ML102180372: Difference between revisions

From kanterella
Jump to navigation Jump to search
(Created page by program invented by StriderTol)
 
(Created page by program invented by StriderTol)
 
Line 15: Line 15:


=Text=
=Text=
{{#Wiki_filter:Humboldt Bay Power Plant NRC presentation July 29, 2010 Agenda" Introductions and purpose of this meeting* H BPP Site Orientation" Alternate Disposal Method Request(s)" Reactor Vessel Transportation and Disposal" DCGL's and LTP HBPP Site* 2 Operating Steam Generation Fossil Units 9 2 backu pGas Turbines* Operating ISFSI* Construction of New Generation Facility* Unit 3 Nuclear Plant decommissioning
{{#Wiki_filter:Humboldt Bay Power Plant NRC presentation July 29, 2010
* Preparation for Units 1 and decommissioning 2
Alternate Disposal Request" Purpose of the Alternate Disposal Request (submitted April 1, 2010)* Schedule of Units 1/2 decommissioning" Proposed answers to questions on submittal" Travel Route from Eureka CA to Grand View Idaho (HBPP to USEI)" Weather or road re-routing of trucks" Potential future alternative disposal request(s)
Potential Alternate Disposal Requests* Open air demo limits established at HBPP Unit 3 will require concrete shaving* Resulting concrete structures will be very low concentration limits, consistent with current request* Soils concentrations of SNM very localized* Potential that an additional 1000 shipments will meet current alternate disposal concentration criteria Potential Alternate Disposal Requests e State of Calif Department of Toxic Substances Control (DTSC) clean up standards are based on combined cancer risk model, rather than a dose based model* Increase total shipments c
Humboldt Ba ieOeve*oae in Euea CA, Humold Cony Humold Sont Sopuain bae S~on th 2000 cess i.s 1251pros PG& wiS reai stowe shi fol5 in temiato of 0 ar 50 licens i rarrou more... "iellim jai, 101-Tho-spmp PQý AmS, F*Wbn*jrpft T-,Gow I catne o ol MkAlvsr*,ý, 4-pivii ftdig:-k"bokft, Hit, i


Stp In UwP DLDveomn* Pefr a sorc ter abtacin le Develo an epsur scenaio Deie a mtemaia moe base on*Syrgooia knowledgeS Deive sigl nucid soi 5 3\Deiv sigl nucid stutrlufc pCL/S and Deiv soi an sufc Sre factors Stp to Sorc Ter Absrcto Inopoae pas 10 C1caatrzainrsls0n Thortia rdoules narw dt02H I ieseii poeta rainclds" Ra ionu lids wihh l-ie < .4y as( h lfiv )wer exldd xep o o6" ~ Lo -eaieaudnerdincie icutd n"~ ~ ~ 0aual ocurn raincie0nisigihbefo bakron weeecldd Sorc Ter Abtaton ot Chrcerzto sape wer colce for- -~anlyi of poeta radionSuclies SImace are soi samples" Cocrt core to idntf dept ofpntrto an voum aciainprdcs n"~~~ Cocrt SOSbl sa pe tidnfysufc contamination.
Agenda
S Onl 2 ra in cie eeid niidi@ol I Half Life (Years)Decay Mode Half Life (Years)Decay Mode Radionuclide Radionuclide Am-241 4.32E+02 a, y 1-129 1.57E+07 V3-, y C-14 5.73E+03 Nb-94 2.03E+04 3-, 'y Cm-243 2.91E+01 a, y Ni-59 7.50E+04 F Cm-244 1.81E+01 a, 7 Ni-63 1.OOE+02 Cm-245 8.50E+03 a,y Np-237 2.14E+06 aqy Cm-246 4.75E+03 aq, Pu-238 8.78E+01 a, y Co-60 5.27E+00 13-, y Pu-239 2.4 1E+04 a, y Cs-137 3.02E+01 Pu-240 6.60E+03 a, Y Eu-152 1.36E+01 f3-, y Pu-241 1.44E+01 Eu-154 8.80E+00 J3,, y Sr-90 2. 86E+O1 3-H-3 1.23E+O I Tc-99 2.13E+05 P-,rY Sorc Ter Absrcin Cot Dos modlin objetive Deive sigl nucid DCI onl fo detecte radiouclids, an Acon fo no-etce Ssite-specific poental raincie when comparSingto anu a dos limit
" Introductions and purpose of this meeting
*~ Al 143 ace r m atdicuig 0 105RP r 2liesdIF I
* HBPP Site Orientation
" Alternate Disposal Method Request(s)
" Reactor Vessel Transportation and Disposal
" DCGL's and LTP


Sceari Develpet Cot Log-er PG& exetto to manti sit fo 0 lcria generation0 and trnmsin 0 and PG& ined torti it wesi thrug 0h foeeal future0 00 -0 .0 14 Scenario Development, Cont..Industrial worker scenario chosen for use with RESRAD for soil DCGL derivation:
HBPP Site
* 2 Operating Steam Generation Fossil Units 9 2 backu pGas Turbines
* Operating ISFSI
* Construction of New Generation Facility
* Unit 3 Nuclear Plant decommissioning
* Preparation for Units 1 and 2 decommissioning
 
Alternate Disposal Request
" Purpose of the Alternate Disposal Request (submitted April 1, 2010)
* Schedule of Units 1/2 decommissioning
" Proposed answers to questions on submittal
" Travel Route from Eureka CA to Grand View Idaho (HBPP to USEI)
" Weather or road re-routing of trucks
" Potential future alternative disposal request(s)
 
Potential Alternate Disposal Requests
* Open air demo limits established at HBPP Unit 3 will require concrete shaving
* Resulting concrete structures will be very low concentration limits, consistent with current request
* Soils concentrations of SNM very localized
* Potential that an additional 1000 shipments will meet current alternate disposal concentration criteria
 
Potential Alternate Disposal Requests e State of Calif Department of Toxic Substances Control (DTSC) clean up standards are based on combined cancer risk model, rather than a dose based model
* Increase total shipments
 
c Humboldt      Ba        ieOeve
  *oae          in Euea            CA, Humold Cony Humold                Sont    Sopuain      S~on bae th 2000 cess                  i.s 1251pros PG&wiS          reai    stowe              shi fol5    in        temiato              0 of ar  50    licens
 
i rarrou    more...      "iellim jai, 101
                                                                  -Tho-spmp PQ&#xfd;      AmS, F*Wbn*jrpft T-,Gow Icatne ool MkAlvsr*,&#xfd;,          4-pivii ftdig:-
k"bokft, Hit, i
 
Stp    In                      DLDveomn                  UwP
* Pefr            a  sorc          ter      abtacin leDevelo          an    epsur            scenaio Deie    a    mtemaia                  moe        base  on*
Syrgooia                  knowledgeS Deive      sigl          nucid        soi5    3\
Deiv        sigl          nucid        stutrlufc pCL/S              and Deiv        soi      an  Sresufc                  factors
 
Stp        to      Sorc                                  Ter                  Absrcto Inopoae                  pas    10    C1caatrzainrsls0n Thortia                  rdoules                            narw          dt02H                I    ieseii poeta rainclds
          " Ra ionu lids                  wihh                l-ie        <    .4y  as(          h lfiv    )
wer        exldd                    xep                  o      o6
      " Lo  ~      -eaieaudnerdincie                                                        icutd            n
                "~          ~ ~ocurn                raincie0nisigihbefo                  0aual bakron                weeecldd
 
Sorc                    Ter                  Abtaton                                    ot Chrcerzto                                  sape                    wer        colce -~    for-anlyi                  of      poeta                    radionSuclies SImace          are        soi    samples "Cocrt                  core        to      idntf          dept      ofpntrto an      voum                aciainprdcs                                  n
          "~~~        Cocrt                        sa        SOSbl tidnfysufc pe contamination.                                                    S Onl      2    ra        in        cie                    eeid          niidi@ol
 
I Half Life Decay                Half Life Decay Radionuclide  (Years)  Mode    Radionuclide  (Years) Mode Am-241    4.32E+02  a, y      1-129    1.57E+07  V3-, y C-14    5.73E+03            Nb-94    2.03E+04    3-, 'y Cm-243    2.91E+01    a, y    Ni-59    7.50E+04    F Cm-244    1.81E+01  a, 7      Ni-63      1.OOE+02 Cm-245    8.50E+03    a,y    Np-237    2.14E+06    aqy Cm-246    4.75E+03    aq,      Pu-238    8.78E+01    a, y Co-60    5.27E+00  13-, y    Pu-239    2.4 1E+04  a, y Cs-137    3.02E+01            Pu-240    6.60E+03    a, Y Eu-152    1.36E+01  f3-, y    Pu-241    1.44E+01 Eu-154    8.80E+00  J3,, y    Sr-90    2. 86E+O1    3-H-3      1.23E+O I            Tc-99    2.13E+05  P-,rY
 
Sorc            Ter                Absrcin                  Cot Dos          modlin                objetive Deive sigl                nucid          DCI      onl    fo detecte          radiouclids,                an Acon          fo    no-etce    Ssite-specific poental        raincie                      when comparSingto anu    a  dos        limit
 
*~Al    143  ace    r      m atdicuig 105RP    0    r 2liesdIF            I
 
Sceari               Develpet                             Cot Log-er               PG&             exetto                 to manti           sit     fo 0         lcria       generation0 and     trnmsin               0         and PG&           ined             torti             it         wesi thrug               foeeal 0h               future0 00 0          -       .0                 14
 
Scenario Development, Cont..
Industrial worker scenario chosen for use with RESRAD for soil DCGL derivation:
RESRAD chosen because of subsurface soil contamination, Industrial worker is most appropriate scenario for foreseeable future, and Dose contribution due to detected soil radionuclides indistinguishable from background after 100 years.
RESRAD chosen because of subsurface soil contamination, Industrial worker is most appropriate scenario for foreseeable future, and Dose contribution due to detected soil radionuclides indistinguishable from background after 100 years.
Scenan'o Development, Cont Alternative critical groups and exposure scenarios have been considered:
Scenan'o Development, Cont Alternative critical groups and exposure scenarios have been considered:
A resident farmer establishes occupancy after release of site from Industrial Area use, and If the site license is terminated at uniform industrial worker scenario DCGLs, the site is in compliance with the regulatory limit 32 years later using a resident farmer scenario.
A resident farmer establishes occupancy after release of site from Industrial Area use, and If the site license is terminated at uniform industrial worker scenario DCGLs, the site is in compliance with the regulatory limit 32 years later using a resident farmer scenario.
Sceari Deeopet Cont BUID* Tieost eulydvie@ewe inor S n outdoors.
 
5 ~ -SSS .55 *7
Sceari     Deeopet                 Cont BUID
-pl m0 a -.1jnato of S :;i 0CG-.*E A 6 wa chse to deiv soi*C w due SoS th prsec of subsurface solcnaiain
* Tieost       eulydvie@ewe inor   S n   outdoors.       5 ~     -
-SE A caclain wer pefre in th prba iisi 0oe Derivation of Soil DCGLs, Cont.A RESRAD simplified mathematical hydrogeological model was derived based on existing knowledge-" Site studies define soil and aquifer profiles from surface to potable water aquifer," Approximately 400 ft from surface to potable water aquifer, Several clay layers exist between surface and potable water aquifer, and Brackish water aquifers exist above the clay layers.
SSS *7      .55
Peak Dose at 1 pCi/g (mrem/vrl Nuclide DCGL (DCi/gl AM-241 1 .76E-02 1 .42E+03 C-14 4.98E-06 5.02E+06 Cm-243 7.78E-02 3.21E+02 Cm-244 6.82E-03 3.67E+03 Cm-245 5.44E-02 4.60E+02 Cm-246 1 .26E-02 1 .98E+03 Co-60 1.64E+00 1.52E+01 Cs-137 3.79E-01 6.60E+01 Eu-152 7.40E-01 3.38E+01 Eu-1S4 7.97E-01 3.14E+01 H1-3 8.66E-06 2.89E+06 1-129 1.95E-03 1.28E+04 Nb-94 1.09E+00 2.29E+01 Ni-59 6.05E-07 4.13E+07 Ni-63 1 .65E-06 1 .52E+07 Npm-237 1.31E-01 1.91E+02 Pu-238 1.09E-02 2.29E+03 Pu-239 1.21E-02 2.07E+03 Pu-240 1.21E-02 2.07E+03 PU-241 4.11 E-04 6.08E+04 Sr-90 3.1OE-03 8.06E+03 I ol 1 ,
 
isRSA-UL 33ue in, probabilisti mode an DCL, auesbsdoSninutilwre bildn ocuac scenari introdced i S SOS S675. -U 5-in 21 i i Dose Conversion Factor (mrem/vr Der dnm/100 cm 2)Radionuclide DCGL (dDm/100 cm 2)H-3 6.07E-07 4.12E+07 C-14 2.05&-05 1.22E+06 Ni-59 3.09E-07.
-pl           m0         a                           - .
8.09E+07 Co-60 1 .54E-03 1 .62E+04 Ni-63 8.08F,07 3.09E+07 Sr-90 2.01E-04 1.25E+05 Nb-94 1.06E-03 2.36E+04 Tc-99 2.08E-06 1.20E+07 1-129 2.74E-03 9.12E+03 Cs- 137 4.44E-04 5.63E+04 Eu-152 7.57E-04 3.30E+04 Eu-154 8.26E-04 3.03E+04 Np-237 5.28E-02 4.73E+02 Pu-238 7.01E-03 3,57E+03 Pu-239 S. I7E-03 3.06E+03 Pu-240 7.26E-03 3.44E+03 Pu-241 1.38E-04 1.81E+05 Ani-241 8.34E-03 3.OOE+03 Cm-243 5.20E-03 4.81E+03 Cm-244 3.97E-03 6.30E+03 Cm-245 8.60E-03 2.88E+03 Cm-246 2.08F_,-02 1.20E+03 Deiaino ddtoa CLa In ad ito to thi soil an surfac areas, 0~ were alo evloe for-I-Thic soils,0 Vouercmtras Em ededpiin, n Buie pipng Area Factor = DCGLEMc DCGLW metodg of S- 5 , and Humboldt Bay RPV Project NRC Update 7/-29/2010 Reactor Pressure Vessel Project Goal* Package and Transport HBPP Reactor vessel as an single component package as an LSA shipment in a DOT IP2 package Plant History.65 MW GE Boiling Water Reactor m Approx 5E 5 years effective run life m.Reactor last run in 1976 with approx 35 years of radioactive decay Initial Characterization" Performed in mid 1990s by TLG to support cost estimate for decommissioning" Activation analysis for characterization was performed on internals and vessel* This results in conservative estimates of the part 61 classification of activated internals Current Approach* Normalize the prior activation analysis by dose rate" Determine final classification of vessel based on total activity averaged over metal volume in accordance with the BTP* Perform partial segmentation of internals to remove items to meet the 1R at 3 meter unshielded dose limit Regulatory Basis of Approach m 10 CFR 71.14 concerning transport of LSA materials* NRC Branch Technical Position (BTP) on Concentration Averaging 1995 Segmentation discussion Classification
1jnato                             of S :;i               0CG-.
-Remove internal components to meet 10CFR61 classification as a Class A package-Remove additional internal components to meet the 1R at 3 meter limit of 10CFR71. 14 ALARA Basis for Approach* Segment GTCC waste and place in ISFSI" Segment B/C waste and store on-site until disposal option becomes available" Reduce dose consequence-to workers by minimizing segmentation of internals" Reduce Radiological risk in transportation by minimizing truck quantities of less stable packaging alternatives Project Schedule m Selected RPV removal contractor June 2010.7.* Complete RPV characterization Oct 2010" Mobilize for site work March 2011* Ship reactor vessel February 2012 Summary* Minimum segmentation to do.is the ALARA thing m Making a single disposal package is the ALARA thing to do.* The single package results in safety to the public.}}
          *E A         6           wa     chse           to   deiv soi
        *Cw      due               SoS th   prsec             of subsurface             solcnaiain
              - A          SE caclain                     wer   pefre       in th prba                 iisi                       0oe
 
Derivation of Soil DCGLs, Cont.
A RESRAD simplified mathematical hydrogeological model was derived based on existing knowledge-
  " Site studies define soil and aquifer profiles from surface to potable water aquifer,
  " Approximately 400 ft from surface to potable water aquifer, Several clay layers exist between surface and potable water aquifer, and Brackish water aquifers exist above the clay layers.
 
Peak Dose at 1 pCi/g Nuclide      (mrem/vrl       DCGL (DCi/gl AM-241       1.76E-02         1.42E+03 C-14       4.98E-06         5.02E+06 Cm-243       7.78E-02         3.21E+02 Cm-244       6.82E-03         3.67E+03 Cm-245       5.44E-02         4.60E+02 Cm-246       1.26E-02         1.98E+03 Co-60       1.64E+00         1.52E+01 Cs-137       3.79E-01         6.60E+01 Eu-152       7.40E-01         3.38E+01 Eu-1S4       7.97E-01         3.14E+01 H1-3       8.66E-06         2.89E+06 1-129         1.95E-03         1.28E+04 Nb-94       1.09E+00         2.29E+01 Ni-59       6.05E-07         4.13E+07 Ni-63         1.65E-06         1.52E+07 Npm-237       1.31E-01         1.91E+02 Pu-238       1.09E-02         2.29E+03 Pu-239       1.21E-02         2.07E+03 Pu-240         1.21E-02         2.07E+03 PU-241       4.11 E-04         6.08E+04 Sr-90       3.1OE-03         8.06E+03 I               ol 1,
 
isRSA-UL                   in, 33ue        probabilisti mode   an DCL,     auesbsdoSninutilwre bildn       ocuac             scenari introdced       i S     SOS           S675.           -U         5-in                                 21 i i
 
Dose Conversion Factor Radionuclide (mrem/vr Der dnm/100 cm 2) DCGL (dDm/100 cm 2)
H-3             6.07E-07             4.12E+07 C-14             2.05&-05               1.22E+06 Ni-59             3.09E-07.             8.09E+07 Co-60             1.54E-03               1.62E+04 Ni-63             8.08F,07             3.09E+07 Sr-90             2.01E-04               1.25E+05 Nb-94             1.06E-03             2.36E+04 Tc-99             2.08E-06               1.20E+07 1-129             2.74E-03             9.12E+03 Cs- 137           4.44E-04               5.63E+04 Eu-152             7.57E-04             3.30E+04 Eu-154             8.26E-04               3.03E+04 Np-237             5.28E-02             4.73E+02 Pu-238             7.01E-03               3,57E+03 Pu-239             S.I7E-03               3.06E+03 Pu-240             7.26E-03               3.44E+03 Pu-241             1.38E-04               1.81E+05 Ani-241           8.34E-03               3.OOE+03 Cm-243             5.20E-03             4.81E+03 Cm-244             3.97E-03               6.30E+03 Cm-245             8.60E-03               2.88E+03 Cm-246             2.08F_,-02             1.20E+03
 
Deiaino                               ddtoa                 CLa In ad       ito       to thi       soil an surfac areas,               0~   were       alo evloe for-I-Thic soils,0 Vouercmtras Em ededpiin,                 n Buie     pipng
 
Area Factor= DCGLEMc DCGLW metodg         S-of  5
          ,     and
 
Humboldt Bay RPV Project NRC Update 7/-29/2010
 
Reactor Pressure Vessel Project Goal
* Package and Transport HBPP Reactor vessel as an single component package as an LSA shipment in a DOT IP2 package
 
Plant History
. 65 MW GE Boiling Water Reactor mApprox 5E5 years effective run life m.Reactor last run in 1976 with approx 35 years of radioactive decay
 
Initial Characterization
" Performed in mid 1990s by TLG to support cost estimate for decommissioning
" Activation analysis for characterization was performed on internals and vessel
* This results in conservative estimates of the part 61 classification of activated internals
 
Current Approach
* Normalize the prior activation analysis by dose rate
" Determine final classification of vessel based on total activity averaged over metal volume in accordance with the BTP
* Perform partial segmentation of internals to remove items to meet the 1R at 3 meter unshielded dose limit
 
Regulatory Basis of Approach m 10 CFR 71.14 concerning transport of LSA materials
* NRC Branch Technical Position (BTP) on Concentration Averaging 1995
 
Segmentation discussion Classification
- Remove internal components to meet 10CFR61 classification as a Class A package
- Remove additional internal components to meet the 1R at 3 meter limit of 10CFR71. 14
 
ALARA Basis for Approach
* Segment GTCC waste and place in ISFSI
" Segment B/C waste and store on-site until disposal option becomes available
" Reduce dose consequence- to workers by minimizing segmentation of internals
" Reduce Radiological risk in transportation by minimizing truck quantities of less stable packaging alternatives
 
Project Schedule m Selected RPV removal contractor June 2010                           .7.
* Complete RPV characterization Oct 2010
" Mobilize for site work March 2011
* Ship reactor vessel February 2012
 
Summary
* Minimum segmentation is the ALARA thing to do.
m Making a single disposal package is the ALARA thing to do.
* The single package results in safety to the public.}}

Latest revision as of 15:57, 13 November 2019

Presentation Slides from July 29, 2010, Meeting with Humboldt Bay Power Plant
ML102180372
Person / Time
Site: Humboldt Bay
Issue date: 07/29/2010
From:
NRC/FSME
To:
References
Download: ML102180372 (40)


Text

Humboldt Bay Power Plant NRC presentation July 29, 2010

Agenda

" Introductions and purpose of this meeting

  • HBPP Site Orientation

" Alternate Disposal Method Request(s)

" Reactor Vessel Transportation and Disposal

" DCGL's and LTP

HBPP Site

  • 2 Operating Steam Generation Fossil Units 9 2 backu pGas Turbines
  • Construction of New Generation Facility
  • Unit 3 Nuclear Plant decommissioning
  • Preparation for Units 1 and 2 decommissioning

Alternate Disposal Request

" Purpose of the Alternate Disposal Request (submitted April 1, 2010)

  • Schedule of Units 1/2 decommissioning

" Proposed answers to questions on submittal

" Travel Route from Eureka CA to Grand View Idaho (HBPP to USEI)

" Weather or road re-routing of trucks

" Potential future alternative disposal request(s)

Potential Alternate Disposal Requests

  • Open air demo limits established at HBPP Unit 3 will require concrete shaving
  • Resulting concrete structures will be very low concentration limits, consistent with current request
  • Soils concentrations of SNM very localized
  • Potential that an additional 1000 shipments will meet current alternate disposal concentration criteria

Potential Alternate Disposal Requests e State of Calif Department of Toxic Substances Control (DTSC) clean up standards are based on combined cancer risk model, rather than a dose based model

  • Increase total shipments

c Humboldt Ba ieOeve

  • oae in Euea CA, Humold Cony Humold Sont Sopuain S~on bae th 2000 cess i.s 1251pros PG&wiS reai stowe shi fol5 in temiato 0 of ar 50 licens

i rarrou more... "iellim jai, 101

-Tho-spmp PQý AmS, F*Wbn*jrpft T-,Gow Icatne ool MkAlvsr*,ý, 4-pivii ftdig:-

k"bokft, Hit, i

Stp In DLDveomn UwP

  • Pefr a sorc ter abtacin leDevelo an epsur scenaio Deie a mtemaia moe base on*

Syrgooia knowledgeS Deive sigl nucid soi5 3\

Deiv sigl nucid stutrlufc pCL/S and Deiv soi an Sresufc factors

Stp to Sorc Ter Absrcto Inopoae pas 10 C1caatrzainrsls0n Thortia rdoules narw dt02H I ieseii poeta rainclds

" Ra ionu lids wihh l-ie < .4y as( h lfiv )

wer exldd xep o o6

" Lo ~ -eaieaudnerdincie icutd n

"~ ~ ~ocurn raincie0nisigihbefo 0aual bakron weeecldd

Sorc Ter Abtaton ot Chrcerzto sape wer colce -~ for-anlyi of poeta radionSuclies SImace are soi samples "Cocrt core to idntf dept ofpntrto an voum aciainprdcs n

"~~~ Cocrt sa SOSbl tidnfysufc pe contamination. S Onl 2 ra in cie eeid niidi@ol

I Half Life Decay Half Life Decay Radionuclide (Years) Mode Radionuclide (Years) Mode Am-241 4.32E+02 a, y 1-129 1.57E+07 V3-, y C-14 5.73E+03 Nb-94 2.03E+04 3-, 'y Cm-243 2.91E+01 a, y Ni-59 7.50E+04 F Cm-244 1.81E+01 a, 7 Ni-63 1.OOE+02 Cm-245 8.50E+03 a,y Np-237 2.14E+06 aqy Cm-246 4.75E+03 aq, Pu-238 8.78E+01 a, y Co-60 5.27E+00 13-, y Pu-239 2.4 1E+04 a, y Cs-137 3.02E+01 Pu-240 6.60E+03 a, Y Eu-152 1.36E+01 f3-, y Pu-241 1.44E+01 Eu-154 8.80E+00 J3,, y Sr-90 2. 86E+O1 3-H-3 1.23E+O I Tc-99 2.13E+05 P-,rY

Sorc Ter Absrcin Cot Dos modlin objetive Deive sigl nucid DCI onl fo detecte radiouclids, an Acon fo no-etce Ssite-specific poental raincie when comparSingto anu a dos limit

  • ~Al 143 ace r m atdicuig 105RP 0 r 2liesdIF I

Sceari Develpet Cot Log-er PG& exetto to manti sit fo 0 lcria generation0 and trnmsin 0 and PG& ined torti it wesi thrug foeeal 0h future0 00 0 - .0 14

Scenario Development, Cont..

Industrial worker scenario chosen for use with RESRAD for soil DCGL derivation:

RESRAD chosen because of subsurface soil contamination, Industrial worker is most appropriate scenario for foreseeable future, and Dose contribution due to detected soil radionuclides indistinguishable from background after 100 years.

Scenan'o Development, Cont Alternative critical groups and exposure scenarios have been considered:

A resident farmer establishes occupancy after release of site from Industrial Area use, and If the site license is terminated at uniform industrial worker scenario DCGLs, the site is in compliance with the regulatory limit 32 years later using a resident farmer scenario.

Sceari Deeopet Cont BUID

  • Tieost eulydvie@ewe inor S n outdoors. 5 ~ -

SSS *7 .55

-pl m0 a - .

1jnato of S  :;i 0CG-.

  • E A 6 wa chse to deiv soi
  • Cw due SoS th prsec of subsurface solcnaiain

- A SE caclain wer pefre in th prba iisi 0oe

Derivation of Soil DCGLs, Cont.

A RESRAD simplified mathematical hydrogeological model was derived based on existing knowledge-

" Site studies define soil and aquifer profiles from surface to potable water aquifer,

" Approximately 400 ft from surface to potable water aquifer, Several clay layers exist between surface and potable water aquifer, and Brackish water aquifers exist above the clay layers.

Peak Dose at 1 pCi/g Nuclide (mrem/vrl DCGL (DCi/gl AM-241 1.76E-02 1.42E+03 C-14 4.98E-06 5.02E+06 Cm-243 7.78E-02 3.21E+02 Cm-244 6.82E-03 3.67E+03 Cm-245 5.44E-02 4.60E+02 Cm-246 1.26E-02 1.98E+03 Co-60 1.64E+00 1.52E+01 Cs-137 3.79E-01 6.60E+01 Eu-152 7.40E-01 3.38E+01 Eu-1S4 7.97E-01 3.14E+01 H1-3 8.66E-06 2.89E+06 1-129 1.95E-03 1.28E+04 Nb-94 1.09E+00 2.29E+01 Ni-59 6.05E-07 4.13E+07 Ni-63 1.65E-06 1.52E+07 Npm-237 1.31E-01 1.91E+02 Pu-238 1.09E-02 2.29E+03 Pu-239 1.21E-02 2.07E+03 Pu-240 1.21E-02 2.07E+03 PU-241 4.11 E-04 6.08E+04 Sr-90 3.1OE-03 8.06E+03 I ol 1,

isRSA-UL in, 33ue probabilisti mode an DCL, auesbsdoSninutilwre bildn ocuac scenari introdced i S SOS S675. -U 5-in 21 i i

Dose Conversion Factor Radionuclide (mrem/vr Der dnm/100 cm 2) DCGL (dDm/100 cm 2)

H-3 6.07E-07 4.12E+07 C-14 2.05&-05 1.22E+06 Ni-59 3.09E-07. 8.09E+07 Co-60 1.54E-03 1.62E+04 Ni-63 8.08F,07 3.09E+07 Sr-90 2.01E-04 1.25E+05 Nb-94 1.06E-03 2.36E+04 Tc-99 2.08E-06 1.20E+07 1-129 2.74E-03 9.12E+03 Cs- 137 4.44E-04 5.63E+04 Eu-152 7.57E-04 3.30E+04 Eu-154 8.26E-04 3.03E+04 Np-237 5.28E-02 4.73E+02 Pu-238 7.01E-03 3,57E+03 Pu-239 S.I7E-03 3.06E+03 Pu-240 7.26E-03 3.44E+03 Pu-241 1.38E-04 1.81E+05 Ani-241 8.34E-03 3.OOE+03 Cm-243 5.20E-03 4.81E+03 Cm-244 3.97E-03 6.30E+03 Cm-245 8.60E-03 2.88E+03 Cm-246 2.08F_,-02 1.20E+03

Deiaino ddtoa CLa In ad ito to thi soil an surfac areas, 0~ were alo evloe for-I-Thic soils,0 Vouercmtras Em ededpiin, n Buie pipng

Area Factor= DCGLEMc DCGLW metodg S-of 5

, and

Humboldt Bay RPV Project NRC Update 7/-29/2010

Reactor Pressure Vessel Project Goal

  • Package and Transport HBPP Reactor vessel as an single component package as an LSA shipment in a DOT IP2 package

Plant History

. 65 MW GE Boiling Water Reactor mApprox 5E5 years effective run life m.Reactor last run in 1976 with approx 35 years of radioactive decay

Initial Characterization

" Performed in mid 1990s by TLG to support cost estimate for decommissioning

" Activation analysis for characterization was performed on internals and vessel

  • This results in conservative estimates of the part 61 classification of activated internals

Current Approach

  • Normalize the prior activation analysis by dose rate

" Determine final classification of vessel based on total activity averaged over metal volume in accordance with the BTP

  • Perform partial segmentation of internals to remove items to meet the 1R at 3 meter unshielded dose limit

Regulatory Basis of Approach m 10 CFR 71.14 concerning transport of LSA materials

  • NRC Branch Technical Position (BTP) on Concentration Averaging 1995

Segmentation discussion Classification

- Remove internal components to meet 10CFR61 classification as a Class A package

- Remove additional internal components to meet the 1R at 3 meter limit of 10CFR71. 14

ALARA Basis for Approach

" Segment B/C waste and store on-site until disposal option becomes available

" Reduce dose consequence- to workers by minimizing segmentation of internals

" Reduce Radiological risk in transportation by minimizing truck quantities of less stable packaging alternatives

Project Schedule m Selected RPV removal contractor June 2010 .7.

  • Complete RPV characterization Oct 2010

" Mobilize for site work March 2011

  • Ship reactor vessel February 2012

Summary

  • Minimum segmentation is the ALARA thing to do.

m Making a single disposal package is the ALARA thing to do.

  • The single package results in safety to the public.