Text

WATERFORD-2017-03 Public Forms
	ML17137A191
Person / Time
Site:	Waterford
Issue date:	04/05/2017
From:	Vincent Gaddy; Operations Branch IV
To:	; Entergy Operations
References
	Download: ML17137A191 (14)
	v • d • e

ES-201 Examination Outline Quality Checklist Form ES-201-2 Facility: Date of Examination:

Initials Item Task Description la b* c#

1.

w

a. Verify that the outline(s) fit(s) the appropriate model, in accordance with ES-401 or ES-401 N. ~ lk - v.M>

R b. Assess whether the outline was systematically and randomly prepared in accordance with T

I Section D.1 of ES-401 or ES-401 N and whether all KJA categories are appropriately sampled. ~ Pt:- ~

T E c. Assess whether the outline over-emphasizes any systems, evolutions, or generic topics. ~ w.,. ~

N

d. Assess whether the justifications for deselected or rejected KJA statements are appropriate. ~ !AL *JM)

2. a. Using Form ES-301-5, verify that the proposed scenario sets cover the required number of s

I normal evolutions, instrument and component failures, technical specifications, and major transients. ~ JI{_

'2 M b. Assess whether there are enough scenario sets (and spares) to test the projected number and u mix of applicants in accordance with the expected crew composition and rotation schedule L

A without compromising exam Integrity, and ensure that each applicant can be tested using at least one new or significantly modified scenario, that no scenarios are duplicated from the j~

c::::

f1<- ~

T applicants' audit test(s), and that scenarios will not be repeated on subsequent days. I

~

0

c. To the extent possible, assess whether the outline(s) conform(s) with the qualitative and R

quantitative criteria specified on Form ES-301-4 and described in Appendix D.

(.,f.... (l1;_>

3. a. Verify that the systems walk-through outline meets the criteria specified on Form ES-301-2:

(1) the outllne(s) contain(s) the required number of control room and in-plant tasks distributed w among the safety functions as specified on the form I A (2) task repetition from the last two NRC examinations is within the limits specified on the form L

K (3) no tasks are duplicated from the applicants' audit test(s)

(4) the number of new a modified tasks meets or exceeds the minimums specified on the form (5) the number of alternate path, low-power, emergency, and RCA tasks meet the criteria on

~* ~

/'(..-

lt T the form.

H

,)

R b. Verify that the administrative outline meets the criteria specified on Form ES-301-1 :

0 u

(1) the tasks are distributed among the topics as specified on the form (2) at least one task Is new or significantly modified V't_. IP<.

G (3) no more than one task is repeated from the last two NRC licensing examinations H

~

c. Determine if there are enough different outlines to test the projected number and mix of J.t:._

applicants and ensure that no items are duplicated on subseauent days. I~ ~

4. a. Assess whether plant-specific priorities (Including PRA and IPE insights) are covered in the appropriate exam sections. ~ II<- t;b{7 G

.£. ~

E N

b. Assess whether the 10 CFR 55.41/43 and 55.45 sampling is appropriate.

E R

A L

c. Ensure that KJA importance ratings (except for plant-specific priorities) are at least 2.5.

d. Check for duplication and overlap among exam sections.

e. Check the entire exam for balance of coverage.

1£ 11¥.J

~ I~

~ µ....

lk> IQ IA.

~

~-

f. Assess whether the exam fits the appropriate job level (RO or SRO). Ir - IY'

(-ronz.o /io £ ~oluPrint~i:7me ign~ ~re.. ~*o *j I

a. Author .,~ I

£../< lllJ> r.J)#-77.AvcJ fl V. - "> - _, o*

b.

c.

Facility Reviewer (*)

NRC Chief Examiner(#) . I(.11r..~ ln...1-i." /..,.. l (JJ,,. ~.... 1.J'~ - \,

d. NRC Supervisor 'A "'"A~ ..,r_1,.1- J1d lfv ,r.... - ,\, A- ....._JAIJ I(

Note: #Independent NRC reviewer lnltlal Items in Column "c"; chief examiner concurrence required.

Not applicable for NRC-prepared examination outlines .

ES-201, Page 26 of 28

ES-401 Written Examination Quality Checklist Form ES-401-6 Facility: Waterford 3 Date of Examination: April 5, 2017 Exam Level: RO 181 SRO 181 Initial Item Descri tion b*

1. Questions and answers are technicall accurate and a licable to the facili tk- ()'t

2. a. NRC K/As are referenced for all questions.

b. Facili learnln ob"ectives are referenced as available. {IA./' (Jt-

3. SRO uestions are a ro riate in accordance with Section D.2.d of ES401 ~ Cit

4. The sampling process was random and systematic (If more than 4 RO or 2 SRO questions were re eated from the last 2 NRC licensin exams consult the NRR OL ro ram office .

(/(.,,., &e

5. Question duplication from the license screening/audit exam was controlled

~

as indicated below (check the item that applies) and appears appropriate:

D the audit exam was systematically and randomly developed; or

~ C#f!,,

D the audit exam was completed before the license exam was started; or D the examinations were developed independently; or 181 the licensee certifies that there is no duplication; or D other (explain)

6. Bank use meets limits (no more than 75 percent from the bank, at least 10 percent new, and the rest new or modified); enter the actual RO I SRO-only uestion distribution s at ri ht.

Bank 26 / 3 Modified 0/ 1 New 49 / 21 i

7. Between 50 and 60 percent of the questions on the RO Memory CIA exam are written at the comprehension/ analysis level; the SRO exam may exceed 60 percent if the randomly selected K/As support the higher cognitive levels; enter the actual RO I SRO uestion distribution s at ri ht.

36/10 39/15 i

8. References/handouts provided do not give away answers or aid in the elimination of distractors.

9. Question content conforms with specific KIA statements In the previously approved examination outline and is appropriate for the tier to which they are assigned; deviations are ustified.

10. Question s chometric uali and format meet the uidellnes in ES A endix B.

11. The exam contains the required number of one-point, multiple choice items; the total is correct and a rees with the value on the cover sheet.

Date

a. Author

/g/z*11

b. Facility Reviewer(*) *3/q~/7I

c. NRC Chief Examiner (#) ?/r7/2.:.17

d. NRC Supervisor 7/>>h7 Note:

The facility reviewer's initials/signature are not applicable for NRC-Oeveloped examinations.

lnde endent NRC reviewer Initial items in Column *c** chief examiner concurrence re uired.

ES-301 Operating Test Quality Checklist Form ES-301 *3 Facil" Date of Examination: 0 eratin Test Number:

lnltlals

1. General Criteria

a. The operating test conforms with the previously approved outline; changes are consistent with sam lin re uirements e.. , 10 CFR 55.45, o erational im ortance, safe function distribution.

b. There is no day-to-day repetition between this and other operating tests to be administered during this examination.

c. The operating test shall not duplicate items from the applicants' audit test(s). (see Section D.1.a.)

d. Overlap with the written examination and between different parts of the operating test Is within acce table limits.

e. It appears that the operating test will differentiate between competent and less-than-competent a licants at the desi nated license level.

2. Walk*Throu h Criteria

a. Each JPM includes the following, as applicable:

initial conditions initiating cues references and tools, including associated procedures reasonable and validated time limits (average time allowed for completion) and specific designation if deemed to be time-critical by the facility licensee operationally important specific performance criteria that include:

detailed expected actions with exact criteria and nomenclature system response and other examiner cues statements describing important observations to be made by the applicant criteria for successful completion of the task identification of critical steps and their associated performance standards restrictions on the se uence of ste s, if a llcable

b. Ensure that any changes from the previously approved systems and administrative walk-through outlines (Forms ES-301-1 and 2) have not caused the test to deviate from any of the acceptance criteria (e.g., item distribution, bank use, repetition from the last 2 NRC examinations) specified on those forms and Form ES-201-2.

3. Simulator Criteria The associated simulator operating tests (scenario sets) have been reviewed in accordance with Form ES-301-4 and a co is attached.

a. Author

b. Facility Reviewer(*)

c. NRC Chief Examiner (#)

d. NRC Supervisor NOTE:

The facility signature is not applicable for NRG-developed tests.

lnde endent NRC reviewer initial items in Column "c"; chief examiner concurrence re uired.

ES-301, Page 24 of 27

ES-301 Simulator Scenario Quality Checklist Form ES-301-4 Facility: Waterford 3 Date of Exam: March 27, 2017 Scenario Numbers: 1 / 2 I 3 I 4 Operating Test No.: 1 QUALITATIVE ATTRIBUTES Initials a b* c#

1. The initial conditions are realistic, in that some equipment and/or instrumentation may be out of service, but It does not cue the operators into expected events.

-k I<.- ~

2. The scenarios consist mostly of related events. lh. fL Cf,t

3. Each event description consists of

the point in the scenario when it is to be initiated

the malfunction{s) or conditions that are entered to initiate the event

the symptoms/cues that will be visible to the crew the expected operator actions {by shift position) the event termination point (if applicable) k kA-- etc..

4. The events are valid with regard to physics and thermodynamics. ~ flt.,,, ('j(!,

~ c~

5. Sequencing and timing of events is reasonable, and allows the examination team to obtain complete evaluation results commensurate with the scenario objectives. 1. . ~

6. If time compression techniques are used, the scenario summary clearly so indicates.

Operators have sufficient time to carry out expected activities without undue time constraints. N/A NIA NIA Cues are given. ~

7. The simulator modeling is not altered. 1lt /ft__ (j,l

8. The scenarios have been validated. Pursuant to 10 CFR 55.46{d), any open simulator performance deficiencies or deviations from the referenced plant have been evaluated to ensure that functional fidelity is maintained while running the planned scenarios. ~ k..- cBfr

9. Every operator will be evaluated using at least one new or significantly modified scenario. All other scenarios have been altered in accordance with Section D.5 of ES-301. ~ ~ [jl

10. All individual operator competencies can be evaluated, as verified using Form ES-301-6 {submit the form along with the simulator scenarios). .( Jf/ CIJC

'f~ /ft,,. (Jtt

11. The scenario set provides the opportunity for each applicant to be evaluated in each of the applicable rating factors. (Competency Rating factors as described on forms ES-303-1 and ES-303-3.)

12. Each applicant will be significantly involved in the minimum number of transients and events specified on Form ES-301-5 (submit the form with the simulator scenarios). 1

' ¥: ~ ~*

13. The level of difficulty is appropriate to support licensing decisions for each crew position. ~lE ver...- ~

Target Quantitative Attributes {Per Scenario; See Section D.5.d) Actual Attributes A- -- -

1. Malfunctions after EOP entry (1-2) 1 I 2 I 2 I 2 ~ /~ ~e

2. Abnormal events (2-4) 4 I 3 I 3 I 3 ~JJ.t ~ rn~

3. Major transients (1-2) 2 I 1 I 2 I 2 I ~ /,((/ l{J)l

4. 1 I 1 I 1 I 1 .~ ~ (At, 5.

EOPs entered/requiring substantive actions (1-2)

EOP contingencies requiring substantive actions (0-2) 0 I 0 I 0 I 1

'- IJU.-- Ill<:

6. EOP based Critical tasks (2-3) 2 I 3 I 2 I 3 ~ UL/ '{J)Dt NOTE:

The facility signature is not applicable for NRG-developed tests.

Independent NRC reviewer initial items in Column "c"; chief examiner concurrence required.

ES-403 Written Examination Grading Form ES-403-1 Quallty Checklist Facility: ""14"11-/.htb 3 Date of Exam: o/spo17Exam Level: RO SRO D Item Description Initials a b c

1. Clean answer sheets copied before grading

? Answer key changes and questlon deletions justified and documented

3. Applicants' scores checked for addition errors (reviewers spot check > 25% of examinations)

4. Grading for all borderline cases (80 +/-2% overall and 70 or 80, as applicable, +/-4% on the SRO-only) reviewed in detail

5. All other failing examinations checked to ensure that grades are justified

6. Performance on missed questions checked for training deficiencies and wording problems; evaluate validity of questions missed by half or more of the applicants Date

a. Grader _!1_/JJn

~--

b. Facility Reviewer(*) iJ-to-17

c. NRC Chief Examiner (*) '7 /11/11

d. NRC Supervisor(*) 1}Ur!_

(*) The facility reviewer's signature is not applicable for examinations graded by the NRC; two independent NRC reviews are required.

ES-403, Page 6 of 6

ES-403 Written Examination Grading Form ES-403*1 Quality Checklist Facility: Wo.~hr' ~ ~ Date of Exam: '1/1*11'Exam Level: RO DsRo [}Zf Item Description Initials

,a b c 1.

¥\

Clean answer sheets copied before grading

~ C~l-

~

t')

Answer key changes and question deletions justified and fl-.-- cJl documented

3. Applicants' scores checked for addition errors l (reviewers spot check> 25% of examinations)

IA.- ~&

c~

4. Grading for all borderline cases (80 +/-2% overall and 70 or 80, as applicable, +/-4% on the SRO-only) reviewed in detail

! fl1t- ~

5. All other failing examinations checked to ensure that grades I

(}~

6.

are justified

<~ "'{.,

k Performance on missed questions checked for training deficiencies and wording problems; evaluate validity of questions missed by half or more of the applicants tt_. ~

Date Printed Name/Signature ~ .

a. Grader fuit<Ut/,, &u:vd f.J.f' ~~ 4[£,bz

,~,.;.17

b. Facility Reviewer(*) D,,+viD {_()/.-'t,7.q,.vei ~~ . . lf-' '"11

c. NRG Chief Examiner (*) {1~1STIA/'J &yt~t_ at~ 4/11/1'7

d. NRG Supervisor (*) Viat~ fut ~11) Vi~ 11! Wt~ 4b-(*) The facility reviewer's signature is not applicable for examinations graded by the NRG; two independent NRG reviews are required.

ES-403, Page 6 of 6

Page 1of4 Operator Licensing Exam Schedule 04/0612017 08:52:13 From 10/01/2016 To 04130/2017 Report21 Region: 4 Phase Code: 5

\ Exam Week II S~ket No./lnsp Rpt # caw *1 #Candidates wa:-- * * ~

)\Type >JLExam Author I@~£Exam.=~.. I @Xamtners Assigned * :J 10/03/2016 Waterford I 050003821 Prep COWDREY, CHRISTAIN B. CLAYTON, KELLY D.

TAC#: X02588 COWDREY, CHRISTAIN B.

HAYES, MAHDI 0.

KIRKLAND, JOHN C.

02/13/2017 Waterford I 05000382 I Prep COWDREY, CHRISTAIN B. CLAYTON, KELLY D.

TAC #". X02588 COWDREY, CHRISTAIN B.

03/27/2017 Waterford I 05000382 I R0 - 7 SROl - 1 Adm in NFF COWDREY, CHRISTAIN B. CLAYTON, KELLY D.

TAC#: X02588 SROU - 3 COWDREY, CHRISTAIN B.

HAYES, MAHDI 0.

KIRKLAND, JOHN C.

04/0312017 Waterford I 05000382 I Doc COWDREY, CHRISTAIN B. CLAYTON, KELLY D.

TAC#: X02588 COWDREY, CHRISTAIN B.

HAYES, MAHDI 0.

KIRKLAND, JOHN C.

Sites: WAT Orgs: 4620 Exam Author: ALL

Page2of4 Operator Licensing Exam Schedule 00/00/0000 00:00:00 From 10/01/2016 To 04/30/2017 Report21 Region: 4 Phase Code: 5 ISummary By Date l 03/2017 WAT - Waterfon:I R0-7 SROl-1 SROU - 3 LSR0-0 Total for Waterford: 11 03/2017 R0 - 7 SROl-1 SROU-3 LSR0-0 Total for 03/2017: 11 04/2017 WAT - Waterfon:I R0-0 SROl-0 SROU-0 LSR0-0 Total for Waterford: 0 04/2017 R0-0 SROl-0 SROU - 0 LSRO *O Total for 04/2017: 0 02/2017 WAT- Waterfon:I RO*O SROl - 0 SROU-0 LSR0 - 0 Total for Waterford: o 02/2017 R0-0 SROI - 0 SROU-0 LSR0 - 0 Total for 02/2017: 0 10/2018 WAT-Waterfon:I R0 - 0 SROl - 0 SROU - 0 LSR0 - 0 Total for Waterford: 0 Sites: WAT Orgs: 4820 Exam Author: ALL

Page4 of4 Operator Licensing Exam Schedule 0010010000 00:00:00 From 10/01/2016 To 04/30/2017 Report 21 Region: 4 Phase Code: 5 ISummary By Region J Reglon4 R0-7 SROl - 1 SROU - 3 LSR0-0 Total for Region 4: 11 Sites: WAT Orgs: 4820 Exam Author: ALL

Page 3of4 Operator Licensing Exam Schedule 0010010000 00:00:00 From 10/01/2016 To 04/30/2017 Report21 Region: 4 Phase Code: 5 lsumma~!t!!!9~---.J*L..~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~-

WAT - Waterford R0 - 7 SROl-1 SROU - 3 LSR0 - 0 Total for Waterford: 11 Sites: WAT

>rgs: 4620

Xam Author: ALL

ES-201 Examination Security Agreement Form ES-201-3

1. Pre-Examination I acknowledgethatl have acquired specialized knowledge aboutthe NRC licensing examinations scheduled forthe week(s) of filA,?. 27, Zt/7as of the date of my signature. I agree that I will not knowingly divulge any information about these examinations to any persons who have not been authorized by the NRC chief examiner. I understand that I am not to instruct, evaluate, or provide performance feedback to those applicants scheduled to be administered these licensing examinations from this date until completion of examination administration, except as specifically noted below and authorized by the NRC (e.g., acting as a simulator booth operator or communicator is acceptable if the individual does not select the training content or provide direct or indirect feedback). Furthermore, I am aware of the physical security measures and requirements (as documented in the facility licensees procedures) and understand that violation of the conditions of this agreement may result in cancellation of the examinations and/or an enforcement action against me or the facility licensee. I will immediately report to facility management or the NRC chief examiner any indications or suggestions that examination security may have been compromised.

2. Post-Examination To the best of my knowledge, I did not divulge to any unauthorized persons any information concerning the NRC licensing examinations administered during the week(s) of /2,4R 27 Zoli From the date that I entered into this security agreement until the completion of examination administration, I did not instruct, evaluate, or provide performance feedback to those applicants who were administered these licensing examinations

, except as specifically noted

-a below and authorized by the NRC.

0)

Co CD PRINTED NAME JOB TITLE I RESPONSIBILITY SIGNATURE (1) DATE SIGNATURE (2) DATE NOTE

-.1 0

-4, F.)

l%JANE 1ELCANo

2. 1) J5pr.P Si4uLAT. i?cLç ks4f jL.,JJ r3cç 7/7//(, JaModvb-

? ?. -:

/f/,7 1b/it (i..

qM -r/7/l J41%J? ,/4c]i7 izc 6Am 5.Ai/jg 47AC.

4/sJ) Scz 4tL.j17 D?&ck+;L1s enscr1t

7. Ch,,siLop.4cr 1qfri) Ltd 11Lf lbtC& cf:t,7 11i2

8. Ec \ ; \, -. /7 /5/GT

9. tIA/LJ( L-i.icrc .VA 1- v.4 1or

10. 1rat1 GLioti 11.e5 t/,4,Vi v4 ,T9R 12.Dc.rJ 5 -/7 çoo Oy,s i

/fI 0 13.,ji /ç,M co4o 4çJ..ih% McoQW/idø

14. rtL PMqmer 7I.c.)e t-t3-7%_ 77T

15. Ox Th(t.Jei - Z./iq(7

-J NOTES:

cory1asce Llid .IP1C(t/ (a1-kche4)

/

ES-201 Examination Security Agreement Form ES-201-3

1. Pre-Examination I acknowledge that I have acquired specialized knowledge about the NRC licensing examinations scheduled for the week(s) of MAR. 27, 201 7 as of the date of my signature. I agree that I will not knowingly divulge any information about these examinations to any persons who have not been authorized by the NRC chief examiner. I understand that I am not to instruct, evaluate, or provide performance feedback to those applicants scheduled to be administered these licensing examinations from this date until completion of examination administration, except as specifically noted below and authorized by the NRC (e.g. acting as a simulator booth operator or communicator is acceptable if the individual does not select the training content or provide direct or indirect feedback). Furthermore, I am aware of the physical security measures and requirements (as documented in the facility licensees procedures) and understand that violation of the conditions of this agreement may result in cancellation of the examinations and/or an enforcement action against me or the facility licensee. I will immediately report to facility management or the NRC chief examiner any indications or suggestions that examination security may have been compromised.

2. Post-Examination m To the best of my knowledge, I did not divulge to any unauthorized ci) persons any information concerning the NRC licensing examinations administered during the week(s) of flZ4 .21, 2017. From the date that I entered into this security agreement until the completion of examination administration, I did not

n)

Co CD 0

1 rj PRINTED NAME

2. i3&t L JOB TITLE / RESPONSIBILITY In

?%a

()(1 c.i%

DATE f-i7- t7 SIGNATURE (2) DATE NOTE 3.$fdf (a,Øi (1)

4. LyikAw&Lt3 ALnjJrAi 5.& 1 . O r_

--r L

6. J AA I__ Lc--.

c_i bC..3( .

I]1Q+ -_ y-(7 8.4u L2,v.Si* .S Lf- Wlt(LIcf2 t / - -? L-(Th ( , 1 -tt7 9.cJ/ti,4A7 ,;/jq/;7/) / )91. /zi/77

10. -J ,(Ih7 éOL)&5Th5 3/zi/i7 S tti-cr ?7 tf/

/y_-*.i

/ 23 3/z l2.W!1/e, t2 fEttIiJTdfiZ 7/3 /6r

13. c,4J Xtr SE1cc- - --

/lL/,-1 .)

14. L-(P oC.S M%4Uff 3/iiti1- 1,r/,1 13D3 15 I kzz _( %

NOTES:

D A isjko5iS co,1t&ve v e itz:( (ui+L?ocL

Note 1: Attached examination security agreement emails were verified and redacted due to PII concerns.

ML17137A191

Text

Navigation menu

Search