Text

Enclosure 1, Including Attachments 1 to 8: Licensing Summary of Walkdown Report. Part 3 of 7
	ML13252A154
Person / Time
Site:	Farley
Issue date:	09/04/2013
From:	; Southern Nuclear Operating Co
To:	; Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation
Shared Package
ML13252A148	List: ML13252A150; ML13252A151; ML13252A153; ML13252A154; ML13252A155; ML13252A156; ML13252A157; ML13252A159; NL-13-1555, Enclosure 1, Including Attachments 1 to 8: Licensing Summary of Walkdown Report. Part 1 of 7; NL-13-1555, Enclosure 2: Updated Farley Unit 2 Seismic Walkdown Report for Resolution of Fukushima Near-Term Task Force Recommendation 2.3: Seismic; NL-13-1555, Joseph M. Farley Unit 2, Updated Seismic Recommendation 2.3 Walkdown Report Requested by NRC Letter, Request for Information Re Recommendations 2.1, 2.3 & 9.3 of the Near-Term Task Force Review of Insights from Fukushima Dai Ichi Accident;
References
	NL-13-1555
	Download: ML13252A154 (104)
	v • d • e

ATTACHMENT 3: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS NO. SNCF164-RPT-02, VERSION 2.0 Sheet i of/-

Status: Y[ NI==] U]

Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)

Equipment ID No. 02H21EO05 Equip. Class' 20 Equipment Description 4.16KV SWITCHGEAR 2G LOCAL CONT PANEL Location: Bldg. AUXILIARY Floor El. 121 Room. Area 2233 Manufacturer, Model. Etc. (optional but recommended)

Instructions for Completing Checklist This checklist may be used to document the results of the Seismic Walkdown of an item of equipment on the SWEL. The space below each of the following questions may be used to record the results ofjudgments and findings. Additional space is provided at the end of this checklist for documenting other comments.

Anchorage

1. Is the anchorage configuration verification required (i.e., is the item one of the 50% of SWEL items requiring such verification)? IA4 UAe Anchorage is inside panel and cannot be verified fr-)b I 0CtL E,JA-ocS c

2. Is the anchorage free of bent, broken, missing or loose hardware? YEI NEI US N/AEI

3. Is the anchorage free of corrosion that is more than mild surface YEI NEI US N/AE" oxidation?

4. Is the anchorage free of visible cracks in the concrete near the anchors? YE) NEr US N/A["

5. Is the anchorage configuration consistent with plant documentation'? YEI NEI UAYN/AW (Note: This question only applies if the item is one of the 50% for which an anchorage configuration verification is required.)

6. Based on the above anchorage evaluations, is the anchorage free of YEI NCi UO potentially adverse seismic conditions?

I Enter the equipmentclass name from Appendix B: Classes of Equipment.

Page 171 of 467

ATTACHMENT 3: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS NO. SNCF164-RPT-02, VERSION 2.0 Sheet 2 Of 3C Status: YID NEI UN Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)

Equipment ID No. 02H21E-05 Equip. Class, 20 Equipment Description 4.16KV SWITCHGEAR 2G LOCAL CONT PANEL Interaction Effects

7. Are soft targets free from impact by nearby equipment or structures? YE NO UE N/AE Test cable N2R 15G0001D is wrapped aroundexisting Siemens junction box as documented in Deficiency Report 565268 (See Pic) on 4-7-05.

Conclusion:

Cable and attachedpiece of equipment could impactpanel in seismic event. rdt _2..-504961

8. Are overhead equipment, distribution systems, ceiling tiles and lighting. YZ NEI Ur N/A1 and masonry block walls not likely to collapse onto the equipment?

9. Do attached lines have adequate flexibility to avoid damage? YO NE UE N/AE

10. Based on the above seismic interaction evaluations, is equipment free YO NO U" of potentially adverse seismic interaction effects?

Other Adverse Conditions

11. Have you looked for and found no other seismic conditions that could YO NEI UEl adversely affect the safety functions of the equipment?

Comments (Additional pages may be added as necessary)

CR 504967 was createdto document the housekeepingi test cable issue described in #7 above.

Evaluated by: W Lat-At

- LULwr-a M--acWI" I)ate: 2'- '2`4-U

-rq1y A-L-&ýJ MatmF?ýdL4fQ20:))

IN \J0-J.--1 L7 Page 172 of 467

ATTACHMENT 3: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS NO. SNCF164-RPT-02, VERSION 2.0 m

Page 173 of 467

ATTACHMENT 3: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS 0 NO. SNCF164-RPT-02, VERSION 2.0 Page 174 of 467

ATTACHMENT 3: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS NO. SNCF164-RPT-02, VERSION 2.0 Page 175 of 467

ATTACHMENT 3: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS NO. SNCF164-RPT-02, VERSION 2.0 Page 176 of 467

ATTACHMENT 3: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS NO. SNCF164-RPT-02, VERSION 2.0 Sheet 1ofi w Status: 2N0 UR Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)

Equipment ID No. Q2H21E505 Equip., Class' 20 Equipment Description 4.16KV SWITCHGEAR 2J LOCAL CONT PANEL Location: Bldg. DIESEL Floor El. 155 Room, Area 5C..,

Manufacturer, Model, Etc. (optional but recommended)

Instructions for Completing Checklist This checklist may be used to document the results of the Seismic Walkdown of an item of equipment on the SWEL. The space below each of the following questions may be used to record the results of judgments and findings. Additional space is provided at the end of this checklist for documenting other comments.

Anchorage

1. Is the anchorage configuration verification required (i.e., is the item one YX NEI of the 50% of SWEL items requiring such verification)?

2. Is the anchorage free of bent, broken, missing or loose hardware? YE NE UX. N/A-

3. Is the anchorage free of corrosion that is more than mild surface YE NE UL N/A-oxidation?

4. Is the anchorage free of visible cracks in the concrete near the anchors? YE NEI N/AO

5. Is the anchorage configuration consistent with plant documentation? YE NE J*N/A-(Note: This question only applies if the item is one of the 50% for which an anchorage configuration verification is required.)

6. Based on the above anchorage evaluations, is the anchorage free of YO NE UO potentially adverse seismic conditions?

' Enter the equipment class name from Appendix 13:Classes of Equipment. '

Page 177 of 467

ATTACHMENT 3: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS NO. SNCF164-RPT-02, VERSION 2.0 Sheet 2 of OAP Status: 4 NEI U[

Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC) LIA C~j/4 Equipment ID No. Q2H21E505 Equip. Class, 20 Equipment Description 4.16KV SWITCHGEAR 2J LOCAL CONT PANEL Interaction Effects

7. Are soft targets free from impact by nearby equipment or structures? YER NO UEI N/AD

'v**'**i* '& L k;-* \ Q;S e l*,k U-, k-to 0 .**,,(24": rc- CA .\t4 -. 5C - 3**-

3 f ' -*

u*AV,4**o F¢'4t r .

8. Are overhead equipment, distribution systems, ceiling tiles and lighting, Y NE] Ur] N/AMAD and masonry block walls not likely to collapse onto the equipment? /

9. Do attached lines have adequate flexibility to avoid damage? yrlit NEI UED N/AEO

10. Based on the above seismic interaction evaluations, is equipment free Y% NC ijo of potentially adverse seismic interaction effects?

Other Adverse Conditions

11. Have you looked for and found no other seismic conditions that could Y'NEI UF adversely affect the safety functions of the equipment?

Comments (Additional pages may be added as necessary)

A-iaW l-b iS in -GvD(Ct-,v r-Z -gM: , cu pw - "f Q* 2 © -.

Evaluatedk t Date: IT /ZO-l2*

G/I' /1Z I aj r Page 178 of 467

ATTACHMENT 3: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS NO. SNCF164-RPT-02, VERSION 2.0 Page 179 of 467

ATTACHMENT 3: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS NO. SNCF164-RPT-02, VERSION 2.0 Page 180 of 467

ATTACHMENT 3: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS NO. SNCF164-RPT-02, VERSION 2.0 Page 181 of 467

ATTACHMENT 3: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS NO. SNCF164-RPT-02, VERSION 2.0 J2 fz-4, Sheet a of A5 Status: YE] NE] U0 Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)

Equipment ID No. Q2H21E507 Equip. Class, 20 Equipment Description 4.16KV SWITCHGEAR 2L LOCAL CONT PANEL Location: Bldg. SWIS Floor El. 188 Room, Area "'Z*

Manufacturer, Model, Etc. (optional but recommended)

Instructions for Completing Checklist This checklist may be used to document the results of the Seismic Walkdown of an item of equipment on the SWEL. The space below each of the following questions may be used to record the results of judgments and findings. Additional space is provided at the end of this checklist for documenting other comments.

Anchorage

1. Is the anchorage configuration verification required (i.e., is the item one Y" NOi of the 50% of SWEL items requiring such verification)?

2. Is the anchorage free of bent, broken, missing or loose hardware? YO NFE Up N/AD

3. Is the anchorage free of corrosion that is more than mild surface YO NE UO N/AO oxidation?

4. Is the anchorage free of visible cracks in the concrete near the anchors? YO NO UM N/AD

5. Is the anchorage configuration consistent with plant documentation? YO- NO U[9 N/AD (Note: This question only applies if the item is one of the 50% for which an anchorage configuration verification is required.)

6. Based on the above anchorage evaluations, is the anchorage free of YO NO U1 potentially adverse seismic conditions?

IEnter the equipment class name from Appendix B: Classes of Equipment.

Page 182 of 467

ATTACHMENT 3: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS NO. SNCF164-RPT-02, VERSION 2.0 Sheet 2 of,3"*

Status: YE] NI] U[9 Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)

Equipment ID No. Q2H21E507 Equip. Class' 20 Equipment Description 4.16KV SWITCHGEAR 2L LOCAL CONT PANEL Interaction Effects

7. Are soft targets free from impact by nearby equipment or structures? YJA NEI Ul N/AQ S. Are overhead equipment, distribution systems, ceiling tiles and lighting, YU N- U- N/Ar and masonry block walls not likely to collapse onto the equipment?

9. Do attached lines have adequate flexibility to avoid damage? YX] NO UO N/Ar-E

10. Based on the above seismic interaction evaluations, is equipment free Y9 NO UOi of potentially adverse seismic interaction effects?

Other Adverse Conditions II. Have you looked for and found no other seismic conditions that could Ylo NEIUI adversely affect the safety functions of the equipment?

Comments (Additional pages may be added as necessary)

II AoxevxeaA ti~ht \,r)4e-rvo(-ric~ djcC&0T coý-bipet-S ct-

'IV ~t'Se~b"-he

Ityr'tX1cjY VYIMAnrthSO bO RS COý\Aý1rnOT be COU{trrk mg be-b~e jo~ir Evaluated by: - -uOLL r M .aaq- Date: 3// 1 -2 ,

<.. K Page 183 of 467

ATTACHMENT 3: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS NO. SNCF164-RPT-02, VERSION 2.0 Page 184 of 467

ATTACHMENT 3: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS NO. SNCF164-RPT-02, VERSION 2.0 RNlf lUt Page 185 of 467

ATTACHMENT 3: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS 0 NO. SNCF164-RPT-02, VERSION 2,0 Page 186 of 467

ATTACHMENT 3: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS NO. SNCF164-RPT-02, VERSION 2.0 I F2-5o Sheet 1 of'XAtt)

Status: *"N- Ui--

Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)

Equipment ID No. Q2H21NBMER2619 Equip. Class, 20 Equipment Description SG IC WIDE RANGE LEVEL MCB ISOLATOR Location: Bldg. AUXILIARY Floor El. 121 Room, Area 2227 Manufacturer, Model. Etc. (optional but recommended)

Instructions for Completing Checklist This checklist may be used to document the results of the Seismic Walkdown of an item of equipment on the SWEL. The space below each of the following questions may be used to record the results of judgments and findings. Additional space is provided at the end of this checklist for documenting other comments.

Anchorage I. Is the anchorage configuration verification required (i.e.. is the item one of the 50% of SWEL items requiring such verification)?

2. Is the anchorage free of bent. broken, missing or loose hardware? YI/N- UDI N/A[]

3. Is the anchorage free of cortosion that is more than mild surface Y-NE] UEI N/All oxidation?

4. Is the anchorage free of visible cracks in the concrete near the anchors? Y[eO U[U N/A"

5. Is the anchorage configuration consistent with plant documentation? iN/A (Note: This question only applies if the item is one of the 50% for which an anchorage configuration verification is required.)

$,s the avahg e7uan t -ia 3 ce of Y 4j t JU"

6. Based on the above anchorage evaluations, is the anchorage free of Y;NOUE potentially adverse seismic conditions?

IEnter the equipment class name from Appendix B: Classes of'Equipment.

Page 187 of 467

ATTACHMENT 3: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS NO. SNCF164-RPT-02, VERSION 2.0 Sheet 2 of') /'1, Status: Y**(--] Ur-1 Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)

Equipment ID No. 02H21NBMER2619 Equip. Class' 20 Equipment Description SG 1C WIDE RANGE LEVEL MCB ISOLATOR Interaction Effects

7. Are soft targets free from impact by nearby equipment or structures? YRq]UE N/AE1

8. Are overhead equipment, distribution systems, ceiling tiles and lighting, Y~--3Ufl N/AE]

and nasonry block walls not likely to collapse onto the equipment?

9. Do attached lines have adequate flexibility to avoid damage? YV-*'E1 UE3 N/AEI

10. Based on the above seismic interaction evaluations, is equipment free Yt'OU0 of potentially adverse seismic interaction effects?

Oilier Adverse Conditions

11. Have you looked for and found no other seismic conditions that could ' NO U0' adversely affect the safety functions of the equipment?

Comments (Additional pages may be added as necessary)

F ~t. ,nwd h~'

Evaluatedbv:

- ~ J ~ 12 ~ Date: 1 - 2 zl--

/- ",

Page 188 of 467

0 0 0 NO. SNCF164-RPT-02, VERSION 2.0 ATTACHMENT 3: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS Q2H2~1NBER&1I 1-n Page 189 of 467

ATTACHMENT 3: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS NO. SNCF164-RPT-02, VERSION 2.0 Page 190 of 467

ATTACHMENT 3: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS NO. SNCF164-RPT-02, VERSION 2.0 Page 191 of 467

ATTACHMENT 3: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS NO. SNCF164-RPT-02, VERSION 2.0 S NO:

Status: YQ]/I UF:

Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)

Equipment ID No. Q2H22LOO1D Equip. Class, 20 Equipment Description MULTIPLYING RELAY CABINET 2D Location: Bldg. AUXILIARY Floor El. 139 Room, Area . ,3L .

Manufacturer, Model, Etc. (optional but recommended)

Instructions for Completing Checklist This checklist may be used to document the results of the Seismic Walkdown of an item of equipment on the SWEL. The space below each of the following questions may be used to record the results ofjudgments and findings. Additional space is provided at the end of this checklist for documenting other comments.

Anchorage

1. Is the anchorage configuration verification required (i.e., is the item one YXIND of the 50% of SWEL items requiring such verification)?

Ge jý*ý

2. Is the anchorage free of bent, broken, missing or loose hardware? y2ý NO U[ N/A-

3. Is the anchorage free of corrosion that is more than mild surface Y9 ND U-I N/AD oxidation?

4. Is the anchorage free of visible cracks in the concrete near the anchors? Yd( ND UD N/AD

5. Is the anchorage configuration consistent with plant documentation? Y[Z ND UD N/AD3 (Note: This question only applies if the item is one of the 50% for which an anchorage configuration verification is required.)

6. Based on the above anchorage evaluations, is the anchorage free of Yý ND UD potentially adverse seismic conditions?

Enter the equipment class name from Appendix B: Classes of Equipment.

Page 192 of 467

ATTACHMENT 3: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS NO. SNCF164-RPT-02, VERSION 2.0 Status: Y N'- ur" Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)

Equipment ID No. Q2H22LOOID Equip. Class, 20 Equipment Description MUL TIPL YING RELAY CABINET 2D Interaction Effects

7. Are soft targets free from impact by nearby equipment or structures? Y* NO UIE N/A"

8. Are overhead equipment, distribution systems, ceiling tiles and lighting, Y&6 NO UIE N/AE and masonry block walls not likely to collapse onto the equipment?

9. Do attached lines have adequate flexibility to avoid damage? YE/ NEI U- N/AE

10. Based on the above seismic interaction evaluations, is equipment free YEý NEI UE of potentially adverse seismic interaction effects?

Other Adverse Conditions II. Have you looked for and found no other seismic conditions that could Y[*N- UE adversely affect the safety functions of the equipment?

Comments (Additional pages may be added as necessary) 1 0 Evaluated by: Date: Zq r ~ i-k a Page 193 of 467

ATTACHMENT 3: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS NO. SNCF164-RPT-02, VERSION 2.0 Sheet of 3 Status: Y7 N[-] U[-

Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)

Equipment ID No. Q2H22L003 Equip. ClassI 20 Equipment Description TRANSFER RELAY CABINET 2 Location: Bldg. AUXILIARY Floor El. 100 Room, Area ,.2- 1.O Manufacturer, Model, Etc. (optional but recommended)

Instructions for Completing Checklist This checklist may be used to document the results of the Seismic Walkdown of an item of equipment on the SWEL. The space below each of the following questions may be used to record the results of judgments and findings. Additional space is provided at the end of this checklist for documenting other comments.

Anchorase

1. Is the anchorage configuration verification required (i.e., is the item one Y of the 50% of SWEL items requiring such verification)?

XA--i 7-1-?3

2. Is the anchorage free of bent, broken, missing or loose hardware? YVINE UEJ N/A[]

3. Is the anchorage free of corrosion that is more than mild surface YMNN[] UI N/A[

oxidation?

4. Is the anchorage free of visible cracks in the concrete near the anchors? YkINEI Uf- N/AFI

5. Is the anchorage configuration consistent with plant documentation? YVNEI UE" N/AE (Note: This question only applies if the item is one of the 50% for which an anchorage configuration verification is required.)

6. Based on the above anchorage evaluations, is the anchorage free of potentially adverse seismic conditions?

Enter the equipment class name from Appendix B: Classes of Equipment.

Page 194 of 467

ATTACHMENT 3: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS NO. SNCF164-RPT-02, VERSION 2.0 Sthee of Status: Y, N[- U[-]

Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)

Equipment ID No. Q2H22L003 Equip. Class, 20 Equipment Description TRANSFER RELAY CABINET 2 Interaction Effects

7. Are soft targets free from impact by nearby equipment or structures? YQ'<-] Urn N/AE-

8. Are overhead equipment, distribution systems, ceiling tiles and lighting, YkNT-I Ur-] N/AI]

and masonry block walls not likely to collapse onto the equipment?

9. Do attached lines have adequate flexibility to avoid damage? Y+/--]N3 Urn N/AE

10. Based on the above seismic interaction evaluations, is equipment free -'NE] Urn of potentially adverse seismic interaction effects?

Other Adverse Conditions

11. Have you looked for and found no other seismic conditions that could YII'Ni"- UE3 adversely affect the safety functions of the equipment?

Comments (Additional pages may be added as necessary) j/ Oait 4

Evaluated by: -ýoe0 f i9'.- , Z Date: 28 -Z..1 8-6-W61-Z~

Page 195 of 467

ATTACHMENT 3: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS NO. SNCF164-RPT-02, VERSION 2.0 Page 196 of 467

ATTACHMENT 3: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS NO. SNCF164-RPT-02, VERSION 2.0 Sheet 1 of 5, Status: YE] NEI UR Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)

Equipment ID No. 02H22L503 Equip. Class' 20 Equipment Description DIESEL LOCAL RELAY PANEL 2B Location: Bldg. DIESEL Floor El. 155 Room, Area 0059 Manufacturer, Model, Etc. (optional but recomrunended)

Instructions for Completing Checklist This checklist may be used to document the results of the Seismic Walkdown of an item of equipment on the SWEL. The space below each of the following questions may be used to record the results of judgments and findings. Additional space is provided at the end of this checklist for documenting other comments.

Anchorage I. Is the anchorage configuration verification required (i.e., is the item one Y-1-NB-of the 50% of SWEL items requiring such verification)?

cisc lqeo*- arvl WN 's ro-t qsibZe-

2. Is the anchorage free of bent, broken. missing or loose hardware? YO NEI UZ N/AF

3. Is the anchorage free of COtTOsion that is more than mild surface Y[-E NEI UER N/A[-I oxidation'?

4. Is the anchorage free of visible cracks in the concrete near the anchors? YE NE US N/A-

5. Is the anchorage configuration consistent with plant documentation? YE NO W.,J"/AEr (Note: This question only applies if the item is one of the 50% for which an anchorage configuration verification is required.)

A-Jv 4IV,-AW 5V 60-L4.1 6.0 fv i+ýaA clo cwa-&.ý +kL "*. vA

6. Based on the above anchorage evaluations, is the anchorage free of YE NEI UZ potentially adverse seismic conditions?

IEnter the equipment class name from Appendix B: Classes of Equipment.

Page 197 of 467

ATTACHMENT 3: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS NO. SNCF164-RPT-02, VERSION 2.0 5

Sheet 2 of' Status: Y[] NE- UZ Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)

Equipment ID No. 02H22L503 Equip. Class' 20 Equipniem Description DIESEL LOCAL RELAY PANEL 2B Interaction Effects

7. Are soft targets free from impact by nearby equipment or structures? YZ N[ U5 N/ADI 8 Are overhead equipment, distribution systems, ceiling tiles and lighting, Y9 N[-3 UtJ N/Afl and masonry block walls not likely it collapse onto the equipment?

9 Do attached lines have adequate flexibility to avoid damage? YZ NEI U-I N/AD

10. Based on the above seismic interaction evaluations, is equipment free YZ ND UD of potentially adverse seismic interaction effects?

Other Adverse Conditions II Have you looked for and found no other seismic conditions that could YZ NEI U11]

adversely affect the safety functions of the equipmern9 Comments (Additional pages may be added as necessary) qSY-4 IM SL 7. ( rt-10 ).

Evaluated by: 't ýL fl>CIciy LzteýT~ kicatt Dale:

TEFA"~ ArLAM u UrtrN; 'c 8q 0 7V ý ý/

Page 198 of 467

0 ATTACHMENT 3: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS 0 NO. SNCF164-RPT-02, VERSION 2.0 I

LDCAL PELAY PANEL DIE SEL 28 Page 199 of 467

ATTACHMENT 3: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS 0

NO. SNCF164-RPT-02, VERSION 2.0 Page 200 of 467

ATTACHMENT 3: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS NO. SNCF164-RPT-02, VERSION 2.0 log Page 201 of 467

ATTACHMENT 3: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS NO. SNCF164-RPT-02, VERSION 2.0 Status: Y EA Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC) Z Equipment ID No. Q2H25L029 Equip. Class, 20 Equipment Description Termination Cabinet Location: Bldg. AUXILIARY Floor El. 139 Room, Area 2318 Manufacturer, Model, Etc. (optional but recommended)

Instructions for Completing Checklist This checklist may be used to document the results of the Seismic Walkdown of an item of equipment on the SWEL. The space below each of the following questions may be used to record the results of judgments and findings. Additional space is provided at the end of this checklist for documenting other comments.

Anchorage I

1. Is the anchorage configuration verification required (i.e., is the item one YE-] N[Z]

of the 50% of SWEL items requiring such verification)?

2. Is the anchorage free of bent, broken, missing or loose hardware? YER NEI +4& N/AD RP'4 Ye%, -t 3 Qsk. $/1T? ..

Y[]*NE U,*N/AE-

3. Is the anchorage free of conrosion that is more than mild suiface oxidation?

Y!k NE N/AE

4. Is the anchorage free of visible cracks in the concrete near the anchors?

5. Is the anchorage configuration consistent with plant documentation? YE NEI LIE N/AE (Note: This question only applies if the item is one of the 50% for which an anchorage configuration verification is required.)

S /

6. Based on the above anchorage evaluations, is the anchorage free of Y[9 Nr-U7-**

potentially adverse seismic conditions? pa" Enter the equlipmelnt class niae h'On Appendix B: (lasses of Equipment.

Page 202 of 467

ATTACHMENT 3: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS NO. SNCF164-RPT-02, VERSION 2.0 Status: NE Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)

AlA.

Equipment I]DNo. 02H25L029 Equip. Class, 20 Equipment Description TERMINATION CABINET Interaction Effects

7. Are soft targets free from impact by nearby equipment or structures? Y[d NEIUL N/AE

8. Are overhead equipment, distribution systems, ceiling tiles and lighting, Y Nfl UO N/AO and masonry block walls not likely to collapse onto the equipment?

Do attached lines have adequate flexibility to avoid damage? Y[I NrI U- N/AO Ckz -f -T,,, (aXktý cisn"Cq RlteýQ oQcdG- J, C' fwý(b-ftj &~~

Yý NEI UQ C A ,dVq\ýUr

10. Based on the above seismic interaction evaluations, is equipment free o.sv, .'.'0\ e.. **,.a o lJet&'

of potentially adverse seismic interaction effects?

Other Adverse Conditions

11. Have you looked for and found no other seismic conditions that could Y`2*'"NO U[:i adversely affect the safety functions of the equipment?

Comments (Additional pages may be added as necessary)

Evaluated bv: K . .Date:

--- ., t, Page 203 of 467

0 ATTACHMENT 3: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS NO. SNCF164-RPT-02, VERSION 2.0 Page 204 of 467

ATTACHMENT 3: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS NO. SNCF164-RPT-02, VERSION 2.0 1/

Page 205 of 467

ATTACHMENT 3: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS NO. SNCF164-RPT-02, VERSION 2.0 Page 206 of 467

ATTACHMENT 3: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS NO. SNCF164-RPT-02, VERSION 2.0 Page 207 of 467

ATTACHMENT 3: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS NO. SNCF164-RPT-02, VERSION 2.0 7/1 Page 208 of 467

ATTACHMENT 3: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS NO. SNCF164-RPT-02, VERSION 2.0 Page 209 of 467

0 ATTACHMENT 3: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS 0 NO. SNCF164-RPT-02, VERSION 2.0

-2Q Page 210 of 467

ATTACHMENT 3: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS NO. SNCF164-RPT-02, VERSION 2.0 Sheet of V' 4 Status: 4 N- U7 Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)

Equipment DID No. Q2N11HV3369C Equip. Classi 7 Equipment Descrinption MAIN STEAM ISOLATION VALVE Location: Bldg. AUXILIARY Floor El. 127 Room, Area 2, 4 (

Manufacturer, Model, Etc. (optional but recommended)

Instructions for Completing Checklist This checklist may be used to document the results of the Seismic Walkdown of an item of equipment on the SWEL. The space below each of the following questions may be used to record the results of judgments and findings. Additional space is provided at the end of this checklist for documenting other comments.

Anchorage

1. Is the anchorage configuration verification required (i.e., is the item one YEI NZK of the 50% of SWEL items requiring such verification)?

2. Is the anchorage free of bent, broken, missing or loose hardware? YEl NEI UE N/Av_'/

3. Is the anchorage free of corrosion that is more than mild surface YEI NE UE N/AX*-'j oxidation?

4. Is the anchorage free of visible cracks in the concrete near the anchors? YEI NEI U- N/E&/

5. Is the anchorage configuration consistent with plant documentation? YEJ NE UE /

(Note: This question only applies if the item is one of the 50% for which an anchorage configuration verification is required.)

6. Based on the above anchorage evaluations, is the anchorage free of Y13*0'UE potentially adverse seismic conditions?

' Enter the equipment class name from Appendix B: Classes of Equipment.

Page 211 of 467

ATTACHMENT 3: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS NO. SNCF164-RPT-02, VERSION 2.0 Fa-s*

Sheet 2 of4 1'0 Status: Yf((N- UL-Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)

Equipment ID No. Q2NIlHV3369C Equip. Class' 7 Equipment Description MAIN STEAM ISOLATION VALVE Interaction Effects

7. Are soft targets free from impact by nearby equipment or structures? YNrND UI- N/AD S. Are overhead equipment, distribution systems, ceiling tiles and lighting, '/N0D U-D N/AD-and masonry block walls not likely to collapse onto the equipment?

9. Do attached lines have adequate flexibility to avoid damage? "i/NO U[3 N/AD

10. Based on the above seismic interaction evaluations, is equipment free YVN<D U0 of potentially adverse seismic interaction effects?

/

Other Adverse Conditions-

11. Have you looked for and found no other seismic conditions that could Y[INDI UDl adversely affect the safety functions of the equipment?

Comments (Additional pages may be added as necessary)

A/o 2-L-Evaluated by:

I/ -" Date: K. 3D. 2,0t -'

t4 11 /ark Page 212 of 467

0 ATTACHMENT 3: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS NO. SNCF164-RPT-02, VERSION 2.0 Page 213 of 467

ATTACHMENT 3: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS 0 NO. SNCF164-RPT-02, VERSION 2.0 I

N Page 214 of 467

ATTACHMENT 3: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS NO. SNCF164-RPT-02, VERSION 2.0 Sheet i of' fJi'al Status: V"'NE- UE-Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)

Equipment ID No. Q2N11HV3370B Equip. Class, 7 Equipment Description MAIN STEAM LINE ISOLATION VALVE Location: Bldg. AUXILIARY Floor El. 127 Room, Area 2 2 .4 Manufacturer, Model, Etc. (optional but recommended)

Instructions for Completing Checklist This checklist may be used to document the results of the Seismic Walkdown of an item of equipment on the SWEL. The space below each ofthe following questions may be used to record the results ofjudgments and findings. Additional space is provided at the end of this checklist for documenting other comments.

Anchorage I. Is the anchorage configuration verification required (i.e., is the item one YOE of the 50% of SWEL items requiring such verification)?

2. Is the anchorage free of bent, broken, missing or loose hardware? YE NEI UE N/Ali5---

3. Is the anchorage free of corrosion that is more than mild surface YE NO U- N/A__

oxidation?

4. Is the anchorage free of visible cracks in the concrete near the anchors? YE NE U[E) N/A[4--j

5. Is the anchorage configuration consistent with plant documentation? YED NE UE N/A[*-'

(Note: This question only applies if the item is one of the 50% for which an anchorage configuration verification is required.)

6. Based on the above anchorage evaluations, is the anchorage free of YbNOUO potentially adverse seismic conditions?

IEnter the equipment class name from Appendix B: Classes of Equipment.

Page 215 of 467

ATTACHMENT 3: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS NO. SNCF164-RPT-02, VERSION 2.0 Sheet 2 Of ' '"'

Status: Y9 NEI U-Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)

Equipment ID No. Q2NlIlHV3370B Equip. Class, 7 Equipment Description MAIN STEAM LINE ISOLATION VALVE Interaction Effects

7. Are soft targets free from impact by nearby equipment or structures? YgrC U[- N/AD'

8. Are overhead equipment, distribution systems, ceiling tiles and lighting, YjNEI UD N/AD and masonry block walls not likely to collapse onto the equipment?

9. Do attached lines have adequate flexibility to avoid damage? i"NE) UF] N/AD

10. Based on the above seismic interaction evaluations, is equipment free ,IJNIUE1 of potentially adverse seismic interaction effects?

Other Adverse Conditions I1. Have you looked for and found no other seismic conditions that could V U-"

adversely affect the safety functions of the equipment?

Comments (Additional pages may be added as necessary)

/V0 )^Jj Evaluated by:

Date: ________ ,,_-

live6

('.Usk I k e Page 216 of 467

ATTACHMENT 3: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS

[ NO. SNCF164-RPT-02, VERSION 2.0 Page 217 of 467

ATTACHMENT 3: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS NO. SNCF164-RPT-02, VERSION 2.0 Page 218 of 467

ATTACHMENT 3: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS NO. SNCF164-RPT-02, VERSION 2.0 0

Page 219 of 467

ATTACHMENT 3: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS NO. SNCF164-RPT-02, VERSION 2.0 r2 - 5`

Sheet 1 f.Y Status: Y[ýrND UE]

Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)

Equipment ID No. Q2NI1PT0484 Equip. Class' 18 Equipment Description SG 2B DISCHARGE PRESSURE Location: Bldg. AUXILIARY Floor El. Room, Area 2- 4 (o Z-Manufacturer, Model, Etc. (optional but recommended)

Instructions for Completing Checklist This checklist may be used to document the results of the Seismic Walkdown of an item of equipment on the SWEL. The space below each of the following questions may be used to record the results of judgments and findings. Additional space is provided at the end of this checklist for documenting other comments.

Anchoragye I. Is the anchorage configuration verification required (i.e., is the item one YEC NG](

of the 50% of SWEL items requiring such verification)?

2. Is the anchorage free of bent, broken, missing or loose hardware? Y&j NEI UC N/AC

3. Is the anchorage free of corrosion that is more than mild surface Y[*/NC U-- N/AD oxidation?

4. Is the anchorage free of visible cracks in the concrete near the anchors? YVNI' UC- N/AC

5. Is the anchorage configuration consistent with plant documentation? YO NCI UC- N/A6 (Note: This question only applies if the item is one of the 50% for which an anchorage configuration verification is required.)

6. Based on the above anchorage evaluations, is the anchorage free of Y¥(Nr UC potentially adverse seismic conditions?

' Enter the equipment class name from Appendix B: Classes of Equipment.

Page 220 of 467

ATTACHMENT 3: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS NO. SNCF164-RPT-02, VERSION 2.0 Sheet '20 Status: YE(Nr-- urE Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)

Equipment ID No. Q2N11PT0484 Equip. Class, 18 Equipment Description SG 2B DISCHARGE PRESSURE Interaction Effects

7. Are soft targets free from impact by nearby equipment or structures? y[ NO UD N/AD-

8. Are overhead equipment, distribution systems, ceiling tiles and lighting, Y9f NEI UO N/AD and masonry block walls not likely to collapse onto the equipment?

9. Do attached lines have adequate flexibility to avoid damage? YIj"Nr U[: N/AD

10. Based on the above seismic interaction evaluations, is equipment free of potentially adverse seismic interaction effects?

Other Adverse Conditions

11. Have you looked for and found no other seismic conditions that could Y0 N\" U13 adversely affect the safety functions of the equipment?

Comments (Additional pages may be added as necessary)

Evaluated by -Eý Date: 131 b I ý7-Q-

Page 221 of 467

ATTACHMENT 3: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS NO. SNCF164-RPT-02, VERSION 2.0 Page 222 of 467

ATTACHMENT 3: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS NO. SNCF164-RPT-02, VERSION 2.0 Page 223 of 467

ATTACHMENT 3: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS NO. SNCF164-RPT-02, VERSION 2.0 Sheet 1 of,.-/ IT, Status: Ye*" ],"UFi]

Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC) tj Equipment ID No. Q2NIIPV3371 _t4 Equip. Class g Equipment Dcscription MAIN STEAM ATMOSPHERIC RELIEF VALVE Location: Bldg. AUXILIARY Floor El. 127 Room, Area ,_ __--4/

Manufacturer, Model, Etc. (optional but recommended)

Instructions for Completing Checklist This checklist may be used to document the results of the Seismic Walkdown of an item of equipment on the SWEL. The space below each of the following questions may be used to record the results ofjudgments and findings. Additional space is provided at the end of this checklist for documenting other comments.

Anchorage

1. Is the anchorage configuration verification required (i.e., is the item one YE7 NP-,t of the 50% of SWEL items requiring such verification)?

2. Is the anchorage free of bent, broken, missing or loose hardware? YLI NE UED N/*IA---

3. Is the anchorage free of corrosion that is more than mild surface YEI NEI UE- N/A--'

oxidation?

4. Is the anchorage free of visible cracks in the concrete near the anchors? YE" NEI U[] N/AE""

5. Is the anchorage configuration consistent with plant documentation? YEI NEI UEI N/A6--

(Note: This question only applies if the item is one of the 50% for which an anchorage configuration verification is required.)

6. Based on the above anchorage evaluations, is the anchorage free of Y6NNE UE-potentially adverse seismic conditions?

IEnter the equipment class name from Appendix B: Classes of Equipment.

Page 224 of 467

ATTACHMENT 3: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS NO. SNCF164-RPT-02, VERSION 2.0 Sheet 2 of 3-'

Status: YEJ NEI UW' Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC))

Equipment ID No. Q2N11PV3371C3'A Equip. Class' 7 Equipment Description MAIN STEAM ATMOSPHERIC RELIEF VALVE Interaction Effects

7. Are soft targets free from impact by nearby equipment or structures? Y~'OUE N/AE

8. Are overhead equipment, distribution systems, ceiling tiles and lighting, *'NO UO N/AE and masonry block walls not likely to collapse onto the equipment?

9. Do attached lines have adequate flexibility to avoid damage? YlýNO UQ N/AE

10. Based on the above seismic interaction evaluations, is equipment free Y~rNO~ UD of potentially adverse seismic interaction effects?

Other Adverse Conditions

11. Have you looked for and found no other seismic conditions that could ) 'N" UI-adversely affect the safety functions of the equipment?

Comments (Additional pages may be added as necessary)

Evaluated by: -- 4C 7

r rIt Date: 9 20, Cmhs1 4 La hq' ý?1-2 J

Page 225 of 467

ATTACHMENT 3: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS 0

NO. SNCF164-RPT-02, VERSION 2.0 Page 226 of 467

ATTACHMENT 3: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS 0 NO. SNCF164-RPT-02, VERSION 2.0 U p Page 227 of 467

ATTACHMENT 3: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS NO. SNCF164-RPT-02, VERSION 2.0 Sht i Of 3 Status: VINE] U["]

Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)

Equipmcnt ID No. Q2N11SV3369CC Equip.

Equipment Description SOLENOID FOR MAIN STEAM ISOLATION VALVE Location: Bldg. AUXILIARY Floor El. 127 Room, Area 2.;z 4/

Manufacturer, Model, Etc. (optional but recommended)

Instructions for Completing Checklist This checklist may be used to document the results of the Seismic Walkdown of an item of equipment on the SWEL. The space below each of the following questions may be used to record the results ofjudgments and findings. Additional space is provided at the end of this checklist for documenting other comments.

Anchorage I. Is the anchorage configuration verification required (i.e., is the item one YIE-] N[A]'-

of the 50% of SWEL items requiring such verification)?

2. Is the anchorage free of bent, broken, missing or loose hardware? YEI NEI UE3N/eJ -

3. Is the anchorage free of corrosion that is more than mild surface YE] NEI UC N/Agý-'

oxidation?

4. Is the anchorage free of visible cracks in the concrete near the anchors? YEI NE UE N/A[]

5. Is the anchorage configuration consistent with plant documentation? YE N[E Urn NUC f"-

(Note: This question only applies if the item is one of the 50% for which an anchorage configuration verification is required.)

6. Based on the above anchorage evaluations, is the anchorage free of *IýUE1 potentially adverse seismic conditions?

IEnter the equipment class name from Appendix B: Classes of Equipment.

Page 228 of 467

ATTACHMENT 3: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS NO. SNCF164-RPT-02, VERSION 2.0 Shee4 of 3 Status: Yo N[] U["

Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)

Equipment ID No. 02N11SV3369CC Equip. Class' 8 Equipment Description SOLENOID FOR MAIN STEAM ISOLATION VALVE Interaction Effects

7. Are soft targets free from impact by nearby equipment or structures? aoN3UC3 N/ACD

8. Are overhead equipment, distribution systems, ceiling tiles and lighting, Yb'N U[0 MIAO and masonry block walls not likely to collapse onto the equipment?

9. Do attached lines have adequate flexibility to avoid damage? Yp 4 rn UE] NIAE--

10. Based on the above seismic interaction evaluations, is equipment free Yk(/NC3 U[3 of potentially adverse seismic interaction effects?

Other Adverse Conditions I1. Have you looked for and found no other seismic conditions that could Y j No" Urn adversely affect the safety functions of the equipment?

Comments (Additional pages may be added as necessary)

Evaluated by: $ -5 ,-1 AA-* " 6 Date: G. 30. Z a /Z is/ 2cw,' C _

Page 229 of 467

ATTACHMENT 3: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS 0 NO. SNCF164-RPT-02, VERSION 2.0 Page 230 of 467

ATTACHMENT 3: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS NO. SNCF164-RPT-02, VERSION 2.0 Sheet I of 3 Status: Y0Nr-] UE-Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)

Equipment 1DNo. Q2N23FI3229CB Equip. Class' 18 Equipment Description FEEDWA TER INTAKE FLOW INDICATION Location: Bldg. AUXILIARY Floor El. 100 Room, Area ý21.0 Manufacturer, Model, Etc. (optional but recommended)

Instructions for Completing Checklist This checklist may be used to document the results of the Seismic Walkdown of an item of equipment on the SWEL. The space below each ofthe following questions may be used to record the results ofjudgments and findings. Additional space is provided at the end of this checklist for documenting other comments.

Anchoraee

1. Is the anchorage configuration verification required (i.e., is the item one YO Ni!

of the 50% of SWEL items requiring such verification)?

2. Is the anchorage free of bent, broken, missing or loose hardware? YM N U0 N/AC

3. Is the anchorage free of corrosion that is more than mild surface UCI N/AC oxidation?

4. Is the anchorage free of visible cracks in the concrete near the anchors? Yg/NC UCI N/AC

5. Is the anchorage configuration consistent with plant documentation? YCI NC- UC3 N/AlP

(Note: This question only applies if the item is one of the 50% for which an anchorage configuration verification is required.)

6. Based on the above anchorage evaluations, is the anchorage free of Y*IN'- UCI potentially adverse seismic conditions?

Enter the equipment class name from Appendix B: Classes of Equipment.

Page 231 of 467

ATTACHMENT 3: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS NO. SNCF164-RPT-02, VERSION 2.0 Shee of3 Status: N10 U-Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)

Equipment ID No. Q2N23FI3229CB Equip. Class, 18 Equipment Description FEEDWA TER INTAKE FLOW INDICATION Interaction Effects

7. Are soft targets free from impact by nearby equipment or structures? Y/NE U[3 N/AE

8. Are overhead equipment, distribution systems, ceiling tiles and lighting, Y N0 Ur-C N/A[

and masonry block walls not likely to collapse onto the equipment?

9. Do attached lines have adequate flexibility to avoid damage? Yg N U[-] N/AlC

10. Based on the above seismic interaction evaluations, is equipment free Y52'<E] UE]

of potentially adverse seismic interaction effects?

Other Adverse Conditions

11. Have you looked for and found no other seismic conditions that could 4 /Nr--I Un adversely affect the safety functions of the equipment?

Comments (Additional pages may be added as necessary)

Evaluated by: S -_ Date: ..2/. Zolz..

Page 232 of 467

ATTACHMENT 3: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS NO. SNCF164-RPT-02, VERSION 2.0 Page 233 of 467

ATTACHMENT 3: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS NO. SNCF164-RPT-02, VERSION 2.0 Shea t Of 3 Status: Z*"(( U0:

Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)

Equipment ID No. Q2N23FT3229B Equip. Class, 18 Equipment Description AUX FEEDWATER FLOW TRANSMITTER Location: Bldg. AUXILIARY Floor El. 100 Room, Area 2- F A4 Manufacturer, Model, Etc. (optional but recommended)

Instructions for Completing Checklist This checklist may be used to document the results of the Seismic Walkdown of an item of equipment on the SWEL. The space below each of the following questions may be used to record the results ofjudgments and findings. Additional space is provided at the end of this checklist for documenting other comments.

Anchorage I. Is the anchorage configuration verification required (i.e., is the item one YO of the 50% of SWEL items requiring such verification)?

2. Is the anchorage free of bent, broken, missing or loose hardware? 12N((] UE- N/AE

3. Is the anchorage free of corrosion that is more than mild surface YV4NE Ur N/AO oxidation?

4. Is the anchorage free of visible cracks in the concrete near the anchors? Y NI-- UEI N/A--

5. Is the anchorage configuration consistent with plant documentation? YE NEI UE- N/Av/

(Note: This question only applies if the item is one of the 50% for which an anchorage configuration verification is required.)

6. Based on the above anchorage evaluations, is the anchorage free of YP(N/l UI]

potentially adverse seismic conditions?

'Enter the equipment class name from Appendix B: Classes of Equipment.

Page 234 of 467

ATTACHMENT 3: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS NO. SNCF164-RPT-02, VERSION 2.0 Sheet 2 of 3 Status: YO*N- UE Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)

Equipment ID No. Q2N23FT3229B Equip. Class' 18 Equipment Description AUX FEEDWA TER FLOW TRANSMITTER Interaction Effects Y15 Nf- U0"N/AE1

7. Are soft targets free from impact by nearby equipment or structures?

ANOUEJ N/AE1

8. Are overhead equipment, distribution systems, ceiling tiles and lighting, YNE UEJ N/AE3 and masonry block walls not likely to collapse onto the equipment?

9. Do attached lines have adequate flexibility to avoid damage? NUEI N/A

10. Based on the above seismic interaction evaluations, is equipment free of potentially adverse seismic interaction effects?

Other Adverse Conditions

11. Have you looked for and found no other seismic conditions that could Y;N[] U[]

adversely affect the safety functions of the equipment?

Comments (Additional pages may be added as necessary)

AlDaxlf Evaluated by: ,51Z7L Date: 5'. Z/. Zot-'

L d LŽ42zz21 Y/z1 /1o2 12 Page 235 of 467

ATTACHMENT 3: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS 0

NO. SNCF164-RPT-02, VERSION 2.0 Page 236 of 467

ATTACHMENT 3: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS NO. SNCF164-RPT-02, VERSION 2.0 z2- (-

She aoft3 Status: YZN[-] U{-}

Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)

Equipment ID No. 02N23HV3227C Equip. Class' 7 Equipment Description MOTOR DRIVEN AUX FEEDWA TER TO STEAM GENERATOR 2C Location: Bldg. AUXILIARY Floor El. 130 Room, Area 2241 Manufacturer, Model, Etc. (optional but recommended)

Instructions for Completing Checklist This checklist may be used to document the results of the Seismic Walkdown of an item of equipment on the SWEL. The space below each of the following questions may be used to record the results ofjudgments and findings. Additional space is provided at the end of this checklist for documenting other comments./

Anchora2e

1. Is the anchorage configuration verification required (i.e., is the item one YE NZ of the 50% of SWEL items requiring such verification)?

2. Is the anchorage free of bent, broken, missing or loose hardware? YO] NE3 UEi N/Alb

3. Is the anchorage free of corrosion that is more than mild surface Y["] NE- UE- N/AU "

oxidation?

4. Is the anchorage free of visible cracks in the concrete near the anchors? YEr NEI UEI N/Ab

5. Is the anchorage configuration consistent with plant documentation? Y[-I NEI ur- N/AUE--E/

(Note: This question only applies if the item is one of the 50% for which an anchorage configuration verification is required.)

6. Based on the above anchorage evaluations, is the anchorage free of Yn ] UE-potentially adverse seismic conditions?

ý Enter the equipment class name from Appendix B: Classes of Equipment.

Page 237 of 467

ATTACHMENT 3: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS NO. SNCF164-RPT-02, VERSION 2.0 Sheet 2 Of 3 Status: Y i-7 U-Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)

Equipment ID No. Q2N23HV3227C Equip. Class' 7 Equipment Description MOTOR DRIVEN AUX FEEDWATER TO STEAM GENERATOR 2C Interaction Effects

7. Are soft targets free from impact by nearby equipment or structures? Y[.,-N[3] UjJ N/AE]

8. Arc overhead equipment, distribution systems, ceiling tiles and lighting, Y.'ND] UE1 N/AD-and masonry block walls not likely to collapse onto the equipment?

9. Do attached lines have adequate flexibility to avoid damage? YQ[-`N UD N/AD

10. Based on the above seismic interaction evaluations, is equipment free VE3"ND) UEr of potentially adverse seismic interaction effects?

Other Adverse Conditions

11. Have you looked for and found no other seismic conditions that could Y*1'r-N UF-1 adversely affect the safety functions of the equipment?

Comments (Additional pages may be added as necessary)

Evaluated by: . Id7 L a/_. 2' ,

K'.'/u, (o,-7 Date:

/

Page 238 of 467

0 ATTACHMENT 3: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS NO. SNCF164-RPT-02, VERSION 2.0 Page 239 of 467

ATTACHMENT 3: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS NO. SNCF164-RPT-02, VERSION 2.0 Sheet I of 3 Status: Yp['NE] UE]

Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)

Equipment ID No. Q2N23MOV3209B Equip. Class' 8 Equipment Description SW ISOLATION VALVE TO AUX FEEDWA TER Location: Bldg. AUXILIARY Floor El. 100 Room, Area Manufacturer, Model, Etc. (optional but recommended) Aw Instructions for Completing Checklist This checklist may be used to document the results of the Seismic Walkdown of an item of equipment on the SWEL. The space below each of the following questions may be used to record the results of judgments and findings. Additional space is provided at the end of this checklist for documenting other comments.

Anchora2e

1. Is the anchorage configuration verification required (i.e., is the item one YO No./

of the 50% of SWEL items requiring such verification)?

2. Is the anchorage free of bent, broken, missing or loose hardware? YO NED U' N/AD"'

zispLw a

3. Is the anchorage free of corrosion that is more than mild surface YE NO UE N/AI*

oxidation?

4. Is the anchorage free of visible cracks in the concrete near the anchors? YO NO UE NIAM/

5. Is the anchorage configuration consistent with plant documentation? YO NE U[- N/ApfY (Note: This question only applies if the item is one of the 50% for which an anchorage configuration verification is required.)

6. Based on the above anchorage evaluations, is the anchorage free of Yp24' UI potentially adverse seismic conditions?

IEnter the equipment class name from Appendix B: Classes of Equipment.

Page 240 of 467

ATTACHMENT 3: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS NO. SNCF164-RPT-02, VERSION 2.0 Sheet 2 of 3 Status: Y! /NI- U-Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)

Equipment ID No. Q2N23MOV3209B Equip. Class, 8 Equipment Description SW ISOLATION VALVE TO AUX FEEDWA TER Interaction Effects

7. Are soft targets free from impact by nearby equipment or structures? YVI'NE) UEI NAp

8. Are overhead equipment, distribution systems, ceiling tiles and lighting, Y /NEI ULI N/AfL and masonry block walls not likely to collapse onto the equipment?

9. Do attached lines have adequate flexibility to avoid damage? YI&ErN- UE] N/AE-

10. Based on the above seismic interaction evaluations, is equipment free Y&/No UE-of potentially adverse seismic interaction effects?

Other Adverse Conditions

11. Have you looked for and found no other seismic conditions that could Y "NE" U-adversely affect the safety functions of the equipment?

Comments (Additional pages may be added as necessary)

NDAI(141 Evaluated by: - -7 Date: 9- 2,-, 2-,2.-

'a' Loyvfi, Page 241 of 467

ATTACHMENT 3: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS 0 NO. SNCF164-RPT-02, VERSION 2.0 Page 242 of 467

ATTACHMENT 3: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS NO. SNCF164-RPT-02, VERSION 2.0 Sheet I of 3 Status: Y[1[-] Uf-Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)

Equipment ID No. Q2N23MOV3210A Equip. Class' 8 Equipment Description SW TO AUX FEEDWA TER PUMP2A INTAKE Location: Bldg. AUXILIARY Floor El. 100 Room, Area 2191 Manufacturer, Mode], Etc. (optional but recommended)

Instructions for Completing Checklist This checklist may be used to document the results of the Seismic Walkdown of an item of equipment on the SWEL. The space below each of the following questions may be used to record the results of judgments and findings. Additional space is provided at the end of this checklist for documenting other corm-nents.

Anchorage

1. Is the anchorage configuration verification required (i.e., is the item one YO N of the 50% of SWEL items requiring such verification)'?

2. Is the anchorage free of bent, broken, missing or loose hardware? YO NE U- N/At/

//M L'AI 6DI4oAAf jer

3. Is the anchorage free of conosion that is more than mild surface YO NO UO N/Atý-'

oxidation?

4. Is the anchorage free of visible cracks in the concrete near the anchors? YE N- U- N/Ab"

5. Is the anchorage configuration consistent with plant documentation? YE NE UF N/AM---,

(Note: This question only applies if the item is one of the 50% for which an anchorage configuration verification is required.)

/A, - L-, olu,,,/7 6, Based on the above anchorage evaluations, is the anchorage free of YA"'Nr UE potentially adverse seismic conditions?

iEnter the equipment class name from Appendix B: Classes of Equipment.

Page 243 of 467

ATTACHMENT 3: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS NO. SNCF164-RPT-02, VERSION 2.0 Sheet.2 of 3 Status: Y* N7 U7]

Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)

Equipment ID No. Q2N23MOV3210A Equip. ClassI 8 Equipment Description SW TO AUX FEEDWA TER PUMP2A INTAKE Interaction Effects

7. Are soft targets free from impact by nearby equipment or structures? 16'N[l UfE N/AE3

8. Are overhead equipment, distribution systems, ceiling tiles and lighting, ýlffNO- UE1 N/AD and masonry block walls not likely to collapse onto the equipment?

9. Do attached lines have adequate flexibility to avoid damage? N[- UE- N/AE-1

10. Based on the above seismic interaction evaluations, is equipment free (/NE) U0' of potentially adverse seismic interaction effects?

Other Adverse Conditions

11. Have you looked for and found no other seismic conditions that could /N" UE' adversely affect the safety functions of the equipment?

Comments (Additional pages may be added as necessary)

Evaluated by: --ýJ> k1A L - -* *-tl Date: ___-2_ ___"_- __

4-L LOP.- 1yoji-&ULoop Page 244 of 467

ATTACHMENT 3: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS NO. SNCF164-RPT-02, VERSION 2.0 Page 245 of 467

ATTACHMENT 3: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS NO. SNCF164-RPT-02, VERSION 2.0 Sahee Of 3 Status: NF] U[---

Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)

Equipment ID No. 02N23PO01B Equip. Class' 5 Equipment Description AUXFEEDWATER PUMP 2B Location: Bldg. AUXILIARY Floor El. 100 Room, Area ;/6 -

Manufacturer, Model, Etc. (optional but recommended)

Instructions for Completing Checklist This checklist may be used to document the results of the Seismic Walkdown of an item of equipment on the SWEL. The space below each of the following questions may be used to record the results ofjudgments and findings. Additional space is provided at the end ofthis checklist for documenting other comments.

Anchorage

1. Is the anchorage configuration verification required (i.e., is the item one Y1240 of the 50% of SWEL items requiring such verification)?

--D -zot, G 87 vr,-2..7.

1 "1'LT.-t., 2

2. Is the anchorage free of bent, broken, missing or loose hardware? V/NE] U'] N/Al]

3. Is the anchorage free of corrosion that is more than mild surface YfJ] UE] N/Al]

oxidation?

4. Is the anchorage free of visible cracks in the concrete near the anchors? vfNI Ul] N/AlI

5. Is the anchorage configuration consistent with plant documentation? X'*'NE] Ul] N/Al]

(Note: This question only applies if the item is one of the 50% for which an anchorage configuration verification is required.)

6. Based on the above anchorage evaluations, is the anchorage free of YVNEI- UI-potentially adverse seismic conditions?

IEnter the equipment class name from Appendix B: Classes of Equipment.

Page 246 of 467

ATTACHMENT 3: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS NO. SNCF164-RPT-02, VERSION 2.0 Sheet 2 of 3 Status: l2i NO UF Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)

Equipment ID No. Q2N23PO01B Equip. Class, 5 Equipment Description AUX FEEDWA TER PUMP 2B Interaction Effects

7. Are soft targets free fiom impact by nearby equipment or structures? YE(NEIUEI N/AVjAIIJ

8. Are overhead equipment, distribution systems, ceiling tiles and lighting, Ykr-i u[U N/AE]

and masonry block walls not likely to collapse onto the equipment?

9. Do attached lines have adequate flexibility to avoid damage? Yt/N[- UE] N/A[E

10. Based on the above seismic interaction evaluations, is equipment free 'NfO UE of potentially adverse seismic interaction effects?

Other Adverse Conditions

11. Have you looked for and found no other seismic conditions that could YP4 - UEI adversely affect the safety functions of the equipment?

Comments (Additional pages may be added as necessary)

Evaluated by: 5A ý Date: __'________

6v Lome(U.4/I Page 247 of 467

0 ATTACHMENT 3: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS NO. SNCF164-RPT-02, VERSION 2.0 Page 248 of 467

ATTACHMENT 3: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS NO. SNCF164-RPT-02, VERSION 2.0 Sheas tOf 3 Status: Y7"NE] UE--

Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)

Equipment ID No. Q2P11LT0515 Equip. Class' 18 Equipment Description CONDENSATE STORAGE TANK LEVEL TRANSMITTER Location: Bldg. YARD Floor El. 155 Room, Area (f /

Manufacturer, Model, Etc. (optional but recommended)

Instructions for Completing Checklist This checklist may be used to document the results of the Seismic Walkdown of an item of equipment on the SWEL. The space below each of the following questions may be used to record the results ofjudgments and findings. Additional space is provided at the end of this checklist for documenting other comments.

Anchorae/

I. Is the anchorage configuration verification required (i.e., is the item one YE N of the 50% of SWEL items requiring such verification)?

2. Is the anchorage free of bent, broken, missing or loose hardware? Y~b4-/OUON/A[-

3. Is the anchorage free of corrosion that is more than mild surface '&NO NrU N/AE oxidation?

4. Is the anchorage free of visible cracks in the concrete near the anchors? Yp-!ýE UE N/AE

5. Is the anchorage configuration consistent with plant documentation? YE NEI UE N/Ab"X (Note: This question only applies if the item is one of the 50% for which an anchorage configuration verification is required.)

6. Based on the above anchorage evaluations, is the anchorage free of yt -iýUE potentially adverse seismic conditions?

IEnter (he equipmenI class name from Appendix B: Classes of Equipment.

Page 249 of 467

ATTACHMENT 3: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS NO. SNCF164-RPT-02, VERSION 2.0 Sheet 2 of 3 Status: YVN-U"]

Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)

Equipment IDNo. 02P11LT0515 Equip. Class' 18 Equipment Description CONDENSATE STORAGE TANK LEVEL TRANSMITTER Interaction Effects

7. Are soft targets free from impact by nearby equipment or structures? YIN 4 UD N/AE

8. Are overhead equipment, distribution systems, ceiling tiles and lighting, Yiz5ZCj UQ: N/AE3 and masonry block walls not likely to collapse onto the equipment?

9. Do attached lines have adequate flexibility to avoid damage? Y[N"O UEI1 N/AD3

10. Based on the above seismic interaction evaluations, is equipment free YVINE urn3 of potentially adverse seismic interaction effects?

Other Adverse Conditions l1. Have you looked for and found no other seismic conditions that could Y N0 130 adversely affect the safety functions of the equipment?

Comments (Additional pages may be added as necessary)

Q~ T ji((Ji , (fi1ck , -(,-,-7) (Ir -/ ,(,L 631/ 4S 1 0i /AL Evaluated by: tiA7g~L-biI.j Date: 2 7. Zo,'...-

P~14 A 14r4-0 Page 250 of 467

ATTACHMENT 3: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS NO. SNCF164-RPT-02, VERSION 2.0 Page 251 of 467

ATTACHMENT 3: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS NO. SNCF164-RPT-02, VERSION 2.0 I

ý "ý'& Sheet of4:ý'M Status: Yý Nr- U7 Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)

Equipment ID No. Q2P11TO01 Equip. Class, 21 Equipment Description CONDENSATE STORAGE TANK Location: Bldg. YARD Floor El. 155 Room, Area CST Manufacturer, Model, Etc. (optional but recommended)

Instructions for Completing Checklist This checklist may be used to document the results of the Seismic Walkdown of an item of equipment on the SWEL. The space below each of the following questions may be used to record the results of judgments attd findings. Additional space is provided at the end of this checklist for documenting other comments.

Anchorage

1. Is the anchorage configuration verification required (i.e., is the item one YfNi--N of the 50% of SWEL items requiring such verification)?

-3>2OlZ1T'7 Ve..-. 3 1 , C-0o RL, VC1 1.2

2. Is the anchorage free of bent, broken, missing or loose hardware? Y[ ND UE- N/AD

3. Is the anchorage free of corrosion that is more than mild surface ! L/N"IN/AE" UEI oxidation? 7 X

%g.,-.

' ),4o. COrsO~ 0., -o " t .

0 ~~ ~ -o/,oY-4 he -e5 7-.'f~ 4j.Ie.r-rI' S Q 1 '4 S -

4. Is the anchorage free of visible cracks in the concrete near the anchors? YI f' U- N/A-

5. Is the anchorage configuration consistent with plant docutnentation? Y[ NE ULIEN/AEl (Note: This question only applies if the item is one of the 50% for which an anchorage configuration verification is required.)

6. Based on the above anchorage evaluations, is the anchorage flee of YkNI- UE-7 potentially adverse seismic conditions?

Enter ihe eqtUipfftellt class name rom Appendix B: Classes of Equipmeot.

Page 252 of 467

ATTACHMENT 3: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS NO. SNCF164-RPT-02, VERSION 2.0 Sheet 2 Of Of Status: I2"N- U7 Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)

Equipment ID No. Q2P11TO01 Equip. Class' 21 Equipment Description CONDENSATE STORAGE TANK Interaction Effects

7. Are soft targets free from impact by nearby equipment or structures? YM /N[ Uffl N/AEZ

8. Are overhead equipment, distribution systems, ceiling tiles and lighting, Y NLE UEr N/AI-]

and masonry block walls not likely to collapse onto the equipment?

9. Do attached lines have adequate flexibility to avoid damage? YE NEI L-'E N/AE

10. Based on the above seismic interaction evaluations, is equipment free NED U0 of potentially adverse seismic interaction effects?

Other Adverse Conditions

11. Have you looked for and found no other seismic conditions that could YVN] LIE]

adversely affect the safety functions of the equipment?

Comments (Additional pages may be added as necessary)

Evaluated bv: .4 1'I4 L.-> 1 Date: * -Z7.2C/2*

~

Page 253 of 467

ATTACHMENT 3: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS NO. SNCF164-RPT-02, VERSION 2.0 Page 254 of 467

0 ATTACHMENT 3: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS NO. SNCF164-RPT-02, VERSION 2.0 111 UL Page 255 of 467

ATTACHMENT 3: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS 0 NO. SNCF164-RPT-02, VERSION 2.0 1-0 r,-

Page 256 of 467

ATTACHMENT 3: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS NO. SNCF164-RPT-02, VERSION 2.0

'i 0--4ýW &

Sheet i of/+.

Status: Y[ NO UD-Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)

Equipment 1D No. 02P13HV2867C Equip. Class, 7 Equipment Description CTMT PURGEISOLATION OUTSIDE CTMT VALVE Location: Bldg. AUXILIARY Floor El. 121 Room, Area _?._

Manufacturer, Model, Etc. (optional but recommended) - -----

/ Instructions for Completing Checklist This checklist may be used to document the results of the Seismic Walkdown of an item of equipment on the SWEL. The space below each of the following questions may be used to record the results ofjudgments and findings. Additional space is provided at the end of this checklist for documenting other comments.

Anchoraite

1. Is the anchorage configuration verification required (i.e., is the item one Y[] NZ]

of the 50% of SWEL items requiring such verification)?

2. Is the anchorage free of bent, broken, missing or loose hardware? YEl- NO U[-I N/A#

3. Is the anchorage free of corrosion that is more than mild surface YEI NE UD N/AIA oxidation?

4. Is the anchorage free of visible cracks in the concrete near the anchors? Yv] N[] UD NA?

5. Is the anchorage configuration consistent with plant documentation? YEI NEI tiI] N/AN',

(Note: This question only applies if the item is one of the 50% for which an anchorage configuration verification is required.)

6. Based on the above anchorage evaluations, is the anchorage free of potentially adverse seismic conditions?

Entei the equipment class name from Appendix B: Classes of Equipment.

Page 257 of 467

ATTACHMENT 3: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS NO. SNCF164-RPT-02, VERSION 2.0 F 0 2)-60 Sheet 2 of,/

Status: Y[ NF U[D Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)

Equipment ID No. Q2P13HV2867C Equip. Class' 7 Equipment Description CTMT PURGE ISOLATION OUTSIDE CTMT VALVE Interaction Effects

7. Are soft targets free from impact by nearby equipment or structures? Yo NEI U-E NAt]

8. Are overhead equipment, distribution systems, ceiling tiles and lighting, Y1d NE3 UE N/AE]

and masonry block walls not likely to collapse onto the equipment?

9. Do attached lines have adequate flexibility to avoid damage? Y N U0] N/A]

10. Based on the above seismic interaction evaluations, is equipment free YP NED ULE of potentially adverse seismic interaction effects?

Other Adverse Conditions I1 Have you looked for and found no other seismic conditions that could N NEI Ut adversely affect the safety functions of the equipment?

Comments (Additional pages may be added as necessary)

Evaluated by: 49 ,a:?211C j l.... kiv.l. h. Date: e z- 2.

{~gjh>2~ T~V Page 258 of 467

ER ON2.0

-RPT

-RPTO2, NO 64 CHECKLISTS 3: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKIS.SSNCF1 ATTACHMENT

ROE cTM A 17NI 7 ,P A E k ý4 US~

V 7C-A$

0 2 P3H Page 259 of 467

0 ATTACHMENT 3: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS NO. SNCF164-RPT-02, VERSION 2.0 Page 260 of 467

ATTACHMENT 3: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS NO. SNCF164-RPT-02, VERSION 2.0 Sheet i of/fo Status: YI- No 1U7 Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)

Equipment ID No. Q2P16F5018 Equip. Class, 0 Equipment Description SW STRAINER 28 Location: Bldg. SW/S Floor El. 167 Room, Area 1-A Manufacturer, Model, Etc. (optional but recommended)

Instructions for Completing Checklist This checklist may be used to document the results of the Seismic Walkdown of an item of equipment on the SWEL. The space below each of the following questions may be used to record the results ofjudgments and findings. Additional space is provided at the end of this checklist for documenting other comments.

Anchoratt -"

1. Is the anchorage configuration verification required (i.e., is the item one YN3 ýN of the 50% of SWEL items requiring such verification)?

2. Is the anchorage free of bent, broken, missing or loose hardware? NEIUE] NtAE]

3 Is the anchorage free of corrosion that is more than mild surface YE] NL] U-] N/AF]

oxidation?

kl A W Wt-enckls -- L ~e.i -~t

4. Is the anchorage free of visible cracks in the concrete near the anchors? Y4 N L-lUi N/A 0 i

5, Is the anchorage configuration consistent with plant documentation? N[O UIE N.AF-(Note: This question only applies if the item is one of the 50% for which an anchorage configuration venficatmion is required.)

6. Based on the above anchorage evaluations, is the anchorage free of YE] N'IV U potentially adverse seismic conditions?

Enter the equipment class name fromnAppendix B Classes of Equipment Page 261 of 467

ATTACHMENT 3: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS NO. SNCF164-RPT-02, VERSION 2.0 Sheet 2 oflf6 Status: YO Ný UO Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)

Equipment ID No. Q2P16F501B Equip. Class, C __

Equipment Description SW STRAINER 2B Interaction Effects

7. Are soft targets free from impact by nearby equipment or structures? Y[ NO Ur N/AZ

8. Are overhead equipment, distribution systems, ceiling tiles and lighting, Y7 NO UZ N/AZ and masonry block walls not likely to collapse onto the equipment?

9. Do attached lines have adequate flexibility to avoid damage? Yý NEI UZ N/AO I\

10. Based on the above seismic interaction evaluations, is equipment free Yl, NO UZ of potentially adverse seismic interaction effects?

Other Adverse Conditions

11. Have you looked for and found no other seismic conditions that could YANEI UE adversely affect the safety functions of the equipment?

Comments (Additional pages may be added as necessary) al'IkL- ,)y/ is jn 4rolde"- F,- I. rqUIpAnI t QSW4J64g-6j3D.

CI P5022-70o WaS wri*erl toV d 6 4r - thc

- orrlheoh.

/Ea iti Evaluated~y: 1ý TcP-P~ A-IALLE&(\v Date.

6'

[1 Page 262 of 467

ATTACHMENT 3: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS NO. SNCF164-RPT-02, VERSION 2.0 Page 263 of 467

ATTACHMENT 3: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS NO. SNCF164-RPT-02, VERSION 2.0 Page 264 of 467

ATTACHMENT 3: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS NO. SNCF164-RPT-02, VERSION 2.0 Page 265 of 467

0 ATTACHMENT 3: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS NO. SNCF164-RPT-02, VERSION 2.0 Page 266 of 467

ATTACHMENT 3: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS NO. SNCF164-RPT-02, VERSION 2.0 D3 Sheet I of 3 Status: nN] U1]

Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)

Equipment 1D No. Q2P16FV3009C Equip. Class, 7 Equipment Description CCW HEAT EXCHANGER SW DISCHARGE Location: Bldg. AUXILIARY Floor El. 100 Room, Area Wa 2AS Manufacturer, Model, Etc. (optional but recommended)

Instructions for Completing Checklist This checklist may be used to document the results of the Seismic Walkdown of an item of equipment on the SWEL. The space below each of the following questions may be used to record the results of'judgments and findings. Additional space is provided at the end of this checklist for documenting other comments.

Anchorage I. Is the anchorage configuration verification required (i.e., is the item one YE N'*

of the 50% of SWEL items requiring such verification)? /

,v~:*rerr,

\r*tir*, o a*c, ae.c~:

2. Is the anchorage free of bent, broken, missing or loose hardware? YEI NEI UE] N/AF

3. Is the anchorage free of corrosion that is more than mild surface YE NED UE N oxidation'

4. Is the anchorage free of visible cracks in the concrete near the anchors? YE NE UE N'A[1

5. Is the anchorage configuration consistent with plant documentation? YE NE UE1 N//I -

(Note: This question only applies if the item is one of the 50% for which an anchorage configuration verification is required.)

6. Based on the above anchorage evaluations, is the ancharage free of YR NE UED potentially adverse seismic conditions?

Enter the equipment class name from Appendix B Classes ot"Equipment.

Page 267 of 467

ATTACHMENT 3: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS NO. SNCF164-RPT-02, VERSION 2.0 Shget 2 of 3 UL]

Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC) /.

Status: Y[N N7-Equipment ID No. Q2P16FV3009C Equip. Class, 7 Equipment Description CCW HEA T EXCHANGER SW DISCHARGE Interaction Effects

7. Are soft targets free from impact by nearby equipment or structures? YA NEI Um N/AO

8. Are overhead equipment, distribution systems, ceiling tiles and lighting, Y+N- U- N!A-and masonry block walls not likely to collapse onto the equipment?

9. Do attached lines have adequate flexibility to avoid damage? YY NV UE N/A[-]

10. Based on the above seismic interaction evaluations, is equipment free I NE UD of potentially adverse seismic interaction effects?

Other Adverse Conditions I Have you looked for and found no other seismic conditions that could Y Nl UE-1 adversely affect the safety functions of the equipment?

Comments (Additional pages may be added as necessary) 4 b ArrWa V4lIC-bV 0,o,- roor- -11r, j-Sit-*,n C-O-ldr V--z-"t01(Q-.PtLfl o~ts*)

Evaluated b~ i'tz4LC 0 Date: LP

( ,t .2 Page 268 of 467

ATTACHMENT 3: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS NO. SNCF164-RPT-02, VERSION 2.0 Page 269 of 467

ATTACHMENT 3: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS NO. SNCF164-RPT-02, VERSION 2.0 S-ei mic - ekis (SW .e,C 4l +owýCh Sheet 1 of/s-Status: YE] NE] UP Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)

Equipment iD No. Q2P16L002 Equip. Class' 20 Equipment Description SW DISCHARGE VALVE RELAY CABINET 2B Location: Bldg(A&X-I4A4 Floor El. 19d9t Room, Area Manufacturer, Model, Etc. (optional but recommended)

Instructions for Completing Checklist This checklist may be used to document the results of the Seismic Walkdown of an item of equipment on the SWEL. The space below each of the following questions may be used to record the results of judgments and findings. Additional space is provided at the end of this checklist for documenting other comments.

Anchorage

1. Is the anchorage configuration verification required (i.e., is the item one NO I

of the 50% of SWEL items requiring such verification)?

2. Is the anchorage free of bent, broken, missing or loose hardware? YO NO Ui* N/A-

3. Is the anchorage free of corrosion that is more than mild surface YO- NE Uý. N/AO oxidation?

4. Is the anchorage free of visible cracks in the concrete near the anchors? YO- NO UES N/A-

5. Is the anchorage configuration consistent with plant documentation? YO NEI UED N/A-(Note: This question only applies if the item is one of the 50% for which an anchorage configuration verification is required.)

6. Based on the above anchorage evaluations, is the anchorage free of YO NEI U[2 potentially adverse seismic conditions?

Enter the equipment class name from Appcndix B: Classes of Equipment.

Page 270 of 467

ATTACHMENT 3: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS NO. SNCF164-RPT-02, VERSION 2.0 Sheet 2 of8 9" Status: YNU NLJ U[d Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)

Equipment lDNo. Q2P16LO02 Equip. Class' 20 Equipment Description SW DISCHARGE VALVE RELAY CABINET 2B Interaction Effects

7. Are soft targets free from impact by nearby equipment or structures? Yý NE UQ N/AO

8. Are overhead equipment, distribution systems, ceiling tiles and lighting, Y* N- U- N/A[

and masonry block walls not likely to collapse onto the equipment?

9. Do attached lines have adequate flexibility to avoid damage? Yj, NO U- N/AE

10. Based on the above seismic interaction evaluations, is equipment free Yt]N- U1 I

of potentially adverse seismic interaction effects?

Other Adverse Conditions

]1. Have you looked for and found no other seismic conditions that could YI[ NE UM adversely affect the safety functions of the equipment?

Comments (Additional pages may be added as necessary)

Evaluiated by:4CW,ý--ýccý% LafO vbi o w~~x Date: 3/10/12 C'Vz MAILML~t\~ I /t-t Page 271 of 467

ATTACHMENT 3: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS NO. SNCF164-RPT-02, VERSION 2.0 Page 272 of 467

ATTACHMENT 3: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS NO. SNCF164-RPT-02, VERSION 2.0 Page 273 of 467

ATTACHMENT 3: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS NO. SNCF164-RPT-02, VERSION 2.0 T-C'*"1 .,* I

/

Page 274 of 467

ML13252A154

Text

Conclusion:

Navigation menu

Search