IR 05000280/2010004

IR 05000280-10-004, 05000281-10-004, 05000280-10-501, and 05000281-10-501, on 10/29/10, Surry Power Station - Errata

ML110450732
Person / Time
Site:	Surry
Issue date:	02/11/2011
From:	Gerald Mccoy NRC/RGN-II/DRP/RPB5
To:	Heacock D Virginia Electric & Power Co (VEPCO)
References
IR-10-004, IR-10-501
Download: ML110450732 (5)

Text

UNITED STATES NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION REGION II 245 PEACHTREE CENTER AVENUE NE, SUITE 1200 ATLANTA, GEORGIA 30303-1257 February 11, 2011 Mr. David President and Chief Nuclear Officer Virginia Electric and Power Company Innsbrook Technical Center 5000 Dominion Boulevard Glen Allen, VA 23060-6711 SUBJECT: SURRY POWER STATION - NRC INTEGRATED INSPECTION REPORT 05000280/2010004, 05000281/2010004, 05000280/2010501 and 05000281/2010501 ERRATA

Dear Mr. Heacock:

On October 29, 2010, the United States Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC) issued the subject NRC Integrated Inspection Report 05000280/2010004, 05000281/2010004, 05000280/2010501 and 05000281/2010501 for Surry Power Station, Units 1 and 2, ADAMS ML103020186. In reviewing this report it was noted that in Section 4OA7, the reported time period of reduced staffing for mechanical maintenance and electrical maintenance personnel between December 2006, and January 2010, was incorrect. The correct reported time period was between October 2009, and January 2010. Accordingly, we are providing a revised version of the inspection report that includes the correct time period.

In accordance with 10 CFR 2.390 of the NRC's "Rules of Practice," a copy of this letter, its enclosure, and your response (if any) will be available electronically for public inspection in the NRC Public Document Room or from the Publicly Available Records (PARS) component of the NRC's document system (ADAMS). ADAMS is accessible from the NRC Website at http://www.nrc.gov/reading-rm/adams.html (the Public Electronic Reading Room).

Sincerely,

/RA/

Gerald J. McCoy, Chief Reactor Projects Branch 5 Division of Reactor Projects

Docket Nos.: 50-280, 50-281 License Nos.: DPR-32, DPR-37 Enclosure: As stated

cc: See page 2

_________________________ X SUNSI REVIEW COMPLETE OFFICE RII: DRS RII: DRP SIGNATURE RA RA NAME BONSER MCCOY DATE 2/11/2011 2/11/2011 E-MAIL COPY? YES NO YES NO YES NO YES NO YES NO YES NO YES NO VEPCO 2 cc w/encl: Gerald T. Bischof Site Vice President Surry Power Station Virginia Electric and Power Company Electronic Mail Distribution B. L. (Sonny) Stanley Director, Nuclear Safety and Licensing Virginia Electric and Power Company Electronic Mail Distribution Lillian M. Cuoco, Esq. Senior Counsel Dominion Resources Services, Inc. Electronic Mail Distribution

Chris L. Funderburk Director, Nuclear Licensing & Operations Support Virginia Electric and Power Company Electronic Mail Distribution

Ginger L. Melton Virginia Electric and Power Company Electronic Mail Distribution

Virginia State Corporation Commission Division of Energy Regulation P.O. Box 1197 Richmond, VA 23209

Attorney General Supreme Court Building 900 East Main Street Richmond, VA 23219

Senior Resident Inspector Surry Power Station U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission 5850 Hog Island Rd Surry, VA 23883 Michael M. Cline Director Virginia Department of Emergency Services Management Electronic Mail Distribution

VEPCO 5 Enclosure On September 29, 2010, the lead inspector re-exited with Mr. K. Sloane, Plant Manager, and other members of the Surry staff via teleconference. The closure of Unresolved Item (URI) 05000280, 281/2010002-01, Emergency Plan Minimum Staffing was discussed.

4OA7 Licensee-Identified Violation The following finding of very low significance was identified by the licensee and is a violation of NRC requirements which meets the criteria of Section 2.3.2 of the NRC Enforcement Policy, NUREG-1600, for characterization as a Green Non-Cited Violation (NCV). * 10 CFR 50.54(q) states in part that a licensee authorized to possess and operate a nuclear power reactor shall follow and maintain in effect emergency plans which meet the standards in 10 CFR 50.47(b) and the requirements in appendix E of this part. Contrary to this, between October 2009, and January 2010, the licensee identified that the staffing was reduced for mechanical maintenance and electrical maintenance personnel on shift to below the minimum shift staffing requirements of the Emergency Plan without a 50.54(q) review. The violation was determined to be of very low safety significance because, the licensee demonstrated non-designated coincidental coverage for the shift staffing positions in question, no degradation of the planning standard existed and the criteria for a white finding was not met. The licensee corrected the deficiency when it was discovered and entered it into the corrective action program as condition report CR364194.

ATTACHMENT: SUPPPLEMENTAL INFORMATION

VEPCO 5 Enclosure On September 29, 2010, the lead inspector re-exited with Mr. G. Sloane and other members of the Surry staff via teleconference. The closure of Unresolved Item (URI) 05000280, 281/2010002-01, Emergency Plan Minimum Staffing was discussed

4OA7 Licensee-Identified Violation The following finding of very low significance was identified by the licensee and is a violation of NRC requirements which meets the criteria of Section 2.3.2 of the NRC Enforcement Policy, NUREG-1600, for characterization as a Green Non-Cited Violation (NCV). * 10 CFR 50.54(q) states in part that a licensee authorized to possess and operate a nuclear power reactor shall follow and maintain in effect emergency plans which meet the standards in 10 CFR 50.47(b) and the requirements in appendix E of this part. Contrary to this, between December 2006 and January 2010, the licensee identified that the staffing was reduced for mechanical maintenance and electrical maintenance personnel on shift to below the minimum shift staffing requirements of the Emergency Plan without a 50.54(q) review. The violation was determined to be of very low safety significance because, the licensee demonstrated non-designated coincidental coverage for the shift staffing positions in question, no degradation of the planning standard existed and the criteria for a white finding was not met. The licensee corrected the deficiency when it was discovered and entered it into the corrective action program as condition report CR364194.

ATTACHMENT: SUPPPLEMENTAL INFORMATION