly bounded to the typical detail limitations established in M663-00017. This evaluation was conducted in effort to satisfy regulatory expectation regarding qualification and documentation of fire barrier penetration seals, as discussed in NRC lnformation Notice 88-04. This evaluation was conducted in accordance with the guidance of NRC Generic Letter 86-10. I 2.0 Scope 2.1 The Table I and II Penetration Seals in relation to the design requirements discussed in Section 5.1. 2.2 Refer to Section 7.0 of M663-00017A for a cross-reference list of penetrations within Table l and II that are evaluated for additional seal parameters that do not satisfy the typical detail limitations of M663-00017. In these instances, the potential cumulative affects of multiple unbounded attributes were considered for each penetration of concern. 3.0 References 3.1 NRC Generic Letter 86-10, Implementation of Fire Protection Requirements, dated April 24, 1986 3.2 NRC lnformation Notice 88-04, Inadequate Qualification and Documentation of Fire Barrier Penetration Seals 3.3 10 CFR 50 Appendix R, Fire Protection Program For Nuclear Power Facilities Operating Prior To January 1, 1979 3.4 LER 87-10, Technical Specification Violations - Inoperable Fire Barriers Caused By Personnel Errors 1 3.5 W663-00017, Penetration Seal Typical Details, Rev. W20 ~ 3.6 W663-00111, Promatec Penetration Closure Heat Transfer Report, Rev. 3 3.7 CTP-1001, (M-663-00082) Fire Qualification Test on Silicone Foam Floor Penetration Seals, Rev. W01 I ~ 3.8 AP 10-102, Control Of Combustible Materials, Rev. 9 3.9 AP 10-1 04, Breach Authorization, Rev. 19 3.1 0 Bruin Plastics Company Inc., Material Safety Data Sheet for VRP 1862 9x12, Yellow Standard Herculite Vinyl Laminated Fabric or Vinyl Coated Mesh Polyester Scrim M-663-00017A Page 5 of 1 1 Attachment B12 Revision W01 3.1 1 M-162C, Specification for Non-metallic Thermal lnsulation for Piping and Equipment Located In Auxiliary Building, Control Building, Diesel Generator Building, Fuel Building, and Radwaste Building For The Wolf Creek Generating Station, Rev. 19 3.12 DDCN M-162C-19-10,

Subject:

Pipe lnsulation Control to Ensure Penetration Seal Fire Resistance Rating Maintained 4.0 Assumptions 4.1 It is assumed that existing penetration seal materials have been installed as required by applicable typical design details and procedures. This is an acceptable assumption based on a review of the Quality Control documentation maintained during initial penetration seal installation activities and the intrusive inspections conducted to address LER 87-10, regarding seal material depth. 5.0 Evaluation 5.1 Assessment of Condition to Design Requirements Initial typical detail assignment for the penetrations identified in Tables I and II resulted in a condition where at least one M663-00017 typical detail critical parameter was not satisfied for each penetration seal. In these cases, the nonconforming parameter was penetrant size. Due to the lack of industry testing, penetration seals identified in Tables I and II require further evaluation to determine actual fire rating and to document the basis for that assigned rating. Refer to Appendix B12 for relevant penetration seal data. TABLE l Radflex Penetrations Crediting lnsulation - Penetration Number PI 33S0799: with a single 12" pipe penetrant PI 34S0860: with a single 12" pipe penetrant Communicating Fire Areas Typical Detail RB-1 RB-1 Side I A-25 A-24 Side 2 A- I A- I Barrier Thickness (Inches) 12" 12" Sealant Depth Assumed per Detail Assumed Per Detail CommentslDisposition 1%" thick (X) Calcium Silica Pipe Insulation provides additional protection from direct flame impingement and provides basis for "F" Rating. (Ref. M162C, D8) 2" thick (X) Calcium Silica Pipe Insulation provides additional protection from direct flame impingement and provides basis for "F" Rating. (Ref. M162C, D8)

M-663-00017A Page 6 of 1 1 Attachment 81 2 Rev~s~on W01 I I I I I I I I Insulation CommentslDisposition 1%" thrck (AS) Fiberglass P~pe Insulation prov~des addlt~onal protection from dlrect flame lmpngement on both sldes of the barrier and provldes basls for "F" Ratlng (M162C, D19c) 1%" thlck (AS) F~berglass P~pe lnsulatlon prov~des addlt~onal protection from dlrect flame ~mplngement on the A-I slde of the barr~er and prov~des bas~s for "F Ratlng (NC162C, D19j) 1%" thlck (AS) Fiberglass P~pe lnsulatlon provldes addlt~onal protect~on from dlrect flame lmplngement on the A-6 slde of the barrler and provldes bas~s for "F" Ratlng (M162C, Dl 9c) 1%" thlck (AS) F~berglass P~pe lnsulat~on prov~des addlt~onal protection from dlrect flame ~mplngement on both s~des of the barr~er and prov~des bass for "F" Ratlng (IM162C, 0191) 1%" thlck (AS) F~berglass P~pe lnsulatlon provldes add~tlonal protection from dlrect flame lmplngement on both sldes of the barr~er and prov~des basis for "F" Ratlng (NC162C, D19f) 1%" thlck (X) Calclum Slllca P~pe Insulation provldes add~t~onal protectlon from dlrect flame lmplngement on both sides of the barr~er and prov~des bass for "F" Ratlng (Ref M-I62C, 01 7) TABLE ll Penetrations Barrier Thickness (Inches) 12" 24" 24" 10" 10" 24" Foam Typical Detail W1 Wl MI W6A Wl W I Penetration Number PI 14W0423: wlth a slngle 8" pipe penetrant PI 25W2432: wlth a slngle 8" plpe penetrant PI 25W2434: wlth a angle 8" plpe penetrant PI 32S0683: wlth a s~ngle 24 plpe penetrant PI 32S0684: wlth a slngle 24" pipe penetrant PI 32W1433: with a slngle 8" plpe penetrant Crediting Sealant Depth Assumed per Detail Assumed Per Detail Assumed per Detail 11" Assumed per Detall Assumed Per Detail Silicone RTV Communicating Fire Side 1 A- I A- I A-6 A-8 A-8 A-8 Areas Side 2 A-6 A-33 A-33 A- I A- I CC-1 M-663-00017A Page 7 of 1 1 Attachment B12 Revision W01 I 5.2 Evaluation of Condition I 5.2.1 Radflex Penetrations (Table I) Radflex seal designs with pipe penetrants greater than 2" have not been specifically fire tested in accordance with ASTM E-119. M663-00017, RB-1 Detail evaluated penetrant size and concluded that 10" pipe penetrant with or without pipe insulation is 3-hour fire (F) and temperature (T) rated. This determination was based on the comparison of Radflex material performance to Silicone RTV Foam, with a resulting conclusion that that Radflex is superior to Silicone RTV Foam when subjected to fire exposure. It is important to note that this evaluated conclusion was based on bare pipe exposure, which is considered more severe than pipe protected with Calcium Silica type insulation. I Table I penetration seals have a single 12" pipe penetrant that is slightly larger than that evaluated in M-663-00017, Detail RB-1. Therefore, further review is required to assess acceptability. Field inspection and review of the penetrations identified in Table I revealed that each penetration seal incorporates Calcium Silica pipe insulation. I The Calcium Silica piping insulation was initially installed due to high system temperatures and the potential to degrade the sealant material after prolonged system temperature exposures. It is concluded that F rating requirements can be satisfied if the Calcium Silica pipe insulation is credited for providing added protection from the effects of conductive and radiant thermal propagation to the unexposed side of the barrier. I Pipe penetrants that utilize Calcium Silica are continuously protected through and on both sides of the barrier, thus significantly reducing thermal insult during fire exposure to the installed penetrants. M663- 001 11 demonstrated that insulating pipe penetrants through the seal material would significantly reduce thermal exposure to the seal material, thus preserving seal characteristics for prolong system temperature exposures. This report documented a significant drop in interface I temperatures as a result of installed piping insulation. The actual drop varies depending on postulated system temperatures and insulation thickness, but in all cases the reported temperature drop is significant. This thermal benefit logic can be applied to fire exposure when considering that the pipe penetrants being evaluated are only slightly larger than that previously evaluated in M-663-00017, Detail RB-1. Furthermore, Calcium Silica type insulation is not consumed during fire I exposure, as demonstrated in fire test CTP-1001, Penetration 5.1. This fire test contained a 4" pipe penetrant that was insulated with 1" thick Calcium Silica through a 6" Silicone RTV Foam seal with 1" bottom side damming. Considering that Silicone RW Foam has a greater char rate, it is consumed more rapidly than Radflex. Therefore, direct flame I M-663-00017A Page 8 of 1 1 Attachment B12 Revision W01 impingement to the test article would be more severe than that expected I for the Table I pipe penetrations sealed with Radflex (RB-1). This 1 coupled with the fact that the Radflex penetration seal designs have greater sealant depths and insulation thickness, the slightly larger pipe sizes than that qualified in lM663-00017, Detail RB-1 are considered inconsequential. Based on these constructive attributes, it is reasonable to conclude that the penetration seals identified in Table I would resist the affects of fire exposure and prevent the passage of flame to unexposed side of the barrier for a 3hour duration. Therefore, Table I penetration I seals are considered 3-hour F rated. Due to the larger pipe sizes, Table I penetration seals are not qualified for a 3hour T rating. In effort to evaluate fire area impact, field walkdowns and comprehensive assessment reviews, documented in Appendix B12- 1, were conducted for each penetration of concern. This review was completed in accordance with the criteria and review methodology established in b.4663-00017A Section 7.2.3 for non-T rated penetrations. The review identified that no exposed insitu combustibles or PFSSD circuits are located within the Heat Affected Zone (HAZ) for penetration P133S0799. Therefore, the penetration satisfies the review criteria of M 663-00017 where T rating requirements are not met. P134S0860 has radiation shielding directly affixed to the insulation within the HAZ to provide added protection from radiological exposure. This I I shielding has combustible components and further assessment is required to ensure that a fire in Fire Area A1 would not transmit sufficient conductive or radiant heat to ignite the shielding in Fire Area A24. Section 7.2.3 and Table 7.2.31 of M663-00017A has compared pipe sizes and unexposed side penetrant exposure temperatures. The comparison demonstrates that a 10" un-insulated pipe through a 12" I Silicone RTV Foam seal will yield a temperature of 455°F on the unexposed side of the test slab (on the penetrant, 6" above the slab). As discussed above, the slightly larger pipe insulated with Calcium Silica I type insulation will adequately compensate for the diameter differential. It is also apparent that an equal depth of Radflex verses Silicone Rn/ Foam is a superior seal configuration with regard to fire exposure performance. In addition, it is reasonable to conclude regarding penetrant temperature performance, that the presence of Calcium Silica i insulation will also provide additional thermal margin to resist conductive and radiant energy propagation through the barrier to the radiation shielding affixed to the penetrant insulation. The unexposed side insulation is not directly exposed to the fire and will provide at least equivalent protection to that of the exposed side of the barrier, thus providing even more thermal margin than that indicated in Table 7.2.3-1. I ! The lead shielding is comprised of Standard "Herculite" (Polyvinyl Chloride [PVC] Nylon laminate) with a fibrous reinforcement weave to provide strength. The PVCINylon laminate material is the combustible element of the shielding, which has a 600°F auto-ignition temperature, as identified by the manufactures data (Bruin Plastics). Based on the above I M-663-00017A Page 9 of 11 I I Attachment B12 I I Revision W0 1 discussions, it is reasonable to conclude that the auto-ignition temperature of the radiation shielding will not be reached resulting from a fire in Fire Area Al. This conclusion is primarily based on the presence of the Calcium Silica insulation, through and on both sides of the barrier penetration seal and the fact that the installed Radflex will perform better than that of Foam, as evaluated in M-663-00017A. Therefore, the presence of radiation shielding within the HAZ of penetration seal P134S0860 is acceptable and its ability to prevent the passage of flame will not be impacted by the lack of T rating. i 5.2.2 Silicone RTV Foam Penetrations (Table II) The Table II penetration openings contain insulated pipe penetrants that are sealed with Silicone RTV Foam and Ceramic Fiber damming. Penetration P132W1433 is insulated with Calcium Silica through the seal and completely encompasses the barrier opening on both barrier sides. As discussed in Section 5.2.1 above, this insulation material has been demonstrated by industry testing to improve unexposed side penetration seal performance. The insulation provides protection of the seal from direct flame impingement and a reduction in thermal conduction though the penetrant. This protection ensures the 3hour F rated performance of ! this seal. I I The remaining Table II penetrations are insulated with fiberglass type insulation on at least one side of the barrier. The Fiberglass Anti-Sweat insulation appears to abut or stop at the penetration seal material and is primarily used for piping with less than 200°F system temperatures. As with Calcium Silica insulation, the Fiberglass Anti-Sweat insulation also provides protection from direct flame impingement and it is reasonable to conclude that substantial benefit is achieved by crediting this non- combustible insulation type material. For the purpose of this evaluation, one sided insulation protection is the more severe and bounds two sided insulation protection. I I Pipe penetrants that utilize Fiberglass Anti-Sweat type insulation (AS) I provide added shielding from direct flame impingement resulting lower temperature exposure to the penetrant, thus lowering heat transmission to the unexposed barrier side of the barrier. Although, not specifically tested to ASTM El 19 requirements, fiberglass type insulation is non- combustible and is not readily consumed during fire exposures. The fiberglass element of the insulation is anticipated to remain intact for a 3 hour3.472222e-5 days <br />8.333333e-4 hours <br />4.960317e-6 weeks <br />1.1415e-6 months <br /> fire duration. Specific temperature performance is not a critical attribute for this insulation type because it does not transition through the barrierlseal opening nor does it contribute to the physical barrier separating fire areas. I The pipe insulation is a molded, heavy density, one-piece insulation made from inorganic glass fibers bonded with a thermosetting resin. The I I insulation is produced in three-foot lengths either with or without a jacket and is typically installed, cut to length, as needed. The jacket is a white- Kraft paper bonded to aluminum foil (jacket) and reinforced with fiberglass M-663-00017A Attachment B12 Revision W01 Page 10 of 11 fibers. This vapor seal material and the adhesive used to bond the vapor seal to the jacketing has been determined combustible and is evaluated herein. The vapor barrier and associated adhesive amounts have been determined to be an insignificant quantity of Class "A combustible that is located on the inner surface of the jacketing. When tested in accordance with ASTM E-84, NFPA 255 and UL 723 as plain insulation or on a composite basis (insulation, jacket and adhesive), the pipe insulation I does not exceed: 25 Flame spread 50 fuel contribution 50 smoke development Because the vapor seal and associated adhesive contribute an I I insignificant quantity of combustible and the fiberglass insulation element would not be consumed during fire exposure, it is reasonable to conclude that the remaining fiberglass would provide thermal benefit to the penetrant on the unexposed side of the barrier. Although, it can be expected that the insulation jacket, vapor barrier and adhesive would be consumed rapidly during an ASTM El 19 fire on the exposed barrier side, the remaining fiberglass element of the composite insulation unit would not be dislodged due to the stainless steel banding I used to secure the composite insulation unit to the pipe. It is important to understand that this insulation is regarded as an enhancement that will impede radiant energy from passing through the penetrant, damming and sealant to the unexposed side of the barrier. This additional protection (insulation) is credited to slow the char rate of the internal sealant material by impeding thermal propagation to the unexposed side of the barrier, I thus yielding improved thermal performance on the unexposed side of the barrier. On the unexposed barrier side the vapor barrier and adhesive are protected from fire propagation by the compressive sheet metal outer jacket, which will not be physically affected on the cold side. Based on the protective attributes provided by the Fiberglass Anti-Sweat pipe insulation, it is reasonable to conclude that the penetration seals ! identified in Table II would resist the affects of fire exposure and prevent the passage of flame to unexposed side of the barrier for a 3-hour duration. Therefore, Table II penetration seals are considered 3hour F rated. Due to the larger pipe sizes, Table I1 penetration seals are not qualified for a 3hour T rating. In effort to evaluate fire area impact, feld walk- downs and comprehensive assessment reviews, documented in Appendix B12-1, were conducted for each penetration of concern. This review was completed in accordance with the criteria and review methodology established in M663-00017A Section 7.2.3 for non-T rated penetrations. The review identified that no exposed insitu combustibles or PFSSD circuits are located within the Heat Affected Zone. Therefore, M-663-00017A Page11 of11 Attachment 612 Revision W01 the Table II penetrations satisfy the review criteria of M-663-00017 where I T rating requirements are not met. 1 Procedure AP 10-1 04 and Specification M- 162C have been revised to provide insulation control for the Table I and II penetrations and associated pipe lines. This was necessary in order to identify the fire protection significance of the insulation and define the fire protection compensatory measures if insulation is removed. I I 5.3 Post Fire Safe Shutdown Impact There is no impact to PFSSD systems or components as a result of this evaluation. The Table I and II penetration seals are evaluated as 3-hour F rated. The comprehensive walkdown review for each of these penetrations revealed that no exposed insitu combustibles or PFSSD circuits are negatively affected by the non-T rated penetrations. A segment of insulated pipe directly above penetration P134S0860 is covered with radiation shielding that is directly affixed to the pipe insulation. This radiation shielding contains combustible PVC plastic material that is within AP 10-102 limitations. The above evaluation determined that the presence of the shielding does not to impact the seal's ability to maintain its intended design function. Therefore, PFSSD circuits are not negatively affected by the non-T rated penetrations. ! 6.0 Conclusions Based on the above discussions, it is reasonable to conclude that the Table l and II penetration seals are acceptable as 3hour F rated and will perform their intended design function, regardless of not achieving a T rating. In all cases, the installed piping insulation on either side of the barrier will improve radiant performance regardless of i pipe sizes. By crediting the piping insulation radiant improvement (T) will be achieved by lowering thermal transmission through the barrier, thus improving the F rating performance of the penetration seals. The penetration seals satisfy regulatory requirements and commitments as well as WCNOC Fire Protection Program I requirements, to prevent spread of fire from one fire area to another. It has also been determined through this evaluation that the lack of a T rating will not affect the plant's ability to achieve and maintain PFSSD. I I I M-663-00017A, Revision W01 Penetration Seal Data Appendix: ~12 Penetration #: PI 14W0423 Penetration Type: M-I Fire Area (Side 1): A-I Fire Area (Side 2): A-6 Loc.lElev.: 1986'-6" M-OX Dwg: M-1x0360 1. Barrier Thickness: 12" Nominal 10. Annular Gap (smallest): Unknown 2. Opening Size: 14"D 11. Gap between pen: NIA 3. Penetrants: (1)8"P 12. Barrier Type: F 4. Sealant Type: Assumed Per Detail 13. Opening Sleeved or Concrete: Steel 5. Damming Side1 : Unknown 14. Pipe Insulated: Yes 6. Damming Side 2: Unknown Wayne Aregood 7. Damming Continuity (AcclRej): Accept Prepared By: 8. Boot Condition (AcclRej): N/A Jeff Suter 9. Sealant Depth: Assumed 6" Reviewed By: Walkdown Comments: QC documentation identifies that seal depth is 6". Insulation completely covering seal surfaces, seal specifics can not be verified (See Drawing M-13EF06; Essential Service Water [EF] Line Number 099-HBC-8", 95F Design Temp, 1-112" thick, Classificat~on "AS" [Anti-Sweat] Fiberglass Type Insulation) Sketch: f M-663-00017A, Revision W0 1 Page B 12-2 of B 12-24 , Fire Area A-I (Side 1) Penetration Seal Data Appendix: ~12 Photos: PI 14W0423 Fire Area A-I (Side 1) Fire Area A-6 (Side 2) Fire Area A-6 (Side 2)

M-663-00017A, Revision WOl Penetration Seal Data Heat Affected Zone Review: P114W0423 Fire Area (Side 1) A-1 1. 1-1/2" Conduit 5J1259, Not within Heat Affected Zone 2. 3.4" Conduit for emergency Light A-14, not within Heat Affected Zone Fire Area (Side 2) A-6 1. 1-1 /2" Conduit 5J 1259, Not within Heat Affected Zone 2. 3.4" Conduit for emergency Light A-14, not within Heat Affected Zone Side 1 Photo Side 2 Photo No photo required. No photo required. Sketch Sketch FA: A-1 Slde1

  • 1 I t ' ----+-', __,_.__.....__,.___.,_ t-Page B12-3 ofB12-24 Appendix: B12 Review Distances (Reference M-663-00017 A, Figure 7.2.3-1 ) 8" Pipe l1 & l2 Temp. R1 Radius R2 Radius Dist. (ft) (of) (in) (in) 0.5 1677 4.4 5.8 1 1463 3.4 4.8 1.5 1277 2.6 3.9 2 1116 1.9 3.2 2.5 976 1.2 2.6 3 855 0.7 2 3.5 750 0.2 1.6 4 659 Contact 1.2 4.5 581 0.8 5 512 0.5 5.5 453 0.2 6 402 0 6.5 358 Contac1 M-663-00017A, Revision W0 1 Page B12-4 of B 12-24 Fire Area (Side 1): A-l MOX Dw~: M-1 XT932 Fire Area (Side 2): A33 10. Annular Gap (smallest): 1 " 11. Gap between pen: NIA 12. Barrier Type: A F W 13. Opening Sleeved or Concrete: Steel 14. Pipe Insulated: No Wayne Aregcad Prepared By: Jefi Suter Reviewed By: Penetration Seal Data Appendix: ~12 Penetration #: PI 25W2432 Penetration Type: M-l LocJElev.: 1993'4" 9. Barrier Thickness: 24" 2. Opening Ske; 14-0 3. Penetrants: (1 )8"P 4. Sealant Type: Foam 5. Damming Sidel:
  • Unknown 6. Damming Side 2: Flush 7. Damming Continuity (AcdRej): Accept 8. Boot Condition (AccRej): NIA 9. Sealant Depth: ' Assumed 6" Walkdown Comments: Barrier thickness based on drawing C-I C1151. ' Side I is completely covered wlinsulation.
  • Side 2, pipe is not insulated, side 1 is insulated. QC documentation identifies that seal depth is 6". 1 Sketch:

M-663-000 1 7A, Revision WO 1 (Side 2) Page B 12-5 of B 12-24 -- - Penetration Seal Data Appendix: BI~ Photos: P125W2432 Fire Area A-1 (Side 1) Fire Area A33 Fire Area A-l (Side I) Fire Area A-33 (Side 2)

  • *
  • M-663-00017A, Revision WOJ Penetration Seal Data Heat Affected Zone Review: P125W2432 Fire Area (Side 1) A-1 1. No issues within Heat Affected Zone Fire Area (Side 2) A-33 2. 1 1/2" conduit (not identified) within Heat Affected Zone. Conduit is Plant utility. 110 Volt, No Problem. Side 1 Photo Sketch FA: A-1 S.1 Side 2 Photo Page B12-6ofB12-24 Appendix: 812 Review Distances (Re!Mnce Fl!llft 7.2.3-1 ) B"Pipe L1 &L2 Temp. R1 Radius R2Radlus Dist. (ft) ("F) (in) (in) 0.5 1677 4.4 5.8 1 1463 3.4 4.8 1.5 1277 2.6 3.9 2 1116 1.9 3.2 2.5 976 1.2 2.6 3 855 0.7 2 3.5 750 0.2 1.6 4 659 Contact 1.2 4.5 561 0.8 5 512 0.5 5.5 453 0.2 6 402 0 6.5 358 Contact I M-663-00017A, Revision WO 1 Fire Area (Side 1): A-6 M-OX Dwg: IW-1x3 932 Fire Area (Side 2): A33 10. Annular Gap (smallest): 114" 1 1. Gap between pen: NIA 12. Barrier Type: A F 13. Opening Sleeved or Concrete; 14. Pipe Insulated: No' Wayne Aregod Prepared By: Jeff Suter Rwiewed By: Penetration Seal Data Appendix: BIZ Penetration #: P125W2434 Penetration Type: M-I Loc.Elev.: 1990'-1" 1. Barrier Thickness: 24" 2. Opening Si: ?4"D 3. Penetrants: (1)8"P 4. Sealant Ty ps: Foam 5. Damming Side1 : Flush 6. Damming Side 2:
  • Unknown 7. Damming Continuity (A-ej): Accept 8. Boot Condiion (AcclRej): NIA 9. Sealant Depth:
  • Assumed 6" Walkdown Comments: Barrier thickness based on 1 C-I 151.
  • Side 1 is completely covered wlinsulation.
  • Side 2. pipe is not insulated, side 1 is insulated. QC documentation identifies that seal depth is 6". ..- I Sketch:

M-663-000 17A, Revision WO 1 Penetration Seal Data Appendix: 812 Photos: Pf25W2434 Fire Area A-6 (Side 1) Fire Area A33 (Side 2) Fire Area A-6 (Side I) Fire Area A-33 (Side 2)

M-663-000 17 A. Revision WO 1 Penetration Seal Data

  • Heat Affected Zone Review: Pt25W2434 Fire Area (Side 1) A-6 1. No issues within Heat Affected Zone Fire Area (Side 2) A-33 2. 6" Cable Tray 182F02, not within Heat Affected Zone Side 1 Photo Side2Photo
  • Sketch
  • Page 812-9 ofBJ2-24 Appendix: 812 Review Distances t.I-663-00017A. Fvn 1.2.3-1) a* Pipe L1 &L2 Temp. R1 Radius R2 Radius Dist. (ft) (OF) (in) (in) 0.5 1677 4.4 5.8 1 1463 3.4 4.8 1.5 1277 12.6 3.9 2 1116 1.9 3.2 2.5 976 1.2 2.6 .3 855 0.7 2 3.5 750 0.2 1.6 4 659 Contact 1.2 4.5 581 0.8 5 512 0.5 . 5.5 453 0.2 6 402 0 6.5 358 Contact ..

M-663-00017A, Revision W0 1 Page B12-10 of B12-24 Fire Area (Side 1): A-8 M-OX Dwg: M-1x1323 Fire Area (Side 2): A-l Penetration Seal Data Appendix: B~Z Penetration #: P13280683 Penetration Type: M-6A LocElev.: 2000'-0 1. Barrier Thickness: 10" 2. Opening Sixe: 30-0 3. Penetrants: (1)24"P 4. Sealant Type: Foam 5. Damming Sidel: Assumed per detail 6. Damming Side 2: Recessed 4' 7. Damming Continuity (AcelRej): Accept 8. Soot Condion (AcdRej); MIA 9. Sealant Depth: 11"* Watkdown Comments: Top side seal is enclosed within support insulation, Insulation abuts damming board on bottom side. Slab thickness determined by Drawing C-1C1311 (wsa). ' 11' foam depth based on installation QC documentafion (WSA). (See Drawing M-13EF02; Essential Service Water Supply [EF;I Line Number 076-HBC-24". 95F Design Temp. 1-912" thick. Classification "AS" IAnti-Sweat] Fiberglass Type Insulation) 10. Annular Gap {smallest): 1 " I I. Gap between pen: NIA 12. Barrier Type: 13. Opening Slewed or Concrete: 14. Pipe lnsulatad: Yes Jeff Suter Prepared By: Wayne Aregoad Reviewed By: Steel M-663-00017A, Revision W0 1 Page B12-11 of BI2-24 I Penetration Seal Data Appendix: 812 1 Photos: Pi 32S0683 Fire Area A4 (Side I) Fire Area A-8 (Side 1 j Fire Area A-l (Side 2) Fire Area A-I (Side 2)

  • *
  • M-663-00017A, Revision WOl Penetration Seal Data Heat Affected Zone Review: P132S0683 Fire Area (Side 1) A-8 No Issues within Heat Affected Zone Fire Area (Side 2) A-1 No Issues within Heat Affected Zone Side 1 Photo Side 2 Photo 00 Sketch Page 812-12 of 812-24 Appendix: 812 Review Distances FISJA 7.2.3-1) 24ft Pipe L1 & L2 Temp. R1 Radius R2 Radius Dist. (ft) rt=) {In) (in) 0.5 1763 4.8 6.1 1 1615 4.1 5.5 1.5 1480 3.5 4.9 2 1357 3 4.3 2.5 1 1244 2.5 3.8 3 H41 2 3.3 3.5 1048 1.6 2.9 4 '962 1.2 2.5 4.5 1884 0.8 2.2 5 813 0.5 1.9 5.5 748 0.2 1.6 6 689 Contact 1.3 6.5 635 1.1 7 585 0.8 7.5 540 0.6 8 499 0.4 8.5 462 0.3 9 427 0.1 9.5 396 Contact No sketch requir
  • M-663-00017A, Revision W01 Page B12-13 of B12-24 1 Fire Area (Side ): A43 MQX Dwg: M-$Xi321 Fire Area (Side 2): A-1 10. Annular Gap (smallest): Indeterminant j1. Gap between pen; NIA 12. Barrier Type: 13. Opening Sleeved or Concrete: SW 14. Pipe Insulated: Yes Jeff Suter Prepared By: Wayne Aregood Reviewed By: Penetration Seal Data ~pp~dii: 812 Penetration #: PI 3280684 Penetmtion Type: &I, 1oc.Etev.: 2000'-0" I. Barrier Thickness: 10' 2. Opening Size; 30"D 3. Pondran&: (1)24"P 4. Sealant Type: Foam 5. Damming Sidel: Assumed per detail 6. Damming Side 2: Assumed per detail 7. Damming Continuity (AcclRej): NIA 8. Boot Condition (AcdRej); WA 9. Sealant Depth: Assumed per detail Walkdown Comments: insulation covers opening on both krrier sides. Slab thickness determined by Drawing C-I C1311 (wss) (See Drawing M-13EF03; Essential Service Water Return [Em Line Number 080-HBG24", 110F Design Temp, 1-112' thick, Classification "AS" [Anti-Sweat] Fiberglass Type Insulation) Sketch; M-663-000 17A, Revision W01 Page 512-14 of B12-24 I Penetration Seal Data Appe~tdi~: B12 I I Photos: P132S0684 Fire Area A-8 (Side 1) Fire Area A-8 (Side 1) Fire Area A-1 Fire Area A-l (Side 2)

M-663-00017A, Revision W01 NQ *photo required. Side 2 Photo , - Srlo photo required. Penetration Seal Data Appendix: 612 Heat Affected 2 one Review: PI 32S0684 Fire Area (Side 1) A-8 No issues within Hest Affected Zone Fire Area (Side 2) A-1 No issues within Heat Affected Zone Side 9 Photo I Sketch 1 - I I i No sketc required. C -#in, 1 ;.g -$, '.X. ;- , , ' ; . 1 - h ,y*%;. gb ..; . q~;~~;f ' .- ;: 'I '"-h< :, . ,, L+- 5: - .-,-.

M-663-000 174 Revision WO I Page BIZ-16 of B12-24 Sketch: Fire Area (Side 1): A-8 M-OXDwg; M-1x1904 Fire Area (Side 2): CC-1 10. Annular Gap (smallest): Unknown I I. Gap between pen: NIA 12. Barrier Type: A F 13. Opening Sleeved or Concrek SW Id Pipe Insulated: Yes Wayne Aregood Prepamd By: Jeff Suter Reviewed By: Penetration Seal Data Appendix: ~12 Penetration #: P132W1433 Penetration Type: M-1 Loe./Elev.: 201 3-0 3 I. Barrier Thickness: 24" 2 Opening Size: 1 B"D 3. Penetrants: (i)BUP 4. Sealant Type: Foam 5. Damming Sidel: Unknown 6. Damming Side 2: Unknown 7. Damming Continuity (AcclRej): Unknown 8. Boot Condition (AcelRej): NIA 5. Sealant Depth: Assumed Per Detail Walkdown Comments: QC documentation identifies a 6" seal depth. Insulation completely covers seal configuration. (WSA) (See Drawing M-13CB04: Central Chilled Water Supply [GB] Line Number 008-HBD-8", 44F Design Temp, 2" thick, Classification "Xu Calcium Silica Type Insulation) I .-

M-663-000 17A, Revision WO 1 Page Bl2-17 ofB12-24 Penetration Seal Data Appendix: ~12 Photos: P132W1433 Fire Area A-8 Fire Area A-8 (Side I) (Side 1) Fire Area CCf (Side 2) Fire Area CG1 (Side 2)

  • *
  • M-663-00017A, Revision WOl Penetration Seal Data Heat Affected Zone Review: P132W1433 Fire Area (Side 1) A-8 1. 4" conduit, not within Heat Affected Zone Fire Area (Side 2) CC-1 2. 1* nitrogen line, not within Heat Affected Zone. Insulation thickness included in dimensional distance. Side 1 Photo Sketch FA: A4l Slde1 Side 2 Photo
  • Page B12-18 ofB12-24 Appendix: 1812 Review Distances (RIIfennll M-663-00017A. F'&U'II 7 .2.M ) L1 &U Dist. (ft) 0.5 1 1.5 2 2.5 3 '4 4.5 5 5.5 6 16.5 a* Pipe Temp. R1 Radius (oF) (in) 1677 4.4 1463 .3.4 12n 2.6 1116 1.9 976 1.2 855 0.7 750 0.2 659 Contact 581 512 453 1402 I 358 FA: CC.1 Side 2 R2 Radius (in) 5.8 4.8 3.9 3.2 I 2.6 2 1 1.6 1.2 0.8 0.5 0.2 0 Contacl M-663-00017A, Revision W0 1 Page B12-19 of B12-24 Fire Area (Side 1): A-25 M9X Pwg: MOXI 331 Fire Area (Side 2): A-l 10. Annular Gap (smallest): 4" 11. Gap between pen: NIA 12. Barrier Type: R 4 3. Opening Sleeved or Concrete: St4 14. Pipe Insulated: Yes Penetration Seal Data Appendix: 812 Penetration #: Pi 3380799 Penetration Type: RE-1 WEtev.: 2000'-0" I. Barrier Thickness: 12" 2. Opening Size: 24"D 3. Penetrants: (1) 12"P 4. Sealant Type: Radflex 5. Damming Side1 : Unknown 6. Damming Side 2: Boot 7. Damming Continuity (AcdRej): NIA 8. Boot Condin (AoelRej): Accept
  • 9. Sealant Depth: Assumed Per DetaiI Walkdown Comments: Boot for battom side only. top side enclosed. Insulation appears to transition through the sealant zone. (WSA) (See Drawing M-13EJ02; Residual Heat Removal Train B [EJ] Line Number 009-ECB-12", 350F Design Temp, 2" thick, Classification "X" Calcium Silicate Type Insulation) Wayne Aregood Prepared By: Jeff Suter Reviewed By: Sketch:

M-663-00017A, Revision W01 Page 8 12-20 of B 1 2-24 Penetration Seal Data Appendix: ~12 I Photos: PI 3380799 Fire Area A-25 (Side 1 ) Fire Area A-1 Fire Area A-25 (Side 1) (Side 2) Fire Area A-I (Side 2)

  • *
  • M-663-00017A,Revision WOl Penetration Seal Data Heat Affected Zone Review: P133S0799 fire Area (Side 1) No issues within Heat Affected Zone Fire Area (Side 2) A-1 No issues within Heat Affected Zone Side 1 Photo Side 2 Photo Sketch Page B12-21 ofB12-24 Appendix: B 12 Review Distances (!Werance M-WOOJ17A. Figura 7.2.3-11 12* Pipe L1 &L2 Temp. R1 Radius R2 Radius Dist. (ft) ("F) (in) (in) 0.5 1712 :4.6 5.9 1 1524 13.7 5.1 1.5 1357 3 4.3 2 1209 12.3 3.6 2.5 1078 !u 3.1 3 . 962 1 1.2 2.5 3.5 860 0.7 2.1 *4 769 I o.3 1.7 4.5 689 I Contact 1.3 5 618 1 5.5 555 I 0.7 6 499 I 0.4 6.5 . 450 0.2 7 406 I 0 7.5 368 Contact I No sketch required .

Page B 1 2-22 of B 1 2-24 Sketch: Fire Area (Side I): A-24 MOX Dwg: M-lXI34i Fire Area (Side 2): A-I 10. Annular Gap (smallest): 4" 31. Gap between pen; NIA 12. Bam'sr Type: R 13. Opening Sleeved or Conerek Steel f 4. Pipe lnsutu Yes Wayne Aregood Prepared By: Jeff Suter Reviewed By: - - . .- Penetration Seal Data Appendix: ~12 Penetration #: PI 34S0860 Penetration Type: RB-I LocAlev.: 2000'-0" 1. Barrier Thickness: 12* 2. Opening Si: 24" 0 3. Penetrants: (1) t2"P 4. Sealant Type: Rad flex 5. Damming Side1 :

  • Unknown 6. Damming Side 2 Boot 7. Damming Continuity (AcdRej): NIA 8. Boot Contiion (AcclRej): ' Accept 9. Sealant Depth: Assumed Per Detail Walkdown Comments: Slab thickness based on drawing C-'I C1311.
  • Top side seal is covered with support insulation and shielding, obscuring inspection attributes. Insulation appears to transition through the sealant via bottom side examination. . I -- I Ill Fk kl WI1.t M-663-00017A, Revision W0 1 Page B12-23 of. Penetration Seal Data Appendix: BIZ Photos: PI 3480860 Fire Area A-24 (Side 1) Fire Area A-I (Side 2) Are Area A-9 (Side 2) Fire Area A-24 (Side I)
  • *
  • M-663-00017A, Revision WOl Penetration Seal Data Heat Affected Zone Review: Fire Area (Side 1) A-24 1. Lead shielding (PVC coated) on pipe Fire Area (Side 2) A-1 No issues within Heat Affected Zone Side 1 Photo Sketch qui fA: A-24 Slde1 1 I PtPI'
  • P134S0860 Side2Photo +-t --.... ' I Page BJ2-24 ofBI2*24 Appendix: 812 Review Distances Figure 12" Pipe L1 & L2 Temp. R1 Radius Dist. (ft) (*F) (In) 0.5 1712 4.6 1 1524 3.7 11.5 1357 3 2 1209 2.3 I 1078 1.7 962 1.2 3.5 '860 0.7 4 769 0.3 4.5 689 Contact 5 618 5.5 555 6 499 6.5 450 7 406 7.5 368 +-t--1-'!.j FA:. M llde2 R2 Radius (in) 5.9 5.1 4.3 3.6 3.1 2.5 2.1 1.7 1.3 1 ().7 0.4 0.2 0 1 rContact I

/A W~@/CF CREEK Page 1 I I I I I I I ! I I I I I i I M-663-00017A Attachment B13 Fire Protection Evaluation For Penetration Openings with Unique Bounding Attributes (PIR 2005-2384) Date 9/9/05 01/11/06 Rev. No. wo1 W02 Reviewed By Jeff Suter # h Jeff Suter Prepared By Ad& Wayne S Aregood d Wayne S Aregood Date 9/9/05 l/ll/O6 M-663-00017A Attachment B13 Revision W02 Page 2 of 19 Table of Contents Revision Log ................................................................................................................................. 3 ............................................................................................................................. 1.0 Purpose 4 2.0 Scope .................................. : ............................................................................................. 4 ........................................................................................................................ 3.0 References 4 4.0 Evaluation ......................................................................................................................... 5 5.0 Conclusions ..................................................................................................................... 19 ...................................................... Appendix B13, Penetration Seal Data (88 Total Pages)

M-663-00017A Page 3 of 19 Attachment 813 Revision W02 Revision Log j I I I I I I Revision W01 W02 - Reason for Revision Original Issue Changed seal requirements for Penetration P142W1932 M-663-00017A Page 4 of 19 Attachment B13 Revision W02 1.0 Purpose 1 .I The purpose of this document is to evaluate existing penetration seals that are not directly bounded to the typical detail limitations established in M-663-00017. This evaluation was conducted in effort to satisfy regulatory expectation regarding qualification and documentation of fire barrier penetration seals, as discussed in NRC lnformation Notice 88-04. This evaluation was conducted in I accordance with the guidance of NRC Generic Letter 86-10. 2.0 Scope 2.1 Table I penetrations in relation to the design requirements discussed in Section 5.1. 2.2 Refer to Section 7.0 of M-663-00017A for a cross-reference list of penetrations within Table I that are evaluated for additional seal parameters that do not satisfy the typical detail limitations of M-663-00017. In these instances, the potential cumulative affects of multiple unbounded attributes were considered for each penetration of concern. 3.0 References I 3.1 NRC Generic Letter 86-10, Implementation of Fire Protection Requirements, dated April 24, 1986 I 3.2 NRC lnformation Notice 88-04, Inadequate Qualification and Documentation of Fire Barrier Penetration Seals 3.3 10 CFR 50 Appendix R, Fire Protection Program For Nuclear Power Facilities Operating Prior To January 1, 1979 3.4 LER 87-10, Technical Specification Violations - Inoperable Fire Barriers Caused By Personnel Errors 3.5 M-663-00017, Penetration Seal Typical Details, Rev. W20 3.6 M-663-00111, Promatec Penetration Closure Heat Transfer Report, Rev. 3 3.7 CTP-1001, (M-663-00082) Fire Qualification Test on Silicone Foam Floor Penetration Seals, Rev. W01 I 3.8 CTP-1002, (M-663-00083), Fire Qualification Test on Silicone Foam Floor Penetration Seals 3.9 CTP-1020 & 1021 (M-663-00060), Fire Qualification Test on Penetration Seals 3.10 CTP-I 022 (M-663-00121), Fire Qualification Test on Penetration Seals I M-663-00017A Page 5 of 19 Attachment B13 Revision W02 3.1 1 TR-187 (M-663-00154), Fire and Hose Stream Test of a 8" thick specimen of #TCO-026 Ceramic Blanket used as a penetration seal material in a 12" diameter sleeve penetrated by bare pipe, insulated pipe, and copper, monel, and stainless steel instrument tubing 3.12 PIR 2005-2384, Unbounded Penetration Seals requiring additional design to I enhance seal performance. I 3.13 Work Order 05-275799, Thirty-one Penetration Seals Requiring Field Work 3.14 Work Order 03-256183, Cable Addition for Penetration P371W0948 3.1 5 M-162C, Specification for Non-metallic Thermal Insulation for Piping and Equipment Located In Auxiliary Building, Control Building, Diesel Generator Building, Fuel Building, and Radwaste Building For The Wolf Creek Generating Station, Rev. 19 3.16 DDCN M-162C-19-10,

Subject:

Pipe Insulation Control to Ensure Penetration Seal Fire Resistance Rating Maintained 4.0 Assumptions 4.1 It is assumed that existing penetration seal materials have been installed as I i required by applicable typical design details and procedures. This is an ! acceptable assumption based on a review of the Quality Control documentation I maintained during initial penetration seal installation activities and the intrusive inspections conducted to address LER 87-10, regarding seal material depth. 5.0 Evaluation 5.1 Assessment of Condition to Desiqn Requirements I 5.1 .I Initial typical detail assignment for the Table I penetrations resulted in a condition where at least one M-663-00017 typical detail critical parameter was not satisfied for each penetration seal. The issues associated with these penetrations are generically identified below, while the Table I "Problem" column characterizes the applicable issue(s) to the respective penetration. 5.1 .I .I Penetrant size exceeds the typical detail limitations such that I the seal could not be reasonably qualified as 3-hour fire (F) I i rated due to seal material type andlor depth. 5.1.1.2 Penetrant size exceeds the typical detail limitations. The penetration seal can be qualified by evaluation as 3-hour F rated due to seal material type and depth. However, the penetration is not directly qualified as 3-hour temperature (T) rated, and field inspection has determined that combustible materials are located within the M-663-00017A defined heat affected zone. This presents the potential for auto-ignition of M-663-00017A Page 6 of 19 Attachment 81 3 Revision W02 I combustible materials on the unexposed barrier side, when considering a 3-hour ASTM E-119 fire intensity. 5.1 .I .3 Penetrant design lateral movement exceeds typical detail limitation. For these penetrations the primary seal material (ceramic fiber) may lose resilience, if subjected to significant lateral movement compressing the ceramic fiber. This ! creates the potential for a through hole opening within the I ceramic fiber seal. Due to the presence of a silicone impregnated boot on both barrier sides, intrusive inspection was deemed necessary to determine if identified design movements had affected seal continuity. Each of the Table I penetrations required field work to address the issues identified above. This was initially identified in PIR 2005-2384, with field work conducted in accordance with Work Order 05-275799. The Table I "Resolution" column identifies the field work activity conducted for each penetration. Appendix B13 contains the penetration walkdown data that was utilized to assess the adequacy of the initial in plant configuration for the Table I penetrations. TABLE l Penetration Seal Field Work Resolution Penetration No. PI 12W1377 PI 12W1379 PI 13W0421 P121S0284 P121S0285 P121S0287 I i I ! I Communicating Typical Detail M-6A M-6A M-I RB-5A RBdA RB-5A Fire Side 1 A-I A-1 A-1 A-I A-1 A-I Side 2 C-I C-1 A-5 A-4 A-4 A-4 Eval. Section 5.2.5 5.2.5 5.2.1 5.2.6 5.2.6 5.2.6 Problem Section 5.1 .I .I 5.1.1.1 5.1 .I .I 5.1 .I .2 5.1 .I .2 5.1 .I .2 Resolution Add full depth ceramic fiber to recessed side of seal (Fire Area C-1) and evaluate for F-Rating only. Add full depth ceramic fiber to recessed side of seal (Fire Area C-I) and evaluate for F-Rating only. Eliminate combustible storage area on A-I side that is within the heat affected zone for the penetrant. Add foam to satisfy M-6A and this penetration will be bounded. Wrap penetration at floor up 18" (min.) with 3" (rnin.) ceramic fiber blanket. Encapsulate exposed ceramic fiber with a stainless steel sheet metal cover. Notch around interferences as necessary. Secure sheet metal cover with stainless steel banding.

Wrap penetration at floor up 18" (min.) with 3" (rnin.) ceramic fiber blanket. Encapsulate exposed ceramic fiber with a stainless steel sheet metal cover. Notch around interferences as necessary. Secure sheet metal cover with stainless steel banding. Wrap penetration at floor up 18" (min.) with 3" (rnin.) ceramic fiber blanket. Encapsulate exposed ceramic fiber with a stainless steel sheet metal cover. Notch around interferences as necessary. Secure sheet metal cover with stainless steel banding.

M-663-00017A Page 7 of 19 Attachment 81 3 I I Revision W02 I I I I I I Penetration No. P132W1845 PI 33S0762 PI 33S0784 PI 33S0788 PI 33W2037 PI 33W2042 P 1 34S0877 PI 34W2054 P141S1015 P141S1023 P141W1907 P141W1908 P141W1913 Problem Section 5.1.1.1 5.1 .I .3 5.1.1.2 5.1.1.2 5.1.1.1 5.1 .I .I 5.1.1.2 5.1.1.1 5.1.1.1 5.1.1.1 5.1 .I .I 5.1.1.1 5.1.1.1 Typical Detail M-6A FB-I RM- 1 AIA-7 RB-5A M-I M-I RB-5A M-I M-6A M-6A M-I M-I M-I Resolution 1) Locally remove insulation to expose seal damming and to provide sufficient room to allow damming attachment on A-8 side. 2) Mechanically attach per A-5 Detail, two layers of ceramic fiber damming to the barrier surface on each A-8 side. Perform intrusive inspection to verify penetrant movement has not affected seal continuity. Remove Armaflex from A-25 (Top Side) for a distance of at least 7'-6" from penetration and replace with noncombustible Anti-sweat insulation, if required. Remove Armaflex from A-25 (Top Side) for a distance of at least 7'-6" from penetration and replace with noncombustible Anti-sweat insulation, if required. Add full depth ceramic fiber to recessed side of seal (Fire Area A-25) and evaluate for F-and T rating. Add full depth ceramic fiber to recessed side of seal (Fire Area A-25) and evaluate for F-Rating only. Remove Armaflex from A-24 (Top Side) for a distance of at least 7'-6" from penetration and replace with noncombustible Anti-sweat insulation, if required. Add full depth ceramic fiber to recessed side of seal (Fire Area A-8) and evaluate for F-Rating only. 1) Add full depth ceramic fiber to sleeve on topside (Fire Area A-16) and evaluate for F-Rating only. 2) Remove Armaflex (Top Side) for a distance of at least 4' on the 4 pipe connected to the main pipe and locally remove Armaflex from the 4" pipe with air gap for a minimum distance of to 12" from closest contact point, both directions and replace with noncombustible Anti-sweat insulation, if required. Add full depth ceramic fiber to sleeve on topside (Fire Area A-16) and evaluate for F-Rating only. Add ceramic fiber to sleeve in Fire Area A-26 and mechanically attach a single layer of ceramic fiber board to barrier on A-26 side. Evaluate for F-Rating only. Add ceramic fiber to sleeve in Fire Area A-26 and mechanically attach a single layer of ceramic fiber board to barrier on A-26 side. Evaluate for F-Rating only. Add foam to satisfy M-6A, which will bound penetration. Fire Side 1 A-8 A-8 A-25 A-25 A-8 A-8 A-24 A-8 A-16 A-16 A-16 A-16 A-16 Eval. Section 5.2.5 5.2.7 5.2.4 5.2.2 5.2.5 5.2.5 5.2.2 5.2.5 5.2.5 5.2.5 5.2.5 5.2.5 5.2.1 Communicating Areas Side 2 - A-3 A- I A- I A- I A-25 A-25 A- I A-24 A-8 A-8 A-26 A-26 A-26 M-663-00017A Page 8 of 19 Attachment B13 Revision W02 i I I I 1 I I 5.1.2 Work Order 03-256183 identified that during installation of additional cables through penetration P371W0948 it was noted that the gap tolerances for installing foam per CNT-MC-905 could not be obtained between the new cables and the cable tray sleeve. The resulting seal configuration observed in the field is not directly bounded by typical detail E-2A from M-663-00017. I I I I I Penetration No. P142S1083 P142S1086 P142W1932 P143W2514 P143W2515 PI 45S0952 P145S0954 P152W1421 P311 W0841 P311 W0842 P311 W0845 P611 W0206 Fire Side 1 A-16 A-16 A-16 A-16 A-16 A-23 A-23 A-19 C-I C-I C-I F-2 Typical Detail M-I FB-1 M-6A M-I M-6A FB-I FB-1 M-I M-6A M-6A M-6A M-I Communicating Areas Side 2 A-3 A-3 A-10 A-5 A-5 A-1 5 A-15 CC-1 CC-1 CC-1 CC-1 F-3 Eva I. Section 5.2.5 5.2.3 5.2.9 5.2.5 5.2.5 5.2.7 5.2.7 5.2.5 5.2.5 5.2.5 5.2.5 5.2.5 Problem Section 5.1.1.1 5.1 .I .2 5.1 .I .I 5.1.1.1 5.1 .I .1 5.1 .I .3 5.1 .I .3 5.1 .I .I 5.1.1.1 5.1 .I .I 5.1.1.1 5.1 .I .I Resolution Add ceramic fiber flush with sleeve on the topside (Fire Area A-16) and evaluate as F-Rated only. Remove Armaflex (Top Side) for a distance of at least 12" from closest point (Both Directions) of main penetrating pipe and replace with noncombustible Anti- Sweat insulation, if required. Remove existing silicone foam seal and damming from the 2026' Corridor (A-16) side and add full depth ceramic fiber to the penetration from the A-16 side. Evaluate for F-Rating only. Add full depth ceramic fiber to recessed side of seal (Fire Area A-16) and mechanically attach at least one layer of ceramic fiber board to barrier on A-16 side. Evaluate for F-Rating only. Mechanically attach at least one layer of ceramic fiber board to barrier on A-1 6 side. Evaluate for F-Rating only. Perform intrusive inspection to verify penetrant movement has not affected seal continuity. Perform intrusive inspection to verify penetrant movement has not affected seal continuity. Add full depth ceramic fiber to recessed side of seal (Fire Area CC-1) and evaluate for F-Rating only. Add full depth ceramic fiber to recessed side of seal (Fire Area CC-1) and evaluate for F-Rating only. Add full depth ceramic fiber to recessed side of seal (Fire Area CC-1) and evaluate for F-Rating only. Add full depth ceramic fiber to recessed side of seal (Fire Area CC-1) and evaluate for F-Rating only. Add ceramic fiber to recessed side of penetration (Fire Area F-2) and mechanically attach a single layer of ceramic fiber board to barrier on F-2 side. Evaluate for F-Rating only.

M-663-00017A Page 9 of 19 Attachment B13 Revision W02 ! I I 5.2 Evaluation of Condition I I ! 5.2.1 Silicone Foam Added - Boundinq to M-6A Detail I The Table I penetration seals referring to this section have a penetrant size that exceeds the M-I typical detail bounding limitation. The addition of RTV Silicone Foam material to a minimum 9" depth between 1" thick ceramic fiber damming results in penetration attributes that are bounded by the limiting parameters of typical detail M-6A from M-663-00017. Therefore, no further evaluation is required. 5.2.2 RB-5A Detail with Armaflex Removed from HAZ The HDSEIHDLE annular reduction seals for the Table I penetrations referring to this section are bounded by the limitations of typical detail RM-IA, which allows up to an 18" pipe penetrant for an HDSEIHDLE seal. The unbounded portion necessitating evaluation is the penetrant size in relation to the annular gap sealed with ceramic fiber and a silicone impregnated boot. Figure 1 reflects the RB-5A typical detail seal configuration. INSTRUMENT TUBE I INVERTED BOOT ITYP.) 3" MIN. DEPTH ALUMINA-SLICA I BLWKET (TYP.1 I I" MAX. ANNULUS AROUND I PIPE. OIMENSION DETERMINED ! ! HOSEfHDLE FULL BARRIER awrn (12 MIN.) BAND CLAMP METAL SLEEVE PQHESIVE SEALAN FLOOR OR WALL CONFIGURATION FIGURE 1 Typical Detail RB-5A (Reference M-663-00017) These penetrations are considered 3-hour F rated based on the successful performance of Penetration 1 from fire test CTP-1022. The tested configuration was comprised of a 10" opening containing a 2" diameter pipe penetrant. The opening was sealed with a 12" depth of HDLE leaving a 1" annulus around the pipe penetrant. Silicone impregnated boots filled with a 3" ceramic fiber depth were then installed beyond the barrier plane on both penetration sides. This presented a seal configuration consistent with Figure 1 above. I I i I M-663-00017A Attachment B13 Revision W02 Page 10 of 19 Industry fire testing reveals that the exposed side boot is sacrificial and will be consumed when directly subjected to an ASTM E-119 fire. The loss of this boot will result in the loss of the exposed side ceramic fiber due to gravity, since the only structural support provided for the material beyond the barrier plane is that presented by the boot. However, the unexposed side boot with ceramic fiber fill will remain in tact, and adequately prevent fire propagation via the small annular gap between the pipe penetrant and the HDSEIHDLE sidewall. This ceramic fiber and boot configuration will not be charred or consumed during the fire exposure. The ceramic fiber will be maintained in position by the unexposed side boot, which is not determinately impacted, because it is not subjected to direct flame impingement. Considering the performance of Penetration 1 from CTP-1022 and the and the non-ablative material properties of ceramic fiber, penetrant size will not impact seal F rating. However, fire testing does not directly bound a T rating for penetrants larger than 2" diameter. M-663-00017 identifies that where piping penetrations exist that do not satisfy T rating requirements, a seal assembly with an F rating corresponding to the hourly rating of the associated barrier is acceptable, provided evaluation demonstrates that exposed insitu combustibles and redundant post fire safe shutdown (PFSSD) equipment/circuits on the unexposed barrier side will not be detrimentally affected by the increased penetrant temperatures. In effort to evaluate fire area impact, field walkdowns and comprehensive assessment reviews, documented in Appendix B13, were conducted for each penetration of concern. This review was completed in accordance with the criteria and review methodology established in M-663-00017A Section 7.2.3 for non-T rated penetrations. The review identified that once the combustible Armaflex is removed from the heat affected zone, no other exposed insitu combustibles or PFSSD circuits are located within the HAZ. Each of the penetrations satisfy the review criteria of M-663-00017 where T rating requirements are not met. Therefore, the penetrations are acceptable, as this evaluation demonstrates reasonable assurance that the penetration seals do not present a negative impact to PFSSD capability. 5.2.3 FB-1 Detail with Armaflex Removed from HAZ Penetration P142S1086 contains a pipe penetrant (24" diameter) that exceeds the size limitation directly bounded by typical detail FB-1 from M- 663-00017. The FB-I detail, which is comprised of a 12" ceramic fiber depth between silicone impregnated fiberglass boots, directly qualifies a seal with up to a 6" diameter penetrant as 3-hour fire F and T rated. Penetration P142S1086 is considered 3-hour F rated based on the successful performance of the following fire tested configurations, which M-663-00017A Attachment B13 Revision W02 Page 11 of 19 demonstrate that a minimum 8" depth of ceramic fiber will prevent the passage of flame and hose stream to the unexposed barrier side. TR-187 - 12" diameter opening containing a 2" bare and insulted pipe and three %" diameter tube penetrants. The penetration was sealed with an 8" depth of ceramic fiber blanket. CTP-1002 Penetration 6 - 12" diameter opening containing a 6" bare pipe penetrant. The penetration was sealed with a 12" depth of ceramic fiber blanket between silicone impregnated fiberglass boots. CTP-1002 Penetration 10 - 12" diameter opening containing a 6" insulated pipe penetrant. The penetration was sealed with a 12" depth of ceramic fiber blanket between silicone impregnated fiberglass boots. CTP-1020 Penetration 1 - 6" diameter opening containing a 2" bare pipe penetrant. The penetration was sealed with a 12" depth of ceramic fiber blanket between silicone impregnated fiberglass boots. CTP-1021 Penetration 1 - 10" diameter opening containing a 2" bare pipe penetrant. The penetration was sealed with a 12" depth of ceramic fiber blanket between silicone impregnated fiberglass boots. Ceramic fiber is an inert material comprised of compressed refractory fibers. It is not charred or consumed during fire exposure. The material will not be negatively affected by heat transmission through the penetrating item. Therefore, penetrant size is not a concern regarding capability of a ceramic fiber seal to prevent flame and hose stream passage to the unexposed side. However, penetrant size is a concern regarding unexposed side temperature development. Based on a comparison to the fire tested configurations bounding detail FB-1, penetration P142S1086 is not considered T rated. M-663-00017 identifies that where piping penetrations exist that do not satisfy T rating requirements, a seal assembly with an F rating corresponding to the hourly rating of the associated barrier is acceptable, provided evaluation demonstrates that exposed insitu combustibles and redundant post fire safe shutdown (PFSSD) equipment/circuits on the unexposed barrier side will not be detrimentally affected by the increased penetrant temperatures. In effort to evaluate fire area impact, field walkdowns and comprehensive assessment reviews, documented in Appendix B13, were conducted for penetration P142S1086. This review was completed in accordance with the criteria and review methodology established in M-663-00017A Section 7.2.3 for non-T rated penetrations.

M-663-00017A Page 12 of 19 Attachment 61 3 Revision W02 The review identified that once the combustible Armaflex insulation is removed from the heat affected zone, no other exposed insitu combustibles or PFSSD circuits are located within the HAZ. The penetration satisfies the review criteria of M-663-00017 where T rating requirements are not met. Therefore, the penetration is acceptable, as this evaluation demonstrates reasonable assurance that the penetration seals do not present a negative impact to PFSSD capability. 5.2.4 RM-1A /A-7 Detail with Armaflex Removed from HAZ I I I I Penetration P133S0784 is an HSDEIHDLE annular reduction seal with the annular gap between the pipe and high density elastomer sealed with ceramic fiber. The pipe penetrant is 14 diameter. The HDSEIHDLE portion of the seal is bounded by the limitations of typical detail RM-IA, which allows up to an 18" pipe penetrant for an HDSEIHDLE seal. The unbounded portion necessitating evaluation is the penetrant size in relation to the annular gap sealed with ceramic fiber. Ceramic fiber seal detail A-7 qualifies up to a 2" pipe penetrant as 3-hour F and T rated. This penetration is considered 3-hour F rated based on the discussion provided in Section 5.2.3 for a ceramic fiber sealed penetration. However, the penetration is not considered T rated based on the large penetrant size. M-663-00017 identifies that where piping penetrations exist that do not satisfy T rating requirements, a seal assembly with an F rating corresponding to the hourly rating of the associated barrier is acceptable, provided evaluation demonstrates that exposed insitu combustibles and redundant post fire safe shutdown (PFSSD) equipment/circuits on the I unexposed barrier side will not be detrimentally affected by the increased I I penetrant temperatures. I In effort to evaluate fire area impact, field walkdowns and comprehensive assessment reviews, documented in Appendix 813, were conducted for penetration P133S0784. This review was completed in accordance with the criteria and review methodology established in M-663-00017A Section 7.2.3 for non-T rated penetrations. The review identified that once the combustible Armaflex insulation is removed from the heat affected zone, no other exposed insitu combustibles or PFSSD circuits are located within the HAZ. The penetration satisfies the review criteria of M-663-00017 where T rating requirements are not met. Therefore, the penetration is acceptable, as this evaluation demonstrates reasonable assurance that the penetration seals do not present a negative impact to PFSSD capability. I I I I I I I M-663-00017A Page 13 of 19 Attachment B13 Revision W02 I I I I 5.2.5 Ceramic Fiber Added to Silicone Foam Seal I Each of the Table I penetrations referring to this section contain a large penetrant size that is not directly bounded by detail M-I or M-6A. The primary seal material (Silicone Foam) for these penetrations chars during fire exposure, with the char rate typically accelerating as the penetrant size increases. This is the case due to the increased thermal mass presented by a large diameter penetrant. Considering an ASTM E-119 3-hour fire exposure, the thermal mass of a penetrant larger than that bounded by fire testing could potentially contribute to an increased seal char rate and ultimately present a seal failure mode. To address this concern, seal performance was enhanced by adding ceramic fiber materials to the existing seal configuration to ensure a 3- hour F rating capability. The recessed area of existing penetration seals were either filled with compressed ceramic fiber and/or additional ceramic fiberboards were added to one or both sides of the barrier penetration seal, depending on in-plant configuration. Ceramic fiber is an inert material comprised of compressed refractory fibers. It is not charred or consumed during fire exposure. The material will not be negatively affected by heat transmission through the penetrating item. The addition of the ceramic fiber optimizes the capability of the penetration seal to resist the affects of Silicone Foam consumption and thermal propagation (conduction and radiant energy) along the large penetrant. Therefore, ensuring that the seal will prevent the passage of flame for a 3-hour I I duration. However, due to the large penetrant size, these penetrations I are not considered T rated. I M-663-00017 identifies that where piping penetrations exist that do not satisfy T rating requirements, a seal assembly with an F rating corresponding to the hourly rating of the associated barrier is acceptable, provided evaluation demonstrates that exposed insitu combustibles and redundant post fire safe shutdown (PFSSD) equipment/circuits on the unexposed barrier side will not be detrimentally affected by the increased penetrant temperatures. In effort to evaluate fire area impact, field walkdowns and comprehensive assessment reviews, documented in Appendix 913, were conducted for each penetration of concern. This review was completed in accordance with the criteria and review methodology established in M-663-00017A Section 7.2.3 for non-T rated penetrations. The review identified that once the combustible Armaflex is removed from the heat affected zone (where required by Table I), no other exposed insitu combustibles or PFSSD circuits are affected within the HAZ. Each of the penetrations satisfies the review criteria of M-663-00017 where T rating requirements are not met. Therefore, the penetrations are acceptable, as this evaluation demonstrates reasonable assurance that the penetration seals do not present a negative impact to PFSSD capability. I I I I I M-663-00017A Page 14 of 19 Attachment B13 I Revision W02 5.2.6 Thermal Protective Jacket added to RB-5A Details I I I The Table I penetration seals referring to this section have penetrant sizes exceeding the bounding limitations of the assigned typical detail. These RB-5A penetrations are 3-hour F rated based on the discussion provided in Section 5.2.2. However, the penetrations are not considered T rated based on the penetrant size exceeding the limitations of the typical detail. Typical detail RB-5A bounds up to a 2" diameter pipe as 3- hour F and T rated, while the penetrations of concern each contain a 4" diameter steel pipe penetrant. M-663-00017 identifies that where piping penetrations exist that do not satisfy T rating requirements, a seal assembly with an F rating corresponding to the hourly rating of the associated barrier is acceptable, provided evaluation demonstrates that exposed insitu combustibles and I redundant post fire safe shutdown (PFSSD) equipment/circuits on the unexposed barrier side will not be detrimentally affected by the increased penetrant temperatures. In effort to evaluate fire area impact, field walkdowns and comprehensive assessment reviews, documented in Appendix B13, were conducted for each penetration of concern. This review was completed in accordance with the criteria and review methodology established in M-663-00017A Section 7.2.3 for non-T rated penetrations. The HAZ review identified that combustible Armaflex anti-sweat insulation I is provided on the pipe within the heat affected zone on the bottom side of I I each penetration. No other exposed insitu combustibles or PFSSD ! circuits are located within the HAZ. In all cases, the pipe penetrating the barrier opening is protected with fiberglass insulation on the topside and the bottom side is protected with Armaflex insulation. No insulation transitions through the seal. It has been determined that Armaflex anti- sweat insulation is combustible and should be removed from the pipe on the unexposed side of the barrier for a sufficient distance that will eliminate auto-ignition concerns. However, since the location is within a radiological and/or contaminated area along the ceiling in areas that are difficult to access, an alternative measure was chosen. This involved protecting the topside penetration seal configuration with a thermal protective jacket to lower unexposed side temperatures on the bottom side in effort to prevent potential auto-ignition of the Armaflex type I insulation. This thermal protective jacket is constructed by wrapping the penetration sleeve, boot and existing pipe insulation with 3" thick ceramic fiber blanket for a distance of 18" from the floor interface. The ceramic fiber is then encapsulated with a 20-gage stainless steel cover, banded in place to prevent dislodgement during potential hose stream activities. As necessary, the jacket design was locally notched at interferences to eliminate system interaction. See Figure 2 for the thermal protective jacket design.

M-663-000 1 7A Page 15 of 19 I I Attachment B13 I I Revision W02 I I Ceramic fiber is the primary insulating component of the thermal jacket design. Ceramic fiber has been tested and qualified through penetration and seismic gap seal testing programs. Ceramic fiber products are inert and will remain in place for the entire 3-hour qualification period with no material consumption. The resulting installation, as shown in Figure 2, will provide an additional 18" x 3" thick thermal protective barrier along the pipe penetrant to enable lowering of unexposed side temperatures, which will prevent auto-ignition of the Armaflex that is present on the bottom side of the penetration. The thermal jacket design is installed over existing insulation, thus providing added protection from radiant and conductive energy that could develop from fire exposure on the topside of the barrier. The end result protective configuration provides a cumulative seal depth of approximately 37". The bounding fire tested seal depth was 12" of HDLE between boots containing a 3" depth of ceramic fiber. Pipe penetrants that utilize fiberglass insulation are protected up to the ceramic filled boot that is part of the installed penetration seal design, thus significantly reducing thermal insult during fire exposure to the installed penetrants. M-663-00111 demonstrated that insulating pipe penetrants through the seal material would significantly reduce thermal exposure to the seal material and penetrant. This report documented a significant drop in interface temperatures as a result of installed piping insulation. The actual drop varies depending on postulated system temperatures and insulation thickness, but in all cases the reported I temperature drop is significant. I This thermal benefit logic can be applied to fire exposure when I considering that the pipe penetrants being evaluated are only slightly larger than that previously evaluated in M-663-00017, Detail RB-5A. Therefore, direct flame impingement to the test article would be more severe than that expected for the Table I pipe penetrations protected with ceramic fiber thermal jacketing. Based on the construction attributes of the existing insulation and thermal jacketing, it is reasonable to conclude that the penetration seals identified in Table I would resist the affects of fire exposure and prevent conductive and radiant energy exposure to unexposed side of the barrier for a 3-hour duration. Therefore, Table I penetration seals referencing this section are 3-hour F rated and will prevent the auto-ignition of Armaflex type insulation on the unexposed side of the barrier. I Structurally, the addition of the insulating jacket will not affect the seismic qualification, system performance, or the performance of any SSCs in proximity to the seals. The insulating jacket design is self-supporting to the floor, compressible, and will move with any system moment as with the current insulation material installed on the pipes. Based on the above discussions and considering the installed 37" (approximate) seal design and the pipe penetrant size in relation to that bounded by testing, it is reasonable to conclude that the additional thermal jacket design will provide the additional protection necessary to M-663-00017A Page 16 of 19 Attachment B13 Revision W02 I I I prevent potential auto-ignition of the unexposed side Armaflex present on ! the pipe penetrant. Therefore, the penetrations are acceptable, as this evaluation demonstrates reasonable assurance that the penetration seals do not present a negative impact to PFSSD capability. CEiMlC ABER BLAN<ET-- W/ STME55 STEEL SHIATHNC SUl.MLlAL I20 GA MN 1 9 i,,"?, d O?i j I ! i FIGURE 2 I I Thermal Protective Jacket 1 I 5.2.7 Penetrations with Lateral Movement Exceedinq Typical Detail Penetration seals referring to this section have design penetrant movement that exceeds the bounding limitations of the installed seal configuration. The movement specifically evaluated and inspected were lateral movements that could potentially compress the ceramic fiber within the penetration opening during system operational cycles. Because significant lateral movement is a worse case scenario these penetrations could not be evaluated acceptable in accordance with Attachment B4.

M-663-00017A Page 17 of 19 Attachment B13 Revision W02 Therefore, intrusive examination was performed to assess the internal ceramic fiber condition. This inspection revealed that no through-hole I opening was present and therefore, these ceramic fiber details (FB-I) are fully bounded in accordance with the penetration attributes. Considering I I that the plant has been operating for 20 years and has experienced numerous system cycles, it is reasonable to conclude that these booted penetrations have been subjected to the typical system movement that will be seen through the life of the plant. Therefore, no further evaluation is required. 5.2.8 Penetration P371 W0948 Penetration P371W0948 is a cable tray blockout through a 12" thick concrete wall. The current seal configuration is not directly bounded by assigned deta'il E-2A. The actual seal configuration is 10" Silicone Foam with 1" ceramic fiber damming flush with the barrier plane on both sides I with the exception of the cable chase side, where in isolated areas of cable congestion at the top of the blockout, damming continuity is not maintained due to substantial cable fill. At these locations, Silicone Foam is present in lieu of ceramic fiber damming. The resulting overall seal depth for the penetration is maintained at 12". This configuration provides an acceptable seal based on comparison to the requirements of typical details E-2A and E-18. E-2A requires a 9 Silicone Foam depth between 1" ceramic fiber damming, while E-18 requires a 12" Silicone Foam depth and no damming. The penetration of concern contains a minimum 10" Silicone Foam depth with isolated areas providing a 12" foam depth. Industry fire testing has demonstrated that a 1 1" ceramic fiber depth provides superior fire resistive performance to that ! provided by a 1" Silicone Foam depth. Considering this, the penetration seal configuration for P371W0948 is at least equivalent to detail E-18, as Silicone Foam depth is either 12" per the detail requirements or an equal thickness of ceramic fiber damming is substituted for Silicone Foam, where the foam depth is 10". Therefore, the penetration is considered 3- hour F and T rated. 5.2.9 Penetration P142W1932 Penetration P142W1932 contains a large penetrant size that is not directly bounded by detail M-6A. As discussed in Section 5.2.5, the primary seal material (Silicone Foam) chars during fire exposure, with the char rate typically accelerating as the penetrant size increases. To address this concern, the Silicone Foam seal will be removed and a full barrier (36") thick ceramic fiber seal will be installed. This seal configuration was necessary, as it was not cost effective or ALARA wise to add ceramic fiber to the recessed side of the existing seal in the 'A' RHR Heat Exchanger Room (A-lo), where the penetration is located 30 feet from the floor. The seal work will be conducted in the 2026' Corridor 1408 (A-16) where the seal is readily accessible. This action will I M-663-000 1 7A Page 18 of 19 Attachment B13 Revision W02 necessitate original seal removal, since it is installed flush with the barrier plane on the A-16 side. Ceramic fiber is an inert material comprised of compressed refractory fibers. It is not charred or consumed during fire exposure. The material will not be negatively affected by heat transmission through the penetrating item. Therefore, penetrant size is not a concern regarding capability of a ceramic fiber seal to prevent flame and hose stream passage to the unexposed side, as the material depth and penetration annulus are well within the bounding limitations of typical ceramic fiber seal detail A-7 from M-663-00017. However, penetrant size is a concern regarding unexposed side temperature development. Therefore, penetration P142W1932 is considered F but not T rated. M-663-00017 identifies that where piping penetrations exist that do not satisfy T rating requirements, a seal assembly with an F. rating corresponding to the hourly rating of the associated barrier is acceptable, provided evaluation demonstrates that exposed insitu combustibles and redundant post fire safe shutdown (PFSSD) equipment/circuits on the unexposed barrier side will not be detrimentally affected by the increased penetrant temperatures. In effort to evaluate fire area impact, a field walkdown and comprehensive assessment review, documented in Appendix B13, was conducted for the penetration of concern. This review was completed in accordance with the criteria and review methodology established in M-663-00017A Section 7.2.3 for non-T rated penetrations. The review identified that no exposed insitu combustibles or PFSSD circuits are affected within the HAZ. The penetration satisfies the review criteria of M-663-00017 where T rating requirements are not met. Therefore, P142W1932 is acceptable, as this evaluation demonstrates reasonable assurance that the penetration seal does not present a negative impact to PFSSD capability. ! I I I I ! 5.3 Post Fire Safe Shutdown Impact There is no impact to PFSSD systems or components as a result of this evaluation. The Table I penetrations are evaluated as 3-hour F rated or are 3- hour F and T rated where stated. The comprehensive walkdown review for each of the non-T rate penetration seals revealed that no exposed insitu combustibles outside what was evaluated existed, and no PFSSD circuits are negatively affected by the non-T rated penetrations. Therefore, no PFSSD circuits are negatively affected by the non-T rated penetrations I i I I I I M-663-00017A Attachment B13 Revision W02 Page 19 of 19 6.0 Conclusions Based on the above discussions, it is reasonable to conclude that the Table I penetration seals that were not bounded to T rating requirements are acceptable as 3-hour F rated and will perform their intended design function. The additional modification made to these penetrations significantly enhance the seal performance, ensuring that regulatory requirements and commitments as well as WCNOC Fire Protection Program requirements to prevent spread of fire from one fire area to another are satisfied. It has also been determined through this evaluation that the lack of a T rating will not affect the plant's ability to achieve and maintain PFSSD.

M-663-00017A, Revision W01 Fire Area (Side 1): A-.I M-OX Dwg: M-1 XI 902 Page B13-I of B13-88: Fire Area (Side 2): C-1 10. Annular Gap (smallest): 2' I 1. Gap between pen: NIA 12. Barrier Type: A F 13. Opening Sleeved or Concrete: Steel 14. Pipe lnsulat& Yes Wayne Aregood Prepamd By: Jeff Suter Reviewed By: Penetration Seal Data Appendix: 1313 Penetration #: PI lZW1377 Penetration Type: MA LoeJElev.: 'I 979'4" 1. Barrier Thickness: 36* 2. Opening Size: 42"D 3. Penetrants: (1)3OHP 4. Sealant Type: Foam I I 5. Damming Side1 : Flush 6. Damming Side 2: 25Vecessed 7. Damming Continuiiy (AcdRej): Accept 8. Boot Condition (Acchj): WA 9. Sealant Depth: 9" I Walkdown Comments: insulation abuts damming, does not transition through seal zone. I Sketch:

M-663-00017A, Revision WO I (Side 2) Penetration Seal Data Appendk ~13 Photos: P112W1377 Fire Area A-1 (Side 1) Fire Area C-l I I I I Fire Area A-I (Side 1 ) Fire Area GI (Side 2)

  • *
  • M-663-00017A, Revision WOI Penetration Seal Data Heat Affected Zone Review: P112W1377 Fire Area (Side 1) A-1 1. 1-1/2" Cond. 5J3022, not within Heat Affected Zone. Fire Area (Side 2) C-1 2. 4" Cond. 4U1F1A. not with Heat Affected Zone 3. 3/4" Cond. 4J3018, not within Heat Affected Zone 4. 1" Cond. 6J1A10, not within Heat Affected Zone Side 1 Photo Side2Photo Sketch FA:A-1 Sldei * * . . ..__ . p .... * * * -.** :* IJ. .* *
  • A . ,* . Page B 13-3 of B 13-88 Appendix: 813 Review Distances (RAifelwoce FQUN 7.2.3-1 ) 30" Pipe L1 & L2 Temp. R1 Radius R2 Radius Dist. (ft) ("F) 0.5 1 1.5 2 2.5 3 3.5 4 4.5 5 5.5 6 6.5 7 1706 1513 1342 1 1192 1059 942 839 748 668 597 535 480 432 389 FA:.C-1 Slde2 (In) (in) 4.5 5.9 3.7 5 2.9 4.2 2.2 3.6 1.6 3 1.1 2.4 0.6 2 0.2 1.6 Contact 1.2 0.9 0.6 0.4 0.1 Contact M-663-00017A, Revision W0 1 Sketch Fire Area (Side 1): A-I MQX Dwg: M-1 XI PO2 Page B13-4 of Bl3-88 Fire Area (Side 2): C-1 10. Annular Gap (smallest): 1 112" 11. Gap between pen: NIA 12. Barrier Type: A F 13. Opening Sleeved or Concrete: Steel 14. Pipe Insulated: Yes Wayne Aregood Prepared By: Jeff Suter Reviewed By: Penetration Seal Data Appendix: 813 Penetration #: PI 1 2W1379 Penetration Type: M-6A LocJaev.: 1979'-6" 1. Barrier Thickness: 38" 2. Owning =ze: 42"D 3. Penetrants: (1)WP 4. Sealant Type: Foam 5. Damming Sidel; Flush 6. Damming Side 2: 24" recessed 7. Damming Continuity (AcdRej): Accept 8. Boat Condition (AccRej): NIB 9. Sealant Depth: 1 Oh Walkdown Comments: Insulation abuts damming, does not transition through seal zone.

M-663-00017A, Revision W01 Page 3 13-5 of B 13-88 Fire Area A-l (Side 1) Penetration Seal Data Appendix: BI~ Photos: Pt 12W1379 Fire Area A-1 (Side 1) Fire Area GI (Side 2) Fire Area GI (Side 2)

  • *
  • M-663-00017A, Revision WOI Penetration Seal Data Heat Affected Zone Rev.iew: P112W1379 Fire Area (Side 1) A-1 1. Security communications cable, not within Heat Affected Zone 2. Combustible Material Storage Area direcUy adjacent and under penetration seal. Fire Area (Side 2) C-1 2. 3/4"1ighting conduit, not within Heat Affected Zone Side 1 Photo Sketch FA: A-1 stde1 Side 2 Photo Page B 13-6 of B 13-88 Appendix: B13 Review Distances (R8felenoiM-863-<)0()17A. L1 & L2 Dist. (ft) 0.5 1 1.5 2 2.5 3 3.5 4 4.5 5 5.5 '6 6.5 7 30" Pipe Temp. R1 Radius ("F) (in) 1706 4.5 1513 3.7 1342 12.9 1192 2.2 1059 I 1.6 J 942 1.1 1839 0.6 748 0.2 668 Contact ! 597 535 480 432 389 FA:t-1 llde2 R2 Radius (in) '5.9 '5 4.2 3.6 3 2.4 2 1.6 1.2 0.9 0.6 J 0.4 0.'1 I Contact I Sketch: Fire Area (Side I): A-I MOX Dw~: M-1 X0360 Page B 13-7 of I3 13-88 Fire Area (Side 2): A-5 10. Annular Gap (smallest): 314" 11. Gap between pen: NIA 12. Barrier Type: 13. Opening Sleeved or Concrete: Steel 14. Pipe Insulated: No Wayne Aregood Prepared By: Jeff Suter Reviewed By: Penetration Seal Data Appendix: 613 Penetration #: P113W0421 Penetration Type: M-I Loc.lEk~.: 1983'-10 1. Barrier Thickness: -12" Nominal 2. Opening Size; 12"D 3. Penetrants: (1WP 4. Sealant Type: Fm 5. Damming Sidel: Flush 8. Damming Side 2: 2-1R" Recess 7. Damming Continuity (AccRej): Accept 8. Boot Condition (AcdRej): NIA 9. Sealant Depth: 7-712" Walkdown Comments:

M-663-000 174 Revision WO I Page B 13-8 of B 13-88 Penetration Seal Data Appendix: ~-13 Photos: P1 t 3W0421 Fire Area A-l (Side 1) Flre Area A-5 Fire Area A-l (Side 1) Fire Area A-5 (Side 2)

Sketch: Fire Area (Side I); +M M9X Dwg: M-OXI211 Fire Area (Side 2): A-4 10. Annular Gap (smallest): 2* 1 1. Gap between pen: NIA 12. Bartier Type: F RW 13. Opening Sleeved or Concrete: Steel 14. Pipe Insulated: N6 Wayne Aregood Prepared By: Jeff Suter Reviewed By: Penetration Seal Data Appen 31 3 Penetration #: PI 21 SO284 Penetration Type: RB-5A LocEiev.: 1988'4" 1. Barrier Thickness: 19" 2. Opening Sire: 8'0 3. Penetrants: (1) 4"P 4. Sealant Type: HDSElhDLE, Ceramic Fiber 5. Damming Sidel: Boot I. Damming Side 2: Boot 7. Damming Continuity (AcclRejj: WA 8. Boot Condition (AccRej); Acmpt 9. Sealant Depth: A~sum8d Per Detall Walkdown Comments: Slab thickness determined from drawing C-OCl211. Pipe is insulated in A-I and covered with Armaflex in A-4. this is not considered insulated for the purpose of heat exposure.

M-663-00017A, Revision W01 Page B13-10 of B13-88 I Penetration Sea[ Data Appendix: 813 1 Photos: P121 SO284 (Side 1) Fire Area A-4 (Side 2) Fire Area A-4 (Side 2)

  • *
  • M-663-00017A, Revision WOl Penetration Seal Data Heat Affected Zone Review: P121S0284 Fire Area (Side1) A-1 No Issues within Heat Affected Zone Fire Area (Side 2) A-4 1. Armaflex on pipe.: Additional Evaluation Required. Side1 Photo Sketch FA:A-1 Sklei Side2 Photo I Page B 13-11 ofB13-88 Appendix: 813 Review Distances L1 & L2 Dist. (ft) 0.5 1 11.5 2 2.5 3 3.5 4 4.5 5 .. .. .. . .... . . . . ' . ..
  • A
  • I. t. . -. . ... . ** .A.
  • I
  • u. u. 1 -* 4" Pipe Temp. rF) 1625 1374 1163 987 839 715 610 523 450 389 FA: A-4 81de2 R1 Radius (In) 4.2 3 2.1 1.3 0.6 0.1 Contact R2 Radius (In) 5.5 4.4 3.4 2.6 .. 2 1.4 0.9 0.6 I 0.2 Contact Sketch: Fire Area (Side I): A-1 M4X Dwg: MPXt 21 I Fire Area (Side 2): A-4 10. Annular Gap (smallest): 1-112" If. Gap between pen: N/A 12. Barrier Type: R W 13. Opening Sfeeved or Concrete: Sbl 14. Pipe Insulated: No Wayne Aregood Prepared By: v Jeff Suter Reviewed By: Penetration Seal Data Appendix: 513 Penetration #: PI 21 SO285 Penetration Type: RB-5A Loc.&v.: 1988'-0" 1. Barrier Thickness: 19" 2. Opening Size: 8"0 3. Penetrants: (1.) 4"P 4. Sealant Type: HDSEIHDLE, Ceramic Fiber 5. Damming Side1 : Boot 6. Damming Side 2: Boot 7. Damming Continuity (AcclRej): NIA 8. 6mt CondPion (AcclRej): Accept 9. Sealant Depth: Assumed Per Detail Walkdown Comments: Slab thickness detemined from drawing C-OC124 1. I M-663-00017A, Revision W0 1 Page B13-13 of Bf 3-88 Penetration Seal Data Appendii: B13 I Photos: P121S0285 Fire Area A-1 (Side 1) Fire Area A-1 (Side 1) Fire Area A-4 (Side 2) Fire Area A-4 (Side 2)
  • *
  • M-663-000J7A. Revision WOI Penetration Seal Data Heat Affected Zone Review: P121S0285 Fire Area (Side 1) A-1 No issues within Heat Affected Zone Fire Area (Side 2) A-4 1. Armanex on pipe: Addition evaluation Required Side 1 Photo Sketch FA:A-1 Side 1 Side2 Photo photo fi . . .. 0 * .. . .... .... v * , .. 4 : .. , . ' ... . 't>* . . . . . . ' .. ,* Page 813-14 ofBJ3-88 Appendix: 813 Review Distances M-663.()0017A. F9Jre 7 -U-1 I L1 & L2 Dist._(ft} 0.5 1 1.5 2 2.5 3 3.5 4 4.5 5 ... . 4RPipe Temp. R1 Radius (.fr (In) 1625 4.2 1374 3 1163 2.1 987 1.3 839 0.6 715 0.1 610 Contact 523 I 450 389 FA: A-4 Sld*Z --R2Radlus (in) 5.5 4.4 3.4 2.6 2 :1.4 0.9 0.6 0.2 Contact I M-663-00017A, Revision WO 1 FireA~a (Sidel): A-I MOX Dwg: WOX12l i Fire Area (Side 2): A-4 10. Annular Gap (smallest): 7" I I. Gap between pen: MIA 12. Barrier Type: RW - Penetration Seal Data Appendix: B13 Penetration #: PA 21 SO287 Pemtmtion Type: M-gA Loe.Rlev.: 1988'-0" 1. Barrier Thickness: 22" 2. Opening Sie: VD 3. Penetrants; (I) 4"~ 4. Sealant Type: HDSEIHDLE, Ceramic Fiber 5. Damming Sidel: Boot 6. Damming Side 2; Boot 7. Damming Continuity (AcclRej); NIA 8. Bwl Condition (Acme]): Accept 9. Sealant Depth: Assumed Per Detail Walkdown Comments: Slab thickness determined from drawing CQC1211. Anti-sweat on bottom side is not considered insulation. 13. Opening Sleeved or Concrete: Sfeel 14. Pipe Insulated: Yes Wayne Aregood Prepared By: Jeff Suter Reviewed By:

M-663-000 1 7A, Revision W0 1 Page B13-16 of Bl3-88 (Side 2) Penetration Seal Data Appendix: ~13 Photos: P121 SO287 Fire Area A-1 (Side 1 ) Fire Area A - r; A 1 I Fire Area A-l (Side 1) i 28:-7!T,; ui .- . -.* - "g5&T@ "*., .- -- - ""I Fire Area A-4 (Side 2)

  • *
  • M-663-00017A, Revision WOl Penetration Seal Data Heat Affected Zone Review: P12150287 Fire Area (Side 1) A-1 No issues within Heat Affected Zone Fire Area (Side 2) A-4 1. Armaftex on pipe.: Additional Evaluation Required 2. Unscheduled oonduit (Detection), not an issue. Side 1 Photo Side2Photo Sketch FA: A-1 llcs.1 . . . .. * * . -. pho -. -*0 . ...
  • I> *. ' . .... -... .. * * . . I ... r . i -" ' . Page B 13-17 of B 13-88 Appendix: 813 Review Distances (Refertrn:e M-663-00017A.F'ogure 7 ) 4R Pipe L1 & L2 Temp. R1 Radius R2 Radius Oist. (ft) (*f) (In) (in) 0.5 1625 4.2 5.5 , 1374 3 4.4 1.5 1163 2.1 3.4 2 987 1.3 2:6 2.5 839 0.6 2 3 715 0.1 1.4 3.5 610 Contact 0.9 4 523 0.6 -4.5 450 02 5 389 .. . Contact * .. 0 . " p . *' . . R FkM Slde2 M-663-000 1 7A, Revision WOS Page B13-18 of Bl3-888 Fire Area (Side I): A-8 M4X Dwg: M-1x1918 Fife Area (Side 2): A3 30. Annular Gap (smallest): 3" 1 I. Gap between pen: NIA 12. Barrier Type: 13. Opening Sleeved or Con-: Steel 14. Pipe Insulated: No Wayne Aregaod Pmpared By: Jeff Suter Reviewed By: Penetration Sea[ Data Appendix: 843 Penetration #: PI 32W1845 Penetration Type: MA LodEkv.: 20 1 3'-9" 1. Barrier Thickness: 12" 2. Opening Sie: 30"D 3. Penetrants; ($)24"~ 4. Sealant Type: Foam 5. Damming Sidef: 114* recessed 6. Damming Side 2: Flush 7. Damming Continuity (AcdRej): ' Accept 8. BDof Condition (AcclRej): NIA 9. Sealant Depth: 9-34" Waikdown Comments: Walt thickness determined by Drawing 1-C01321. ' Partially exposed, acceptance applies to exposed surfaces only. Changed Detail from M-1 to M-6a based on actual seal depth. Sketch:

M-663-00017A, Revision WO 1 PageB13-19 ofB13-88 Penetration Seal Data Appendix: 813 Y Photos: Pi 32W1845 Fire ha A-8 (Side 1) Fire Area A-8 (Side 1) fire Area A3 Flre Area A-3 (Side 2)

  • *
  • M-663..()()() 17 A, Revision WOI Penetration Seal Data Heat Affected Zone Review: P132W1845 Fire Area (Side 1) A-8 No issues within Heat Affected Zone Fire Area (Side 2) A-3 No issues within Heat Affected Zone Side 1 Photo Side 2 Photo Sketch Page B 13-20 of B 13-88 Appendix: 813 Review Distances (Refaaa M-&63-00017A. f'"llllft 7.2.3-1 I I 24" Pipe L1 & L2 Temp. R1 Radius R2 Radius Dist (ft) (*F) (in) (In) 0.5 1763 4.8 6.1 1 1615 4.1 5.5 1.5 1480 3.5 :4.9 2 1357 3 4.3 2.5 1244 2.5 3.8 3 1141 2 3.3 3.5 1048 1.6 2.9 4 962 1.2 2.5 4.5 884 I o.a 2.2 5 813 . 0.5 1.9 5.5 748 i 0.2 1.6 6 689 i Contact 1.3 . 6.5 635 1.1 7 585 0.8 7.5 540 0.6 8 499 0.4 8.5 462 0.3 9 427 0.1 .. 9.5 396 Contact No sketch requir
  • M-663-000 1 7A, Revision W0 1 Fire Area (Side f ): A-8 M-OX Dwg: MQXl331 Fire Area (Side 2): A-7 TO. Annular Gap (smallest): 314" 11. Gap between pen: NJA 12. Barrier Type: 13. Opening Sleeved or Concrete: Steel 14. Pipe Insulated: Yes Wayne Aregod Prepared By: Jeff Sufer Reviewed By: Penetration Seal Data Appendix: 13 13 Penetration #: PI3380762 Penetration Type: m-1 toc.lElev.: 2000'4Y f . Barrier Thickness: 12" 2. Opening Si: 8"D 3. Penetrants: (IF!"? 4. Sealant Type: Ceramic Fiber 5. Damming Sidef : MIA 6. Damming Side 2: NIA 7. Damming Continuity (Adej): NIA 8. Booi Condition (AcelRej): Acqt 9. Sealant Depth: 14" ** Walkdown Commenfs: Cumnt Boot condition is acceptable and shows no degradation from excessive moments. There is evidence of previous repair on the top side. However, It physically appears to be quite dd. Label ordered. Slab thickness determined by Drawing C-IC1311, **Sealant dspth determined by inspection report Sketch:

M-663M)t)17A, Revision W0 1 Page I3 1 3-22 of B 1 3-88 Penetration Seal Data Appendix: ~13 Photos: Pi 3380762 Fire Area A-8 (Side 1) Fire Area A-I (Side 2) Fire Area A-8 [Side 1) Fite Area A-1 (Side 2)

M-663-00017A, Revision W0 1 - Page B 13-23 of B 13-88 Penetration Seal Data Appendii: 613 Penetration #: P13380784 Penetration Type: RM-1 AIA-7 Fire Area (Side I): A-25 M-OX Dw~: M-OX? 331 Fire Area (Side 2): A-1 1. Barrier Thickness: 1 2" 2. Opening Size: 20"D 3. Penetrants: 4. Sealant Type: 5. Damming Sidel: HDSEIHDLE HDLE flush wlsleeve 6. Damming Side 2: Boot 7. Damming Continuity (AcdRej): NIA 8. Boot Condition (AcclRej): Accept 9. Sealant Depth: 14-3 12" 10. Annular Gap (smailest): 2-112" 11. Gap between wn: MIA f 2. Barrier Type: F R 13. Opening Slewed or ~oncktk: Steel 14. Pipe Insulated: No Wayne Aregood Prepared By: Jeff Suter Reviewed By: Watkdown Comments: Slab thickness determined by Drawing C-lCl311. Top side HDLE flush with sleeve end. Bottom side pipe is insulated, top side has Armaflex. Stab thickness determined by Drawing C-1 Cj311. Sealant depth determined from inspection document and observation of seal material within sleeve. Sketch:

M-663-000 17A, Revision W0 1 Page B 13-24 of B 1 3-88 Penetration Seal Data Appendix: BI~ Photos: PI 33S0784 Fire Area A-25 (Side 1 ) Fire Area A-25 {Side 1 ) Fire Area A-I (Side 2) Fire Area A-1 (Side 2)

M-663-00017A, Revision WOI Penetration Seal Data

  • Heat Affected Zone Review: P133'50784 Fire Area (Side 1) A-25 . 1 Anna!lex on pipe: Additional Evaluation Required i i Fire Area (Side 2) A-1 No issues within Heat Affected Zone Side 1 Photo Side 2 Photo
  • Sketch FA: A-25 Slde1 .
  • Page B 13-25 of B 13-88 Appendix: 813 Review Distances (Refnnce IU63-00017A. f"9'87.2.3-1 ) 1(* Pipe L1 &L2 Temp. R1 Radius R2 Radius Dist. (ft) rFl (in) 0.5 1 1.5 2 2.5 3 3.5 4 4.5 5 6 6.5 17 7.5 ' ., r * ** . p.,. . . ., . *
  • c ...... ,*. I *, * *. ** * '1721 1539 1377 1233 11105 991 889 799 719 647 583 527 477 432 392 t * .. + -t 4.6 3.8 3 2.4 1.8 1.3 '0:9 0.4 0.1 Contact I FA:A-1 Slde2 (in) 5.9 5.1 4.4 3.8 3.2 2.7 2.2 1.8 L4 1.1 Q.8 0,6 0.3 10.1 Contact
Retrieved from "https://kanterella.com/w/index.php?title=ML16204A143&oldid=672391"