ML17216A010: Difference between revisions

From kanterella
Jump to navigation Jump to search
(Created page by program invented by StriderTol)
(Created page by program invented by StriderTol)
Line 18: Line 18:


=Text=
=Text=
{{#Wiki_filter:From: Sreenivas, V To: Loomis, Thomas R:(GenCo-Nuc) (thomas.loomis@exeloncorp.com)
{{#Wiki_filter:From:             Sreenivas, V To:               Loomis, Thomas R:(GenCo-Nuc) (thomas.loomis@exeloncorp.com)
Cc: Danna, James
Cc:               Danna, James; Casto, Greg; Robinson, Jay; Dimitriadis, Anthony
; Casto, Greg
; Robinson, Jay
; Dimitriadis, Anthony


==Subject:==
==Subject:==
R.E. Ginna Post NFPA 805 LAR, Remove Overcurrent Protection Modification, Application Acceptance (CAC No.
R.E. Ginna Post NFPA 805 LAR, Remove Overcurrent Protection Modification, Application Acceptance (CAC No.
MF9948)Date: Thursday, August 03, 2017 4:25:00 PM By letter dated June 30, 2017 (ADAMS Accession No. ML17186A233), Exelon Generation
MF9948)
 
Date:             Thursday, August 03, 2017 4:25:00 PM By letter dated June 30, 2017 (ADAMS Accession No. ML17186A233), Exelon Generation submitted a license amendment request for the R.E. Ginna Nuclear Power Plant in order to remove a required modification associated with Ginnas transition to 10 CFR 50.48(c),
submitted a license amendment request for the R.E. Ginna Nuclear Power Plant in order to
(National Fire Protection Association Standard 805). The acceptance review was performed to determine if there is sufficient technical information in scope and depth to allow the staff to complete its detailed technical review. The acceptance review is also intended to identify whether the application has any readily apparent information insufficiencies in its characterization of the regulatory requirements or the licensing basis of the plant.
 
The NRC staff has reviewed your application and concluded that it does provide technical information in sufficient detail to enable the NRC staff to complete its detailed technical review and make an assessment regarding the acceptability of the proposed amendment in terms of regulatory requirements and the protection of public health and safety and the environment Given the lesser scope and depth of the acceptance review as compared to the detailed technical review, there may be instances in which issues that impact the NRC staffs ability to complete the detailed technical review are identified despite completion of an adequate acceptance review. If additional information is needed, you will be advised by separate correspondence.
remove a required modification associated with Ginna's transition to 10 CFR 50.48(c),
Based on the information provided in your submittal, the NRC staff has estimated that this request will take approximately [[estimated NRC review hours::220 hours]] to complete. The NRC staff expects to complete this review in approximately 12 months, which is June 30, 2018. If there are emergent complexities or challenges in our review that would cause changes to the initial forecasted completion date or significant changes in the forecasted hours, the reasons for the changes, along with the new estimates, will be communicated during the routine interactions with the assigned project manager.
(National Fire Protection Association Standard 805). The acceptance review was performed
These estimates are based on the NRC staffs initial review of the application and they could change, due to several factors including requests for additional information, unanticipated addition of scope to the review, and review by NRC advisory committees or hearing-related activities.
 
to determine if there is sufficient technical information in scope and depth to allow the staff
 
to complete its detailed technical review. The acceptance review is also intended to identify
 
whether the application has any readily apparent information insufficiencies in its
 
characterization of the regulatory requirements or the licensing basis of the plant.
 
The NRC staff has reviewed your application and concluded that it does provide technical
 
information in sufficient detail to enable the NRC staff to complete its detailed technical
 
review and make an assessment regarding the acceptability of the proposed amendment in
 
terms of regulatory requirements and the protection of public health and safety and the
 
environment Given the lesser scope and depth of the acceptance review as compared to
 
the detailed technical review, there may be instances in which issues that impact the NRC
 
staff's ability to complete the detailed technical review are identified despite completion of
 
an adequate acceptance review. If additional information is needed, you will be advised by
 
separate correspondence.
 
Based on the information provided in your submittal, the NRC staff has estimated that this
 
request will take approximately [[estimated NRC review hours::220 hours]] to complete.
The NRC staff expects to complete
 
this review in approximately 12 months, which is June 30, 2018.
If there are emergent
 
complexities or challenges in our review that would cause changes to the initial forecasted
 
completion date or significant changes in the forecasted hours, the reasons for the
 
changes, along with the new estimates, will be communicated during the routine
 
interactions with the assigned project manager.
 
These estimates are based on the NRC staff's initial review of the application and they
 
could change, due to several factors including requests for additional information, unanticipated addition of scope to the review, and review by NRC advisory committees or
 
hearing-related activities.
 
If you have any questions, please contact me at (301) 415-2597.
If you have any questions, please contact me at (301) 415-2597.
___________________________________
___________________________________
V. Sreenivas, Ph.D., C.P.M.
V. Sreenivas, Ph.D., C.P.M.
 
Licensing Project Manager Limerick and Ginna, Plant Licensing Branch I Division of Operating Reactor Licensing Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation}}
Licensing Project Manager
 
Limerick and Ginna, Plant Licensing Branch I
 
Division of Operating Reactor Licensing
 
Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation}}

Revision as of 23:47, 29 October 2019

Email - R.E. Ginna Post NFPA 805 LAR, Remove Overcurrent Protection Modification, Application Acceptance
ML17216A010
Person / Time
Site: Ginna Constellation icon.png
Issue date: 08/03/2017
From: V Sreenivas
Plant Licensing Branch 1
To: Tom Loomis
Exelon Corp
Sreenivas V, NRR/DORL/LPL1, 415-2596
References
CAC MF9948
Download: ML17216A010 (1)
v • d • e


Text

From: Sreenivas, V To: Loomis, Thomas R:(GenCo-Nuc) (thomas.loomis@exeloncorp.com)

Cc: Danna, James; Casto, Greg; Robinson, Jay; Dimitriadis, Anthony

Subject:

R.E. Ginna Post NFPA 805 LAR, Remove Overcurrent Protection Modification, Application Acceptance (CAC No.

MF9948)

Date: Thursday, August 03, 2017 4:25:00 PM By letter dated June 30, 2017 (ADAMS Accession No. ML17186A233), Exelon Generation submitted a license amendment request for the R.E. Ginna Nuclear Power Plant in order to remove a required modification associated with Ginnas transition to 10 CFR 50.48(c),

(National Fire Protection Association Standard 805). The acceptance review was performed to determine if there is sufficient technical information in scope and depth to allow the staff to complete its detailed technical review. The acceptance review is also intended to identify whether the application has any readily apparent information insufficiencies in its characterization of the regulatory requirements or the licensing basis of the plant.

The NRC staff has reviewed your application and concluded that it does provide technical information in sufficient detail to enable the NRC staff to complete its detailed technical review and make an assessment regarding the acceptability of the proposed amendment in terms of regulatory requirements and the protection of public health and safety and the environment Given the lesser scope and depth of the acceptance review as compared to the detailed technical review, there may be instances in which issues that impact the NRC staffs ability to complete the detailed technical review are identified despite completion of an adequate acceptance review. If additional information is needed, you will be advised by separate correspondence.

Based on the information provided in your submittal, the NRC staff has estimated that this request will take approximately 220 hours9.167 days <br />1.31 weeks <br />0.301 months <br /> to complete. The NRC staff expects to complete this review in approximately 12 months, which is June 30, 2018. If there are emergent complexities or challenges in our review that would cause changes to the initial forecasted completion date or significant changes in the forecasted hours, the reasons for the changes, along with the new estimates, will be communicated during the routine interactions with the assigned project manager.

These estimates are based on the NRC staffs initial review of the application and they could change, due to several factors including requests for additional information, unanticipated addition of scope to the review, and review by NRC advisory committees or hearing-related activities.

If you have any questions, please contact me at (301) 415-2597.

___________________________________

V. Sreenivas, Ph.D., C.P.M.

Licensing Project Manager Limerick and Ginna, Plant Licensing Branch I Division of Operating Reactor Licensing Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation

Retrieved from "https://kanterella.com/w/index.php?title=ML17216A010&oldid=2003961"