ML20204G239: Difference between revisions

From kanterella
Jump to navigation Jump to search
(StriderTol Bot insert)
 
(StriderTol Bot change)
 
Line 16: Line 16:


=Text=
=Text=
{{#Wiki_filter:}}
{{#Wiki_filter:*
3 pv kNE[En UNITED STATES OF AMERICA NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION
                                                                ,03 ATOMIC SAFETY AND LICENSING APPEAL, PANEL      ??R ?"o P2:05 Administrative Judges:                                        5 Alan S. Rosenthal, Chairman                            ''
Gary J. Edles Dr. Reginald L. Gotchy 3
SERVED APR291983 In the Matter of                    )
                                              )
UNION ELECTRIC COMPANY              ) Docket No. STN 50-483 OL
                                              )
(Callaway Plant, Unit 1)            )
                                              )
                                              )
ORDER April 29, 1983
    -          Oral argument on the appeal of the Joint Intervenors from the December 13, 1982 partial initial decision of the Licensing Board in this operating license proceeding 1/ will be held at l        9:30 a.m. on Tuesday, June 14, 1983, in the NRC Public Hearing l
Room, Fifth Floor, East-West Towers Building, 4350 East-West Highway, Bethesda, Maryland. Each side is allotted a total of one hour for the presentation of argument; the time provided t
appellees 2/ will be divided equally between them unless those i
i
_1/  LBP-82-109, 16 NRC    .
_2/  The Union Electric Company and the NRC staff.
1            -
l 8305020394 830429 PDR 0
ADOCK 05000483 l
PM L
3SD2_
 
s 9'
parties agree upon some other division. The appellants may reserve a reasonable portion of their time for rebuttal.
In preparing for oral argument, counsel are to assume that the members of the Board will be generally familiar with both the partial initial decision below and the appellate positions of the respective parties as developed in the briefs now on file. For this reason, there will be no necessity for any counsel to embark at argument upon a detailed recitation of the background of the controversy.
Each pa'rty is to provide the Secretary to this Board, by letter mailed no later than June 3, 1983, with the name of the counsel who will present the oral argument on its be-half.
It is so ORDERED.
FOR THE APPEAL BOARD
                                      -  2  A ve l              '
B&rbara A. Tompkins  '
Secretary to the Appeal Board
                                              ..    ._        _      .-}}

Latest revision as of 17:24, 30 December 2020

Order Scheduling 830614 Oral Argument in Bethesda,Md Re Joint Intervenors Appeal from ASLB Partial Initial Decision
ML20204G239
Person / Time
Site: Callaway Ameren icon.png
Issue date: 04/29/1983
From: Tompkins B
NRC ATOMIC SAFETY & LICENSING APPEAL PANEL (ASLAP)
To:
References
ISSUANCES-OL, NUDOCS 8305020394
Download: ML20204G239 (2)


Text

3 pv kNE[En UNITED STATES OF AMERICA NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION

,03 ATOMIC SAFETY AND LICENSING APPEAL, PANEL  ??R ?"o P2:05 Administrative Judges: 5 Alan S. Rosenthal, Chairman

Gary J. Edles Dr. Reginald L. Gotchy 3

SERVED APR291983 In the Matter of )

)

UNION ELECTRIC COMPANY ) Docket No. STN 50-483 OL

)

(Callaway Plant, Unit 1) )

)

)

ORDER April 29, 1983

- Oral argument on the appeal of the Joint Intervenors from the December 13, 1982 partial initial decision of the Licensing Board in this operating license proceeding 1/ will be held at l 9:30 a.m. on Tuesday, June 14, 1983, in the NRC Public Hearing l

Room, Fifth Floor, East-West Towers Building, 4350 East-West Highway, Bethesda, Maryland. Each side is allotted a total of one hour for the presentation of argument; the time provided t

appellees 2/ will be divided equally between them unless those i

i

_1/ LBP-82-109, 16 NRC .

_2/ The Union Electric Company and the NRC staff.

1 -

l 8305020394 830429 PDR 0

ADOCK 05000483 l

PM L

3SD2_

s 9'

parties agree upon some other division. The appellants may reserve a reasonable portion of their time for rebuttal.

In preparing for oral argument, counsel are to assume that the members of the Board will be generally familiar with both the partial initial decision below and the appellate positions of the respective parties as developed in the briefs now on file. For this reason, there will be no necessity for any counsel to embark at argument upon a detailed recitation of the background of the controversy.

Each pa'rty is to provide the Secretary to this Board, by letter mailed no later than June 3, 1983, with the name of the counsel who will present the oral argument on its be-half.

It is so ORDERED.

FOR THE APPEAL BOARD

- 2 A ve l '

B&rbara A. Tompkins '

Secretary to the Appeal Board

.. ._ _ .-