ML15091A265: Difference between revisions

From kanterella
Jump to navigation Jump to search
(Created page by program invented by StriderTol)
(Created page by program invented by StriderTol)
Line 18: Line 18:
=Text=
=Text=
{{#Wiki_filter:UNITED STATES
{{#Wiki_filter:UNITED STATES
NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION
                              NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION
REGION III 2443 WARRENVILLE RD. SUIT
                                                REGION III
E 210 LISLE, IL 60532
                                      2443 WARRENVILLE RD. SUITE 210
-4352 March 30, 2015
                                            LISLE, IL 60532-4352
  Mr. Bryan C. Hanson
                                            March 30, 2015
Senior VP, Exelon Generation Company, LLC President and CNO, Exelon Nuclear
Mr. Bryan C. Hanson
4300 Winfield Road
Senior VP, Exelon Generation Company, LLC
SUBJECT: QUAD CITIES NUCLEAR  
President and CNO, Exelon Nuclear
POWER STATION-NOTIFICATION OF AN N
4300 Winfield Road
RC TRIENNIAL HEAT SINK PERFORMANCE INSPECTION
SUBJECT: QUAD CITIES NUCLEAR POWER STATION-NOTIFICATION OF AN NRC
AND REQUEST FO
              TRIENNIAL HEAT SINK PERFORMANCE INSPECTION AND REQUEST FOR
R INFORMATION
              INFORMATION INSPECTION REPORT 05000254/2015002; 05000265/2015002
INSPECTION REPORT 05000254/20 1500 2; 05000 265/20 1500 2  Dear Mr. Hanson
Dear Mr. Hanson:
: On May 18, 2015, the U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC) will begin the onsite portion of the Triennial Heat Sink Performance Inspection at your
On May 18, 2015, the U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC) will begin the onsite portion
Quad Cities Nuclear Power Station. This inspection will be performed in accordance with NRC Baseline Inspection Procedure
of the Triennial Heat Sink Performance Inspection at your Quad Cities Nuclear Power Station.
(IP) 71111.07. In order to minimize the impact that the inspection has on the site
This inspection will be performed in accordance with NRC Baseline Inspection Procedure (IP)
, and to ensure a productive inspection, we have enclosed a request for documents needed for the inspection. The documents have been divided into three groups.
71111.07.
  The first group lists information necessary for our initial inspection scoping activities. This
In order to minimize the impact that the inspection has on the site, and to ensure a productive
information should be available to the lead inspector no later than
inspection, we have enclosed a request for documents needed for the inspection. The
April 20, 2015. By April 2 7, 2015, the inspector will communicate the initial selected set of approximately  
documents have been divided into three groups.
2-3 ris k-significant heat exchangers.
*    The first group lists information necessary for our initial inspection scoping activities. This
  The second group  
    information should be available to the lead inspector no later than April 20, 2015. By
is needed to support our in-office preparation activities. This set of documents, including the calculations associated with the selected heat exchangers, should  
    April 27, 2015, the inspector will communicate the initial selected set of approximately
be available at the Regional Office no later than
    2-3 risk-significant heat exchangers.
May 4, 2015.  
*    The second group is needed to support our in-office preparation activities. This set of
This information should be separated for each selected component, especially if provided electronically (e.g., folder with component name that includes calculations, condition reports, maintenance history, etc
    documents, including the calculations associated with the selected heat exchangers, should
.). During the in
    be available at the Regional Office no later than May 4, 2015. This information should be
-office preparation activities, the inspector may identify additional information
    separated for each selected component, especially if provided electronically (e.g., folder with
needed to support the inspection.
    component name that includes calculations, condition reports, maintenance history, etc.).
  The last group includes the additional information above, as well as plant
    During the in-office preparation activities, the inspector may identify additional information
-specific reference material. This information should be available onsite to the inspector
    needed to support the inspection.
on May 18, 2015. It is also requested that corrective action documents and/or questions developed during the inspection be provided to the inspector as the documents are generated.
*    The last group includes the additional information above, as well as plant-specific reference
All requested documents are to be for the time period from the onsite inspection period back to the documents that were provided in response to the previous
    material. This information should be available onsite to the inspector on May 18, 2015. It is
Heat Sink Performance  
    also requested that corrective action documents and/or questions developed during the
Inspection. If no activities were accomplished
    inspection be provided to the inspector as the documents are generated.
in that time period, then the request applies to the last applicable document in the previous time period.
All requested documents are to be for the time period from the onsite inspection period back to
It is important that these documents be as complete as possible, in order to minimize the number of documents requested during the  
the documents that were provided in response to the previous Heat Sink Performance
Inspection. If no activities were accomplished in that time period, then the request applies to the
last applicable document in the previous time period. It is important that these documents be as
complete as possible, in order to minimize the number of documents requested during the
preparation week or during the onsite inspection.
preparation week or during the onsite inspection.
 
 
B. Hans o n -2- The lead inspector for this inspection is
B. Hanson                                      -2-
Michael Jones. We understand that our regulatory contact for this inspection is Tom Peterson
The lead inspector for this inspection is Michael Jones. We understand that our regulatory
of your organization. If there are questions about the material requested, or the inspection, please call
contact for this inspection is Tom Peterson of your organization. If there are questions about
Mr. Jones at (630) 829
the material requested, or the inspection, please call Mr. Jones at (630) 829-9745. Please send
-9745. Please send the information to the following e
the information to the following e-mail address Michael.Jones@nrc.gov. A hard-copy with the
-mail address Michael.Jones@nrc.gov. A hard-copy with the required information is also an acceptable option.
required information is also an acceptable option.
This letter does not contain new or amended information collection requirements subject  
This letter does not contain new or amended information collection requirements subject
to the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995 (44 U.S.C. 3501 et seq.). Existing information collection requirements were approved by the Office of Management and Budget, Control Number 3150-0011. The NRC may not conduct or sponsor, and a person is not required to respond to, a request for information or an information collection requirement unless the requesting document displays a currently valid Office of Management and Budget  
to the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995 (44 U.S.C. 3501 et seq.). Existing information
Control Number.   In accordance with Title 10 of the Code of Federal Regulations
collection requirements were approved by the Office of Management and Budget, Control
(10 CFR) 2.390, "Public Inspections, Exemptions, Requests for Withholding,"
Number 3150-0011. The NRC may not conduct or sponsor, and a person is not required to
of the NRC's
respond to, a request for information or an information collection requirement unless the
"Rules of Practice," a copy  
requesting document displays a currently valid Office of Management and Budget Control
of this letter, its enclosure, and your response (if any) will be available electronically for public inspection in the NRC
Number.
's Public Document Room or from the Publicly Available Records (PARS) component of the NRC's Agencywide
In accordance with Title 10 of the Code of Federal Regulations (10 CFR) 2.390, Public
Document s Access and Management System (ADAMS).  
Inspections, Exemptions, Requests for Withholding, of the NRC's "Rules of Practice," a copy
ADAMS is accessible from the NRC Web
of this letter, its enclosure, and your response (if any) will be available electronically for public
site at http://www.nrc.gov/reading
inspection in the NRCs Public Document Room or from the Publicly Available Records (PARS)
-rm/adams.html
component of the NRC's Agencywide Documents Access and Management System (ADAMS).
(the Public Electronic Reading Room).
ADAMS is accessible from the NRC Web site at http://www.nrc.gov/reading-rm/adams.html
Sincerely, /RA Benny Jose Acting for/
(the Public Electronic Reading Room).
  Christine A. Lipa , Chie f Engineering Branch 2
                                              Sincerely,
Division of Reactor Safety  
                                              /RA Benny Jose Acting for/
Docket No s. 50-254; 50-265 License No
                                              Christine A. Lipa, Chief
s. DPR-29; DPR-30 Enclosure:
                                              Engineering Branch 2
  Triennial Heat Sink Performance Inspection  
                                              Division of Reactor Safety
  Document Request
Docket Nos. 50-254; 50-265
cc w/encl: Distribution via LISTSERV
License Nos. DPR-29; DPR-30
 
Enclosure:
TRIENNIAL HEAT
  Triennial Heat Sink Performance Inspection
SINK PERFORMANCE INSPECTION
  Document Request
DOCUMENT REQUEST
cc w/encl: Distribution via LISTSERV
Enclosure Inspection Report:
 
  05000 254/20 1500 2; 05000 265/20 1500 2 Inspection Dates:
        TRIENNIAL HEAT SINK PERFORMANCE INSPECTION DOCUMENT REQUEST
  May 18-22, 2015 Inspection
  Inspection Report:           05000254/2015002; 05000265/2015002
Procedure:
  Inspection Dates:             May 18-22, 2015
IP 71111.07
  Inspection Procedure:         IP 71111.07T, Heat Sink Performance
T, "Heat Sink Performance"
  Lead Inspector:               Michael A. Jones, Jr.
Lead Inspector:
                                (630) 829-9745
  Michael A. Jones
                                Michael.Jones@nrc.gov
, Jr. (630) 829-9745   Michael.Jones@nrc.gov
  I.   Information Requested By April 20, 2015:
  I. Information Requested By
      1.     List of the Generic Letter (GL) 89-13, Service Water System Problems Affecting
April 20, 2015: 1. List of the Generic Letter (GL) 89
            Safety-Related Equipment, heat exchangers in order of risk significance.
-13, "Service Water System Problems Affecting Safety-Related Equipment,"
      2.     Copy of heat exchanger performance trending data tracked for each GL 89-13 heat
heat exchangers in order of risk significance. 2. Copy of heat exchanger performance trending data tracked for each GL 89
            exchanger.
-13 heat exchanger.
      3.     List of Corrective Action Program (CAP) documents (with a short description)
3. List of Corrective Action Program
            associated with GL 89-13 heat exchangers, heat sinks, silting, corrosion, fouling, or
(CAP) documents (with a short description) associated with GL 89
            heat exchanger testing, for the previous 3 years, or since the last CAP document list
-13 heat exchangers, heat sinks, silting, corrosion, fouling, or heat exchanger testing, for the previous  
            was sent to the NRC for the previous Heat Sink Performance Inspection. The list
3 years , or since the last CAP document list was sent to the NRC for the previous Heat Sink Performance Inspection. The list should include all CAP
            should include all CAP documents not on the last CAP document list.
documents not on the last CAP document list.
      4.     Copy of any self-assessment done on any of GL 89-13 heat exchangers.
4. Copy of any self
      5.     Last two System Health Report(s) and maintenance rule system notebooks for all the
-assessment done on any of GL 89
            GL 89-13 heat exchangers.
-13 heat exchangers.
      6.     List of engineering-related operator workarounds (with a short description)
5. Last two System Health Report(s) and maintenance rule system notebooks for all the  
            associated with GL 89-13 heat exchangers. The requested documents are to be for
G L 89-13 heat exchangers.
            the time period from the onsite inspection period back to the documents that were
6. List of engineering
            provided in response to the previous heat sink performance inspection.
-related operator workarounds
      7.     List of permanent and temporary modifications (with a short description) associated
(with a short description)
            with GL 89-13 heat exchangers. The requested documents are to be for the time
associated with GL 89
            period from the onsite inspection period back to the documents that were provided in
-13 heat exchangers. The requested documents are to be for the time period from the onsite inspection period back to the
            response to the previous Heat Sink Performance Inspection.
documents that were provided in response to the previous
II.   Information Requested By May 4, 2015
heat sink performance  
      1.     Copies of the GL 89-13 responses.
inspectio n. 7. List of permanent and temporary modifications
      2.     Copy of the Updated Final Safety Analysis Report (UFSAR) section applicable to the
(with a short description)
            GL 89-13 Heat Exchanger Program.
associated with GL 89
      3.     Copies of procedures developed to implement the recommendations of GL 89-13
-13 heat exchangers. The requested documents are to be for the time  
            (e.g., the GL 89-13 Heat Exchanger Program description).
period from the onsite inspection period back to the
                                                                                        Enclosure
documents that were provided in response to the previous
 
Heat Sink Performance  
  TRIENNIAL HEAT SINK PERFORMANCE INSPECTION DOCUMENT REQUEST
Inspectio n. II. Information Requested By May 4, 2015
4.     Copies of the selected CAP documents.
1. Copies of the GL 89
5.     For the specific heat exchangers selected:
-13 responses
      a.       Copies of the UFSAR sections applicable for each heat exchanger.
2. Copy of the Updated Final Safety Analysis Report  
      b.       Copy of system description and design basis document for the heat
(UFSAR) section applicable to
                exchangers (as applicable).
the GL 89-13 Heat Exchanger Program.
      c.       Provide a list of calculations (with a short description) which currently apply to
3. Copies of procedures developed to implement the recommendations of GL 89
                each heat exchanger.
-13 (e.g., the GL 89-13 Heat Exchanger Program description).
              i.         establish the limiting design basis heat load required to be removed
 
                        by each of these heat exchangers;
TRIENNIAL HEAT
            ii.         demonstrate the heat exchangers capacity to remove the limiting heat
SINK PERFORMANCE INSPECTION
                        load;
DOCUMENT REQUEST
            iii.         correlate surveillance testing and/or inspection results from these heat
2 4. Copies of the selected CAP documents.
                        exchangers with design basis heat removal capability (e.g., basis for
5. For the specific heat exchangers selected:
                        surveillance test and/or inspection acceptance criteria);
a. Copies of the UFSAR sections applicable
            iv.         evaluate the potential for water hammer in each heat exchanger or
for each heat exchanger.
                        associated piping; and
b. Copy of system description and
            v.         evaluate excessive tube vibration in each heat exchanger.
design basis document for the heat exchangers (as applicable).
      d.       Copy of any operability determinations or other documentation of degradation
c. Provide a list of calculations  
                associated with the heat exchangers or the systems that support the
(with a short description
                operation for the selected heat exchangers.
) which currently apply to each heat exchanger
      e.       Copy of the construction code, Design Specification, heat exchanger data
. i. establish the limiting design basis heat load required to be removed by each of these heat exchangers;
                sheets, and vendor documents including component drawings applicable for
ii. demonstrate the heat exchangers capacity to remove the limiting heat load; iii. correlate surveillance testing and/or inspection results from these heat exchangers with design basis heat removal capability (e.g., basis for surveillance test and/or inspection acceptance criteria);
                the heat exchangers.
iv. evaluate the potential for water hammer in each heat exchanger or associated piping; and  
      f.       Copies of normal, abnormal, and emergency operating procedures
v. evaluate excessive tube vibration in each heat exchanger.
                associated with the selected heat exchangers.
d. Copy of any operability determinations or other documentation of degradation associated with the heat exchangers or the systems that support the operation for the selected heat exchangers.
6.     For the ultimate heat sink (UHS) and the safety-related service water system (or
e. Copy of the construction code, Design Specification, heat exchanger data sheets, and vendor documents including component drawings applicable for the heat exchangers.
      equivalent):
f. Copies of normal, abnormal, and emergency operating procedures associated with the selected heat exchangers.
      a.       Copies of the applicable UFSAR sections.
6. For the ultimate heat sink (UHS) and the safety
      b.       Copy of system description and design basis document (as applicable).
-related service water system (or equivalent):
      c.       Copy of any operability determinations or other documentation of degradation
a. Copies of the applicable  
                associated with the UHS, and the safety-related service water system.
UFSAR sections
      d.       Copy of the document (e.g., UFSAR or Technical Requirements Manual) that
. b. Copy of system description and design basis document (as applicable).
                states the maximum cooling water system inlet temperature limit that still
c. Copy of any operability determinations or other documentation of degradation  
                allows full licensed power operation of the nuclear reactor.
associated with the  
      e.       Copy of system description and design basis document (as applicable).
UHS , and the safety
                                                2
-related service water system
 
. d. Copy of the document (e.
        TRIENNIAL HEAT SINK PERFORMANCE INSPECTION DOCUMENT REQUEST
g., UFSAR or Technical Requirements Manual) that states the maximum cooling water system inlet temperature limit that still allows full licensed power operation of the nuclear reactor.
            f.     Copy of the construction code and Design Specification.
e. Copy of system description and design basis document (as applicable).
            g.     Copies of normal, abnormal, and emergency operating procedures
 
                    associated with the UHS and safety-related service water systems including
TRIENNIAL HEAT
                    procedures for loss of these systems.
SINK PERFORMANCE INSPECTION
            h.     Copy of any operability determinations or other documentation of degradation
DOCUMENT REQUEST
                    associated with the UHS, and the safety-related service water system.
3 f. Copy of the construction code and Design Specification.
            i.     Copies of corrective action documents associated with water hammer or
g. Copies of normal, abnormal, and emergency operating procedures associated with the UHS and safety
                    hydraulic transients in the service water system since the last Heat Sink
-related service water systems including procedures for loss of these systems.
                    Performance Inspection.
h. Copy of any operability
            j.     If available, provide an electronic copy of piping and instrumentation
determinations or other documentation of degradation associated with the UHS
                    diagrams (P&IDs) for the service water system, including the intake structure.
, and the safety
            k.     Provide a list of calculations (with a short description), which currently apply
-related service water system.
                    to UHS, and service water system.
i. Copies of corrective action documents associated with water
            l.     Provide a list of instruments (with a short description) associated with
hammer or hydraulic transients in the service water system since the last Heat Sink Performance Inspection.
                    automatic or alarm functions for the safety-related service water system
j. If available, provide an electronic copy of piping and instrumentation diagrams (P&IDs) for the service water system, including the intake structure.
                    and/or UHS.
k. Provide a list of calculations (with a short description), which currently apply to UHS , and service water system.
            m.     Provide a list of any design change (with a short description) performed on
l. Provide a list of instruments (with a short description) associated with automatic or alarm functions for the safety
                    the UHS or safety-related service water system since the last heat sink
-related service water system and/or UHS.
                    performance inspection.
m. Provide a list of any design change (with a short description) performed on the UHS or safety
    7.     A schedule of all inspections, cleanings, maintenance, or testing of any
-related service water system since the last heat sink performance inspection.
            safety-related plant heat exchanger to be performed during the on-site portion of the
7. A schedule of all inspections, cleanings, maintenance, or testing of  
            inspection.
any safety-related plant
III. Information Requested to be Available on First Day of Inspection, May 18, 2015
heat exchanger to be performed during the on
    1.     For the specific heat exchangers selected:
-site portion of
            a.     Copy of the calculation which correlates surveillance testing results from
the inspection
                    these heat exchangers with design basis heat removal capability (e.g., basis
. III. Information Requested to be Available on First Day of Inspection, May 18, 2015
                    for surveillance test acceptance criteria).
1. For the specific heat exchangers selected
            b.     Copies of the two most recent completed tests and evaluation data
: a. Copy of the calculation which correlates surveillance testing results from these heat exchangers with design basis heat removal capability (e.g.
                    confirming thermal performance for those heat exchangers which are
, basis for surveillance test acceptance criteria).
                    performance tested.
b. Copies of the two most recent completed tests and evaluation data confirming thermal performance for those heat exchangers which are performance tested.
            c.     Documentation and procedures that identify the types, accuracy, and location
  c. Documentation and procedures that identify the types, accuracy, and location of any special instrumentation used for the two most recently completed thermal performance tests for the heat exchangers (e.g., high accuracy ultrasonic flow instruments or temperature instruments). Include calibration records for the instruments used during these tests.
                    of any special instrumentation used for the two most recently completed
d. Information regarding any alarms which monitor on
                    thermal performance tests for the heat exchangers (e.g., high accuracy
-line performance.  
                    ultrasonic flow instruments or temperature instruments). Include calibration
 
                    records for the instruments used during these tests.
TRIENNIAL HEAT
            d.     Information regarding any alarms which monitor on-line performance.
SINK PERFORMANCE INSPECTION
                                                    3
DOCUMENT REQUEST
 
4 e. Copy of the document describing the inspection results of each heat exchanger. The requested documents are to be for the time period from the onsite inspection period back to the
  TRIENNIAL HEAT SINK PERFORMANCE INSPECTION DOCUMENT REQUEST
documents that were provided in response to the previous
      e.     Copy of the document describing the inspection results of each heat
Heat Sink Performance  
              exchanger. The requested documents are to be for the time period from the
Inspectio n.  f. The cleaning and inspection maintenance schedule for each heat exchanger for the next 5 years
              onsite inspection period back to the documents that were provided in
. g. Copy of the design specification and heat exchanger data sheets for each heat exchanger
              response to the previous Heat Sink Performance Inspection.
h. Copy of the vendor manuals including component drawings for each heat exchanger. i. Copy of the calculation which establishes the limiting (maximum) design basis heat load which is required to be removed by each of these heat exchangers
      f.     The cleaning and inspection maintenance schedule for each heat exchanger
. j. Copy of the operating procedure that ensures that the maximum cooling water system inlet temperature limit is not exceeded
              for the next 5 years.
. k. Copy of the calculations or documents which evaluate the potential for water hammer in each heat exchanger or associated piping
      g.     Copy of the design specification and heat exchanger data sheets for each
l. Copy of the calculations that evaluate excessive tube vibration in each heat exchanger and the documents that describe the controls that prevent heat  
              heat exchanger.
exchanger degradation due to excessive flow induced vibration during operation.
      h.     Copy of the vendor manuals including component drawings for each heat
m. Copy of the periodic flow testing at or near maximum design flow. The requested documents are to be for the time period from the onsite inspection period back to the
              exchanger.
documents that were provided in response to the previous
      i.     Copy of the calculation which establishes the limiting (maximum) design
Heat Sink Performance  
              basis heat load which is required to be removed by each of these heat
Inspectio n. n. Copy of the document which identifies the current number of tubes in service  
              exchangers.
for each heat exchanger and the supporting calculation which establishes the maximum number of tubes which can be plugged in each heat exchanger
      j.     Copy of the operating procedure that ensures that the maximum cooling
. o. Copy of the document establishing the repair criteria (plugging limit) for  
              water system inlet temperature limit is not exceeded.
degraded tubes which are identified in each heat exchanger
      k.     Copy of the calculations or documents which evaluate the potential for water
p. Copies of the documents that verify the structural integrity of the heat exchanger (e.g., eddy current summary sheets, ultrasonic testing results, and visual inspection results
              hammer in each heat exchanger or associated piping.
). q. Copies of those documents that describe the methods taken to control water  
      l.     Copy of the calculations that evaluate excessive tube vibration in each heat
ch emistry in the heat exchangers
              exchanger and the documents that describe the controls that prevent heat
2. For the review of the performance testing of the safety
              exchanger degradation due to excessive flow induced vibration during
-related service water system (or equivalent)
              operation.
and the UHS
      m.     Copy of the periodic flow testing at or near maximum design flow. The
: a. Copies of the last two performance tests, such as the American Society of  
              requested documents are to be for the time period from the onsite inspection
Mechanical  
              period back to the documents that were provided in response to the previous
Engineers in-service test
              Heat Sink Performance Inspection.
, for the pumps, valves, and, if
      n.     Copy of the document which identifies the current number of tubes in service
TRIENNIAL HEAT
              for each heat exchanger and the supporting calculation which establishes the
SINK PERFORMANCE INSPECTION
              maximum number of tubes which can be plugged in each heat exchanger.
DOCUMENT REQUEST
      o.     Copy of the document establishing the repair criteria (plugging limit) for
2 applicable, the towers
              degraded tubes which are identified in each heat exchanger.
fans in the safety
      p.     Copies of the documents that verify the structural integrity of the heat
-related service water system. If the components are not performance tested, please provide documentation verifying performance by the methods actually used.
              exchanger (e.g., eddy current summary sheets, ultrasonic testing results, and
b. Copies of the documents that demonstrate that flow balance testing was performed during the last  
              visual inspection results).
3 years. If the last flow test was performed longer than 3 years, then provide the last flow test.
      q.     Copies of those documents that describe the methods taken to control water
c. Copies of the documents that demonstrate that flow balance testing will continue to be periodically done in the future.
              chemistry in the heat exchangers.
d. Copies of procedures used to monitor interface valves between the safety
2.     For the review of the performance testing of the safety-related service water system
related section of the service water system
      (or equivalent) and the UHS:
, and the non
      a.     Copies of the last two performance tests, such as the American Society of
-safety relate
              Mechanical Engineers in-service test, for the pumps, valves, and, if
d section , and the associated results. The requested documents are to be for the time period from the onsite inspection period back to the
                                            4
documents that were provided in response to the previous
 
Heat Sink Performance  
        TRIENNIAL HEAT SINK PERFORMANCE INSPECTION DOCUMENT REQUEST
Inspectio n. e. Copies of the procedures that verify the performance of risk significant non
                    applicable, the towers fans in the safety-related service water system. If the
-safety functions
                    components are not performance tested, please provide documentation
, and the associated results. The requested documents are to be for the time period from the onsite inspection period back to the
                    verifying performance by the methods actually used.
            b.     Copies of the documents that demonstrate that flow balance testing was
documents that were provided in
                    performed during the last 3 years. If the last flow test was performed longer
response to the previous
                    than 3 years, then provide the last flow test.
Heat Sink Performance  
            c. Copies of the documents that demonstrate that flow balance testing will continue
Inspectio n. 3. For the review associated with the system walkdown of the service water system.
                to be periodically done in the future.
a. Copies of the Testing , Inspection, or Monitoring
            d.     Copies of procedures used to monitor interface valves between the safety
Program Procedures
                    related section of the service water system, and the non-safety related
for buried or inaccessible piping
                    section, and the associated results. The requested documents are to be for
, and the associated results
                    the time period from the onsite inspection period back to the documents that
. The requested documents are to be for the time period from the onsite inspection period back to the
                    were provided in response to the previous Heat Sink Performance Inspection.
documents that were provided in response to the previous
            e.     Copies of the procedures that verify the performance of risk significant non-
Heat Sink Performance  
                    safety functions, and the associated results. The requested documents are
Inspectio n. b. Copies of the ultrasonic test results and/or
                    to be for the time period from the onsite inspection period back to the
visual inspections that verify the structural integrity of the piping.
                    documents that were provided in response to the previous Heat Sink
c. Copies of the procedures to monitor , assess , and disposition active thru wall pipe leaks, including structural evaluations and/or planned corrective actions
                    Performance Inspection.
. d. History of any through wall pipe leak on the system. The requested documents are to be for the time period from the onsite inspection period back to the documents that were provided in response to the previous Heat Sink Performance Inspection
    3.     For the review associated with the system walkdown of the service water system.
e. Copies of the documents associated with the Periodic Inspection Program
            a.     Copies of the Testing, Inspection, or Monitoring Program Procedures for
used to detect protective coating failure, corrosion, and erosion
                    buried or inaccessible piping, and the associated results. The requested
. f. Copies of the  
                    documents are to be for the time period from the onsite inspection period
Inservice Test vibration monitoring results and operational history for deep draft vertical pumps, if applicable. The requested documents are to be for the time period from the onsite inspection period back to the
                    back to the documents that were provided in response to the previous Heat
documents that were provided in response to the previous
                    Sink Performance Inspection.
heat sink performance  
            b.     Copies of the ultrasonic test results and/or visual inspections that verify the
inspectio n.  If the information requested above will not be available, please contact Michael Jones as soon as possible at (630) 8
                    structural integrity of the piping.
29-9745 , or e-mail Michael.Jones@nrc.gov
            c.     Copies of the procedures to monitor, assess, and disposition active thru wall
.
                    pipe leaks, including structural evaluations and/or planned corrective actions.
  B. Hans o n -2- The lead inspector for this inspection is Michael Jones. We understand that our regulatory contact for this inspection is Tom Peterson
            d.     History of any through wall pipe leak on the system. The requested
of your organization.  
                    documents are to be for the time period from the onsite inspection period
If there are questions about the material requested, or the inspection, please call Mr. Jones
                    back to the documents that were provided in response to the previous Heat
at (630) 829-9745. Please send the information to the following e
                    Sink Performance Inspection.
-mail address Michael.Jones@nrc.gov. A hard-copy with the required information is also an acceptable option. This letter does not contain new or amended information collection requirements subject  
            e.     Copies of the documents associated with the Periodic Inspection Program
to the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995 (44 U.S.C. 3501 et seq.). Existing information collection  
                    used to detect protective coating failure, corrosion, and erosion.
requirements were approved by the Office of Management and Budget, Control Number
            f.     Copies of the Inservice Test vibration monitoring results and operational
3150-0011. The NRC may not conduct or sponsor, and a person is not required to respond to, a request for information or an information collection requirement unless the requesting document displays a currently valid Office of Management and Budget Control Number.
                    history for deep draft vertical pumps, if applicable. The requested documents
In accordance with Title 10 of the Code of Federal Regulations
                    are to be for the time period from the onsite inspection period back to the
(10 CFR) 2.390, "Public Inspections, Exemptions, Requests for Withholding," of the NRC's "Rules of Practice," a copy of
                    documents that were provided in response to the previous heat sink
this letter, its enclosure, and your response (if any) will be available electronically
                    performance inspection.
for public inspection in the NRC's Public Document Room or from the Publicly Available Records (PARS) component of the NRC's Agencywide
If the information requested above will not be available, please contact Michael Jones as soon
Documents Access and Management System (ADAMS). ADAMS is accessible from the NRC Web site at http://www.nrc.gov/reading
as possible at (630) 829-9745, or e-mail Michael.Jones@nrc.gov.
-rm/adams.html
                                                    2
(the Public Electronic Reading Room).
 
Sincerely, /RA Benny Jose Acting for/
B. Hanson                                                                  -2-
 
The lead inspector for this inspection is Michael Jones. We understand that our regulatory contact for this
Christine A. Lipa, Chief
inspection is Tom Peterson of your organization. If there are questions about the material requested, or
Engineering Branch 2
the inspection, please call Mr. Jones at (630) 829-9745. Please send the information to the following e-
Division of Reactor Safety  
mail address Michael.Jones@nrc.gov. A hard-copy with the required information is also an acceptable
Docket No s. 50-254; 50-265 License No
option.
s. DPR-29; DPR-30 Enclosure:
This letter does not contain new or amended information collection requirements subject
  Triennial Heat Sink Performance Inspection  
to the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995 (44 U.S.C. 3501 et seq.). Existing information collection
  Document Request
requirements were approved by the Office of Management and Budget, Control Number 3150-0011. The
cc w/encl: Distribution via LISTSERV
NRC may not conduct or sponsor, and a person is not required to respond to, a request for information or
DISTRIBUTION
an information collection requirement unless the requesting document displays a currently valid Office of
: Kimyata MorganButler
Management and Budget Control Number.
RidsNrrDorlLpl3
In accordance with Title 10 of the Code of Federal Regulations (10 CFR) 2.390, Public Inspections,
-2 Resource
Exemptions, Requests for Withholding, of the NRC's "Rules of Practice," a copy of this letter, its
RidsNrrPMQuadCities Resource
enclosure, and your response (if any) will be available electronically for public inspection in the NRCs
Public Document Room or from the Publicly Available Records (PARS) component of the NRC's
RidsNrrDirsIrib Resour
Agencywide Documents Access and Management System (ADAMS). ADAMS is accessible from the
ce Cynthia Pederson
NRC Web site at http://www.nrc.gov/reading-rm/adams.html (the Public Electronic Reading Room).
Darrell Roberts
                                                                          Sincerely,
Richard Skokowski
                                                                          /RA Benny Jose Acting for/
Allan Barker
                                                                          Christine A. Lipa, Chief
Carole Ariano
                                                                          Engineering Branch 2
Linda Linn
                                                                          Division of Reactor Safety
DRPIII DRSIII Jim Clay Carmen Olteanu
Docket Nos. 50-254; 50-265
  ADAMS Accession Number ML15091A265
License Nos. DPR-29; DPR-30
  Publicly Available
Enclosure:
  Non-Publicly Available
  Triennial Heat Sink Performance Inspection
  Sensitive Non-Sensitive To receive a copy of this document, indicate in the concurrence box "C" = Copy without attach/encl "E" = Copy with attach/encl "N" = No copy
  Document Request
  OFFICE RIII RIII RIII RIII  NAME MJones:cl BJose for CLipa   DATE 03/30/15 03/30/15   OFFICIAL RECORD COPY
                                                         
cc w/encl: Distribution via LISTSERV
DISTRIBUTION:
Kimyata MorganButler
RidsNrrDorlLpl3-2 Resource
RidsNrrPMQuadCities Resource
RidsNrrDirsIrib Resource
Cynthia Pederson
Darrell Roberts
Richard Skokowski
Allan Barker
Carole Ariano
Linda Linn
DRPIII
DRSIII
Jim Clay
Carmen Olteanu
ADAMS Accession Number ML15091A265
    Publicly Available                           Non-Publicly Available                   Sensitive               Non-Sensitive
To receive a copy of this document, indicate in the concurrence box "C" = Copy without attach/encl "E" = Copy with attach/encl "N" = No copy
  OFFICE             RIII                                 RIII                           RIII                               RIII
  NAME               MJones:cl                           BJose for CLipa
DATE               03/30/15                             03/30/15
                                                            OFFICIAL RECORD COPY
}}
}}

Revision as of 14:36, 31 October 2019

Ltr 03/30/15 Quad Cities Nuclear Power Station Notification of an NRC Triennial Heat Sink Performance Inspection and Request for Information Inspection Report 05000254/2015002; 05000265/2015002
ML15091A265
Person / Time
Site: Quad Cities  Constellation icon.png
Issue date: 03/30/2015
From: Christine Lipa
NRC/RGN-III/DRS/EB2
To: Bryan Hanson
Exelon Generation Co, Exelon Nuclear
References
IR 2015002
Download: ML15091A265 (8)


See also: IR 05000254/2015002

Text

UNITED STATES

NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION

REGION III

2443 WARRENVILLE RD. SUITE 210

LISLE, IL 60532-4352

March 30, 2015

Mr. Bryan C. Hanson

Senior VP, Exelon Generation Company, LLC

President and CNO, Exelon Nuclear

4300 Winfield Road

SUBJECT: QUAD CITIES NUCLEAR POWER STATION-NOTIFICATION OF AN NRC

TRIENNIAL HEAT SINK PERFORMANCE INSPECTION AND REQUEST FOR

INFORMATION INSPECTION REPORT 05000254/2015002; 05000265/2015002

Dear Mr. Hanson:

On May 18, 2015, the U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC) will begin the onsite portion

of the Triennial Heat Sink Performance Inspection at your Quad Cities Nuclear Power Station.

This inspection will be performed in accordance with NRC Baseline Inspection Procedure (IP) 71111.07.

In order to minimize the impact that the inspection has on the site, and to ensure a productive

inspection, we have enclosed a request for documents needed for the inspection. The

documents have been divided into three groups.

  • The first group lists information necessary for our initial inspection scoping activities. This

information should be available to the lead inspector no later than April 20, 2015. By

April 27, 2015, the inspector will communicate the initial selected set of approximately

2-3 risk-significant heat exchangers.

  • The second group is needed to support our in-office preparation activities. This set of

documents, including the calculations associated with the selected heat exchangers, should

be available at the Regional Office no later than May 4, 2015. This information should be

separated for each selected component, especially if provided electronically (e.g., folder with

component name that includes calculations, condition reports, maintenance history, etc.).

During the in-office preparation activities, the inspector may identify additional information

needed to support the inspection.

  • The last group includes the additional information above, as well as plant-specific reference

material. This information should be available onsite to the inspector on May 18, 2015. It is

also requested that corrective action documents and/or questions developed during the

inspection be provided to the inspector as the documents are generated.

All requested documents are to be for the time period from the onsite inspection period back to

the documents that were provided in response to the previous Heat Sink Performance

Inspection. If no activities were accomplished in that time period, then the request applies to the

last applicable document in the previous time period. It is important that these documents be as

complete as possible, in order to minimize the number of documents requested during the

preparation week or during the onsite inspection.

B. Hanson -2-

The lead inspector for this inspection is Michael Jones. We understand that our regulatory

contact for this inspection is Tom Peterson of your organization. If there are questions about

the material requested, or the inspection, please call Mr. Jones at (630) 829-9745. Please send

the information to the following e-mail address Michael.Jones@nrc.gov. A hard-copy with the

required information is also an acceptable option.

This letter does not contain new or amended information collection requirements subject

to the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995 (44 U.S.C. 3501 et seq.). Existing information

collection requirements were approved by the Office of Management and Budget, Control

Number 3150-0011. The NRC may not conduct or sponsor, and a person is not required to

respond to, a request for information or an information collection requirement unless the

requesting document displays a currently valid Office of Management and Budget Control

Number.

In accordance with Title 10 of the Code of Federal Regulations (10 CFR) 2.390, Public

Inspections, Exemptions, Requests for Withholding, of the NRC's "Rules of Practice," a copy

of this letter, its enclosure, and your response (if any) will be available electronically for public

inspection in the NRCs Public Document Room or from the Publicly Available Records (PARS)

component of the NRC's Agencywide Documents Access and Management System (ADAMS).

ADAMS is accessible from the NRC Web site at http://www.nrc.gov/reading-rm/adams.html

(the Public Electronic Reading Room).

Sincerely,

/RA Benny Jose Acting for/

Christine A. Lipa, Chief

Engineering Branch 2

Division of Reactor Safety

Docket Nos. 50-254; 50-265

License Nos. DPR-29; DPR-30

Enclosure:

Triennial Heat Sink Performance Inspection

Document Request

cc w/encl: Distribution via LISTSERV

TRIENNIAL HEAT SINK PERFORMANCE INSPECTION DOCUMENT REQUEST

Inspection Report: 05000254/2015002; 05000265/2015002

Inspection Dates: May 18-22, 2015

Inspection Procedure: IP 71111.07T, Heat Sink Performance

Lead Inspector: Michael A. Jones, Jr.

(630) 829-9745

Michael.Jones@nrc.gov

I. Information Requested By April 20, 2015:

1. List of the Generic Letter (GL) 89-13, Service Water System Problems Affecting

Safety-Related Equipment, heat exchangers in order of risk significance.

2. Copy of heat exchanger performance trending data tracked for each GL 89-13 heat

exchanger.

3. List of Corrective Action Program (CAP) documents (with a short description)

associated with GL 89-13 heat exchangers, heat sinks, silting, corrosion, fouling, or

heat exchanger testing, for the previous 3 years, or since the last CAP document list

was sent to the NRC for the previous Heat Sink Performance Inspection. The list

should include all CAP documents not on the last CAP document list.

4. Copy of any self-assessment done on any of GL 89-13 heat exchangers.

5. Last two System Health Report(s) and maintenance rule system notebooks for all the

GL 89-13 heat exchangers.

6. List of engineering-related operator workarounds (with a short description)

associated with GL 89-13 heat exchangers. The requested documents are to be for

the time period from the onsite inspection period back to the documents that were

provided in response to the previous heat sink performance inspection.

7. List of permanent and temporary modifications (with a short description) associated

with GL 89-13 heat exchangers. The requested documents are to be for the time

period from the onsite inspection period back to the documents that were provided in

response to the previous Heat Sink Performance Inspection.

II. Information Requested By May 4, 2015

1. Copies of the GL 89-13 responses.

2. Copy of the Updated Final Safety Analysis Report (UFSAR) section applicable to the

GL 89-13 Heat Exchanger Program.

3. Copies of procedures developed to implement the recommendations of GL 89-13

(e.g., the GL 89-13 Heat Exchanger Program description).

Enclosure

TRIENNIAL HEAT SINK PERFORMANCE INSPECTION DOCUMENT REQUEST

4. Copies of the selected CAP documents.

5. For the specific heat exchangers selected:

a. Copies of the UFSAR sections applicable for each heat exchanger.

b. Copy of system description and design basis document for the heat

exchangers (as applicable).

c. Provide a list of calculations (with a short description) which currently apply to

each heat exchanger.

i. establish the limiting design basis heat load required to be removed

by each of these heat exchangers;

ii. demonstrate the heat exchangers capacity to remove the limiting heat

load;

iii. correlate surveillance testing and/or inspection results from these heat

exchangers with design basis heat removal capability (e.g., basis for

surveillance test and/or inspection acceptance criteria);

iv. evaluate the potential for water hammer in each heat exchanger or

associated piping; and

v. evaluate excessive tube vibration in each heat exchanger.

d. Copy of any operability determinations or other documentation of degradation

associated with the heat exchangers or the systems that support the

operation for the selected heat exchangers.

e. Copy of the construction code, Design Specification, heat exchanger data

sheets, and vendor documents including component drawings applicable for

the heat exchangers.

f. Copies of normal, abnormal, and emergency operating procedures

associated with the selected heat exchangers.

6. For the ultimate heat sink (UHS) and the safety-related service water system (or

equivalent):

a. Copies of the applicable UFSAR sections.

b. Copy of system description and design basis document (as applicable).

c. Copy of any operability determinations or other documentation of degradation

associated with the UHS, and the safety-related service water system.

d. Copy of the document (e.g., UFSAR or Technical Requirements Manual) that

states the maximum cooling water system inlet temperature limit that still

allows full licensed power operation of the nuclear reactor.

e. Copy of system description and design basis document (as applicable).

2

TRIENNIAL HEAT SINK PERFORMANCE INSPECTION DOCUMENT REQUEST

f. Copy of the construction code and Design Specification.

g. Copies of normal, abnormal, and emergency operating procedures

associated with the UHS and safety-related service water systems including

procedures for loss of these systems.

h. Copy of any operability determinations or other documentation of degradation

associated with the UHS, and the safety-related service water system.

i. Copies of corrective action documents associated with water hammer or

hydraulic transients in the service water system since the last Heat Sink

Performance Inspection.

j. If available, provide an electronic copy of piping and instrumentation

diagrams (P&IDs) for the service water system, including the intake structure.

k. Provide a list of calculations (with a short description), which currently apply

to UHS, and service water system.

l. Provide a list of instruments (with a short description) associated with

automatic or alarm functions for the safety-related service water system

and/or UHS.

m. Provide a list of any design change (with a short description) performed on

the UHS or safety-related service water system since the last heat sink

performance inspection.

7. A schedule of all inspections, cleanings, maintenance, or testing of any

safety-related plant heat exchanger to be performed during the on-site portion of the

inspection.

III. Information Requested to be Available on First Day of Inspection, May 18, 2015

1. For the specific heat exchangers selected:

a. Copy of the calculation which correlates surveillance testing results from

these heat exchangers with design basis heat removal capability (e.g., basis

for surveillance test acceptance criteria).

b. Copies of the two most recent completed tests and evaluation data

confirming thermal performance for those heat exchangers which are

performance tested.

c. Documentation and procedures that identify the types, accuracy, and location

of any special instrumentation used for the two most recently completed

thermal performance tests for the heat exchangers (e.g., high accuracy

ultrasonic flow instruments or temperature instruments). Include calibration

records for the instruments used during these tests.

d. Information regarding any alarms which monitor on-line performance.

3

TRIENNIAL HEAT SINK PERFORMANCE INSPECTION DOCUMENT REQUEST

e. Copy of the document describing the inspection results of each heat

exchanger. The requested documents are to be for the time period from the

onsite inspection period back to the documents that were provided in

response to the previous Heat Sink Performance Inspection.

f. The cleaning and inspection maintenance schedule for each heat exchanger

for the next 5 years.

g. Copy of the design specification and heat exchanger data sheets for each

heat exchanger.

h. Copy of the vendor manuals including component drawings for each heat

exchanger.

i. Copy of the calculation which establishes the limiting (maximum) design

basis heat load which is required to be removed by each of these heat

exchangers.

j. Copy of the operating procedure that ensures that the maximum cooling

water system inlet temperature limit is not exceeded.

k. Copy of the calculations or documents which evaluate the potential for water

hammer in each heat exchanger or associated piping.

l. Copy of the calculations that evaluate excessive tube vibration in each heat

exchanger and the documents that describe the controls that prevent heat

exchanger degradation due to excessive flow induced vibration during

operation.

m. Copy of the periodic flow testing at or near maximum design flow. The

requested documents are to be for the time period from the onsite inspection

period back to the documents that were provided in response to the previous

Heat Sink Performance Inspection.

n. Copy of the document which identifies the current number of tubes in service

for each heat exchanger and the supporting calculation which establishes the

maximum number of tubes which can be plugged in each heat exchanger.

o. Copy of the document establishing the repair criteria (plugging limit) for

degraded tubes which are identified in each heat exchanger.

p. Copies of the documents that verify the structural integrity of the heat

exchanger (e.g., eddy current summary sheets, ultrasonic testing results, and

visual inspection results).

q. Copies of those documents that describe the methods taken to control water

chemistry in the heat exchangers.

2. For the review of the performance testing of the safety-related service water system

(or equivalent) and the UHS:

a. Copies of the last two performance tests, such as the American Society of

Mechanical Engineers in-service test, for the pumps, valves, and, if

4

TRIENNIAL HEAT SINK PERFORMANCE INSPECTION DOCUMENT REQUEST

applicable, the towers fans in the safety-related service water system. If the

components are not performance tested, please provide documentation

verifying performance by the methods actually used.

b. Copies of the documents that demonstrate that flow balance testing was

performed during the last 3 years. If the last flow test was performed longer

than 3 years, then provide the last flow test.

c. Copies of the documents that demonstrate that flow balance testing will continue

to be periodically done in the future.

d. Copies of procedures used to monitor interface valves between the safety

related section of the service water system, and the non-safety related

section, and the associated results. The requested documents are to be for

the time period from the onsite inspection period back to the documents that

were provided in response to the previous Heat Sink Performance Inspection.

e. Copies of the procedures that verify the performance of risk significant non-

safety functions, and the associated results. The requested documents are

to be for the time period from the onsite inspection period back to the

documents that were provided in response to the previous Heat Sink

Performance Inspection.

3. For the review associated with the system walkdown of the service water system.

a. Copies of the Testing, Inspection, or Monitoring Program Procedures for

buried or inaccessible piping, and the associated results. The requested

documents are to be for the time period from the onsite inspection period

back to the documents that were provided in response to the previous Heat

Sink Performance Inspection.

b. Copies of the ultrasonic test results and/or visual inspections that verify the

structural integrity of the piping.

c. Copies of the procedures to monitor, assess, and disposition active thru wall

pipe leaks, including structural evaluations and/or planned corrective actions.

d. History of any through wall pipe leak on the system. The requested

documents are to be for the time period from the onsite inspection period

back to the documents that were provided in response to the previous Heat

Sink Performance Inspection.

e. Copies of the documents associated with the Periodic Inspection Program

used to detect protective coating failure, corrosion, and erosion.

f. Copies of the Inservice Test vibration monitoring results and operational

history for deep draft vertical pumps, if applicable. The requested documents

are to be for the time period from the onsite inspection period back to the

documents that were provided in response to the previous heat sink

performance inspection.

If the information requested above will not be available, please contact Michael Jones as soon

as possible at (630) 829-9745, or e-mail Michael.Jones@nrc.gov.

2

B. Hanson -2-

The lead inspector for this inspection is Michael Jones. We understand that our regulatory contact for this

inspection is Tom Peterson of your organization. If there are questions about the material requested, or

the inspection, please call Mr. Jones at (630) 829-9745. Please send the information to the following e-

mail address Michael.Jones@nrc.gov. A hard-copy with the required information is also an acceptable

option.

This letter does not contain new or amended information collection requirements subject

to the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995 (44 U.S.C. 3501 et seq.). Existing information collection

requirements were approved by the Office of Management and Budget, Control Number 3150-0011. The

NRC may not conduct or sponsor, and a person is not required to respond to, a request for information or

an information collection requirement unless the requesting document displays a currently valid Office of

Management and Budget Control Number.

In accordance with Title 10 of the Code of Federal Regulations (10 CFR) 2.390, Public Inspections,

Exemptions, Requests for Withholding, of the NRC's "Rules of Practice," a copy of this letter, its

enclosure, and your response (if any) will be available electronically for public inspection in the NRCs

Public Document Room or from the Publicly Available Records (PARS) component of the NRC's

Agencywide Documents Access and Management System (ADAMS). ADAMS is accessible from the

NRC Web site at http://www.nrc.gov/reading-rm/adams.html (the Public Electronic Reading Room).

Sincerely,

/RA Benny Jose Acting for/

Christine A. Lipa, Chief

Engineering Branch 2

Division of Reactor Safety

Docket Nos. 50-254; 50-265

License Nos. DPR-29; DPR-30

Enclosure:

Triennial Heat Sink Performance Inspection

Document Request

cc w/encl: Distribution via LISTSERV

DISTRIBUTION:

Kimyata MorganButler

RidsNrrDorlLpl3-2 Resource

RidsNrrPMQuadCities Resource

RidsNrrDirsIrib Resource

Cynthia Pederson

Darrell Roberts

Richard Skokowski

Allan Barker

Carole Ariano

Linda Linn

DRPIII

DRSIII

Jim Clay

Carmen Olteanu

ADAMS Accession Number ML15091A265

Publicly Available Non-Publicly Available Sensitive Non-Sensitive

To receive a copy of this document, indicate in the concurrence box "C" = Copy without attach/encl "E" = Copy with attach/encl "N" = No copy

OFFICE RIII RIII RIII RIII

NAME MJones:cl BJose for CLipa

DATE 03/30/15 03/30/15

OFFICIAL RECORD COPY