ML13252A157

From kanterella
Jump to navigation Jump to search
Enclosure 1, Including Attachments 1 to 8: Licensing Summary of Walkdown Report. Part 6 of 7
ML13252A157
Person / Time
Site: Farley Southern Nuclear icon.png
Issue date: 09/04/2013
From:
Southern Nuclear Operating Co
To:
Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation
Shared Package
ML13252A148 List:
References
NL-13-1555
Download: ML13252A157 (144)
v • d • e


Text

ATTACHMENT 5: IPEEE VULNERABILITIES INFORMATION NO. SNCF164-RPT-02, VERSION 2.0 ATTACHMENT 5 UNIT 2 - IPEEE VULNERABILITIES INFORMATION NO. SNCF164-RPT-02 This attachment contains Appendix H from the report entitled, "Joseph M. Farley Nuclear Plant, Unit 1 and Unit 2, Individual Plant Examination of External Events - Seismic" Note: Only page 3 was updated in report version 2.0.

Page 1 of 4

ATTACHMENT 5: IPEEE VULNERABILITIES INFORMATION NO. SNCF164-RPT-02, VERSION 2.0 Appendix H UNIT 2 Description of Equipment Outliers Equipment Equipment Equipment Description of Outlier ID Number Class Description Plant Area Outlier Resolution N2H11NGMCB2500A-AB 20 Main control board Auxiliary building El. 155' 1. Potential interaction from 1. Restrain section A overhead light overhead light

2. Potential interaction from 2. Restrain or un-restrained cables and remove monitor unrestrained items Q2C11E004A-AB 2 Reactor trip switchgear Auxiliary building El. 121' Adjacent cabinets not bolted Bolt cabinets No. 1 together together Q2C11E004B-AB 2 Reactor trip switchgear Auxiliary building El. 121' Adjacent cabinets not bolted Bolt cabinets No. 2 together together Q2C55NM0048-A 18 Alternate shutdown Auxiliary building El. 139' Screws missing at internal Install missing neutron flux monitoring panel screws signal amplifier Q2F16LT0501-A 18 RWST level transmitte Yard El. 155' Missing screw at transmitter Install missing screw Q2H11NGASC2506C-B 20 Auxiliary safeguard Auxiliary building El. 155' 1. Potential Interaction from 1. Restrain cabinet "C" overhead light overhead light
2. Potential interactions 2. Bolt cabinets from Panels N2H1 1NGDEH2506P and 0.

Q2H11NGASC2506D-A 20 Auxiliary safeguard Auxiliary Building El. 155' 1. Potential interaction from 1. Restrain cabinet "T" overhead light overhead light

2. Adjacent cabinets not 2. Bolt cabinets bolted together together Q2H11NGB2504J-A 20 Balance of paint panel Auxiliary building El. 155' 1. Potential interaction from 1. Restrain

'J' (process overhead light overhead light electronics) 2. Potential interaction from 2. Bolt cabinets panels Q2H 11NGB2504L, together M, N, 0, P, 0 Q21 1NGR25041, NSH11NGLEF2518-N, N2H 11 NGDEH2506R and N2H 11NGSS2504 Q2H11NGB2504K-B 20 Balance of plant Auxiliary building El. 155' 1. Potential interaction from 1. Restrain instrumentation cabinet overhead light overhead light

'K' 2. Adjacent cabinets not 2. Bolt cabinets bolted together together Q2H11NGB2504L-A 20 Balance of plant panel Auxiliary building El. 155' 1. Potential interaction from 1. Restrain overhead light overhead light

2. Adjacent cabinets not 2. Bolt cabinets bolted together together Q2H11NGB2504M-A 20 Balance of plant panel Auxiliary building El. 155' Potential interaction from Restrain

.M_ overhead light overhead light Q2H111 NGB2504N-B 20 Balance of plant panel Auxiliary building El. 155' 1. Potential interaction from 1. Restrain

'N' overhead light overhead light

2. Adjacent cabinets not 2. Bolt cabinets bolted together together 02H1-1NGBOP2506Q-N 20 Balance of plant panel Auxiliary building El. 155' Potential interaction from Restrain overhead light overhead light Q2H11NGCCM2523A-A 20 ICCMS processor Auxiliary building El. 155' Potential interaction from Restrain cabinet train A overhead light overhead light Q2H1 1NGCCM2523B-B 20 ICCMS processor Auxiliary building El. 155' Potential interaction from Restrain cabinet train B overhead light overhead light Q2H1 1NGNIS2503A-1 20 NIS excora detector Auxiliary building El. 155' Potential interaction from Restrain cabinet overhead light overhead light Q2H11NGR25041-AB 20 Radiation monitor Auxiliary building El. 155' Potential interaction from Restrain I panel overhead light overhead light Page 2 of 4

ATTACHMENT 5: IPEEE VULNERABILITIES INFORMATION NO. SNCF164-RPT-02, VERSION 2.0 UNIT 2 Description of Equipment Outliers Equipment Equipment Equipment Description of Outlier ID Number Class Description Plant Area Outlier Resolution Q2H11NGSSP2506G-B 20 Solid state protection Auxiliary building El. 155' 1. Potential interaction from 1. Restrain input cabinet overhead light overhead light

2. Potential interaction from 2. Bolt cabinets panels together N2H1 1NGGFF2506B and N2H11NGMiM2515N Q2H11NGSSP2506J-B 20 Solid state protection Auxiliary building El. 155' 1. Potential interaction from 1. Restrain test cabinet overhead light overhead light
2. Adjacent cabinets not 2. Bolt cabinets bolted together together Q2H11NGSSP2506K-A 20 Solid state protection Auxiliary building El. 155' 1. Potential interaction from 1. Restrain input cabinet overhead light, overhead light
2. Adjacent Cabinets not 2. Bolt cabinets bolted together together Q2H11NGSSP2506N-A 20 Solid state protection Auxiliary building El. 155' 1. Potential interaction from 1. Restrain test cabinet overhead light overhead light
2. Adjacent cabinets not 2. Bolt cabinets bolted together together Q2H21E504-A 20 4.18KV switchgear 2H Diesel Building El. 155' Potential interaction from Trim strut to local control panel Nearby strut provide adequate clearance Q2H21E506-A 20 4.6KV switchgear 2K Service water intake El. Potential interaction from Restrain local control panel 188'-6" overhead light overhead light Q2H21E507-B 20 4.16KV switchgear 2L Service water intake El 1. Potential Interaction from 1. Restrain local control panel 188'-6" overhead light overhead light
2. Adjacent Cabinets not 2. Bolt cabinets bolted together together Q2H21E527-B 20 Diesel generator 2B Diesel Building El. 155' 1. Potential interaction from 1. Restrain local control panel overhead light overhead light
2. Adjacent cabinets not 2. Bolt cabinets bolted together together Q2H22L003-A 20 Transfer relay cabinet - auxiliary building El. 100' Potential interaction from remove table 2 nearby table Q2H22L503-B 20 Diesel local replay Diesel building El. 155' 1. Potential Interaction from 1. Restrain panel 2B overhead light overhead light
2. Adjacent cabinets not 2. Bolt cabinets bolted together together
3. Potential bolt bending 3. Resolved by concern analysis Q2H25L008-A 20 Termination cabinet Auxiliary building El. 139' Potential Interaction from Bolt cabinets panels Q2H25L009-A, 10-A, together 1 -A, 40-A, 40-B, 40-C, 40-D and 40-E Q2H25L029-B 20 Termination cabinet Auxiliary building El. 139' Potential interaction from Bolt cabinets panels Q2H25L020-B, 21-B, together 27-B, 30-B, and 31-B Q2R11B503-A 4 LC transformer 2R Diesel building El. 155' Bolt missing at support install missing bolt Q2R11B507-B 4 600 V station service Diesel building El. 155' Bolt missing at support install missing transformer 2S bolt Q2R15A505-A 3 4.16KV switchgear 2K Service water intake El. Potential interaction from Restrain 188'-6" overhead light overhead light Q2R15A506-B 3 4.16KV switchgear 2L Service water intake El. Potential interaction from Restrain 188'-6" overhead light overhead light Q2R16B007-B 2 60V Load center 2E Auxiliary building El. 121' Inadequate relay anchorage Modify anchorage Q2R17B001-A 1 MCC 2A Auxiliary building El. 139' 1. Potential interaction from 1. Restrain or unrestrained cart remove cart
2. Inadequate replay 2. Modify anchorage anchorage Q2R17B002-B 1 MCC 2B Auxiliary building El. 121' Inadequate anchorage Modify anchorage Page 3 of 4

ATTACHMENT 5: IPEEE VULNERABILITIES INFORMATION NO. SNCF164-RPT-02, VERSION 2.0 UNIT 2 Description of Equipment Outliers Equipment Equipment Equipment Description of Outlier ID Number Class Description Plant Area Outlier Resolution Q2R17B008-A 1 MCC 2U Auxiliary building El. 139' 1. Inadequate anchorage 1. Modify

2. Potential Interaction anchorage concern 2. Bolt MCC bays back-to-back Q2R17B009-B 1 MCC 2V Auxiliary building El. 139' 1. Modify
1. Inadequate anchorage anchorage
2. Potential interaction 2. Bolt MCC bays concern back-to-back Q2R17B098-A 1 MCC 2CC Auxiliary building El. 155' 1. Modify
1. Inadequate anchorage anchorage
2. Potential Interaction 2. Bolt MCC bays concern with wall to wall
3. Potential bolt bending 3. Resolved by concern analysis Q2R17B099-B 1 MCC 2DD Auxiliary building El. 155' 1. Inadequate anchorage 1. Modify
2. Potential Interaction anchorage concern with wall 2. Bolt MCC bays I to wall Q2R21LO01A-1 14 120V vital AC Auxiliary building El. 155' Potential interaction from Restrain instrument distribution overhead light overhead light panel 2A Q2R21L001D-4 14 Vital AC distribution Auxiliary building El. 139' Screws missing at internal Install missing panel 2D panel screws Q2R36A501-A 3 4.16KV switchgear 2K Service water intake El. Inadequate anchorage due Tighten bolts and surge arrestor 188'-6" to loose bolt and cracked repair concrete concrete crack Q2R36A502-B 3 4.16KV switchgear 2L Service water intake El. Bolts not tightened Tighten Bolts surge arrestor 188'-6" Q2R36A510-A 3 4.16KV switchgear 2K Diesel Building El. 155' 1. Bolts not tightened 1. Tighten Bolts surge arrestor 2. Potential bolt banding 2. Resolved by concern analysis Q2R36A511-B 3 4.16KV switchgear 2L Diesel building El. 155' Potential bolt bending resolved by surge arrestor concern analysis Q2R41LO01A-A 14 125 VDC distribution Auxiliary building El. 155' Restrain or panel 2A Potential interaction from remove file adjacent file cabinet cabinet Q2R43E002A-A 20 Sequencer B2G Auxiliary building El. 139' Potential interaction form Restrain I _ overhead light overhead light
  • This document has been re-typed from the IPEEE Vulnerabilities Appendix H.

Page 4 of 4

ATTACHMENT 6: SEISMIC WALKDOWN ENGINEER CERTIFICATIONS NO. SNCF164-RPT-02, VERSION 2.0 ATTACHMENT 6 UNIT 2 - SEISMIC WALKDOWN ENGINEER CERTIFICATIONS (Version 1.0 and Version 2.0)

NO. SNCF164-RPT-02 Page 1 of 21

ATTACHMENT 6: SEISMIC WALKDOWN ENGINEER CERTIFICATIONS 0 NO. SNCF164-RPT-02, VERSION 2.0 Robert W. Ashworth Page 2 of 21

NO. SNCF164-RPT-02, VERSION 2.0 ATTACHMENT 6: SEISMIC WALKDOWN ENGINEER CERTIFICATIONS I. I. ELECTRIC POWER EP211 RESEARCH INSTITUTE Certificate of Completion Robert W. Ashworth Training on Near Term Task Force Recommendation 2.3 - Plant Seismic Walkdowns July 3, 2012 Date Caroline S- Schlaseman. P.E.

Instructor Page 3 of 21

ATTACHMENT 6: SEISMIC WALKDOWN ENGINEER CERTIFICATIONS NO. SNCF164-RPT-02, VERSION 2.0 Page 4 of 21

NO. SNCF164-RPT-02, VERSION 2.0 ATTACHMENT 6: SEISMIC WALKDOWN ENGINEER CERTIFICATIONS

.. ENERCON f xcem~icrk Every pqocc t Ecry gjy.

Certificate of Completion is hereby granted to Maggie Farah for successful completion of TRAINING ON NEAR TERM TASK FORCE RECOMMENDATION 2.3 PLANT SEISMIC WALKDO WNS Awarded: 7/26/2012 in Mt. Arlington, N)

... KennethW hitmore Certified Seismic Walkdown Engineer Alexandria, VA - 6/20/2012 Page 5 of 21

0 NO. SNCF164-RPT-02, VERSION 2.0 ATTACHMENT 6: SEISMIC WALKDOWN ENGINEER CERTIFICATIONS 5~ARCH IN5TrT QC QiE Certificateof Completion Ryan Harlos Training on Near Term Task Force Recommendation 2.3

- Plant Seismic Walkdowns June 21, 2012 Date Robert K. Kasawara EPRI Manager.

Structural Rellablity & Integrity Page 6 of 21

ATTACHMENT 6: SEISMIC WALKDOWN ENGINEER CERTIFICATIONS NO. SNCF164-RPT-02, VERSION 2.0 Execellence-Evory project Every day.

ICertificate of Completion is hereby granted to

  • Chelicia Hill AlxnriV

- 6/0/01 for successful completion of TRAINING ON NEAR TERM TASK FORCE

  • RECOMMENDATION 2.3 PLANT SEISMIC WALKDOWNS
  • Awarded: 2/27/2013 at Farley Nuclear Plant Page 7 of 21

0 ATTACHMENT 6: SEISMIC WALKDOWN ENGINEER CERTIFICATIONS NO. SNCF164-RPT-02, VERSION 2.0 RESEAREIINSTITUTE Certificate of Completion Crystal Lovelady Training on Near Term Task Force Recommendation 2.3

- Plant Seismic Walkdowns June 13, 2012 Date Robert K.Kassawara EPRI Manager, Structural Reliability & Integrity Page 8 of 21

ATTACHMENT 6: SEISMIC WALKDOWN ENGINEER CERTIFICATIONS NO. SNCF164-RPT-02, VERSION 2.0 Certificate of Completion This certifies that Crystal R Lovelady Has successfully completed SAM NTTF 2.3 Seismic Walkdown Engineer JFG Completed On 8/18/2012 03:00 PM America/Chicago Page 9 of 21

ATTACHMENT 6: SEISMIC WALKDOWN ENGINEER CERTIFICATIONS NO. SNCF164-RPT-02, VERSION 2.0 flENERCON Excellence-Every project Every day.

Certificate of Completion is hereby granted to

  • !*? Laura Maclay
i: i*!iii'i~~~~~~i !!> :! , : ':i **:*: ::: : : -----.-**>*!:**! :'! >-t-
- :i!? . . . ..,!!ii!i -w-'?--. ,:iC

-' . *:i*:>:*,  :!!*i,:

for successful completion of TRAINING ON NEAR TERM TASK FORCE J RECOMMENDATION 2.3 PLANT SEISMIC WALKDOWNS Awarded: 7/26/2 012 in Mt. Arlington, NJ Kenneth Whitmore Certified Seismic Walkdown Engineer Alexandria, VA -6/20/2012 Page 10 of 21

0 ATTACHMENT 6: SEISMIC WALKDOWN ENGINEER CERTIFICATIONS NO. SNCF164-RPT-02, VERSION 2.0 Page 11 of 21

NO. SNCF164-RPT-02, VERSION 2.0 ATTACHMENT 6: SEISMIC WALKDOWN ENGINEER CERTIFICATIONS

(

I I

( SEPRI Electric Power Research Institute

(*11 is is to (J*trtifU3 ti~tt p11Z 1panI A. *iktus 0 14ts TLomphrteb tire

ý§ismir 3pi Abb-On Q*raininq (Toursr

)WR N-rib 3ut!j 27-29, 1992 I1 2P6? ~

David A. Freed, MPR Associates SQUG Training Coordinator k 1ý Robert P. Kassawara. EPRI SQUG Program Manager ft I

L I A ý11 ,"' " ,, r ~w I Page 12 of 21

0 ATTACHMENT 6: SEISMIC WALKDOWN ENGINEER CERTIFICATIONS S NO. SNCF164-RPT-02, VERSION 2.0 Page 13 of 21

ATTACHMENT 6: SEISMIC WALKDOWN ENGINEER CERTIFICATIONS NO. SNCF164-RPT-02, VERSION 2.0

' *"*E E RC 0 N ,i':

Exce-lk*(Je-F very pojec t. Every day.

Certificate of Completion is hereby granted to Terry (Alan) Mullenix for successful completion of TRAINING ON NEAR TERM TASK FORCE RECOMMENDATION 2.3 PLANT SEISMIC WALKDOWNS Awarded: 7/11/2012 in Kennesaw, GA

/Kevin Bessell Kenneth Whitmore Certified Seismic Walkdown Engineer Certified Seismic Walkdown Engineer Palo Alto CA - 6/13/2012 Alexandria, VA - 6/20/2012 Page 14 of 21

0 ATTACHMENT 6: SEISMIC WALKDOWN ENGINEER CERTIFICATIONS 0 4 NO. SNCF164-RPT-02, VERSION 2.0

-<,:i~i:=:::::E N E R C O N i:**:

Excellence-Every projecs. Every day.

Certificate of Completion is hereby granted to Brian Nelson for successful completion of TRAINING ON NEAR TERM TASK FORCE RECOMMENDATION 2.3 PLANT SEISMIC WALKD OWNS Awarded: 2/27/2013 at Farley Nuclear Plant

  • 1."::.: "":: "! ~ Certified Seismic Walkdown Engineer!!-:;i."i AlxndiVA-62021 Page 15 of 21

ATTACHMENT 6: SEISMIC WALKDOWN ENGINEER CERTIFICATIONS NO. SNCF164-RPT-02, VERSION 2.0 Page 16 of 21

ATTACHMENT 6: SEISMIC WALKDOWN ENGINEER CERTIFICATIONS NO. SNCF164-RPT-02, VERSION 2.0 Certificate of Completion Kenneth Whitmore Training on Near Term Task Force Recommendation 2.3

- Plant Seismic Walkdowns III

'Ii June 21, 2012 Date Robert K. Kassaware EPRI Manager.

in Structua ReiabIty & intagrlty iii Page 17 of 21

NO. SNCF164-RPT-02, VERSION 2.0 ATTACHMENT 6: SEISMIC WALKDOWN ENGINEER CERTIFICATIONS Presentsthis Certfiecate ofAchievement To Certify That Kenneth L. Whitmore has Competedthe SQUG Wafkdown Screening andSeismic Evaluation Training Course Hfelf Apd'16t - 1oth, 1992 NeilP. Smith,CommonwealthEdison SQUGChamionv

- ~ DavidA. Freed.MPRAssociates SQUG Training Coordinator ______ t_________________

Robert P. Kassawa. EPRI SQUG Program Manager m

Page 18 of 21

0 NO. SNCF164-RPT-02, VERSION 2.0 ATTACHMENT 6: SEISMIC WALKDOWN ENGINEER CERTIFICATIONS I

Certfi3cateofAchievement This is to Certify that C

N

\K Kenneth L.Whitmore has Completedthe EPRIAdd-On Seismic IPiEEE Training Course

]fefdNovem6er 2n through 4 thi, 1992 David A. Frced, MPR Associates EPRI RobertP. KZasaawara, Training Coordinator ProgramManager

-A Page 19 of 21

0 NO. SNCF164-RPT-02, VERSION 2.0 ATTACHMENT 6: SEISMIC WALKDOWN ENGINEER CERTIFICATIONS Certificateof Completion Taylor Youngblood Training on Near Term Task Force Recommendation 2.3

- Plant Seismic Walkdowns July Ii, 2012 oate Oats RabefI K. Kassayaf a EPPi Mmuage, SlnmbffWaRetabilty & tntegitty Page 20 of 21

ATTACHMENT 6: SEISMIC WALKDOWN ENGINEER CERTIFICATIONS NO. SNCF164-RPT-02, VERSION 2.0 E ENERCON f x(eIe;errce--Everyo,'ojec . Every a*,y Certificate of Completion is hereby granted to Steve Yuan for successful completion of TRAINING ON NEAR TERM TASK FORCE RECOMMENDATION 2.3 PLANT SEISMIC WALKDOWNS Awarded: 7/26/2012 in Mt. Arlington, NJ "K. nneth Whitmore Certified Seismic Walkdown Engineer Alexandria, VA - 6/20/2012 Page 21 of 21

ATTACHMENT 7: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS NO. SNCF164-RPT-02, VERSION 2.0 ATTACHMENT 7 UNIT 2 - SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS (SWCS) (Version 2.0)

NO. SNCF164-RPT-02 Page 1 of 234

ATTACHMENT 7: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS NO. SNCF164-RPT-02, VERSION 2.0 F1. -Cr-% Sheet I of 3 Status: YZ N[] U" Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)

Equipment ID No. O2B31MOV8000B Equip. Class' 8 Equipment Description PRESSURIZER POWER RELIEF ISOLATION VALVE Location: Bldg. CTMT Floor El. 175 Room. Area PZR Cubicle Manufacturer, Model, Etc. (optional but recommended)

Instructions for Completing Checklist This checklist may be used to document the results of the Seismic Walkdown of an item of equipment on the SWEL. The space below each of the following questions may be used to record the results of judgments and findings. Additional space is provided at the end of this checklist for documenting other comments.

Anchoraez I. Is the anchorage configuration verification required (i.e., is the item one YO NED of the 50% of SWEL items requiring such verification)?

2. Is the anchorage free of bent, broken, missing or loose hardware? YO NE UD N/AS In-line component, no anchorage
3. Is the anchorage free of corrosion that is more than mild surface YO NO U- NWAS oxidation?

In-line component, no anchorage

4. Is the anchorage free of visible cracks in the concrete near the anchors? YO NO UO N/As@

In-line component, no anchorage

5. Is the anchorage configuration consistent with plant documentation? YO NO UO N/AS (Note: This question only applies if the item is one of the 50% for which an anchorage configuration verification is required.)

In-line component, no anchorage

6. Based on the above anchorage evaluations, is the anchorage free of YZ NO UO potentially adverse seismic conditions?

Based on the above, the anchorageis free of adverse seismic conditions.

'Enter the equipment class name from Appendix B: Classes of Equipment.

Page 2 of 234

ATTACHMENT 7: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS NO. SNCF164-RPT-02, VERSION 2.0 Sheet 2 of 3 Status: YN N[" UM Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)

Equipment ID No. Q2B31MOV8000B Equip. Class, 8 Equipment Description PRESSURIZER POWER RELIEF ISOLATION VALVE Interaction Effects

7. Are soft targets free from impact by nearby equipment or structures? YZ NOI UQ N/AO No soft targets were identified which could be impacted by nearby equipment orstructures.
8. Are overhead equipment, distribution systems, ceiling tiles and lighting, YO NO UO N/AO and masonry block walls not likely to collapse onto the equipment?

No overhead equipment was identified that could collapse onto the equipment. During normal operations,a missile shield (grating)is also installedover the Pressurizercubicle which would prevent any overheadequipment external to the Pressurizerfrom coming In contact with the equipment.

9. Do attached lines have adequate flexibility to avoid damage? Y0 NO UO N/AO All attachedlines were determined to have adequate flexibility.
10. Based on the above seismic interaction evaluations, is equipment free YN NE UO of potentially adverse seismic interaction effects?

No conditions were identified which would result in an adverse seismic interactioneffect.

Other Adverse Conditions II. Have you looked for and found no other seismic conditions that could YZ NOI UO adversely affect the safety functions of the equipment?

No other adverse conditions were identified which would result in a potentiallyadverse seismic condition.

Comments (Additional pages may be added as necessary)

Evaluated by: Ryan Harlos Date: ql/ -7A 3

$1 1~i BrianNelson Page 3 of 234

ATTACHMENT 7: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS NO. SNCF164-RPT-02, VERSION 2.0 Sheet 3 of 3 Page 4 of 234

ATTACHMENT 7: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS NO. SNCF164-RPT-02, VERSION 2.0 Sheet 1 of 3 Status: YZ NEI Ur-]

Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)

Equipment ID No. Q2B31PCV0445A Equip. Class, 7 Equipment Description PRESSURIZER POWER RELIEF VALVE Location: Bldg. CTMT Floor El. 173 Room. Area PZR Cubicle Manufacturer, Model, Etc. (optional but recommended)

Instructions for Completing Checklist This checklist may be used to document the results of the Seismic Walkdown of an item of equipment on the SWEL. The space below each of the following questions may be used to record the results of judgments and findings. Additional space is provided at the end of this checklist for documenting other comments.

Anchorage

1. Is the anchorage configuration verification required (i.e., is the item one YO NO of the 50% of SWEL items requiring such verification)?
2. Is the anchorage free of bent, broken, missing or loose hardware? YO NI UO N/AN In-line component, no anchorage
3. Is the anchorage free of corrosion that is more than mild surface YrO NO UO N/A9 oxidation?

In-line component, no anchorage

4. Is the anchorage free of visible cracks in the concrete near the anchors? YO NO UO N/A9 In-line component, no anchorage
5. Is the anchorage configuration consistent with plant documentation? YO NO UO N/AS (Note: This question only applies if the item is one of the 50% for which an anchorage configuration verification is required.)

In-line component, no anchorage

6. Based on the above anchorage evaluations, is the anchorage free of YZ NE UO potentially adverse seismic conditions?

Based on the above, the anchorage is free of adverse seismic conditions.

Enter the equipment class name from Appendix B: Classes of Equipment.

Page 5 of 234

ATTACHMENT 7: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS NO. SNCF164-RPT-02, VERSION 2.0 Sheet 2 of 3 F 2.- (=C:k2.

Status: YZ N[:] U-]

Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)

Equipment ID No. Q2B31PCVO445A Equip. ClassI 7 Equipment Description PRESSURIZER POWER RELIEF VALVE Interaction Effects

7. Are soft targets free from impact by nearby equipment or structures? YZ NO U' N/A' No soft targets were identified which could be impacted by nearby equipment or structures.
8. Are overhead equipment, distribution systems, ceiling tiles and lighting, YCD NEI U- N/Ar and masonry block walls not likely to collapse onto the equipment?

No overhead equipment was identified thatcould collapse onto the equipment. During normal operations,a missile shield (grating)is also installed over the Pressurizercubicle which would prevent any overheadequipment externalto the Pressurizerfrom coming in contact with the equipment.

9. Do attached lines have adequate flexibility to avoid damage? Y0 NO Ur N/AD The PORV airlines and flex conduit lines routed from the limit switches all had adequateflexibility to prevent damage during a seismic event.
10. Based on the above seismic interaction evaluations, is equipment free YCD NEI UM of potentially adverse seismic interaction effects?

No conditions were identified which would result in an adverse seismic interactioneffect.

Other Adverse Conditions I1. Have you looked for and found no other seismic conditions that could YZ NO Ui adversely affect the safety functions of the equipment?

No other adverse conditions were identified which would result in a potentiallyadverse seismiccondition.

Comments (Additional pages may be added as necessary)

A WB performedwith component 02B31MOV8000B.

Date: 4/ 1-?/1-S Evaluated by: Ryan Harlos 4/ -

/7',

Brian Nelson """ .- -.

Page 6 of 234

ATTACHMENT 7: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS NO. SNCF164-RPT-02, VERSION 2.0 Sheet 3 of 3 Page 7 of 234

ATTACHMENT 7: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS NO. SNCF164-RPT-02, VERSION 2.0 F Z- 00 Sheet i of 5 Status: Y0 NEI U-Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)

Equipment ID No. Q2E1 1LT3594B Equip. Class, 18 Equipment Description Containment Sump Level Transmitter Location: Bldg. U2 CTMT Floor El. 105' Room, Area CTMT 105' CorridorOutside Bioshield Manufacturer, Model, Etc. (optional but recommended)

Instructions for Completing Checklist This checklist may be used to document the results of the Seismic Walkdown of an item of equipment on the SWEL. The space below each of the following questions may be used to record the results of judgments and findings. Additional space is provided at the end of this checklist for documenting other comments.

Anchoraee

1. Is the anchorage configuration verification required (i.e., is the item one YO] NZ of the 50% of SWEL items requiring such verification)?
2. Is the anchorage free of bent, broken, missing or loose hardware? YO NEI U- N/AD
3. Is the anchorage free of corrosion that is more than mild surface YZ NO UD N/AD oxidation?
4. Is the anchorage free of visible cracks in the concrete near the anchors? Y0 NDI U" N/AD
5. Is the anchorage configuration consistent with plant documentation? YEI ND UD N/A[D (Note: This question only applies if the item is one of the 50% for which an anchorage configuration verification is required.)
6. Based on the above anchorage evaluations, is the anchorage free of YO ENDUD potentially adverse seismic conditions?

I Enter the equipment class name from Appendix B: Classes of Equipment.

Page 8 of 234

ATTACHMENT 7: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS NO. SNCF164-RPT-02, VERSION 2.0 Sheet 2 of 5 Status: YZ NF] UMi Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)

Equipment ID No. Q2E11LT3594B Equip. Class' 18 Equipment Description ContainmentSumo Level Transmitter Interaction Effects

7. Are soft targets free from impact by nearby equipment or structures? YN NEI Ur N/A]
8. Are overhead equipment, distribution systems, ceiling tiles and lighting, YS NE] UE] N/Al and masonry block walls not likely to collapse onto the equipment?
9. Do attached lines have adequate flexibility to avoid damage? YO NEI UD N/AD
10. Based on the above seismic interaction evaluations, is equipment free Yo NO Url of potentially adverse seismic interaction effects?

Other Adverse Conditions It. Have you looked for and found no other seismic conditions that could YN NO UE]

adversely affect the safety functions of the equipment?

This question was discussed by the SWEs and both concurredthat this level transmitteris seismically adequatefrom all aspects including but not limited to bolting/mounting hardware,adequate flex in all cables, and free from any other adverse seismic condition.

Comments (Additional pages may be added as necessary)

Evaluated by: Taylor Youngblood Date: z41/-1 - /-3 U U U Chelicia Hill ( .LFs! 41,,"

Page 9 of 234

ATTACHMENT 7: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS NO. SNCF164-RPT-02, VERSION 2.0 Sheet 3 of 5 Page 10 of 234

ATTACHMENT 7: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS NO. SNCF164-RPT-02, VERSION 2.0 Sheet 4 of 5 Page 11 of 234

ATTACHMENT 7: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS NO. SNCF164-RPT-02, VERSION 2.0 Sheet 5 of 5 Page 12 of 234

ATTACHMENT 7: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS NO. SNCF164-RPT-02, VERSION 2.0 Sheet i of 5 Status: YN NEI UM Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)

Equipment ID No. Q2E 1MOyV8702A Equip. Class' 8 Equipment Description RHR INLET ISOLATION VALVE Location: Bldg. U2 CTMT Floor El. 105' Room. Area CTMT 105' CorridorOutside Bioshield Manufacturer, Model, Etc. (optional but recommended)

Instructions for Completing Checklist This checklist may be used to document the results of the Seismic Walkdown of an item of equipment on the SWEL. The space below each of the following questions may be used to record the results of judgments and findings. Additional space is provided at the end of this checklist for documenting other comments.

Anchorage

1. Is the anchorage configuration verification required (i.e., is the item one YZ NO of the 50% of SWEL items requiring such verification)?
2. Is the anchorage free of bent, broken, missing or loose hardware? YOI NO UIO N/A(&

In-line Component

3. Is the anchorage free of corrosion that is more than mild surface YO NO UO N/AU oxidation?
4. Is the anchorage free of visible cracks in the concrete near the anchors? YO NO U[I N/AS
5. Is the anchorage configuration consistent with plant documentation? YO NO UIO N/AZ (Note: This question only applies if the item is one of the 50% for which an anchorage configuration verification is required.)
6. Based on the above anchorage evaluations, is the anchorage free of YZ NO UO potentially adverse seismic conditions?

IEnter the equipment class name from Appendix B: Classes of Equipment.

Page 13 of 234

ATTACHMENT 7: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS NO. SNCF164-RPT-02, VERSION 2.0 Sheet 2 of 5 Status: Y0 NEI UI Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)

Equipment ID No. Q2E11MOV87o2A Equip. Class' 8 Equipment Description RHR INLET ISOLATION VALVE Interaction Effects

7. Are soft targets free from impact by nearby equipment or structures? Y0 N[3 U0 N/Ar'
8. Are overhead equipment, distribution systems, ceiling tiles and lighting, Y9 NEI U' N/Af and masonry block walls not likely to collapse onto the equipment?

The SWEs discussed lighting above valve but determined that the light was mounted properly.

9. Do attached lines have adequate flexibility to avoid damage? YZI NOI UI' N/AD
10. Based on the above seismic interaction evaluations, is equipment free YN N[3 UO of potentially adverse seismic interaction effects?

Other Adverse Conditions

11. Have you looked for and found no other seismic conditions that could YN NOI UO adversely affect the safety functions of the equipment?

Nearby workers were present that ensured any housekeeping items would be cleaned prior to end of shift. There were also some temporary cabling that was draped across the actuatorof this valve, but it was for nearby outage work and it is to be removed prior to the end of the outage.

Comments (Additional pages may be added as necessary)

  • Watkdown was performedon 4/18/2013. Form was retyped and resigned on date reflected below for clarity.

Evaluated by: Taylor Younablood Date: /*-*-z, Chelicia Hill / 6 A("o, 7]~5i ~i3 Page 14 of 234

ATTACHMENT 7: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS NO. SNCF164-RPT-02, VERSION 2.0 Sheet 3 of 5 Page 15 of 234

ATTACHMENT 7: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS NO. SNCF164-RPT-02, VERSION 2.0 Sheet 4 of 5 Page 16 of 234

ATTACHMENT 7: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS NO. SNCF164-RPT-02, VERSION 2.0 Sheet 5 of 5 Page 17 of 234

ATTACHMENT 7: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS NO. SNCF164-RPT-02, VERSION 2.0 Sheet 1 of 6 Status: YZ NEI U[

Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)

Equipment ID No. Q2E21MOV8808B Equip. Class' 8 Equipment Description Accumulator B Discharge Valve Location: Bldg. U2 CTMT Floor El. 105' Room, Area CTMT 105' CorridorOutside Bioshield Manufacturer, Model, Etc. (optional but recommended)

Instructions for Completing Checklist This checklist may be used to document the results of the Seismic Walkdown of an item of equipment on the SWEL. The space below each of the following questions may be used to record the results of judgments and findings. Additional space is provided at the end of this checklist for documenting other comments.

Anchorage

1. Is the anchorage configuration verification required (i.e., is the item one YN NO of the 50% of SWEL items requiring such verification)?
2. Is the anchorage free of bent, broken, missing or loose hardware? YO NiO Ur N/AZ In-line Component
3. Is the anchorage free of corrosion that is more than mild surface YO NEI UE N/AJ@

oxidation?

4. Is the anchorage free of visible cracks in the concrete near the anchors? YE NEI UE N/AZ
5. Is the anchorage configuration consistent with plant documentation'? YEI NEI UE N/A2 (Note: This question only applies if the item is one of the 50% for which an anchorage configuration verification is required.)
6. Based on the above anchorage evaluations, is the anchorage free of YZ NEI U-potentially adverse seismic conditions?

I Enter the equipment class name from Appendix B: Classes of Equipment.

Page 18 of 234

ATTACHMENT 7: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS NO. SNCF164-RPT-02, VERSION 2.0 Sheet 2 of 6 Status: YN N-' U0-Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)

Equipment ID No. Q2E21MOV8808B Equip. Class, 8 Equipment Description Accumulator B Discharge Valve Interaction Effects

7. Are soft targets free from impact by nearby equipment or structures? YN NCi U-I N/AEI
8. Are overhead equipment, distribution systems, ceiling tiles and lighting, YO NCI UO N/AC and masonry block walls not likely to collapse onto the equipment?
9. Do attached lines have adequate flexibility to avoid damage? Y9 NEI UC N/ACI
10. Based on the above seismic interaction evaluations, is equipment free Y[D NEi U-1 of potentially adverse seismic interaction effects?

Other Adverse Conditions

11. Have you looked for and found no other seismic conditions that could YN NEI UCr adversely affect the safety functions of the equipment?

No adverse seismic conditions were observed. Bolting/mounting of the valve was in adequate condition, nearby supports for the in line valve were adequate, and the cables had adequate flex.

Comments (Additional pages may be added as necessary)

  • Walkdown was performed on 4/18/2013. Form was retyped and resigned on date reflected below for clarity.

Evaluanted bh:

j Tai~nr V~~unnhlood Date: 7& L--3 Chelicia Hill  ! .- , ,

Page 19 of 234

ATTACHMENT 7: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS NO. SNCF164-RPT-02, VERSION 2.0 Sheet 3 of 6 Page 20 of 234

ATTACHMENT 7: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS NO. SNCF164-RPT-02, VERSION 2.0 Sheet 4 of 6 Page 21 of 234

ATTACHMENT 7: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS NO. SNCF164-RPT-02, VERSION 2.0 Sheet 5 of 6 Page 22 of 234

ATTACHMENT 7: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS NO. SNCF164-RPT-02, VERSION 2.0 Sheet 6 of 6 Page 23 of 234

ATTACHMENT 7: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS NO. SNCF164-RPT-02, VERSION 2.0 I~Z-o4I &e4r~JD&Q~.oP~~

Sheet 1 of 6 Status: YN NI] U-]

Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)

Equipment ID No. Q2H1 1NGASC2506D Equip. Class' 20 Equipment Descripdon AUX SAFEGUARDS CABINET D Location: Bldg. AUXILIARY Floor El. 155' Room, Area 471 Manufacturer, Model, Etc. (optional but recommended)

Instructions for Completing Checklist This checklist may be used to document the results of the Seismic Walkdown of an item of equipment on the SWEL. The space below each of the following questions may be used to record the results of judgments and findings. Additional space is provided at the end of this checklist for documenting other comments.

Anchorage

1. Is the anchorage configuration verification required (i.e., is the item one YO NO of the 50% of SWEL items requiring such verification)?

This anchorageconfiguration was verified in the originalSeismic Walkdown Checklist dated 8-28-12

2. Is the anchorage free of bent, broken, missing or loose hardware? YZ NO U' N/AO
3. Is the anchorage free of corrosion that is more than mild surface YZ NE UO N/AO oxidation?
4. Is the anchorage free of visible cracks in the concrete near the anchors? YZ NO UO N/AO
5. Is the anchorage configuration consistent with plant documentation? Y9 NO UO N/AO (Note: This question only applies if the item is one of the 50% for which an anchorage configuration verification is required.)
6. Based on the above anchorage evaluations, is the anchorage free of Y[R NE UO potentially adverse seismic conditions?

IEnter the equipment class name from Appendix B: Classes of Equipment.

Page 24 of 234

ATTACHMENT 7: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS NO. SNCF164-RPT-02, VERSION 2.0 Sheet 2 of 6 Status: YZ NE] U]

Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)

Equipment ID No. 02H1 1NGASC2506D Equip. Class' 20 Equipment Description AUX SAFEGUARDS CABINET D Interaction Effects

7. Are soft targets free from impact by nearby equipment or structures? YZ ND UD N/AD
8. Are overhead equipment, distribution systems, ceiling dies and lighting, YN NDI UD N/AD and masonry block walls not likely to collapse onto the equipment?
9. Do attached lines have adequate flexibility to avoid damage? YN NO UD N/AD
10. Based on the above seismic interaction evaluations, is equipment free YZ ND U" of potentially adverse seismic interaction effects?

Other Adverse Conditions

11. Have you looked for and found no other seismic conditions that could YI ND UD adversely affect the safety functions of the equipment?

No adverse seismic conditions were observed. Bolting/mounting of the components inside the cabinet was adequate and the wiring of the components had adequate flex. As shown In one of the attached photos, the bolting at the bottom of the cabinet was inspectedand was determined to be in good condition.

Comments (Additional pages may be added as necessary)

The Area Walk-By for room 471 is includedin walkdown package F2-042.

Evaluated by: Taylor Youngblood - ___!! rlQ Date: i's Brian Nelson. -g/* " "-/'/3 Page 25 of 234

ATTACHMENT 7: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS NO. SNCF164-RPT-02, VERSION 2.0 Sheet 3 of 6 Page 26 of 234

ATTACHMENT 7: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS NO. SNCF164-RPT-02, VERSION 2.0 Sheet 4 of 6 Page 27 of 234

ATTACHMENT 7: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS NO. SNCF164-RPT-02, VERSION 2.0 Sheet .; of 6 Page 28 of 234

ATTACHMENT 7: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS NO. SNCF164-RPT-02, VERSION 2.0 Sheet 6 of 6 0

Page 29 of 234

ATTACHMENT 7: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS NO. SNCF164-RPT-02, VERSION 2.0 Sheet I of 5 Status: YZ NEI U--

Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)

Equipment iD No. 02HI1NGB2504K Equip. Class, 20 Equipment Description BOP INSTRUMENTATION CABINET K Location: Bldg. AUXILIARY Floor El. 155 Room, Area 471 Manufacturer, Model, Etc. (optional but recommended)

Instructions for Completing Checklist This checklist may be used to document the results of the Seismic Walkdown of an item of equipment on the SWEL. The space below each of the following questions may be used to record the results of judgments and findings. Additional space is provided at the end of this checklist for documenting other comments.

Anchorage I. Is the anchorage configuration verification required (i.e., is the item one Y[@ NJ-of the 50% of SWEL items requiring such verification)?

2. Is the anchorage free of bent, broken, missing or loose hardware? YZ ND UD N/AD
3. Is the anchorage free of corrosion that is more than mild surface YED ND UD N/AD oxidation?
4. Is the anchorage free of visible cracks in the concrete near the anchors? Y[K ND UD N/AD
5. Is the anchorage configuration consistent with plant documentation? YZ ND UD N/AD (Note: This question only applies if the item is one of the 50% for which an anchorage configuration verification is required.)

Anchorage verified to be consistent on 8/23/12 against SEWS dated 7/1/93.

6. Based on the above anchorage evaluations, is the anchorage free of Y NOi UD potentially adverse seismic conditions?

Anchorage verified SA Ton 8/23/12. SWC Addendum is being performed to inspect cabinet internals.

Enter the equipment class name from Appendix B: Classes of Equipment.

Page 30 of 234

ATTACHMENT 7: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS NO. SNCF164-RPT-02, VERSION 2.0 Sheet 2 of 5 Status: YN N["] U["

Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)

Equipment ID No. 02H11NGB2504K Equip. Class' 20 Equipment Description BOP INSTRUMENTATION CABINET K Interaction Effects

7. Are soft targets free from impact by nearby equipment or structures? YZ NE] UD N/AD
8. Are overhead equipment, distribution systems, ceiling tiles and lighting. YID N] UD N/AD and masonry block walls not likely to collapse onto the equipment?
9. Do attached lines have adequate flexibility to avoid damage? YZ ND UF' N/AD
10. Based on the above seismic interaction evaluations, is equipment free Y[D ND UD of potentially adverse seismic interaction effects?

Other Adverse Conditions I1. Have you looked for and found no other seismic conditions that could Y9 NEI UM adversely affect the safety functions of the equipment?

No otheradverse conditions have been notified.

Comments (Additional pages may be added as necessary)

SWC completed originallyon 8/23/12. Second walkdown being performed to inspect cabinetinternals This item was an IPEEE Outlier which was determined to be resolved during the first walkdown on 8/23/12. A WB located with package F2-42.

Cabinetinternals inspected on 1/7/13. No adverse seismic conditionsnoted.

Evaluated by: Date:

Page 31 of 234

ATTACHMENT 7: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS NO. SNCF164-RPT-02, VERSION 2.0 Sheet 3 of 5 Page 32 of 234

ATTACHMENT 7: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS NO. SNCF164-RPT-02, VERSION 2.0 Sheet 4 of 5 AAA Page 33 of 234

ATTACHMENT 7: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS NO. SNCF164-RPT-02, VERSION 2.0 Page 34 of 234

ATTACHMENT 7: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS NO. SNCF164-RPT-02, VERSION 2.0 Sheet 1of 5 Status: YE] NEI U[

Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)

Equipment ID No. Q2H1 1NGNIS2503A Equip. Class' 20 Equipment Description NIS EXCORE DETECTOR CABINET Location: Bldg. AUXILIARY Floor El. 155' Room, Area 416 Manufacturer, Model, Etc. (optional but recommended)

Instructions for Completing Checklist This checklist may be used to document the results of the Seismic Walkdown of an item of equipment on the SWEL. The space below each of the following questions may be used to record the results of judgments and findings. Additional space is provided at the end of this checklist for documenting other comments.

Anchorage I. Is the anchorage configuration verification required (i.e., is the item one YO NO of the 50% of SWEL items requiring such verification)?

Item has been removed from the subset of 50% equipment requiring verification. See Comments

2. Is the anchorage free of bent, broken, missing or loose hardware? YE NEI US N/AD See Comments
3. Is the anchorage free of corrosion that is more than mild surface YO NO US N/AE oxidation?

See Comments

4. Is the anchorage free of visible cracks in the concrete near the anchors? YO NE US N/AE See Comments
5. Is the anchorage configuration consistent with plant documentation? YE NE UE N/A9 (Note: This question only applies if the item is one of the 50% for which an anchorage configuration verification is required.)
6. Based on the above anchorage evaluations, is the anchorage free of YE NEI US potentially adverse seismic conditions'?

See Comments I Enter the equipment class name from Appendix B: Classes of Equipment.

Page 35 of 234

ATTACHMENT 7: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS NO. SNCF164-RPT-02, VERSION 2.0 Sheet 2 of 5 Status: YEI NEI U[

Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)

Equipment ID No. Q2H11NGNIS2503A Equip. Class' 20 Equipment Description NIS EXCORE DETECTOR CABINET Interaction Effects

7. Are soft targets free from impact by nearby equipment or structures? YZ NEI UD] N/AD3
8. Are overhead equipment, distribution systems, ceiling tiles and lighting, Y[9 NE] Ur N/A[]

and masonry block walls not likely to collapse onto the equipment?

9. Do attached lines have adequate flexibility to avoid damage? YN N[:1 U-- N/AL]
10. Based on the above seismic interaction evaluations, is equipment free YN NO U0!

of potentially adverse seismic interaction effects?

Other Adverse Conditions II. Have you looked for and found no other seismic conditions that could YE NE UD]

adversely affect the safety functions of the equipment?

No adverse seismic conditions were observed. Bolting/mounting of the components inside the cabinet was adequateand the wiring of the components had adequate flex. There was discussion about the bundle of spare cable in the bottom of the cabinet, but both SWEs agreedthat it did not pose an adverse seismic condition.

Comments (Additional pages may be added as necessary)

During the initial walkdown performedon 8/28/12, the SWEs were denied access to inspect the lower portion of the anchorage which requiredremoval of a kickplate in the Main Control Room. An expanded scope walkdown was performed on 5/9/13 to inspect cabinetinternals which identified no additionalseismic concerns. However, the anchorage was still unable to be verified. Therefore, this form has been revised to shw an "Undetermined"evaluation of the anchorage.This walkdown package is included in the final reportfor completeness.

See Fl-091 for Area Walk-By. I Evaluated by: Taylor Youngblood ,I t Z- '9c*64Lro Date: S- Z9-si Brian Nelson e -

Page 36 of 234

ATTACHMENT 7: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS NO. SNCF164-RPT-02, VERSION 2.0 Sheet 3 of 5 Page 37 of 234

ATTACHMENT 7: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS NO. SNCF164-RPT-02, VERSION 2.0 Sheet 4 of 5 Page 38 of 234

ATTACHMENT 7: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS NO. SNCF164-RPT-02, VERSION 2.0 Sheet 5 of 5 Page 39 of 234

ATTACHMENT 7: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS NO. SNCF164-RPT-02, VERSION 2.0 F-Z- q-t Sheet I of 4 Status: YN NEI ul1 Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)

Equipment ID No. 02Ht1 NGPIC2505D Equip. Class' 20 Equipment Description PROCESSPROTECTION CABINET CHANNEL 4 Location: Bldg. AUXILIARY Floor El. 155 Room, Area 0471 Manufacturer, Model, Etc. (optional but recommended)

Instructions for Completing Checklist This checklist may be used to document the results of the Seismic Walkdown of an item of equipment on the SWEL. The space below each of the following questions may be used to record the results of judgments and findings. Additional space is provided at the end of this checklist for documenting other comments.

Anchorage

1. Is the anchorage configuration verification required (i.e., is the item one YO NO of the 50% of SWEL items requiring such verification)?
2. Is the anchorage free of bent, broken, missing or loose hardware? Y0 NC Ul N/AC
3. Is the anchorage free of corrosion that is more than mild surface Y9 NEI Ur NIAC oxidation?
4. Is the anchorage free of visible cracks in the concrete near the anchors? Y(@ NEI UD N/Af
5. Is the anchorage configuration consistent with plant documentation? Y[9 NCI UC N/AC (Note: This question only applies if the item is one of the 50% for which an anchorage configuration verification is required.)

Anchorage verified to be consistent on 8/23/12 againstSEWS dated 7/1/93.

6. Based on the above anchorage evaluations, is the anchorage free of Y0 NC UC potentially adverse seismic conditions?

Anchorage verified SAT on 8/23/12. SWC Addendum is being performed to inspectcabinet internals.

Enler the equipment class name from Appendix B: Classes of Equipment.

Page 40 of 234

ATTACHMENT 7: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS NO. SNCF164-RPT-02, VERSION 2.0 Sheet 2 Of 4 Status: YS NE] Ur-]

Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)

Equipment ID No. O2H1 1NGPIC2505D Equip. Class' 20 Equipment Description PROCESS PROTECTION CABINET CHANNEL 4 Interaction Effects

7. Are soft targets free from impact by nearby equipment or structures? YZ ND UQ N/AD
8. Are overhead equipment, distribution systems, ceiling tiles and lighting. YER NEI UD N/AO and masonry block walls not likely to collapse onto the equipment?
9. Do attached lines have adequate flexibility to avoid damage? YN NO UQ N/A[-]
10. Based on the above seismic interaction evaluations, is equipment free YZ NC UO of potentially adverse seismic interaction effects?

Other Adverse Conditions

11. Have you looked for and found no other seismic conditions that could Y0 NEI UEI adversely affect the safety functions of the equipment?

The cabinetinternals were inspected and no missing fasteners were observed. All internalconnections androuted cables have been determined to be adequate and pose no adverse seismic condition.

Comments (Additional pages may be added as necessary)

SWC completed originally on 8/23/12.

Final walkdown performed on 1/7/13 to inspect cabinet intemals. No adverse seismic conditions noted.

Evaluated by: Ryan Harlos Date: 42k3 Taylor Youngblood E)ýýp ou 7L Page 41 of 234

ATTACHMENT 7: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS NO. SNCF164-RPT-02, VERSION 2.0 Sheet 3 of 4 0

Page 42 of 234

ATTACHMENT 7: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS NO. SNCF164-RPT-02, VERSION 2.0 Sheet 4 of 4 Page 43 of 234

ATTACHMENT 7: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS NO. SNCF164-RPT-02, VERSION 2.0 Sheet i of 6 Status: YZ N[- U--

Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)

Equipment ID No. 02H11NGPIC2505H Equip. ClassI 20 Equipment Description PROCESS CONTROL CABINET CHANNEL 4 Location: Bldg. AUXILIARY Floor El. 155 Room, Area 471 Manufacturer, Model, Etc. (optional but recommended)

Instructions for Completing Checklist This checklist may be used to document the results of the Seismic Walkdown of an item of equipment on the SWEL. The space below each of the following questions may be used to record the results of judgments and findings. Additional space is provided at the end of this checklist for documenting other comments.

Anchorage I. Is the anchorage configuration verification required (i.e., is the item one Y0 NO of the 50% of SWEL items requiring such verification)?

2. Is the anchorage free of bent, broken, missing or loose hardware? YE NO UO N/AO
3. Is the anchorage free of corrosion that is more than mild surface Y19 NOI UO N/AO oxidation?
4. Is the anchorage free of visible cracks in the concrete near the anchors? YE NOI UO N/AO
5. Is the anchorage configuration consistent with plant documentation? YZ NOI UO N/AO (Note: This question only applies if the item is one of the 50% for which an anchorage configuration verification is required.)

Anchorage verified to be consistent on 8/23/12 against SEWS dated 7/1/93.

6. Based on the above anchorage evaluations, is the anchorage free of YO NEI UO potentially adverse seismic conditions?

Anchorage verified SAT on 8/23/12. SWC Addendum is being performed to inspect cabinet internals.

I Enter the equipment class name from Appendix B: Classes of Equipment.

Page 44 of 234

ATTACHMENT 7: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS NO. SNCF164-RPT-02, VERSION 2.0 Sheet 2 of 6 Status: YE NE[ UM Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)

Equipment ID No. 02H1I NGPIC2505H Equip. Class' 20 Equipment Description PROCESS CONTROL CABINET CHANNEL 4 Interaction Effects

7. Are soft targets free from impact by nearby equipment or structures? YZ NO UO N/AO
8. Are overhead equipment, distribution systems, ceiling tiles and lighting, YN NE UO N/AO and masonry block walls not likely to collapse onto the equipment?
9. Do attached lines have adequate flexibility to avoid damage? YEI NO UO N/AO
10. Based on the above seismic interaction evaluations, is equipment free YN NO UO of potentially adverse seismic interaction effects?

Other Adverse Conditions II. Have you looked for and found no other seismic conditions that could Y0 NOI UO adversely affect the safety functions of the equipment?

Comments (Additional pages may be added as necessary)

SWC completed originally on 8/23/12. Second performance beingperformed to inspect cabinet internals.

Cabinet internalsinspected on 1/7/13. No adverse seismic conditions noted.

Evaluated by: Ryan Harlos Date: IA' I Taylor Youngblood dY q ,nt 7 '

Page 45 of 234

ATTACHMENT 7: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS NO. SNCF164-RPT-02, VERSION 2.0 Sheet 3 of 6 CABINET NO, 8 CONTROL 4 Page 46 of 234

ATTACHMENT 7: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS NO. SNCF164-RPT-02, VERSION 2.0 Sheet 4 of 6 Page 47 of 234

ATTACHMENT 7: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS NO. SNCF164-RPT-02, VERSION 2.0 Sheet 5 of 6 Page 48 of 234

ATTACHMENT 7: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS NO. SNCF164-RPT-02, VERSION 2.0 Sheet 6 of 6 0

Page 49 of 234

ATTACHMENT 7: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS NO. SNCF164-RPT-02, VERSION 2.0 F2--q(. P~mop0S6opF-Sheet i of 6 Status: YC NI] UM-Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)

Equipment ID No. Q2H11NGSSP2506N Equip. Class1 20 Equipment Description SOLID STATE PROTECTION TEST CABINIET Location: Bldg. AUXILIARY Floor El. 155' Room, Area 471 Manufacturer, Model, Etc. (optional but recommended)

Instructions for Completing Checklist This checklist may be used to document the results of the Seismic Walkdown of an item of equipment on the SWEL. The space below each of the following questions may be used to record the results of judgments and findings. Additional space is provided at the end of this checklist for documenting other comments.

Anchorage

1. Is the anchorage configuration verification required (i.e., is the item one YZ NEI of the 50% of SWEL items requiring such verification)?

This anchorageconfiguration was verified in the originalSeismic Walkdown Checklist dated 8-28-12.

2. Is the anchorage free of bent, broken, missing or loose hardware? YER ND UD N/AD
3. Is the anchorage free of corrosion that is more than mild surface YZ Nil UD N/AD oxidation?
4. Is the anchorage free of visible cracks in the concrete near the anchors? YJ9 ND U- N/AD
5. Is the anchorage configuration consistent with plant documentation? Y0 NEI UD1 N/AD (Note: This question only applies if the item is one of the 50% for which an anchorage configuration verification is required.)
6. Based on the above anchorage evaluations, is the anchorage free of YO NEI UD-potentially adverse seismic conditions?

IEnter the equipment class name from Appendix B: Classes of Equipment.

Page 50 of 234

ATTACHMENT 7: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS NO. SNCF164-RPT-02, VERSION 2.0 Sheet 2 of 6 Status: YZ NE] U']

Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)

Equipment ID No. Q2H1 INGSSP2506N Equip. Class, 20 Equipment Description SOLID STATE PROTECTION TEST CABINIET Interaction Effects

7. Are soft targets free from impact by nearby equipment or structures? YED NEI UEI N/AD
8. Are overhead equipment, distribution systems, ceiling tiles and lighting, YZ ND UD N/AD and masonry block walls not likely to collapse onto the equipment?
9. Do attached lines have adequate flexibility to avoid damage? YN ND UD N/AD
10. Based on the above seismic interaction evaluations, is equipment free YZ ND UD of potentially adverse seismic interaction effects?

Other Adverse Conditions

11. Have you looked for and found no other seismic conditions that could Y[@ NDl UD adversely affect the safety functions of the equipment?

No adverse seismic conditions were observed. Bolting/mounting of the components inside the cabinet was found adequate and the wiring of the components hadadequate flex.

Comments (Additional pages may be added as necessary)

The Area Walk-By for room 471 is included in walkdown package F2-042.

Evaluated by: Talr Youn blood Date: 7- /3 Brian Nelson Page 51 of 234

ATTACHMENT 7: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS NO. SNCF164-RPT-02, VERSION 2.0 Sheet 3 of 6 Page 52 of 234

ATTACHMENT 7: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS NO. SNCF164-RPT-02, VERSION 2.0 Sheet 4 of 6 Page 53 of 234

ATTACHMENT 7: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS NO. SNCF164-RPT-02, VERSION 2.0 Sheet 5 of 6 Page 54 of 234

ATTACHMENT 7: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS NO. SNCF164-RPT-02, VERSION 2.0 Sheet 6 of 6 Page 55 of 234

ATTACHMENT 7: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS NO. SNCF164-RPT-02, VERSION 2.0 F 2- L-4 Sheet 1 of 5 Status: YN NEI Ur-Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)

Equipment ID No. 02H21EO05 Equip. Class' 20 Equipment Description 4.16KVSWITCHGEAR 2G LOCAL CONT PANEL Location: Bldg. AUXILIARY Floor El. 121 Room, Area 2233 Manufacturer, Model, Etc. (optional but recommended)

Instructions for Completing Checklist This checklist may be used to document the results of the Seismic Walkdown of an item of equipment on the SWEL. The space below each of the following questions may be used to record the results of judgments and findings. Additional space is provided at the end of this checklist for documenting other comments.

Anchorage I. Is the anchorage configuration verification required (i.e., is the item one YE NO of the 50% of SWEL items requiring such verification)?

Anchorage is internal to cabinet

2. Is the anchorage free of bent, broken. missing or loose hardware? YU NO UO N/AU
3. Is the anchorage free of corrosion that is more than mild surface YS NO UO N/AD oxidation?
4. Is the anchorage free of visible cracks in the concrete near the anchors? YI NOI UO N/AU
5. Is the anchorage configuration consistent with plant documentation? YO NO UO N/AU (Note: This question only applies if the item is one of the 50% for which an anchorage configuration verification is required.)

Anchorage verified against SEWS for Q1H21E005which contains the Unit I and Unit 2 information and calculations. In addition to the four plug welds documented In the calc, the cabinet is also anchoredto the base plate with 7 approximately 1.5 fillet welds. This question is considered Y by the SWEs based on the information that the cabinet is anchored,at a minimum, as documented in the SEWS package and CALCs. The additionalfillet welds only provide additionalbracing for the cabinet.

Enter the equipment class name from Appendix B: Classes of Equipment.

Page 56 of 234

ATTACHMENT 7: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS NO. SNCF164-RPT-02, VERSION 2.0 Sheet 2 of 5 Status: YZ NE] UE]

Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)

Equipment ID No. Q2H21E005 Equip. Class' 20 Equipment Description 4.16KV SWITCHGEAR 2G LOCAL CONT PANEL

6. Based on the above anchorage evaluations, is the anchorage free of YO NE U-potentially adverse seismic conditions?

No adverse seismic conditions were noted during the inspection.

Interaction Effects

7. Are soft targets free from impact by nearby equipment or structures? YZ NEI UD N/AO
8. Are overhead equipment, distribution systems, ceiling tiles and lighting, Y0 ND UQ N/AQ and masonry block walls not likely to collapse onto the equipment?
9. Do attached lines have adequate flexibility to avoid damage? YZ N] UO N/AO
10. Based on the above seismic interaction evaluations, is equipment free YZ NO UO of potentially adverse seismic interaction effects?

Other Adverse Conditions II. Have you looked for and found no other seismic conditions that could YO NE UO adversely affect the safety functions of the equipment?

The cabinet internals were inspected and no missing fasteners were observed.All internal connections and routed cables have been determined to be adequateand pose no adverse seismic condition.

Comments (Additional pages may be added as necessary)

SWC completed originallyon 8/24/12. AWB included with package F2-107.

Final Walkdown performed on 1/11/13 to inspect cabinet internalsand complete anchorage verification. No adverse seismic conditions noted.

Page 57 of 234

ATTACHMENT 7: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS NO. SNCF164-RPT-02, VERSION 2.0 Sheet 3 of 5 Evaluated by: Ryan Harlos Date: 1111b3 Ta*,or You,,blood ,-$a.. / /,, L Page 58 of 234

ATTACHMENT 7: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS NO. SNCF164-RPT-02, VERSION 2.0 Ll6Al f Page 59 of 234

ATTACHMENT 7: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS NO. SNCF164-RPT-02, VERSION 2.0 Sheet 5 of 5 Page 60 of 234

ATTACHMENT 7: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS NO. SNCF164-RPT-02, VERSION 2.0 Sheet 1of 5 Status: YE NEI U]

Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)

Equipment ID No. 02H21E505 Equip. Class, 20 Equipment Description 4.16KV SWITCHGEAR 2J LOCAL CONT PANEL Location: Bldg. DIESEL Floor El. 155 Room. Area 56C Manufacturer, Model, Etc. (optional but recommended)

Instructions for Completing Checklist This checklist may be used to document the results of the Seismic Walkdown of an item of equipment on the SWEL. The space below each of the following questions may be used to record the results of judgments and findings. Additional space is provided at the end of this checklist for documenting other comments.

Anchorage I. Is the anchorage configuration verification required (i.e., is the item one Y[D N["]

of the 50% of SWEL items requiring such verification)?

Anchorage is internalto cabinet

2. Is the anchorage free of bent, broken, missing or loose hardware? YZ ND UD N/AD
3. Is the anchorage free of corrosion that is more than mild surface Y[@ ND UD N/AD oxidation?
4. Is the anchorage free of visible cracks in the concrete near the anchors? YZ ND UD" N/AD
5. Is the anchorage configuration consistent with plant documentation? YU NDI UD1 N/AD (Note: This question only applies if the item is one of the 50% for which an anchorage configuration verification is required.)

Anchorage was verified againstSEWS for Q1H21E504 which contains both the Unit 1 and Unit 2 cabinet information and D 171435. The SEWS contains calc and anchorageconfiguration for Q2H21E504 which envelopes Q2H21E505.

6. Based on the above anchorage evaluations, is the anchorage free of YZ NEI U-potentially adverse seismic conditions?

No adverse seismic conditions were noted during the inspection.

Enter the equipment class name from Appendix B: Classes of Equipment.

Page 61 of 234

ATTACHMENT 7: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS NO. SNCF164-RPT-02, VERSION 2.0 Sheet 2 of 5 Status: YM NEI Ur"]

Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)

Equipment ID No. 02H21E505 Equip. Class' 20 Equipment Description 4.16KV SWITCHGEAR 2J LOCAL CONT PANEL Interaction Effects

7. Are soft targets free from impact by nearby equipment or structures? Y[ NDI UD" N/AD
8. Are overhead equipment. distribution systems, ceiling tiles and lighting, Y0 NDI UD" N/AD" and masonry block walls not likely to collapse onto the equipment?
9. Do attached lines have adequate flexibility to avoid damage? YO NDI UDI N/AD
10. Based on the above seismic interaction evaluations, is equipment free YO NDI UD' of potentially adverse seismic interaction effects?

Other Adverse Conditions I1. Have you looked for and found no other seismic conditions that could YN NDI UD-adversely affect the safety functions of the equipment?

The cabinet internals were inspected and no missing fasteners were observed. All internal connections and routed cables have been determined to be adequateand pose no adverse seismic condition.

Comments (Additional pages may be added as necessary)

SWC completed originallyon 9/11/12.

Final Walkdown performed on 1/11/13 to inspect cabinet internalsand complete anchorage verification. No adverse seismic conditions noted.

Evaluated by: Ryan Harlos Date: 14 2 Taylor Youngblood 4& 0 //" /-3 Page 62 of 234

ATTACHMENT 7: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS NO. SNCF164-RPT-02, VERSION 2.0 Sheet 3 of 5 0

0 Page 63 of 234

ATTACHMENT 7: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS NO. SNCF164-RPT-02, VERSION 2.0 Sheet 4 of 5 0

Page 64 of 234

ATTACHMENT 7: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS NO. SNCF164-RPT-02, VERSION 2.0 Sheets of.c 0

Page 65 of 234

ATTACHMENT 7: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS NO. SNCF164-RPT-02, VERSION 2.0 Sheet I of 7 Status: Y* N[] UE-Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)

Equipment ID No. 02H21E507 Equip. Class' 20 Equipment Description 4.16KVSWITCHGEAR2L LOCAL CONT PANEL Location: Bldg. SW/S Floor El. 188 Room, Area 728 Manufacturer, Model, Etc. (optional but recommended)

Instructions for Completing Checklist This checklist may be used to document the results of the Seismic Walkdown of an item of equipment on the SWEL. The space below each of the following questions may be used to record the results of judgments and findings. Additional space is provided at the end of this checklist for documenting other comments.

Anchorage

1. Is the anchorage configuration verification required (i.e., is the item one YZ NE of the 50% of SWEL items requiring such verification)'?

Anchorage is internal to cabinet

2. Is the anchorage free of bent, broken, missing or loose hardware? Y[R NEI UD N/AO
3. Is the anchorage free of corrosion that is more than mild surface YZ NO UD N/AO oxidation?
4. Is the anchorage free of visible cracks in the concrete near the anchors? YER NEI U0 N/AO
5. Is the anchorage configuration consistent with plant documentation? Y9 NE UO N/AD (Note: This question only applies if the item is one of the 50% for which an anchorage configuration verification is required.)

The local controlpanel was observedto be anchoredusing four 5/8' anchorbolts. Anchorage has been determinedto be consistent using D172164 which calls out for 5/8' anchor bolts projected 2".

6. Based on the above anchorage evaluations, is the anchorage free of Y0 NE U0 potentially adverse seismic conditions?

SWEs have concluded that the component anchorageis free of any potentiallyadverse seismic conditions.

Enter the equipment class name from Appendix B: Classes of Equipment.

Page 66 of 234

ATTACHMENT 7: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS NO. SNCF164-RPT-02, VERSION 2.0 Sheet 2 of 7 Status: YZ NE] UI]

Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)

Equipment ID No. 02H21E507 Equip. Class' 20 Equipment Description 4.16KV SWITCHGEAR 2L LOCAL CONT PANEL Interaction Effects

7. Are soft targets free from impact by nearby equipment or structures? YZ N[l UQ- N/AO
8. Are overhead equipment. distribution systems, ceiling tiles and lighting, YN NOI U0 N/AO and masonry block walls not likely to collapse onto the equipment?
9. Do attached lines have adequate flexibility to avoid damage? Y(9 NEI UI- N/A[3
10. Based on the above seismic interaction evaluations, is equipment free YZ NEI U-'

of potentially adverse seismic interaction effects?

No adverse seismic interaction effects have been identified either external or internal to the cabinet.

Other Adverse Conditions II. Have you looked for and found no other seismic conditions that could YN NEI UE-adversely affect the safety functions of the equipment?

The cabinet internals were inspected and no missing hardware or fasteners were observed. The cables inside the cabinet had adequate flex and no otheradverse seismic conditions were noted.

Comments (Additional pages may be added as necessary)

SWC completed originally on 9/11/12. Second performance beingperformed to inspect cabinet internalsand complete anchorage verification.

The IPEEE Outlier was determined to be resolved during the component walkdown on 9/11/12.

The final walkdown performed on 3/25/13 was to inspect the local controlpanel internalsand complete the anchorage verification. The anchorage was verified to be consistent with plant documentation and no adverse seismic conditions were noted during the walkdown.

Evaluated hv: Rvan Harlo.s . .- -I Date: -__

V Tnlh~r Vimn ohlinnA b

.*loodL.

Youn As3Q Ta lo Page 67 of 234

ATTACHMENT 7: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS NO. SNCF164-RPT-02, VERSION 2.0 Sheet 3 of 7 LO CON ...... ST A

SWR 4160V 2i Page 68 of 234

ATTACHMENT 7: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS NO. SNCF164-RPT-02, VERSION 2.0 Sheet 4 of 7 Page 69 of 234

ATTACHMENT 7: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS NO. SNCF164-RPT-02, VERSION 2.0 Sheet 5 of 7 Page 70 of 234

ATTACHMENT 7: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS NO. SNCF164-RPT-02, VERSION 2.0 Sheet 6 of 7 Page 71 of 234

ATTACHMENT 7: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS NO. SNCF164-RPT-02, VERSION 2.0 Sheet 7 of 7 Page 72 of 234

ATTACHMENT 7: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS NO. SNCF164-RPT-02, VERSION 2.0 Sheet 1 of 4 Status: YN NEJ[ U--

Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)

Equipment ID No. 02H22LOO1D Equip. Class t 20 Equipment Description MULTIPLYING RELAY CABINET 2D Location: Bldg. AUXILIARY Floor El. 139 Room. Area 2318 Manufacturer, Model, Etc. (optional but recommended) - -

Instructions for Completing Checklist This checklist may be used to document the results of the Seismic Walkdown of an item of equipment on the SWEL. The space below each of the following questions may be used to record the results of judgments and findings. Additional space is provided at the end of this checklist for documenting other comments.

Anchorage I. Is the anchorage configuration verification required (i.e., is the item one Y9 NE of the 50% of SWEL items requiring such verification)?

Anchorage is shown on SEWS for 02H22L001D

2. Is the anchorage free of bent, broken, missing or loose hardware? YO NEI UD N/A[3
3. Is the anchorage free of corrosion that is more than mild surface YZ NEi Ui N/A[O]

oxidation?

4. Is the anchorage free of visible cracks in the concrete near the anchors? Y0 NEI UD N/A[]
5. Is the anchorage configuration consistent with plant documentation? Y[ NEI UE N/AU1 (Note: This question only applies if the item is one of the 50% for which an anchorage configuration verification is required.)

Anchorage verified to be consistenton 8/24/12 againstSEWS.

6. Based on the above anchorage evaluations, is the anchorage free of YZ NO UO potentially adverse seismic conditions?

Anchorage verified SAT on 8/24/12. SWC Addendum is being performed to inspect cabinet internals.

Enter the equipment class name from Appendix B: Classes of Equipment.

Page 73 of 234

ATTACHMENT 7: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS NO. SNCF164-RPT-02, VERSION 2.0 Sheet 2 of 4 Status: YM NE] ur]

Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)

Equipment ID No. 02H22LOOID Equip. Class, 20 Equipment Description MULTIPLYING RELAY CABINET 2D Interaction Effects

7. Are soft targets free from impact by nearby equipment or structures? Y9 NO U'- N/AO
8. Are overhead equipment. distribution systems, ceiling tiles and lighting, YI NOI UO N/A[-

and masonry block walls not likely to collapse onto the equipment?

9. Do attached lines have adequate flexibility to avoid damage? YID NEI UD N/AD
10. Based on the above seismic interaction evaluations, is equipment free YS NO UQ of potentially adverse seismic interaction effects?

Other Adverse Conditions 1I. Have you looked for and found no other seismic conditions that could YN NO U0 adversely affect the safety functions of the equipment?

The cabinet internals were inspectedand no missing fasteners were observed. All internal connections and routed cables have been determined to be adequate and pose no adverse seismic condition.

Comments (Additional pages may be added as necessary)

SWC completed originally on 8/24/12.

Final Walkdown performedon 1/11/13 to inspect cabinet internals. No adverse seismic conditions noted.

Evaluated by: Ryan Harlos o,,- Date: j

/ I,/

Taylor Youngblood .0 4 "

Page 74 of 234

ATTACHMENT 7: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS NO. SNCF164-RPT-02, VERSION 2.0 Sheet 3 of 4

-m2LO I-Page 75 of 234

ATTACHMENT 7: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS NO. SNCF164-RPT-02, VERSION 2.0 Sheet 4 of 4 Page 76 of 234

ATTACHMENT 7: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS NO. SNCF164-RPT-02, VERSION 2.0 Sheet i of 6 Status: YE NEI UM Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)

Equipment ID No. Q2H22L003 Fo Equip. Class, ManAu4acu Mod 2/2E/bu Equipment Description A4WUP~LL.4ý'4 RELAY CABINE T9#

Location: Bldg. AUXILIARY Floor El. 100 Room. Area 2190 Manufacturer, Model, Etc. (optional but recommended) ____

Instructions for Completing Checklist This checklist may be used to document the results of the Seismic Walkdown of an item of equipment on the SWEL. The space below each of the following questions may be used to record the results of judgments and findings. Additional space is provided at the end of this checklist for documenting other comments.

Anchorage I. Is the anchorage configuration verification required (i.e., is the item one Y0 NEI of the 50% of SWEL items requiring such verification)?

Anchorage is shown on SEWS dated 7/1/93

2. Is the anchorage free of bent, broken, missing or loose hardware? YE; NO UO N/AD
3. Is the anchorage free of corrosion that is more than mild surface YE NO UO N/AO oxidation?
4. Is the anchorage free of visible cracks in the concrete near the anchors? Y0 NO UO- N/AD
5. Is the anchorage configuration consistent with plant documentation? Y0 NO UO N/AD (Note: This question only applies if the item is one of the 50% for which an anchorage configuration verification is required.)

Anchorage verified to be consistent on 8/28/12 against SEWS.

6. Based on the above anchorage evaluations, is the anchorage free of YS ND UD potentially adverse seismic conditions?

Anchorage verified SAT on 8/28/12.

Enter the equipment class name from Appendix B: Classes of Equipment.

Page 77 of 234

ATTACHMENT 7: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS NO. SNCF164-RPT-02, VERSION 2.0 Sheet 2 of 6 Status: YE NEI U[-

Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)

Equipment ID No. 02H22L003 - Equip.

Equipment Description -1f*f T'Pt'N&RELAYCABINET 249 Interaction Effects

7. Are soft targets free from impact by nearby equipment or structures? YZ NEI Ufi N/AD
8. Are overhead equipment, distribution systems, ceiling tiles and lighting, YZ NEI UO N/AD and masonry block walls not likely to collapse onto the equipment?
9. Do attached lines have adequate flexibility to avoid damage? Y0 NE UE" N/AD
10. Based on the above seismic interaction evaluations, is equipment free Y9I No" UD of potentially adverse seismic interaction effects?

Other Adverse Conditions I1. Have you looked for and found no other seismic conditions that could YN No Ur adversely affect the safety functions of the equipment?

The cabinetinternals were inspected and no missing fasteners were observed.All internal connections and routed cables have been determined to be adequateand pose no adverse seismic condition.

Comments (Additional pages may be added as necessary)

SWC completed orginally on 8/28/12. see* ' P*-oo AW kVt*. ILV%'W*

Wipes were noted in the bottom of the cabinet. These pose no adverse condition and plant staff has been notified to remove the wipes.

The IPEEE outlier of a table nearby has been resolved by removing the table.

Final walkdown performed on 1/25/13 to inspect cabinet internals. No adverse seismic conditions noted.

Evaluated by: Ryan Harlos Date: ____ _'_-__ _

Tavlor Youngblood =L ý 163 C/'0 Page 78 of 234

ATTACHMENT 7: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS NO. SNCF164-RPT-02, VERSION 2.0 Sheet 3 of 6 Page 79 of 234

ATTACHMENT 7: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS NO. SNCF164-RPT-02, VERSION 2.0 Sheet 4 of 6 Page 80 of 234

ATTACHMENT 7: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS NO. SNCF164-RPT-02, VERSION 2.0 Sheet 5 of 6 Page 81 of 234

ATTACHMENT 7: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS NO. SNCF164-RPT-02, VERSION 2.0 Sheet 6 of 6 Page 82 of 234

ATTACHMENT 7: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS NO. SNCF164-RPT-02, VERSION 2.0 Sheet I of 4 Status: YE N[' U[

Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)

Equipment ID No. Q2H22L503 Equip. Class, Equipment Description DIESEL LOCAL RELAY PANEL 2B Location: Bldg. DIESEL Floor El. 155' Room, Area 0059 Manufacturer, Model, Etc. (optional but recommended)

Instructions for Completing Checklist This checklist may be used to document the results of the Seismic Walkdown of an item of equipment on the SWEL. The space below each of the following questions may be used to record the results of judgments and findings. Additional space is provided at the end of this checklist for documenting other comments.

Anchorage

1. Is the anchorage configuration verification required (i.e., is the item one YO NO of the 50% of SWEL items requiring such verification)?
2. Is the anchorage free of bent, broken, missing or loose hardware? YO NE UD N/AD
3. Is the anchorage free of corrosion that is more than mild surface YZ ND UD N/AD oxidation?
4. Is the anchorage free of visible cracks in the concrete near the anchors? YZ NO UD N/AD
5. Is the anchorage configuration consistent with plant documentation? YO NI UrI N/A9 (Note: This question only applies if the item is one of the 50% for which an anchorage configuration verification is required.)
6. Based on the above anchorage evaluations, is the anchorage free of YO NO Ur potentially adverse seismic conditions?

Anchorage contains no adverse seismic conditions.

IEnter the equipment class name from Appendix B: Classes of Equipment.

Page 83 of 234

ATTACHMENT 7: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS NO. SNCF164-RPT-02, VERSION 2.0 Sheet 2 of 4 Status: Yo NR U((

Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)

Equipment ID No. 02H22L503 Equip. Class' 20 Equipment Description DIESEL LOCAL RELAY PANEL 2B Interaction Effects

7. Are soft targets free from impact by nearby equipment or structures? YZ ND UD N/A[-
8. Are overhead equipment, distribution systems, ceiling tiles and lighting, YED ND U-I N/AD and masonry block walls not likely to collapse onto the equipment?
9. Do attached lines have adequate flexibility to avoid damage? Y[ ND UE-] N/AD
10. Based on the above seismic interaction evaluations, is equipment free YO NEI UF-of potentially adverse seismic interaction effects?

Other Adverse Conditions

11. Have you looked for and found no other seismic conditions that could YO ND UD" adversely affect the safety functions of the equipment?

The cabinet internals were inspected and no missing fasteners were observed. All internalconnections and routed cables have been determinedto be adequate and pose no adverse seismic condition.

Comments (Additional pages may be added as necessary)

SWC completed originally on 8/24/12. IPEEEoutlier verified to be resolved on 8/24/12.

Cabinetinternalsand anchorageinspected on 1/7/13. Noadverse seismic conditions noted.

  • Walkdown was performed on 1/7/2013. Form was retyped and resigned on date reflected below for clarity.

Evaluated by: -Ryan Harlos Date: -7 12 */-S Tnvlor

...... eb.o.d 717-91j Tavlor Youneblood Page 84 of 234

ATTACHMENT 7: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS NO. SNCF164-RPT-02, VERSION 2.0 Sheet 3 of 4 LOA REA PAE DISL2 Q2H2L53-Page 85 of 234

ATTACHMENT 7: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS NO. SNCF164-RPT-02, VERSION 2.0 Sheet 4 of 4 Page 86 of 234

ATTACHMENT 7: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS NO. SNCF164-RPT-02, VERSION 2.0 Z -7 Sheet I of 5 Status: YN NEI U[-

Seismic Walkdol Checklist (SWC)

Equipment ID No. Q2P16L002 Equip. Class' 20 Equipment Description SW DISCHARGE VALVE RELAY CABINET 2B Location: Bldg. AUXILIARY Floor El. 155 Room, Area 2405 Manufacturer, Model, Etc. (optional but recommended)

Instructions for Completing Checklist This checklist may be used to document the results of the Seismic Walkdown of an item of equipment on the SWEL. The space below each of the following questions may be used to record the results of judgments and findings. Additional space is provided at the end of this checklist for documenting other comments.

Anchorage I. Is the anchorage configuration verification required (i.e., is the item one YE NEI of the 50% of SWEL items requiring such verification)?

Reference SEWS dated 7/3/93

2. Is the anchorage free of bent, broken, missing or loose hardware? YZ NDI UD N/AD Anchorage verified SAT on 2/8/13
3. Is the anchorage free of corrosion that is more than mild surface YI ND UD N/AD oxidation?

Anchorage verified SA T on 2/8/13

4. Is the anchorage free of visible cracks in the concrete near the anchors? YZ NDI UO N/AD Anchorage verified SAT on 218/13
5. Is the anchorage configuration consistent with plant documentation? YN NDI UD N/A-(Note: This question only applies if the item is one of the 50% for which an anchorage configuration verification is required.)

The anchoragewas verified on 2/8/13 to meet the configuration documented in the SEWS for Q2P16L002 dated 7/3/93.

6. Based on the above anchorage evaluations, is the anchorage free of YZ NDI UD potentially adverse seismic conditions?

The anchorageinspection was completed on 2/8/13. The overall condtiion of the anchoragewas determined to be SAT and no conditions were present which would call into question the function of the cabinet during a seismic event.

'Enter the equipment class name from Appendix B: Classes of Equipment.

Page 87 of 234

ATTACHMENT 7: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS NO. SNCF164-RPT-02, VERSION 2.0 Sheet 2 of 5 Status: YZ NEI UQ Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)

Equipment ID No. 02P16L002 Equip. Class, 20 Equipment Description SW DISCHARGE VALVE RELAY CABINET 2B Interaction Effects

7. Are soft targets free from impact by nearby equipment or structures? YN NO UO N/Ar
8. Are overhead equipment, distribution systems, ceiling tiles and lighting, YO NOI UO N/AO and masonry block walls not likely to collapse onto the equipment?
9. Do attached lines have adequate flexibility to avoid damage? YS NO UQ N/AO
10. Based on the above seismic interaction evaluations, is equipment free YO NO U.3 of potentially adverse seismic interaction effects?

Other Adverse Conditions II. Have you looked for and found no other seismic conditions that could YI9 NOI UO adversely affect the safety functions of the equipment?

The cabinetInternalswere inspected andno missing fasteners were observed.Ali Internalconnectionsand routedcables have been dtenmined to be adequate andpose no adverse seismiccondition.

Comments (Additional pages nay be added as necessary)

SWC completed originallyon 9/10/12 Finalwalkdown performed on 2/8/13 to Inspect the cabinet internalsandcomplete the anchorage configuration check. No adverse seismic conditionswere noted.

Evaluated by: Ruavn "Art* IDate: 2A:2 ,Ll

  1. I Taylor Youngbiomf 008/13 Page 88 of 234

ATTACHMENT 7: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS NO. SNCF164-RPT-02, VERSION 2.0 Sheet 3 of 5 Page 89 of 234

ATTACHMENT 7: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS NO. SNCF164-RPT-02, VERSION 2.0 Sheet 4 of 5 Page 90 of 234

ATTACHMENT 7: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS NO. SNCF164-RPT-02, VERSION 2.0 Sheet s of s Page 91 of 234

ATTACHMENT 7: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS NO. SNCF164-RPT-02, VERSION 2.0 Sheet 1 of 7 Status: YZ NI ULE]

Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)

Equipment ID No. 02Pf7MOV3046 Equip. Class' Equipment Description CCW Return Valve from RCPs Location: Bldg. U2 CTMT Floor El. 129' Room, Area 129' Hallway Near Seal Table Manufacturer, Model, Etc. (optional but recommended)

Instructions for Completing Checklist This checklist may be used to document the results of the Seismic Walkdown of an item of equipment on the SWEL. The space below each of the following questions may be used to record the results of judgments and findings. Additional space is provided at the end of this checklist for documenting other comments.

Anchorage

1. Is the anchorage configuration verification required (i.e., is the item one YID NEI of the 50% of SWEL items requiring such verification)?
2. Is the anchorage free of bent, broken, missing or loose hardware? YEI NE U- N/AZ In-line Component
3. Is the anchorage free of corrosion that is more than mild surface YEI NE UE N/A0 oxidation?
4. Is the anchorage free of visible cracks in the concrete near the anchors? Y0 NEI UE1 N/A0
5. Is the anchorage configuration consistent with plant documentation? YO NE UCI N/AZ (Note: This question only applies if the item is one of the 50% for which an anchorage configuration verification is required.)
6. Based on the above anchorage evaluations, is the anchorage free of YE NEI UO potentially adverse seismic conditions?

I Enter the equipment class name from Appendix B: Classes of Equipment.

Page 92 of 234

ATTACHMENT 7: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS NO. SNCF164-RPT-02, VERSION 2.0 Sheet 2 of 7 Status: YZ N[-] U[-

Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)

Equipment ID No. 02P17MOV3046 Equip. Class' 8 Equipment Description CCW Return Valve from RCPs Interaction Effects

7. Are soft targets free from impact by nearby equipment or structures? YZ ND' UD N/AD
8. Are overhead equipment, distribution systems, ceiling tiles and lighting, Y9 NDI UD N/AD and masonry block walls not likely to collapse onto the equipment?
9. Do attached lines have adequate flexibility to avoid damage? YZ NDi UDI N/AD
10. Based on the above seismic interaction evaluations, is equipment free of potentially adverse seismic interaction effects?

Other Adverse Conditions II. Have you looked for and found no other seismic conditions that could YU ND UD adversely affect the safety functions of the equipment?

No adverse seismic conditions were observed. Bolting/mounting of the valve was in adequatecondition, nearbysupports for the in line valve were adequate, and the cables hadadequate flex.

Comments (Additional pages may be added as necessary)

  • Walkdown was performed on 4/18/2013. Form was retyped and resigned on date reflected below for clarity.

Evaluated by: Taylor Youngblood d1'e.-, Date: ____ i' CheliciaHill 1/',

  • lY*

Page 93 of 234

ATTACHMENT 7: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS NO. SNCF164-RPT-02, VERSION 2.0 Sheet q of 7 Page 94 of 234

ATTACHMENT 7: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS NO. SNCF164-RPT-02, VERSION 2.0 Sheet 4 of 7 Page 95 of 234

ATTACHMENT 7: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS NO. SNCF164-RPT-02, VERSION 2.0 Sheet 5 of 7 Page 96 of 234

ATTACHMENT 7: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS NO. SNCF164-RPT-02, VERSION 2.0 Sheet 6 of 7 Page 97 of 234

ATTACHMENT 7: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS NO. SNCF164-RPT-02, VERSION 2.0 Sheet 7 of 7 Page 98 of 234

ATTACHMENT 7: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS NO. SNCF164-RPT-02, VERSION 2.0 Sheet 1 of ii F2'- 09t) Status: YE] No U[]

Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)

Equipment ID No.A 2RY6B007l Equip. Class' e Equipment Description 600V LOAD CENTER 2E Location: Bldg. AUXILIARY Floor El. 121 Room. Area 2229 Manufacturer, Model, Etc. (optional but recommended)

Instructions for Completing Checklist This checklist may be used to document the results of the Seismic Walkdown of an item of equipment on the SWEL. The space below each of the following questions may be used to record the results of judgments and findings. Additional space is provided at the end of this checklist for documenting other comments.

Anchorage I. Is the anchorage configuration verification required (i.e., is the item one Y] NO of the 50% of SWEL items requiring such verification)?

Configuration verificationis not required.SEWS for Q2R16B007 dated 7/2193 was used to identify the location of the anchorage.

2. Is the anchorage free of bent, broken, missing or loose hardware? YO NEI UO N/AO]
3. Is the anchorage free of corrosion that is more than mild surface YO NEI UO N/AO oxidation?
4. Is the anchorage free of visible cracks in the concrete near the anchors? YZ N[] U[] N/A[
5. Is the anchorage configuration consistent with plant documentation? YI- N[l UD N/AO (Note: This question only applies if the item is one of the 50% for which an anchorage configuration verification is required.)

' Enter the equipment class name from Appendix B: Classes of Equipment.

Page 99 of 234

ATTACHMENT 7: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS NO. SNCF164-RPT-02, VERSION 2.0 Sheet 2 of 11 Status: YIZI No Ur-Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)

Equipment ID No. Q2R16B007 Equip.

Equipment Description 600V LOAD CENTER 2E

6. Based on the above anchorage evaluations, is the anchorage free of YE NE] UD potentially adverse seismic conditions?

The anchorage was verified to be free of any potentially adverse seismic conditions on 2/7/13. Attachment A of the SEWS for Q2R16B007 was used to assist in verifying the anchorageis free of adverse seismic condtiions. The same plug welds (front of the cabinet) which were visible and used for the Design Calculations were verified to be present and free of adverse seismic conditions.

The rearpanels of the Load Center contained vents which allowed a visual inspection of the anchorage (rearanchorageis 1/2" diameter bolts) through the associated vents.

Interaction Effects

7. Are soft targets free from impact by nearby equipment or structures? YO NDI UD N/AD CR 586439 has been written to document a wire way cover which has slid down the wireway onto the heating element for the first bay doorof O2R16BKREE02. It has been determined that the wire way would not impact any othercomponents and pose an adverse seismic interaction effect.
8. Are overhead equipment, distribution systems, ceiling tiles and lighting, YO ND UD N/ADI and masonry block walls not likely to collapse onto the equipment?
9. Do attached lines have adequate flexibility to avoid damage? YO ND UD" N/AD
10. Based on the above seismic interaction evaluations, is equipment free YO NDI UD of potentially adverse seismic interaction effects?

No interaction effects were identified which representan adverse seismic condition.

Other Adverse Conditions 1I. Have you looked for and found no other seismic conditions that could YD NO UE]

adversely affect the safety functions of the equipment?

AGASTA T Relay O2R16BKREE0262 was identified to only have the top two fasteners used to anchor the relay to the cabinet door. This issue was identified during the IPEEE walkdowns as an IPEEE Outlier and determined to be inadequateby the Seismic Walkdown Team performing the IPEEE walkdowns. As a result of the previous SEWS package, this is been identified as an adverse seismic condition.

CR586528 has been written to evaluate the condition.

Page 100 of 234

ATTACHMENT 7: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS NO. SNCF164-RPT-02, VERSION 2.0 Sheet 3 of 11 Status: YE[ NO U[-1 Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)

Equipment ID No. Q2R16B007 Equip. Class' 2 Equipment Description 600V LOAD CENTER 2E Comments (Additional pages may be added as necessary)

SWC completed originally.on 8/24/12 A,* ".,*vocd , ., -h. IV rlw.113 The final walkdown was performed on 217/13 to inspect cabinet internals,complete anchorage verification, and verify the IPEEE Outlier.

As documented in question 11 for OtherAdverse Conditions, AGASTAT Relay Q2R16BKREE0262 was previously identified as an IPEEE Outlier. During the performance of the walkdown on 217/13, it has been determined that this IPEEE Outlier is not currently resolved though it is suspected that the Outlier was originallycompleted. The relay is replaced on a 10-year frequency, with the last replacementoccuring 1/14/10 which is when this condition is expected to have reoccurred.

CRs 586439 and 586528 have been written, reference Questions 7 and 11 for furtherinformation.

Removal of the rearbay doors and breakersin the Load Centerhave been classified as extensive disassembly and therefore are scoped out of the addedguidance to inspectall cabinet internals.

Note that the lower 1/4 of all the rearpanels were still able to be visually inspectedthrough the vents located in the lower section of all the 600V Load Center rear panels.

Evaluated by: Ryan Harlos Date: 2/'7 1I Tavlor Younskbbood /3 Page 101 of 234

ATTACHMENT 7: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS NO. SNCF164-RPT-02, VERSION 2.0 Sheet 4 of 11 Page 102 of 234

ATTACHMENT 7: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS NO. SNCF164-RPT-02, VERSION 2.0 Sheet q of 11 Page 103 of 234

ATTACHMENT 7: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS NO. SNCF164-RPT-02, VERSION 2.0 Sheet 6 of ii Page 104 of 234

ATTACHMENT 7: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS NO. SNCF164-RPT-02, VERSION 2.0 Sheet 7 of 1I Page 105 of 234

ATTACHMENT 7: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS NO. SNCF164-RPT-02, VERSION 2.0 Sheet 8 of 11 Page 106 of 234

ATTACHMENT 7: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS NO. SNCF164-RPT-02, VERSION 2.0 Sheet 9 of 11 Page 107 of 234

ATTACHMENT 7: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS NO. SNCF164-RPT-02, VERSION 2.0 Page 108 of 234

ATTACHMENT 7: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS NO. SNCF164-RPT-02, VERSION 2.0 Sheet 11 of ii Page 109 of 234

ATTACHMENT 7: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS NO. SNCF164-RPT-02, VERSION 2.0 Sheet 1 of 1o Status: YN N["] U"]

Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)

Equipment ID No. Q2R17B510 Equip. Class, I Equipment Description MCC2T Location: Bldg. DIESEL Floor El. 155 Room, Area 59 Manufacturer, Model, Etc. (optional but recommended)

Instructions for Completing Checklist This checklist may be used to document the results of the Seismic Walkdown of an item of equipment on the SWEL. The space below each of the following questions may be used to record the results of judgments and findings. Additional space is provided at the end of this checklist for documenting other comments.

Anchorage I. Is the anchorage configuration verification required (i.e., is the item one Y(9 NEI of the 50% of SWEL items requiring such verification)?

Reference SEWS package dated 7/8/93

2. Is the anchorage free of bent, broken, missing or loose hardware? YO NEI UE! N/A[]

The rearC.I.P. bolt in the first cabinet on the left was identified to be less than 5 degrees off the vertical axis. The bolt was determinedto have full engagement and all other anchoragewas SAT with full engagement. SWEs have determined that this condition is SAT.

3. Is the anchorage free of corrosion that is more than mild surface YZ NEI U" N/AE!

oxidation?

4. Is the anchorage free of visible cracks in the concrete near the anchors? YO NEI Ur! N/AD
5. Is the anchorage configuration consistent with plant documentation? YN NE! UE! N/AE (Note: This question only applies if the item is one of the 50% for which an anchorage configuration verification is required.)

Reference SEWS package dated 7/8/93. The walkdown determined that the MCC is anchored with 5/8" C.I.P. bolts (1 front and I rear,per bay).

This anchorageconfigurationmatches the SEWS package dated 7/8/93.

6. Based on the above anchorage evaluations, is the anchorage free of YS NO! UOi potentially adverse seismic conditions?

Component anchorageis free of any adverse seismic condtions.

Enter the equipment class name from Appendix B: Classes of Equipment.

Page 110 of 234

ATTACHMENT 7: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS NO. SNCF164-RPT-02, VERSION 2.0 Sheet 2 of 10 Status: YN NE] Ur-Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)

Equipment IDNo. 02R17B510 Equip.

Equipment Description MCC2T Interaction Effects

7. Are soft targets free from impact by nearby equipment or structures? YN NO UO N/AQ
8. Are overhead equipment, distribution systems, ceiling tiles and lighting. Y[D NO UO N/AQ and masonry block walls not likely to collapse onto the equipment?
9. Do attached lines have adequate flexibility to avoid damage? Y0 NO UO N/AO
10. Based on the above seismic interaction evaluations, is equipment free YO NE UO of potentially adverse seismic interaction effects?

No adverse seismic interaction effects have been identified either external or internal to the cabinet.

Other Adverse Conditions

11. Have you looked for and found no other seismic conditions that could YN NOI U" adversely affect the safety functions of the equipment?

The cabinet internalswere inspectedand no missing hardware or fasteners were observed. The cables inside the cabinet had adequate flex and no other adverseseismic conditions were noted.

Comments (Additional pages may be added as necessary)

SWC completed originallyon 8/24/12 The final walkdown performed on 3/25/13 inspected the cabinet internalsand completed the anchorageverification.The anchorage was verified to be consistent with plant documentation and no adverseseismic conditions were noted during the walkdown.

Evaluated by: Ryan Harlos Date: 112S A-Z I I Taylor Youngblood~

Page 111 of 234

ATTACHMENT 7: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS NO. SNCF164-RPT-02, VERSION 2.0 Sheet 3 of lo Page 112 of 234

ATTACHMENT 7: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS NO. SNCF164-RPT-02, VERSION 2.0 Sheet 4 of 10 Page 113 of 234

ATTACHMENT 7: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS NO. SNCF164-RPT-02, VERSION 2.0 Sheet 5 of 10 Page 114 of 234

ATTACHMENT 7: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS NO. SNCF164-RPT-02, VERSION 2.0 Sheet 6 of io Page 115 of 234

ATTACHMENT 7: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS NO. SNCF164-RPT-02, VERSION 2.0 Sheet 7 Of10 Page 116 of 234

ATTACHMENT 7: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS NO. SNCF164-RPT-02, VERSION 2.0 Sheet 8 of lo Page 117 of 234

ATTACHMENT 7: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS NO. SNCF164-RPT-02, VERSION 2.0 Sheet 9 of lo Page 118 of 234

ATTACHMENT 7: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS NO. SNCF164-RPT-02, VERSION 2.0 Sheet lo of lo Page 119 of 234

Retrieved from "https://kanterella.com/w/index.php?title=ML13252A157&oldid=2636056"