ML080170194: Difference between revisions

From kanterella
Jump to navigation Jump to search
(Created page by program invented by StriderTol)
 
(Created page by program invented by StriderTol)
Line 2: Line 2:
| number = ML080170194
| number = ML080170194
| issue date = 01/17/2008
| issue date = 01/17/2008
| title = Waterford, Appendix F - Region Iv Written Examination Outline Quality Review Matrix
| title = Appendix F - Region Iv Written Examination Outline Quality Review Matrix
| author name =  
| author name =  
| author affiliation = NRC/RGN-IV
| author affiliation = NRC/RGN-IV

Revision as of 16:09, 17 April 2019

Appendix F - Region Iv Written Examination Outline Quality Review Matrix
ML080170194
Person / Time
Site: Waterford Entergy icon.png
Issue date: 01/17/2008
From:
NRC Region 4
To:
Entergy Operations
References
50-382/07-302
Download: ML080170194 (1)


Text

- Page 1 -APPENDIX F - REGION IV WRITTEN EXAMINATION OUTLINE QUALITY REVIEW MATRIXReview Performed by G. Apger (9/12/07)

Q#1.LOK (F/H)2.LOD (1-5)3. Psychometric Errors4. Job Content Errors5.

U/E/S 6.Explanation(See below for instructions)

StemFocus Direct L/U One Ans Min Resp Scope (TS?)Job-Link Minu-tia SROOnly Back-wards See Comments in column#6SGeneric K/A 2.4.30 was listed as rejected due to being less than 2.5 for RO. This is contrary to methodology outlined in the

selection process description.While Tier 3 items are specifically identified as not eligible to be pre-screened out, they may be rejected if justified on a case-by-case

basis: ES401 Att.2 See Comments in column#6SWhile the specific K/As are different, it was noted that repeat APE items in Tier 2 Group 1 are very similar to those repeat items in another facility's exam outline which was

developed using the same program.

-AND-Sampled APE items for Tier 2 Group 2 repeat 5 of 24 items from that same facility's

exam.