Information Notice 2003-02, Recent Experience with Reactor Coolant System Leakage & Boric Acid Corrosion: Difference between revisions
StriderTol (talk | contribs) Created page by program invented by StriderTol |
StriderTol (talk | contribs) Created page by program invented by StriderTol |
||
| Line 15: | Line 15: | ||
| page count = 7 | | page count = 7 | ||
}} | }} | ||
{{#Wiki_filter:UNITED | {{#Wiki_filter:UNITED STATES | ||
NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION | |||
OFFICE OF NUCLEAR REACTOR REGULATION | |||
WASHINGTON, DC 20555-0001 January 16, 2003 NRC INFORMATION NOTICE 2003-02: RECENT EXPERIENCE WITH REACTOR | |||
COOLANT SYSTEM LEAKAGE AND BORIC ACID | |||
CORROSION | CORROSION | ||
| Line 23: | Line 31: | ||
==Purpose== | ==Purpose== | ||
The U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC) is issuing this information notice to | The U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC) is issuing this information notice to inform | ||
addressees of recently observed reactor coolant leakage at two pressurized water reactor | |||
facilities, one of which resulted in the subsequent degradation of the reactor pressure vessel | facilities, one of which resulted in the subsequent degradation of the reactor pressure vessel | ||
head. | head. It is expected that recipients will review the information for applicability to their facilities | ||
and consider actions, as appropriate, to avoid similar problems. | and consider actions, as appropriate, to avoid similar problems. However, suggestions in this | ||
information notice are not NRC requirements; therefore no specific action or written response is | information notice are not NRC requirements; therefore no specific action or written response is | ||
| Line 36: | Line 46: | ||
==Description of Circumstances== | ==Description of Circumstances== | ||
Sequoyah Unit 2 On December 26, 2002, the unit tripped from full power as a result of low reactor | |||
===Sequoyah Unit 2=== | |||
On December 26, 2002, the unit tripped from full power as a result of low reactor coolant | |||
system (RCS) flow due to a ground fault in a reactor coolant pump motor winding. In the | |||
ensuing shutdown to correct the pump problem, the licensee initiated a search to locate and | ensuing shutdown to correct the pump problem, the licensee initiated a search to locate and | ||
| Line 42: | Line 56: | ||
correct a suspected RCS leak that, prior to the trip, had resulted in elevated moisture and | correct a suspected RCS leak that, prior to the trip, had resulted in elevated moisture and | ||
activity levels inside containment. | activity levels inside containment. During this inspection, the licensee identified an | ||
accumulation of boric acid on the reactor vessel head insulation that resulted from a leaking | accumulation of boric acid on the reactor vessel head insulation that resulted from a leaking | ||
reactor vessel level indication system (RVLIS) compression fitting. | reactor vessel level indication system (RVLIS) compression fitting. The leakage had seeped | ||
through a seam in the insulation onto the reactor pressure vessel (RPV) head and resulted in | through a seam in the insulation onto the reactor pressure vessel (RPV) head and resulted in | ||
minor boric acid corrosion of the head. | minor boric acid corrosion of the head. This RVLIS compression fitting had been disconnected | ||
and reconnected during the May 2002 refueling outage. | and reconnected during the May 2002 refueling outage. The licensee also identified a small | ||
leak through a canopy seal weld on an empty control rod drive mechanism (CRDM) penetration | leak through a canopy seal weld on an empty control rod drive mechanism (CRDM) penetration | ||
that did not result in any boric acid corrosion of the reactor vessel head.Based on the location of the leaking RVLIS fitting, the temperature of the leakage fluid | that did not result in any boric acid corrosion of the reactor vessel head. | ||
Based on the location of the leaking RVLIS fitting, the temperature of the leakage fluid was | |||
close to the ambient temperature outside the vessel insulation. The licensee estimated the | |||
mass of boric acid crystals on this insulation surface at about 9 kilograms (20 pounds). A seam | |||
in the insulation was in this area. On removing the insulation and cleaning the area, the | |||
licensee observed boric acid corrosion of the head near the flange. The licensee determined | |||
that the amount of material loss from the head was small, in the shape of a groove less than | that the amount of material loss from the head was small, in the shape of a groove less than | ||
one centimeter (cm) [0.3 inch] wide, about twelve cm [4.6 inches] long, and at most about one- third cm [0.125 inch] deep.The | one centimeter (cm) [0.3 inch] wide, about twelve cm [4.6 inches] long, and at most about one- third cm [0.125 inch] deep. | ||
The licensees evaluation indicated that 98 percent or better of the structural wall remained | |||
intact and that no abrupt corners existed in the degraded area. The licensee justified continued | |||
operation based on the minor extent of the degradation. | |||
===Comanche Peak Unit 1=== | |||
On November 30, 2002, a control rod dropped into the core. The licensee suspected a fault in | |||
the CRDM coils. Failing to identify the cause of the dropped rod while at reduced power, the | |||
licensee decided to shut down. | licensee decided to shut down. While continuing to troubleshoot the CRDM problem in Mode 3, the licensee observed a leak around the CRDM housing. The leak was from a CRDM canopy | ||
seal weld. | seal weld. Water from the leaking canopy seal weld apparently entered the CRDM coils, causing coil failure. Boric acid crystals were found around the leak site, on the vessel head | ||
insulation, and on the reactor pressure vessel head. | insulation, and on the reactor pressure vessel head. The licensee repaired the canopy weld | ||
with a weld overlay and cleaned the CRDM housing, the head insulation, and the head to | with a weld overlay and cleaned the CRDM housing, the head insulation, and the head to | ||
remove the boric acid deposits. | remove the boric acid deposits. The amount of boric acid crystals recovered from the head was | ||
about 1 kilogram (2 pounds). The licensee did not find any reactor coolant pressure boundary | |||
degradation. | |||
Other operating experiences of similar character may be found in the generic communications | |||
listed in NRC Bulletin 2002-01, Reactor Pressure Vessel Head Degradation and Reactor | |||
Coolant Pressure Boundary Integrity. | |||
Discussion | |||
A number of mechanical and welded connections exist above the reactor pressure vessel head | |||
that, historically, have leaked at a number of plants. This leakage of borated water may lead to | |||
Unit 2, the leakage resulted in relatively minor degradation of the reactor vessel head. | degradation of the low alloy steel reactor vessel head by boric acid corrosion. At Sequoyah | ||
Unit 2, the leakage resulted in relatively minor degradation of the reactor vessel head. At | |||
Comanche Peak Unit 1, the leakage resulted in no apparent degradation of the RCS pressure | Comanche Peak Unit 1, the leakage resulted in no apparent degradation of the RCS pressure | ||
boundary. | boundary. In the Sequoyah Unit 2 and Comanche Peak Unit 1 events, the unidentified reactor | ||
coolant leakage had not shown a discernible increase from the very low levels that typically | coolant leakage had not shown a discernible increase from the very low levels that typically | ||
occur at a PWR facility. Common assumptions that RCS leakage onto a hot surface, such as the reactor | occur at a PWR facility. | ||
Common assumptions that RCS leakage onto a hot surface, such as the reactor pressure | |||
vessel head, will not cause corrosion may not be justified and are the subject of ongoing | |||
research. | research. Usually, small quantities of water coming into contact with a surface as hot as the | ||
reactor vessel head would be expected to flash and leave a noncorrosive dry boric acid residue | reactor vessel head would be expected to flash and leave a noncorrosive dry boric acid residue | ||
on the surface. | on the surface. However, at Sequoyah Unit 2 the resulting condition produced an environment | ||
in which boric acid corrosion could occur. | in which boric acid corrosion could occur. This experience challenges current assumptions with | ||
respect to the potential effects of RCS leakage. | respect to the potential effects of RCS leakage. The NRC is continuing to consider the safety | ||
and regulatory aspects of this experience. This information notice requires no specific action or written response. | and regulatory aspects of this experience. This information notice requires no specific action or written response. If you have any | ||
questions about the information in this notice, please contact the technical contact listed below | |||
or the appropriate project manager from the NRCs Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation | |||
(NRR). | |||
/RA/ | |||
William D. Beckner, Program Director | |||
Operating Reactor Improvements Program | |||
Division of Regulatory Improvement Programs | Division of Regulatory Improvement Programs | ||
Office of Nuclear Reactor | Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation | ||
Technical contacts: V. Hodge, NRR E. Sullivan, NRR | |||
301-415-1861 301-415-2796 E-mail: cvh@nrc.gov E-mail: ejs@nrc.gov | |||
Attachment: List of Recently Issued NRC Information Notices | |||
ML030160004 DOCUMENT NAME: C:\ORPCheckout\FileNET\ML030160004.wpd | |||
*See Previous Concurrence | |||
INDICATE IN BOX: C=COPY W/O ATTACHMENT/ENCLOSURE, E=COPY W/ATT/ENCL, N=NO COPY | |||
OFFICE RORP:DRIP EMCB:DE EMCB:DE EMCB:DE | |||
NAME VHodge TSullivan SCoffin BBateman | |||
DATE 01/13/03* 01/13/03* 01/14/03* 01/15/03 OFFICE DLPM:PD-2 RORP:DRIP RORP | |||
NAME AHowe TReiss BBeckner | |||
* | DATE 01/14/03* 01/15/03 01/16/03 | ||
Attachment 1 LIST OF RECENTLY ISSUED | |||
NRC INFORMATION NOTICES | |||
_____________________________________________________________________________________ | |||
Information Date of | |||
Notice No. Subject Issuance Issued to | |||
_____________________________________________________________________________________ | |||
2003-01 Failure of a Boiling Water 01/15/2003 All holders of operating licenses | |||
nuclear power reactors, except | Reactor Target Rock Main or construction permits for | ||
Steam Safety/Relief Valve nuclear power reactors, except | |||
those that have permanently | those that have permanently | ||
| Line 142: | Line 212: | ||
permanently removed from the | permanently removed from the | ||
reactor. | reactor. | ||
2002-35 Changes to 10 CFR Parts 71 12/20/2002 All holders of 10 CFR Part 71 and 72 Quality Assurance quality assurance program | |||
approvals and all 10 CFR Part 72 licensees and certificate holders. | Programs approvals and all 10 CFR Part 72 licensees and certificate holders. | ||
2002-34 Failure of Safety-Related 11/25/2002 All holders of operating licenses | |||
Circuit Breaker External or construction permits for | |||
Auxiliary Switches at Columbia nuclear power reactors. | |||
Generating Station | |||
2002-33 Notification of Permanent 11/21/2002 All teletherapy and radiation | |||
Injunction Against Neutron processing licensees. | |||
those who have ceased | Products Incorporated of | ||
Dickerson, Maryland | |||
2002-29 Recent Design Problems in 11/06/2002 All holders of operating licenses | |||
(Errata) Safety Functions of Pneumatic or construction permits for | |||
Systems nuclear power reactors. | |||
2002-32 Electromigration on 10/31/2002 All holders of operating licenses | |||
Semiconductor Integrated for nuclear power reactors except | |||
Circuits those who have ceased | |||
operations and have certified that | operations and have certified that | ||
| Line 168: | Line 250: | ||
fuel has been permanently | fuel has been permanently | ||
removed from the reactor vessel.Note:NRC generic communications may be received in electronic format shortly after they | removed from the reactor vessel. | ||
Note: NRC generic communications may be received in electronic format shortly after they are | |||
issued by subscribing to the NRC listserver as follows: | |||
To subscribe send an e-mail to <listproc@nrc.gov >, no subject, and the following | |||
command in the message portion: | |||
subscribe gc-nrr firstname lastname | |||
______________________________________________________________________________________ | |||
OL = Operating License | |||
CP = Construction Permit}} | |||
{{Information notice-Nav}} | {{Information notice-Nav}} | ||
Revision as of 04:00, 24 November 2019
| ML030160004 | |
| Person / Time | |
|---|---|
| Site: | Sequoyah, Comanche Peak |
| Issue date: | 01/16/2003 |
| From: | Beckner W NRC/NRR/DRIP/RORP |
| To: | |
| Hodge, CV, NRR/DRIP/RORP, (415-1861) | |
| References | |
| TAC MB7177 IN-03-002 | |
| Download: ML030160004 (7) | |
UNITED STATES
NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION
OFFICE OF NUCLEAR REACTOR REGULATION
WASHINGTON, DC 20555-0001 January 16, 2003 NRC INFORMATION NOTICE 2003-02: RECENT EXPERIENCE WITH REACTOR
COOLANT SYSTEM LEAKAGE AND BORIC ACID
CORROSION
Addressees
All holders of operating licenses or construction permits for pressurized water reactors (PWRs).
Purpose
The U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC) is issuing this information notice to inform
addressees of recently observed reactor coolant leakage at two pressurized water reactor
facilities, one of which resulted in the subsequent degradation of the reactor pressure vessel
head. It is expected that recipients will review the information for applicability to their facilities
and consider actions, as appropriate, to avoid similar problems. However, suggestions in this
information notice are not NRC requirements; therefore no specific action or written response is
required.
Description of Circumstances
Sequoyah Unit 2
On December 26, 2002, the unit tripped from full power as a result of low reactor coolant
system (RCS) flow due to a ground fault in a reactor coolant pump motor winding. In the
ensuing shutdown to correct the pump problem, the licensee initiated a search to locate and
correct a suspected RCS leak that, prior to the trip, had resulted in elevated moisture and
activity levels inside containment. During this inspection, the licensee identified an
accumulation of boric acid on the reactor vessel head insulation that resulted from a leaking
reactor vessel level indication system (RVLIS) compression fitting. The leakage had seeped
through a seam in the insulation onto the reactor pressure vessel (RPV) head and resulted in
minor boric acid corrosion of the head. This RVLIS compression fitting had been disconnected
and reconnected during the May 2002 refueling outage. The licensee also identified a small
leak through a canopy seal weld on an empty control rod drive mechanism (CRDM) penetration
that did not result in any boric acid corrosion of the reactor vessel head.
Based on the location of the leaking RVLIS fitting, the temperature of the leakage fluid was
close to the ambient temperature outside the vessel insulation. The licensee estimated the
mass of boric acid crystals on this insulation surface at about 9 kilograms (20 pounds). A seam
in the insulation was in this area. On removing the insulation and cleaning the area, the
licensee observed boric acid corrosion of the head near the flange. The licensee determined
that the amount of material loss from the head was small, in the shape of a groove less than
one centimeter (cm) [0.3 inch] wide, about twelve cm [4.6 inches] long, and at most about one- third cm [0.125 inch] deep.
The licensees evaluation indicated that 98 percent or better of the structural wall remained
intact and that no abrupt corners existed in the degraded area. The licensee justified continued
operation based on the minor extent of the degradation.
Comanche Peak Unit 1
On November 30, 2002, a control rod dropped into the core. The licensee suspected a fault in
the CRDM coils. Failing to identify the cause of the dropped rod while at reduced power, the
licensee decided to shut down. While continuing to troubleshoot the CRDM problem in Mode 3, the licensee observed a leak around the CRDM housing. The leak was from a CRDM canopy
seal weld. Water from the leaking canopy seal weld apparently entered the CRDM coils, causing coil failure. Boric acid crystals were found around the leak site, on the vessel head
insulation, and on the reactor pressure vessel head. The licensee repaired the canopy weld
with a weld overlay and cleaned the CRDM housing, the head insulation, and the head to
remove the boric acid deposits. The amount of boric acid crystals recovered from the head was
about 1 kilogram (2 pounds). The licensee did not find any reactor coolant pressure boundary
degradation.
Other operating experiences of similar character may be found in the generic communications
listed in NRC Bulletin 2002-01, Reactor Pressure Vessel Head Degradation and Reactor
Coolant Pressure Boundary Integrity.
Discussion
A number of mechanical and welded connections exist above the reactor pressure vessel head
that, historically, have leaked at a number of plants. This leakage of borated water may lead to
degradation of the low alloy steel reactor vessel head by boric acid corrosion. At Sequoyah
Unit 2, the leakage resulted in relatively minor degradation of the reactor vessel head. At
Comanche Peak Unit 1, the leakage resulted in no apparent degradation of the RCS pressure
boundary. In the Sequoyah Unit 2 and Comanche Peak Unit 1 events, the unidentified reactor
coolant leakage had not shown a discernible increase from the very low levels that typically
occur at a PWR facility.
Common assumptions that RCS leakage onto a hot surface, such as the reactor pressure
vessel head, will not cause corrosion may not be justified and are the subject of ongoing
research. Usually, small quantities of water coming into contact with a surface as hot as the
reactor vessel head would be expected to flash and leave a noncorrosive dry boric acid residue
on the surface. However, at Sequoyah Unit 2 the resulting condition produced an environment
in which boric acid corrosion could occur. This experience challenges current assumptions with
respect to the potential effects of RCS leakage. The NRC is continuing to consider the safety
and regulatory aspects of this experience. This information notice requires no specific action or written response. If you have any
questions about the information in this notice, please contact the technical contact listed below
or the appropriate project manager from the NRCs Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation
(NRR).
/RA/
William D. Beckner, Program Director
Operating Reactor Improvements Program
Division of Regulatory Improvement Programs
Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation
Technical contacts: V. Hodge, NRR E. Sullivan, NRR
301-415-1861 301-415-2796 E-mail: cvh@nrc.gov E-mail: ejs@nrc.gov
Attachment: List of Recently Issued NRC Information Notices
ML030160004 DOCUMENT NAME: C:\ORPCheckout\FileNET\ML030160004.wpd
- See Previous Concurrence
INDICATE IN BOX: C=COPY W/O ATTACHMENT/ENCLOSURE, E=COPY W/ATT/ENCL, N=NO COPY
OFFICE RORP:DRIP EMCB:DE EMCB:DE EMCB:DE
NAME VHodge TSullivan SCoffin BBateman
DATE 01/13/03* 01/13/03* 01/14/03* 01/15/03 OFFICE DLPM:PD-2 RORP:DRIP RORP
NAME AHowe TReiss BBeckner
DATE 01/14/03* 01/15/03 01/16/03
Attachment 1 LIST OF RECENTLY ISSUED
NRC INFORMATION NOTICES
_____________________________________________________________________________________
Information Date of
Notice No. Subject Issuance Issued to
_____________________________________________________________________________________
2003-01 Failure of a Boiling Water 01/15/2003 All holders of operating licenses
Reactor Target Rock Main or construction permits for
Steam Safety/Relief Valve nuclear power reactors, except
those that have permanently
ceased operations and have
certified that fuel has been
permanently removed from the
reactor.
2002-35 Changes to 10 CFR Parts 71 12/20/2002 All holders of 10 CFR Part 71 and 72 Quality Assurance quality assurance program
Programs approvals and all 10 CFR Part 72 licensees and certificate holders.
2002-34 Failure of Safety-Related 11/25/2002 All holders of operating licenses
Circuit Breaker External or construction permits for
Auxiliary Switches at Columbia nuclear power reactors.
Generating Station
2002-33 Notification of Permanent 11/21/2002 All teletherapy and radiation
Injunction Against Neutron processing licensees.
Products Incorporated of
Dickerson, Maryland
2002-29 Recent Design Problems in 11/06/2002 All holders of operating licenses
(Errata) Safety Functions of Pneumatic or construction permits for
Systems nuclear power reactors.
2002-32 Electromigration on 10/31/2002 All holders of operating licenses
Semiconductor Integrated for nuclear power reactors except
Circuits those who have ceased
operations and have certified that
fuel has been permanently
removed from the reactor vessel.
Note: NRC generic communications may be received in electronic format shortly after they are
issued by subscribing to the NRC listserver as follows:
To subscribe send an e-mail to <listproc@nrc.gov >, no subject, and the following
command in the message portion:
subscribe gc-nrr firstname lastname
______________________________________________________________________________________
OL = Operating License
CP = Construction Permit