ML13252A153

Enclosure 1, Including Attachments 1 to 8: Licensing Summary of Walkdown Report. Part 2 of 7

ML13252A153
Person / Time
Site:	Farley
Issue date:	09/04/2013
From:	Southern Nuclear Operating Co
To:	Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation
Shared Package
ML13252A148	List: ML13252A150 ML13252A151 ML13252A153 ML13252A154 ML13252A155 ML13252A156 ML13252A157 ML13252A159 NL-13-1555, Enclosure 1, Including Attachments 1 to 8: Licensing Summary of Walkdown Report. Part 1 of 7 NL-13-1555, Enclosure 2: Updated Farley Unit 2 Seismic Walkdown Report for Resolution of Fukushima Near-Term Task Force Recommendation 2.3: Seismic NL-13-1555, Joseph M. Farley Unit 2, Updated Seismic Recommendation 2.3 Walkdown Report Requested by NRC Letter, Request for Information Re Recommendations 2.1, 2.3 & 9.3 of the Near-Term Task Force Review of Insights from Fukushima Dai Ichi Accident
References
NL-13-1555
Download: ML13252A153 (102)

Text

ATTACHMENT 3: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS NO. SNCF164-RPT-02, VERSION 2.0F2., 2ASeismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)Equipment ID No. Q2E16H05B Sheet i of 3Status: YVNOIN UI[Equip. Class' 10Equipment Description AUX FEEDWA TER PUMP ROOM COOLER 2BLocation:

Bldg. AUXILIARY Floor El. 100 Room, Area 2 ] ?#,7-Manufacturer, Model, Etc. (optional but recommended)

Instructions for Completing Checklist This checklist may be used to document the results of the Seismic Walkdown of an item of equipment on theSWEL. The space below each of the following questions may be used to record the results ofjudgments andfindings.

Additional space is provided at the end of this checklist for documenting other comments.

Anchorage

1. Is the anchorage configuration verification required (i.e., is the item oneof the 50% of SWEL items requiring such verification)?

2. Is the anchorage free of bent, broken, missing or loose hardware?

3. Is the anchorage free of corrosion that is more than mild surfaceoxidation?

YD N8YgNE-' UD N/AEIYR(N- UD N/AD4. Is the anchorage free of visible cracks in the concrete near the anchors?

Y NI'-I] UD N/AD5. Is the anchorage configuration consistent with plant documentation?

(Note: This question only applies if the item is one of the 50% forwhich an anchorage configuration verification is required.)

6. Based on the above anchorage evaluations, is the anchorage free ofpotentially adverse seismic conditions?

YD ND UD N/A[7YO'- U[]'Enter the equipment class name from Appendix B: Classes of Equipment.

Page 69 of 467 ATTACHMENT 3: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS NO. SNCF164-RPT-02, VERSION 2.0Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)Equipment ID No. Q2E16HOO5B Equip.SheSa2 Of 3Status: NEI- U--Equipment Description AUX FEEDWA TER PUMP ROOM COOLER 2BInteraction Effects7. Are soft targets free from impact by nearby equipment or structures?

8. Are overhead equipment, distribution

systems, ceiling tiles and lighting, and masonry block walls not likely to collapse onto the equipment?

9. Do attached lines have adequate flexibility to avoid damage?Y/N[E UE1 /WYUKNEI IE1 N/AE-YZN I]UE N/Ao'4,4)

Toe. uf-- Sep eLbr4 -8 (ojT see r)o~.. --M .L OY-Q10. Based on the above seismic interaction evaluations, is equipment freeof potentially adverse seismic interaction effects?Y[-NE) U0-Other Adverse Conditions

11. Have you looked for and found no other seismic conditions that could YIýE" UEadversely affect the safety functions of the equipment?

Comments (Additional pages may be added as necessary) 04 /yEvaluated by: Scýf --" J I/.-. 1Date: P. 21. 2_.cl/l /2:/-Page 70 of 467 0ATTACHMENT 3: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS NO. SNCF164-RPT-02, VERSION 2.0Page 71 of 467 ATTACHMENT 3: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS NO. SNCF164-RPT-02, VERSION 2.0Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)Equipment ID No. Q2E16H007 Equip. Class, 10Equipment Description MCC 2A ROOM COOLER'A SSheet I of -Status: Y/N 'D UEILocation:

Bldg. AUXILIARY Floor El. 139 Room, Area 2-.'Manufacturer, Model, Etc. (optional but recommended)

Instructions for Completing Checklist This checklist may be used to document the results of the Seismic Walkdown of an item of equipment on theSWEL. The space below each of the following questions may be used to record the results of judgments andfindings.

Additional space is provided at the end of this checklist for documenting other comments.

Anchorage

1. Is the anchorage configuration verification required (i.e., is the item oneof the 50% of SWEL items requiring such verification)?

2. Is the anchorage free of bent, broken, missing or loose hardware?

3. Is the anchorage free of corrosion that is more than mild surfaceoxidation?

4. Is the anchorage free of visible cracks in the concrete near the anchors?5. Is the anchorage configuration consistent with plant documentation?

(Note: This question only applies if the item is one of the 50% forwhich an anchorage configuration verification is required.)

6. Based on the above anchorage evaluations, is the anchorage free ofpotentially adverse seismic conditions?

Yl] N21Y[O/N4" Ul- N/Al]Y[ý'NO Ul] N/A[]YN-N[J Ul- N/Al-YO- NO" UI- N/AGYY N-] Un1Enter the equipment class name from Appendix B: Classes of Equipment.

Page 72 of 467 ATTACHMENT 3: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS NO. SNCF164-RPT-02, VERSION 2.0-ASheet 2 ofX/-Status: UE-Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)Equipment ID No. Q2E16HO07 Equip. Class' 10Equipment Description MCC 2A ROOM COOLERInteraction Effects7. Are soft targets free from impact by nearby equipment or structures?

8. Are overhead equipment, distribution

systems, ceiling tiles and lighting, and masonry block walls not likely to collapse onto the equipment?

9. Do attached lines have adequate flexibility to avoid damage?10. Based on the above seismic interaction evaluations, is equipment freeof potentially adverse seismic interaction effects?YEAEI UE] N/ADY[RNlf'I UEI N/AE-'YI/N4- U0I N/A[YEl'NEI UE]Other Adverse Conditions

11. Have you looked for and found no other seismic conditions that could Y[/NEI Ul--adversely affect the safety functions of the equipment?

Comments (Additional pages may be added as necessary)

Evaluated by:.Y UAAL..Date: 6-29-144-0 .Xr" ~-1Page 73 of 467 0NO. SNCF164-RPT-02, VERSION 2.0ATTACHMENT 3: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS Page 74 of 467 0 0 0ATTACHMENT 3: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS NO. SNCF164-RPT-02, VERSION 2.0Page 75 of 467 ATTACHMENT 3: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS NO. SNCF164-RPT-02, VERSION 2.0('2-.Sheet i of,'4Status: YZ N[] Ur]Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)Equipment ID No. Q2E16H008 Equip. Class, 10Equipment Description 121'MCC2B Room ACULocation:

Bldg. Aux bldo Floor El. 121' Room, AreaManufacturer, Model, Etc. (optional but recommended)

Instructions for Completing Checklist This checklist may be used to document the results of the Seismic Walkdown of an item of equipment on theSWEL. The space below each of the following questions may be used to record the resulls of judgments andfindings.

Additional space is provided at the end of this checklist for documenting other comments.

Anchorage

1. Is the anchorage configuration verification required (i.e., is the item oneof the 50% of SWEL items requiring such verification)?

Anchorage configuration was based on SEWS for Q2E16H008-B andQ2E16H007-A, dated 07-03-93 and 07-01-93 respectively.

2. Is the anchorage free of bent, broken, missing or loose hardware?

Welded to embedded steel3. Is the anchorage free of cortosion that is more than mild surfaceoxidation?

YZ NiYZ NEI UD N/ADYN NO UD N/ADVery minor surface corrosion and cracked paint observed.

Nodegradation of weld observed.

Condition has no adverse seismicimpact.4. Is the anchorage free of visible cracks in the concrete near the anchors?

YZ N' UD N/AD5. Is the anchorage configuration consistent with plant documentation?

(Note: This question only applies if the item is one of the 50% forwhich an anchorage configuration verification is required.)

6. Based on the above anchorage evaluations, is the anchorage free ofpotentially adverse seismic conditions?

YN ND UD N/ADYN NO UDEnter the equipment class name fsom Appendix B: Classes of Equipment.

Page 76 of 467 ATTACHMENT 3: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS NO. SNCF164-RPT-02, VERSION 2.0Sheet 2 4Status: YCK NEI uF"]Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)Equipment ID No. Q2E16H008 Equip. Class' 10Equipment Description 121'MCC 2B Room ACUInteraction Effecs7. Are soft targets free from impact by nearby equipment or structures?

8. Are overhead equipmoent, distribution

systems, ceiling tiles and lighting, and masonry block walls not likely to collapse onto the equipment?

Component is adjacent to a block wall. The wall was seismically qualified as part of the response to NRC t. E.Bulletin 80-11, asdocumented in Report No FTG-C-002, RO, and on drawing D-206004, R 16.9. Do attached lines have adequate flexibility to avoid damage?10. Based on the above seismic interaction evaluations, is equipment freeof potentially adverse seisnic interaction effects?Y0 NE UO N/AOYZ NO Ur N/AQ1Y13 NO UD N/AOY[ NO UMIOther Adverse Conditions 1I. Have you looked for and found no other seismic conditions that could Y9 NO UE-adversely affect the safety functions of the equipment?

Comments (Additional pages may be added as necessary) ly2& t,"Y P ,G I -/Evaluated by: P._Miktus~~tDt:0.31 Date: 08-23-1208-23-12Page 77 of 467 0ATTACHMENT 3: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS NO. SNCF164-RPT-02, VERSION 2.0Page 78 of 467 ATTACHMENT 3: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS NO. SNCF164-RPT-02, VERSION 2.0Page 79 of 467 ATTACHMENT 3: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS NO. SNCF164-RPT-02, VERSION 2.0Sheet i ofýi 'I(IStatus: Y1 NO] Ui-]Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)Equipment ID No. Q2E21FT0943 Equip. Class, 18Equipment Description HIGH HEAD SAFETY INJECTION FLOW TRANSMITTER Location:

Bldg. AUXILIARY Floor El. 100 Room, Area 17Manufacturer, Model, Etc. (optional but recommended)

Instructions for Completing Checklist This checklist may be used to document the results of the Seismic Walkdown of an item of equipment on theSWEL. The space below each of the following questions may be used to record the results ofjudgments andfindings.

Additional space is provided at the end of this checklist for documenting other comments.

Anchoraee

1. Is the anchorage configuration verification required (i.e., is the item oneof the 50% of SWEL items requiring such verification)?

2. Is the anchorage free of bent, broken, missing or loose hardware?

3. Is the anchorage free of corrosion that is more than mild surfaceoxidation?

YId NO UEI N/AOYd~ NEI UO N/AE4. Is the anchorage free of visible cracks in the concrete near the anchors?

Y[J NEI U- N/AO5. Is the anchorage configuration consistent with plant documentation?

(Note: This question only applies if the item is one of the 50% forwhich an anchorage configuration verification is required.)

YE] NE U- N/A[v/NO1,V0~ O45 ApeQewo :3 00%c A#J 4lq8CJ4D2A6iE V&AiFICATro&)

ib Por6. Based on the above anchorage evaluations, is the anchorage free ofpotentially adverse seismic conditions?

YS'NEI U-I Enter the equipment class name from Appendix B: Classes of Equipment.

Page 80 of 467 ATTACHMENT 3: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS NO. SNCF164-RPT-02, VERSION 2.0Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)Equipment M1 No. Q2E21FT0943 Equip. Class, 18Equipment Description HIGH HEAD SAFETY INJECTION FLOW TRANSMITTER Sheet 2 of)' ,S tatus: Y"[f N -- U W- A"Interaction Effects7. Are soft targets free from impact by nearby equipment or structures?

YM/N'- UC] N/AC-]8. Are overhead equipment, distribution

systems, ceiling tiles and lighting, Y[ NO- U[:] N/ACand masonry block walls not likely to collapse onto tite equipment?

.oeK WAIJ-L5 e'j rNE We6r Oe V e_.,.LVA ArE)P9.NDo ac ed l T Fea t-(2-e ex , to -F. DW4 dN-ZoaN5og.

9. Do attached lines have adequate flexibility to avoid damage? NO] U[- N/A[:Y/NO UC]10. Based on the above seismic interaction evaluations, is equipment freeof potentially adverse seismic interaction effects?Other Adverse Conditions

11. Have you looked for and found no other seismic conditions that could YU NEI UC-]adversely affect the safety functions of the equipment?

Comments (Additional pages may be added as necessary)

/MoteEvaluated by:3.M'TVS 2Date: 1-274-Page 81 of 467 0NO. SNCF164-RPT-02, VERSION 2.0ATTACHMENT 3: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS Page 82 of 467 ATTACHMENT 3: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS NO. SNCF164-RPT-02, VERSION 2.0Page 83 of 467 ATTACHMENT 3: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS NO. SNCF164-RPT-02, VERSION 2.0Sheet i off 3Status: YA NO UOSeismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)Equipment ID No. Q2E21LCVO115B Equip. Class' 8Equipment Description RWST TO CHARGING PUMP SUCTION VALVELocation:

Bldg. AUXILIARY Floor El. 100 Room, Area 2-.1-7 2.Manufacturer, Model, Etc. (optional but recommended)

Instructions for Completing Checklist This checklist may be used to document the results of the Seismic Walkdown of an item of equipment on theSWEL. The space below each of the following questions may be used to record the results ofjudgments andfindings.

Additional space is provided at the end of this checklist for documenting other comments.

Anchorage

1. Is the anchorage configuration verification required (i.e., is the item one YE N[lof the 50% of SWEL items requiring such verification)?

Inline Corry.rw-ht, rlc ctchot-jo.cd

2. Is the anchorage free of bent, broken, missing or loose hardware?

3. Is the anchorage free of corrosion that is more than mild surfaceoxidation?

YEr NEI UE N/ApYEI NE UE N/A[I4. Is the anchorage free of visible cracks in the concrete near the anchors?

YE" NEI UiE N/Ap5. Is the anchorage configuration consistent with plant documentation?

(Note: This question only applies if the item is one of the 50% forwhich an anchorage configuration verification is required.)

6. Based on the above anchorage evaluations, is the anchorage free ofpotentially adverse seismic conditions?

YEV NE3 UEI N/AJAANE UDEý Enter the equipment class name from Appendix B: Classes of Equipment.

Page 84 of 467 ATTACHMENT 3: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS NO. SNCF164-RPT-02, VERSION 2.0Sheet 2 O 3fStatus: Y11 NF] [IE]Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)Equipment ID No. Q2E21LCVO115B Equip. Class' 8Equipment Description RWST TO CHARGING PUMP SUCTION VALVEInteraction Effects7. Are soft targets free from impact by nearby equipment or structures?

Y? N] UM] N/AOeqimnsses tdes-.-t and-,

8. Are overhead equipment, distribution

systems, ceiling tiles and lighting, Y1M NO] U!- N/ADand masonry block walls not likely to collapse onto the equipment?

e9. Do attached lines have adequate flexibility to avoid damage?10. Based on the above seismic interaction evaluations, is equipment freeof potentially adverse seismic interaction effects?Other Adverse Conditions l1. Have you looked for and found no other seismic conditions that couldadversely affect the safety functions of the equipment?

YP NE] U!] N/A7YINE] U!]NEI UEComments (Additional pages may be added as necessary)

Evaluated by: r I!ga- / T"+/-+/-* .,r4 -',"A"JY1~

V U'- /An illol (06-dDate: _ W 1 i ~ 2--LLktm MaQdL~ao iPage 85 of 467 ATTACHMENT 3: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS NO. SNCF164-RPT-02, VERSION 2.0Page 86 of 467 ATTACHMENT 3: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS NO. SNCF164-RPT-02, VERSION 2,0i lifPage 87 of 467 ATTACHMENT 3: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS NO. SNCF164-RPT-02, VERSION 2.0Sheet I of 3Status: Y[VN- UE-Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)Equipment ID No. Q2E21LT112 Equip. Class' 18Equipment Description VCT LEVEL TRANSMITTER Location:

Bldg. AUXILIARY Floor El. 121 Room, Area 2 -21,Manufacturer, Model, Etc. (optional but recommended)

Instructions for Completing Checklist This checklist may be used to document the results of the Seismic Walkdown of an item of equipment on theSWEL. The space below each of the following questions may be used to record the results ofjudgments andfindings.

Additional space is provided at the end of this checklist for documenting other comments.

Anchorage

1. Is the anchorage configuration verification required (i.e., is the item oneof the 50% of SWEL items requiring such verification)?

2. Is the anchorage free of bent, broken, missing or loose hardware?

3. Is the anchorage free of corrosion that is more than mild surfaceoxidation?

YEN"NO" UE N/AE[Y1$EN" U0 N/AE4. Is the anchorage free of visible cracks in the concrete near the anchors?

\TNE" UE N/AE"5. Is the anchorage configuration consistent with plant documentation?

(Note: This question only applies if the item is one of the 50% forwhich an anchorage configuration verification is required.)

6. Based on the above anchorage evaluations, is the anchorage free ofpotentially adverse seismic conditions?

YE NE UE] N/A/Y"/ND UE'Enter the equipment class name from Appendix B: Classes of Equipment.

Page 88 of 467 ATTACHMENT 3: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS NO. SNCF164-RPT-02, VERSION 2.0Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)Sh t Of 3Status: Y;['N[- Un-Equipment ED No. 02E21LT112 Equip. Class, 18Equipment Description VCT LEVEL TRANSMITTER Interaction Effects7. Are soft targets free from impact by nearby equipment or structures?

S. Are overhead equipment, distribution

systems, ceiling tiles and lighting, and masonry block walls not likely to collapse onto the equipment?

YO/ND UE1 N/AE3YE-týfl UE] N/AE19. Do attached lines have adequate flexibility to avoid damage? Y[E)NEI UrI N/A0--1 -r. ,) o ,10. Based on the above seismic interaction evaluations, is equipment free Y-" NEI Uof potentially adverse seismic interaction effects?Other Adverse Conditions 1I. Have you looked for and found no otiler seismic conditions that could 'YEýN-I UE]adversely affect the safety functions of the equipment?

Comments (Additional pages may be added as necessary)

'IEvaluated by: Date: -__________

DateJJPage 89 of 467 ATTACHMENT 3: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS NO. SNCF164-RPT-02, VERSION 2.0Page 90 of 467 ATTACHMENT 3: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS NO. SNCF164-RPT-02, VERSION 2.0-This 'cqof: A iS, css , c, -n,.- a'SSeismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC) QQ E a2 I Va 3Equipment ID No. 02E21MOV8100 Equip. Class' 8Equipment Description RCP SEAL WATER RETURN ISOLATION Sheet i ofXAtStatus: Yd NO UUJLocation:

Bldg. AUXILIARY Floor El. 121 Room, Area ,?QManufacturer, Model, Etc. (optional but recommended)

Instructions for Completing Checklist This checklist may be used to document the results of the Seismic Walkdown of an item of equipment on theSWEL. The space below each of the following questions may be used to record the results of judgments andfindings.

Additional space is provided at the end of this checklist for documenting other comments.

Anchoraoe

1. Is the anchorage configuration verification required (i.e., is the item one Y" Neof the 50% of SWEL items requiring such verification)?

2. Is the anchorage free of bent, broken, missing or loose hardware?

3. Is the anchorage free of corrosion that is more than mild surfaceoxidation?

YE NM U171 N/AdfYO NO UO N/A@/w , ,k ' q .e_.\, ,q ,t , , x Q U -?.V\ Y 4 , ( O , , \ z ý c t -o- 12 .4. Is the anchorage free of visible cracks in the concrete near the anchors?

YO No UiE N/An'k \- V rit5. Is the anchorage configuration consistent with plant documentation?

(Note: This question only applies if the item is one of the 50% forwhich an anchorage configuration verification is required.)

6. Based on the above anchorage evaluations, is the anchorage free ofpotentially adverse seismic conditions?

Enter the equipment class name from Appendix B: Classes of Equipment.

YO NE Uti N/AX'Y0"N0 uCPage 91 of 467 ATTACHMENT 3: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS NO. SNCF164-RPT-02, VERSION 2.0Sheet 2 of3 lStatus: Y[Z- NE-] U[]Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)Equipment ID No. Q2E21MOV8100 Equip. Class, 8Equipment Description RCP SEAL WATER RETURN ISOLATION Interaction Effects7. Are soft targets free from impact by nearby equipment or structures?

8. Are overhead equipment, distribution

systems, ceiling tiles and lighting, and masonry block walls not likely to collapse onto the equipment?

9. Do attached lines have adequate flexibility to avoid damage?10. Based on the above seismic interaction evaluations, is equipment freeof potentially adverse seismic interactiou effects?Y2 NEI UI- N/A[lY5ý/1- UEI N/A5Y(NE] UE3 N/AEIYE]N1 E3UuOther Adverse Conditions 1I. Have you looked for and found no other seismic conditions that could Ye NEl UFIadversely affect the safety functions of the equipment?

Comments (Additional pages may be added as necessary)

Evaluated by: / jDate: ~3l~Page 92 of 467 NO. SNCF164-RPT-02, VERSION 2.0ATTACHMENT 3: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS Page 93 of 467 NO. SNCF164-RPT-02, VERSION 2.0ATTACHMENT 3: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS Page 94 of 467 ATTACHMENT 3: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS NO. SNCF164-RPT-02, VERSION 2.0T Ci _ r\l -' s qlso , o-5 She71of 3Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC) E & \'"/, t% Status: 7 NEl UE-Equipment D No. Q2E21MOV8108 Equip. Class' 8Equipment Description CHARGING PUMP TO RCS ISOLATION Location:

Bldg. AUXILIARY Floor El. 121 Room, Area Q69aManufacturer, Model, Etc. (optional but recommended)

Instructions for Completing Checklist This checklist may be used to document the results of the Seismic Walkdown of an item of equipment on theSWEL. The space below each of the following questions may be used to record the results of judgments andfindings.

Additional space is provided at the end of this checklist for documenting other comments.

Anchorage

1. Is the anchorage configuration verification required (i.e., is the item one YOI N%of the 50% of SWEL items requiring such verification)?

2. Is the anchorage free of bent, broken, missing or loose hardware?

3. Is the anchorage free of corrosion that is more than mild surfaceoxidation?

YO] NEI UO N/AE9-Y(:] NI- UF] N/A2-4'. I st a ch e , 4f-re o s c k t c _ocrc hO-4. Is the anchorage free of visible cracks in the concrete near the anchors?

YI-] N-I U-i] N/Az']5. Is the anchorage configuration consistent with plant documentation?

(Note: This question only applies if the item is one of the 50% forwhich an anchorage configuration verification is required.)

6. Based on the above anchorage evaluations, is the anchorage free ofpotentially adverse seismic conditions?

YOI NI] UI0 N/AsYR NI] U-I1ý1- `ýý A-ýý is -ý-ctze ý:PEnter the equipment class name from Appendix B: Classes of Equipment.

Page 95 of 467 ATTACHMENT 3: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS NO. SNCF164-RPT-02, VERSION 2.0Sheet 2 of 3Status: YZI NEI UE"]Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)Equipment lD No. Q2E21MOV8108 Equip. Class, 8Equipment Description CHARGING PUMP TO RCS ISOLATION Interaction Effects7. Are soft targets free from impact by nearby equipment or structures?

8. Are overhead equipment, distribution

systems, ceiling tiles and lighting, and masonry block walls not likely to collapse onto the equipment?

9. Do attached lines have adequate flexibility to avoid damage?I0. Based on the above seismic interaction evaluations, is equipment freeof potentially adverse seismic interaction effects?Ya NO U- N/A-Y~f/N- U] N/ACYE(NI U- N/AI/UCOther Adverse Conditions 1I. Have you looked for and found no other seismic conditions that could YO'NO U-adversely affect the safety functions of the equipment?

Comments (Additional pages may be added as necessary)Evaluated by: ..3,Q...1&cVX Date:Page 96 of 467 0ATTACHMENT 3: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS NO. SNCF164-RPT-02, VERSION 2.0Page 97 of 467 ATTACHMENT 3: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS NO. SNCF164-RPT-02, VERSION 2.0V2" 1PSeismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)Equipment ID No. Q2E21MOV8109C Equip. Class, 8Equipment Description CHARGING PUMP PO02C MINIFLOW VALVESheet i of Status: Y5 NEI U1-]Location:

Bldg. AUXILIARY Floor El. 102 Room, Area M 2ý1ýýManufacturer, Model, Etc. (optional but recommended)

Instructions for Completing Checklist This checklist may be used to document the results of the Seismic Walkdown of an item of equipment on theSWEL. The space below each of the following questions may be used to record the results of judgments andfindings.

Additional space is provided at the end of this checldist for documenting other comments.

Anchorage

1. Is the anchorage configuration verification required (i.e., is the item one YE Njtof the 50% of SWEL items requiring such verification)?

Irtitpr a c hO oCboro,-cue.

2. Is the anchorage free of bent, broken, missing or loose hardware?

3. Is the anchorage free of corrosion that is more than mild surfaceoxidation?

4. Is the anchorage free of visible cracks in the concrete near the anchors?5. Is the anchorage configuration consistent with plant documentation?

(Note: This question only applies if the item is one of the 50% forwhich an anchorage configuration verification is required.)

6. Based on the above anchorage evaluations, is the anchorage free ofpotentially adverse seismic conditions?

YED NE UE N/AC&YE NE UE N/ApYE NEI UE N/A0YE NEI UE N/A4Y0 NO UEEnter the equipment class name from Appendix B: Classes of Equipment.

Page 98 of 467 ATTACHMENT 3: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS NO. SNCF164-RPT-02, VERSION 2.0Sheet 2 of" 4Status: Y[5 NEI UE-Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)Equipment ID No. Q2E21MOV8109C Equip. Class' 8Equipment Description CHARGING PUMP PO02C MINIFLOW VALVEInteraction Effects7. Are soft targets free from impact by nearby equipment or structures?

YEA NO UD N/AD8. Are overhead equipment, distribution

systems, ceiling tiles and lighting, Yg NDI UD N/ADand masonry block walls not likely to collapse onto the equipment?

9. Do attached lines have adequate flexibility to avoid damage?10. Based on the above seismic interaction evaluations, is equipment freeof potentially adverse seismic interaction effects?YV NEI UD N/ADYP NO UDOther Adverse Conditions I1. Have you looked for and found no other seismic conditions that could Yy ND UDadversely affect the safety functions of the equipment?

Comments (Additional pages may be added as necessary)

Evaluated by: .GoAMAa o- -1(W Loolut o\AC'tUA/

Date: _ -_ ___ __Page 99 of 467 0 3ATTACHMENT 3: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS NO. SNCF164-RPT-02, VERSION 2.0Page 100 of 467 ATTACHMENT 3: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS NO. SNCF164-RPT-02, VERSION 2.0IPage 101 of 467 ATTACHMENT 3: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS NO. SNCF164-RPT-02, VERSION 2.0Sheet i °fz¢ 43 AStatus: Yf NO UE $1011"Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)Equipment ID No. Q2E21MOV8130A Equip. Classw 8Equipment Description CHG PUMP SUCTION HDR ISOLATION Location:

Bldg. AUXILIARY Floor El. 100 Room, AreaManufacturer, Model, Etc. (optional but recommended)

Instructions for Completing Checklist This checklist may be used to document the results of the Seismic Walkdown of an item of equipment on theSWEL. The space below each of the following questions may be used to record the results ofjudgments andfindings.

Additional space is provided at the end of this checklist for documenting other comments.

Anchorage I. Is the anchorage configuration verification required (i.e., is the item oneof the 50% of SWEL items requiring such verification)?

2. Is the anchorage free of bent, broken, missing or loose hardware?

3. Is the anchorage free of corrosion that is more than mild surfaceoxidation?

4. Is the anchorage free of visible cracks in the concrete near the anchors?5. Is the anchorage configuration consistent with plant documentation?

(Note: This question only applies if the item is one of the 50% forwhich an anchorage configuration verification is required.)

6. Based on the above anchorage evaluations, is the anchorage free ofpotentiafly adverse seismic conditions?

YEI NdYE NEI UE- N/A[RYEI NE UE N/AGYO NE UE N/A[?YEr NEI UE] N/AdN[- UE-Enter the equipment class name from Appendix B: Classes of Equipment.

IPage 102 of 467 ATTACHMENT 3: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS NO. SNCF164-RPT-02, VERSION 2.0Sheet 2 of42Status: Y NEI U[Jltjl?

vSeismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)Equipment ID No. 02E21MOV8130A Equip. Class' 8Equipment Description CHG PUMP SUCTION HDR ISOLA TIONInteraction Effects7. Are soft targets free from impact by nearby equipment or structures?

Y[dNI-- U-J N/AE1Y[4 NE UE- N/AEl8. Are overhead equipment, distribution

systems, ceiling tiles and lighting, and masonry block walls not likely to collapse onto the equipment?

Siva Vag ' 0 y0 ME r £-'AI- d,4 oF 1e PAwimKegeeALLJA-T" tV4,o&V-

&619'2r FTý-c!.-,94Z, 1-4. DaAiWtA tI-20b?2,IP9.

9. Do aitached lines have adequate flexibility to avoid damage?10. Based on the above seismic interaction evaluations, is equipment freeof potentially adverse seismic interaction effects?YQ NE UI-1 N/AE1Yd NIE- UEIOther Adverse Conditions

11. Have you looked for and found no other seismic conditions that could Yd NEI UE-]adversely affect the safety functions of the equipment?

Comments (Additional pages may be added as necessary)

Evaluated byPn~R5Date: __ "_ 7-/___Page 103 of 467 00ATTACHMENT 3: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS NO. SNCF164-RPT-02, VERSION 2.0Page 104 of 467 SATTACHMENT 3: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS 0NO. SNCF164-RPT-02, VERSION 2.0Page 105 of 467 ATTACHMENT 3: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS NO. SNCF164-RPT-02, VERSION 2.0II&I ISheetttsd.:Y uE%Status: U[71Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)Equipment ID No. Q2E21MOV8133A Equip. Class, 8Equipment Description CHG PUMP DISCHARGE HDR ISOLATION Location:

Bldg. AUXILIARY Floor El. 100 Room, Area ZI1_Manufacturer, Model, Etc. (optional but recommended)

Instructions for Completing Checklist This checklist may be used to document the results of the Seismic Walkdown of an item of equipment on theSWEL. The space below each of the following questions may be used to record the results ofjudgments andfindings.

Additional space is provided at the end of this checklist for documenting other conmnents.

Anchorage

1. Is the anchorage configuration verification required (i.e., is the item oneof the 50% of SWEL items requiring such verification)?

2. Is the anchorage free of bent, broken, missing or loose hardware?

3. Is the anchorage free of corrosion that is more than mild surfaceoxidation?

4. Is the anchorage free of visible cracks in the concrete near the anchors?5. Is the anchorage configuration consistent with plant documentation?

(Note: This question only applies if the item is one of the 50% forwhich an anchorage configuration verification is required.)

6. Based on the above anchorage evaluations, is the anchorage free ofpotentially adverse seismic conditions?

Y[3NY[3 N[3 uE N/UD(YE- NE UCI N/A[/YEI NE- UC- N/A[v'YE[ NEI U['-DY4NC UEIEnter the equipment class name from Appendix B: Classes of Equipment.

Page 106 of 467 ATTACHMENT 3: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS NO. SNCF164-RPT-02, VERSION 2.0F! -3qSeismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)Sheet Status: Y0- NEI U[:[ ,lDl'lEquipment ID No. Q2E21MOV8133A Equip. Class' 8Equipment Description CHG PUMP DISCHARGE HDR ISOLATION Interaction Effects7. Are soft targets free from impact by nearby equipment or structures?

YW"ND U'- N/AC]8. Are overhead equipment, distribution

systems, ceiling tiles and lighting, YNr"NC] UC) N/ACand masonry block walls not likely to collapse onto the equipment?

JA01- RF-,,2- FrA,-C.-0,,0.-

16L&CI -WAL Tl VALLtA1Tj

' 1W 9 PPi T- -29. Do attached lines have adequate flexibiltty to avoi damage? YC"Nr UC- N/AC10. Based on the above seismic interaction evaluations, is equipment free Y[2j NCI UCof potentially adverse seismic interaction effects?Other Adverse Conditions

11. Have you looked for and found no other seismic conditions that could YEY NCI UCDadversely affect the safety functions of the equipment?

Comments (Additional pages may be added as necessary) dIatJIFvalutaedtby PIMIRM)..........

2.5 IVA ..Date: 11274-rS 7-f 7,Page 107 of 467 NO. SNCF164-RPT-02, VERSION 2.0ATTACHMENT 3: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS Page 108 of 467 0ATTACHMENT 3: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS NO. SNCF164-RPT-02, VERSION 2.0Page 109 of 467 ATTACHMENT 3: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS NO. SNCF164-RPT-02, VERSION 2.0/Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)Sheet i ofl JfStatus: YP NEI Uj-]Equipment ID No. Q2E21MOV8885 Equip. Class, 8Equipment Description HHSI TO RCS COLD LEG ISOLATION Location:

Bldg. AUXILIARY Floor El. 100 Room, Area 2., AManufacturer, Model, Etc. (optional but recommended)

Instructions for Completing Checklist This checklist may be used to document the results of the Seismic Walkdown of an item of equipment on theSWEL. The space below each of the following questions may be used to record the results of judgments andfindings.

Additional space is provided at the end of this checklist for documenting other comments.

Anchorage

1. Is the anchorage configuration verification required (i.e., is the item one YO] Noof the 50% of SWEL items requiring such verification)?

il-%lrxr coirn~ctx-,t, no~ a.nr,ý2. Is the anchorage free of bent, broken, missing or loose hardware?

3. Is the anchorage free of corrosion that is more than mild surfaceoxidation?

4. Is the anchorage free of visible cracks in the concrete near the anchors?5. Is the anchorage configuration consistent with plant documentation?

(Note: This question only applies if the item is one of the 50% forwhich an anchorage configuration verification is required.)

6. Based on the above anchorage evaluations, is the anchorage free ofpotentially adverse seismic conditions?

YE] NE] UE] N/AI9YE] NE] UE] N/AgYE] NE] UE] N/A0YE] NE] UE] N/A0Y'rNEI U50Ie* kEnter the equipment class name from Appendix B: Classes of Equipment.

Page 110 of 467 ATTACHMENT 3: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS NO. SNCF164-RPT-02, VERSION 2.0Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)Equipment ID No. Q2E21MOV8885 Sheet 2 oftStatus: Y54! NF'- U#JEquip. Class, 8Equipment Description HHSt TO RCS COLD LEG ISOLATPON Interaction Effects7. Are soft targets free from impact by nearby equipment or structures?

Y ' NE] UF] N/A[]i,ý I Ix' ýq-'1/2 %3F- j4't -, , s'j tý,cj Mcqcgosc8. Are overhead equipment, distribution

systems, ceiling tiles and lighting, and masonry block walls not likely to collapse onto the equipment?

9. Do attached lines have adequate flexibility to avoid damage'?10. Based on the above seismic interaction evaluations, is equipment freeof potentially adverse seismic interaction effects?YZ NEI U[E] N/AE[Ye NE] U[3 N/A]Y[A NE] U[EOther Adverse Conditions

11. Have you looked fbr and found no other seismic conditions that could U[Iadversely affect the safety functions of the equipment?

Comments (Additional pages may be added as necessary)

Evaluated by:L.acixg Mctc~lcxf Date: -2Z VZ-"Page 111 of 467 ATTACHMENT 3: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS NO. SNCF164-RPT-02, VERSION 2.0Page 112 of 467 ATTACHMENT 3: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS NO. SNCF164-RPT-02, VERSION 2.0Page 113 of 467 ATTACHMENT 3: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS NO. SNCF164-RPT-02, VERSION 2.0Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)Equipment ID No. 02E21PO02

-Equip.Sheet s of 16Status;:

YJ'No Ut]Equipment Description CHARGING/HHSI PUMP P002B SWING PUMPLocation:

Bldg. AUXILIARY Floor El. 100 Room, Area 7"11-4Manufacturer, Model, Etc. (optional but recommended)

Instructions for Completing Checklist This checklist may be used to document the results of the Seismic Walkdown of an item of equipment on theSWEL. The space below each of the following questions may be used to record the results ofjudgments andfindings.

Additional space is provided at the end ofthis checklist for documenting other comments.

Anchoraee

1. Is the anchorage configuration verification required (i.e., is the item one Y10 Noof the 50% of SWEL items requiring such verification)?

2. Is the anchorage free of bent, broken, missing or loose hardware?

3. Is the anchorage free of corrosion that is more than mild surfaceoxidation?

4. Is the anchorage fe of visible cracks in the concrete near the anchors?5. Is the anchorage configuration consistent with plant documentation?

(Note: This question only applies if the item is one of the 50% forwhich an anchorage configuration verfication is required.)

~a 5N~.05e jI 4v k IE-Z I 9,907A6. Based on the above anchorage evaluations, is the anchorage free ofpotentially adverse seismic conditions?

Y'ND ULID N/ADY[1N- UO N/ADYINO Uf N/ADY'/NO UQ N/ADYG(NO U-I Ent=i the equipment class name from Appendix B: Claones of Equipment Page 114 of 467 ATTACHMENT 3: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS NO. SNCF164-RPT-02, VERSION 2.0Sheet 2 of rSStatus: Yf NO] U0Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)Equipment ID No. Q2E21PO02B Equip. Class, 5Equipment Description CHARGING/I"/HSI PUMP P00219 SWING PUMPInteraction Effects7. Are soft targets free from impact by nearby equipment or structures?

8. Are overhead equipment, distribution

systems, ceiling tiles and lighting, and masonry block walls not likely to collapse onto the equipment?

9. Do attached lines have adequate flexibility to avoid damage?10. Based on the above seismic interaction evaluations, is equipment freeof potentially adverse seismic interaction effects?Y&ýNO UC N/AQ3Y[/N0 U[:] N/AtYI'NQ UD N/AQYL NC UQOther Adverse Conditions

11. Have you looked for and found no other seismic conditions that couldadversely affect the safety functions of the equipment?

YG/N[] UDComments (Additional pages may be added as necessary)

C 6 0 k j0r 60 r 01~t~M1 T A6 V- M4fi ý Ome pýýDEvaluated by:_ P-MIXTO ad"9"Date: 27-1 1.6.- 7 -1'/,Page 115 of 467 0ATTACHMENT 3: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS NO. SNCF164-RPT-02, VERSION 2.0Page 116 of 467 0ATTACHMENT 3: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS 0NO. SNCF164-RPT-02, VERSION 2.0NJPage 117 of 467 0ATTACHMENT 3: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS 00NO. SNCF164-RPT-02, VERSION 2.0(AJ-,,J"c1Page 118 of 467 ATTACHMENT 3: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS NO. SNCF164-RPT-02, VERSION 2.0Sheet ovY4 11Status: Y) NO UE-Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)Equipment ID No. Q2F16LT0501 Equip. Class, 18Equipment Description RWST LEVEL TRANSMITTER Location:

Bldg. YARD Floor El. 155 Room, Area RWSTManufacturer, Model. Etc. (optional but recontmended)

Instructions for Completing Checklist This checklist may be used to document the results of the Seismic Walkdown of an item of equipment on theSWEL. The space below each of the following questions may be used to record the results of judgments andfindings.

Additional space is provided at the end of this checklist for documenting other comments.

Anchorage

1. Is the anchorage configuration verification required (i.e.. is the item one YEI N52"of the 50% of SWEL items requiring such verification)?

2. Is the anchorage free of bent, broken, missing or loose hardware? UE- N/AEr3. Is the anchorage free of corrosion that is more than mild surface YO '"NDN UEI N/AEroxidation?

4. Is the anchorage free of visible cracks in the concrete near the anchors?

YR.NE-I UEJ N/AE_a,,,j,;',/d 07" -'5*10.¢

" o( 5. Is the anchorage configuration consistent with plant documentation?

YE3 NEI UE" N/AAI-'"(Note: This question only applies if the item is one of the 50% forwhich an anchorage configuration verification is required.)

6. Based on the above anchorage evaluations, is the anchorage free of YkNiE UErpotentially adverse seismic conditions?

Enter the equipment class name front Appendix B: Classes uf Equpnment.

Page 119 of 467 ATTACHMENT 3: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS NO. SNCF164-RPT-02, VERSION 2.0Shee. of (,/WLjStatus: YM NEI U['-Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)Equipment ID No. Q2F16LT0501 Equip. Class' 18Equipment Description RWST LEVEL TRANSMITTER Interaction Effects7. Are soft targets free from impact by nearby equipment or structures?

8. Are. overhead equipment, distribution

systems, ceiling tiles and lighting, and masonry block walls not likely to collapse onto the equipment?

Y6frEi5UD N/AD*ý NNo U'] N/AD9. Do attached lines have adequate flexibility to avoid damage? 6N" UEI-' N/ADofBased on the above seismic interaction evaluations, is equipment free Y ND UDof potentially adverse seismidc interaction effects?Other Adverse Conditions 1I. Have you looked for and found no other seismic conditions that could UDadversely affect the safety functions of the equipment?

Comments (Additional pages may be added as necessary)

Evaluated by: (2- .Date: V. -o. 2 ./uzo/20/ZPage 120 of 467 0NO. SNCF164-RPT-02, VERSION 2.0ATTACHMENT 3: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS Page 121 of 467 ATTACHMENT 3: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS NO. SNCF164-RPT-02, VERSION 2.0Page 122 of 467 ATTACHMENT 3: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS NO. SNCF164-RPT-02, VERSION 2.0Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)Sheet i of 3ý4Status: YP -] UF]Equipment ID No. Q2G31HOO1B Equip. Class' 21Equipment Description SFP HEAT EXCHANGER TRAIN ALocation:

Bldg. AUXILIARY Floor El. 165 Room, Area Z4La7Manufacturer, Model, Etc. (optional but recommended)

Instructions for Completing Checklist This checklist may be used to document the results of the Seismic Walkdown of an item of equipment on theSWEL. The space below each of the following questions may be used to record the results ofjudgments andfindings.

Additional space is provided at the end of this checklist for documenting other comments.

Anchorage I. Is the anchorage configuration verification required (i.e., is the item one YO/NE)of the 50% of SWEL items requiring such verification)?

2.1--b2. Is the anchorage free of bent, broken, missing or loose hardware?

YkýNEI UE] N/AEYP'NE] UO N/AM3. Is the anchorage free of corrosion that is more than mild surfaceoxiOation?

4shean the- convret 4ea othe aor Y[p<c ] N4. Is the anchorage free of visible cracks in the concrete near the anchors?

YONE] UE] N/ACI5. Is the anchorage configuration consistent with plant documentation?

(Note: This question only applies if the item is one of the 50% forwhich an anchorage configuration verification is required.)

6. Based on the above anchorage evaluations, is the anchorage free ofpotentially adverse seistmic conditions?

4KNE] UE1 N/AE1'ýi0/N UEIEnter the equipment class natne from Appendix B: Classes of Equipment.

Page 123 of 467 ATTACHMENT 3: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS NO. SNCF164-RPT-02, VERSION 2.0CleoSheet 2 of/ IStatus: Y[t NE- U-Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)Equipment ID No. Q2G31HOO1B Equip. ClassI 21Equipment Description SFP HEAT EXCHANGER TRAIN AInteraction Effects7. Are soft targets free from impact by nearby equipment or structures?

YPAE] U[- N/A128. Are overhead equipment, distribution

systems, ceiling tiles and lighting, and masonry block walls not likely to collapse onto the equipment?

9. Do attached lines have adequate flexibility to avoid damage?Y~1\JE U0 N/AEI10. Based on the above seismic interaction evaluations, is equipment free Yt]-Nf Uijof potentially adverse seismic interaction effects?Other Adverse Conditions

11. Have you looked for and found no other seismic conditions that could O-NE] UE-adversely affect the safety functions of the equipment?

Comments (Additional pages may be added as necessary)

,fb Af &Evaluated Date: -'2~Page 124 of 467 0ATTACHMENT 3: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS NO. SNCF164-RPT-02, VERSION 2.0Page 125 of 467 NO. SNCF164-RPT-02, VERSION 2.0ATTACHMENT 3: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS Page 126 of 467 ATTACHMENT 3: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS NO. SNCF164-RPT-02, VERSION 2.0rý- 41Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)Sheet i ofN u/j Status: NEI UE-- '4111"Equipment ID No. Q2H11NGASC2506D Equip. Class, 20Equipment Description AUX SAFEGUARDS CABINET DLocation:

Bldg. AUXILIARY Floor El. 155 Room, Area 471Manufacturer, Model, Etc. (optional but recommended)

Instructions for Completing Checklist This checklist may be used to document the results of the Seismic Walkdown of an item of equipment on theSWEL. The space below each of the following questions may be used to record the results ofjudgments andfindings.

Additional space is provided at the end of this checklist for documenting other comments.

Anchora2e I. Is the anchorage configuration verification required (i.e., is the item oneof the 50% of SWEL items requiring such verification)?

2. Is the anchorage free of bent, broken, missing or loose hardware?

3. Is the anchorage free of corrosion that is more than mild surfaceoxidation?

Yd NEIYEl NEI UO N/AOYE/N- UI- N/A7]4. Is the anchorage free of visible cracks in the concrete near the anchors?

Y[ NOI UFJ N/A]5. Is the anchorage configuration consistent with plant documentation?

(Note: This question only applies if the item is one of the 50% forwhich an anchorage configuration verification is required.)

h4M .ollgjý 06jF167tY 4rigiV 0.2&lr/9//

A61A " vsr -56. Based on the above anchorage evaluations, is the anchorage free ofpotentially adverse seismic conditions?

Enter the equipment class name from Appendix B: Classes of Equipment.

YfNO Ul] N/Al]Qz Uit hYOA 50 2,5-o& A-q2' 4P 0 PIUPC 216o54-)Y9~ NO UlPage 127 of 467 ATTACHMENT 3: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS NO. SNCF164-RPT-02, VERSION 2.0Sheet 2 of X 5 7(jdy ,Status: Y9NE- U[-- O'llSeismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)Equipment ID No. Q2H1INGASC2506D Equip. Class1Equipment Description AUX SAFEGUARDS CABINET LInteraction Effects7. Are soft targets free from impact by nearby equipment or structures?

8. Are overhead equipment, distribution

systems, ceiling tiles and lighting, and masonry block walls not likely to collapse onto the equipment?

9. Do attached lines have adequate flexibility to avoid damage?10. Based on the above seismic interaction evaluations, is equipment freeof potentially adverse seismic interaction effects?Y[2(N[E UE1 N/AE]YE3'NEJ Ul1 N/AE1YD/NE) UEI N/AQlY2( NEI UMOther Adverse Conditions

11. Have you looked for and found no other seismic conditions that could YE'N"I Ufadversely affect the safety functions of the equipment?

Comments (Additional pages may be added as necessary) rMi- A/ I c Mg-,9 " FZ -;;70 ,' TA , 'k. : ,-.-°,VA.II" tEvaluated by: , VL). 0Al(-Date: __ __ _- __ __//Page 128 of 467 ATTACHMENT 3: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS NO. SNCF164-RPT-02, VERSION 2.0Page 129 of 467 ATTACHMENT 3: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS NO. SNCF164-RPT-02, VERSION 2.0Page 130 of 467 0ATTACHMENT 3: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS NO. SNCF164-RPT-02, VERSION 2.0Page 131 of 467 ATTACHMENT 3: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS NO. SNCF164-RPT-02, VERSION 2.0..I ' "Sheet s of" 4e &Status: YE NO U["] Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)Equipment ID No. 02H1 1NGB2504K Equip. Class' 20Equipment Description BOP INSTRUMENTATION CABINET KLocation:

Bldg. AUX Floor El. 155 Room, Area 0471Manufacturer, Model. Etc. (optional but recommended)

Instructions for Completing Checklist This checklist may be used to document the results of the Seismic Walkdown of an item of equipment on theSWEL. The space below each of the following questions may be used to record the results of judgments andfindings.

Additional space is provided at the end of this checklist for documenting other comments.

Anchorage

1. Is the anchorage configuration verification required (i.e., is the item one YZ NMof the 50% of SWEL items requiring such verification)?

2. Is the anchorage free of bent, broken, missing or loose hardware?

3. Is the anchorage free of conrosion that is more than mild surfaceoxidation?

4. Is the anchorage free of visible cracks in the concrete near the anchors?5. Is the anchorage configuration consistent with plant documentation?

(Note: This question only applies if the item is one of the 50% forwhich an anchorage configuration verification is required.)

Panel is welded to embedded plate in floor. Welds are on the outsideof the panel. The welds were confirmed to be consistent with the weldsidentified and evaluated in the SEWS package for this component dated 7/1/93. All welds were determined to be free from adverseconditions and to match plant documentation.

See pages ,t3'forpictures of typical welds 4. "-t9Enter the equipment class name from Appendix B: Classes of Equipment.

Y[ NEI UEr N/AEfYN NEI UE" N/Ar-YN NEI ur- N/AEYZ NE] UEI N/A['-Page 132 of 467 ATTACHMENT 3: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS NO. SNCF164-RPT-02, VERSION 2.0Sheet 2 of,-r (g MStatus: Y[ NEI U[] Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)Equipment ID No. Q2HI INGB254KU Equip. Class, 20Equipmient Description BOP INSTRUMENTATION CABINET KInteraction Effects6. Based on the above anchorage evaluations, is the anchorage free ofpotentially adverse seismic conditions?

YED NEI U-Interaction Effects7. Are soft targets free from impact by nearby equipment or structures?

8. Are overhead equipment, distribution

systems, ceiling tiles and lighting.

and masonry block walls not likely to collapse onto the equipment?

Isolated cases were found where some of the east-west spanningrunners were not clipped to the north south spanning runners.However, all north south spanning runners are supported from the roofand are prevented from lateral motion. The lights, vents and otheritems are supported from the structure independently from the ceilingtile system. The overall configuration is consistent with theconfiguration identified and evaluated in the SEWS walkdownperformed on 7/1/93. Due to the fact that the unclipped runners occuronly in isolated cases and the fact that all tiles are supported on at leastthree sides, the ceiling tiles will not fall and adversely impact thepanels. There are no ceiling tiles directly over any panels and thepanels are all closed on the top. A corrective action report has beenissued to reattach the loose runners.9. Do attached lines have adequate flexibility to avoid damage?YZ NEI UI N/AOYZ NO U[O N/ArYG3 NO Ufi N/AO10. Based on the above seistmtic interaction evaluations, is equipment fiee YZ NO U-of potentially adverse seismic interaction effects?Other Adverse Conditions I1. Have you looked for and found no other seismic conditions that couldadversely affect the safety functions of the equipment?

YZ NO UOPage 133 of 467 ATTACHMENT 3: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS NO. SNCF164-RPT-02, VERSION 2.0Sheet 3 of,4/0 JWStatus: Y1 N'-' UE" 11011.Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)Equipmenl ID No. Q2H11NGB2504K Equip. ClassI 20Equipment Description BOP INSTRUMENTATION CABINET KComments (Additional pages may be added as necessary)

Evaluated by: hamIKWt' Date: f-7_.- 7-S I -)-.Page 134 of 467 0ATTACHMENT 3: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS NO. SNCF164-RPT-02, VERSION 2.0Page 135 of 467 ATTACHMENT 3: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS NO. SNCF164-RPT-02, VERSION 2.0Page 136 of 467 ATTACHMENT 3: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS NO. SNCF164-RPT-02, VERSION 2.0Page 137 of 467 ATTACHMENT 3: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS NO. SNCF164-RPT-02, VERSION 2.0Sheet 1 of 4Status: YE] NE] UN20Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)Equipment ID No. Q2HI1NGNIS2503A Equip. ClassEquipment Description NIS EXCORE DETECTOR CABLocation:

Bldg. AUXILIARY Floor El. 155' Room, Area 416Manufacturer, Model, Etc. (optional but recommended)

Instructions for Completing Checklist This checklist may be used to document the results of the Seismic Walkdown of an item of equipment on theSWEL. The space below each of the following questions may be used to record the results ofjudgments andfindings.

Additional space is provided at the end of this checklist for documenting other comments.

Anchorage

1. Is the anchorage configuration verification required (i.e., is the item oneof the 50% of SWEL items requiring such verification)?

See note in question

1. 62. Is the anchorage free of bent, broken, missing or loose hardware?

3. Is the anchorage free of corrosion that is more than mild surfaceoxidation?

4. Is the anchorage free of visible cracks in the concrete near the anchors?5. Is the anchorage configuration consistent with plant documentation?

(Note: This question only applies if the item is one of the 50% forwhich an anchorage configuration verification is required.)

6. Based on the above anchorage evaluations, is the anchorage free ofpotentially adverse seismic conditions?

Some anchorages (welds) of this cabinet are under a vinyl kick plateat its base. The FNP Ops Shift Sup was uncomfortable authorizing the removal of the kick plate due to the potential to bump the cabinetduring removal.

Review of the anchorages (and of this component overall) were therefore marked Undetermined.

See Comments pg 2.YE[: NOYEO NOI UZ N/AEYEI NEI UO N/AEYO NE UO N/AEYE NE UO N/AEYO NEI UOEnter the equipment class name from Appendix B: Classes of Equipment.

Page 138 of 467 ATTACHMENT 3: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)Equipment ID No. Q2H11NGNIS2503A Equip. Class'Equipment Description NIS EXCORE DETECTOR CABNO. SNCF164-RPT-02, VERSION 2.0Sheet 2 of 4Status: YE] NEl] U[20INETInteraction Effects7. Are soft targets free from impact by nearby equipment or structures?

YZ NE] Ur- N/A28. Are overhead equipment, distribution

systems, ceiling tiles and lighting, YZ NE] Ur- N/AOand masonry block walls not likely to collapse onto the equipment?

9. Do attached lines have adequate flexibility to avoid damage?10. Based on the above seismic interaction evaluations, is equipment freeof potentially adverse seismic interaction effects?YZ NE! UE N/AC]YO NEI UOOther Adverse Conditions

11. Have you looked for and found no other seismic conditions that couldadversely affect the safety functions of the equipment?

YI NEI UIComments (Additional pages may be added as necessary)

This SWC was originally completed on 8-28-12 and retyped for clarity on 8-27-13.

The subjectcomponent was removed from the SWEL since the anchorages could not be verified.

This isdiscussed in the note in Question 6 on pg 1. However, the conclusions of the 8-28-12 walkdown, inresponse to Questions 7 through 11 above are valid. The Area Walk By for this component, i.e., forRoom 416 is documented in AWC package FI-091.Evaluated by: Stephen Yuankw, A aDate: 08-28-1208-28-12Paul A. MiktusPage 139 of 467 0ATTACHMENT 3: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS NO. SNCF164-RPT-02, VERSION 2.0Page 140 of 467 ATTACHMENT 3: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS NO. SNCF164-RPT-02, VERSION 2.03Page 141 of 467 ATTACHMENT 3: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS NO. SNCF164-RPT-02, VERSION 2.0Sheet t ofA Status; YEE NO UF]Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)Equipment ID No. O2HI1NGPIC2505D Equip. Class, 20Equipment Description Process Protection Cabinet Channel 4Location:

Bldg. Aux. Bldq Floor El. 155' Room. AreaManufacturer, Model, Etc. (optional but recommended)

Instructions for Completing Checklist This checklist may be used to document the results of the Seismic Walkdown of an item of equipment on theSWEL. The space below each of the following questions may be used to record the results of judgments andfindings.

Additional space is provided at the end of this checklist for documenting other comments.

Anchorag$.

I. Is the anchorage configuration verification required (i.e.. is the item one YZ NOof the 50% of SWEL items requiring such verification)?

2. Is the anchorage free of bent. broken. missing or loose hardware?

Cabinet is welded to embedded steel in the floor.3. Is the anchorage fiee of corrosion that is more than mild surfaceoxidation?

4. Is the anchorage free of visible cracks in the concrete near the anchors?5. Is the anchorage configuration consistent with plant documentation?

(Note: This question only applies if the item is one of the 50% forwhich an anchorage configuration verification is required.)

Anchorage documentation was obtained from SEWS package for thiscomponent, dated 7/1/93. Anchorage consists of welds to anembedded plate located on outside of cabinet.

Carpeting was partially removed to verify that welds match documented condition and that theyhave no adverse seismic conditions.

YZ NEI UD N/ADYZ NO UE N/AOYZ NI UQ N/AEYZ NO Uf N/A"Enter the equipment class name from Appendix B: Classes of Equipment.

Page 142 of 467 ATTACHMENT 3: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS NO. SNCF164-RPT-02, VERSION 2.0Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)Sheet 2ofkfg 1[$.[ VStatus: YN NEI U["]Equipment ID No. 02HI 1NGPIC2505D Equip. Class' 20Equipment Description Process Protection Cabinet Channel 46. Based on the above anchorage evaluations, is the anchorage free ofpotentially adverse seismic conditions?

YI ND UOInteraction Effects7. Are soft targets free from impact by nearby equipment or structures?

8. Are overhead equipment.

distribution

systems, ceiling tiles and lighting, and masonry block walls not likely to collapse Onto the equipment?

Suspended ceiling and fixtures (lights, vents, etc) inspected anddetermined to be seismically adequate.

Isolated cases found whererunners were not clipped at both ends. See walkdown package for02H I1NGB2504K (package F2-42) and CR506358 for additional information on the control room ceiling.9. Do attached lines have adequate flexibility to avoid damage?10. Based on the above seismic interaction evaluations, is equipment freeof potentially adverse seismic interaction effects?Y0 NEI U- N/ADYZ NEI U- N/ADYZ NO UD N/ADY0 NO U-Other Adverse Conditions

11. Have you looked for and found no other seismic conditions that could YO ND UDadversely affect the safety functions of the equipment?

Comments (Additional pages may be added as necessary)

Verified the adequacy of welds as per SEWS for O2H 11NGBR2504K-B and Q2H11 NGPIC2505A-I,dated 7-1-93. The Area Walk By is included in package F2-42.Page 143 of 467 ATTACHMENT 3: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS NO. SNCF164-RPT-02, VERSION 2.0Evaluated by: P. MiktusS. YuanSheet 3 of 4-'.iDate: 08-23-1208-23-12Page 144 of 467 0ATTACHMENT 3: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS NO. SNCF164-RPT-02, VERSION 2.0Page 145 of 467 ATTACHMENT 3: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS NO. SNCF164-RPT-02, VERSION 2.0Page 146 of 467 SNO. SNCF164-RPT-02, VERSION 2.0ATTACHMENT 3: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS Page 147 of 467 ATTACHMENT 3: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS NO. SNCF164-RPT-02, VERSION 2.011IJPage 148 of 467 ATTACHMENT 3: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS NO. SNCF164-RPT-02, VERSION 2.0-iPage 149 of 467 0ATTACHMENT 3: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS NO. SNCF164-RPT-02, VERSION 2.0Page 150 of 467 0NO. SNCF164-RPT-02, VERSION 2.0ATTACHMENT 3: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS Page 151 of 467I ATTACHMENT 3: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS NO. SNCF164-RPT-02, VERSION 2.0Page 152 of 467 ATTACHMENT 3: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS NO. SNCF164-RPT-02, VERSION 2.0Page 153 of 467 0NO. SNCF164-RPT-02, VERSION 2.0ATTACHMENT 3: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS

~~1Page 154 of 467 ATTACHMENT 3: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS NO. SNCF164-RPT-02, VERSION 2.0FZ-4.Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)Sheet i feIt 0'sStatus: YZ NrD UEI1Equipment ID No. Q2HI1NGPIC2505H Equip. Class' 20Equipment Description Process Control Cabinet Channel 4Location:

Bldg. Aux. Bldg Floor El. 155' Room, AreaManufacturer, Model, Etc. (optional but recommended)

Instructions for Completing Checklist This checklist may be used to document the results of the Seismic Walkdown of an item of equipment on theSWEL. The space below each of the following questions may be used to record the results of judgments andfindings.

Additional space is provided at the end of this checklist for documenting other comments.

Anchorage

1. Is the anchorage configuration verification required (i.e., is the item one YED NDIof the 50% of SWEL items requiring such verification)?

2. Is the anchorage free of bent, broken, missing or loose hardware?

Cabinet is welded to embedded steel in the floor.3. Is the anchorage free of corrosion that is more than mild surfaceoxidation?

4. Is the anchorage free of visible cracks in the concrete near the anchors?5. Is the anchorage configuration consistent with plant documentation?

(Note: This question only applies if the item is one of the 50% forwhich an anchorage configuration verification is required.)

Anchorage documentation was obtained from SEWS package for thiscomponent, dated 7/1/93. Anchorage consists of welds to anembedded plate located on outside of cabinet.

Carpeting was partially removed to verify that welds match documented condition and that theyhave no adverse seismic conditions.

YZ NEI UD N/ADY0 ND UD N/ADY[ NDI UD N/ADYZ ND UD N/ADI Enter the equipment class name from Appendix B: Classes of Equipment.

Page 155 of 467 ATTACHMENT 3: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS NO. SNCF164-RPT-02, VERSION 2.0Sheet 2 OfI74t~trA Status: YZ NEI U-Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)Equipment ID No. Q2HI1NGPIC2505H Equip. Class,Equipment Description Process Control Cabinet Channet146. Based on the above anchorage evaluations, is the anchorage free ofpotentially adverse seismic conditions?

YZ NE UDInteraction Effects7. Are soft targets free froom impact by nearby equipment or structures?

8. Are overhead equipment, distribution

systems, ceiling tiles and lighting, and masonry block walls not likely to collapse onto the equipment?

Suspended ceiling and fixtures (lights, vents, etc) inspected anddetermined to be seismically adequate.

Isolated cases found whererunners were not clipped at both ends. See walkdown package for02H11 NGB2504K (package F2-42) and CR506358 for additional information on the control room ceiling.9. Do attached lines have adequate flexibility to avoid damage?10. Based on the above seismic interaction evaluations, is equipment freeof potentially adverse seismic interaction effects?YZ NEI UE N/AQYN NEI U0 N/AElYZ NEl UE- N/AEYZ NC UEOther Adverse Conditions 1I. Have you looked for and found no other seismic conditions that could Y[ NEI UEiadversely affect the safety functions of the equipment?

Comments (Additional pages may be added as necessary)

Verified the adequacy of welds as per SEWS for Q2H 11NGBR2504K-B and Q2HI 1NGPIC2505A-1, dated 7-1-93. The Area Walk By package in included in package F2-42Page 156 of 467 ATTACHMENT 3: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS NO. SNCF164-RPT-02, VERSION 2.0Eva Iu a kdby: P. Miktu 1 J- 92S. YzianSheet 3 Of" 3 itDate: 08.23-1208-23-12Page 157 of 467 ATTACHMENT 3: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS NO. SNCF164-RPT-02, VERSION 2.0Page 158 of 467 ATTACHMENT 3: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS NO. SNCF164-RPT-02, VERSION 2.0Page 159 of 467 0ATTACHMENT 3: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS NO. SNCF164-RPT-02, VERSION 2.0Page 160 of 467 ATTACHMENT 3: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS NO. SNCF164-RPT-02, VERSION 2.0Page 161 of 467 ATTACHMENT 3: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS NO. SNCF164-RPT-02, VERSION 2.0Page 162 of 467 ATTACHMENT 3: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS NO. SNCF164-RPT-02, VERSION 2.0Page 163 of 467 ATTACHMENT 3: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS NO. SNCF164-RPT-02, VERSION 2.0Page 164 of 467 ATTACHMENT 3: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS NO. SNCF164-RPT-02, VERSION 2.0Page 165 of 467 ATTACHMENT 3: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS NO. SNCF164-RPT-02, VERSION 2.0S heet Nof Ustatus: y[f1" NE] uE'Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)Equipment ID No. Q2H1 INGSSP2506N Equip. Class, 20Equipment Description SOLID STATE PROTECTION TEST CABINETLocation:

Bldg. AUXILIARY FloorEl.

155 Room, Area 4-1Manufacturer, Model, Etc. (optional but recommended)

Instructions for Completing Checklist This checklist may be used to document the results of the Seismic Walkdown of an item of equipment on theSWEL. The space below each of the following questions may be used to record the results ofjudgments andfindings.

Additional space is provided at the end of this checklist for documenting other comments.

An chorage1. Is the anchorage configuration verification required (i.e., is the item oneof the 50% of SWEL items requiring such verification)?

2. Is the anchorage free of bent, broken, missing or loose hardware?

3. Is the anchorage free of corrosion that is more than mild surfaceoxidation?

4. Is the anchorage free of visible cracks in the concrete near the anchors?Y2/NDY[-I(NE]

UED N/AE1YM/N[] UE3 N/A[sYt9INE] UE1 N/AEI5. Is the anchorage configuration consistent with plant documentation? N[l U[' N/AE3(Note: This question only applies if the item is one of the 50% forwhich an anchorage configuration verification is required.)

Re-..70 Pok2 Q2HaI00G5P~Z5064-.A,VATet>

7-1 -4, Ao 0 eu D -5E- --6. Based on the above anchorage evaluations, is the anchorage free of Y.N[ Urnpotentially adverse seismic conditions?

Enter the equipment class name from Appendix B: Classes of Equipment.

Page 166 of 467 ATTACHMENT 3: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS NO. SNCF164-RPT-02, VERSION 2.0JSheet 2 6f,!ý"ýStatus: YIgNE[ U-]Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)Equipment ID No. Q2H11NGSSP2506N Equip. Class' 20Equipment Description SOLID STATE PROTECTION TEST CABINETInteraction Effects7. Are soft targets free from impact by nearby equipmcnt or structures?

8. Are overhead equipment, distribution

systems, ceiling tiles and lighting, and masonry block walls not likely to collapse onto the equipment?

9. Do attached lines have adequate flexibility to avoid damage?10. Based on the above seismic interaction evaluations, is equipment freeof potentially adverse seismic interaction effects?YEZ NEI UE3 N/AE3YPýINEI UIII N/AElY[E]NEI UEI N/ACIYEI'NE1 UE]Other Adverse Conditions 1I. Hlave you looked for and found no other seismic conditions that could YE]. 'NrE UE-adversely affect the safety functions of the equipment?

Comments (Additional pages may be added as necessary) idj 0 ýPEvaluated by: 'PAý) ADate: -"&: .$ A, 3 -',.: sPage 167 of 467 0ATTACHMENT 3: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS NO. SNCF164-RPT-02, VERSION 2.0!vPage 168 of 467 ATTACHMENT 3: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS NO, SNCF164-RPT-02, VERSION 2.0Page 169 of 467 ATTACHMENT 3: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS NO. SNCF164-RPT-02, VERSION 2.0Page 170 of 467