Text

Enclosure 1, Including Attachments 1 to 8: Licensing Summary of Walkdown Report. Part 3 of 7
	ML13252A154
Person / Time
Site:	Farley
Issue date:	09/04/2013
From:	; Southern Nuclear Operating Co
To:	; Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation
Shared Package
ML13252A148	List: ML13252A150; ML13252A151; ML13252A153; ML13252A154; ML13252A155; ML13252A156; ML13252A157; ML13252A159; NL-13-1555, Enclosure 1, Including Attachments 1 to 8: Licensing Summary of Walkdown Report. Part 1 of 7; NL-13-1555, Enclosure 2: Updated Farley Unit 2 Seismic Walkdown Report for Resolution of Fukushima Near-Term Task Force Recommendation 2.3: Seismic; NL-13-1555, Joseph M. Farley Unit 2, Updated Seismic Recommendation 2.3 Walkdown Report Requested by NRC Letter, Request for Information Re Recommendations 2.1, 2.3 & 9.3 of the Near-Term Task Force Review of Insights from Fukushima Dai Ichi Accident;
References
	NL-13-1555
	Download: ML13252A154 (104)
	v • d • e

ATTACHMENT 3: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS NO. SNCF164-RPT-02, VERSION 2.0 Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)

Sheet i of/-

Status: Y[

NI==] U]

Equipment ID No. 02H21EO05 Equip. Class' 20 Equipment Description 4.16KV SWITCHGEAR 2G LOCAL CONT PANEL Location: Bldg. AUXILIARY Floor El. 121 Room. Area 2233 Manufacturer, Model. Etc. (optional but recommended)

Instructions for Completing Checklist This checklist may be used to document the results of the Seismic Walkdown of an item of equipment on the SWEL. The space below each of the following questions may be used to record the results ofjudgments and findings. Additional space is provided at the end of this checklist for documenting other comments.

Anchorage

1. Is the anchorage configuration verification required (i.e., is the item one of the 50% of SWEL items requiring such verification)?

Anchorage is inside panel and cannot be verified fr-)b I 0CtL E, JA-ocS c

2. Is the anchorage free of bent, broken, missing or loose hardware?

3. Is the anchorage free of corrosion that is more than mild surface oxidation?

4. Is the anchorage free of visible cracks in the concrete near the anchors?

5. Is the anchorage configuration consistent with plant documentation'?

(Note: This question only applies if the item is one of the 50% for which an anchorage configuration verification is required.)

6. Based on the above anchorage evaluations, is the anchorage free of potentially adverse seismic conditions?

UAe IA4 YEI NEI US N/AEI YEI NEI US N/AE" YE) NEr US N/A["

YEI NEI UAYN/AW YEI NCi UO I Enter the equipmentclass name from Appendix B: Classes of Equipment.

Page 171 of 467

ATTACHMENT 3: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS NO. SNCF164-RPT-02, VERSION 2.0 Sheet 2 Of 3C Status: YID NEI UN Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)

Equipment ID No. 02H21E-05 Equip. Class, 20 Equipment Description 4.16KV SWITCHGEAR 2G LOCAL CONT PANEL Interaction Effects

7. Are soft targets free from impact by nearby equipment or structures?

Test cable N2R 15G0001D is wrapped around existing Siemens junction box as documented in Deficiency Report 565268 (See Pic) on 4-7-05.

==

Conclusion:==

Cable and attached piece of equipment could impact panel in seismic event. rdt _2..

-504961

8. Are overhead equipment, distribution systems, ceiling tiles and lighting.

and masonry block walls not likely to collapse onto the equipment?

9. Do attached lines have adequate flexibility to avoid damage?

10. Based on the above seismic interaction evaluations, is equipment free of potentially adverse seismic interaction effects?

YE NO UE N/AE YZ NEI Ur N/A1 YO NE UE N/AE YO NO U" Other Adverse Conditions

11. Have you looked for and found no other seismic conditions that could YO NEI UEl adversely affect the safety functions of the equipment?

Comments (Additional pages may be added as necessary)

CR 504967 was created to document the housekeepingi test cable issue described in #7 above.

Evaluated by:

W Lat-At LULwr-a M--acWI" I

U

-rq1y A-L-&ýJ MatmF?ýdL4fQ20:))

I N \\J0-J.--1 L7

)ate:

2'- '2`4-Page 172 of 467

ATTACHMENT 3: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS NO. SNCF164-RPT-02, VERSION 2.0 m

Page 173 of 467

0 ATTACHMENT 3: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS NO. SNCF164-RPT-02, VERSION 2.0 Page 174 of 467

ATTACHMENT 3: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS NO. SNCF164-RPT-02, VERSION 2.0 Page 175 of 467

ATTACHMENT 3: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS NO. SNCF164-RPT-02, VERSION 2.0 Page 176 of 467

ATTACHMENT 3: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS NO. SNCF164-RPT-02, VERSION 2.0 Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)

Equipment ID No. Q2H21E505 Equip.,

Sheet 1 ofi w Status:

2N0 UR Class' 20 Equipment Description 4.16KV SWITCHGEAR 2J LOCAL CONT PANEL Location: Bldg. DIESEL Floor El. 155 Room, Area 5C..,

Manufacturer, Model, Etc. (optional but recommended)

Instructions for Completing Checklist This checklist may be used to document the results of the Seismic Walkdown of an item of equipment on the SWEL. The space below each of the following questions may be used to record the results of judgments and findings. Additional space is provided at the end of this checklist for documenting other comments.

Anchorage

1. Is the anchorage configuration verification required (i.e., is the item one YX NEI of the 50% of SWEL items requiring such verification)?

2. Is the anchorage free of bent, broken, missing or loose hardware?

3. Is the anchorage free of corrosion that is more than mild surface oxidation?

4. Is the anchorage free of visible cracks in the concrete near the anchors?

5. Is the anchorage configuration consistent with plant documentation?

(Note: This question only applies if the item is one of the 50% for which an anchorage configuration verification is required.)

6. Based on the above anchorage evaluations, is the anchorage free of potentially adverse seismic conditions?

YE NE UX. N/A-YE NE UL N/A-YE NEI N/AO YE NE J*N/A-YO NE UO

' Enter the equipment class name from Appendix 13: Classes of Equipment.

Page 177 of 467

ATTACHMENT 3: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS NO. SNCF164-RPT-02, VERSION 2.0 Sheet 2 of OAP Status: 4 NEI U[

LIA C~j/4 Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)

Equipment ID No. Q2H21E505 Equip. Class, 20 Equipment Description 4.16KV SWITCHGEAR 2J LOCAL CONT PANEL Interaction Effects

7. Are soft targets free from impact by nearby equipment or structures?

YER NO UEI N/AD

'v**'*

i* '& L k;-* \\ Q;S e l*,k U-, k-to 0.**,,(

24": rc-CA.\\t4

-. 5C 3**-

- 3 f ' -*

u*AV

,4**o F¢' 4t r

8. Are overhead equipment, distribution systems, ceiling tiles and lighting, Y

NE] Ur] N/AMAD and masonry block walls not likely to collapse onto the equipment?

/

9. Do attached lines have adequate flexibility to avoid damage?

10. Based on the above seismic interaction evaluations, is equipment free of potentially adverse seismic interaction effects?

yrlit NEI UED N/AEO Y% NC ijo Other Adverse Conditions

11. Have you looked for and found no other seismic conditions that could Y'NEI UF adversely affect the safety functions of the equipment?

Comments (Additional pages may be added as necessary)

A-iaW l-b iS in

-GvD(Ct-,v r-Z -gM:,

cu pw - "f Q* 2

Evaluatedk t

I aj r Date: IT /ZO-l2*

G/I'

/1Z Page 178 of 467

ATTACHMENT 3: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS NO. SNCF164-RPT-02, VERSION 2.0 Page 179 of 467

ATTACHMENT 3: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS NO. SNCF164-RPT-02, VERSION 2.0 Page 180 of 467

ATTACHMENT 3: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS NO. SNCF164-RPT-02, VERSION 2.0 Page 181 of 467

ATTACHMENT 3: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS NO. SNCF164-RPT-02, VERSION 2.0 fz-4, J2 Sheet a of A5 Status: YE] NE] U0 Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)

Equipment ID No. Q2H21E507 Equip. Class, 20 Equipment Description 4.16KV SWITCHGEAR 2L LOCAL CONT PANEL Location: Bldg. SWIS Floor El. 188 Room, Area "'Z*

Manufacturer, Model, Etc. (optional but recommended)

Instructions for Completing Checklist This checklist may be used to document the results of the Seismic Walkdown of an item of equipment on the SWEL. The space below each of the following questions may be used to record the results of judgments and findings. Additional space is provided at the end of this checklist for documenting other comments.

Anchorage

1. Is the anchorage configuration verification required (i.e., is the item one Y"

NOi of the 50% of SWEL items requiring such verification)?

2. Is the anchorage free of bent, broken, missing or loose hardware?

3. Is the anchorage free of corrosion that is more than mild surface oxidation?

4. Is the anchorage free of visible cracks in the concrete near the anchors?

5. Is the anchorage configuration consistent with plant documentation?

(Note: This question only applies if the item is one of the 50% for which an anchorage configuration verification is required.)

6. Based on the above anchorage evaluations, is the anchorage free of potentially adverse seismic conditions?

YO NFE Up N/AD YO NE UO N/AO YO NO UM N/AD YO-NO U[9 N/AD YO NO U1 I Enter the equipment class name from Appendix B: Classes of Equipment.

Page 182 of 467

ATTACHMENT 3: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS NO. SNCF164-RPT-02, VERSION 2.0 Sheet 2 of,3"*

Status: YE] NI] U[9 Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)

Equipment ID No. Q2H21E507 Equip. Class' 20 Equipment Description 4.16KV SWITCHGEAR 2L LOCAL CONT PANEL Interaction Effects

7. Are soft targets free from impact by nearby equipment or structures?

S. Are overhead equipment, distribution systems, ceiling tiles and lighting, and masonry block walls not likely to collapse onto the equipment?

9. Do attached lines have adequate flexibility to avoid damage?

10. Based on the above seismic interaction evaluations, is equipment free of potentially adverse seismic interaction effects?

YJA NEI Ul N/AQ YU N-U-

N/Ar YX] NO UO N/Ar-E Y9 NO UOi Other Adverse Conditions II. Have you looked for and found no other seismic conditions that could Ylo NEI UI adversely affect the safety functions of the equipment?

Comments (Additional pages may be added as necessary)

II AoxevxeaA ti~ht \\,r)4e-rvo

(-ric~

djcC&0T coý-bipet-S

'IV ct-

~t'Se~b"-he Ityr'tX1cjY VYIMAnrthSO bO RS COý\\Aý1 rnOT be COU{trrk mg be-b~e jo~ir Evaluated by:

-uOLL r M

.aaq-K Date: 3//

1-2,

Page 183 of 467

NO. SNCF164-RPT-02, VERSION 2.0 ATTACHMENT 3: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS Page 184 of 467

ATTACHMENT 3: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS NO. SNCF164-RPT-02, VERSION 2.0 RNlf lUt Page 185 of 467

0 ATTACHMENT 3: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS NO. SNCF164-RPT-02, VERSION 2,0 Page 186 of 467

ATTACHMENT 3: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS NO. SNCF164-RPT-02, VERSION 2.0 I F2-5o Sheet 1 of' XAtt)

Status: *"N-Ui--

Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)

Equipment ID No.

Q2H21NBMER2619 Equip. Class, 20 Equipment Description SG IC WIDE RANGE LEVEL MCB ISOLATOR Location: Bldg. AUXILIARY Floor El. 121 Room, Area 2227 Manufacturer, Model. Etc. (optional but recommended)

Instructions for Completing Checklist This checklist may be used to document the results of the Seismic Walkdown of an item of equipment on the SWEL. The space below each of the following questions may be used to record the results of judgments and findings. Additional space is provided at the end of this checklist for documenting other comments.

Anchorage I. Is the anchorage configuration verification required (i.e.. is the item one of the 50% of SWEL items requiring such verification)?

2. Is the anchorage free of bent. broken, missing or loose hardware?

3. Is the anchorage free of cortosion that is more than mild surface oxidation?

4. Is the anchorage free of visible cracks in the concrete near the anchors?

5. Is the anchorage configuration consistent with plant documentation?

(Note: This question only applies if the item is one of the 50% for which an anchorage configuration verification is required.)

YI/N-UDI N/A[]

Y-NE] UEI N/All Y[eO U[U N/A" iN/A

$,s the avahg e7uan

-i t

3 a

ce 4j of Y

t JU" the above anchorage evaluations, is the anchorage free of Y;NOUE

6. Based on potentially adverse seismic conditions?

I Enter the equipment class name from Appendix B: Classes of'Equipment.

Page 187 of 467

ATTACHMENT 3: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS NO. SNCF164-RPT-02, VERSION 2.0 Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)

Equipment ID No.

02H21NBMER2619 Equip. Class' 20 Equipment Description SG 1C WIDE RANGE LEVEL MCB ISOLATOR Sheet 2 of')

/'1, Status: Y**(--]

Ur-1 Interaction Effects

7. Are soft targets free from impact by nearby equipment or structures?

8. Are overhead equipment, distribution systems, ceiling tiles and lighting, and nasonry block walls not likely to collapse onto the equipment?

9. Do attached lines have adequate flexibility to avoid damage?

10. Based on the above seismic interaction evaluations, is equipment free of potentially adverse seismic interaction effects?

YRq]UE N/AE1 Y~--3Ufl N/AE]

YV-*'E1 UE3 N/AEI Yt'OU0 Oilier Adverse Conditions

11. Have you looked for and found no other seismic conditions that could NO U0' adversely affect the safety functions of the equipment?

Comments (Additional pages may be added as necessary)

F ~t.,nwd h~'

- ~

J ~

12 ~

Evaluatedbv:

Date:

1 -

/-

2 --

zl Page 188 of 467

0 ATTACHMENT 3: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS 0

0 NO. SNCF164-RPT-02, VERSION 2.0 Q2H2~1NBER&1I 1-n Page 189 of 467

ATTACHMENT 3: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS NO. SNCF164-RPT-02, VERSION 2.0 Page 190 of 467

ATTACHMENT 3: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS NO. SNCF164-RPT-02, VERSION 2.0 Page 191 of 467

ATTACHMENT 3: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS NO. SNCF164-RPT-02, VERSION 2.0 S

/I Status: YQ] NO: UF:

Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)

Equipment ID No. Q2H22LOO1D Equip. Class, 20 Equipment Description MULTIPLYING RELAY CABINET 2D Location: Bldg. AUXILIARY Floor El. 139 Room, Area.

,3L.

Manufacturer, Model, Etc. (optional but recommended)

Instructions for Completing Checklist This checklist may be used to document the results of the Seismic Walkdown of an item of equipment on the SWEL. The space below each of the following questions may be used to record the results ofjudgments and findings. Additional space is provided at the end of this checklist for documenting other comments.

Anchorage

1. Is the anchorage configuration verification required (i.e., is the item one YXIND of the 50% of SWEL items requiring such verification)?

Ge jý*ý

2. Is the anchorage free of bent, broken, missing or loose hardware?

3. Is the anchorage free of corrosion that is more than mild surface oxidation?

y2ý NO U[

N/A-Y9 ND U-I N/AD

4. Is the anchorage free of visible cracks in the concrete near the anchors?

Yd( ND UD N/AD

5. Is the anchorage configuration consistent with plant documentation?

(Note: This question only applies if the item is one of the 50% for which an anchorage configuration verification is required.)

6. Based on the above anchorage evaluations, is the anchorage free of potentially adverse seismic conditions?

Y[Z ND UD N/AD3 Yý ND UD Enter the equipment class name from Appendix B: Classes of Equipment.

Page 192 of 467

ATTACHMENT 3: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS NO. SNCF164-RPT-02, VERSION 2.0 Status: Y N'- ur" Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)

Equipment ID No. Q2H22LOOID Equip. Class, 20 Equipment Description MUL TIPL YING RELAY CABINET 2D Interaction Effects

7. Are soft targets free from impact by nearby equipment or structures?

8. Are overhead equipment, distribution systems, ceiling tiles and lighting, and masonry block walls not likely to collapse onto the equipment?

9. Do attached lines have adequate flexibility to avoid damage?

10. Based on the above seismic interaction evaluations, is equipment free of potentially adverse seismic interaction effects?

Y* NO UIE N/A" Y&6 NO UIE N/AE YE/

NEI U-N/AE YEý NEI UE Other Adverse Conditions II. Have you looked for and found no other seismic conditions that could Y[*N-UE adversely affect the safety functions of the equipment?

Comments (Additional pages may be added as necessary) 1 0 Evaluated by:

Date:

Z q r ~ i-k a

Page 193 of 467

ATTACHMENT 3: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS NO. SNCF164-RPT-02, VERSION 2.0 Sheet of 3 Status: Y7 N[-] U[-

Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)

Equipment ID No. Q2H22L003 Equip. ClassI 20 Equipment Description TRANSFER RELAY CABINET 2 Location: Bldg. AUXILIARY Floor El. 100 Room, Area

,.2-1.O Manufacturer, Model, Etc. (optional but recommended)

Instructions for Completing Checklist This checklist may be used to document the results of the Seismic Walkdown of an item of equipment on the SWEL. The space below each of the following questions may be used to record the results of judgments and findings. Additional space is provided at the end of this checklist for documenting other comments.

Anchorase

1. Is the anchorage configuration verification required (i.e., is the item one Y

of the 50% of SWEL items requiring such verification)?

XA--i 7-1-?3

2. Is the anchorage free of bent, broken, missing or loose hardware?

3. Is the anchorage free of corrosion that is more than mild surface oxidation?

4. Is the anchorage free of visible cracks in the concrete near the anchors?

5. Is the anchorage configuration consistent with plant documentation?

(Note: This question only applies if the item is one of the 50% for which an anchorage configuration verification is required.)

6. Based on the above anchorage evaluations, is the anchorage free of potentially adverse seismic conditions?

YVINE UEJ N/A[]

YMNN[] UI N/A[

YkINEI Uf-N/AFI YVNEI UE" N/AE Enter the equipment class name from Appendix B: Classes of Equipment.

Page 194 of 467

ATTACHMENT 3: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS NO. SNCF164-RPT-02, VERSION 2.0 Sthee of Status: Y, N[-

U[-]

Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)

Equipment ID No. Q2H22L003 Equip. Class, 20 Equipment Description TRANSFER RELAY CABINET 2 Interaction Effects

7. Are soft targets free from impact by nearby equipment or structures?

8. Are overhead equipment, distribution systems, ceiling tiles and lighting, and masonry block walls not likely to collapse onto the equipment?

9. Do attached lines have adequate flexibility to avoid damage?

10. Based on the above seismic interaction evaluations, is equipment free of potentially adverse seismic interaction effects?

YQ'<-] Urn N/AE-YkNT-I Ur-] N/AI]

Y+/--]N3 Urn N/AE

-'NE]

Urn Other Adverse Conditions

11. Have you looked for and found no other seismic conditions that could YII'Ni"- UE3 adversely affect the safety functions of the equipment?

Comments (Additional pages may be added as necessary) j/ Oait Evaluated by:

-ýoe 0 f

Z 4 i9'.-

Date:

28

-Z..1 8-6-W61-Z~

Page 195 of 467

ATTACHMENT 3: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS NO. SNCF164-RPT-02, VERSION 2.0 Page 196 of 467

ATTACHMENT 3: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS NO. SNCF164-RPT-02, VERSION 2.0 Sheet 1 of 5, Status: YE] NEI UR Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)

Equipment ID No. 02H22L503 Equip. Class' 20 Equipment Description DIESEL LOCAL RELAY PANEL 2B Location: Bldg. DIESEL Floor El. 155 Room, Area 0059 Manufacturer, Model, Etc. (optional but recomrunended)

Instructions for Completing Checklist This checklist may be used to document the results of the Seismic Walkdown of an item of equipment on the SWEL. The space below each of the following questions may be used to record the results of judgments and findings. Additional space is provided at the end of this checklist for documenting other comments.

Anchorage I. Is the anchorage configuration verification required (i.e., is the item one Y-1-NB-of the 50% of SWEL items requiring such verification)?

cisc lqeo*-

arvl WN 's ro-t qsibZe-

2. Is the anchorage free of bent, broken. missing or loose hardware?

3. Is the anchorage free of COtTOsion that is more than mild surface oxidation'?

YO NEI UZ N/AF Y[-E NEI UER N/A[-I

4. Is the anchorage free of visible cracks in the concrete near the anchors?

YE NE US N/A-

5. Is the anchorage configuration consistent with plant documentation?

YE NO W.,J"/AEr (Note: This question only applies if the item is one of the 50% for which an anchorage configuration verification is required.)

A-Jv 4I V,-AW 5V 60-L4.1 6.0 fv i +ýaA clo cwa-&.ý

+kL vA

6. Based on the above anchorage evaluations, is the anchorage free of potentially adverse seismic conditions?

YE NEI UZ I Enter the equipment class name from Appendix B: Classes of Equipment.

Page 197 of 467

ATTACHMENT 3: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS NO. SNCF164-RPT-02, VERSION 2.0 Sheet 2 of' 5

Status: Y[] NE-UZ Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)

Equipment ID No. 02H22L503 Equip. Class' 20 Equipniem Description DIESEL LOCAL RELAY PANEL 2B Interaction Effects

7. Are soft targets free from impact by nearby equipment or structures?

8 Are overhead equipment, distribution systems, ceiling tiles and lighting, and masonry block walls not likely it collapse onto the equipment?

9 Do attached lines have adequate flexibility to avoid damage?

10. Based on the above seismic interaction evaluations, is equipment free of potentially adverse seismic interaction effects?

YZ N[

U5 N/ADI Y9 N[-3 UtJ N/Afl YZ NEI U-I N/AD YZ ND UD Other Adverse Conditions II Have you looked for and found no other seismic conditions that could YZ NEI U11]

adversely affect the safety functions of the equipmern9 Comments (Additional pages may be added as necessary) qSY-4 IM SL

7.

( rt-10 ).

Evaluated by: 't

ýL fl>CIciy LzteýT~

kicatt Dale:

TEFA"~ ArLAM u UrtrN; 'c 8q 0 7 V

ý ý/

Page 198 of 467

0 ATTACHMENT 3: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS 0

NO. SNCF164-RPT-02, VERSION 2.0 I

L DCAL PELAY PANEL DIE SEL 28 Page 199 of 467

0 ATTACHMENT 3: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS NO. SNCF164-RPT-02, VERSION 2.0 Page 200 of 467

ATTACHMENT 3: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS NO. SNCF164-RPT-02, VERSION 2.0 log Page 201 of 467

ATTACHMENT 3: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS NO. SNCF164-RPT-02, VERSION 2.0 Status: Y EA Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)

Z Equipment ID No. Q2H25L029 Equip. Class, 20 Equipment Description Termination Cabinet Location: Bldg. AUXILIARY Floor El. 139 Room, Area 2318 Manufacturer, Model, Etc. (optional but recommended)

Instructions for Completing Checklist This checklist may be used to document the results of the Seismic Walkdown of an item of equipment on the SWEL. The space below each of the following questions may be used to record the results of judgments and findings. Additional space is provided at the end of this checklist for documenting other comments.

Anchorage I

1. Is the anchorage configuration verification required (i.e., is the item one YE-] N[Z]

of the 50% of SWEL items requiring such verification)?

2. Is the anchorage free of bent, broken, missing or loose hardware?

Ye%, -t 3

Qsk.

$/1T?

3. Is the anchorage free of conrosion that is more than mild suiface oxidation?

4. Is the anchorage free of visible cracks in the concrete near the anchors?

5. Is the anchorage configuration consistent with plant documentation?

(Note: This question only applies if the item is one of the 50% for which an anchorage configuration verification is required.)

YER NEI +4& N/AD RP'4 Y[]*NE U,*N/AE-Y!k NE N/AE YE NEI LIE N/AE S

/

6. Based on the above anchorage evaluations, is the anchorage free of Y[9 Nr-U7-**

potentially adverse seismic conditions?

pa" Enter the equlipmelnt class niae h'On Appendix B: (lasses of Equipment.

Page 202 of 467

ATTACHMENT 3: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS NO. SNCF164-RPT-02, VERSION 2.0 Status:

NE AlA.

Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)

Equipment I]D No. 02H25L029 Equip. Class, 20 Equipment Description TERMINATION CABINET Interaction Effects

7. Are soft targets free from impact by nearby equipment or structures?

Y[d NEI UL N/AE

8. Are overhead equipment, distribution systems, ceiling tiles and lighting, and masonry block walls not likely to collapse onto the equipment?

Y Nfl UO N/AO Do attached lines have adequate flexibility to avoid damage?

Y[I NrI U-N/AO C kz

-f

-T,,,

(aXktý cisn" lteý Cq R

Q oQcdG-J, C'

fwý(b-ftj

&~~

10. Based on the above seismic interaction evaluations, is equipment free Yý NEI UQ C A

,dVq\\ýUr of potentially adverse seismic interaction effects?

o.sv,.'.'0\\

e.. **,.a o lJet&'

Other Adverse Conditions

11.

Have you looked for and found no other seismic conditions that could Y`2*'"NO U[:i adversely affect the safety functions of the equipment?

Comments (Additional pages may be added as necessary)

Evaluated bv: K

.Date:

t, Page 203 of 467

0 ATTACHMENT 3: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS NO. SNCF164-RPT-02, VERSION 2.0 Page 204 of 467

ATTACHMENT 3: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS NO. SNCF164-RPT-02, VERSION 2.0 1/

Page 205 of 467

ATTACHMENT 3: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS NO. SNCF164-RPT-02, VERSION 2.0 Page 206 of 467

ATTACHMENT 3: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS NO. SNCF164-RPT-02, VERSION 2.0 Page 207 of 467

ATTACHMENT 3: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS NO. SNCF164-RPT-02, VERSION 2.0 7/1 Page 208 of 467

ATTACHMENT 3: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS NO. SNCF164-RPT-02, VERSION 2.0 Page 209 of 467

0 ATTACHMENT 3: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS 0

NO. SNCF164-RPT-02, VERSION 2.0

-2Q Page 210 of 467

ATTACHMENT 3: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS NO. SNCF164-RPT-02, VERSION 2.0 Sheet of V' 4 Status: 4 N-U7 Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)

Equipment DID No. Q2N11HV3369C Equip. Classi 7 Equipment Descrinption MAIN STEAM ISOLATION VALVE Location: Bldg. AUXILIARY Floor El. 127 Room, Area 2,

4 (

Manufacturer, Model, Etc. (optional but recommended)

Instructions for Completing Checklist This checklist may be used to document the results of the Seismic Walkdown of an item of equipment on the SWEL. The space below each of the following questions may be used to record the results of judgments and findings. Additional space is provided at the end of this checklist for documenting other comments.

Anchorage

1. Is the anchorage configuration verification required (i.e., is the item one of the 50% of SWEL items requiring such verification)?

2. Is the anchorage free of bent, broken, missing or loose hardware?

3. Is the anchorage free of corrosion that is more than mild surface oxidation?

4. Is the anchorage free of visible cracks in the concrete near the anchors?

5. Is the anchorage configuration consistent with plant documentation?

(Note: This question only applies if the item is one of the 50% for which an anchorage configuration verification is required.)

6. Based on the above anchorage evaluations, is the anchorage free of potentially adverse seismic conditions?

YEI NZK YEl NEI UE N/Av_'/

YEI NE UE N/AX*-'j YEI NEI U-N/E&/

YEJ NE UE

/

Y13*0'UE

' Enter the equipment class name from Appendix B: Classes of Equipment.

Page 211 of 467

ATTACHMENT 3: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS NO. SNCF164-RPT-02, VERSION 2.0 Fa-s*

Sheet 2 of4 1'0 Status: Yf((N-UL-Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)

Equipment ID No. Q2NIlHV3369C Equip. Class' 7 Equipment Description MAIN STEAM ISOLATION VALVE Interaction Effects

7. Are soft targets free from impact by nearby equipment or structures?

S. Are overhead equipment, distribution systems, ceiling tiles and lighting, and masonry block walls not likely to collapse onto the equipment?

9. Do attached lines have adequate flexibility to avoid damage?

10. Based on the above seismic interaction evaluations, is equipment free of potentially adverse seismic interaction effects?

YNrND UI-N/AD

'/N0D U-D N/AD-

"i/NO U[3 N/AD YVN<D U0

/

Other Adverse Conditions-

11. Have you looked for and found no other seismic conditions that could Y[INDI UDl adversely affect the safety functions of the equipment?

Comments (Additional pages may be added as necessary)

A/o 2-L-Evaluated by:

I/

Date:

K. 3D. 2,0t -'

t 4 11

/ark Page 212 of 467

0 ATTACHMENT 3: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS NO. SNCF164-RPT-02, VERSION 2.0 Page 213 of 467

0 ATTACHMENT 3: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS NO. SNCF164-RPT-02, VERSION 2.0 I

N Page 214 of 467

ATTACHMENT 3: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS NO. SNCF164-RPT-02, VERSION 2.0 Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)

Sheet i of' fJi'al Status: V"'NE-UE-Equipment ID No. Q2N11HV3370B Equip. Class, 7 Equipment Description MAIN STEAM LINE ISOLATION VALVE Location: Bldg. AUXILIARY Floor El. 127 Room, Area 2 2.4 Manufacturer, Model, Etc. (optional but recommended)

Instructions for Completing Checklist This checklist may be used to document the results of the Seismic Walkdown of an item of equipment on the SWEL. The space below each ofthe following questions may be used to record the results ofjudgments and findings. Additional space is provided at the end of this checklist for documenting other comments.

Anchorage I. Is the anchorage configuration verification required (i.e., is the item one of the 50% of SWEL items requiring such verification)?

2. Is the anchorage free of bent, broken, missing or loose hardware?

3. Is the anchorage free of corrosion that is more than mild surface oxidation?

YOE YE NEI UE N/Ali5---

YE NO U-N/A__

4. Is the anchorage free of visible cracks in the concrete near the anchors?

YE NE U[E) N/A[4--j

5. Is the anchorage configuration consistent with plant documentation?

(Note: This question only applies if the item is one of the 50% for which an anchorage configuration verification is required.)

6. Based on the above anchorage evaluations, is the anchorage free of potentially adverse seismic conditions?

YED NE UE N/A[*-'

YbNOUO I Enter the equipment class name from Appendix B: Classes of Equipment.

Page 215 of 467

ATTACHMENT 3: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS NO. SNCF164-RPT-02, VERSION 2.0 Sheet 2 Of Status: Y9 NEI U-Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)

Equipment ID No. Q2NlIlHV3370B Equip. Class, 7 Equipment Description MAIN STEAM LINE ISOLATION VALVE Interaction Effects

7. Are soft targets free from impact by nearby equipment or structures?

8. Are overhead equipment, distribution systems, ceiling tiles and lighting, and masonry block walls not likely to collapse onto the equipment?

9. Do attached lines have adequate flexibility to avoid damage?

10. Based on the above seismic interaction evaluations, is equipment free of potentially adverse seismic interaction effects?

YgrC U[- N/AD' YjNEI UD N/AD i"NE) UF] N/AD

,IJNIUE1 Other Adverse Conditions I1. Have you looked for and found no other seismic conditions that could V

U-"

adversely affect the safety functions of the equipment?

Comments (Additional pages may be added as necessary)

/V0 )^Jj Evaluated by:

Date:

('.Usk I

live6 k

e Page 216 of 467

[

ATTACHMENT 3: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS NO. SNCF164-RPT-02, VERSION 2.0 Page 217 of 467

ATTACHMENT 3: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS NO. SNCF164-RPT-02, VERSION 2.0 Page 218 of 467

ATTACHMENT 3: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS NO. SNCF164-RPT-02, VERSION 2.0 0

Page 219 of 467

ATTACHMENT 3: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS NO. SNCF164-RPT-02, VERSION 2.0 r2 -5`

Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)

Sheet 1 f.Y Status: Y[ýrND UE]

Equipment ID No. Q2NI1PT0484 Equip. Class' 18 Equipment Description SG 2B DISCHARGE PRESSURE Location: Bldg. AUXILIARY Floor El.

Room, Area Manufacturer, Model, Etc. (optional but recommended) 2-4 (o Z-Instructions for Completing Checklist This checklist may be used to document the results of the Seismic Walkdown of an item of equipment on the SWEL. The space below each of the following questions may be used to record the results of judgments and findings. Additional space is provided at the end of this checklist for documenting other comments.

Anchoragye I. Is the anchorage configuration verification required (i.e., is the item one of the 50% of SWEL items requiring such verification)?

2. Is the anchorage free of bent, broken, missing or loose hardware?

3. Is the anchorage free of corrosion that is more than mild surface oxidation?

YEC NG](

Y&j NEI UC N/AC Y[*/NC U-- N/AD

4. Is the anchorage free of visible cracks in the concrete near the anchors?

YVNI' UC-N/AC

5. Is the anchorage configuration consistent with plant documentation?

(Note: This question only applies if the item is one of the 50% for which an anchorage configuration verification is required.)

6. Based on the above anchorage evaluations, is the anchorage free of potentially adverse seismic conditions?

YO NCI UC-N/A6 Y¥(Nr UC

' Enter the equipment class name from Appendix B: Classes of Equipment.

Page 220 of 467

ATTACHMENT 3: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS NO. SNCF164-RPT-02, VERSION 2.0 Sheet ' 20 Status: YE(Nr-- urE Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)

Equipment ID No. Q2N11PT0484 Equip. Class, 18 Equipment Description SG 2B DISCHARGE PRESSURE Interaction Effects

7. Are soft targets free from impact by nearby equipment or structures?

8. Are overhead equipment, distribution systems, ceiling tiles and lighting, and masonry block walls not likely to collapse onto the equipment?

9. Do attached lines have adequate flexibility to avoid damage?

y[

NO UD N/AD-Y9f NEI UO N/AD YIj"Nr U[: N/AD

10. Based on the above seismic interaction evaluations, is equipment free of potentially adverse seismic interaction effects?

Other Adverse Conditions

11. Have you looked for and found no other seismic conditions that could Y0 N\\" U13 adversely affect the safety functions of the equipment?

Comments (Additional pages may be added as necessary)

Evaluated by

-Eý Q-Date:

131 b I ý 7-Page 221 of 467

ATTACHMENT 3: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS NO. SNCF164-RPT-02, VERSION 2.0 Page 222 of 467 I

ATTACHMENT 3: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS NO. SNCF164-RPT-02, VERSION 2.0 Page 223 of 467

ATTACHMENT 3: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS NO. SNCF164-RPT-02, VERSION 2.0 Sheet 1 of,.-/ IT, Status: Ye*"

]," UFi]

Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC) tj Equipment ID No. Q2NIIPV3371

_t4 Equip. Class g

Equipment Dcscription MAIN STEAM ATMOSPHERIC RELIEF VALVE Location: Bldg. AUXILIARY Floor El. 127 Room, Area

__--4/

Manufacturer, Model, Etc. (optional but recommended)

Instructions for Completing Checklist This checklist may be used to document the results of the Seismic Walkdown of an item of equipment on the SWEL. The space below each of the following questions may be used to record the results ofjudgments and findings. Additional space is provided at the end of this checklist for documenting other comments.

Anchorage

1. Is the anchorage configuration verification required (i.e., is the item one of the 50% of SWEL items requiring such verification)?

2. Is the anchorage free of bent, broken, missing or loose hardware?

3. Is the anchorage free of corrosion that is more than mild surface oxidation?

YE7 NP-,t YLI NE UED N/*IA---

YEI NEI UE-N/A--'

4. Is the anchorage free of visible cracks in the concrete near the anchors?

YE" NEI U[] N/AE""

5. Is the anchorage configuration consistent with plant documentation?

(Note: This question only applies if the item is one of the 50% for which an anchorage configuration verification is required.)

6. Based on the above anchorage evaluations, is the anchorage free of potentially adverse seismic conditions?

YEI NEI UEI N/A6--

Y6NNE UE-I Enter the equipment class name from Appendix B: Classes of Equipment.

Page 224 of 467

ATTACHMENT 3: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS NO. SNCF164-RPT-02, VERSION 2.0 Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC))

Equipment ID No. Q2N11PV3371C3'A Equip. Class' 7 Sheet 2 of 3-'

Status: YEJ NEI UW' Equipment Description MAIN STEAM ATMOSPHERIC RELIEF VALVE Interaction Effects

7. Are soft targets free from impact by nearby equipment or structures?

8. Are overhead equipment, distribution systems, ceiling tiles and lighting, and masonry block walls not likely to collapse onto the equipment?

9. Do attached lines have adequate flexibility to avoid damage?

10. Based on the above seismic interaction evaluations, is equipment free of potentially adverse seismic interaction effects?

Y~'OUE N/AE

'NO UO N/AE YlýNO UQ N/AE Y~rNO~ UD Other Adverse Conditions

11. Have you looked for and found no other seismic conditions that could

)

'N" UI-adversely affect the safety functions of the equipment?

Comments (Additional pages may be added as necessary)

Evaluated by:

74C r rIt Date:

9 20, Cm hs14 La hq'

ý?1-2 J

Page 225 of 467

0 ATTACHMENT 3: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS NO. SNCF164-RPT-02, VERSION 2.0 Page 226 of 467

0 ATTACHMENT 3: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS NO. SNCF164-RPT-02, VERSION 2.0 U

p Page 227 of 467

ATTACHMENT 3: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS NO. SNCF164-RPT-02, VERSION 2.0 Sht i Of 3 Status: VINE] U["]

Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)

Equipmcnt ID No. Q2N11SV3369CC Equip.

Equipment Description SOLENOID FOR MAIN STEAM ISOLATION VALVE Location: Bldg. AUXILIARY Floor El. 127 Room, Area 2.;z 4/

Manufacturer, Model, Etc. (optional but recommended)

Instructions for Completing Checklist This checklist may be used to document the results of the Seismic Walkdown of an item of equipment on the SWEL. The space below each of the following questions may be used to record the results ofjudgments and findings. Additional space is provided at the end of this checklist for documenting other comments.

Anchorage I. Is the anchorage configuration verification required (i.e., is the item one YIE-] N[A]'-

of the 50% of SWEL items requiring such verification)?

YEI NEI UE3N/eJ

2. Is the anchorage free of bent, broken, missing or loose hardware?

3. Is the anchorage free of corrosion that is more than mild surface oxidation?

4. Is the anchorage free of visible cracks in the concrete near the anchors?

5. Is the anchorage configuration consistent with plant documentation?

(Note: This question only applies if the item is one of the 50% for which an anchorage configuration verification is required.)

6. Based on the above anchorage evaluations, is the anchorage free of potentially adverse seismic conditions?

YE] NEI UC N/Agý-'

YEI NE UE N/A[]

YE N[E Urn NUC f"-

IýUE1 I Enter the equipment class name from Appendix B: Classes of Equipment.

Page 228 of 467

ATTACHMENT 3: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS NO. SNCF164-RPT-02, VERSION 2.0 Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)

Shee4 of 3 Status: Yo N[] U["

Equipment ID No.

02N11SV3369CC Equip. Class' 8 Equipment Description SOLENOID FOR MAIN STEAM ISOLATION VALVE Interaction Effects

7. Are soft targets free from impact by nearby equipment or structures?

8. Are overhead equipment, distribution systems, ceiling tiles and lighting, and masonry block walls not likely to collapse onto the equipment?

9. Do attached lines have adequate flexibility to avoid damage?

10. Based on the above seismic interaction evaluations, is equipment free of potentially adverse seismic interaction effects?

aoN3UC3 N/ACD Yb'N U[0 MIAO Yp 4 rn UE] NIAE--

Yk(/NC3 U[3 Other Adverse Conditions I1. Have you looked for and found no other seismic conditions that could Y

j No" Urn adversely affect the safety functions of the equipment?

Comments (Additional pages may be added as necessary)

Evaluated by: $ -5,-1 AA-*

6 Date:

G. 30. Z a /Z is/ 2cw,'

C Page 229 of 467

0 ATTACHMENT 3: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS NO. SNCF164-RPT-02, VERSION 2.0 Page 230 of 467

ATTACHMENT 3: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS NO. SNCF164-RPT-02, VERSION 2.0 Sheet I of 3 Status: Y0Nr-] UE-Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)

Equipment 1D No. Q2N23FI3229CB Equip. Class' 18 Equipment Description FEEDWA TER INTAKE FLOW INDICATION Location: Bldg. AUXILIARY Floor El. 100 Room, Area

ý21.0 Manufacturer, Model, Etc. (optional but recommended)

Instructions for Completing Checklist This checklist may be used to document the results of the Seismic Walkdown of an item of equipment on the SWEL. The space below each ofthe following questions may be used to record the results ofjudgments and findings. Additional space is provided at the end of this checklist for documenting other comments.

Anchoraee

1. Is the anchorage configuration verification required (i.e., is the item one YO Ni!

of the 50% of SWEL items requiring such verification)?

YM N U0 N/AC

2. Is the anchorage free of bent, broken, missing or loose hardware?

3. Is the anchorage free of corrosion that is more than mild surface UCI N/AC oxidation?

4. Is the anchorage free of visible cracks in the concrete near the anchors?

Yg/NC UCI N/AC

5. Is the anchorage configuration consistent with plant documentation?

(Note: This question only applies if the item is one of the 50% for which an anchorage configuration verification is required.)

6. Based on the above anchorage evaluations, is the anchorage free of potentially adverse seismic conditions?

YCI NC-UC3 N/AlP

Y*IN'- UCI Enter the equipment class name from Appendix B: Classes of Equipment.

Page 231 of 467

ATTACHMENT 3: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS NO. SNCF164-RPT-02, VERSION 2.0 Shee of3 Status:

N10 U-Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)

Equipment ID No.

Q2N23FI3229CB Equip. Class, 18 Equipment Description FEED WA TER INTAKE FLOW INDICATION Interaction Effects

7. Are soft targets free from impact by nearby equipment or structures?

8. Are overhead equipment, distribution systems, ceiling tiles and lighting, and masonry block walls not likely to collapse onto the equipment?

9. Do attached lines have adequate flexibility to avoid damage?

Y/NE U[3 N/AE Y

N0 Ur-C N/A[

Yg N

U[-] N/AlC

10. Based on the above seismic interaction evaluations, is equipment free Y52'<E] UE]

of potentially adverse seismic interaction effects?

Other Adverse Conditions

11. Have you looked for and found no other seismic conditions that could 4

/Nr--I Un adversely affect the safety functions of the equipment?

Comments (Additional pages may be added as necessary)

Evaluated by: S -_

Date:

..2/. Zolz..

Page 232 of 467

ATTACHMENT 3: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS NO. SNCF164-RPT-02, VERSION 2.0 Page 233 of 467

ATTACHMENT 3: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS NO. SNCF164-RPT-02, VERSION 2.0 Shea t Of 3 Status: Z*"(( U0:

Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)

Equipment ID No. Q2N23FT3229B Equip. Class, 18 Equipment Description AUX FEEDWA TER FLOW TRANSMITTER Location: Bldg. AUXILIARY Floor El. 100 Room, Area 2-F A 4 Manufacturer, Model, Etc. (optional but recommended)