ML090830544: Difference between revisions

From kanterella
Jump to navigation Jump to search
(Created page by program invented by StriderTol)
 
(StriderTol Bot change)
 
(3 intermediate revisions by the same user not shown)
Line 2: Line 2:
| number = ML090830544
| number = ML090830544
| issue date = 02/23/2009
| issue date = 02/23/2009
| title = Rancho Seco Final Status Survey Report for February 22, 2009, Central Industrial Area Paved Roadways, Survey Unit F8000106
| title = Final Status Survey Report for February 22, 2009, Central Industrial Area Paved Roadways, Survey Unit F8000106
| author name =  
| author name =  
| author affiliation = Sacramento Municipal Utility District (SMUD)
| author affiliation = Sacramento Municipal Utility District (SMUD)
Line 17: Line 17:


=Text=
=Text=
{{#Wiki_filter:Rancho Seco Final Status Survey Summary Report February 22, 2009 Central Industrial Area Paved Roadways Survey Unit F8000106 Prepared By: Date: -/ý.bs/zzo9 FSS Engineer Reviewed By: O- I J .X Date: '7-\. O0 Lead FSS Engineer Approved By: -& Date: 2-7 7-0co Dismantlement Sul rintendent, Radiological FINAL STATUS SURVEY  
{{#Wiki_filter:Rancho Seco Final Status Survey Summary Report February 22, 2009 Central Industrial Area Paved Roadways Survey Unit F8000106 Prepared By:                               Date:   -/ý.bs/zzo9 FSS Engineer Reviewed By:     O- I J         . X   Date: '7-\.     O0 Lead FSS Engineer Approved By:       &-                       Date:   2-7 7-0co Dismantlement Sul     rintendent, Radiological
 
FINAL STATUS SURVEY  


==SUMMARY==
==SUMMARY==
REPORT Survey Unit: F8000106, Central Industrial Area Paved Roadways Survey Unit
REPORT Survey Unit:
F8000106, Central Industrial Area Paved Roadways Survey Unit


== Description:==
== Description:==


Operating History: Paved areas within the Industrial Area included the access road, parking lots, foundation pads from demolished temporary structures, and on-site transportation corridors used to transport materials across the site, including radioactive material.
Operating History: Paved areas within the Industrial Area included the access road, parking lots, foundation pads from demolished temporary structures, and on-site transportation corridors used to transport materials across the site, including radioactive material. Both operational surveys and the HSA document contaminated asphalt and concrete within the IA and potential contamination events outside the IA.
Both operational surveys and the HSA document contaminated asphalt and concrete within the IA and potential contamination events outside the IA.Site Characterization:
Site Characterization: Paved areas were surveyed using gas flow proportional detectors with more than 300 direct measurements taken. Mean levels of contamination reported were 2,630 dpm/100 cm 2 with a maximum value of 5,262 dpm/100 cm 2 . Additionally, the access roads were gamma scanned using a multiple detector array with the east road showing <0.17 pCi/g Cs-137 and the west road showing <0.23 pCi/g Cs-137. Based on classification procedure (DSIP-0020) and the levels of activity found on asphalt and concrete surfaces, the general paved areas of the site were classified as Class 3. The classification for this survey area was increased from Class 3 to Class 2 not based on viable characterization data but as a conservative measure as the survey unit bounds a Class 1 land area.
Paved areas were surveyed using gas flow proportional detectors with more than 300 direct measurements taken. Mean levels of contamination reported were 2,630 dpm/100 cm 2 with a maximum value of 5,262 dpm/100 cm 2.Additionally, the access roads were gamma scanned using a multiple detector array with the east road showing <0.17 pCi/g Cs-137 and the west road showing <0.23 pCi/g Cs-137. Based on classification procedure (DSIP-0020) and the levels of activity found on asphalt and concrete surfaces, the general paved areas of the site were classified as Class 3. The classification for this survey area was increased from Class 3 to Class 2 not based on viable characterization data but as a conservative measure as the survey unit bounds a Class 1 land area.Survey Unit Design Information:
Survey Unit Design Information:
The Survey Unit Design Parameters are presented in Table 1 below. The survey unit and measurement locations are depicted on the maps in Attachment  
The Survey Unit Design Parameters are presented in Table 1 below. The survey unit and measurement locations are depicted on the maps in Attachment 1. Direct measurement locations were determined using a random-start, fixedgrid pattern and 782 m2 were scanned for approximately 21% coverage. ISOCS gamma measurements were collected at each direct measurement location. The instrumentation used for the survey along with the MDC values are listed in Tables 2-1 and 2-2 in Attachment 2.
: 1. Direct measurement locations were determined using a random-start, fixedgrid pattern and 782 m2 were scanned for approximately 21% coverage.
Page 2 of 7                       FSS Summary Report                             F8000106
ISOCS gamma measurements were collected at each direct measurement location.
 
The instrumentation used for the survey along with the MDC values are listed in Tables 2-1 and 2-2 in Attachment 2.Page 2 of 7 FSS Summary Report F8000106 Table 1. Survey Unit Design Parameters Survey Design Value Comment Parameter Survey Area: F800 Central Industrial Area Paved Roadways Open Land Area LTP Table 5-4 Survey Unit: Class: SU Area (m2): Evaluator:
Table 1. Survey Unit Design Parameters Survey Design                   Value                     Comment Parameter Survey Area:                     F800   Central Industrial Area Paved Roadways Survey Unit:                      0106 Open Land Area Class:                          2 LTP Table 5-4 SU Area (m2):                     3,680 Evaluator:               D. Anderson DCGL Cs-137 surrogate                         51.2 (pCi/g):
DCGL Cs-137 surrogate (pCi/g): Area Factor: Design DCGLemc (pci/g): LBGR (pCi/g): Design Sigma (pCi/g): Type I Error: Type II Error: Nuclide: Sample Area (m2): Total Area Scanned (m 2): Scan Coverage (%): Zi-p: Sign P: Calculated Relative Shift: Relative Shift Used: N-Value: Design N-Value + 20%: Grid Spacing L: 0106 2 3,680 D. Anderson 51.2 N/A N/A 39.5 3.90 0.05 0.05 Cs-137 263 782 21.3%1.645 1.645 0.99865 3.0 3.0 11 14 16.2 Class 2 Class 2 Adjusted DTBD-06-001, Table 5-4C Class 2 Class 2 Uses 3.0 if Rel Shift >3 NUREG-1575 Table 5-5 Class 2 Page 3 of 7 FSS Summary Report F8000106 Survey Results: A total of 14 direct measurements were made in F8000106.
Area Factor:                       N/A  Class 2 Design DCGLemc (pci/g):                         N/A  Class 2 LBGR (pCi/g):                     39.5  Adjusted Design Sigma (pCi/g):                     3.90  DTBD-06-001, Table 5-4C Type I Error:                       0.05 Type II Error:                       0.05 Nuclide:                   Cs-137 Sample Area (m2):                       263 Class 2 Total Area Scanned (m2):                       782 Scan Coverage (%):                     21.3% Class 2 1.645 Zi-p:                   1.645 Sign P:                 0.99865 Calculated Relative Shift:                       3.0 Relative Shift Used:                       3.0 Uses 3.0 if Rel Shift >3 N-Value:                         11 Design N-Value + 20%:                           14 NUREG-1575 Table 5-5 Grid Spacing L:                       16.2 Class 2 Page 3 of 7                    FSS Summary Report                        F8000106
The results including mean, median, standard deviation and range are shown in Table 2. All of the direct measurements were less than the DCGL. None of the' ISOCS gamma scan measurements on the asphalt roadway surfaces indicated areas of elevated activity.
 
Co-60 was not identified above the MDC. The highest scan activity was 7.74E-01 pCi/g Cs-137.Table 2. Direct Measurement Results (all activity values in pCig)Measurement ID Cs137 MDA Csi37 Activity Uncertainty Mean: Median: Standard Deviation:
Survey Results:
Range: A 2.90E-0 1 2.90E-0 1 1.39E-02 2.67E-&#xfd;01 to 3.13E-01 F8000106AOOO1GD 2.95E-01 < 2.95E-01 F8000106AO002GD 2.84E-01 < 2.84E-01 F8000106AO003GD 3.08E-01 < 3.08E-01 F8000106AO004GD 2.67E-01 < 2.67E-01 F8000106AO005GD 2.90E-01 < 2.90E-01 F8000106AO006GD 2.92E-01 < 2.92E-01 F8000106AO007GD 2.98E-01 < 2.98E-01 F8000106AO008GD 2.73E-01 < 2.73E-01 F8000106AO009GD 2:84E-01 < 2.84E-01 FS000106AOOIOGD 2.82E-01 < 2.82E-01 F8000106AOI11GD 2.73E-01 < 2.73E-01 F8000106AO012GD 2.90E-01 < 2.90E-01 F8000106AO013GD 3.08E-0I < 3.08E-01 F8000106A0014GD 3.13E-01 < 3.13E-01 Page 4 of 7 FSS Summary Report F8000106 Survey Unit Data Assessment:
A total of 14 direct measurements were made in F8000106. The results including mean, median, standard deviation and range are shown in Table 2. All of the direct measurements were less than the DCGL. None of the' ISOCS gamma scan measurements on the asphalt roadway surfaces indicated areas of elevated activity. Co-60 was not identified above the MDC. The highest scan activity was 7.74E-01 pCi/g Cs-137.
The survey design required 14 direct measurements for the Sign Test. The critical value and the results of the Sign Test are presented in Table 3. The sample mean and median values were less than the DCGL. The sample standard deviation was less than the design standard deviation so no additional samples were required.Page 5 of 7 FSS Summary Report F8000106 Table 3. Data Assessment Results Survey Results Parameter Value Comment Actual Direct Measurements (N): 14 Median (pCi/g): 2.90E-01 Mean (pCi/g): 2.90E-01 Direct Measurement Std Deviation (pCi/g): 1.39,E-02 Maximum (pCi/g): 3.13E-01 Sign Test Final N Value: 14 S+ Value: 14 Critical Value: 10 Sufficient Samples Collected:
Table 2. Direct Measurement Results (all activity values in pCig)
Yes Maximum Value < DCGL: Yes Median Value < DCGL: Yes Mean Value < DCGL: Yes Maximum Value < DCGLemc: N/A Class 2 Standard Deviation
Measurement ID            Cs137 MDA                  Csi37 Activity    Uncertainty Mean:                                    2.90E-0 1 Median:                                    2.90E-0 1 Standard Deviation:               A                     1.39E-02 Range:                            2.67E-&#xfd;01 to 3.13E-01 F8000106AOOO1GD              2.95E-01                      < 2.95E-01 F8000106AO002GD              2.84E-01                      < 2.84E-01 F8000106AO003GD              3.08E-01                      < 3.08E-01 F8000106AO004GD              2.67E-01                      < 2.67E-01 F8000106AO005GD              2.90E-01                      < 2.90E-01 F8000106AO006GD              2.92E-01                      < 2.92E-01 F8000106AO007GD              2.98E-01                     < 2.98E-01 F8000106AO008GD              2.73E-01                     < 2.73E-01 F8000106AO009GD              2:84E-01                     < 2.84E-01 FS000106AOOIOGD              2.82E-01                     < 2.82E-01 F8000106AOI11GD              2.73E-01                     < 2.73E-01 F8000106AO012GD              2.90E-01                     < 2.90E-01 F8000106AO013GD              3.08E-0I                      < 3.08E-01 F8000106A0014GD              3.13E-01                     < 3.13E-01 Page 4 of 7                      FSS Summary Report                            F8000106
<= Sigma: Yes Pass the Sign Test? Yes Reject the Null Hypothesis?
 
Yes Does the Survey Unit Pass All Criteria?
Survey Unit Data Assessment:
Yes Page 6 of 7 FSS Summary Report F8000106 Survey Unit Investigations and Results: No investigations were required for either direct or scan measurements and no investigation results are reported.ALARA Statement:
The survey design required 14 direct measurements for the Sign Test. The critical value and the results of the Sign Test are presented in Table 3. The sample mean and median values were less than the DCGL. The sample standard deviation was less than the design standard deviation so no additional samples were required.
As stated in Chapter 4 of the LTP, as long as the residual activity within the survey unit is less than the DCGL (i.e. the survey unit average activity is less than the DCGL and the EMC criterion has been met), the ALARA criterion has been met.Changes in Initial Survey Unit Assumptions:
Page 5 of 7                        FSS Summary Report                        F8000106
The survey unit was designed as a Class 2 land survey and the sample results are consistent with that classification.
 
The variability of the survey results was less than the characterization data used for survey design. No potential areas of elevated activity were detected.Conclusion:
Table 3. Data Assessment Results Survey Results Parameter              Value            Comment Actual Direct Measurements (N):            14 Median (pCi/g): 2.90E-01 Mean (pCi/g): 2.90E-01 Direct Measurement Std Deviation (pCi/g):  1.39,E-02 Maximum (pCi/g):  3.13E-01 Sign Test Final N Value:          14 S+ Value:           14 Critical Value:          10 Sufficient Samples Collected:        Yes Maximum Value < DCGL:              Yes Median Value < DCGL:            Yes Mean Value < DCGL:           Yes Maximum Value < DCGLemc:             N/A Class 2 Standard Deviation <= Sigma:           Yes Pass the Sign Test?        Yes Reject the Null Hypothesis?        Yes Does the Survey Unit Pass All Criteria?        Yes Page 6 of 7                    FSS Summary Report                  F8000106
The FSS of this survey unit was properly designed as a Class 2 survey based on Table 5-4 of the LTP. The required number of direct measurements was made and the scan coverage met the requirement of Table 5-6 of.the LTP'. All of the direct measurements were less than Unity. No investigations were required.The direct measurement data support rejection of the null hypothesis, providing high confidence that the survey unit satisfied the release criteria and that the data quality objectives were met.It is concluded that survey unit F8000106 meets the release criteria of 1OCFR20.1402.
 
Page 7 of 7 FSS Summary Report F8000106 Attachment 1 Maps February 22, 2009 Survey Unit F80001,06
Survey Unit Investigations and Results:
---.-PRAY PONDS L.o..-' I---E--- El HUT 00 --l oo~~~~ ~~~ ........ j4 t INDUSTRIAL
No investigations were required for either direct or scan measurements and no investigation results are reported.
[' 1 , ARFA FENCE-~- 51II-HAZARD MATERIAL 5 I 'i/AREHOUUK 1 /_ L0 S. BUILDN G_I.. I ...... .. .. -... .. .5i '/ / U I~ ) SLDIi V. HLORINE BUILDIN,/ "WATER TREATMENT PL.NT~/,--- .- MICROWAVE UILEIINC-SEAGE TREATMENT FARE SF5-* h-".".BARREL F RM PRA (PAP)'"" TAAETK .. .........B L-ERE EIVIIN WAREHOUSE AERA.TO N
ALARA Statement:
; N!.... i. ... .-..LIR /~AEATO "' --_ -RF S RAl l \ >- TURBINE BUJILDING-..7. .I ._ FUEL STORACE BIUILDIIJI SEWAG..E .REATM _ .:," I T-- ' ArTOR BUILDIf-IG n E r---~--- SWITCHYARE f [ " -II SI\ WTC'RUrOTOL)I TECHNICIAL CENTER BUILDING AUXILIARY I -~7Z Ai-BUILDIG AZ. BU NISTRATION HGLDU~'TASK'--
As stated in Chapter 4 of the LTP, as long as the residual activity within the survey unit is less than the DCGL (i.e. the survey unit average activity is less than the DCGL and the EMC criterion has been met), the ALARA criterion has been met.
11---E H[___REENERATIV AB T &R *BUIDIN)APEHOIISL-D/HOLDUP T.-IAIIKOS BILASI, L RESE. -O_ .........
Changes in Initial Survey Unit Assumptions:
W ,O(,@ BU. -. .....-ITER ARA -, WAREOUS. ----- .. S HA O P ALR .-4N * = -- -; " ,, m, , , --': -- -/ .. .... .. ": .... .. .... .. .I 1-!.7" ./I; ,10 (CAS)j -"- RESERVOIR
The survey unit was designed as a Class 2 land survey and the sample results are consistent with that classification. The variability of the survey results was less than the characterization data used for survey design. No potential areas of elevated activity were detected.
"\'-. ) , -
 
' ."N UL tt-i , d -]'"-" rILTER AREA -."-".. .:- --.....-' ELECTRICA1-
==
: t. .,., .u --/ ' "
Conclusion:==
........" \,F-ABRICATION SHOP .'' / \
 
1"// .# :' -IN'DUSTRIAL  
The FSS of this survey unit was properly designed as a Class 2 survey based on Table 5-4 of the LTP. The required number of direct measurements was made and the scan coverage met the requirement of Table 5-6 of.the LTP'. All of the direct measurements were less than Unity. No investigations were required.
00'.5 AREA FENCE 2 -Industrial Area Boundary' Map F8000106-1, Central Industrial Area Paved Roadway E Location of surve unit Survey Unit Area: 3,680 sq. meters............................
The direct measurement data support rejection of the null hypothesis, providing high confidence that the survey unit satisfied the release criteria and that the data quality objectives were met.
Class 2 Area  
It is concluded that survey unit F8000106 meets the release criteria of 10CFR20.1402.
('D 0 00 CIO)Warehouse B Turbine Building 00 OC N 0 5 10 15 20 Distance in Meters 25 ft.T&R Building Map F8000106-2, Central Industrial Area Paved Roadway Survey Unit Dimensions Map F8000106-3, Central Industrial Area Paved Roadway Random Start Location 1. -_ILj1rl -L~00 --t-T- h 4-4V ON4 _L Ti4-T 0 00 Map F8000106-4, Central Industrial Area Paved Roadway Direct Measurement Locations F8000106A0001GD to F8000106A0014GD 12.56 sq. meter field of view Laydown 3 3 Start Location:  
Page 7 of 7                        FSS Summary Report                              F8000106
/11 m north of survey unit boundary 14 m west of North Laydown area 16 m by 16 m grid (DO(Turbine Building N I Distance in Meters Distance in meters south of corner OI 00 C)C)o&#xfd;Maintenance Shop Map F8000106-5, Central Industrial Area Paved Roadway Scan Measurement Locations F8000106AOOO1GS to F8000106AOO13GS12.56 sq. meter field of view Total Scan Area: 163 sq. meters C 00 Warehouse B North Laydown 13GS H iiH iH M H! H 1R1444 1 I i iH , =HNHHi I H l=Hill,,, ,t! H, i tJ !!i t! J i HH H JH HI= HIN HN H IH =,H lH=i HHH HOI ,HH ........I' H H ,J 12GS m 11GS ...... 12 m lOGS.......
 
16m 9GS ........ 20 m 2 mfrom east edge 8GS 28 m of road.. ~~~~~~~~~...G  
Attachment 1 Maps February 22, 2009 Survey Unit F80001,06
..... .....7GS 32m Turbine.. ..... ... m 6GS 36m Building 0 5GS 44 m in meters" of 4GS 48 m corner 3GS ....52 m C) 2GS 60m C) Maintenance
 
____Shop 1GS 64m m 5Distance in Me 10 1 m from 0 00 Map F8000106-6, Central Industrial Area Paved Roadway Scan Measurement Locations F8000106AD014GS to F8000106AO040GS 12.56 sq. meter field of view Total Scan Area: 339 sq. meters q) O OPq)cr (n) (1)C 0D 602 -4 02 OD 0) F) .9 3 3 3 3 r&#xfd; k K: is&#xfd; r ~.C? W... .. .O ..... .... ..... .... ...... ..00 ON 2 2 W. N NO -0) CO 0 N 3 Turbine Building N i st 10 Distance in Meters Maintenance Shop Map F8000106-7, Central Industrial Area Paved Roadway Scan Measurement Locations F8000106A0041GS to F8000106AO050GS (D 28 sq. meter field of view 00 Total Scan Area: 280 sq. meters 0 Do FWa~rehouse B 000....... ..........
                                                                                                                                                --    *."        -    .-        PRAY PONDS                    L.
...south edge of road 00 0 CO M)0 3 3 3 020 U, 000 o 4: C)I C) Maintenance
o..-'                                                                                                                                                                                                                        I---E---El HUT 00
,., Shop oN Turbine Building N 0 5 10 Distance in Meters Attachment 2 Instrumentation February 22, 2009 Survey Unit F8000106 Table 2-1. Survey Unit Instrumentation Detector Detector Serial Instrument Model MDC No.ISOCS N/A 1983920 Asphalt -3.37E-01 pCi/g Cs-137 CAsphalt -2.68E-01 pCi/g Co-60 Concrete -995 dprr/100 cm 2 Cs-137 ISOCS N/A 1983920 Concrete -701 dpm/100 cm 2 Co-60 Table 2-2. Investigation Criteria and DCGL Instrument Parameter Value ISOCS Investigation Criteria -Scan Asphalt 20 pCi/g Cs-137 ISOCS Investigation Criteria -Scan Concrete-4,300 dpm/100 cm 2 Cs-137 All DCGLW 51.2 Cs-137 12.6 Co-60 All DCGLW 43,000 dpm/100 cm 2 All DCGLEMC N/A Page 2 of 2 Att. 2 Instrumentation F8000106 Attachment 3 Investigation February 22, 2009 Survey Unit F8000106 (none required)
                                                                                                                                                                  ~~~j4
Attachment 4 Data Assessment February 22, 2009 Survey Unit F8000106 F8000106 Quantile Plot Cs137 DCGL = 51.2 pCi/g (t~0 A A-CD 0.320 0.310 0.300 U>. 0.290 0.280 0.270 0.29 0.260 -P 0 20 40 60 80 100 00 o C)C)Percentile SActivty -Median -75th Percentile 50th Percentile o (D w 0 4:->pj Cd)00 0 5.00E-01 4S50E-01 ,4%00E-01 U 3.50E-01 CL aDDE-01o 2.50E-0.2,.00E-01 1.50E-01!,00E-01 F8000106 Scatter Plot Cs137 DCGL = 51.2 pClig V So0 0 0 0 0 a a -a a a a a a a a a a a -a a a a a a --a --I*1.331 0.290 D-248 I.00 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Meas< <urmn<L Measurement Locations.........
                            -                                          -l oo~~~~                                                                                                                                                                                          t INDUSTRIAL                                                                                                            ['                    1                        ,
.A cti ty .. .. .. ..0Activt iI Average- "+3StDer " -3StDev !
ARFA FENCE-~-                   51II                                                                                                                                                                                  -HAZARD            MATERIAL 5                                                                                                I                                      'i/AREHOUUK 1          S. BUILDN/_      G_                                                                                L0 I..                                                                I .                               . ....     ..                     ..       -      ...           ..         .5i                    '
(I0 (t~0* Cj2 (t~(D.F8000106 Frequency Plot Csl 37 DCGL = 51.2 pCi/g 6 5 Cr 0 U.-0 0f 4-3-2-.1-0 (0 N CP/N 03V rII 00 C)C)IV, Bins -Upper End Value (pCi/g)}}
              //                /*                            U   I~       SLDIi                                                                      )                                                         V. HLORINE         BUILDIN,
                              /                 "WATER                                                                                                                                                                                 TREATMENT     PL.NT
                                            ~/,---                 .-     MICROWAVE               UILEIINC-                                                                                                               SEAGE         TREATMENT           FARE SF5-*         h-".".BARREL F RM                                                                                                                                                                                               PRA       (PAP)'""
AERA.TO N F'O!*C,--            ;                                i.               .               ..   . -        .. LIR                N!....
LERS-.,*                                                /~ TAAETK    ,FARMIT*-"        ..     .........       B L-ERE    EIVIIN  WAREHOUSE AEATO "' -- _             -         RFl          S       RAl                 \                                                                                                   >-       TURBINE BUJILDING
                                                                              - ..             7.                 .I     ._                                                                                           FUEL STORACE BIUILDIIJI SEWAG..E E               r---~--- SWITCHYARE
                                                                                                          .1*,_
                                                                                                          .REATM f
[   .                            I            T--'                    "-
                                                                                                                                                                                                                            -*      ArTOR BUILDIf-IGn II SI\                   WTC'RUrOTOL)I                                                                                                                                                                                     TECHNICIALCENTER BUILDING
                                                                                                                                                                        ~7Z       Ai AUXILIARY BUILDIG I                            -
BU AZ.       NISTRATION HGLDU~'TASK'--       AB 11---E T &R             *BUIDIN H[___REENERATIV T.-IAIIKOS )APEHOIISL-D/HOLDUP                                                                       BILASI,                                         L RESE.             -O_
                                                                                        .........                                             W         ,O(,@                                                     BU.     N-**,i                      -.       .....
ARA
                                                                                                      -,         -ITER                        WAREOUS. -----                               ..                             S O HAPALR              .
                                                                                                                                        ,10                                              7"                                        (CAS)                                  ./I;
                    -4N               j                    -"-                *   = --"
RESERVOIR "\'-.          )    ,,-;  ,m,
                                                                                                                                                                ,,-~J.'.cA'*
                                                                                                                                                                        '  -- ':."N-- -/
                                                                                                                                                                                                .. ....       ..":. . .. .. tt-i. ... .. .I UL ELECTRICA1-1-!.                       ,
: t.        .,., .
d   *    -]'"-"                       rILTER AREA - . "-"..
u "**  -- '.*/      )*      '      "            *'-'t''*-'*'T-'*'-''*-]        Z'*---'-*-7              ........       "         \,F-ABRICATION                           SHOP                           .''                                   /       \
                                          */**--""-* .                    1"//                                       #                                       :'                             -IN'DUSTRIAL                                                                     ' *"
00'.5                                                                                                         AREA FENCE 2           -         Industrial Area Boundary'                                                                                                                                                           Map F8000106-1, Central Industrial Area Paved Roadway E           Location of surve unit                                                                                                                                                               Survey Unit Area: 3,680 sq. meters
                  ............................                                                                                                                                                               Class 2 Area
 
('D 0
00   CIO)
Warehouse B Turbine Building N                       25 ft.                                   T&R 00                                                                          Building OC 0  5  10 15 20 Map F8000106-2, Central Industrial Area Paved Roadway Distance in Meters                          Survey Unit Dimensions
 
Map F8000106-3, Central Industrial Area Paved Roadway Random Start Location
                                                - 1. _ILj1rl
                                                          -L~
00                                 t                    --
                              -                     T-       h 4-4V ON4                           _LTi4-T
 
Map F8000106-4, Central Industrial Area Paved Roadway Direct Measurement Locations F8000106A0001GD to F8000106A0014GD 12.56 sq. meter field of view 0
00 Laydown 3           3 (DO(
Start Location: /
11 m north of survey unit boundary 14 m west of North Laydown area 16 m by 16 m grid Turbine Building Distance in meters                           N OI 00 C)
Maintenance south of corner I
C)                       Shop                                                                    Distance in Meters o&#xfd;
 
Map F8000106-5, Central Industrial Area Paved Roadway Scan Measurement Locations F8000106AOOO1GS to F8000106AOO13GS (D* 12.56 sq. meter field of view C
Total Scan Area: 163 sq. meters 00 Warehouse B North Laydown 13GS H iH iiH M   H!1R1444 HH*  1 Ii iH , =HNHHi I H l=Hill,,,       ,t!     H,     i     tJJ!!i it! HH JH     HI=
H HINHNH IH =,H lH=i   HHH HOI ,HH I'  ........
H H ,J 12GS                       m 11GS ...... 12 m lOGS.......             16m 9GS ........         20 m 2 mfrom
                                            ..           ~~~~~~~~~...G ''""*2fr!~l east edge                "*"-- .     .
8GS                  28 m    of road 7GS 6GS
                                                                .. .....   ... 32m 36m m                                                               Turbine Building 0                                                                       *Distance 5GS                 44 m                                                 in meters
                                                  "             ,.*I                                    *south                            of 4GS                 48 m                                                   corner 3GS       .... 52 m C)                                                         2GS                 60m C)                         Maintenance                                                                                                             ____
Shop                        1GS   *'*          64m m                                                             Distance5in Me 10 1 m from
 
Map F8000106-6, Central Industrial Area Paved Roadway Scan Measurement Locations F8000106AD014GS to F8000106AO040GS 12.56 sq. meter field of view 0
Total Scan Area: 339 sq. meters 00 r&#xfd; kK:      is&#xfd;  r        ~.C?        W q) O    OPq)cr (n) (1)C
                                                                    ......O    ....
0D     602     -4 02     W.        N        NO        -
OD      0)     F)   .9     0)        CO      0        N 3       3       3   3   2 2            3 Turbine Building N
00 Maintenance ON                            Shop                                                                      i  st        10 Distance in Meters
 
Map F8000106-7, Central Industrial Area Paved Roadway Scan Measurement Locations F8000106A0041GS to F8000106AO050GS (D      28 sq. meter field of view 00      Total Scan Area: 280 sq. meters 0
Do FWa~rehouse B                    000 south edge of road 00    0                      CO            M)0 3     3          3 020 Turbine Building U,
o000                          4:
N C)I C)                              Maintenance
,.,                                Shop                                                  0      5      10 Distance in Meters oN
 
Attachment 2 Instrumentation February 22, 2009 Survey Unit F8000106
 
Table 2-1. Survey Unit Instrumentation Detector      Detector Serial Instrument    Model                                              MDC No.
ISOCS        N/A            1983920            Asphalt - 3.37E-01 pCi/g Cs-137 CAsphalt - 2.68E-01 pCi/g Co-60 Concrete - 995 dprr/100 cm22Cs-137 ISOCS        N/A            1983920            Concrete - 701 dpm/100 cm Co-60 Table 2-2. Investigation Criteria and DCGL Instrument          Parameter                              Value ISOCS      Investigation Criteria - Scan        Asphalt    20 pCi/g Cs-137 ISOCS      Investigation Criteria - Scan  Concrete- 4,300 dpm/100 cm 2 Cs-137 All    DCGLW                                        51.2 Cs-137 12.6 Co-60 All    DCGLW                                  43,000 dpm/100 cm 2 All    DCGLEMC                                          N/A Page 2 of 2                    Att. 2 Instrumentation                        F8000106
 
Attachment 3 Investigation February 22, 2009 Survey Unit F8000106 (none required)
 
Attachment 4 Data Assessment February 22, 2009 Survey Unit F8000106
 
F8000106 Quantile Plot Cs137 DCGL = 51.2 pCi/g (t~
0      0.320 A
0.310 0.300 U
A
    >. 0.290                                                                0.29
-CD 0.280 0.270 0.260 -P 00 o
0            20         40              60        80        100 C)
C)                                      Percentile SActivty -     Median  - 75th Percentile 50th Percentile
 
o(D F8000106 Scatter Plot w                                      Cs137 DCGL = 51.2 pClig 5.00E-01  V 0
4S50E-01
      ,4%00E-01 U 3.50E-01 4:-  CL                                                                                                            1.331 So0                                                                              0 aDDE-01o                      0                                                  0      0                0.290 pj Cd) 2.50E-0.       a a - a  a  a  a  a  a a  a  a  a a  -   a  a  a  a a    a      -    - a  - - I*
D-248 2,.00E-01 1.50E-01
          !,00E-01 I.
00      0      0        0    0      0    0      0      0        0       0     0       0
                                      <urmn<L    Meas<
00                                                Measurement Locations 0
0Activt
                                    . A cti ty iI
                                  .........           Average-       "+3StDer ..    .." -3StDev
 
F8000106 Frequency Plot (I0 (t~
Csl 37 DCGL = 51.2 pCi/g 0
6 5
Cr 4-3-
U.
* Cj2
        -0 (t~  0 2-.
(D. 0f 1-0
                                      /
N                     N 00 C) rII (0            CP 03V C)
IV, Bins - Upper End Value (pCi/g)}}

Latest revision as of 14:43, 12 March 2020

Final Status Survey Report for February 22, 2009, Central Industrial Area Paved Roadways, Survey Unit F8000106
ML090830544
Person / Time
Site: Rancho Seco
Issue date: 02/23/2009
From:
Sacramento Municipal Utility District (SMUD)
To:
NRC/FSME
Shared Package
ML090830613 List: ... further results
References
DPG 09-097, F8000106
Download: ML090830544 (22)


Text

Rancho Seco Final Status Survey Summary Report February 22, 2009 Central Industrial Area Paved Roadways Survey Unit F8000106 Prepared By: Date: -/ý.bs/zzo9 FSS Engineer Reviewed By: O- I J . X Date: '7-\. O0 Lead FSS Engineer Approved By: &- Date: 2-7 7-0co Dismantlement Sul rintendent, Radiological

FINAL STATUS SURVEY

SUMMARY

REPORT Survey Unit:

F8000106, Central Industrial Area Paved Roadways Survey Unit

Description:

Operating History: Paved areas within the Industrial Area included the access road, parking lots, foundation pads from demolished temporary structures, and on-site transportation corridors used to transport materials across the site, including radioactive material. Both operational surveys and the HSA document contaminated asphalt and concrete within the IA and potential contamination events outside the IA.

Site Characterization: Paved areas were surveyed using gas flow proportional detectors with more than 300 direct measurements taken. Mean levels of contamination reported were 2,630 dpm/100 cm 2 with a maximum value of 5,262 dpm/100 cm 2 . Additionally, the access roads were gamma scanned using a multiple detector array with the east road showing <0.17 pCi/g Cs-137 and the west road showing <0.23 pCi/g Cs-137. Based on classification procedure (DSIP-0020) and the levels of activity found on asphalt and concrete surfaces, the general paved areas of the site were classified as Class 3. The classification for this survey area was increased from Class 3 to Class 2 not based on viable characterization data but as a conservative measure as the survey unit bounds a Class 1 land area.

Survey Unit Design Information:

The Survey Unit Design Parameters are presented in Table 1 below. The survey unit and measurement locations are depicted on the maps in Attachment 1. Direct measurement locations were determined using a random-start, fixedgrid pattern and 782 m2 were scanned for approximately 21% coverage. ISOCS gamma measurements were collected at each direct measurement location. The instrumentation used for the survey along with the MDC values are listed in Tables 2-1 and 2-2 in Attachment 2.

Page 2 of 7 FSS Summary Report F8000106

Table 1. Survey Unit Design Parameters Survey Design Value Comment Parameter Survey Area: F800 Central Industrial Area Paved Roadways Survey Unit: 0106 Open Land Area Class: 2 LTP Table 5-4 SU Area (m2): 3,680 Evaluator: D. Anderson DCGL Cs-137 surrogate 51.2 (pCi/g):

Area Factor: N/A Class 2 Design DCGLemc (pci/g): N/A Class 2 LBGR (pCi/g): 39.5 Adjusted Design Sigma (pCi/g): 3.90 DTBD-06-001, Table 5-4C Type I Error: 0.05 Type II Error: 0.05 Nuclide: Cs-137 Sample Area (m2): 263 Class 2 Total Area Scanned (m2): 782 Scan Coverage (%): 21.3% Class 2 1.645 Zi-p: 1.645 Sign P: 0.99865 Calculated Relative Shift: 3.0 Relative Shift Used: 3.0 Uses 3.0 if Rel Shift >3 N-Value: 11 Design N-Value + 20%: 14 NUREG-1575 Table 5-5 Grid Spacing L: 16.2 Class 2 Page 3 of 7 FSS Summary Report F8000106

Survey Results:

A total of 14 direct measurements were made in F8000106. The results including mean, median, standard deviation and range are shown in Table 2. All of the direct measurements were less than the DCGL. None of the' ISOCS gamma scan measurements on the asphalt roadway surfaces indicated areas of elevated activity. Co-60 was not identified above the MDC. The highest scan activity was 7.74E-01 pCi/g Cs-137.

Table 2. Direct Measurement Results (all activity values in pCig)

Measurement ID Cs137 MDA Csi37 Activity Uncertainty Mean: 2.90E-0 1 Median: 2.90E-0 1 Standard Deviation: A 1.39E-02 Range: 2.67E-ý01 to 3.13E-01 F8000106AOOO1GD 2.95E-01 < 2.95E-01 F8000106AO002GD 2.84E-01 < 2.84E-01 F8000106AO003GD 3.08E-01 < 3.08E-01 F8000106AO004GD 2.67E-01 < 2.67E-01 F8000106AO005GD 2.90E-01 < 2.90E-01 F8000106AO006GD 2.92E-01 < 2.92E-01 F8000106AO007GD 2.98E-01 < 2.98E-01 F8000106AO008GD 2.73E-01 < 2.73E-01 F8000106AO009GD 2:84E-01 < 2.84E-01 FS000106AOOIOGD 2.82E-01 < 2.82E-01 F8000106AOI11GD 2.73E-01 < 2.73E-01 F8000106AO012GD 2.90E-01 < 2.90E-01 F8000106AO013GD 3.08E-0I < 3.08E-01 F8000106A0014GD 3.13E-01 < 3.13E-01 Page 4 of 7 FSS Summary Report F8000106

Survey Unit Data Assessment:

The survey design required 14 direct measurements for the Sign Test. The critical value and the results of the Sign Test are presented in Table 3. The sample mean and median values were less than the DCGL. The sample standard deviation was less than the design standard deviation so no additional samples were required.

Page 5 of 7 FSS Summary Report F8000106

Table 3. Data Assessment Results Survey Results Parameter Value Comment Actual Direct Measurements (N): 14 Median (pCi/g): 2.90E-01 Mean (pCi/g): 2.90E-01 Direct Measurement Std Deviation (pCi/g): 1.39,E-02 Maximum (pCi/g): 3.13E-01 Sign Test Final N Value: 14 S+ Value: 14 Critical Value: 10 Sufficient Samples Collected: Yes Maximum Value < DCGL: Yes Median Value < DCGL: Yes Mean Value < DCGL: Yes Maximum Value < DCGLemc: N/A Class 2 Standard Deviation <= Sigma: Yes Pass the Sign Test? Yes Reject the Null Hypothesis? Yes Does the Survey Unit Pass All Criteria? Yes Page 6 of 7 FSS Summary Report F8000106

Survey Unit Investigations and Results:

No investigations were required for either direct or scan measurements and no investigation results are reported.

ALARA Statement:

As stated in Chapter 4 of the LTP, as long as the residual activity within the survey unit is less than the DCGL (i.e. the survey unit average activity is less than the DCGL and the EMC criterion has been met), the ALARA criterion has been met.

Changes in Initial Survey Unit Assumptions:

The survey unit was designed as a Class 2 land survey and the sample results are consistent with that classification. The variability of the survey results was less than the characterization data used for survey design. No potential areas of elevated activity were detected.

==

Conclusion:==

The FSS of this survey unit was properly designed as a Class 2 survey based on Table 5-4 of the LTP. The required number of direct measurements was made and the scan coverage met the requirement of Table 5-6 of.the LTP'. All of the direct measurements were less than Unity. No investigations were required.

The direct measurement data support rejection of the null hypothesis, providing high confidence that the survey unit satisfied the release criteria and that the data quality objectives were met.

It is concluded that survey unit F8000106 meets the release criteria of 10CFR20.1402.

Page 7 of 7 FSS Summary Report F8000106

Attachment 1 Maps February 22, 2009 Survey Unit F80001,06

-- *." - .- PRAY PONDS L.

o..-' I---E---El HUT 00

~~~j4

- -l oo~~~~ t INDUSTRIAL [' 1 ,

ARFA FENCE-~- 51II -HAZARD MATERIAL 5 I 'i/AREHOUUK 1 S. BUILDN/_ G_ L0 I.. I . . .... .. .. - ... .. .5i '

// /* U I~ SLDIi ) V. HLORINE BUILDIN,

/ "WATER TREATMENT PL.NT

~/,--- .- MICROWAVE UILEIINC- SEAGE TREATMENT FARE SF5-* h-".".BARREL F RM PRA (PAP)'""

AERA.TO N F'O!*C,--  ; i. . .. . - .. LIR N!....

LERS-.,* /~ TAAETK ,FARMIT*-" .. ......... B L-ERE EIVIIN WAREHOUSE AEATO "' -- _ - RFl S RAl \ >- TURBINE BUJILDING

- .. 7. .I ._ FUEL STORACE BIUILDIIJI SEWAG..E E r---~--- SWITCHYARE

.1*,_

.REATM f

[ . I T--' "-

-* ArTOR BUILDIf-IGn II SI\ WTC'RUrOTOL)I TECHNICIALCENTER BUILDING

~7Z Ai AUXILIARY BUILDIG I -

BU AZ. NISTRATION HGLDU~'TASK'-- AB 11---E T &R *BUIDIN H[___REENERATIV T.-IAIIKOS )APEHOIISL-D/HOLDUP BILASI, L RESE. -O_

......... W ,O(,@ BU. N-**,i -. .....

ARA

-, -ITER WAREOUS. ----- .. S O HAPALR .

,10 7" (CAS) ./I;

-4N j -"- * = --"

RESERVOIR "\'-. ) ,,-; ,m,

,,-~J.'.cA'*

' -- ':."N-- -/

.. .... ..":. . .. .. tt-i. ... .. .I UL ELECTRICA1-1-!. ,

t. .,., .

d * -]'"-" rILTER AREA - . "-"..

u "** -- '.*/ )* ' " *'-'t*-'*'T-'*'-*-] Z'*---'-*-7 ........ " \,F-ABRICATION SHOP . / \

  • /**--""-* . 1"// #  :' -IN'DUSTRIAL ' *"

00'.5 AREA FENCE 2 - Industrial Area Boundary' Map F8000106-1, Central Industrial Area Paved Roadway E Location of surve unit Survey Unit Area: 3,680 sq. meters

............................ Class 2 Area

('D 0

00 CIO)

Warehouse B Turbine Building N 25 ft. T&R 00 Building OC 0 5 10 15 20 Map F8000106-2, Central Industrial Area Paved Roadway Distance in Meters Survey Unit Dimensions

Map F8000106-3, Central Industrial Area Paved Roadway Random Start Location

- 1. _ILj1rl

-L~

00 t --

- T- h 4-4V ON4 _LTi4-T

Map F8000106-4, Central Industrial Area Paved Roadway Direct Measurement Locations F8000106A0001GD to F8000106A0014GD 12.56 sq. meter field of view 0

00 Laydown 3 3 (DO(

Start Location: /

11 m north of survey unit boundary 14 m west of North Laydown area 16 m by 16 m grid Turbine Building Distance in meters N OI 00 C)

Maintenance south of corner I

C) Shop Distance in Meters oý

Map F8000106-5, Central Industrial Area Paved Roadway Scan Measurement Locations F8000106AOOO1GS to F8000106AOO13GS (D* 12.56 sq. meter field of view C

Total Scan Area: 163 sq. meters 00 Warehouse B North Laydown 13GS H iH iiH M H!1R1444 HH* 1 Ii iH , =HNHHi I H l=Hill,,, ,t! H, i tJJ!!i it! HH JH HI=

H HINHNH IH =,H lH=i HHH HOI ,HH I' ........

H H ,J 12GS m 11GS ...... 12 m lOGS....... 16m 9GS ........ 20 m 2 mfrom

.. ~~~~~~~~~...G ""*2fr!~l east edge "*"-- . .

8GS 28 m of road 7GS 6GS

.. ..... ... 32m 36m m Turbine Building 0 *Distance 5GS 44 m in meters

" ,.*I *south of 4GS 48 m corner 3GS .... 52 m C) 2GS 60m C) Maintenance ____

Shop 1GS *'* 64m m Distance5in Me 10 1 m from

Map F8000106-6, Central Industrial Area Paved Roadway Scan Measurement Locations F8000106AD014GS to F8000106AO040GS 12.56 sq. meter field of view 0

Total Scan Area: 339 sq. meters 00 rý kK: isý r ~.C? W q) O OPq)cr (n) (1)C

......O ....

0D 602 -4 02 W. N NO -

OD 0) F) .9 0) CO 0 N 3 3 3 3 2 2 3 Turbine Building N

00 Maintenance ON Shop i st 10 Distance in Meters

Map F8000106-7, Central Industrial Area Paved Roadway Scan Measurement Locations F8000106A0041GS to F8000106AO050GS (D 28 sq. meter field of view 00 Total Scan Area: 280 sq. meters 0

Do FWa~rehouse B 000 south edge of road 00 0 CO M)0 3 3 3 020 Turbine Building U,

o000 4:

N C)I C) Maintenance

,., Shop 0 5 10 Distance in Meters oN

Attachment 2 Instrumentation February 22, 2009 Survey Unit F8000106

Table 2-1. Survey Unit Instrumentation Detector Detector Serial Instrument Model MDC No.

ISOCS N/A 1983920 Asphalt - 3.37E-01 pCi/g Cs-137 CAsphalt - 2.68E-01 pCi/g Co-60 Concrete - 995 dprr/100 cm22Cs-137 ISOCS N/A 1983920 Concrete - 701 dpm/100 cm Co-60 Table 2-2. Investigation Criteria and DCGL Instrument Parameter Value ISOCS Investigation Criteria - Scan Asphalt 20 pCi/g Cs-137 ISOCS Investigation Criteria - Scan Concrete- 4,300 dpm/100 cm 2 Cs-137 All DCGLW 51.2 Cs-137 12.6 Co-60 All DCGLW 43,000 dpm/100 cm 2 All DCGLEMC N/A Page 2 of 2 Att. 2 Instrumentation F8000106

Attachment 3 Investigation February 22, 2009 Survey Unit F8000106 (none required)

Attachment 4 Data Assessment February 22, 2009 Survey Unit F8000106

F8000106 Quantile Plot Cs137 DCGL = 51.2 pCi/g (t~

0 0.320 A

0.310 0.300 U

A

>. 0.290 0.29

-CD 0.280 0.270 0.260 -P 00 o

0 20 40 60 80 100 C)

C) Percentile SActivty - Median - 75th Percentile 50th Percentile

o(D F8000106 Scatter Plot w Cs137 DCGL = 51.2 pClig 5.00E-01 V 0

4S50E-01

,4%00E-01 U 3.50E-01 4:- CL 1.331 So0 0 aDDE-01o 0 0 0 0.290 pj Cd) 2.50E-0. a a - a a a a a a a a a a a - a a a a a a - - a - - I*

D-248 2,.00E-01 1.50E-01

!,00E-01 I.

00 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

<urmn<L Meas<

00 Measurement Locations 0

0Activt

. A cti ty iI

......... Average- "+3StDer .. .." -3StDev

F8000106 Frequency Plot (I0 (t~

Csl 37 DCGL = 51.2 pCi/g 0

6 5

Cr 4-3-

U.

  • Cj2

-0 (t~ 0 2-.

(D. 0f 1-0

/

N N 00 C) rII (0 CP 03V C)

IV, Bins - Upper End Value (pCi/g)