|
|---|
Category:- No Document Type Applies
MONTHYEARML17073A1642017-03-14014 March 2017
Public Meeting Feedback Form 659
ML17011A2022016-12-23023 December 2016
ASP Analysis-Reject-Farley TDAFW Pump Design Issue Resulted in a Degraded Condition in Both Unites(Ler 348-2015-005)
ML15253A4052016-03-11011 March 2016
Enclosure 1 Seven Screening Criteria
ML13252A1592013-09-0404 September 2013
Enclosure 1, Including Attachments 1 to 8: Licensing Summary of Walkdown Report. Part 7 of 7
ML13247A4282013-09-0404 September 2013
Decommissioning Spot-Check - Farley Unit 2
ML13252A1512013-09-0404 September 2013
Enclosure 1, Including Attachments 1 to 8: Licensing Summary of Walkdown Report. Part 1 of 7
NL-13-1555, Enclosure 2: Updated Farley Unit 2 Seismic Walkdown Report for Resolution of Fukushima Near-Term Task Force Recommendation 2.3: Seismic2013-09-0404 September 2013
Enclosure 2: Updated Farley Unit 2 Seismic Walkdown Report for Resolution of Fukushima Near-Term Task Force Recommendation 2.3: Seismic
ML13252A1532013-09-0404 September 2013
Enclosure 1, Including Attachments 1 to 8: Licensing Summary of Walkdown Report. Part 2 of 7
ML13252A1542013-09-0404 September 2013
Enclosure 1, Including Attachments 1 to 8: Licensing Summary of Walkdown Report. Part 3 of 7
ML13252A1552013-09-0404 September 2013
Enclosure 1, Including Attachments 1 to 8: Licensing Summary of Walkdown Report. Part 4 of 7
ML13252A1562013-09-0404 September 2013
Enclosure 1, Including Attachments 1 to 8: Licensing Summary of Walkdown Report. Part 5 of 7
ML13252A1572013-09-0404 September 2013
Enclosure 1, Including Attachments 1 to 8: Licensing Summary of Walkdown Report. Part 6 of 7
NL-13-1555, Enclosure 1, Including Attachments 1 to 8: Licensing Summary of Walkdown Report. Part 1 of 72013-09-0404 September 2013
Enclosure 1, Including Attachments 1 to 8: Licensing Summary of Walkdown Report. Part 1 of 7
ML13247A4252013-08-22022 August 2013
Decommissioning Spot-Check - Farley, Unit 1
ML13130A0782013-04-29029 April 2013
Consent and Waiver Form
ML12056A0522012-03-12012 March 2012
Enclosure 6 - List of Power Reactor Licensees and Holders of Construction Permits in Active or Deferred Status
ML1019303142010-06-0909 June 2010
Onsite Ground/Surface Water Monitoring Questionnaire for Farley
ML1023605662010-05-0303 May 2010
CR Word Search Query, Farley
ML0914801562009-05-28028 May 2009
Initial Exam 2008-301 Final Administrative Documents
ML0819603482008-07-14014 July 2008
Public Meeting Attendee List
ML0733301402007-11-19019 November 2007
Attendee List for Public Exit Meeting
ML0732400242007-10-25025 October 2007
Examples of Max Thermal Power License Conditions
ML0726701442007-09-20020 September 2007
Farley Public Exit Meeting, List of Attendees
ML0726303192007-09-14014 September 2007
P. Paquin Ltr Amendment to Certificate of Compliance No. 6574 for the Model No. 3-82B Package (TAC L24116)/ Register User List
ML0726301142007-09-14014 September 2007
/ P. Paquin Ltr Amendment to Certificate of Compliance No. 9208 for the Model No. 10-142B Package (TAC L24117)/S121170
ML0634705992006-12-14014 December 2006
Plant Service List
ML0634103562006-12-0505 December 2006
Enclosure 4, Plant Mailing List
ML0611400662006-04-18018 April 2006
Annual Assessment Meeting, NRC, Joseph M. Farley Nuclear Plant, Attendee List
ML0519603252005-07-15015 July 2005
Attachment 3 - Recommendation and Action Item Cross Reference Table 2005-025
ML0514301482005-05-0101 May 2005
Preoperational Tests, Startup Tests, and Other Items Which Must Be Completed Prior to Proceeding to Succeeding Operational Modes
ML0512500472005-04-27027 April 2005
Annual Assessment Meeting - Attendance List for Joseph M. Farley Nuclear Plant
ML0404104922004-02-20020 February 2004
Order EA-03-009 Service List
ML0505404642004-02-0909 February 2004
Dynamic Web Page Printout Dated 02/09/2004 Regarding Applied Violations for Nuclear Power Plants
ML0403702172004-01-16016 January 2004
Photo Copy of Cd Entitled Usfws Fnp Additional Environmental Informstion.
ML0325214292003-08-20020 August 2003
Westinghouse - Nuclear Safety Advisory Letter NSAL-03-6, High Net Heat Input, Dated 08/20/2003
2017-03-14
[Table view] |
Text
ONSITE GROUND/SURFACE WATER MONITORING QUESTIONNAIRE Onsite RadiologicalEffluent/REMP Monitoring Program Phase I (Near term response)
Yes No
- 1. Does the licensee have radioactive groundwater monitoring wells onsite? C If YES: How many wells:
Where are they located (e.g., distributed around/throughout the site, in a particular region of the site and/or near particular buildings/structures, etc.)
(a.) within the Protected Area C C (b.) within the Radiologically Restricted Area C C (c.) within the owner-controlled area C C (d.) at what frequency does the licensee sample/analyze the wells, (e.) for what radionuclides does the licensee monitor Gamma emitters (gamma Spec) C C If Yes - at what MDA
- . Tritium C C If Yes - at what MDA Gross Beta C C If Yes - at what MDA Other: C C If Yes - at what MDA
- 2. If the licensee does NOT have an onsite radioactive groundwater monitoring program:
(a.) Does the licensee plan to implement a groundwater C monitoring program?.
If Yes, when and to what extent: -Do quarterly monitoring of groundwater
_which includes water pumped from tendon gallery (b.),Does the licensee plan to take other measures to assure they C can identify radioactive groundwater contamination
- 3. Does the licensee have a french drain system surrounding the main reactor facility and auxiliary structures?
(a.) is the system analyzed for radionuclides?
C C (b.) at what frequency does the licensee sample/analyze the wells (c.) for what radionuclides does the licensee monitor Gamma emitters (gamma Spec) C C If Yes - at what MDA Tritium C C IfYes - at what MDA Gross Beta C C If Yes - at what MDA
- 4. Does the licensee have a surveillance program to periodically:
(a.) walkdown outside areas around the site to look for potential leaks c aid spills?
(b.) pressunze buried radwaste lines to evaluate structural integrity and evaluate potential for leaks and spills?
- 5. Does the licensee perform any other onsite monitoring (e.g. soil sampling) ý C to identify unexpected radioactive releases
- 6. Doesthe licensee's radioactive liquid discharge line traverse any non-licensee owned areas (e.g., it'is on a right-of-way surrounded by private properties)?
Yes No
- 7. If the licensee has a discharge pipe that runs underground or any underground piping that carries radioactive liquids, does the licensee perform monitoring along the discharge pathway to identify potential leakage.
If YES:,:
."How frequently is the sampling performed:
Yes No
- 8. Historical, nsite Radioactive Contamination:
(a.) Does the licensee have any history of radioactive spills and/or leaks C C Are they documented in 10 CFR 50.75g file? C (b.) Has the licensee identified onsite radioactive groundwater C contamination?
If YES:
When was it identified - IF known:
Dates: _Has four files in 50.75g dating back to'early 1980s and 2002 CR LER/Abnormal Event Report/Condition Report Nos:
(If available)
To what extent - IF known [square footage, estimated ground depth of the contamination, estimated quantity (volume concentration), etc.]
_Review files Has the contamination moved outside the Restricted Area or the owner-controlled area mments:
AI
