ML16193A357: Difference between revisions

From kanterella
Jump to navigation Jump to search
(Created page by program invented by StriderTol)
(Created page by program invented by StriderTol)
 
Line 16: Line 16:


=Text=
=Text=
{{#Wiki_filter:USCA Case #16-1189                Document #1621433              Filed: 06/23/2016    Page 1 of 1 United States Court of Appeals FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA CIRCUIT
{{#Wiki_filter:USCA Case #16-1189                Document #1621433              Filed: 06/23/2016    Page 1 of 1 United States Court of Appeals FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA CIRCUIT No. 16-1189                                                        September Term, 2015 NRC-50-247-LR NRC-50-286-LR Filed On: June 23, 2016 In re: Friends of the Earth, et al.,
____________
Petitioners Entergy Nuclear Indian Point 2, LLC and Entergy Nuclear Operations, Inc.,
No. 16-1189                                                        September Term, 2015 NRC-50-247-LR NRC-50-286-LR Filed On: June 23, 2016 In re: Friends of the Earth, et al.,
Petitioners
------------------------------
Entergy Nuclear Indian Point 2, LLC and Entergy Nuclear Operations, Inc.,
Intervenors BEFORE:          Griffith, Srinivasan, and Millett, Circuit Judges ORDER Upon consideration of the emergency petition for writ of mandamus and the supplement thereto, the responses, and the reply, it is ORDERED that the emergency petition for writ of mandamus be denied.
Intervenors BEFORE:          Griffith, Srinivasan, and Millett, Circuit Judges ORDER Upon consideration of the emergency petition for writ of mandamus and the supplement thereto, the responses, and the reply, it is ORDERED that the emergency petition for writ of mandamus be denied.
Petitioners have failed to demonstrate a clear and indisputable right to the extraordinary relief requested. See Gulfstream Aerospace Corp. v. Mayacamas Corp., 485 U.S. 271, 289 (1988).
Petitioners have failed to demonstrate a clear and indisputable right to the extraordinary relief requested. See Gulfstream Aerospace Corp. v. Mayacamas Corp., 485 U.S. 271, 289 (1988).

Latest revision as of 00:48, 5 February 2020

Per Curiam Order Denying Petition (DC Cir) 06-23-2016
ML16193A357
Person / Time
Site: Indian Point  Entergy icon.png
Issue date: 06/23/2016
From: Langer M
US Federal Judiciary, US Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit
To: Mullins C
NRC/OGC
References
16-1189, 1621433, 50-247-LAR, 50-286-LAR
Download: ML16193A357 (1)


Text

USCA Case #16-1189 Document #1621433 Filed: 06/23/2016 Page 1 of 1 United States Court of Appeals FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA CIRCUIT No. 16-1189 September Term, 2015 NRC-50-247-LR NRC-50-286-LR Filed On: June 23, 2016 In re: Friends of the Earth, et al.,

Petitioners Entergy Nuclear Indian Point 2, LLC and Entergy Nuclear Operations, Inc.,

Intervenors BEFORE: Griffith, Srinivasan, and Millett, Circuit Judges ORDER Upon consideration of the emergency petition for writ of mandamus and the supplement thereto, the responses, and the reply, it is ORDERED that the emergency petition for writ of mandamus be denied.

Petitioners have failed to demonstrate a clear and indisputable right to the extraordinary relief requested. See Gulfstream Aerospace Corp. v. Mayacamas Corp., 485 U.S. 271, 289 (1988).

Per Curiam FOR THE COURT:

Mark J. Langer, Clerk BY: /s/

Robert J. Cavello Deputy Clerk