ML18080A174: Difference between revisions
StriderTol (talk | contribs) (Created page by program invented by StriderTol) |
StriderTol (talk | contribs) (Created page by program invented by StriderTol) |
||
| Line 17: | Line 17: | ||
=Text= | =Text= | ||
{{#Wiki_filter: | {{#Wiki_filter:NuScaleDCRaisPEm Resource From: Chowdhury, Prosanta Sent: Wednesday, March 21, 2018 4:37 PM To: Request for Additional Information Cc: Lee, Samuel; Cranston, Gregory; Markley, Anthony; Dias, Antonio; Hernandez, Raul; NuScaleDCRaisPEm Resource | ||
==Subject:== | ==Subject:== | ||
Request for Additional | Request for Additional Information No. 396 eRAI No. 9328 (09.01.02) | ||
Attachments: | Attachments: Request for Additional Information No. 396 (eRAI No. 9328).pdf Attached please find NRC staffs request for additional information (RAI) concerning review of the NuScale Design Certification Application. | ||
Request for Additional | |||
Please submit your technically correct and complete response within 60 days of the date of this RAI to the NRC Document Control Desk. | Please submit your technically correct and complete response within 60 days of the date of this RAI to the NRC Document Control Desk. | ||
If you have any questions, please contact me. | |||
If you have any questions, please contact me. | Thank you. | ||
Thank you. | |||
Prosanta Chowdhury, Project Manager Licensing Branch 1 (NuScale) | Prosanta Chowdhury, Project Manager Licensing Branch 1 (NuScale) | ||
Division of New Reactor Licensing Office of New Reactors U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission | Division of New Reactor Licensing Office of New Reactors U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission 301-415-1647 1 | ||
Hearing Identifier: NuScale_SMR_DC_RAI_Public Email Number: 426 Mail Envelope Properties (BN7PR09MB26096BDE9E0BBF74148776949EAA0) | |||
==Subject:== | ==Subject:== | ||
Request for Additional Information No. 396 eRAI No. 9328 (09.01.02) | Request for Additional Information No. 396 eRAI No. 9328 (09.01.02) | ||
Tracking Status: None | Sent Date: 3/21/2018 4:37:15 PM Received Date: 3/21/2018 4:37:20 PM From: Chowdhury, Prosanta Created By: Prosanta.Chowdhury@nrc.gov Recipients: | ||
Tracking Status: None | "Lee, Samuel" <Samuel.Lee@nrc.gov> | ||
Tracking Status: None | Tracking Status: None "Cranston, Gregory" <Gregory.Cranston@nrc.gov> | ||
Tracking Status: None "Markley, Anthony" <Anthony.Markley@nrc.gov> | |||
Post Office: | Tracking Status: None "Dias, Antonio" <Antonio.Dias@nrc.gov> | ||
Tracking Status: None "Hernandez, Raul" <Raul.Hernandez@nrc.gov> | |||
Tracking Status: None "NuScaleDCRaisPEm Resource" <NuScaleDCRaisPEm.Resource@nrc.gov> | |||
Tracking Status: None "Request for Additional Information" <RAI@nuscalepower.com> | |||
Tracking Status: None Post Office: BN7PR09MB2609.namprd09.prod.outlook.com Files Size Date & Time MESSAGE 551 3/21/2018 4:37:20 PM Request for Additional Information No. 396 (eRAI No. 9328).pdf 75261 Options Priority: Standard Return Notification: No Reply Requested: No Sensitivity: Normal Expiration Date: | |||
Recipients Received: | |||
Request for Additional Information No. 396 (eRAI 9328) | Request for Additional Information No. 396 (eRAI 9328) | ||
Issue Date: 03/21/2018 Application Title: NuScale Standard Design Certification 048 Operating Company: NuScale Power, LLC Docket No. 52-048 Review Section: 09.01.02 - New and Spent Fuel Storage Application Section: Section 9.1.2 and 9.2.5 QUESTIONS 09.01.02-36 Appendix A to 10 CFR Part 50 -General Design Criteria for Nuclear Power Plants Criterion 61 | Issue Date: 03/21/2018 Application Title: NuScale Standard Design Certification 048 Operating Company: NuScale Power, LLC Docket No. 52-048 Review Section: 09.01.02 - New and Spent Fuel Storage Application Section: Section 9.1.2 and 9.2.5 QUESTIONS 09.01.02-36 Appendix A to 10 CFR Part 50 -General Design Criteria for Nuclear Power Plants Criterion 61 - | ||
Fuel storage and handling and radioactivity control, states that the fuel storage and handling, radioactive waste, and other systems which may contain radioactivity shall be designed to assure adequate safety under normal and postulated accident conditions. These systems shall be designed with a capability to permit appropriate periodic inspection and testing of components important to safety. | |||
NUREG-800, SRP 9.1.2, | NUREG-800, SRP 9.1.2, New and Spent Fuel Storage, Section III.2.K instructs the staff to verify that the detection and collection of spent fuel pool liner leaks are incorporated into the design with capability to collect pool liner leaks (e.g. drains and sumps) to prevent uncontrolled releases of radioactive material to the environment and to keep radiation exposure as low as reasonably achievable for personnel. | ||
In RAI 03.08.05-23, the staff requested the applicant to describe the leak chase system in detail. In its response to the RAI dated October 17,2017, the applicant stated that pool leakage detection system (PLDS) consists of floor leakage channels, perimeter leakage channels, channel drainage lines, leak collection headers, leakage rate measuring lines, and valves. The floor leakage channels are embedded in the concrete beneath the field welded seams of the pool floor liner plates in the UHS pools and the dry dock. A perimeter channel is embedded in concrete at the wall and floor liner joint area. | In RAI 03.08.05-23, the staff requested the applicant to describe the leak chase system in detail. In its response to the RAI dated October 17,2017, the applicant stated that pool leakage detection system (PLDS) consists of floor leakage channels, perimeter leakage channels, channel drainage lines, leak collection headers, leakage rate measuring lines, and valves. The floor leakage channels are embedded in the concrete beneath the field welded seams of the pool floor liner plates in the UHS pools and the dry dock. A perimeter channel is embedded in concrete at the wall and floor liner joint area. | ||
The guidance provided in SRP 9.1.2 states that the SFP should be provided with a leakage detection system. A typical leakage detection system monitors all wetted surfaces (walls and floor welds). The applicants PLDS does not monitor leakage through the wall welds; therefore, the staff finds that the applicants design of the PLDS does not follow the recommendations of SRP 9.1.2. | |||
The guidance provided in SRP 9.1.2 states that the SFP should be provided with a leakage detection system. A typical leakage detection system monitors all wetted surfaces (walls and floor welds). The | |||
Operational experience has shown that slow, undetected leakage of borated water has the capability of degrading reinforced concrete. Without a leakage detection system on the walls of the UHS/SFP, it is not clear to the staff how the applicant is capable of detecting slow leakages capable of compromising the structural integrity of the concrete walls (which are safety-related and risk-significant) of the UHS/SFP. | Operational experience has shown that slow, undetected leakage of borated water has the capability of degrading reinforced concrete. Without a leakage detection system on the walls of the UHS/SFP, it is not clear to the staff how the applicant is capable of detecting slow leakages capable of compromising the structural integrity of the concrete walls (which are safety-related and risk-significant) of the UHS/SFP. | ||
The staff requests the applicant to modify the design of the PLDS, to include monitoring of the pool wall leakage, or to provide a justification as to how the current design of the PLDS is capable of detecting pool leakage, preventing degradation of the safety-related concrete structure of the pools and the spread of contamination.}} | The staff requests the applicant to modify the design of the PLDS, to include monitoring of the pool wall leakage, or to provide a justification as to how the current design of the PLDS is capable of detecting pool leakage, preventing degradation of the safety-related concrete structure of the pools and the spread of contamination.}} | ||
Revision as of 16:03, 21 October 2019
| ML18080A174 | |
| Person / Time | |
|---|---|
| Site: | NuScale |
| Issue date: | 03/21/2018 |
| From: | NRC |
| To: | NRC/NRO/DNRL/LB1 |
| References | |
| Download: ML18080A174 (3) | |
Text
NuScaleDCRaisPEm Resource From: Chowdhury, Prosanta Sent: Wednesday, March 21, 2018 4:37 PM To: Request for Additional Information Cc: Lee, Samuel; Cranston, Gregory; Markley, Anthony; Dias, Antonio; Hernandez, Raul; NuScaleDCRaisPEm Resource
Subject:
Request for Additional Information No. 396 eRAI No. 9328 (09.01.02)
Attachments: Request for Additional Information No. 396 (eRAI No. 9328).pdf Attached please find NRC staffs request for additional information (RAI) concerning review of the NuScale Design Certification Application.
Please submit your technically correct and complete response within 60 days of the date of this RAI to the NRC Document Control Desk.
If you have any questions, please contact me.
Thank you.
Prosanta Chowdhury, Project Manager Licensing Branch 1 (NuScale)
Division of New Reactor Licensing Office of New Reactors U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission 301-415-1647 1
Hearing Identifier: NuScale_SMR_DC_RAI_Public Email Number: 426 Mail Envelope Properties (BN7PR09MB26096BDE9E0BBF74148776949EAA0)
Subject:
Request for Additional Information No. 396 eRAI No. 9328 (09.01.02)
Sent Date: 3/21/2018 4:37:15 PM Received Date: 3/21/2018 4:37:20 PM From: Chowdhury, Prosanta Created By: Prosanta.Chowdhury@nrc.gov Recipients:
"Lee, Samuel" <Samuel.Lee@nrc.gov>
Tracking Status: None "Cranston, Gregory" <Gregory.Cranston@nrc.gov>
Tracking Status: None "Markley, Anthony" <Anthony.Markley@nrc.gov>
Tracking Status: None "Dias, Antonio" <Antonio.Dias@nrc.gov>
Tracking Status: None "Hernandez, Raul" <Raul.Hernandez@nrc.gov>
Tracking Status: None "NuScaleDCRaisPEm Resource" <NuScaleDCRaisPEm.Resource@nrc.gov>
Tracking Status: None "Request for Additional Information" <RAI@nuscalepower.com>
Tracking Status: None Post Office: BN7PR09MB2609.namprd09.prod.outlook.com Files Size Date & Time MESSAGE 551 3/21/2018 4:37:20 PM Request for Additional Information No. 396 (eRAI No. 9328).pdf 75261 Options Priority: Standard Return Notification: No Reply Requested: No Sensitivity: Normal Expiration Date:
Recipients Received:
Request for Additional Information No. 396 (eRAI 9328)
Issue Date: 03/21/2018 Application Title: NuScale Standard Design Certification 048 Operating Company: NuScale Power, LLC Docket No.52-048 Review Section: 09.01.02 - New and Spent Fuel Storage Application Section: Section 9.1.2 and 9.2.5 QUESTIONS 09.01.02-36 Appendix A to 10 CFR Part 50 -General Design Criteria for Nuclear Power Plants Criterion 61 -
Fuel storage and handling and radioactivity control, states that the fuel storage and handling, radioactive waste, and other systems which may contain radioactivity shall be designed to assure adequate safety under normal and postulated accident conditions. These systems shall be designed with a capability to permit appropriate periodic inspection and testing of components important to safety.
NUREG-800, SRP 9.1.2, New and Spent Fuel Storage,Section III.2.K instructs the staff to verify that the detection and collection of spent fuel pool liner leaks are incorporated into the design with capability to collect pool liner leaks (e.g. drains and sumps) to prevent uncontrolled releases of radioactive material to the environment and to keep radiation exposure as low as reasonably achievable for personnel.
In RAI 03.08.05-23, the staff requested the applicant to describe the leak chase system in detail. In its response to the RAI dated October 17,2017, the applicant stated that pool leakage detection system (PLDS) consists of floor leakage channels, perimeter leakage channels, channel drainage lines, leak collection headers, leakage rate measuring lines, and valves. The floor leakage channels are embedded in the concrete beneath the field welded seams of the pool floor liner plates in the UHS pools and the dry dock. A perimeter channel is embedded in concrete at the wall and floor liner joint area.
The guidance provided in SRP 9.1.2 states that the SFP should be provided with a leakage detection system. A typical leakage detection system monitors all wetted surfaces (walls and floor welds). The applicants PLDS does not monitor leakage through the wall welds; therefore, the staff finds that the applicants design of the PLDS does not follow the recommendations of SRP 9.1.2.
Operational experience has shown that slow, undetected leakage of borated water has the capability of degrading reinforced concrete. Without a leakage detection system on the walls of the UHS/SFP, it is not clear to the staff how the applicant is capable of detecting slow leakages capable of compromising the structural integrity of the concrete walls (which are safety-related and risk-significant) of the UHS/SFP.
The staff requests the applicant to modify the design of the PLDS, to include monitoring of the pool wall leakage, or to provide a justification as to how the current design of the PLDS is capable of detecting pool leakage, preventing degradation of the safety-related concrete structure of the pools and the spread of contamination.