ML091960560: Difference between revisions

From kanterella
Jump to navigation Jump to search
(Created page by program invented by StriderTol)
 
(Created page by program invented by StriderTol)
 
Line 18: Line 18:


=Text=
=Text=
{{#Wiki_filter:I 0ff1'ý IO~ nýJ6enp/tive In~t'nalIfifyrf54g DRS Management Briefing Oyster Creek License Renewal Regulatory Footprint Sept 23, 2008 10:00 to 11:00 AM Purpose Working Discussion of Issues and Options.In response to RA questions on a LR Regulatory Footprint.
{{#Wiki_filter:I 0ff1'ý IO~ nýJ6enp/tive In~t'n*alIfifyrf54g DRS Management Briefing Oyster Creek License Renewal Regulatory Footprint Sept 23, 2008 10:00 to 11:00 AM Purpose Working Discussion of Issues and Options.
Success Determine Where We Are Headed.Management Information Needs are Satisfied.
In response to RA questions on a LR Regulatory Footprint.
Agenda 1. Opening Remarks 2. Current Course 3. Key Stakeholders and Stakeholder Interests 4. Is There a Problem with Commitments  
Success Determine Where We Are Headed.
& Lic. Conditions
Management Information Needs are Satisfied.
: 5. Regulatory Options 6. Key Players for RA Brief (Oct. 1)7. Other Issues -Looking Forward rjc (2 minute)jer (1 minute)all (6 minutes)all (15 minute)all (20 minute)all (2 minute)jer (3 minute)Wccofance With the Freedom of Infofmej AO L Exemption 5 -FOIA/PA CJ 0 7 Off01 4 U7COnI -Se 2%ve Intfna Info/7g41n
Agenda
: 1. OPENING REMARKS 1.1 Conduct of Briefing a. Conduct briefing as a working discussion
: 1. Opening Remarks                                                   rjc (2 minute)
: b. Keep discussion fairly high level c. Focus on desired outcome -not the details of how to get there 1.2 Discussion Content a. Identify what issues we need Options for (e.g., what are we trying to achieve, solve, or prevent)b. Discuss our perceptions of what the various stakeholders expect c. Discuss which organization should take the lead and who is needed for key support d. Build on this working discussion with Darrell -- for the briefing with Sam 2. CURRENT COURSE 2.1 NRC to continue on course, as though the OC license had been renewed a. We Assume AmerGen will continue to implement commitments, with no gaps b. R-1 Inspection Activities  
: 2. Current Course                                                     jer (1 minute)
-71003 Planning in-progress, no gaps expected 71003 Inspection, per 2515 App-C, with RA approval 3. KEY STAKEHOLDERS AND STAKEHOLDER INTERESTS 3.1 Stakeholders
: 3. Key Stakeholders and Stakeholder Interests                       all (6 minutes)
: a. NRC [Commision, ASLB, DLR, OGC, Region-i]b. AmerGen [Exelon]c. NJ State DEP d. NJ State & Local Legislators
: 4. Is There a Problem with Commitments & Lic. Conditions             all (15 minute)
: 5. Regulatory Options                                               all (20 minute)
: 6. Key Players for RA Brief (Oct. 1)                                   all (2 minute)
: 7. Other Issues - Looking Forward                                   jer (3 minute)
Wccofance With the Freedom of Infofmej AOL Exemption     5 -
FOIA/PA       CJ     0 7
 
4 U7COnI -Se %ve Off01                        Intfna*  Info/7g41n 2
: 1. OPENING REMARKS 1.1   Conduct of Briefing
: a. Conduct briefing as a working discussion
: b. Keep discussion fairly high level
: c. Focus on desired outcome - not the details of how to get there 1.2   Discussion Content
: a. Identify what issues we need Options for (e.g., what are we trying to achieve, solve, or prevent)
: b. Discuss our perceptions of what the various stakeholders expect
: c. Discuss which organization should take the lead and who is needed for key support
: d. Build on this working discussion with Darrell -- for the briefing with Sam
: 2. CURRENT COURSE 2.1   NRC to continue on course, as though the OC license had been renewed
: a. We Assume AmerGen will continue to implement commitments, with no gaps
: b. R-1 Inspection Activities - 71003 Planning in-progress, no gaps expected 71003 Inspection, per 2515 App-C, with RA approval
: 3. KEY STAKEHOLDERS AND STAKEHOLDER INTERESTS 3.1   Stakeholders
: a. NRC [Commision, ASLB, DLR, OGC, Region-i]
: b. AmerGen [Exelon]
: c. NJ State DEP
: d. NJ State & Local Legislators
: e. Webster [Citizens]
: e. Webster [Citizens]
: f. Media [Local NJ Press]3.2 Stakeholder Interests a. NJ State DEP Interface  
: f. Media [Local NJ Press]
-Open & Transparent Sharing of Information (as allowed by the MOU)Four Principle DEP Concerns (1) Drywell Liner Condition (71003 Outage Inspection Item)(2) 3-D Finite Element Analysis -Technical Review (NRRIDLR Review of AmerGen Summary Report)(3) Fatigue Monitoring Calculation  
3.2   Stakeholder Interests
-Technical Review (?? need DLR input)(4) Combustion Turbine Maintenance Program -Verification of Commitment (Future 71003 Non-Outage Inspection Item)b. NJ State & Local Legislators  
: a. NJ State DEP Interface - Open &Transparent Sharing of Information (as allowed by the MOU)
-- need PAO and SLO Input c. Webster & Citizens -- need PAO and SLO Input Oj Us/'O~r4enS.5ifie lntpenal Inf 7 Kat;,A 4. IS THERE A PROBLEM WITH COMMITMENTS  
Four Principle DEP Concerns (1) Drywell Liner Condition (71003 Outage Inspection Item)
& LICENSE CONDITIONS 4.1 If the license is not renewed by April 9, 2009 ...What about SER "Proposed Conditions of License" and SER "Commitment List" Requirements vs Expectations Are Proposed Conditions of License and Commitments part of the current CLB?Do they have to revise the FSAR to incorporate Aging Management Programs?If they did revise the FSAR, doesn't that make the AMPs part of the CLB?Is AmerGen required to implement  
(2) 3-D Finite Element Analysis - Technical Review (NRRIDLR Review of AmerGen Summary Report)
& manage LR commitments?
(3) Fatigue Monitoring Calculation - Technical Review (?? need DLR input)
Is AmerGen required to use the NEI Commitment Management Program?Can they be held accountable for anything they said in their LR Application?
(4) Combustion Turbine Maintenance Program - Verification of Commitment (Future 71003 Non-Outage Inspection Item)
If AmerGen not required to do any of the above -- Then What ?4.2 Regulatory Tools LR Application not yet approved§ (b)(5) 11 pocketea LetoerS [oPei 1:rm various tasks CLB -Correspondence  
: b. NJ State & Local Legislators -- need PAO and SLO Input
-FSAR (b)(5)4.3 Outside Stakeholder Perceptions NJ State DEP seems satisfied  
: c. Webster & Citizens -- need PAO and SLO Input
-has not expressed any concern [yet]NJ State & Local Legislators Webster & Citizens Media & Press 0Wc ýO, en/ie Inte76a inp4a"1n5. REGULATORY OPTIONS 5.1 (b)(5)5.2 Communication Plan with an FAQ (b)(5)5.3 Exchange of Correspondence with Exelon (b)(5)5.4 (b)(5)75----'It ~//
 
5.5 (b)(5)6. KEY PLAYERS FOR RA BRIEF (OCT. 1)R-1 Executive Team Karl Farrar, Regional Counsel Mary Baty, OGC Ed Williamson, OGC Brian Holian, DLR Louise Lund, DLR Dave Pelton, DLR Bob Summers, Regional OE Ron Bellamy, DRP Marc Ferdas, OC SRI Rich Conte, DRS John Richmond, 71003 Team Leader Michael Modes, Regional LR Expert (and 71002 Team Lead)Marjorie McLaughlin, SLO Diane Screnci, PAO ANY OTHERS ?7. OTHER ISSUES -LOOKING FORWARD 7.1 What happens if OC does not get a renewed license?Why did we do a 71003 inspection?
Oj Us/'O~r4enS.5ifie lntpenal Inf7 Kat;,A
7.2 (b) (5) 7.3Off~%e Ure OýiIy-Sen~hive Int~rnalIn rnm/ton (b)(5)}}
: 4. IS THERE A PROBLEM WITH COMMITMENTS & LICENSE CONDITIONS 4.1   Ifthe license is not renewed by April 9, 2009 ...
What about SER "Proposed Conditions of License" and SER "Commitment List" Requirements vs Expectations Are Proposed Conditions of License and Commitments part of the current CLB?
Do they have to revise the FSAR to incorporate Aging Management Programs?
Ifthey did revise the FSAR, doesn't that make the AMPs part of the CLB?
Is AmerGen required to implement & manage LR commitments?
Is AmerGen required to use the NEI Commitment Management Program?
Can they be held accountable for anything they said in their LR Application?
IfAmerGen not required to do any of the above -- Then What ?
4.2   Regulatory Tools LR Application not yet approved§               (b)(5)         11 pocketea LetoerS [oPei 1:rm various tasks CLB - Correspondence - FSAR             (b)(5) 4.3   Outside Stakeholder Perceptions NJ State DEP seems satisfied - has not expressed any concern [yet]
NJ State & Local Legislators Webster & Citizens Media & Press
 
0Wc     ýO,             en/ie Inte76a inp4a"1n*
: 5. REGULATORY OPTIONS 5.1 (b)(5) 74*b;-
5.2   Communication Plan with an FAQ (b)(5) 5----
5.3   Exchange of Correspondence with Exelon (b)(5)
                                                                  'It ~
5.4 (b)(5)
                                                                  /
                                                                /
 
5.5 (b)(5)
: 6. KEY PLAYERS FOR RA BRIEF (OCT. 1)
R-1 Executive Team Karl Farrar, Regional Counsel Mary Baty, OGC Ed Williamson, OGC Brian Holian, DLR Louise Lund, DLR Dave Pelton, DLR Bob Summers, Regional OE Ron Bellamy, DRP Marc Ferdas, OC SRI Rich Conte, DRS John Richmond, 71003 Team Leader Michael Modes, Regional LR Expert (and 71002 Team Lead)
Marjorie McLaughlin, SLO Diane Screnci, PAO ANY OTHERS ?
: 7. OTHER ISSUES - LOOKING FORWARD 7.1   What happens if OC does not get a renewed license?
Why did we do a 71003 inspection?
7.2 (b)(5)
 
7.3Off~%e UreOýiIy-Sen~hive Int~rnalIn rnm/ton (b)(5)}}

Latest revision as of 05:10, 14 November 2019

09/23/2008 DRS Management Briefing Oyster Creek License Renewal Regulatory Footprint, Working Discussion of Issues and Options, in Response to RA Questions
ML091960560
Person / Time
Site: Oyster Creek
Issue date: 06/17/2009
From:
- No Known Affiliation
To:
NRC Region 1
References
FOIA/PA-2009-0070
Download: ML091960560 (6)
v • d • e


Text

I 0ff1'ý IO~ nýJ6enp/tive In~t'n*alIfifyrf54g DRS Management Briefing Oyster Creek License Renewal Regulatory Footprint Sept 23, 2008 10:00 to 11:00 AM Purpose Working Discussion of Issues and Options.

In response to RA questions on a LR Regulatory Footprint.

Success Determine Where We Are Headed.

Management Information Needs are Satisfied.

Agenda

1. Opening Remarks rjc (2 minute)
2. Current Course jer (1 minute)
3. Key Stakeholders and Stakeholder Interests all (6 minutes)
4. Is There a Problem with Commitments & Lic. Conditions all (15 minute)
5. Regulatory Options all (20 minute)
6. Key Players for RA Brief (Oct. 1) all (2 minute)
7. Other Issues - Looking Forward jer (3 minute)

Wccofance With the Freedom of Infofmej AOL Exemption 5 -

FOIA/PA CJ 0 7

4 U7COnI -Se %ve Off01 Intfna* Info/7g41n 2

1. OPENING REMARKS 1.1 Conduct of Briefing
a. Conduct briefing as a working discussion
b. Keep discussion fairly high level
c. Focus on desired outcome - not the details of how to get there 1.2 Discussion Content
a. Identify what issues we need Options for (e.g., what are we trying to achieve, solve, or prevent)
b. Discuss our perceptions of what the various stakeholders expect
c. Discuss which organization should take the lead and who is needed for key support
d. Build on this working discussion with Darrell -- for the briefing with Sam
2. CURRENT COURSE 2.1 NRC to continue on course, as though the OC license had been renewed
a. We Assume AmerGen will continue to implement commitments, with no gaps
b. R-1 Inspection Activities - 71003 Planning in-progress, no gaps expected 71003 Inspection, per 2515 App-C, with RA approval
3. KEY STAKEHOLDERS AND STAKEHOLDER INTERESTS 3.1 Stakeholders
a. NRC [Commision, ASLB, DLR, OGC, Region-i]
b. AmerGen [Exelon]
c. NJ State DEP
d. NJ State & Local Legislators
e. Webster [Citizens]
f. Media [Local NJ Press]

3.2 Stakeholder Interests

a. NJ State DEP Interface - Open &Transparent Sharing of Information (as allowed by the MOU)

Four Principle DEP Concerns (1) Drywell Liner Condition (71003 Outage Inspection Item)

(2) 3-D Finite Element Analysis - Technical Review (NRRIDLR Review of AmerGen Summary Report)

(3) Fatigue Monitoring Calculation - Technical Review (?? need DLR input)

(4) Combustion Turbine Maintenance Program - Verification of Commitment (Future 71003 Non-Outage Inspection Item)

b. NJ State & Local Legislators -- need PAO and SLO Input
c. Webster & Citizens -- need PAO and SLO Input

Oj Us/'O~r4enS.5ifie lntpenal Inf7 Kat;,A

4. IS THERE A PROBLEM WITH COMMITMENTS & LICENSE CONDITIONS 4.1 Ifthe license is not renewed by April 9, 2009 ...

What about SER "Proposed Conditions of License" and SER "Commitment List" Requirements vs Expectations Are Proposed Conditions of License and Commitments part of the current CLB?

Do they have to revise the FSAR to incorporate Aging Management Programs?

Ifthey did revise the FSAR, doesn't that make the AMPs part of the CLB?

Is AmerGen required to implement & manage LR commitments?

Is AmerGen required to use the NEI Commitment Management Program?

Can they be held accountable for anything they said in their LR Application?

IfAmerGen not required to do any of the above -- Then What ?

4.2 Regulatory Tools LR Application not yet approved§ (b)(5) 11 pocketea LetoerS [oPei 1:rm various tasks CLB - Correspondence - FSAR (b)(5) 4.3 Outside Stakeholder Perceptions NJ State DEP seems satisfied - has not expressed any concern [yet]

NJ State & Local Legislators Webster & Citizens Media & Press

0Wc ýO, en/ie Inte76a inp4a"1n*

5. REGULATORY OPTIONS 5.1 (b)(5) 74*b;-

5.2 Communication Plan with an FAQ (b)(5) 5----

5.3 Exchange of Correspondence with Exelon (b)(5)

'It ~

5.4 (b)(5)

/

/

5.5 (b)(5)

6. KEY PLAYERS FOR RA BRIEF (OCT. 1)

R-1 Executive Team Karl Farrar, Regional Counsel Mary Baty, OGC Ed Williamson, OGC Brian Holian, DLR Louise Lund, DLR Dave Pelton, DLR Bob Summers, Regional OE Ron Bellamy, DRP Marc Ferdas, OC SRI Rich Conte, DRS John Richmond, 71003 Team Leader Michael Modes, Regional LR Expert (and 71002 Team Lead)

Marjorie McLaughlin, SLO Diane Screnci, PAO ANY OTHERS ?

7. OTHER ISSUES - LOOKING FORWARD 7.1 What happens if OC does not get a renewed license?

Why did we do a 71003 inspection?

7.2 (b)(5)

7.3Off~%e UreOýiIy-Sen~hive Int~rnalIn rnm/ton (b)(5)

Retrieved from "https://kanterella.com/w/index.php?title=ML091960560&oldid=2143641"