05000483/FIN-2011002-02: Difference between revisions
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
StriderTol (talk | contribs) (Created page by program invented by StriderTol) |
StriderTol (talk | contribs) (Created page by program invented by StriderTol) |
||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
{{finding | {{finding | ||
| title = Failure to Report Inoperability of Class 1E Electrical Equipment for a Period Greater than Allowed by the Plant's Technical Specifications | | title = Failure to Report Inoperability of Class 1E Electrical Equipment for a Period Greater than Allowed by the Plant\'s Technical Specifications | ||
| docket = 05000483 | | docket = 05000483 | ||
| inspection report = IR 05000483/2011002 | | inspection report = IR 05000483/2011002 | ||
| Line 15: | Line 15: | ||
| CCA = N/A for ROP | | CCA = N/A for ROP | ||
| INPO aspect = | | INPO aspect = | ||
| description = The inspectors identified a IV noncited violation of 10 CFR 50.73(a)(2)(v), Licensee Event Report System, for failure to report inoperability of Class 1E electrical equipment for a period greater than allowed by the plants technical specifications. The licensee determined there were no prior instances where the Class 1E electrical equipment air conditioning units were inoperable greater than the technical specification allowed completion time of the supported equipment. The inspectors reviewed the licensees reportability evaluation and identified that the event described in Callaway Action Request 200800615 resulted in a period where the Class 1E electrical equipment air conditioning unit train B was inoperable for approximately 37 hours which exceeded the technical specification allowed completion time of the equipment supported by the Class 1E electrical equipment and constituted a condition which was prohibited by the plant's technical specifications and should have been reported in a licensee event report. This issue was entered into the licensees corrective action program as Callaway Action Request 201011132. This finding affects the Mitigating Systems Cornerstone and is greater than minor because in order to perform its regulatory function, the NRC relies on licensees to identify and report conditions or events meeting the criteria specified in the regulations. Because this issue affected the NRC's ability to perform its regulatory function, it was evaluated using the traditional enforcement process. Consistent with the guidance in Section 6.9, Paragraph d.9, of the NRC Enforcement Policy, this finding was determined to be a Severity Level IV noncited violation. This finding has no crosscutting aspect as it was strictly associated with a traditional enforcement violation (Section 1R15). | | description = The inspectors identified a IV noncited violation of 10 CFR 50.73(a)(2)(v), Licensee Event Report System, for failure to report inoperability of Class 1E electrical equipment for a period greater than allowed by the plants technical specifications. The licensee determined there were no prior instances where the Class 1E electrical equipment air conditioning units were inoperable greater than the technical specification allowed completion time of the supported equipment. The inspectors reviewed the licensees reportability evaluation and identified that the event described in Callaway Action Request 200800615 resulted in a period where the Class 1E electrical equipment air conditioning unit train B was inoperable for approximately 37 hours which exceeded the technical specification allowed completion time of the equipment supported by the Class 1E electrical equipment and constituted a condition which was prohibited by the plant\'s technical specifications and should have been reported in a licensee event report. This issue was entered into the licensees corrective action program as Callaway Action Request 201011132. This finding affects the Mitigating Systems Cornerstone and is greater than minor because in order to perform its regulatory function, the NRC relies on licensees to identify and report conditions or events meeting the criteria specified in the regulations. Because this issue affected the NRC\'s ability to perform its regulatory function, it was evaluated using the traditional enforcement process. Consistent with the guidance in Section 6.9, Paragraph d.9, of the NRC Enforcement Policy, this finding was determined to be a Severity Level IV noncited violation. This finding has no crosscutting aspect as it was strictly associated with a traditional enforcement violation (Section 1R15). | ||
}} | }} | ||
Latest revision as of 19:48, 20 February 2018
| Site: | Callaway  |
|---|---|
| Report | IR 05000483/2011002 Section 1R15 |
| Date counted | Mar 31, 2011 (2011Q1) |
| Type: | TEV: Severity level IV |
| cornerstone | Mitigating Systems |
| Identified by: | NRC identified |
| Inspection Procedure: | IP 71111.15 |
| Inspectors (proximate) | D Dumbacher P Elkmann G Miller J Groom |
| INPO aspect | |
| ' | |