ML070730345: Difference between revisions

From kanterella
Jump to navigation Jump to search
(Created page by program invented by StriderTol)
 
(Created page by program invented by StriderTol)
Line 16: Line 16:


=Text=
=Text=
{{#Wiki_filter:PRM-51-10     DOCKETED   03/14/07 (71FR64169)
{{#Wiki_filter:PRM-51-10                                                             DOCKETED 03/14/07 (71FR64169)
Comment No. 35 From: Edward Russell <EdRussel@aol.com> To: <SECY@nrc.gov.> Date: Tue, Mar 13, 2007 4:35 PM  
Comment No. 35 From:             Edward Russell <EdRussel@aol.com>
To:               <SECY@nrc.gov.>
Date:             Tue, Mar 13, 2007 4:35 PM


==Subject:==
==Subject:==
PRM-51-10 MA Attorney General Petition U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission, Washington, DC 20555-0001  
PRM-51-10 MA Attorney General Petition U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission, Washington, DC 20555-0001 Attn: Rulemakings and Adjudications Staff.
 
RE: Docket No. PRM-51 Support The Massachusetts Attorney General's Petition for Rulemaking- Spent Fuel My wife Charlotte and I support the Massachusetts Attorney Generals Petition for Rulemaking on the effects of the spent fuel at the Pilgrim reactor in our town.
Attn: Rulemakings and Adjudications Staff.  
We feel the Nuclear Regulatory Commission should: Consider the new and significant information showing that NRC incorrectly characterized the environmental impacts of spent fuel storage as insignificant. We also feel the NRC should revoke the regulations codifying that incorrect conclusion. We'd like a determination that the environmental impacts of high-density pool storage of spent fuel are significant, and require that an EIS be prepared addressing the environmental impacts of high-density pool storage of spent fuel at that nuclear plant and a reasonable array of alternatives for avoiding or mitigating those impacts.
 
We live in a different post 9/11 world and the NRC must recognize that that nuclear power plants are on terrorist lists. President Bush acknowledges that.
RE: Docket No. PRM-51 Support The Massachusetts Attorney   General's Petition for Rulemaking- Spent Fuel  
Sincerely, Edward & Charlotte Russell 725 Long Pond Road Plymouth, MA 02360=
 
My wife Charlotte and I support the Massachusetts Attorney General's Petition for Rulemaking on the effects of the spent fuel at the Pilgrim reactor in our town.
We feel the Nuclear Regulatory Commission should: Consider the new and significant information showing that NRC incorrectly characterized the environmental impacts of spent fuel storage as insignificant. We also feel the NRC should revoke the regulations   codifying that incorrect conclusion. We'd like a determination that   the environmental impacts of high-density pool storage of spent fuel are significant, and require that an EIS be prepared addressing the environmental impacts of high-density pool storage of spent fuel at that nuclear plant and a reasonable array of alternatives for avoiding or mitigating those impacts.
We live in a different post 9/11 world and the NRC must recognize that that nuclear power plants are on terrorist lists. President Bush acknowledges that.  


Sincerely, Edward & Charlotte Russell 725 Long Pond Road Plymouth, MA 02360=
Mail Envelope Properties     (45F70B10.EF4 : 24 : 32500)
Mail Envelope Properties (45F70B10.EF4 : 24 : 32500)  


==Subject:==
==Subject:==
PRM-51-10 MA Attorney General Petition Creation Date Tue, Mar 13, 2007 4:35 PM From: Edward Russell <EdRussel@aol.com>  
PRM-51-10 MA Attorney General Petition Creation Date           Tue, Mar 13, 2007 4:35 PM From:                   Edward Russell <EdRussel@aol.com>
 
Created By:             EdRussel@aol.com Recipients nrc.gov.
Created By: EdRussel@aol.com Recipients nrc.gov. SECY Post Office Route nrc.gov. Files Size Date & Time MESSAGE 1281 Tuesday, March 13, 2007   4:35 PM TEXT.htm 4653 Mime.822 7943  
SECY Post Office                                                             Route nrc.gov.
 
Files                           Size               Date & Time MESSAGE                         1281               Tuesday, March 13, 2007 4:35 PM TEXT.htm                       4653 Mime.822                       7943 Options Expiration Date:               None Priority:                       Standard ReplyRequested:                 No Return Notification:           None Concealed  
Options Expiration Date:
None Priority:
Standard ReplyRequested:
No Return Notification:
None Concealed  


==Subject:==
==Subject:==
 
No Security:                       Standard Junk Mail Handling Evaluation Results Message is eligible for Junk Mail handling This message was not classified as Junk Mail Junk Mail settings when this message was delivered Junk Mail handling disabled by User Junk Mail handling disabled by Administrator Junk List is not enabled Junk Mail using personal address books is not enabled Block List is not enabled}}
No Security:
Standard Junk Mail Handling Evaluation Results Message is eligible for Junk Mail handling This message was not classified as Junk Mail Junk Mail settings when this message was delivered Junk Mail handling disabled by User Junk Mail handling disabled by Administrator Junk List is not enabled Junk Mail using personal address books is not enabled Block List is not enabled}}

Revision as of 08:28, 23 November 2019

2007/03/13-Comment (35) Submitted by Edward and Charlotte Russell Supporting Massachusetts Attorney General'S PRM-51-10 Re Spent Fuel at the Pilgrim
ML070730345
Person / Time
Site: Pilgrim
Issue date: 03/13/2007
From: Russell C, Russell E
- No Known Affiliation
To:
NRC/SECY
SECY RAS
References
71FR64169 00035, PRM-51-10
Download: ML070730345 (2)
v • d • e


Text

PRM-51-10 DOCKETED 03/14/07 (71FR64169)

Comment No. 35 From: Edward Russell <EdRussel@aol.com>

To: <SECY@nrc.gov.>

Date: Tue, Mar 13, 2007 4:35 PM

Subject:

PRM-51-10 MA Attorney General Petition U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission, Washington, DC 20555-0001 Attn: Rulemakings and Adjudications Staff.

RE: Docket No. PRM-51 Support The Massachusetts Attorney General's Petition for Rulemaking- Spent Fuel My wife Charlotte and I support the Massachusetts Attorney Generals Petition for Rulemaking on the effects of the spent fuel at the Pilgrim reactor in our town.

We feel the Nuclear Regulatory Commission should: Consider the new and significant information showing that NRC incorrectly characterized the environmental impacts of spent fuel storage as insignificant. We also feel the NRC should revoke the regulations codifying that incorrect conclusion. We'd like a determination that the environmental impacts of high-density pool storage of spent fuel are significant, and require that an EIS be prepared addressing the environmental impacts of high-density pool storage of spent fuel at that nuclear plant and a reasonable array of alternatives for avoiding or mitigating those impacts.

We live in a different post 9/11 world and the NRC must recognize that that nuclear power plants are on terrorist lists. President Bush acknowledges that.

Sincerely, Edward & Charlotte Russell 725 Long Pond Road Plymouth, MA 02360=

Mail Envelope Properties (45F70B10.EF4 : 24 : 32500)

Subject:

PRM-51-10 MA Attorney General Petition Creation Date Tue, Mar 13, 2007 4:35 PM From: Edward Russell <EdRussel@aol.com>

Created By: EdRussel@aol.com Recipients nrc.gov.

SECY Post Office Route nrc.gov.

Files Size Date & Time MESSAGE 1281 Tuesday, March 13, 2007 4:35 PM TEXT.htm 4653 Mime.822 7943 Options Expiration Date: None Priority: Standard ReplyRequested: No Return Notification: None Concealed

Subject:

No Security: Standard Junk Mail Handling Evaluation Results Message is eligible for Junk Mail handling This message was not classified as Junk Mail Junk Mail settings when this message was delivered Junk Mail handling disabled by User Junk Mail handling disabled by Administrator Junk List is not enabled Junk Mail using personal address books is not enabled Block List is not enabled

Retrieved from "https://kanterella.com/w/index.php?title=ML070730345&oldid=2179998"