Text

Enclosure 1, Including Attachments 1 to 8: Licensing Summary of Walkdown Report. Part 5 of 7
	ML13252A156
Person / Time
Site:	Farley
Issue date:	09/04/2013
From:	; Southern Nuclear Operating Co
To:	; Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation
Shared Package
ML13252A148	List: ML13252A150; ML13252A151; ML13252A153; ML13252A154; ML13252A155; ML13252A156; ML13252A157; ML13252A159; NL-13-1555, Enclosure 1, Including Attachments 1 to 8: Licensing Summary of Walkdown Report. Part 1 of 7; NL-13-1555, Enclosure 2: Updated Farley Unit 2 Seismic Walkdown Report for Resolution of Fukushima Near-Term Task Force Recommendation 2.3: Seismic; NL-13-1555, Joseph M. Farley Unit 2, Updated Seismic Recommendation 2.3 Walkdown Report Requested by NRC Letter, Request for Information Re Recommendations 2.1, 2.3 & 9.3 of the Near-Term Task Force Review of Insights from Fukushima Dai Ichi Accident;
References
	NL-13-1555
	Download: ML13252A156 (95)
	v • d • e

ATTACHMENT 3: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS NO. SNCF164-RPT-02, VERSION 2.0 Sh tiog Status:ZEY~[U[

Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)

Equipment ID No. Q2R21LOOID Equip. Class' 14 Equipment Description VITAL AC DISTRIBUTION PANEL 2D Location: Bldg. AUXILIARY Floor El. 139 Room, Area .*3/s Manufacturer, Model, Etc. (optional but recommended)

Instructions for Completing Checklist This checklist may be used to document the results of the Seismic Walkdown of an item of equipment on the SWEL. The space below each of the following questions may be used to record the results ofjudgments and findings. Additional space is provided at the end of this checklist for documenting other comments.

Anchoraee

1. Is the anchorage configuration verification required (i.e., is the item one Yd Nr-I of the 50% of SWEL items requiring such verification? L. -14

2. Is the anchorage free of bent, broken, missing or loose hardware? Y5 NI]I UI] N/A-I

3. Is the anchorage free of corrosion that is more than mild surface oxidation?

4. Is the anchorage free of visible cracks in the concrete near the anchors? Yd' NI] UI] N/A-I

5. Is the anchorage configuration consistent with plant documentation? YJ6 NI] UI N/AD (Note: This question only applies if the item is one of the 50% for which an anchorage configuration verification is required.)

6. Based on the above anchorage evaluations, is the anchorage free of potentially adverse seismic conditions?

Enter the equipment class name from Appendix B: Classes of Equipment.

Page 373 of 467

ATTACHMENT 3: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS NO. SNCF164-RPT-02, VERSION 2.0 Sheet 2 of/3 Status: Yg/N- UE-Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)

Equipment ID No. 02R21LOOID Equip. Class' 14 Equipment Description VITAL AC DISTRIBUTION PANEL 2D Interaction Effects

7. Are soft targets frec from impact by nearby equipment or structures? Y96 NEI UE- N/AD

8. Are overhead equipment, distribution systems, ceiling tiles and lighting, YEý NEI UD- N/ADl and masonry block walls not likely to collapse onto the equipment?

9. Do attached lines have adequate flexibility to avoid damage? Y2(NiD U- N/AD

10. Based on the above seismic interaction evaluations, is equipment free Y[RND UD-of potentially adverse seismic interaction effects?

Other Adverse Conditions

11. Have you looked for and found no other seismic conditions that could Y*f NDI UD1 adversely affect the safety functions of the equipment?

Comments (Additional pages may be added as necessary)

__* _** * )* *~c*'*

4* -- -

P.valusted by:

by:

~ K Iýf %KQ- 'Date: a~

g-. ~

Page 374 of 467

ATTACHMENT 3: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS NO. SNCF164-RPT-02, VERSION 2.0 Page 375 of 467

ATTACHMENT 3: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS NO. SNCF164-RPT-02, VERSION 2.0 Page 376 of 467

ATTACHMENT 3: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS NO. SNCF164-RPT-02, VERSION 2.0 Sheet 1 of, Status: YE- NE] UV*

Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)

Equipment ID No. Q2R36A501 Equip. Class' 3 Equipment Description 4.16KV SWlTCHGEAR 2K SURGE ARRESTOR Location: Bldg. SW/S Floor El. 188 Room, Area -72A Manufacturer, Mode], Etc. (optional but recommended)

Instructions for Completing Checklist This checklist may be used to document the results of the Seismic Walkdown of an item of equipment on the SWEL. The space below each of the following questions may be used to record the results ofjudgments and findings. Additional space is provided at the end of this checklist for documenting other comments.

Anchorage I. Is the anchorage configuration verification required (i.e., is the item one YP-N-- cjzI,*-

of the 50% of SWEL items requiring such verification)?

2. Is the anchorage free of bent, broken, missing or loose hardware? YO NO U20 N/AC

3. Is the anchorage free of corrosion that is more than mild surface YO N- UC9 N/AO oxidation?

4. Is the anchorage free of visible cracks in the concrete near the anchors? YO Nr Um N/AO Is the anchorage configuration consistent with plant documentation? YO NEI U50 N/A" (Note: This question only applies if the item is one of the 50% for which an anchorage configuration verification is required.)

6. Based on the above anchorage evaluations, is the anchorage free of YE NEI Uj potentially adverse seismic conditions?

Enter the equipment class name from Appendix B: Classes of Equipment.

Page 377 of 467

ATTACHMENT 3: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS NO. SNCF164-RPT-02, VERSION 2.0 Sheet 2 of/=7 Status: YE] N] U9 Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)

Equipment ID No. Q2R36A501 Equip. Class, 3 Equipment Description 4.16KV SWITCHGEAR 2K SURGE ARRESTOR Interaction Effects

7. Are soft targets free from impact by nearby equipment or structures? Y' NEI U1-7 N/A[L

8. Are overhead equipment, distribution systems, ceiling tiles and lighting, Y% N*Eu] N/A[

and masonry block walls not likely to collapse onto the equipment?

9. Do attached lines have adequate flexibility to avoid damage? YX NE U0 N/AE

10. Based on the above seismic interaction evaluations, is equipment free YEI NEI U-of potentially adverse seismic interaction effects?

Other Adverse Conditions

11. Have you looked for and found no other seismic conditions that could YD NEI UM adversely affect the safety functions of the equipment' Comments (Additional pages may be added as necessary)

ArP--P -cl h`-~L~- I C' tcl1c10' bot t-, 9i Evaluated by. Wh~hCO~i (V Date: 2*£[2--/I2

>L A -.huLUVý W ýe A

/ / I

/

Page 378 of 467

0 ATTACHMENT 3: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS 0

NO. SNCF164-RPT-02, VERSION 2.0 Page 379 of 467

ATTACHMENT 3: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS NO. SNCF164-RPT-02, VERSION 2.0 Page 380 of 467

ATTACHMENT 3: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS NO. SNCF1 64-RPT-02, VERSION 2.0 I

Page 381 of 467

ATTACHMENT 3: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS NO. SNCF164-RPT-02, VERSION 2.0 F2- 106 Sheet i of--

Status: )ZN['- ur-(SWC)

Seismic Walkdfmwn Checklist Equipment ID No. Q2R41LOOIA Equip. Class' 14 Equipment Description 15VDC DISTRIBUTION PANEL 2A Location: Bldg. AUXILIARY Floor El. 155' Room. Area 471 Manufacturer. Model, Etc. (optional but recommended)

Instructions for Completing Checklist This checklist may be used to document the results of the Seismic Walkdown of an item of equipment on the SWEL. The space below each of the following questions may be used to record the results of judgments and findings. Additional space is provided at the end of this checklist for documenting other comments.

A~nchorae I. Is the anchorage configuration verification required (i.e., is the item one Yr- N /

of the 50% of SWEL items requiring such verification)?

2. Is the anchorage free of bent, broken, missing or loose hardware? Y'(ND- UQ' N/AD

.'-t.1 , ,r,.- o-%-, L. 6--& .. d-;* 4a,-e.-%1\.,,,-:)X, u - S4,-- ' "H,<'*ce.

, ,. Jks a resow 4.*- ,,cA- , ;-. o., advsc ,

3. Is the anchorage free of corrosion that is more than mild surface YN"I U- N/AF" oxidation?

4. Is the anchorage free of visible cracks in the concrete near the anchors? Y)E(NI UF- N/AQ

5. Is the anchorage configuration consistent with plant documentation? YEF NEI UD" N/A,0]

(Note: This question only applies if the item is one of the 50% for which an anchorage configuration verification is required.)

6. Based on the above anchorage evaluations, is the anchorage free of Yj/ NEI UD]

potentially adverse seismic conditions?

Enter texn cl n uss - c nd ,fmABC AssLe-t. 4 "G4 71-,e

- ?

I Enter the equipment class name from Appendix B: Classes of Equipment.

Page 382 of 467

ATTACHMENT 3: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS NO. SNCF164-RPT-02, VERSION 2.0 Sheet 2 of V-Status: yf 'NE]uE Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)

Equipment ID No. O2R41LOOIA -Equip. Class, Equipment Description 15VDC DISTRIBUTION PANEL 2A Interaction Effects

7. Are soft targets free from impact by nearby equipment or structures? Y)ZrNI UO N/AD

8. Are overhead equipment, distribution systems, ceiling tiles and lighting, Yo ND UD N/AD and masonry block walls not likely to collapse onto the equipment?

9. Do attached lines have adequate flexibility to avoid damage? Y,*TNI UD N/AD

10. Based on the above seismic interaction evaluations, is equipment free YO'ND UD of potentially adverse seismic interaction effects?

Other Adverse Conditions 1I. Have you looked for and found no other seismic conditions that could Y,ýND U((

adversely affect the safety functions of the equipment?

Comments (Additional pages may be added as necessary)

N

. W6Z\r F 2. - 41 Evaluated by: sucx 1-k to&=- 6 " "-,/'V" Date: 40 1/ ,

-1. !1 oe

ýýv Page 383 of 467

ATTACHMENT 3: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS NO. SNCF164-RPT-02, VERSION 2.0 125 VW fwmpcvT P&w"L 2A WR41LOOIA-A SWKY.

rWRa &--"

LA-Up Page 384 of 467

ATTACHMENT 3: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS 0

NO. SNCF164-RPT-02, VERSION 2.0 Page 385 of 467

ATTACHMENT 3: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS NO. SNCF164-RPT-02, VERSION 2.0 Page 386 of 467

ATTACHMENT 3: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS NO. SNCF164-RPT-02, VERSION 2.0 Page 387 of 467

ATTACHMENT 3: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS NO. SNCF164-RPT-02, VERSION 2.0 Page 388 of 467

ATTACHMENT 3: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS NO. SNCF164-RPT-02, VERSION 2.0 Page 389 of 467

ATTACHMENT 3: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS NO. SNCF164-RPT-02, VERSION 2.0 Z.- to Sheet 1 of 3 Status: Y[K NE] U-]

Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)

Equipment ID No. 02R42B522A Equip. Class, 18 Equipment Description UNIT 2 SERVICE WATER BATTERY FUSE BOX Location: Bldg. SW/S Floor El. 188 Room, Area -".

Manufacturer, Model, Etc. (optional but recommended)

Instructions for Completing Checklist This checklist may be used to document the results of the Seismic Walkdown of an item of equipment on the SWEL. The space below each of the following questions may be used to record the results ofjudgments and findings. Additional space is provided at the end of this checklist for documenting other comments.

Anchorage

1. Is the anchorage configuration verification required (i.e., is the item one Y$ NEI of the 50% of SWEL items requiring such verification)?

2. Is the anchorage free of bent, broken, missing or loose hardware?

YX NEI UE] N/AE

3. Is the anchorage free of corrosion that is more than mild surface Y71 NEI UE] N/AD oxidation?

4. Is the anchorage free of visible cracks in the concrete near the anchors? YP NEI U0 N/AE3

5. Is the anchorage configuration consistent with plant documentation? YM NEI UEr-N/AD (Note: This question only applies if the item is one of the 50% for which an anchorage configuration verification is required.)

6. Based on the above anchorage evaluations, is the anchorage free of Y*E UIE potentially adverse seismic conditions?

Enter the equipment class name from Appendix B: Classes of Equipment.

Page 390 of 467

ATTACHMENT 3: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS NO. SNCF164-RPT-02, VERSION 2.0 Sheet 2 of 3 Status: Yl] NEI U[]

Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)

Equipment ID No. Q2R42B522A Equip. Class, 18 Equipment Description UNIT 2 SERVICE WATER BATTERY FUSE BOX Interaction Effects

7. Are soft targets free from impact by nearby equipment or structures?

YK NEI UD N/AD

8. Are overhead equipment, distribution systems, ceiling tiles and lighting, Y \ N- U- N/AD and masonry block walls not likely to collapse onto the equipment? A

9. Do attached lines have adequate flexibility to avoid damage?

Iý NEI UD N/AD

10. Based on the above seismic interaction evaluations, is equipment free of potentially adverse seismic interaction effects? I NEI UF'D Other Adverse Conditions l1. Have you looked for and found no other seismic conditions that could Yo ND U-adversely affect the safety functions of the equipment?

Comments (Additional pages may be added as necessary)

Ai v4v(iý sIr c"erW-~~p~n ~W4CC7~

Evaluated by: Lawic.i Date: _ _ _/12

_.a~

9=4y A. IA4UlWr'JIA Page 391 of 467

ATTACHMENT 3: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS 0 NO. SNCF164-RPT-02, VERSION 2.0 Page 392 of 467

ATTACHMENT 3: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS NO. SNCF164-RPT-02, VERSION 2.0 fi- lot-Sheet 1of* 1 Status: Y[ONE] UE:

Seismic Walkdewn Checklist (SWC)

Equipment IDNo. Q2R42EOOIA Equip. Class, 16 Equipment Description BATTERY CHARGER 2A Location: Bldg. AUXILIARY Floor El. 121 Room, Area _ _ __Q_ _ _ _

Manufacturer, Model, Etc. (optional but recommended)

Instructions for Completing Checklist This checklist may be used to document the results of the Seismic Walkdown of an item of equipment on the SWEL. The space below each of the following questions may be used to record the results ofjudgments and findings. Additional space is provided at the end of this checklist for documenting other comments.

Anchorage

1. Is the anchorage configuration verification required (i.e., is the item one Y' N[-I of the 50% of SWEL items requiring such verification)?

. *Ait o~2 -,.ze- -OVS Z

2. Is the anchorage free of bent, broken, missing or loose hardware? YJ6 Nil UD3 N/AD

3. Is the anchorage free of corrosion that is more than mild surface Yd' ND UED N/AD oxidation?

4. Is the anchorage free of visible cracks in the concrete near the anchors? YD Nil UD N/Ar

5. Is the anchorage configuration consistent with plant documentation? YI9/NE UD N/AD (Note: This question only applies if the item is one of the 50% for which an anchorage configuration verification is required.)

6. Based on the above anchorage evaluations, is the anchorage free of Y[/N E UID potentially adverse seismic conditions?

Enter the equipment class name from Appendix B: Classes of Equipment.

Page 393 of 467

ATTACHMENT 3: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS NO. SNCF164-RPT-02, VERSION 2.0 Sheet 2 Of 3 '

Status: Y&N] UF" Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)

Equipment ID No. Q2R42EOO1A Equip. Class ,v Equipment Description BATTERY CHARGER 2A Interaction Effects

7. Are soft targets free from impact by nearby equipment or structures? YdNFl UE3 N/Afl

8. Are overhead equipment, distribution systems, ceiling tiles and lighting, Y95 NEI UE1 N/AEI and masonry block walls not likely to collapse onto the equipment?

9. Do attached lines have adequate flexibility to avoid damage? Y&'NEI UEI N/AEI

10. Based on the above seismic interaction evaluations, is equipment free YE2/N[:] UEI of potentially adverse seismic interaction effects?

Other Adverse Conditions

11. Have you looked for and found no other seismic conditions that could Yfý NEI U--I adversely affect the safety functions of the equipment?

Comments (Additional pages may be added as necessary)

Page 394 of 467

ATTACHMENT 3: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS NO. SNCF164-RPT-02, VERSION 2.0 TI Page 395 of 467

ATTACHMENT 3: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS NO. SNCF164-RPT-02, VERSION 2.0 Page 396 of 467

ATTACHMENT 3: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS NO. SNCF164-RPT-02, VERSION 2.0 Sheet aofj/'y Status: Y0 NEI UE' 1010 Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)

Equipment ID No. 02R42EO02B Equip. Class Equipment Description Battery2B Location: Bldg. Aux Bldg Floor El. 121' Room, Area 2212 Manufacturer, Model, Etc. (optional but recommended)

Instructions for Completing Checklist This checklist may be used to document the results of the Seismic Walkdown of an item of equipment on the SWEL. The space below each of the following questions may be used to record the results of judgments and findings. Additional space is provided at the end of this checklist for documenting other cormments.

Anchorage

1. Is the anchorage configuration verification required (i.e.. is the item one Yo No of the 50% of SWEL items requiring such verification)?

2. Is the anchorage free of bent, broken, missing or loose hardware? YZ Nr UD N/A-

3. Is the anchorage free of corrosion that is more than mild surface Y9 Nr U-- N/Af-D oxidation?

4. Is the anchorage free of visible cracks in the concrete near the anchors? YZ NEI Ur N/AD

5. Is the anchorage configuration consistent with plant documentation'? Y[9 NO UD N/AD (Note: This question only applies if the item is one of the 50% for which an anchorage configuration verification is required.)

Anchorage in field matches plant documentation. Plant configuration was obtained from SEWS walkdown performed for this component.

The SEWS package from 7/3/93 shows that battery rack is welded to embedded steel The weld configurationin the field was confirmed to be as shown and evaluated in the SEWS package. See pages S for view of batteryrack and typical weld. q aped

Enter the equipment class namnefro1m1 Appendix a: Classes of Equipment.

Page 397 of 467

ATTACHMENT 3: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS NO. SNCF164-RPT-02, VERSION 2.0 Sheet 2 of4'5S Status: YE NEI uE-'10 Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)

Equipment ID No. 02R42EO029 Equip. Class, 15 Equipment Description Battery 2B

6. Based on the above anchorage evaluations, is the anchorage free of YN NO UO potentially adverse seismic conditions?

Interaction Effects

7. Are soft targets free from impact by nearby equipment or structures? YN NO UO N/AO

8. Are overhead equipment, distnibution systems, ceiling tiles and lighting, Y0 NO Ur N/AO and masonry block walls not likely to collapse onto the equipment?

The room has block walls on three sides. Based on a review of drawing D-206508, Revision 20 and Report FTG-C-002,these walls have been seismically analyzed and supported as required. Therefore, there is no potential seismic interaction.

9. Do attached lines have adequate flexibility to avoid damage? YZ NO UO N/AO

10. Based on the above seismic interaction evaluations, is equipment free YZ NOI UOl of potentially adverse seismic interaction effects?

Other Adverse Conditions

11. Have you looked for and found no other seismic conditions that could YN NO UO adversely affect the safety functions of the equipment?

Comments (Additional pages may be added as necessary)

None Page 398 of 467

ATTACHMENT 3: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS NO. SNCF164-RPT-02, VERSION 2.0 Fe~/O3 Sheet 3 of I5 (JIP Evaluated by: P. ig Date: 08-23-12 S. Yuan W / 08-23-12 Page 399 of 467

ATTACHMENT 3: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS NO. SNCF164-RPT-02, VERSION 2.0 "o,

Page 400 of 467

0 ATTACHMENT 3: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS NO. SNCF164-RPT-02, VERSION 2.0 Page 401 of 467

ATTACHMENT 3: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS NO. SNCF164-RPT-02, VERSION 2.0 Sheet I of 3 Status: Yo NE] U[-]

Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)

Equipment ID No. Q2R43A505 Equip. Class, 17 Equipment Description DIESEL GENERATOR 2B (SKID)

Location: Bldg. DIESEL Floor El. 155 Room, Area Manufacturer, Model, Etc. (optional but recommended)

Instructions for Completing Checklist This checklist may be used to document the results of the Seismic Walkdown of an item of equipment on the SWEL. The space below each of the following questions may be used to record the results of judgments and findings. Additional space is provided at the end of this checklist for documenting other comments.

Anchorage

1. Is the anchorage configuration verification required (i.e., is the item one YW NEI of the 50% of SWEL items requiring such verification)?

2. Is the anchorage free of bent, broken, missing or loose hardware? YX/ NC UC" N/AC

3. Is the anchorage free of corrosion that is more than mild surface NI UQ N/AQ oxidation?

4. Is the anchorage free of visible cracks in the concrete near the anchors? YN NEI UEC N/AC

5. Is the anchorage configuration consistent with plant documentation? Y4 Nil UC] N/AC (Note: This question only applies if the item is one of the 50% for which an anchorage configuration verification is required.)

eqApRYW4 anCah Ce.

6. Based on the above anchorage evaluations, is the anchorage free of Y4 NC UC' potentially adverse seismic conditions?

Enter the equipment class name from Appendix B: Classes of Equipment.

Page 402 of 467

ATTACHMENT 3: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS NO. SNCF164-RPT-02, VERSION 2.0 Sheet 2 of 3 Status: YT NE[] U7 Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)

Equipment ID No. Q2R43A505 Equip. Class, Equipment Description DIESEL GENERA TOR 2B (SKID Interaction Effects

7. Are soft targets free from impact by nearby equipment or structures?

I NEI UE' N/A[

8. Are overhead equipment, distribution systems, ceiling tiles and lighting, 7 NE UE- N/ADl and masonry block walls not likely to collapse onto the equipment?

9. Do attached lines have adequate flexibility to avoid damage? I N[3 UE- N/AE"

10. Based on the above seismic interaction evaluations, is equipment free Y'ý NE) UE of potentially adverse seismic interaction effects?

Other Adverse Conditions

11. Have you looked for and found no other seismic conditions that could YM NEi UE-adversely affect the safety functions of the equipment?

Comments (Additional pages may be added as necessary)

AY"-'0 WGalk-byr [-r YcOM r;, t.l- wlgt-h ej+Ajpnwh (3+INA54,2.D. (F2-1cg)

Eval a lu ate d /uy'&r.ý Date:

ýL4& Y 4 Lw 'cc J08k gh-q L01A-0 AO'a

\j f V/

/

Page 403 of 467

ATTACHMENT 3: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS 0 NO. SNCF164-RPT-02, VERSION 2.0 Page 404 of 467

ATTACHMENT 3: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS NO. SNCF164-RPT-02, VERSION 2.0 Sheet i ofj5 Status: YD NO U[

Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)

Equipment ID No. Q2R43E00Y -l Equip. Cla 20 a Equipment Description SEQUENCER b2o L~ocation: Bldg. AUXILIARY Floor El. 121 Room, Area 2229 Manufacturer, Model, Etc. (optional but recommended)

Instructions for Completing Checklist This checklist may be used to document the results of the Seismic Walkdown of an item of equipment on the SWEL. The space below each of the following questions may be used to record the results ofjudgments and findings. Additional space is provided at the end of this checklist for documenting other comments.

Anchorape

1. Isthe anchorage configuration verification required (i.e., is the item one Y0 NE]

of the 50% of SWEL items requiring such verification)?

W Wd'e~ce-t- j ' 'F-WS jUa(v-KA-9C d~ttd "-7-i- 9 ,

2. Is the anchorage free of bent, broken, missing or loose hardware? Y29 NO UJ NAS-

"Ids, a q A- kCs t

3. Is the anchorage free of Corrosion that is more than mnild surface Y[D NEI U- N/Ar oxidation?

4. Is the anchorage free of visible cracks in the concrete near the anchors? YZ NO] UE] N/AF]

lOmm concrete crack in SEWS package could not be located. A very small crack runs in the same location but It is nearly imperceptible, therefore, ok. -rr-rs SEAr) ,c=W,.ot O-, oilu6--

~~r~~~i-ý 1Ve C)a 0f e 11.-0C cotdyu-fo cc-&lu~c.

5. Is the anchorage configuration consistent with plant documentation? YZ NE] Ur N/A']

(Note: This question only applies if the item is one of the 50% for which an anchorage configuration verification is required.)

6. Based on the above anchorage evaluations, is the anchorage free of YZ NE] Ur]

potentially adverse seismic conditions?

Enter the equipment class name from Appendix B: Classes of Equipment.

Page 405 of 467

ATTACHMENT 3: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS NO. SNCF164-RPT-02, VERSION 2.0 Sheet 2 of0/

Status: YE NO U[-]

Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)

Equipment ID No. S2R43EQE RB 2G Equip. Class' 20 Equipment Description SEQUENCER 82G Interaction Effects

7. Arc soft targets free from impact by nearby equipment or structures? YEI NO UE[ N/A[l Heavy metal tool is hangingfrom a 4' long rod next to cabinet Q2R43EOO1B and could act similar to a pendulum in a seismic event and swing into cabinet or completely fall from wall into the cabinet.

Revise wall fastener to ensure tool is secure.

8. Are overhead equipment, distribution systems, ceiling tiles and lighting, YZ NEI UE N/AE3 and masonry block walls not likely to collapse onto the equipment?

9. Do attached lines have adequate flexibility to avoid damage'? YCK NEI UEI N/All

10. Based on the above seismic interaction evaluations, is equipment free YO NEI UE3 of potentially adverse seismic interaction effects?

Other Adverse Conditions

11. Have you looked for and found no other seismic conditions that could YZ NEI UE adversely affect the safety functions of the equipment?

Comments (Additional pages may be added as necessary)

OR SC4+-2 \a! C.WjkeXk -C AUc.LL,-,er-ýt VlC. *6Jlr- tj. l r*,cI t-Evaluated by: 2t

-hIA LLAl MVccL.V Date: ' -f9--I2-Ur 5 U

~~Yo e A MJt'-

Page 406 of 467

ATTACHMENT 3: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS NO. SNCF164-RPT-02, VERSION 2.0 Page 407 of 467

ATTACHMENT 3: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS NO. SNCF164-RPT-02, VERSION 2.0 Page 408 of 467

ATTACHMENT 3: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS NO. SNCF164-RPT-02, VERSION 2.0 Page 409 of 467

ATTACHMENT 3: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS NO. SNCF164-RPT-02, VERSION 2.0 I

Sheet 1 of Status: Y*N[EI UF'I Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)

Equipment ID No. Q2R43EO02A Equip. Class' Equipment Description SEQUENCER B2F AUX PANEL Location: Bldg. AUXILIARY Floor El. 139' Room, Area 2343 Manufacturer, Model, Etc. (optional but recommended)

Instructions for Completing Checklist This checklist may be used to document the results of the Seismic Walkdown of an item of equipment on the SWEL. The space below each of the following questions may be used to record the results of judgments and findings. Additional space is provided at the end of this checklist for documenting other comments.

Anchorage

1. Is the anchorage configuration verification required (i.e., is the item one Y., ND of the 50% of SWEL items requiring such verification)?

2. Is the anchorage free of bent, broken, missing or loose hardware? Y.E(NO UD N/AD

3. Is the anchorage free of corrosion that is more than mild surface Y,of NO U- N/AD oxidation?

4. Is the anchorage free of visible cracks in the concrete near the anchors? Y,0" NEl UD N/AD

5. Is the anchorage configuration consistent with plant documentation? Y,2l'NO UD N/AD (Note: This question only applies if the item is one of the 50% for which an anchorage configuration verification is required.)

6. Based on the above anchorage evaluations, is the anchorage free of Y/0- NO UO potentially adverse seismic conditions?

Enter the equipment class name from Appendix B: Classes of Equipment.

Page 410 of 467

ATTACHMENT 3: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS NO. SNCF164-RPT-02, VERSION 2.0

-1 Sheet 2 of-- u.1 Status: YO N[I] Ur Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)

Equipment ID No. 02R43EO02A Equip. ClassI 20 Equipment Description SEQUENCER B2FAUX PANEL Interaction Effects

7. Are soft targets free from impact by nearby equipment or structures? YZNO U[-1 N/AE'

8. Are overhead equipment, distribution systems, ceiling tiles and lighting, Y,0NO UD N/AD and masonry block walls not likely to collapse onto the equipment?

9. Do attached lines have adequate flexibility to avoid damage? Y.O'ND UD N/AD

10. Based on the above seismic interaction evaluations, is equipment free Yg ND UD of potentially adverse seismic interaction effects?

Other Adverse Conditions II. Have you looked for and found no other seismic conditions that could Y*0ND Ur adversely affect the safety functions of the equipment?

Comments (Additional pages may be added as necessary)

AV4?, Cer?,e 9(Zq -WI 14- 4, 4- +L -FE- c~- ePý Evaluated by: R0,o-,\-kao - Date: (Ch

,DL~.

7I/e WyI~

Page 411 of 467

ATTACHMENT 3: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS 0

NO. SNCF164-RPT-02, VERSION 2.0 r

Page 412 of 467

ATTACHMENT 3: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS NO. SNCF164-RPT-02, VERSION 2.0 Page 413 of 467

ATTACHMENT 3: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS 0

NO. SNCF164-RPT-02, VERSION 2.0 Page 414 of 467

ATTACHMENT 3: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS NO. SNCF164-RPT-02, VERSION 2.0 Page 415 of 467

ATTACHMENT 3: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS NO. SNCF164-RPT-02, VERSION 2.0 Page 416 of 467

ATTACHMENT 3: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS NO. SNCF164-RPT-02, VERSION 2.0 Sheet i of/,4 Status: *]

Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC) 7W, N[" U7 Equipment ID No. Q2R43EO02B Equip. Class' 20 Equipment Description SEQUENCER B2G AUX RELAY PANEL Location: Bldg. AUXILIARY Floor El. 121 Room, Area 2-; '3 Manufacturer, Model, Etc. (optional but recommended)

Instructions for Completing Checklist This checklist may be used to document the results of the Seismic Walkdown of an item of equipment on the SWEL. The space below each of the following questions may be used to record the results ofjudgments and findings. Additional space is provided at the end of this checklist for documenting other comments.

Anchorage I. Is the anchorage configuration verification required (i.e., is the item one YANEI of the 50% of SWEL items requiring Such verification)?

_ekittn ce. "1-2.,"l1/2V

2. Is the anchorage free of bent, broken, missing or loose hardware? YR NEI UI-- N/AO

3. Is the anchorage free of corrosion that is more than mild surface YU NO Ul- N/Al oxidation?

4. Is the anchorage free of visible cracks in the concrete near the anchors? Y0 NO U- N/Ar

5. Is the anchorage configuration consistent with plant documentation? Yo NEI U- N/AE (Note: This question only applies if the item is one of the 50% for which an anchorage configuration verification is required.)

6. Based on the above anchorage evaluations, is the anchorage free of Yj NO Un potentially adverse seismic conditions?

I Enter the equipment class name from Appendix B: Classes of Equipment.

Page 417 of 467

ATTACHMENT 3: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS NO. SNCF164-RPT-02, VERSION 2.0 Fr2-a/07 Sheet 2 ofA Status: I7 NL- UF]

Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)

Equipment 1I)No. 02R43EO02B Equip. Class, 20 Equipment Description SEQUENCER B2G AUX RELAY PANEL Interaction Effects

7. Are soft targets free from impact by nearby equipment or structures? Y"6 NEr UE- N/AEl Lo-lch ý-o dckt-r ,J caDrJrT a" c -zj21 I L-00 fr:-,--T2c - "

8. Are overhead equipment, distribution systems,'etmyn es and lighting, 0 NIP UD N/AEl and masonry block walls not likely to collapse onto the equipment? LA '6i'[\"z"

9. Do attached lines have adequate flexibility to avoid damage? Yý NEI UE] N/AEl

10. Based on the above seismic interaction evaluations, is equipment free YY N[] UO of potentially adverse seismic interaction effects?

Other Adverse Conditions

11. Have you looked for and found no other seismic conditions that could Yo NEI U-adversely affect the safety functions of the equipment?

Comments (Additional pages may be added as necessary)

Evaluated by: tU,- ) __. L-awg-ltAI.~ Date: . I ..

Tjr2l A.

1Az' Page 418 of 467

0 ATTACHMENT 3: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS 0 NO. SNCF164-RPT-02, VERSION 2.0 I

Page 419 of 467

0 ATTACHMENT 3: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS NO. SNCF164-RPT-02, VERSION 2.0

I I Page 420 of 467

ATTACHMENT 3: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS NO. SNCF164-RPT-02, VERSION 2.0 I *. 'Sheet I of'77 Status: YN NEI ur-Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)

Equipment ID No. QSY41C507D Equip. Class' 9 Equipment Descripdon DG RM 2B EXHAUST FAN Location: Bldg. DIESEL Floor El. 177' Room, Area 59 Manufacturer, Model, Etc. (optional but recommended)

Instructions for Completing Checklist This checklist may be used to document the results of the Seismic Walkdown of an item of equipment on the SWEL. The space below each of the following questions may be used to record the results ofjudgments and findings. Additional space is provided at the end of this checklist for documenting other comments.

Anchorage I. Is the anchorage configuration verification required (i.e., is the item one YZ N" of the 50% of SWEL items requiring such verification)?

2. Is the anchorage free of bent, broken, missing or loose hardware? YE NO UI N/A-

3. Is the anchorage free of corrosion that is more than mild surface YZ NO UC N/A[I oxidation?

4. Is the anchorage free of visible cracks in the concrete near the anchors? YE NEI Ur N/AO

5. Is the anchorage configuration consistent with plant documentation? Y9 NEI UE N/AO (Note: This question only applies if the item is one of the 50% for which an anchorage configuration verification is requited.)

Refer to drawing D- 170338, Rev. 10

6. Based on the above anchorage evaluations. is the anchorage free of YZ NEI UE potentially adverse seismic conditions?

'Enier the eq uipmenrt rlsss nanic fromnAppendix B: Classes of Equipmuent.

Page 421 of 467

ATTACHMENT 3: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS NO. SNCF164-RPT-02, VERSION 2.0 Sheet 2 ofGV7 Status: Y[ NE] UI-Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)

Equipment ID No. QSY4IC507D Equip. Class' Equipment Description DG RM2B EXHAUST FAN Interaction Effects

7. Are soft targets free from impact by nearby equipment or structures? YZ NE[ UE- N/A0

8. Are overhead equipment, distribution systems, ceiling tiles and lighting, YZ NEI UEI N/AE and masonry block walls not likely to collapse onto the equipment?

9. Do attached lines have adequate flexibility to avoid damage? YED NE3 U0 N/AQ

10. Based on the above seismic interaction evaluations, is equipment free YS NEI UE of potentially adverse seismic interaction effects?

Other Adverse Conditions

11. Have you looked for and found no other seismic conditions that could YM NEI U[l adversely affect the safety functions of the equipment?

Comments (Additional pages may be added as necessary)

Evaluated by: *4

.. ..kf "ai *t . , CcL Date: dI/C'/12

".., /n-., / * -~LQ

'[ io !~' .*'T Page 422 of 467

ATTACHMENT 3: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS NO. SNCF1 64-RPT-02, VERSION 2.0 Page 423 of 467

ATTACHMENT 3: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS NO. SNCF164-RPT-02, VERSION 2.0 Page 424 of 467

ATTACHMENT 3: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS NO. SNCF164-RPT-02, VERSION 2.0 Page 425 of 467

ATTACHMENT 3: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS NO. SNCF164-RPT-02, VERSION 2.0 Page 426 of 467

ATTACHMENT 3: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS NO. SNCF164-RPT-02, VERSION 2.0 0

'7 Page 427 of 467

ATTACHMENT 3: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS NO. SNCF164-RPT-02, VERSION 2.0 6ýz IAtI~

Sheet i of iW Status: Y* NEI ur--

Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)

Equipment ID No. QSY41M542D Equip. Class' v Equipment Description DG RM 2B INTAKE LOUVER Mi Location: Bldg. DIESEL Floor El. 155 Room, Area V5-1 Manufacturer, Model, Etc. (optional but recommended)

Instructions for Completing Checklist This checklist may be used to document the results of the Seismic Walkdown of an item of equipment on the SWEL. The space below each of the following questions may be used to record the results of judgments and findings. Additional space is provided at the end of this checklist for documenting other comments.

Anchorage

1. Is the anchorage configuration verification required (i.e., is the item one Yo NI]

of the 50% of SWEL items requiring such verification)?

2. Is the anchorage free of bent, broken, missing or loose hardware?

YFNO U- N/AO

3. Is the anchorage free of corrosion that is more than mild surface Y0 NI UOI N/AD oxidation?

4. Is the anchorage free of visible cracks in the concrete near the anchors? Yo NEI Ur N/A"

5. Is the anchorage configuration consistent with plant documentation? Y) NEI UO N/Al (Note: This question only applies if the item is one of the 50% for which an anchorage configuration verification is required.)

6. Based on the above anchorage evaluations, is the anchorage free of v NE UE potentially adverse seismic conditions?

Enter the equipment class nane from Appendix B: Classes of Equipment.

Page 428 of 467

ATTACHMENT 3: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS NO. SNCF164-RPT-02, VERSION 2.0 Sheet 2 ofRq Status: YP NE* U Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)

Equipment ID No. QSY41M542D Equip. Class' 0 Equipment Description DG RM 2B INTAKE LOUVER MOTOR Interaction Effects

7. Are soft targets free from impact by nearby equipment or structures? I NEI U['3 N/AD

8. Are overhead equipment, distribution systems, ceiling tiles and lighting, Yo ND UD N/AD and masonry block walls not likely to collapse onto the equipment?

9. Do attached lines have adequate flexibility to avoid damage? YP NIl LID N/AD3

10. Based on the above seismic interaction evaluations, is equipment free Yo NDi UD of potentially adverse seismic interaction effects?

Other Adverse Conditions

11. Have you looked for and found no other seismic conditions that could Y[ONr UD adversely affect the safety functions of the equipment?

Comments (Additional pages may be added as necessary)

Evaluated by: al I (AlXi "0 M (A Date: *-74 12 Page 429 of 467

SATTACHMENT 3: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS NO. SNCF164-RPT-02, VERSION 2.0 Page 430 of 467

ATTACHMENT 3: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS NO. SNCF164-RPT-02, VERSION 2.0 Page 431 of 467

ATTACHMENT 3: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS NO. SNCF164-RPT-02, VERSION 2.0 Sheet 1of 4 Status: YD-- NE-- U[]

Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)

Equipment ID No. Q2R16B006-A Pko Equip. Class, 2 F2-110 Equipment Description 600V LOAD CENTER 2D Location: Bldg. AUX Floor El. 139 Room, Area 2335 Manufacturer, Model, Etc. (optional but recommended)

Instructions for Completing Checklist This checklist may be used to document the results of the Seismic Walkdown of an item of equipment on the SWEL. The space below each of the following questions may be used to record the results of judgments and findings. Additional space is provided at the end of this checklist for documenting other comments.

Anchorage

1. Is the anchorage configuration verification required (i.e., is the item one Y[E] NZ of the 50% of SWEL items requiring such verification)?

2. Is the anchorage free of bent, broken, missing or loose hardware? YE- NEI UE N/AD

3. Is the anchorage free of corrosion that is more than mild surface YE NE-] UZ N/AD oxidation?

Cannot open cabinet,anchorage is inside cabinet

4. Is the anchorage free of visible cracks in the concrete near the anchors? YE] N[E U! N/AE

5. Is the anchorage configuration consistent with plant documentation? YE- NEI UE N/AZ (Note: This question only applies if the item is one of the 50% for which an anchorage configuration verification is required.)

6. Based on the above anchorage evaluations, is the anchorage free of YE- NEI UZ potentially adverse seismic conditions?

Cannot open cabinet, anchorage is inside cabinet Enter the equipment class name from Appendix B: Classes of Equipment.

Page 432 of 467

ATTACHMENT 3: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS NO. SNCF164-RPT-02, VERSION 2.0 Sheet 2 of 4 Status: YE] NE] UN Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)

Equipment ED No. Q2R 168006-A. Pko Equip. Class,...2 F2-1 10 Equipment Description 600V LOAD CENTER 2D Interaction Effects

7. Are soft targets free from impact by nearby equipment or structures? YE NEI UE3 N/AE

8. Are overhead equipment, distribution systems, ceiling tiles and lighting, YE NEI UE] N/AE and masonry block walls not likely to collapse onto the equipment?

9. Do attached lines have adequate flexibility to avoid damage? Y[ NEI UE- N/AE]

10. Based on the above seismic interaction evaluations, is equipment free YE NEI UFJ of potentially adverse seismic interaction effects?

Other Adverse Conditions

11. Have you looked for and found no other seismic conditions that could YZ N[-] U7 adversely affect the safety functions of the equipment?

Comments (Additional pages may be added as necessary)

This package was originallysigned on 8-29-12 but retyped to clarity responses on 10-24-12.

Evaluated by: d

.. ~eFarah bv Tel eo 1bu/' Date: 8/29/12 Worn6obv Telecon 8/29/12 Page 433 of 467

0 ATTACHMENT 3: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS NO. SNCF164-RPT-02, VERSION 2.0 Page 434 of 467

0 ATTACHMENT 3: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS NO. SNCF164-RPT-02, VERSION 2.0 Page 435 of 467

ATTACHMENT 3: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS NO. SNCF164-RPT-02, VERSION 2.0 Sheet i of.8/ 6,1 .1 Status: Y2JN[-] U- i'l/'

Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)

Equipment IDNo. Q2R17BOO1-A Equip.

Equipment Description MCC 2A Location: Bldg. AUXILIARY Floor El. 139' Room, Area 2F,"

Manufacturer, Model, Etc. (optional but recommended)

Instructions for Completing Checklist This checklist may be used to document the results of the Seismic Walkdown of an item of equipment on the SWEL. The space below each of the following questions may be used to record the results ofjudgments and findings. Additional space is provided at the end of this checklist for documenting other comments.

Anchorage I. Is the anchorage configuration verification required (i.e., is the item one YI- N4!

of the 50% of SWEL items requiring such verification)?

2. Is the anchorage free of bent, broken, missing or loose hardware? Y.,]NC U-I N/AC

3. Is the anchorage free of corrosion that is more than mild surface Y*iN- UIJ N/AC oxidation?

4. Is the anchorage free of visible cracks in the concrete near the anchors? Y[R/Nr- U-] N/AC3

5. Is the anchorage configuration consistent with plant documentation? YEI NEI UE- N/AEI (Note: This question only applies if the item is one of the 50% for which an anchorage configuration verification is required.)

6. Based on the above anchorage evaluations, is the anchorage free of Y[Ef/N U]

potentially adverse seismic conditions?

Enter the equipment class name from Appendix B: Classes of Equipment.

Page 436 of 467

ATTACHMENT 3: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS NO. SNCF164-RPT-02, VERSION 2.0 Sheet 2 of" 5 Jew,/11,

] U E)-- s Status: Y4 N E Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)

Equipment ID No. Q2R17BOO1-A Equip. Class, 1 Equipment Description MCC 2A Interaction Effects

7. Are soft targets free from impact by nearby equipment or structures? YZNr- U- N/AO S. Are overhead equipment, distribution systems, ceiling tiles and lighting, YO NfI UE] N/AEl and masonry block walls not likely to collapse onto the equipment?

9. Do attached lines have adequate flexibility to avoid damage? Y[D N- UO N/AO

10. Based on the above seismic interaction evaluations, is equipment free YC/NO U-of potentially adverse seismic interaction effects?

Other Adverse Conditions 1I. Have you looked for and found no other seismic conditions that could Yd NO UE-adversely affect the safety functions of the equipment?

Comments (Additional pages may be added as necessary)

'.O Evaluated by: -. l'i4i *- ~~it~$tA~ Date: ___________

(2 . -_ . .

(2/w6 ý4n&:

Page 437 of 467

ATTACHMENT 3: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS NO. SNCF164-RPT-02, VERSION 2.0 Page 438 of 467

ATTACHMENT 3: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS S

NO. SNCF164-RPT-02, VERSION 2.0 L

Page 439 of 467

ATTACHMENT 3: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS 0

NO. SNCF164-RPT-02, VERSION 2.0 Page 440 of 467

ATTACHMENT 3: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS NO. SNCF164-RPT-02, VERSION 2.0

~:44~ ~1-~

,ýýL, p- Shta t ofs :

Status: YI* I-- ul-Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)

Equipment ID No. Q2RI7B098-A Equip. Class' I Equipment Description MCC 2CC Location: Bldg. AUXILIARY Floor El. 155 Room, Area 2409 Manufacturer. Model. Etc. (optional hut recommended)

Instructions for Completing Checklist This checklist may be used to document the results of the Seismic Walkdown of an item of equipment on the SWEL. The space below each of the following questions may be used to record the results of judgments and findings. Additional space is provided at the end of this checklist for documenting other comments.

Ancchorae I. Is the anchorage configuration verification required (i.e., is the item one YO of the 507o of SWEL items requiring such verification)?

.7,

2. Is the anchorage free of bent, broken, missing or loose hardware? Y[2NE UOI N/AEI CC;ae61/-ý 7) ,)e P1w~

^Je ",,/ -7br~

4,171 1"' Is Ihe anchorage free of corrosion that is more than mild surface YkNO UE N/AE oxidation?

4. Is the anchorage free of visible cracks in the concrete near the anchors? Yk ZN-I U- N/A1

5. Is the anchorage configuration consistent with plant documentation? YO NO uo NUAD--

(Note: This question only applies if the item is one of the 50% foi which an anchorage configuration verification is required.)

/

YE]UD-

6. Based on the above anchorage evaluations, is the anchorage free of potentially adverse seismic conditions'?

t nter Ihe equlplnien class name fioln Appendix B: Classes of EqUlillpleCll.

Page 441 of 467

ATTACHMENT 3: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS NO. SNCF164-RPT-02, VERSION 2.0 Status: Sheet YZNooa UF]

Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)

Equipment ID No. Q2R17B098-A Equip. Classi I Equipment Description MCC 2CC Interaction Effects

7. Are soft targets free from impact by nearby equipment or structures?

8. Are overhead equipment, distribution systems, ceiling tiles and lighting, YV<n1 UO N/AQ and masonry block walls not likely to collapse onto the equipment?

9. Do attached lines have adequate flexibility to avoid damage? YVN/l U0- N/A[]

10. Based on the above seismic interaction evaluations, is equipment free YN/NEN UD of potentially adverse seismic interaction effects?

Other Adverse Conditions

11. Have you looked for and found no other seismic conditions that could a [] U[]

adversely affect the safety functions of the equipment?

Comments (Additional pages may be added as necessary)

Page 442 of 467

ATTACHMENT 3: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS NO. SNCF164-RPT-02, VERSION 2.0 Page 443 of 467

ATTACHMENT 3: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS NO. SNCF164-RPT-02, VERSION 2.0 Page 444 of 467

ATTACHMENT 3: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS NO. SNCF164-RPT-02, VERSION 2.0 9-j Page 445 of 467

ATTACHMENT 3: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS NO. SNCF164-RPT-02, VERSION 2.0 Sheet i of 2'Z Status: YZ N[] UE]

Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)

Equipment ID No. Q2R17BO02-B Equip. Class' I Equipment Description MCC 2B Location: Bldg. Aux. Bido Floor El. 121' Room, Area 2209 Manufacturer, Model, Etc. (optional but recommended)

Instructions for Completing Checklist This checklist may be used to document the results of the Seismic Walkdown of an item of equipment on the SWEL. The space below each of the following questions may be used to record the results of judgments and findings. Additional space is provided at the end of this checklist for documenting other comments.

Anchorage

1. Is the anchorage configuration verification required (i.e., is the item one Yo No of the 50% of SWEL items requiring such verification)?

2. Is the anchorage free of bent, broken, missing or loose hardware? Y0D NEI UD1 N/AC' Component welded to channel welded to embedded plate. Welds inspected for cracks, corrosion and other potentially adverse seismic conditions.

3. Is the anchorage free of corrosion that is more than mild surface YZ NEI U1 N/A" oxidation?

4. Is the anchorage free of visible cracks in the concrete near the anchors? Y0 NEI UQ- N/AD

5. Is the anchorage configuration consistent with plant documentation? YZ N["] UD N/A[

(Note: This question only applies if the item is one of the 50% for which an anchorage configuration verification is required.)

uvI~wi VI

6. Based on the above anchorage evaluations, is the anchorage free of YN NEI Un potentially adverse seismic conditions'?

1 Enter the equipment class name from Appendix B: Classes of Equipment.

Page 446 of 467

ATTACHMENT 3: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS NO. SNCF164-RPT-02, VERSION 2.0 Sheet 2 of/*

Status: Y N[l] UFC Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)

EquipmentiDNo. 02R17B002-B Equip. Class' I Equipment Description MCC2B Interaction Effects

7. Are soft targets free from impact by nearby equipment or structures? Y9 N[3 UD N/AD

8. Are overhead equipment, distribution systems, ceiling tiles and lighting, YZ ND] UD N/AD-and masonry block walls not likely to collapse onto the equipment?

9. Do attached lines have adequate flexibility to avoid damage? Y0 ND3 UD' N/AD

10. Based on the above seismic interaction evaluations, is equipment free YS ND3 U']

of potentially adverse seismic interaction effects?

Other Adverse Conditions

11. Have you looked for and found no other seismic conditions that could Y[K NDI UD" adversely affect the safety functions of the equipment?

Comments (Additional pages may be added as necessary)

None Page 447 of 467

ATTACHMENT 3: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS NO. SNCF164-RPT-02, VERSION 2.0 r,?--t4-Sheet 1 of`845 Status: YE NF UFi Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)

Equipment ID No. Q2F16T501 Equip.

Equipment Description RWST TANK Location: Bldg. RWST Floor El. 155 Room, Area RWST Manufacturer, Model. Etc. (optional but recommended)

Instructions for Completing Checklist This checklist may be used to document the results of the Seismic Walkdown of an item of equipment on the SWEL. The space below each of the following questions may be used to record the results ofjudgments and findings. Additional space is provided at the end of this checklist for documenting other comments.

Anchorage

1. Is the anchorage configuration verification required (i.e., is the item one of the 50% of SWEL items requiring such verification)?

h Sf /2.Ihb ofe en,me har

2. Is the anchorage free of bent, broken, midssing or loose hardware? YVNrI U-- N/AEl

3. Is the anchorage free of coiTosion that is more than mild surface YZNC UC- N/AD oxidation?

6/?- 5o9~ ý/ 6,e 7D C/e 9 -4 AýeA &

4. Is the anchorage free of vtstble cracks in the concrete nea-r the anchors? 1ý'NCO UC N/AC3 Ahiw ck -e-9q,4* -J f' dat kd%6

5. Is the anchorage configuration consistent with plant documentation? Y NE-] UC N/ACI (Note: This question only applies if the item is one of the 50% for which art anchor1age configuration verification is required.)

6. Based on the above anchorage evaluations, is the anchorage free of & NC] UCI potentially adverse seismic conditions?

Entei the equipment class nanse from Appendix B: Classes of Equipment.

Page 448 of 467

ATTACHMENT 3: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS NO. SNCF164-RPT-02, VERSION 2.0 Sheet 2 of$6A Status: YONr" UE-Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)

Equipment ID No. Q2F16T501 Equip.

Equipment Description RWST TANK Interaction Effects

7. Are soft targets free from impact by nearby equipment or structures? Y-ND3 UD N/AD

8. Are overhead equipment, distribution systems, ceiling files and lighting, INF-I UD N/AD and masonry block walls not likely to collapse onto the equipment?

9. Do attached lines have adequate flexibility to avoid damage? TNrC3 UD N/AD-

10. Based on the above seismic interaction evaluations, is equipment free 'fND UD of potentially adverse seismic interaction effects?

Other Adverse Conditions 1I. Have you looked for and found no other seismic conditions that could V I"NE UO adversely affect the safety functions of the equipment?

Comments (Additional pages may be added as necessary)

A0 Evaluated by: ., y ,_ Date: r So

2-P, /-ve6'clki>l. Ao/'kz.a0 Page 449 of 467

ATTACHMENT 3: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS NO. SNCF164-RPT-02, VERSION 2.0 Page 450 of 467

ATTACHMENT 3: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS NO. SNCF164-RPT-02, VERSION 2.0 Page 451 of 467

ATTACHMENT 3: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS NO. SNCF164-RPT-02, VERSION 2.0 Page 452 of 467

ATTACHMENT 3: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS NO. SNCF164-RPT-02, VERSION 2.0 Page 453 of 467

ATTACHMENT 3: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS NO. SNCF164-RPT-02, VERSION 2.0 2.1 S~heeeof"3 Status: No U-I" Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)

Equipment ID No. Q2G31POO2A Equip. Class' 5 Equipment Description 2A SFP PUMP Location: Bldg. AUXILIARY Floor El. 139 Room, Area 2.3 4Z.

Manufacturer, Model, Etc. (optional but recommended)

Instructions for Completing Checklist This checklist may be used to document the results of the Seismic Walkdown of an item of equipment on the SWEL. The space below each of the following questions may be used to record the results ofjudgments and findings. Additional space is provided at the end of this checklist for documenting other comments.

Anchorage

1. Is the anchorage configuration verification required (i.e., is the item one of the 50% of SWEL items requiring such verification)?

2. Is the anchorage free of bent, broken, missing or loose hardware? Yk"NDl U[I N/AQ-

3. Is the anchorage free ofcorrosion that is more than mild surface Ytr'I U0I N/Al:

oxidation?

4. Is the anchorage free of visible cracks in the concrete near the anchors? ý-O U[I--N/A-

5. Is the anchorage configuration consistent with plant documentation? Yb-NND UEI N/AE (Note: This question only applies ifthe item is one of the 50% for which an anchorage configuration verification is required.)

6. Based on the above anchorage evaluations, is the anchorage free of 4 UD uE3 potentially adverse seismic conditions?

' Enter the equipment class name from Appendix B: Classes of Equipment.

Page 454 of 467

ATTACHMENT 3: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS NO. SNCF164-RPT-02, VERSION 2.0 SheetOf 3 Status: YV"N* U[-']

Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)

Equipment ID No. 02G31PO02A Equip. Class, 5 Equipment Description 2A SFP PUMP Interaction Effects

7. Are soft targets free from impact by nearby equipment or structures? YoNUE N/ACL

8. Are overhead equipment, distribution systems, ceiling tiles and lighting. "V ["] U[E] N/AE]

and masonry block walls not likely to collapse onto the equipment?

9. Do attached lines have adequate flexibility to avoid damage? Y2ý()UE N/AE1

10. Based on the above seismic interaction evaluations, is equipment free of potentially adverse seismic interaction effects?

Other Adverse Conditions

11. Have you looked for and found no other seismic conditions that could YP]E UF-adversely affect the safety functions of the equipment?

Comments (Additional pages may be added as necessary)

IV0o, Evaluated by: _ ýCZX Date: 2.)// 2Zc(-V k w',,,, 13*.*, s 1V1' t I I

Page 455 of 467

ATTACHMENT 3: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS NO. SNCF164-RPT-02, VERSION 2.0 Page 456 of 467

ATTACHMENT 3: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS NO. SNCF164-RPT-02, VERSION 2.0 F25,02 -3 Sheey{ of 3 Status: Y5 NEI U[7 Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)

Equipment ID No. 02G31VO02A Equip. Class, v Equipment Description 24 SFP HX INLET ISO Location: Bldg. AUXILIARY Floor El. 155 Room, Area ,2. 44r*

Manufacturer, Model, Etc. (optional but recommended)

Instructions for Completing Checklist This checklist may be used to document the results of the Seismic Walkdown of an item of equipment on the SWEL. The space below each of the following questions may be used to record the results ofjudgments and findings. Additional space is provided at the end of this checklist for documenting other comments.

Anchorage

1. Is the anchorage configuration verification required (i.e., is the item one YEI N--/A of the 50% of SWEL items requiring such verification)?

2. Is the anchorage free of bent, broken, missing or loose hardware? YEI NEI UE1 N/AEý-'

3. Is the anchorage free of corrosion that is more than mild surface YEI NEI UED N/Ap.-

oxidation?

4. Is the anchorage free of visible cracks in the concrete near the anchors? YE-) NEI UE3 N/A6fr-

5. Is the anchorage configuration consistent with plant documentation? Y[E NE UE N/Aý5ý (Note: This question only applies if the item is one of the 50% for which an anchorage configuration verification is required.)

/"v - C&/AZo,04i f- -

6. Based on the above anchorage evaluations, is the anchorage free of potentially adverse seismic conditions?

Enter the equipment class name from Appendix 13:Classes of Equipment.

Page 457 of 467

ATTACHMENT 3: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS NO. SNCF164-RPT-02, VERSION 2.0 Shet of3 Status: YZ* N[E ur-Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)

Equipment I1) No. Q2G31VOO2A Equip. Class' 0 Equipment Description 2A SFP HX INLET ISO Interaction Effects

7. Are soft targets free from impact by nearby equipment or structures? YI/4[J U[] N/A[]

8. Are overhead equipment, distribution systems, ceiling tiles and lighting, YUVN[] Ui- N/A[]

and masonry block walls not likely to collapse onto the equipment?

9. Do attached lines have adequate flexibility to avoid damage? Yre[N] U[] N/AL]

10. Based on the above seismic interaction evaluations, is equipment free NE- Un of potentially adverse seismic interaction effects?

Other Adverse Conditions

11. Have you looked for and found no other seismic conditions that could N U[L]

adversely affect the safety functions of the equipment?

Comments (Additional pages may be added as necessary)

Al/o g e!

Evaluated by:

4U 1>&-/ Date: './I. 2O/ -.

Page 458 of 467

ATTACHMENT 3: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS NO. SNCF164-RPT-02, VERSION 2.0 Page 459 of 467

ATTACHMENT 3: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS NO. SNCF164-RPT-02, VERSION 2.0 F2 Z)'2- 4-- Sheet 1 of/4 Status: Y*J NE] UL Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)

Equipment ID No. Q2G31VOO3B Equip. Class' 0 Equipment Description 2B SFP HX OUTLET ISO Location: Bldg. AUXILIARY Floor El. 165 Room, Area (4-'r& OUT)

Manufacturer, Model, Etc. (optional but recommended)

Instructions for Completing Checklist This checklist may be used to document the results of the Seismic Walkdown of an item of equipment on the SWEL. The space below each of the following questions may be used to record the results ofjudgments and findings. Additional space is provided at the end of this checklist for documenting other comments.

Anchora2e

1. Is the anchorage configuration verification required (i.e., is the item one YOEN of the 50% of SWEL items requiring such verification)?

2. Is the anchorage free of bent, broken, missing or loose hardware? YE NO UE N/Ap

3. Is the anchorage free of corrosion that is more than mild surface YO NO U- N/A, oxidation?

4. Is the anchorage free of visible cracks in the concrete near the anchors? YO NE UE N/Ag

5. Is the anchorage configuration consistent with plant documentation? YO NEI U" N/Ar (Note: This question only applies if the item is one of the 50% for which an anchorage configuration verification is required.)

6. Based on the above anchorage evaluations, is the anchorage free of Y, NO UE-"

potentialy adverse seismic conditions?

Enter the equipment class name from Appendix B: Classes of Equipment.

Page 460 of 467

ATTACHMENT 3: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS NO. SNCF164-RPT-02, VERSION 2.0 Sheet 2 of 14 Status: YIA NEI] U[-

Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)

Equipment ID No. Q2G31VOO3B Equip. Class, 0 Equipment Description 2B SFP HX OUTLET ISO Interaction Effects

7. Are soft targets free from impact by nearby equipment or structures? YN- Ur- N/AO

8. Are overhead equipment, distribution systems, ceiling tiles and lighting, ybd NE UE N/Al]

and masonry block walls not likely to collapse onto the equipment? / k.

9. Do attached lines have adequate flexibility to avoid damage? YY NO1 UO N/AO

10. Based on the above seismic interaction evaluations, is equipment free /0( NEI UO of potentially adverse seismic interaction effects?

Other Adverse Conditions 1I. Have you looked for and found no other seismic conditions that could Y NEI UEJ adversely affect the safety functions of the equipment?

Comments (Additional pages may be added as necessary)

Evaluated by: Laura m4 c.a, Date: e/'o/r-0 /3o Il12-Page 461 of 467

ATTACHMENT 3: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS NO. SNCF164-RPT-02, VERSION 2.0 Page 462 of 467

ATTACHMENT 3: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS 0

NO. SNCF164-RPT-02, VERSION 2.0 "A

Page 463 of 467

ATTACHMENT 3: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS NO. SNCF164-RPT-02, VERSION 2.0 Sheet 1 ofi -

Status: YEýINEI U--

Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)

Equipment ID No. Q2G31VO21B Equip. Class, 0 Equipment Description 2B SFP PUMP CASING VENT Location: Bldg. AUXILIARY Floor El. 139 Room, Area Q34 Manufacturer, Model, Etc. (optional but recommended) - -

Instructions for Completing Checkiist This checklist may be used to document the results of the Seismic Walkdown of an item of equipment on the SWEL. The space below each of the following questions may be used to record the results ofjudgments and findings. Additional space is provided at the end of this checklist for documenting other comments.

Anchorage

1. Is the anchorage configuration verification required (i.e., is the item one YE of the 50% of SWEL items requiring such verification)?

2. Is the anchorage free of bent, broken, missing or loose hardware? YeNEI UL] N/A[-

3. Is the anchorage free of corrosion that is more than mild surface YENE- UE- N/AL oxidation?

4. Is the anchorage free of visible cracks in the concrete near the anchors? YMNE'I Uf- N/AL]

5. Is the anchorage configuration consistent with plant documentation? YE NEI ULI N/A[ý(

(Note: This question only applies if the item is one of the 50% for which an anchorage configuration verification is required.)

/

YE'NEN*ur

6. Based on the above anchorage evaluations, is the anchorage free of potentially adverse seismic conditions?

IEnter the equipment class name from Appendix B: Classes ot-Equipment.

Page 464 of 467

ATTACHMENT 3: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS NO. SNCF164-RPT-02, VERSION 2.0 Sheet 2 of6~

Status: Y*NLZ U[-

Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)

Equipment ID No. 02G31V021B Equip. Class, 0 Equipment Description 2B SFP PUMPCASING VENT Interaction Effects

7. Are soft targets free from impact by nearby equipment or structures? Y[E' NO U" N/AO

8. Are overhead equipment, distribution systems, ceiling tiles and lighting, Yd fNO UO N/A[

and masonry block walls not likely to collapse onto the equipment?

9. Do attached lines have adequate flexibility to avoid damage? Y[NO- UO N/AO

10. Based on the above seismic interaction evaluations, is equipment free of potentially adverse seismic interaction effects?

Other Adverse Conditions

11. Have you looked for and found no other seismic conditions that could YdN- UO adversely affect the safety functions of the equipment?

Comments (Additional pages may be added as necessary)

-&- ") I/

Page 465 of 467

ATTACHMENT 3: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS NO. SNCF164-RPT-02, VERSION 2.0 0

Page 466 of 467

ATTACHMENT 3: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS NO. SNCF164-RPT-02, VERSION 2.0 Page 467 of 467

ML13252A156

Text

Navigation menu

Search