ML16141A386

Lr Hearing - FW: Mims - Metal Impact Monitoring System

ML16141A386
Person / Time
Site:	Indian Point
Issue date:	03/31/2016
From:	Office of Public Affairs Region I
To:	Division of License Renewal
References
Download: ML16141A386 (5)

Text

IPRenewal NPEmails From: Screnci, Diane Sent: Thursday, March 31, 2016 3:29 PM To: Dentel, Glenn

Subject:

FW: RE: MIMS - Metal Impact Monitoring System FYI -

Diane Screnci Sr. Public Affairs Officer USNRC, RI 610-337-5330 From: Dave Lochbaum [1]

Sent: Thursday, March 31, 2016 3:19 PM To: Screnci, Diane <Diane.Screnci@nrc.gov>

Subject:

[External_Sender] RE: MIMS - Metal Impact Monitoring System Hello Diane:

Thanks. I look forward to reading the inspection report, Dave Lochbaum UCS From: Screnci, Diane [Diane.Screnci@nrc.gov]

Sent: Thursday, March 31, 2016 3:05 PM To: Dave Lochbaum

Subject:

RE: MIMS - Metal Impact Monitoring System

Dave, Im told were still in the midst of our inspection activities and were looking at these things. Ill let you know when the inspection report is being issued.

Regards, Diane Screnci Sr. Public Affairs Officer USNRC, RI 610-337-5330 From: Dave Lochbaum [2]

Sent: Thursday, March 31, 2016 1:46 PM To: Screnci, Diane <Diane.Screnci@nrc.gov>

Subject:

[External_Sender] MIMS - Metal Impact Monitoring System Hello Diane:

Section 4.6 of the Updated Final Safety Analysis Report for Indian Point 2 describes the Metal Impact Monitoring System:

1

Source: ML15334A228 2

I understand the NRC is looking into the cause and consequences of the degraded bolts within the reactor vessel at Indian Point Unit 2. I hope that future NRC inspection reports that comment on this matter will include discussion of the role, if any, that this "quite valuable" advisory system played, addressing questions like:

Did it detect any of the pieces from broken bolts?

If so, how did workers evaluate the quite valuable advice it provided?

If not, should it have detected the impacts from the metal pieces?

Thanks, Dave Lochbaum UCS 3

Hearing Identifier: IndianPointUnits2and3NonPublic_EX Email Number: 6371 Mail Envelope Properties (80f9ba169151453b92fb3c64f43d19d9)

Subject:

FW: RE: MIMS - Metal Impact Monitoring System Sent Date: 3/31/2016 3:29:24 PM Received Date: 3/31/2016 3:29:25 PM From: Screnci, Diane Created By: Diane.Screnci@nrc.gov Recipients:

"Dentel, Glenn" <Glenn.Dentel@nrc.gov>

Tracking Status: None Post Office: R1PWMSMRS02.nrc.gov Files Size Date & Time MESSAGE 1889 3/31/2016 3:29:25 PM image001.jpg 371880 Options Priority: Standard Return Notification: No Reply Requested: No Sensitivity: Normal Expiration Date:

Recipients Received:

IPRenewal NPEmails From: Screnci, Diane Sent: Thursday, March 31, 2016 3:29 PM To: Dentel, Glenn

Subject:

FW: RE: MIMS - Metal Impact Monitoring System FYI -

Diane Screnci Sr. Public Affairs Officer USNRC, RI 610-337-5330 From: Dave Lochbaum [3]

Sent: Thursday, March 31, 2016 3:19 PM To: Screnci, Diane <Diane.Screnci@nrc.gov>

Subject:

[External_Sender] RE: MIMS - Metal Impact Monitoring System Hello Diane:

Thanks. I look forward to reading the inspection report, Dave Lochbaum UCS From: Screnci, Diane [Diane.Screnci@nrc.gov]

Sent: Thursday, March 31, 2016 3:05 PM To: Dave Lochbaum

Subject:

RE: MIMS - Metal Impact Monitoring System

Dave, Im told were still in the midst of our inspection activities and were looking at these things. Ill let you know when the inspection report is being issued.

Regards, Diane Screnci Sr. Public Affairs Officer USNRC, RI 610-337-5330 From: Dave Lochbaum [4]

Sent: Thursday, March 31, 2016 1:46 PM To: Screnci, Diane <Diane.Screnci@nrc.gov>

Subject:

[External_Sender] MIMS - Metal Impact Monitoring System Hello Diane:

Section 4.6 of the Updated Final Safety Analysis Report for Indian Point 2 describes the Metal Impact Monitoring System:

1

Source: ML15334A228 2

I understand the NRC is looking into the cause and consequences of the degraded bolts within the reactor vessel at Indian Point Unit 2. I hope that future NRC inspection reports that comment on this matter will include discussion of the role, if any, that this "quite valuable" advisory system played, addressing questions like:

Did it detect any of the pieces from broken bolts?

If so, how did workers evaluate the quite valuable advice it provided?

If not, should it have detected the impacts from the metal pieces?

Thanks, Dave Lochbaum UCS 3

Hearing Identifier: IndianPointUnits2and3NonPublic_EX Email Number: 6371 Mail Envelope Properties (80f9ba169151453b92fb3c64f43d19d9)

Subject:

FW: RE: MIMS - Metal Impact Monitoring System Sent Date: 3/31/2016 3:29:24 PM Received Date: 3/31/2016 3:29:25 PM From: Screnci, Diane Created By: Diane.Screnci@nrc.gov Recipients:

"Dentel, Glenn" <Glenn.Dentel@nrc.gov>

Tracking Status: None Post Office: R1PWMSMRS02.nrc.gov Files Size Date & Time MESSAGE 1889 3/31/2016 3:29:25 PM image001.jpg 371880 Options Priority: Standard Return Notification: No Reply Requested: No Sensitivity: Normal Expiration Date:

Recipients Received: