|
|
| Line 16: |
Line 16: |
|
| |
|
| =Text= | | =Text= |
| {{#Wiki_filter:United States Court of AppealsFOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA CIRCUIT____________No. 16-1189September Term, 2015NRC-50-247-LRNRC-50-286-LRFiled On: June 23, 2016In re: Friends of the Earth, et al.,Petitioners------------------------------Entergy Nuclear Indian Point 2, LLC andEntergy Nuclear Operations, Inc.,IntervenorsBEFORE:Griffith, Srinivasan, and Millett, Circuit JudgesO R D E RUpon consideration of the emergency petition for writ of mandamus and thesupplement thereto, the responses, and the reply, it isORDERED that the emergency petition for writ of mandamus be denied. Petitioners have failed to demonstrate a clear and indisputable right to the extraordinaryrelief requested. See Gulfstream Aerospace Corp. v. Mayacamas Corp., 485 U.S. 271,289 (1988).Per CuriamFOR THE COURT:Mark J. Langer, Clerk BY:/s/Robert J. Cavello Deputy ClerkUSCA Case #16-1189 Document #1621433 Filed: 06/23/2016 Page 1 of 1}} | | {{#Wiki_filter:United States Court of AppealsFOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA CIRCUIT____________No. 16-1189 September Term, 2015 NRC-50-247-LRNRC-50-286-LRFiled On: June 23, 2016In re: Friends of the Earth, et al.,Petitioners------------------------------Entergy Nuclear Indian Point 2, LLC andEntergy Nuclear Operations, Inc.,IntervenorsBEFORE:Griffith, Srinivasan, and Millett, Circuit Judges O R D E RUpon consideration of the emergency petition for writ of mandamus and thesupplement thereto, the responses, and the reply, it isORDERED that the emergency petition for writ of mandamus be denied. Petitioners have f ailed to demonstrate a clear and indisputable right to the extraordina ryrelief requeste |
| | : d. See Gulfstream Aerospace Corp. v. Mayacamas Corp., 485 U.S. 271,289 (1988).Per CuriamFOR THE COURT: |
| | Mark J. La nger, Clerk BY:/s/Robert J. Cavello Deputy ClerkUSCA Case #16-1189 Document #1621433 Filed: 06/23/2016 Page 1 of 1}} |
Revision as of 05:04, 30 June 2018
|
|---|
Category:Legal-Order
MONTHYEARML21155A0162021-06-0303 June 2021
Mandate (DC Cir.)(Case No. 21-1037)
ML21155A0182021-06-0303 June 2021
Order (DC Cir.)(Case No. 21-1037)
ML21138A4172021-05-14014 May 2021
5-14-21 Order (DC Cir.)(Ny V. Nrc)(Case No. 21-1037)
ML21029A1242021-01-28028 January 2021
1-28-21 Order (DC Cir.)(Case No. 21-1037)
ML21015A2012021-01-15015 January 2021
Commission Memorandum and Order (CLI-21-01)
ML20330A2542020-11-25025 November 2020
Letter to New York State Department of Public Service Deputy General Counsel John Sipos and Assistant Counsel Ryan Coyne from the NRC Secretary
ML20297A3252020-11-23023 November 2020
Enclosure 1, Order Approving Transfer of Facility Operating Licenses to Holtec International, Owner, and Holtec Decommissioning International, LLC, Operator
ML20325A2242020-11-20020 November 2020
Letter to Senators Schumer and Gillibrand, and Representatives Lowey, Engel, and Maloney from the NRC Executive Director for Operations
ML20302A3362020-10-28028 October 2020
Letter from NRC Secretary to Senator Schumer, Et Al
ML20301A3832020-10-27027 October 2020
Letter from NRC Secretary to Indian Point License Transfer Matter Parties
ML20072K2182020-03-12012 March 2020
Notice of Appearance of Todd D. Ommen
ML20072N9792020-03-12012 March 2020
Order (Granting Motions for Extension of Time)
ML20065M3532020-03-0505 March 2020
Order (Denying Improper Requests for Adjudicatory Hearing)
ML20059N6842020-02-28028 February 2020
Letter from NRC Secretary to Assemblywoman Sandy Galef of the New York State 95th Assembly District Re Indian Point Energy Center License Transfer Request
ML20057F1282020-02-26026 February 2020
Letter from NRC Secretary to Benjamin Boykin, Chairman of the Westchester County New York Board of Legislators, Et Al, Re Indian Point Energy Center License Transfer Request
ML20054B9932020-02-20020 February 2020
Letter from NRC Secretary to Chairman Wolfe
ML20049A1042020-02-18018 February 2020
Memorandum to Petitioners Regarding Commissioner Jeff Baran Site Visit
ML20049H3362020-02-18018 February 2020
Letters from Secretary Annette Vietti-Cook to Senators Schumer and Gillibrand and Representatives Lowey, Engel and Maloney Re Indian Point Energy Center License Transfer Request
ML17192A4202017-07-11011 July 2017
Memorandum from the Secretary to the Board and Parties
ML17103A4972017-04-13013 April 2017
Memorandum from the Secretary to the Board and Parties
ML17072A3922017-03-13013 March 2017
Order LBP-17-13 (Granting Motion to Dismiss Contentions and to Terminate This Proceeding)
ML17046A1382017-02-15015 February 2017
Notice (Opportunity for Comment on Motion to Withdraw)
ML17013A5082017-01-13013 January 2017
Notice (Scheduling Telephone Conference)
ML17012A1722017-01-12012 January 2017
Order - (Holding Further Filings in Abeyance and Requesting Availability for Telephone Status Conference)
ML16348A4952016-12-13013 December 2016
Memorandum and Order (Ruling on Petition to Intervene and Request for a Hearing) - LBP-16-14
ML16343A0662016-12-0808 December 2016
Order (Requesting Updated Information on Pending Litigation and Other Matters)
ML16323A3222016-11-18018 November 2016
Establishment of Atomic Safety and Licensing Board in the Matter of Entergy Nuclear Operations, Inc., Indian Point Nuclear Generating Unit No. 3 and James A. Fitzpatrick Nuclear Power Plant
ML16320A2052016-11-15015 November 2016
Referral Memorandum from the Secretary
ML16307A3542016-11-0202 November 2016
Order (Granting Unopposed Motion for Extension of Time)
ML16277A6052016-10-0303 October 2016
Order of the Secretary
ML16216A2512016-08-0303 August 2016
Order (Granting Joint Motion for Reconsideration)
ML16204A2272016-07-22022 July 2016
Order (Denying New York Motion to Establish a Schedule for the Filing of a Waiver Petition and or Contentions)
ML16195A2122016-07-13013 July 2016
Order (Scheduling of Further Filings on Track 2 Contentions) in the Matter of Entergy Nuclear Operations, Inc
ML16182A4182016-06-30030 June 2016
June 20, 2016 Service of Commission Meeting Transcript
ML16193A3572016-06-23023 June 2016
Per Curiam Order Denying Petition (DC Cir) 06-23-2016
ML16160A1702016-06-0808 June 2016
Order (Adopting Schedule Deferral at Request of the Parties and Requesting Conference Call Availability)
ML16159A1112016-06-0707 June 2016
Order (Dismissing Contention NYS-40)
ML16154A0562016-06-0202 June 2016
Commission Memorandum and Order (CLI-16-10)
ML16141A2612016-05-20020 May 2016
Notice (Contact with NRC Employee)
ML16131A6662016-05-10010 May 2016
Order (Adopting Track 2 Hearing Schedule Deferral at Request of the Parties)
ML16125A1502016-05-0404 May 2016
Commission Memorandum and Order CLI-16-07
ML16106A0342016-04-15015 April 2016
Memorandum and Order Denying Riverkeepers Request for Admission of a New Contention
ML16096A3962016-04-0505 April 2016
Order of the Secretary
ML16096A0992016-04-0505 April 2016
Commission Memorandum and Order CLI-16-05
ML16092A1622016-04-0101 April 2016
Order (Adopting Joint Motion for Track 2 Hearing Schedule Deferral)
ML16075A1552016-03-15015 March 2016
Order (Granting New York'S Motion for Extension of Time)
ML16050A3152016-02-19019 February 2016
Order (Requesting Expert Testimony on New York Proposed Exhibits and Suspending Deadline for Filing Proposed Findings of Fact and Law)
ML16034A1982016-02-0303 February 2016
Order (Denying New York Motion for Public Disclosure)
ML16034A1972016-02-0303 February 2016
Order (Adopting Jointly Proposed Transcript Corrections; Rejecting the State of New York Proposed Corrections)
ML15341A1712015-12-0707 December 2015
Order (Setting Post-Hearing Briefing Schedule)
2021-06-03
[Table view] |
Text
United States Court of AppealsFOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA CIRCUIT____________No. 16-1189 September Term, 2015 NRC-50-247-LRNRC-50-286-LRFiled On: June 23, 2016In re: Friends of the Earth, et al.,Petitioners------------------------------Entergy Nuclear Indian Point 2, LLC andEntergy Nuclear Operations, Inc.,IntervenorsBEFORE:Griffith, Srinivasan, and Millett, Circuit Judges O R D E RUpon consideration of the emergency petition for writ of mandamus and thesupplement thereto, the responses, and the reply, it isORDERED that the emergency petition for writ of mandamus be denied. Petitioners have f ailed to demonstrate a clear and indisputable right to the extraordina ryrelief requeste
- d. See Gulfstream Aerospace Corp. v. Mayacamas Corp., 485 U.S. 271,289 (1988).Per CuriamFOR THE COURT:
Mark J. La nger, Clerk BY:/s/Robert J. Cavello Deputy ClerkUSCA Case #16-1189 Document #1621433 Filed: 06/23/2016 Page 1 of 1
