ML13252A155

Enclosure 1, Including Attachments 1 to 8: Licensing Summary of Walkdown Report. Part 4 of 7

ML13252A155
Person / Time
Site:	Farley
Issue date:	09/04/2013
From:	Southern Nuclear Operating Co
To:	Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation
Shared Package
ML13252A148	List: ML13252A150 ML13252A151 ML13252A153 ML13252A154 ML13252A155 ML13252A156 ML13252A157 ML13252A159 NL-13-1555, Enclosure 1, Including Attachments 1 to 8: Licensing Summary of Walkdown Report. Part 1 of 7 NL-13-1555, Enclosure 2: Updated Farley Unit 2 Seismic Walkdown Report for Resolution of Fukushima Near-Term Task Force Recommendation 2.3: Seismic NL-13-1555, Joseph M. Farley Unit 2, Updated Seismic Recommendation 2.3 Walkdown Report Requested by NRC Letter, Request for Information Re Recommendations 2.1, 2.3 & 9.3 of the Near-Term Task Force Review of Insights from Fukushima Dai Ichi Accident
References
NL-13-1555
Download: ML13252A155 (98)

Text

ATTACHMENT 3: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS NO. SNCF164-RPT-02, VERSION 2.0 Sheet i ofK4 Status: YO ND U[-]

Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)

Equipment ID No. Q2P16PO01C Equip.

Equipment Description SERVICE WATER PUMP Location: Bldg. SW/S Floor El. 188 Room, Area .22A Manufacturer, Model, Etc. (optional but recommended)

Instructions for Completing Checklist This checklist may be used to document the results of the Seismic Walkdown of an item of equipment on the SWEL. The space below each of the following questions may be used to record the results of judgments and findings. Additional space is provided at the end of this checklist for documenting other comments.

Anchorage

1. Is the anchorage configuration verification required (i.e., is the item one Y(O NO-of the 50% of SWEL items requiring such verification)?

2. Is the anchorage free of bent, broken, missing or loose hardware? Y[o NEI U] N/A]3

3. Is the anchorage free of corrosion that is more than mild surface 4 N] U] N/Ar]

oxidation?

4. Is the anchorage free of visible cracks in the concrete near the anchors? Y[O N] U] N/A]

5. Is the anchorage configuration consistent with plant documentation? YE N]I U] N/A]

(Note: This question only applies if the item is one of the 50% for which an anchorage configuration verification is required.)

ý d- -JU -C '11 -7

11, v . I

6. Based on the above anchorage evaluations, is the anchorage free of YR NO U]

potentially adverse seismic conditions?

I Enter the equipment class name from Appendix B: Clas.es of Equipment.

Page 275 of 467

ATTACHMENT 3: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS NO. SNCF164-RPT-02, VERSION 2.0 Sheet 2 of'q Status: Y0 NEI UU-Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)

Equipment ID No. Q2P16PO01C Equip. Class, 6 Equipment Description SERVICE WA TER PUMP2C Interaction Effects

7. Are soft targets free from impact by nearby equipment or structures? Yo NE UEr N/AE]

8. Are overhead equipment, distribution systems, ceiling tiles and lighting, Y[P NEI UE1 N/AE and masonry block walls not likely to collapse onto the equipment?

9. Do attached lines have adequate flexibility to avoid damage? YW NEI UE N/AEl

10. Based on the above seismic interaction evaluations, is equipment free YE) NEI UE]

of potentially adverse seismic interaction effects?

Other Adverse Conditions

11. Have you looked for and found no other seismic conditions that could YCV NEI U[E adversely affect the safety functions of the equipment?

Comments (Additional pages may be added as necessary)

Evaluated by: rfr-A,

• U &o. J Lcpj t gtJ mO Date:  :'1/I10 2 Page 276 of 467

ATTACHMENT 3: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS NO. SNCF164-RPT-02, VERSION 2.0 Page 277 of 467

ATTACHMENT 3: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS NO. SNCF164-RPT-02, VERSION 2.0 Page 278 of 467

ATTACHMENT 3: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS NO. SNCF164-RPT-02, VERSION 2.0 Sheet i of ý' A Status: Y[5 NEI U--

Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)

Equipment ID No. 02P16V514 Equip. Class' 8 Equipment Description SW TO TURBINE BLDG ISOLATION VALVE Location: Bldg. YARD Floor El. 155 Room, Area 2V ý3- 1 Manufacturer, Model, Etc. (optional but recommended)

Instructions for Completing Checklist This checklist may be used to document the results of the Seismic Walkdown of an item of equipment on the SWEL. The space below each of the following questions may be used to record the results ofjudgments and findings. Additional space is provided at the end of this checklist for documenting other comments.

Anchorage

1. Is the anchorage configuration verification required (i.e., is the item one YOEN of the 50% of SWEL items requiring such verification)?

2. Is the anchorage free of bent, broken, missing or loose hardware? YE NE UE N/At w-&- GLLL. Y'c3J,'

3. Is the anchorage free of corrosion that is more than mild surface YE NEI UE N/po oxidation?

4. Is the anchorage free of visible cracks in the concrete near the anchors? YE NEI UE N/Ap

5. Is the anchorage configuration consistent with plant documentation? YE NE UE N/AR' (Note: This question only applies if the item is one of the 50% for which an anchorage configuration verification is required.)

6. Based on the above anchorage evaluations, is the anchorage free of Y9*

/ NE UE potentially adverse seismic conditions?

Enter the equipment class name from Appendix B: Classes of Equipment.

Page 279 of 467

ATTACHMENT 3: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS NO. SNCF164-RPT-02, VERSION 2.0 F,;--13 Sheet 2 of, 4 Status: YO NCI U[-]

Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)

Equipment ED No. Q2P16V514 Equip. Class, 8 Equipment Description SW TO TURBINE BLDG ISOLATION VALVE Interaction Effects

7. Are soft targets free from impact by nearby equipment or structures?

YT], NEI U- N/AOl

8. Are overhead equipment, distribution systems, ceiling tiles and lighting, Y*. N- UL[ N/AD and masonry block walls not likely to collapse onto the equipment?

9. Do attached lines have adequate flexibility to avoid damage? Y&NEI ULD N/AD

10. Based on the above seismic interaction evaluations, is equipment free Y[N NEI ULIE of potentially adverse seismic interaction effects?

Other Adverse Conditions

11. Have you looked for and found no other seismic conditions that could NO U-D adversely affect the safety functions of the equipment? /

Comments (Additional pages may be added as necessary)

Date: q li/IT--

Page 280 of 467

ATTACHMENT 3: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS 0

NO, SNCF164-RPT-02, VERSION 2.0 Page 281 of 467

ATTACHMENT 3: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS NO. SNCF164-RPT-02, VERSION 2.0 1

Page 282 of 467

ATTACHMENT 3: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS NO. SNCF164-RPT-02, VERSION 2.0 f`/ 74-Sheet 1 of /4 Status: YR NF] U7 Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)

Equipment ID No. Q2P16V516 Equip. Class, 8 Equipment Description SW TO TURBINE BLDG TRAIN A ISOLATION Location: Bldg. YARD Floor El. 155 Room, Area 2,'E3 -l1t, Manufacturer, Model, Etc. (optional but recommended)

Instructions for Completing Checklist This checklist may be used to document the results of the Seismic Walkdown of an item of equipment on the SWEL. The space below each of the following questions may be used to record the results ofjudgments and findings. Additional space is provided at the end of this checklist for documenting other comments.

Anchorage

1. Is the anchorage configuration verification required (i.e., is the item one YEIN of the 50% of SWEL items requiring such verification)?

2. Is the anchorage free of bent, broken, missing or loose hardware? YEI NEI UE- N/AY

3. Is the anchorage free of corrosion that is more than mild surface YE N[E U[] N/A X, oxidation?

4. Is the anchorage free of visible cracks in the concrete near the anchors? YE] NE- UE] N/A[9,

5. Is the anchorage configuration consistent with plant documentation? YE- NEI UE- N/A[6" (Note: This question only applies if the item is one of the 50% for which an anchorage configuration verification is required.)

6. Based on the above anchorage evaluations, is the anchorage free of YFJNE-1 UE potentially adverse seismic conditions?

I Enter the equipment class name from Appendix B: Classes of Equipment.

Page 283 of 467

ATTACHMENT 3: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS NO. SNCF164-RPT-02, VERSION 2.0 Sheet 2 of,91 Status: Y0 NED UE]

Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)

Equipment ID No. Q2P16V516 Equip. ClassI 8 Equipment Description SW TO TURBINE BLDG TRAIN A ISOLATION Interaction Effects

7. Are soft targets free from impact by nearby equipment or structures? YO NEI UEI N/AEr

8. Are overhead equipment, distribution systems, ceiling tiles and lighting, YP NEI U[:] N/AD and masonry block walls not likely to collapse onto the equipment?

9. Do attached lines have adequate flexibility to avoid damage? Y2 NE) UE- N/AEl

10. Based on the above seismic interaction evaluations, is equipment free Yi NEI UE of potentially adverse seismic interaction effects?

Other Adverse Conditions

11. Have you looked for and found no other seismic conditions that could Yo NE- UE adversely affect the safety functions of the equipment?

Comments (Additional pages may be added as necessary)

AV'lcl 0-14-4-ý, ýs ir- fodc "I' 3 dvllT 2Pb\

Evaluated by: *,O M~r."6 Lir, ,M.

\ac ta' Date: gi/L/Z

_; -.- "-J"-. ' L Page 284 of 467

ATTACHMENT 3: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS NO. SNCF164-RPT-02, VERSION 2.0 Page 285 of 467

ATTACHMENT 3: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS NO. SNCF164-RPT-02, VERSION 2.0 Page 286 of 467

ATTACHMENT 3: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS NO. SNCF164-RPT-02, VERSION 2.0 Sheet a of 3 Status: N[-] U--

Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)

Equipment ID No. Q2P16V539 Equip. Class, 8 Equipment Description SW EMERGENCY RECIRCULA TION TO POND Location: Bldg. YARD Floor El. 155 Room, Area 1ttMv N2 *&2..e A Manufacturer, Model, Etc. (optional but recommended)

Instructions for Completing Checklist This checklist may be used to document the results of the Seismic Walkdown of an item of equipment on the SWEL. The space below each of the following questions may be used to record the results ofjudgments and findings. Additional space is provided at the end of this checklist for documenting other comments.

Anchoraze

1. Is the anchorage configuration verification required (i.e., is the item one of the 50% of SWEL items requiring such verification)?

2. Is the anchorage free of bent, broken, missing or loose hardware? YO NO UL- N/A+

3. Is the anchorage free of corrosion that is more than mild surface YO" NO UO NI oxidation?

4. Is the anchorage free of visible cracks in the concrete near the anchors? Yf NOl UE- N/As

5. Is the anchorage configuration consistent with plant documentation? YOl NEI UQ N/AK (Note: This question only applies if the item is one of the 50% for which an anchorage configuration verification is required.)

6. Based on the above anchorage evaluations, is the anchorage free of NEI UO potentially adverse seismic conditions?

Enter the equipment class name from Appendix 1: Classes of Equipment.

Page 287 of 467

ATTACHMENT 3: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS NO. SNCF164-RPT-02, VERSION 2.0 Sh et2of3 Status: N7 ur]

Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)

Equipment ID No. Q2P16v539 -Equip. Class' 8 __________________

Equipment Description SW EMERGENCY RECI'RCULA TION TO POND Interaction Effects

7. Are soft targets free from impact by nearby equipment or structures?

N/A[3 Yý NEI UE3

8. Are overhead equipment, distribution systems, ceiling tiles and lighting, NI] U[] N/A[-]

and masonry block walls not likely to collapse onto the equipment? I

9. Do attached lines have adequate flexibility to avoid damage? YMNE] UE] N/AI]

10. Based on the above seismic interaction evaluations, is equipment free Y/ NI] UI]3 of potentially adverse seismic interaction effects?

Other Adverse Conditions

11. Have you looked for and found no other seismic conditions that could N*I U]

adversely affect the safety functions of the equipment?

Comments (Additional pages may be added as necessary) tA-z 8I27y 11 Evaluated by: AW-"1 U*{taQ.a I nurct KiAac(Au( Datc: .'t 2 V-I #

J 1~7Z.it~ A.

Page 288 of 467

ATTACHMENT 3: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS NO. SNCF164-RPT-02, VERSION 2.0 Page 289 of 467

ATTACHMENT 3: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS NO. SNCF1 64-RPT-02, VERSION 2.0 Sheet I of 3 Status: I N-- UE-'

Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)

Equipment ID No. Q2P16V546 Equip. Class' 8 Equipment Description SW DISCHARGE FROM AUXILIARY BUILDING Location: Bldg. YARD Floor El. 155 Room, Area We+/-, V59 Manufacturer, Model, Etc. (optional but recommended)

Instructions for Completing Checklist This checklist may be used to document the results of the Seismic Walkdown of an item of equipment on the SWEL. The space below each of the following questions may be used to record the results of judgments and findings. Additional space is provided at the end of this checklist for documenting other comments.

Anchorage I. Is the anchorage configuration verification required (i.e., is the item one Y- N]

of the 50% of SWEL items requiring such verification)?

,4J0 4eeve Ld ccvL4ý &IkL4

2. Is the anchorage free of bent, broken, missing or loose hardware? YEI NEI UEi N/A/

3. Is the anchorage free of corrosion that is more than mild surface YEr NE UE N/A*

oxidation?

4. Is the anchorage free of visible cracks in the concrete near the anchors? YO NEI U N/Ar

5. Is the anchorage configuration consistent with plant documentation? YEI NEI UE NA (Note: This question only applies if the item is one of the 50% for which an anchorage configuration verification is required.)

6. Based on the above anchorage evaluations, is the anchorage free of UE potentially adverse seismic conditions? IJNEI I Enter the equipment class name from Appendix B: Classes of Equipment.

Page 290 of 467

ATTACHMENT 3: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS NO. SNCF164-RPT-02, VERSION 2.0 Sheet 2 of 3 Status: Y NEI Un]

Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)

Equipment ID No. Q2P16V546 Equip. Class, 8 Equipment Description SW DISCHARGE FROM AUXILIARY BUILDING Interaction Effects

7. Are soft targets free from impact by nearby equipment or structures? Y NE(( U[ N/AD

8. Are overhead equipment, distribution systems, ceiling tiles and lighting, Y NE] UD N/A[]

and masonry block walls not likely to collapse onto the equipment?

9. Do attached lines have adequate flexibility to avoid damage? YXNEI Ufl N/A[3

10. Based on the above seismic interaction evaluations, is equipment free YthNEI UEI of potentially adverse seismic interaction effects?

Other Adverse Conditions

11. Have you looked for and found no other seismic conditions that could adversely affect the safety functions of the equipment?

Comments (Additional pages may be added as necessary)

Evaluated by: L&&-I-aura akd.L&424qA Date:  ?"61".

K 4.

/ 27/ 2-Page 291 of 467

0 ATTACHMENT 3: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS 0 NO. SNCF164-RPT-02, VERSION 2.0 Page 292 of 467

ATTACHMENT 3: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS NO. SNCF164-RPT-02, VERSION 2.0 Sheet i of/ 4 Status: YP NEI UF-Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)

Equipment ID No. Q2P16V563 Equip.

Equipment Description A TRN DIL BYP PCV Location: Bldg. YARD Floor El. 155 Room, Area Wye 11o xZA Manufacturer, Model, Etc. (optional but recommended)

Instructions for Completing Checklist This checklist may be used to document the results of the Seismic Walkdown of an item of equipment on the SWEL. The space below each of the following questions may be used to record the results ofjudgments and findings. Additional space is provided at the end of this checklist for documenting other comments.

Anchorage

1. Is the anchorage configuration verification required (i.e., is the item one of the 50% of SWEL items requiring such verification)?

YO ý It%tihc- C'rrjPrvmh-, ho 0ozehor-a.

2. Is the anchorage free of bent, broken, missing or loose hardware? YO NE UO N/Aý

3. Is the anchorage free of corrosion that is more than mild surface YO NEI U- N/A t oxidation?

4. Is the anchorage free of visible cracks in the concrete near the anchors? YO NO U' N/AD,

5. Is the anchorage configuration consistent with plant documentation? YEO NO UO N/Aý (Note: This question only applies if the item is one of the 50% for which an anchorage configuration verification is required.)

6. Based on the above anchorage evaluations, is the anchorage free of Y'* NO UO potentially adverse seismic conditions?

ý Enter the equipment class name from Appendix B: Classes of Equipment.

Page 293 of 467

ATTACHMENT 3: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS NO. SNCF164-RPT-02, VERSION 2.0 Sheet 2 of'4 Status: Yý N- U[

Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)

Equipment ID No. Q2P16V563 Equip. Class' 7 Equipment Description A TRN DIL BYP PCV Interaction Effects

7. Are soft targets free from impact by nearby equipment or structures? YrN[O U[] N/AL f

8. Are overhead equipment, distribution systems, ceiling tiles and lighting, Y[{ NE UO N/AO and masonry block walls not likely to collapse onto the equipment?

9. Do attached lines have adequate flexibility to avoid damage? Yt NE UF1 N/AO

10. Based on the above seismic interaction evaluations, is equipment free Yvi NEI UO of potentially adverse seismic interaction effects?

Other Adverse Conditions

11. Have you looked for and found no other seismic conditions that could YT NE UM adversely affect the safety functions of the equipment?

Comments (Additional pages may be added as necessary)

Area wVoilW-10y t* V'Ivc b:ox av-8%A iS With equyrnx-f*) q-2 P to\415 3 9, Evaluated by: A.Ull/ L,, ot MQ(cav Date; ý-2-1-t*

A. Mw-Ft-ý,a I

Page 294 of 467

ATTACHMENT 3: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS NO. SNCF164-RPT-02, VERSION 2.0 Page 295 of 467

ATTACHMENT 3: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS NO. SNCF164-RPT-02, VERSION 2.0 Page 296 of 467

ATTACHMENT 3: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS NO. SNCF164-RPT-02, VERSION 2.0 Sheet s of*'4.

Status: Y[D NEI U--

Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)

Equipment ID No. 02P16V578 Equip. Class, 7 Equipment Description 2C PUMPMIN FLOW Location: Bldg. SWIS Floor El. 188 Room, Area 724 Manufacturer, Model, Etc. (optional but reconmmended)

Instructions for Completing Checklist This checklist may be used to document the results of the Seismic Walkdown of an item of equipment on the SWEL. The space below each of the following questions may be used to record the results of judgments and findings. Additional space is provided at the end of this checklist for documenting other comments.

Anchorage va qj P

1. Is the anchorage configuration verification required (i.e., is the item one .Y0 NVq of the 50% of SWEL items requiring such verification)?

Inline valve, no anchorage

2. Is the anchorage free of bent, broken, missing or loose hardware? YO NO U- N/AZ

3. Is the anchorage free of conosion that is mote than mild sutface YE NE UE N/A[D oxidation?

4. Is the anchorage free of visible cracks in the concrete near the anchors? YE NE UE N/AZ

5. Is the anchorage configuration consistent with plant documentation? YE NEI UE N/AN (Note: This question only applies if the item is one of the 50% for which an anchorage configuration verification is required.)

6. Based on the above anchorage evaluations, is the anchorage free of YZ NE UE potentially adverse seismic conditions?

IEnci (he equipmeni class nalne fiomnAppendix B: Classes of Equipment.

Page 297 of 467

ATTACHMENT 3: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS NO. SNCF164-RPT-02, VERSION 2.0 Sheet 2 ofý4 Status: YI NEI ur Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)

Equipment ID No. 02P16V578 Equip. Class' 7 Equipment Description 2C PUMPMIN FLOW Interaction Effects

7. Are soft targets free from impact by nearby equipment or structures? Y0 N["] UD N/AD

8. Are overhead equipment, distribution systems, ceiling tiles and lighting, Y[ NE UE N/AD and masonry block walls not likely to collapse onto the equipment?

9. Do attached lines have adequate flexibility to avoid damage? YED NE U["D N/AD

10. Based on the above seismic interaction evaluations, is equipment free YZ NEI U'-E of potentially adverse seismic interaction effects?

Other Adverse Conditions II. Have you looked for and found no other seismic conditions that could YZ NEI UI-adversely affect the safety functions of the equipment?

Comments (Additional pages may be added as necessary)

Armt ( j- Lýr-foldc-r ri-l-qI, Nwq r'fd- Qw ijCS 1 p.32 Evaluated by: -,wA,& -. ucf0u Laura Mada, Date.: 2L['30/L fU k2*D T~s-y 11.Mt~i*~J~ 83 1401/o I -

\\j Page 298 of 467

ATTACHMENT 3: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS NO. SNCF164-RPT-02, VERSION 2.0 Page 299 of 467

ATTACHMENT 3: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS NO. SNCF164-RPT-02, VERSION 2.0 Page 300 of 467

ATTACHMENT 3: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS NO. SNCF164-RPT-02, VERSION 2.0 Sheet I of 3 Status: YZ N[] U[]

Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)

Equipment [D No. Q2P17HOO1B Equip. Class' 21 Equipment Description SWING CCW HEAT EXCHANGER Location: Bldg. AUXILIARY Floor El. 100 Room. Area 2185 Manufacturer. Model, Etc. (optional but recommended)

Instructions for Completing Checklist This checklist may be used to document the results of the Seismic Walkdown of an item of equipment on the SWEL. The space below each of the following questions may be used to record the results ofjudgments and findings. Additional space is provided at the end of this checklist for documenting other comments.

Anchorag.

I. Is the anchorage configuration verification required (i.e., is the item one YZ NI]

of the 50% of SWEL items requiring such verification)?

Drawing D206597 Rev. 6

2. Is the anchorage free of bent, broken, missing or loose hardware? YZ N[I UE] N/AE]

3. Is The anchorage free of corrosion that is more than mild surface YZ NI Url N/A0]

oxidation?

4. Is the anchorage free of visible cracks in the concrete near the anchors? YZ NEI UlI N/Al]

5. Is the anchorage configuration consistent with plant documentation? YZ NIl U[-] N/Al]

(Note: This question only applies if the item is one of the 50% for which att anchorage consfiguration verification is required.)

6. Based on the above anchorage evaluations, is the anchorage free of Y91 NE] UE:

potentially adverse seismic conditions?

IEaner the equipmeat class aine from Appendix B: Classes of Eqtripamen.

Page 301 of 467

ATTACHMENT 3: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS NO. SNCF164-RPT-02, VERSION 2.0 Sheet 2 of 3 Status: YZ NE UM Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)

Equipment ID No. Q2P17HOO1B Equip. Class, 21 Equipment Description SWING CCW HEAT EXCHANGER Interaction Effects

7. Are soft targets free from impact by nearby equipment or structures? YZ NO UO N/AO A cable tray has <1 of clearance from the top of the CCW end cap (see picture), however both the cable tray and HX are adequately restrainedagainstvertical displacement. There is nozzle equipment at the other end of the HX that is close to overhead piping but judged OK since gap >2"

8. Are overhead equipment, distribution systems, ceiling tiles and lighting, YN NEI UD N/AD and masonry block walls not likely to collapse onto the equipment?

9. Do attached lines have adequate flexibility to avoid damage? Y0 NO UD N/AD

10. Based on the above seismic interaction evaluations, is equipment free YZ NO UD of potentially adverse seismic interaction effects?

Other Adverse Conditions II. Have you looked for and found no other seismic conditions that could Y[ NOI UD adversely affect the safety functions of the equipment?

Comments (Additional pages may be added as necessary)

Evaluated by: Te2 f A. K4A LLFW_____ Date:

L-Qiiuimou WA2.Y(o Page 302 of 467

ATTACHMENT 3: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS 0 NO. SNCF164-RPT-02, VERSION 2.0 Page 303 of 467

ATTACHMENT 3: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS NO. SNCF164-RPT-02, VERSION 2.0 Sheet I of 3 Status: YlA NEI U-]

Ax Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)

Equipment [D No. Q2P17HV3045 Equip. Class' Equipment Description CCW RETURN FROM RCP THERMAL BARRIER ISOLA TION Location: Bldg. AUXILIARY Floor El. 121 Room, Area ZZ3Z

ý\ Manufacturer, Model, Etc. (optional but recommended)

Instructions for Completing Checklist This checklist may be used to document the results of the Seismic Walkdown of an item of equipment on the SWEL. The space below each of the following questions may be used to record the results ofjudgments and findings. Additional space is provided at the end of this checklist for documenting other comments.

Anchorale

1. Is the anchorage configuration verification required (i.e., is the item one YE)]N of the 50% of SWEL items requiring such verification)?

)

2. Is the anchorage free of bent, broken, missing or loose hardware? YO NEI UD N/AE?

3. Is the anchorage free of corrosion that is more than mild surface YEO NOI UE" N/AA oxidation?

4. Is the anchorage free of visible cracks in the concrete near the anchors? YE NE UE] N/AO

5. Is the anchorage configuration consistent with plant documentation? YE] NEI UE] N/Aý]

(Note: This question only applies if the item is one of the 50% for which an anchorage configuration verification is required.)

6. Based on the above anchorage evaluations, is the anchorage free of Y/* NE] UE]

potentially adverse seismic conditions?

I Enter the equipment class name from Appendix B: Classes of Equipment.

Page 304 of 467

ATTACHMENT 3: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS NO. SNCF164-RPT-02, VERSION 2.0 Sheet 2 of 3 Status: Y[A N-1 U--

Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)

Equipment lD No. Q2P17HV3045 Equip. Class' 7 Equipment Description CCW RETURN FROM RCP THERMAL BARRIER ISOLATION Interaction Effects

7. Are soft targets free from impact by nearby equipment or structures? Y[N NEI UE] N/A[]

8. Are overhead equipment, distribution systems, ceiling tiles and lighting, "1 NE] UE1 N/A[]

and masonry block walls not likely to collapse onto the equipment?

9. Do attached lines have adequate flexibility to avoid damage? )ýý-)N(( UE[ N/AE[

10. Based on the above seismic interaction evaluations, is equipment free Yý N[] U[]

of potentially adverse seismic interaction effects?

Other Adverse Conditions

11. Have you looked for and found no other seismic conditions that could NEI U[]

adversely affect the safety functions of the equipment? /

Comments (Additional pages may be added as necessary)

,qf.E'~t W"Ja-^S ,, XfLt- 4~ Z.Z.3 's e Q2FI v L m**Ac,.,

Evaluated by. .QLU Date:

Page 305 of 467

ATTACHMENT 3: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS NO. SNCF164-RPT-02, VERSION 2.0

- 11 Page 306 of 467

ATTACHMENT 3: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS NO. SNCF164-RPT-02, VERSION 2.0 Sheet i of 4 Status: YO NEI U[]

Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)

Equipment ID No. Q2P17HV3095 Equip. Class' Equipment Description CCW SUPPLY TO EXCESS LETDOWN HEAT EXCHANGER Location: Bldg. AUXILIARY Floor El. 121' Room, Area 2223 (PEN 45)

Manufacturer, Model, Etc. (optional but recommended)

Instructions for Completing Checklist This checklist may be used to document the results of the Seismic Walkdown of an item of equipment on the SWEL. The space below each of the following questions may be used to record the results of judgments and findings. Additional space is provided at the end of this checklist for documenting other comments.

Anchorase

1. Is the anchorage configuration verification required (i.e., is the item one YO N9 of the 50% of SWEL items requiring such verification)?

2. Is the anchorage free of bent, broken, missing or loose hardware? YO NO U' N/A0 IN-LINE COMPONENT

3. Is the anchorage free of corrosion that is more than mild surface YO NO UO N/AO oxidation?

4. Is the anchorage free of visible cracks in the concrete near the anchors? YO NO UO N/A0

5. Is the anchorage configuration consistent with plant documentation? YO NO U[ N/AO (Note: This question only applies if the item is one of the 50% for which an anchorage configuration verification is required.)

IN-LINE COMPONENT

6. Based on the above anchorage evaluations, is the anchorage free of Y0 NO UO potentially adverse seismic conditions?

'Enter the equipment class name from Appendix B: Classes of Equipment.

Page 307 of 467

ATTACHMENT 3: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS NO. SNCF164-RPT-02, VERSION 2.0 Sheet 2 of 4 Status: Y0 NEI Url Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)

Equipment ID No. Q2P17HV3095 Equip. Class' 7 Equipment Description CCW SUPPLY TO EXCESS LETDOWN HEAT EXCHANGER Interaction Effects

7. Are soft targets free from impact by nearby equipment or structures? YO NEI Ur- N/All

8. Are overhead equipment, distribution systems, ceiling tiles and lighting, YIZ NEI U-' N/AD and masonry block walls not likely to collapse onto the equipment?

9. Do attached lines have adequate flexibility to avoid damage? YZ NEI UD N/AEJ

10. Based on the above seismic interaction evaluations, is equipment free YO NEI U[D of potentially adverse seismic interaction effects?

Other Adverse Conditions

11. Have you looked for and found no other seismic conditions that could YO NDI U' adversely affect the safety functions of the equipment?

Close (1" away) to 1-1/2" anchored/supportedline. Mass is so small that if any interaction occurred,it is no seismic concern to the valve, OKAY Comments (Additional pages may be added as necessary)

None See F2-15 for A WC (02E1 1MOV8888B)

• Walkdown was performed on 9/10/2012. Form was retyped and resignedon date reflected below for clarity. Comments section has also been updated to reference the correctArea Walk-by for the associatedlocation. /

Evaluated by: Scott Walden Date: 08, 0 8. ZO '%

Rvan Harlos Z7i%

Page 308 of 467

ATTACHMENT 3: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS 0 NO. SNCF164-RPT-02, VERSION 2.0 Page 309 of 467

ATTACHMENT 3: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS NO. SNCF164-RPT-02, VERSION 2.0 Page 310 of 467

ATTACHMENT 3: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS NO. SNCF164-RPT-02, VERSION 2.0 Sheet i of/4 Status: Y[I N[] U--

Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)

Equipment ID No. Q2P17HV3096B Equip. Class' Equipment Description CCWNON-SAFETYISOLATIO' Location: Bldg. AUXILIARY Floor El. 100 Room, Area .2* L, I Manufacturer, Model, Etc. (optional but recommended)

Instructions for Completing Checklist This checklist may be used to document the results of the Seismic Walkdown of an item of equipment on the SWEL. The space below each of the following questions may be used to record the results ofjudgments and findings. Additional space is provided at the end of this checklist for documenting other comments.

Anchorage

1. Is the anchorage configuration verification required (i.e., is the item one YOn1 of the 50% of SWEL items requiring such verification)?

lfniihs Caryj)4-sený-' hots O,.-hheroge.

2. Is the anchorage free of bent, broken, missing or loose hardware? YE NE) UE N/A5 YOI NO UOI N/A59

3. Is the anchorage free of corrosion that is more than mild surface oxidation?

4. Is the anchorage free of visible cracks in the concrete near the anchors? YE) NE) UE) N/Au

5. Is the anchorage configuration consistent with plant documentation? YE NE) UE) NIA[0 (Note: This question only applies if the item is one of the 50% for which an anchorage configuration verification is required.)

6. Based on the above anchorage evaluations, is the anchorage free of A

Y01U NE) UW potentially adverse seismic conditions?

' Enter the equipment class name from Appendix B: Classes of Equipment.

Page 311 of 467

ATTACHMENT 3: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS NO. SNCF164-RPT-02, VERSION 2.0 Sheet 2 of/ 4 Status: Yn NEI UE-Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)

Equipment ID No. Q2P17HV3096B Equip. Class' 7 Equipment Description CCW NON-SAFETY ISOLATION Interaction Effects

7. Are soft targets free from impact by nearby equipment or structures? Yjg NEI U-] N/Al]

8. Are overhead equipment, distribution systems, ceiling tiles and lighting, Y; NE] UO N/AO and masonry block walls not likely to collapse onto the equipment?

9. Do attached lines have adequate flexibility to avoid damage? YP NI] Ul- N/Al]

10. Based on the above seismic interaction evaluations, is equipment free Y NOI Un of potentially adverse seismic interaction effects?

Other Adverse Conditions 1I. Have you looked for and found no other seismic conditions that could YId NI U[]

adversely affect the safety functions of the equipment?

Comments (Additional pages may be added as necessary)

Evaluated by: i" ,I ýLyy*.cj I (U Lawcam cicla/ Date: 6-Z2- -

-ýLWL TMWI mwýym J/ý " ,

Page 312 of 467

ATTACHMENT 3: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS NO. SNCF164-RPT-02, VERSION 2.0 Page 313 of 467

ATTACHMENT 3: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS NO. SNCF164-RPT-02, VERSION 2.0 Page 314 of 467

ATTACHMENT 3: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS NO. SNCF164-RPT-02, VERSION 2.0

,cL. ?A-Sheet i of 3'4- S}il Status: Y!r'NE Un 14-1t Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)

Equipment ID No. Q2P17MOV3185B - Equip. Class' 8 Equipment Description CCW INLET TO RHR HEAT EXCHANGER NO. 2 Location: Bldg. AUXILIARY Floor El. 83 Room, Area Manufacturer, Model, Etc. (optional but recommended)

Instructions for Completing Checklist This checklist may be used to document the results of the Seismic Walkdown of an item of equipment on the SWEL. The space below each of the following questions may be used to record the results of judgments and findings. Additional space is provided at the end of this checklist for documenting other comments.

Anchorage

1. Is the anchorage configuration verification required (i.e., is the item one YE N'3 of the 50% of SWEL items requiring such verification)?

2. Is the anchorage free of bent, broken, missing or loose hardware? YO- NEIUI N/A[f

./

3. Is the anchorage free of corrosion that is more than mild surface YO NEI U[ N/AO/

oxidation?

4. Is the anchorage free of visible cracks in the concrete near the anchors? YE NE ULE N/AE'

5. Is the anchorage configuration consistent with plant documentation? YO NEI U N/ALI' (Note: This question only applies if the item is one of the 50% for which an anchorage configuration verification is required.)

Yf-f NOq UO-

6. Based on the above anchorage evaluations, is the anchorage free of potentially adverse seismic conditions?

Enter the equipment class name from Appendix B: Classes of EqUipment.

Page 315 of 467

ATTACHMENT 3: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS NO. SNCF164-RPT-02, VERSION 2.0 Sheet 2 ofT4- ý,"f Status: YZ NEI U- 5 ,I Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)

Equipment ID No. Q2P17MOV3185B Equip. Class, 8 Equipment Description CCW INLET TO RHR HEAT EXCHANGER NO. 2 Interaction Effects

7. Are soft targets free from impact by nearby equipment or structures? Y-'NE] UEI N/AE-

8. Are overhead equipment, distribution systems, ceiling tiles and lighting, Y[/NE[ U0I N/A[:]

and masonry block walls not likely to collapse onto the equipment?

9. Do attached lines have adequate flexbility to avoid damage? YZN[:] U[I] N/AE[

/

Y[* NE' U[E

10. Based on the above seismic interaction evaluations, is equipment free of potentially adverse seismic interaction effects?

Other Adverse Conditions

1. Have you looked for and found no other seismic conditions that could Yd/ NEI UE-1 adversely affect the safety functions of the equipment?

Comments (Additional pages may be added as necessary)

A10I t4e Evaluated by:. AK mty-r.5 Date: __ _ Z "__I__ _

5T-FPHC- 1A0 &4AU_ ~.. ('2' Page 316 of 467

ATTACHMENT 3: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS 0

NO. SNCF164-RPT-02, VERSION 2.0 Page 317 of 467

ATTACHMENT 3: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS NO. SNCF164-RPT-02, VERSION 2.0 Page 318 of 467

ATTACHMENT 3: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS NO. SNCF164-RPT-02, VERSION 2.0

,-T Sheet i of Kri4 Status: 'YANE] UE-Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)

Equipment ID No. Q2PI7PO01C Equip. Class' 5 Equipment Description CCW PUMP 2C TRAIN A Location: Bldg. AUXILIARY Floor El. 100 Room, Area 2.\S Manufacturer, Model, Etc. (optional but recommended)

Instructions for Completing Checklist This checklist may be used to document the results of the Seismic Walkdown of an item of equipment on the SWEL. The space below each of the following questions may be used to record the results ofjudgments and findings. Additional space is provided at the end of this checklist for documenting other comments.

Anchorage I. Is the anchorage configuration verification required (i.e., is the item one YEXqNO]

of the 50% of SWEL items requiring such verification)?

2. Is the anchorage free of bent, broken, missing or loose hardware?

YIr NI U-I N/AE]

3. Is the anchorage free of corrosion that is more than mild surface -

N/A I oxidation? U OI

-]

NI

4. Is the anchorage free of visible cracks in the concrete near the anchors? Yj NI] U-I N/AO

5. Is the anchorage configuration consistent with plant documentation? Y,* NEI Ur] N/A-(Note: This question only applies if the item is one of the 50% for which an anchorage configuration verification is required.)

6. Based on the above anchorage evaluations, is the anchorage free of ))<No U"]

potentially adverse seismic conditions?

Enter the equipment class name from Appendix B: Classes of Equipment.

Page 319 of 467

ATTACHMENT 3: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS NO. SNCF164-RPT-02, VERSION 2.0 i -I Sheet 2 ofAf Status: Yý ND- Un Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)

Equipment ID No. Q2P17PO01C Equip. Class, 5 Equipment Description CCW PUMP2C TRAIN A Interaction Effects

7. Are soft targets free from impact by nearby equipment or structures?

YýNEI UE] N/A[:

8. Are overhead equipment, distribution systems, ceiling tiles and lighting, 4 NEI UE] N/Ar-and masonry block walls not likely to collapse onto the equipment?

9. Do attached lines have adequate flexibility to avoid damage? -- NF US N/AZ 10 Based on the above seismic interaction evaluations, is equipment tree . NE3 UE3 of potentially adverse seismic interaction effects?

Other Adverse Conditions

11. Have you looked for and found no other seismic conditions that could Yý(ND U0 adversely affect the safety functions of the equipment?

Comments (Additional pages may be added as necessary)

,Arft Wal*KO/ Pr- k-oorr., 2.1t5 Istr od*p**/Q-'lo:**

Evaluated by k 4 F~k~ate:

A WA a Q ak IoAar~ Wy /ii /2~

Page 320 of 467

ATTACHMENT 3: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS NO. SNCF164-RPT-02, VERSION 2.0 Page 321 of 467

ATTACHMENT 3: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS NO. SNCF164-RPT-02, VERSION 2.0 Page 322 of 467

ATTACHMENT 3: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS NO. SNCF164-RPT-02, VERSION 2.0 Sheet i ofg b Status: YE] NF U-Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)

Equipment ID No. Q2P17TO01 Equip. Class' 21 Equipment Description SURGE TANK (CCW)

Location: Bldg. AUXILIARY Floor El. 179 Room, Area 2, $0 (S Manufacturer, Model, Etc. (optional but recommended)

Instructions for Completing Checklist This checklist may be used to document the results of the Seismic Walkdown of an item of equipment on the SWEL. The space below each of the following questions may be used to record the results ofjudgments and findings. Additional space is provided at the end of this checklist for documenting other comments.

Anchoraoe

1. Is the anchorage configuration verification required (i.e., is the item one YEN'NO of the 50% of SWEL items requiring such verification)?

2. Is the anchorage free of bent, broken, missing or loose hardware? Yd NE1 UI- N/AE-

3. Is the anchorage free of corrosion that is more than mild surface Y[' NEI U[- N/AD oxidation?

4. Is the anchorage free of visible cracks in the concrete near the anchors? Y9 N[-E UE) N/AE

5. Is the anchorage configuration consistent with plant documentation? Yln NE UE- N/A[]

(Note: This question only applies if the item is one of the 50% for which an anchorage configuration verification is required.)

Vf Pi'.'i'* ,

A'li-l' t A (,ý, p/,/I.

A 0(J .

6. Based on the above anchorage evaluations, is the anchorage free of YED' N[E UE potentially adverse seismic conditions?

Enter the equipment class name from Appendix B: Classes of Equipment.

Page 323 of 467

ATTACHMENT 3: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS NO. SNCF164-RPT-02, VERSION 2.0 Sheet 2 of2( 6 Status: Y2 NO U0 Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)

Equipment ID No. Q2P17T001 Equip. ClassI 21 Equipment Description SURGE TANK (CCVV Interaction Effects

7. Are soft targets free from impact by nearby equipment or structures? YU/ NEI U- N/A[

8. Are overhead equipment, distribution systems, ceiling tiles and lighting, YE/ NO UE N/AE and masonry block walls not likely to collapse onto the equipment?

9. Do attached lines have adequate flexibility to avoid damage? Yd NO UE N/Al

10. Based on the above seismic interaction evaluations, is equipment free Y9/ NEI UO of potentially adverse seismic interaction effects?

Other Adverse Conditions

11. Have you looked for and found no other seismic conditions that could Y91' NEI UD adversely affect the safety functions of the equipment?

Comments (Additional pages may be added as necessary) po t.f'F-Evaluated by: V.44ik -/V- Date: __ _ Y9_"/ _

!5,U A) '4LLZt 19 - 19 .

Page 324 of 467

ATTACHMENT 3: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS 0 NO. SNCF164-RPT-02, VERSION 2.0 Page 325 of 467

ATTACHMENT 3: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS NO. SNCF164-RPT-02, VERSION 2.0 Page 326 of 467

ATTACHMENT 3: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS NO. SNCF164-RPT-02, VERSION 2.0 Page 327 of 467

ATTACHMENT 3: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS 0 NO. SNCF164-RPT-02, VERSION 2.0 Page 328 of 467

ATTACHMENT 3: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS NO. SNCF164-RPT-02, VERSION 2.0 Sheet, ofnLt Status: Y[E NO] Uf-]

Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)

Equipment ID No. Q2P1BCOO2B Equip. Class' 12 Equipment Description TRAIN B EMERGENCY AIR COMPRESSOR Location: Bldg. AUXILIARY Floor El. 100 Room, Area s 819 Manufacturer, Model, Etc. (optional but recommended)

Instructions for Completing Checklist This checklist may be used to document the results of the Seismic Walkdown of an item of equipment on the SWEL. The space below each of the following questions may be used to record the results of'judgments and findings. Additional space is provided at the end of this checklist for documenting other comments.

Anchorage

1. Is the anchorage configuration verification required (i.e., is the item one Ye NEI of the 50% of SWEL items requiring such verification)?

13NlS o cO-e~~,

O .. it>.V--we.ooýr

2. Is the anchorage free of bent, broken, missing or loose hardware? Y*f NEI U- N/AE

3. Is the anchorage free of corrosion that is more than mild surface YV'N1 UE- N/AO oxidation?

4. Is the anchorage free of visible cracks in the concrete near the anchors? YE' NEI U- N/AE

5. Is the anchorage configuration consistent with plant documentation? YVJ NE UE- N/AE (Note: This question only applies if the item is one of the 50% for which an anchorage configuration verification is required.)

6. Based on the above anchorage evaluations, is the anchorage free of Ye NEI Ur-E potentially adverse seismic conditions?

- (he equipment class name from Appendix B: Classes of Equipment.

Page 329 of 467

ATTACHMENT 3: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS NO. SNCF164-RPT-02, VERSION 2.0 Sheet 2 ofA L4 Status: 1(0 NE] U[--]

Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)

Equipment ID No. Q2P18C002B Equip. Class, 12 Equipment Description TRAIN B EMERGENCY AIR COMPRESSOR Interaction Effects

7. Are soft targets free from impact by nearby equipment or structures? Y["'NE- U[-E N/AE]

8. Are overhead equipment, distribution systems, ceiling tiles and lighting, YZI' NO] UE] N/AE]

and masonry block walls not likely to collapse onto the equipment?

9. Do attached lines have adequate flexibility to avoid damaje? YJ NEI U[-I N/A[]

10. Based on the above seismic interaction evaluations, is equipment free of potentially adverse seismic interaction effects?

Other Adverse Conditions

11. Have you looked for and found no other seismic conditions that could YVN'I ULI]

adversely affect the safety functions of the equipment?

Comments (Additional pages may be added as necessary)

Evaluated bv:

L/,J A Q -~ibe:

'-I7~

Page 330 of 467

ATTACHMENT 3: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS S NO. SNCF164-RPT-02, VERSION 2.0 Page 331 of 467

0 ATTACHMENT 3: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS NO. SNCF164-RPT-02, VERSION 2.0 IK Page 332 of 467

ATTACHMENT 3: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS NO. SNCF164-RPT-02, VERSION 2.0

• Sheet i of,"-!*

Status: Y['NEN U0-i Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)

Equipment ID No. Q2P19HV3611 Equip. ClassI 7 Equipment Description CTMT INST AIR ISO Location: Bldg. AUXILIARY Floor El. 100 Room, Area 2. I '-

Manufacturer, Model, Etc. (optional but recommended)

Instructions for Completing Checklist This checklist may be used to document the results of the Seismic Walkdown of an item of equipment on the SWEL. The space below each of the following questions may be used to record the results ofjudgments and findings. Additional space is provided at the end of this checklist for documenting other comments.

Anchorage

1. Is the anchorage configuration verification required (i.e., is the item one YCI NdI of the 50% of SWEL items requiring such verification)?

I Ii.J VALVE

2. Is the anchorage free of bent, broken, missing or loose hardware? YEI NEI UE) NIAft

3. Is the anchorage free of corrosion that is more than mild surface YQI NEI UQ W/AY oxidation?

4. Is the anchorage free of visible cracks in the concrete near the anchors? YEI NEI UE3 NIA(V

5. Is the anchorage configuration consistent with plant documentation? YO NEI UEI /N (Note: This question only applies if the item is one of the 50% for which an anchorage configuration verification is required.)

6. Based on the above anchorage evaluations, is the anchorage free of Y4Nfl UED potentially adverse seismic conditions?

Enter the equipment class name from Appendix B: Classes of Equipment.

Page 333 of 467

ATTACHMENT 3: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS NO. SNCF164-RPT-02, VERSION 2.0 Sheet 2 ofY..*,

Status: YM NEI Ui./V Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)

Equipment ID No. Q2P19HV3611 Equip. Class, 7 Equipment Description CTMT INSTAIR ISO Interaction Effects

7. Are soft targets free from impact by nearby equipment or structures? Y2"NC-I U- N/AC

8. Are overhead equipment, distribution systems, ceiling tiles and lighting, Y[*/N- U- N/AC and masonry block walls not likely to collapse onto the equipment?

9. Do attached lines have adequate flexibility to avoid damage? Yl[ NC UC N/A-

10. Based on the above seismic interaction evaluations, is equipment free Y96 NC UC of potentially adverse seismic interaction effects?

Other Adverse Conditions

11. Have you looked for and found no other seismic conditions that could Y[9/NC UC-1 adversely affect the safety functions of the equipment?

Comments (Additional pages may be added as necessary)

Evaluated by: m i y- To Date: __ -_77-_(_"

.s.10,0~i 8-277 Page 334 of 467

ATTACHMENT 3: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS NO. SNCF164-RPT-02, VERSION 2.0 Page 335 of 467

ATTACHMENT 3: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS 0 NO. SNCF164-RPT-02, VERSION 2.0 Page 336 of 467

ATTACHMENT 3: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS NO. SNCF164-RPT-02, VERSION 2.0 Page 337 of 467

ATTACHMENT 3: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS NO. SNCF164-RPT-02, VERSION 2.0 Sheet I of 4 Status: Y[ NF UF-Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)

Equipment ID No. Q2R11B507, Pkq F2- Equip. Class' 4 89 Equipment Description LC TRANSFORMER 2S Location: Bldg. DIESEL Floor El. 155 Room, Area 56C Manufacturer, Model, Etc. (optional but recommended)

Instructions for Completing Checklist This checklist may be used to document the results of the Seismic Walkdown of an item of equipment on the SWEL. The space below each of the following questions may be used to record the results of judgments and findings. Additional space is provided at the end of this checklist for documenting other comments.

Anchorage

1. Is the anchorage configuration verification required (i.e., is the item one Y0 NO of the 50% of SWEL items requiring such verification)?

2. Is the anchorage free of bent. broken, missing or loose hardware? YN NEI UE N/AE

3. Is the anchorage free of corrosion that is more than mild surface YZ NO UE N/AE oxidation?

4. Is the anchorage free of visible cracks in the concrete near the anchors? Y9 NE UE N/AE

5. Is the anchorage configuration consistent with plant documentation? YZ NE U- N/Ai (Note: This question only applies if the item is one of the 50% for which an anchorage configuration verification is required.)

Reference SEWS package dated5-28-94

6. Based on the above anchorage evaluations, is the anchorage free of Y0D NEI UE potentially adverse seismic conditions?

IEnter the equipment class name from Appendix B: Classes of Equipment Page 338 of 467

ATTACHMENT 3: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS NO. SNCF164-RPT-02, VERSION 2.0 Sheet 2 of 4 Status: YN Nr-I Ur-]

Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)

Equipment ID No. Q2R1 1B507, Pkq F2- Equip. Class, 4 89 Equipment Description LC TRANSFORMER 2S Interaction Effects

7. Are soft targets free from impact by nearby equipment or structures? YN ND U] N/AD1 S. Are overhead equipment, distribution systems, ceiling tiles and lighting, YX NO ULI N/AD and masonry block walls not likely to collapse onto the equipment?

9- Do attached lines have adequate flexibility to avoid damage? YZ* NEI U[:1 N/AD

10. Based on the above seismic interaction evaluations, is equipment free Y[1 ND UD of potentially adverse seismic interaction effects?

Other Adverse Conditions

11. Have you looked for and found no other seismic conditions that could YZ NDI UD]

adversely affect the safety functions of the equipment?

Comments (Additional pages may be added as necessary)

Opening the transformerfor internalinspection is considereddisassembly.

This package was originally signed on 8-24-12 but retyped for clarity on 10-23-12.

Evaluated by: TerA.Mullenig I&A. Date: 8/24/12 o!taclov by Telecon ,I,,h 8/24/12 Page 339 of 467

ATTACHMENT 3: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS NO. SNCF164-RPT-02, VERSION 2.0 Page 340 of 467

ATTACHMENT 3: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS NO. SNCF164-RPT-02, VERSION 2.0

-s -I 0a Page 341 of 467

ATTACHMENT 3: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS NO. SNCF164-RPT-02, VERSION 2.0 Sheet i of/ 4 Status: Y[] NE] U[E Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)

Equipment ID No. Q2R16B007 Equip. Class' 2 Equipment Description 600V LOAD CENTER 2E Location: Bldg. AUXILIARY Roor El. 121 Room, Area 2229 Manufacturer. Model. Etc. (optional but recommended)

Instructions for Completing Checklist This checklist may be used to document the results of the Seismic Walkdown of an item of equipment on the SWEL. The space below each of the following questions may be used to record the results of judgments and findings. Additional space is provided at the end of this checklist for documenting other comments.

Anchorage

1. Is the anchorage configuration verification required (i.e., is the item one YD NCD of the 50% of SWEL items requiring such verification)?

Anchorage is insidepanel and cannot be verified

2. Is the anchorage free of bent, broken, missing or loose hardware? YD NDI UN N/AD

3. Is the anchorage free of corrosion that is more than nmfild surface YO NDI UZ N/AD oxidation?

4. Is the anchorage free of visible cracks in the concrete near the anchors? YO NDI UZ N/AD

5. Is the anchorage configuration consistent with plant documentation? YO NDI UZ NIAD (Note: This question only applies if the item is one of the 50% for which an anchorage configuration verification is required.)

6. Based on the above anchorage evaluations, is the anchorage free of Yrl ND UO potentially adverse seismic conditions?

IEnter the equipment class eaine froin Appendix B: Classes of EqUipnsent.

Page 342 of 467

ATTACHMENT 3: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS NO. SNCF164-RPT-02, VERSION 2.0 Sheet 2of94 Status: YE] NEI UN Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)

EquipmentiDNo. Q2816B007 Equip. Class' 2 Equipment Description 600V LOAD CENTER 2E Interaction Effects

7. Are soft targets free front impact by nearby equipment or structures? YO NO UO N/AD

8. Are overhead equipment, distribution systems, ceiling tiles and lighting, YZ N["1 U[" N/AO and masonry block walls not likely to collapse onto the equipment?

9. Do attached lines have adequate flexibility to avoid damage? YZ NO UOI N/AO

10. Based on the above seismic interaction evaluations, is equipment free Y[ NEI UO of potentially adverse seismic interaction effects?

Other Adverse Conditions II. Have you looked for and found no other seismic conditions that could YE NO" U13 adversely affect the safety functions of the equipment?

Comments (Additional pages may be added as necessary)

Evaluated by: lam A. AGi Date: 9121VZzi-Lcu~-c'-~~.J fc~

-ý Yyj1, /Cmc Page 343 of 467

ATTACHMENT 3: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS NO. SNCF164-RPT-02, VERSION 2.0 Page 344 of 467

ATTACHMENT 3: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS NO. SNCF164-RPT-02, VERSION 2.0 Page 345 of 467

ATTACHMENT 3: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS NO. SNCF164-RPT-02, VERSION 2.0 Sheet, of/ A4 Status: YE NE] UV Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)

Equipment IDNo. Q2R17B510 Equip. Class' 1 Equipment Description MCC 2T Location: Bldg. DIESEL Floor El. 155 Room, Area 1:A Manufacturer, Model, Etc. (optional but recommended)

Instructions for Completing Checklist This checklist may be used to document the results of the Seismic Walkdown of an item of equipment on the SWEL. The space below each of the following questions may be used to record the results ofjudgments and findings. Additional space is provided at the end of this checklist for documenting other comments.

Anchorage I. Is the anchorage configuration verification required (i.e., is the item one YV NE' of the 50% of SWEL items requiring such verification)?

Ancho crr*zis -isibec+ cmbiwi4 Ctfld \Nac no+t visk'iple dAuvin tf'c \./'LULQ im~pac~-ion

2. Is the anchorage free of bent, broken, missing or loose hardware? YEI NEI U0 N/AE-

3. Is the anchorage free of corrosion that is more than mild surface YEI NEI UEA N/AE oxidation?

4. Is the anchorage free of visible cracks in the concrete near the anchors? YEI NE] U% N/AEl

5. Is the anchorage configuration consistent with plant documentation? YEI NE3 U5N/AE (Note: This question only applies if the item is one of the 50% for which an anchorage configuration verification is required.)

kek--rtc- ;Ewý 'p c"A jc d a V-cld 71W"-1 3-

6. Based on the above anchorage evaluations, is the anchorage free of YE3 NE) U0 potentially adverse seismic conditions?

IEnter the equipment class name from Appendix B: Classes of Equipment.

Page 346 of 467

ATTACHMENT 3: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS NO. SNCF164-RPT-02, VERSION 2.0 Sheet 2 ofJ4 Status: YEI NEI Up Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)

Equipment ID No. Q2R17B510 Equip. Class, I Equipment Description MCC 2T

.Interaction Effects

7. Are soft targets free from impact by nearby equipment or structures? Y" NEI UE] N/AE-S. Are overhead equipment, distribution systems, ceiling tiles and lighting, Yo NEI UE] N/AO and masonry block walls not likely to collapse onto the equipment?

9. Do attached lines have adequate flexibility to avoid damage? Yo NEI UE] N/AE-

10. Based on the above seismic interaction evaluations, is equipment free Yo NEI UE]

of potentially adverse seismic interaction effects?

Other Adverse Conditions

11. Have you looked for and found no other seismic conditions that could Yo NEI U0 adversely affect the safety functions of the equipment?

Comments (Additional pages may be added as necessary)

Ai wallk4y f-- roon-, S i, U f-'n "Vfprv'w -rt Q)S;14,IM 42,D' I

Evaluated by: ýKawaAcam V Latm ýýa2m- Date: 3 zqv

-Iarr, J4. ý4 /Z- 2 J/\-/ / V I Page 347 of 467

ATTACHMENT 3: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS NO. SNCF164-RPT-02, VERSION 2.0 Page 348 of 467

ATTACHMENT 3: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS 0 NO. SNCF164-RPT-02, VERSION 2.0 m

Page 349 of 467

ATTACHMENT 3: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS NO. SNCF164-RPT-02, VERSION 2.0 Sz--9 Sheet 1 of,*3-4 Status: YIN" NEI Ul]

Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)

Equipment 11 No. Q2R18B030 Equip. Class' 2 Equipment Description POWER DISCONNECT SWITCH Location: Bldg. AUXILIARY Floor El. 139 Room, Area .

Manufacturer, Model, Etc. (optional but recommended)

Instructions for Completing Checklist This checklist may be used to document the results of the Seismic Walkdown of an item of equipment on the SWEL. The space below each of the following questions may be used to record the results ofjudgments and findings. Additional space is provided at the end of this checklist for documenting other comments.

Anchorage

1. Is the anchorage configuration verification required (i.e., is the item one of the 50% of SWEL items requiring such verification)?

2. Is the anchorage free of bent, broken, missing or loose hardware? YEI NEI UEI N/AE

3. Is the anchorage free of corrosion that is more than mild surface YIJEI UEI N/A['

oxidation?

4. Is the anchorage free of visible cracks in the concrete near the anchors? /

5. Is the anchorage configuration consistent with plant documentation? Y' NEI U0 N/ACj (Note: This question only applies if the item is one of the 50% for which an anchorage configuration verification is required.)

/

6. Based on the above anchorage evaluations, is the anchorage free of Y[E/NE UE3 potentially adverse seismic conditions?

Enter the equipinent class nasie from Appendix B: Classes of Equipment.

Page 350 of 467

ATTACHMENT 3: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS NO. SNCF164-RPT-02, VERSION 2.0 Sheet 2 of"4" Status: Y[2f NEI Ur-E Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)

Equipment ID No. Q2R18B030 Equip. Class' 2 Equipment Description POWER DISCONNECT SWITCH Interaction Effects

7. Are soft targets free from impact by ncarby equipment or structures? YJNE] U0- N/AE

8. Arc overhead equipment, distribution systems, ceiling tiles and lighting, YIEDlN[ U[] N/A" and masonry block walls not likely to collapse onto the equipment?

9. Do attached lines have adequate flexibility to avoid damage? Y[/NEI U- N/AE1

10. Based on the above seismic interaction evaluations, is equipment free Y 'ND U[]

of potentially adverse seismic interaction effects?

Other Adverse Conditions E

11. Have you looked for and found no other seismic conditions that could YýN[] U[E]

adversely affect the safety functions of the equipment?

Comments (Additional pages may be added as necessary)

A0 IsBt,** -';

Date: 5-2b_ " _ _

Page 351 of 467

ATTACHMENT 3: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS NO, SNCF164-RPT-02, VERSION 2.0 Page 352 of 467

ATTACHMENT 3: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS 0 0 NO. SNCF164-RPT-02, VERSION 2.0 Page 353 of 467

ATTACHMENT 3: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS NO. SNCF164-RPT-02, VERSION 2.0 Sheetsofxbothlol[

Status: Y[;j NE'] U-Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)

Equipment ID No. Q2R18B032 Equip. Class' Equipment Description CIRCUIT BREAKER BOX Location: Bldg. AUXILIARY Floor El. 139 Room, Area 23-32 Manufacturer, Model, Etc. (optional but recommended)

Instructions for Completing Checklist This checklist may be used to document the results of the Seismic Walkdown of an item of equipment on the SWEL. The space below each of the following questions may be used to record the results ofjudgments and findings. Additional space is provided at the end of this checklist for documenting other comments.

Anchorage

1. Is the anchorage configuration verification required (i.e., is the item one Y[( NEI of the 50% of SWEL items requiring such verification)?

2. Is the anchorage free of bent, broken, missing or loose hardware? Y3"'NI- UE' N/AI-

3. Is the anchorage free of corrosion that is more than mild surface YE[*N-I Ul1 N/AE1 oxidation?

4. Is the anchorage free of visible cracks in the concrete near the anchors? Y ' N[-- U0 N/A[3

5. Is the anchorage configuration consistent with plant documentation? Y[(/NI- UC N/AC (Note: This question only applies if the item is one of the 50% for which an anchorage configuration verification is required.)

(1':Y:6e ýPAAIS15OI TOiN "2t f4T4A

6. Based on the above anc orage eva uations,-is-ttbe ancho-reeo YEYNC UC3 potentially adverse seismic conditions?

Enter the equipment class name from Appendix B: Classes of Equipment.

Page 354 of 467

ATTACHMENT 3: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS NO. SNCF164-RPT-02, VERSION 2.0 Sheet 2 Of ,

Status: YEJN[-I UEJI--

Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)

Equipment ID No. Q2R18B032 Equip. Class, 14 Equipment Description CIRCUIT BREAKER BOX Interaction Effects

7. Are soil targets free from impact by nearby equipment or structures? Y[ý'NO UEI N/AO

8. Are overhead equipment, distribution systems, ceiling tiles and lighting, Y[Z'NEJ VE N/AE]

and masonry block walls not likely to collapse onto the equipment?

9. Do attached lines have adequate flexibility to avoid damage? YE3 NEO UE N/AO

10. Based on the above seismic interaction evaluations, is equipment free Yff NEI UE]1 of potentially adverse seismic interaction effects?

Other Adverse Conditions

11. Have you looked for and found no other seismic conditions that could Yff NEI U-adversely affect the safety functions of the equipment?

Comments (Additional pages may be added as necessary)

A p Evaluated by: 2 ,, Date: a-ifZ -1 1" I ". ' - ( ".Ij Page 355 of 467

ATTACHMENT 3: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS NO. SNCF164-RPT-02, VERSION 2.0 Page 356 of 467

0 ATTACHMENT 3: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS NO. SNCF164-RPT-02, VERSION 2.0 Page 357 of 467

ATTACHMENT 3: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS NO. SNCF164-RPT-02, VERSION 2.0

' F-Sher 1of3 Status: Y' NEI UR]

Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)

Equipment ID No. Q2R18B034 Equip. Class, 2 Equipment Description POWER DISCONNECT SWITCH Location: Bldg. AUXILIARY Floor El. 139 Room, Area _ -_ _

Manufacturer, Model, Etc. (optional but recommended)

Instructions for Completing Checklist This checklist may be used to document the results of the Seismic Walkdown of an item of equipment on the SWEL. The space below each of the following questions may be used to record the results of judgments and fimdings. Additional space is provided at the end of this checklist for documenting other comments.

Anchorage

1. Is the anchorage configuration verification required (i.e., is the item one of the 50% of SWEL items requiring such verification)?

2. Is the anchorage free of bent, broken, missing or loose hardware? Y2J NEI UO N/AD

3. Is the anchorage free of corrosion that is more than mild surface Y*f NEI U" N/AD--

oxidation?

4, Is the anchorage free of visible cracks in the concrete near the anchors? YJNO U0i N/AD 9

5. Is the anchorage configuration consistent with plant documentation. Yj N U" N/I (Note: This question only applies if the item is one of the 50% for YO which an anchorale configuration verification is reouired.)

o0 3t*)*'U4*a twocvotueihor Crae6 comion a,*,l ium ar"'MWPAIV=*L LP04C) UNt'~i,Q-

'2VAV 4c*9-.1

-/, wk W-

• .nrge

'Sev

.v, 4brcMP&U'1 C

PI-jp"l*

wl*"* VOVl~e

6. Based on the above anchorage evaluations, is the anc orage free of w NO UD ,4 kt potentially adverse seismic conditions? N Enter the equipment class name from Appendix B: Classes of Equipment.

Page 358 of 467

ATTACHMENT 3: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS NO. SNCF164-RPT-02, VERSION 2.0 Sheet 2 of 3 Status: Y9 NM Uni Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)

Equipment ID No. Q2R18B034 Equip. Class, Equipment Description POWER DISCONNECT SWITCi -f Interaction Effects

7. Are soft targets free from impact by nearby equipment or structures? Yý NEI UO N/A"I

8. Are overhead equipment, distribution systems, ceiling tiles and lighting, Y*' NO UE N/AE and masonry block walls not likely to collapse onto the equipment?

9. Do attached lines have adequate flexibility to avoid damage? Yý NEI UE N/A(--

10. Based on the above seismic interaction evaluations, is equipment free Y[- NO UE of potentially adverse seismic interaction effects?

Other Adverse Conditions l1. Have you looked for and found no other seismic conditions that could YEý NE-] U[

adversely affect the safety functions of the equipment?

Comments (Additionat pages maybe added as necessarvTfl-sa.1t 05Q.fO'n tslc*Wo (tr 1/2

-~QA. oz,- ý-rV-D~ :4 -

Evaluated by: -J\~-c ~' \Cý C. Date: _

Page 359 of 467

ATTACHMENT 3: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS NO. SNCF164-RPT-02, VERSION 2.0 Page 360 of 467

ATTACHMENT 3: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS NO. SNCF164-RPT-02, VERSION 2.0 Sheet I of 3 Status: Y NL UE-Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)

Equipment DD No. Q2R18B043 Equip. Class' 2 Equipment Description MOV POWER DISCONNECT SWITCH Location: Bldg. AUXILIARY Floor El. 139 Room, Area 2 QgICiQ Manufacturer, Model, Etc. (optional but recommended)

Instructions for Completing Checklist This checklist may be used to document the results of the Seismic Walkdown of an item of equipment on the SWEL. The space below each of the following questions may be used to record the results of judgments and findings. Additional space is provided at the end of this checklist for documenting other comments.

Anchorage

1. Is the anchorage configuration verification required (i.e., is the item o of the 50% of SWEL items requiring such verification)? \/@5

2. Is the anchorage free of bent, broken, missing or loose hardware? YJZ NED U1 N/Al

3. Is the anchorage free of corrosion that is more than mild surface Y&6 NO U- N/A-oxidation?

4. Is the anchorage free of visible cracks in the concrete near the anchors? YOJ NC UC N/AC

5. Is the anchorage configuration consistent with plant documentation? VNCI UC N/

(Note: Th=is question only applies if the item is one of the 50% for

• /pw* $ihich an anchorage configuration verification is required.) Obe,( 'Q-6 "oP -twjo C c ."oe

ýq C-'?s

6. Based on the above anchorage evaluations, is the anchorage free of YEZ NO UC--] %Ajs1,4.k potentially adverse seismic conditions?

Enter the equipment class name from Appendix B: Classes of Equipment. * - t.J.\'t C.,

• C -

Page 361 t4 -cD" Jt& A

ATTACHMENT 3: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS NO. SNCF164-RPT-02, VERSION 2.0 Sheet 2 of 3 Status: Y N[E] UI-]

Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)

Equipment ID No. Q2R18B043 Equip. Class' 2 Equipment Description MOV POWER DISCONNECT SWITCH Interaction Effects

7. Are soft targets free from impact by nearby equipment or structures? YEJ NO UO N/Ar

8. Are overhead equipment, distribution systems, ceiling tiles and lighting, Y6 NO UD N/AO and masonry block walls not likely to collapse onto the equipment?

9. Do attached lines have adequate flexibility to avoid damage? Yfý NEI UO N/AO

10. Based on the above seismic interaction evaluations, is equipment free Yd NO UF-of potentially adverse seismic interaction effects?

Other Adverse Conditions 5

11. Have you looked for and found no other seismic conditions that could Y NE- UEý adversely affect the safety functions of the equipment?

Comments (Additional pages may be added as necessary)-yf'nCf (O(1c,Cl "o,- Oox -I '

Evaluated by: *ý '"'"-- Date. 1*3-74 Page 362 of 467

ATTACHMENT 3: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS NO. SNCF164-RPT-02, VERSION 2.0 Page 363 of 467

ATTACHMENT 3: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS NO. SNCF164-RPT-02, VERSION 2.0 Sheet 1 ofiL --

Status: YNE/] U-]

Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)

Equipment ID No. 02R21BOO1D Equip.

Equipment Description 120V REG PANEL 2F Location: Bldg. AUXILIARY Floor El. 139 Room, Area cp ,1 8 Manufacturer, Model, Etc. (optional but recommended)

Instructions for Completing Checklist This checklist may be used to document the results of the Seismic Walkdown of an item of equipment on the SWEL. The space below each of the following questions may be used to record the results ofjudgments and findings. Additional space is provided at the end of this checklist for documenting other comments.

Anchorale

1. Is the anchorage configuration verification required (i.e., is the item one Y4 NEI of the 50% of SWEL items requiring such verification)?

2. Is the anchorage free of bent, broken, missing or loose hardware? YVA NI] U-] N/AO

3. Is the anchorage free of corrosion that is more than mild surface Y13'ND UEI N/AE1 oxidation?

4. Is the anchorage free of visible cracks in the concrete near the anchors? Y[f NI] U'- N/AD

5. Is the anchorage configuration consistent with plant documentation? YEý NCI UDl N/AD-(Note: This question only applies if the item is one of the 50% for which an anchorage configuration verification is required.)

6. Based on the above anchorage evaluations, is the anchorage free of Y[Z'ND" UCD potentially adverse seismic conditions?

IEnter the equipment class name from Appendix B: Classes of Equipment.

Page 364 of 467

ATTACHMENT 3: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS NO. SNCF164-RPT-02, VERSION 2.0 FDqk Sheet 2 of2-/ -A Status: YE(N- U--

Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)

Equipment ID No. Q2R21BOOID Equip. Class Equipment Description 120V REG PANEL 2F Interaction Effects

7. Are soft targets free from impact by ncarby equipment or structures? Y&f ND UD N/AD

8. Are overhead equipment, distribution systems, ceiling tiles and lighting, YO NDl U-- N/AD and masonry block walls not likely to collapse onto the equipment?

9. Do attached lines have adequate flexibility to avoid damage? Y* NDI U-- N/AF-

10. Based on the above seismic interaction evaluations, is equipment free Y0E NEI U-of potentially adverse seismic interaction effects?

Other Adverse Conditions

11. Have you looked for and found no other seismic conditions that could Y["/NI-' Ur-adversely affect the safety functions of the equipment?

Comments (Additional pages may be added as necessary)

Evaluated Date: (.* 17-PIZ)1"Z Page 365 of 467

ATTACHMENT 3: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS 0

NO. SNCF164-RPT-02, VERSION 2.0 Page 366 of 467

ATTACHMENT 3: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS NO. SNCF164-RPT-02, VERSION 2.0 Page 367 of 467

ATTACHMENT 3: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS NO. SNCF164-RPT-02, VERSION 2.0 Sheet 1 of 6 fell UD 01?

Status: Y[4 N((

Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)

-EquipmentID-No.-02R21E009D - Equip.-Class--1.6- - - _______

Equipment Description INVERTER 2D Location: Bldg. AUXILIARY Floor El. 121 Room, Area 1426 Manufacturer, Model, Etc. (optional but recommended)

Instructions for Completing Checklist This checklist may be used to document the results of the Seismic Walkdown of an item of equipment on the SWEL. The space below each of the following questions may be used to record the results ofjudgments and findings. Additional space is provided at the end of this checklist for documenting other comments.

Anchorage

1. Is the anchorage configuration verification required (i.e., is the item one YdI-NE of the 50% of SWEL items requiring such verification)?

2. Is the anchorage free of bent, broken, missing or loose hardware? Yn/NF' UDE N/A((

3. Is the anchorage free of corrosion that is more than mild surface YO/N-I U0 N/All oxidation?

4. Is the anchorage free of visible cracks in the concrete near the anchors? YEý NEI UD N/ADI

5. Is the anchorage configuration consistent with plant documentation? YE[/ND UFD N/AD]

(Note: This question only applies if the item is one of the 50% for which an anchorage configuration verification is required.)

6. Based on the above anchorage evaluations, is the anchorage free of Y'N- U-potentially adverse seismic conditions?

I Enter the equipment class name from Appendix B: Classes of Equipment.

Page 368 of 467

ATTACHMENT 3: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS NO. SNCF164-RPT-02, VERSION 2.0 Sheet 2 of/ i Status: YM NEI UE /]tV' Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)

Equipment ID No. Q2R21EOO9D Equip. Class' .v Equipment Description INVERTER 2D Interaction Effects / /"

4

7. Are soft targets free from impact by nearby equipment or structures? Y0 iND UD N/AD

8. Are overhead equipment, distribution systems, ceiling tiles and lighting, YG['N- U- N/AD and masonry block walls not likely to collapse onto the equipment?

9. Do attached lines have adequate flexibility to avoid damage? Y[*NI UD N/AD

10. Based on the above seismic interaction evaluations, is equipment free Yd' N[ U-of potentially adverse seismic interaction effects?

Other Adverse Conditions

11. Have you looked for and found no other seismic conditions that could Y[Z ND UD-adversely affect the safety functions of the equipment?

Comments (Additional pages may be added as necessary)

I ,tJ Evaltuated by: Mfg li62S Date: Y__0 -I?-

q-to -t ?

i Page 369 of 467

0 ATTACHMENT 3: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS 0 0 NO. SNCF164-RPT-02, VERSION 2.0 Page 370 of 467

ATTACHMENT 3: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS NO. SNCF164-RPT-02, VERSION 2.0 Page 371 of 467

ATTACHMENT 3: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS 0

NO. SNCF164-RPT-02, VERSION 2.0 Page 372 of 467