ML15314A484: Difference between revisions

From kanterella
Jump to navigation Jump to search
(Created page by program invented by StriderTol)
(Created page by program invented by StriderTol)
 
Line 16: Line 16:


=Text=
=Text=
{{#Wiki_filter:44464 Federal Register/Vol. 79, No. 147/Thursday, July 31, 2014/Notices discharge from the wet weather facilities; and (3) all defendants are in  
{{#Wiki_filter:NRC-009 Submitted Nov. 10, 2015 44464                             Federal Register / Vol. 79, No. 147 / Thursday, July 31, 2014 / Notices discharge from the wet weather                             reproduction costs. Please mail your                    written request and payment of facilities; and (3) all defendants are in                   request and payment to: Consent Decree                  reproduction costs. Please mail your violation of the Clean Water Act and                       Library, U.S. DOJENRD, P.O. Box                        request and payment to: Consent Decree their NPDES permits because they have                       7611, Washington, DC 20044-7611.                        Library, U.S. DOJENRD, P.O. Box unlawful sanitary sewer overflows                           Please enclose a check or money order                    7611, Washington, DC 20044-7611.
 
(SSOs) during wet weather.                             for $54.25 (25 cents per page                              Please enclose a check or money order The proposed Consent Decree                             reproduction cost) payable to the U.S.                  for $3 (25 cents per page reproduction implements a regional asset                                 Treasury.                                                cost) payable to the United States management program that puts the                                                                                     Treasury.
violation of the Clean Water Act and  
defendants on a path to eliminate                           Henry Friedman, prohibited wet weather facility                             Assistant Section Chief, Environmental                  Susan Akers, discharges by December 31, 2035, and to                     Enforcement Section, Environment and                    Assistant Section Chief, Environmental Natural Resources Division.                              Enforcement Section, Environment and control SSOs within ten years of Decree entry. Among other things, the                             [FR Doc. 2014-18047 Filed 7-30-14; 8:45 am]              Natural Resources Division.
 
defendants will rehabilitate and clean                     BILLING CODE 4410-15-P                                  [FR Doc. 2014-17980 Filed 7-30-14; 8:45 am]
their NPDES permits because they have  
sanitary sewer infrastructure, identify                                                                             BILLING CODE 4410-15-P and eliminate sources of inflow and rapid infiltration to the sewer systems,                   DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE and continue to require repair or                           Notice of Lodging of Proposed Joint                      NUCLEAR REGULATORY replacement of private sewer laterals                       Stipulation under the Clean Water Act                    COMMISSION under local and regional ordinances.
 
In addition, each defendant will pay                       On July 25, 2014, the Department of                  [Docket Nos. 50-250 and 50-251; NRC-a civil penalty for its past violations, for               Justice lodged a proposed settlement                    2014-0181]
unlawful sanitary sewer overflows  
a total of $1,563,556 in civil penalties.                   with the United States District Court for EBMUD will pay $201,600; the City of                       the District of Alaska in the lawsuit                    Florida Power & Light Company; Alameda will pay $111,150; the City of                     entitled United States and Alaska v. BP                  Turkey Point Nuclear Generating Unit Albany will pay $42,038; the City of                       (Exploration) Alaska, Inc., Civil Action                Nos. 3 and 4 Berkeley will pay $267,000; the City of                     No. 3:14-cv-00146.                                      AGENCY:  Nuclear Regulatory Emeryville will pay $1,870; the City of                       The United States and State of Alaska Commission.
 
Oakland will pay $850,000; the City of                     filed this lawsuit under the Clean Water Piedmont will pay $41,038; and the                         Act against BP (Exploration) Alaska, Inc.               ACTION: Environmental assessment and Stege Sanitary District will pay $48,860.                   The complaint seeks civil penalties and                 final finding of no significant impact; The proposed Consent Decree                              injunctive relief for violations of the                 issuance.
(SSOs) during wet weather.
replaces a January 2009 interim                            Clean Water Act, as amended by the Oil                  
The proposed Consent Decree implements a regional asset  
 
management program that puts the  
 
defendants on a path to eliminate  
 
prohibited wet weather facility  
 
discharges by December 31, 2035, and to  
 
control SSOs within ten years of Decree  
 
entry. Among other things, the  
 
defendants will rehabilitate and clean  
 
sanitary sewer infrastructure, identify  
 
and eliminate sources of inflow and  
 
rapid infiltration to the sewer systems, and continue to require repair or  
 
replacement of private sewer laterals  
 
under local and regional ordinances.
In addition, each defendant will pay a civil penalty for its past violations, for  
 
a total of $1,563,556 in civil penalties.  
 
EBMUD will pay $201,600; the City of  
 
Alameda will pay $111,150; the City of  
 
Albany will pay $42,038; the City of  
 
Berkeley will pay $267,000; the City of  
 
Emeryville will pay $1,870; the City of Oakland will pay $850,000; the City of  
 
Piedmont will pay $41,038; and the  
 
Stege Sanitary District will pay $48,860.
The proposed Consent Decree replaces a January 2009 interim
 
settlement with EBMUD and a March
 
2011 interim settlement with the
 
Satellite Communities.
The publication of this notice opens a period for public comment on the
 
proposed Consent Decree. Comments
 
should be addressed to the Assistant
 
Attorney General, Environment and
 
Natural Resources Division, and should
 
refer to United States of America et al.
: v. East Bay Municipal Utility District et al., D.J. Ref. No. 90-5-1-1-09361. All comments must be submitted no later
 
than thirty (30) days after the
 
publication date of this notice.
 
Comments may be submitted either by
 
email or by mail:
To submit comments:
Send them to: By email.......
pubcomment-ees.enrd@
usdoj.gov. By mail.........Assistant Attorney General, U.S. DOJENRD, P.O.
Box 7611, Washington, DC
 
20044-7611.
During the public comment period, the proposed Consent Decree may be examined and downloaded at this
 
Department of Justice Web site:
http:// www.usdoj.gov/enrd/Consent
_Decrees.html.
We will provide a paper copy of the proposed Consent Decree
 
upon written request and payment of reproduction costs. Please mail your request and payment to: Consent Decree
 
Library, U.S. DOJENRD, P.O. Box
 
7611, Washington, DC 20044-7611.
Please enclose a check or money order for $54.25 (25 cents per page
 
reproduction cost) payable to the U.S.
 
Treasury.
Henry Friedman, Assistant Section Chief, Environmental Enforcement Section, Environment and
 
Natural Resources Division.
[FR Doc. 2014-18047 Filed 7-30-14; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4410-15-P DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE Notice of Lodging of Proposed Joint Stipulation under the Clean Water Act On July 25, 2014, the Department of Justice lodged a proposed settlement with the United States District Court for
 
the District of Alaska in the lawsuit
 
entitled United States and Alaska
: v. BP (Exploration) Alaska, Inc., Civil Action No. 3:14-cv-00146.
The United States and State of Alaska filed this lawsuit under the Clean Water
 
Act against BP (Exploration) Alaska, Inc.  
 
The complaint seeks civil penalties and  
 
injunctive relief for violations of the  
 
Clean Water Act, as amended by the Oil  
 
Pollution Act of 1990, 33 U.S.C. 2701 et
 
seq., and Alaska Statutes 46.03.710 and
 
46.03.740. The settlement provides a
 
covenant not to sue in return for
 
defendants payment of $450,000.
The publication of this notice opens a period for public comment on the
 
settlement. Comments should be
 
addressed to the Assistant Attorney
 
General, Environment and Natural
 
Resources Division, and should refer to
 
United States and Alaska
: v. BP (Exploration) Alaska, Inc., D.J. Ref. No.
90-5-1-1-08808/1. All comments must
 
be submitted no later than thirty (30)
 
days after the publication date of this
 
notice. Comments may be submitted
 
either by email or by mail:
To submit com-ments: Send them to: By email.................
pubcomment-ees.enrd@usdoj.gov. By mail...................Assistant Attorney Gen-eral, U.S. DOJ-ENRD, P.O. Box
 
7611, Washington, DC 20044-7611.
During the public comment period, the settlement may be examined and downloaded at this Justice Department
 
Web site:
http://www.usdoj.gov/enrd/
 
Consent_Decrees.html.
We will provide a paper copy of the settlement upon written request and payment of
 
reproduction costs. Please mail your
 
request and payment to: Consent Decree
 
Library, U.S. DOJENRD, P.O. Box
 
7611, Washington, DC 20044-7611.
Please enclose a check or money order for $3 (25 cents per page reproduction
 
cost) payable to the United States
 
Treasury.
Susan Akers, Assistant Section Chief, Environmental Enforcement Section, Environment and
 
Natural Resources Division.
[FR Doc. 2014-17980 Filed 7-30-14; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4410-15-P NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION
[Docket Nos. 50-250 and 50-251; NRC-2014-0181]
Florida Power & Light Company; Turkey Point Nuclear Generating Unit
 
Nos. 3 and 4 AGENCY: Nuclear Regulatory Commission.
ACTION: Environmental assessment and final finding of no significant impact;
 
issuance.


==SUMMARY==
==SUMMARY==
: The U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC) is considering  
:   The U.S. Nuclear Regulatory settlement with EBMUD and a March                          Pollution Act of 1990, 33 U.S.C. 2701 et                Commission (NRC) is considering 2011 interim settlement with the                            seq., and Alaska Statutes 46.03.710 and                  issuance of amendments to Renewed Satellite Communities.                                      46.03.740. The settlement provides a The publication of this notice opens                                                                              Facility Operating License Nos. DPR-31 covenant not to sue in return for                        and DPR-41 issued to Florida Power &
 
a period for public comment on the                          defendants payment of $450,000.
issuance of amendments to Renewed  
proposed Consent Decree. Comments                                                                                    Light Company (FPL, the licensee) for The publication of this notice opens should be addressed to the Assistant                                                                                operation of Turkey Point Nuclear a period for public comment on the Attorney General, Environment and                                                                                    Generating Unit Nos. 3 and 4 (Turkey settlement. Comments should be Natural Resources Division, and should                                                                              Point) located in Homestead, Miami-addressed to the Assistant Attorney refer to United States of America et al.                                                                            Dade County, Florida. The proposed General, Environment and Natural
 
: v. East Bay Municipal Utility District et                                                                            amendments would increase the Resources Division, and should refer to al., D.J. Ref. No. 90-5-1-1-09361. All                                                                              ultimate heat sink (UHS) water United States and Alaska v. BP comments must be submitted no later                                                                                  temperature limit specified in the (Exploration) Alaska, Inc., D.J. Ref. No.
Facility Operating License Nos. DPR-31  
than thirty (30) days after the                                                                                      Turkey Point Technical Specifications 90-5-1-1-08808/1. All comments must publication date of this notice.                                                                                    (TSs) from 100 degrees Fahrenheit (°F) be submitted no later than thirty (30)
 
Comments may be submitted either by                                                                                  to 104 °F and add a surveillance days after the publication date of this email or by mail:                                                                                                    requirement to monitor the UHS notice. Comments may be submitted temperature more frequently if the UHS either by email or by mail:
and DPR-41 issued to Florida Power &  
To submit                                                                                                            temperature approaches the new limit.
 
Send them to:                                                                                  The NRC did not identify any comments:                                                  To submit com-                Send them to:              significant environmental impacts ments:
Light Company (FPL, the licensee) for  
By email ....... pubcomment-ees.enrd@                                                                           associated with the proposed license usdoj.gov.                           By email ................. pubcomment-                amendments based on its evaluation of By mail ......... Assistant Attorney General,                                           ees.enrd@usdoj.gov.     the information provided in the U.S. DOJENRD, P.O.                 By mail ................... Assistant Attorney Gen-Box 7611, Washington, DC                                                                      licensees application and other eral, U.S. DOJ-20044-7611.                                                                                   available information. Accordingly, the ENRD, P.O. Box 7611, Washington,       NRC has prepared this Environmental wreier-aviles on DSK5TPTVN1PROD with NOTICES During the public comment period,                                                         DC 20044-7611.           Assessment (EA) and Final Finding of the proposed Consent Decree may be                                                                                  No Significant Impact (FONSI) for the examined and downloaded at this                               During the public comment period,                     proposed license amendments.
 
Department of Justice Web site: http://                    the settlement may be examined and                       ADDRESSES: Please refer to Docket ID www.usdoj.gov/enrd/Consent_                                downloaded at this Justice Department                    NRC-2014-0181 when contacting the Decrees.html. We will provide a paper                      Web site: http://www.usdoj.gov/enrd/                    NRC about the availability of copy of the proposed Consent Decree                        Consent_Decrees.html. We will provide                    information regarding this document.
operation of Turkey Point Nuclear  
upon written request and payment of                         a paper copy of the settlement upon                      You may access publicly available VerDate Mar<15>2010     14:56 Jul 30, 2014  Jkt 232001  PO 00000  Frm 00082    Fmt 4703    Sfmt 4703  E:\FR\FM\31JYN1.SGM  31JYN1
 
Generating Unit Nos. 3 and 4 (Turkey  
 
Point) located in Homestead, Miami-  
 
Dade County, Florida. The proposed  
 
amendments would increase the  
 
ultimate heat sink (UHS) water temperature limit specified in the Turkey Point Technical Specifications (TSs) from 100 degrees Fahrenheit (&deg;F) to 104&deg;F and add a surveillance requirement to monitor the UHS temperature more frequently if the UHS  
 
temperature approaches the new limit.  
 
The NRC did not identify any  
 
significant environmental impacts  
 
associated with the proposed license
 
amendments based on its evaluation of
 
the information provided in the
 
licensees application and other
 
available information. Accordingly, the
 
NRC has prepared this Environmental
 
Assessment (EA) and Final Finding of
 
No Significant Impact (FONSI) for the
 
proposed license amendments.
ADDRESSES: Please refer to Docket ID NRC-2014-0181 when contacting the
 
NRC about the availability of
 
information regarding this document.  
 
You may access publicly available VerDate Mar<15>2010 14:56 Jul 30, 2014Jkt 232001PO 00000Frm 00082Fmt 4703Sfmt 4703E:\FR\FM\31JYN1.SGM31JYN1 wreier-aviles on DSK5TPTVN1PROD with NOTICES 44465 Federal Register/Vol. 79, No. 147/Thursday, July 31, 2014/Notices information related to this document using any of the following methods:
*Federal Rulemaking Web site: Go to http://www.regulations.gov and search for Docket ID NRC-2011-0181. Address
 
questions about NRC dockets to Carol
 
Gallagher; telephone: 301-287-3422;
 
email: Carol.Gallagher@nrc.gov.
For technical questions, contact the
 
individual listed in the FORFURTHER INFORMATIONCONTACT section of this document.  
*NRCs Agencywide Documents Access and Management System (ADAMS): You may obtain publicly
 
available documents online in the NRC
 
Public Documents collection at http://www.nrc.gov/reading-rm/adams.html.  
 
To begin the search, select ADAMS
 
Public Documents and then select
 
Begin Web-based ADAMS Search.
For problems with ADAMS, please contact
 
the NRCs Public Document Room (PDR)
 
reference staff at 1-800-397-4209, 301-
 
415-4737, or by email to pdr.resource@
nrc.gov. The ADAMS accession number for each document referenced in this
 
notice (if that document is available in
 
ADAMS) is provided the first time that
 
a document is referenced. For the
 
convenience of the reader, the ADAMS
 
accession numbers are also provided in
 
a table in the Availability of
 
Documents section of this document.  
*NRCs PDR: You may examine and purchase copies of public documents at
 
the NRCs PDR, Room O1-F21, One
 
White Flint North, 11555 Rockville
 
Pike, Rockville, Maryland 20852. FORFURTHERINFORMATIONCONTACT
: Audrey L. Klett, Office of Nuclear
 
Reactor Regulation, U.S. Nuclear
 
Regulatory Commission, Washington, DC 20555-0001; telephone: 301-415-
 
0489; email:
Audrey.Klett@nrc.gov. SUPPLEMENTARYINFORMATION
: I. Introduction The NRC is considering issuance of amendments to Renewed Facility
 
Operating License Nos. DPR-31 and
 
DPR-41 issued to FPL for operation of
 
Turkey Point, located in Homestead, Miami-Dade County, Florida. As required by &sect;51.21 of Title 10 of the
 
Code of Federal Regulations (10 CFR Part 51.21), the NRC staff performed an
 
EA to document its findings related to
 
the proposed license amendments. FPL submitted its license amendment request by letter dated July 10, 2014 (ADAMS Accession No. ML14196A006) and subsequently supplemented its application by letters dated July 17, 2014 (ADAMS Accession No.
ML14202A392), July 22, 2014 (ADAMS Accession Nos. ML14204A367 and ML14204A368), and July 24, 2014 (ADAMS Accession No. ML14206A853).
Based on information provided in FPLs
 
application and associated supplements, the NRC staffs independent review, and
 
the NRCs consultation with the U.S.  
 
Fish and Wildlife Service (FWS)
 
pursuant to section 7 of the Endangered
 
Species Act of 1973, as amended (ESA),
the NRC did not identify any significant
 
environmental impacts associated with
 
the proposed license amendments.
Based on the results of the EA documented herein, the NRC is issuing
 
this final FONSI, in accordance with 10
 
CFR 51.32, for the proposed license
 
amendments.
II. Environmental Assessment
 
Plant Site and Environs The Turkey Point site encompasses 11,000 acres (ac) (4,450 hectares (ha)) in
 
Miami-Dade County, Florida. The site
 
lies 25 miles (mi) (40 kilometers [km])
 
south of Miami, Florida, and the nearest
 
city limits are Florida City, which lies
 
8 mi (13 km) to the west, Homestead, which lies 4.5 mi (7 km) to the
 
northwest, and Key Largo, which lies 10
 
mi (16 km) south of the Turkey Point
 
site. The Turkey Point site is bordered
 
to the east by Biscayne National Park, to
 
the north by Homestead Bayfront Park
 
and a portion of Biscayne National Park, and on the west and south by FPLs
 
13,000-ac (5,260-ha) Everglades
 
Mitigation Bank. The Turkey Point site
 
includes five electric generating units.  
 
Units 1, 2, and 5 are fossil-fueled
 
generating units and are not covered by
 
the proposed licensing action; Units 3
 
and 4 are nuclear generating units. Each
 
nuclear reactor is a Westinghouse
 
pressurized light-water reactor that
 
generates electricity via three steam
 
generators that produce steam that turns
 
turbines. The site features a 6,100-ac
 
(2,500-ha) closed cooling canal system (CCS) that cools heated water
 
discharged by Units 1 through 4. Unit 5
 
uses mechanical draft cooling towers for
 
cooling, draws makeup water from the
 
Upper Floridan Aquifer, and discharges
 
blowdown to the CCS. The five units
 
and supporting equipment (excluding
 
the CCS) occupy approximately 130 ac
 
(53 ha). The U.S. Atomic Energy Commission (AEC), the NRCs predecessor agency, and the NRC have previously conducted
 
environmental reviews of Turkey Point
 
in several documents, and the
 
descriptions therein continue to
 
accurately depict the Turkey Point site
 
and environs. Those documents include
 
the AECs July 1972 Final
 
Environmental Statement (FES); the
 
NRCs January 2002 Generic
 
Environmental Impact Statement for License Renewal of Nuclear Plants:
Regarding Turkey Point Units 3 and 4
 
Final Report (NUREG-1437, Supplement 5) (ADAMS Accession No.  
 
ML020280236); and the NRCs March
 
2012 environmental assessment and
 
final FONSI for the Turkey Point
 
extended power uprate (EPU) (ADAMS
 
Accession No. ML12074A251).
Identification of the Proposed Action The proposed action would increase the UHS water temperature limit
 
specified in the Turkey Point TSs and
 
add a surveillance requirement to
 
monitor the UHS temperature more
 
frequently if the UHS temperature
 
approaches the new limit. The proposed
 
action is in accordance with the
 
licensees application dated July 10, 2014, as supplemented by letters dated
 
July 17, July 22 (two letters), and July
 
24, 2014.
More specifically, the proposed action would amend Appendix A of Turkey
 
Points Renewed Facility Operating
 
Licenses in order to revise the UHS
 
temperature limit set forth in TS
 
Limiting Operating Condition (LOC) 3/
4.7.4 from 100
&deg;F to 104 &deg;F. The CCS serves as the UHS for the Intake Cooling
 
Water (ICW) system and provides the
 
coolant for the Circulating Water (CW) system. The CW system provides
 
cooling water to the main plant
 
condensers, and the ICW system
 
removes heat loads from the Component
 
Cooling Water (CCW) system during
 
normal and accident conditions to
 
support both reactor and containment
 
heat removal requirements as well as
 
spent fuel cooling requirements.
Currently, TS LOC 3/4.7.4 includes a Surveillance Requirement (SR) that
 
necessitates the licensee to verify the
 
UHS (CCS) temperature once every 24-
 
hour period and confirm that the
 
average supply water temperature is
 
within the 100
&deg;F limit. The proposed license amendments would modify the
 
SR to require the licensee to verify the
 
average supply water temperature to be
 
within the new TS limit at least once
 
per 24 hours, and once per hour when
 
the water temperature exceeds 100
&deg;F. FPL monitors the UHS (CCS)
 
temperature at a point in the ICW
 
system piping going into the inlet of the
 
CCW Heat Exchangers.
The license amendment would require the licensee to place both units
 
in at least hot standby within 12 hours
 
and cold shutdown within the next 30
 
hours if the UHS exceeds 104
&deg;F. The proposed TS revisions would not result in or require any physical changes
 
to Turkey Point systems, structures, or
 
components, including those intended
 
for the prevention of accidents. If VerDate Mar<15>2010 14:56 Jul 30, 2014Jkt 232001PO 00000Frm 00083Fmt 4703Sfmt 4703E:\FR\FM\31JYN1.SGM31JYN1 wreier-aviles on DSK5TPTVN1PROD with NOTICES 44466 Federal Register/Vol. 79, No. 147/Thursday, July 31, 2014/Notices approved, the LAR would be effective from the date of NRC approval through
 
the expiration dates of the renewed
 
facility operating licenses (i.e., through
 
2032 for Unit 3 and 2033 for Unit 4).
The Need for the Proposed Action The proposed action is needed to provide FPL with additional operational
 
flexibility during periods when high air
 
temperatures, low rainfall, and other
 
factors contribute to conditions
 
resulting in a UHS temperature in
 
excess of 100
&deg;F that would otherwise necessitate FPL to place Turkey Point in
 
cold shutdown. In its application, FPL
 
states that loss of load and voltage
 
control resulting from shutdown during
 
periods of high summer demand could
 
result in impacts to grid reliability. UHS
 
temperatures have recently approached
 
and exceeded the 100
&deg;F TS limit on several occasions. On July 20, 2014, the
 
NRC approved a notice of enforcement
 
discretion (NOED), which allows the
 
UHS temperature to exceed 100
&deg;F up to 103 &deg;F for a period of no more than 10 days, as well as several other NOED exit
 
criteria. The NRC documented the
 
NOED in a letter to FPL dated July 23, 2014 (ADAMS Accession No.
 
ML14204A652).
Environmental Impacts of the Proposed Action As part of the original licensing review for Turkey Point, the AEC
 
published an FES in July 1972 that
 
evaluates potential environmental impacts associated with the operation of
 
Turkey Point over its initial 40-year
 
operating period (1972-2012 for Unit 3
 
and 1973-2013 for Unit 4). In 2002, the
 
NRC evaluated the environmental
 
impacts of operating Turkey Point for an
 
additional 20 years beyond the original
 
operating license (i.e., through 2032 for
 
Unit 3 and 2033 for Unit 4) and  
 
predicted that the environmental
 
impacts of license renewal were small
 
for all environmental resources.
 
NUREG-1437, Supplement 5 provides
 
that assessment. In 2012, the NRC
 
evaluated the impacts of a then-
 
proposed EPU at Turkey Point that
 
authorized the facility to increase the
 
maximum power level from 2300
 
megawatts thermal (MWt) to 2644 MWt
 
for each unit. The NRCs March 2012 EA
 
and final FONSI provide that
 
assessment.
As previously discussed, the proposed action would not result in or
 
require any physical changes to Turkey
 
Point systems, structures, or
 
components, including those intended
 
for the prevention of accidents. Further, the proposed license amendments
 
involve TS changes that would only result in changes in procedural and operational aspects undertaken by FPL
 
personnel for monitoring and
 
maintaining the UHS temperature limit
 
as measured at the ICW system piping
 
going into the inlet of the CCW Heat
 
Exchangers. Thus, FPLs workforce
 
would not change, and the regular
 
operations workforce would otherwise
 
be unaffected by the proposed action.
 
Based on the above and the available
 
information reviewed by the staff, the
 
NRC concludes that the proposed action
 
would result in no significant impact on
 
land use, visual resources, air quality, noise, the geologic environment, groundwater resources, terrestrial
 
resources, historic and cultural
 
resources, socioeconomic conditions
 
including minority and low income
 
populations (environmental justice), or
 
waste generation and management
 
activities. Therefore, this environmental
 
assessment does not prevent any further
 
evaluation of the operational impacts on
 
these environmental resources. The
 
NRC previously assessed the
 
environmental impacts of continued
 
operations of Turkey Point in NUREG-
 
1437, Supplement 5 and the EA and
 
final FONSI for the EPU, and
 
implementation of the proposed license  
 
amendments would not result in any
 
impacts beyond those already
 
characterized in these documents.  
 
Accordingly, this environmental
 
assessment focuses on the
 
environmental resources that could be
 
affected by the change in the CCS
 
thermal limit: Surface water resources, aquatic resources, and Federally-
 
protected species and habitats.
 
Radiological impacts are also addressed.
The details of the NRC staffs safety evaluation will be separately provided
 
in the license amendment package
 
issued to approve the license
 
amendment, if granted.
Nonradiological Impacts
 
Surface Water Resources The Turkey Point site lies on the shore of Biscayne Bay. South of the site, Mangrove Point divides the bay from
 
Card Sound. Biscayne Bay and Card
 
Sound are shallow, subtropical estuarine waters located between the Atlantic coast mainland and a grouping of barrier islands that form the northernmost Florida Keys. The Atlantic Ocean lies beyond the barrier islands.
The Intracoastal Waterway traverses
 
Biscayne Bay and Card Sound, and a
 
barge passage runs from the Intracoastal
 
Waterway to the non-nuclear units on
 
the Turkey Point site.
In addition to these offsite waters, the site includes several manmade surface waters, the most significant of which is the CCS. The CCS spans a 6,100-ac
 
(2,500-ha) area (4,370 ac (1,770 ha) of
 
surface water) spread over a 5-mi by 2-
 
mi (8-km by 3.2-km) area. The system
 
includes 168 mi (270 km) of earthen
 
canals with an average depth of 2.8 ft
 
(0.8 km) and contains approximately 4
 
billion gallons (12,300 acre-feet) of
 
water. The Turkey Point units (both
 
nuclear Units 3 and 4 and fossil-fueled
 
Units 1 and 2) use the CCS like a
 
radiator and, as previously mentioned, the CCS serves as the UHS for Units 3
 
and 4. Heated water discharges into the
 
CCS at one end, flows through the canal
 
system, and is withdrawn from the other
 
end for reuse as cooling water. The
 
heated discharge effluent is distributed
 
to 32 feeder canals. Water in the feeder
 
canals flows south and discharges into
 
a single collector canal that distributes
 
water to six return canals. Water in the
 
return canals flows north to the plant
 
intake. The entire circuit that water
 
travels from plant discharge back to
 
plant intake is 13.2 mi (21.2 km), and
 
transit time through the system is
 
approximately 44 hours. Water flows
 
attributable to Units 3 and 4 amount to
 
approximately 1.0 million gallons per
 
minute. Temperature rise across the  
 
plant (from intake to discharge) averages
 
15 to 30 &deg;F depending on the number of fossil and nuclear units in operation, unit load, and various other factors. The
 
average intake temperature is 2.5
&deg;F above the average ambient air
 
temperature. Rainfall, stormwater
 
runoff, and groundwater exchange
 
replace evaporative losses.
The Florida Department of Environmental Protection (FDEP) has
 
issued FPL a No Discharge National
 
Pollutant Discharge Elimination System (NPDES) permit (No. FL0001562) to
 
operate the CCS as an industrial
 
wastewater facility. Accordingly, the
 
CCS does not discharge directly to fresh
 
or marine surface waters. The proposed
 
action would not require FPL to request
 
modifications to the NPDES permit
 
because the plant discharge limits
 
would not change. Plant discharge
 
limits are not intake-temperature
 
limited; rather, they are a function of the  
 
quantity of heat rejected to the CCS
 
during plant operation.
Under the proposed action, the CCS could experience temperatures between
 
100 &deg;F and 104
&deg;F at the TS monitoring location near the north end of the
 
system for short durations during
 
periods of peak summer air
 
temperatures and low rainfall. Such
 
conditions may not be experienced at all
 
depending on site and weather conditions. Temperature increases
 
would also increase CCS water VerDate Mar<15>2010 14:56 Jul 30, 2014Jkt 232001PO 00000Frm 00084Fmt 4703Sfmt 4703E:\FR\FM\31JYN1.SGM31JYN1 wreier-aviles on DSK5TPTVN1PROD with NOTICES 44467 Federal Register/Vol. 79, No. 147/Thursday, July 31, 2014/Notices evaporation rates and result in higher salinity levels. This effect would also be
 
temporary and short in duration because
 
salinity would again decrease upon
 
natural freshwater recharge of the
 
system (i.e., through rainfall, stormwater
 
runoff, and groundwater exchange). No
 
other onsite or offsite waters would be
 
affected by the proposed UHS
 
temperature limit increase.
Because the proposed action would only affect the CCS, and the CCS is a
 
manmade closed cycle cooling system, the NRC concludes that the proposed
 
action would not result in significant
 
impacts to surface water resources.
Aquatic Resources As determined in the previous section, the CCS is the only surface
 
water that would be affected by the proposed action. Accordingly, this
 
section only addresses aquatic resources
 
in the CCS.
The CCS supports a variety of aquatic species typical of shallow, subtropical
 
waters, including phytoplankton, zooplankton, marine algae, rooted
 
plants, crabs, and estuarine fish.
 
Because of high water temperatures and
 
salinity content of the CCS, the resident
 
fish assemblage is dominated by species
 
adapted to living in harsh conditions, such as sheepshead minnow
 
(Cyprinodon variegatus) and several Fundulus species. The CCS is owner-controlled and closed to the public;
 
thus, fish and other aquatic biota in the
 
CCS do not carry any commercial or
 
recreational value.
Because aquatic organisms in the cooling canal system are unable to travel
 
to or from Biscayne Bay, Card Sound, or
 
any other natural water body, changes to
 
the conditions within the CCS would
 
not affect any aquatic populations in the
 
surrounding natural aquatic habitats of
 
Biscayne Bay, Card Sound, or the
 
Atlantic Ocean. Therefore, the NRC staff
 
concludes that the proposed action
 
would result in no significant impact to
 
aquatic resources.
Federally Protected Species and Habitats The Turkey Point site is home to a resident population of Federally-
 
threatened American crocodiles
 
(Crocodylus acutus
). Crocodiles discovered and colonized the Turkey
 
Point CCS following plant construction
 
in the 1970s, and the site now hosts
 
approximately one-third to one-half of
 
the United States breeding population.
 
In 1977, the FWS designated an area of
 
Florida that includes the majority of the
 
Turkey Point site (including the CCS) as
 
critical habitat for the species under the
 
ESA. FPL maintains a crocodile management plan that prescribes how CCS maintenance procedures shall be
 
conducted to minimize nest, hatchling, or adult disturbance. FPL also maintains
 
a crocodile monitoring program to
 
document breeding success and survival
 
on the site.
As a Federal agency, the NRC must comply with the ESA as part of any
 
action it authorizes, funds, or carries
 
out, such as the proposed action
 
evaluated in this environmental
 
assessment. Under ESA section 7, the
 
NRC must consult with the FWS and the National Marine Fisheries Service, as appropriate, to ensure that the proposed
 
agency action is not likely to jeopardize
 
the continued existence of any
 
endangered or threatened species or
 
result in the destruction or adverse
 
modification of designated critical
 
habitat. The ESA and the regulations
 
that implement ESA section 7 (50 CFR
 
Part 402) describe the consultation
 
process that Federal agencies must
 
follow in support of agency actions.
Based on a review of the proposed action, the NRC staff has determined
 
that the American crocodile is the only
 
Federally-listed species that has the


potential to be affected by the proposed  
Federal Register / Vol. 79, No. 147 / Thursday, July 31, 2014 / Notices                                          44465 information related to this document                    (ADAMS Accession No. ML14206A853).                    License Renewal of Nuclear Plants:
using any of the following methods:                      Based on information provided in FPLs                Regarding Turkey Point Units 3 and 4
* Federal Rulemaking Web site: Go to                  application and associated supplements,              Final Report (NUREG-1437, http://www.regulations.gov and search                    the NRC staffs independent review, and              Supplement 5) (ADAMS Accession No.
for Docket ID NRC-2011-0181. Address                    the NRCs consultation with the U.S.                  ML020280236); and the NRCs March questions about NRC dockets to Carol                    Fish and Wildlife Service (FWS)                      2012 environmental assessment and Gallagher; telephone: 301-287-3422;                      pursuant to section 7 of the Endangered              final FONSI for the Turkey Point email: Carol.Gallagher@nrc.gov. For                      Species Act of 1973, as amended (ESA),                extended power uprate (EPU) (ADAMS technical questions, contact the                        the NRC did not identify any significant              Accession No. ML12074A251).
individual listed in the FOR FURTHER                    environmental impacts associated with                Identification of the Proposed Action INFORMATION CONTACT section of this                      the proposed license amendments.
document.                                                  Based on the results of the EA                        The proposed action would increase
* NRCs Agencywide Documents                          documented herein, the NRC is issuing                the UHS water temperature limit Access and Management System                            this final FONSI, in accordance with 10              specified in the Turkey Point TSs and (ADAMS): You may obtain publicly                        CFR 51.32, for the proposed license                  add a surveillance requirement to available documents online in the NRC                    amendments.                                          monitor the UHS temperature more Public Documents collection at http://                                                                        frequently if the UHS temperature II. Environmental Assessment                          approaches the new limit. The proposed www.nrc.gov/reading-rm/adams.html.
To begin the search, select ADAMS                      Plant Site and Environs                              action is in accordance with the Public Documents and then select                                                                            licensees application dated July 10, The Turkey Point site encompasses                  2014, as supplemented by letters dated Begin Web-based ADAMS Search. For                    11,000 acres (ac) (4,450 hectares (ha)) in problems with ADAMS, please contact                                                                            July 17, July 22 (two letters), and July Miami-Dade County, Florida. The site                  24, 2014.
the NRCs Public Document Room (PDR)                    lies 25 miles (mi) (40 kilometers [km])
reference staff at 1-800-397-4209, 301-                                                                          More specifically, the proposed action south of Miami, Florida, and the nearest              would amend Appendix A of Turkey 415-4737, or by email to pdr.resource@                  city limits are Florida City, which lies              Points Renewed Facility Operating nrc.gov. The ADAMS accession number                      8 mi (13 km) to the west, Homestead,                  Licenses in order to revise the UHS for each document referenced in this                    which lies 4.5 mi (7 km) to the                      temperature limit set forth in TS notice (if that document is available in                northwest, and Key Largo, which lies 10              Limiting Operating Condition (LOC) 3/
ADAMS) is provided the first time that                  mi (16 km) south of the Turkey Point                  4.7.4 from 100 &deg;F to 104 &deg;F. The CCS a document is referenced. For the                        site. The Turkey Point site is bordered              serves as the UHS for the Intake Cooling convenience of the reader, the ADAMS                    to the east by Biscayne National Park, to            Water (ICW) system and provides the accession numbers are also provided in                  the north by Homestead Bayfront Park                  coolant for the Circulating Water (CW) a table in the Availability of                        and a portion of Biscayne National Park,              system. The CW system provides Documents section of this document.                    and on the west and south by FPLs                    cooling water to the main plant
* NRCs PDR: You may examine and                      13,000-ac (5,260-ha) Everglades                      condensers, and the ICW system purchase copies of public documents at                  Mitigation Bank. The Turkey Point site                removes heat loads from the Component the NRCs PDR, Room O1-F21, One                          includes five electric generating units.              Cooling Water (CCW) system during White Flint North, 11555 Rockville                      Units 1, 2, and 5 are fossil-fueled                  normal and accident conditions to Pike, Rockville, Maryland 20852.                        generating units and are not covered by              support both reactor and containment FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:                        the proposed licensing action; Units 3                heat removal requirements as well as Audrey L. Klett, Office of Nuclear                      and 4 are nuclear generating units. Each              spent fuel cooling requirements.
Reactor Regulation, U.S. Nuclear                        nuclear reactor is a Westinghouse                        Currently, TS LOC 3/4.7.4 includes a Regulatory Commission, Washington,                      pressurized light-water reactor that                  Surveillance Requirement (SR) that DC 20555-0001; telephone: 301-415-                      generates electricity via three steam                necessitates the licensee to verify the 0489; email: Audrey.Klett@nrc.gov.                      generators that produce steam that turns              UHS (CCS) temperature once every 24-SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:                              turbines. The site features a 6,100-ac                hour period and confirm that the (2,500-ha) closed cooling canal system                average supply water temperature is I. Introduction                                          (CCS) that cools heated water                        within the 100 &deg;F limit. The proposed The NRC is considering issuance of                    discharged by Units 1 through 4. Unit 5              license amendments would modify the amendments to Renewed Facility                          uses mechanical draft cooling towers for              SR to require the licensee to verify the Operating License Nos. DPR-31 and                        cooling, draws makeup water from the                  average supply water temperature to be DPR-41 issued to FPL for operation of                    Upper Floridan Aquifer, and discharges                within the new TS limit at least once Turkey Point, located in Homestead,                      blowdown to the CCS. The five units                  per 24 hours, and once per hour when Miami-Dade County, Florida. As                          and supporting equipment (excluding                  the water temperature exceeds 100 &deg;F.
required by &sect; 51.21 of Title 10 of the                  the CCS) occupy approximately 130 ac                  FPL monitors the UHS (CCS)
Code of Federal Regulations (10 CFR                      (53 ha).                                              temperature at a point in the ICW Part 51.21), the NRC staff performed an                    The U.S. Atomic Energy Commission                  system piping going into the inlet of the EA to document its findings related to                  (AEC), the NRCs predecessor agency,                  CCW Heat Exchangers.
the proposed license amendments. FPL                    and the NRC have previously conducted                    The license amendment would submitted its license amendment                          environmental reviews of Turkey Point                require the licensee to place both units wreier-aviles on DSK5TPTVN1PROD with NOTICES request by letter dated July 10, 2014                    in several documents, and the                        in at least hot standby within 12 hours (ADAMS Accession No. ML14196A006)                        descriptions therein continue to                      and cold shutdown within the next 30 and subsequently supplemented its                        accurately depict the Turkey Point site              hours if the UHS exceeds 104 &deg;F.
application by letters dated July 17,                    and environs. Those documents include                    The proposed TS revisions would not 2014 (ADAMS Accession No.                                the AECs July 1972 Final                            result in or require any physical changes ML14202A392), July 22, 2014 (ADAMS                      Environmental Statement (FES); the                    to Turkey Point systems, structures, or Accession Nos. ML14204A367 and                          NRCs January 2002 Generic                            components, including those intended ML14204A368), and July 24, 2014                          Environmental Impact Statement for                    for the prevention of accidents. If VerDate Mar<15>2010  14:56 Jul 30, 2014  Jkt 232001  PO 00000  Frm 00083  Fmt 4703  Sfmt 4703  E:\FR\FM\31JYN1.SGM  31JYN1


action. Pursuant to ESA section 7, NRC  
44466                          Federal Register / Vol. 79, No. 147 / Thursday, July 31, 2014 / Notices approved, the LAR would be effective                    result in changes in procedural and                  waters, the most significant of which is from the date of NRC approval through                    operational aspects undertaken by FPL                the CCS. The CCS spans a 6,100-ac the expiration dates of the renewed                      personnel for monitoring and                          (2,500-ha) area (4,370 ac (1,770 ha) of facility operating licenses (i.e., through              maintaining the UHS temperature limit                surface water) spread over a 5-mi by 2-2032 for Unit 3 and 2033 for Unit 4).                    as measured at the ICW system piping                  mi (8-km by 3.2-km) area. The system going into the inlet of the CCW Heat                  includes 168 mi (270 km) of earthen The Need for the Proposed Action Exchangers. Thus, FPLs workforce                    canals with an average depth of 2.8 ft The proposed action is needed to                      would not change, and the regular                    (0.8 km) and contains approximately 4 provide FPL with additional operational                  operations workforce would otherwise                  billion gallons (12,300 acre-feet) of flexibility during periods when high air                be unaffected by the proposed action.                water. The Turkey Point units (both temperatures, low rainfall, and other                    Based on the above and the available                  nuclear Units 3 and 4 and fossil-fueled factors contribute to conditions                        information reviewed by the staff, the                Units 1 and 2) use the CCS like a resulting in a UHS temperature in                        NRC concludes that the proposed action               radiator and, as previously mentioned, excess of 100 &deg;F that would otherwise                    would result in no significant impact on              the CCS serves as the UHS for Units 3 necessitate FPL to place Turkey Point in                land use, visual resources, air quality,              and 4. Heated water discharges into the cold shutdown. In its application, FPL                  noise, the geologic environment,                      CCS at one end, flows through the canal states that loss of load and voltage                    groundwater resources, terrestrial                    system, and is withdrawn from the other control resulting from shutdown during                  resources, historic and cultural                      end for reuse as cooling water. The periods of high summer demand could                      resources, socioeconomic conditions                  heated discharge effluent is distributed result in impacts to grid reliability. UHS              including minority and low income                    to 32 feeder canals. Water in the feeder temperatures have recently approached                    populations (environmental justice), or              canals flows south and discharges into and exceeded the 100 &deg;F TS limit on                      waste generation and management                      a single collector canal that distributes several occasions. On July 20, 2014, the                activities. Therefore, this environmental            water to six return canals. Water in the NRC approved a notice of enforcement                    assessment does not prevent any further              return canals flows north to the plant discretion (NOED), which allows the                      evaluation of the operational impacts on              intake. The entire circuit that water UHS temperature to exceed 100 &deg;F up to                  these environmental resources. The                    travels from plant discharge back to 103 &deg;F for a period of no more than 10                  NRC previously assessed the                          plant intake is 13.2 mi (21.2 km), and days, as well as several other NOED exit                environmental impacts of continued                    transit time through the system is criteria. The NRC documented the                        operations of Turkey Point in NUREG-                  approximately 44 hours. Water flows NOED in a letter to FPL dated July 23,                                                                        attributable to Units 3 and 4 amount to 1437, Supplement 5 and the EA and 2014 (ADAMS Accession No.                                                                                      approximately 1.0 million gallons per final FONSI for the EPU, and ML14204A652).                                                                                                  minute. Temperature rise across the implementation of the proposed license Environmental Impacts of the Proposed                    amendments would not result in any                    plant (from intake to discharge) averages Action                                                  impacts beyond those already                          15 to 30 &deg;F depending on the number of characterized in these documents.                    fossil and nuclear units in operation, As part of the original licensing                                                                            unit load, and various other factors. The review for Turkey Point, the AEC                        Accordingly, this environmental assessment focuses on the                            average intake temperature is 2.5 &deg;F published an FES in July 1972 that                                                                            above the average ambient air evaluates potential environmental                        environmental resources that could be affected by the change in the CCS                    temperature. Rainfall, stormwater impacts associated with the operation of                                                                      runoff, and groundwater exchange Turkey Point over its initial 40-year                    thermal limit: Surface water resources, aquatic resources, and Federally-                    replace evaporative losses.
operating period (1972-2012 for Unit 3                                                                            The Florida Department of and 1973-2013 for Unit 4). In 2002, the                  protected species and habitats.
Environmental Protection (FDEP) has NRC evaluated the environmental                          Radiological impacts are also addressed.
The details of the NRC staffs safety              issued FPL a No Discharge National impacts of operating Turkey Point for an                                                                      Pollutant Discharge Elimination System additional 20 years beyond the original                  evaluation will be separately provided (NPDES) permit (No. FL0001562) to operating license (i.e., through 2032 for                in the license amendment package operate the CCS as an industrial Unit 3 and 2033 for Unit 4) and                          issued to approve the license wastewater facility. Accordingly, the predicted that the environmental                        amendment, if granted.
CCS does not discharge directly to fresh impacts of license renewal were small                    Nonradiological Impacts                              or marine surface waters. The proposed for all environmental resources.                                                                              action would not require FPL to request NUREG-1437, Supplement 5 provides                        Surface Water Resources modifications to the NPDES permit that assessment. In 2012, the NRC                           The Turkey Point site lies on the                  because the plant discharge limits evaluated the impacts of a then-                        shore of Biscayne Bay. South of the site,            would not change. Plant discharge proposed EPU at Turkey Point that                        Mangrove Point divides the bay from                  limits are not intake-temperature authorized the facility to increase the                  Card Sound. Biscayne Bay and Card                    limited; rather, they are a function of the maximum power level from 2300                            Sound are shallow, subtropical                        quantity of heat rejected to the CCS megawatts thermal (MWt) to 2644 MWt                      estuarine waters located between the                  during plant operation.
for each unit. The NRCs March 2012 EA                  Atlantic coast mainland and a grouping                  Under the proposed action, the CCS and final FONSI provide that                            of barrier islands that form the                      could experience temperatures between assessment.                                              northernmost Florida Keys. The Atlantic              100 &deg;F and 104 &deg;F at the TS monitoring wreier-aviles on DSK5TPTVN1PROD with NOTICES As previously discussed, the                          Ocean lies beyond the barrier islands.                location near the north end of the proposed action would not result in or                  The Intracoastal Waterway traverses                  system for short durations during require any physical changes to Turkey                  Biscayne Bay and Card Sound, and a                    periods of peak summer air Point systems, structures, or                            barge passage runs from the Intracoastal              temperatures and low rainfall. Such components, including those intended                    Waterway to the non-nuclear units on                  conditions may not be experienced at all for the prevention of accidents. Further,                the Turkey Point site.                                depending on site and weather the proposed license amendments                            In addition to these offsite waters, the          conditions. Temperature increases involve TS changes that would only                      site includes several manmade surface                would also increase CCS water VerDate Mar<15>2010  14:56 Jul 30, 2014  Jkt 232001  PO 00000  Frm 00084  Fmt 4703  Sfmt 4703  E:\FR\FM\31JYN1.SGM  31JYN1


staff consulted with FWS staff at the  
Federal Register / Vol. 79, No. 147 / Thursday, July 31, 2014 / Notices                                            44467 evaporation rates and result in higher                  management plan that prescribes how                  proposed action would not have a salinity levels. This effect would also be              CCS maintenance procedures shall be                  significant adverse effect on the temporary and short in duration because                  conducted to minimize nest, hatchling,                probability of an accident occurring or salinity would again decrease upon                      or adult disturbance. FPL also maintains              result in an increased radiological natural freshwater recharge of the                      a crocodile monitoring program to                    hazard beyond those analyzed in the system (i.e., through rainfall, stormwater              document breeding success and survival                licensees Updated Final Safety runoff, and groundwater exchange). No                    on the site.                                          Analysis Report. The proposed action other onsite or offsite waters would be                    As a Federal agency, the NRC must                  would result in no changes to radiation affected by the proposed UHS                            comply with the ESA as part of any                    levels or the types or quantities of temperature limit increase.                              action it authorizes, funds, or carries              radioactive effluents (gaseous or liquid)
Because the proposed action would                    out, such as the proposed action                      that affect radiation exposures to only affect the CCS, and the CCS is a                    evaluated in this environmental                      members of the public or plant workers.
manmade closed cycle cooling system,                    assessment. Under ESA section 7, the                  No changes or different types of the NRC concludes that the proposed                      NRC must consult with the FWS and the                radiological impacts would be expected action would not result in significant                  National Marine Fisheries Service, as                from the proposed action. Therefore, the impacts to surface water resources.                      appropriate, to ensure that the proposed              radiological impacts of granting the agency action is not likely to jeopardize            license amendments would result in no Aquatic Resources the continued existence of any                        significant impact on the radiological As determined in the previous                        endangered or threatened species or                  environment.
section, the CCS is the only surface                    result in the destruction or adverse water that would be affected by the                      modification of designated critical                  Cumulative Impacts proposed action. Accordingly, this                      habitat. The ESA and the regulations section only addresses aquatic resources                                                                          The Council on Environmental that implement ESA section 7 (50 CFR in the CCS.                                                                                                    Quality defines cumulative impacts Part 402) describe the consultation The CCS supports a variety of aquatic                                                                      under the National Environmental process that Federal agencies must species typical of shallow, subtropical                                                                        Policy Act of 1969, as amended (NEPA) follow in support of agency actions.
waters, including phytoplankton,                            Based on a review of the proposed                  as the impact on the environment which zooplankton, marine algae, rooted                        action, the NRC staff has determined                  results from the incremental impact of plants, crabs, and estuarine fish.                      that the American crocodile is the only              the action when added to other past, Because of high water temperatures and                  Federally-listed species that has the                present, and reasonably foreseeable salinity content of the CCS, the resident                potential to be affected by the proposed              future actions regardless of what agency fish assemblage is dominated by species                  action. Pursuant to ESA section 7, NRC                (Federal or non-Federal) or person adapted to living in harsh conditions,                  staff consulted with FWS staff at the                 undertakes such other actions (40 CFR such as sheepshead minnow                                South Florida Ecological Services Office              Part 1508.7). For the purposes of this (Cyprinodon variegatus) and several                      in Vero Beach, Florida. The NRC staff                analysis, past actions are related to the Fundulus species. The CCS is owner-                      prepared a biological assessment                      resource conditions when Turkey Point controlled and closed to the public;                    (ADAMS Accession No. ML14206A806)                    was licensed and constructed; present thus, fish and other aquatic biota in the                that considers the potential for the                  actions are related to the resource CCS do not carry any commercial or                      proposed action to reduce hatchling                  conditions during current operations; recreational value.                                      survival, alter crocodile growth rates,              and future actions are those that are Because aquatic organisms in the                      and reduce habitat availability and                  reasonably foreseeable through the cooling canal system are unable to travel                concludes that the proposed action is                expiration of Turkey Points renewed to or from Biscayne Bay, Card Sound, or                  not likely to adversely affect the                    facility operating licenses. In the any other natural water body, changes to                American crocodile and would have no                  preceding sections of this EA, the NRC the conditions within the CCS would                      effect on the species designated critical            has determined that the proposed action not affect any aquatic populations in the                habitat. Based on the NRC staffs                    has the potential to only affect surface surrounding natural aquatic habitats of                  biological assessment determinations,                water resources and aquatic resources in Biscayne Bay, Card Sound, or the                        the NRC concludes that the proposed                  the CCS and Federally protected species Atlantic Ocean. Therefore, the NRC staff                action would have no significant impact              and habitats (i.e., the sites resident concludes that the proposed action                      on Federally-protected species or                    population of American crocodiles and would result in no significant impact to                habitats.                                            its designated critical habitat). This EA aquatic resources.                                          In a July 25, 2014, letter (ADAMS                  also addresses radiological impacts of Accession No. ML14206A800) to FWS,                    the proposed action. Accordingly, this Federally Protected Species and                                                                                section only addresses the cumulative the NRC requested ESA section 7 Habitats                                                                                                      impacts that could result from the consultation.
The Turkey Point site is home to a                                                                          proposed action and other actions on resident population of Federally-                        Radiological Impacts                                  these resources. The proposed action threatened American crocodiles                            The proposed action would not result                would have no effect on the remaining (Crocodylus acutus). Crocodiles                          in or require any physical changes to                resources (i.e., land use, visual discovered and colonized the Turkey                      Turkey Point systems, structures, or                  resources, air quality, noise, the geologic Point CCS following plant construction                  components, including those intended                  environment, groundwater resources, wreier-aviles on DSK5TPTVN1PROD with NOTICES in the 1970s, and the site now hosts                    for the prevention of accidents because              terrestrial resources, historic and approximately one-third to one-half of                  the proposed license amendments                      cultural resources, socioeconomic the United States breeding population.                  involve TS changes that would only                    conditions including minority and low In 1977, the FWS designated an area of                  result in changes in procedural and                  income populations (environmental Florida that includes the majority of the                operational aspects undertaken by FPL                justice), and waste generation and Turkey Point site (including the CCS) as                personnel for monitoring and                          management activities), and thus, critical habitat for the species under the              maintaining the increased allowable                  cumulative impacts would not occur for ESA. FPL maintains a crocodile                          UHS temperature limit. Thus, the                      these environmental resources.
VerDate Mar<15>2010  14:56 Jul 30, 2014  Jkt 232001  PO 00000  Frm 00085  Fmt 4703  Sfmt 4703  E:\FR\FM\31JYN1.SGM  31JYN1


South Florida Ecological Services Office
44468                          Federal Register / Vol. 79, No. 147 / Thursday, July 31, 2014 / Notices The NRC staff has identified several                  from either the presence of higher algae              7. Submission of the COLA does not actions that may contribute to                          concentrations or the recent chemical                commit FPL to build two new nuclear cumulative effects; each of these actions                treatments.                                          units and does not constitute approval is described separately below.                                                                                of the proposal by the NRC; however, Aquifer Withdrawals submission of the COLA infers that the CCS Chemical Treatments                                    The CCS is situated above two                      construction and operation of the new In 2011, FPL began to notice                          aquifers: the shallower saltwater                    units is a reasonably foreseeable future increased blue green algae                              Biscayne Aquifer and the deeper                      action. The COLA will be evaluated on concentrations in the CCS. The                          brackish Floridan Aquifer. A confining                its merits, and the NRC will decide concentrations have steadily increased                  layer separates the two aquifers from                whether to grant the licenses after since that time. FPL has performed                      one another. Turkey Point, Unit 5 uses                considering and evaluating the engineering and environmental analyses                  the Floridan Aquifer for cooling water.              environmental and safety implications and believes that the presence of higher                The South Florida Water Management                    of the proposal. Environmental impacts than normal CCS algae concentrations                    District (SFWMD) recently granted FPL                of constructing and operating Turkey may be diminishing the CCSs heat                        approval to withdraw a portion                        Point, Units 6 and 7 will depend on transfer capabilities. FPL developed a                  (approximately 5 million gallons per                  their actual design characteristics, plan to gradually reduce algae                          day [MGD]) of the Unit 5 withdrawal                  construction practices, and power plant concentrations through controlled                        allowance for use in the CCS. FPL began              operations. These impacts will be chemical treatment of the CCS over the                  pumping Floridan Aquifer water into                  assessed by the NRC in a separate NEPA course of several weeks. On June 18,                    the CCS in early July. FPL has also                  document. The cumulative impacts 2014, FPL submitted a request to the                    received temporary approval to                        presented in this EA may differ from FDEP to approve the use of copper                        withdraw 30 MGD from the Biscayne                    those impacts assessed for the COLA.
sulfate, hydrogen peroxide, and a bio-                  Aquifer, though FPL has not yet used                  Potential impacts presented below have stimulant to treat the algae (letter                    this allowance.                                      been drawn from FPLs Turkey Point, contained in Appendix A of ADAMS                            FPL also anticipates the FDEP to issue            Units 6 and 7 Environmental Report, Accession No. ML14206A806). On June                      an Administrative Order requiring FPL                Revision 5 (ADAMS Accession No.
27, 2014, the FDEP approved FPLs                        to install up to six new wells that will              ML13357A435), and NRCs 2012 EA and treatment plan for a 90-day trial period                pump approximately 14 MGD of water                    final FONSI for the EPU.
(letter contained in Appendix A of                      from the Floridan Aquifer into the CCS.                  Of the environmental resources ADAMS Accession No. ML14206A806).                        Modeling performed by FPL consultants                affected by the proposed action, the The FDEP requested that during the 90-                  and the SFWMD indicates that in                      possible construction and operation of day treatment period, FPL monitor the                    approximately 2 years, the withdrawals                Units 6 and 7 only have the potential to CCS for total recoverable copper and                    would reduce the salinity of the CCS to              contribute to cumulative radiological dissolved oxygen and submit its results                  the equivalent of Biscayne Bay (about 34              impacts. Units 6 and 7 would not use to the FDEP. The FDEP also                              parts per thousand [ppt]). Such                      the CCS for cooling. Rather, Units 6 and recommended that FPL coordinate with                    withdrawals could also help moderate                  7 would have a closed-cycle cooling the Florida Fish and Wildlife                            water temperatures.                                  system with mechanical draft cooling Conservation Commission (FWC) due to                        The current and anticipated future                towers. The cooling towers would draw the presence of crocodiles in the cooling                aquifer withdrawals have the potential                makeup from Miami-Dade Water and system. The FWC provided its                            to contribute to cumulative effects on                Sewer Department reclaimed water and comments on FPLs treatment plan in a                    CCS surface water resources, CCS                      would discharge blowdown into deep letter dated July 1, 2014 (letter                        aquatic resources, and crocodiles.                    injection wells. Saltwater extracted from contained in Appendix A of ADAMS                        Because the CCS is a manmade closed                  Biscayne Bay subsurface sediment Accession No. ML14206A806).                              cycle cooling system, aquifer                        through radial collector wells proposed The CCS chemical treatments have                      withdrawals are not likely to have a                  to be built on the Turkey Point site the potential to contribute to cumulative                significant cumulative effect on surface              would serve as a secondary source of effects on CCS surface water resources,                  water resources. Aquifer withdrawals                  makeup water when a sufficient CCS aquatic resources, and the                          would result in beneficial impacts to                quantity and/or quality of reclaimed American crocodile. Because the CCS is                  CCS aquatic resources and the                        water is not available. Because Units 6 a manmade closed cycle cooling system,                  crocodiles inhabiting the Turkey Point                and 7 would not use the CCS, the treatment of the CCS is not likely to                    site. FPL anticipates that the                        proposed new units would not have a have a significant cumulative effect on                  withdrawals will reduce the salinity of              cumulative effect on CCS surface water surface water resources. Monitoring                      the CCS to about 34 ppt and could also                resources or CCS aquatic resources.
required by the FDEP will ensure                        help moderate CCS temperatures over                      Regarding crocodiles, potential adequate water quality throughout and                    the long term. Both of these effects                  impacts to this species and its critical following treatment. Monitoring will                    would create favorable conditions for                habitat will be addressed in a future also ensure that any unanticipated                      CCS aquatic biota and crocodiles, which              ESA section 7 consultation between the effects on the aquatic organisms that                    are currently tolerating an unusually                NRC and FWS. When considering inhabit the CCS are appropriately                        hot, hypersaline environment.                        cumulative impacts on Federally listed addressed. During the treatment period,                                                                        species, the ESAs implementing FPL has agreed to report any potentially                Turkey Point, Units 6 and 7                          regulations direct Federal agencies to wreier-aviles on DSK5TPTVN1PROD with NOTICES related fish kills in the CCS to the FWC.                Construction and Operation                            consider the effects of future State or No fish kills have been reported to date.                  In June 2009, FPL submitted a                      private activities, not involving Federal Regarding crocodiles, the NRCs July 25,                combined license application (COLA)                  activities, that are reasonably certain to 2014, biological assessment notes that                  (ADAMS Accession No. ML091830589)                    occur within the action area of the FPL has not observed any behavioral or                  to construct and operate two                          Federal action subject to consultation distributional changes or any other                      Westinghouse Advanced Passive 1000                    (50 CFR part 402.02; emphasis added).
noticeable differences that would                        (AP1000) pressurized-water reactors                  Accordingly, the NRC will not address indicate effects to crocodiles resulting                designated as Turkey Point, Units 6 and              cumulative impacts of Units 6 and 7 on VerDate Mar<15>2010  14:56 Jul 30, 2014  Jkt 232001  PO 00000  Frm 00086  Fmt 4703  Sfmt 4703  E:\FR\FM\31JYN1.SGM  31JYN1


in Vero Beach, Florida. The NRC staff  
Federal Register / Vol. 79, No. 147 / Thursday, July 31, 2014 / Notices                                          44469 the American crocodile in this EA                        10 CFR part 20 during all phases of                  action. The State official had no because the NRCs issuance of a license                  operations. Operation of Units 6 and 7                comments.
to construct and operate Units 6 and 7                  would require a similar radiation                        The NRC staff also coordinated with is a separate Federal activity that will                protection program, and the licensee                  the FWS pursuant to consultation under require future consultation.                            would be responsible for ensuring that                ESA section 7 during the staffs review Regarding cumulative radiological                    workers are not exposed to dose limits                of the proposed action. The consultation impacts, the NRC and Environmental                      above those specified in 10 CFR part 20.              is further discussed under the Protection Agency have developed                        Therefore, the NRC staff concludes that              Federally-Protected Species section of radiological dose limits for protection of              the cumulative radiological impacts to                this environmental assessment.
the public and workers that address the                  plant workers that could result from the cumulative effects of acute and long-                    combined operations of Turkey Point,                  III. Finding of No Significant Impact term exposure to radiation and                          Units 3 and 4 and the proposed new                      The NRC is considering issuing radioactive material. These dose limits                  Units 6 and 7 would result in no                      amendments for Renewed Facility are specified in 10 CFR part 20 and 40                  significant impact on the radiological                Operating License Nos. DPR-31 and CFR part 190.                                            environment.                                          DPR-41, issued to FPL for operation of The cumulative radiation dose to the                                                                        Turkey Point to increase the UHS water public and workers is required to be                    Cumulative Impacts Conclusion temperature limit specified in the within the regulations cited above. The                    The NRC staff considered the                      Turkey Point TSs from 100 &deg;F to 104 &deg;F public dose limit of 25 millirem (0.25                  cumulative impacts of CCS chemical                    and add an SR to monitor the UHS millisieverts) in 40 CFR part 190 applies                treatments, current and anticipated                  temperature more frequently if the UHS to all reactors that may be on a site and                future aquifer withdrawals, and the                  temperature approaches the new limit.
also includes any other nearby nuclear                  possible future construction and power reactor facilities. The NRC staff                                                                          On the basis of the EA included in operation of two new nuclear units on reviewed several years of radiation dose                                                                      Section II above and incorporated by the Turkey Point site. Based on the data contained in the licensees annual                                                                        reference in this finding, the NRC information presented in this section, radioactive effluent release reports for                                                                      concludes that the proposed action the NRC staff concludes that the Turkey Point, and the data demonstrate                                                                        would not have significant effects on the proposed action, in combination with that the dose to members of the public                                                                        quality of the human environment. The other cumulative actions, would result from radioactive effluents is within the                                                                      proposed action would result in no in no significant cumulative impacts on limits of 10 CFR part 20 and 40 CFR part                                                                      significant impacts on surface water the environment.
190. As previously indicated in the                                                                            resources, aquatic resources, or the Radiological Impacts section of this                Alternatives to the Proposed Action                  radiological environment. In addition, environmental assessment, the proposed                      As an alternative to the proposed                  the proposed action is not likely to action would result in no changes to                    action, the NRC staff considered denial              adversely affect any Federally-protected radiation levels or the types or                        of the proposed license amendments                    species or affect any designated critical quantities of radioactive effluents                      (i.e., the no-action alternative). Denial        habitat. The proposed action would also (gaseous or liquid) that affect radiation                of the application would result in no                not result in significant cumulative exposures to plant workers and                          change in current environmental                      impacts on any environmental members of the public.                                  conditions or impacts. However, denial                resources. The NRCs evaluation FPLs COLA for Units 6 and 7                          would result in reduced operational                  considered information provided in the contains an assessment of the radiation                  flexibility and could require FPL to                  licensees application and associated doses to members of the public from the                  derate or shutdown Turkey Point if the                supplements; the NRCs staff proposed new reactors and concludes                      UHS average supply water temperature                  independent review of other that doses would be within regulatory                    approaches or exceeds the 100 &deg;F TS                  environmental documents, and limits. The staff expects continued                      limit. In its application, FPL states that            coordination with the FWS pursuant to compliance with regulatory dose limits                  loss of load and voltage control resulting            consultation under ESA section 7.
during operation of Turkey Point, Units                  from such a shutdown during periods of                Section IV below lists the 3 and 4 under the proposed action.                      high summer demand could result in                    environmental documents related to the Therefore, the NRC staff concludes that                  impacts to grid reliability.                          proposed action and includes the cumulative radiological impacts to                                                                        information on the availability of these members of the public that could result                  Alternative Use of Resources                          documents. Based on its findings, the from the combined operations of Turkey                    The action does not involve the use of              NRC has decided not to prepare an Point, Units 3 and 4 and the proposed                    any different resources than those                    environmental impact statement for the new Units 6 and 7 would result in no                    previously considered in NUREG-1437,                 proposed action.
significant impact on the environment.                  Supplement 5 prepared for license                    IV. Availability of Documents Regarding radiation dose to workers,                  renewal of Turkey Point.
cumulative dose would only be                                                                                    The following table identifies the applicable for those workers that would                  Agencies and Persons Consulted                        environmental and other documents be engaged at both facilities (i.e., the                  On July 28, 2014, the NRC staff                     cited in this document and related to currently operating Units 3 and 4 and                    notified the Florida State official, Ms.              the NRCs FONSI. These documents are proposed new Units 6 and 7). For Units                  Cindy Becker, Chief of Bureau of                      available for public inspection online wreier-aviles on DSK5TPTVN1PROD with NOTICES 3 and 4, the licensee has a radiation                    Radiation Control, of the Florida                    through ADAMS at http://www.nrc.gov/
protection program that maintains                        Department of Health, regarding the                  reading-rm/adams.html or in person at worker doses within the dose limits in                  environmental impacts of the proposed                the NRCs PDR as described previously.
VerDate Mar<15>2010  14:56 Jul 30, 2014  Jkt 232001  PO 00000  Frm 00087  Fmt 4703  Sfmt 4703  E:\FR\FM\31JYN1.SGM  31JYN1


prepared a biological assessment (ADAMS Accession No. ML14206A806)
44470                          Federal Register / Vol. 79, No. 147 / Thursday, July 31, 2014 / Notices Adams Document                                                      Accession No.
 
Documents Related to License Amendment Request Florida Power & Light Company. License Amendment Request No. 231, Application to Revise Technical Specifications to Re-        ML14196A006 vise Ultimate Heat Sink Temperature Limit. Dated July 10, 2014.
that considers the potential for the
Florida Power & Light Company. License Amendment Request No. 231, Application to Revise Ultimate Heat Sink Tempera-            ML14202A392 ture LimitRequest for Emergency Approval. Dated July 17, 2014.
 
U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission. Turkey Point 3 and 4 Request for Additional InformationLAR231 (TAC MF4392 and             ML14203A614 MF4393). [1 of 2] Dated July 18, 2014.
proposed action to reduce hatchling survival, alter crocodile growth rates, and reduce habitat availability and
U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission. Turkey Point 3 and 4 Request for Additional InformationLAR231 (TAC MF4392 and              ML14203A618 MF4393). [2 of 2] Dated July 18, 2014.
 
Florida Power & Light Company. License Amendment Request No. 231, Application to Revise Ultimate Heat Sink Tempera-            ML14204A367 ture LimitSupplement 1, and Response to Request for Additional Information. Dated July 22, 2014.
concludes that the proposed action is
Florida Power & Light Company. Response to Request for Additional Information Regarding License Amendment Request No.          ML14204A368 231, Application to Revise Technical Specifications to Revise Ultimate Heat Sink Temperature Limit. Dated July 22, 2014.
 
U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission. Turkey Point 3 and 4 Request for Additional InformationLAR231 (TAC MF4392 and             ML14204A814 MF4393). Dated July 22, 2014.
not likely to adversely affect the
U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission. Notice of Enforcement Discretion for Florida Power & Light Company Regarding Turkey        ML14204A652 Point Nuclear Generating Unit Nos. 3 and 4 [NOED NO. 14-2-001]. Dated July 23, 2014.
 
Florida Power & Light Company. Response to Containment and Ventilation Branch Request for Additional Information, Re-          ML14206A853 garding License Amendment Request No. 231, Application to Revise Ultimate Heat Temperature Limit. Dated July 24, 2014.
American crocodile and would have no
Florida Power & Light Company. Turkey Point Nuclear Generating Unit Nos. 3 and 4Individual Notice of Consideration of          ML14204A129 Issuance of Amendments to Renewed Facility Operating Licenses, Proposed No Significant Hazards Consideration Deter-            (letter) mination, and Opportunity for Hearing (Exigent Circumstances) (TAC Nos. MF4392 and MF4293). Dated July 24, 2014.             ML14199A111 (enclosure)
 
U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission. Request to Reinitiate Informal Consultation for a Proposed License Amendment to In-        ML14206A800 crease the Ultimate Heat Sink Temperature Limit at Turkey Point Nuclear Generating Unit Nos. 3 and 4. Dated July 25, 2014.
effect on the species designated critical
U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission. Biological Assessment on the American Crocodile (Crocodylus acutus) for Turkey Point        ML14206A806 Nuclear Generating Unit Nos. 3 and 4 Proposed License Amendment to Increase the Ultimate Heat Sink Temperature Limit. Dated July 25, 2014.
 
Other Referenced Documents U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission. Generic Environmental Impact Statement for License Renewal of Nuclear Plants: Re-           ML020280236 garding Turkey Point Units 3 and 4Final Report (NUREG-1437, Supplement 5). Dated January 28, 2002.
habitat. Based on the NRC staffs
Florida Power & Light Company. Proposed Turkey Point Units 6 & 7, Project No. 763, Application for Combined License for        ML091830589 Turkey Point Units 6 and 7. Dated June 30, 2009.
 
U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission. Final Environmental Assessment and Finding of No Significant Impact Related to a Li-        ML12074A251 cense Amendment To Increase the Maximum Reactor Power Level, Florida Power & Light Company; Turkey Point, Units 3 and 4. Dated March 27, 2012.
biological assessment determinations, the NRC concludes that the proposed action would have no significant impact on Federally-protected species or habitats.
Florida Power & Light Company. Turkey Point Units 6 & 7 Combine License Application, Part 3: Environmental Report, Revi-        ML13357A435 sion 5. Dated December 23, 2013.
In a July 25, 2014, letter (ADAMS Accession No. ML14206A800) to FWS, the NRC requested ESA section 7
Florida Power & Light Company. Turkey Point Units 3 and 4; Wastewater Permit FL0001563; Request for Approval for the           ML14206A806
 
* Use of Copper Sulfate, Hydrogen Peroxide, and a Bio-Stimulant in the Treatment and Control of Blue Green Algae in the Cooling Canal System. Dated June 18, 2014.
consultation.
Florida Department of Environmental Protection. Re: Florida Power & Light, Turkey Point, NPDES Permit FL0001562, 90-Day        ML14206A806
Radiological Impacts The proposed action would not result in or require any physical changes to
* Trial Approval. Dated June 27, 2014.
 
Florida Fish and Wildlife Conservation Commission. Re: Florida Power & Light, Turkey Point Plant Maintenance Activity,         ML14206A806
Turkey Point systems, structures, or
* NPDES Permit FL0001562, Miami-Dade County. Dated July 1, 2014.
 
                                                      * (See Appendix A.)
components, including those intended
Dated at Rockville, Maryland, this 28th day             For the Nuclear Regulatory Commission.
 
of July 2014.                                           Lisa M. Regner, Acting Chief, Plant Licensing Branch II-2, Division of Operating Reactor Licensing, Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation.
for the prevention of accidents because
 
the proposed license amendments
 
involve TS changes that would only
 
result in changes in procedural and  
 
operational aspects undertaken by FPL
 
personnel for monitoring and
 
maintaining the increased allowable
 
UHS temperature limit. Thus, the proposed action would not have a significant adverse effect on the
 
probability of an accident occurring or
 
result in an increased radiological
 
hazard beyond those analyzed in the
 
licensees Updated Final Safety
 
Analysis Report. The proposed action
 
would result in no changes to radiation
 
levels or the types or quantities of
 
radioactive effluents (gaseous or liquid)  
 
that affect radiation exposures to
 
members of the public or plant workers.  
 
No changes or different types of
 
radiological impacts would be expected
 
from the proposed action. Therefore, the
 
radiological impacts of granting the
 
license amendments would result in no
 
significant impact on the radiological
 
environment.
Cumulative Impacts The Council on Environmental Quality defines cumulative impacts
 
under the National Environmental
 
Policy Act of 1969, as amended (NEPA)
 
as the impact on the environment which
 
results from the incremental impact of
 
the action when added to other past, present, and reasonably foreseeable
 
future actions regardless of what agency (Federal or non-Federal) or person
 
undertakes such other actions (40 CFR
 
Part 1508.7). For the purposes of this
 
analysis, past actions are related to the
 
resource conditions when Turkey Point  
 
was licensed and constructed; present
 
actions are related to the resource
 
conditions during current operations;
 
and future actions are those that are
 
reasonably foreseeable through the
 
expiration of Turkey Points renewed
 
facility operating licenses. In the
 
preceding sections of this EA, the NRC
 
has determined that the proposed action
 
has the potential to only affect surface
 
water resources and aquatic resources in
 
the CCS and Federally protected species
 
and habitats (i.e., the sites resident
 
population of American crocodiles and
 
its designated critical habitat). This EA
 
also addresses radiological impacts of
 
the proposed action. Accordingly, this
 
section only addresses the cumulative
 
impacts that could result from the
 
proposed action and other actions on
 
these resources. The proposed action
 
would have no effect on the remaining
 
resources (i.e., land use, visual
 
resources, air quality, noise, the geologic
 
environment, groundwater resources, terrestrial resources, historic and  
 
cultural resources, socioeconomic
 
conditions including minority and low
 
income populations (environmental
 
justice), and waste generation and
 
management activities), and thus, cumulative impacts would not occur for
 
these environmental resources. VerDate Mar<15>2010 14:56 Jul 30, 2014Jkt 232001PO 00000Frm 00085Fmt 4703Sfmt 4703E:\FR\FM\31JYN1.SGM31JYN1 wreier-aviles on DSK5TPTVN1PROD with NOTICES 44468 Federal Register/Vol. 79, No. 147/Thursday, July 31, 2014/Notices The NRC staff has identified several actions that may contribute to  
 
cumulative effects; each of these actions
 
is described separately below.
CCS Chemical Treatments In 2011, FPL began to notice increased blue green algae
 
concentrations in the CCS. The
 
concentrations have steadily increased
 
since that time. FPL has performed
 
engineering and environmental analyses
 
and believes that the presence of higher
 
than normal CCS algae concentrations
 
may be diminishing the CCSs heat
 
transfer capabilities. FPL developed a
 
plan to gradually reduce algae
 
concentrations through controlled
 
chemical treatment of the CCS over the
 
course of several weeks. On June 18, 2014, FPL submitted a request to the  
 
FDEP to approve the use of copper
 
sulfate, hydrogen peroxide, and a bio-
 
stimulant to treat the algae (letter
 
contained in Appendix A of ADAMS
 
Accession No. ML14206A806). On June
 
27, 2014, the FDEP approved FPLs
 
treatment plan for a 90-day trial period (letter contained in Appendix A of
 
ADAMS Accession No. ML14206A806).  
 
The FDEP requested that during the 90-
 
day treatment period, FPL monitor the
 
CCS for total recoverable copper and
 
dissolved oxygen and submit its results
 
to the FDEP. The FDEP also
 
recommended that FPL coordinate with
 
the Florida Fish and Wildlife
 
Conservation Commission (FWC) due to  
 
the presence of crocodiles in the cooling
 
system. The FWC provided its
 
comments on FPLs treatment plan in a
 
letter dated July 1, 2014 (letter
 
contained in Appendix A of ADAMS
 
Accession No. ML14206A806).
The CCS chemical treatments have the potential to contribute to cumulative
 
effects on CCS surface water resources, CCS aquatic resources, and the
 
American crocodile. Because the CCS is
 
a manmade closed cycle cooling system, treatment of the CCS is not likely to
 
have a significant cumulative effect on
 
surface water resources. Monitoring
 
required by the FDEP will ensure
 
adequate water quality throughout and
 
following treatment. Monitoring will
 
also ensure that any unanticipated effects on the aquatic organisms that
 
inhabit the CCS are appropriately
 
addressed. During the treatment period, FPL has agreed to report any potentially
 
related fish kills in the CCS to the FWC.  
 
No fish kills have been reported to date.  
 
Regarding crocodiles, the NRCs July 25, 2014, biological assessment notes that
 
FPL has not observed any behavioral or
 
distributional changes or any other
 
noticeable differences that would
 
indicate effects to crocodiles resulting from either the presence of higher algae concentrations or the recent chemical
 
treatments.
Aquifer Withdrawals The CCS is situated above two aquifers: the shallower saltwater
 
Biscayne Aquifer and the deeper
 
brackish Floridan Aquifer. A confining
 
layer separates the two aquifers from
 
one another. Turkey Point, Unit 5 uses
 
the Floridan Aquifer for cooling water.  
 
The South Florida Water Management
 
District (SFWMD) recently granted FPL approval to withdraw a portion (approximately 5 million gallons per
 
day [MGD]) of the Unit 5 withdrawal
 
allowance for use in the CCS. FPL began
 
pumping Floridan Aquifer water into
 
the CCS in early July. FPL has also
 
received temporary approval to
 
withdraw 30 MGD from the Biscayne
 
Aquifer, though FPL has not yet used
 
this allowance.
FPL also anticipates the FDEP to issue an Administrative Order requiring FPL
 
to install up to six new wells that will
 
pump approximately 14 MGD of water
 
from the Floridan Aquifer into the CCS.
Modeling performed by FPL consultants
 
and the SFWMD indicates that in
 
approximately 2 years, the withdrawals
 
would reduce the salinity of the CCS to
 
the equivalent of Biscayne Bay (about 34
 
parts per thousand [ppt]). Such
 
withdrawals could also help moderate
 
water temperatures.
The current and anticipated future aquifer withdrawals have the potential
 
to contribute to cumulative effects on
 
CCS surface water resources, CCS
 
aquatic resources, and crocodiles.
 
Because the CCS is a manmade closed
 
cycle cooling system, aquifer
 
withdrawals are not likely to have a
 
significant cumulative effect on surface water resources. Aquifer withdrawals would result in beneficial impacts to CCS aquatic resources and the crocodiles inhabiting the Turkey Point
 
site. FPL anticipates that the
 
withdrawals will reduce the salinity of
 
the CCS to about 34 ppt and could also
 
help moderate CCS temperatures over
 
the long term. Both of these effects
 
would create favorable conditions for
 
CCS aquatic biota and crocodiles, which
 
are currently tolerating an unusually
 
hot, hypersaline environment.
Turkey Point, Units 6 and 7 Construction and Operation In June 2009, FPL submitted a combined license application (COLA)
(ADAMS Accession No. ML091830589)
 
to construct and operate two
 
Westinghouse Advanced Passive 1000 (AP1000) pressurized-water reactors
 
designated as Turkey Point, Units 6 and
: 7. Submission of the COLA does not commit FPL to build two new nuclear
 
units and does not constitute approval
 
of the proposal by the NRC; however, submission of the COLA infers that the
 
construction and operation of the new
 
units is a reasonably foreseeable future
 
action. The COLA will be evaluated on
 
its merits, and the NRC will decide
 
whether to grant the licenses after
 
considering and evaluating the
 
environmental and safety implications
 
of the proposal. Environmental impacts
 
of constructing and operating Turkey
 
Point, Units 6 and 7 will depend on
 
their actual design characteristics, construction practices, and power plant
 
operations. These impacts will be
 
assessed by the NRC in a separate NEPA
 
document. The cumulative impacts
 
presented in this EA may differ from
 
those impacts assessed for the COLA.
 
Potential impacts presented below have
 
been drawn from FPLs Turkey Point, Units 6 and 7 Environmental Report, Revision 5 (ADAMS Accession No.
 
ML13357A435), and NRCs 2012 EA and
 
final FONSI for the EPU.
Of the environmental resources affected by the proposed action, the
 
possible construction and operation of
 
Units 6 and 7 only have the potential to
 
contribute to cumulative radiological
 
impacts. Units 6 and 7 would not use
 
the CCS for cooling. Rather, Units 6 and
 
7 would have a closed-cycle cooling
 
system with mechanical draft cooling
 
towers. The cooling towers would draw
 
makeup from Miami-Dade Water and
 
Sewer Department reclaimed water and
 
would discharge blowdown into deep
 
injection wells. Saltwater extracted from
 
Biscayne Bay subsurface sediment
 
through radial collector wells proposed
 
to be built on the Turkey Point site
 
would serve as a secondary source of
 
makeup water when a sufficient
 
quantity and/or quality of reclaimed
 
water is not available. Because Units 6
 
and 7 would not use the CCS, the
 
proposed new units would not have a
 
cumulative effect on CCS surface water
 
resources or CCS aquatic resources.
Regarding crocodiles, potential impacts to this species and its critical
 
habitat will be addressed in a future
 
ESA section 7 consultation between the
 
NRC and FWS. When considering
 
cumulative impacts on Federally listed
 
species, the ESAs implementing
 
regulations direct Federal agencies to
 
consider the effects of future State or
 
private activities, not involving Federal activities, that are reasonably certain to occur within the action area of the
 
Federal action subject to consultation
 
(50 CFR part 402.02; emphasis added).
Accordingly, the NRC will not address
 
cumulative impacts of Units 6 and 7 on VerDate Mar<15>2010 14:56 Jul 30, 2014Jkt 232001PO 00000Frm 00086Fmt 4703Sfmt 4703E:\FR\FM\31JYN1.SGM31JYN1 wreier-aviles on DSK5TPTVN1PROD with NOTICES 44469 Federal Register/Vol. 79, No. 147/Thursday, July 31, 2014/Notices the American crocodile in this EA because the NRCs issuance of a license
 
to construct and operate Units 6 and 7
 
is a separate Federal activity that will
 
require future consultation.
Regarding cumulative radiological impacts, the NRC and Environmental
 
Protection Agency have developed
 
radiological dose limits for protection of
 
the public and workers that address the
 
cumulative effects of acute and long-
 
term exposure to radiation and
 
radioactive material. These dose limits
 
are specified in 10 CFR part 20 and 40
 
CFR part 190.
The cumulative radiation dose to the public and workers is required to be
 
within the regulations cited above. The
 
public dose limit of 25 millirem (0.25
 
millisieverts) in 40 CFR part 190 applies
 
to all reactors that may be on a site and
 
also includes any other nearby nuclear
 
power reactor facilities. The NRC staff
 
reviewed several years of radiation dose
 
data contained in the licensees annual
 
radioactive effluent release reports for
 
Turkey Point, and the data demonstrate
 
that the dose to members of the public
 
from radioactive effluents is within the
 
limits of 10 CFR part 20 and 40 CFR part
 
190. As previously indicated in the
 
Radiological Impacts section of this
 
environmental assessment, the proposed
 
action would result in no changes to
 
radiation levels or the types or
 
quantities of radioactive effluents (gaseous or liquid) that affect radiation
 
exposures to plant workers and
 
members of the public.
FPLs COLA for Units 6 and 7 contains an assessment of the radiation
 
doses to members of the public from the proposed new reactors and concludes
 
that doses would be within regulatory
 
limits. The staff expects continued
 
compliance with regulatory dose limits
 
during operation of Turkey Point, Units
 
3 and 4 under the proposed action.
 
Therefore, the NRC staff concludes that
 
the cumulative radiological impacts to
 
members of the public that could result
 
from the combined operations of Turkey
 
Point, Units 3 and 4 and the proposed
 
new Units 6 and 7 would result in no
 
significant impact on the environment.
Regarding radiation dose to workers, cumulative dose would only be
 
applicable for those workers that would
 
be engaged at both facilities (i.e., the
 
currently operating Units 3 and 4 and
 
proposed new Units 6 and 7). For Units
 
3 and 4, the licensee has a radiation
 
protection program that maintains
 
worker doses within the dose limits in 10 CFR part 20 during all phases of operations. Operation of Units 6 and 7
 
would require a similar radiation
 
protection program, and the licensee
 
would be responsible for ensuring that
 
workers are not exposed to dose limits
 
above those specified in 10 CFR part 20.
 
Therefore, the NRC staff concludes that
 
the cumulative radiological impacts to
 
plant workers that could result from the
 
combined operations of Turkey Point, Units 3 and 4 and the proposed new
 
Units 6 and 7 would result in no significant impact on the radiological environment.
Cumulative Impacts Conclusion The NRC staff considered the cumulative impacts of CCS chemical
 
treatments, current and anticipated
 
future aquifer withdrawals, and the
 
possible future construction and
 
operation of two new nuclear units on
 
the Turkey Point site. Based on the
 
information presented in this section, the NRC staff concludes that the
 
proposed action, in combination with
 
other cumulative actions, would result
 
in no significant cumulative impacts on
 
the environment.
Alternatives to the Proposed Action As an alternative to the proposed action, the NRC staff considered denial
 
of the proposed license amendments (i.e., the no-action alternative). Denial
 
of the application would result in no
 
change in current environmental
 
conditions or impacts. However, denial
 
would result in reduced operational
 
flexibility and could require FPL to derate or shutdown Turkey Point if the UHS average supply water temperature
 
approaches or exceeds the 100
&deg;F TS limit. In its application, FPL states that
 
loss of load and voltage control resulting
 
from such a shutdown during periods of
 
high summer demand could result in
 
impacts to grid reliability.
Alternative Use of Resources The action does not involve the use of any different resources than those
 
previously considered in NUREG-1437, Supplement 5 prepared for license
 
renewal of Turkey Point.
Agencies and Persons Consulted On July 28, 2014, the NRC staff notified the Florida State official, Ms.
 
Cindy Becker, Chief of Bureau of
 
Radiation Control, of the Florida
 
Department of Health, regarding the
 
environmental impacts of the proposed action. The State official had no comments.
The NRC staff also coordinated with the FWS pursuant to consultation under
 
ESA section 7 during the staffs review of the proposed action. The consultation is further discussed under the
 
Federally-Protected Species section of
 
this environmental assessment.
III. Finding of No Significant Impact The NRC is considering issuing amendments for Renewed Facility
 
Operating License Nos. DPR-31 and
 
DPR-41, issued to FPL for operation of
 
Turkey Point to increase the UHS water
 
temperature limit specified in the
 
Turkey Point TSs from 100
&deg;F to 104&deg;F and add an SR to monitor the UHS
 
temperature more frequently if the UHS
 
temperature approaches the new limit.
On the basis of the EA included in Section II above and incorporated by
 
reference in this finding, the NRC
 
concludes that the proposed action
 
would not have significant effects on the
 
quality of the human environment. The
 
proposed action would result in no
 
significant impacts on surface water
 
resources, aquatic resources, or the
 
radiological environment. In addition, the proposed action is not likely to
 
adversely affect any Federally-protected
 
species or affect any designated critical
 
habitat. The proposed action would also
 
not result in significant cumulative
 
impacts on any environmental
 
resources. The NRCs evaluation
 
considered information provided in the
 
licensees application and associated
 
supplements; the NRCs staff
 
independent review of other
 
environmental documents, and
 
coordination with the FWS pursuant to
 
consultation under ESA section 7.
 
Section IV below lists the
 
environmental documents related to the
 
proposed action and includes
 
information on the availability of these
 
documents. Based on its findings, the
 
NRC has decided not to prepare an
 
environmental impact statement for the
 
proposed action.
IV. Availability of Documents The following table identifies the environmental and other documents
 
cited in this document and related to
 
the NRCs FONSI. These documents are
 
available for public inspection online through ADAMS at http://www.nrc.gov/
reading-rm/adams.html or in person at the NRCs PDR as described previously. VerDate Mar<15>2010 14:56 Jul 30, 2014Jkt 232001PO 00000Frm 00087Fmt 4703Sfmt 4703E:\FR\FM\31JYN1.SGM31JYN1 wreier-aviles on DSK5TPTVN1PROD with NOTICES 44470 Federal Register/Vol. 79, No. 147/Thursday, July 31, 2014/Notices Document Adams Accession No.
Documents Related to License Amendment Request Florida Power & Light Company. License Amendment Request No. 231, Application to Revise Technical Specifications to Re-vise Ultimate Heat Sink Temperature Limit. Dated July 10, 2014.
ML14196A006 Florida Power & Light Company. License Amendment Request No. 231, Application to Revise Ultimate Heat Sink Tempera-ture LimitRequest for Emergency Approval. Dated July 17, 2014.
ML14202A392 U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission. Turkey Point 3 and 4 Request for Additional InformationLAR231 (TAC MF4392 and MF4393). [1 of 2] Dated July 18, 2014.
ML14203A614 U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission. Turkey Point 3 and 4 Request for Additional InformationLAR231 (TAC MF4392 and MF4393). [2 of 2] Dated July 18, 2014.
ML14203A618 Florida Power & Light Company. License Amendment Request No. 231, Application to Revise Ultimate Heat Sink Tempera-ture LimitSupplement 1, and Response to Request for Additional Information. Dated July 22, 2014.
ML14204A367 Florida Power & Light Company. Response to Request for Additional Information Regarding License Amendment Request No.
231, Application to Revise Technical Specifications to Revise Ultimate Heat Sink Temperature Limit. Dated July 22, 2014.
ML14204A368 U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission. Turkey Point 3 and 4 Request for Additional InformationLAR231 (TAC MF4392 and MF4393). Dated July 22, 2014.
ML14204A814 U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission. Notice of Enforcement Discretion for Florida Power & Light Company Regarding Turkey Point Nuclear Generating Unit Nos. 3 and 4 [NOED NO. 14-2-001]. Dated July 23, 2014.
ML14204A652 Florida Power & Light Company. Response to Containment and Ventilation Branch Request for Additional Information, Re-garding License Amendment Request No. 231, Application to Revise Ultimate Heat Temperature Limit. Dated July 24, 2014.
ML14206A853 Florida Power & Light Company. Turkey Point Nuclear Generating Unit Nos. 3 and 4Individual Notice of Consideration of Issuance of Amendments to Renewed Facility Operating Licenses, Proposed No Significant Hazards Consideration Deter-
 
mination, and Opportunity for Hearing (Exigent Circumstances) (TAC Nos. MF4392 and MF4293). Dated July 24, 2014.
ML14204A129 (letter) ML14199A111 (enclosure)
U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission. Request to Reinitiate Informal Consultation for a Proposed License Amendment to In-crease the Ultimate Heat Sink Temperature Limit at Turkey Point Nuclear Generating Unit Nos. 3 and 4. Dated July 25, 2014.ML14206A800 U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission. Biological Assessment on the American Crocodile (Crocodylus acutus) for Turkey Point Nuclear Generating Unit Nos. 3 and 4 Proposed License Amendment to Increase the Ultimate Heat Sink Temperature
 
Limit. Dated July 25, 2014.
ML14206A806 Other Referenced Documents U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission. Generic Environmental Impact Statement for License Renewal of Nuclear Plants: Re-garding Turkey Point Units 3 and 4Final Report (NUREG-1437, Supplement 5). Dated January 28, 2002.
ML020280236 Florida Power & Light Company. Proposed Turkey Point Units 6 & 7, Project No. 763, Application for Combined License for Turkey Point Units 6 and 7. Dated June 30, 2009.
ML091830589 U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission. Final Environmental Assessment and Finding of No Significant Impact Related to a Li-cense Amendment To Increase the Maximum Reactor Power Level, Florida Power & Light Company; Turkey Point, Units 3
 
and 4. Dated March 27, 2012.
ML12074A251 Florida Power & Light Company. Turkey Point Units 6 & 7 Combine License Application, Part 3: Environmental Report, Revi-sion 5. Dated December 23, 2013.
ML13357A435 Florida Power & Light Company. Turkey Point Units 3 and 4; Wastewater Permit FL0001563; Request for Approval for the Use of Copper Sulfate, Hydrogen Peroxide, and a Bio-Stimulant in the Treatment and Control of Blue Green Algae in the
 
Cooling Canal System. Dated June 18, 2014.ML14206A806*
Florida Department of Environmental Protection. Re: Florida Power & Light, Turkey Point, NPDES Permit FL0001562, 90-Day Trial Approval. Dated June 27, 2014.ML14206A806*
Florida Fish and Wildlife Conservation Commission. Re: Florida Power & Light, Turkey Point Plant Maintenance Activity, NPDES Permit FL0001562, Miami-Dade County. Dated July 1, 2014.ML14206A806* *(See Appendix A.)
Dated at Rockville, Maryland, this 28th day of July 2014.
For the Nuclear Regulatory Commission.
Lisa M. Regner, Acting Chief, Plant Licensing Branch II-2, Division of Operating Reactor Licensing, Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation.
[FR Doc. 2014-18159 Filed 7-30-14; 8:45 am]
[FR Doc. 2014-18159 Filed 7-30-14; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 7590-01-P VerDate Mar<15>2010 17:51 Jul 30, 2014Jkt 232001PO 00000Frm 00088Fmt 4703Sfmt 4703E:\FR\FM\31JYN1.SGM31JYN1 wreier-aviles on DSK5TPTVN1PROD with NOTICES 44464 Federal Register/Vol. 79, No. 147/Thursday, July 31, 2014/Notices discharge from the wet weather facilities; and (3) all defendants are in
BILLING CODE 7590-01-P wreier-aviles on DSK5TPTVN1PROD with NOTICES VerDate Mar<15>2010   17:51 Jul 30, 2014  Jkt 232001  PO 00000  Frm 00088  Fmt 4703  Sfmt 4703  E:\FR\FM\31JYN1.SGM  31JYN1


violation of the Clean Water Act and  
NRC-009 Submitted Nov. 10, 2015 44464                            Federal Register / Vol. 79, No. 147 / Thursday, July 31, 2014 / Notices discharge from the wet weather                              reproduction costs. Please mail your                    written request and payment of facilities; and (3) all defendants are in                  request and payment to: Consent Decree                  reproduction costs. Please mail your violation of the Clean Water Act and                       Library, U.S. DOJENRD, P.O. Box                        request and payment to: Consent Decree their NPDES permits because they have                       7611, Washington, DC 20044-7611.                        Library, U.S. DOJENRD, P.O. Box unlawful sanitary sewer overflows                           Please enclose a check or money order                    7611, Washington, DC 20044-7611.
 
(SSOs) during wet weather.                             for $54.25 (25 cents per page                              Please enclose a check or money order The proposed Consent Decree                             reproduction cost) payable to the U.S.                  for $3 (25 cents per page reproduction implements a regional asset                                 Treasury.                                                cost) payable to the United States management program that puts the                                                                                     Treasury.
their NPDES permits because they have  
defendants on a path to eliminate                           Henry Friedman, prohibited wet weather facility                             Assistant Section Chief, Environmental                  Susan Akers, discharges by December 31, 2035, and to                     Enforcement Section, Environment and                    Assistant Section Chief, Environmental Natural Resources Division.                              Enforcement Section, Environment and control SSOs within ten years of Decree entry. Among other things, the                             [FR Doc. 2014-18047 Filed 7-30-14; 8:45 am]              Natural Resources Division.
 
defendants will rehabilitate and clean                     BILLING CODE 4410-15-P                                  [FR Doc. 2014-17980 Filed 7-30-14; 8:45 am]
unlawful sanitary sewer overflows  
sanitary sewer infrastructure, identify                                                                             BILLING CODE 4410-15-P and eliminate sources of inflow and rapid infiltration to the sewer systems,                   DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE and continue to require repair or                           Notice of Lodging of Proposed Joint                      NUCLEAR REGULATORY replacement of private sewer laterals                       Stipulation under the Clean Water Act                    COMMISSION under local and regional ordinances.
 
In addition, each defendant will pay                       On July 25, 2014, the Department of                  [Docket Nos. 50-250 and 50-251; NRC-a civil penalty for its past violations, for               Justice lodged a proposed settlement                    2014-0181]
(SSOs) during wet weather.
a total of $1,563,556 in civil penalties.                   with the United States District Court for EBMUD will pay $201,600; the City of                       the District of Alaska in the lawsuit                    Florida Power & Light Company; Alameda will pay $111,150; the City of                     entitled United States and Alaska v. BP                  Turkey Point Nuclear Generating Unit Albany will pay $42,038; the City of                       (Exploration) Alaska, Inc., Civil Action                Nos. 3 and 4 Berkeley will pay $267,000; the City of                     No. 3:14-cv-00146.                                      AGENCY:  Nuclear Regulatory Emeryville will pay $1,870; the City of                       The United States and State of Alaska Commission.
The proposed Consent Decree implements a regional asset  
Oakland will pay $850,000; the City of                     filed this lawsuit under the Clean Water Piedmont will pay $41,038; and the                         Act against BP (Exploration) Alaska, Inc.               ACTION: Environmental assessment and Stege Sanitary District will pay $48,860.                   The complaint seeks civil penalties and                 final finding of no significant impact; The proposed Consent Decree                              injunctive relief for violations of the                 issuance.
 
replaces a January 2009 interim                            Clean Water Act, as amended by the Oil                  
management program that puts the  
 
defendants on a path to eliminate  
 
prohibited wet weather facility  
 
discharges by December 31, 2035, and to  
 
control SSOs within ten years of Decree  
 
entry. Among other things, the  
 
defendants will rehabilitate and clean  
 
sanitary sewer infrastructure, identify  
 
and eliminate sources of inflow and  
 
rapid infiltration to the sewer systems, and continue to require repair or  
 
replacement of private sewer laterals  
 
under local and regional ordinances.
In addition, each defendant will pay a civil penalty for its past violations, for  
 
a total of $1,563,556 in civil penalties.  
 
EBMUD will pay $201,600; the City of  
 
Alameda will pay $111,150; the City of  
 
Albany will pay $42,038; the City of  
 
Berkeley will pay $267,000; the City of  
 
Emeryville will pay $1,870; the City of Oakland will pay $850,000; the City of  
 
Piedmont will pay $41,038; and the  
 
Stege Sanitary District will pay $48,860.
The proposed Consent Decree replaces a January 2009 interim
 
settlement with EBMUD and a March
 
2011 interim settlement with the
 
Satellite Communities.
The publication of this notice opens a period for public comment on the
 
proposed Consent Decree. Comments
 
should be addressed to the Assistant
 
Attorney General, Environment and
 
Natural Resources Division, and should
 
refer to United States of America et al.
: v. East Bay Municipal Utility District et al., D.J. Ref. No. 90-5-1-1-09361. All comments must be submitted no later
 
than thirty (30) days after the
 
publication date of this notice.
 
Comments may be submitted either by
 
email or by mail:
To submit comments:
Send them to: By email.......
pubcomment-ees.enrd@
usdoj.gov. By mail.........Assistant Attorney General, U.S. DOJENRD, P.O.
Box 7611, Washington, DC
 
20044-7611.
During the public comment period, the proposed Consent Decree may be examined and downloaded at this
 
Department of Justice Web site:
http:// www.usdoj.gov/enrd/Consent
_Decrees.html.
We will provide a paper copy of the proposed Consent Decree
 
upon written request and payment of reproduction costs. Please mail your request and payment to: Consent Decree
 
Library, U.S. DOJENRD, P.O. Box
 
7611, Washington, DC 20044-7611.
Please enclose a check or money order for $54.25 (25 cents per page
 
reproduction cost) payable to the U.S.
 
Treasury.
Henry Friedman, Assistant Section Chief, Environmental Enforcement Section, Environment and
 
Natural Resources Division.
[FR Doc. 2014-18047 Filed 7-30-14; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4410-15-P DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE Notice of Lodging of Proposed Joint Stipulation under the Clean Water Act On July 25, 2014, the Department of Justice lodged a proposed settlement with the United States District Court for
 
the District of Alaska in the lawsuit
 
entitled United States and Alaska
: v. BP (Exploration) Alaska, Inc., Civil Action No. 3:14-cv-00146.
The United States and State of Alaska filed this lawsuit under the Clean Water
 
Act against BP (Exploration) Alaska, Inc.  
 
The complaint seeks civil penalties and  
 
injunctive relief for violations of the  
 
Clean Water Act, as amended by the Oil  
 
Pollution Act of 1990, 33 U.S.C. 2701 et
 
seq., and Alaska Statutes 46.03.710 and
 
46.03.740. The settlement provides a
 
covenant not to sue in return for
 
defendants payment of $450,000.
The publication of this notice opens a period for public comment on the
 
settlement. Comments should be
 
addressed to the Assistant Attorney
 
General, Environment and Natural
 
Resources Division, and should refer to
 
United States and Alaska
: v. BP (Exploration) Alaska, Inc., D.J. Ref. No.
90-5-1-1-08808/1. All comments must
 
be submitted no later than thirty (30)
 
days after the publication date of this
 
notice. Comments may be submitted
 
either by email or by mail:
To submit com-ments: Send them to: By email.................
pubcomment-ees.enrd@usdoj.gov. By mail...................Assistant Attorney Gen-eral, U.S. DOJ-ENRD, P.O. Box
 
7611, Washington, DC 20044-7611.
During the public comment period, the settlement may be examined and downloaded at this Justice Department
 
Web site:
http://www.usdoj.gov/enrd/
 
Consent_Decrees.html.
We will provide a paper copy of the settlement upon written request and payment of
 
reproduction costs. Please mail your
 
request and payment to: Consent Decree
 
Library, U.S. DOJENRD, P.O. Box
 
7611, Washington, DC 20044-7611.
Please enclose a check or money order for $3 (25 cents per page reproduction
 
cost) payable to the United States
 
Treasury.
Susan Akers, Assistant Section Chief, Environmental Enforcement Section, Environment and
 
Natural Resources Division.
[FR Doc. 2014-17980 Filed 7-30-14; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4410-15-P NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION
[Docket Nos. 50-250 and 50-251; NRC-2014-0181]
Florida Power & Light Company; Turkey Point Nuclear Generating Unit
 
Nos. 3 and 4 AGENCY: Nuclear Regulatory Commission.
ACTION: Environmental assessment and final finding of no significant impact;
 
issuance.


==SUMMARY==
==SUMMARY==
: The U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC) is considering  
:   The U.S. Nuclear Regulatory settlement with EBMUD and a March                          Pollution Act of 1990, 33 U.S.C. 2701 et                Commission (NRC) is considering 2011 interim settlement with the                            seq., and Alaska Statutes 46.03.710 and                  issuance of amendments to Renewed Satellite Communities.                                      46.03.740. The settlement provides a The publication of this notice opens                                                                              Facility Operating License Nos. DPR-31 covenant not to sue in return for                        and DPR-41 issued to Florida Power &
 
a period for public comment on the                          defendants payment of $450,000.
issuance of amendments to Renewed  
proposed Consent Decree. Comments                                                                                    Light Company (FPL, the licensee) for The publication of this notice opens should be addressed to the Assistant                                                                                operation of Turkey Point Nuclear a period for public comment on the Attorney General, Environment and                                                                                    Generating Unit Nos. 3 and 4 (Turkey settlement. Comments should be Natural Resources Division, and should                                                                              Point) located in Homestead, Miami-addressed to the Assistant Attorney refer to United States of America et al.                                                                            Dade County, Florida. The proposed General, Environment and Natural
 
: v. East Bay Municipal Utility District et                                                                            amendments would increase the Resources Division, and should refer to al., D.J. Ref. No. 90-5-1-1-09361. All                                                                              ultimate heat sink (UHS) water United States and Alaska v. BP comments must be submitted no later                                                                                  temperature limit specified in the (Exploration) Alaska, Inc., D.J. Ref. No.
Facility Operating License Nos. DPR-31  
than thirty (30) days after the                                                                                     Turkey Point Technical Specifications 90-5-1-1-08808/1. All comments must publication date of this notice.                                                                                     (TSs) from 100 degrees Fahrenheit (&deg;F) be submitted no later than thirty (30)
 
Comments may be submitted either by                                                                                  to 104 &deg;F and add a surveillance days after the publication date of this email or by mail:                                                                                                    requirement to monitor the UHS notice. Comments may be submitted temperature more frequently if the UHS either by email or by mail:
and DPR-41 issued to Florida Power &  
To submit                                                                                                            temperature approaches the new limit.
 
Send them to:                                                                                  The NRC did not identify any comments:                                                  To submit com-                Send them to:              significant environmental impacts ments:
Light Company (FPL, the licensee) for  
By email ....... pubcomment-ees.enrd@                                                                            associated with the proposed license usdoj.gov.                          By email ................. pubcomment-               amendments based on its evaluation of By mail ......... Assistant Attorney General,                                           ees.enrd@usdoj.gov.      the information provided in the U.S. DOJENRD, P.O.                  By mail ................... Assistant Attorney Gen-Box 7611, Washington, DC                                                                      licensees application and other eral, U.S. DOJ-20044-7611.                                                                                  available information. Accordingly, the ENRD, P.O. Box 7611, Washington,        NRC has prepared this Environmental wreier-aviles on DSK5TPTVN1PROD with NOTICES During the public comment period,                                                         DC 20044-7611.          Assessment (EA) and Final Finding of the proposed Consent Decree may be                                                                                  No Significant Impact (FONSI) for the examined and downloaded at this                              During the public comment period,                     proposed license amendments.
 
Department of Justice Web site: http://                    the settlement may be examined and                       ADDRESSES: Please refer to Docket ID www.usdoj.gov/enrd/Consent_                                downloaded at this Justice Department                    NRC-2014-0181 when contacting the Decrees.html. We will provide a paper                      Web site: http://www.usdoj.gov/enrd/                    NRC about the availability of copy of the proposed Consent Decree                        Consent_Decrees.html. We will provide                    information regarding this document.
operation of Turkey Point Nuclear  
upon written request and payment of                        a paper copy of the settlement upon                      You may access publicly available VerDate Mar<15>2010      14:56 Jul 30, 2014  Jkt 232001  PO 00000  Frm 00082    Fmt 4703    Sfmt 4703  E:\FR\FM\31JYN1.SGM  31JYN1
 
Generating Unit Nos. 3 and 4 (Turkey  
 
Point) located in Homestead, Miami-  
 
Dade County, Florida. The proposed  
 
amendments would increase the  
 
ultimate heat sink (UHS) water temperature limit specified in the Turkey Point Technical Specifications (TSs) from 100 degrees Fahrenheit (&deg;F) to 104&deg;F and add a surveillance requirement to monitor the UHS temperature more frequently if the UHS
 
temperature approaches the new limit.  
 
The NRC did not identify any
 
significant environmental impacts
 
associated with the proposed license
 
amendments based on its evaluation of  
 
the information provided in the  
 
licensees application and other
 
available information. Accordingly, the
 
NRC has prepared this Environmental
 
Assessment (EA) and Final Finding of
 
No Significant Impact (FONSI) for the  
 
proposed license amendments.
ADDRESSES: Please refer to Docket ID NRC-2014-0181 when contacting the
 
NRC about the availability of  
 
information regarding this document.  
 
You may access publicly available VerDate Mar<15>2010 14:56 Jul 30, 2014Jkt 232001PO 00000Frm 00082Fmt 4703Sfmt 4703E:\FR\FM\31JYN1.SGM31JYN1 wreier-aviles on DSK5TPTVN1PROD with NOTICES 44465 Federal Register/Vol. 79, No. 147/Thursday, July 31, 2014/Notices information related to this document using any of the following methods:
*Federal Rulemaking Web site: Go to http://www.regulations.gov and search for Docket ID NRC-2011-0181. Address
 
questions about NRC dockets to Carol
 
Gallagher; telephone: 301-287-3422;
 
email: Carol.Gallagher@nrc.gov.
For technical questions, contact the
 
individual listed in the FORFURTHER INFORMATIONCONTACT section of this document.  
*NRCs Agencywide Documents Access and Management System (ADAMS): You may obtain publicly
 
available documents online in the NRC
 
Public Documents collection at http://www.nrc.gov/reading-rm/adams.html.  
 
To begin the search, select ADAMS
 
Public Documents and then select
 
Begin Web-based ADAMS Search.
For problems with ADAMS, please contact
 
the NRCs Public Document Room (PDR)
 
reference staff at 1-800-397-4209, 301-  
 
415-4737, or by email to pdr.resource@
nrc.gov. The ADAMS accession number for each document referenced in this
 
notice (if that document is available in
 
ADAMS) is provided the first time that
 
a document is referenced. For the  
 
convenience of the reader, the ADAMS
 
accession numbers are also provided in
 
a table in the Availability of  
 
Documents section of this document.
*NRCs PDR: You may examine and purchase copies of public documents at  
 
the NRCs PDR, Room O1-F21, One
 
White Flint North, 11555 Rockville
 
Pike, Rockville, Maryland 20852. FORFURTHERINFORMATIONCONTACT
: Audrey L. Klett, Office of Nuclear
 
Reactor Regulation, U.S. Nuclear
 
Regulatory Commission, Washington, DC 20555-0001; telephone: 301-415-
 
0489; email:
Audrey.Klett@nrc.gov. SUPPLEMENTARYINFORMATION
: I. Introduction The NRC is considering issuance of amendments to Renewed Facility
 
Operating License Nos. DPR-31 and
 
DPR-41 issued to FPL for operation of
 
Turkey Point, located in Homestead, Miami-Dade County, Florida. As required by &sect;51.21 of Title 10 of the
 
Code of Federal Regulations (10 CFR Part 51.21), the NRC staff performed an
 
EA to document its findings related to
 
the proposed license amendments. FPL submitted its license amendment request by letter dated July 10, 2014 (ADAMS Accession No. ML14196A006) and subsequently supplemented its application by letters dated July 17, 2014 (ADAMS Accession No.
ML14202A392), July 22, 2014 (ADAMS Accession Nos. ML14204A367 and ML14204A368), and July 24, 2014 (ADAMS Accession No. ML14206A853).
Based on information provided in FPLs
 
application and associated supplements, the NRC staffs independent review, and
 
the NRCs consultation with the U.S.
 
Fish and Wildlife Service (FWS)
 
pursuant to section 7 of the Endangered
 
Species Act of 1973, as amended (ESA),
the NRC did not identify any significant
 
environmental impacts associated with
 
the proposed license amendments.
Based on the results of the EA documented herein, the NRC is issuing
 
this final FONSI, in accordance with 10
 
CFR 51.32, for the proposed license
 
amendments.
II. Environmental Assessment
 
Plant Site and Environs The Turkey Point site encompasses 11,000 acres (ac) (4,450 hectares (ha)) in
 
Miami-Dade County, Florida. The site
 
lies 25 miles (mi) (40 kilometers [km])
 
south of Miami, Florida, and the nearest
 
city limits are Florida City, which lies
 
8 mi (13 km) to the west, Homestead, which lies 4.5 mi (7 km) to the
 
northwest, and Key Largo, which lies 10
 
mi (16 km) south of the Turkey Point
 
site. The Turkey Point site is bordered
 
to the east by Biscayne National Park, to
 
the north by Homestead Bayfront Park
 
and a portion of Biscayne National Park, and on the west and south by FPLs
 
13,000-ac (5,260-ha) Everglades
 
Mitigation Bank. The Turkey Point site
 
includes five electric generating units.
 
Units 1, 2, and 5 are fossil-fueled
 
generating units and are not covered by
 
the proposed licensing action; Units 3
 
and 4 are nuclear generating units. Each
 
nuclear reactor is a Westinghouse
 
pressurized light-water reactor that
 
generates electricity via three steam
 
generators that produce steam that turns
 
turbines. The site features a 6,100-ac
 
(2,500-ha) closed cooling canal system (CCS) that cools heated water
 
discharged by Units 1 through 4. Unit 5
 
uses mechanical draft cooling towers for
 
cooling, draws makeup water from the
 
Upper Floridan Aquifer, and discharges
 
blowdown to the CCS. The five units
 
and supporting equipment (excluding
 
the CCS) occupy approximately 130 ac
 
(53 ha). The U.S. Atomic Energy Commission (AEC), the NRCs predecessor agency, and the NRC have previously conducted
 
environmental reviews of Turkey Point
 
in several documents, and the
 
descriptions therein continue to
 
accurately depict the Turkey Point site
 
and environs. Those documents include
 
the AECs July 1972 Final
 
Environmental Statement (FES); the
 
NRCs January 2002 Generic
 
Environmental Impact Statement for License Renewal of Nuclear Plants:
Regarding Turkey Point Units 3 and 4
 
Final Report (NUREG-1437, Supplement 5) (ADAMS Accession No.
 
ML020280236); and the NRCs March
 
2012 environmental assessment and
 
final FONSI for the Turkey Point
 
extended power uprate (EPU) (ADAMS
 
Accession No. ML12074A251).
Identification of the Proposed Action The proposed action would increase the UHS water temperature limit
 
specified in the Turkey Point TSs and
 
add a surveillance requirement to
 
monitor the UHS temperature more
 
frequently if the UHS temperature
 
approaches the new limit. The proposed
 
action is in accordance with the
 
licensees application dated July 10, 2014, as supplemented by letters dated
 
July 17, July 22 (two letters), and July
 
24, 2014.
More specifically, the proposed action would amend Appendix A of Turkey
 
Points Renewed Facility Operating
 
Licenses in order to revise the UHS
 
temperature limit set forth in TS
 
Limiting Operating Condition (LOC) 3/
4.7.4 from 100
&deg;F to 104 &deg;F. The CCS serves as the UHS for the Intake Cooling
 
Water (ICW) system and provides the
 
coolant for the Circulating Water (CW) system. The CW system provides
 
cooling water to the main plant
 
condensers, and the ICW system
 
removes heat loads from the Component
 
Cooling Water (CCW) system during
 
normal and accident conditions to
 
support both reactor and containment
 
heat removal requirements as well as
 
spent fuel cooling requirements.
Currently, TS LOC 3/4.7.4 includes a Surveillance Requirement (SR) that
 
necessitates the licensee to verify the
 
UHS (CCS) temperature once every 24-
 
hour period and confirm that the
 
average supply water temperature is
 
within the 100
&deg;F limit. The proposed license amendments would modify the
 
SR to require the licensee to verify the
 
average supply water temperature to be
 
within the new TS limit at least once
 
per 24 hours, and once per hour when
 
the water temperature exceeds 100
&deg;F. FPL monitors the UHS (CCS)
 
temperature at a point in the ICW
 
system piping going into the inlet of the
 
CCW Heat Exchangers.
The license amendment would require the licensee to place both units
 
in at least hot standby within 12 hours
 
and cold shutdown within the next 30
 
hours if the UHS exceeds 104
&deg;F. The proposed TS revisions would not result in or require any physical changes
 
to Turkey Point systems, structures, or
 
components, including those intended
 
for the prevention of accidents. If VerDate Mar<15>2010 14:56 Jul 30, 2014Jkt 232001PO 00000Frm 00083Fmt 4703Sfmt 4703E:\FR\FM\31JYN1.SGM31JYN1 wreier-aviles on DSK5TPTVN1PROD with NOTICES 44466 Federal Register/Vol. 79, No. 147/Thursday, July 31, 2014/Notices approved, the LAR would be effective from the date of NRC approval through
 
the expiration dates of the renewed
 
facility operating licenses (i.e., through
 
2032 for Unit 3 and 2033 for Unit 4).
The Need for the Proposed Action The proposed action is needed to provide FPL with additional operational
 
flexibility during periods when high air
 
temperatures, low rainfall, and other
 
factors contribute to conditions
 
resulting in a UHS temperature in
 
excess of 100
&deg;F that would otherwise necessitate FPL to place Turkey Point in
 
cold shutdown. In its application, FPL
 
states that loss of load and voltage
 
control resulting from shutdown during
 
periods of high summer demand could
 
result in impacts to grid reliability. UHS
 
temperatures have recently approached
 
and exceeded the 100
&deg;F TS limit on several occasions. On July 20, 2014, the
 
NRC approved a notice of enforcement
 
discretion (NOED), which allows the
 
UHS temperature to exceed 100
&deg;F up to 103 &deg;F for a period of no more than 10 days, as well as several other NOED exit
 
criteria. The NRC documented the
 
NOED in a letter to FPL dated July 23, 2014 (ADAMS Accession No.
 
ML14204A652).
Environmental Impacts of the Proposed Action As part of the original licensing review for Turkey Point, the AEC
 
published an FES in July 1972 that
 
evaluates potential environmental impacts associated with the operation of
 
Turkey Point over its initial 40-year
 
operating period (1972-2012 for Unit 3
 
and 1973-2013 for Unit 4). In 2002, the
 
NRC evaluated the environmental
 
impacts of operating Turkey Point for an
 
additional 20 years beyond the original
 
operating license (i.e., through 2032 for
 
Unit 3 and 2033 for Unit 4) and
 
predicted that the environmental
 
impacts of license renewal were small
 
for all environmental resources.
 
NUREG-1437, Supplement 5 provides
 
that assessment. In 2012, the NRC
 
evaluated the impacts of a then-
 
proposed EPU at Turkey Point that
 
authorized the facility to increase the
 
maximum power level from 2300
 
megawatts thermal (MWt) to 2644 MWt
 
for each unit. The NRCs March 2012 EA
 
and final FONSI provide that
 
assessment.
As previously discussed, the proposed action would not result in or
 
require any physical changes to Turkey
 
Point systems, structures, or
 
components, including those intended
 
for the prevention of accidents. Further, the proposed license amendments
 
involve TS changes that would only result in changes in procedural and operational aspects undertaken by FPL
 
personnel for monitoring and
 
maintaining the UHS temperature limit
 
as measured at the ICW system piping
 
going into the inlet of the CCW Heat
 
Exchangers. Thus, FPLs workforce
 
would not change, and the regular
 
operations workforce would otherwise
 
be unaffected by the proposed action.
 
Based on the above and the available
 
information reviewed by the staff, the
 
NRC concludes that the proposed action
 
would result in no significant impact on
 
land use, visual resources, air quality, noise, the geologic environment, groundwater resources, terrestrial
 
resources, historic and cultural
 
resources, socioeconomic conditions
 
including minority and low income
 
populations (environmental justice), or
 
waste generation and management
 
activities. Therefore, this environmental
 
assessment does not prevent any further
 
evaluation of the operational impacts on
 
these environmental resources. The
 
NRC previously assessed the
 
environmental impacts of continued
 
operations of Turkey Point in NUREG-
 
1437, Supplement 5 and the EA and
 
final FONSI for the EPU, and
 
implementation of the proposed license
 
amendments would not result in any
 
impacts beyond those already
 
characterized in these documents.
 
Accordingly, this environmental
 
assessment focuses on the
 
environmental resources that could be
 
affected by the change in the CCS
 
thermal limit: Surface water resources, aquatic resources, and Federally-
 
protected species and habitats.
 
Radiological impacts are also addressed.
The details of the NRC staffs safety evaluation will be separately provided
 
in the license amendment package
 
issued to approve the license
 
amendment, if granted.
Nonradiological Impacts
 
Surface Water Resources The Turkey Point site lies on the shore of Biscayne Bay. South of the site, Mangrove Point divides the bay from
 
Card Sound. Biscayne Bay and Card
 
Sound are shallow, subtropical estuarine waters located between the Atlantic coast mainland and a grouping of barrier islands that form the northernmost Florida Keys. The Atlantic Ocean lies beyond the barrier islands.
The Intracoastal Waterway traverses
 
Biscayne Bay and Card Sound, and a
 
barge passage runs from the Intracoastal
 
Waterway to the non-nuclear units on
 
the Turkey Point site.
In addition to these offsite waters, the site includes several manmade surface waters, the most significant of which is the CCS. The CCS spans a 6,100-ac
 
(2,500-ha) area (4,370 ac (1,770 ha) of
 
surface water) spread over a 5-mi by 2-
 
mi (8-km by 3.2-km) area. The system
 
includes 168 mi (270 km) of earthen
 
canals with an average depth of 2.8 ft
 
(0.8 km) and contains approximately 4
 
billion gallons (12,300 acre-feet) of
 
water. The Turkey Point units (both
 
nuclear Units 3 and 4 and fossil-fueled
 
Units 1 and 2) use the CCS like a
 
radiator and, as previously mentioned, the CCS serves as the UHS for Units 3
 
and 4. Heated water discharges into the
 
CCS at one end, flows through the canal
 
system, and is withdrawn from the other
 
end for reuse as cooling water. The
 
heated discharge effluent is distributed
 
to 32 feeder canals. Water in the feeder
 
canals flows south and discharges into
 
a single collector canal that distributes
 
water to six return canals. Water in the
 
return canals flows north to the plant
 
intake. The entire circuit that water
 
travels from plant discharge back to
 
plant intake is 13.2 mi (21.2 km), and
 
transit time through the system is
 
approximately 44 hours. Water flows
 
attributable to Units 3 and 4 amount to
 
approximately 1.0 million gallons per
 
minute. Temperature rise across the
 
plant (from intake to discharge) averages
 
15 to 30 &deg;F depending on the number of fossil and nuclear units in operation, unit load, and various other factors. The
 
average intake temperature is 2.5
&deg;F above the average ambient air
 
temperature. Rainfall, stormwater
 
runoff, and groundwater exchange
 
replace evaporative losses.
The Florida Department of Environmental Protection (FDEP) has
 
issued FPL a No Discharge National
 
Pollutant Discharge Elimination System (NPDES) permit (No. FL0001562) to
 
operate the CCS as an industrial
 
wastewater facility. Accordingly, the
 
CCS does not discharge directly to fresh
 
or marine surface waters. The proposed
 
action would not require FPL to request
 
modifications to the NPDES permit
 
because the plant discharge limits
 
would not change. Plant discharge
 
limits are not intake-temperature
 
limited; rather, they are a function of the
 
quantity of heat rejected to the CCS
 
during plant operation.
Under the proposed action, the CCS could experience temperatures between
 
100 &deg;F and 104
&deg;F at the TS monitoring location near the north end of the
 
system for short durations during
 
periods of peak summer air
 
temperatures and low rainfall. Such
 
conditions may not be experienced at all
 
depending on site and weather conditions. Temperature increases
 
would also increase CCS water VerDate Mar<15>2010 14:56 Jul 30, 2014Jkt 232001PO 00000Frm 00084Fmt 4703Sfmt 4703E:\FR\FM\31JYN1.SGM31JYN1 wreier-aviles on DSK5TPTVN1PROD with NOTICES 44467 Federal Register/Vol. 79, No. 147/Thursday, July 31, 2014/Notices evaporation rates and result in higher salinity levels. This effect would also be
 
temporary and short in duration because
 
salinity would again decrease upon
 
natural freshwater recharge of the
 
system (i.e., through rainfall, stormwater
 
runoff, and groundwater exchange). No
 
other onsite or offsite waters would be
 
affected by the proposed UHS
 
temperature limit increase.
Because the proposed action would only affect the CCS, and the CCS is a
 
manmade closed cycle cooling system, the NRC concludes that the proposed
 
action would not result in significant
 
impacts to surface water resources.
Aquatic Resources As determined in the previous section, the CCS is the only surface
 
water that would be affected by the proposed action. Accordingly, this
 
section only addresses aquatic resources
 
in the CCS.
The CCS supports a variety of aquatic species typical of shallow, subtropical
 
waters, including phytoplankton, zooplankton, marine algae, rooted
 
plants, crabs, and estuarine fish.
 
Because of high water temperatures and
 
salinity content of the CCS, the resident
 
fish assemblage is dominated by species
 
adapted to living in harsh conditions, such as sheepshead minnow
 
(Cyprinodon variegatus) and several Fundulus species. The CCS is owner-controlled and closed to the public;
 
thus, fish and other aquatic biota in the
 
CCS do not carry any commercial or
 
recreational value.
Because aquatic organisms in the cooling canal system are unable to travel
 
to or from Biscayne Bay, Card Sound, or
 
any other natural water body, changes to
 
the conditions within the CCS would
 
not affect any aquatic populations in the
 
surrounding natural aquatic habitats of
 
Biscayne Bay, Card Sound, or the
 
Atlantic Ocean. Therefore, the NRC staff
 
concludes that the proposed action
 
would result in no significant impact to
 
aquatic resources.
Federally Protected Species and Habitats The Turkey Point site is home to a resident population of Federally-
 
threatened American crocodiles
 
(Crocodylus acutus
). Crocodiles discovered and colonized the Turkey
 
Point CCS following plant construction
 
in the 1970s, and the site now hosts
 
approximately one-third to one-half of
 
the United States breeding population.
 
In 1977, the FWS designated an area of
 
Florida that includes the majority of the
 
Turkey Point site (including the CCS) as
 
critical habitat for the species under the
 
ESA. FPL maintains a crocodile management plan that prescribes how CCS maintenance procedures shall be
 
conducted to minimize nest, hatchling, or adult disturbance. FPL also maintains
 
a crocodile monitoring program to
 
document breeding success and survival
 
on the site.
As a Federal agency, the NRC must comply with the ESA as part of any
 
action it authorizes, funds, or carries
 
out, such as the proposed action
 
evaluated in this environmental
 
assessment. Under ESA section 7, the
 
NRC must consult with the FWS and the National Marine Fisheries Service, as appropriate, to ensure that the proposed
 
agency action is not likely to jeopardize
 
the continued existence of any
 
endangered or threatened species or
 
result in the destruction or adverse
 
modification of designated critical
 
habitat. The ESA and the regulations
 
that implement ESA section 7 (50 CFR
 
Part 402) describe the consultation
 
process that Federal agencies must
 
follow in support of agency actions.
Based on a review of the proposed action, the NRC staff has determined
 
that the American crocodile is the only
 
Federally-listed species that has the
 
potential to be affected by the proposed
 
action. Pursuant to ESA section 7, NRC
 
staff consulted with FWS staff at the
 
South Florida Ecological Services Office
 
in Vero Beach, Florida. The NRC staff
 
prepared a biological assessment (ADAMS Accession No. ML14206A806)
 
that considers the potential for the
 
proposed action to reduce hatchling survival, alter crocodile growth rates, and reduce habitat availability and
 
concludes that the proposed action is
 
not likely to adversely affect the
 
American crocodile and would have no
 
effect on the species designated critical
 
habitat. Based on the NRC staffs
 
biological assessment determinations, the NRC concludes that the proposed action would have no significant impact on Federally-protected species or habitats.
In a July 25, 2014, letter (ADAMS Accession No. ML14206A800) to FWS, the NRC requested ESA section 7
 
consultation.
Radiological Impacts The proposed action would not result in or require any physical changes to
 
Turkey Point systems, structures, or
 
components, including those intended
 
for the prevention of accidents because
 
the proposed license amendments
 
involve TS changes that would only
 
result in changes in procedural and
 
operational aspects undertaken by FPL
 
personnel for monitoring and
 
maintaining the increased allowable
 
UHS temperature limit. Thus, the proposed action would not have a significant adverse effect on the
 
probability of an accident occurring or
 
result in an increased radiological
 
hazard beyond those analyzed in the
 
licensees Updated Final Safety
 
Analysis Report. The proposed action
 
would result in no changes to radiation
 
levels or the types or quantities of
 
radioactive effluents (gaseous or liquid)
 
that affect radiation exposures to
 
members of the public or plant workers.
 
No changes or different types of
 
radiological impacts would be expected
 
from the proposed action. Therefore, the
 
radiological impacts of granting the
 
license amendments would result in no
 
significant impact on the radiological
 
environment.
Cumulative Impacts The Council on Environmental Quality defines cumulative impacts
 
under the National Environmental
 
Policy Act of 1969, as amended (NEPA)
 
as the impact on the environment which
 
results from the incremental impact of
 
the action when added to other past, present, and reasonably foreseeable
 
future actions regardless of what agency (Federal or non-Federal) or person
 
undertakes such other actions (40 CFR
 
Part 1508.7). For the purposes of this
 
analysis, past actions are related to the
 
resource conditions when Turkey Point
 
was licensed and constructed; present
 
actions are related to the resource
 
conditions during current operations;
 
and future actions are those that are
 
reasonably foreseeable through the
 
expiration of Turkey Points renewed
 
facility operating licenses. In the
 
preceding sections of this EA, the NRC
 
has determined that the proposed action
 
has the potential to only affect surface
 
water resources and aquatic resources in
 
the CCS and Federally protected species
 
and habitats (i.e., the sites resident
 
population of American crocodiles and
 
its designated critical habitat). This EA
 
also addresses radiological impacts of
 
the proposed action. Accordingly, this
 
section only addresses the cumulative
 
impacts that could result from the
 
proposed action and other actions on
 
these resources. The proposed action
 
would have no effect on the remaining
 
resources (i.e., land use, visual
 
resources, air quality, noise, the geologic
 
environment, groundwater resources, terrestrial resources, historic and
 
cultural resources, socioeconomic
 
conditions including minority and low
 
income populations (environmental
 
justice), and waste generation and
 
management activities), and thus, cumulative impacts would not occur for
 
these environmental resources. VerDate Mar<15>2010 14:56 Jul 30, 2014Jkt 232001PO 00000Frm 00085Fmt 4703Sfmt 4703E:\FR\FM\31JYN1.SGM31JYN1 wreier-aviles on DSK5TPTVN1PROD with NOTICES 44468 Federal Register/Vol. 79, No. 147/Thursday, July 31, 2014/Notices The NRC staff has identified several actions that may contribute to
 
cumulative effects; each of these actions
 
is described separately below.
CCS Chemical Treatments In 2011, FPL began to notice increased blue green algae
 
concentrations in the CCS. The
 
concentrations have steadily increased
 
since that time. FPL has performed
 
engineering and environmental analyses
 
and believes that the presence of higher
 
than normal CCS algae concentrations
 
may be diminishing the CCSs heat
 
transfer capabilities. FPL developed a
 
plan to gradually reduce algae
 
concentrations through controlled
 
chemical treatment of the CCS over the
 
course of several weeks. On June 18, 2014, FPL submitted a request to the
 
FDEP to approve the use of copper
 
sulfate, hydrogen peroxide, and a bio-
 
stimulant to treat the algae (letter
 
contained in Appendix A of ADAMS
 
Accession No. ML14206A806). On June
 
27, 2014, the FDEP approved FPLs
 
treatment plan for a 90-day trial period (letter contained in Appendix A of
 
ADAMS Accession No. ML14206A806).
 
The FDEP requested that during the 90-
 
day treatment period, FPL monitor the
 
CCS for total recoverable copper and
 
dissolved oxygen and submit its results
 
to the FDEP. The FDEP also
 
recommended that FPL coordinate with
 
the Florida Fish and Wildlife
 
Conservation Commission (FWC) due to
 
the presence of crocodiles in the cooling
 
system. The FWC provided its
 
comments on FPLs treatment plan in a
 
letter dated July 1, 2014 (letter
 
contained in Appendix A of ADAMS
 
Accession No. ML14206A806).
The CCS chemical treatments have the potential to contribute to cumulative
 
effects on CCS surface water resources, CCS aquatic resources, and the
 
American crocodile. Because the CCS is
 
a manmade closed cycle cooling system, treatment of the CCS is not likely to
 
have a significant cumulative effect on
 
surface water resources. Monitoring
 
required by the FDEP will ensure
 
adequate water quality throughout and
 
following treatment. Monitoring will
 
also ensure that any unanticipated effects on the aquatic organisms that
 
inhabit the CCS are appropriately
 
addressed. During the treatment period, FPL has agreed to report any potentially
 
related fish kills in the CCS to the FWC.
 
No fish kills have been reported to date.
 
Regarding crocodiles, the NRCs July 25, 2014, biological assessment notes that
 
FPL has not observed any behavioral or
 
distributional changes or any other
 
noticeable differences that would
 
indicate effects to crocodiles resulting from either the presence of higher algae concentrations or the recent chemical
 
treatments.
Aquifer Withdrawals The CCS is situated above two aquifers: the shallower saltwater
 
Biscayne Aquifer and the deeper
 
brackish Floridan Aquifer. A confining
 
layer separates the two aquifers from
 
one another. Turkey Point, Unit 5 uses
 
the Floridan Aquifer for cooling water.
 
The South Florida Water Management
 
District (SFWMD) recently granted FPL approval to withdraw a portion (approximately 5 million gallons per
 
day [MGD]) of the Unit 5 withdrawal
 
allowance for use in the CCS. FPL began
 
pumping Floridan Aquifer water into
 
the CCS in early July. FPL has also
 
received temporary approval to
 
withdraw 30 MGD from the Biscayne
 
Aquifer, though FPL has not yet used
 
this allowance.
FPL also anticipates the FDEP to issue an Administrative Order requiring FPL
 
to install up to six new wells that will
 
pump approximately 14 MGD of water
 
from the Floridan Aquifer into the CCS.
Modeling performed by FPL consultants
 
and the SFWMD indicates that in
 
approximately 2 years, the withdrawals
 
would reduce the salinity of the CCS to
 
the equivalent of Biscayne Bay (about 34
 
parts per thousand [ppt]). Such
 
withdrawals could also help moderate
 
water temperatures.
The current and anticipated future aquifer withdrawals have the potential
 
to contribute to cumulative effects on
 
CCS surface water resources, CCS
 
aquatic resources, and crocodiles.
 
Because the CCS is a manmade closed
 
cycle cooling system, aquifer
 
withdrawals are not likely to have a
 
significant cumulative effect on surface water resources. Aquifer withdrawals would result in beneficial impacts to CCS aquatic resources and the crocodiles inhabiting the Turkey Point
 
site. FPL anticipates that the
 
withdrawals will reduce the salinity of
 
the CCS to about 34 ppt and could also
 
help moderate CCS temperatures over
 
the long term. Both of these effects
 
would create favorable conditions for
 
CCS aquatic biota and crocodiles, which
 
are currently tolerating an unusually
 
hot, hypersaline environment.
Turkey Point, Units 6 and 7 Construction and Operation In June 2009, FPL submitted a combined license application (COLA)
(ADAMS Accession No. ML091830589)
 
to construct and operate two
 
Westinghouse Advanced Passive 1000 (AP1000) pressurized-water reactors
 
designated as Turkey Point, Units 6 and
: 7. Submission of the COLA does not commit FPL to build two new nuclear
 
units and does not constitute approval
 
of the proposal by the NRC; however, submission of the COLA infers that the
 
construction and operation of the new
 
units is a reasonably foreseeable future
 
action. The COLA will be evaluated on
 
its merits, and the NRC will decide
 
whether to grant the licenses after
 
considering and evaluating the
 
environmental and safety implications
 
of the proposal. Environmental impacts
 
of constructing and operating Turkey
 
Point, Units 6 and 7 will depend on
 
their actual design characteristics, construction practices, and power plant
 
operations. These impacts will be
 
assessed by the NRC in a separate NEPA
 
document. The cumulative impacts
 
presented in this EA may differ from
 
those impacts assessed for the COLA.
 
Potential impacts presented below have
 
been drawn from FPLs Turkey Point, Units 6 and 7 Environmental Report, Revision 5 (ADAMS Accession No.
 
ML13357A435), and NRCs 2012 EA and
 
final FONSI for the EPU.
Of the environmental resources affected by the proposed action, the
 
possible construction and operation of
 
Units 6 and 7 only have the potential to
 
contribute to cumulative radiological
 
impacts. Units 6 and 7 would not use
 
the CCS for cooling. Rather, Units 6 and
 
7 would have a closed-cycle cooling
 
system with mechanical draft cooling
 
towers. The cooling towers would draw
 
makeup from Miami-Dade Water and
 
Sewer Department reclaimed water and
 
would discharge blowdown into deep
 
injection wells. Saltwater extracted from
 
Biscayne Bay subsurface sediment
 
through radial collector wells proposed
 
to be built on the Turkey Point site
 
would serve as a secondary source of
 
makeup water when a sufficient
 
quantity and/or quality of reclaimed
 
water is not available. Because Units 6
 
and 7 would not use the CCS, the
 
proposed new units would not have a
 
cumulative effect on CCS surface water
 
resources or CCS aquatic resources.
Regarding crocodiles, potential impacts to this species and its critical
 
habitat will be addressed in a future
 
ESA section 7 consultation between the
 
NRC and FWS. When considering
 
cumulative impacts on Federally listed
 
species, the ESAs implementing
 
regulations direct Federal agencies to
 
consider the effects of future State or
 
private activities, not involving Federal activities, that are reasonably certain to occur within the action area of the
 
Federal action subject to consultation
 
(50 CFR part 402.02; emphasis added).
Accordingly, the NRC will not address
 
cumulative impacts of Units 6 and 7 on VerDate Mar<15>2010 14:56 Jul 30, 2014Jkt 232001PO 00000Frm 00086Fmt 4703Sfmt 4703E:\FR\FM\31JYN1.SGM31JYN1 wreier-aviles on DSK5TPTVN1PROD with NOTICES 44469 Federal Register/Vol. 79, No. 147/Thursday, July 31, 2014/Notices the American crocodile in this EA because the NRCs issuance of a license
 
to construct and operate Units 6 and 7
 
is a separate Federal activity that will
 
require future consultation.
Regarding cumulative radiological impacts, the NRC and Environmental
 
Protection Agency have developed
 
radiological dose limits for protection of
 
the public and workers that address the
 
cumulative effects of acute and long-
 
term exposure to radiation and
 
radioactive material. These dose limits
 
are specified in 10 CFR part 20 and 40
 
CFR part 190.
The cumulative radiation dose to the public and workers is required to be
 
within the regulations cited above. The
 
public dose limit of 25 millirem (0.25
 
millisieverts) in 40 CFR part 190 applies
 
to all reactors that may be on a site and
 
also includes any other nearby nuclear
 
power reactor facilities. The NRC staff
 
reviewed several years of radiation dose
 
data contained in the licensees annual
 
radioactive effluent release reports for
 
Turkey Point, and the data demonstrate
 
that the dose to members of the public
 
from radioactive effluents is within the
 
limits of 10 CFR part 20 and 40 CFR part
 
190. As previously indicated in the
 
Radiological Impacts section of this
 
environmental assessment, the proposed
 
action would result in no changes to
 
radiation levels or the types or
 
quantities of radioactive effluents (gaseous or liquid) that affect radiation
 
exposures to plant workers and
 
members of the public.
FPLs COLA for Units 6 and 7 contains an assessment of the radiation
 
doses to members of the public from the proposed new reactors and concludes
 
that doses would be within regulatory
 
limits. The staff expects continued
 
compliance with regulatory dose limits
 
during operation of Turkey Point, Units
 
3 and 4 under the proposed action.
 
Therefore, the NRC staff concludes that
 
the cumulative radiological impacts to
 
members of the public that could result
 
from the combined operations of Turkey
 
Point, Units 3 and 4 and the proposed
 
new Units 6 and 7 would result in no
 
significant impact on the environment.
Regarding radiation dose to workers, cumulative dose would only be
 
applicable for those workers that would
 
be engaged at both facilities (i.e., the
 
currently operating Units 3 and 4 and
 
proposed new Units 6 and 7). For Units
 
3 and 4, the licensee has a radiation
 
protection program that maintains
 
worker doses within the dose limits in 10 CFR part 20 during all phases of operations. Operation of Units 6 and 7
 
would require a similar radiation
 
protection program, and the licensee
 
would be responsible for ensuring that
 
workers are not exposed to dose limits
 
above those specified in 10 CFR part 20.
 
Therefore, the NRC staff concludes that
 
the cumulative radiological impacts to
 
plant workers that could result from the
 
combined operations of Turkey Point, Units 3 and 4 and the proposed new
 
Units 6 and 7 would result in no significant impact on the radiological environment.
Cumulative Impacts Conclusion The NRC staff considered the cumulative impacts of CCS chemical
 
treatments, current and anticipated
 
future aquifer withdrawals, and the
 
possible future construction and
 
operation of two new nuclear units on
 
the Turkey Point site. Based on the
 
information presented in this section, the NRC staff concludes that the
 
proposed action, in combination with
 
other cumulative actions, would result
 
in no significant cumulative impacts on
 
the environment.
Alternatives to the Proposed Action As an alternative to the proposed action, the NRC staff considered denial
 
of the proposed license amendments (i.e., the no-action alternative). Denial
 
of the application would result in no
 
change in current environmental
 
conditions or impacts. However, denial
 
would result in reduced operational
 
flexibility and could require FPL to derate or shutdown Turkey Point if the UHS average supply water temperature
 
approaches or exceeds the 100
&deg;F TS limit. In its application, FPL states that
 
loss of load and voltage control resulting
 
from such a shutdown during periods of
 
high summer demand could result in
 
impacts to grid reliability.
Alternative Use of Resources The action does not involve the use of any different resources than those
 
previously considered in NUREG-1437, Supplement 5 prepared for license
 
renewal of Turkey Point.
Agencies and Persons Consulted On July 28, 2014, the NRC staff notified the Florida State official, Ms.
 
Cindy Becker, Chief of Bureau of
 
Radiation Control, of the Florida
 
Department of Health, regarding the
 
environmental impacts of the proposed action. The State official had no comments.
The NRC staff also coordinated with the FWS pursuant to consultation under
 
ESA section 7 during the staffs review of the proposed action. The consultation is further discussed under the
 
Federally-Protected Species section of
 
this environmental assessment.
III. Finding of No Significant Impact The NRC is considering issuing amendments for Renewed Facility
 
Operating License Nos. DPR-31 and
 
DPR-41, issued to FPL for operation of
 
Turkey Point to increase the UHS water
 
temperature limit specified in the
 
Turkey Point TSs from 100
&deg;F to 104&deg;F and add an SR to monitor the UHS
 
temperature more frequently if the UHS
 
temperature approaches the new limit.
On the basis of the EA included in Section II above and incorporated by
 
reference in this finding, the NRC
 
concludes that the proposed action
 
would not have significant effects on the
 
quality of the human environment. The
 
proposed action would result in no
 
significant impacts on surface water
 
resources, aquatic resources, or the
 
radiological environment. In addition, the proposed action is not likely to
 
adversely affect any Federally-protected
 
species or affect any designated critical
 
habitat. The proposed action would also
 
not result in significant cumulative
 
impacts on any environmental
 
resources. The NRCs evaluation
 
considered information provided in the
 
licensees application and associated
 
supplements; the NRCs staff
 
independent review of other
 
environmental documents, and
 
coordination with the FWS pursuant to
 
consultation under ESA section 7.
 
Section IV below lists the
 
environmental documents related to the
 
proposed action and includes
 
information on the availability of these
 
documents. Based on its findings, the
 
NRC has decided not to prepare an
 
environmental impact statement for the
 
proposed action.
IV. Availability of Documents The following table identifies the environmental and other documents
 
cited in this document and related to


the NRCs FONSI. These documents are  
Federal Register / Vol. 79, No. 147 / Thursday, July 31, 2014 / Notices                                          44465 information related to this document                    (ADAMS Accession No. ML14206A853).                    License Renewal of Nuclear Plants:
using any of the following methods:                      Based on information provided in FPLs                Regarding Turkey Point Units 3 and 4
* Federal Rulemaking Web site: Go to                  application and associated supplements,              Final Report (NUREG-1437, http://www.regulations.gov and search                    the NRC staffs independent review, and              Supplement 5) (ADAMS Accession No.
for Docket ID NRC-2011-0181. Address                    the NRCs consultation with the U.S.                  ML020280236); and the NRCs March questions about NRC dockets to Carol                    Fish and Wildlife Service (FWS)                      2012 environmental assessment and Gallagher; telephone: 301-287-3422;                      pursuant to section 7 of the Endangered              final FONSI for the Turkey Point email: Carol.Gallagher@nrc.gov. For                      Species Act of 1973, as amended (ESA),                extended power uprate (EPU) (ADAMS technical questions, contact the                        the NRC did not identify any significant              Accession No. ML12074A251).
individual listed in the FOR FURTHER                    environmental impacts associated with                Identification of the Proposed Action INFORMATION CONTACT section of this                      the proposed license amendments.
document.                                                  Based on the results of the EA                        The proposed action would increase
* NRCs Agencywide Documents                          documented herein, the NRC is issuing                the UHS water temperature limit Access and Management System                            this final FONSI, in accordance with 10              specified in the Turkey Point TSs and (ADAMS): You may obtain publicly                        CFR 51.32, for the proposed license                  add a surveillance requirement to available documents online in the NRC                    amendments.                                          monitor the UHS temperature more Public Documents collection at http://                                                                        frequently if the UHS temperature II. Environmental Assessment                          approaches the new limit. The proposed www.nrc.gov/reading-rm/adams.html.
To begin the search, select ADAMS                      Plant Site and Environs                              action is in accordance with the Public Documents and then select                                                                            licensees application dated July 10, The Turkey Point site encompasses                  2014, as supplemented by letters dated Begin Web-based ADAMS Search. For                    11,000 acres (ac) (4,450 hectares (ha)) in problems with ADAMS, please contact                                                                            July 17, July 22 (two letters), and July Miami-Dade County, Florida. The site                  24, 2014.
the NRCs Public Document Room (PDR)                    lies 25 miles (mi) (40 kilometers [km])
reference staff at 1-800-397-4209, 301-                                                                          More specifically, the proposed action south of Miami, Florida, and the nearest              would amend Appendix A of Turkey 415-4737, or by email to pdr.resource@                  city limits are Florida City, which lies              Points Renewed Facility Operating nrc.gov. The ADAMS accession number                      8 mi (13 km) to the west, Homestead,                  Licenses in order to revise the UHS for each document referenced in this                    which lies 4.5 mi (7 km) to the                      temperature limit set forth in TS notice (if that document is available in                northwest, and Key Largo, which lies 10              Limiting Operating Condition (LOC) 3/
ADAMS) is provided the first time that                  mi (16 km) south of the Turkey Point                  4.7.4 from 100 &deg;F to 104 &deg;F. The CCS a document is referenced. For the                        site. The Turkey Point site is bordered              serves as the UHS for the Intake Cooling convenience of the reader, the ADAMS                    to the east by Biscayne National Park, to            Water (ICW) system and provides the accession numbers are also provided in                  the north by Homestead Bayfront Park                  coolant for the Circulating Water (CW) a table in the Availability of                        and a portion of Biscayne National Park,              system. The CW system provides Documents section of this document.                   and on the west and south by FPLs                    cooling water to the main plant
* NRCs PDR: You may examine and                      13,000-ac (5,260-ha) Everglades                      condensers, and the ICW system purchase copies of public documents at                  Mitigation Bank. The Turkey Point site                removes heat loads from the Component the NRCs PDR, Room O1-F21, One                          includes five electric generating units.              Cooling Water (CCW) system during White Flint North, 11555 Rockville                      Units 1, 2, and 5 are fossil-fueled                  normal and accident conditions to Pike, Rockville, Maryland 20852.                        generating units and are not covered by              support both reactor and containment FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:                        the proposed licensing action; Units 3                heat removal requirements as well as Audrey L. Klett, Office of Nuclear                      and 4 are nuclear generating units. Each              spent fuel cooling requirements.
Reactor Regulation, U.S. Nuclear                        nuclear reactor is a Westinghouse                        Currently, TS LOC 3/4.7.4 includes a Regulatory Commission, Washington,                      pressurized light-water reactor that                  Surveillance Requirement (SR) that DC 20555-0001; telephone: 301-415-                      generates electricity via three steam                necessitates the licensee to verify the 0489; email: Audrey.Klett@nrc.gov.                      generators that produce steam that turns              UHS (CCS) temperature once every 24-SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:                              turbines. The site features a 6,100-ac                hour period and confirm that the (2,500-ha) closed cooling canal system                average supply water temperature is I. Introduction                                          (CCS) that cools heated water                        within the 100 &deg;F limit. The proposed The NRC is considering issuance of                    discharged by Units 1 through 4. Unit 5              license amendments would modify the amendments to Renewed Facility                          uses mechanical draft cooling towers for              SR to require the licensee to verify the Operating License Nos. DPR-31 and                        cooling, draws makeup water from the                  average supply water temperature to be DPR-41 issued to FPL for operation of                    Upper Floridan Aquifer, and discharges                within the new TS limit at least once Turkey Point, located in Homestead,                      blowdown to the CCS. The five units                  per 24 hours, and once per hour when Miami-Dade County, Florida. As                          and supporting equipment (excluding                  the water temperature exceeds 100 &deg;F.
required by &sect; 51.21 of Title 10 of the                  the CCS) occupy approximately 130 ac                  FPL monitors the UHS (CCS)
Code of Federal Regulations (10 CFR                      (53 ha).                                              temperature at a point in the ICW Part 51.21), the NRC staff performed an                    The U.S. Atomic Energy Commission                  system piping going into the inlet of the EA to document its findings related to                  (AEC), the NRCs predecessor agency,                  CCW Heat Exchangers.
the proposed license amendments. FPL                    and the NRC have previously conducted                    The license amendment would submitted its license amendment                          environmental reviews of Turkey Point                require the licensee to place both units wreier-aviles on DSK5TPTVN1PROD with NOTICES request by letter dated July 10, 2014                    in several documents, and the                        in at least hot standby within 12 hours (ADAMS Accession No. ML14196A006)                        descriptions therein continue to                      and cold shutdown within the next 30 and subsequently supplemented its                        accurately depict the Turkey Point site              hours if the UHS exceeds 104 &deg;F.
application by letters dated July 17,                    and environs. Those documents include                    The proposed TS revisions would not 2014 (ADAMS Accession No.                                the AECs July 1972 Final                            result in or require any physical changes ML14202A392), July 22, 2014 (ADAMS                      Environmental Statement (FES); the                    to Turkey Point systems, structures, or Accession Nos. ML14204A367 and                          NRCs January 2002 Generic                            components, including those intended ML14204A368), and July 24, 2014                          Environmental Impact Statement for                    for the prevention of accidents. If VerDate Mar<15>2010  14:56 Jul 30, 2014  Jkt 232001  PO 00000  Frm 00083  Fmt 4703  Sfmt 4703  E:\FR\FM\31JYN1.SGM  31JYN1


available for public inspection online through ADAMS at http://www.nrc.gov/
44466                          Federal Register / Vol. 79, No. 147 / Thursday, July 31, 2014 / Notices approved, the LAR would be effective                    result in changes in procedural and                  waters, the most significant of which is from the date of NRC approval through                    operational aspects undertaken by FPL                the CCS. The CCS spans a 6,100-ac the expiration dates of the renewed                      personnel for monitoring and                          (2,500-ha) area (4,370 ac (1,770 ha) of facility operating licenses (i.e., through              maintaining the UHS temperature limit                surface water) spread over a 5-mi by 2-2032 for Unit 3 and 2033 for Unit 4).                   as measured at the ICW system piping                  mi (8-km by 3.2-km) area. The system going into the inlet of the CCW Heat                 includes 168 mi (270 km) of earthen The Need for the Proposed Action Exchangers. Thus, FPLs workforce                    canals with an average depth of 2.8 ft The proposed action is needed to                      would not change, and the regular                    (0.8 km) and contains approximately 4 provide FPL with additional operational                  operations workforce would otherwise                  billion gallons (12,300 acre-feet) of flexibility during periods when high air                be unaffected by the proposed action.                 water. The Turkey Point units (both temperatures, low rainfall, and other                    Based on the above and the available                  nuclear Units 3 and 4 and fossil-fueled factors contribute to conditions                        information reviewed by the staff, the                Units 1 and 2) use the CCS like a resulting in a UHS temperature in                        NRC concludes that the proposed action                radiator and, as previously mentioned, excess of 100 &deg;F that would otherwise                    would result in no significant impact on              the CCS serves as the UHS for Units 3 necessitate FPL to place Turkey Point in                land use, visual resources, air quality,              and 4. Heated water discharges into the cold shutdown. In its application, FPL                  noise, the geologic environment,                      CCS at one end, flows through the canal states that loss of load and voltage                    groundwater resources, terrestrial                    system, and is withdrawn from the other control resulting from shutdown during                  resources, historic and cultural                      end for reuse as cooling water. The periods of high summer demand could                      resources, socioeconomic conditions                  heated discharge effluent is distributed result in impacts to grid reliability. UHS              including minority and low income                    to 32 feeder canals. Water in the feeder temperatures have recently approached                    populations (environmental justice), or              canals flows south and discharges into and exceeded the 100 &deg;F TS limit on                      waste generation and management                      a single collector canal that distributes several occasions. On July 20, 2014, the                activities. Therefore, this environmental            water to six return canals. Water in the NRC approved a notice of enforcement                    assessment does not prevent any further              return canals flows north to the plant discretion (NOED), which allows the                      evaluation of the operational impacts on              intake. The entire circuit that water UHS temperature to exceed 100 &deg;F up to                  these environmental resources. The                    travels from plant discharge back to 103 &deg;F for a period of no more than 10                  NRC previously assessed the                          plant intake is 13.2 mi (21.2 km), and days, as well as several other NOED exit                environmental impacts of continued                    transit time through the system is criteria. The NRC documented the                        operations of Turkey Point in NUREG-                  approximately 44 hours. Water flows NOED in a letter to FPL dated July 23,                                                                        attributable to Units 3 and 4 amount to 1437, Supplement 5 and the EA and 2014 (ADAMS Accession No.                                                                                      approximately 1.0 million gallons per final FONSI for the EPU, and ML14204A652).                                                                                                 minute. Temperature rise across the implementation of the proposed license Environmental Impacts of the Proposed                    amendments would not result in any                    plant (from intake to discharge) averages Action                                                  impacts beyond those already                          15 to 30 &deg;F depending on the number of characterized in these documents.                     fossil and nuclear units in operation, As part of the original licensing                                                                            unit load, and various other factors. The review for Turkey Point, the AEC                        Accordingly, this environmental assessment focuses on the                            average intake temperature is 2.5 &deg;F published an FES in July 1972 that                                                                            above the average ambient air evaluates potential environmental                        environmental resources that could be affected by the change in the CCS                    temperature. Rainfall, stormwater impacts associated with the operation of                                                                      runoff, and groundwater exchange Turkey Point over its initial 40-year                    thermal limit: Surface water resources, aquatic resources, and Federally-                    replace evaporative losses.
reading-rm/adams.html or in person at the NRCs PDR as described previously. VerDate Mar<15>2010 14:56 Jul 30, 2014Jkt 232001PO 00000Frm 00087Fmt 4703Sfmt 4703E:\FR\FM\31JYN1.SGM31JYN1 wreier-aviles on DSK5TPTVN1PROD with NOTICES 44470 Federal Register/Vol. 79, No. 147/Thursday, July 31, 2014/Notices Document Adams Accession No.
operating period (1972-2012 for Unit 3                                                                            The Florida Department of and 1973-2013 for Unit 4). In 2002, the                  protected species and habitats.
Documents Related to License Amendment Request Florida Power & Light Company. License Amendment Request No. 231, Application to Revise Technical Specifications to Re-vise Ultimate Heat Sink Temperature Limit. Dated July 10, 2014.
Environmental Protection (FDEP) has NRC evaluated the environmental                          Radiological impacts are also addressed.
ML14196A006 Florida Power & Light Company. License Amendment Request No. 231, Application to Revise Ultimate Heat Sink Tempera-ture LimitRequest for Emergency Approval. Dated July 17, 2014.
The details of the NRC staffs safety              issued FPL a No Discharge National impacts of operating Turkey Point for an                                                                      Pollutant Discharge Elimination System additional 20 years beyond the original                  evaluation will be separately provided (NPDES) permit (No. FL0001562) to operating license (i.e., through 2032 for                in the license amendment package operate the CCS as an industrial Unit 3 and 2033 for Unit 4) and                         issued to approve the license wastewater facility. Accordingly, the predicted that the environmental                        amendment, if granted.
ML14202A392 U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission. Turkey Point 3 and 4 Request for Additional InformationLAR231 (TAC MF4392 and MF4393). [1 of 2] Dated July 18, 2014.
CCS does not discharge directly to fresh impacts of license renewal were small                    Nonradiological Impacts                              or marine surface waters. The proposed for all environmental resources.                                                                              action would not require FPL to request NUREG-1437, Supplement 5 provides                        Surface Water Resources modifications to the NPDES permit that assessment. In 2012, the NRC                          The Turkey Point site lies on the                  because the plant discharge limits evaluated the impacts of a then-                        shore of Biscayne Bay. South of the site,            would not change. Plant discharge proposed EPU at Turkey Point that                        Mangrove Point divides the bay from                  limits are not intake-temperature authorized the facility to increase the                  Card Sound. Biscayne Bay and Card                    limited; rather, they are a function of the maximum power level from 2300                            Sound are shallow, subtropical                        quantity of heat rejected to the CCS megawatts thermal (MWt) to 2644 MWt                      estuarine waters located between the                  during plant operation.
ML14203A614 U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission. Turkey Point 3 and 4 Request for Additional InformationLAR231 (TAC MF4392 and MF4393). [2 of 2] Dated July 18, 2014.
for each unit. The NRCs March 2012 EA                  Atlantic coast mainland and a grouping                  Under the proposed action, the CCS and final FONSI provide that                            of barrier islands that form the                      could experience temperatures between assessment.                                             northernmost Florida Keys. The Atlantic              100 &deg;F and 104 &deg;F at the TS monitoring wreier-aviles on DSK5TPTVN1PROD with NOTICES As previously discussed, the                          Ocean lies beyond the barrier islands.               location near the north end of the proposed action would not result in or                  The Intracoastal Waterway traverses                  system for short durations during require any physical changes to Turkey                  Biscayne Bay and Card Sound, and a                    periods of peak summer air Point systems, structures, or                            barge passage runs from the Intracoastal              temperatures and low rainfall. Such components, including those intended                    Waterway to the non-nuclear units on                  conditions may not be experienced at all for the prevention of accidents. Further,               the Turkey Point site.                               depending on site and weather the proposed license amendments                            In addition to these offsite waters, the          conditions. Temperature increases involve TS changes that would only                      site includes several manmade surface                would also increase CCS water VerDate Mar<15>2010  14:56 Jul 30, 2014  Jkt 232001  PO 00000  Frm 00084  Fmt 4703  Sfmt 4703  E:\FR\FM\31JYN1.SGM  31JYN1
ML14203A618 Florida Power & Light Company. License Amendment Request No. 231, Application to Revise Ultimate Heat Sink Tempera-ture LimitSupplement 1, and Response to Request for Additional Information. Dated July 22, 2014.
ML14204A367 Florida Power & Light Company. Response to Request for Additional Information Regarding License Amendment Request No.
231, Application to Revise Technical Specifications to Revise Ultimate Heat Sink Temperature Limit. Dated July 22, 2014.
ML14204A368 U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission. Turkey Point 3 and 4 Request for Additional InformationLAR231 (TAC MF4392 and MF4393). Dated July 22, 2014.
ML14204A814 U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission. Notice of Enforcement Discretion for Florida Power & Light Company Regarding Turkey Point Nuclear Generating Unit Nos. 3 and 4 [NOED NO. 14-2-001]. Dated July 23, 2014.
ML14204A652 Florida Power & Light Company. Response to Containment and Ventilation Branch Request for Additional Information, Re-garding License Amendment Request No. 231, Application to Revise Ultimate Heat Temperature Limit. Dated July 24, 2014.
ML14206A853 Florida Power & Light Company. Turkey Point Nuclear Generating Unit Nos. 3 and 4Individual Notice of Consideration of Issuance of Amendments to Renewed Facility Operating Licenses, Proposed No Significant Hazards Consideration Deter-


mination, and Opportunity for Hearing (Exigent Circumstances) (TAC Nos. MF4392 and MF4293). Dated July 24, 2014.
Federal Register / Vol. 79, No. 147 / Thursday, July 31, 2014 / Notices                                            44467 evaporation rates and result in higher                  management plan that prescribes how                  proposed action would not have a salinity levels. This effect would also be              CCS maintenance procedures shall be                  significant adverse effect on the temporary and short in duration because                  conducted to minimize nest, hatchling,                probability of an accident occurring or salinity would again decrease upon                      or adult disturbance. FPL also maintains              result in an increased radiological natural freshwater recharge of the                      a crocodile monitoring program to                    hazard beyond those analyzed in the system (i.e., through rainfall, stormwater              document breeding success and survival                licensees Updated Final Safety runoff, and groundwater exchange). No                    on the site.                                          Analysis Report. The proposed action other onsite or offsite waters would be                    As a Federal agency, the NRC must                  would result in no changes to radiation affected by the proposed UHS                            comply with the ESA as part of any                    levels or the types or quantities of temperature limit increase.                              action it authorizes, funds, or carries              radioactive effluents (gaseous or liquid)
ML14204A129 (letter) ML14199A111 (enclosure)
Because the proposed action would                    out, such as the proposed action                      that affect radiation exposures to only affect the CCS, and the CCS is a                    evaluated in this environmental                      members of the public or plant workers.
U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission. Request to Reinitiate Informal Consultation for a Proposed License Amendment to In-crease the Ultimate Heat Sink Temperature Limit at Turkey Point Nuclear Generating Unit Nos. 3 and 4. Dated July 25, 2014.ML14206A800 U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission. Biological Assessment on the American Crocodile (Crocodylus acutus) for Turkey Point Nuclear Generating Unit Nos. 3 and 4 Proposed License Amendment to Increase the Ultimate Heat Sink Temperature
manmade closed cycle cooling system,                    assessment. Under ESA section 7, the                  No changes or different types of the NRC concludes that the proposed                      NRC must consult with the FWS and the                radiological impacts would be expected action would not result in significant                  National Marine Fisheries Service, as                from the proposed action. Therefore, the impacts to surface water resources.                     appropriate, to ensure that the proposed              radiological impacts of granting the agency action is not likely to jeopardize            license amendments would result in no Aquatic Resources the continued existence of any                        significant impact on the radiological As determined in the previous                        endangered or threatened species or                  environment.
section, the CCS is the only surface                    result in the destruction or adverse water that would be affected by the                      modification of designated critical                  Cumulative Impacts proposed action. Accordingly, this                      habitat. The ESA and the regulations section only addresses aquatic resources                                                                          The Council on Environmental that implement ESA section 7 (50 CFR in the CCS.                                                                                                    Quality defines cumulative impacts Part 402) describe the consultation The CCS supports a variety of aquatic                                                                      under the National Environmental process that Federal agencies must species typical of shallow, subtropical                                                                        Policy Act of 1969, as amended (NEPA) follow in support of agency actions.
waters, including phytoplankton,                            Based on a review of the proposed                  as the impact on the environment which zooplankton, marine algae, rooted                        action, the NRC staff has determined                  results from the incremental impact of plants, crabs, and estuarine fish.                       that the American crocodile is the only              the action when added to other past, Because of high water temperatures and                  Federally-listed species that has the                present, and reasonably foreseeable salinity content of the CCS, the resident                potential to be affected by the proposed              future actions regardless of what agency fish assemblage is dominated by species                  action. Pursuant to ESA section 7, NRC                (Federal or non-Federal) or person adapted to living in harsh conditions,                  staff consulted with FWS staff at the                undertakes such other actions (40 CFR such as sheepshead minnow                                South Florida Ecological Services Office              Part 1508.7). For the purposes of this (Cyprinodon variegatus) and several                      in Vero Beach, Florida. The NRC staff                analysis, past actions are related to the Fundulus species. The CCS is owner-                      prepared a biological assessment                      resource conditions when Turkey Point controlled and closed to the public;                    (ADAMS Accession No. ML14206A806)                    was licensed and constructed; present thus, fish and other aquatic biota in the                that considers the potential for the                  actions are related to the resource CCS do not carry any commercial or                      proposed action to reduce hatchling                  conditions during current operations; recreational value.                                      survival, alter crocodile growth rates,              and future actions are those that are Because aquatic organisms in the                      and reduce habitat availability and                  reasonably foreseeable through the cooling canal system are unable to travel                concludes that the proposed action is                expiration of Turkey Points renewed to or from Biscayne Bay, Card Sound, or                  not likely to adversely affect the                    facility operating licenses. In the any other natural water body, changes to                American crocodile and would have no                  preceding sections of this EA, the NRC the conditions within the CCS would                      effect on the species designated critical            has determined that the proposed action not affect any aquatic populations in the                habitat. Based on the NRC staffs                    has the potential to only affect surface surrounding natural aquatic habitats of                  biological assessment determinations,                water resources and aquatic resources in Biscayne Bay, Card Sound, or the                        the NRC concludes that the proposed                  the CCS and Federally protected species Atlantic Ocean. Therefore, the NRC staff                action would have no significant impact              and habitats (i.e., the sites resident concludes that the proposed action                      on Federally-protected species or                    population of American crocodiles and would result in no significant impact to                habitats.                                            its designated critical habitat). This EA aquatic resources.                                          In a July 25, 2014, letter (ADAMS                  also addresses radiological impacts of Accession No. ML14206A800) to FWS,                    the proposed action. Accordingly, this Federally Protected Species and                                                                                section only addresses the cumulative the NRC requested ESA section 7 Habitats                                                                                                      impacts that could result from the consultation.
The Turkey Point site is home to a                                                                          proposed action and other actions on resident population of Federally-                        Radiological Impacts                                  these resources. The proposed action threatened American crocodiles                            The proposed action would not result                would have no effect on the remaining (Crocodylus acutus). Crocodiles                          in or require any physical changes to                resources (i.e., land use, visual discovered and colonized the Turkey                      Turkey Point systems, structures, or                  resources, air quality, noise, the geologic Point CCS following plant construction                  components, including those intended                  environment, groundwater resources, wreier-aviles on DSK5TPTVN1PROD with NOTICES in the 1970s, and the site now hosts                    for the prevention of accidents because              terrestrial resources, historic and approximately one-third to one-half of                  the proposed license amendments                      cultural resources, socioeconomic the United States breeding population.                  involve TS changes that would only                    conditions including minority and low In 1977, the FWS designated an area of                  result in changes in procedural and                  income populations (environmental Florida that includes the majority of the                operational aspects undertaken by FPL                justice), and waste generation and Turkey Point site (including the CCS) as                personnel for monitoring and                          management activities), and thus, critical habitat for the species under the              maintaining the increased allowable                  cumulative impacts would not occur for ESA. FPL maintains a crocodile                          UHS temperature limit. Thus, the                     these environmental resources.
VerDate Mar<15>2010  14:56 Jul 30, 2014  Jkt 232001  PO 00000  Frm 00085  Fmt 4703  Sfmt 4703  E:\FR\FM\31JYN1.SGM  31JYN1


Limit. Dated July 25, 2014.
44468                          Federal Register / Vol. 79, No. 147 / Thursday, July 31, 2014 / Notices The NRC staff has identified several                  from either the presence of higher algae              7. Submission of the COLA does not actions that may contribute to                          concentrations or the recent chemical                commit FPL to build two new nuclear cumulative effects; each of these actions                treatments.                                          units and does not constitute approval is described separately below.                                                                                of the proposal by the NRC; however, Aquifer Withdrawals submission of the COLA infers that the CCS Chemical Treatments                                    The CCS is situated above two                      construction and operation of the new In 2011, FPL began to notice                          aquifers: the shallower saltwater                    units is a reasonably foreseeable future increased blue green algae                              Biscayne Aquifer and the deeper                      action. The COLA will be evaluated on concentrations in the CCS. The                          brackish Floridan Aquifer. A confining                its merits, and the NRC will decide concentrations have steadily increased                  layer separates the two aquifers from                whether to grant the licenses after since that time. FPL has performed                      one another. Turkey Point, Unit 5 uses                considering and evaluating the engineering and environmental analyses                  the Floridan Aquifer for cooling water.               environmental and safety implications and believes that the presence of higher                The South Florida Water Management                    of the proposal. Environmental impacts than normal CCS algae concentrations                    District (SFWMD) recently granted FPL                of constructing and operating Turkey may be diminishing the CCSs heat                        approval to withdraw a portion                        Point, Units 6 and 7 will depend on transfer capabilities. FPL developed a                  (approximately 5 million gallons per                  their actual design characteristics, plan to gradually reduce algae                          day [MGD]) of the Unit 5 withdrawal                  construction practices, and power plant concentrations through controlled                        allowance for use in the CCS. FPL began              operations. These impacts will be chemical treatment of the CCS over the                  pumping Floridan Aquifer water into                  assessed by the NRC in a separate NEPA course of several weeks. On June 18,                    the CCS in early July. FPL has also                  document. The cumulative impacts 2014, FPL submitted a request to the                    received temporary approval to                        presented in this EA may differ from FDEP to approve the use of copper                        withdraw 30 MGD from the Biscayne                    those impacts assessed for the COLA.
ML14206A806 Other Referenced Documents U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission. Generic Environmental Impact Statement for License Renewal of Nuclear Plants: Re-garding Turkey Point Units 3 and 4Final Report (NUREG-1437, Supplement 5). Dated January 28, 2002.
sulfate, hydrogen peroxide, and a bio-                  Aquifer, though FPL has not yet used                  Potential impacts presented below have stimulant to treat the algae (letter                    this allowance.                                       been drawn from FPLs Turkey Point, contained in Appendix A of ADAMS                            FPL also anticipates the FDEP to issue            Units 6 and 7 Environmental Report, Accession No. ML14206A806). On June                      an Administrative Order requiring FPL                Revision 5 (ADAMS Accession No.
ML020280236 Florida Power & Light Company. Proposed Turkey Point Units 6 & 7, Project No. 763, Application for Combined License for Turkey Point Units 6 and 7. Dated June 30, 2009.
27, 2014, the FDEP approved FPLs                        to install up to six new wells that will              ML13357A435), and NRCs 2012 EA and treatment plan for a 90-day trial period                pump approximately 14 MGD of water                    final FONSI for the EPU.
ML091830589 U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission. Final Environmental Assessment and Finding of No Significant Impact Related to a Li-cense Amendment To Increase the Maximum Reactor Power Level, Florida Power & Light Company; Turkey Point, Units 3
(letter contained in Appendix A of                      from the Floridan Aquifer into the CCS.                  Of the environmental resources ADAMS Accession No. ML14206A806).                        Modeling performed by FPL consultants                affected by the proposed action, the The FDEP requested that during the 90-                  and the SFWMD indicates that in                      possible construction and operation of day treatment period, FPL monitor the                    approximately 2 years, the withdrawals                Units 6 and 7 only have the potential to CCS for total recoverable copper and                    would reduce the salinity of the CCS to              contribute to cumulative radiological dissolved oxygen and submit its results                  the equivalent of Biscayne Bay (about 34              impacts. Units 6 and 7 would not use to the FDEP. The FDEP also                              parts per thousand [ppt]). Such                      the CCS for cooling. Rather, Units 6 and recommended that FPL coordinate with                    withdrawals could also help moderate                  7 would have a closed-cycle cooling the Florida Fish and Wildlife                            water temperatures.                                  system with mechanical draft cooling Conservation Commission (FWC) due to                        The current and anticipated future                towers. The cooling towers would draw the presence of crocodiles in the cooling                aquifer withdrawals have the potential                makeup from Miami-Dade Water and system. The FWC provided its                            to contribute to cumulative effects on                Sewer Department reclaimed water and comments on FPLs treatment plan in a                    CCS surface water resources, CCS                      would discharge blowdown into deep letter dated July 1, 2014 (letter                        aquatic resources, and crocodiles.                    injection wells. Saltwater extracted from contained in Appendix A of ADAMS                        Because the CCS is a manmade closed                  Biscayne Bay subsurface sediment Accession No. ML14206A806).                              cycle cooling system, aquifer                        through radial collector wells proposed The CCS chemical treatments have                      withdrawals are not likely to have a                  to be built on the Turkey Point site the potential to contribute to cumulative                significant cumulative effect on surface              would serve as a secondary source of effects on CCS surface water resources,                  water resources. Aquifer withdrawals                  makeup water when a sufficient CCS aquatic resources, and the                          would result in beneficial impacts to                quantity and/or quality of reclaimed American crocodile. Because the CCS is                  CCS aquatic resources and the                        water is not available. Because Units 6 a manmade closed cycle cooling system,                  crocodiles inhabiting the Turkey Point                and 7 would not use the CCS, the treatment of the CCS is not likely to                    site. FPL anticipates that the                        proposed new units would not have a have a significant cumulative effect on                  withdrawals will reduce the salinity of              cumulative effect on CCS surface water surface water resources. Monitoring                      the CCS to about 34 ppt and could also                resources or CCS aquatic resources.
required by the FDEP will ensure                        help moderate CCS temperatures over                      Regarding crocodiles, potential adequate water quality throughout and                    the long term. Both of these effects                  impacts to this species and its critical following treatment. Monitoring will                    would create favorable conditions for                habitat will be addressed in a future also ensure that any unanticipated                      CCS aquatic biota and crocodiles, which              ESA section 7 consultation between the effects on the aquatic organisms that                    are currently tolerating an unusually                NRC and FWS. When considering inhabit the CCS are appropriately                        hot, hypersaline environment.                         cumulative impacts on Federally listed addressed. During the treatment period,                                                                        species, the ESAs implementing FPL has agreed to report any potentially                Turkey Point, Units 6 and 7                          regulations direct Federal agencies to wreier-aviles on DSK5TPTVN1PROD with NOTICES related fish kills in the CCS to the FWC.               Construction and Operation                            consider the effects of future State or No fish kills have been reported to date.                  In June 2009, FPL submitted a                       private activities, not involving Federal Regarding crocodiles, the NRCs July 25,                 combined license application (COLA)                  activities, that are reasonably certain to 2014, biological assessment notes that                  (ADAMS Accession No. ML091830589)                    occur within the action area of the FPL has not observed any behavioral or                  to construct and operate two                          Federal action subject to consultation distributional changes or any other                      Westinghouse Advanced Passive 1000                    (50 CFR part 402.02; emphasis added).
noticeable differences that would                        (AP1000) pressurized-water reactors                  Accordingly, the NRC will not address indicate effects to crocodiles resulting                designated as Turkey Point, Units 6 and              cumulative impacts of Units 6 and 7 on VerDate Mar<15>2010  14:56 Jul 30, 2014  Jkt 232001  PO 00000  Frm 00086  Fmt 4703  Sfmt 4703  E:\FR\FM\31JYN1.SGM  31JYN1


and 4. Dated March 27, 2012.
Federal Register / Vol. 79, No. 147 / Thursday, July 31, 2014 / Notices                                          44469 the American crocodile in this EA                        10 CFR part 20 during all phases of                  action. The State official had no because the NRCs issuance of a license                  operations. Operation of Units 6 and 7                comments.
ML12074A251 Florida Power & Light Company. Turkey Point Units 6 & 7 Combine License Application, Part 3: Environmental Report, Revi-sion 5. Dated December 23, 2013.
to construct and operate Units 6 and 7                  would require a similar radiation                        The NRC staff also coordinated with is a separate Federal activity that will                protection program, and the licensee                  the FWS pursuant to consultation under require future consultation.                            would be responsible for ensuring that                ESA section 7 during the staffs review Regarding cumulative radiological                    workers are not exposed to dose limits                of the proposed action. The consultation impacts, the NRC and Environmental                      above those specified in 10 CFR part 20.              is further discussed under the Protection Agency have developed                        Therefore, the NRC staff concludes that              Federally-Protected Species section of radiological dose limits for protection of              the cumulative radiological impacts to                this environmental assessment.
ML13357A435 Florida Power & Light Company. Turkey Point Units 3 and 4; Wastewater Permit FL0001563; Request for Approval for the Use of Copper Sulfate, Hydrogen Peroxide, and a Bio-Stimulant in the Treatment and Control of Blue Green Algae in the  
the public and workers that address the                  plant workers that could result from the cumulative effects of acute and long-                    combined operations of Turkey Point,                  III. Finding of No Significant Impact term exposure to radiation and                          Units 3 and 4 and the proposed new                      The NRC is considering issuing radioactive material. These dose limits                  Units 6 and 7 would result in no                      amendments for Renewed Facility are specified in 10 CFR part 20 and 40                  significant impact on the radiological                Operating License Nos. DPR-31 and CFR part 190.                                            environment.                                          DPR-41, issued to FPL for operation of The cumulative radiation dose to the                                                                        Turkey Point to increase the UHS water public and workers is required to be                    Cumulative Impacts Conclusion temperature limit specified in the within the regulations cited above. The                    The NRC staff considered the                      Turkey Point TSs from 100 &deg;F to 104 &deg;F public dose limit of 25 millirem (0.25                  cumulative impacts of CCS chemical                    and add an SR to monitor the UHS millisieverts) in 40 CFR part 190 applies                treatments, current and anticipated                  temperature more frequently if the UHS to all reactors that may be on a site and                future aquifer withdrawals, and the                  temperature approaches the new limit.
also includes any other nearby nuclear                  possible future construction and power reactor facilities. The NRC staff                                                                          On the basis of the EA included in operation of two new nuclear units on reviewed several years of radiation dose                                                                      Section II above and incorporated by the Turkey Point site. Based on the data contained in the licensees annual                                                                        reference in this finding, the NRC information presented in this section, radioactive effluent release reports for                                                                      concludes that the proposed action the NRC staff concludes that the Turkey Point, and the data demonstrate                                                                        would not have significant effects on the proposed action, in combination with that the dose to members of the public                                                                        quality of the human environment. The other cumulative actions, would result from radioactive effluents is within the                                                                      proposed action would result in no in no significant cumulative impacts on limits of 10 CFR part 20 and 40 CFR part                                                                      significant impacts on surface water the environment.
190. As previously indicated in the                                                                            resources, aquatic resources, or the Radiological Impacts section of this                Alternatives to the Proposed Action                  radiological environment. In addition, environmental assessment, the proposed                      As an alternative to the proposed                  the proposed action is not likely to action would result in no changes to                    action, the NRC staff considered denial              adversely affect any Federally-protected radiation levels or the types or                        of the proposed license amendments                    species or affect any designated critical quantities of radioactive effluents                      (i.e., the no-action alternative). Denial        habitat. The proposed action would also (gaseous or liquid) that affect radiation                of the application would result in no                not result in significant cumulative exposures to plant workers and                          change in current environmental                      impacts on any environmental members of the public.                                  conditions or impacts. However, denial                resources. The NRCs evaluation FPLs COLA for Units 6 and 7                          would result in reduced operational                  considered information provided in the contains an assessment of the radiation                  flexibility and could require FPL to                  licensees application and associated doses to members of the public from the                  derate or shutdown Turkey Point if the                supplements; the NRCs staff proposed new reactors and concludes                      UHS average supply water temperature                  independent review of other that doses would be within regulatory                    approaches or exceeds the 100 &deg;F TS                  environmental documents, and limits. The staff expects continued                      limit. In its application, FPL states that            coordination with the FWS pursuant to compliance with regulatory dose limits                  loss of load and voltage control resulting            consultation under ESA section 7.
during operation of Turkey Point, Units                 from such a shutdown during periods of                Section IV below lists the 3 and 4 under the proposed action.                      high summer demand could result in                    environmental documents related to the Therefore, the NRC staff concludes that                  impacts to grid reliability.                          proposed action and includes the cumulative radiological impacts to                                                                        information on the availability of these members of the public that could result                  Alternative Use of Resources                          documents. Based on its findings, the from the combined operations of Turkey                    The action does not involve the use of              NRC has decided not to prepare an Point, Units 3 and 4 and the proposed                    any different resources than those                    environmental impact statement for the new Units 6 and 7 would result in no                    previously considered in NUREG-1437,                  proposed action.
significant impact on the environment.                  Supplement 5 prepared for license                    IV. Availability of Documents Regarding radiation dose to workers,                  renewal of Turkey Point.
cumulative dose would only be                                                                                    The following table identifies the applicable for those workers that would                  Agencies and Persons Consulted                        environmental and other documents be engaged at both facilities (i.e., the                  On July 28, 2014, the NRC staff                    cited in this document and related to currently operating Units 3 and 4 and                    notified the Florida State official, Ms.              the NRCs FONSI. These documents are proposed new Units 6 and 7). For Units                  Cindy Becker, Chief of Bureau of                      available for public inspection online wreier-aviles on DSK5TPTVN1PROD with NOTICES 3 and 4, the licensee has a radiation                    Radiation Control, of the Florida                    through ADAMS at http://www.nrc.gov/
protection program that maintains                        Department of Health, regarding the                  reading-rm/adams.html or in person at worker doses within the dose limits in                   environmental impacts of the proposed                the NRCs PDR as described previously.
VerDate Mar<15>2010  14:56 Jul 30, 2014  Jkt 232001  PO 00000  Frm 00087  Fmt 4703  Sfmt 4703  E:\FR\FM\31JYN1.SGM  31JYN1


Cooling Canal System. Dated June 18, 2014.ML14206A806*
44470                          Federal Register / Vol. 79, No. 147 / Thursday, July 31, 2014 / Notices Adams Document                                                      Accession No.
Florida Department of Environmental Protection. Re: Florida Power & Light, Turkey Point, NPDES Permit FL0001562, 90-Day Trial Approval. Dated June 27, 2014.ML14206A806*
Documents Related to License Amendment Request Florida Power & Light Company. License Amendment Request No. 231, Application to Revise Technical Specifications to Re-        ML14196A006 vise Ultimate Heat Sink Temperature Limit. Dated July 10, 2014.
Florida Fish and Wildlife Conservation Commission. Re: Florida Power & Light, Turkey Point Plant Maintenance Activity, NPDES Permit FL0001562, Miami-Dade County. Dated July 1, 2014.ML14206A806* *(See Appendix A.)
Florida Power & Light Company. License Amendment Request No. 231, Application to Revise Ultimate Heat Sink Tempera-            ML14202A392 ture LimitRequest for Emergency Approval. Dated July 17, 2014.
Dated at Rockville, Maryland, this 28th day of July 2014.
U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission. Turkey Point 3 and 4 Request for Additional InformationLAR231 (TAC MF4392 and              ML14203A614 MF4393). [1 of 2] Dated July 18, 2014.
For the Nuclear Regulatory Commission.
U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission. Turkey Point 3 and 4 Request for Additional InformationLAR231 (TAC MF4392 and              ML14203A618 MF4393). [2 of 2] Dated July 18, 2014.
Lisa M. Regner, Acting Chief, Plant Licensing Branch II-2, Division of Operating Reactor Licensing, Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation.
Florida Power & Light Company. License Amendment Request No. 231, Application to Revise Ultimate Heat Sink Tempera-            ML14204A367 ture LimitSupplement 1, and Response to Request for Additional Information. Dated July 22, 2014.
Florida Power & Light Company. Response to Request for Additional Information Regarding License Amendment Request No.          ML14204A368 231, Application to Revise Technical Specifications to Revise Ultimate Heat Sink Temperature Limit. Dated July 22, 2014.
U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission. Turkey Point 3 and 4 Request for Additional InformationLAR231 (TAC MF4392 and              ML14204A814 MF4393). Dated July 22, 2014.
U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission. Notice of Enforcement Discretion for Florida Power & Light Company Regarding Turkey        ML14204A652 Point Nuclear Generating Unit Nos. 3 and 4 [NOED NO. 14-2-001]. Dated July 23, 2014.
Florida Power & Light Company. Response to Containment and Ventilation Branch Request for Additional Information, Re-          ML14206A853 garding License Amendment Request No. 231, Application to Revise Ultimate Heat Temperature Limit. Dated July 24, 2014.
Florida Power & Light Company. Turkey Point Nuclear Generating Unit Nos. 3 and 4Individual Notice of Consideration of          ML14204A129 Issuance of Amendments to Renewed Facility Operating Licenses, Proposed No Significant Hazards Consideration Deter-            (letter) mination, and Opportunity for Hearing (Exigent Circumstances) (TAC Nos. MF4392 and MF4293). Dated July 24, 2014.              ML14199A111 (enclosure)
U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission. Request to Reinitiate Informal Consultation for a Proposed License Amendment to In-        ML14206A800 crease the Ultimate Heat Sink Temperature Limit at Turkey Point Nuclear Generating Unit Nos. 3 and 4. Dated July 25, 2014.
U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission. Biological Assessment on the American Crocodile (Crocodylus acutus) for Turkey Point        ML14206A806 Nuclear Generating Unit Nos. 3 and 4 Proposed License Amendment to Increase the Ultimate Heat Sink Temperature Limit. Dated July 25, 2014.
Other Referenced Documents U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission. Generic Environmental Impact Statement for License Renewal of Nuclear Plants: Re-          ML020280236 garding Turkey Point Units 3 and 4Final Report (NUREG-1437, Supplement 5). Dated January 28, 2002.
Florida Power & Light Company. Proposed Turkey Point Units 6 & 7, Project No. 763, Application for Combined License for        ML091830589 Turkey Point Units 6 and 7. Dated June 30, 2009.
U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission. Final Environmental Assessment and Finding of No Significant Impact Related to a Li-        ML12074A251 cense Amendment To Increase the Maximum Reactor Power Level, Florida Power & Light Company; Turkey Point, Units 3 and 4. Dated March 27, 2012.
Florida Power & Light Company. Turkey Point Units 6 & 7 Combine License Application, Part 3: Environmental Report, Revi-        ML13357A435 sion 5. Dated December 23, 2013.
Florida Power & Light Company. Turkey Point Units 3 and 4; Wastewater Permit FL0001563; Request for Approval for the            ML14206A806
* Use of Copper Sulfate, Hydrogen Peroxide, and a Bio-Stimulant in the Treatment and Control of Blue Green Algae in the Cooling Canal System. Dated June 18, 2014.
Florida Department of Environmental Protection. Re: Florida Power & Light, Turkey Point, NPDES Permit FL0001562, 90-Day         ML14206A806
* Trial Approval. Dated June 27, 2014.
Florida Fish and Wildlife Conservation Commission. Re: Florida Power & Light, Turkey Point Plant Maintenance Activity,         ML14206A806
* NPDES Permit FL0001562, Miami-Dade County. Dated July 1, 2014.
                                                      * (See Appendix A.)
Dated at Rockville, Maryland, this 28th day             For the Nuclear Regulatory Commission.
of July 2014.                                            Lisa M. Regner, Acting Chief, Plant Licensing Branch II-2, Division of Operating Reactor Licensing, Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation.
[FR Doc. 2014-18159 Filed 7-30-14; 8:45 am]
[FR Doc. 2014-18159 Filed 7-30-14; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 7590-01-P VerDate Mar<15>2010 17:51 Jul 30, 2014Jkt 232001PO 00000Frm 00088Fmt 4703Sfmt 4703E:\FR\FM\31JYN1.SGM31JYN1 wreier-aviles on DSK5TPTVN1PROD with NOTICES}}
BILLING CODE 7590-01-P wreier-aviles on DSK5TPTVN1PROD with NOTICES VerDate Mar<15>2010   17:51 Jul 30, 2014  Jkt 232001  PO 00000  Frm 00088  Fmt 4703  Sfmt 4703  E:\FR\FM\31JYN1.SGM  31JYN1}}

Latest revision as of 05:44, 31 October 2019

NRC-009 - Florida Power & Light Company, Turkey Point Units 3 and 4: Environmental Analysis and Finding of No Significant Impact, 79 Fed. Reg. 44,464 (July 31, 2014)
ML15314A484
Person / Time
Site: Turkey Point  NextEra Energy icon.png
Issue date: 07/31/2014
From:
NRC/OGC
To:
Atomic Safety and Licensing Board Panel
SECY RAS
References
RAS 28490, ASLBP 15-935-02-LA-BD01, 50-250-LA, 50-251-LA
Download: ML15314A484 (7)


Text

NRC-009 Submitted Nov. 10, 2015 44464 Federal Register / Vol. 79, No. 147 / Thursday, July 31, 2014 / Notices discharge from the wet weather reproduction costs. Please mail your written request and payment of facilities; and (3) all defendants are in request and payment to: Consent Decree reproduction costs. Please mail your violation of the Clean Water Act and Library, U.S. DOJENRD, P.O. Box request and payment to: Consent Decree their NPDES permits because they have 7611, Washington, DC 20044-7611. Library, U.S. DOJENRD, P.O. Box unlawful sanitary sewer overflows Please enclose a check or money order 7611, Washington, DC 20044-7611.

(SSOs) during wet weather. for $54.25 (25 cents per page Please enclose a check or money order The proposed Consent Decree reproduction cost) payable to the U.S. for $3 (25 cents per page reproduction implements a regional asset Treasury. cost) payable to the United States management program that puts the Treasury.

defendants on a path to eliminate Henry Friedman, prohibited wet weather facility Assistant Section Chief, Environmental Susan Akers, discharges by December 31, 2035, and to Enforcement Section, Environment and Assistant Section Chief, Environmental Natural Resources Division. Enforcement Section, Environment and control SSOs within ten years of Decree entry. Among other things, the [FR Doc. 2014-18047 Filed 7-30-14; 8:45 am] Natural Resources Division.

defendants will rehabilitate and clean BILLING CODE 4410-15-P [FR Doc. 2014-17980 Filed 7-30-14; 8:45 am]

sanitary sewer infrastructure, identify BILLING CODE 4410-15-P and eliminate sources of inflow and rapid infiltration to the sewer systems, DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE and continue to require repair or Notice of Lodging of Proposed Joint NUCLEAR REGULATORY replacement of private sewer laterals Stipulation under the Clean Water Act COMMISSION under local and regional ordinances.

In addition, each defendant will pay On July 25, 2014, the Department of [Docket Nos. 50-250 and 50-251; NRC-a civil penalty for its past violations, for Justice lodged a proposed settlement 2014-0181]

a total of $1,563,556 in civil penalties. with the United States District Court for EBMUD will pay $201,600; the City of the District of Alaska in the lawsuit Florida Power & Light Company; Alameda will pay $111,150; the City of entitled United States and Alaska v. BP Turkey Point Nuclear Generating Unit Albany will pay $42,038; the City of (Exploration) Alaska, Inc., Civil Action Nos. 3 and 4 Berkeley will pay $267,000; the City of No. 3:14-cv-00146. AGENCY: Nuclear Regulatory Emeryville will pay $1,870; the City of The United States and State of Alaska Commission.

Oakland will pay $850,000; the City of filed this lawsuit under the Clean Water Piedmont will pay $41,038; and the Act against BP (Exploration) Alaska, Inc. ACTION: Environmental assessment and Stege Sanitary District will pay $48,860. The complaint seeks civil penalties and final finding of no significant impact; The proposed Consent Decree injunctive relief for violations of the issuance.

replaces a January 2009 interim Clean Water Act, as amended by the Oil

SUMMARY

The U.S. Nuclear Regulatory settlement with EBMUD and a March Pollution Act of 1990, 33 U.S.C. 2701 et Commission (NRC) is considering 2011 interim settlement with the seq., and Alaska Statutes 46.03.710 and issuance of amendments to Renewed Satellite Communities. 46.03.740. The settlement provides a The publication of this notice opens Facility Operating License Nos. DPR-31 covenant not to sue in return for and DPR-41 issued to Florida Power &

a period for public comment on the defendants payment of $450,000.

proposed Consent Decree. Comments Light Company (FPL, the licensee) for The publication of this notice opens should be addressed to the Assistant operation of Turkey Point Nuclear a period for public comment on the Attorney General, Environment and Generating Unit Nos. 3 and 4 (Turkey settlement. Comments should be Natural Resources Division, and should Point) located in Homestead, Miami-addressed to the Assistant Attorney refer to United States of America et al. Dade County, Florida. The proposed General, Environment and Natural

v. East Bay Municipal Utility District et amendments would increase the Resources Division, and should refer to al., D.J. Ref. No. 90-5-1-1-09361. All ultimate heat sink (UHS) water United States and Alaska v. BP comments must be submitted no later temperature limit specified in the (Exploration) Alaska, Inc., D.J. Ref. No.

than thirty (30) days after the Turkey Point Technical Specifications 90-5-1-1-08808/1. All comments must publication date of this notice. (TSs) from 100 degrees Fahrenheit (°F) be submitted no later than thirty (30)

Comments may be submitted either by to 104 °F and add a surveillance days after the publication date of this email or by mail: requirement to monitor the UHS notice. Comments may be submitted temperature more frequently if the UHS either by email or by mail:

To submit temperature approaches the new limit.

Send them to: The NRC did not identify any comments: To submit com- Send them to: significant environmental impacts ments:

By email ....... pubcomment-ees.enrd@ associated with the proposed license usdoj.gov. By email ................. pubcomment- amendments based on its evaluation of By mail ......... Assistant Attorney General, ees.enrd@usdoj.gov. the information provided in the U.S. DOJENRD, P.O. By mail ................... Assistant Attorney Gen-Box 7611, Washington, DC licensees application and other eral, U.S. DOJ-20044-7611. available information. Accordingly, the ENRD, P.O. Box 7611, Washington, NRC has prepared this Environmental wreier-aviles on DSK5TPTVN1PROD with NOTICES During the public comment period, DC 20044-7611. Assessment (EA) and Final Finding of the proposed Consent Decree may be No Significant Impact (FONSI) for the examined and downloaded at this During the public comment period, proposed license amendments.

Department of Justice Web site: http:// the settlement may be examined and ADDRESSES: Please refer to Docket ID www.usdoj.gov/enrd/Consent_ downloaded at this Justice Department NRC-2014-0181 when contacting the Decrees.html. We will provide a paper Web site: http://www.usdoj.gov/enrd/ NRC about the availability of copy of the proposed Consent Decree Consent_Decrees.html. We will provide information regarding this document.

upon written request and payment of a paper copy of the settlement upon You may access publicly available VerDate Mar<15>2010 14:56 Jul 30, 2014 Jkt 232001 PO 00000 Frm 00082 Fmt 4703 Sfmt 4703 E:\FR\FM\31JYN1.SGM 31JYN1

Federal Register / Vol. 79, No. 147 / Thursday, July 31, 2014 / Notices 44465 information related to this document (ADAMS Accession No. ML14206A853). License Renewal of Nuclear Plants:

using any of the following methods: Based on information provided in FPLs Regarding Turkey Point Units 3 and 4

  • Federal Rulemaking Web site: Go to application and associated supplements, Final Report (NUREG-1437, http://www.regulations.gov and search the NRC staffs independent review, and Supplement 5) (ADAMS Accession No.

for Docket ID NRC-2011-0181. Address the NRCs consultation with the U.S. ML020280236); and the NRCs March questions about NRC dockets to Carol Fish and Wildlife Service (FWS) 2012 environmental assessment and Gallagher; telephone: 301-287-3422; pursuant to section 7 of the Endangered final FONSI for the Turkey Point email: Carol.Gallagher@nrc.gov. For Species Act of 1973, as amended (ESA), extended power uprate (EPU) (ADAMS technical questions, contact the the NRC did not identify any significant Accession No. ML12074A251).

individual listed in the FOR FURTHER environmental impacts associated with Identification of the Proposed Action INFORMATION CONTACT section of this the proposed license amendments.

document. Based on the results of the EA The proposed action would increase

  • NRCs Agencywide Documents documented herein, the NRC is issuing the UHS water temperature limit Access and Management System this final FONSI, in accordance with 10 specified in the Turkey Point TSs and (ADAMS): You may obtain publicly CFR 51.32, for the proposed license add a surveillance requirement to available documents online in the NRC amendments. monitor the UHS temperature more Public Documents collection at http:// frequently if the UHS temperature II. Environmental Assessment approaches the new limit. The proposed www.nrc.gov/reading-rm/adams.html.

To begin the search, select ADAMS Plant Site and Environs action is in accordance with the Public Documents and then select licensees application dated July 10, The Turkey Point site encompasses 2014, as supplemented by letters dated Begin Web-based ADAMS Search. For 11,000 acres (ac) (4,450 hectares (ha)) in problems with ADAMS, please contact July 17, July 22 (two letters), and July Miami-Dade County, Florida. The site 24, 2014.

the NRCs Public Document Room (PDR) lies 25 miles (mi) (40 kilometers [km])

reference staff at 1-800-397-4209, 301- More specifically, the proposed action south of Miami, Florida, and the nearest would amend Appendix A of Turkey 415-4737, or by email to pdr.resource@ city limits are Florida City, which lies Points Renewed Facility Operating nrc.gov. The ADAMS accession number 8 mi (13 km) to the west, Homestead, Licenses in order to revise the UHS for each document referenced in this which lies 4.5 mi (7 km) to the temperature limit set forth in TS notice (if that document is available in northwest, and Key Largo, which lies 10 Limiting Operating Condition (LOC) 3/

ADAMS) is provided the first time that mi (16 km) south of the Turkey Point 4.7.4 from 100 °F to 104 °F. The CCS a document is referenced. For the site. The Turkey Point site is bordered serves as the UHS for the Intake Cooling convenience of the reader, the ADAMS to the east by Biscayne National Park, to Water (ICW) system and provides the accession numbers are also provided in the north by Homestead Bayfront Park coolant for the Circulating Water (CW) a table in the Availability of and a portion of Biscayne National Park, system. The CW system provides Documents section of this document. and on the west and south by FPLs cooling water to the main plant

  • NRCs PDR: You may examine and 13,000-ac (5,260-ha) Everglades condensers, and the ICW system purchase copies of public documents at Mitigation Bank. The Turkey Point site removes heat loads from the Component the NRCs PDR, Room O1-F21, One includes five electric generating units. Cooling Water (CCW) system during White Flint North, 11555 Rockville Units 1, 2, and 5 are fossil-fueled normal and accident conditions to Pike, Rockville, Maryland 20852. generating units and are not covered by support both reactor and containment FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: the proposed licensing action; Units 3 heat removal requirements as well as Audrey L. Klett, Office of Nuclear and 4 are nuclear generating units. Each spent fuel cooling requirements.

Reactor Regulation, U.S. Nuclear nuclear reactor is a Westinghouse Currently, TS LOC 3/4.7.4 includes a Regulatory Commission, Washington, pressurized light-water reactor that Surveillance Requirement (SR) that DC 20555-0001; telephone: 301-415- generates electricity via three steam necessitates the licensee to verify the 0489; email: Audrey.Klett@nrc.gov. generators that produce steam that turns UHS (CCS) temperature once every 24-SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: turbines. The site features a 6,100-ac hour period and confirm that the (2,500-ha) closed cooling canal system average supply water temperature is I. Introduction (CCS) that cools heated water within the 100 °F limit. The proposed The NRC is considering issuance of discharged by Units 1 through 4. Unit 5 license amendments would modify the amendments to Renewed Facility uses mechanical draft cooling towers for SR to require the licensee to verify the Operating License Nos. DPR-31 and cooling, draws makeup water from the average supply water temperature to be DPR-41 issued to FPL for operation of Upper Floridan Aquifer, and discharges within the new TS limit at least once Turkey Point, located in Homestead, blowdown to the CCS. The five units per 24 hours2.777778e-4 days <br />0.00667 hours <br />3.968254e-5 weeks <br />9.132e-6 months <br />, and once per hour when Miami-Dade County, Florida. As and supporting equipment (excluding the water temperature exceeds 100 °F.

required by § 51.21 of Title 10 of the the CCS) occupy approximately 130 ac FPL monitors the UHS (CCS)

Code of Federal Regulations (10 CFR (53 ha). temperature at a point in the ICW Part 51.21), the NRC staff performed an The U.S. Atomic Energy Commission system piping going into the inlet of the EA to document its findings related to (AEC), the NRCs predecessor agency, CCW Heat Exchangers.

the proposed license amendments. FPL and the NRC have previously conducted The license amendment would submitted its license amendment environmental reviews of Turkey Point require the licensee to place both units wreier-aviles on DSK5TPTVN1PROD with NOTICES request by letter dated July 10, 2014 in several documents, and the in at least hot standby within 12 hours1.388889e-4 days <br />0.00333 hours <br />1.984127e-5 weeks <br />4.566e-6 months <br /> (ADAMS Accession No. ML14196A006) descriptions therein continue to and cold shutdown within the next 30 and subsequently supplemented its accurately depict the Turkey Point site hours if the UHS exceeds 104 °F.

application by letters dated July 17, and environs. Those documents include The proposed TS revisions would not 2014 (ADAMS Accession No. the AECs July 1972 Final result in or require any physical changes ML14202A392), July 22, 2014 (ADAMS Environmental Statement (FES); the to Turkey Point systems, structures, or Accession Nos. ML14204A367 and NRCs January 2002 Generic components, including those intended ML14204A368), and July 24, 2014 Environmental Impact Statement for for the prevention of accidents. If VerDate Mar<15>2010 14:56 Jul 30, 2014 Jkt 232001 PO 00000 Frm 00083 Fmt 4703 Sfmt 4703 E:\FR\FM\31JYN1.SGM 31JYN1

44466 Federal Register / Vol. 79, No. 147 / Thursday, July 31, 2014 / Notices approved, the LAR would be effective result in changes in procedural and waters, the most significant of which is from the date of NRC approval through operational aspects undertaken by FPL the CCS. The CCS spans a 6,100-ac the expiration dates of the renewed personnel for monitoring and (2,500-ha) area (4,370 ac (1,770 ha) of facility operating licenses (i.e., through maintaining the UHS temperature limit surface water) spread over a 5-mi by 2-2032 for Unit 3 and 2033 for Unit 4). as measured at the ICW system piping mi (8-km by 3.2-km) area. The system going into the inlet of the CCW Heat includes 168 mi (270 km) of earthen The Need for the Proposed Action Exchangers. Thus, FPLs workforce canals with an average depth of 2.8 ft The proposed action is needed to would not change, and the regular (0.8 km) and contains approximately 4 provide FPL with additional operational operations workforce would otherwise billion gallons (12,300 acre-feet) of flexibility during periods when high air be unaffected by the proposed action. water. The Turkey Point units (both temperatures, low rainfall, and other Based on the above and the available nuclear Units 3 and 4 and fossil-fueled factors contribute to conditions information reviewed by the staff, the Units 1 and 2) use the CCS like a resulting in a UHS temperature in NRC concludes that the proposed action radiator and, as previously mentioned, excess of 100 °F that would otherwise would result in no significant impact on the CCS serves as the UHS for Units 3 necessitate FPL to place Turkey Point in land use, visual resources, air quality, and 4. Heated water discharges into the cold shutdown. In its application, FPL noise, the geologic environment, CCS at one end, flows through the canal states that loss of load and voltage groundwater resources, terrestrial system, and is withdrawn from the other control resulting from shutdown during resources, historic and cultural end for reuse as cooling water. The periods of high summer demand could resources, socioeconomic conditions heated discharge effluent is distributed result in impacts to grid reliability. UHS including minority and low income to 32 feeder canals. Water in the feeder temperatures have recently approached populations (environmental justice), or canals flows south and discharges into and exceeded the 100 °F TS limit on waste generation and management a single collector canal that distributes several occasions. On July 20, 2014, the activities. Therefore, this environmental water to six return canals. Water in the NRC approved a notice of enforcement assessment does not prevent any further return canals flows north to the plant discretion (NOED), which allows the evaluation of the operational impacts on intake. The entire circuit that water UHS temperature to exceed 100 °F up to these environmental resources. The travels from plant discharge back to 103 °F for a period of no more than 10 NRC previously assessed the plant intake is 13.2 mi (21.2 km), and days, as well as several other NOED exit environmental impacts of continued transit time through the system is criteria. The NRC documented the operations of Turkey Point in NUREG- approximately 44 hours5.092593e-4 days <br />0.0122 hours <br />7.275132e-5 weeks <br />1.6742e-5 months <br />. Water flows NOED in a letter to FPL dated July 23, attributable to Units 3 and 4 amount to 1437, Supplement 5 and the EA and 2014 (ADAMS Accession No. approximately 1.0 million gallons per final FONSI for the EPU, and ML14204A652). minute. Temperature rise across the implementation of the proposed license Environmental Impacts of the Proposed amendments would not result in any plant (from intake to discharge) averages Action impacts beyond those already 15 to 30 °F depending on the number of characterized in these documents. fossil and nuclear units in operation, As part of the original licensing unit load, and various other factors. The review for Turkey Point, the AEC Accordingly, this environmental assessment focuses on the average intake temperature is 2.5 °F published an FES in July 1972 that above the average ambient air evaluates potential environmental environmental resources that could be affected by the change in the CCS temperature. Rainfall, stormwater impacts associated with the operation of runoff, and groundwater exchange Turkey Point over its initial 40-year thermal limit: Surface water resources, aquatic resources, and Federally- replace evaporative losses.

operating period (1972-2012 for Unit 3 The Florida Department of and 1973-2013 for Unit 4). In 2002, the protected species and habitats.

Environmental Protection (FDEP) has NRC evaluated the environmental Radiological impacts are also addressed.

The details of the NRC staffs safety issued FPL a No Discharge National impacts of operating Turkey Point for an Pollutant Discharge Elimination System additional 20 years beyond the original evaluation will be separately provided (NPDES) permit (No. FL0001562) to operating license (i.e., through 2032 for in the license amendment package operate the CCS as an industrial Unit 3 and 2033 for Unit 4) and issued to approve the license wastewater facility. Accordingly, the predicted that the environmental amendment, if granted.

CCS does not discharge directly to fresh impacts of license renewal were small Nonradiological Impacts or marine surface waters. The proposed for all environmental resources. action would not require FPL to request NUREG-1437, Supplement 5 provides Surface Water Resources modifications to the NPDES permit that assessment. In 2012, the NRC The Turkey Point site lies on the because the plant discharge limits evaluated the impacts of a then- shore of Biscayne Bay. South of the site, would not change. Plant discharge proposed EPU at Turkey Point that Mangrove Point divides the bay from limits are not intake-temperature authorized the facility to increase the Card Sound. Biscayne Bay and Card limited; rather, they are a function of the maximum power level from 2300 Sound are shallow, subtropical quantity of heat rejected to the CCS megawatts thermal (MWt) to 2644 MWt estuarine waters located between the during plant operation.

for each unit. The NRCs March 2012 EA Atlantic coast mainland and a grouping Under the proposed action, the CCS and final FONSI provide that of barrier islands that form the could experience temperatures between assessment. northernmost Florida Keys. The Atlantic 100 °F and 104 °F at the TS monitoring wreier-aviles on DSK5TPTVN1PROD with NOTICES As previously discussed, the Ocean lies beyond the barrier islands. location near the north end of the proposed action would not result in or The Intracoastal Waterway traverses system for short durations during require any physical changes to Turkey Biscayne Bay and Card Sound, and a periods of peak summer air Point systems, structures, or barge passage runs from the Intracoastal temperatures and low rainfall. Such components, including those intended Waterway to the non-nuclear units on conditions may not be experienced at all for the prevention of accidents. Further, the Turkey Point site. depending on site and weather the proposed license amendments In addition to these offsite waters, the conditions. Temperature increases involve TS changes that would only site includes several manmade surface would also increase CCS water VerDate Mar<15>2010 14:56 Jul 30, 2014 Jkt 232001 PO 00000 Frm 00084 Fmt 4703 Sfmt 4703 E:\FR\FM\31JYN1.SGM 31JYN1

Federal Register / Vol. 79, No. 147 / Thursday, July 31, 2014 / Notices 44467 evaporation rates and result in higher management plan that prescribes how proposed action would not have a salinity levels. This effect would also be CCS maintenance procedures shall be significant adverse effect on the temporary and short in duration because conducted to minimize nest, hatchling, probability of an accident occurring or salinity would again decrease upon or adult disturbance. FPL also maintains result in an increased radiological natural freshwater recharge of the a crocodile monitoring program to hazard beyond those analyzed in the system (i.e., through rainfall, stormwater document breeding success and survival licensees Updated Final Safety runoff, and groundwater exchange). No on the site. Analysis Report. The proposed action other onsite or offsite waters would be As a Federal agency, the NRC must would result in no changes to radiation affected by the proposed UHS comply with the ESA as part of any levels or the types or quantities of temperature limit increase. action it authorizes, funds, or carries radioactive effluents (gaseous or liquid)

Because the proposed action would out, such as the proposed action that affect radiation exposures to only affect the CCS, and the CCS is a evaluated in this environmental members of the public or plant workers.

manmade closed cycle cooling system, assessment. Under ESA section 7, the No changes or different types of the NRC concludes that the proposed NRC must consult with the FWS and the radiological impacts would be expected action would not result in significant National Marine Fisheries Service, as from the proposed action. Therefore, the impacts to surface water resources. appropriate, to ensure that the proposed radiological impacts of granting the agency action is not likely to jeopardize license amendments would result in no Aquatic Resources the continued existence of any significant impact on the radiological As determined in the previous endangered or threatened species or environment.

section, the CCS is the only surface result in the destruction or adverse water that would be affected by the modification of designated critical Cumulative Impacts proposed action. Accordingly, this habitat. The ESA and the regulations section only addresses aquatic resources The Council on Environmental that implement ESA section 7 (50 CFR in the CCS. Quality defines cumulative impacts Part 402) describe the consultation The CCS supports a variety of aquatic under the National Environmental process that Federal agencies must species typical of shallow, subtropical Policy Act of 1969, as amended (NEPA) follow in support of agency actions.

waters, including phytoplankton, Based on a review of the proposed as the impact on the environment which zooplankton, marine algae, rooted action, the NRC staff has determined results from the incremental impact of plants, crabs, and estuarine fish. that the American crocodile is the only the action when added to other past, Because of high water temperatures and Federally-listed species that has the present, and reasonably foreseeable salinity content of the CCS, the resident potential to be affected by the proposed future actions regardless of what agency fish assemblage is dominated by species action. Pursuant to ESA section 7, NRC (Federal or non-Federal) or person adapted to living in harsh conditions, staff consulted with FWS staff at the undertakes such other actions (40 CFR such as sheepshead minnow South Florida Ecological Services Office Part 1508.7). For the purposes of this (Cyprinodon variegatus) and several in Vero Beach, Florida. The NRC staff analysis, past actions are related to the Fundulus species. The CCS is owner- prepared a biological assessment resource conditions when Turkey Point controlled and closed to the public; (ADAMS Accession No. ML14206A806) was licensed and constructed; present thus, fish and other aquatic biota in the that considers the potential for the actions are related to the resource CCS do not carry any commercial or proposed action to reduce hatchling conditions during current operations; recreational value. survival, alter crocodile growth rates, and future actions are those that are Because aquatic organisms in the and reduce habitat availability and reasonably foreseeable through the cooling canal system are unable to travel concludes that the proposed action is expiration of Turkey Points renewed to or from Biscayne Bay, Card Sound, or not likely to adversely affect the facility operating licenses. In the any other natural water body, changes to American crocodile and would have no preceding sections of this EA, the NRC the conditions within the CCS would effect on the species designated critical has determined that the proposed action not affect any aquatic populations in the habitat. Based on the NRC staffs has the potential to only affect surface surrounding natural aquatic habitats of biological assessment determinations, water resources and aquatic resources in Biscayne Bay, Card Sound, or the the NRC concludes that the proposed the CCS and Federally protected species Atlantic Ocean. Therefore, the NRC staff action would have no significant impact and habitats (i.e., the sites resident concludes that the proposed action on Federally-protected species or population of American crocodiles and would result in no significant impact to habitats. its designated critical habitat). This EA aquatic resources. In a July 25, 2014, letter (ADAMS also addresses radiological impacts of Accession No. ML14206A800) to FWS, the proposed action. Accordingly, this Federally Protected Species and section only addresses the cumulative the NRC requested ESA section 7 Habitats impacts that could result from the consultation.

The Turkey Point site is home to a proposed action and other actions on resident population of Federally- Radiological Impacts these resources. The proposed action threatened American crocodiles The proposed action would not result would have no effect on the remaining (Crocodylus acutus). Crocodiles in or require any physical changes to resources (i.e., land use, visual discovered and colonized the Turkey Turkey Point systems, structures, or resources, air quality, noise, the geologic Point CCS following plant construction components, including those intended environment, groundwater resources, wreier-aviles on DSK5TPTVN1PROD with NOTICES in the 1970s, and the site now hosts for the prevention of accidents because terrestrial resources, historic and approximately one-third to one-half of the proposed license amendments cultural resources, socioeconomic the United States breeding population. involve TS changes that would only conditions including minority and low In 1977, the FWS designated an area of result in changes in procedural and income populations (environmental Florida that includes the majority of the operational aspects undertaken by FPL justice), and waste generation and Turkey Point site (including the CCS) as personnel for monitoring and management activities), and thus, critical habitat for the species under the maintaining the increased allowable cumulative impacts would not occur for ESA. FPL maintains a crocodile UHS temperature limit. Thus, the these environmental resources.

VerDate Mar<15>2010 14:56 Jul 30, 2014 Jkt 232001 PO 00000 Frm 00085 Fmt 4703 Sfmt 4703 E:\FR\FM\31JYN1.SGM 31JYN1

44468 Federal Register / Vol. 79, No. 147 / Thursday, July 31, 2014 / Notices The NRC staff has identified several from either the presence of higher algae 7. Submission of the COLA does not actions that may contribute to concentrations or the recent chemical commit FPL to build two new nuclear cumulative effects; each of these actions treatments. units and does not constitute approval is described separately below. of the proposal by the NRC; however, Aquifer Withdrawals submission of the COLA infers that the CCS Chemical Treatments The CCS is situated above two construction and operation of the new In 2011, FPL began to notice aquifers: the shallower saltwater units is a reasonably foreseeable future increased blue green algae Biscayne Aquifer and the deeper action. The COLA will be evaluated on concentrations in the CCS. The brackish Floridan Aquifer. A confining its merits, and the NRC will decide concentrations have steadily increased layer separates the two aquifers from whether to grant the licenses after since that time. FPL has performed one another. Turkey Point, Unit 5 uses considering and evaluating the engineering and environmental analyses the Floridan Aquifer for cooling water. environmental and safety implications and believes that the presence of higher The South Florida Water Management of the proposal. Environmental impacts than normal CCS algae concentrations District (SFWMD) recently granted FPL of constructing and operating Turkey may be diminishing the CCSs heat approval to withdraw a portion Point, Units 6 and 7 will depend on transfer capabilities. FPL developed a (approximately 5 million gallons per their actual design characteristics, plan to gradually reduce algae day [MGD]) of the Unit 5 withdrawal construction practices, and power plant concentrations through controlled allowance for use in the CCS. FPL began operations. These impacts will be chemical treatment of the CCS over the pumping Floridan Aquifer water into assessed by the NRC in a separate NEPA course of several weeks. On June 18, the CCS in early July. FPL has also document. The cumulative impacts 2014, FPL submitted a request to the received temporary approval to presented in this EA may differ from FDEP to approve the use of copper withdraw 30 MGD from the Biscayne those impacts assessed for the COLA.

sulfate, hydrogen peroxide, and a bio- Aquifer, though FPL has not yet used Potential impacts presented below have stimulant to treat the algae (letter this allowance. been drawn from FPLs Turkey Point, contained in Appendix A of ADAMS FPL also anticipates the FDEP to issue Units 6 and 7 Environmental Report, Accession No. ML14206A806). On June an Administrative Order requiring FPL Revision 5 (ADAMS Accession No.

27, 2014, the FDEP approved FPLs to install up to six new wells that will ML13357A435), and NRCs 2012 EA and treatment plan for a 90-day trial period pump approximately 14 MGD of water final FONSI for the EPU.

(letter contained in Appendix A of from the Floridan Aquifer into the CCS. Of the environmental resources ADAMS Accession No. ML14206A806). Modeling performed by FPL consultants affected by the proposed action, the The FDEP requested that during the 90- and the SFWMD indicates that in possible construction and operation of day treatment period, FPL monitor the approximately 2 years, the withdrawals Units 6 and 7 only have the potential to CCS for total recoverable copper and would reduce the salinity of the CCS to contribute to cumulative radiological dissolved oxygen and submit its results the equivalent of Biscayne Bay (about 34 impacts. Units 6 and 7 would not use to the FDEP. The FDEP also parts per thousand [ppt]). Such the CCS for cooling. Rather, Units 6 and recommended that FPL coordinate with withdrawals could also help moderate 7 would have a closed-cycle cooling the Florida Fish and Wildlife water temperatures. system with mechanical draft cooling Conservation Commission (FWC) due to The current and anticipated future towers. The cooling towers would draw the presence of crocodiles in the cooling aquifer withdrawals have the potential makeup from Miami-Dade Water and system. The FWC provided its to contribute to cumulative effects on Sewer Department reclaimed water and comments on FPLs treatment plan in a CCS surface water resources, CCS would discharge blowdown into deep letter dated July 1, 2014 (letter aquatic resources, and crocodiles. injection wells. Saltwater extracted from contained in Appendix A of ADAMS Because the CCS is a manmade closed Biscayne Bay subsurface sediment Accession No. ML14206A806). cycle cooling system, aquifer through radial collector wells proposed The CCS chemical treatments have withdrawals are not likely to have a to be built on the Turkey Point site the potential to contribute to cumulative significant cumulative effect on surface would serve as a secondary source of effects on CCS surface water resources, water resources. Aquifer withdrawals makeup water when a sufficient CCS aquatic resources, and the would result in beneficial impacts to quantity and/or quality of reclaimed American crocodile. Because the CCS is CCS aquatic resources and the water is not available. Because Units 6 a manmade closed cycle cooling system, crocodiles inhabiting the Turkey Point and 7 would not use the CCS, the treatment of the CCS is not likely to site. FPL anticipates that the proposed new units would not have a have a significant cumulative effect on withdrawals will reduce the salinity of cumulative effect on CCS surface water surface water resources. Monitoring the CCS to about 34 ppt and could also resources or CCS aquatic resources.

required by the FDEP will ensure help moderate CCS temperatures over Regarding crocodiles, potential adequate water quality throughout and the long term. Both of these effects impacts to this species and its critical following treatment. Monitoring will would create favorable conditions for habitat will be addressed in a future also ensure that any unanticipated CCS aquatic biota and crocodiles, which ESA section 7 consultation between the effects on the aquatic organisms that are currently tolerating an unusually NRC and FWS. When considering inhabit the CCS are appropriately hot, hypersaline environment. cumulative impacts on Federally listed addressed. During the treatment period, species, the ESAs implementing FPL has agreed to report any potentially Turkey Point, Units 6 and 7 regulations direct Federal agencies to wreier-aviles on DSK5TPTVN1PROD with NOTICES related fish kills in the CCS to the FWC. Construction and Operation consider the effects of future State or No fish kills have been reported to date. In June 2009, FPL submitted a private activities, not involving Federal Regarding crocodiles, the NRCs July 25, combined license application (COLA) activities, that are reasonably certain to 2014, biological assessment notes that (ADAMS Accession No. ML091830589) occur within the action area of the FPL has not observed any behavioral or to construct and operate two Federal action subject to consultation distributional changes or any other Westinghouse Advanced Passive 1000 (50 CFR part 402.02; emphasis added).

noticeable differences that would (AP1000) pressurized-water reactors Accordingly, the NRC will not address indicate effects to crocodiles resulting designated as Turkey Point, Units 6 and cumulative impacts of Units 6 and 7 on VerDate Mar<15>2010 14:56 Jul 30, 2014 Jkt 232001 PO 00000 Frm 00086 Fmt 4703 Sfmt 4703 E:\FR\FM\31JYN1.SGM 31JYN1

Federal Register / Vol. 79, No. 147 / Thursday, July 31, 2014 / Notices 44469 the American crocodile in this EA 10 CFR part 20 during all phases of action. The State official had no because the NRCs issuance of a license operations. Operation of Units 6 and 7 comments.

to construct and operate Units 6 and 7 would require a similar radiation The NRC staff also coordinated with is a separate Federal activity that will protection program, and the licensee the FWS pursuant to consultation under require future consultation. would be responsible for ensuring that ESA section 7 during the staffs review Regarding cumulative radiological workers are not exposed to dose limits of the proposed action. The consultation impacts, the NRC and Environmental above those specified in 10 CFR part 20. is further discussed under the Protection Agency have developed Therefore, the NRC staff concludes that Federally-Protected Species section of radiological dose limits for protection of the cumulative radiological impacts to this environmental assessment.

the public and workers that address the plant workers that could result from the cumulative effects of acute and long- combined operations of Turkey Point, III. Finding of No Significant Impact term exposure to radiation and Units 3 and 4 and the proposed new The NRC is considering issuing radioactive material. These dose limits Units 6 and 7 would result in no amendments for Renewed Facility are specified in 10 CFR part 20 and 40 significant impact on the radiological Operating License Nos. DPR-31 and CFR part 190. environment. DPR-41, issued to FPL for operation of The cumulative radiation dose to the Turkey Point to increase the UHS water public and workers is required to be Cumulative Impacts Conclusion temperature limit specified in the within the regulations cited above. The The NRC staff considered the Turkey Point TSs from 100 °F to 104 °F public dose limit of 25 millirem (0.25 cumulative impacts of CCS chemical and add an SR to monitor the UHS millisieverts) in 40 CFR part 190 applies treatments, current and anticipated temperature more frequently if the UHS to all reactors that may be on a site and future aquifer withdrawals, and the temperature approaches the new limit.

also includes any other nearby nuclear possible future construction and power reactor facilities. The NRC staff On the basis of the EA included in operation of two new nuclear units on reviewed several years of radiation dose Section II above and incorporated by the Turkey Point site. Based on the data contained in the licensees annual reference in this finding, the NRC information presented in this section, radioactive effluent release reports for concludes that the proposed action the NRC staff concludes that the Turkey Point, and the data demonstrate would not have significant effects on the proposed action, in combination with that the dose to members of the public quality of the human environment. The other cumulative actions, would result from radioactive effluents is within the proposed action would result in no in no significant cumulative impacts on limits of 10 CFR part 20 and 40 CFR part significant impacts on surface water the environment.

190. As previously indicated in the resources, aquatic resources, or the Radiological Impacts section of this Alternatives to the Proposed Action radiological environment. In addition, environmental assessment, the proposed As an alternative to the proposed the proposed action is not likely to action would result in no changes to action, the NRC staff considered denial adversely affect any Federally-protected radiation levels or the types or of the proposed license amendments species or affect any designated critical quantities of radioactive effluents (i.e., the no-action alternative). Denial habitat. The proposed action would also (gaseous or liquid) that affect radiation of the application would result in no not result in significant cumulative exposures to plant workers and change in current environmental impacts on any environmental members of the public. conditions or impacts. However, denial resources. The NRCs evaluation FPLs COLA for Units 6 and 7 would result in reduced operational considered information provided in the contains an assessment of the radiation flexibility and could require FPL to licensees application and associated doses to members of the public from the derate or shutdown Turkey Point if the supplements; the NRCs staff proposed new reactors and concludes UHS average supply water temperature independent review of other that doses would be within regulatory approaches or exceeds the 100 °F TS environmental documents, and limits. The staff expects continued limit. In its application, FPL states that coordination with the FWS pursuant to compliance with regulatory dose limits loss of load and voltage control resulting consultation under ESA section 7.

during operation of Turkey Point, Units from such a shutdown during periods of Section IV below lists the 3 and 4 under the proposed action. high summer demand could result in environmental documents related to the Therefore, the NRC staff concludes that impacts to grid reliability. proposed action and includes the cumulative radiological impacts to information on the availability of these members of the public that could result Alternative Use of Resources documents. Based on its findings, the from the combined operations of Turkey The action does not involve the use of NRC has decided not to prepare an Point, Units 3 and 4 and the proposed any different resources than those environmental impact statement for the new Units 6 and 7 would result in no previously considered in NUREG-1437, proposed action.

significant impact on the environment. Supplement 5 prepared for license IV. Availability of Documents Regarding radiation dose to workers, renewal of Turkey Point.

cumulative dose would only be The following table identifies the applicable for those workers that would Agencies and Persons Consulted environmental and other documents be engaged at both facilities (i.e., the On July 28, 2014, the NRC staff cited in this document and related to currently operating Units 3 and 4 and notified the Florida State official, Ms. the NRCs FONSI. These documents are proposed new Units 6 and 7). For Units Cindy Becker, Chief of Bureau of available for public inspection online wreier-aviles on DSK5TPTVN1PROD with NOTICES 3 and 4, the licensee has a radiation Radiation Control, of the Florida through ADAMS at http://www.nrc.gov/

protection program that maintains Department of Health, regarding the reading-rm/adams.html or in person at worker doses within the dose limits in environmental impacts of the proposed the NRCs PDR as described previously.

VerDate Mar<15>2010 14:56 Jul 30, 2014 Jkt 232001 PO 00000 Frm 00087 Fmt 4703 Sfmt 4703 E:\FR\FM\31JYN1.SGM 31JYN1

44470 Federal Register / Vol. 79, No. 147 / Thursday, July 31, 2014 / Notices Adams Document Accession No.

Documents Related to License Amendment Request Florida Power & Light Company. License Amendment Request No. 231, Application to Revise Technical Specifications to Re- ML14196A006 vise Ultimate Heat Sink Temperature Limit. Dated July 10, 2014.

Florida Power & Light Company. License Amendment Request No. 231, Application to Revise Ultimate Heat Sink Tempera- ML14202A392 ture LimitRequest for Emergency Approval. Dated July 17, 2014.

U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission. Turkey Point 3 and 4 Request for Additional InformationLAR231 (TAC MF4392 and ML14203A614 MF4393). [1 of 2] Dated July 18, 2014.

U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission. Turkey Point 3 and 4 Request for Additional InformationLAR231 (TAC MF4392 and ML14203A618 MF4393). [2 of 2] Dated July 18, 2014.

Florida Power & Light Company. License Amendment Request No. 231, Application to Revise Ultimate Heat Sink Tempera- ML14204A367 ture LimitSupplement 1, and Response to Request for Additional Information. Dated July 22, 2014.

Florida Power & Light Company. Response to Request for Additional Information Regarding License Amendment Request No. ML14204A368 231, Application to Revise Technical Specifications to Revise Ultimate Heat Sink Temperature Limit. Dated July 22, 2014.

U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission. Turkey Point 3 and 4 Request for Additional InformationLAR231 (TAC MF4392 and ML14204A814 MF4393). Dated July 22, 2014.

U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission. Notice of Enforcement Discretion for Florida Power & Light Company Regarding Turkey ML14204A652 Point Nuclear Generating Unit Nos. 3 and 4 [NOED NO. 14-2-001]. Dated July 23, 2014.

Florida Power & Light Company. Response to Containment and Ventilation Branch Request for Additional Information, Re- ML14206A853 garding License Amendment Request No. 231, Application to Revise Ultimate Heat Temperature Limit. Dated July 24, 2014.

Florida Power & Light Company. Turkey Point Nuclear Generating Unit Nos. 3 and 4Individual Notice of Consideration of ML14204A129 Issuance of Amendments to Renewed Facility Operating Licenses, Proposed No Significant Hazards Consideration Deter- (letter) mination, and Opportunity for Hearing (Exigent Circumstances) (TAC Nos. MF4392 and MF4293). Dated July 24, 2014. ML14199A111 (enclosure)

U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission. Request to Reinitiate Informal Consultation for a Proposed License Amendment to In- ML14206A800 crease the Ultimate Heat Sink Temperature Limit at Turkey Point Nuclear Generating Unit Nos. 3 and 4. Dated July 25, 2014.

U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission. Biological Assessment on the American Crocodile (Crocodylus acutus) for Turkey Point ML14206A806 Nuclear Generating Unit Nos. 3 and 4 Proposed License Amendment to Increase the Ultimate Heat Sink Temperature Limit. Dated July 25, 2014.

Other Referenced Documents U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission. Generic Environmental Impact Statement for License Renewal of Nuclear Plants: Re- ML020280236 garding Turkey Point Units 3 and 4Final Report (NUREG-1437, Supplement 5). Dated January 28, 2002.

Florida Power & Light Company. Proposed Turkey Point Units 6 & 7, Project No. 763, Application for Combined License for ML091830589 Turkey Point Units 6 and 7. Dated June 30, 2009.

U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission. Final Environmental Assessment and Finding of No Significant Impact Related to a Li- ML12074A251 cense Amendment To Increase the Maximum Reactor Power Level, Florida Power & Light Company; Turkey Point, Units 3 and 4. Dated March 27, 2012.

Florida Power & Light Company. Turkey Point Units 6 & 7 Combine License Application, Part 3: Environmental Report, Revi- ML13357A435 sion 5. Dated December 23, 2013.

Florida Power & Light Company. Turkey Point Units 3 and 4; Wastewater Permit FL0001563; Request for Approval for the ML14206A806

  • Use of Copper Sulfate, Hydrogen Peroxide, and a Bio-Stimulant in the Treatment and Control of Blue Green Algae in the Cooling Canal System. Dated June 18, 2014.

Florida Department of Environmental Protection. Re: Florida Power & Light, Turkey Point, NPDES Permit FL0001562, 90-Day ML14206A806

  • Trial Approval. Dated June 27, 2014.

Florida Fish and Wildlife Conservation Commission. Re: Florida Power & Light, Turkey Point Plant Maintenance Activity, ML14206A806

  • NPDES Permit FL0001562, Miami-Dade County. Dated July 1, 2014.
  • (See Appendix A.)

Dated at Rockville, Maryland, this 28th day For the Nuclear Regulatory Commission.

of July 2014. Lisa M. Regner, Acting Chief, Plant Licensing Branch II-2, Division of Operating Reactor Licensing, Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation.

[FR Doc. 2014-18159 Filed 7-30-14; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 7590-01-P wreier-aviles on DSK5TPTVN1PROD with NOTICES VerDate Mar<15>2010 17:51 Jul 30, 2014 Jkt 232001 PO 00000 Frm 00088 Fmt 4703 Sfmt 4703 E:\FR\FM\31JYN1.SGM 31JYN1

NRC-009 Submitted Nov. 10, 2015 44464 Federal Register / Vol. 79, No. 147 / Thursday, July 31, 2014 / Notices discharge from the wet weather reproduction costs. Please mail your written request and payment of facilities; and (3) all defendants are in request and payment to: Consent Decree reproduction costs. Please mail your violation of the Clean Water Act and Library, U.S. DOJENRD, P.O. Box request and payment to: Consent Decree their NPDES permits because they have 7611, Washington, DC 20044-7611. Library, U.S. DOJENRD, P.O. Box unlawful sanitary sewer overflows Please enclose a check or money order 7611, Washington, DC 20044-7611.

(SSOs) during wet weather. for $54.25 (25 cents per page Please enclose a check or money order The proposed Consent Decree reproduction cost) payable to the U.S. for $3 (25 cents per page reproduction implements a regional asset Treasury. cost) payable to the United States management program that puts the Treasury.

defendants on a path to eliminate Henry Friedman, prohibited wet weather facility Assistant Section Chief, Environmental Susan Akers, discharges by December 31, 2035, and to Enforcement Section, Environment and Assistant Section Chief, Environmental Natural Resources Division. Enforcement Section, Environment and control SSOs within ten years of Decree entry. Among other things, the [FR Doc. 2014-18047 Filed 7-30-14; 8:45 am] Natural Resources Division.

defendants will rehabilitate and clean BILLING CODE 4410-15-P [FR Doc. 2014-17980 Filed 7-30-14; 8:45 am]

sanitary sewer infrastructure, identify BILLING CODE 4410-15-P and eliminate sources of inflow and rapid infiltration to the sewer systems, DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE and continue to require repair or Notice of Lodging of Proposed Joint NUCLEAR REGULATORY replacement of private sewer laterals Stipulation under the Clean Water Act COMMISSION under local and regional ordinances.

In addition, each defendant will pay On July 25, 2014, the Department of [Docket Nos. 50-250 and 50-251; NRC-a civil penalty for its past violations, for Justice lodged a proposed settlement 2014-0181]

a total of $1,563,556 in civil penalties. with the United States District Court for EBMUD will pay $201,600; the City of the District of Alaska in the lawsuit Florida Power & Light Company; Alameda will pay $111,150; the City of entitled United States and Alaska v. BP Turkey Point Nuclear Generating Unit Albany will pay $42,038; the City of (Exploration) Alaska, Inc., Civil Action Nos. 3 and 4 Berkeley will pay $267,000; the City of No. 3:14-cv-00146. AGENCY: Nuclear Regulatory Emeryville will pay $1,870; the City of The United States and State of Alaska Commission.

Oakland will pay $850,000; the City of filed this lawsuit under the Clean Water Piedmont will pay $41,038; and the Act against BP (Exploration) Alaska, Inc. ACTION: Environmental assessment and Stege Sanitary District will pay $48,860. The complaint seeks civil penalties and final finding of no significant impact; The proposed Consent Decree injunctive relief for violations of the issuance.

replaces a January 2009 interim Clean Water Act, as amended by the Oil

SUMMARY

The U.S. Nuclear Regulatory settlement with EBMUD and a March Pollution Act of 1990, 33 U.S.C. 2701 et Commission (NRC) is considering 2011 interim settlement with the seq., and Alaska Statutes 46.03.710 and issuance of amendments to Renewed Satellite Communities. 46.03.740. The settlement provides a The publication of this notice opens Facility Operating License Nos. DPR-31 covenant not to sue in return for and DPR-41 issued to Florida Power &

a period for public comment on the defendants payment of $450,000.

proposed Consent Decree. Comments Light Company (FPL, the licensee) for The publication of this notice opens should be addressed to the Assistant operation of Turkey Point Nuclear a period for public comment on the Attorney General, Environment and Generating Unit Nos. 3 and 4 (Turkey settlement. Comments should be Natural Resources Division, and should Point) located in Homestead, Miami-addressed to the Assistant Attorney refer to United States of America et al. Dade County, Florida. The proposed General, Environment and Natural

v. East Bay Municipal Utility District et amendments would increase the Resources Division, and should refer to al., D.J. Ref. No. 90-5-1-1-09361. All ultimate heat sink (UHS) water United States and Alaska v. BP comments must be submitted no later temperature limit specified in the (Exploration) Alaska, Inc., D.J. Ref. No.

than thirty (30) days after the Turkey Point Technical Specifications 90-5-1-1-08808/1. All comments must publication date of this notice. (TSs) from 100 degrees Fahrenheit (°F) be submitted no later than thirty (30)

Comments may be submitted either by to 104 °F and add a surveillance days after the publication date of this email or by mail: requirement to monitor the UHS notice. Comments may be submitted temperature more frequently if the UHS either by email or by mail:

To submit temperature approaches the new limit.

Send them to: The NRC did not identify any comments: To submit com- Send them to: significant environmental impacts ments:

By email ....... pubcomment-ees.enrd@ associated with the proposed license usdoj.gov. By email ................. pubcomment- amendments based on its evaluation of By mail ......... Assistant Attorney General, ees.enrd@usdoj.gov. the information provided in the U.S. DOJENRD, P.O. By mail ................... Assistant Attorney Gen-Box 7611, Washington, DC licensees application and other eral, U.S. DOJ-20044-7611. available information. Accordingly, the ENRD, P.O. Box 7611, Washington, NRC has prepared this Environmental wreier-aviles on DSK5TPTVN1PROD with NOTICES During the public comment period, DC 20044-7611. Assessment (EA) and Final Finding of the proposed Consent Decree may be No Significant Impact (FONSI) for the examined and downloaded at this During the public comment period, proposed license amendments.

Department of Justice Web site: http:// the settlement may be examined and ADDRESSES: Please refer to Docket ID www.usdoj.gov/enrd/Consent_ downloaded at this Justice Department NRC-2014-0181 when contacting the Decrees.html. We will provide a paper Web site: http://www.usdoj.gov/enrd/ NRC about the availability of copy of the proposed Consent Decree Consent_Decrees.html. We will provide information regarding this document.

upon written request and payment of a paper copy of the settlement upon You may access publicly available VerDate Mar<15>2010 14:56 Jul 30, 2014 Jkt 232001 PO 00000 Frm 00082 Fmt 4703 Sfmt 4703 E:\FR\FM\31JYN1.SGM 31JYN1

Federal Register / Vol. 79, No. 147 / Thursday, July 31, 2014 / Notices 44465 information related to this document (ADAMS Accession No. ML14206A853). License Renewal of Nuclear Plants:

using any of the following methods: Based on information provided in FPLs Regarding Turkey Point Units 3 and 4

  • Federal Rulemaking Web site: Go to application and associated supplements, Final Report (NUREG-1437, http://www.regulations.gov and search the NRC staffs independent review, and Supplement 5) (ADAMS Accession No.

for Docket ID NRC-2011-0181. Address the NRCs consultation with the U.S. ML020280236); and the NRCs March questions about NRC dockets to Carol Fish and Wildlife Service (FWS) 2012 environmental assessment and Gallagher; telephone: 301-287-3422; pursuant to section 7 of the Endangered final FONSI for the Turkey Point email: Carol.Gallagher@nrc.gov. For Species Act of 1973, as amended (ESA), extended power uprate (EPU) (ADAMS technical questions, contact the the NRC did not identify any significant Accession No. ML12074A251).

individual listed in the FOR FURTHER environmental impacts associated with Identification of the Proposed Action INFORMATION CONTACT section of this the proposed license amendments.

document. Based on the results of the EA The proposed action would increase

  • NRCs Agencywide Documents documented herein, the NRC is issuing the UHS water temperature limit Access and Management System this final FONSI, in accordance with 10 specified in the Turkey Point TSs and (ADAMS): You may obtain publicly CFR 51.32, for the proposed license add a surveillance requirement to available documents online in the NRC amendments. monitor the UHS temperature more Public Documents collection at http:// frequently if the UHS temperature II. Environmental Assessment approaches the new limit. The proposed www.nrc.gov/reading-rm/adams.html.

To begin the search, select ADAMS Plant Site and Environs action is in accordance with the Public Documents and then select licensees application dated July 10, The Turkey Point site encompasses 2014, as supplemented by letters dated Begin Web-based ADAMS Search. For 11,000 acres (ac) (4,450 hectares (ha)) in problems with ADAMS, please contact July 17, July 22 (two letters), and July Miami-Dade County, Florida. The site 24, 2014.

the NRCs Public Document Room (PDR) lies 25 miles (mi) (40 kilometers [km])

reference staff at 1-800-397-4209, 301- More specifically, the proposed action south of Miami, Florida, and the nearest would amend Appendix A of Turkey 415-4737, or by email to pdr.resource@ city limits are Florida City, which lies Points Renewed Facility Operating nrc.gov. The ADAMS accession number 8 mi (13 km) to the west, Homestead, Licenses in order to revise the UHS for each document referenced in this which lies 4.5 mi (7 km) to the temperature limit set forth in TS notice (if that document is available in northwest, and Key Largo, which lies 10 Limiting Operating Condition (LOC) 3/

ADAMS) is provided the first time that mi (16 km) south of the Turkey Point 4.7.4 from 100 °F to 104 °F. The CCS a document is referenced. For the site. The Turkey Point site is bordered serves as the UHS for the Intake Cooling convenience of the reader, the ADAMS to the east by Biscayne National Park, to Water (ICW) system and provides the accession numbers are also provided in the north by Homestead Bayfront Park coolant for the Circulating Water (CW) a table in the Availability of and a portion of Biscayne National Park, system. The CW system provides Documents section of this document. and on the west and south by FPLs cooling water to the main plant

  • NRCs PDR: You may examine and 13,000-ac (5,260-ha) Everglades condensers, and the ICW system purchase copies of public documents at Mitigation Bank. The Turkey Point site removes heat loads from the Component the NRCs PDR, Room O1-F21, One includes five electric generating units. Cooling Water (CCW) system during White Flint North, 11555 Rockville Units 1, 2, and 5 are fossil-fueled normal and accident conditions to Pike, Rockville, Maryland 20852. generating units and are not covered by support both reactor and containment FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: the proposed licensing action; Units 3 heat removal requirements as well as Audrey L. Klett, Office of Nuclear and 4 are nuclear generating units. Each spent fuel cooling requirements.

Reactor Regulation, U.S. Nuclear nuclear reactor is a Westinghouse Currently, TS LOC 3/4.7.4 includes a Regulatory Commission, Washington, pressurized light-water reactor that Surveillance Requirement (SR) that DC 20555-0001; telephone: 301-415- generates electricity via three steam necessitates the licensee to verify the 0489; email: Audrey.Klett@nrc.gov. generators that produce steam that turns UHS (CCS) temperature once every 24-SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: turbines. The site features a 6,100-ac hour period and confirm that the (2,500-ha) closed cooling canal system average supply water temperature is I. Introduction (CCS) that cools heated water within the 100 °F limit. The proposed The NRC is considering issuance of discharged by Units 1 through 4. Unit 5 license amendments would modify the amendments to Renewed Facility uses mechanical draft cooling towers for SR to require the licensee to verify the Operating License Nos. DPR-31 and cooling, draws makeup water from the average supply water temperature to be DPR-41 issued to FPL for operation of Upper Floridan Aquifer, and discharges within the new TS limit at least once Turkey Point, located in Homestead, blowdown to the CCS. The five units per 24 hours2.777778e-4 days <br />0.00667 hours <br />3.968254e-5 weeks <br />9.132e-6 months <br />, and once per hour when Miami-Dade County, Florida. As and supporting equipment (excluding the water temperature exceeds 100 °F.

required by § 51.21 of Title 10 of the the CCS) occupy approximately 130 ac FPL monitors the UHS (CCS)

Code of Federal Regulations (10 CFR (53 ha). temperature at a point in the ICW Part 51.21), the NRC staff performed an The U.S. Atomic Energy Commission system piping going into the inlet of the EA to document its findings related to (AEC), the NRCs predecessor agency, CCW Heat Exchangers.

the proposed license amendments. FPL and the NRC have previously conducted The license amendment would submitted its license amendment environmental reviews of Turkey Point require the licensee to place both units wreier-aviles on DSK5TPTVN1PROD with NOTICES request by letter dated July 10, 2014 in several documents, and the in at least hot standby within 12 hours1.388889e-4 days <br />0.00333 hours <br />1.984127e-5 weeks <br />4.566e-6 months <br /> (ADAMS Accession No. ML14196A006) descriptions therein continue to and cold shutdown within the next 30 and subsequently supplemented its accurately depict the Turkey Point site hours if the UHS exceeds 104 °F.

application by letters dated July 17, and environs. Those documents include The proposed TS revisions would not 2014 (ADAMS Accession No. the AECs July 1972 Final result in or require any physical changes ML14202A392), July 22, 2014 (ADAMS Environmental Statement (FES); the to Turkey Point systems, structures, or Accession Nos. ML14204A367 and NRCs January 2002 Generic components, including those intended ML14204A368), and July 24, 2014 Environmental Impact Statement for for the prevention of accidents. If VerDate Mar<15>2010 14:56 Jul 30, 2014 Jkt 232001 PO 00000 Frm 00083 Fmt 4703 Sfmt 4703 E:\FR\FM\31JYN1.SGM 31JYN1

44466 Federal Register / Vol. 79, No. 147 / Thursday, July 31, 2014 / Notices approved, the LAR would be effective result in changes in procedural and waters, the most significant of which is from the date of NRC approval through operational aspects undertaken by FPL the CCS. The CCS spans a 6,100-ac the expiration dates of the renewed personnel for monitoring and (2,500-ha) area (4,370 ac (1,770 ha) of facility operating licenses (i.e., through maintaining the UHS temperature limit surface water) spread over a 5-mi by 2-2032 for Unit 3 and 2033 for Unit 4). as measured at the ICW system piping mi (8-km by 3.2-km) area. The system going into the inlet of the CCW Heat includes 168 mi (270 km) of earthen The Need for the Proposed Action Exchangers. Thus, FPLs workforce canals with an average depth of 2.8 ft The proposed action is needed to would not change, and the regular (0.8 km) and contains approximately 4 provide FPL with additional operational operations workforce would otherwise billion gallons (12,300 acre-feet) of flexibility during periods when high air be unaffected by the proposed action. water. The Turkey Point units (both temperatures, low rainfall, and other Based on the above and the available nuclear Units 3 and 4 and fossil-fueled factors contribute to conditions information reviewed by the staff, the Units 1 and 2) use the CCS like a resulting in a UHS temperature in NRC concludes that the proposed action radiator and, as previously mentioned, excess of 100 °F that would otherwise would result in no significant impact on the CCS serves as the UHS for Units 3 necessitate FPL to place Turkey Point in land use, visual resources, air quality, and 4. Heated water discharges into the cold shutdown. In its application, FPL noise, the geologic environment, CCS at one end, flows through the canal states that loss of load and voltage groundwater resources, terrestrial system, and is withdrawn from the other control resulting from shutdown during resources, historic and cultural end for reuse as cooling water. The periods of high summer demand could resources, socioeconomic conditions heated discharge effluent is distributed result in impacts to grid reliability. UHS including minority and low income to 32 feeder canals. Water in the feeder temperatures have recently approached populations (environmental justice), or canals flows south and discharges into and exceeded the 100 °F TS limit on waste generation and management a single collector canal that distributes several occasions. On July 20, 2014, the activities. Therefore, this environmental water to six return canals. Water in the NRC approved a notice of enforcement assessment does not prevent any further return canals flows north to the plant discretion (NOED), which allows the evaluation of the operational impacts on intake. The entire circuit that water UHS temperature to exceed 100 °F up to these environmental resources. The travels from plant discharge back to 103 °F for a period of no more than 10 NRC previously assessed the plant intake is 13.2 mi (21.2 km), and days, as well as several other NOED exit environmental impacts of continued transit time through the system is criteria. The NRC documented the operations of Turkey Point in NUREG- approximately 44 hours5.092593e-4 days <br />0.0122 hours <br />7.275132e-5 weeks <br />1.6742e-5 months <br />. Water flows NOED in a letter to FPL dated July 23, attributable to Units 3 and 4 amount to 1437, Supplement 5 and the EA and 2014 (ADAMS Accession No. approximately 1.0 million gallons per final FONSI for the EPU, and ML14204A652). minute. Temperature rise across the implementation of the proposed license Environmental Impacts of the Proposed amendments would not result in any plant (from intake to discharge) averages Action impacts beyond those already 15 to 30 °F depending on the number of characterized in these documents. fossil and nuclear units in operation, As part of the original licensing unit load, and various other factors. The review for Turkey Point, the AEC Accordingly, this environmental assessment focuses on the average intake temperature is 2.5 °F published an FES in July 1972 that above the average ambient air evaluates potential environmental environmental resources that could be affected by the change in the CCS temperature. Rainfall, stormwater impacts associated with the operation of runoff, and groundwater exchange Turkey Point over its initial 40-year thermal limit: Surface water resources, aquatic resources, and Federally- replace evaporative losses.

operating period (1972-2012 for Unit 3 The Florida Department of and 1973-2013 for Unit 4). In 2002, the protected species and habitats.

Environmental Protection (FDEP) has NRC evaluated the environmental Radiological impacts are also addressed.

The details of the NRC staffs safety issued FPL a No Discharge National impacts of operating Turkey Point for an Pollutant Discharge Elimination System additional 20 years beyond the original evaluation will be separately provided (NPDES) permit (No. FL0001562) to operating license (i.e., through 2032 for in the license amendment package operate the CCS as an industrial Unit 3 and 2033 for Unit 4) and issued to approve the license wastewater facility. Accordingly, the predicted that the environmental amendment, if granted.

CCS does not discharge directly to fresh impacts of license renewal were small Nonradiological Impacts or marine surface waters. The proposed for all environmental resources. action would not require FPL to request NUREG-1437, Supplement 5 provides Surface Water Resources modifications to the NPDES permit that assessment. In 2012, the NRC The Turkey Point site lies on the because the plant discharge limits evaluated the impacts of a then- shore of Biscayne Bay. South of the site, would not change. Plant discharge proposed EPU at Turkey Point that Mangrove Point divides the bay from limits are not intake-temperature authorized the facility to increase the Card Sound. Biscayne Bay and Card limited; rather, they are a function of the maximum power level from 2300 Sound are shallow, subtropical quantity of heat rejected to the CCS megawatts thermal (MWt) to 2644 MWt estuarine waters located between the during plant operation.

for each unit. The NRCs March 2012 EA Atlantic coast mainland and a grouping Under the proposed action, the CCS and final FONSI provide that of barrier islands that form the could experience temperatures between assessment. northernmost Florida Keys. The Atlantic 100 °F and 104 °F at the TS monitoring wreier-aviles on DSK5TPTVN1PROD with NOTICES As previously discussed, the Ocean lies beyond the barrier islands. location near the north end of the proposed action would not result in or The Intracoastal Waterway traverses system for short durations during require any physical changes to Turkey Biscayne Bay and Card Sound, and a periods of peak summer air Point systems, structures, or barge passage runs from the Intracoastal temperatures and low rainfall. Such components, including those intended Waterway to the non-nuclear units on conditions may not be experienced at all for the prevention of accidents. Further, the Turkey Point site. depending on site and weather the proposed license amendments In addition to these offsite waters, the conditions. Temperature increases involve TS changes that would only site includes several manmade surface would also increase CCS water VerDate Mar<15>2010 14:56 Jul 30, 2014 Jkt 232001 PO 00000 Frm 00084 Fmt 4703 Sfmt 4703 E:\FR\FM\31JYN1.SGM 31JYN1

Federal Register / Vol. 79, No. 147 / Thursday, July 31, 2014 / Notices 44467 evaporation rates and result in higher management plan that prescribes how proposed action would not have a salinity levels. This effect would also be CCS maintenance procedures shall be significant adverse effect on the temporary and short in duration because conducted to minimize nest, hatchling, probability of an accident occurring or salinity would again decrease upon or adult disturbance. FPL also maintains result in an increased radiological natural freshwater recharge of the a crocodile monitoring program to hazard beyond those analyzed in the system (i.e., through rainfall, stormwater document breeding success and survival licensees Updated Final Safety runoff, and groundwater exchange). No on the site. Analysis Report. The proposed action other onsite or offsite waters would be As a Federal agency, the NRC must would result in no changes to radiation affected by the proposed UHS comply with the ESA as part of any levels or the types or quantities of temperature limit increase. action it authorizes, funds, or carries radioactive effluents (gaseous or liquid)

Because the proposed action would out, such as the proposed action that affect radiation exposures to only affect the CCS, and the CCS is a evaluated in this environmental members of the public or plant workers.

manmade closed cycle cooling system, assessment. Under ESA section 7, the No changes or different types of the NRC concludes that the proposed NRC must consult with the FWS and the radiological impacts would be expected action would not result in significant National Marine Fisheries Service, as from the proposed action. Therefore, the impacts to surface water resources. appropriate, to ensure that the proposed radiological impacts of granting the agency action is not likely to jeopardize license amendments would result in no Aquatic Resources the continued existence of any significant impact on the radiological As determined in the previous endangered or threatened species or environment.

section, the CCS is the only surface result in the destruction or adverse water that would be affected by the modification of designated critical Cumulative Impacts proposed action. Accordingly, this habitat. The ESA and the regulations section only addresses aquatic resources The Council on Environmental that implement ESA section 7 (50 CFR in the CCS. Quality defines cumulative impacts Part 402) describe the consultation The CCS supports a variety of aquatic under the National Environmental process that Federal agencies must species typical of shallow, subtropical Policy Act of 1969, as amended (NEPA) follow in support of agency actions.

waters, including phytoplankton, Based on a review of the proposed as the impact on the environment which zooplankton, marine algae, rooted action, the NRC staff has determined results from the incremental impact of plants, crabs, and estuarine fish. that the American crocodile is the only the action when added to other past, Because of high water temperatures and Federally-listed species that has the present, and reasonably foreseeable salinity content of the CCS, the resident potential to be affected by the proposed future actions regardless of what agency fish assemblage is dominated by species action. Pursuant to ESA section 7, NRC (Federal or non-Federal) or person adapted to living in harsh conditions, staff consulted with FWS staff at the undertakes such other actions (40 CFR such as sheepshead minnow South Florida Ecological Services Office Part 1508.7). For the purposes of this (Cyprinodon variegatus) and several in Vero Beach, Florida. The NRC staff analysis, past actions are related to the Fundulus species. The CCS is owner- prepared a biological assessment resource conditions when Turkey Point controlled and closed to the public; (ADAMS Accession No. ML14206A806) was licensed and constructed; present thus, fish and other aquatic biota in the that considers the potential for the actions are related to the resource CCS do not carry any commercial or proposed action to reduce hatchling conditions during current operations; recreational value. survival, alter crocodile growth rates, and future actions are those that are Because aquatic organisms in the and reduce habitat availability and reasonably foreseeable through the cooling canal system are unable to travel concludes that the proposed action is expiration of Turkey Points renewed to or from Biscayne Bay, Card Sound, or not likely to adversely affect the facility operating licenses. In the any other natural water body, changes to American crocodile and would have no preceding sections of this EA, the NRC the conditions within the CCS would effect on the species designated critical has determined that the proposed action not affect any aquatic populations in the habitat. Based on the NRC staffs has the potential to only affect surface surrounding natural aquatic habitats of biological assessment determinations, water resources and aquatic resources in Biscayne Bay, Card Sound, or the the NRC concludes that the proposed the CCS and Federally protected species Atlantic Ocean. Therefore, the NRC staff action would have no significant impact and habitats (i.e., the sites resident concludes that the proposed action on Federally-protected species or population of American crocodiles and would result in no significant impact to habitats. its designated critical habitat). This EA aquatic resources. In a July 25, 2014, letter (ADAMS also addresses radiological impacts of Accession No. ML14206A800) to FWS, the proposed action. Accordingly, this Federally Protected Species and section only addresses the cumulative the NRC requested ESA section 7 Habitats impacts that could result from the consultation.

The Turkey Point site is home to a proposed action and other actions on resident population of Federally- Radiological Impacts these resources. The proposed action threatened American crocodiles The proposed action would not result would have no effect on the remaining (Crocodylus acutus). Crocodiles in or require any physical changes to resources (i.e., land use, visual discovered and colonized the Turkey Turkey Point systems, structures, or resources, air quality, noise, the geologic Point CCS following plant construction components, including those intended environment, groundwater resources, wreier-aviles on DSK5TPTVN1PROD with NOTICES in the 1970s, and the site now hosts for the prevention of accidents because terrestrial resources, historic and approximately one-third to one-half of the proposed license amendments cultural resources, socioeconomic the United States breeding population. involve TS changes that would only conditions including minority and low In 1977, the FWS designated an area of result in changes in procedural and income populations (environmental Florida that includes the majority of the operational aspects undertaken by FPL justice), and waste generation and Turkey Point site (including the CCS) as personnel for monitoring and management activities), and thus, critical habitat for the species under the maintaining the increased allowable cumulative impacts would not occur for ESA. FPL maintains a crocodile UHS temperature limit. Thus, the these environmental resources.

VerDate Mar<15>2010 14:56 Jul 30, 2014 Jkt 232001 PO 00000 Frm 00085 Fmt 4703 Sfmt 4703 E:\FR\FM\31JYN1.SGM 31JYN1

44468 Federal Register / Vol. 79, No. 147 / Thursday, July 31, 2014 / Notices The NRC staff has identified several from either the presence of higher algae 7. Submission of the COLA does not actions that may contribute to concentrations or the recent chemical commit FPL to build two new nuclear cumulative effects; each of these actions treatments. units and does not constitute approval is described separately below. of the proposal by the NRC; however, Aquifer Withdrawals submission of the COLA infers that the CCS Chemical Treatments The CCS is situated above two construction and operation of the new In 2011, FPL began to notice aquifers: the shallower saltwater units is a reasonably foreseeable future increased blue green algae Biscayne Aquifer and the deeper action. The COLA will be evaluated on concentrations in the CCS. The brackish Floridan Aquifer. A confining its merits, and the NRC will decide concentrations have steadily increased layer separates the two aquifers from whether to grant the licenses after since that time. FPL has performed one another. Turkey Point, Unit 5 uses considering and evaluating the engineering and environmental analyses the Floridan Aquifer for cooling water. environmental and safety implications and believes that the presence of higher The South Florida Water Management of the proposal. Environmental impacts than normal CCS algae concentrations District (SFWMD) recently granted FPL of constructing and operating Turkey may be diminishing the CCSs heat approval to withdraw a portion Point, Units 6 and 7 will depend on transfer capabilities. FPL developed a (approximately 5 million gallons per their actual design characteristics, plan to gradually reduce algae day [MGD]) of the Unit 5 withdrawal construction practices, and power plant concentrations through controlled allowance for use in the CCS. FPL began operations. These impacts will be chemical treatment of the CCS over the pumping Floridan Aquifer water into assessed by the NRC in a separate NEPA course of several weeks. On June 18, the CCS in early July. FPL has also document. The cumulative impacts 2014, FPL submitted a request to the received temporary approval to presented in this EA may differ from FDEP to approve the use of copper withdraw 30 MGD from the Biscayne those impacts assessed for the COLA.

sulfate, hydrogen peroxide, and a bio- Aquifer, though FPL has not yet used Potential impacts presented below have stimulant to treat the algae (letter this allowance. been drawn from FPLs Turkey Point, contained in Appendix A of ADAMS FPL also anticipates the FDEP to issue Units 6 and 7 Environmental Report, Accession No. ML14206A806). On June an Administrative Order requiring FPL Revision 5 (ADAMS Accession No.

27, 2014, the FDEP approved FPLs to install up to six new wells that will ML13357A435), and NRCs 2012 EA and treatment plan for a 90-day trial period pump approximately 14 MGD of water final FONSI for the EPU.

(letter contained in Appendix A of from the Floridan Aquifer into the CCS. Of the environmental resources ADAMS Accession No. ML14206A806). Modeling performed by FPL consultants affected by the proposed action, the The FDEP requested that during the 90- and the SFWMD indicates that in possible construction and operation of day treatment period, FPL monitor the approximately 2 years, the withdrawals Units 6 and 7 only have the potential to CCS for total recoverable copper and would reduce the salinity of the CCS to contribute to cumulative radiological dissolved oxygen and submit its results the equivalent of Biscayne Bay (about 34 impacts. Units 6 and 7 would not use to the FDEP. The FDEP also parts per thousand [ppt]). Such the CCS for cooling. Rather, Units 6 and recommended that FPL coordinate with withdrawals could also help moderate 7 would have a closed-cycle cooling the Florida Fish and Wildlife water temperatures. system with mechanical draft cooling Conservation Commission (FWC) due to The current and anticipated future towers. The cooling towers would draw the presence of crocodiles in the cooling aquifer withdrawals have the potential makeup from Miami-Dade Water and system. The FWC provided its to contribute to cumulative effects on Sewer Department reclaimed water and comments on FPLs treatment plan in a CCS surface water resources, CCS would discharge blowdown into deep letter dated July 1, 2014 (letter aquatic resources, and crocodiles. injection wells. Saltwater extracted from contained in Appendix A of ADAMS Because the CCS is a manmade closed Biscayne Bay subsurface sediment Accession No. ML14206A806). cycle cooling system, aquifer through radial collector wells proposed The CCS chemical treatments have withdrawals are not likely to have a to be built on the Turkey Point site the potential to contribute to cumulative significant cumulative effect on surface would serve as a secondary source of effects on CCS surface water resources, water resources. Aquifer withdrawals makeup water when a sufficient CCS aquatic resources, and the would result in beneficial impacts to quantity and/or quality of reclaimed American crocodile. Because the CCS is CCS aquatic resources and the water is not available. Because Units 6 a manmade closed cycle cooling system, crocodiles inhabiting the Turkey Point and 7 would not use the CCS, the treatment of the CCS is not likely to site. FPL anticipates that the proposed new units would not have a have a significant cumulative effect on withdrawals will reduce the salinity of cumulative effect on CCS surface water surface water resources. Monitoring the CCS to about 34 ppt and could also resources or CCS aquatic resources.

required by the FDEP will ensure help moderate CCS temperatures over Regarding crocodiles, potential adequate water quality throughout and the long term. Both of these effects impacts to this species and its critical following treatment. Monitoring will would create favorable conditions for habitat will be addressed in a future also ensure that any unanticipated CCS aquatic biota and crocodiles, which ESA section 7 consultation between the effects on the aquatic organisms that are currently tolerating an unusually NRC and FWS. When considering inhabit the CCS are appropriately hot, hypersaline environment. cumulative impacts on Federally listed addressed. During the treatment period, species, the ESAs implementing FPL has agreed to report any potentially Turkey Point, Units 6 and 7 regulations direct Federal agencies to wreier-aviles on DSK5TPTVN1PROD with NOTICES related fish kills in the CCS to the FWC. Construction and Operation consider the effects of future State or No fish kills have been reported to date. In June 2009, FPL submitted a private activities, not involving Federal Regarding crocodiles, the NRCs July 25, combined license application (COLA) activities, that are reasonably certain to 2014, biological assessment notes that (ADAMS Accession No. ML091830589) occur within the action area of the FPL has not observed any behavioral or to construct and operate two Federal action subject to consultation distributional changes or any other Westinghouse Advanced Passive 1000 (50 CFR part 402.02; emphasis added).

noticeable differences that would (AP1000) pressurized-water reactors Accordingly, the NRC will not address indicate effects to crocodiles resulting designated as Turkey Point, Units 6 and cumulative impacts of Units 6 and 7 on VerDate Mar<15>2010 14:56 Jul 30, 2014 Jkt 232001 PO 00000 Frm 00086 Fmt 4703 Sfmt 4703 E:\FR\FM\31JYN1.SGM 31JYN1

Federal Register / Vol. 79, No. 147 / Thursday, July 31, 2014 / Notices 44469 the American crocodile in this EA 10 CFR part 20 during all phases of action. The State official had no because the NRCs issuance of a license operations. Operation of Units 6 and 7 comments.

to construct and operate Units 6 and 7 would require a similar radiation The NRC staff also coordinated with is a separate Federal activity that will protection program, and the licensee the FWS pursuant to consultation under require future consultation. would be responsible for ensuring that ESA section 7 during the staffs review Regarding cumulative radiological workers are not exposed to dose limits of the proposed action. The consultation impacts, the NRC and Environmental above those specified in 10 CFR part 20. is further discussed under the Protection Agency have developed Therefore, the NRC staff concludes that Federally-Protected Species section of radiological dose limits for protection of the cumulative radiological impacts to this environmental assessment.

the public and workers that address the plant workers that could result from the cumulative effects of acute and long- combined operations of Turkey Point, III. Finding of No Significant Impact term exposure to radiation and Units 3 and 4 and the proposed new The NRC is considering issuing radioactive material. These dose limits Units 6 and 7 would result in no amendments for Renewed Facility are specified in 10 CFR part 20 and 40 significant impact on the radiological Operating License Nos. DPR-31 and CFR part 190. environment. DPR-41, issued to FPL for operation of The cumulative radiation dose to the Turkey Point to increase the UHS water public and workers is required to be Cumulative Impacts Conclusion temperature limit specified in the within the regulations cited above. The The NRC staff considered the Turkey Point TSs from 100 °F to 104 °F public dose limit of 25 millirem (0.25 cumulative impacts of CCS chemical and add an SR to monitor the UHS millisieverts) in 40 CFR part 190 applies treatments, current and anticipated temperature more frequently if the UHS to all reactors that may be on a site and future aquifer withdrawals, and the temperature approaches the new limit.

also includes any other nearby nuclear possible future construction and power reactor facilities. The NRC staff On the basis of the EA included in operation of two new nuclear units on reviewed several years of radiation dose Section II above and incorporated by the Turkey Point site. Based on the data contained in the licensees annual reference in this finding, the NRC information presented in this section, radioactive effluent release reports for concludes that the proposed action the NRC staff concludes that the Turkey Point, and the data demonstrate would not have significant effects on the proposed action, in combination with that the dose to members of the public quality of the human environment. The other cumulative actions, would result from radioactive effluents is within the proposed action would result in no in no significant cumulative impacts on limits of 10 CFR part 20 and 40 CFR part significant impacts on surface water the environment.

190. As previously indicated in the resources, aquatic resources, or the Radiological Impacts section of this Alternatives to the Proposed Action radiological environment. In addition, environmental assessment, the proposed As an alternative to the proposed the proposed action is not likely to action would result in no changes to action, the NRC staff considered denial adversely affect any Federally-protected radiation levels or the types or of the proposed license amendments species or affect any designated critical quantities of radioactive effluents (i.e., the no-action alternative). Denial habitat. The proposed action would also (gaseous or liquid) that affect radiation of the application would result in no not result in significant cumulative exposures to plant workers and change in current environmental impacts on any environmental members of the public. conditions or impacts. However, denial resources. The NRCs evaluation FPLs COLA for Units 6 and 7 would result in reduced operational considered information provided in the contains an assessment of the radiation flexibility and could require FPL to licensees application and associated doses to members of the public from the derate or shutdown Turkey Point if the supplements; the NRCs staff proposed new reactors and concludes UHS average supply water temperature independent review of other that doses would be within regulatory approaches or exceeds the 100 °F TS environmental documents, and limits. The staff expects continued limit. In its application, FPL states that coordination with the FWS pursuant to compliance with regulatory dose limits loss of load and voltage control resulting consultation under ESA section 7.

during operation of Turkey Point, Units from such a shutdown during periods of Section IV below lists the 3 and 4 under the proposed action. high summer demand could result in environmental documents related to the Therefore, the NRC staff concludes that impacts to grid reliability. proposed action and includes the cumulative radiological impacts to information on the availability of these members of the public that could result Alternative Use of Resources documents. Based on its findings, the from the combined operations of Turkey The action does not involve the use of NRC has decided not to prepare an Point, Units 3 and 4 and the proposed any different resources than those environmental impact statement for the new Units 6 and 7 would result in no previously considered in NUREG-1437, proposed action.

significant impact on the environment. Supplement 5 prepared for license IV. Availability of Documents Regarding radiation dose to workers, renewal of Turkey Point.

cumulative dose would only be The following table identifies the applicable for those workers that would Agencies and Persons Consulted environmental and other documents be engaged at both facilities (i.e., the On July 28, 2014, the NRC staff cited in this document and related to currently operating Units 3 and 4 and notified the Florida State official, Ms. the NRCs FONSI. These documents are proposed new Units 6 and 7). For Units Cindy Becker, Chief of Bureau of available for public inspection online wreier-aviles on DSK5TPTVN1PROD with NOTICES 3 and 4, the licensee has a radiation Radiation Control, of the Florida through ADAMS at http://www.nrc.gov/

protection program that maintains Department of Health, regarding the reading-rm/adams.html or in person at worker doses within the dose limits in environmental impacts of the proposed the NRCs PDR as described previously.

VerDate Mar<15>2010 14:56 Jul 30, 2014 Jkt 232001 PO 00000 Frm 00087 Fmt 4703 Sfmt 4703 E:\FR\FM\31JYN1.SGM 31JYN1

44470 Federal Register / Vol. 79, No. 147 / Thursday, July 31, 2014 / Notices Adams Document Accession No.

Documents Related to License Amendment Request Florida Power & Light Company. License Amendment Request No. 231, Application to Revise Technical Specifications to Re- ML14196A006 vise Ultimate Heat Sink Temperature Limit. Dated July 10, 2014.

Florida Power & Light Company. License Amendment Request No. 231, Application to Revise Ultimate Heat Sink Tempera- ML14202A392 ture LimitRequest for Emergency Approval. Dated July 17, 2014.

U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission. Turkey Point 3 and 4 Request for Additional InformationLAR231 (TAC MF4392 and ML14203A614 MF4393). [1 of 2] Dated July 18, 2014.

U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission. Turkey Point 3 and 4 Request for Additional InformationLAR231 (TAC MF4392 and ML14203A618 MF4393). [2 of 2] Dated July 18, 2014.

Florida Power & Light Company. License Amendment Request No. 231, Application to Revise Ultimate Heat Sink Tempera- ML14204A367 ture LimitSupplement 1, and Response to Request for Additional Information. Dated July 22, 2014.

Florida Power & Light Company. Response to Request for Additional Information Regarding License Amendment Request No. ML14204A368 231, Application to Revise Technical Specifications to Revise Ultimate Heat Sink Temperature Limit. Dated July 22, 2014.

U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission. Turkey Point 3 and 4 Request for Additional InformationLAR231 (TAC MF4392 and ML14204A814 MF4393). Dated July 22, 2014.

U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission. Notice of Enforcement Discretion for Florida Power & Light Company Regarding Turkey ML14204A652 Point Nuclear Generating Unit Nos. 3 and 4 [NOED NO. 14-2-001]. Dated July 23, 2014.

Florida Power & Light Company. Response to Containment and Ventilation Branch Request for Additional Information, Re- ML14206A853 garding License Amendment Request No. 231, Application to Revise Ultimate Heat Temperature Limit. Dated July 24, 2014.

Florida Power & Light Company. Turkey Point Nuclear Generating Unit Nos. 3 and 4Individual Notice of Consideration of ML14204A129 Issuance of Amendments to Renewed Facility Operating Licenses, Proposed No Significant Hazards Consideration Deter- (letter) mination, and Opportunity for Hearing (Exigent Circumstances) (TAC Nos. MF4392 and MF4293). Dated July 24, 2014. ML14199A111 (enclosure)

U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission. Request to Reinitiate Informal Consultation for a Proposed License Amendment to In- ML14206A800 crease the Ultimate Heat Sink Temperature Limit at Turkey Point Nuclear Generating Unit Nos. 3 and 4. Dated July 25, 2014.

U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission. Biological Assessment on the American Crocodile (Crocodylus acutus) for Turkey Point ML14206A806 Nuclear Generating Unit Nos. 3 and 4 Proposed License Amendment to Increase the Ultimate Heat Sink Temperature Limit. Dated July 25, 2014.

Other Referenced Documents U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission. Generic Environmental Impact Statement for License Renewal of Nuclear Plants: Re- ML020280236 garding Turkey Point Units 3 and 4Final Report (NUREG-1437, Supplement 5). Dated January 28, 2002.

Florida Power & Light Company. Proposed Turkey Point Units 6 & 7, Project No. 763, Application for Combined License for ML091830589 Turkey Point Units 6 and 7. Dated June 30, 2009.

U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission. Final Environmental Assessment and Finding of No Significant Impact Related to a Li- ML12074A251 cense Amendment To Increase the Maximum Reactor Power Level, Florida Power & Light Company; Turkey Point, Units 3 and 4. Dated March 27, 2012.

Florida Power & Light Company. Turkey Point Units 6 & 7 Combine License Application, Part 3: Environmental Report, Revi- ML13357A435 sion 5. Dated December 23, 2013.

Florida Power & Light Company. Turkey Point Units 3 and 4; Wastewater Permit FL0001563; Request for Approval for the ML14206A806

  • Use of Copper Sulfate, Hydrogen Peroxide, and a Bio-Stimulant in the Treatment and Control of Blue Green Algae in the Cooling Canal System. Dated June 18, 2014.

Florida Department of Environmental Protection. Re: Florida Power & Light, Turkey Point, NPDES Permit FL0001562, 90-Day ML14206A806

  • Trial Approval. Dated June 27, 2014.

Florida Fish and Wildlife Conservation Commission. Re: Florida Power & Light, Turkey Point Plant Maintenance Activity, ML14206A806

  • NPDES Permit FL0001562, Miami-Dade County. Dated July 1, 2014.
  • (See Appendix A.)

Dated at Rockville, Maryland, this 28th day For the Nuclear Regulatory Commission.

of July 2014. Lisa M. Regner, Acting Chief, Plant Licensing Branch II-2, Division of Operating Reactor Licensing, Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation.

[FR Doc. 2014-18159 Filed 7-30-14; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 7590-01-P wreier-aviles on DSK5TPTVN1PROD with NOTICES VerDate Mar<15>2010 17:51 Jul 30, 2014 Jkt 232001 PO 00000 Frm 00088 Fmt 4703 Sfmt 4703 E:\FR\FM\31JYN1.SGM 31JYN1