|
|
Line 16: |
Line 16: |
|
| |
|
| =Text= | | =Text= |
| {{#Wiki_filter:}} | | {{#Wiki_filter:* |
| | 3 pv kNE[En UNITED STATES OF AMERICA NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION |
| | ,03 ATOMIC SAFETY AND LICENSING APPEAL, PANEL ??R ?"o P2:05 Administrative Judges: 5 Alan S. Rosenthal, Chairman '' |
| | Gary J. Edles Dr. Reginald L. Gotchy 3 |
| | SERVED APR291983 In the Matter of ) |
| | ) |
| | UNION ELECTRIC COMPANY ) Docket No. STN 50-483 OL |
| | ) |
| | (Callaway Plant, Unit 1) ) |
| | ) |
| | ) |
| | ORDER April 29, 1983 |
| | - Oral argument on the appeal of the Joint Intervenors from the December 13, 1982 partial initial decision of the Licensing Board in this operating license proceeding 1/ will be held at l 9:30 a.m. on Tuesday, June 14, 1983, in the NRC Public Hearing l |
| | Room, Fifth Floor, East-West Towers Building, 4350 East-West Highway, Bethesda, Maryland. Each side is allotted a total of one hour for the presentation of argument; the time provided t |
| | appellees 2/ will be divided equally between them unless those i |
| | i |
| | _1/ LBP-82-109, 16 NRC . |
| | _2/ The Union Electric Company and the NRC staff. |
| | 1 - |
| | l 8305020394 830429 PDR 0 |
| | ADOCK 05000483 l |
| | PM L |
| | 3SD2_ |
| | |
| | s 9' |
| | parties agree upon some other division. The appellants may reserve a reasonable portion of their time for rebuttal. |
| | In preparing for oral argument, counsel are to assume that the members of the Board will be generally familiar with both the partial initial decision below and the appellate positions of the respective parties as developed in the briefs now on file. For this reason, there will be no necessity for any counsel to embark at argument upon a detailed recitation of the background of the controversy. |
| | Each pa'rty is to provide the Secretary to this Board, by letter mailed no later than June 3, 1983, with the name of the counsel who will present the oral argument on its be-half. |
| | It is so ORDERED. |
| | FOR THE APPEAL BOARD |
| | - 2 A ve l ' |
| | B&rbara A. Tompkins ' |
| | Secretary to the Appeal Board |
| | .. ._ _ .-}} |
Latest revision as of 17:24, 30 December 2020
|
---|
Category:LEGAL TRANSCRIPTS & ORDERS & PLEADINGS
MONTHYEARML20212K8711999-09-30030 September 1999 Comment Supporting Proposed Rule 10CFR50 Re Elimination of Requirements for Noncombustible Fire Barriers Penetration Seal Matls ULNRC-04117, Comment Supporting Proposed Rules 10CFR50 & 72 Re Reporting Requirements for Nuclear Power Reactors & Draft NUREG-1022, Rev 2, Event Reporting Guidelines 10CFR50.72 & 50.731999-09-22022 September 1999 Comment Supporting Proposed Rules 10CFR50 & 72 Re Reporting Requirements for Nuclear Power Reactors & Draft NUREG-1022, Rev 2, Event Reporting Guidelines 10CFR50.72 & 50.73 ML20217M2091998-03-19019 March 1998 Comment on Proposed Rule 10CFR50 Re Industry Codes & Stds Amended Requirements. NRC Justification for Avoiding Backfit Analysis,Nonstantial.Backfit Analysis,As Required by Law as Mandatory for Proposed Rule Changes ML20217J9691997-10-16016 October 1997 Order Approving Application Re Corporate Merger Agreement Between Union Electric Co & Cipsco,Inc to Form Holding Company.Commission Ordered to Approve Subj Application ML20148N0511997-06-19019 June 1997 Comment Opposing Proposed NRC Bulletin 96-001,Suppl 1, CR Insertion Problems ML20140G1691997-06-0606 June 1997 Requests Extension of Comment Period Expiration Date from 970619 to 970719,for Comments on Control Rod Insertion Problems ML20077E9041994-12-0202 December 1994 Comment Supporting Proposed Rule 10CFR50 Re TS Improvements. Advises That PSA Portion of Fourth Criterion Should Be Clarified to Include Only Those Equipment Items Important to risk-significant Sequences as Defined in GL 88-20,App 2 ML20071L1951994-07-21021 July 1994 Comment on Proposed Rule 10CFR26 Re Changes to fitness-for-duty Requirements.Urges NRC to Revise Scope of 10CFR26 to Limit Random Drug & Alcohol Testing to Only Workers Who Have Unescorted Access to Vital Areas at NPP ML20065D3851994-03-22022 March 1994 Comment on Draft NUREG-1022, Event Reporting Systems, 10CFR50.72 & 50.73 ML20113H4281992-07-23023 July 1992 Comment Commending Proposed Suppl One to GL 83-28 4.2.3 & 4.2.4 Closing All GL 83-28 Actions for Callaway But Staff Conclusion Should Be Expanded ML20101P4091992-06-26026 June 1992 Comment Supporting low-level Radwaste After Treatment to Reduce Volume & Represents Safest,Most Cost Effective Solution ML20091F9501991-12-0202 December 1991 Submits Comments Opposing Draft NUREG-1022, Event Reporting Sys,10CFR50.72 & 50.73. Licensee Feels That Changes to Intial NUREG-1022 Increases Util Expenses W/O Improving Public Health & Safety ML20058D2741990-10-15015 October 1990 Comment Supporting Proposed Rules 10CFR2,50 & 54 Re Nuclear Power Plant License Renewal ML20058N9891990-08-0101 August 1990 Comment Re Proposed Rules 10CFR20,30,40 & 70, Notifications of Incidents. Language of Rule Should Be Clarified by Referring to Applicable Reporting Requirements of 10CFR50.72 & 73 for Commercial Nuclear Power Reactors ML20063Q1771990-07-0606 July 1990 Comment on Petition for Rulemaking PRM-50-55 Re Revs to Fsar.Revs Should Be Driven by Circumstances Rather than by Arbitrary Time Schedule ML20235V9301989-02-27027 February 1989 Comment Opposing Proposed Rule 10CFR50 Re Maint Programs for Nuclear Power Plants.Endorses NUMARC Comments.Major Concern Is Lack of Demonstrated Need for Rule Since Most Utils Already Have Effective Maint Programs ML20235T7901989-02-20020 February 1989 Comment Opposing Proposed Rules 10CFR50 & 55 Re Educ & Experience Requirements for Senior Reactor Operators & Supervisors at Nuclear Power Plants.Establishment of Programs for Operators to Earn Degress Would Be Expensive ML20235T7011989-02-17017 February 1989 Comment Opposing Proposed Rules 10CFR50 & 55 Which Require Degrees of Senior Operators & Shift Supervisors.Both Alternatives Would Contribute to Lower Morale Among Reactor Operators ML20195J3191988-11-25025 November 1988 Comment on Proposed Rule 10CFR26 Re Fitness for Duty Program.Policy of Yearly Testing & Testing for Cause,Backed Up by Training for Drug Prevention Supported ML20195E8561988-10-28028 October 1988 Comment Supporting Proposed Rule 10CFR50 Re Renewal of Licenses ML20133B7711985-08-0202 August 1985 Response to 850705 Petitioner Response in Opposition to Util Request That Show Cause Order Not Be Issued.Util Actions Demonstrate Dedication to QA & Safe Plant Operation. Certificate of Svc Encl ML20128K2111985-07-0505 July 1985 Response Opposing Util Request That Show Cause Order Not Be Issued.Requests NRC Independent Investigation & Suspension or Revocation of OL During Period of Investigation ML20129H7511985-06-0606 June 1985 Response to Missouri Coalition for Environ & K Drey 850325 Show Cause Petition Requesting Suspension or Revocation of OL Due to Questionable QC Inspector Certification.Denial of Petition Recommended.Certificate of Svc Encl ML20129H7741985-06-0505 June 1985 Affidavit of DF Schnell Re Issues Raised in Missouri Coalition for Environ & K Drey Petition to Show Cause Requesting Suspension or Revocation of Ol.Root Causes of Questionable QC Certifications Addressed ML20100F4301985-03-25025 March 1985 Show Cause Petition Requesting Suspension or Revocation of License NPF-30,due to Failure to Comply W/Qa Regulations & Guidelines Re Proper Training of QA Personnel ML20092H1141984-06-22022 June 1984 Answer Opposing Petitioners 840613 Instant Motion for Order Setting Aside or Staying Permit for Ol.Certificate of Svc Encl ML20197H4321984-06-13013 June 1984 Motion for Commission Order Setting Aside Low Power Testing Permit Granted on 840611,or in Alternative,Stay to Permit & Prohibit Taking of Any Action.Certificate of Svc Encl ML20091R6401984-06-13013 June 1984 Request That Commission Enter Order Setting Aside Low Power Testing Permit Allegedly Granted on or About 840611,due to Joint Intervenors 840418 Motion for Leave to File Supplemental Contention ML20084G1561984-05-0303 May 1984 Answer Opposing Coalition for Environ,Missourians for Safe Energy & Crawdad Alliance 840418 Motion for Leave to File Supplemental Contention Re Financial Qualifications of Util. Certificate of Svc Encl ML20084G1791984-05-0303 May 1984 Affidavit of Cw Mueller Re Financial Integrity of Util ML20084G1731984-05-0202 May 1984 Affidavit of DF Schnell Re Financial Stability of Util ML20083Q3671984-04-18018 April 1984 Supplemental Contention Re Applicant Financial Qualification to Construct & Operate Facility.Certificate of Svc Encl ML20083Q3521984-04-18018 April 1984 Motion for Leave to File Supplemental Contention Re Financial Qualification of Applicant to Construct & Operate Facility.Certificate of Svc Encl ML20083Q2601984-04-18018 April 1984 Notice of Appearance of LC Green & Withdrawal of KM Chackes as Counsel for Intervenors.Certificate of Svc Encl ML20082A6631983-11-15015 November 1983 Comments on NRC & Applicant Responses to Aslab 831020 Order Requesting Addl Info.Responses Contain Nothing More than Description of Activities & Conclusion of No Safety Significance.Certificate of Svc Encl ML20082B4641983-11-15015 November 1983 Comments on Applicant & NRC Responses to Aslab 831020 Memorandum & Order Re Safety of Manually Welded Embedded Plates.Appointment of Independent Expert Requested. Certificate of Svc Encl ML20078P7131983-11-0404 November 1983 Response to Aslab 831020 Memorandum & Order for Addl Info on Observation 4-1 of Integrated Design Insp Program Rept Re Original Design Floor Response Spectra.Spectra Have No Safety Significance.Certificate of Svc Encl ML20078P7251983-11-0303 November 1983 Affidavit of Ew Thomas Re Revised Design Response Spectra ML20081C3031983-10-27027 October 1983 Reply to Reed 831006 Proposed Findings of Fact & Conclusions of Law Re Contention 6.Findings Mischaracterized Fda Recommendation & Position of Applicant & State of Mo. Certificate of Svc Encl ML20078H1751983-10-12012 October 1983 Response to Joint Intervenors 830823 Petition for Reconsideration of ASLB 830914 Decision ALAB-740. Insufficient Showing Made to Justify Reopening Record. Certificate of Svc Encl ML20080Q4471983-10-0606 October 1983 Findings of Fact & Conclusions of Law.Certificate of Svc Encl ML20080M6381983-09-29029 September 1983 Motion for Extension to File,W/Commission,Petition for Review of Aslab 830914 Decision ALAB-740.Extension Should Be Granted Until 15 Days After Aslab Rules on Joint Intervenors 830923 Reconsideration Petition.Certificate of Svc Encl ML20078B4981983-09-23023 September 1983 Petition for Reconsideration of 830914 Decision ALAB-740 in Light of New Evidence Re Adequacy of Applicant QA Program. Many Items Remain Open in Integrated Design Insp Program Rept.Certificate of Svc Encl ML20078B8201983-09-23023 September 1983 Proposed Corrections to 830913 Evidentiary Hearing Transcript.Certificate of Svc Encl ML20078B8151983-09-23023 September 1983 Proposed Findings of Fact & Conclusions of Law in Form of Proposed Initial Decision ML20024E8211983-08-31031 August 1983 Comments on Applicant Response to Aslab 830815 Order Re Failure to Provide Safe SA-312 Piping & Adequate QA Program.Certificate of Svc Encl ML20080C6991983-08-24024 August 1983 Testimony of Ng Slaten in Response to Reed Contentions 6 & 16 Re Protective Actions Against Radioiodines & Messages W/Instructions for long-term Sheltering.Related Correspondence ML20080C7141983-08-24024 August 1983 Testimony of Kv Miller in Response to Reed Contention 6 Re Protective Actions Against Radioiodines.State of Mo Decided Not to Administer Potassium Iodide to General Public Based on Federal Guidance & Weighing of Advantages/Disadvantages ML20080C7121983-08-24024 August 1983 Testimony of Re Linnemann in Response to Reed Contentions 6 & 16 Re Protective Actions Against Radioiodines & Messages W/Instructions for long-term Sheltering.Related Correspondence ML20080C7061983-08-24024 August 1983 Testimony of DF Paddleford in Response to Reed Contentions 6 & 16 Re Protective Actions Against Radioiodines & Messages W/Instructions for long-term Sheltering.Related Correspondence 1999-09-30
[Table view] Category:ORDERS
MONTHYEARML20217J9691997-10-16016 October 1997 Order Approving Application Re Corporate Merger Agreement Between Union Electric Co & Cipsco,Inc to Form Holding Company.Commission Ordered to Approve Subj Application ML20204G2391983-04-29029 April 1983 Order Scheduling 830614 Oral Argument in Bethesda,Md Re Joint Intervenors Appeal from ASLB Partial Initial Decision ML20058J5301982-08-0606 August 1982 Memorandum & Hearing Schedule Order Establishing Schedule for Filing Response to Discovery Requests,Summary Disposition Motions & Testimony.Prehearing Conference Will Be Held on 820902-03 ML20003E2031980-12-22022 December 1980 Order by Montgomery County,Mo That F Luekey Be Permitted to Represent County in Hearings as Local Govt Representative ML20009C9421978-11-0101 November 1978 Opinions & Award Ordering That W Smart Be Reinstated W/Back Pay & All Incidents of Employment That Would Have Been His from 780321 Onward.Company Did Not Establish That Smart Was Discharged for Insubordination 1997-10-16
[Table view] |
Text
3 pv kNE[En UNITED STATES OF AMERICA NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION
,03 ATOMIC SAFETY AND LICENSING APPEAL, PANEL ??R ?"o P2:05 Administrative Judges: 5 Alan S. Rosenthal, Chairman
Gary J. Edles Dr. Reginald L. Gotchy 3
SERVED APR291983 In the Matter of )
)
UNION ELECTRIC COMPANY ) Docket No. STN 50-483 OL
)
(Callaway Plant, Unit 1) )
)
)
ORDER April 29, 1983
- Oral argument on the appeal of the Joint Intervenors from the December 13, 1982 partial initial decision of the Licensing Board in this operating license proceeding 1/ will be held at l 9:30 a.m. on Tuesday, June 14, 1983, in the NRC Public Hearing l
Room, Fifth Floor, East-West Towers Building, 4350 East-West Highway, Bethesda, Maryland. Each side is allotted a total of one hour for the presentation of argument; the time provided t
appellees 2/ will be divided equally between them unless those i
i
_1/ LBP-82-109, 16 NRC .
_2/ The Union Electric Company and the NRC staff.
1 -
l 8305020394 830429 PDR 0
ADOCK 05000483 l
PM L
3SD2_
s 9'
parties agree upon some other division. The appellants may reserve a reasonable portion of their time for rebuttal.
In preparing for oral argument, counsel are to assume that the members of the Board will be generally familiar with both the partial initial decision below and the appellate positions of the respective parties as developed in the briefs now on file. For this reason, there will be no necessity for any counsel to embark at argument upon a detailed recitation of the background of the controversy.
Each pa'rty is to provide the Secretary to this Board, by letter mailed no later than June 3, 1983, with the name of the counsel who will present the oral argument on its be-half.
It is so ORDERED.
FOR THE APPEAL BOARD
- 2 A ve l '
B&rbara A. Tompkins '
Secretary to the Appeal Board
.. ._ _ .-