ML16123A182

Transmittal of Biennial 10 CFR 50.59 and Pdms SAR Report

ML16123A182
Person / Time
Site:	Three Mile Island
Issue date:	04/29/2016
From:	Halnon G H GPU Nuclear
To:	Document Control Desk, Office of Nuclear Material Safety and Safeguards
References
TMl-16-013
Download: ML16123A182 (2)

Text

((a.u NUCLEAR April 29, 2016 TMl-16-013 U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission Attn: Document Control Desk Washington, DC 20555-000_1

SUBJECT:

THREE MILE ISLAND NUCLEAR STATION, UNIT 2 (TMl-2) POSSESSION ONLY LICENSE NO. DPR-73 DOCKET NO. 50-320 BIENNIAL 10 CFR 50.59 AND PDMS SAR REPORT GPU Nuclear Inc. Three Mile Island Nuclear Station Route 441 South Post Office Box 480 Middletown, PA 17057-0480 Tel 717-948-8641 Attached is the biennial report for Three Mlle Island Nuclear Station, Unit 2 (TMl-2) for years 2014 and 2015. This report is being submitted in accordance with TMl-2 Technical Specification 6.8.1.4 and the requirements of 10 CFR 50.59. 1 Please contact Mike FitzwaterofTMl-1 Regulatory Assurance at (717) 948-8228 if you have any questions regarding this submittal.

Respectfully, Attachment cc: USNRC TMl-2 Begion I Inspector USNRC TMl-2 Project Manager USNRC Regional Administrator, Region 1 TMl-16-013 Biennial 10 CFR 50.59 and PDMS SAR Report TMl-2 PDMS ACTIVITIES DURING 2014 AND 2015 TMl-2 remained in a safe and stable condition during calendar years 2014 and 2015. Activities included rad waste processing, routine surveillances, equipment repair, and structural repairs. PDMS SAFETY ANALYSIS REPORT CHANGES The PDMS SAR was updated (Update 11) and submitted to the NRC in GPU Nuclear letter, TMl-15-091, dated August 24, 2015. PDMS Update 11 revised the PDMS SAR to reflect the current plant configuration, administrative processes, and editorial changes. PROCEDURE CHANGES The typical categories of procedures that were changed in 2014 and 2015 were administrative, ventilation, electrical distribution, rad waste processing, fire protection, and Technical Specification surveillance.

All procedure changes at TMl-2 are made using the Exelon 10 CFR 50.59 Review Process, which provides a screening process to determine if the change requires a written evaluation.

During 2014 and 2015 there were no procedure changes which required a written evaluation.

TESTS AND EXPERIMENTS No tests or experiments not described in the PDMS SAR were performed atTMl-2 during 2014 and 2015. FACILITY MODIFICATION During 2014 and 2015 there was one facility modification that impacted the PDMS SAR. This was the sale and transfer of the TMl-2 River Water Pump House (RWPH) to TMl-1 (Exelon).

The TMl-2 RWPH did not contain any safety-related equipment pertaining to the Unit 2 PDMS condition and was being rented and used by TMl-1. The transfer of the TMl-2 RWPH to TMl-1 did not screen to require a 10 CFR 50.59 evaluation.

Thus there were no 10 CFR 50.59 evaluations performed with regard to facility modifications.

Due to the non-operating and defueled status ofTMl-2 during PDMS, there are no structures, systems, or components that are required to meet the safety-related criteria.

Therefore, there are no structures, systems, or components classified as safety-related at TMl-2 during PDMS. All facility modifications are made using the Exelon 10 CFR 50.59 Review Process, which provides a screening process to determine if the change requires a written evaluation.

This review and screening process is based on, and incorporates in its entirety, the implementation guidance provided in NEI 96-07, Revision 1. *

((a.u NUCLEAR April 29, 2016 TMl-16-013 U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission Attn: Document Control Desk Washington, DC 20555-000_1

SUBJECT:

THREE MILE ISLAND NUCLEAR STATION, UNIT 2 (TMl-2) POSSESSION ONLY LICENSE NO. DPR-73 DOCKET NO. 50-320 BIENNIAL 10 CFR 50.59 AND PDMS SAR REPORT GPU Nuclear Inc. Three Mile Island Nuclear Station Route 441 South Post Office Box 480 Middletown, PA 17057-0480 Tel 717-948-8641 Attached is the biennial report for Three Mlle Island Nuclear Station, Unit 2 (TMl-2) for years 2014 and 2015. This report is being submitted in accordance with TMl-2 Technical Specification 6.8.1.4 and the requirements of 10 CFR 50.59. 1 Please contact Mike FitzwaterofTMl-1 Regulatory Assurance at (717) 948-8228 if you have any questions regarding this submittal.

Respectfully, Attachment cc: USNRC TMl-2 Begion I Inspector USNRC TMl-2 Project Manager USNRC Regional Administrator, Region 1 TMl-16-013 Biennial 10 CFR 50.59 and PDMS SAR Report TMl-2 PDMS ACTIVITIES DURING 2014 AND 2015 TMl-2 remained in a safe and stable condition during calendar years 2014 and 2015. Activities included rad waste processing, routine surveillances, equipment repair, and structural repairs. PDMS SAFETY ANALYSIS REPORT CHANGES The PDMS SAR was updated (Update 11) and submitted to the NRC in GPU Nuclear letter, TMl-15-091, dated August 24, 2015. PDMS Update 11 revised the PDMS SAR to reflect the current plant configuration, administrative processes, and editorial changes. PROCEDURE CHANGES The typical categories of procedures that were changed in 2014 and 2015 were administrative, ventilation, electrical distribution, rad waste processing, fire protection, and Technical Specification surveillance.

All procedure changes at TMl-2 are made using the Exelon 10 CFR 50.59 Review Process, which provides a screening process to determine if the change requires a written evaluation.

During 2014 and 2015 there were no procedure changes which required a written evaluation.

TESTS AND EXPERIMENTS No tests or experiments not described in the PDMS SAR were performed atTMl-2 during 2014 and 2015. FACILITY MODIFICATION During 2014 and 2015 there was one facility modification that impacted the PDMS SAR. This was the sale and transfer of the TMl-2 River Water Pump House (RWPH) to TMl-1 (Exelon).

The TMl-2 RWPH did not contain any safety-related equipment pertaining to the Unit 2 PDMS condition and was being rented and used by TMl-1. The transfer of the TMl-2 RWPH to TMl-1 did not screen to require a 10 CFR 50.59 evaluation.

Thus there were no 10 CFR 50.59 evaluations performed with regard to facility modifications.

Due to the non-operating and defueled status ofTMl-2 during PDMS, there are no structures, systems, or components that are required to meet the safety-related criteria.

Therefore, there are no structures, systems, or components classified as safety-related at TMl-2 during PDMS. All facility modifications are made using the Exelon 10 CFR 50.59 Review Process, which provides a screening process to determine if the change requires a written evaluation.

This review and screening process is based on, and incorporates in its entirety, the implementation guidance provided in NEI 96-07, Revision 1. *